This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
June 23, 2021
The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) is a federal executive department responsible for the administration of lands, minerals, and other resources of the United States. DOI
Mark K. DeSantis
for the conservation and administration of the public lands and mineral estate of the United States. DOI describes its mission as protecting and managing the nation'’s natural resources and
Analyst in Natural
cultural heritage for the benefit of the American people; providing scientific and
Resources Policy
scholarly information about those resources and natural hazards; and exercising the nation'
nation’s trust responsibilities and special commitments to American Indians, Alaska
Natives, and island territories under U.S. administration.
As part of its responsibilities, DOI oversees and fosters the use of more than 480 million acres of public lands, 700 million roughly 420 mil ion acres of federal lands, nearly 55 mil ion acres of tribal lands, more than 700 mil ion acres of subsurface minerals, and 1.7 billionabout 2.5 bil ion acres of the outer
continental shelf. Each year, Congress deliberates legislation that could affect DOI'’s management of this vast federal estate. As a result, understandingUnderstanding the roles and responsibilities of DOI'’s various componentsagencies and offices iscan be valuable when crafting legislation that affects the department's operations and ability to fulfill its mission.
’s structure, operations, programs, and funding.
DOI primarily implements its responsibilities and mission through nine technicalvarious bureaus that make up more than 80% 90% of the agency'’s workforce. These technical bureaus are the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), Bureau of Indian Education
(BIE), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), National Park Service (NPS), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Each of these bureausbureau has a unique mission and set of responsibilities, as well as a distinctwel as an organizational structure that servesdesigned to meet its functional duties. In addition to these technical bureaus, DOI has
multiple departmental offices, which that are responsible for other programs and provide leadership, coordination, and services to DOI'’s various bureaus and programs.
As of June 2018, DOI employed a staff of 69,563 nationwide across its bureaus and offices. However, total DOI employment figures fluctuate throughout the year, as some bureaus rely on seasonal and part-time staff, increasing staff totals during the summer months. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM)
The names, structures, and responsibilities of DOI and its various bureaus and offices have evolved since the establishment of DOI in 1849. These changes and evolutions are regularly subject to congressional oversight and executive branch examination. In recent years, Congress has considered numerous executive branch proposals on
DOI organization and management, including the transfer of programs between various agencies and offices, the creation of new offices and/or bureaus, and the consolidation of DOI boundaries across agencies.
In December 2020, DOI employed a staff of 60,634 nationwide across its bureaus and offices, according to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). DOI employment figures fluctuate throughout the year, in part because some bureaus increase seasonal and part-time staff during the summer months. OPM reports the average total DOI employment as 65,35063,175 for the four reporting periods from September 2017 to June 2018March 2020 to December 2020. The largest
bureau within DOI based on number of staff is NPS, which averaged close to 20,000 staff over the same time period—more thannearly 19,000 employees during 2020—nearly twice the size of the second-largest bureau, BLM. The smallest technicalsmal est bureau by employment is OSMRE, which averaged just over 400 employees. Approximately 10% of all DOI staff are within the District of Columbia core-based statistical area (CBSA), which includes the District of Columbia and selected counties in Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Congress providesfewer than 400 employees.
Congress provides discretionary appropriations for DOI through two annual appropriations bil s: the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies bil and the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies bil . From
FY2017 to FY2021, total DOI appropriations increased 13% in current dollars. Enacted discretionary appropriations for FY2021 totaled $15.4 bil ion.
Congressional Research Service
link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 8 link to page 9 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 13 link to page 14 link to page 15 link to page 16 link to page 18 link to page 19 link to page 20 link to page 21 link to page 22 link to page 23 link to page 25 link to page 26 link to page 26 link to page 27 link to page 27 link to page 27 link to page 27 link to page 28 link to page 28 link to page 31 link to page 31 link to page 32 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 13 link to page 31 link to page 33 link to page 29 link to page 30 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Establishment of the Department: A Brief History ................................................................ 2 DOI Today: Leadership, Structure, and Functions ................................................................ 4
Leadership................................................................................................................ 5 Recent DOI Reorganization Plans, Proposals, and Issues for Congress............................... 6
Department-Wide Reorganization Plan .................................................................... 7
DOI Bureaus: History, Missions, and Current Structures .................................................. 9
Bureau of Indian Affairs ...................................................................................... 10 Bureau of Indian Education.................................................................................. 11 Bureau of Land Management ............................................................................... 12 Bureau of Ocean Energy Management ................................................................... 14
Bureau of Reclamation........................................................................................ 15 Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement................................................... 16 National Park Service ......................................................................................... 17 Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement .......................................... 18 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.............................................................................. 19
U.S. Geological Survey ....................................................................................... 21
Departmental Offices and Programs ........................................................................... 22
Office of the Secretary ........................................................................................ 22 Office of the Solicitor ......................................................................................... 23 Office of the Inspector General............................................................................. 23 Bureau of Trust Funds Administration (Office of the Special Trustee for American
Indians).......................................................................................................... 23
Office of Insular Affairs ...................................................................................... 24
DOI Employment Levels................................................................................................ 24 Overview of DOI Appropriations..................................................................................... 27
DOI Discretionary Appropriations: FY2017-FY2021 .................................................... 27 DOI Discretionary Appropriations: FY2021, by Agency ................................................ 28
Figures Figure 1. Timeline of Selected DOI Agency Establishments and Reorganizations...................... 3 Figure 2. DOI Organizational Chart of Bureaus and Selected Offices ...................................... 4 Figure 3. Unified Interior Regional Boundaries.................................................................... 9 Figure 4. DOI Discretionary Appropriations: FY2017-FY2021 ............................................ 27 Figure 5. DOI Discretionary Appropriations for FY2021, by Agency .................................... 29
Tables Table 1. DOI Employment Trends, by Agency ................................................................... 25 Table 2. DOI Employment: Inside vs. Outside Washington, DC............................................ 26
Congressional Research Service
link to page 33 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Contacts Author Information ....................................................................................................... 29
Congressional Research Service
link to page 7 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Introduction appropriations for DOI through two annual appropriations bills: the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies bill and the Energy and Water appropriations bill. Enacted discretionary appropriations for FY2018 totaled $14.6 billion. DOI also received $566 million in supplemental emergency appropriations in FY2018, for a total of $15.2 billion in discretionary appropriations for FY2018.
The organizational structure of DOI is subject to continual congressional oversight and executive branch examination. In 2017 and 2018, President Trump and then-Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke submitted reorganization plans for the department and its bureaus. These plans put forth several recommendations, including the consolidation and transfer of most functions of the Army Corps of Engineers Civil Works Division to DOI, the merger of the Department of Commerce's National Marine Fisheries Service with FWS, and the creation of 12 "Unified Regional Boundaries" across DOI's various bureaus.
The Department of the Interior (DOI) is a federal executive department responsible for the conservation and use of roughly three-quarters of U.S. public landsapproximately two-thirds of the estimated 640 mil ion acres of federal
land. DOI defines its mission as to protect and manage the nation'’s natural resources and cultural heritage for the benefit of the American people; to provide scientific and scholarly information about those resources and natural hazards; and to exercise the country'’s trust responsibilities and special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and island territories under U.S. administration.1 Initially 1 Initial y conceived as a "“home department"” in 1849 to oversee a broad array of internal affairs,22 DOI has evolved to become the nation'’s principal land management agency,
charged with administering the use of more than 480 million acres of public lands, 700 million roughly 420 mil ion acres of federal lands, nearly 55 mil ion acres of tribal lands, more than 700 mil ion acres of subsurface minerals, and 1.7 billionabout 2.5 bil ion acres of the
outer continental shelf (OCS).3
3
As is the case for many federal departments, DOI'Congress examines DOI’s organizational structure and functions as part of itsand functions are under continual congressional examination as part of Congress's lawmaking and oversight functions. Similarly, DOI'’s executive branch structure and operations are also thea subject of administrative scrutinyscrutiny and analysis by various Administrations. Over the course of the department'’s roughly 170-year history, DOI has evolved in response to the needs of the nation and at the behest of Congress and the President. (See (see Figure 1 for a timeline
of selected events that influenced the current structure of the department)..) Some of these changes have been relatively broad in nature, such as the creation of a new agency or regulatory body. Other shiftschanges have been smallersmal er in scope, such as modifications to interagency processes or reorganizations in howreorganizations of resources or responsibilities are distributed
among offices or programs.4
This report is a primer to understanding the organizational framework under which DOI operates, and it provides context for how ongoing and potential future reorganizations might affect these operations. First, the report provides a timeline of congressional and executive actions that have shaped the structure and function of DOI since its establishment. It includes an overview of
DOI’s history, mission, and current structure, as wel as recent and ongoing reorganization actions. Next, the report provides more detailed information on the mission, leadership, and regional office structure of DOI’s bureaus and selected offices.5 The report then details staffing levels for the department, including a breakdown of staff located inside and outside the Washington, DC, duty station. Final y, it relates the annual discretionary appropriations for the
department and each of its agencies over the last five years (FY2017-FY2021), with a focus on
1 Department of the Interior (DOI), 2020/2021 Annual Performance Plan & 2019 Report (APP&R) , p. 3, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/final-appr-03312020_0.pdf (last accessed September 17, 2020).
2 Robert M. Utley and Barry Mackintosh, The Department of Everything Else: Highlights of Interior History (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1989), at https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/utley-mackintosh/. Hereinafter referred to as Utley and Mackintosh, Departm ent of Everything Else.
3 For data and other information on federal land management, see CRS Report R42346, Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data, by Carol Hardy Vincent and Laura A. Hanson , and CRS Report R43429, Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 117th Congress, coordinated by Katie Hoover. For a brief summary of the responsibilities of DOI land management agencies, see CRS In Focus IF10585, The Federal Land Managem ent Agencies, coordinated by Katie Hoover. T he outer continental shelf (OCS) is defined by statute as all submerged lands lying seaward of state coastal waters (3 nautical miles offshore generally) which are under U.S. jurisdiction (43 U.S.C. §1301).
4 For a more complete discussion of the history and legal authority pertaining to executive branch reorganization, see CRS Report R44909, Executive Branch Reorganization, by Henry B. Hogue.
5 References in this report to DOI “offices” refer to selected offices only.
Congressional Research Service
1
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
FY2021. In general, this report contains the most recently available data and estimates as of
March 2021. A list of CRS experts for DOI bureaus is at the end of the report.
among offices or programs.4
DOI reorganization proposals put forth by the Trump Administration have renewed attention to the structural relationship between the department's various bureaus and their regulatory responsibilities. In March 2017, President Trump signed an executive order calling on agency leaders to, "if appropriate," submit a proposed reorganization plan for their agencies to the director of the Office of Management and Budget within 180 days.5 In September 2017, then-Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a reorganization proposal for DOI in response to this order. In June 2018, President Trump issued a more expansive government-wide reorganization proposal, which included further recommendations and proposals affecting the structure of DOI.6 In addition to these broader proposals, smaller interagency administrative changes either took effect in FY2019 or are proposed for FY2019 implementation, including the transfer and consolidation of several department offices and programs.
This report is a primer to understanding the organizational framework under which DOI operates, while providing context for how ongoing and proposed reorganizations might affect these operations. The report provides a timeline of congressional and executive actions that have shaped the structure and function of DOI since its establishment. It also offers a brief summary of DOI's history, mission, and current structure, as well as an overview of the primary functions of its multiple bureaus and offices as of December 2018. Employment figures and corresponding maps illustrate the varying regional office structures among DOI bureaus, as they exist currently. In addition, the report includes an overview of the annual funding and appropriations process for the department. Although the report provides a broad summary of the proposed reorganization efforts under way or in effect as of December 2018, it does not offer a detailed analysis of these plans or their potential impact on DOI's structure and function. A list of CRS experts for the issue areas covered by DOI and its bureaus is at the end of the report. In general, this report contains the most recently available data and estimates as of December 2018.
Establishment of the Department: A Brief History Prior to the establishment of DOI in 1849, Congress apportioned domestic affairs in the United States across the three original executive departments: Department of State, Department of War (now Department of Defense), and Department of the Treasury.76 The Department of State housed
the nation'’s Patent Office, and the Department of War housed the Office of Indian Affairs and the Pension Office, which at the time administered pensions solely for military personnel.8 7 Meanwhile, the General Land Office (GLO), which oversaw and disposed of the public domain, was placed by Congress within the Department of the Treasury because of the revenue generated
by the GLO from land sales.9
8
By the 1840s, the growing federal estate acquired through the Louisiana Purchase, the Mexican-American War, and the newly negotiated Oregon Territory placed an increasing burden on the departments and their leadership.109 In 1848, then-Secretary of the Treasury Robert J. Walker
submitted to Congress a proposal that would bring together GLO, the Office of Indian Affairs, and several other disparate offices and functions under a single, separate executive department.11 Congress officially10
Congress official y established the Department of the Interior on March 3, 1849.12
11
In addition to absorbing the functions of the Patent Office, the Office of Indian Affairs, the Pension Office, and GLO, the newly established DOI assumed responsibility for a wide range of other domestic matters. As part of DOI'’s organic legislation, Congress conferred on the Secretary of the Interior the "“supervisory and appellateappel ate powers"” held by the President over the commissioner of Public Buildings, as well wel as oversight responsibility for both the U.S. Census
and the Penitentiary of the District of Columbia.1312 Over time, Congress further expanded the department'department’s functions to include the construction of the national capital'’s water system, the colonization of freed slaves in Haiti, water pollution control, and the regulation of interstate commerce.1413 Most of these early activities eventuallyeventual y were transferred from DOI'’s charge as Congress began to authorize and create new executive departments and independent agencies to
handle this growing list of responsibilities.
