Contents

• Introduction
• Budget Sequestration
• Budget Enforcement Rules
• Budget Control Act
• Statutory PAYGO
• Medicare Overview
• Beneficiary Costs
• Provider and Plan Payments
• Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
• Administrative Spending
• Medicare Sequestration Rules
• Medicare Sequester Execution
• Timing
• Reductions in Benefit Spending
• Parts A and B
• Part C
• Part D
• HCFAC
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program
• Administrative Expenses
• Medicare and the BCA Mandatory Sequester

Summary

Sequestration is the automatic reduction (i.e., cancellation) of certain federal spending, generally by a uniform percentage. The sequester is a budget enforcement tool that was established by Congress in the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA, also known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act; P.L. 99-177, as amended) and was intended to encourage compromise and action, rather than actually being implemented (also known as triggered). Generally, this budget enforcement tool has been incorporated into laws to either discourage Congress from violating specific budget objectives or encourage Congress to fulfill specific budget objectives. When Congress breaks these types of rulesor encourage certain budget objectives or goals. When these goals are not met, either through the enactment of a law or the lack thereof, a sequester is triggered and certain federal spending is reduced.

Sequestration is of recent interest due to its current use as an enforcement mechanism for three budget enforcement rules created by the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (Statutory PAYGO; P.L. 111-139) and the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA; P.L. 112-25). At present, only the BCA mandatory sequester ishas been triggered. Under the BCA, the sequestration of mandatory spending was originally scheduled to occur in FY2013 through FY2021; however, subsequent legislation, including the Bipartisan Budget Act of 20182019 (BBA 182019; P.L. 115-123116-37), extended sequestration for mandatory spending through FY2027FY2029. The Statutory PAYGO sequester and BCA discretionary sequester are current law and can be triggered if associated budget enforcement rules are broken (and Congress does not take action to change or waive these rules).

Medicare is a federal program that pays for certain health care services of qualified beneficiaries. The program is funded using both mandatory and discretionary spending and is impacted by any sequestration order issued in accordance with the aforementioned laws. Medicare is mainly impacted by the sequestration of mandatory funds since Medicare benefit payments (the majority of Medicare expenditures) are considered mandatory spending. Special sequestration rules limit the extent to which Medicare benefit spending can be reduced in a given fiscal year. This limit varies depending on the type of sequestration order.

Under a BCA mandatory sequestration order, Medicare benefit payments and Medicare Integrity Program spending cannot be reduced by more than 2%. Under a Statutory PAYGO sequestration order, Medicare benefit payments and Medicare Program Integrity spending cannot be reduced by more than 4%. These limits do not apply to mandatory administrative Medicare spending under either type of sequestration order. These limits also do not apply to discretionary administrative Medicare spending under a BCA discretionary sequestration order.

Generally, Medicare's benefit structure remains unchanged under a mandatory sequestration order and beneficiaries see few direct impacts. However, dueMedicare plans and providers see reductions in payments. Due to varying plan and provider payment mechanisms among the four parts of the programMedicare, sequestration is implemented somewhat differently across the program.

---

Introduction

Sequestration is the automatic reduction (i.e., cancellation) of certain federal spending, generally by a uniform percentage.¹ The sequester is a budget enforcement tool that Congress established in the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA, also known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act; P.L. 99-177, as amended) intended to encourage compromise and action, rather than actually being implemented (also known as triggered).² Generally, this budget enforcement tool has been incorporated into laws to either discourage Congress from violating specific budget objectives or encourage Congress to fulfill specific budget objectives. When Congress breaks these types of rulesor encourage certain budget objectives or goals. When these goals are not met, either through the enactment of a law or lack thereof, a sequester is triggered and certain federal spending is reduced.

Sequestration is of recent interest due to its current use as an enforcement mechanism for three budget enforcement rules created by the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (Statutory PAYGO; P.L. 111-139) and the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA; P.L. 112-25). Currently, only the BCA mandatory sequester has been triggered and is in effect. However, the Statutory PAYGO sequester and the BCA discretionary sequester are current law and can be triggered if the budget enforcement rules are broken (and Congress does not take action to change or waive these rules).

Medicare, which is a federal program that pays for covered health care services of qualified beneficiaries,³ is subject to a reduction in federal spending associated with the implementation of these three sequesters, although special rules limit the extent to which it is impacted.

This report begins with an overview of budget sequestration and Medicare before discussing how budget sequestration has been implemented across the different parts of the Medicare program. Additionally, this report provides appendixes that include references to additional Congressional Research Service (CRS) resources related to this report and budget terminology definitions, as defined by BBEDCA.

Budget Sequestration

Under current law, sequestration is a budget enforcement tool that occurs because certain policybudgetary goals have not been met. When a sequester is triggered, all applicable budget accounts, unless exempted by law, are reduced by a certain percentage amount for a fiscal year.⁴ The percentage reduction varies between and within budget accounts depending on the categories of funding, as described below, contained within each budget account.

After accounting foridentifying each category of funding within a budget account, sequestration reductions are spread evenly across all budget account subcomponents referenced in committee reports, budget justifications, and/or Presidential Detailed Budget Estimates – also known as programs, projects or activities.⁵ For budget accounts that contain only one category of funding, all sequestrable funds are reduced by the same corresponding percentage. For accounts that contain multiple categories of funding, the total amount of each category of sequestrable funds is reduced by its corresponding percentage. The reduced budget resources are usually permanently cancelled.⁵

6

As currently used, a sequester applies to either discretionary or mandatory spending. Discretionary spending is associated with most funds provided by annual appropriations acts. While all discretionary spending is subject to the annual appropriations process, only a portion of mandatory spending is provided in appropriations acts.⁶7 Mandatory spending is generally provided by permanent laws, such as the Social Security Act, which made indefinite budget authority permanently available for Medicare benefit payments.⁷8 Some federal programs, such as Medicare, can receive both discretionary and mandatory funding.

In the event that a sequester is triggered, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is responsible for calculating the across-the-board percentage reductions, and calculates separate percentages for Medicare, other nondefense, and defense funding.⁸9 Due to sequestration rules, which are covered later in this report, mandatory Medicare benefit payments receive a specific percentage reduction different from other types of federal spending.

