Tax Incentives for Opportunity Zones: In Brief

Opportunity zones, OZs, QOZs, opportunity funds, qualified opportunity funds, QOFs, CDFI Fund, New Markets Tax Credit, NMTC, community development, economic development, P.L. 115-97, tax reform, tcja, tax cuts and jobs act, 2017 tax revision, tax incentives, capital gains, investment

Tax Incentives for Opportunity Zones: In Brief

Updated June 28, 2019 (R45152)

The 2017 tax revision (P.L. 115-97) temporarily authorized Opportunity Zone (OZ) tax incentives for investments held by Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOFs) in qualified OZs.1 The Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund (hereinafter, the "Fund"), organized under the Department of the Treasury, designated qualified census tracts that are eligible for OZ tax incentives after receiving recommendations from the head executives at the state level. Qualified OZ designations are in effect through 2026. The tax benefits for these investments include (1) a temporary tax deferral for capital gains reinvested in a QOF, (2) a step-up in basis for any investment in a QOF held for at least five years (10% basis increase) or seven years (15% basis increase), and (3) a permanent exclusion of capital gains from the sale or exchange of an investment in a QOF held for at least 10 years.

This report briefly describes what census tracts have been designated as an OZ, what types of entities can are eligible as QOFs, the tax benefits of investments in QOFs, and what economic effects can be expected from OZ tax incentives.

For further reading on the Fund's other programs and analysis of related policy issues, see CRS Report R42770, Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund: Programs and Policy Issues, by Sean Lowry. For updated guidance regarding OZ tax incentives, including any IRS notices and proposed regulations, see websites created by the Fund and IRS.2

Opportunity Zone Designations

To become a qualified OZ, the CEO (e.g., governor) of the state must have nominated, in writing, a limited number of census tracts to the Secretary of the Treasury.3 A nominated tract must have been either (1) a qualified low-income community (LIC), using the same criteria as eligibility under the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC),4 or (2) a census tract that was contiguous with a nominated LIC if the median family income of the tract does not exceed 125% of that contiguous, nominated LIC.5 Nominations were due to the Fund by March 21, 2018.6

Figure 1 provides a screenshot of the Fund's online mapping tool, which displays census tracts that have been designated as a qualified OZ by the state or territory's CEO and approved by the Fund. A complete list of qualified OZs has been published as an IRS Internal Revenue Bulletin and is available on the Fund's "Opportunity Zone" website.7

Figure 1. CDFI Fund Mapping Tool Showing Designated Opportunity Zones (OZs)

Source: CRS screenshot of CDFI Fund, CIMS mapping tool, accessed November 11, 2018, at

Notes: Designated OZs are shown in blue. Congressional district borders have been enabled in the above screenshot.

P.L. 115-97 limits the number of census tracts within a state that can be designated as qualified OZs based on the following criteria:

  • If the number of LICs in a state is less than 100, then a total of 25 census tracts may be designated as qualified OZs.
  • If the number of LICs in a state is 100 or more, then the maximum number of census tracts that may be designated as qualified OZs is equal to 25% of the total number of LICs.
  • Not more than 5% of the census tracts designated as qualified OZs in a state can be non-LIC tracts that are contiguous to nominated LICs.

Table 1 displays the maximum number of census tracts in each state or territory that were eligible for OZ designation under each of the two nomination criteria. These data, current as of February 27, 2018, were posted on the Fund's website before the qualified OZ recommendations issued by state or territory CEOs were certified.

Table 1. Maximum Number of Census Tracts Eligible
for Opportunity Zone Designation, by State or Territory






Total Number of Low-Income Community (LIC) Tracts in State

Maximum Number of Tracts That Can Be Nominated (the Greater of 25% of All LICs or 25 If State Has Fewer Than 100 LICs)

Maximum Number of Eligible Non-LIC Contiguous Tracts That Can Be Nominated (5% of Column B)









American Samoa



See Notes

























District of Columbia
























































































New Hampshire




New Jersey




New Mexico




New York




North Carolina




North Dakota




Northern Mariana Islands



See Notes

















Puerto Rico


See Notes

See Notes

Rhode Island




South Carolina




South Dakota




















Virgin Islands



See Notes









West Virginia












Source: CDFI Fund, "Opportunity Zones Information Resources," February 27, 2018, at

Notes: These data are still available on the website, above, as of the publication date of this report.

