Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

April 2, 2002 – October 13, 2020 RS20210

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
Updated October 13, 2020
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
RS20210

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

Summary
As Congress considers potential legislation related to trade agreements or authorities, the
potential impact on U.S. workers and firms is part of the debate. The Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) programs were first authorized by Congress in the Trade Expansion Act of
1962 (P.L. 87-794) to help workers and firms adapt to import competition and dislocation caused
by trade liberalization. While trade liberalization may increase the overall economic welfare of all
the affected trade partners, it can also cause adjustment problems for firms and workers facing
import competition, and adjustment assistance has long been justified on the grounds that it is the
least disruptive option for offsetting policy-driven trade liberalization. The TAA programs for
workers, firms, and farmers represent an alternative to policies that would restrict imports,
providing assistance while bolstering freer trade and diminishing prospects for potentially costly
tension (retaliation) among trade partners.
This report discusses the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms (TAAF) program, which is
administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
(EDA), and related policy issues. Most recently, reauthorization of TAA was linked to renewal of
Trade Promotion Authority (TPA). Both TPA (P.L. 114-26 ) and TAA (P.L. 114-27) were signed
into law in June 2015. The current TAA authorization expires in June 2022.
TAAF provides technical assistance to help trade-impacted firms make strategic adjustments to
improve their global competitiveness. TAAF targets firms harmed by import competition. Under
TAAF, a firm first submits a petition to demonstrate its eligibility, then works with TAAF
professionals to develop and submit, and finally implement, a business recovery plan.
As required by the Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009 (TGAAA) (Title
II of P.L. 111-5), EDA publishes annual reports on the performance of the TAAF program. The
reports have generally shown that two years after completion of the program, on average,
participating firms have increased sales, employment, and productivity. The high success rate for
firms that “completed” the TAAF program represents the majority of firms certified as eligible for
assistance. Other businesses left the program without completing an adjustment plan and were no
longer monitored. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) completed a comprehensive
evaluation of the TAAF program in 2012 and found marked improvement in EDA’s
administration and evaluation efforts and also confirmed EDA’s assessment that trade-impacted
firms benefitted from the specialized attention provided by TAAF assistance. GAO also found a
“small and statistically significant relationship between program participation and sales,” which
was particularly relevant to smaller firms, albeit also highly correlated with firms operating in
high-growth industries. Employment effects were not found to be statistically significant.
Trade has shifted since Congress first authorized TAA. Global value chains (GVCs) have
emerged as a dominant force in international trade and the global economy; today more than two-
thirds of world trade occurs via GVCs. GVCs establish production processes in various stages
and locate them in various places around the globe where particular stages can be best conducted
to achieve efficient production. GVCs offer the potential for small- and medium-size firms to
become more integrated into international trade and produce higher-value-added products. One
question is whether EDA, through the TAAF program, can help trade-impacted firms in
developing stronger relationships with multinational corporations (MNCs) and GVCs. Another is
how EDA can help small and medium enterprises take advantage of the digital economy to reach
new markets, including those opened up by trade agreements. Congress may consider these
questions as well as further reforms or amendments to TAAF as part of ongoing discussions on
potential trade agreements.
Congressional Research Service

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

he Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) programs were first authorized by Congress in the
Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, to help workers and firms adjust to import
Tcompetition and dislocation caused by trade liberalization.1 Although overall economic
welfare can be increased by trade liberalization, TAA has long been justified on grounds
that the government has an obligation to help the “losers” of policy-driven trade openings that
may cause adjustment problems for firms and workers adversely affected by import competition.
TAA programs that cover workers, firms, and farmers aim to “facilitate efforts by the domestic
industry to make a positive adjustment to import competition and provide greater economic and
social benefits than costs.”2 Congress continues to monitor TAA program performance and to
periodically reauthorize and amend the governing legislation.3 TAA is currently authorized
through June 30, 2022.
This report discusses the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms (TAAF) program, which is
administered by the Economic Development Administration (EDA) of the Department of
Commerce. The TAAF program assists eligible American companies that have been harmed by
increasing imports; this harm is defined by lower domestic sales and employment because of
increased imports of similar goods and services. As currently designed, the TAAF program does
not target firms whose sales are impacted by foreign tariffs or other trade restrictions. Through the
TAAF program, EDA provides technical assistance, on a cost-sharing basis, to help eligible
businesses create and implement business recovery plans that may allow them to remain
competitive in a dynamic international economy.4 The TAAF program provides technical
assistance through a partnership with a national network of 11 EDA-funded Trade Adjustment
Assistance Centers (TAACs).
The Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
Program: Legislation since 2009
Congress first authorized TAA in Title III of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (P.L. 87-794), but it
was little used until it was updated and reauthorized under the Trade Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-618),
enacted in January 1975. Congress has amended TAA programs many times over the half-century
of its existence. TAA includes a firm and industry assistance program that is administered by the
EDA.5
Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act (TGAAA)
In 2009, the 111th Congress expanded TAA through a bipartisan agreement to reauthorize the
program. The Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 (P.L. 111-5) expanded and extended the then-existing

1 A list of acronyms is provided at the end of this report to assist readers.
2 P.L. 93-618, §201. (a).
3 For a broader discussion on the policy debate over TAA, see nondistributable CRS Report R41922, Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy, by J. F. Hornbeck, available to congressional clients on request.
See also CRS Report R40206, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers, by Mark A. McMinimy; and CRS Report
R42661, Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training Grants, by Benjamin Collins.
4 The Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms (TAAF) program is authorized by Chapters 3 and 5 of Title II of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. §2341 et seq.).
5 The TAAF program was originally administered jointly by the Tariff Commission (predecessor to the USITC) and the
U.S. Department of Commerce.
Congressional Research Service

