This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
The Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill includes funding for approximatelymore than 30 agencies and entities. They include most of the Department of the Interior (DOI) as well as agencies within other departments, such as the Forest Service within the Department of Agriculture and the Indian Health Service within the Department of Health and Human Services. The bill also provides funding for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), arts and cultural agencies, and other organizations and entities. At issue for Congress is determining the length, amount, terms, and conditions of funding for FY2018 for agencies and programs within the bill.
From October 1, 2017, through January 19, 2018, Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies received appropriations under continuing resolutions (CRs) because no regular appropriations were enacted before the start of the 2018 fiscal year. The CR expired after January 19, before being extended on January 22, 2018, until February 8, 2018. As a result of the lapse in funds, a partial government shutdown went into effect. Agencies in the Interior bill generally operated under "contingency" plans that summarize activities that would cease and activities that would continue during a lapse in appropriations.
Currently, the CR generally provides funding at the FY2017 level, minus an across-the-board reduction of 0.6791%. It also generally provides funds for continuing projects and activities, under the same authority and conditions and to the same extent and manner as for FY2017. However, the CR included exceptions ("anomalies") that changed the purposes or amounts of funds, extended expiring provisions of law, or made other changes to existing law.
For FY2018, President Trump requested $27.26 billion for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. For DOI agencies (Title I), the request was $10.62 billion, or 38.9% of the total requested. For EPA (Title II), the request was $5.66 billion, or 20.7% of the total. For the roughly 20 entities funded in Title III, the request was $10.99 billion, or 40.3% of the total.
H.R. 3354, as passed by the House on September 14, 2017, contained $31.50 billion in appropriations for FY2018 for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. On November 20, 2017, the Senate Appropriations Committee released a chairmen's draft that included $32.60 billion for the bill, an amount $1.09 billion (3.5%) higher than the House-passed level.
The President's request, House-passed bill, and Senate chairmen's draft would provide lower appropriations for FY2018 than the $32.63 billion enacted for FY2017. Under each of the three FY2018 proposals (President, House, Senate chairmen's draft), funding for Title II (EPA) would have the largest dollar reduction from FY2017 levels of the three titles. Specifically, the President's overall request was a decrease of $5.37 billion (16.5%) from the total FY2017 appropriations. Funding for each of the bill's three titles was decreased, with EPA funding reduced by $2.40 billion (29.8%). The $31.50 billion in the House-passed bill would be a reduction of $1.13 billion (3.5%) from FY2017. The House-passed bill decreased funding for each of the three titles, with EPA declining by $665.1 million (8.3%). The $32.60 billion in the Senate chairmen's draft would be a reduction of $35.2 million (0.1%). The Senate chairmen's draft would decrease funding for DOI agencies and EPA (by $149.5 million, 1.9%, for EPA), while increasing funding for Related Agencies.
This report first presents a brief overview of the major agencies in the annual Interior appropriations bill. It then describes the appropriations requested by President Trump for FY2018. It next compares the FY2018 funding levels requested by the President, passed by the House, and contained in the Senate chairmen's draft with each other and with FY2017 appropriations. Finally, it summarizes the current status, including the government shutdown due to a lapse in continuing appropriations (provided through January 19, 2018).
For FY2019, President Trump requested $28.34 billion for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. For DOI agencies (Title I), the request was $10.59 billion, or 37.4% of the total requested. For EPA (Title II), the request was $6.19 billion, or 21.8% of the total. For the more than 20 entities funded in Title III, the request was $11.56 billion, or 40.8% of the total. The President's request for FY2019 also included a legislative proposal to authorize a $1.52 billion cap adjustment to the discretionary spending limits in law for certain wildland fire suppression activities. Budget authority designated for those activities would cause the limits to be adjusted, making those funds effectively not subject to the discretionary spending limits. H.R. 6147, as passed by the House on July 19, 2018, contained $35.31 billion for FY2019 for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. H.R. 6147, as passed by the Senate on August 1, 2018, included $35.91 billion for FY2019. Neither chamber approved a discretionary cap adjustment for wildland fire suppression for FY2019 as proposed by the President. However, Congress enacted a similar proposal as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141), although the cap adjustment is not available until FY2020. For FY2018, the total enacted appropriation for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies was $36.59 billion, including $35.31 billion in regular appropriations (in P.L. 115-141) and $1.28 billion in emergency supplemental appropriations for disaster relief (in P.L. 115-72 and P.L. 115-123). The President, House, and Senate each proposed less funding for FY2019 relative to the FY2018 enacted total of $36.59 billion, proposing 22.5%, 3.5%, and 1.8% less, respectively. In contrast, relative to the regular FY2018 appropriation of $35.31 billion, the President would reduce funding (19.8%), the House would provide nearly level appropriations (<0.1% decrease), and the Senate would increase funding (1.7%) for FY2019. For individual agencies and programs in the bill, there are many differences among the funding levels enacted for FY2018 and those supported by the President, House, and Senate for FY2019. This report highlights funding for selected agencies and programs that have been among the many of interest to Congress, stakeholders, and the public. They include the Bureau of Land Management, EPA, Fish and Wildlife Service, Forest Service, Indian Affairs, Indian Health Service, Land and Water Conservation Fund, National Park Service, Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program, Smithsonian Institution, U.S. Geological Survey, and Wildland Fire Management.This report focuses on FY2018FY2019 for agencies and programs within the bill.