The methodologies used to calculate these percentages and the sequestered amounts are published in a report produced by OMB. Once the President issues a sequestration order, the associated report is made available to the public and transmitted to Congress.⁹10

Budget Enforcement Rules

Currently, there are three budget enforcement rules that can trigger sequestration. Two were established by the BCA and one was established by Statutory PAYGO. The three rules and their corresponding sequesters can be summarized as follows (and are presented in Table 1):

Budget Control Act

The BCA established a bipartisan Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (Joint Committee), which was responsible for developing legislation that would reduce the deficit by at least $1.52 trillion from FY2012 to FY2021.¹⁰11 However, the Joint Committee was unable to achieve this goal; therefore, Congress and the President were unable to enact corresponding deficit reduction legislation by a date specified in the law. As a result, two types of spending reductions were automatically triggered.¹¹

12

One automatic spending reduction involved the sequestration of certain mandatory spending from FY2013 to FY2021. Through subsequent legislation, including, most recently, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 20182019 (BBA 182019; P.L. 115-123116-37), Congress extended this reduction through FY2027.¹²FY2029.¹³ (This reduction is referred to in this report as the "BCA mandatory sequester".)

Additionally, the BCA established statutory limits on discretionary spending for FY2013FY2012-FY2021.¹³14 These discretionary spending limits (discretionary caps) restrict the amount of spending permitted through the annual appropriations process for defense and nondefense programs. Any breach of these discretionary caps results in the sequestration of nonexempt discretionary funding. (This reduction is referred to in this report as the "BCA discretionary sequester".) This was triggered once in FY2013,¹⁵ and can be triggered again if discretionary caps are breached in any fiscal year through FY2021 and Congress does not take action to raise these caps. Most recently, BBA 18the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018; P.L. 115-123) increased the discretionary spending caps for FY2018 and FY2019 so they would not be breached, and BBA 2019 increased the caps for FY2020 and FY2021.

Statutory PAYGO

The Statutory PAYGO Act established a budget enforcement mechanism generally requiring that direct spending and revenue legislation enacted into law not increaselegislation affecting direct (mandatory) spending and revenues does not have the effect of increasing the deficit over a 5- and/or 10-year period. If such legislation were to become law, a sequester of certain mandatory spending would be orderedrequired. This budget enforcement rule does not have a sunset date and therefore remains in effect under current law. (This reduction is referred to in this report as "Statutory PAYGO sequester".)

Although Congress has passed legislation that has been estimated to increase the deficit since the law went into effect, the Statutory PAYGO sequester has never been triggered due to the fact that, as Congress has voted to prohibit the effects of specific legislation from being counted under the normal operations of the Statutory PAYGO Act. A recent example of this is the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018; P.L. 115-123),BBA 2019,¹⁶ which included language to reduce the "scorecards" tallying the total impact of legislation on the deficit to zero.

For more information on budget sequestration, see CRS Report R42050, Budget "Sequestration" and Selected Program Exemptions and Special Rules, coordinated by Karen Spar, and CRS Report R42972, Sequestration as a Budget Enforcement Process: Frequently Asked Questions, by Megan S. Lynchand CRS Report R45941, The Annual Sequester of Mandatory Spending through FY2029.

Medicare Overview

Medicare, which is a federal program that pays for certain health care services of qualified beneficiaries, is subject to sequestration, although special rules limit the extent to which it is impacted. Due to the varying payment structures of the four parts of the program, sequestration is applied differently across Medicare.

Medicare was established in 1965 under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide hospital and supplementary medical insurance to Americans ageaged 65 and older. Over time, the program has been expanded to also include certain disabled persons, including those with end-stage renal disease. In 2017FY2019, the program covered an estimated 5861 million persons (4952 million aged and 9 million disabled).¹⁴

17

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that total Medicare spending will be about $718772 billion in FY2018FY2019 and will increase to about $1,390500 billion in FY2027.¹⁵FY2029.¹⁸ Almost all Medicare spending is mandatory spending that is primarily used to cover benefit payments (i.e., payments to health care providers for their services), administration, and the Medicare Integrity Program (MIP). The remaining Medicare outlays are discretionary and used almost entirely for other administrative activities that are described in more detail later in this report.

Medicare consists of four distinct parts:

• 1. Part A (Hospital Insurance, or HI) covers inpatient hospital services, skilled nursing care, hospice care, and some home health services. Most persons aged 65 and older are automatically entitled to premium-free Part A because they or their spouse paid Medicare payroll taxes for at least 40 quarters (10 years) on earnings covered by either the Social Security or the Railroad Retirement systems. Part A services are paid for out of the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, which is mainly funded by a dedicated 2.9% payroll tax on earnings of current workers, shared equally between employers and workers.
• 2. Part B (Supplementary Medical Insurance, or SMI) covers a broad range of medical services, including physician services, laboratory services, durable medical equipment, and outpatient hospital services. Enrollment in Part B is optional, but most beneficiaries with Part A also enroll in Part B. Part B benefits are paid for out of the Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund, which is primarily funded through beneficiary premiums and federal general revenues.
• 3. Part C (Medicare Advantage, or MA) is a private plan option that covers all Parts A and B services, except hospice. Individuals choosing to enroll in Part C must be eligible for Part A and must also enroll in Partenrolled in Parts A and B. About one-third of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in MA. Part C is funded through both the HI and SMI trust funds.
• 4. Part D is a private plan option that covers outpatient prescription drug benefits. This portion of the program is optional. About 76%three-quarters of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicare Part D or have coverage through an employer retiree plan subsidized by Medicare. Part D benefits are also paid for out of the Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund, which is primarily funded through beneficiary premiums and, federal general revenues, and state transfer payments.

For more information on the Medicare program, see CRS Report R40425, Medicare Primer, coordinated by Patricia A. Davis.

Beneficiary Costs

Beneficiaries are responsible for paying Medicare Parts B and D premiums, as well as other out-of-pocket costs, such as deductibles and coinsurance,¹⁶19 for services provided under all parts of the Medicare program.¹⁷20 Under Medicare Parts A, B and D, there is no limit on beneficiary out-of-pocket spending, and most beneficiaries have some form of supplemental insurance through private Medigap plans, employer-sponsored retiree plans, or Medicaid to help cover a portion of their Medicare premiums and/or deductibles and coinsurance. Medicare Advantage has limits on out-of-pocket spending.