1

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

programs for workers, firms, and farmers, and added a fourth program for communities (later
repealed). In terms of the TAAF program, the TGAAA:
 expanded eligibility to include firms in the services sector to reflect the larger
role of services in the U.S. economy;6
 provided greater flexibility for a firm to demonstrate eligibility for assistance
through an “extended look-back period,” giving firms longer time frames for
calculating sales or production declines due to import competition;
 increased annual authorized funding levels from $16 million to $50 million;
 established new oversight and evaluation criteria;
 created a new position of Director of Adjustment Assistance for Firms; and
 required that EDA submit a detailed annual report to Congress.
When the TAA programs were set to expire on January 1, 2011, the House and Senate passed, and
the President signed, the Omnibus Trade Act of 2011 (P.L. 111-344) in late December 2010.
While the act extended TAA programs for six weeks through mid-February, it eliminated some of
the expanded provisions of the TGAAA, including eligibility for services firms and the expanded
look-back periods for qualifying firms to meet eligibility requirements. The debate over passage
of the proposed free trade agreements (FTAs) with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea offered
the 112th Congress another opportunity to revisit TAA reauthorization as part of the implementing
legislation approval process.
Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act (TAAEA)
In October 2011, Congress passed, and the President signed into law, the Trade Adjustment
Assistance Extension Act of 2011 (TAAEA) (Title II, P.L. 112-40). The TAAEA authorized the
TAAF program through December 31, 2014. The prior 2011 expiration of the expanded
provisions of the TAAF program limited the number of firms entering the program (as services
firms were no longer eligible to participate), and eliminated the extended look-back period. These
factors, combined with an improving economy, made it more difficult for firms to demonstrate
their eligibility to participate. The TAAEA retroactively extended the enhanced provisions
(inclusion of services firms and the extended “look-back” period) contained in the TGAAA
through December 31, 2013. On January 1, 2014, the TAAF again reverted back to the more
limited program that had been in effect as of February 13, 2011.
Though the TAAF authorization expired on January 1, 2015, the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (P.L. 113-235), extended TAAF appropriations through
September 30, 2015, allowing Trade Adjustment Assistance Centers administering the program to
continue to serve existing firms and certify new firms.
Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization Act (TAARA)
Six months after the TAAF authorization ended in January 2015, Congress passed, and the
President signed, the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-27), which included Title
IV, the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization Act (TAARA) of 2015. Congress linked the
reauthorization of TAA to renewal of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA). Both TPA (P.L. 114-26 )

6 According to the United States Trade Representative and U.S. Department of Labor, services account for 68% of U.S.
gross domestic product (GDP) and 80% of U.S. civilian employment. For more information on U.S. trade in services,
please see CRS Report R43291, U.S. Trade in Services: Trends and Policy Issues, by Rachel F. Fefer.
Congressional Research Service

2

link to page 7 link to page 6

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

and TAARA (P.L. 114-27) were signed into law in June 2015. The TAARA reauthorized the
TAAF program through June 30, 2021, and added back the enhanced provisions of the TAAEA,
effective retroactively to January 1, 2014. TAARA also restored annual authorization levels to
$16 million. Appropriations were $12.5 million in FY2015 and have been $13 million a year
since FY2016 (Table 1). If Congress does not reauthorize the program, on July 1, 2021, the
TAAF program will revert to the more limited program as in 2011, and the entire program will
expire on June 30, 2022 (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Legislative History of TAAF since 2009

Source: CRS.
If the President concludes negotiations and submits an implementing bill for a trade agreement,
such as with the United Kingdom (UK) or European Union (EU), the subsequent legislative
debate and package may provide Congress an opportunity to further amend TAARA, which could
include reforming the TAA programs, changing the management structure or requirements, or
adjusting the current funding level or timelines. 7 With TPA authorization expiring on July 1,
2021, renewal of TPA and TAA legislation may present an earlier opportunity for Congress to
debate and update trade negotiating objectives and assistance programs.

7 For more information on UK and EU trade negotiations, see CRS In Focus IF11123, Brexit and Outlook for a U.S.-
UK Free Trade Agreement, by Shayerah Ilias Akhtar, Rachel F. Fefer, and Andres B. Schwarzenberg and CRS In
Focus IF10931, U.S.-EU Trade and Economic Issues, by Shayerah Ilias Akhtar.
Congressional Research Service

3

link to page 7 Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

Overview of the TAAF Program8
The TAAF provides technical assistance to help trade-impacted firms make strategic adjustments
that may allow them to remain competitive in a global economy. Originally, TAAF also included
loans and loan guarantees, but Congress eliminated all direct financial assistance in 1986 because
of federal budgetary cutbacks and concern over the program’s high default rates and limited
effectiveness. Funding levels have been consistent for the past five years.
TAAF authorizations and appropriations for FY2008-FY2020 appear in Table 1.
Table 1. Firm TAA Authorizations and Appropriations, FY2008-FY2020
($ millions)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Authorizations
16.0
50.0
50.0
18.3
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
16.0
Appropriations
14.2
13.9
15.8
15.8
15.8
15.8
15.0
12.5 13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
Data Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (EDA).
Notes: * P.L. 111-5 (TGAAA) authorized $12.5 mil ion for October 1, 2010-December 31, 2010; P.L. 111-344
authorized $5.8 mil ion for January 1, 2011-February 12, 2011.
The TAAF Program: How It Operates
Administered by the Department of Commerce Economic Development Agency (EDA), the
TAAF program provides technical assistance to firms through 11 regional Trade Adjustment
Assistance Centers (TAACs).9 TAACS, which operate under cooperative agreements with EDA,
are available to assist firms in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico. The following entities may apply to operate a TAAC: (1) universities or affiliated
organizations; (2) states or local governments; or (3) nonprofit organizations.10 They provide or
contract for technical assistance to firms from the initial certification process through adjustment
proposal (AP) implementation. TAACs are staffed by professionals with broad business expertise
who can help firms develop recovery strategies and also identify financial resources. These
professionals function as consultants who specialize in business turnaround strategies specifically
designed to meet the needs of individual firms that may face adjustments in competing with
lower-priced imports.11 TAACs apply for EDA grants to operate their programs. All appropriated
funds are used to support the TAAC process; no funds or direct financial assistance may be
provided to firms.

