This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
Appendixes
Summary
Conventional wisdom holds that the federal government plays relatively little role in U.S. campaigns and elections. Although states retain authority for most aspects of election administration, a closer look reveals that the federal government also has steadily increased its presence in campaigns and elections in the past 5060 years. Altogether, dozens of congressional committees and federal agencies could be involved in federal elections under current law.
Congress faces a complex mix of traditional oversight areas withand developing ones throughout the elections field. Reports of foreign interference during the 2016 election cycle, and concerns about future interference, have raised the profile of campaigns and elections policy in Congress, at federal agencies, and beyond. As Congress considers these and other developing issues, thisThis report provides the House and Senate with a resource for first understanding the current campaigns and elections regulatory structure. The report addresses those areas of law and public policy that most directly and routinely affect American campaigns and elections. This includes six broad categories of law through which Congress has assigned various agencies roles in regulating or supporting campaigns, elections, or both. These are campaign finance; election administration; election security; redistricting; qualifications and contested elections; and voting rights.
No single federal agency is in charge of the federal role in campaigns and elections, just as multiple statutes address various aspects of the field. The Election Assistance Commission and Federal Election Commission are devoted entirely to campaigns and elections. Congress has charged other departments and agencies—such as the Department of Justice, Department of Defense, and component organizations comprising the Intelligence Community—primarily with responsibilities for other areas of public policy, but also with supporting or administering campaigns and elections policy in specific cases. Other agencies or statutes may be relevant in specific cases.
This report does not track legislation that proposes changes in the policy environment discussed herein. It will be updated occasionally to reflect new information or major policy developments.
Since the 2016 election cycle, the policy community has focused on what roles the federal government plays—or could play—in protecting U.S. elections from foreign interference. Recent reports suggest that attempts to interfere with the 2018 election cycle also are under way.1 Congress is responsible for overseeing the federal presence in campaigns and elections, both with respect to traditional policy challenges and new ones.
No single federal agency is in charge of the federal role in campaigns and elections, just as multiple statutes address various aspects of the field. Two federal agencies' duties are devoted solely to elections issues. The Election Assistance Commission (EAC) administers available federal funding for state and territorial election administration, and provides these jurisdictions with information about election administration. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) administers civil aspects of federal campaign finance law. Congress has charged other departments and agencies with supporting campaigns and elections policy in specific cases, although those agencies' primary roles are focused on areas beyond elections. Examples include the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), and component organizations comprising the Intelligence Community (IC). Statutory requirements establish specific, typically long-term roles for the federal government, the states, or both. Other factors, such as executive orders, changes in presidential or agency policy priorities, agency organization, funding, and emerging policy challenges, can affect the implementation of federal statutes affecting campaigns and elections. This report does not track legislation that proposes changes in the policy environment discussed herein. It will be updated occasionally to reflect major developments.This report is intended to help Congress understand how the statutes and agencies it has created affect U.S. campaigns and elections. Currently, no single agency or statute provides overarching coordination. As this report shows, at least 22 congressional committees; 17Tables throughout the report, and two appendices at the end of the report, are designed to help the reader locate key information quickly. Appendix A provides a quick reference of key agency roles and statutory citations by policy area. Appendix B briefly summarizes information about executive orders issued during 2020 or later that are or were substantially related to federal elections policy.
Introduction
This CRS report is intended to help Congress understand how the statutes and agencies it has created affect U.S. campaigns and elections. No single agency or statute provides overarching coordination for the federal role in campaigns and elections. As this report shows, at least 22 congressional committees; 20 federal departments or independent agencies (plus the Intelligence Community and the federal judiciary); 9 federal statutes; and several constitutional provisions can affect the federal role in campaigns and elections.
As this report discusses
The following pages are based on CRS research of statutory references1 to campaigns and elections; legislative or other congressional activity; federal agency documents and websites; scholarly research; and media accounts.2 Citations appear throughout, including to other CRS products that provide additional detail. This report does not track legislation.
U.S. Code citations appear throughout this report. Title 52 citations reflect a 2014 "editorial reclassification" of federal election law. Some provisions noted in this report are now codified in Title 52 but were previously located in Titles 2 and 42 of the Code.3 As the Office of Law Revision Counsel (the House office that maintains the U.S. Code) explains, "No statutory text is altered by such editorial reclassification projects, other than necessary updates to references to reflect the reorganization. Relevant provisions are merely transferred from one place to another in the Code."4
The report addresses those areas of law and public policy that most directly and routinely affect federal campaigns and elections.53 It does not attempt to cover every instance of federal involvement in this policy area. Other agencies64 or provisions in law or regulation that are not addressed here might be relevant in specific cases.75 For example, a campaign finance investigation might involve banking law, but because banking law typically is not a campaign finance policy or election administration matter in the United States, the report does not address it. The report also excludes agencies that Congress generally has prohibited from elections involvement, or in which involvement has merely been proposed. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), for example, meets both criteria.8
As another CRS report explains, "evaluating the authority of Congress to establish standardized election procedures would appear to require a consideration of a variety of different proposals and scenarios."9 This report does not provide such a legal or constitutional analysis. In practice, the federal and state governments share responsibility for administering, regulating, or supporting campaigns and elections in the United States.
6
The report emphasizes roles supporting or regulating campaigns and elections that Congress has assigned federal agencies in codified law. Unless otherwise noted, it does not address temporary provisions found in appropriations law.7 The report addresses some executive orders or other agency policy documents that have had long-term impacts on federal elections policy. in the future to reflect major developments or new information.
occasionally to reflect major developments or new information.
Policy Developments Subject to Change
Congress has made no major recent statutory changes affecting the federal role in campaigns or elections. Beyond statutory provisions, developments such as changes in presidential or agency policy priorities, agency organization, funding, and emerging policy challenges can impact the implementation of federal statutes affecting elections.9 This report includes some discussion of potentially more temporary policy changes affecting elections roles, but is not intended to provide detailed tracking of such developments. Policy changes such as those below could have practical implications for the federal role in campaigns and elections at specific time periods, even without changes to the statutory roles this report emphasizes: In some cases, these developments are or have been subject to litigation that is beyond the scope of this report.10
The report also briefly discusses other areas of law that can substantially affect campaigns, elections, or both. Roles refer to specific governmental responsibilities within the categories. These roles refer to what the federal government does to support, regulate, or fund aspects of U.S. campaigns or elections.
The Appendix
Appendix A at the end of this report lists the roles organized by category. For example, the Election Administration category includes the Voters—Registration role. Importantly, these categories and roles are not definitive, and not necessarily mutually exclusive. What one reader would characterize as Election Administration, another might view as more appropriately Voting Rights.
Campaigns and elections are distinct concepts. This distinction affects the federal government's role in both. Practically and simply, campaigns are about persuading voters in an effort to win elections. Voters express their campaign preferences by casting ballots in elections. Except for campaign finance policy, U.S. campaigns are subject to relatively little regulation. Elections in the United States are highly regulated and primarily a state-level responsibility.
There is no uniform standard for campaign conduct in the United States. Primarily, federal policy regulates how campaigns and related entities raise and spend money. Most regulation of campaign conduct rests in campaign finance law.1011 This includes topics such as
Most of these provisions apply to a limited set of actors known as "political committees." These are candidate campaign committees, party committees, and political action committees (PACs).1112 In addition, campaign finance policy primarily affects activities that explicitly advocate for election or defeat of political candidates, or, in some cases, certain preelection advertising1213 that mentions candidates but does not explicitly call for election or defeat.
Other areas of law and regulation sometimes affect campaigns, but do not specifically address campaign conduct. For example, state or local property law might govern disputes over campaign assets. In general, however, barring some other provision of federal, state, or local law (such as corporate law, or law prohibiting race-based discrimination), federal campaign finance policy is silent on topics such as
Consequently, the federal government plays relatively little role in campaign conduct. As discussed below, the federal role in elections also is limited but far greater.
The federal role in elections is limited yet complicated. The Constitution and federalism limit the federal government's roles to specific tasks, many of which support states, territories, and localities. Within its purview, however, the federal government's duties can involve multiple statutes, agencies, and areas of public policy. Table 1 below provides a brief overview of the major functions performed by the federal government and by the states.13 The 14 Appendix A at the end of this report provides additional detail and cites relevant federal statutes.
Table 1. Categories of Major Governmental Functions in U.S. Campaigns and Elections, In Brief
(Refers to federal elections only)
|
|
Federal Agencies | |||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Federal |
| |||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
States |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Election Security |
States |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
Federal |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Redistricting |
States |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Voting Rights |
Federal |
|
Source: CRS.
Note: See additional discussion in the text of this report.
Note: See additional discussion in the text of this report. References to state-government responsibilities include territorial governments. In many states, local governments (especially counties) administer elections. As noted in the text of the report, other agencies not listed in the table also exercise government elections functions in specific cases (e.g., the U.S. Postal Service transmits election mail, which could be relevant for aspects of the "Election Administration" and "Election Security" rows in the table). Federal roles in elections include activities such as
Most aspects of voting and administering elections are notably absent from this list because they fall to the states. Federal provisions discussed throughout the report also can affect state obligations.16 In general, state and local government roles in elections include activities such as
To summarize, states, territories, and local election jurisdictions (often counties) do most of the work of administering federal elections.17 They also retain most authority over how those elections are conducted. The federal government primarily supports state, territorial, and local election jurisdictions. The federal government also is responsible for ensuring that state, territorial, and local jurisdictions administer their elections consistent with federal law.
The Constitution and federal statutes establish the federal role in U.S. campaigns and elections. The following discussion addresses constitutional provisions; statutes that primarily regulate campaigns and elections; and, finally, statutes that can affect campaigns and elections but primarily address other policy issues. The Appendix A at the end of this report provides citations to other areas of law that may be relevant in specific cases but are not otherwise addressed in the report.
Appendix B briefly summarizes recent executive orders (EOs) that appear to be particularly relevant for the federal role in campaign finance, elections, or voting policy. Importantly, EOs and other nonstatutory provisions are particularly subject to change.
The Constitution
The U.S. Constitution recognizes states' primary roles in election administration but also provides specific powers and responsibilities for the federal government.16
At least nine major statutes substantially affect the federal role in U.S. campaigns and elections. This section provides brief highlights of each, and cites other CRS products that contain additional detail.
Modern campaign finance law dates to the 1970s, with the 1971 enactment of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)2122 and major amendments in 1974, 1976, and 1979.2223 Collectively, these provisions
Congress enacted the most significant amendment to FECA to date in 2002, via the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA).2325 Among other provisions, the act
27Major litigation affected interpretation of these statutes and of some others discussed in this report. Other CRS products contain additional information.26
Congress enacted the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)2729 in 2002, after the disputed 2000 presidential election raised concerns about election administration, ballot design, and voting equipment around the country. HAVA remains the nation's primary federal statute devoted to election administration.28 Among other provisions, HAVA
A 2024 amendment to HAVA also requires states to provide specified access for designated congressional observers in federal elections.39
National Voter Registration Act
Congress enacted the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA, sometimes called the "Motor-Voter" law) in 1993.34 Some provisions in NVRA originated in other statutes enacted previously.3540 In brief, current major NVRA provisions include
42Parts of the act also interact with provisions found in the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act and the Voting Rights Act, both of which are discussed below. The Justice Department is responsible for civil NVRA enforcement.