Now, DOI hasBy the 20th century, DOI had evolved to focus primarily on protecting and managing natural resources,; conducting scientific research,; and exercising the nation'’s trust responsibilities to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated
island communities.
6 T he Department of State (initially established as the Department of Foreign Affairs) was created in 1781 (1 Stat. 28). T he Department of War (1 Stat.49) and Department of the Treasury (1 Stat. 65) each were established eight years later, in 1789. 7 Utley and Mackintosh, Department of Everything Else. 8 T he General Land Office Act (2 Stat. 716), April 25, 1812, created the General Land Office (GLO) in the Department of the T reasury to “ superintend, execute, and perform, all such acts and things, touching or respecting the public lands of the United States,” including those functions formerly vested in the Secretaries of War and State.
9 John T . Woolley and Gerhard Peters, The Presidency A to Z, 5th ed. (CQ Press, 2012), p. 315. 10 Guide to the Presidency and the Executive Branch, ed. Michael Nelson, 5th ed. (CQ Press, 2012). 11 9 Stat. 395. 12 9 Stat. 395, §§7-10. 13 DOI, “History of the Interior,” at https://www.doi.gov/whoweare/history (last accessed December 2020).
Congressional Research Service
2
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Figure 1. Timeline of Selected DOI Agency Establishments and Reorganizations
Source: Congressional Research Service island communities.
DOI is a Cabinet-level department that employs approximately 6563,000 full-time employees across nine technical bureaus and various administrative and programmatic offices.15multiple bureaus and other offices.14 In addition to its headquarters in Washington, DC, DOI has staff in roughly 2,400 locations across the United States, including both regional offices and field centers.16locations.15 Each of DOI's technical ’s bureaus and programmatic offices has a unique mission and set of responsibilities, as well wel as a distinct organizational structure that serves to meet its functional duties.17. Figure 2 shows
the DOI organization chart as of March 2021.
Figure 2. DOI Organizational Chart of Bureaus and Selected Offices
the DOI organization chart as of December 2018.
(as of December 2018) |
![]() |
Source: CRS, using information from DOI Office of the Secretary: Department-Wide Notes: CFO = Chief financial officer. This chart does not depict every office within the department but rather key positions and bureaus reflected in this report. The FY2019 Budget Justification for the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians (OST) proposes a change in the reporting relationship of the OST from the Office of the Secretary to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. This proposed change is reflected here. See "Departmental Offices and Programs" section for more information. |
Secretary Deputy Secretary Assistant Secretary—Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Assistant Secretary—Insular Affairs Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals Management Assistant Secretary—Policy, Management, and Budget/Chief Financial Officer Assistant Secretary—Water and Science Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs Chairperson—National Indian Gaming Commission Special Trustee—American Indians Commissioner—Bureau of Reclamation Director—Bureau of Land Management Director—U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director—National Park Service Director—Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Director—U.S. Geological Survey Inspector General Solicitor Notes: For a more complete discussion of Senate confirmation process, see CRS Report RL30959, Presidential Appointee Positions Requiring Senate Confirmation and Committees Handling Nominations, by Christopher M. Davis and Michael Greene. |
files/fy2021-budget-justification-os-dwp.pdf, and information in the explanatory text of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260), Congressional Record, vol. 166, no. 218, book IV (December 21, 2021), p.
14 U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), FedScope database, Employment cubes, Cabinet -Level Agencies parameter set to Department of the Interior, at https://www.fedscope.opm.gov/. T he data reflect “ on-board employment” figures based on the number of employees in pay status at the end of the quarter. Data are published on a quarterly basis (March, June, September, and December). T otal employment figures in this report reflect the average employment totals for the four reported quarters for 2020 (March 2020, June, 2020, September 2020, and December 2020).
15 Department of the Interior (DOI), Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2018-2022, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2018-2022-strategic-plan.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
4
link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 8 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
H8537. Additional information provided via personal communication between CRS and DOI Office of Legislative Affairs, April 27, 2021. Notes: Figure reflects DOI organizational chart as of this report; however, the organization and reporting status of bureaus and offices are subject to change and may be currently under review. The order of bureaus and offices is not intended to reflect a given hierarchy within DOI. CFO = Chief Financial Officer. The Assistant Secretary—Policy, Management and Budget serves as the DOI’s CFO. The FY2020 Interior Appropriations law approved the Administration’s proposal to establish the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) as an independent bureau. See explanatory statement accompanying H.R. 1865 (enacted as P.L. 116-94) at House debate, Congressional Record, vol. 165, no. 204, book III (December 17, 2019), p. H11289. Congress now provides funding to BIE separately from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), and DOI considers BIE as an independent bureau from BIA. Also, effective October 1, 2020, many of the trust responsibilities previously performed by the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians were transferred to a newly established Bureau of Trust Funds Administration (BTFA), according to DOI. This change is reflected with a dashed arrow. However, Congress indicated that it “does not accept the Department’s decision to move forward” with the creation of the BTFA.16 The special trustee and the principal deputy special trustee continue to report directly to the Secretary. For more information on the status of this reorganization, see “Recent DOI Reorganization Plans, Proposals, and Issues for Congress.”
Leadership
The leadership team and senior executives of DOI provide oversight
DOI Presidential Appointees Requiring
and guidance for the department's ’s
Senate Confirmation
various offices, bureaus, and field
Secretary
locations. The department is
Deputy Secretary
administered and overseen by the
Assistant Secretary—Fish, Wildlife, and Parks
Secretary of the Interior (referred to in
Assistant Secretary—Insular Affairs
this report as the Secretary) and a Deputy Secretary, who serves in a leadership capacity under the Secretary. The President appoints both positions, and the U.S. Senate confirms them (see
Assistant Secretary—Land and Minerals Management
Deputy Secretary, who serves in a
Assistant Secretary—Policy, Management, and Budget
leadership capacity under the
Assistant Secretary—Water and Science
Secretary. The President appoints both
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs
positions, and the U.S. Senate confirms
Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission
them. (See text box for a full list of
text box for a full list of DOI appointees requiring Senate confirmation). Serving under the Secretary and Deputy Secretary are six Assistant Secretaries, who oversee DOI's nine technical bureaus and different
Special Trustee for American Indians
confirmation.) Serving under the
Commissioner, Bureau of Reclamation
Secretary and Deputy Secretary are six
Director, Bureau of Land Management
Assistant Secretaries, who oversee
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
DOI’s bureaus and administrative and
Director, National Park Service
administrative and programmatic offices. (See Figure 2
Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
for these position titles and
Director, U.S. Geological Survey
responsibilities.)17
Inspector General
(see Figure 2 for these position titles and responsibilities).18
In addition to the Secretary, the Deputy
Solicitor
Secretary, and the six Assistant Secretaries, DOI has a number of other congressionally mandated leadership positions. Like
Source: U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, United States Government
Secretaries, DOI has other
Policy and Supporting Positions (Plum Book), 116th Cong., 2nd sess.,
congressional y mandated leadership
committee print, December 1, 2020 (Washington: GPO, 2020).
positions. Similar to other Cabinet-
other Cabinet-level agencies, DOI has an inspector general, who administers the office responsible for providing oversight to DOI's programs, operations, to provide oversight of DOI’s programs, operations,
16 Explanatory text of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260), Congressional Record, vol. 166, no. 218, book IV (December 21, 2021), p. H8537.
17 43 U.S.C. §§1452-1476.
Congressional Research Service
5
link to page 11 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
and management.18and management.19 The DOI solicitor heads the Office of the Solicitor, which provides legal counsel, advice, and representation for the department.19 The special trustee for American Indians is responsible for overseeing the management of financial assets of American Indians held in trust by DOI. Final y, the chairperson of the National Indian Gaming Commission oversees an independent regulatory body within DOI responsible for administering and promoting economic development through gaming on Indian lands.20 Similar to the special trustee, the chairperson of
the commission operates in an independent capacity separate from the Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs (AS-IA).
Recent DOI Reorganization Plans, Proposals, and Issues for Congress Congress uses a variety of tools—including authorizing legislation, appropriations legislation, and oversight activities—to shape and organize the executive branch and its agencies.21 Often,
changes are made through internal office transfers and/or budget realignments approved by Congress through the appropriations process. In other cases, Congress has considered more extensive executive branch reorganization efforts that have broader operational implications for
an agency or for the department as a whole (see “Department-Wide Reorganization Plan”).
In recent years, Congress has considered, made, or approved several changes to DOI and its organizational structure. In addition, some changes to DOI and its agencies have been proposed
for FY2021 but may not yet be in effect or are stil under consideration.
The 115th Congress approved several internal office transfers and realignments, including the transfer of appropriations for the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) from DOI’s Office of the Secretary to Department-Wide Programs.22 In addition, the 116th Congress approved
the consolidation of ethics staffing and funds from across DOI to the Departmental Ethics Office in the Office of the Solicitor, essential y implementing proposals put forth by DOI in the FY2021
budget justification and by the Secretary as part of Secretarial Order (S.O.) 3375.23
In 2016, Congress enacted legislation related to the reorganization of the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians (OST).24 The Indian Trust Asset Reform Act (ITARA) directed the Secretary of the Interior to—among other things—“ensure that appraisals and valuations of Indian trust property are administered by a single bureau, agency, or other administrative entity within the Department” not later than 18 months after enactment.25 Congress subsequently
approved a transfer of the Office of Appraisal Services within OST to the Office of the
18 Inspector General Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-452, 92 Stat. 1101). 19 60 Stat. 312, 43 U.S.C. §1455. 20 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, P.L. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2469, 25 U.S.C. §2704. 21 For a more complete discussion of Congress’s constitutional responsibility in establishing the structural organization of the executive branch, see CRS Report R44909, Executive Branch Reorganization, by Henry B. Hogue.
22 DOI, Interior Budget in Brief—Fiscal Year 2018, p. BH-91, at https://edit.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/2018_highlights_book.pdf. 23 DOI, Secretary of the Interior, Order No. 3375, “Improving the Department of the Inter ior’s Ethics Programs T hrough Consolidation,” August 14, 2019. For the proposed transfer, see DOI, Interior Budget in Brief—Fiscal Year 2021, p. DH-32, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/2021-highlights-book.pdf; proposal was enacted as part of P.L. 116-260.
24 P.L. 114-178. 25 25 U.S.C. §5635a.
Congressional Research Service
6
link to page 8 link to page 27 link to page 27 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Secretary’s Appraisal and Valuation Services Office, thereby consolidating al appraisal activities
within a single entity.26
In addition to this transfer, the FY2019 and FY2020 budget justifications for OST proposed to
transfer OST from the Office of the Secretary to the Office of the AS-IA, wherein OST would report to the AS-IA rather than directly to the Secretary (see Figure 2).27 In submitting OST’s budget request for FY2021, DOI included a proposal to transfer many of the trust responsibilities performed by the OST to a newly established Bureau of Trust Funds Administration (BTFA).28 On August 31, 2020, the then-Secretary of the Interior signed S.O. 3384, which effectuated this
transfer of duties and established the BTFA (effective October 1, 2020). On the effective date, al functions and personnel previously under OST were transferred to BTFA, according to DOI. Per S.O. 3384, the BTFA is led by a director, who reports directly to the AS-IA, whereas the positions of the special trustee and the principal deputy special trustee continue to report separately to the Secretary.29 According to DOI, although the positions of special trustee and principal deputy
special trustee stil exist, they are no longer fil ed as of the publication of this report.30
In the explanatory language for the FY2021 Interior Appropriations Act, Congress stated that it “does not accept the Department’s decision to move forward with its budget proposal to create
[the] BTFA without waiting for the resolution of the proposal through the fiscal year 2021 appropriations process and over the clear objections of the House of Representatives.”31 Congress further expressed that it “expected that the incoming Administration wil perform its own analysis of its trust responsibilities under the 1994 Act and subsequent legislation and that committees of jurisdiction, including the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, wil consider any proposals to address the future disposition of OST without prejudice.”32 (For more information,
see “Bureau of Trust Funds Administration (Office of the Special Trustee for American
Indians).”33
Department-Wide Reorganization Plan
The Trump Administration also proposed broader DOI reorganization activities. In March 2017, President Trump signed an executive order cal ing on agency leaders to, “if appropriate,” submit a
26 T he Administration’s proposal can be found at Office of the Special T rustee for American Indians (OST ), Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019 , OST -1, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2019_ost_budget_justification.pdf. Congress approved the transfer as part of the FY2019 Interior appropriations law (see H.Rept. 116-9).
27 OST , Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019 , OST -1-2. 28 Bureau of T rust Funds Administration (BT FA; formerly Office of the Special T rustee for American Indians), Budget Justifications and Perform ance Inform ation Fiscal Year 20 21, BT FA-5. 29 DOI, Secretary David Bernhardt, Secretarial Order 3384, Creation of the Bureau of Trust Funds Administration and Realignm ent of the Office of the Special Trustee for Am erican Indians, Land Buy -Back Program for Tribal Nations, and Office of Historical Trust Accounting , August 31, 2020.