Introduction
This report focuses on FY2019 discretionary appropriations for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies.1 appropriations for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. At issue for Congress is whether to enact full-year or continuing appropriations, determining the amount of funding for agencies and programs in the bill, and the terms and conditions of such funding.
This report first presents a briefshort overview of the agencies and other entities funded in the bill. It then describes the appropriations requested by President Trump for FY2018FY2019 for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. Next, it briefly compares the appropriations enacted for FY2018,2 requested by the President for FY2019, passed by the House for FY2019, and passed by the Senate for FY2019.3 The comparison focuses on several agencies and issues that have been among those of interest to Congress. compares the President's request for FY2018 with appropriations enacted for FY2017. It then compares the FY2018 appropriations in H.R. 3354 as passed by the House on September 14, 2017,1 with the FY2018 appropriations included in the draft measure released by the chairmen of the Senate Committee on Appropriations and Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies on November 20, 2017.2 The report also compares these House and Senate "measures" with the FY2017 enacted appropriations and the President's requested appropriations for FY2018. Finally, the report summarizes the current status of appropriations, including the government shutdown due to a lapse in funding; continuing appropriations for October 1, 2017, through January 19, 2018; and supplemental appropriations enacted for FY2018.
Appropriations are complex. Budget justifications for some agencies are large, often several hundred pages long and containing numerous funding, programmatic, and legislative changes for congressional consideration. Further, appropriations laws provide funds for numerous accounts, activities, and subactivities, and the accompanying explanatory statements provide additional directives and other important information. This report generally does not provide in-depth information at the account and subaccount levels, nor does it detail budgetary reorganizations or legislative changes enacted in law or proposed for FY2018FY2019. For information on a particular agency or on individual accounts, programs, or activities administered by a particular agency, contact the key policy staff listed at the end of this report. In addition, for selected reports related to appropriations for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, such as individual agencies (e.g., National Park Service) or cross-cutting programs (e.g., Wildland Fire Management), see the "Interior & Environment Appropriations" subissue under the "Appropriations" Issue Area page on the Congressional Research Service (CRS) website.3
The annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill includes funding and other provisions for agencies and programs in three separate federal departments and for numerous related agencies.4 The Interior bill typically contains three primary titlesappropriations titles and a fourth title with general provisions. Title I provides funding for most Department of the Interior (DOI) agencies,5 many of which manage land and other natural resource or regulatory programs. Title II contains appropriationsI also typically includes general provisions related to DOI agencies. Title II contains appropriations and administrative provisions for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Title III, Related Agencies, currently funds 2123 agencies in other departments, such as the Forest Service in the Department of Agriculture and the Indian Health Service in the Department of Health and Human Services; arts and cultural agencies, including the Smithsonian Institution; and various other organizations and entities. Title III of the bill is referred to as "Related Agencies."also contains administrative provisions for some agencies funded therein. A fourth title of the bill, General Provisions, typically contains additional guidance and direction for agencies in the bill. In addition, in the FY2018 appropriations law and the House- and Senate-passed bills for FY2019, Title IV also included appropriations, primarily for EPA. Selected major agencies in the Interior bill are briefly described below.
DOI's mission is to protect and manage the nation's natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources and natural hazards; and exercise trust responsibilities and other commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities.6 There are eight DOI agencies and two other broad accounts funded in the Interior bill that carry out this mission. Hereinafter, these agencies and broad accounts are referred to collectively as the 10 DOI "agencies." DOI agencies funded in the Interior bill include the following:7
EPA's mission is has no organic statute establishing an overall mission; rather, the agency administers various environmental statutes, which have an express or general objective to protect human health and the environment. Primary responsibilities include the implementation of federal statutes regulating air quality, water quality, drinking water safety, pesticides, toxic substances, management and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes, and cleanup of environmental contamination. EPA also awards grants to assist states and local governments in implementing federal law and complying with federal requirements to control pollution.