Provider and Plan Payments

Under Medicare Parts A and B, the government generally pays providers directly for services on a fee-for-service basis using different prospective payment systems and fee schedules.¹⁸21 Under Parts C and D, Medicare pays private insurers a monthly capitated per person amount to provide coverage to enrollees, regardless of the amount of services used. The capitated payments are adjusted to reflect differences in the relative cost of sicker beneficiaries with different risk factors including age, disability, or end-stage renal disease.

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program

The Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program (HCFAC) was established by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA; P.L. 104-191) and is responsible for activities that fight health care fraud and waste. HCFAC is funded using both mandatory and discretionary funds and consists of three programs: (1) the HCFAC program, which finances the investigative and enforcement activities undertaken by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the HHS Office of Office of Inspector General, the Department of Justice, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, (2) Medicaid Oversight, and (3) MIP.

Historically, MIP has focused on combating fee-for-service fraud in Medicare Parts A and B. However, increases in private Medicare enrollment—Parts C and D—have expanded program integrity efforts into capitated payment systems as well.

While HCFAC is not a part of the Medicare program, MIP is authorized by the same title of the Social Security Act as Medicare and focuses entirely on the program. As a result, this portion of HCFAC is treated as a part of Medicare benefit payments under a sequestration order and would beis subject to the Medicare mandatory sequestration percentage limits.¹⁹

22

Administrative Spending

The administration of Medicare is funded through a combination of discretionary and mandatory resources that are subject to reductions under a discretionary or mandatory sequestration order, respectively. Discretionary administration funding includes amounts for payments to contractors to process providers' claims, beneficiary outreach and education, and maintenance of Medicare's information technology infrastructure. Mandatory administration funding includes amounts for quality improvement organizations and Part B premium payments for Qualifying Individuals (QI).²³

Medicare Sequestration Rules

Special rules limit the total effect of budget sequestration on Medicare (see Table 1). Most notably, BBEDCA, as amended by the BCA, prohibits Medicare benefit payments from being reduced by more than 2% under a BCA mandatory sequestration order. Similarly, Statutory PAYGO prohibits Medicare benefit payments from being reduced by more than 4% under a Statutory PAYGO sequestration order.²⁰24 The cap does not apply to Medicare mandatory and discretionary administrative spending, which is subject to the unrestricted percentage reduction under both BCA and Statutory PAYGO sequestration orders.

Under the current mandatory sequestration order triggered by the BCA, the Medicare sequestration percentage is capped at 2%.²¹25 Therefore, as OMB determines the percentage reductions for each budget category through FY2027FY2029, Medicare benefit payments cannot be reduced by more than 2%; as such, another budget category may be subject to a higher percentage reduction in order to achieve the necessary amount of savings.

More specifically, if OMB determines that total nonexempt, nondefense mandatory funds need to be reduced by a percentage larger than 2% in order to achieve necessary savings under a BCA sequestration order for a given year, then a 2% reduction would be made to Medicare benefit spending, and the uniform reduction percentage for the remaining non-Medicare benefit, nonexempt, nondefense mandatory programs would be recalculated and increased by an amount to achieve the necessary level of reductions. If the uniform percentage reduction needed to achieve the total amount of savings is less than 2%, then the determined percentage would be applied to all nonexempt, nondefense, mandatory accounts, including MedicareMedicare as well as to all other nonexempt non-Medicare nondefense mandatory spending. Of note, if a mandatory sequestration order were triggered by Statutory PAYGO, the process would be the same, but the reduction of payments for Medicare benefits would be capped at 4%.²²

26

In addition to these percentage caps, BBEDCA also prohibits Statutory PAYGO and BCA mandatory sequestration effects from being included in the determination of annual adjustments to Medicare payment rates established under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act.²³27 (See "Reductions in Benefit Spending".)

Finally, certain Medicare programs and activities are explicitly exempted from Statutory PAYGO and BCA sequestration orders. Specifically, Part D low-income subsidies,²⁴28 Part D catastrophic subsidies (reinsurance),²⁵29 and QI premiums²⁶ cannot be reduced under a mandatory sequestration order.²⁷

30

Medicare Sequester Execution

Timing

Once a sequester is triggered, OMB issues a sequestration order for, at most, one fiscal year, and subsequent orders are reissued for each fiscal year, as necessary. These orders can be issued either before or during the fiscal year in which they apply, depending on the trigger.

Reductions in budget resources are to be made during the effective period of a sequestration order; however special rules differentiate when a sequestration order is implemented for benefit payments. As a result, sequestration orders are applied to Medicare benefit payments on a different timeline than other mandatory and discretionary Medicare funds (i.e., Medicare administration and HCFAC).

Once OMB issues a sequestration order, Medicare benefit payments are sequestered beginning on the first date of the following month and remain in effect for all services furnished during the following one-year period.²⁸31 In the event that a subsequent sequester order is issued prior to the completion of the first order, the subsequent order begins on the first day after the initial order has been completed.

As an example, the first BCA mandatory sequester order (FY2013) was issued on March 1, 2013, and took effect April 1, 2013. It remained in effect through March 31, 2014. The FY2014 order was issued on April 10, 2013, (corrected on May 20, 2013) and was in effect from April 1, 2014, to March 31, 2015.²⁹

32

All other sequestrable funding is reduced only during the fiscal year associated with the sequester report. Using the same example, the first BCA mandatory sequester order (FY2013) reduced appropriate administrative spending from March 1, 2013, to September 30, 2013. The second order for FY2014 sequestered funds from October 1, 2013, to September 30, 2014.

While OMB uses current law to determine the amount of funds available to be sequestered and corresponding percentage reductions, actual Medicare outlays will not be known until after the end of the fiscal year. Since sequestration orders are issued either before or during the fiscal year in which they are applicable, OMB estimates the total sequestrable budget authority for Medicare, and other accounts with indefinite budget authority, in order to determine necessary sequestration percentages.³⁰

33

If Medicare outlays exceed the estimated amount included in a sequestration order for that fiscal year, the additional outlays are sequestered at the established percentage for that fiscal year. If Medicare outlays are determined to be less than the estimated amount, no adjustments are made to the sequestration order. In other words, OMB does not adjust sequestration percentages for any category of budget authority once actuals are realized for accounts with indefinite budget authority. Similarly, OMB does not adjust future orders to account for any previous discrepancies between estimates and actuals.