30 Personal communication between CRS and DOI Office of Legislative Affairs, April 27, 2021. 31 Explanatory text of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260), Congressional Record, vol. 166, no. 218, book IV (December 21, 2021), p. H8537. T he text also states, “ The decision to transfer the functions of OST wholesale into a new bureau also raises questions about whether it is consistent with provisions of the 1994 Indian T rust Reform Management Act (P.L. 103-412), which created OST on a temporary basis until the completion of certain trust reforms, or with the existing transition plan for OST proposed by the Administration and adopted by Congress in fiscal year 2019.” 32 Ibid. 33 According to DOI, the Secretary has the legal authority under the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 to create the BT FA. DOI considers the establishment of the BT FA finalized as of October 1, 2020.
Congressional Research Service
7
link to page 13 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
proposed reorganization plan for their agencies to the director of the Office of Management and Budget within 180 days.34 In September 2017, then-Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke issued a reorganization proposal for DOI in response to this order. Included in this proposal was a plan to consolidate the different regional boundaries of each DOI bureau into 12 Unified Interior Regional Boundaries. In August 2018, DOI official y announced the designation of its 12 new Unified Interior Regional Boundaries (see Figure 3).35 According to DOI, the BIA, BIE, and OST
were excluded from this realignment and retained their existing regional boundaries.36
In addition to the consolidation of regional boundaries, the plan sought to shift some resources “to
the field,” potential y in the form of staff, budget, and/or facilities.37 In FY2019, Congress appropriated funds for the reorganization of BLM, FWS, NPS, USGS, and Reclamation.38 The Administration’s request indicated that this funding was intended to support the establishment of the new Unified Interior Regional Boundaries and to “shift some BLM, FWS, and Reclamation
headquarters staff to the West.”39
As part of the broader DOI reorganization effort, the Trump Administration announced plans to relocate most BLM positions and personnel based in Washington, DC, to BLM state offices across the West and to establish a new BLM headquarters office in Grand Junction, CO. The
Administration cited potential benefits of the move, including cost savings from lower office lease payments and travel costs, as wel as enhanced integration of policy and operations personnel, understanding of western needs, decisionmaking in the field, and partnerships with communities and organizations. The relocation was controversial, with some stakeholders raising concerns around the costs of relocation, a loss of expertise due to senior staff who did not relocate, a possible decline in staff diversity, and potential difficulty for BLM leadership to
coordinate with DOI management. On August 10, 2020, the Secretary of the Interior signed S.O.
3382, which formal y established the new Grand Junction headquarters office.40
34 Executive Order 13781, “Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch,” 82 Federal Register 13959-13960, March 13, 2017. 35 DOI, “ Establishment of Unified Regional Boundaries for the Department of the Interior ,” August 29, 2018, at https://www.doi.gov/employees/reorg/establishment -unified-regional-boundaries-department -interior (accessed in March 2021).
36 DOI, “Interior Reorganization,” at https://www.doi.gov/employees/reorg (accessed in March 2021). 37 Ibid. 38 Congress appropriated $14.1 million for the reorganization of the Bureau of Land Management ( BLM), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), and U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) through Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations laws (see H.Rept. 116-9). T he accompanying report does not identify the portion of the appropriation for each of the five agencies. T he FY2019 request also sought $3.4 million for the reorganization of Reclamation. It appears as though this request was approved as part of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations bill (P.L. 115-244); however, neither the bill language nor the accompanying report specifies funding for reorganization purposes.
39 DOI, The Interior Budget in Brief Fiscal Year 2019, p. DH-26. 40 DOI, Secretary of the Interior, Order No. 3382, “Establishment of the Bureau of Land Management’s Headquarters in Grand Junction, CO,” August 10, 2020.
Congressional Research Service
8
link to page 28 link to page 28
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Figure 3. Unified Interior Regional Boundaries
Source: DOI, “Unified Interior Regional Boundaries,” at https://www.doi.gov/employees/reorg/unified-regional-boundaries (last accessed April 7, 2021).
DOIcounsel, advice, and representation for the department.20 In 1994, Congress established the position of special trustee for Indian Affairs to manage DOI's fiduciary responsibilities to American Indians.21 Since its establishment, the Office of the Special Trustee (OST) has operated independently from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), which held these responsibilities prior to 1994.22 Finally, the chairperson of the National Indian Gaming Commission oversees an independent regulatory body within DOI responsible for administering and promoting economic development through gaming on Indian lands.23 Similar to the Special Trustee, the chairperson of the commission operates in an independent capacity separate from the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs.
Nine technical Bureaus: History, Missions, and Current Structures
Various bureaus comprising more than 90% of the DOI workforce are responsible for implementing the department'contribute to implement the department’s mission and responsibilities.2441 The names, structures, and duties of these bureaus have evolved over time in accordance with both administrative actions and shiftschanges in the
authorities provided to them by Congress. Below is a brief overview of each bureau, including the historical context within which it was created, its organizational structure, and its current mission and responsibilities.
Bureaus appear below in alphabetical order. An "“At a Glance"” box provides a snapshot of key information and data for each respective bureau. The "Established"“Established” date reflects the year in which a bureau was created, which in some cases predates the bureau’s assignment to DOI. The “was created. The "Key Statute" ” listed may represent the initial legislative legislative authorization for a bureau to carry out its regulatory
duties, or it may reference an agency'’s organic act, which articulates itits mission and/or responsibilities. This information does not reflect the full list of governing statutes for DOI bureaus, as each bureau is subject to numerous laws. The number of employees“Average Staff” listed for each bureau reflects the average for the2020 average of four reporting periods (from March 2020 to December 2020)from September 2017 to June 2018, with employment figures rounded to the nearest hundred, as reported to OPM. These annual averages differ from the figures included in the narrative sections of each agency, which reflect June 2018 figures, the most recently reported by OPM's Fedscope database as of the publication of this report. DOI employee data are discussed in more detail in the section "DOI Employment."
the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM). DOI employee data are discussed in more detail in the section “DOI
Employment Levels.”
41 Calculation based on OPM Fedscope data.
Congressional Research Service
9
link to page 13
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
For most agencies, the accompanying map shows an overlay of two different types of boundaries: the 12 newly designated unified regional boundaries denoted with numbers 1-12 (as shown in Figure 3) and the traditional individual agency boundaries denoted in different colors.42 Boundaries for the BIA, BIE, and two agencies that administer offshore energy development (BOEM and BSEE) show individual agency boundaries only, because they were not included in the newly designated unified regional boundaries, as noted. Although applicable DOI agencies are
operating with the unified regional boundaries, their individual boundaries may stil reflect
regional office jurisdictions and reporting structures for some agency purposes.
Bureau of Indian Affairs
At a Glance: Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA)
Established: 1824 Key Statute: | |
Established: 1824
Mission: ”* Leadership: Director Headquarters: Washington, DC Average Staff: 7, ** Regions: Unified Regions: N/A
Agency Regions: 12 (colored)
| |
Source: *Bureau of Indian Affairs, |
about-us. Notes: **OPM Fedscope data. This figure includes employees of both BIA and BIE , as Fedscope does not distinguish between the two bureaus. The FY2021 budget justifications for BIA and BIE estimated roughly 4,000 and 2,500 ful -time-equivalent staff, respectively, for FY2020, as distinct from the on-board employment as reported in Fedscope.
Established in 1824, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is the oldest bureau within DOI, predating the department by 25 years. Then-Secretary of War John C. Calhoun established the Office of Indian Affairs within the War Department to help centralize what was at the time a fractured administrative approach to Indian policy and relations in the United States.2543 It was not until 1832 that Congress officiallyofficial y recognized the Office of Indian Affairs as a bureau of the War Department by appointingestablishing a commissioner to oversee the agency.2644 The Office of Indian Affairs
was transferred to DOI in 1849, when the department was created. DOI formallyformal y adopted the
name Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1947.27
BIA provides services to federally45
42 Unless otherwise noted, the individual agency boundaries are shown as they existed prior to the August 2018 establishment of the unified regional boundaries. 43 William S. Belko, “John C. Calhoun and the Creation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs: An Essay o n Political Rivalry, Ideology, and Policymaking in the Early Republic,” The South Carolina Historical Magazine 105, no. 3 (2004), p. 194, at http://www.jstor.org/stable/27570693.
44 From an act dated July 9, 1832, ch. 174, §1, 4 Stat. 564. 45 T he Office of Indian Affairs was redesignated the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) by Secretarial Order No. 2362.
Congressional Research Service
10
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
BIA provides services to federal y recognized American Indian and Alaska Native tribes and their nearly 2 mil ion members.46nearly 1.9 million members.28 These services include disaster relief, child welfare, and road construction, as well wel as the operation and funding of law enforcement, tribal courts, and detention facilities within native villages and reservations.29, among others. The bureau is also is responsible for protecting and administering assets on tribal lands, including the management of 55 million mil ion surface acres and 57 million59 mil ion acres of subsurface mineral
estates held in trust by the United States.30
The BIA was also previously responsible for providing elementary and secondary education and educational assistance to Indian children through BIA's Office of Indian Education Programs. In 2006, however, 47
The BIA is administered by a director who oversees the agency’s functions and reports to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. Similar to other DOI agencies, the BIA has a three-tiered
organizational structure, with leadership and senior executives operating from headquarters in Washington, DC, and 12 regional offices that oversee 85 field offices (referred to as agencies by
the BIA); these agencies deliver program services directly to tribal communities.48
Bureau of Indian Education49
At a Glance: Bureau of Indian Education (BIE)
Established: 2006 Key Statute: Snyder Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 208) Mission: “To provide quality education opportunities from early childhood through life in accordance with a tribe’s needs for cultural and economic wel -being, in keeping with the wide diversity of Indian tribes and Alaska Native vil ages as distinct cultural and governmental entities.”* Leadership: Director Headquarters: Washington, DC Average Staff: 7,100 (including staff from the Bureau of Indian Affairs)** Regions:
Unified Regions: N/A Agency Regions: 12 (colored)
Source: *Bureau of Indian Education, “About Us,” at https://www.bia.gov/about-us. Notes: **OPM Fedscope data. This figure includes employees of both BIA and BIE , as Fedscope does not distinguish between the two bureaus. The FY2021 budget justifications for BIA and BIE estimated roughly 4,000 and 2,500 ful -time-equivalent staff (not on-board employment), respectively, for FY2020.
BIA previously was responsible for managing the bureau’s elementary, secondary, and postsecondary schools and for supporting additional Indian education activities through BIA’s Office of Indian Education Programs. In 2006, the Secretary of the Interior separated the BIA education programs from the rest of the BIA and placed them in a new Bureau of Indian Education (BIE).50 However, both BIA and BIE were funded as part of DOI’s broader Indian Affairs budget
until FY2020, when the two bureaus were funded separately.
46 Figures provided to CRS by DOI, Office of Congressional and Legislative Affairs, June 2021. 47 BIA, “What We Do,” at https://www.bia.gov/bia/ots/what-we-do. 48 DOI, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2021 , p. IA-RES-5, at https://www.bia.gov/sites/bia.gov/files/assets/as-ia/obpm/BIA_FY2021_Greenbook-508.pdf.
49 For a more complete discussion of BIE and its various duties, see CRS Report RL34205, Indian Elementary-Secondary Education: Program s, Background, and Issues, by Cassandria Dortch.
50 DOI, Indian Affairs, Budget Justifications Fiscal Year 2008, pp. IA-EDUC-5 to -6.
Congressional Research Service
11
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
For FY2020, the Trump Administration proposed funding BIE independently from BIA and submitted a separate budget justification for each bureau.51 In proposing a separate budget structure for BIE, the Administration sought to “strengthen BIE as an independent bureau with a separate budget structure to advance ongoing BIE reforms to Cimprove learning and student outcomes” and to reduce overlapping functions between BIA and BIE to “better deliver services to schools, maximize efficiency, and build capacity within BIE.”52 In the explanatory language for
the FY2020 Interior Appropriations law, Congress approved the establishment of BIE as an
independent bureau with a separate budget structure from BIA.53
The BIE education system serves approximately 46,000 students through 169 elementary/secondary schools and 14 dormitories located in 23 states, as wel as 1,500 students through 2 postsecondary institutions in 2 states.54 BIE-funded elementary and secondary schools may be operated directly by the bureau, by tribes and tribal organizations, or through a cooperative agreement with a public school district. BIE also supports public school students, 29 tribal y controlled colleges and universities, and two tribal technical colleges. BIE is administered
by a director, who oversees the bureau’s functions and reports to the Assistant Secretary of Indian
Affairs.
Bureau of Land Management
(BIE) under the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.31 As of FY2018, the BIE education system served approximately 47,000 students through 169 elementary/secondary schools and 14 dormitories located in 23 states.32 For the purposes of this report, BIE is not considered a technical bureau of DOI. However, BIE employment figures are included in BIA totals listed above and in the "DOI Employment Levels" section.
The BIA is administered by a director who oversees the agency's functions and reports to the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs. Similar to other DOI agencies, the BIA has a three-tiered organizational structure, with leadership and senior executives operating from headquarters in Washington, DC, and 12 regional offices that oversee 53 field offices (referred to as agencies by the BIA); these agencies deliver program services directly to tribal communities.33 As of June 2018, the BIA and BIE combined had roughly 7,000 employees.34
At a Glance: Bureau of Land Management (BLM) |
|
Established: 1946
) Mission: Leadership: Director Headquarters: Washington, DC Average Staff Regions: 12 (state offices) | |
|
our-mission.