8 Based on 2012 13 C.F.R. §315, which provides details for applying for TAAF assistance, and EDA, Annual Report to
Congress on the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program, for various fiscal years.
9 See http://www.taacenters.org/locations.html.
10 13 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Ch. III §315.4, January 1, 2014, p. 774.
11 P.L. 93-618, §253, as amended, and U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration,
http://www.taacenters.org.
Congressional Research Service

4

link to page 9 Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

Eligibility, Certification, and Implementation12
There are three phases to successful completion of a trade adjustment assistance project (see
Figure 2).
In phase one, a firm must demonstrate that it is eligible to apply for assistance. The firm submits
a petition for certification documenting that it is a “trade-impacted firm” by having met three
conditions:13
1. “A significant number or proportion of workers”14 in the firm have become or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
2. Sales, or production, or both decreased absolutely, or sales, or production, or both
of any article that accounted for not less than 25% of total sales or production of
the firm during the 12, 24, or 36 months preceding the most recent 12 months for
which data are available have decreased absolutely (the “look-back” period); and
3. Increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles produced
by the firm have “contributed importantly”15 to both layoffs and the decline in
sales and/or production.
The third criteria ensures that TAAF focuses on firms hurt by import competition and not other
trade-related issues (e.g., export restrictions, foreign tariffs or quotas). Certification specialists are
available in the TAACs to work with firms (at no cost to the firm) to complete and submit a
petition to EDA to be certified as a trade impacted firm. EDA is statutorily required to make a
final determination on a petition within 40 days of accepting it. This time period has declined
from an average of 45 days in FY 2009 to 26 days in FY2018.16 In FY 2018, 276 firms received
assistance in preparing petitions, but not all petitions were submitted in the same year.17

12 The data in this report is based on the most recent publicly available EDA annual report from FY2018 which uses
base year FY2016. The data used in the EDA report only reflects those firms for which all data was available; as firms
are not required to submit survey data, EDA collected complete data from 187 out of 245 firms who completed the
TAAF program in FY2016 and were in operation in FY2018.
13 13 C.F.R. §315.7 and U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration, EDA, Annual Report
to Congress on the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program, Fiscal Year 2015, p. 11,
https://www.eda.gov/pdf/annual-reports/taaf/FY15-TAAF-Annual-Report-to-Congress.pdf.
14 Five percent of a firm’s work force or 50 workers, whichever is less, with EDA discretion to set other parameters in
special cases (13 C.F.R. §315.2).
15 In this case, the contributing cause must be important, but not necessarily more important than any other cause. A
firm must provide a list of four important customers, of which the TAAC must interview two, to help evaluate whether
the firm has been “trade-impacted” (13 C.F.R. §315.2).
16 EDA, Annual Report to Congress on the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program, Fiscal Year 2018,
https://www.eda.gov/files/annual-reports/taaf/FY18-TAAF-Annual-Report-to-Congress.pdf, p. 10.
17 Ibid, p. 17.
Congressional Research Service

5

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

In phase two, a firm certified as eligible has two years to develop and submit a business recovery
plan or adjustment proposal (AP). Approval of the AP is contingent on EDA’s finding that the AP
(1) is reasonably calculated “to materially contribute” to the economic adjustment of the firm; (2)
gives adequate consideration to the interests of the firm’s workers; and (3) demonstrates that the
firm will use its own resources for adjustment.
The TAACs also provide detailed assistance for the adjustment proposal, which seeks to identify
business planning and practices that can be enhanced to improve firm competitiveness. Because
technical assistance is provided in the
preparation of the petition and adjustment
TAAF Snapshot
proposal, there is a high formal acceptance

Provides technical assistance to help trade-
rate. TAAC assistance ensures that
impacted firms make strategic adjustments;
submissions are completed correctly and that

Manufacturing, Production, Agriculture, Mining,
poor candidates are weeded out early in the
and Service sector firms are eligible for assistance;
process. EDA has 60 days to accept or reject

Petitioning firms may use a 12-, 24-, or 36-month
the adjustment proposal. In FY2018, the
“look-back” period;
average processing time for APs increased

EDA must make a determination on eligibility
from prior years to 28 days as EDA needed to
within 40 days.
work with some firms to clarify their
submission. The firm must pay at least 25% of the cost to prepare the adjustment proposal. In
FY2018, 116 firms received assistance in developing APs.18
Figure 2. Three Stages of TAAF: Process and Interaction among Firms, TAACs, EDA

Source: Government Accountability Office, Trade Adjustment Assistance: Commerce Program Has Helped
Manufacturing and Services Firms, but Measures, Data, and Funding Formula Could Improve, GAO-12-930,
Washington, DC, September 2012, p. 7.
Notes: Diagram based on GAO analysis of EDA documents. Under TAARA, EDA is statutorily required to
make a final determination on a petition for certification within 40 days of accepting it.

18 Ibid, p. 18-19.
Congressional Research Service

6

link to page 10 link to page 11 Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

In phase three, firms have five years to complete project implementation based on an approved
AP. EDA may provide financial assistance for project implementation, but firms must pay at least
a 25% match where an AP total implementation cost is less than $30,000. For project assistance
exceeding $30,000, a firm must cover at least 50% of the total cost, with the federal share capped
at $75,000.19 On average, nationally firms received just under five years (57 months) of benefits
under the TAAF program.20
Adjustment proposals may involve strategic restructuring of various aspects of business
operations. Consultants with specific expertise are selected jointly between TAACs and the firm
to help with implementation. Because firms must be experiencing falling sales or declining
production to be eligible, TAACs often focus first on marketing or sales strategies to identify new
markets, new products, promotional initiatives, and export opportunities. The core objective is to
increase revenue. Second, production inefficiencies are often targeted to reduce firm costs and
improve price competitiveness. Third, TAACs can develop debt restructuring strategies and act as
intermediaries in finding new sources of business financing.
In FY2018, 506 firms received AP assistance in implementing projects.21 TAAC technical
assistance to firms to prepare petitions and to develop and implement business recovery plans (or
APs) amounted to $7.9 million in FY2018 and the financial contribution of firms participating in
the program amounted to $4.3 million.22 Like earlier years, in FY2018, technical assistance fell
under five categories:
1. Financial (accounting systems upgrade, cost control tracking system, automatic
data processing development);
2. Management (strategic business planning, succession management, management
development);
3. Marketing and Sales (sales process training, market expansion and feasibility,
web site design and upgrade);
4. Production (lean manufacturing and certification, new product development,
Production and warehouse automation); and
5. Support Systems (enterprise resource planning, management information systems
upgrades, computer aided design software)
Unlike prior annual reports, EDA no longer provides exact breakdowns of the projects by
category in its most recent annual reports.
Table 2 summarizes select firm trade adjustment data for FY2008-FY2018. The TAAF program
targets small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which is borne out in the firm data. Firms
averaged fewer than 100 employees with average sales under $20 million.
Table 2. TAAF Select Program Indicators for FY2008-FY2018