Congress has enacted laws to help members of the military vote since the Civil War.3843 Current provisions, which also cover overseas civilians, appear in the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA).3944 Congress most recently substantially amended UOCAVA in 2009, when it included provisions in stand-alone measure S. 1415, the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment (MOVE) Act in the FY2010 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).4045 In brief, the current statute
(As of this writing, the Secretary of Defense is using a secondary Secretary of War designation, under Executive Order 14347 dated September 5, 2025.47)The Department of Defense, Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP), administers UOCAVA. Individual federal agencies with covered employees also could have UOCAVA compliance responsibilities.48 The Justice Department is responsible for civil enforcement of some UOCAVA provisions.
Congress enacted the Electoral Count Act in 1887.4249 This statute, as amended, and the Twelfth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, establish a timeline and procedures for electoral college action, and for the joint session of Congress that convenes to certifycount the electoral college results.
Congress amended the ECA via the Electoral Count Reform Act (ECRA) in 2022. Collectively, these provisions, codified in Title 3 of the U.S. Code, specify how Congress—and, in some cases, the states and DC—implement their electoral college roles.
Federal Contested Election Act
U.S. constitutional provisions discussed elsewhere in this report address qualifications and vacancies among federal officeholders. State law also covers some scenarios.43 The Federal Contested Elections Act (FCEA)44Election Act (FCEA, which appears as the Federal Contested Elections Act in some texts)50 applies to contested U.S. House elections, as do constitutional provisions and chamber rules. FCEA, enacted in 1969,4551 primarily concerns procedural and judicial provisions that govern House contests. FCEA does not cover contested Member-elect qualifications or eligibility.
For more than 50 years, nowhere has the federal government been more involved in election administration than with protecting voting rights60 years, protecting voting rights has been one of the federal government's most prominent elections roles. Enactment of modern federal law to protect access to registration and the ballot followed more than a century of national struggle on politics and race. More recently, Congress has enacted federal law designed to make registering to vote, and being able to cast ballots, easier for those who are blind, disabled, or elderly.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted in 1990, prohibits disability-based discrimination in a variety of public and private services, most of which are beyond the scope of this report.4652 The law does not specifically address elections, butalthough the findings section references voting discrimination against individuals with disabilities.53 Justice Department regulations4754 implementing the statute require accessible public programs and services. The ADA and Justice Department regulations implementing Title II of the act are therefore sometimes included in discussions of federal provisions requiring accessible polling places.48
Congress enacted the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act (VAEHA) in 1984.4956 VAEHA generally requires states to
The Justice Department enforces these provisions.
Congress originally enacted the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in 1965, at the height of the civil rights movement and amid violent voter suppression in some states.5158 Congress extended or expanded the VRA several times between 1970 and 2006. The 2013 Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder5259 substantially affected the two sections of the VRA, although the case explicitly addressed only one. Specifically, in Shelby County, the Court invalidated Section 4(b) of the VRA. This section of the act contained a coverage formula that identified jurisdictions within states, and some entire states, that had previously engaged in discrimination or contained minority-language populations that Congress determined warranted additional federal voting protections. Under Section 5 of the act, the U.S. Attorney General or the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia had to approve in advance ("preclear") voting changes (e.g., changes in polling places) in those jurisdictions. Although the Court did not invalidate Section 5, it is inoperable now that Section 4(b) has been invalidated.
Currently, among
Among other provisions, the VRA
Constitutional provisions establish the decennial census, apportionment, and redistricting processes. Federal statutes codify elements of those provisions.54 Also, as61 As noted previously, the Voting Rights Act prohibits using race, color, or minority language status to discriminate against voters (e.g., vote dilution), including in redistricting.55
At least four other
Other areas of law also can affect campaigns, elections, or both.
Additional provisions appear in the Appendix at the end of this report.
81
Members of congressional leadership also influence, formally or informally, appointments to the Election Assistance Commission, Federal Election Commission, and other agencies involved in campaigns and elections. The Senate provides advice and consent as required by statute or the Constitution.73
84 Table 2 provides a brief overview of these and other duties.
|
Role |
Role |
Notes |
||
or Entity
Notes |
|
— |
||
— |
|
Other committees have jurisdiction over specific policy areas. See also Table 3 | ||
Administering chamber rules regarding campaigns and elections |
|
See also table notes below. | ||
|
Receiving campaign finance reports |
|
Refers to Senate political committee reports; others file directly with Federal Election Commission. House Clerk and Senate Secretary also receive bundling reports from registered lobbyists. |
||
|
| See also Resolving contested congressional elections below. | ||
|
| Refers to presidential elections | ||
Resolving contested congressional elections |
| Each chamber has authority over its own contests. | ||
|
Resolving contested presidential elections |
|
Resolving contested presidential elections | ||
Resolving contested vice presidential elections |
|
|
Source: CRS.
Notes: The table excludes legislative branch support agencies, such as CRS and the Government Accountability Office, which may support congressional consideration of campaigns and elections policy. The text of this report discusses authorities (e.g., chamber rules or laws) for these roles. In the House, the Office of Congressional EthicsConduct (formerly the Office of Congressional Ethics) may make referrals to the Ethics Committee. Also in the House, the Communications Standards Commission (formerly the Franking Commission) administers some communications rules.
At least 22 congressional committees potentially have roles in overseeing or appropriating funds for the federal role in U.S. campaigns and elections, as shown in Table 3.
85Other policy matters related to campaigns, elections, or both sometimes arise in other committees' legislative, oversight, or appropriations work. Table 3 contains a brief sample.
Chamber |
Committee |
Sample Policy and Oversight Areas |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Appropriations |
Appropriating federal funds |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Armed Services |
Military absentee voting; cybersecurity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Energy and Commerce |
Committee Sample Policy and Oversight Areas House Appropriations Appropriating federal funds House Armed Services Military absentee voting; cybersecurity House Energy and Commerce Telecommunications related to political advertising House Ethics Campaigns, elections, and certain chamber rules House Foreign Affairs Foreign interference in U.S. elections House Homeland Security Election security (including cybersecurity) House House Administration Primary oversight of campaign finance and federal elections House Intelligence Foreign interference in U.S. elections House Judiciary Constitutional issues; voting rights; enforcement; presidential succession House Oversight and Government Reform Governmental coordination (including cybersecurity); Census Bureau oversight House Science, Space, and Technology Cybersecurity House Ways and Means Taxation, financial disclosure for politically active organizations; presidential public financing Senate Appropriations Appropriating federal funds Senate Armed Services Military absentee voting; cybersecurity Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Telecommunications related to political advertising Senate Ethics Campaigns, elections, and certain chamber rules Senate Finance Taxation, financial disclosure for politically active organizations; presidential public financing Senate Foreign Relations Foreign interference in U.S. elections Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Election security (including cybersecurity); Census Bureau oversight Senate Intelligence Foreign interference in U.S. elections Senate Judiciary Constitutional issues; voting rights; enforcement Senate Rules and Administration Primary oversight of campaign finance and federal elections Source: CRS. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Ethics |
Campaigns, elections, and certain chamber rules |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Foreign Affairs |
Foreign interference in U.S. elections |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Homeland Security |
Election security (including cybersecurity); governmental coordination |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
House Administration |
Primary oversight of campaign finance and federal elections |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Intelligence |
Foreign interference in U.S. elections |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Judiciary |
Constitutional issues; voting rights; enforcement; presidential succession |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Oversight and Government Reform |
Governmental coordination (including cybersecurity); Census Bureau oversight |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Science, Space, and Technology |
Cybersecurity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
House |
Ways and Means |
Taxation, financial disclosure for politically active organizations; presidential public financing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Appropriations |
Appropriating federal funds |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Armed Services |
Military absentee voting; cybersecurity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Commerce, Science, and Transportation |
Telecommunications related to political advertising |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Ethics |
Campaigns, elections, and certain chamber rules |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Finance |
Taxation, financial disclosure for politically active organizations; presidential public financing |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Foreign Relations |
Foreign interference in U.S. elections |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs |
Election security (including cybersecurity); governmental coordination; Census Bureau oversight |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Intelligence |
Foreign interference in U.S. elections |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Judiciary |
Constitutional issues; voting rights; enforcement |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Senate |
Rules and Administration |
Primary oversight of campaign finance and federal elections |
Source: CRS.
Notes: The table reflects committees' policy and oversight areas based on recent hearings, bill referrals, or other research conducted for this report. The table is not intended to indicate which committees would receive referral of specific legislation. Legislative jurisdiction is determined by House and Senate rules and past referral practices, with guidance from the parliamentarians.
Most federal election law applies to all federal elections. The same is generally true for campaign finance law regulating campaigns. There are, however, limited circumstances in which the House and Senate have established specific requirements for each chamber. For example, air-travel provisions of the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act (HLOGA, which amended FECA) apply differently to the House and Senate.75 Similarly, FECA specifies that Senate political committees file disclosure reports on paper and with the Secretary of the Senate. Other federal political committees file electronically with the FEC.7686 The two chambers typically defer to one another on issues only affecting the House or Senate.
House and Senate rules govern some Member and staff conduct during federal campaigns and elections. Examples include prohibitions on campaign activity in congressional offices and preelection "blackout" periods for certain franked communications. The Committee on House Administration and the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, and the House7787 and Senate Ethics Committees, provide guidance on how chamber rules might affect Member and staff activity.78
This section briefly summarizes federal agencies that are substantially involved in regulating or supporting U.S. campaigns or federal elections. This report does not attempt to provide a detailed discussion of these roles, nor does it address issues beyond these agencies' elections responsibilities. Other agencies not addressed here might be relevant in specific circumstances.7989 The discussion is divided into two sections: those agencies whose primary duties concern campaigns or elections; and those that primarily serve other policy areas, but that also have secondary elections duties.
Table 4 provides a brief overview; more detailed discussion follows the table.
|
Department or Agency |
Role Highlights |
Notes |
|||||||
Department or Agency Role Highlights Notes Department of Commerce | Provides Census Bureau data supporting apportionment and redistricting; National |
— |
|||||||
— |
Federal Voting Assistance Program administers Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA); cybersecurity and intelligence in some cases; FVAP |
— |
|||||||
|
Department of Health and Human Services |
Administered Help America Vote Act (HAVA) funding for disability access to polls |
— |
|||||||
|
Department of Homeland Security |
Individual military services and civilian agencies participate in administering UOCAVA for their covered employees or dependents. As of this writing, the Department of Defense is using a secondary Department of War designation, under Executive Order 14347 dated September 5, 2025. Department of Health and Human Services Administers Help America Vote Act (HAVA) funding related to polling-place access and "protection and advocacy" systems — Department of Homeland Security |
— |
|||||||
|
Department of Justice |
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) exercises many DHS elections-support functions. Some Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant programs have required allocations for election security. As of this writing, some elections roles appear to be in flux. Department of Justice |
— |
|||||||
|
Department of Labor |
; FBI participates in assessments and advisories related to foreign interference in campaigns and elections
As of this writing, some elections roles appear to be in flux. Department of Labor | See also Federal Election Commission. | |||||||
Department of State |
Supports overseas citizen UOCAVA |
— |
|||||||
|
Department of the Treasury |
administration
— Department of Transportation Participates in UOCAVA administration for merchant mariners; collects certain information regarding air-carrier extensions of credit to political candidates — Department of the Treasury |
— |
|||||||
— |
Sole federal agency devoted to assisting states with election administration; — |
— |
|||||||
Federal Communications Commission | Administers and enforces civil aspects of telecommunications law regarding political advertising and candidate access | See also Federal Election Commission. | |||||||
Federal Election Commission | Sole federal agency devoted to campaign finance; administers and enforces civil campaign finance law |
— |
|||||||
|
Intelligence Community |
— Intelligence Community | Includes multiple federal agencies, some of which are not reflected in the table | |||||||
. See also Office of the Director of National Intelligence. As of this writing, some elections roles appear to be in flux.