Title III of the Interior bill currently funds 2123 agencies, organizations, and other entities, which are collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Related Agencies." Among the Related Agencies funded in the Interior bill, roughly 95% of the funding is typically provided to the following:
For FY2018FY2019, President Trump requested $27.2628.34 billion for the approximatelymore than 30 agencies and entities in the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies appropriations bill. The President also requested the establishment of a new adjustment to the discretionary spending limits for certain wildland fire suppression activities, and he requested $1.52 billion to be made available through the cap adjustment for FY2019.13 Budget authority designated for those activities would cause the spending limits to be adjusted, making it effectively not subject to the limits.14
For the 10 major DOI agencies in Title I of the bill, the request was $10.6259 billion, or 38.937.4% of the $28.34 billion total requested. For EPA, funded in Title II of the bill, the request was $5.666.19 billion, or 20.721.8% of the total.13 For the roughly 2023 agencies and other entities funded in Title III of the bill, the request was $10.9911.56 billion, or 40.38% of the total.
Appropriations for agencies vary widely for reasons relating to the number, breadth, and complexity of agency responsibilities; alternative sources of funding (e.g., mandatory appropriations); and Administration and congressional priorities, among other factors. Thus, although the President's FY2018FY2019 request covered approximatelymore than 30 agencies, funding for a small subset of these agencies accounted for most of the total. For example, the requested appropriations for three agencies—EPA, Forest Service, and Indian Health Service—were more than half (5557.4%) of the total request.15 Further, nearly three-quarters (73.975.5%) of the request was for these three agencies and two others, National Park Service and Indian Affairs.1416
For DOI agencies, the FY2018FY2019 requests ranged from $114.2121.7 million for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to $2.55Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement to $2.70 billion for the National Park Service. The requests for 5 of the 10 agencies exceeded $1 billion. Nearly half (47.548.3%) of the $10.6259 billion requested for DOI agencies was for two agencies—the National Park Service ($2.5570 billion) and Indian Affairs ($2.4941 billion).
For Related Agencies in Title III, the requested funding levels exhibited even more variation. The President sought amounts ranging from no funding for two entities—grants under National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs and the Women's Suffrage Centennial Commission—to $4.745.42 billion for the Indian Health Service. The Forest Service would be the only other agency to receive more than $4 billion.15 The next-largest request was for the Smithsonian Institution, at $947.0957.4 million. By contrast, 17 agencies would receive less than $80 million each, including 919 entities would each receive $62 million or less, including 12 with appropriations of less than $10 million each.
Figure 1 identifies the share of the President's
FY2018FY2019 request for particular agencies in the Interior bill.
request for particular agencies in the Interior bill. Figure 2 depicts the appropriations requested by the President for FY2018 for each of the three main titles of the bill: Title I, DOI; Title II, EPA; and Title III, Related Agencies. For each of the three main titles, Figure 2 also depicts the enacted appropriations for FY2017, the appropriations for FY2018 in H.R. 3354 as passed by the House, and the appropriations for FY2018 in the draft released by the chairmen of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. Table 1, at the end of this report, contains the amount requested by the President for FY2018 for each agency. It also contains the FY2017 enacted appropriations for each agency; the percentage change between FY2017 enacted appropriations and the President's request for FY2018; the FY2018 appropriations included in H.R. 3354 as passed by the House; the percentage change between the FY2017 enacted appropriations and the FY2018 levels passed by the House; the FY2018 appropriations included in the Senate chairmen's draft; and the percentage change between the FY2017 enacted appropriations and the FY2018 levels included in the Senate chairmen's draft.
The President's request of $27.26 billion for FY2018 would be a decrease of $5.37 billion (16.5%) from the total FY2017 enacted appropriations of $32.63 billion. This FY2017 total includes $407.0 million in emergency funding for wildfire suppression of the Forest Service and DOI.16
Under the President's proposal, the total for each of the bill's three titles would decrease by a different amount relative to FY2017 enacted levels. Funding for DOI agencies would decrease by $1.64 billion (13.4%) when compared to FY2017. EPA appropriations would decrease by $2.40 billion (29.8%), the largest dollar amount and percentage of the three titles. The total for all Related Agencies in Title III would decline by $1.33 billion (10.8%).
With regard to DOI, the President proposed decreases below FY2017 enacted levels for 8 of the 10 agencies. The decreases varied in dollar amount and percentage of appropriations, with the smallest dollar decrease of $83.3 million (5.3%) for the Department-Wide Programs account. The overall reduction for Department-Wide Programs reflected the President's elimination of funding for the FLAME Wildfire Suppression Reserve account. The President continued to seek funds for fire suppression through DOI's Wildland Fire Management account, however.17 Within the Department-Wide Programs Account, the President also sought to reduce funding for the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program (PILT), from $465.0 million in FY2017 to $396.9 million in FY2018. PILT compensates counties and local governments for nontaxable lands within their jurisdictions. The proposed decreases for the other seven DOI agencies exceeded $100.0 million. The largest was for the National Park Service, with a reduction of $378.5 million (12.9%). Some of this reduction was proposed for facility operation and maintenance, land acquisition, and grant programs. The next-largest decrease was for Indian Affairs—$371.7 million (13.0%), reflecting reductions for education and construction programs, among others.