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) was created in 1946, following the merger of DOI's ’s General Land Office (GLO) and the U.S. Grazing Service, known previously as the Division of Grazing Control and subsequently as the Division of Grazing.35 BLM manages just under 250 million acres 55 BLM manages 244 mil ion acres 51 T he budget justifications for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Education are located on the DOI website at https://www.doi.gov/budget/appropriations/2020.
52 DOI, Fiscal Year 2020: The Interior Budget in Brief, p. BH-95. 53 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, committee print, 116th Cong., 2nd sess., January 2020 (Washington: GPO, 2020), p. 604.
54 DOI, Bureau of Indian Education, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2021 , p. BIE-ES-1 and BIE-OIEP-6, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2021-budget -justification-bie.pdf. T he three-year average daily student estimate (referred to as “Average Daily Membership”) is roughly 41,000. 55 DOI, Secretary Harold L. Ickes, Secretarial Order 2225, July 15, 1946. Implemented as part of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1946 (11 Federal Register 7875, 60 Stat. 1097), effective July 16, 1946. T he GLO, created by Congress in 1812, helped convey lands to pioneers settling western lands in the early 19 th century. T he U.S. Grazing Service (then
Congressional Research Service
12
link to page 11 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
of public land—roughly 10% of the total U.S. land area. The vast majority of this land (more than 99%) is located in 12 western states, including Alaska.3656 The agency also is responsible for approximately 800 million more than 700 mil ion acres of the federal onshore subsurface mineral estate and forprovides technical supervision of mineral development on about 60 million acres of Indian trust lands.3759 mil ion acres of BIA mineral estate.57 BLM manages public lands under the dual framework of multiple use and sustained yield, as required under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976.3858 These uses include a wide range
of activities, such as energy and mineral development, livestock grazing, and preservation, as well as hunting, fishing, and other recreational activities.39
The BLM national headquarters in Washington, DC, is home to the agency'recreation.
In 2020, BLM relocated its primary headquarters from Washington, DC, to a new office in Grand
Junction, CO (see “Department-Wide Reorganization Plan” for more information). The new BLM headquarters is home to the agency’s leadership, which provides strategic direction, policy guidance, and oversight of BLM'’s national-level activities. Twelve activities. BLM has indicated that about 60 positions from programs with “inherently DC-based responsibilities, like legislative, regulatory and public affairs, budget, and Freedom of Information Act compliance, as well as the Deputy Director for Policy and Programs” wil remain in the Washington, DC, area.59 In addition to the Grand Junction, CO, and
Washington, DC, offices, 12 state offices—which are akin to the regional office structure of other agencies—carry out BLM'’s mission within their respective geographical areas of jurisdiction.40 60 Reporting to these 12 state offices are numerous district offices, which are further divided into localized localized field offices. Field offices oversee the day-to-day management of public land resources and the on-the-ground delivery of BLM programs and services. BLM also has several national-
level support and service centers. As of June 2018, BLM had roughly 10,700 employees.41
known as the Division of Grazing Control) was established in 1934 to administer grazing on public rangelands. (T aylor Grazing Act, 48 Stat. 1269.) 56 BLM, Public Land Statistics 2019 (as of June 2020), T able 1-4, at https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/PublicLandStatistics2019.pdf. Hereinafter referred to as “ BLM, Public Land Statistics 2019.”
57 BLM, Public Land Statistics 2019. 58 Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§1701, et seq. FLPMA defines multiple use as “ ... the management of the public lands and their various resource values so that they are utilized in the combination that will best meet the present and future needs of the American people ... ” and sustained yield as “ ... the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity of a high -level annual or regular periodic output of the various renewable resources of the public lands consistent with mult iple use” (43 U.S.C. §1702(h)). Although BLM was established in 1946, FLPMA is considered the agency’s organic act, as it consolidated and articulated the agency’s responsibilities. 59 BLM, “Headquarters Move West,” at https://www.blm.gov/office/national-office/hq-move-west (accessed on May 11, 2021).
60 43 C.F.R. §1821.10a.
Congressional Research Service
13
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
At a Glance: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM)
Established: 2011 Key Statute: | |
Established: 2010
Mission: Leadership: Director
Average Regions: 4 | |
Source: *BOEM, "About BOEM," at https://www.boem.gov/About-BOEM/. |
Established in 2010 Staff: 600 Regions: Unified Regions: N/A
Agency Regions: 4 (colored)
Source: *BOEM, “About BOEM,” at https://www.boem.gov/About-BOEM/.
Established in 2011, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) manages development of the nation'’s energy and mineral resources on thenearly 2.5 bil ion acres of the U.S. outer continental shelf (OCS).61 The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) of 1953 defines the OCS as all al submerged lands lying seaward of state coastal waters that are subject to federal jurisdiction, constituting approximately 1.7 billion acres.42 .62
Under OCSLA, the Secretary of the Interior has the authority to manage the development of the OCS.43
OCS.63
Prior to BOEM'’s establishment, the Secretary delegated the leasing and management authority
granted by OCSLA to the DOI agency known as the Minerals Management Service (MMS).44 64 During its existence, MMS had three primary responsibilities concerning offshore development: resource management, safety and environmental oversight and enforcement, and revenue collection. Following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill spil in 2010, concerns about perceived conflicts between these three missions prompted then-Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar to reorganize
the agency. MMS was formally abolishedformal y dissolved, and three new units were established within DOI: BOEM, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), and the Office of Natural
Resource Revenue (ONRR).
The agency’s leadership—led by a director—is headquartered in Washington, DC, and divides itself among three programmatic offices covering strategic resource programs, offshore renewable energy programs, and environmental analysis and science. Meanwhile, regional offices oversee
61 Although the order dividing the Minerals Management Service (MMS) into three separate entities was issued in 2010, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) was not formally established until October 1, 2011. Prior to that, an interim agency known as t he Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement was in place. For more information, see BOEM, “T he Reorganization of the Former MMS,” at https://www.boem.gov/about-boem/reorganization/reorganization-former-mms. 62 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953, 42 U.S.C. §§1331-1356b. T he definition of the outer continental shelf (OCS) is at 43 U.S.C. §1331(a).
63 For a discussion of state and federal waters, see CRS Report RL33404, Offshore Oil and Gas Development: Legal Fram ework, by Adam Vann.
64 Secretarial Order 3071, January 19, 1982, established the MMS following a number of hearings and investigations into allegations of fraud, lack of oversight, and inadequate collection of royalties from oil and gas production on federal lands and the OCS.
Congressional Research Service
14
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Resource Revenue (ONRR).
As of June 2018, BOEM employed approximately 500 people to carry out its mission of managing offshore conventional and renewable energy resources on the OCS.45 The agency's leadership in Washington, DC, divides itself between three programmatic offices covering strategic resource development, environmental analysis and applied science, and offshore renewable energy development. Meanwhile, regional offices oversee on-the-ground operations and policy implementation in the four OCS regions in the Atlantic, the Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific, and Alaska.46
At a Glance: Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) | |
Established: 1902
Established: 1902 Key Statute Mission: Leadership: Commissioner Headquarters: Washington, DC Washington, DC Denver, Average Staff: Regions: 5 | |
5,300 Regions:
Unified Regions: 12 (numbered) Agency Regions: 6 (colored)
Source: *Bureau of Reclamation, |
The large-scale construction of federal dams and irrigation projects throughout the 20th century was born, in part, out of a growing need for water supplies in the arid and rapidly expanding western United States.47 To meet this need, Congress passed the Reclamation Act of 1902, which set aside federal dollars to fund irrigation projects and large-scale dam construction in the arid and rapidly expanding western United States.66 projects in 13 western states.48
Shortly thereafter, Congress established the U.S. Reclamation Service as a program within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). In its first five years, the service began work on more than 30 projects across the American West. In 1907, the Secretary of the Interior elevated the
program to an independent bureau within DOI before renaming it the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) in 1923.4967 Since its establishment, Reclamation has constructed or overseen the completionconstruction of more than 600 projectsdams and reservoirs across the western United States.50 68 Beneficiaries of thesereclamation projects generallygeneral y repay the costs for construction and operations of
65 BOEM, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2021, p. 83, at https://www.boem.gov/sites/default/files/documents/about-boem/budget/FY%202021%20Budget%20Justification.pdf. T he Gulf of Mexico, California, and Alaska regions are managed from offices in New Orleans, LA; Camarillo, CA; and Anchorage, AK, respectively. BOEM’s Office of Renewable Energy Programs based in Sterling, VA, oversees wind and water development in t he Atlantic OCS region. T he Gulf of Mexico Regional Office oversees oil and gas activities in the Atlantic OCS; however, no active OCS oil and gas leases exist in the region, nor are there any proposed lease sales under the proposed Five-Year Leasing Program 2017-2022.
66 Newlands Reclamation Act, P.L. 57-161, 32 Stat. 388 (enacted June 17, 1902). Initially, the Reclamation Act set aside funding for projects across 13 western states. Over time, Reclamation expanded the number of states within which it worked. Reclamation now manages projects constructed by the agency in 17 states (referred to as Reclam ation states): AZ, CO, CA, ID, KS, MT , NE, ND, NM, NV, OK, OR, SD, T X, UT , WA, WY.
67 Mary C. Rabbitt, A Brief History of the United States Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1975, pp. 3-4, at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70039204. Hereinafter referred to as Rabbitt, United States Geological Survey.
68 Reclamation, “About Us,” at https://www.usbr.gov/main/about/.
Congressional Research Service
15
link to page 18 link to page 18
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
repay the costs for construction and operations of these facilities to the federal government over extended terms (in some cases without interest).
The exception are costs deemed "federal"“federal” in nature, as federal costs are nonreimbursable.51
Whereas Reclamation originally 69
Although Reclamation original y focused almost entirely on building new water storage and
diversion projects, the agency now largely focuses on the operation and maintenance of existing facilities.52 Reclamation'70 Reclamation’s mission also has expanded to include support for other efforts to improve water supplies in the western United States, such as promoting water reuse and recycling
efforts, desalination projects, and Indian water rights settlements.
A presidentially
A presidential y appointed commissioner oversees the work of Reclamation and, along with other senior-level executives, manages the overall overal operations of the agency from its headquarters in Washington, DC. Due to the amountnumber of projects and employees based in western states, Reclamation also maintains federal offices in Denver, CO, which administer many of Reclamation'
Reclamation’s programs, initiatives, and activities. These programs include efforts that address dam safety, flood hydrology, fisheries and wildlife resources, and research programs that seek to improve management and increase water supplies. Meanwhile, fiveIn addition, six regional offices manage Reclamation'Reclamation’s water projects and oversee various local area offices responsible for the day-to-day
operations of the nearly 180 projects currently under the agency'’s authority.71
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
s authority.53 As of June 2018, Reclamation had roughly 5,500 employees.54
At a Glance: Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) | |
Established: 2010
Established: 2011 Key Statute: Mission: Leadership: Director ”* Leadership: Director Headquarters: Average Regions: 4 | |
Source: *BSEE, "About Us," at https://www.bsee.gov/who-we-are/about-us. |
Following the 2010 restructuring of MMS, the Staff: 800 Regions: Unified Regions: N/A
Agency Regions: 4 (colored)
Source: *BSEE, “About Us,” at https://www.bsee.gov/about-bsee.
Following the 2011 restructuring of MMS (see “Bureau of Ocean Energy Management”), the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) inherited the safety and environmental enforcement functions previously carried out by MMS.72 These functions are primarily concerned with the offshore energy industry on the OCS—largely oil and natural gas production. BSEE's ’s
69 Nonreimbursable costs include costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement and recreation, among other things. For more information on Reclamation project rep ayment, see CRS In Focus IF10806, Bureau of Reclam ation Project Authorization and Financing, by Charles V. Stern.
70 For a more comprehensive discussion of Reclamation’s functions and responsibilities, see CRS Report R46303, Bureau of Reclam ation: History, Authorities, and Issues for Congress, by Charles V. Stern and Anna E. Normand.
71 T he regional offices are the Columbia-Pacific Northwest Region, Missouri Basin Region, Upper Colorado Basin Region, Lower Colorado Basin Region, California-Great Basin Region, and Arkansas-Rio Grande-T exas Gulf Region.
72 See footnote 61.
Congressional Research Service
16
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
responsibilities include regulation of worker safety, emergency preparedness, environmental
responsibilities include regulation of worker safety, emergency preparedness, environmental compliance, and resource conservation.55
73
BSEE is administered by a director based out of the agency'’s headquarters in Washington, DC.