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Number of Firms
143
172
264
183
102
114
107
120
75
104
98
Assisteda

19 Ibid, p. 9.
20 EDA defines benefits as technical assistance provided to firms from the time of petition certification to the time of
program completion. Ibid, p.21.
21 Ibid, p. 18.
22 Ibid, p. 38.
Congressional Research Service

7

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Avg. Firm Sales
$13.1 $10.3 $19.1 $19.6 $19.2 $15.2 $15.1 $13.8 $16.2 $12.3 $12.4
(mil ions)
Avg. Firm Employees
82
79
138
91
81
86
84
79
89
71
67
Data Source: EDA, Annual Report to Congress on the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program, Fiscal Year
2018, https://www.eda.gov/files/annual-reports/taaf/FY18-TAAF-Annual-Report-to-Congress.pdf.
a. Number of adjustment proposals approved. Participating firms may have up to five projects in an approved
AP. Firms can remain in an approved AP for up to five years, with firms remaining in the program for
differing lengths of time.
Program Evaluation
Historically, TAAF program evaluation was limited, with EDA lacking a formal evaluation
process. Early efforts to analyze the program included comprehensive outside studies by the
Urban Institute in 1998 and Government Accountability Office (GAO) in 2000 that addressed two
critical issues: program administration and effectiveness.23 The 2000 GAO report was not able to
conclusively assess the impact of the program on firms because of a lack of systematic data. Both
reports identified specific deficiencies with the TAAF program, such as a cumbersome
certification process, long approval times, and little oversight and evaluation of projects. As a
small program with limited resources, the TAAF had not received the managerial input required
to adequately evaluate its efforts. Congress addressed this issue in the 2009 TGAAA, which
required the creation of a new Director of Adjustment Assistance for Firms, along with additional
support staff. The act also required an annual report to Congress and included specific
performance measures to be collected and analyzed. Congress also mandated EDA to certify
petitions for assistance and adjustment proposals within specific time frames.
GAO 2012 Evaluation
As required by Congress, the GAO conducted a comprehensive review of the TAAF program,
released in September 2012.24 It noted important progress in the administrative capabilities of
EDA and documents the positive impact of the TAAF program on trade-affected businesses. The
GAO report also discussed the positive contribution of the changes initially made by the TGAAA
and reinstated by the TAAEA.
GAO found that EDA’s administration of the TAAF program had improved markedly as a result
of changes resulting from the 2009 legislation. EDA reduced processing times, provided new
performance reporting measures, and increased firm participation. GAO noted that TGAAA
modifications to the TAAF program led to improvements in (1) management and staffing, (2)
annual reporting, (3) eligibility for participation of services firms, and (4) expansion of the “look-
back” period that permitted more firms to meet certification criteria.25

23 EDA, Effective Aid to Trade-Impacted Manufacturers: An Evaluation of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program,
prepared by the Urban Institute, Washington, DC, November 1998; GAO, Trade Adjustment Assistance: Impact of
Federal Assistance to Firms Is Unclear. Report GAO-01-12, Washington, DC, December 2000.
24 GAO, Trade Adjustment Assistance: Commerce Program Has Helped Manufacturing and Services Firms, but
Measures, Data, and Funding Formula Could Improve, Report GAO-12-930. Washington, DC, September 2012.
25 Ibid, pp. 12-13.
Congressional Research Service

8

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

The report also pointed to continuing challenges in centralized data management, evaluation
reporting, and assessment of the effectiveness of TAAF.26 One weakness identified by GAO was
EDA’s funding allocation formula for TAACs to ensure that the distribution of funds across
TAACs provide “equivalent benefits” adequate to meet the varying needs of the 11 TAACs.
The second area of concern raised by GAO was EDA’s analysis of performance measures. The
most recent TAAF annual reports (FY2011 through FY2018) emphasize output measures (the
type or level of program activities conducted or the direct products or services delivered by a
program: number of firms assisted, petitions accepted, processing times) rather than outcome
measures (defined as goals and performance measures that assess the results of a program,
compared with its intended purpose). In part, this appears to be a result of the measures and
indicators that Congress required EDA to collect and analyze. Of the 16 performance indicators,
GAO reported that 13 emphasize outputs, or measures, of the goods and services provided by the
program.
The TAAF annual reports have compared the performance of TAAF participants, which are, by
definition, trade-impacted, troubled firms to the average performance of the U.S. manufacturing
sector as a whole (using Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS] data). GAO expressed concerns with
EDA’s methodology and recommended that “using program evaluation methods to rule out
plausible alternative explanations for outcomes that may be influenced by a variety of external
factors, such as changes in the economy, can help strengthen evaluations.”27 GAO conducted its
own analysis to evaluate the policy impact of the TAAF on firms participating in the program.
The GAO report discussed the difficulties inherent in attempting to assess the “apples-to-oranges”
effect of comparing TAAF-participating companies with a group of nonparticipating firms (as
EDA has done). Even if a control group with characteristics similar to TAAF-participating firms
could be identified, GAO noted that such an analysis would also have weaknesses. Given these
limitations, GAO analyzed the performance of TAAF-participating firms, but explicitly
recognized that such an approach could not determine whether TAAF firms’ performance would
have improved in the absence of the program.28
Using its own methodology, GAO found a “small and statistically significant relationship
between program participation and sales.”29 GAO estimated that TAAF assistance, on average,
resulted in a 5% to 6% increase in sales, which was particularly relevant to smaller firms, and a
4% increase in productivity, albeit also highly correlated with firms operating in industries that
were experiencing growth. Employment effects were not found to be statistically significant.
GAO also confirmed EDA’s assessment that both manufacturing and services firms faced import
competition that directly affected their sales, and that these firms, by and large, benefitted from
specialized attention provided by TAACs. In addition, GAO conducted a survey of firms
participating in the TAAF program. The survey found that 90% of respondent firms reported that
they were “very” or “generally” satisfied with the services that they received from the TAACs.