Reductions in Benefit Spending

Parts A and B

Under Medicare Parts A and B, participating providers, such as hospitals and physicians, are paid by the federal government on a fee-for-service basis for services provided to a beneficiary. According to guidance issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), any sequestration reductions are to be made to claims after determining coinsurance, deductibles, and any applicable Medicare Secondary Payment adjustments.³¹34 Therefore, sequestration applies only to the portion of the payment paid to providers by Medicare; the beneficiary cost-sharing amounts and amounts paid by other insurance are not reduced.

As an example, if the total allowed payment for a particular service is $100 and the beneficiary has a 20% co-insurance, the beneficiary would be responsible for paying the provider the full $20 in co-insurance. The remaining 80% that is paid by Medicare would be reduced by 2% under the FY2018 sequestration order, or $1.60 in this example, resulting in a total Medicare payment of $78.40. In total, the provider would receive a payment of $98.40. This reduced payment is considered payment in full and the Medicare beneficiary is not expected to pay higher copayments to make up for the reduced Medicare payment.³²

35

Part A inpatient services are considered to be furnished on the date of the individual's discharge from the inpatient facility. For services paid on a reasonable cost basis,³³36 the reduction is to be applied to payments for such services incurred at any time during each cost reporting period during the sequestration period, for the portion of the cost reporting period that occurs during the effective period of the order. For Part B services provided under assignment,³⁴37 the reduced payment is to be considered payment in full and the Medicare beneficiary will not pay higher copayments to make up for the reduced amount.³⁵38

Medicare non-participating providers, which are providers that do not elect to accept Medicare payments on all claims in a given year, are not subject to the same rules. Medicare non-participating providers receive a lower reimbursement rate from Medicare on all services provided and may charge beneficiaries a limited amount more (balance bill charge) than the fee schedule amount on non-assigned claims.³⁶39 In these instances, instead of the Medicare check being sent to the provider, a check that incorporates the 2% reduction is mailed to the patient. The patient must then pay the provider an amount that incorporates the sequestered amount. More specifically, as payment, the beneficiary is responsible for paying the provider the amount listed on the check, any cost sharing, balance bill charges, and the sequestered amounts taken out of the provider check.³⁷

40

Annual adjustments to Medicare payment rates are determined without incorporating sequestration.³⁸41 However, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission does incorporate the effects of sequestration when assessing the adequacy of provider payments.³⁹42 The commission uses these annual assessments to develop payment adjustment recommendations to the HHS Secretary and/or Congress.

Part C

Under Medicare Advantage, private health plans are paid a per person monthly amount to provide all Medicare-covered benefits, except hospice, to beneficiaries who enroll in their plan. These capitated monthly payments are made to MA plans regardless of how many or how few services beneficiaries actually use. The plan is at risk if costs for all of its enrollees exceed program payments and beneficiary cost sharing; conversely, the plan can generally retain savings if aggregate enrollee costs are less than program payments and cost sharing.

With respect to sequestration, reductions are uniformly made to the monthly capitated payments to the private plans administering Medicare Advantage (Medicare Advantage Organizations or MAOs). These fixed payments are determined every year with CMS approval through an annual "bid process" and the amounts can vary depending on the private plan.⁴⁰43

In general, CMS payments to MAOs are generally comprised of amounts to cover medical costs, administrative expenses, private plan profits, risk adjustments, and plan rebates to beneficiaries.⁴¹44 MAOs have discretion to distribute any sequestration cut across these four different components but must still adhere to their legal obligations.⁴²

45

Some MAOs have attempted to pass the reduction in their capitation rates onto providers through lower reimbursement rates; however MAOs may be limited in their ability to do so.⁴³46 CMS provided instructions regarding the treatment of contract and non-contract providers that provide services under Part C. Specifically, "whether and how sequestration might affect an MAO's payments to its contracted providers are governed by the terms of the contract between the MAO and the provider."⁴⁴47 Therefore, in order for MAOs to reduce provider payments by the sequestered amount, specific language within a contract must allow the reduction or the contract would need to be renegotiated.

In certain instances, such as when beneficiaries receive emergency out-of-network care, MAOs need to reimburse the non-contracted providers; in such cases, the MAOs are required to pay at least the rate providers would have received if the beneficiaries had been enrolled in original Medicare. However, MAOs have the discretion of whether or not to incorporate sequestration cuts into payments to non-contracted providers for those services.⁴⁵48 Non-contracted providers must accept any payments reduced by the sequestration percentage as payment in full.

In addition, regulations in the annual bid process restrict MAO's potential responses to sequestration. Specifically, MAOs are limited to "reasonable" revenue margins and a set Medicare/non-Medicare profit margin discrepancy, among other requirements.⁴⁶49 Furthermore, MAOs are restricted from allowing sequestration to impact a beneficiary's plan benefits or liabilities,⁴⁷50 so it becomes difficult for MAOs to pass an entire sequestration cut onto beneficiaries through higher premiums or seek to offset lost revenue by increasing non-Medicare profits.

As HHS computes annual adjustments to Medicare payment rates, the Secretary cannot take into account any reductions in payment amounts under sequestration for the Part C growth percentage.⁴⁸51 In other words, plan payment updates are to be determined as if the reductions under sequestration have not taken place. This results in larger annual adjustments as compared to baselines that incorporate sequestration cuts.

Part D

Under Medicare Part D, each plan receives a base capitated monthly payment, called a direct subsidy, which is adjusted to incorporate three risk -sharing mechanisms (low-income subsidies, individual reinsurance, and risk corridor payments). While each plan receives the same direct subsidy amount for each enrollee regardless of how many benefits an enrollee actually uses, plans receive different risk -sharing adjustments in their monthly payments. With respect to sequestration, reductions are uniformly made only to the direct subsidy amounts. Part D risk -sharing adjustments are exempt from sequestration and are therefore not reduced.⁴⁹

52

Part D also contains a Retiree Drug Subsidy Program, which pays subsidies to qualified employers and union groups that provide prescription drug insurance to Medicare-eligible, retired workers. Instead of a capitated monthly payment, each sponsor receives a federal subsidy at the end of the year to cover a portion of gross prescription drug costs for each retiree during that year. Under this program, sequestration reductions are applied to the annual subsidy amount.⁵⁰

53

TheSimilar to Part C, the HHS Secretary is prohibited from taking into account any reductions in payment amounts under sequestration for purposes of computing the Part D annual growth rate.⁵¹

54

HCFAC

Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program

As noted, the HCFAC program is not part of Medicare but does receive mandatory and discretionary funds to ensure the programmatic integrity of the Medicare program. Under a BCA sequestration order of mandatory funds, MIP funds are treated as Medicare budget authority and are subject to the a part of Medicare benefit payments and are therefore subject to the Medicare 2% sequester limit. HCFAC mandatory funding that does not exclusively address Medicare is reduced by the nondefense mandatory sequester rate (5.9% in 2020), when applicable.