National Archives and Records Administration | Administers communication with states for electoral college |
— |
|||||||
|
Office of Personnel Management |
— Issues assessments of foreign interference in U.S. elections and advisories for campaigns regarding foreign influence and cybersecurity Includes consultations with other agencies, some of which are not reflected in the table. As of this writing, some elections roles appear to be in flux. Office of Government Ethics Administers presidential- and vice-presidential candidate personal financial disclosure, in conjunction with the FEC Other federal ethics requirements, which are beyond the scope of this report, also could have implications for campaign or political activity by federal officials. Office of Personnel Management |
| |||||||
. U.S. Access Board | Access Board personnel included in EAC Board of Advisors and Technical Guidelines Development Committee | The Access Board coordinates information regarding disability access. Board members include representatives from multiple federal departments, some of which are not reflected in the table. | |||||||
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights | Conducts research on voting and political participation |
— |
|||||||
— | Transmits election mail and political mail |
— |
; U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) conducts law-enforcement duties related to election mail, as might other federal law-enforcement agencies
—
Source: CRS analysis as discussed in the report text.
Notes: The table primarily reflects roles specified in statute. The table : The table does not address congressional or judicial roles, which are discussed in the . See additional details in report text.
report text.
Congress established the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in 2002, when it enacted the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). The EAC is the sole federal agency devoted to election administration.90 Major EAC functions include the following:
The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is the only federal agency with a significant regulatory role affecting political campaigns.8396 Among other duties, the FEC
Some of the HAVA funding discussed in the "Help America Vote Act" section above was designated for improving voting access for disabled peoplepeople with disabilities, and for "protection and advocacy" payments to support voting among disabled Americans.91systems.111 Congress assigned the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with distributingadministering those funds.92
112 Separately, like other federal agencies with covered employees or dependents, HHS may provide outreach and compliance information to eligible UOCAVA voters. In particular, as noted elsewhere in this report, UOCAVA covers U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) commissioned officers.113 HHS houses the USPHS.
Department of Homeland Security
The Department of Homeland Security's (DHS's) role in elections has grown significantly in recent years.grew significantly after the 2016 election cycle.114 DHS's most substantial involvement in elections stems from Secretary Jeh Johnson's January 2017 decision to designate U.S. elections infrastructure as "critical infrastructure."93
In addition to these elections-related duties, through.120
97123 The Secret Service is also the lead security agency for "national special security events" (NSSEs), such as presidential inaugurations and presidential nominating conventions.98
124
As of this writing, some of the department's elections roles appear to be in flux. For example, in early 2025, much of CISA's elections work conducted during the 2020 and 2024 election cycles reportedly was curtailed.126 Some of those services were provided in the form of DHS funding that previously supported the Center for Internet Security's (CIS's) Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) and the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC).127The Justice Department (DOJ) investigates and enforces aspects of federal law, including those concerning election crimes. Among other roles in federal elections, DOJ is responsible for the following:
Annual financial reports filed with the Labor Department
Department of Labor
Annual financial reports filed with the Labor Department (DOL) include certain union "political activities." These can include funds spent to support or oppose candidates among union members and their families.103136 Similar information must be reported separately to the FEC.
As noted elsewhere in this report, political advertising regulation rests in campaign finance law administered by the Federal Election Commission, and criminally enforced by the Justice Department. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)146 administers aspects of telecommunications law that permit candidates to purchase preemptible broadcast advertising and that require broadcasters to maintain publicly available files of requests for advertising purchases.108
Several federal departments and agencies constitute the Intelligence Community (IC). Security issues covered by the IC may affect campaigns and elections. Detailed discussion of that activity is beyond the scope of this report.109 As the IC has explained, these activities notwithstanding, the IC focuses on "foreign actors; it does not analyze US political processes or US public opinion."110
Reports of foreign interference in the 2016 election cycle increased federal attention to intelligence and security concerns that were not previously a major part of American campaigns or election administration. On January 6, 2017, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a declassified version of an Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) containing information and analysis from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, and National Security Agency (NSA) regarding their assessment of Russian attempts to influence 2016-cycle U.S. elections.111 That assessment has been the focus of much of the congressional oversight and subsequent federal activity surrounding election security.112
The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Office of the Federal Register, administers communication with the states during the electoral college process.113 NARA transmits state election certificates to Congress for counting electoral college results during a joint session to determine the presidential election.114
The VRA authorizes the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to deploy federal election observers where ordered by a federal court or directed by the U.S. Attorney General.115 DOJ has determined that the 2013 Shelby County decision limits some of these provisions.116
The U.S. Access Board coordinates information to ensure equal access for disabled people to federally funded facilities and activities.117 The board consists of representatives from 12 federal departments, and private individuals.118 HAVA requires that Access Board members be appointed to the EAC's Board of Advisors and to the Technical Guidelines Development Committee.119
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights investigates discrimination based on "color, race, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin."120 This includes conducting research on voting and political participation. The VRA authorizes the commission to designate jurisdictions subject to Census Bureau post-election surveys.121 HAVA requires that Civil Rights Commission members be appointed to the EAC's Board of Advisors.122
147 The FCC also administers Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) provisions affecting automated telephone calls ("robocalls") that can affect certain communications regarding federal campaigns or elections.148
Intelligence Community
Congress has assigned the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) with statutory responsibilities for assessing foreign interference in U.S. elections, as discussed below.149 The DNI provides oversight and direction of the Intelligence Community (IC), which includes several departments and agencies.150 Other CRS products provide additional detail about the DNI and IC.151
Provisions codified in Title 50 of the U.S. Code require the DNI, in consultation with other agencies, to issue an assessment of "any information" indicating that a foreign government or someone acting on behalf of a foreign government "has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in elections for Federal office" during the cycle.152 The ODNI is required to release a public version of the assessment "not later than 60 days after the end of a Federal election cycle."153 Federal law also requires the ODNI, in consultation with the DHS Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis, and the FBI Director, to produce a publicly available "advisory report" on counterintelligence and cybersecurity threats to U.S. campaigns. The report must be issued at least one year before a federal election and contain best practices for threat mitigation.154 As of this writing, some policy aspects of U.S. efforts to monitor and counter foreign interference in U.S. elections appear to be in flux.155 For example, in August 2025, the DNI announced her intention to reorganize the ODNI, including "refocusing functions within the Foreign Malign Influence Center" (FMIC).156 As another CRS product explains, due partially to concerns surrounding foreign influence in U.S. elections, Congress established the FMIC, within the ODNI, in December 2019.157 The FMIC housed the Election Threats Executive (ETE) position, which the ODNI previously characterized as "serv[ing] as the IC's coordinating and integrating authority on all election security activities, initiatives, and programs."158 The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Office of the Federal Register (OFR), administers communication with the states during the electoral college process.159 NARA transmits state election certificates to Congress for counting electoral college results during a joint session to determine the presidential election.160 Presidential and vice-presidential candidates file annual personal financial disclosure reports (OGE Form 278 (or 278e)) with the FEC. The FEC then transmits the forms to the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) for compliance review.161 OGE primarily issues regulations and provides advice and education to Designated Agency Ethics Officials (DAEOs) for the administration of financial disclosure requirements for government employees, a topic that is beyond the scope of this report.162 The VRA authorizes the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to deploy federal election observers where ordered by a federal court or directed by the U.S. Attorney General.163 DOJ has determined that the 2013 Shelby County decision limits some of these provisions.164 The U.S. Access Board coordinates information to ensure equal access for people with disabilities to federally funded facilities and activities.165 The board consists of representatives from 12 federal departments, and private individuals.166 HAVA requires that Access Board members be appointed to the EAC's Board of Advisors and to the Technical Guidelines Development Committee.167 The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights investigates discrimination based on "color, race, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin."168 This includes conducting research on voting and political participation. The VRA authorizes the commission to designate jurisdictions subject to Census Bureau post-election surveys.169 HAVA requires that Civil Rights Commission members be appointed to the EAC's Board of Advisors.170 National Archives and Records Administration
Office of Government Ethics
Office of Personnel Management
U.S. Access Board
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
U.S. Postal Service
Election administrators and political campaigns (and parties, etc.) rely on the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to transmit election mail and political mail.171Election administrators and political campaigns (and parties, etc.) rely on the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) to transmit election mail and political mail. The former includes election-administration materials, such as absentee ballots, polling-place notices, etc. The latter refers to mailings advocating for political candidates, parties, etc. As noted previously, mail to military personnel can be handled by the USPS and by the MPSA (DOD).
The U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) may participate in investigations or other law-enforcement duties regarding mail affecting federal campaigns or elections.172 The Federal Judiciary Courts do not play policymaking or implementation roles in U.S. campaigns and elections. The judiciary's role is therefore largely beyond the scope of this report, as are legal issues. It is important to note, however, that courts can substantially affect interpretation of the statutes discussed above, and review agency implementation of those statutes. Federal law also assigns election-related duties to courts in specific cases, as noted briefly below.
Frequent election-related litigation and the increasing frequency of legal specialties devoted to campaign finance and elections suggest that the courts will continue to play important roles in shaping federal regulation of campaigns and elections.
The federal presence in campaigns and elections does not necessarily mean federal power. The preceding pages confirm that the federal government does relatively little to actually administer elections. Where the federal government is involved, however, its presence can be extensive. Historically, the federal government has emphasized domestic campaigns and elections concerns. These include topics such as transparent campaign financing, protecting voting rights, and providing states funding to upgradesupport election equipmentadministration. New challenges, such as threats from foreign actors and through cyberattacks, suggest that the federal government's role in campaigns and elections is increasingly complex and interdisciplinary.
Some federal roles as implemented in policy or practice vary compared with the roles as specified in statute.
Currently, no single agency or statute provides overarching coordination for the federal presencerole in campaigns and elections. Only two small independent agencies—the EAC for election administration and the FEC for campaign finance—are devoted solely to campaigns and elections policy. Agencies such as DHS can bring security expertise to elections, but are not elections specialists, as are the EAC, FEC, or parts of DOJ. For some, greater coordination across statutes and agencies might be beneficial, while others likely willwould respond that the existing system is based on deliberately unique statutes and, agency expertise, and federalism principles.
Federal policy and law regarding elections primarily emphasizes regulating campaigns, campaign finance, election administration, or voting rights issues. Other issue areas, such as homeland security, telecommunications, and taxation, can affect aspects of federal policy related to elections in specific circumstances. Congress could choose to broaden or narrow agency expertise.
Currently, regulating campaigns and elections depends on a clear connection to defeating or electing candidates, or to voting for or against those candidates. This report generally does not address some topics—such as issue advocacy or foreign propaganda—not because they are unimportant, but because Congress has chosen primarily to regulate them outside of campaigns and elections statutes.126 Congress could choose to broaden the kinds of conduct that are subject to regulation in campaign finance or election law in the future. If it does so, one or more of the statutes and agencies discussed in this report likely would be affected.