26 GAO, Trade Adjustment Assistance: Commerce Program Has Helped Manufacturing and Service Firms, but
Measures, Data, and Funding Formula Could Be Enhanced, GAO-12-930, September 2012,
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-13-166T.
27 Ibid, p. 18. The recommendations are contained in GAO, Program Evaluation: A Variety of Rigorous Methods Can
Help Identify Effective Interventions, GAO-10-30, November 23, 2009, Washington, DC.
28 GAO, Trade Adjustment Assistance: Commerce Program Has Helped Manufacturing and Services Firms, but
Measures, Data, and Funding Formula Could Improve, Appendix III: Economic Analysis of the Effect of Trade
Adjustment Assistance Policy on Firm Market Performance, Report GAO-12-930, Washington, DC, September 2012,
p. 50.
29 Ibid, pp. 22-24.
Congressional Research Service

9

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

The GAO report provided some of the strongest evidence to date of the benefits of the now-
lapsed 2009 legislative changes, as well as EDA’s much-improved administration and evaluation
of the TAAF program compared to years past.
EDA Annual Reports
Most of the public debate on trade and TAA does not distinguish between the various programs
that EDA administers, including the TAAF. Some observers believe that TAA should be
eliminated while others say that reform and changes are needed to the programs.30 Whether
changes are needed to TAA programs may depend on their effectiveness in assisting workers, or
firms in the case of TAAF, survive and grow despite trade liberalization.
For the TAAF program, EDA is required by Congress to submit an annual report that provides
findings and specified results (or performance measures).31 EDA has released nine annual reports
(FY2010 through FY2018) that identify numerous administrative and operational improvements.
In addition, TAACs are now allocated funds in part based on performance measures (number of
firm certifications and adjustment proposals generated) and quality measures.
As part of the TAAF annual report, EDA is required to provide a comparison of sales,
employment, and productivity for each firm at the time it was certified and both one and two
years after the recovery plan was completed. EDA does not estimate the specific number of "jobs
retained" or "jobs created.” In its FY2018 report, EDA notes that, from FY2017 to FY2018,
average firm sales had increased by 43%, average employment increased by 23%, and average
productivity increased by 16%.32 EDA also notes that all firms completing the adjustment
program were still in operation—suggesting an impressive “survival rate”—particularly given
that all these firms have the additional burden of adjusting to import competition.33
In analyzing earlier EDA reports (FY2010 to FY2012), GAO concluded that these trends provide
only a limited understanding of program effectiveness. The data on employment and productivity
are derived from annual surveys conducted by the 11 TAACs. The data are then aggregated and
presented as part of the congressionally required annual report. Employment effects are referred
to as number of “jobs impacted,” or number of jobs retained or generated at firms completing at
least one technical assistance project.
Declines in employment do not necessarily reflect TAAC performance. Employment can fall
dramatically for firms that are hit by a surge of foreign import competition, declines in exports, or
by market disruptions that are not trade-related. In the two reporting years following firms’
completion of business recovery programs, firms may continue to experience increased import
competition or other negative effects (for instance, a slow economic recovery from the 2008
recession).
Under these circumstances, the fact that employment losses continue after an adjustment proposal
has been completed is not necessarily an unexpected or negative outcome in terms of trade
adjustment assistance effectiveness. Whether the current one- and two-year post-TAAF-exit

30 Sallie James, Trade Adjustment Assistance, Cato Institute, May 2011,
http://www.downsizinggovernment.org/sites/downsizinggovernment.org/files/pdf/labor-trade-adjustment-
assistance.pdf. Also see Cathleen Cimino-Isaacs and Gary Clyde Hufbauer, The Fate of Trade Adjustment Assistance:
The Basics, Peterson Institute for International Economics, June 11, 2015, http://blogs.piie.com/trade/?p=312.
31 §255A of Chapter 3 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
32 Productivity is defined as sales per worker, a simple measure that can be used across industries, but which may have
limitations for evaluative purposes. See Annual Report 2018, p. 2.
33 EDA, Annual Report to Congress on the Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms Program, Fiscal Year 2018, p.3.
Congressional Research Service