Two DOI agencies would receive increased appropriations for FY2018 under the President's request. Appropriations for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management would increase by $39.6 million (53.0%), largely because of a decrease in expected revenue from rental receipts and cost-recovery fees. Thus, the Administration anticipates funding a higher amount of the agency's budget through appropriations. Appropriations for the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement also would increase, by $31.9 million (38.3%), in large part due to a rescission of appropriations for FY2017. Such rescissions have the effect of offsetting appropriations.
Within the overall decrease for EPA, the President sought reductions for most, but not all, accounts.18 The $880.5 million (33.9%) decrease for the Environmental Programs and Management account was the largest overall dollar decrease for EPA accounts. This account funds a broad array of activities supporting EPA's development and enforcement of pollution-control regulations and standards, technical assistance, and administrative and operational expenses. The President proposed lower amounts for various programs within the account, among them geographic programs, enforcement, clean air, and water-quality protection. The second-largest decrease from FY2017 enacted levels, $593.7 million (16.8%), was proposed for EPA's account for State and Tribal Assistance Grants. Within this account, the President proposed reductions for a variety of state and tribal categorical grant programs.19 However, the President sought level funding in the account for grants to states for wastewater infrastructure projects through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and for drinking water infrastructure grants to states through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.
Under the President's FY2018 request, 18 of the 21 Title III agencies that were funded in FY2017 would receive varying funding decreases. The President proposed the largest dollar declines for the two biggest agencies. Appropriations for the Forest Service would be cut by $879.8 million (15.7%), primarily through lower funding for capital improvement and maintenance, cooperative forestry, land acquisition, and fire suppression. Similar to the DOI proposal, the Forest Service proposal would eliminate funding for the Forest Service's FLAME account. However, the President's request included funding for wildfire suppression through the Wildland Fire Management account. The President also proposed a $300.6 million (6.0%) decrease for the Indian Health Service, reflecting reduced funding for clinical services, health facilities, and other programs. The Smithsonian Institution would receive the largest increase of Title III agencies—$83.7 million (9.7%)—largely dedicated to revitalizing facilities. In addition, the President sought $7.0 million in FY2018 for one entity that did not receive appropriations in FY2017—the World War I Centennial Commission.
For FY2018, the total enacted appropriation for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies was $36.59 billion. This total included $35.31 billion in regular appropriations and $1.28 billion in emergency supplemental appropriations for disaster relief.17 As noted, for FY2019, the President sought $28.34 billion for agencies in the Interior bill and a discretionary cap adjustment of $1.52 billion for wildland fire suppression. Neither the House nor the Senate version of the bill contained the cap adjustment.18 H.R. 6147, as passed by the House on July 19, 2018, would provide $35.31 billion for FY2019. H.R. 6147, as passed by the Senate on August 1, 2018, would provide $35.91 billion for FY2019. Thus, when including the supplemental disaster funding, the President, House, and Senate would provide less overall funding for FY2019 as compared to the FY2018 enacted total of $36.59 billion, as follows:
However, relative to the regular FY2018 appropriation of $35.31 billion (excluding the supplemental disaster funding), for FY2019:
Figure 2. Appropriations for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies, by Major Title, FY2018-FY2019 |
![]() |
Source: Prepared by CRS with data from the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. Notes: This figure depicts appropriations enacted for |
H.R. 3354, as passed by the House on September 14, 2017, contained $31.50 billion in appropriations for FY2018 for Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. The draft chairmen's recommendation released by the Senate Appropriations Committee on November 20, 2017, included $32.60 billion for the bill, an amount $1.09 billion (3.5%) higher than the House-passed level.20 Both bills included $465.0 million for PILT, level with the FY2017 appropriation.
See Table 1 for the House-passed and Senate chairmen's draft funding levels for each title and agency in the Interior bill.
The bills differed in terms of the amount, type, and accounts for addressing wildland fires. The Senate draft contained higher overall funding for wildland fires, including $506.8 million in emergency appropriations for managing wildland fires ($11.6 million for DOI and $495.2 million for the Forest Service). Such emergency funding typically does not count towards a subcommittee's allocation for the bill.21 The House-passed bill did not include emergency appropriations. The Senate chairmen's draft also proposed a cap adjustment to the discretionary spending limits in law for certain wildland fire suppression activities.22 The measures would fund some Forest Service activities currently funded under the Wildland Fire Management account under other Forest Service accounts.23
The Senate chairmen's draft contained higher appropriations than H.R. 3354 for each of the three titles of the bill, with an additional $109.8 million (0.9%) for DOI agencies, $515.6 million (7.0%) for EPA, and $471.3 million (3.9%) for Related Agencies. Most, but not all, DOI agencies would receive higher funding under the Senate chairmen's draft than under the House-passed bill.
The measures included differing amounts for many EPA accounts, with the biggest dollar difference for Environmental Programs and Management—the Senate chairmen's draft had $499.2 million (25.2%) more). Although the draft reflected more money for certain activities in this account (e.g., clean air and geographic programs), the variation between the measures was primarily due to a $386.9 million general reduction for the account in the House bill only.