Table A-1. Overview of Major Governmental Roles in U.S. Campaigns and Elections Refers only to elections for federal offices unless otherwise noted. See also Table Notes below.
|
Category |
Topic |
Category Topic |
Federal Role | Primary Federal Agency or Agencies Responsible | Key Constitutional Provisions or Federal Statutesa |
Notes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Civil regulation, disclosure, and enforcement |
Federal |
Notes Campaign Finance Civil regulation, disclosure, and enforcement Federal | Federal Election Commission (FEC) | U.S. Constitution: 1st Amdt.; Election law (Federal Election Campaign Act, FECA): 52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146 |
Certain independent spending also may be regulated by the Internal Revenue Code (tax law) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
|
Federal |
; Department of Labor (DOL) provides updated Consumer Price Index information to FEC for indexing contribution limits; Office of Government Ethics (OGE) personal financial disclosure reports for presidential and vice-presidential candidates are filed with the FEC and then transmitted to OGE for compliance review.
Campaign Finance Federal | Department of Justice (DOJ); FEC may make referrals | U.S. Constitution: 1st Amdt.; Election law (FECA): 52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146; Criminal law: 18 U.S.C. §§594-607, 610 | Other federal law/agencies relevant in some cases (e.g., tax, banking matters) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Disclosure of certain union financial activity |
Federal |
Campaign Finance Disclosure of certain State Department-nominee financial contributions Federal Nominees for "chief of mission, ambassador at large, or minister" are required to disclose to the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and to the Speaker of the House certain FECA campaign contributions made by themselves or specified family members Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Speaker of the House (see Notes column) 22 U.S.C. §3944(b)(3), relying on FECA contribution definition (52 U.S.C. §30101(8) The Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Speaker of the House receive disclosure reports, which nominees are responsible for filing. Campaign Finance Disclosure of certain union financial activity Federal | FEC; Department of Labor | Election law (FECA): 52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146; Labor law (Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, LMRDA): 29 U.S.C. §§401-531 | Campaign finance law regulates reporting for union electioneering communications, independent expenditures, and political action committees. See also Campaign Finance—Civil regulation, disclosure, and enforcement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Campaign Finance |
Federal |
Federal | FEC; Department of the Treasury (Treasury), Internal Revenue Service (IRS) | Tax law (Internal Revenue Code, IRC): 26 U.S.C. §§501(c)4-501(c)(6), 527; Election law (FECA): 52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Presidential inaugurations—fundraising disclosure |
Federal |
Federal law establishes disclosure requirements. |
FEC |
36 U.S.C. §510 |
— Campaign Finance Presidential inaugurations—fundraising disclosure Federal Federal law establishes disclosure requirements. FEC 36 U.S.C. §510 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Presidential public financing program |
Federal |
Campaign Finance Presidential public financing program Federal | FEC administers program; Treasury and IRS collect and disburse funds | Tax law (IRC): 26 U.S.C. §§9001-9042; Election law (FECA): 52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
— Campaign Finance |
Federal |
Federal | U.S. Office of Special Counsel; DOJ | Civil service/ethics law (Hatch Act): 5 U.S.C. §§7321-7326; Criminal law: 18 U.S.C. §§594-607, 610 | See also Election Administration—Voters—Prohibited influence on, coercion, etc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Regulating broadcast/digital political advertising |
Federal |
Campaign Finance Regulating broadcast/digital political advertising and certain other communications Federal | FEC; Federal Communications Commission (FCC) administers broadcaster disclosure | Election law (FECA): 52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146; Telecommunications law [broadcaster disclosure]: 47 U.S.C. §315 |
See also Campaign Finance—Telecommunications—broadcaster obligations, candidate access, and advertising rates. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Taxation of political committees |
Federal |
; on automated calls or texts that can be relevant for federal campaigns or elections: 47 U.S.C. §227
See also Campaign Finance—Telecommunications—broadcaster obligations, candidate access, and advertising rates. Campaign Finance Taxation of political committees Federal | Treasury, IRS | Tax law (IRC): 26 U.S.C. §527 | Separate provisions apply to politically active tax-exempt organizations (e.g., 501(c)(4)s). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Campaign Finance |
Campaign Finance |
Federal |
Federal |
FCC |
FCC | Campaign finance law (FECA) regulates disclaimer and disclosure requirements for certain political advertising. Congress amended some Title 47 provisions through the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA, which amended FECA). BCRA otherwise primarily amended campaign finance law. See also Campaign finance—civil regulation and enforcement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Ballots—mail provision and regulation |
Federal |
Election Administration Ballots—mail provision and regulation Federal | U.S. Postal Service (USPS) for civilian mail; Military Postal Service Agency (MPSA, DOD) for some military mail |
|
See also Election Administration—Ballots—preparing, counting, etc. On registration by mail, see the National Voter Registration Act, NVRA: 52 U.S.C. §§20501-20511, especially §20505). Election Administration Ballots—preparing, counting, etc. States — — — See also Election Administration—Ballots—mailing. Election Administration Ballots—providing absentee States | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Ballots—preparing, counting, etc. |
States |
— |
— |
— |
See also Election Administration—Ballots—mailing. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Ballots—providing absentee |
States |
Federal law mandates availability of absentee ballots to overseas civilians and military voters in federal elections. | Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP, Department of Defense); enforcement: DOJ | Criminal law: 18 U.S.C. §608; Election law (UOCAVA): 52 U.S.C. §§20301-20311 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Election administration—general |
States |
See also Ballots—mail provision and regulation. As of this writing, the Department of Defense is using a secondary Department of War designation, under Executive Order 14347 dated September 5, 2025. Election Administration Election administration—general States | U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) | U.S. Constitution: Art. I, §4, cl. 1 (time, place, and manner) and Art. II, §4, cl. 1 (presidential electors); Election law (Help America Vote Act; HAVA): 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145 | Related topics appear throughout the table. Functional responsibility for most election administration rests with states. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Election Administration |
States |
States |
EAC |
and assist in election administration
EAC |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
— Election Administration |
Federal |
Federal |
DOJ |
DOJ Criminal law: 18 U.S.C. §§592, 593, 596, 608 | Some states have assigned National Guard units to duties such as cybersecurity support for state election officials. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Setting election dates—general |
States |
Federal law establishes national election date for federal elections |
— |
U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, §4; 2 U.S.C. §7 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Setting election dates—primary |
States/state parties |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Voters—prohibited influence on, coercion, etc. |
Federal |
Election Administration Election-records retention States Federal law requires election "officers" to preserve certain election records and papers for 22 months after a general election or a federal primary election, and to provide to the Attorney General under specified circumstances. DOJ 52 U.S.C. §§20701-20706 Cited provisions to left are currently codified in Title 52 (election law); enacted in Civil Rights Act of 1960 (P.L. 86-449, Title III). Election Administration Election-records retention—registration States Federal law requires states to retain for at least two years, and to make publicly available, "all records concerning the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voters," with specified exceptions. DOJ Election law: (NVRA): 52 U.S.C. §§20501-20511; see especially §20507. — Election Administration Setting election dates—general States Federal law establishes national election date for federal elections — U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, §4; 2 U.S.C. §7 See 3 U.S.C. §1 on "time of appointing" presidential electors. Election Administration Setting election dates—primary States/state parties — — — — Election Administration Voters—prohibited influence on, coercion, etc. Federal | U.S. Office of Special Counsel; DOJ | Civil service/ethics (Hatch Act): 5 U.S.C. §§7321-7326; Criminal law: 18 U.S.C. §§594-607, 610 | See also Campaign Finance—prohibitions on federal personnel, on federal property, etc. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Voters—registration |
States |
Election Administration Voters—registration States | DOJ for civil enforcement | Election law (HAVA: 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145; NVRA: 52 U.S.C. §§20501-20511; UOCAVA: 52 U.S.C. §§20301-20311; VRA: 52 U.S.C. §§10101-10702) |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
See also Election Administration—records retention—registration. Election Administration |
States |
States | Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP, DOD); enforcement: DOJ | ; other federal agencies with covered UOCAVA personnel can assist FVAP with administering UOCAVA provisions Criminal law: 18 U.S.C. §608;
Election law (UOCAVA): 52 U.S.C. §§20301-20311 DOD compliance and assessments: 10 U.S.C. §1566; on polling places on military installations, see 10 U.S.C. §2670 See also Election Administration—Ballots—providing absentee. Election Administration Voting equipment—selecting States Federal law places certain conditions on states accepting HAVA grant funds for purchasing election equipment. EAC develops Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) and conducts testing and certification. EAC has primary responsibility for federal role; Department of Commerce (DOC), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Election law (HAVA): 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145 EAC and NIST share certification duties. Election Security Advisory on foreign counterintelligence and cybersecurity threats to U.S. federal election campaigns Federal Federal law requires a publicly available "advisory report," at least one year before a federal election, on counterintelligence and cybersecurity threats to U.S. campaigns and best practices for mitigation Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI); DHS; FBI 50 U.S.C. §3371(a) ODNI issues advisory in coordination with DHS Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis, and FBI Director. Election Security Assessments of foreign interference in U.S. elections Federal ODNI and Intelligence Community (IC) provide or contribute to relevant intelligence assessments and investigations; ODNI Foreign Malign Influence Center (FMIC) housed Election Threats Executive Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) 50 U.S.C. §3371(c); on FMIC: 50 U.S.C. §§3058-3059 See report text and cited CRS products regarding ODNI reorganization announced in August 2025, which affects FMIC. DNI may terminate FMIC effective 12/31/2028 at DNI discretion, pending congressional notification. Election Security Election systems and voting equipment— cybersecurity States |
See also Election Administration—Ballots—providing absentee. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Administration |
Voting equipment—selecting |
States |
Federal law places certain conditions on states accepting HAVA grant funds for purchasing election equipment (e.g., required replacement of punchcard or lever machines). |
EAC; Department of Commerce (DOC), National Institutes of Standards and Technology (NIST) |
Election law (HAVA): 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145 |
EAC and NIST share certification duties. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Security |
Election systems and voting equipment— cybersecurity |
States |
|
EAC; DOC, NIST; DHS; Criminal aspects: DOJ, FBI | Election law (HAVA): 52 U.S.C. §§20901-21145 DOD authority for including elections cyber vulnerabilities in certain exercises: 10 U.S.C. §2224 note [131 Stat. 1744] |
EAC provides grants and disseminates "best practice" information; DHS provides consultations and incident-response if invited; DHS responsible for "critical infrastructure" designation; some Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant programs have required allocations for election security. ODNI and IC agencies participate in assessments of foreign interference. Cybersecurity and law enforcement statutes that do not specifically address elections are also relevant. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Election Security |
Voting equipment—security |
States |
Election Security Voting equipment—security States | EAC; DOC, NIST; DHS; ODNI; IC agencies Criminal aspects: DOJ, FBI |
Election law (HAVA grants): 52 U.S.C. §20971 |
, U.S. Postal Inspection Service (USPIS, for election mail and political mail)
Election law (HAVA): See especially 52 U.S.C. §20971 See also Election systems and voting equipment—cybersecurity. Cybersecurity and law enforcement statutes that do not specifically address elections are also relevant. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
Other |
None (conducted by |
— |
— |
— |
— — — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
Nominating candidates |
Other Nominating candidates None (nongovt. function; conducted by political parties) — — — — Other Presidential candidates and nominating conventions—security Federal |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other |
Presidential candidates and nominating conventions—security |
Federal |
Federal law charges the U.S. Secret Service with protecting major presidential candidates, and with coordinating security for National Special Security Events, including presidential nominating conventions. | DHS, U.S. Secret Service | 6 U.S.C. §601(9); 18 U.S.C. §§871, 3056 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
Contested federal elections |
Federal [see Notes to right] |
The U.S. Constitution and federal law provide each chamber of Congress authority over deciding its own elections. |
Congressional elections: U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, §5; Presidential elections: U.S. Constitution, Art. 1I, §1; 12th Amdt.; 3 U.S.C. §5
|
House contests: Federal Contested Elections Act (FCEA): 2 U.S.C. §§381-396; Presidential contests: Electoral Counting Act (3 U.S.C. §§5; 15) |
Primary federal responsibility at left refers to final disposition. State law also might be relevant. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
House elections—certifying election results |
States |
House Clerk maintains roll of elected Members, as certified by states |
Clerk of the House |
U.S. Constitution, Art. 1 §5; 2 U.S.C. §26 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
House elections—filling House vacancies |
States |
U.S. Constitution requires popular elections to fill House vacancies |
— |
U.S. Constitution, Art., I §2 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
House elections—popular election and qualifications |
States |
U.S. Constitution requires popular elections for House Members and sets Representative qualifications |
— |