Administrative Expenses

Under either a mandatory or discretionary sequestration order, administrative spending within nonexempt Medicare and HCFAC programs is reduced by the nondefense rate determined by OMB. See Table 2 for past and current nondefense sequester percentages under the BCA mandatory sequester (5.9% in 2020).

Medicare and the BCA Mandatory Sequester

Since the first BCA mandatory sequester order issued in FY2013, Medicare benefit payments have been subject to the 2% annual reduction limit established by the BCA. Nondefense mandatory budget authority reductions, which have applied to mandatory Medicare administrative spending, have fluctuated between 5.1% and 7.3% through FY2018.

from FY2013 through FY2020. (See Table 2.)

In the sameFY2020 sequestration order, mandatory Medicare administrative expenses will be sequestered by the nondefense mandatory percentage, 6.6%5.9% in FY2020. The total reduction in Medicare administration budget authority, however, cannot be identified from the data presented in the OMB sequestration report.⁵²

55

In total, Medicare benefit payments (not including administration) are estimated to account for 8991% of all Medicare and non-Medicare resources available to be sequestered (sequestrable budget authority) under the FY2018FY2020 BCA mandatory sequester.⁵³56 Of the funds that are sequestered, Medicare benefit payments are estimated to account for 70% of 74% of the combined mandatory defense and nondefense sequestered funds.⁵⁴

57 Traditionally, Medicare benefit payments comprise the largest single source of sequestered funds in a given mandatory sequestration order. In FY2020, Medicare benefit payments are estimated to account for the largest share of sequestrable budget authority and sequestered funds since the first BCA sequestration order was issued for FY2013, as shown in Figure 1.⁵⁸

Figure 1. Medicare Benefit Payments AsPayment Amounts as a Percentage of Budget Control Act Mandatory Sequester Amounts (FY2013-FY2018FY2020)

Source: CRS analysis of OMB Reports to the Congress on the Joint Committee Sequestration for FY2013 to FY2018FY2020. Notes: Mandatory sequester amounts include amounts for Medicare, other nondefense, and defense. Sequestrable budget authority refers to all resources estimated to be available to be sequestered. Sequestered Funds refers to all resources estimated to be sequestered. Administrative funding is not included in Medicare benefit payment totals. All percentages are estimates.

Traditionally, Medicare benefit payments comprise the largest single source of sequestered funds in a given mandatory sequestration order. In FY2018, Medicare benefit payments are estimated to account for the largest share of sequestrable budget authority and sequestered funds since the first BCA sequestration order was issued for FY2013, as shown in Figure 1.⁵⁵

Figure 2 shows how the FY2018Figure 2 shows how the FY2020 BCA sequestration order is estimated to apply to the various parts of Medicare. It is worth noting that although Medicare Part C is sequestered, OMB sequestration orders delineate at the trust fund level and do not distinguish each Medicare part. Part C is funded out of both the Part A and Part B trust funds and is included in these totals. For reference, from FY2016-FY2017, Medicare Advantage, on average,in FY2018, Medicare Advantage accounted for 3230% of all HI Trust Fund benefit payments and 3829% of all SMI Trust Fund benefit payments.⁵⁶59 These ratios could change in FY2018FY2020 based on actual spending.

Figure 2. Estimated Source of Sequestered Medicare Benefits in FY2018 FY2020 (total reduction in Medicare benefit payments—$12.7615.31 billion)

Source: CRS analysis of OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2018, May 23, 20172020, March 18, 2019. Notes: Administrative funding is not included. Although Medicare Part C is sequestered, OMB sequestration orders delineate at the trust fund level and do not distinguish each Medicare part. Part C is funded out of both the Part A and Part B trust funds and is included in these totals.

CBO estimates that Medicare benefit payment outlays will increase 9695% from FY2018 to FY2027 ($708FY2019 to FY2029 (from $761 billion to $1,387483 billion), which is the last year of BCA mandatory sequestration.⁵⁷60 Most of this expected increase is due to an aging population and rising health care costs per person. In addition, most61 Most of this increase would be subject to sequestration.⁵⁸

When Congress failed to enact legislation that reduced the deficit by at least $1.5 trillion before January 15, 2012, the BCA prompted savings from three sources: (1) the mandatory sequestration of funds, (2) reduced discretionary spending limits, and (3) lower expected interest payments on U.S. government debt, which resulted from the mandatory sequestration of funds and discretionary spending limits. Although Medicare benefit payments traditionally account for a large percentage of mandatory sequestered funds, they account for a much smaller portion of overall BCA savings—generally around 10%—because reduced discretionary spending limits account for a larger share of BCA savings than the mandatory sequester. In FY2018, sequestered Medicare benefit payments will account for approximately 10% of total FY2018 BCA savings, as determined by OMB and shown in Figure 3.⁵⁹

Figure 3. Medicare Benefit Payment Reductions as a Percentage of Budget Control Act Amounts (FY2013-FY2018)

Source: CRS analysis of OMB Reports to the Congress on the Joint Committee Sequestration for FY2013 to FY2018. Notes: BCA refers to Budget Control Act. BCA Budget Authority refers to all resources used in the baseline to determine discretionary cap savings, mandatory sequestration percentages, and interest. Annual Joint Committee Required Savings refers to all resources reduced by the discretionary caps, sequestered, and interest saved, as determined by OMB. Administrative funding is not included in Medicare benefit payment totals. These percentages are developed from OMB Reports to the Congress on the Joint Committee Sequestration for FY2013 to FY2018. The methodologies included in these reports do not incorporate any increases in discretionary caps associated with BBA 2013, BBA 2015, and BBA 2018. All percentages are estimates.