10

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

reporting periods provide enough time and data to assess the effectiveness of recovery programs,
it is possible that a number of successful TAAF participants will continue to face increased
competition that results in some program participants operating at levels of output or employment
that existed prior to TAAC assistance.
As noted in the previous section, caution is warranted when drawing conclusions on the basis of
limited trend data. EDA figures reflect employment trends that could be attributable to the TAAF
program. A more rigorous analysis would be needed to estimate and isolate the effects of the
TAAF program from other factors that affect employment trends in TAAF-participating firms. To
more accurately assess the effectiveness of the TAAF program in terms of helping firms or
“saving jobs,” it would be necessary to use more sophisticated methodologies and analyses (such
as those employed and recommended by GAO) than Congress currently requires for the TAAF
annual report.
With respect to the reported high “survival rate” for firms that completed the TAAF program,
they represent only about half of all firms that had their adjustment proposals approved for
assistance. In FY2018, 187 firms successfully exited the program and 28 did not complete the
program for various reasons, including that the firm was acquired or sold, went out of business,
failed to submit the AP within two years after TAA certification or failed to implement the AP, or
suffered bankruptcy.34 Given that TAAF focuses primarily on small- and medium-size firms that
face multiple challenges, it is not entirely surprising that many firms that receive TAAF
certifications are unable to complete the program.
It is difficult to compare firms because they enter and exit the TAAF program in different years,
and some firms participate in more than one TAAF adjustment program at the same time. Yet,
reporting indicates that the TAAF program is successful in assisting a significant percentage of
firms through a recovery process that can last from two to seven years, which can lead to the
conclusion that the limited amount of funds available to trade-impacted firms through the TAAF
program may amount to a relatively efficient policy tool.
In a final section, the FY2012 through FY2018 TAAF annual reports offer anecdotes collected
from the TAACs that provide success stories about participating firms from all parts of the
country and in various industries that used TAAF assistance. Although these examples may
identify TAAC-provided assistance to select firms, they do not demonstrate the extent to which
TAAF or the TAACs provided the assistance that may have been critical to the success of any one
particular firm to succeed where others do not. Whether some firms might have been able to
adjust on their own cannot be determined.35
Rationale and Economics of Trade Adjustment
Economists tend to agree that in defining the rules of exchange among countries, freer trade is
preferable to protectionism. Insights from trade theory point to the mutual gains for countries
trading on their differences, producing those goods at which they are relatively more efficient,
while trading for those at which they are relatively less so. Additional gains are realized from
intra-industry trade based on efficiencies from segmented and specialized production.36 Firm-
level evidence supports this theory. Trade appears to “enable efficient producers within an

34 Ibid, p. 39.
35 Ibid, p. 43-48.
36 For an accessible and authoritative summary of these effects, see Paul Krugman, “The Increasing Returns Revolution
in Trade and Geography,” American Economic Review, vol. 99, no. 3 (June 2009), pp. 561-571.
Congressional Research Service

11

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

industry, and efficient industries within an economy, to expand,” leading to a reallocation of
resources that increases a country’s productivity, output, and income.37 Consumers (both firms
and households) also gain from a wider variety of goods and lower prices.
However, increased competition from trade liberalization also creates “winners and losers,”
presenting adjustment problems for all countries. Some firms may grow as they expand into new
overseas markets, while others may contract, merge, or fail when faced with greater foreign
competition. While the adjustment process may be healthy from a macroeconomic perspective,
much like market-driven adjustments that occur for reasons other than trade (e.g., technological
changes, weather-related disasters), the transition can be hard on some firms and their workers.38
Critics of free trade agreements often highlight the adjustment costs of reducing trade barriers. To
avoid business closures and layoffs, firms likely to be affected by increased trade may seek to
weaken, if not defeat, trade liberalizing legislation. This makes economic sense from the
perspective of the affected industries, firms, and workers, but economists argue that in the long
run it can be more costly for the country as a whole. The costs of protection arise because
competition is suppressed, reducing pressure on firms to innovate, operate more efficiently, and
become lower-cost producers. The brunt of these costs falls to consumers, both individuals and
businesses, who must pay higher prices, but the national economy is also denied forgone
productivity gains.
One way to balance the large and broad-based gains from freer trade with the smaller and more
highly concentrated costs is to address the needs of firms negatively affected, such as through the
TAA programs, including the one for firms.39 Supporters justify TAA policy on grounds that (1) it
helps those who are hurt by trade liberalization; (2) the economic costs are lower than
protectionism and can be borne by society as a whole; and (3) given rigidities in the adjustment
process, it may help redeploy economic resources more quickly, thereby reducing productivity
losses and related public sector costs (e.g., unemployment compensation). Others dispute these
claims and have raised concerns over the effectiveness and costs of the program, arguing that it
should be limited or discontinued.40
Global Value Chains and the Digital Economy
In debates over trade liberalization, some observers may not appreciate the full impact that
globalization and digitization trends are having on trade. While trade liberalization may present
greater import competition for SMEs domestically, globalization and digitization also present
opportunities for growth. The emergence of global value chains (GVCs) and the internet
revolution provide possible growth opportunities for firms as foreign markets are opened through
trade liberalization. TAAF programs offer one way to help SMEs to gain the knowledge and skills
needed to take advantage of these global shifts. The programs can help SMEs to improve their

37 On how trade affects total factor productivity based on U.S. manufacturing firm and plant level data, see Andrew B.
Bernard and J. Bradford Jensen, “Exporting and Productivity in the USA,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 20,
no. 3 (2004), pp. 343-344, 350, 352, and 356.
38 Both the benefits and costs of trade derive from resources moving from less to more productive plants (intra-
industry) and firms (inter-industry). Employment dislocation is the most noticeable cost, giving rise to congressional
interest in TAA programs. Ibid, pp. 345 and 356.
39 Howard F. Rosen, Strengthening Trade Adjustment Assistance, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Policy
Brief PB08-2, Washington, DC, January 2008, pp. 1-2.
40 A discussion of both sides of the argument may be found in nondistributable CRS Report R41922, Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) and Its Role in U.S. Trade Policy, by J. F. Hornbeck, available to congressional clients on request.
Congressional Research Service