Puerto Rico: The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-123) deemed each population census tract in Puerto Rico that is a low-income community to be certified and designated as a qualified OZ. As of the time these data were being posted, the maximum number of tracts that can be nominated by Puerto Rico as well as the maximum number of Eligible Non-LIC Contiguous Tracts that could have been included in that nomination was being determined by the Fund.

USVI: The U.S. Virgin Islands could nominate Eligible Non-LIC Contiguous Tracts, provided that the nominated non-LIC tracts do not exceed 5% of all nominated tracts (both low-income communities and nominated contiguous tracts). Thus the USVI could nominate no more than one of its Eligible Non-LIC Contiguous Tracts.

Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa: Neither the Northern Mariana Islands nor American Samoa had any Eligible Non-LIC Contiguous Tracts.

What Is a Qualified Opportunity Fund?

P.L. 115-97 defined a QOF as any investment vehicle which is organized as a corporation or partnership for the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone property (other than another QOF) that holds at least 90% of its assets in qualified OZ property. Qualified OZ property can be stock or partnership interest in a business located within a qualified OZ or tangible business property located in a qualified OZ. Qualified OZ property must have been acquired by the QOF after December 31, 2017. For each month that a QOF fails to meet the 90% requirement it must pay a penalty equal to the excess of the amount equal to 90% of its aggregate assets divided by the aggregate amount of qualified OZ property held by a QOF multiplied by an underpayment rate (short-term federal interest rate plus three percentage points). There is an exception from this general penalty for reasonable cause.

The IRS instructs corporations or partnerships seeking to become a QOF to self-certify this status by filling out Form 8996 as part of their annual income tax filings.8 This self-certification process differs from the NMTC, in which the Fund takes prospective action to certify "community development entities" (CDE) before that CDE can receive an NMTC allocation.

What Are the Tax Benefits for Qualified Investments?

P.L. 115-97 provides for three main tax incentives to encourage investment in qualified OZs:

  • 1. Temporary deferral of capital gains that are reinvested in qualified OZ property: Taxpayers can defer capital gains tax due upon sale or disposition of a (presumably non-OZ) asset if the capital gain portion of that asset is reinvested within 180 days in a QOF.9 Under current law, the deferral of gain is available on qualified investments up until the earlier of: (a) the date on which the investment in the QOF is sold or exchanged, or (b) December 31, 2026.10
  • 2. Step-up in basis for investments held in QOFs: If the investment in the QOF is held by the taxpayer for at least five years, the basis on the original gain is increased by 10% of the original gain. If the OZ asset or investment is held by the taxpayer for at least seven years, the basis on the original gain is increased by an additional 5% of the original gain.
  • 3. Exclusion of capital gains tax on qualified OZ investment returns held for at least 10 years: The basis of investments maintained (a) for at least 10 years and (b) until at least December 31, 2026, will be eligible to be marked up to the fair market value of such investment on the date the investment is sold. Effectively, this amounts to an exclusion of capital gains tax on any gains earned from the investment in the QOF (over 10 years) when the investment is sold or disposed.

Table 2 illustrates the tax benefits to a hypothetical investment of $100,000 in a QOF made in 2019. This investment could be $100,000 in capital gains earned from the sale or disposition of another asset (e.g., real property) from outside of an OZ that is reinvested into a QOF within 180 days from the date of that sale or disposition. Taxes on these capital gains are deferred while the investment is held in a QOF.