The measures also reflected differing appropriations levels for many Title III agencies. The Forest Service accounted for the largest dollar difference, with $564.2 million (10.8%) more in the Senate chairmen's draft than in H.R. 3354. Nearly all Forest Service accounts would receive higher funds under the draft, including accounts for State and Private Forestry, Capital Improvement and Maintenance, Land Acquisition, and Wildland Fire Management. The inclusion of the emergency appropriations for wildland fires contributed to the larger overall appropriation in the Senate chairmen's draft. However, the House bill provided higher funding than the draft for some Title III agencies. For instance, for the Indian Health Service, the House bill would provide $96.0 million (1.9%) more than the $5.04 billion in the Senate chairmen's draft. A key difference was the inclusion of funds in the House bill for the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund, which seeks to eliminate deficiencies among Indian health programs.24
Both H.R. 3354 as passed by the House and the Senate chairmen's draft would provide lower appropriations for FY2018 than were enacted for FY2017 ($32.63 billion). The $31.50 billion in the House passed bill would be a reduction of $1.13 billion (3.5%), while the $32.60 billion in the Senate chairmen's draft would be a reduction of $35.2 million (0.1%).
For each of the three titles of the bill, H.R. 3354 would decrease funds by a different amount relative to the FY2017 enacted levels. Funding for DOI agencies would decrease by $189.3 million (1.5%). Funding for EPA would decline by $665.1 million (8.3%), the largest dollar amount and percentage of the three titles. The total for all Related Agencies in Title III would decrease by $281.5 million (2.3%).
Although 5 of the 10 DOI agencies would share in the overall decrease, another 5 DOI agencies would increase under the House-passed bill. The largest recommended dollar decrease was $205.5 million (32.4%) for the Departmental Offices account. Much of the decline would result from moving funding for the Office of Natural Resources Revenue from the Departmental Offices account to the Department-Wide Programs account.25 Of the five DOI agencies that would receive increased funding, the largest dollar amount would be $67.8 million (26.8%) for the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement. The increase was primarily the result of additional funds for grants to states for reclaiming abandoned mine lands and related activities.
Within the overall decrease for EPA, the account with the largest dollar decline would be Environmental Programs and Management, with $616.6 million (31.1%) less than FY2017 enacted appropriations. Programs in the account that would be reduced include clean air, enforcement, water-quality protection, and geographic programs. The general reduction of $386.9 million in the account in the House bill also contributed to its overall lower amount relative to FY2017. In contrast, the House bill would increase funds for some EPA accounts, including a tripling of funding for the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program, with FY2018 funding of $30.0 million. The program helps finance water infrastructure projects.26
Of the 21 Title III agencies funded in FY2017, the largest dollar reduction—$358.4 million (6.4%)—would apply to the Forest Service, largely from reducing funds for wildfire suppression (through eliminating the FLAME account).27 H.R. 3354, as passed by the House, would increase funds for some Title III agencies, with the largest dollar amount—$97.0 million (1.9%)—for the Indian Health Service. The additional funds would be used for hospital and health clinics, the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund,28 and other programs, although funding for some activities would decrease, e.g., contract support costs.
The Senate chairmen's draft would decrease funding for DOI agencies and EPA, while increasing funding for Related Agencies. The overall DOI decrease of $79.5 million (0.6%) was composed of reductions for four agencies, increases for five agencies, and level funding for one agency. The largest recommended dollar decrease was $164.4 million (25.9%) for the Departmental Offices account, again primarily from moving funding for the Office of Natural Resources Revenue to the Department-Wide Programs account. Due to this transfer, the Department-Wide Programs account would receive the largest dollar increase, of $74.2 million (4.8%). However, funding for some Department-Wide Programs would be reduced, with a decline for wildland fire fighting of $58.0 million (5.8%) from the FY2017 level.
The Senate chairmen's draft would fund EPA at $149.5 million (1.9%) less than the FY2017 appropriation. The EPA account with the largest dollar decrease, of $117.5 million (4.5%), would be Environmental Programs and Management. Programs in the account that would be reduced include clean air, enforcement, and water quality protection. The Science and Technology account, which includes funds for research and development, would have the next largest dollar decline, specifically $72.4 million (10.3%). However, funding for some accounts would rise under the draft. Like the House bill, the Senate chairmen's draft would triple funding for the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program from $10.0 million appropriated in FY2017 to $30.0 million for FY2018.
Title III agencies would increase by $189.8 million (1.5%) in FY2018 under the Senate chairmen's draft. The largest dollar increase—of $205.8 million (3.7%)—was for the Forest Service, largely from higher funding for wildland fires (through multiple accounts). Other Forest Service accounts and programs also would receive additional funds under the draft, including the Capital Improvement and Maintenance account, for facilities and other areas. Although the Senate chairmen's draft contained nearly level funding for the Indian Health Service, monies would be allocated differently than in FY2017. For instance, the draft (like the House-passed bill) would provide additional funds for hospital and health clinics but lower funds for contract support costs.