The agency also has a second headquarters location in Sterling, VA, that oversees many of BSEE'BSEE’s national programs (see below) and provides technical and administrative support for the bureau.5674 To carry out the duties of the department, BSEE coordinates between leadership in these two locations and staff operating across three regional offices (serving Alaska, the Pacific, and the Gulf of Mexico OCS regions),5775 and five Gulf Coast district offices (Houma, Lafayette, Lake
Charles, and New Orleans, LA, and Lake Jackson, TX).58 76 Senior leadership sets the policies and
performance goals implemented at these local offices across the agency'’s six national programs.77
National Park Service
At a Glance: National Park Service (NPS)
Established: 1916 Key Statute: National Park Service s six national programs.59 As of June 2018, BSEE had approximately 800 employees across the United States.60
At a Glance: National Park Service (NPS) |
|
Established: 1916
Mission: Leadership: Director Headquarters: Washington, DC Washington, DC Average Regions: 7 | |
|
In 1916, the National Park Service Organic Act (Organic Act) centralized administration of the nation'nation’s national parks and national monuments. With the Organic Act, Congress created the National Park Service (NPS) and established the agency'’s dual mandate—to protect the country's ’s natural and cultural resources while providing for their public use and enjoyment.6178 In undertaking that mission, NPS administers approximately 80 million mil ion acres of federal land,
including 418423 units that comprise the National Park System across all al 50 states and U.S.
territories.
73 Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), “What We Do,” at https://www.bsee.gov/what-we-do. 74 BSEE, “Our Organization,” at https://www.bsee.gov/about-bsee/our-organization. 75 T he Gulf of Mexico Regional Office oversees activities for the Atlantic OCS region. 76 BSEE shares regional offices in New Orleans, LA, Camarillo, CA, and Anchorage, AK, with BOEM staff . 77 BSEE, “National Programs,” at https://www.bsee.gov/about-bsee/our-organization/national-programs. T hese programs are Oil Spill Preparedness Program, Environmental Compliance Program, National Investigations Program, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs, National Enforcement Program, and Office of Administration.
78 39 Stat. 535.
Congressional Research Service
17
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
A park superintendent oversees each NPS unit and50 states and U.S. territories.
Each NPS unit is overseen by a park superintendent, who manages day-to-day administration in accordance with both the agency'’s mission and any laws and regulations specific to the unit.62 79 These units and their leadership report to seven regional directors, who oversee park management and program implementation across defined geographic regions. At the national level, NPS is led by a director and senior executives who manage national programs, policy, and budget from the agency'
agency’s headquarters in Washington, DC.63 As of June 2018, NPS employed roughly 23,000 employees.64
At a Glance: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) | |
Established: 1977
Established: 1977 Key Statute: Mission: Leadership: Director ”* Leadership: Director Headquarters: Average Regions: 3 | |
. Notes: OSMRE Western Region works with three tribal partners to carry out the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA): the Crow Tribe, the Hopi Tribe, and the Navajo Nation. These partners are |
States colored in grey are non-primacy states with no ongoing coal mining operations.
The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) was established as a bureau within DOI following passage of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) in 1977.6581 The law providedauthorized the new agency with the statutory authority to carry out and administer a nationwide program aimed at regulating
program to regulate coal mining in the United States. In particular, OSMRE works with Under SMCRA, OSMRE provides grants to states and tribal communities to reclaim abandoned coal mines, and regulate.82 It also regulates active surface coal mining operations to minimize adverse impacts to the environment and local communities.83
79 NPS park superintendents sometimes are responsible for managing mult iple units based on size, capacity, and geographic proximity.
80 NPS, “Organizational Structure of the National Park Service,” at https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/organizational-structure.htm. 81 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), P.L. 95-87, 91 Stat. 507, 30 U.S.C. §§1201-1328 (enacted August, 3, 1977).
82 For more information, see CRS Report R46266, The Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund: Reauthorization Issues in the 116th Congress, by Lance N. Larson.
83 For more information, see CRS Report R46610, Reclamation of Coal Mining Operations: Select Issues and Legislation, by Lance N. Larson.
Congressional Research Service
18
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
In addition, SMCRA SMCRA also authorizes OSMRE to issue federal payments to the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) coal mineworker health benefits plans.66
America coal mineworker health and pension benefits plans.84
OSMRE serves as the lead regulatory authority over surface coal mining and reclamation
activities for states and tribal communities under the authority granted by Title V of SMCRA.67 SMCRA 85 SMCRA does, however, allowal ow OSMRE to delegate regulatory primacy to states and tribes upon demonstration that a given state or tribe has established regulatory requirements consistent with federal standards.68 Although86 OSMRE operates in an oversight capacity for states that have established such regulatory primacyprimacy states. To date, no tribe
has attained this delegated authority to date (although tribes are eligible to seek regulatory primacy as well).69
OSMRE fulfills.87
OSMRE fulfil s its missions through a three-tiered organizational structure: headquarters in Washington, DC; three regional Officesoffices (Appalachian, Mid-continent, and Western Offices); and multiple
area and field Officesoffices that report directly to the regional offices.70 OSMRE is the smallest of DOI's technical bureaus, employing approximately 400 people nationwide as of June 2018.71
At a Glance: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) | |
Established: 1940
Established: 1940 Key Statute: Mission: Leadership: Director Headquarters: Washington, DC
Average Staff: 8,300 Regions: Unified Regions: 12 (numbered)
Agency Regions: 8 (colored)
Source: *FWS, “ | |
|
.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) is the principal federal agency tasked with the conservation, protection, and restoration of fish, wildlife, and natural habitats across the United
States and its insular territories. The history of FWS can be traced back to the creation of two now-defunct agencies in the late 1800s: the U.S. Commission on Fish and Fisheries in the Department of Commerce and the Division of Economic Ornithology and Mammalogy in the Department of Agriculture.72 These89 The successors to these two agencies were subsequently transferred to DOI in 1939 and subsequently consolidated, creating a single agency known at the time as the Fish and Wildlife Service.73 In 1956, Congress established the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.74
The FWS has a primary-use mission "
84 30 U.S.C. §1232. For more information, see CRS In Focus IF11370, Health and Pension Benefits for United Mine Workers of Am erica Retirees: Recent Legislation, by John J. T opoleski.
85 30 U.S.C. §1254. 86 30 U.S.C. §1253. 87 OSMRE, “Non-Primacy States and T ribes,” at https://www.osmre.gov/programs/AMLIS/nonPrimacyST .shtm. 88 OSMRE, “Who We Are,” at https://www.osmre.gov/about.shtm. 89 For a more complete discussion of the history of FWS, see CRS Report R45265, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: An Overview, by R. Eliot Crafton.
Congressional Research Service
19
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Fish and Wildlife Service.90 In 1956, Congress passed the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, which
established the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.91
The FWS has a primary-use mission “to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife and plants
to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people."75”92 Among its responsibilities, FWS manages the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) under the authority granted bypursuant to the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966.76 as wel as other statutes.93 The NWRS is a network of lands and waters set aside to conserve the nation'’s fish, wildlife, and plants that has grown to include more than 560 refuges, 38 wetland management districts, and other protected areas. More
than 836 million mil ion acres of lands and waters comprise the NWRS; of these lands and waters, 146 million
mil ion acres are classified as National Wildlife Refuges.77
94
In addition, FWS, along with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in
the Department of Commerce, is responsible for implementing the Endangered Species Act (ESA).78 The ESA aims95 The purpose of the ESA is to protect species that are in danger of becoming extinct or could be in danger of becoming extinct in the near future.7996 FWS also assists in international conservation efforts, enforces federal wildlife laws, and administers grant funds to states and
territories for fish and wildlife programs.
Similar to most DOI agencies, FWS has a three-tiered organizational structure comprisedcomposed of national, regional, and local field offices across the United States. The headquarters office—led by an agency director—is split between two locations in Washington, DC, and FallsFal s Church, VA,
which together have primary responsibility for policy formulation and budgeting across the agency's 13 majoragency’s program areas.8097 Eight regional offices oversee FWS field offices and science centers across the United States and U.S. territories, which implement these policies and programs at the
local level.98
90 Reorganization Plan Number III of 1940, 5 U.S.C Appendix —Reorganization Plans. 91 Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 1119, 16 U.S.C. §742a. 92 FWS, “About the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,” at https://www.fws.gov/help/about_us.html. 93 National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, P.L. 89-669, 16 U.S.C. §§668dd et seq. (Note: Congress later passed the National Wildlife Refuge System Im provement Act in 1997 [P.L. 105-57, 111 Stat. 1252], which amended the 1966 law by establishing the refuge system’s mission and providing what is considered to be the organic legislation for its management by FWS). While the Administration Act provided for consolidation of the system, other statues also provide authority for certain system activities. 94 T he 836 million acres that comprise the National Wildlife Refuge System also include waterfowl production areas, coordination areas, and more than 685 million acres of national m onument areas that are located outside National Wildlife Refuge boundaries. T hese national monument areas are National Wildlife Refuge System lands and submerged lands and waters within portions of four marine national monuments that are managed or co -managed by FWS pursuant to presidential proclamations. T hese national monuments were established under the authority granted by the Antiquities Act (54 U.S.C. §320301).
95 Act of December 28, 1973, P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884. 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. 96 16 U.S.C. §1531(b). For a more complete discussion of the ESA, see CRS Report R46677, The Endangered Species Act: Overview and Im plem entation, by Pervaze A. Sheikh, Erin H. Ward, and R. Eliot Crafton .
97 FWS, “About the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services,” at https://www.fws.gov/help/about_us.html. 98 FWS, “Offices,” at https://www.fws.gov/offices.
Congressional Research Service
20
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
U.S. Geological Survey
local level.81 As of June 2018, FWS had roughly 9,000 employees across the country.82
At a Glance: U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) | |
Established: 1879
Established: 1879 Key Statute: Mission: Leadership: Director ”* Leadership: Director Headquarters: Average Regions: 7 | |
|
.
In 1878, the National Academy of Sciences issued a report to Congress asking Congress to provide a plan for surveying and mapping the western territories of the United States.8399 In response, Congress passed an appropriations bill bil the following year that authorized the creation of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Congress established the USGS for the express purpose of
overseeing the "“classification of the public lands, and examination of the geological structure, mineral resources, and products of the national domain."84”100 The authorities and responsibilities of USGS have shifted and evolved over time, with many of its prior activities leading to the formation of new governmental agencies.85101 Today, however, USGS serves as the science agency of DOI, providing physical and biological information across seven interdisciplinaryfive mission areas: (1) water resources, (2) climate and land use change, (3) energy and minerals, (4) energy and mineral resources, (3) natural hazards, (54) core science systems, (6) ecosystems, and (7) environmental health.86, and (5)
ecosystems.102 Unlike other DOI bureaus, USGS has no regulatory or land management mandate.
In addition to its seven programmatic areas, USGS is further organized into seven geographic regions, each under the supervision of a regional director. The regional directors report to a presidentially appointed director based out of the agency's headquarters in Reston, VA. Within each region
A presidential y appointed director based out of the agency’s headquarters in Reston, VA,
administers USGS and oversees seven regional directors across the country. In addition to regional offices, USGS operates science centers, laboratories, and field offices that monitor,
assess, and conduct research on a wide range of topics.87 Overall, USGS had roughly 8,000 employees as of June 2018.88
In addition to the nine technical bureaus, DOI has multiple departmental offices that provide leadership, coordination, and services to the department'103
99 Rabbitt, United States Geological Survey. 100 Sundry Civil Expenses bill, passed on March 3, 1879, 43 U.S.C. §31. 101 Rabbitt, United States Geological Survey. T he Bureau of Reclamation, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are among the modern -day agencies that can trace their roots to USGS and its prior work. 102 For a more complete discussion of the history and programs of USGS, see CRS In Focus IF11433, The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): FY2021 Appropriations Process and Background , by Anna E. Normand. T he FY2021 budget request proposed restructuring mission areas and reorganizing programs under mission areas. In the FY2021 appropriations act, Congress reduced USGS mission areas from six to five by eliminating the Land Resources mission area and transferring its programs and funding to other mission areas.
103 USGS, “About—Organization,” at https://www.usgs.gov/about/organization.
Congressional Research Service
21
link to page 18 link to page 18 link to page 31 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Departmental Offices and Programs104 DOI has multiple departmental offices that provide leadership, coordination, and services to the
department’s various bureaus and programs. These offices coordinate department-wide activities and oversee specialized functions under DOI'’s jurisdiction not administered directly at the bureau level.
The Office of the Secretary provides leadership for the entire department through the
development of policy and through executive oversight of the annual budget and appropriations process. The Office of the Secretary also manages the administrative operations of DOI, including (but not limited to) financial services, information technology and resources, acquisition, and human resources. In addition, the Office of the Secretary manages six other department-wide
programs, offices, and revolving funds:
In 1946, Congress established the Office of the Solicitor to provide advice, counsel, and legal
representation to DOI.94 The office manages DOI's Ethics Office and resolves Freedom of Information Act appeals.109 To accomplish this work, the Office of the Solicitor employs more than 400500 employees, 300400 of whom are licensed attorneys.95110 The Office of the Solicitor is organized into the Immediate Office of the Solicitor, the Departmental Ethics Office, fivethe Departmental FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) Office, the Indian Trust Litigation Office, six legal divisions,
legal divisions, an administrative division, and eight regional offices.96
In 1978, Congress established inspector general positions and offices in more than a dozen specific departments and agencies, including DOI.97112 The mission of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is to provide independent oversight and accountability to the department’s programs, operations, and management. In addition to the Immediate Office of the Inspector
General, the OIG has five offices: the Office of Management; the Office of Investigations; the Office of Audits, Inspections, and Evaluations; the Office of General Counsel; and the Office of Strategic Programs.113 The OIG operates from a headquarters office in Washington, DC, and regional offices located in Herndon, VA; Atlanta, GA; Lakewood, CO; Bil ings, MT; and
programs, operations, and management of the department. OIG has three primary office divisions: (1) the Office of Management serves as the administrative arm; (2) the Office of Investigations conducts, supervises, and coordinates internal investigations on a variety of potential abuses; and (3) the Office of Audits, Inspections, and Evaluations reviews DOI programs and operations for effectiveness and evaluates the financial statements and expenditures of these programs.98 The OIG also operates three regional offices, located in Herndon, VA; Lakewood, CA; and Sacramento, CA.