Column A shows the investment's value over time, assuming a 7% annually compounded rate of return. This hypothetical investment is simplified to assume that an initial investment is made in a QOF in year one and the QOF constantly reinvests any returns to that initial investment (i.e., the QOF does not pay out periodic dividends to the investor during the life of the investment).

Column B shows the increase in adjusted basis earned from holding that investment in a QOF over time: 10% of the original capital gain of $100,000 after the investment is held in a QOF for at least five years and 15% after the capital gain is held for at least seven years.

Column C shows the mandatory recognition of reinvested capital gains at the end of 2026.11 Even if the investor retains their investment in the QOF beyond 2026, they must still recognize $85,000 in capital gains under this hypothetical.12

Column D shows the basis for capital gains tax if the investment in a QOF is sold or disposed in any of the 10 years shown. One of the three major economic incentives to investing in a QOF is the permanent exclusion of capital gains earned after the acquisition of the QOF investment.13 This is shown in the last year of the table where no additional capital gains would be due if the investment was sold—as $85,000 was previously recognized at the end of 2026 (as shown in Column C).

Table 2. Illustration of Opportunity Zone (OZ) Tax Benefits
for a Hypothetical Investment of $100,000 in Reinvested Capital Gains Made in 2019

(Assuming an annual rate of return of 7%)







Investment Valuea

Basis Adjustment

Mandatory Recognition of Reinvested Capital Gain

Taxable Capital Gains if Sold
























































Source: CRS calculations.


a. This hypothetical calculates OZ tax benefits from an initial investment of $100,000 in capital gains earned from outside of an OZ (e.g., sale of appreciated real property) that is rolled over into a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), assuming constant reinvestment over the life of the OZ investment (i.e., no periodic dividends issued from the qualified opportunity fund to the investor).

b. Investments maintained (a) for at least 10 years and (b) until at least December 31, 2026, will be eligible for permanent exclusion of capital gains tax on any gains from the qualified OZ portion of their investment when sold or disposed. In this hypothetical, the $196,715 in earnings over the 10 years that the investment is held in a QOF would be excluded from capital gains tax, and tax would be due on the initial $100,000 in outside capital gains rolled over into the QOF after applying the OZ adjusted basis increase benefit of 15% (i.e., tax due on $85,000 in capital gains).

Note that Table 2 only shows the tax-related benefits of investing in a QOF. It does not include the economic benefits of temporarily deferring capital gains tax on the initial $100,000 investment, which would depend on the time value of money. From an income tax perspective, though, deferral of capital gains tax just delays a tax liability from one period to another.

Actual QOF investment structures could differ from the arrangement in Table 2. As seen in the New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC), investors have developed financial structures that increase the amount of other funding from either private or public sources that are used with the NMTC (i.e., increasing leverage on the NMTC investment).14 Additional layers of financing structures could increase the complexity of investment arrangements and costs attributed to fees and transactional costs instead of development.15

OZ tax incentives are in effect from the enactment of P.L. 115-97 on December 22, 2017, through December 31, 2026. There is no gain or deferral available with respect to any sale or exchange made after December 31, 2026, and there is no exclusion available for investments in qualified OZs made after December 31, 2026.

Proposed Regulations

The Department of the Treasury has issued multiple sets of proposed regulations related to investments in a QOF (under Section 1400Z-2). The most recent notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) was published in the Federal Register on May 1, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as the "May 2019 NPRM").16 The May 2019 NPRM provides details about the requirements under Section 1400Z-2 that could be imposed on OZ-related transactions. These proposed requirements could also shape some of the development effects of OZs. Public comments are due by July 1, 2019, and a public hearing is scheduled for July 9, 2019.17