Both H.R. 3354 as passed by the House and the Senate chairmen's draft would provide higher FY2018 appropriations than requested by President Trump for FY2018 ($27.26 billion). The $31.50 billion in H.R. 3354 was $4.24 billion (15.6%) higher than the President's FY2018 requested appropriations. The $32.60 in the Senate chairmen's draft was $5.34 billion (19.6%) higher than the President's request.
The House-passed bill contained more funding for FY2018 than the Administration's request for each of the bill's three titles. DOI agencies would receive $1.45 billion (13.6%) more under H.R. 3354 than under the President's request, with higher appropriations for 7 of the 10 agencies. The largest dollar increase would be $392.7 million (15.8%) for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. This increase would apply to various programs and activities, including education programs and school construction, public safety and justice, and land and water claims settlements. The next-highest dollar increase in H.R. 3354, relative to the President's request, was an additional $333.7 million (13.1%) for the National Park Service. The additional funds would be directed to facility operations and maintenance, land acquisition and outdoor recreation grants to states, visitor services, and the Historic Preservation Fund, among other activities.
Of DOI agencies, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management would receive the largest dollar decrease under H.R. 3354 relative to the President's request for FY2018, specifically $25.0 million (21.9%) less. The difference is attributable to rescissions of appropriations in H.R. 3354 that did not appear in the President's budget request.
EPA funding would be $1.74 billion (30.7%) higher under the FY2018 House-passed bill than was requested by the President for FY2018. For most accounts, the bill contained higher amounts than sought by the President. The largest dollar differences were for the following three accounts. First, the State and Tribal Assistance Grants account would receive $605.7 million (20.6%) more under the bill than was requested by the President, largely due to higher amounts for a variety of categorical grants. Second, the Hazardous Substance Superfund account would receive $354.3 million (46.5%) more under the bill than under the Administration's request, for remedial and other cleanup, enforcement, and other activities. Third, for Environmental Programs and Management, the bill contained $263.9 million (15.4%) more than the President's request. Programs in the account that would receive higher funding include geographic programs, for which the President did not seek funds, and clean air. As noted, the House bill total for this account reflected a general reduction of $386.9 million (as well as a rescission of $41.0 million).
H.R. 3354 would provide Title III agencies with $1.05 billion (9.6%) more in FY2018 than sought by the President. Thirteen agencies would share in the overall increase for Title III agencies, with the three largest dollar increases as follows. First, for the Forest Service, the House-passed bill included $521.3 million (11.1%) more than the President requested. Most Forest Service accounts would receive higher funding under the bill, including larger appropriations for Capital Improvement and Maintenance ($255.0 million, or 301.1% more) for facilities, roads, and trails; the National Forest System ($134.0 million, or 7.7% more); and State and Private Forestry ($71.2 million, or 60.3% more), especially for cooperative forestry programs. Second, for the Indian Health Service, H.R. 3354 contained $397.6 million (8.4%) more than proposed by the President, with higher amounts for hospital and health clinics, Indian health facilities, and the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund. The Administration did not seek appropriations for this fund. Third, the bill included more funding for the National Endowment for the Arts ($116.0 million, or 399.7% more) and the National Endowment for the Humanities ($102.7 million, or 242.7% more) than the President requested. The House bill contained grant funding for these entities, which the President had proposed to eliminate for FY2018, with one exception for the National Endowment for the Humanities.
A handful of agencies would receive less funding under H.R. 3354 than the President requested for FY2018, among them the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission and the Smithsonian Institution. For the memorial commission, the bill contained $70.2 million (80.9%) less than the President's request, essentially for construction of the memorial. For the Smithsonian Institution, the bill contained $59.9 million (6.3%) less than the request, primarily for revitalizing facilities.
The Senate chairmen's draft also contained higher appropriations for FY2018 than the Administration's request for each of the bill's three titles. In a number of cases, the draft would provide the largest dollar increases to the same agencies and programs as the House bill. The draft contained $1.56 billion (14.7%) more for DOI agencies than the President's request, with higher appropriations for 8 of the 10 agencies. The Senate chairmen's draft provided the largest dollar increases for the National Park Service and Bureau of Indian Affairs. For the National Park Service, the draft contained an additional $388.7 million (15.2%) for a variety of activities, including facility operations and maintenance, land acquisition and outdoor recreation grants to states, visitor services, and the Historic Preservation Fund. For the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the draft included an additional $379.3 million (15.2%) for education programs and school construction, public safety and justice, and land and water claims settlements, among other programs. As under the House bill, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management would receive the largest dollar decrease under the Senate chairmen's draft—$15.0 million (13.1%)—due to a rescission of appropriations.