The American Indian Trust Fund Management Reform Act established the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians (OST) in 1994.99 The OST provides fiduciary oversight and management of the more than 55 million surface acres and 57 million subsurface mineral acres of tribal assets held in trust by the federal government.100 The office carries out its mission from a national office in Washington, DC, and through five regional offices across the nation.101
The OST operates independently from BIA, which carried out these trust responsibilities prior to the 1994 legislation. However, in 2016, Congress passed the Indian Trust Asset Reform Act (ITARA) requiring the Secretary to prepare "a transition plan and timetable for the termination of the Office of the Special Trustee" within two years.102 Although OST still exists, the 2019 Budget Justification proposes transferring some of the functions of OST to other DOI agencies and offices to comply with the reorganization requirements mandated by Congress in ITARA.103 The Budget Justification also includes a proposal to have OST—and the appointed Special Trustee—report directly to the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs starting in FY2019.104 More information regarding this change in OST organizational structure and function is provided in the "DOI Reorganization Plans and Proposals: Issues for Congress" section.
The United States acquired its first insular territories in 1898 with the annexation of the Hawaiian Hawai an
Islands and the acquisition of Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines from Spain following the Spanish-American War.105 119 For much of the early 20th century, territorial oversight of these new possessions fell fel largely to the War Department. In 1934, President Franklin D. Roosevelt created the Division of Territories and Island Possessions to centralize responsibility for coordinating oversight of the nation'’s insular regions.106120 The division—now known as the Office of Insular
Affairs—currently administers federal oversight of American Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, with the goal of promoting their economic, social, and political development.107121 The office also administers federal assistance and U.S. economic commitments to the Freely Associated States: the Federated States of Micronesia,
the Republic of the Marshall Marshal Islands, and the Republic of Palau.108
As of June 2018, the total In 2020, the average number of employees working for DOI was 69,56363,175, according to OPM. (See (see Table 1).109.)123 The data reflect "on-board employment" figures, which calculateare based on the number of employees in pay status at the end of the quarter. Data are published on a quarterly basis (March, June, September, and December); however, figures for September and December 2018 were not available prior to the publication of this report. Data in this report reflect December 2020 figures, unless
116 P.L. 103-412, 108 Stat 4239. 117 Bureau of T rust Funds Administration (BT FA), “About Us,” at https://www.doi.gov/ost/about_us (accessed on February 4, 2021). T he DOI website refers to the OST as the BT FA.
118 OST , “OST Organization Chart ” at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/ost_org_chart_08-03-17_revised.pdf. 119 Utley and Mackintosh, Department of Everything Else. 120 Executive Order 6726, “Establishing the Division of T erritories and Island Possessions in the Department of the Interior and T ransferring T hereto the Functions of the Bureau of Insular Affairs, War Department, Pertaining to the Administration of the Government of Puerto Rico,” May 29, 1934. 121 Office of Insular Affairs, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2021, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/oia-2021-greenbook-final.pdf. 122 Under the Compacts of Free Association, the Freely Associated States (FAS) are considered sovereign nations whose citizens are eligible for various U.S. federal programs and services in exchange for full international defense authority by the United States. For a more complete discussion of FAS policies, see CRS Report R44753, The Pacific Islands: Policy Issues, by T homas Lum and Bruce Vaughn.
123 OPM is an independent agency that functions as the central human resources department of the executive branch and is a primary source for data and information regarding DOI employment figures—as well as the entire federal workforce. For a more complete discussion of OPM data, see CRS Report R43590, Federal Workforce Statistics Sources: OPM and OMB, by Julie Jennings and Jared C. Nagel.
Congressional Research Service
24
link to page 29 link to page 30 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
otherwise specified. Because OPM data include full-time, part-time, and seasonal staff, employment totals tend to spike during the summer months, when agencies such as NPS, BLM, and FWS and
BLM increase their seasonal workforce.
OPM figures differ from DOI Budget Office data. The DOI Budget Office calculates employment by full-time equivalents (FTEs), defined as the total number of regular straight-time hours (not including overtime or holiday hours) worked by employees, divided by the number of compensable hours
applicable to each fiscal year.110
124 Table 1. DOI Employment Trends, by Agency
(on-board employment totals)
Average
Agency
Mar. 2020
June 2020
Sep. 2020
Dec. 2020
2020
Bureau of Land Management
8,838
10,713
10,540
8,887
9,745
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
562
563
571
574
568
Bureau of Reclamation
5,319
5,339
5,350
5,306
5,329
Bureau of Safety & Environmental Enforcement
758
768
768
777
768
Indian Affairs
7,115
7,180
7,138
7,040
7,118
National Park Service
16,744
20,971
20,785
17,069
18,892
Office of the Inspector General
259
261
268
265
263
Office of the Secretary of the Interior
3,393
3,418
3,411
3,446
3,417
Office of the Solicitor
493
494
516
529
508
Office of Surface Mining
348
351
356
353
352
Reclamation & Enforcement
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
8,103
8,291
8,414
8,399
8,302
U.S. Geological Survey
7,802
7,868
7,996
7,989
7,914
Total—Department of the Interior
59,734
66,217
66,113
60,634
63,175
Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), FedScope database, Employment cubes, Cabinet-Level Agencies (on-board employment totals)
Agency |
Sep-17 |
Dec-17 |
Mar-18 |
Jun-18 |
Average Totals |
|||||
Bureau of Land Management |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Bureau of Reclamation |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Bureau of Safety & Environmental Enforcement |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Indian Affairs |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
National Park Service |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Office of the Inspector General |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Office of the Secretary of the Interior |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Office of the Solicitor |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
U.S. Geological Survey |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total—Department of the Interior |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), FedScope database, Employment cubes, Cabinet-Level Agencies parameter set to Department of the Interior, at https://www.fedscope.opm.gov/.
. Data accessed from FedScope on April 14, 2021. Notes: Numbers reflect employees on board (in a pay status). Figures may not add up to totals shown due to rounding. "“Indian Affairs" is meant to include” includes the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE). Per datainformation provided to CRS from DOI, "“Office of the Secretary of the Interior"” includes employees from the Office of Insular Affairs, Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians, and the various Assistant SecretariesSecretary Offices that oversee DOI bureaus and agencies.
The OPM Fedscope data presented in in Table 1 are available by location of employment for each bureau and office reflected. Table 2 shows DOI employment figures both within and outside the DC core-based statistical area (CBSA). OPM defines a CBSA as "a geographic area having at least one urban area of population, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured by commuting ties."111 CBSAs differ from metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs)—a separate statistical definition also reported on by OPM—which typically encompass a smaller geographic area than CBSAs. For example, the DC MSA includes many but not all of the counties and surrounding cities covered under the DC CBSA. For instance, the DC MSA excludes Reston, VA, where the headquarters of USGS is located.112
Table 2. DOI Employment: Inside vs. Outside the DC Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSA)
(as of June 2018)
Agency |
Inside DC CBSA |
Outside DC CBSA |
Total Employment |
% Inside DC CBSA |
||||
Bureau of Land Management |
|
|
|
| ||||
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management |
|
|
|
| ||||
Bureau of Reclamation |
|
|
|
| ||||
Bureau of Safety & Environmental Enforcement |
|
|
|
| ||||
Indian Affairs |
|
|
|
| ||||
National Park Service |
|
|
|
| ||||
Office of the Inspector General |
|
|
|
| ||||
Office of the Secretary of the Interior |
|
|
|
| ||||
Office of the Solicitor |
|
|
|
| ||||
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement |
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service |
|
|
|
| ||||
U.S. Geological Survey |
|
|
|
| ||||
Totals—Department of the Interior |
|
|
|
|
Notes: Data reflect places of employment for DOI staff, not places of residence. Included in the DC CBSA figures are DOI staff considered to be based out of headquarters as well as administrative, regional, and field staff based within the boundaries of the geographic definition. For example, National Park Service staff who work at the National Mall and Memorial Parks unit in Washington, DC, are considered field staff but are included in the DC CBSA figures. "Indian Affairs" is meant to include the for DOI staff, not places of residence. “Indian Affairs” includes the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE). Per datainformation provided to CRS from DOI, "“Office of the Secretary of the Interior"” includes employees from from the Office of Insular Affairs, Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians, and the various Assistant Secretaries Secretary Offices that oversee DOI bureaus and agencies.
125 OPM, Fedscope, “Data Definitions,” at https://www.fedscope.opm.gov/datadefn/index.asp, accessed on December 8, 2020.
126 A 2019 version of this CRS report included DOI employment figures in what OPM referred to as the “DC core-based statistical area (CBSA).” OPM defined a CBSA as “a geographic area having at least one urban area of population, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core as measured by commut ing ties.”126 OPM no longer reports on employment figures within the DC CBSA. Largely as a result of this change, figures in this report for “Inside DC” are lower than those for “Inside DC CBSA” published in the 2019 report.
Congressional Research Service
26
link to page 31
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Overview of DOI Appropriations Discretionary funding for DOI is provided primarily through Title I of the annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bil .127 The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the Central Utah Project, however, receive funding through the Energy and Water Development appropriations bil .128 Several of the agencies that receive discretionary funds through these two appropriations bil s also receive mandatory funding under various authorizing
statutes.
DOI Discretionary Appropriations: FY2017-FY2021129 Figure 4 shows the budget trends for both the Interior and the Energy and Water appropriations bil s over the past five fiscal years (FY2017-FY2021). From FY2017 to FY2021, total DOI appropriations increased 13% in current dollars.130 Total appropriations including supplemental appropriations fluctuated from FY2017 to FY2021. If supplemental appropriations are not considered, DOI discretionary appropriations increased each year from FY2017 to FY2020.
Regular discretionary appropriations decreased by roughly 1% from FY2020 to FY2021 and by
more than 5% including supplemental appropriations.
Figure 4. DOI Discretionary Appropriations: FY2017-FY2021
(in current dol ars)
Source: CRS, with data from the annual Interior Budget in Brief for FY2019-FY2021. Figures for each of FY2017-FY2019 were taken from the volume published two years fol owing the fiscal year in question (e.g., for FY2017,
127 Hereinafter, the annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill is referred to as the Interior appropriations bill. 128 T he Central Utah Project (CUP) is a federal water storage project originally authorized under the management of Reclamation, although it is now overseen and administered by a separate office within DOI .
129 For more in-depth information on DOI appropriations, see CRS Report R46519, Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: Overview of FY2021 Appropriations, by Carol Hardy Vincent and CRS Report R46384, Energy and Water Developm ent: FY2021 Appropriations, by Mark Holt and Corrie E. Clark. 130 Amounts in this section reflect current dollars. Using inflation-adjusted (constant) dollars would result in different amounts of change during this five-year period.
Congressional Research Service
27
link to page 33 U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
figures are from FY2019 document). FY2020 figures reflect enacted totals taken from H.Rept. 116-449 and H.Rept. 116-448. Supplemental figures taken from P.L. 116-136 and P.L. 116-113. FY2021 figures reflect enacted totals taken from P.L. 116-260. Notes: Actual totals include rescissions and transfers authorized by the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies and the Energy and Water Development appropriations bil s. Figures reflect Emergency Supplemental Appropriations for FY2018 and FY2019. For FY2018 this includes $50 mil ion enacted as part of the Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Requirements Act, 2017 (P.L. 115-72), and $516 mil ion enacted as part of the Further Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Requirements Act, 2018 ( P.L. 115-123, Division B, Subdivision I). For FY2019, this reflects $327.8 mil ion in funding provided as part of the Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Act, 2019 (P.L. 116-20). For FY2020, this reflects $4 mil ion in funding provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as part of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act (P.L. 116-113) and funding provided as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act or the ‘ CARES Act” (P.L. 116-136). The CARES Act contained $756 mil ion for various activities of the Bureau of Indian Affairs ($453 mil ion); the Bureau of Indian Education ($69 mil ion); the Office of the Secretary ($158.4); the Office of Insular Affairs ($55 mil ion); and the Bureau of Reclamation ($20.6 mil ion).
DOI Discretionary Appropriations: FY2021, by Agency Figure 5 shows the breakdown of enacted FY2021 appropriations for DOI bureaus, offices, and programs funded through the Interior and the Energy and Water appropriations bil s. Figures are presented in total dollars (in mil ions) and as percentages of the department’s $15.4 bil ion in
enacted appropriations for FY2021.
Congressional Research Service
28
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Figure 5. DOI Discretionary Appropriations for FY2021, by Agency
(in mil ions)
Source: FY2021 figures reflect enacted totals taken from the Joint Explanatory Text of P.L. 116-260. Notes: Figures may not add to total shown due to rounding. “Indian Affairs” includes funding for the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE), and the Office of the Special Trustee (OST); “Departmental Offices” includes funding for the Office of the Secretary, Insular Affairs, Office of the Solicitor, and the Office of Inspector General; “Department-Wide Programs” includes funding for Wildlife Fire Management, Central Hazardous Materials Fund, Natural Resource Damage Assessment Fund, Working Capital Fund, and Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT; which was funded in the General Provisions of Title I of the FY2021 appropriations law). Additional abbreviations are (clockwise): Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), National Park Service (NPS), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE).