12

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

position by integrating into a GVC or using digital platforms to reach new markets, thus
offsetting losses that may occur as a result of trade liberalization.
GVCs are mainly organized and coordinated by large multinational companies (MNCs) and
account for more than 70% of global trade in goods and services and capital goods. A large share
of global trade takes place within GVCs in the form of imports and exports of intermediate (or
unfinished) goods and services that move within, between, and among countries. This system of
production depends on the willingness of many countries to import in order to export. The WTO’s
“Made in the World” initiative finds that the increased use of GVCs has led industries globally to
demand greater trade liberalization and lower protectionism as these firms depend on other links
in the value chain, both domestic and foreign.41
Cross-border production and trade in intermediate goods have increased the number of jobs in the
economy that are tied directly and indirectly to international trade in ways that are not always
fully visible. At the domestic level, the U.S. small- and medium-sized domestic producers that
sell goods and services to multinational exporters are not counted as exporters—even though they
may contribute a substantial amount of the value added in U.S. exports. Unlike most other major
industrialized, emerging, and developing economies, the United States is less dependent on
imports of foreign intermediate goods for its exports.42 Instead, small- and medium-size domestic
firms are, in the aggregate, major suppliers of goods (parts, components, and finished products)
and services to large U.S. exporters. For example, in 2016, the largest share of the total value of
U.S. exports was domestic value added, both direct and indirect, which accounted for 87% of the
total value added through the various parts of the supply chain and through various stages of
production.43
Given that the main focus of TAAF is on troubled SMEs, the magnitude of U.S. SME-produced
goods that are exported by GVCs suggests that the TAAF program could assist and encourage
linkages between these troubled enterprises and the multinationals that are major exporters of
their inputs. Although many SMEs have built strong ties to large U.S. exporters and MNCs,
liberalized trade policies adopted by the United States or other countries, new technologies, or
macroeconomic conditions could potentially erode the incumbent position and domestic
advantages of U.S. SMEs. A potential question is whether the EDA, through the TAAF program
and the TAACs, could assist trade-impacted firms in developing more relationships with MNCs,
as well as analyzing the necessary conditions that would allow TAAF-participating firms to have
a realistic chance of doing so.
The high volume of trade that flows through GVCs and the predominant position of the United
States as a major hub and headquarters nation suggests the possibility that such chains could be a
source of opportunity for U.S. trade-impacted firms.44 Another opportunity related to GVCs is the

41 Yildirim Aydin, Value Added Trade, Global Value Chains, and Trade Policy: Renewed Push for Trade
Liberalization., University of Antwerp (Centre for Institutions and Multilevel Politics), WTO Made in the World
discussion forum, September 1, 2015. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/miwi_e/paper_january15_e.htm.
42 Brazil and Russia, large emerging economies, have traditionally been the two major exceptions. Russia’s low level of
foreign content reflects strong exports by mining and related sectors. Brazil similarly relies on strong exports of mining
as well as agriculture and its manufacturing sector has become more oriented to the domestic market.
https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/measuring-trade-in-value-added.htm.
43 The domestic value-added share of U.S. exports can be segmented further into three components that are associated
with producing goods for export: (1) those activities that are directly involved in production (which accounted for more
than half of the value added of U.S. exports); (2) those activities that are indirectly involved in production; and, (3)
domestic value added that was exported in goods and services that subsequently were used to produce imports of
intermediate goods and services that, in turn, were exported as final products (less than 1% of the value added).
44 OECD/WTO, Trade in Value Added (TIVA) Indicators: United States (Country Notes), May 28, 2013,
Congressional Research Service

13

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

growing demand for a skilled workforce to operate and support supply chains.45 Pairing a TAAF-
qualified firm with MNCs or companies focused on supply chain may provide opportunities for
EDA to help firms through TAAF meet growing demand.
EDA produces an annual report for Congress on the operations of the TAAF program, but among
the data requirements established by Congress in the TGAAA, as amended, there are no
performance measures that document or report on TAAF-participating firms that sell goods or
services to U.S. exporters (in terms of number of firms assisted and value of goods sold), or that
provide data on direct exports by firms receiving TAAF assistance.
The COVID-19 pandemic and related economic downturn have illustrated the importance of the
role of digitization and the digital economy. The digital economy facilitates global trade and
opens potential new markets for SMEs. Digital platforms, including online communication tools
and e-commerce websites, can minimize costs and enable SMEs to grow through extended reach
to new partners, customers and markets or by integrating into a GVC. The COVID-19 pandemic
related restrictions placed on businesses and customers has accelerated the shift to digital tools
and online sales to reach local, regional or international markets.
Using digital platforms, many such firms that in the past might not export or seek new markets
abroad are more easily able and willing to conduct business in global markets. In addition,
increased digitization of customs and border control mechanisms helps simplify and speed
delivery of imported goods to customers, making them more attractive to foreign buyers. As a
result, digitization can enable SMEs to serve the new markets abroad that are opened by trade
liberalization. For example, a study of U.S. SMEs on the e-commerce platform eBay found that
96% of SMEs export compared to 1% of traditional businesses; looking across U.S. states, the
range was of exporters was 94 to 97%.46 According to eBay, 56% of its U.S. SMEs export to 10
or more markets.47 TAAF programs provide one channel for helping trade-impacted SMEs make
the necessary shifts and gain the skills to succeed in online marketplaces and keep up with
technological changes.
The Limits of Trade Adjustment Assistance
The TAAF program targets those firms impacted specifically by import competition and not by
other forms of trade or market disruption. Other federal programs provide assistance for other
forms of economic disruption. A 2019 GAO analysis identifies multiple potential causes of
disruption, including trade agreements, defense or energy policy changes, emerging technologies,
and shifting business models.48 The report provides an inventory of economic adjustment
assistance programs that respond to economic disruptions, including TAAF. While TAAF is solely
focused on assisting businesses, other programs target a mix of individuals, businesses,
communities, and other beneficiaries (e.g., coal communities, health tax credits).

http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/TiVA_USA_MAY_2013.pdf. Data is for 2009. For an explanation of the OECD/WTO
Trade In Value Added (TIVA) Indicators, see their Guide to Country Notes, May 28, 2013,
http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/TiVA_Guide_to_Country_Notes.pdf.
45 See http://www.datexcorp.com/labor-shortages-in-the-supply-chain-workforce for more information.
46 eBay, “United States Small Online Business Growth Report,” July 2020, p. 5,
https://www.ebaymainstreet.com/sites/default/files/policy-papers/us_small_online_business_report_2020.pdf.
47 Ibid, p.2.
48 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Economic Adjustment Assistance: Federal Programs Intended to Help
Beneficiaries, GAO19-85R, March 5, 2019, https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/697222.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