The May 2019 NPRM calls for defining "substantially all" differently in two subsections of the statute. First, under Section 1400Z-2(d)(3)(A)(i)(III), a qualified OZ business is defined, in part, as a trade or business "in which substantially all of the tangible property owned or leased by the taxpayer is qualified opportunity zone business property."18 The May 2019 NPRM says that a trade or business would satisfy the "substantially all" test if at least 70% of the tangible property owned or leased by the trade or business is qualified OZ business property (discussed in more detail, below). Treasury and IRS arrived at the 70% threshold after balancing competing interests: a lower threshold would allow more businesses to benefit from qualifying investments in QOFs while too low of a threshold could dilute the focus of the investments in the communities that OZs were intended to benefit. Second, three different provisions in 1400Z-2(d)(2) require that "during substantially all of the [QOF's] holding period" of any qualified OZ-stock, partnership interest, or business property must be in a qualified OZ. The proposed regulations say that "substantially all" in the holding period context would be defined as 90%.19 The May 2019 NPRM claims that the use of a higher threshold in this context is justified because taxpayers are more easily able to control and time their investments in property, and a lower threshold would, again, reduce the amount of investment in the communities that OZs were intended to benefit.

The May 2019 NPRM also defines the phrase "original use" for the purposes of qualified OZ business property. Under Section 1400Z-2(d)(3)(A)(i)(II), qualified OZ business property is defined in part as tangible trade or business property in which "the original use of such property in the qualified opportunity zone commences with the qualified opportunity fund or the qualified opportunity fund substantially improves the property." The May 2019 NPRM would define "original use" as tangible property that has (1) not been previously placed into service for the purposes of depreciation or amortization, or (2) has not been used in a manner that would allow depreciation or amortization if that person were the property's owner.20

In sum, the proposed rule encourages investments in new tangible property, as opposed to property that a business might have used elsewhere and then moved to business operations within an OZ. The second interpretation, though, allows businesses that lease tangible property to qualify as investments in qualified OZ business property. The May 2019 NPRM notes that some parties were concerned that the original use requirement would not benefit investment in abandoned structures.21 In response, the May 2019 NPRM considers the adoption of a rule that would allow buildings or structures that have been vacant for at least five years prior to being purchased by a QOF or qualified OZ business as satisfying the original use requirement.

The May 2019 NPRM also addresses a number of other questions that could be important to a broad range of OZ transactions, such as

  • Investments in unimproved land not used in a trade or business would generally not be considered OZ property.22 This interpretation is intended to prevent QOFs from speculative land buying. Land that is used in a trade or business by a QOF or a qualified OZ business can qualify for OZ tax incentives, though, as long as the land is "substantially improved."23
  • Leased tangible property used in a trade or business within an OZ would count towards the requirement that "substantially all" (i.e., 70%) of the tangible property owned or leased by for the purposes of a qualified OZ business.24 This interpretation is intended to increase parity between businesses that choose to purchase tangible property versus lease it.
  • A trade or business located on real property straddling (partly inside and outside) a qualified OZ could be eligible as a qualified OZ business if it meets certain criteria. Treasury proposes that if the amount of real property (based on square footage) located within the qualified OZ is substantial as compared to the amount of real property outside of the OZ, and the real property outside of the OZ is contiguous to part or all of the real property within the OZ, then all the property will be deemed to be located within the OZ.25 A similar rule was applied to Empowerment Zones tax incentives.
  • There are three safe harbor provisions (plus an ability to demonstrate eligibility based on the particular facts and circumstances) for determining whether a business has derived at least 50% of its total gross income "from the active conduct of such business" within an OZ, for the purposes of being a qualified OZ business. Those criteria are: (1) the hours performed by its employees and independent contractors; (2) the amounts paid by the trade or business for services performed in the qualified OZ by its employees and contractors; or (3) tangible property of the business and the management or operational functions performed for the business.26 Hypotheticals in the May 2019 NPRM illustrate how these criteria apply to a business. These safe harbors could affect the scope of businesses that could benefit from OZ tax incentives.
  • QOFs have a one-year grace period to sell assets and reinvest the proceedings into another qualified OZ investment for the purposes of meeting the 90% asset requirement for QOFs.27 This provision would clarify the statutory language in Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(B) allowing a QOF "a reasonable period of time to reinvest the turn of capital from investments." On the one hand, a longer grace period could provide QOFs with more flexibility to identify and deploy capital to projects with higher returns. On the other hand, a longer grace period could allow QOFs (and their investors) to hold their assets with the goal of earning the basis adjustments or exclusion of gain without actively investing money into OZ communities.
  • For investors, the May 2019 NPRM provides details on what events could trigger the inclusion of capital gains under Section 1400Z-2(b)(1). This provision is the benefit of deferring capital gains tax liability on the initial capital gain that was reinvested within 180 days into a QOF. Under the statute, that deferral ends the earlier of: (1) the date on which the qualifying investment is sold or exchanged, or (2) December 31, 2026. In short, any transaction that reduces the taxpayer's direct equity interest in a QOF could trigger a sale or exchange requiring the taxpayer to include their deferred capital gains liability for their personal income tax purposes.28