Author Information
Mark K. DeSantis
Analyst in Natural Resources Policy
Congressional Research Service
29
U.S. Department of the Interior: An Overview
Key Policy Staff
Area of Expertise
Name
Bureau of Land Management
Carol Hardy-Vincent
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Laura B. Comay
Bureau of Reclamation
Charles V. Stern
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
Laura B. Comay
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Tana Fitzpatrick
Bureau of Indian Education
Cassandria Dortch
National Park Service
Laura B. Comay / Mark K. DeSantis
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
Lance N. Larson
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
R. Eliot Crafton
U.S. Geological Survey
Anna E. Normand
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should n ot be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Congressional Research Service
R45480 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED
30 agencies.
Discretionary funding for DOI is provided primarily through Title I of the annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill.113 The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the Central Utah Project are the exceptions, as they receive funding through the Energy and Water Development appropriations bill.114 Several of the agencies that receive discretionary funds through these two appropriations bills also receive mandatory funding under various authorizing statutes.
Figure 3 shows the budget trends for both the Interior and the Energy and Water appropriations bills over the past five fiscal years (FY2014-FY2018). From FY2014 to FY2018, total DOI appropriations increased 29% in current dollars. This increase includes the $566 million in FY2018 emergency supplemental appropriations for disaster relief appropriated to DOI in P.L. 115-72 and P.L. 115-123. If supplemental appropriations are not considered, total DOI appropriations increased 23% over the same period.116
(in current dollars) |
![]() |
|
Figure 4 shows the breakdown of enacted FY2018 appropriations for DOI bureaus, offices, and programs funded through the Interior and the Energy and Water appropriations bills. Figures are presented in total dollars (in millions) and as percentages of the department's $15.2 billion in enacted appropriations for FY2018. Supplemental emergency appropriations for FY2018 are shown as a separate segment of the total DOI budget; however, these funds were distributed across several DOI bureaus and programs.
(in millions) |
![]() |
Sources: Prepared by CRS with data from the House Appropriations Committee. Supplemental figures taken from the Additional Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Requirements Act, 2017 (P.L. 115-72), and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-123). Notes: Figures may not add to total shown due to rounding. Per the Interior Budget in Brief for FY2019, "Indian Affairs" is meant to include the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE), and the Office of the Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs (AS-IA); "Departmental Offices" includes funding for the Office of the Secretary, Insular Affairs, Office of the Solicitor, Office of Inspector General, and the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians; "Department-Wide Programs" includes funding for Wildlife Fire Management, Central Hazardous Materials Fund, Natural Resource Damage Assessment Fund, Working Capital Fund, and Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT). Additional abbreviations are (clockwise): Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Central Utah Project (CUP), National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE). |
Executive branch reorganization efforts are an ongoing area of congressional interest and scrutiny as part of Congress's lawmaking and oversight functions. Congress uses a variety of tools—including authorizing legislation, appropriations legislation, and oversight activities—to shape and organize the executive branch and its agencies.117
Several changes to DOI and its organizational structure have taken effect starting in FY2019. Congress previously authorized and approved some of these changes and proposals in the form of appropriations and/or authorizing legislation. Other changes—including broader reorganization proposals put forth by the Trump Administration—have been proposed for FY2019 but are not in effect.
The 115th Congress approved several internal office transfers and realignments. For instance, Congress transferred appropriations for the Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR) from DOI's Office of the Secretary to Department-Wide Programs for FY2018.118 Meanwhile, the 2019 Interior Budget in Brief reflects the transfer of both DOI's Oceans Program and the Office of International Affairs from the Office of the Assistant Secretary, Policy, Management and Budget to the Office of the Assistant Secretary, Insular and International Affairs.119
The 114th Congress passed legislation authorizing the reorganization of the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians (OST). In 2016, ITARA directed the Secretary to—among other things—"ensure that appraisals and valuations of Indian trust property are administered by a single bureau, agency, or other administrative entity within the Department" not later than 18 months after enactment.120 To comply with this requirement, the FY2019 budget request reflects the approved transfer of the Office of Appraisal Services within OST to the Office of the Secretary's Appraisal and Valuation Services Office, thereby consolidating all appraisal activities within a single entity.121 This change is in addition to a proposed shift in the reporting relationship of OST also included in the FY2019 request. Under this proposal, starting in FY2019, OST would report through the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Indian Affairs rather than directly to the Office of the Secretary (see Figure 2).122
As noted in the "Introduction" to this report, the Trump Administration also proposed additional, broader DOI reorganizational plans for consideration. On March 13, 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order 13781 to "improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability of the executive branch."123 The order required executive agency heads to, "if appropriate," submit a proposed reorganization plan for their agencies to the director of the Office of Management and Budget within 180 days. Then-Secretary of the Interior Zinke subsequently submitted a proposal for reorganization aimed at—among other goals—improving agency coordination and service to the public.124 Included in this proposal is a plan to consolidate the various agency-specific regional boundaries (as seen in the "At a Glance" boxes included in each bureau summary) into 12 Unified Regional Boundaries. In addition, the plan looks to shift some resources and authority "to the field," potentially in the form of staff, budget, and/or facilities.
President Trump issued a separate set of reorganization recommendations in June 2018 as part of the Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century report.125 Two proposals in particular would affect DOI and its structure. The first would consolidate most of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (USACE's) Civil Works Division within DOI, including USACE's activities related to flood and storm damage reduction and aquatic ecosystem restoration.126 The second recommendation would transfer NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service from the Department of Commerce to DOI and merge it with the FWS. This proposal would consolidate administration of the ESA and other wildlife laws under one agency.127
The transfers and reorganization proposals discussed here illustrate the potential changes in the structure of DOI and its operations. They also provide insight into areas of possible congressional and executive branch interest moving forward. The 116th Congress may consider additional oversight of these proposals and/or propose new initiatives and plans for the organization and administration of DOI and its bureaus.
Author Contact Information
Key Policy Staff
Area of Expertise |
Name |
Bureau of Land Management |
Carol Hardy Vincent |
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management |
Laura B. Comay / Marc Humphries |
Bureau of Reclamation |
Charles V. Stern |
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement |
Laura B. Comay / Marc Humphries |
Bureau of Indian Affairs |
Peter Folger (coordinator) |
Bureau of Indian Education |
Cassandria Dortch |
National Park Service |
Laura B. Comay |
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement |
David Bearden |
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
R. Eliot Crafton |
U.S. Geological Survey |
Peter Folger |
1. |
Department of the Interior (DOI), "Who We Are," at https://www.doi.gov/whoweare (last accessed September 27, 2018). |
2. |
Robert M. Utley and Barry Mackintosh, The Department of Everything Else: Highlights of Interior History (U.S. Department of the Interior, 1989), at https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/utley-mackintosh/. Hereinafter referred to as Utley and Mackintosh, Department of Everything Else. |
3. |
For data and other information on federal land management, see CRS Report R42346, Federal Land Ownership: Overview and Data, by Carol Hardy Vincent, Laura A. Hanson, and Carla N. Argueta, and CRS Report R43429, Federal Lands and Related Resources: Overview and Selected Issues for the 115th Congress, coordinated by Katie Hoover. For a brief summary of the responsibilities of DOI land management agencies, see CRS In Focus IF10585, The Federal Land Management Agencies, by Katie Hoover. The outer continental shelf (OCS) is defined by statute as all submerged lands lying seaward of state coastal waters (3 miles offshore) which are under U.S. jurisdiction (43 U.S.C. §1301). |
4. |
For a more complete discussion of the history and legal authority around executive branch reorganization, see CRS Report R44909, Executive Branch Reorganization, by Henry B. Hogue. |
5. |
Executive Order 13781, "Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch," 82 Federal Register 13959-13960, March 13, 2017. |
6. |
Executive Office of the President, Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century: Reform Plan and Reorganization Recommendations, June 25, 2018, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Government-Reform-and-Reorg-Plan.pdf. For DOI-related plans and recommendations, see pp. 13, 30-31, and 37-28. |
7. |
The Department of State (initially established as the Department of Foreign Affairs) was created in 1781 (1 Stat. 28). The Department of War (1 Stat.49) and Department of the Treasury (1 Stat. 65) each were established eight years later, in 1789. |
8. |
Utley and Mackintosh, Department of Everything Else. |
9. |
The General Land Office Act (2 Stat. 716), April 25, 1812, created the General Land Office (GLO) in the Department of the Treasury to "superintend, execute, and perform, all such acts and things, touching or respecting the public lands of the United States," including those functions formerly vested in the Secretaries of War and State. |
10. |
John T. Woolley and Gerhard Peters, The Presidency A to Z, 5th ed. (CQ Press, 2012), p. 315. |
11. |
Guide to the Presidency and the Executive Branch, ed. Michael Nelson, 5th ed. (CQ Press, 2012). |
12. |
9 Stat. 395. |
13. |
9 Stat. 395, §§7-10. |
14. |
DOI, "History of the Interior," at https://www.doi.gov/whoweare/history (last accessed September 27, 2018). |
15. |
|
16. |
DOI, Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2018-2022, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2018-2022-strategic-plan.pdf. |
17. |
Hereinafter, the report will use the terms bureaus and agencies interchangeably to refer to DOI's technical bureaus. |
18. |
43 U.S.C. §§1452-1476. |
19. |
The Inspector General Act of 1978 (P.L. 95-452, 92 Stat. 1101). |
20. |
60 Stat. 312, 43 U.S.C. §1455. |
21. |
American Indian Trust Fund Management Reform Act, P.L. 103-412, 108 Stat. 4244, 25 U.S.C. §§4041-4046. |
22. |
The FY2019 budget request from then-Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke proposes a change in reporting structure of the Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians that would move the office and its functions under the administration of the Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs starting in FY2019. See the "Departmental Offices and Programs" section for more information. |
23. |
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, P.L. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2469, 25 U.S.C. §2704. |
24. |
Calculation based on OPM Fedscope data. |
25. |
William S. Belko, "John C. Calhoun and the Creation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs: An Essay on Political Rivalry, Ideology, and Policymaking in the Early Republic," The South Carolina Historical Magazine 105, no. 3 (2004), p. 194, at http://www.jstor.org/stable/27570693. |
26. |
From an act dated July 9, 1832, ch. 174, §1, 4 Stat. 564. |
27. |
The Office of Indian Affairs was redesignated the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) by Secretarial Order No. 2362. |
28. |
Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), "About Us," at https://www.bia.gov/about-us. |
29. |
For a more complete discussion of BIE and its various duties, see CRS Report RL34205, Indian Elementary-Secondary Education: Programs, Background, and Issues, by Cassandria Dortch. |
30. |
BIA, "What We Do," at https://www.bia.gov/bia/ots/what-we-do. |
31. |
DOI, Indian Affairs, Budget Justifications Fiscal Year 2008, pp. IA-EDUC-5 to -6. |
32. |
DOI, Indian Affairs, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019, pp. IA-GS-1. |
33. |
BIA, "Regional Offices" at https://www.bia.gov/regional-offices. As of 2018, BIA reported having a total of 53 agencies across the country, as well as two facilities for irrigation projects under BIA management. |
34. |
OPM Fedscope data. This figure includes employees of both BIA and BIE as Fedscope does not distinguish between the two bureaus in their reporting. The Indian Affairs Shutdown Contingency Plan—December 2018 indicated that BIA had 4,057 on-board employees, whereas BIE had 3,344 employees for a total of 7,401 employees as of December 2018. |
35. |
DOI, Secretary Harold L. Ickes, Secretarial Order 2225, July 15, 1946. Implemented as part of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1946 (11 Federal Register 7875, 60 Stat. 1097), effective July 16, 1946. The GLO, created by Congress in 1812, helped convey lands to pioneers settling western lands in the early 19th century. The U.S. Grazing Service (then known as the Division of Grazing Control) was established in 1934 to administer grazing on public rangelands. (Taylor Grazing Act, 48 Stat. 1269.) |
36. |
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Public Land Statistics 2017 (as of June 2018), Table 1-3, at https://www.blm.gov/sites/blm.gov/files/PublicLandStatistics2017.pdf. Hereinafter referred to as "BLM, Public Land Statistics 2017." |
37. |
BLM, Public Land Statistics 2017. |
38. |
Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. §§1701, et seq. FLPMA defines multiple use as " ... the management of the public lands and their various resource values so that they are utilized in the combination that will best meet the present and future needs of the American people ... " and sustained yield as " ... the achievement and maintenance in perpetuity of a high-level annual or regular periodic output of the various renewable resources of the public lands consistent with multiple use." (43 U.S.C. § 1702(h)). |
39. |
Although BLM was established in 1946, FLPMA is considered the agency's organic act, as it consolidated and articulated the agency's responsibilities. |
40. |
43 C.F.R. §1821.10a |
41. |