For more information on the Budget Control Act, see CRS Report R41965, The Budget Control Act of 2011, by Bill Heniff Jr., Elizabeth Rybicki, and Shannon M. Mahan; and CRS Report R42506, The Budget Control Act of 2011 as Amended: Budgetary Effects, by Grant A. Driessen and Marc Labonte.

Appendix A. Additional CRS Resources

To gain a deeper understanding of the topics covered in this report, readers may also wish to consult the following CRS reports:

CRS Report R40425, Medicare Primer, coordinated by Patricia A. Davis

CRS Report R43122, Medicare Financial Status: In Brief, by Patricia A. Davis

CRS Report R44766R45494, Medicare Advantage (MA)–Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2018CY2020: In Brief, by Paulette C. Morgan

CRS Report R40611, Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefit, by Suzanne M. Kirchhoff

CRS Report R42506, The Budget Control Act of 2011 as Amended: Budgetary Effects, by Grant A. Driessen and Marc Labonte

CRS Report 98-721, Introduction to the Federal Budget Process

CRS Report R41965, The Budget Control Act of 2011

CRS Report R42506, The Budget Control Act of 2011 as Amended: Budgetary Effects

CRS Report RL34424, The Budget Control Act and Trends in Discretionary Spending

CRS Insight IN11148, The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019: Changes to the BCA and Debt Limit

CRS Report R42050, Budget "Sequestration" and Selected Program Exemptions and Special Rules, coordinated by Karen Spar

CRS Report R42972, Sequestration as a Budget Enforcement Process: Frequently Asked Questions, by Megan S. Lynch

CRS Report R41157, The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010: Summary and Legislative History, by Bill Heniff Jr.

CRS Report R41965, The Budget Control Act of 2011, by Bill Heniff Jr., Elizabeth Rybicki, and Shannon M. Mahan

CRS Report 98-721, Introduction to the Federal Budget Process, coordinated by James V. Saturno

R45941, The Annual Sequester of Mandatory Spending through FY2029

CRS In Focus IF11332, FY2020 Mandatory Sequester Reduces Medicare $15.3 Billion, Other Mandatory Spending $5.39 Billion

CRS Report R41157, The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010: Summary and Legislative History

CRS Report R41510, Budget Enforcement Procedures: House Pay-As-You-Go (PAYGO) Rule

Appendix B. Budget Terminology Definitions

As defined by Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA; P.L. 99-177, as amended) and simplified where appropriate:

Budget Authority—Authority provided by federal law to enter into financial obligations that will result in immediate or future outlays involving federal government funds.

Budgetary Resources—An amount available to enter into new obligations and to liquidate them. Budgetary resources are made up of new budget authority (including direct spending authority provided in existing statute and obligation limitations) and unobligated balances of budget authority provided in previous years.

Discretionary Appropriations—Budgetary resources (except to fund direct-spending programs) provided in appropriation Acts.

Mandatory Spending—Also known as direct spendingspending, refers to budget authority that is provided in laws other than appropriation acts, entitlement authority, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Medicare Benefit Payments—All payments for programs and activities under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act.

Revised Nonsecurity Category—Discretionary appropriations other than in budget function 050, often referred to as nondefense category.

Revised Security Category—Discretionary appropriations in budget function 050, often referred to as defense category..

Sequestration—The cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or direct spending laws.

For definitions of other budget terms mentioned in this report but not defined by BBEDCA, see U.S. Government Accountability Office, A Glossary of Terms Used in the Federal Budget Process, GAO-05-734SP, September 1, 2005, p. 23,at https://www.gao.gov/assets/80/76911.pdf.

Author Contact Information

Acknowledgments

This report was originally written by Ryan Rosso while he was a Presidential Management Fellow on rotation with CRS, Analyst in Health Care Financing.

Footnotes

6. 17. 24.