U.S. Constitution, Art., I §2; 2 U.S.C. §8 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
Presidential elections—popular election and qualifications |
States |
U.S. Constitution establishes electoral college and sets presidential and vice-presidential qualifications |
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) |
U.S. Constitution, Art. I1, §1; 12th Amdt.; 3 U.S.C. §§1-21. |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Qualifications and Contested Elections |
Senate elections—certifying election results |
States |
Senate Secretary maintains roll of elected Senators, as certified by states |
Secretary of the Senate |
— Other Required access for designated congressional observers in federal elections Federal Federal law requires states to provide specified access for designated House or Senate employees who are acting as congressional observers in federal elections. The chairs or ranking members of the Committee on House Administration, or of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, may designate observers. Election law (HAVA): 52 U.S.C. §21083a See also Voting Rights—Monitoring and observing U.S. elections. Other Notice of counterintelligence assessments concerning federal candidates Federal Provide specified notice to Congress within 15 days of "each counterintelligence assessment or investigation" involving a federal candidate or federal officeholder FBI 50 U.S.C. §3091 The Speaker of the House; the House Minority Leader; the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate, and the chairs and ranking members of the Committees on Intelligence and on the Judiciary receive reports, which the FBI Director is responsible for filing. Qualifications and Contested Elections Contested federal elections Federal [see Notes to right] The U.S. Constitution and federal law provide each chamber of Congress authority over deciding its own elections. Congressional elections: U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, §5; Presidential elections: U.S. Constitution, Art. 1I, §1; 12th Amdt.; 3 U.S.C. §5 House contests: Federal Contested Election Act (FCEA): 2 U.S.C. §§381-396; Presidential contests: Electoral Count Act (3 U.S.C. §§5; 15) Primary federal responsibility at left refers to final disposition. State law also might be relevant. Qualifications and Contested Elections House elections—compiling certified election results States House Clerk maintains roll of elected Members, as certified by states Clerk of the House U.S. Constitution, Art. 1 §5; 2 U.S.C. §26 See also House Rule II(2). Qualifications and Contested Elections House elections—filling House vacancies States U.S. Constitution requires popular elections to fill House vacancies — U.S. Constitution, Art., I §2 2 U.S.C. §8 specifies provisions for scheduling House special elections in "extraordinary circumstances" of more than 100 vacancies. Qualifications and Contested Elections House elections—popular election and qualifications States U.S. Constitution requires popular elections for House Members and sets Representative qualifications — U.S. Constitution, Art., I §2; 2 U.S.C. §8 — Qualifications and Contested Elections Presidential elections—popular election and qualifications States U.S. Constitution establishes electoral college and sets presidential and vice-presidential qualifications National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) U.S. Constitution, Art. I1, §1; 12th Amdt.; 3 U.S.C. §§1-21. — Qualifications and Contested Elections Senate elections—compiling certified election results States Senate Secretary maintains roll of elected Senators, as certified by states Secretary of the Senate Constitution, Art. 1, §5; 2 U.S.C. §§1a-1b See also Rule II, Standing Rules of the Senate |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifications and Contested Elections | Senate elections—filling Senate vacancies |
States |
States |
— |
— |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
— | Senate elections—popular election and qualifications |
States |
States |
— |
— |
Art. 1, Sec. 3 assigns Senator appointment to | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redistricting |
Reapportionment |
Federal |
Redistricting Reapportionment Federal | DOC, Census Bureau; Enforcement: DOJ |
U.S. Constitution: Art. I; 14th Amdt.; 2 U.S.C. § |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redistricting |
Redistricting |
States |
— Redistricting Redistricting States | DOC, Census Bureau; Enforcement: DOJ |
U.S. Constitution: Art. I; 14th Amdt.; 2 U.S.C. § |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Voting Rights |
Voter eligibility |
States |
— Voting Rights Voter eligibility States | Enforcement: DOJ ; federal law prohibits noncitizen ("alien") voting, with certain exceptions
Enforcement: DOJ | ; U.S. Commission on Civil Rights U.S. Constitution: Art. I and 14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th Amdts.; VRA: 52 U.S.C. §§10101-10702 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Voting Rights |
; on noncitizen ("alien") voting: 18 U.S.C. §611
— Voting Rights |
States |
States | to otherwise support voting access Research: EAC; Enforcement: DOJ; HAVA funding: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) | Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): 42 U.S.C. §§12101-12213; Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act (VAEHA): 52 U.S.C. §§20101-20107; VRA: 52 U.S.C. §§10101-10702; HAVA: 52 U.S.C. U.S.C. §§20901-21145 | The ADA does not appear to specifically address elections, but the ADA and accompanying regulations require accommodation in public services. See the "Americans with Disabilities Act" section for additional discussion. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Voting Rights |
Voting—discriminatory practices |
Federal |
Voting Rights Voting—discriminatory practices Federal | Enforcement: DOJ Participation research: DOC, Census Bureau | ; U.S. Commission on Civil Rights U.S. Constitution: Art. I and 14th, 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th Amdts.; VRA: 52 U.S.C. §§10101-10702 |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Voting Rights |
— Voting Rights |
Federal |
Federal | DOJ (monitors); Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (observers; trained in consultation with DOJ) | Election law (VRA): 52 U.S.C. §§10101-10702 | DOJ has determined that the Supreme Court's 2013 Shelby County v. Holder ruling limits some relevant VRA provisions. |
See also Other—Required access for designated congressional-election observers. Source: CRS analysis of cited statutes and as discussed in the text of this report.
Notes: The table includes functions that specifically affect campaigns or elections. Other agencies or provisions in law or regulation might be relevant in specific cases. For example, a campaign finance investigation might involve banking law, but because banking law is not central to campaign finance and election administration in the United States, it is excluded from the table. Litigation that is beyond the scope of this report affects some of the provisions listed in the table.
a. Cited constitutional and statutory provisions cover various aspects of campaigns or elections, not only those listed in the table. Title 52 citations reflect a 2014 "editorial reclassification" of federal election law, which changed previous locations in the U.S. Code. As the Office of Law Revision Counsel (the House office that maintains the U.S. Code) explains, "No statutory text is altered by such editorial reclassification projects, other than necessary updates to references to reflect the reorganization. Relevant provisions are merely transferred from one place to another in the Code." See U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Law Revision Counsel, "Editorial Reclassification," http://uscode.house.gov/editorialreclassification/reclassification.html.
b. For additional discussion of criminal law concerning campaign finance and elections generally, see Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, 8th edition, ed. Richard C. Pilger (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, 2017), https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download.
Author Contact Information
| 1. |
See, for example, Kyle Cheney and Ashley Gold, "Facebook Suspends 'Inauthentic' Accounts, Sees Russia Link," Politico, July 31, 2018, https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/31/facebook-suspends-inauthentic-propaganda-accounts-752615; Ellen Nakashima, "Pence Condemns Russian Election Interference," Washington Post, August 1, 2018, p. A14; and Remarks by Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Hudson Institute, Washington, DC, July 13, 2018, https://www.hudson.org/events/1576-dialogues-on-american-foreign-policy-and-world-affairs-director-of-national-intelligence-dan-coats-and-walter-russell-mead72018. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. |
Appendix B.
Executive Orders Substantially Related to Elections, 2020-2025
As discussed in the "Scope of the Report" section, this report does not substantially address executive orders (EOs) or other nonstatutory provisions that are subject to change even without amendments to federal law. Table B-1 below provides brief summary information regarding EOs issued since 2020 that contain provisions that could substantially affect the federal campaign finance, elections, or voting policy functions discussed in the body of this report. EO 14215, also discussed below, could specifically affect the FEC or other agencies, although that EO does not address campaign finance, elections, or voting policy issues discussed elsewhere in this report.176
Table B-1. Executive Orders Substantially Related to Elections Policy, 2020-2025
See also Table notes. Date Issued Issuing President Executive Order Number Executive Order Title Brief Summary Regarding Elections Issues 03/10/2021 Biden 14019 Promoting Access to Voting Note: Revoked by Executive Order 14148 (issued 01/20/2025) 03/28/2025 Trump 14248 Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections Source: Information in the table is based on CRS searches of GovInfo.gov for Federal Register executive orders issued between 2020 and 2025 citing "elections" or "voting." Notes: EOs listed in the table contain provisions that could (or did) substantially affect domestic campaign finance, elections, or voting policy. The table excludes EOs that appear to primarily emphasize other topics but that also mention elections topics (e.g., it excludes EOs imposing sanctions for foreign interference in U.S. elections or those revoking security clearances), or review of government contracts or access (see, for example, EOs 14024 (Biden), 14152 (Trump), and 14250 (Trump) respectively). The table does not address litigation affecting the executive orders. It also excludes commemorative proclamations (e.g., recognizing National Voter Registration Day) and executive orders related solely to foreign elections. A Note on the Executive Order 14215 Regarding Agency Rulemaking On February 18, 2025, President Trump issued EO 14215, stating various requirements for many federal agencies, specifically including the FEC.177 Although the order does not specifically address elections, it could affect elections-related rulemakings by the FEC or other agencies. Among other provisions, the EO requires agencies to submit "significant regulatory actions" to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for review, and declares that the President or the Attorney General "shall provide authoritative interpretations of law for the executive branch," including covered agencies.178 U.S. Code citations appear throughout this report. Title 52 citations reflect a 2014 "editorial reclassification" of federal election law. Some provisions noted in this report are now codified in Title 52 but were previously located in Titles 2 and 42 of the Code. On the old and new election-law citations, see U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Law Revision Counsel, "Editorial Reclassification, Title 52, U.S. Code," http://uscode.house.gov/editorialreclassification/t52/index.html. As the Office of Law Revision Counsel (the House office that maintains the U.S. Code) explains, "No statutory text is altered by such editorial reclassification projects, other than necessary updates to references to reflect the reorganization. Relevant provisions are merely transferred from one place to another in the Code." See U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Law Revision Counsel, "Editorial Reclassification," http://uscode.house.gov/editorialreclassification/reclassification.html. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. |
On the old and new election-law citations, see U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Law Revision Counsel, "Editorial Reclassification, Title 52, U.S. Code," http://uscode.house.gov/editorialreclassification/t52/index.html. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. |
See U.S. House of Representatives, Office of Law Revision Counsel, "Editorial Reclassification," http://uscode.house.gov/editorialreclassification/reclassification.html. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. | House Publishers, 1996), pp. 76-104.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. | WMR10006, CRS Guide to Presidential Transitions, by Maeve P. Carey et al.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Even the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9. |
CRS Report RL30747, Congressional Authority to Direct How States Administer Elections, by Kenneth R. Thomas. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10. |
The CRS Appropriations Status Table provides links to other CRS products on appropriations legislation. See CRS, "Appropriations Status Table," https://www.crs.gov/AppropriationsStatusTable/Index. On agency roles and voter registration, such as via executive order, see CRS Insight IN11782, Voter Registration Agencies Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), by Sarah J. Eckman. For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS In Focus IF12453, H.R. 4563, the American Confidence in Elections Act (ACE Act): Legal Background, by L. Paige Whitaker; CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11244, Election 2024: Recent Court Rulings on Voting and Counting Ballots, by L. Paige Whitaker; and Congressional Research Service, "ArtI.S4.C1.2 States and Elections Clause," Constitution Annotated, https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S4-C1-2/ALDE_00013577/. Additional detail about policy or agency changes, including some discussion of elections issues, appears in other CRS products cited throughout the report. See, for example, CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11368, Executive Order on Elections: Legal Background and Court Challenges, by Jimmy Balser and L. Paige Whitaker. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See 52 U.S.C. §30101(4). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
These are "electioneering communications." See 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(3). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13. |
The general discussion contained in this report applies to states and territories. Specific statutes vary in their applicability to territories. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14. |
This report uses the term "states" for general discussion purposes to apply to states, territories, and the District of Columbia (DC). Specific statutes vary in their applicability to states, territories, and DC. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15. |
For additional discussion of voter identification, see CRS Report R42806, State Voter Identification Requirements: Analysis, Legal Issues, and Policy Considerations, by Eric A. Fischer, R. Sam Garrett, and L. Paige Whitaker. Now-retired CRS analyst Kevin J. Coleman originally coauthored the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 16. |
For additional discussion of constitutional provisions, see CRS Report RL30747, Congressional Authority to Direct How States Administer Elections, by Kenneth R. Thomas. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17. | For UOCAVA purposes, the Space Force was included in the uniformed service definition in a 2021 rulemaking. See Department of Defense, "Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP)," 86 Federal Register 70746-707748, December 13, 2021.