OPM Fedscope data. |
42. |
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953, 42 U.S.C. §§1301 et seq. |
43. |
For a discussion of state and federal waters, see CRS Report RL33404, Offshore Oil and Gas Development: Legal Framework, by Adam Vann. |
44. |
Secretarial Order 3071, January 19, 1982, established the Minerals Management Service (MMS) following a number of hearings and investigations into allegations of fraud, lack of oversight, and inadequate collection of royalties from oil and gas production on federal lands and the outer continental shelf (OCS). |
45. |
OPM Fedscope data. |
46. |
BOEM, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019, p. 7, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2019_boem_budget_justification.pdf. The Gulf of Mexico, California, and Alaska regions are managed from offices in New Orleans, LA; Camarillo, CA; and Anchorage, AK; respectively. BOEM's Office of Renewable Energy Program based in Sterling, VA, oversees wind and water development in the Atlantic OCS region. The Gulf of Mexico Regional Office oversees oil and gas activities in the Atlantic OCS; however, no active OCS oil and gas leases exist in the region, nor are there any proposed lease sales under the proposed Five-Year Leasing Program 2017-2022. |
47. |
U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), "A Very Brief History," at https://www.usbr.gov/history/Reclamationhist.html. |
48. |
Newlands Reclamation Act, P.L. 57-161, 32 Stat. 388 (enacted June 17, 1902). Over time, Reclamation expanded the number of states within which it worked. Reclamation now manages projects constructed by the agency in 17 western states (referred to as Reclamation states): AZ, CO, CA, ID, KS, MT, NE, ND, NM, NV, OK, OR, SD, TX, UT, WA, WY. |
49. |
Mary C. Rabbitt, A Brief History of the United States Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1975, pp. 3-4, at https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70039204. Hereinafter referred to as Rabbitt, United States Geological Survey. |
50. |
|
51. |
Nonreimbursable costs include costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement and recreation, among other things. For more information on Reclamation project repayment, see CRS In Focus IF10806, Bureau of Reclamation Project Authorization and Financing, by Charles V. Stern. |
52. |
For a more comprehensive discussion of Reclamation's functions and responsibilities, see CRS In Focus IF10841, Bureau of Reclamation: FY2019 Appropriations, by Charles V. Stern. |
53. |
The regional offices are the Pacific Northwest Region, Great Plains Region, Upper Colorado Region, Lower Colorado Region, and Mid-Pacific Region. |
54. |
OPM Fedscope data. |
55. |
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE), "About Us," at https://www.bsee.gov/who-we-are/about-us. |
56. |
BSEE, "BSEE Contingency Plan: For Use in the Event of an Orderly Shutdown of the U.S. Government," September 2017 at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/2017_09_bsee_contingency_plan.pdf. According to OPM data, Sterling, VA is included within the core-based statistical area (CBSA) for Washington, DC. |
57. |
The Gulf of Mexico Regional Office oversees activities for the Atlantic OCS region. |
58. |
BSEE shares regional offices in New Orleans, LA, Camarillo, CA, and Anchorage, AK, with BOEM staff. |
59. |
These programs are Oil Spill Preparedness Division, Environmental Compliance Division, Safety and Incidents Investigations Division, Office of Offshore Regulatory Programs, Safety Enforcement Division, and Office of Administration. |
60. |
OPM Fedscope data. |
61. |
39 Stat. 535. |
62. |
NPS park superintendents sometimes are responsible for managing multiple units based on size, capacity and geographic proximity. |
63. |
NPS, "Organizational Structure of the National Park Service," at https://www.nps.gov/aboutus/organizational-structure.htm. |
64. |
OPM FedScope data indicates that as of June 2018, NPS had 23,022 employees. This number differs from the 19,700 figure listed in the "At a Glance" section. Because OPM data includes full-time, part-time, and seasonal employees, total NPS employment fluctuates substantially throughout the year. On average, NPS employs roughly 19,700 staff over the course of the fiscal year. See "DOI Employment " section for more information. |
65. |
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA), P.L. 95-87, 91 Stat. 507, 30 U.S.C. §§1201-1328 (enacted August, 3, 1977). |
66. |
30 U.S.C. §1232. Payments are funded with mandatory appropriations from the General Fund of the U.S. Treasury and transfers of interest accrued on the unexpended balance of the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund. |
67. |
30 U.S.C. §1254. |
68. |
30 U.S.C. §1253. |
69. |
OSMRE, "Non-Primacy States and Tribes," at https://www.osmre.gov/programs/AMLIS/nonPrimacyST.shtm. |
70. |
OSMRE, "Who We Are," at https://www.osmre.gov/about.shtm. |
71. |
OPM FedScope data. |
72. |
For a more complete discussion of the history of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), see CRS Report R45265, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: An Overview, by R. Eliot Crafton. |
73. |
Reorganization Plan Number III of 1940, 5 U.S.C Appendix—Reorganization Plans. |
74. |
Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 1119, 16 U.S.C. §742a. |
75. |
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), "About the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service," at https://www.fws.gov/help/about_us.html. |
76. |
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, P.L. 89-669, 16 U.S.C. §§668dd et seq. (Note: Congress later passed the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act in 1997 (P.L. 105-57, 111 Stat. 1252), which amended the 1966 law by strengthening the refuge system's mission and providing what is considered to be the organic legislation for its management by FWS). |
77. |
The 836 million acres that comprise the National Wildlife Refuge System also include Waterfowl Production Areas, Coordination Areas, and more than 685 million acres of National Monument Areas that are located outside National Wildlife Refuge boundaries. These National Monument Areas are Refuge System lands and submerged lands and waters within portions of four marine national monuments that are managed or co-managed by FWS pursuant to Presidential Proclamations. These national monuments were established under the same authority granted by the Antiquities Act (54 U.S.C. §320301) as the national monuments administered by the National Park Service, but are not part of the 418 units that comprise the National Park System. |
78. |
Act of December 28, 1973, P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884. 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. |
79. |
16 U.S.C. §1531(b). For a more complete discussion of the ESA see CRS Report RL31654, The Endangered Species Act: A Primer, by Pervaze A. Sheikh. |
80. |
FWS program areas include (1) Wildlife and Short Fish Restoration; (2) National Wildlife Refuge System; (3) Migratory Birds; (4) Fish and Aquatic Conservation; (5) Ecological Services; (6) International Affairs; (7) Law Enforcement; (8) Science Applications; (9) External Affairs; (10) Budget, Planning, and Human Capital; (11) Business Management and Operations; (12) Information Resources and Technology Management; and (13) National Conservation Training Center. |
81. |
FWS, "Offices," at https://www.fws.gov/offices. |
82. |
OPM Fedscope data. |
83. |
Rabbitt, United States Geological Survey. |
84. |
Sundry Civil Expenses bill, passed on March 3, 1879, 43 U.S.C. §31. |
85. |
Rabbitt, United States Geological Survey. The Bureau of Reclamation, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission are among the modern-day agencies that can trace their roots to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and its prior work. |
86. |
For a more complete discussion of the history and programs of USGS, see CRS Report R43777, U.S. Geological Survey: Background, Appropriations, and Issues for Congress, by Pervaze A. Sheikh and Peter Folger. |
87. |
USGS, "About—Organization," at https://www.usgs.gov/about/organization. |
88. |
The most recent numbers from June 2018 reported via OPM's FedScope indicate that USGS employs 8,015 employees nationwide. |
89. |
The offices in this section do not represent all DOI divisions and programs. Instead, this list reflects the offices and programs included as discrete line items under the "Departmental Offices" and "Department-Wide Programs" accounts funded through the annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill (See "Overview of DOI Appropriations" section for more information). |
90. |
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, P.L. 96-510, approved December 11, 1980. 42 U.S.C. §§9601 et seq. For a more complete discussion of CERCLA, see CRS Report R41039, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act: A Summary of Superfund Cleanup Authorities and Related Provisions of the Act, by David M. Bearden. |
91. |
For a more complete discussion of the Payments in Lieu of Taxes program, see CRS Report RL31392, PILT (Payments in Lieu of Taxes): Somewhat Simplified, by Katie Hoover. |
92. |
Reclamation also has limited responsibility to manage land under its jurisdiction for wildfires. For a more complete discussion of federal wildfire programs, see CRS In Focus IF10732, Federal Assistance for Wildfire Response and Recovery, by Katie Hoover. |
93. |
43 U.S.C. §1467 authorized the creation of the working capital fund in the Department of the Interior. |
94. |
43 U.S.C. §1455, June 26, 1946, ch. 494, 60 Stat. 312. |
95. |
Statement taken from the Office of the Solicitor website at https://www.doi.gov/solicitor (last accessed October 15, 2018). |
96. |
Office of the Solicitor, "The Regions," at https://www.doi.gov/solicitor/regions. |
97. |
The Inspector General Act of 1978 (92 Stat. 1101, P.L. 95-452). |
98. |
DOI, Office of the Inspector General, "About Us," at https://www.doioig.gov/about-us. |
99. |
P.L. 103-412, 108 Stat 4239. |
100. |
Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians (OST), "OST Statistics and Facts," at https://www.doi.gov/ost/about_us/Statistics-and-Facts. |
101. |
Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians (OST), "OST Organization Chart" at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/ost_org_chart_08-03-17_revised.pdf. |
102. | |
103. |
In particular, Section 305(a) of ITARA directs the Secretary to "ensure, that appraisals and valuations of Indian trust property are administered by a single bureau, agency, or other administrative entity within the Department" not later than 18 months after enactment. The FY2019 budget request reflects the transfer of the Office of Appraisal Services within OST to the Office of the Secretary's Appraisal and Valuation Services Office. This would allow for the consolidation of all appraisal services into a single entity as required by ITARA. |
104. |
OST, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019, OST-1, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2019_ost_budget_justification.pdf. |
105. |
Utley and Mackintosh, Department of Everything Else. |
106. |
Executive Order 6726, "Establishing the Division of Territories and Island Possessions in the Department of the Interior and Transferring Thereto the Functions of the Bureau of Insular Affairs, War Department, Pertaining to the Administration of the Government of Puerto Rico," May 29, 1934. |
107. |
Office of Insular Affairs, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2019_oia_budget_justification.pdf. |
108. |
Under the Compacts of Free Association, the Freely Associated States (FAS) are considered sovereign nations whose citizens are eligible for various U.S. federal programs and services in exchange for full international defense authority by the United States. For a more complete discussion of FAS policies, see CRS Report R44753, The Pacific Islands: Policy Issues, by Thomas Lum and Bruce Vaughn. |
109. |
OPM is an independent agency that functions as the central human resources department of the executive branch and is the primary source for data and information regarding DOI employment figures—as well as the entire federal workforce. For a more complete discussion of OPM data, see CRS Report R43590, Federal Workforce Statistics Sources: OPM and OMB, by Julie Jennings and Jared C. Nagel. |
110. |
For comparison, the FY2019 DOI budget justification requested 59,759 full-time equivalents (FTEs) and listed FY2018 enacted FTEs as 64,353. |
111. |
OPM, "Major Work Locations of the Executive Branch FY2017," Table 2, at https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/data-analysis-documentation/federal-employment-reports/reports-publications/major-work-locations-of-the-executive-branch.pdf. |
112. |
The DC core-based statistical area, meanwhile, includes the District of Columbia; Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, Prince William, Stafford, Clarke, Fauquier, Spotsylvania, and Warren Counties in Virginia; Calvert, Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's Counties in Maryland; and Jefferson County in West Virginia. It also includes the independent cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, Manassas Park, and Fredericksburg in Virginia, which fall outside these county lines. |
113. |
Hereinafter, the annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill is referred to as the Interior appropriations bill. |
114. |
The Central Utah Project (CUP) is a federal water storage project originally authorized under the management of Reclamation, although it is now overseen and administered by a separate office within DOI. |
115. |
For more in-depth information on DOI appropriations, see CRS Report R44934, Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: Overview of FY2019 Appropriations, by Carol Hardy Vincent, and CRS Report R45258, Energy and Water Development: FY2019 Appropriations, by Mark Holt and Corrie E. Clark. |
116. |
Amounts in this section reflect current dollars. Using inflation-adjusted (constant) dollars would result in different amounts of change during this five-year period. |
117. |
For a more complete discussion of Congress's constitutional responsibility in establishing the structural organization of the executive branch, see CRS Report R44909, Executive Branch Reorganization, by Henry B. Hogue. |
118. |
DOI, Interior Budget in Brief—Fiscal Year 2018, p. BH-91, at https://edit.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/2018_highlights_book.pdf. |
119. |
DOI, Interior Budget in Brief—Fiscal Year 2019, p. BH-94, at https://edit.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/2019_highlights_book.pdf. |
120. |
25 U.S.C. §5635a |
121. |
OST, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019, OST-1, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2019_ost_budget_justification.pdf. |
122. |
OST, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2019, OST-1-2. |
123. |
Executive Order 13781, "Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch," 82 Federal Register 13959-13960, March 13, 2017. |
124. |
DOI, "DOI: Planning for the Next 100 Years," at https://www.doi.gov/employees/reorg/doi-planning-next-100-years. |
125. |
Executive Office of the President, Delivering Government Solutions in the 21st Century: Reform Plan and Reorganization Recommendations, June 25, 2018, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Government-Reform-and-Reorg-Plan.pdf. See p. 125 for a summary of DOI-specific proposals. Hereinafter Office of the President, Delivering Government Solutions. |
126. |
Office of the President, Delivering Government Solutions, pp. 30-31. Remaining functions of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—specifically commercial navigation programs—would be transferred to the Department of Transportation under this proposal. |
127. |
Office of the President, Delivering Government Solutions, pp. 37-38. |