EPA funding would be $2.25 billion (39.9%) higher under the Senate committee draft than was requested by the President for FY2018. The three accounts that would receive the largest increases under the Senate draft were the following. First, for Environmental Programs and Management, the draft contained $763.1 million (44.4%) more than the President's request. This was in part because the draft funded geographic programs, while the President's request did not, and contained higher funding for clean air. Second, the State and Tribal Assistance Grants account would receive $619.6 million (21.1%) more under the draft than under the President's request, largely due to additional monies for categorical grants. Third, the Hazardous Substance Superfund account would receive $328.7 million (43.1%) more under the bill than under the Administration's request, for remedial and other cleanup, enforcement, and other activities.
Title III agencies would be funded at $1.52 billion (13.9%) more in FY2018 under the Senate chairmen's draft than under the President's request. For the Forest Service, the draft contained $1.09 billion (23.0%) more than the President requested, with most accounts receiving higher funding. Wildland Fire Management would receive $380.5 million (15.2%) more, in part due to the inclusion of emergency appropriations for wildfires. Capital Improvement and Maintenance would be funded at $301.5 million (356.0%) more, and State and Private Forestry would have an additional $188.5 million (159.8%) in part for cooperative forestry programs. For the Indian Health Service, the Senate chairmen's draft contained $301.6 million (6.4%) more than proposed by the President, with higher amounts for hospital and health clinics and Indian health facilities. The Senate chairmen's draft included grant funding for the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, which the President would largely eliminate. As a result, the draft had $120.8 million (416.4%) more for the Arts and $107.5 million (254.2%) more for the Humanities.
The Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission and the Smithsonian Institution were among the Title III agencies that would receive less funding than requested by the President for FY2018. The $70.0 million (80.6%) less for the Memorial Commission reflects lower funding for construction, and the $68.6 million (7.2%) less for the Smithsonian is primarily because of lower funding for revitalizing facilities.
From October 1, 2017, through January 19, 2018, Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies received appropriations under continuing resolutions. Continuing appropriations were provided because no regular appropriations were enacted before the start of the 2018 fiscal year on October 1, 2017. Continuing appropriations expired after January 19, 2018, before being extended on January 22, 2018 (through February 8, 2018). As a result of the funding lapse, a partial government shutdown went into effect. During the funding gap, agencies generally were prohibited by the Antideficiency Act from spending funds in advance of or in excess of appropriations. Exceptions in the law allowed some agency functions to continue, for instance, for "emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property."29 Under guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget, agencies in the Interior bill developed and operated under plans that generally summarized agency activities that would cease and agency activities that would continue during a lapse in appropriations for FY2018. These plans also typically identified the number of employees expected to continue working and the number expected to be furloughed.30
Currently, Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies are receiving continuing appropriations through February 8, 2018.31 The CR generally provides funding at the FY2017 level (in Division G, P.L. 115-31), minus an across-the-board reduction of 0.6791% for the period covered. It also generally provides funds for continuing projects and activities, under the same authority and conditions and to the same extent and manner as for FY2017.32
However, the CR included several exceptions related to Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies. These "anomalies" changed the purposes or amounts of funds, extended expiring provisions of law, or made other changes in existing law. They related to a transfer of funds for wildland fire suppression; funding levels for the operation of the National Park System, EPA's Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovative Program Account, and Indian health services and facilities; and an extension of authorities related to recreation fees, the Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission, and EPA pesticide fee collection.33
For FY2018, a total of $576.5 million in emergency supplemental appropriations has been enacted for wildland fires.34 Of the total, $526.5 million was for the Forest Service, with $184.5 million for Wildland Fire Management and $342.0 million for the FLAME account. The remaining $50.0 million was for DOI Wildland Fire Management.35
Table 1. Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: FY2017-FY2018 Appropriations
(in thousands of dollars)
Bureau or Agency |
FY2017 Enacted Approps. |
FY2018 Requested Approps. |
% Change, FY2017 Enacted- FY2018 Request |
FY2018 House Passed H.R. 3354 |
% Change, FY2017 Enacted- FY2018 House Passed H.R. 3354 |
FY2018 Senate Chairmen Draft |
% Change, FY2017 Enacted- FY2018 Senate Chairmen Draft |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title I: Department of the Interior |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bureau of Land Management |
$1,252,472 |
$1,073,572 |
-14.3% |
$1,207,106 |
-3.6% |
$1,236,070 |
-1.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service |
$1,519,781 |
$1,302,619 |
-14.3% |
$1,477,918 |
-2.8% |
$1,479,341 |
-2.7% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Park Service |
$2,931,948 |
$2,553,446 |
-12.9% |
$2,887,161 |
-1.5% |
$2,942,133 |
+0.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Geological Survey |
$1,085,167 |
$922,168 |
-15.0% |
$1,039,922 |
-4.2% |
$1,085,167 |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management |
$74,616 |
$114,166 |
+53.0% |
$89,166 |
+19.5% |
$99,166 |
+32.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement |
$83,141 |