Other details are provided in the proposed regulations that could be useful for structuring specific OZ-related transactions. A full summary of these provisions is beyond the scope of this report. Treasury also published a request for information in the Federal Register on suggestions for OZ data collection and tracking.29 More regulations could be issued on related issues, but, as of the publication date of this report, no specific timeline has been announced by Treasury or the IRS.

What Economic Effects Can Be Expected?

OZs are an addition to the array of geographically targeted, federal programs and incentives for economic development. Examples of economic development incentives that are administered through the tax code include the NMTC,30 the low-income housing tax credit (LIHTC),31 and the tax credit for the rehabilitation of historic structures.32

Although any one of these tax incentives might not be sufficient to generate a positive investment return from an otherwise unprofitable development project, developers may be able to "stack" the benefits of multiple federal tax incentives (as well as any state and local incentives). The sum of the benefits could make a project located in one area more profitable than alternatives. Studies find that place-based economic development incentives tend to shift investment from one area to another, rather than result in a net increase in aggregate economic activity.33

Comparisons may be made between the NMTC and OZ tax incentives. The OZ tax incentives provide relief from capital gains taxation, thereby directly benefiting owners of capital rather than low-income populations that live in OZs.34 Although the NMTC is an investment credit, it, like the OZ tax incentives, also directly benefits capital owners. The NMTC can be distinguished from the OZ tax incentives in several ways, though. First, Congress has capped the amount of NMTC allocations that the Fund may issue per year ($3.5 billion), thereby making these applications competitive because the demand for NMTC allocations exceeds the supply provided by Congress. In contrast, the maximum amount of tax benefits conferred by the OZ tax incentives are uncapped, much like many tax provisions—if a taxpayer qualifies for the special tax treatment, then they may claim it.

Second, the Fund evaluates NMTC applications based on a set of factors. One factor is the potential impact that the investments supported will have on "community outcomes," including benefits to low-income persons and jobs directly induced by the investments.35 Investments made by QOFs are eligible to benefit a broad range of potential projects, regardless of their potential "community outcomes."36

Third, NMTC recipients are required to adhere to a set of outcome-based reporting and compliance requirements.37 These metrics track the location and type of projects funded by NMTC allocations.38 No such outcome-based requirements are needed for OZ tax incentives.

Fourth, to become eligible for a NMTC allocation, a certified CDE must, among other criteria, have a primary mission of serving or providing investment capital to low-income communities. A governing or advisory board is supposed to hold the CDE accountable to that mission. QOFs are not required to be mission-oriented for the primary purposes of serving low-income communities.