For example, state voter-eligibility determinations must be consistent with federal law, such as the Voting Rights Act. For additional discussion, see CRS Report R45549, The State and Local Role in Election Administration: Duties and Structures, by Karen L. Shanton. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18. | How Are They Filled?, by Sarah J. Eckman.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Const., Art. II, §1. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
In a preparty era, the first- and second-place finishers were elected as President and Vice President, respectively. Party tickets made this arrangement unworkable, as evident in the 1800 presidential election. The states ratified the amendment in 1804. For additional discussion, see, for example, archived CRS Report RL32611, The Electoral College: How It Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections, by Thomas H. Neale | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 U.S.C. §§30101-30146. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional historical discussion, see CRS Report R41542, The State of Campaign Finance Policy: Recent Developments and Issues for Congress, by R. Sam Garrett. As originally enacted, FECA subsumed previous campaign finance statutes, such as the 1925 Corrupt Practices Act, which, by the 1970s, were largely regarded as ineffective, antiquated, or both. The Corrupt Practices Act, which FECA generally supersedes, is 43 Stat. 1070. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23. |
CRS Report R45160, Federal Election Commission: Membership and Policymaking Quorum, In Brief, by R. Sam Garrett. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Soft money" in this context refers to unlimited contributions, especially to political parties, to support the party generally but not specifically to affect elections. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
See 52 U.S.C. §30104(f)(3). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
On selected campaign finance litigation, see CRS Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27. | Law: An Analysis of Key Issues, Recent Developments, and Constitutional Considerations for Legislation, by L. Paige Whitaker; and CRS Infographic IG10054, Campaign Finance Law and the U.S. Supreme Court, by L. Paige Whitaker.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional discussion, see CRS Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 29. |
§101 of the act assigned the General Services Administration (GSA) with disbursing payments to states until the EAC was operational. See 52 U.S.C. §20901(a). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30. | of 2002 (HAVA): Overview and Ongoing Role in Election Administration Policy, by Karen L. Shanton.
For additional discussion, see CRS Report R45770, The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC): Overview and Selected Issues for Congress, by Karen L. Shanton; and CRS In Focus IF10981, The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC): An Overview, by Karen L. Shanton. Section 101 of the act assigned the General Services Administration (GSA) with disbursing payments to states until the EAC was operational. See 52 U.S.C. §20901(a). As noted below, HAVA also assigns some grant-administration responsibilities to the Department of Health and Human Services. For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report R47592, Federal Standards and Guidelines for Voting Systems: Overview and Potential Considerations for Congress, by Karen L. Shanton; and CRS Report WPD00099, Elections Podcast: Federal Standards and Guidelines for Voting Systems, by Karen L. Shanton. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31. | on the registration form and required reporting to Congress.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32. | ; and U.S. Election Assistance Commission, "Charter of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Standards Board," April 11, 2025, https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/Charter_EAC_Standards_Board_2025.pdf.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 33. | ; and U.S. Election Assistance Commission, "Charter of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Board of Advisors," April 11, 2025, https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/Charter_EAC_Board_of_Advisors_2025.pdf.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34. |
As enacted, see P.L. 103-31. NVRA is currently codified at 52 U.S.C. §§20501-20511. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35. | ; and U.S. Election Assistance Commission, "Charter of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission Technical Guidelines Development Committee," April 11, 2025, https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/Charter_EAC_Technical_Guidelines_Development_Committee_2025.pdf.
See, for example, 52 U.S.C. §21111. On certain state-based administrative grievance procedures, see 52 U.S.C. §21112. As enacted, see P.L. 118-106; 138 Stat. 1591. As currently codified, see 52 U.S.C. §21083a. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 36. | On agency roles and voter registration, such as via executive order, see CRS Insight IN11782, Voter Registration Agencies Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), by Sarah J. Eckman.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 U.S.C. §20509. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional discussion, see CRS | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 39. |
52 U.S.C. §§20301-20311. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40. |
For the enacted version, see P.L. 111-84. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 41. | In Focus IF11642, Absentee Voting for Uniformed Services and Overseas Citizens: Roles and Process, In Brief, by R. Sam Garrett; and Donald S. Inbody, The Soldier Vote: War, Politics, and the Ballot in America (Palgrave, 2016).
52 U.S.C. §§20301-20311. For the enacted version, see P.L. 111-84. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 42. |
24 Stat. 373; on a certification deadline (six days before the joint session) for "conclusive" state votes in electoral college contests, see 3 U.S.C. §5. For additional discussion, see CRS Legal Sidebar WSLG1650, How Can the Results of a Presidential Election Be Contested?, by L. Paige Whitaker (out of print but available to congressional clients upon request). See also CRS Report RL32717, Counting Electoral Votes: An Overview of Procedures at the Joint Session, Including Objections by Members of Congress, coordinated by Elizabeth Rybicki and L. Paige Whitaker; and CRS Report RL32611, The Electoral College: How It Works in Contemporary Presidential Elections, by Thomas H. Neale. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 43. |
For additional discussion, see CRS Report R44648, Presidential Elections: Vacancies in Major-Party Candidacies and the Position of President-Elect, by Thomas H. Neale; CRS Report RL32695, Election of the President and Vice President by Congress: Contingent Election, by Thomas H. Neale; CRS Report RS20260, Presidential Disability: An Overview, by Thomas H. Neale; and CRS Report RL33780, Procedures for Contested Election Cases in the House of Representatives, by L. Paige Whitaker. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 44. |
2 U.S.C. §§381-396. For additional discussion, see CRS Report RL33780, Procedures for Contested Election Cases in the House of Representatives, by L. Paige Whitaker. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 45. |
As enacted, see P.L. 91-138. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 46. |
As enacted, see P.L. 101-336. As currently codified, see 42 U.S.C. §§12101-12213. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 47. |
See 28 C.F.R. §§35.101-35.190. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48. | The Space Force was included in the uniformed service definition in a 2021 rulemaking. See Department of Defense, "Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP)," 86 Federal Register 70746-707748, December 13, 2021.
See Executive Order 14347, "Restoring the United States Department of War," 90 Federal Register 173, September 10, 2025. Other federal agencies have responsibility for administering provisions regarding their employees or dependents (e.g., military services conducting outreach to uniformed services members and families, and civilian federal agencies with overseas employees or family members). On voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, "Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers," https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. See 24 Stat. 373 on the ECA; and P.L. 117-328, Division P, Title I, on the ECRA. For additional discussion, see CRS In Focus IF12682, Electoral College Overview, by R. Sam Garrett; and CRS Report R48309, Joint Session of Congress for Counting Electoral Votes for President, by Elizabeth Rybicki, L. Paige Whitaker, and R. Sam Garrett. 2 U.S.C. §§381-396. For additional discussion, see CRS In Focus IF11734, The Federal Contested Election Act: Overview and Recent Contests in the House of Representatives, by R. Sam Garrett, L. Paige Whitaker, and Christopher M. Davis. CRS Report RL33780, Procedures for Contested Election Cases in the House of Representatives, by L. Paige Whitaker. As enacted, see P.L. 91-138. As enacted, see P.L. 101-336. As currently codified, see 42 U.S.C. §§12101-12213. See 42 U.S.C. §12101(a)(3). See 28 C.F.R. §§35.101-35.190. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
As enacted, see P.L. 98-435. As currently codified, see 52 U.S.C. §§20101-20107. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As defined in the act, this is persons age 65 or older. See 52 U.S.C. §20107(2). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
As enacted, see P.L. 89-110. The VRA is currently codified at 52 U.S.C. §§10101-10702. For historical background, see | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52. | CRS Report R47520, The Voting Rights Act: Historical Development and Policy Background, by R. Sam Garrett. See also CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10624, Voting Rights Act: Supreme Court Provides "Guideposts" for Determining Violations of Section 2 in Brnovich v. DNC, by L. Paige Whitaker; and CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10771, Voting Rights Act: Section 3(c) "Bail-In" Provision, by L. Paige Whitaker.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53. | Section 4 of the VRA. For historical background, see CRS Report R47520, The Voting Rights Act: Historical Development and Policy Background, by R. Sam Garrett.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54. |
See 2 U.S.C. §2; and 13 U.S.C. §141. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55. | .
See 2 U.S.C. §§2a-2c; and 13 U.S.C. §141. See also CRS In Focus IF13082, Mid-Decade Congressional Redistricting: Key Issues, by Sarah J. Eckman and L. Paige Whitaker. For additional discussion, including historical discussion regarding statutory provisions regarding reapportionment and redistricting, see CRS In Focus IF12567, Election Policy Fundamentals: Single-Member House Districts, by Sarah J. Eckman and Tyler L. Wolanin; and CRS Insight IN11618, Congressional Redistricting Criteria and Considerations, by Sarah J. Eckman. See also CRS In Focus IF12250, Congressional Redistricting: Key Legal and Policy Issues, by L. Paige Whitaker and Sarah J. Eckman. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional detail, see Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, 8th edition, ed. Richard C. Pilger ( | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57. |
18 U.S.C. §3056. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 58. | See also CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11125, Overview of Federal Criminal Laws Prohibiting Interference with Voting, by Jimmy Balser.
18 U.S.C. §3056. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 59. |
52 U.S.C. §20511(2). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60. |
See, for example, 18 U.S.C. §595. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 61. | For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Legal Sidebar LSB10781, Overview of Federal Criminal Laws Prohibiting Threats and Harassment of Election Workers, by Jimmy Balser.