1.	Under the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA; also known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act; P.L. 99-177) §250(c)(2), sequestration is defined as "the cancellation of budgetary resources provided by discretionary appropriations or direct spending law." Budgetary resources are subject to sequestration unless exempted by law. See Office of Management and Budget (OMB), OMB Circular A-11 (2019), Section 100, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/ files/omb/ assets/a11_current_year/a11_2017wp-content/uploads/2018/06/s100.pdf.
2.	U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Finance, Budget Enforcement Mechanisms, Oral and Written Testimony of the Honorable Phil Gramm, 112th Cong., 1st sess., May 4, 2011.
3.	For more information on Medicare, see CRS Report R40425, Medicare Primer, coordinated by Patricia A. Davis. .
4.	Sequestration does not apply to every account, since many budget accounts are either exempted from sequestration or governed by special rules under sequestration, the latter of which can vary depending on the sequestration trigger. See BBEDCA §255 and §256, as amended. Since OMB is responsible for the execution and legal interpretations of sequestration orders, some accounts not listed in these sections may also be exempt from sequestration. For a complete list of exempted accounts, see CRS Report R42050, Budget "Sequestration" and Selected Program Exemptions and Special Rules, coordinated by Karen Spar.
5.
5.	See CRS Report R42972, Sequestration as a Budget Enforcement Process: Frequently Asked Questions, and CRS Report 98-721, Introduction to the Federal Budget Process.
"In some circumstances current law allows for budget authority sequestered in one fiscal year to become available to the agencies again in a subsequent fiscal year. OMB refers to these amounts as 'pop ups.'" See U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2014 Sequestration Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency of Progress Toward Deficit Reduction Goals, GAO-16-263, April 2016, p. 2720, at https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/676565.pdf.
67.	Some mandatory entitlements are provided through the annual appropriations process and are considered appropriated entitlements (i.ee.g., Medicaid). Although these entitlements are appropriated, the federal government is legally obligated to make payments to those deemed eligible for the entitlement. (Medicaid is explicitly exempt from sequestration.)
78.	Indefinite budget authority is federal spending that, at the time of enactment, is for an unspecified amount that will be determined at a later date. See GAO, A Glossary of Terms Used in the Federal Budget Process, GAO-05-734SP, September 1, 2005, p. 23, at https://www.gao.gov/assets/80/76911.pdf.
89.	All funds are first classified as discretionary or mandatory. Within each of these categories, funds are further classified as Medicare, defense, or nondefense. During a sequestration order, each subcomponent of discretionary and/or mandatory funds receives a sequestration percentage based on the necessary amount of savings for that category. For sequestration purposes, Medicare benefit payments are defined by BBEDCA as all payments for programs and activities under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act. See BBEDCA §256(d). Defense and nondefense are referred to in BBEDCA as either "revised security" or "revised nonsecurity", respectively. "Revised security" is any funding coded with a budget function of 050, which is effectively the Department of Defense. "Revised nonsecurity" includes all other government spending. Each of these categories receives a different percentage reduction under a sequestration order.
910.	For more information about the methodologies associated with calculating the sequester percentage in a given year, see OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2018, May 23, 20172020, March 18, 2019, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2020_JC_Sequestration_Report_3-18-19.pdf .
1011.	See Title IV of the BCA.
1112.	See CRS Report R42050, Budget "Sequestration" and Selected Program Exemptions and Special Rules, coordinated by Karen Spar.
1213.	FourFive subsequent pieces of legislation have extended the BCA mandatory sequester. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA 2013; P.L. 113-67) extended the sequester through FY2023. A law modifying the COLAcost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for certain military retirees (P.L. 113-82) extended the sequester through FY2024. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015; P.L. 114-74) extended the sequester through FY2025. The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018; P.L. 115-123) extended the sequester through FY2027, and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 (BBA 2019; P.L. 116-37) extended the sequester through FY2029.
1314.	Four subsequent pieces of legislation have modified the BCA discretionary caps as enacted. The American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA; P.L. 112-240) postponed the start of the FY2013 sequester until March 1, 2013, and canceled the first two months of spending cuts. BBA 2013 raised theBBA 2013 established new discretionary caps under the BCA on defense and nondefense discretionary spending in FY2014 and FY2015. BBA 2015 raised the discretionary caps in FY2016 and FY2017. BBA 2018 raised the discretionary caps in FY2018 and FY2019, and BBA 2019 raised the discretionary caps in FY2020 and FY2021. For more information about the discretionary spending limits established under the BCA, see CRS Report R42506, The Budget Control Act of 2011 as Amended: Budgetary Effects, by Grant A. Driessen and Marc Labonte.
14and CRS Insight IN11148, The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019: Changes to the BCA and Debt Limit.
15.	See CRS Report RL34424, The Budget Control Act and Trends in Discretionary Spending.
16.	P.L. 116-37, §202.
Department of Health and Human ServicseServices, Fiscal Year 20182020 Budget in Brief: Putting America's Health First, 2017, p. 5276, at https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/Consolidated%20BIB_ONLINE_remediatedfy-2020-budget-in-brief.pdf.
1518.	Congressional Budget Office, June 2017May 2019 Medicare Baseline, at https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/recurringdata/ 51302-2017-06-medicare.pdfsystem/files/2019-05/51302-2019-05-medicare_0.pdf.
1619.	A deductible is the amount an enrollee is required to pay for health care services or products before his or her insurance plan begins to provide coverage. Coinsurance is the percentage share that an enrollee in a health insurance plan pays for a product or service covered by the plan.
1720.	Beneficiaries enrolled in a Medicare Advantage (MA, Part C) plan must pay Part B premiums as well as any additional premium required by the MA plan.
1821.	Under a prospective payment system (PPS), Medicare payments are made using a predetermined, fixed amount based on the classification system for a particular service. The Centers for Medicare and& Medicaid Services (CMS) uses separate PPSs to reimburse acute inpatient hospitals, home health agencies, hospice, hospital outpatient departments, inpatient psychiatric facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, long-term care hospitals, and skilled nursing facilities. A fee schedule is a listing of fees used by Medicare to pay doctors or other providers/suppliers. Fee schedules are used to pay for physician services; ambulance services; clinical laboratory services; and durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies in certain locations.
1922.	For sequestration purposes, BBEDCA defines Medicare benefit payments as all payments for programs and activities under Title XVIII of Social Security Act. This includes the Medicare Integrity Program (MIP). See BBEDCA §256(d).
2023.	The Qualifying Individuals (QI) program is a state program that helps pay Part B premiums for people who have Part A and limited income and resources. See CMS, "Medicare Savings Programs," at https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/help-paying-costs/medicare-savings-program/medicare-savings-programs.html.	Medicare benefit payments are considered mandatory budgetary resources and would not be subject to a BCA discretionary sequestration order.
2125.	See BBEDCA §251A(6). In addition, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (H.R. 18922019 (P.L. 116-37) specifies that the non-administrative Medicare sequester percentage cap will be 4% during the first six months of the FY2027FY2029 sequestration order and 0% for the next six months of the order. See BBEDCA §251A(6)(C) and footnotetable note a in Table 1.
2226.	See BBEDCA §256(d)(2).
2327.	See BBEDCA §256(d)(6).