The Urban Institute analyzed the census tracts designated by the CEOs of the states and the District of Columbia, "scoring" each against measures of the investment flows they are receiving and the socioeconomic changes they have already experienced.39 Tracts that were selected by the state's respective CEO and designated as QOZs were compared with eligible, nondesignated tracts not selected by the CEO. CEOs in Montana, DC, Alaska, and Georgia selected areas with the lowest levels of preexisting investment.40 Conversely, CEOs in Hawaii, Vermont, Nebraska, and West Virginia selected areas with the highest levels of preexisting investment. Additionally

Designated tracks do have lower incomes, higher poverty rates, and higher unemployment rates than eligible nondesignated tracts (and the US overall average, which is as expected given eligibility criteria). Housing conditions trend in similar ways, with lower home values, rents, and homeownership rates. The designated tracts are also notably less white and more Hispanic and black than eligible nondesignated tracts. Age compositions are comparable. Education levels are somewhat lower among designated tracts than eligible nondesignated tracts.... In terms of this program, there appears to be no targeting on the basis of urbanization.41

The Joint Committee on Taxation initially estimated that the OZ tax incentives would result in a revenue loss to the federal government of $1.6 billion over 10 years.42 The revenue loss within the 10-year budget window is due to the relatively small revenue losses associated with the deferral of capital gains tax and the OZ basis adjustments in years five and seven. The largest tax benefit associated with OZ tax incentives, the exclusion of capital gains tax on qualified OZ investment returns in year 10, would fall outside of the 10-year budget window. Those revenue losses would not be expected until 2028 (i.e., FY2028-FY2029).

Author Contact Information

Sean Lowry, Analyst in Public Finance ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])
Donald J. Marples, Specialist in Public Finance ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])



These provisions amend the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) as Sections 1400Z-1 and 1400Z-2.


CDFI Fund, "Opportunity Zone Resources," at; and IRS, "Opportunity Zones Frequently Asked Questions," at


For the purposes of OZ tax incentives, a "state" includes the District of Columbia and any U.S. possession.


See 26 U.S.C. § 45D(e). Qualifying LICs, under the NMTC, include census tracts that have at least one of the following criteria: (1) a poverty rate of at least 20%; (2) a median family income below 80% of the greater of the statewide or metropolitan area median family income if the LIC is located in a metropolitan area; or (3) a median family income below 80% of the median statewide family income if the LIC is located outside a metropolitan area. In addition, designated targeted populations may be treated as LICs. For more information, see CRS Report RL34402, New Markets Tax Credit: An Introduction, by Donald J. Marples and Sean Lowry.


See IRS Rev. Proc. 2018-16, p. 2, at


Id., p. 3.


See CDFI Fund, "List of Designated Qualified Opportunity Zones," at Qualified OZs are also published in IRS Notice 2018-48, Designated Qualified Opportunity Zones Under Internal Revenue Code § 1400Z-2, at; and IRS Notice 2019-42, Amplification of Notice 2018-48 to Include Additional Puerto Rico Designated Qualified Opportunity Zones, at


For more information, see IRS, "Opportunity Zones Frequently Asked Questions," at


For more background on capital gains taxation, see CRS Report 96-769, Capital Gains Taxes: An Overview, by Jane G. Gravelle; and p. 391 in CRS Committee Print CP10003, Tax Expenditures: Compendium of Background Material on Individual Provisions — A Committee Print Prepared for the Senate Committee on the Budget, 2018, by Jane G. Gravelle et al.


IRC Section 1400Z-2(b)(1).




This is equal to $100,000 in capital gains initially rolled over into the QOF in 2019 minus the $15,000 in basis adjustment for holding their investment in the QOF for seven years.


After P.L. 115-97 was enacted, some commentators raised concerns that legislative text created an ambiguity as to whether taxpayers could actually claim the exclusion of qualified OZ investment return gains after 10 years. This was because the capital gains tax exclusion on OZ investment returns provision requires the QOF to hold investments in an OZ for 10 years. The OZ designations were authorized by P.L. 115-97 through 2026. Thus, unless Congress extended OZ designations in subsequent legislation, it would have only been possible for QOFs to hold investments in qualified OZs for a maximum of nine years (i.e., 2018 through 2026). However, the Department of the Treasury released proposed regulations on October 19, 2018, clarifying that the benefit available in year 10 would still be available even if the designations expire at the end of 2026. The proposed regulations state that the benefit will be available until December 31, 2047. Treasury claims that this interpretation is consistent with the legislative intent of P.L. 115-97. See Department of the Treasury, "Treasury, IRS Issue Proposed Regulations on New Opportunity Zone Tax Incentive," press release, October 19, 2018, at The related passage is on p. 16 of the proposed regulation.