52 U.S.C. §20511(2). See, for example, 18 U.S.C. §595. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 U.S.C. §611. As enacted, see P.L. 104-208, §216; 110 Stat. 3009-572. Discussion of the distinction between "citizens" and "aliens" in federal law is beyond the scope of this report. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 63. |
18 U.S.C. §610. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 64. | See also CRS In Focus IF12742, Federal Criminal Laws Prohibiting Unlawful Voting, by Jimmy Balser.
18 U.S.C. §610. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See 26 U.S.C. §§9001-9042. 26 U.S.C. §527. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 66. |
26 U.S.C. §527. For additional discussion, see CRS Report RS21716, Political Organizations Under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, by Erika K. Lunder. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67. |
26 U.S.C. §§501(c)4-501(c)(6). For additional discussion, see CRS Report R40183, 501(c)(4)s and Campaign Activity: Analysis Under Tax and Campaign Finance Laws, by Erika K. Lunder and L. Paige Whitaker. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68. | This includes disclaimers, which announce purchaser (e.g., candidate) responsibility for an advertisement, and disclosures, which refer to public reporting of financial transactions to purchase advertising. Some provisions also appear in telecommunications law. See 47 U.S.C. §§315, 317. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69. |
47 U.S.C. §315(b). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70. |
47 U.S.C. §315(e). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71. |
See, for example, CRS Report R44847, Selected Homeland Security Issues in the 115th Congress, by William L. Painter; CRS Report R42114, Federal Laws Relating to Cybersecurity: Overview of Major Issues, Current Laws, and Proposed Legislation, by Eric A. Fischer; and CRS In Focus IF10683, DHS's Cybersecurity Mission—An Overview, by Chris Jaikaran. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72. |
See CRS In Focus IF10677, The Designation of Election Systems as Critical Infrastructure, by Eric A. Fischer. On critical infrastructure generally, see 42 U.S.C. §5295(c). On cybersecurity generally, see 6 U.S.C. §§1501-1533. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73. |
For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report R46516, Identifying TV Political and Issue Ad Sponsors in the Digital Age, by Dana A. Scherer. 47 U.S.C. §315(b). 47 U.S.C. §315(e). For additional discussion, see, for example CRS Report R46311, Federal Communications Commission: Progress Protecting Consumers from Illegal Robocalls, by Patricia Moloney Figliola; and Federal Communications Commission, "Political Campaign Robocalls and Robotext Rules," updated March 5, 2025, https://www.fcc.gov/rules-political-campaign-calls-and-texts. On automated calls generally, see 47 U.S.C. §227. As enacted, the TCPA is P.L. 102-243. See, for example, CRS In Focus IF10677, The Designation of Election Systems as Critical Infrastructure, by Brian E. Humphreys and CRS In Focus IF11445, The Election Infrastructure Subsector: Development and Challenges, by Brian E. Humphreys and Karen L. Shanton.; and CRS In Focus IF10683, DHS's Cybersecurity Mission—An Overview, by Chris Jaikaran. See, for example, CRS In Focus IF10677, The Designation of Election Systems as Critical Infrastructure, by Brian E. Humphreys and CRS In Focus IF11445, The Election Infrastructure Subsector: Development and Challenges, by Brian E. Humphreys and Karen L. Shanton. On critical infrastructure generally, see 42 U.S.C. §5295(c). On cybersecurity generally, see 6 U.S.C. §§1501-1533. 50 U.S.C. §3371. Some of those requirements are similar to language that also appears in executive orders noted elsewhere in this report. 50 U.S.C. §3091. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 74. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86.
|
| 52 U.S.C. §30114(c). As enacted, HLOGA is P.L. 110-81. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 76. |
On place-of-filing requirements for Senate political committees, see 52 U.S.C. §30102(g). On electronic filing for non-Senate political committees, see 52 U.S.C. §30104(a)(11)(A)(i). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report RL30764, Enforcement of Congressional Rules of Conduct: A Historical Overview, by Jacob R. Straus | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
For example, some National Science Foundation (NSF) funding For additional discussion, see CRS Report R45770, The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC): Overview and Selected Issues for Congress, by Karen L. Shanton; and CRS In Focus IF10981, The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC): An Overview, by Karen L. Shanton. The General Services Administration (GSA) administered the vote.gov website (and a predecessor with a different URL) beginning in October 2015. See U.S. General Services Administration, "USA.Gov Launches vote.USA.gov to Help Citizens Register to Vote," blog post, October 2, 2015, https://blog.usa.gov/usa-gov-launches-vote-usa-gov-to-help-citizens-register-to-vote. The EAC 2024 Annual Report explains that "The [GSA and the EAC] laid the groundwork to transition the management of vote.gov to the EAC, which will continue in 2025." See U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 2024 Annual Report, https://www.eac.gov/sites/default/files/2025-01/EAC_2024_Annual_Report_FINAL_508c.pdf, p. 10. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 82. | For additional information on EIS-GCC membership and roles, see, for example, Election Infrastructure Subsector, Government Coordinating Council, Charter, August 30, 2023, https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/2023-11/GF-EIS-GCC-Charter-2023_1.pdf. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 84. |
13 U.S.C. §141. For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report R44788, The Decennial Census: Issues for 2020, by Jennifer D. Williams. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85. |
On this provision, see 52 U.S.C. §10507. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86. | On the FEC-DOJ relationship on enforcement matters, see Federal Election Commission, "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Enforcement of Federal Campaign Finance Laws," 88 Federal Register 24986-24989, April 25, 2023. For analyses that predate the 2023 MOU but that may contain relevant historical context or additional agency information, see U.S. Government Accountability Office, Campaign Finance: Federal Framework, Agency Roles and Responsibilities, and Perspectives, GAO-20-66R, February 3, 2020, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-66r; and Office of Inspector General, Federal Election Commission, Special Review of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) related to non-Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) law enforcement inquiries, Special Review 22-03, February 8, 2023, https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/OIG-SR-22-03-Final.pdf.
Presidential and vice-presidential candidates file annual personal financial disclosure reports (OGE Form 278 (or 278e)) with the FEC. The FEC then transmits the forms to the Office of Government Ethics for compliance review. 13 U.S.C. §141. For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Insight IN12403, Decennial Census and Apportionment: Frequently Asked Questions, by Sarah J. Eckman, Taylor R. Knoedl, and Mainon A. Schwartz. See also CRS In Focus IF13082, Mid-Decade Congressional Redistricting: Key Issues, by Sarah J. Eckman and L. Paige Whitaker. On this provision, see 52 U.S.C. §10507. See Executive Order 14347, "Restoring the United States Department of War," 90 Federal Register 173, September 10, 2025. See 52 U.S.C. §20961(c)(1) on the NIST director as TGDC chair. On the TGDC and its duties, see 52 U.S.C. §20961 generally. On advisory bodies established in HAVA, see, for example, CRS Report R46949, The Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA): Overview and Ongoing Role in Election Administration Policy, by Karen L. Shanton. See also CRS Report R45770, The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC): Overview and Selected Issues for Congress, by Karen L. Shanton. See Executive Order 14347, "Restoring the United States Department of War," 90 Federal Register 173, September 10, 2025. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 87. | On "troops at the polls" prohibitions, see, for example, 18 U.S.C. §§592, 593, 596, 608. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 88. |
52 U.S.C. §20944(14). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 89. |
See, for example, Ellen Nakashima, "Agencies to Watch for Interference in Midterm Elections," Washington Post, July 18, 2018, p. A9. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 90. |
See §1638 in the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA); P.L. 115-91. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 91. | On voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, "Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers," https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. In addition to UOCAVA provisions codified in Title 52 of the U.S. Code and cited elsewhere in this report, see 10 U.S.C. §1566 on Secretary of Defense responsibilities for ensuring that military services meet compliance and reporting obligations. On service-specific voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, "Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers," https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. 52 U.S.C. §20944(14). See, for example, discussion of memoranda of understanding between FVAP and other agencies in Department of Defense, "Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP)," 86 Federal Register 70746-707748, December 13, 2021. Some U.S. efforts to counter foreign influence in U.S. elections might involve operations in the information environment (or "information operations"). These topics are beyond the scope of this report. For additional information, see, for example, CRS In Focus IF10771, Defense Primer: Operations in the Information Environment, by Catherine A. Theohary. See Section 1638 in the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA); P.L. 115-91. For additional discussion, see CRS Report R46646, Election Administration: Federal Grant Programs for States and Localities, by Karen L. Shanton. On voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, "Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers," https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. For general discussion of the DHS role in election security in 2020 and 2024, see, for example, Office of Inspector General, DHS Improved Election Infrastructure Security, but Its Role in Countering Disinformation Has Been Reduced, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, OIG-24-52, September 17, 2024, pp. 1-4, https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2024-09/OIG-24-52-Sep24.pdf. Separately, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), a DHS agency, also often provides assistance to election jurisdictions affected by natural disasters, although these are not FEMA roles specifically related to elections. See, for example, CRS Report R46455, COVID-19 and Other Election Emergencies: Frequently Asked Questions and Recent Policy Developments, coordinated by R. Sam Garrett. See also, for example, Election Assistance Commission, "Disaster Recovery & Response," October 25, 2024, https://www.eac.gov/recovery. For discussion of FEMA roles in disaster recovery generally, see, for example, CRS Report R41981, Congressional Primer on Responding to and Recovering from Major Disasters and Emergencies, by Elizabeth M. Webster and Bruce R. Lindsay. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 92. |
Funds for this purpose were most recently appropriated in FY2010 and FY2012. For additional discussion, see Table 2 in CRS Report RS20898, The Help America Vote Act and Election Administration: Overview and Selected Issues for the 2016 Election, by Arthur L. Burris and Eric A. Fischer. Now-retired CRS analyst Kevin J. Coleman originally coauthored the report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 93. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 94. | Brian E. Humphreys, and CRS In Focus IF11445, The Election Infrastructure Subsector: Development and Challenges, by Brian E. Humphreys and Karen L. Shanton.