14

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

TAAF is not intended to address all potential disruptions that confront firms involved in
international trade. Such disruptions can include an economic downturn that leads to suppressed
demand by foreign customers; increased costs or lowered demand due to tariffs and trade
disputes; or supply chains affected by protectionism or other policy shifts. In the 116th Congress,
some Members have introduced bills to expand the scope of TAAF to address additional trade-
related elements of economic disruption. For example, one bill introduced (H.R. 6124) would
extend TAAF to cover firms whose exports declined because of foreign retaliatory measures
adopted in repose to tariffs imposed under the Trump Administration. Other proposals focus on
the TAA for Workers program to assist workers whose jobs are eliminated through automation
(see S. 3034) or those adversely affected by disruptions in global supply chains from the
Coronavirus Disease (COVID–19) (see H.R. 6205).
Trade adjustment assistance can play a role in helping companies adapt to a changing
environment. Enabling firms to adopt greater digitization or automation, target new markets, or
develop business continuity plans to increase resilience may lead the firm to need a different
workforce with different skills. Upskilling the workforce of a single TAAF company or helping
that firm recruit and possibly relocate new trained workers could be part of a business recovery
plan under TAAF. However, broader government or private sector programs are likely needed to
address broader educational and training needs of entire industries or sectors.
Issues for Congress
As Congress considers trade liberalization agreements and ongoing trade negotiations, it may
wish to further examine the TAAF in light of the current debate of its effectiveness and the impact
of international trade on the U.S. economy and recent trends. An implementing bill for a new
trade agreement and upcoming expiration of TPA may provide Congress an opportunity to
reexamine and potentially revise the TAA programs. In addition to adjusting appropriations
levels, Congress could examine changing the current program or EDA’s administration of it.
Potential options for Congress to consider on TAAF may include:
 determining if the program should be limited to assisting firms who face
competition from imports or if it should be expanded to assist firms who face
increased costs or decreased demand due to changes in domestic or foreign tariffs
or other trade-related policies;
 determining if current funding levels are appropriate;
 further refining the performance metrics to measure the employment or economic
impact of TAAF programs;
 placing a stronger emphasis on assisting SMEs to utilize technology to improve
operational efficiency, expand into new markets, including through e-commerce,
and take fuller advantage of an increasingly digitally driven economy;
 facilitating partnerships with large multinational companies to support SME
integration into GVCs;
 facilitating partnerships with educational institutions or programs to train
workers for digital or other skills needed by the TAAF firm or other employers;
Congressional Research Service

15

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

 aligning Federal programs by linking qualified workers of a TAAF firm with the
TAA for Workers program under the Department of Labor;49 or
 consolidating or streamlining TAAF with other federal programs that assist
troubled SMEs such as those operated by the Small Business Administration
(SBA).50
While TAAF has traditionally focused on firms who can demonstrate they have been harmed by
import competition, Congress could also explore the feasibility and possible steps that could or
should be taken before firms are harmed. Congress might consider requiring EDA to conduct
outreach and education on pending trade liberalization agreements. The analysis of each proposed
trade agreement by the USITC may help identify industries or regions as potentially vulnerable or
likely to experience a negative impact as a result of proposed trade liberalizing measures.51 For
example, the USITC economic impact assessment report for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP),
before the United States withdrew from the negotiations, contended that U.S. demand for
business services would outstrip supply, presenting opportunities for growth, while employment
could decline in certain manufacturing and transport sectors.52 Congress could, for example,
consider requiring EDA to prepare a capacity building plan to assist those industries or regions
that the USITC identifies as potentially vulnerable or likely to experience a negative impact from
implementation of a proposed trade agreement.

49 For more information on TAA for Workers, see CRS Report R44153, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Workers and
the TAA Reauthorization Act of 2015, by Benjamin Collins.
50 For more information on SBA programs, see CRS Report RL33243, Small Business Administration: A Primer on
Programs and Funding, by Robert Jay Dilger and Sean Lowry.
51 The Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 H.R. 1890 requires the USITC to
prepare a report that assesses the likely impact of a potential trade agreement on the U.S. economy as a whole and on
specific industry sectors and the interests of U.S. consumers. The USITC’s report is due to the President and the
Congress no more than 105 days after the President signs a potential trade agreement. For more information, see CRS
Report R43491, Trade Promotion Authority (TPA): Frequently Asked Questions, by Ian F. Fergusson and Christopher
M. Davis.
52 U.S. International Trade Commission, Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy
and on Specific Industry Sectors, May 2016, https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4607.pdf.
Congressional Research Service

16

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

Appendix. Acronyms
Glossary
AP
Adjustment proposal
ARRA
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
BLS
Bureau of Labor Statistics (of the Department of Labor)
EDA
Economic Development Administration (of the Department of Commerce)
FTAs
Free trade agreements
GVCs
Global value chains
GAO
Government Accountability Office
MNCs
Multinational companies
OECD
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, a 37-member
organization of the world’s most advanced countries and emerging countries:
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United
Kingdom, and the United States.
SMEs
Small and medium-sized enterprises
G20
The Group of Twenty, major advanced and emerging economies: Argentina,
Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan,
Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Turkey, the
United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union.
TAA
Trade Adjustment Assistance
TAAEA
Trade Adjustment Assistance Extension Act of 2011
TAARA
Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization Act (TAARA) of 2015
TAACs
Trade Adjustment Assistance Centers
TAAF
Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms
TGAAA
Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009
USITC
U.S. International Trade Commission

Author Information

Rachel F. Fefer

Analyst in International Trade and Finance

Acknowledgments
This updated report was formerly authored by former longtime Specialists in International Trade and
Finance, John F. Hornbeck and then by Mary Jane Bolle.
Congressional Research Service

17

Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service
RS20210 · VERSION 66 · UPDATED
18

Download PDF

Download EPUB

Revision History

Oct. 13, 2020

HTML · PDF

Aug. 30, 2017

HTML · PDF

1% changed

Sep. 1, 2016

HTML · PDF

15% changed

Jan. 30, 2015