Under the NMTC, the investor receives a credit equal to 5% of the total amount paid for the stock or capital interest at the time of purchase. For the final four years, the value of the credit is 6% annually. Investors must retain their interest in a qualified equity investment throughout the seven-year period. The NMTC value is 39% of the cost of the qualified equity investment and is claimed over a seven-year credit allowance period. For more information, see CRS Report RL34402, New Markets Tax Credit: An Introduction, by Donald J. Marples and Sean Lowry.


For more discussion, see Government Accountability Office (GAO), New Markets Tax Credit - Better Controls and Data Are Needed to Ensure Effectiveness, GAO-14-500, July 2014, pp. 5-20, at


Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, "Investing in Qualified Opportunity Funds," 84 Federal Register 18652-18693, May 1, 2019. Hereinafter referred to as the "May 2019 NPRM." The regulatory docket (including public comments) is available at


84 Federal Register 18652. The public hearing is scheduled for 10:00AM at the New Carrollton Federal Building at 5000 Ellin Road in Lanham, Maryland 20706, on July 9, 2019.


May 2019 NPRM, pp. 7-8.


Id., p. 9.


Id., pp. 10-11.


Id., pp. 11-12.


Id., pp. 13-14.


See IRC Section 1400Z-2(d)(2)(D).


May 2019 NPRM, at 18-19. There are several additional criteria that apply to leased property, though. See pp. 20-23.


Id., pp. 25-26.


Id., pp. 26-30.


Id., pp. 34-35.


Id., pp. 39-43. The May 2019 NPRM provides a nonexhaustive list of events triggering or not triggering inclusion of deferred capital gains liability.


Department of the Treasury, "Request for Information on Data Collection and Tracking for Qualified Opportunity Zones," 84 Federal Register 18648-18649, May 2, 2019. Regulatory docket available at In particular, Treasury is looking for refinements to the initial version of IRS Form 8996 for tax years 2019 and beyond that could provide more detail and "granularity" concerning OZ investments, and data that could be helpful for tracking the effectiveness of OZs. Comments were due May 31, 2019.


See CRS Report RL34402, New Markets Tax Credit: An Introduction, by Donald J. Marples and Sean Lowry.


See CRS Report RS22389, An Introduction to the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit, by Mark P. Keightley.


See National Park Service, "Tax Incentives for Preserving Historic Properties," at


For a discussion of the economic literature on geographically targeted development policies, see CRS Report R42770, Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund: Programs and Policy Issues, by Sean Lowry.


For more discussion on the effects of economic development policies targeting capital versus labor, see ibid.


For examples of such criteria, see the "Community Outcomes" section of CDFI Fund, NMTC Program—Allocation Application Frequently Asked Questions, June 7, 2018, at


QOF investments made in the following categories are not eligible as investments in "qualified OZ business property": any private or commercial golf course, country club, massage parlor, hot tub facility, suntan facility, racetrack or other facility used for gambling, or any store the principal business of which is the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off premises. See IRC 1400Z-2 and IRC Section 144(c)(6)(B). Further, any capital gains earned from investments from the above types of projects are not be eligible for OZ tax benefits.


For compliance reports, see


See various New Markets Tax Credit Program Public Data Releases at


Brett Theodos, Brady Meixell, and Carl Hedman, Did States Maximize Their Opportunity Zone Selections?, Urban Institute, May 21, 2018, at State-by-state comparisons are available in a spreadsheet on the linked page.


Id., at 4.


Id., at 8.


Joint Committee on Taxation, Estimated Revenue Effects of the Conference Agreement for H.R. 1, The "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act," JCX-67-17, December 18, 2017, p. 6, at