Specifically, the designation refers to "election infrastructure" as "storage facilities, polling places, and centralized vote tabulations locations used to support the election process, and information and communications technology to include voter registration databases, voting machines, and other systems to manage the election process and report and display results on behalf of state and local governments." See U.S. Department of Homeland Security, "Statement by Secretary Jeh Johnson on the Designation of Election Infrastructure as a Critical Infrastructure Subsector," press release, January 6, 2017, https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2017/01/06/statement-secretary-johnson-designation-election-infrastructure-critical. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional information on DHS's cybersecurity role, see CRS In Focus IF10683, DHS's Cybersecurity Mission—An Overview, by Chris Jaikaran. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 96. | On the CISA role in the critical infrastructure community generally, see CRS In Focus IF12061, Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience: Countering Russian and Other Nation-State Cyber Threats, by Brian E. Humphreys. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 97. |
For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report RL34603, The U.S. Secret Service: History and Missions, by Shawn Reese; and CRS In Focus IF10130, U.S. Secret Service Protection, by Shawn Reese. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 98. |
CRS Report R43522, National Special Security Events: Fact Sheet, by Shawn Reese. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 99. |
52 U.S.C. §20307. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 100. |
52 U.S.C. §§20944(12)-20944(13). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 101. |
A January 2017 executive order assigns the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, and Attorney General with identifying foreign actors responsible for election interference. See Executive Order 13757, "Taking Additional Steps to Address the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities," 82 Federal Register 1-3, January 3, 2017. See also, for example, Executive Order 13848, "Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Events of Foreign Interference in a United States Election," 83 Federal Register 46843-46848, September 14, 2018, which includes discussion of various agency roles for the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice, State, and Treasury, and the ODNI, that could inform imposing sanctions. The federal role in administering sanctions, including those related to election interference, is otherwise beyond the scope of this report. 50 U.S.C. §3371(a). For additional discussion, see, for example CRS Report R48138, Legislative Evolution of U.S. Secret Service, by Shawn Reese; CRS In Focus IF11732, U.S. Secret Service: Threats to and Assaults on Sitting Presidents and Vice Presidents, by Shawn Reese; and CRS Report R47731, Who Protects Whom? Federal Official and Judicial Security and Personal Protective Details, by Shawn Reese. On use of campaign funds for security purposes, see CRS Insight IN12581, Campaign Finance Policy and Campaign Security, by R. Sam Garrett. On violence against Members of Congress more generally, see CRS Report R41609, Violence Against Members of Congress and Their Staff: Selected Examples and Congressional Responses, by R. Eric Petersen and Jennifer E. Manning. See CRS Report R47439, Special Event Security and National Special Security Events: A Summary and Issues for Congressional Consideration, by Shawn Reese. On service-specific voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, "Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers," https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. See also Department of Defense, "Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP)," 86 Federal Register 70746-707748, December 13, 2021. For additional discussion, see, for example, Colin Wood, "CISA Says It's Not Abandoning the States. Cyber Officials Aren't So Sure," Statescoop, August 11, 2025, https://statescoop.com/cisa-state-local-cyber-ms-isac-2025/. Whether on civil or criminal election matters, various federal agencies could collaborate on enforcement actions or investigations. For example, on reported 2025 information-sharing between DOJ and DHS, see Sarah N. Lynch, "US Justice Dept Considers Handing Over Voter Roll Data for Criminal Probes, Documents Show," Reuters, September 9, 2025, https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-justice-dept-considers-handing-over-voter-roll-data-criminal-probes-documents-2025-09-09/. On the FEC-DOJ relationship on campaign finance enforcement matters, see Federal Election Commission, "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding the Enforcement of Federal Campaign Finance Laws," 88 Federal Register 24986-24989, April 25, 2023. For analyses that predate the 2023 MOU but that may contain relevant historical context or additional agency information, see U.S. Government Accountability Office, Campaign Finance: Federal Framework, Agency Roles and Responsibilities, and Perspectives, GAO-20-66R, February 3, 2020, https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-20-66r; and Office of Inspector General, Federal Election Commission, Special Review of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) related to non-Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) law enforcement inquiries, Special Review 22-03, February 8, 2023, https://www.fec.gov/resources/cms-content/documents/OIG-SR-22-03-Final.pdf. 52 U.S.C. §§20944(12)-20944(13). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 102. | 50 U.S.C. §3771. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 103. | (Bondi) for all departmental employees, "General Policy Regarding Charging, Plea Negotiations, and Sentencing," February 5, 2025, https://www.justice.gov/ag/media/1388541/dl.
See, for example, Derek B. Johnson, "DOJ Disbands Foreign Influence Task Force, Limits Scope of FARA Prosecutions," Cyberscoop, February 6, 2025, https://cyberscoop.com/doj-disbands-foreign-influence-task-force/. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 104. | 52 U.S.C. §30116(c). On voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers, https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 105. | A memorandum of understanding between FVAP and MARAD addresses the relationship between the two agencies. See Department of Defense, "Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP)," 86 Federal Register 70746-707748, December 13, 2021. See also 32 C.F.R. §233.1. MARAD also provides brief UOCAVA information on its website, https://www.maritime.dot.gov/outreach/mariners. On voting assistance plans and resources, see Federal Voting Assistance Program, "Directives and Guidance for Voting Assistance Officers," https://www.fvap.gov/vao/directives. 14 C.F.R. §374a. In March 2024, DOT invited public comments on the "continuing need and usefulness" of the reporting requirement. See U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, "Agency Information Collection; Activity Under OMB Review; Report of Extension of Credit to Political Candidates—Form 183," 89 Federal Register 19638, March 19, 2024. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 106. | For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS Report R41604, Proposals to Eliminate Public Financing of Presidential Campaigns, by R. Sam Garrett. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 107. |
For discussion of FINCEN generally, see, for example CRS Report R47255, The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN): Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 Implementation and Beyond, by Liana W. Rosen and Rena S. Miller. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 108. |
47 U.S.C. §§315; 317. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 109. | On the FCC generally, see, for example, CRS Report R45699, The Federal Communications Commission: Structure, Operations, and Budget, by Patricia Moloney Figliola. 47 U.S.C. §§315; 317. See also, for example, CRS Report R46516, Identifying TV Political and Issue Ad Sponsors in the Digital Age, by Dana A. Scherer. For additional discussion, see, for example CRS Report R46311, Federal Communications Commission: Progress Protecting Consumers from Illegal Robocalls, by Patricia Moloney Figliola; and Federal Communications Commission, "Political Campaign Robocalls and Robotext Rules," updated March 5, 2025, https://www.fcc.gov/rules-political-campaign-calls-and-texts. On automated calls generally, see 47 U.S.C. §227. As enacted, the TCPA is P.L. 102-243. Reports of foreign interference in the 2016 election cycle increased federal attention to intelligence and security concerns that were not previously a major part of American campaigns or election administration. On January 6, 2017, the ODNI released a declassified version of an Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) containing information and analysis from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), FBI, and National Security Agency (NSA) regarding their assessment of Russian attempts to influence 2016-cycle U.S. elections. That assessment generated substantial congressional oversight concerning election security. See, for example, U.S. Congress, Senate Intelligence (Select) Committee, Russian Active Measures Campaigns and Interference in the 2016 U.S. Election, report, volumes I-V, 116th Cong., 2nd sess., November 10, 2020, S.Rept. 116-290 (GPO, 2020). This CRS report does not otherwise address the specifics of this or other election-related ICAs. 50 U.S.C. §3371(c). The statutory language is similar to a requirement from a 2018 executive order. See Executive Order 13848, "Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Events of Foreign Interference in a United States Election," 83 Federal Register 46843-46848, September 14, 2018. 50 U.S.C. §3371(c). 50 U.S.C. §3371(a). See also the "Department of Justice" and "Department of State" sections of this report. As enacted, see P.L. 116-92, §5322; as codified, see 50 U.S.C. §3059. For additional discussion, see CRS In Focus IF12470, The Intelligence Community's Foreign Malign Influence Center, by Michael E. DeVine; and CRS In Focus IF10470, The Director of National Intelligence (DNI), by Michael E. DeVine. See Office of the Director of National Intelligence, National Counterterrorism Center, "Organization," https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/organization/340-about/organization/foreign-malign-influence-center. The DNI may terminate the FMIC in 2028, pending congressional notification. For additional discussion, see CRS In Focus IF12470, The Intelligence Community's Foreign Malign Influence Center, by Michael E. DeVine. On FMIC establishment as enacted, see P.L. 116-92, §5322; as codified, see 50 U.S.C. §3059. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 110. |
Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Background to "Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections": The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution, ICA 2017-01D, January 6, 2017, p. i, https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf. The quoted material omits periods in "U.S." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 111. |
Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Background to "Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections": The Analytic Process and Cyber Incident Attribution, ICA 2017-01D, January 6, 2017, https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf. For additional CRS discussion of these activities as a component of Russian foreign policy, a topic that is beyond the scope of this report, see, for example, CRS Report R44775, Russia: Background and U.S. Policy, by Cory Welt. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 112. |
Recent reports suggest that attempts to interfere with the 2018 election cycle also are under way. See, for example, Kyle Cheney and Ashley Gold, "Facebook Suspends 'Inauthentic' Accounts, Sees Russia Link," Politico, July 31, 2018, https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/31/facebook-suspends-inauthentic-propaganda-accounts-752615; and Remarks by Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats, Hudson Institute, Washington, DC, July 13, 2018, https://www.hudson.org/events/1576-dialogues-on-american-foreign-policy-and-world-affairs-director-of-national-intelligence-dan-coats-and-walter-russell-mead72018. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 113. | The Administrator of General Services and the Secretary of State previously exercised these duties. Congress transferred these duties to the Archivist (NARA) in 1984. As currently codified, see 3 U.S.C. §6. On the 1984 transfer as enacted, see P.L. 98-497. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For additional discussion on electoral college procedure, see CRS Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 115. |
52 U.S.C. §10305. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 116. | R48309, Joint Session of Congress for Counting Electoral Votes for President, by Elizabeth Rybicki, L. Paige Whitaker, and R. Sam Garrett. See also CRS In Focus IF12682, Electoral College Overview, by R. Sam Garrett.
For additional discussion of OGE, see CRS In Focus IF10634, Office of Government Ethics: A Primer, by Jacob R. Straus; and CRS In Focus IF12019, Executive Branch Ethics and Financial Disclosure Administration: The Role of Designated Agency Ethics Officials (DAEOs), by Jacob R. Straus. 52 U.S.C. §10305. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
The board is formally known as the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board. See 29 U.S.C. §792. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The entire federal membership of the Access Board is not reflected in this report. For additional information, see U.S. Access Board, "Access Board Members," https://www.access-board.gov/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
See 52 U.S.C. §20944(11) and 52 U.S.C. §20961(c)(1)(iii), respectively. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 U.S.C. §1975a. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 U.S.C. §10507. The requirement also applies to "covered jurisdictions" established by the act and based on Census Bureau data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
52 U.S.C. §20944(10). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 123. |
See, for example, 52 U.S.C. §30110. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 124. |
See, for example. U.S. Postal Service, 2024 Post-Election Analysis Report, https://about.usps.com/what/government-services/election-mail/pdf/usps-post-election-report-2024-12-02.pdf. See, for example, U.S. Postal Inspection Service, "Election Mail Security," https://www.uspis.gov/election-mail-security. See, for example, 52 U.S.C. §30110. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
See, for example, 52 U.S.C. §10305. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 126. |
For additional discussion, see, for example, CRS In Focus IF10159, Cybersecurity, by Eric A. Fischer and Catherine A. Theohary; CRS Report R45142, Information Warfare: Issues for Congress, by Catherine A. Theohary; and CRS Report R43719, Campaign Finance: Constitutionality of Limits on Contributions and Expenditures, by L. Paige Whitaker. |
This Appendix excludes EOs that cite campaign finance, elections, or voting issues but that appear to primarily emphasize other topics (e.g., EOs imposing sanctions for foreign interference in U.S. elections or those revoking security clearances, or review of government contracts or access (see, for example, EOs 14024 (Biden), 14152 (Trump), and 14250 (Trump) respectively). The table does not address litigation affecting the executive orders. It also excludes commemorative proclamations (e.g., recognizing National Voter Registration Day) and executive orders related solely to foreign elections.
See Executive Order 14215, "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies," 90 Federal Register 10447, February 24, 2025. On inclusion of the FEC, see p. 10448.
See Executive Order 14215, "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies," pp. 10448-10449. On the rulemaking process generally, see, for example, CRS Report RL32240, The Federal Rulemaking Process: An Overview, coordinated by Maeve P. Carey. For additional discussion of OIRA, see CRS Report R48546, The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA): Overview and Major Responsibilities, coordinated by Meghan M. Stuessy and Taylor N. Riccard.