2428.	Medicare Part D provides subsidies to assist low-income beneficiaries with premiums and cost sharing. For more information on Medicare Part D, see CRS Report R40611, Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefit, by Suzanne M. Kirchhoff.
2529.	Part D plan sponsors paypays nearly all drug costs above a catastrophic threshold, except for nominal beneficiary cost sharing. Medicare subsidizes 80% of each plan's costs for this catastrophic coverage. For more information on Medicare Part D, see CRS Report R40611, Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Benefit, by Suzanne M. Kirchhoff.
26.	The Qualifying Individuals (QI) program is a state program that helps pay Part B premiums for people who have Part A and limited income and resources. See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Savings Programs, at https://www.medicare.gov/your-medicare-costs/help-paying-costs/medicare-savings-program/medicare-savings-programs.html.
27. 30.	See BBEDCA §256(d)(7).
2831.	See BBEDCA §256(d)(1).
2932.	Under current law, the sequestration of Medicare benefits under the BCA is scheduled to continue through September 30, 20272029, due to special rules that cap the Medicare sequester percentage at 0% during the last six months of the FY2027FY2029 order. Without this rule, Medicare benefit payments would be reduced from April 1, 20272029, to March 31, 20282030. See BBEDCA §251A(6)(C).
3033.	GAO, 2014 Sequestration Opportunities Exist to Improve Transparency of Progress Toward Deficit Reduction Goals, GAO-16-263, April 2016, p. 27, at https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/676565.pdf.
3134.	Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)CMS, Medicare FFS Provider e-News, March 8, 2013, Monthly Payment Reductions in the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Program – "Sequestration," at https://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/outreach/ffsprovpartprog/downloads/ Outreach-and-Education/Outreach/FFSProvPartProg/Downloads/2013-03-08-standalone.pdf.
3235.	Ibid.
3336.	Most providers are paid under a prospective payment system or fee schedule. Some types of providers, such as Critical Access Hospitals, are paid on a reasonable cost basis under which payments are based on actual costs incurred. Reasonable cost is defined at Social Security Act §1861(v).
3437.	Assignment is an agreement by a doctor, provider, or supplier to be paid directly by Medicare, to accept the payment amount Medicare approves for the service, and not to bill the beneficiary for any more than the Medicare deductible and coinsurance (if applicable). Providers that don't accept assignment may charge more than the Medicare-approved amount.
3538.	See CMS, Medicare FFS Provider e-News, March 8, 2013, Monthly Payment Reductions in the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) Program – "Sequestration," at httphttps://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Outreach/FFSProvPartProg/Downloads/ 2013-03-08-standalone.pdf.
3639.	CMS, Frequently Asked Questions, How does Medicare pay for services delivered by non-participating providers?, at https://questions.cms.gov/faq.php?id=5005&faqId=9920.
37Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier PUF: Frequently Asked Questions, updated May 23, 2019, p. 4, at https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/Downloads/Physician_FAQ.pdf. 40.	CMS, Medicare FFS Provider e-News, March 8, 2013, Monthly Payment Reductions in the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) ProgramProgram – "Sequestration," at https://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/outreach/ffsprovpartprog/downloads/ 2013-03-08-standalone.pdf.
3841.	BBEDCA §256(d)(6).
3942.	Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), Medicare Payment Policy Report to Congress, March 2017, pp. 57-58,2018, p. 60, at http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/mar17_entirereport.pdfmar18_medpac_entirereport_sec_rev_0518.pdf?sfvrsn=0.
4043.	For more information on the annual bid process, see CRS Report R44766R45494, Medicare Advantage (MA)–Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2018CY2020: In Brief, by Paulette C. Morgan.
4144.	A plan rebate is the difference between a plan's bid and a CMS-definedstatutorily specified benchmark amount. It is included in the plan payment and must be returned to enrollees in the form of additional benefits, reduced cost sharing, reduced Medicare Part B or Part D premiums, or some combination of these options.
4245.	See May 1, 2013, memorandum from Cheri Rice and Danielle Moon, CMS, Additional Information Regarding the Mandatory Payment Reductions in the Medicare Advantage, Part D, and Other Programs, at https://www.cms.gov/ Medicare/Medicare-Advantage/Plan-Payment/Downloads/PaymentReductions.pdf.
4346.	As a result of the initial BCA sequester, some Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) attempted to reduce provider payments by 2%. The courts ultimately determined that MAOs were subject to the terms in the contracts with providers. See Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Humana Health Ins. Co. of Florida, Inc. and Butler Healthcare Providers et al. v. Highmark Inc. et al.
4447.	May 1, 2013, memorandum from Cheri Rice and Danielle Moon, CMS, Additional Information Regarding the Mandatory Payment Reductions in the Medicare Advantage, Part D, and Other Programs, at https://www.cms.gov/ Medicare/Medicare-Advantage/Plan-Payment/Downloads/PaymentReductions.pdf.
4548.	Ibid.
4649.	See CMS, Actuarial Bid Training – 20182019, at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/ Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/BidTraining2018BidTraining2019.html and 42 C.F.R. Part 422, Subpart X.
4750.	See CMS, User Group Call 05/07/2015, May 7, 2015, at https://www.cms.gov/ Medicare/Health-Plans/MedicareAdvtgSpecRateStats/Downloads/ActuarialBidQuestions2016.pdf.
4851.	BBEDCA §256(d)(6)(A). The Secretary uses an estimate of the growth in overall spending in Medicare when calculating updated payments to MA plans. See CRS Report R44766R45494, Medicare Advantage (MA)–Proposed Benchmark Update and Other Adjustments for CY2018CY2020: In Brief, by Paulette C. Morgan.
4952.	This is different from Medicare Part C risk -sharing adjustments, which are included in the capitated payments and are subject to sequestration.
5053.	CMS, "Mandatory Payment Reduction in CMS' Retiree Drug Subsidy Reconciliation Payments," press release, April 19, 2014, at https://www.rds.cms.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/webfiles/ documents/mandatorypaymentreduction.pdf.
5154.	BBEDCA §256(d)(6)(B).
5255.	CMS receives administrative funding for the Medicare program through the Medicare trust funds and the CMS program management account. Since the OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 20182020 shows the amount of mandatory administrative funding sequestered at the account level, and CMS funds other programs through the program management account, the total amount of mandatory administrative funding for the Medicare program cannot be determined from the source.
5356.	For a list of sequestrable budget authority by budget account, see OMB Report to the Congress on the Joint Committee Reductions for Fiscal Year 2018. May 23, 20172020, March 18, 2019.
5457.	Ibid.
5558.	Since the mandatory BCA sequester went into effect, the total amount of Medicare benefit payments in a fiscal year has generally increased at a faster rate than other mandatory spending in the corresponding fiscal year. If current trends continue, Medicare benefit payments can be expected to continue to account for larger shares of total sequestered funds through the end of the BCA mandatory sequester in FY20279. In Figure 1, Medicare benefit payments constituted a higher percentage of all sequestered funds in FY2013 because the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (P.L. 112-240) reduced the total amount of sequestered funds in FY2013 relative to all other fiscal years under the BCA mandatory sequester.
5659.	CMS, CMS Financial Report, FY2017FY2018, November 3, 2017, pp. 43-4415, 2018, p. 71, at https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/CFOReport/Downloads/ 2017_CMS_Financial_Report2018_CMS_Financial_Report.pdf.
5760.	Congressional Budget Office, June 2017May 2019 Medicare Baseline, at https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/recurringdata/ 51302-2017-06-medicare.pdfsystem/files/2019-05/51302-2019-05-medicare_0.pdf.
5861.	Congressional Budget Office, The 20172019 Long-Term Budget Outlook, March 2017June 2019, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2019-06/55331-LTBO-2.pdf, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/ 115th-congress-2017-2018/reports/52480-ltbo.pdf.
59.	These percentages are developed from OMB Reports to the Congress on the Joint Committee Sequestration for FY2013 to FY2018. The methodologies included in these reports do not incorporate any increases in discretionary caps associated with BBA 2013, BBA 2015, and BBA 2018.