$115,011 |
+38.3% |
$109,240 |
+31.4% |
$109,240 |
+31.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement |
$253,180 |
$129,439 |
-48.9% |
$320,953 |
+26.8% |
$252,283 |
-0.4% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education |
$2,859,765 |
$2,488,059 |
-13.0% |
$2,880,753 |
+0.7% |
$2,867,314 |
+0.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Departmental Offices |
$634,309 |
$443,220 |
-30.1% |
$428,786 |
-32.4% |
$469,955 |
-25.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| $271,074 There are many differences among the FY2018 enacted appropriations and the FY2019 funding requested by the President, passed by the House, and passed by the Senate. Selected agencies and programs are highlighted below, among the many of interest to Members of Congress, stakeholders, and the public. For the selected agencies and programs, the discussions below briefly compare FY2018 regular annual funding with FY2019 levels requested by the Administration, approved by the House, and approved by the Senate.19 Including FY2018 emergency supplemental appropriations would result in different comparisons for some of the agencies and programs covered below.20 Bureau of Land ManagementThe Administration sought a decrease of 23.2% from the FY2018 appropriation ($1.33 billion) for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The request contained lower funding for many BLM accounts and programs, including those for overall Management of Lands and Resources, and Land Acquisition by the agency. The House and Senate versions of the bill would approve increased appropriations for BLM for FY2019, of 4.1% and 0.9% respectively, with additional funds for the Management of Lands and Resources. The Senate also would provide an increase for Land Acquisition, but the House would reduce funds for that purpose. Further, the Administration proposed a budget restructuring within the Management of Lands and Resources account, to increase flexibility, cost savings, and program integration. The Senate, but not the House, would adopt this restructuring.21 Environmental Protection AgencyFor FY2018, EPA received $8.06 billion in Title II of the regular appropriations law, and another $766.0 million in Title IV of that law, for an FY2018 regular appropriation of $8.82 billion.22 Relative to the FY2018 appropriations in Title II only ($8.06 billion), the EPA would receive a decrease under the Administration's request (23.2%) and under the House-passed bill (1.6%), but it would receive level funding under the Senate-passed bill. The request contained lower funding for several accounts,23 among them Science and Technology, Environmental Programs and Management (including geographic programs), and State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG, including categorical grants).24 However, the Administration sought level funding in the STAG account for grants to states for wastewater infrastructure projects through the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and for drinking water infrastructure grants to states through the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund.25 Moreover, the Administration asked for increased appropriations for two accounts, Buildings and Facilities and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program.26 The House and Senate versions of the bill both supported level (or nearly level) funding for some accounts and programs (e.g., the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund). However, whereas the Senate would provide level funding for many accounts, the House more often supported decreases (e.g., Science and Technology, and Environmental Programs and Management) or increases (e.g., Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Program, and Hazardous Substance Superfund). Fish and Wildlife ServiceFor the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), differing amounts of reductions from the FY2018 level ($1.59 billion)27 were proposed for FY2019 by the Administration (23.1%), House (0.9%), and Senate (1.2%). The Administration sought to reduce funding for the Resource Management account overall, with cuts in programs such as ecological services, habitat conservation, and fish and aquatic conservation, and to eliminate funding for programs including cooperative landscape conservation and science support. The House and Senate versions of the bill would increase funding for Resource Management, with little change for many programs relative to FY2018, and would retain funding for cooperative landscape conservation and science support. Citing "higher priorities,"28 the Administration also proposed eliminating discretionary appropriations for two other FWS accounts—the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund and the National Wildlife Refuge Fund.29 The House- and Senate-passed bills retained discretionary funding for these accounts. Further, the Administration proposed relatively large reductions from the FY2018 level for the Land Acquisition (89.1%) and Construction (79.3%) accounts. The House and Senate supported smaller reductions for both accounts.30 Forest ServiceFor FY2019, the Administration requested 21.5% less for the Forest Service (FS) than was enacted for FY2018 ($5.93 billion).31 Within the overall reduction, the President proposed decreases for each FS account, including 81.6% less for Capital Improvement and Maintenance, 47.7% less for State and Private Forestry, and 10.6% less for the National Forest System. The Administration also sought to eliminate funding for some programs, including Land Acquisition (from the Land and Water Conservation Fund), Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration, and cooperative forestry programs such as Forest Legacy. For FY2019, the House and Senate bills would provide overall increases for the FS of 3.3% and 6.1% respectively, with increases for some FS accounts and retention of programs the Administration sought to eliminate. The House and Senate supported differing levels of appropriations for major FS accounts, with the House approving higher amounts than the Senate for the National Forest System and Capital Improvement and Maintenance and the Senate approving higher amounts than the House for Land Acquisition and Wildland Fire Management, among other differences.32 Indian AffairsThe Administration's FY2019 requested appropriation for Indian Affairs (IA) was 21.2% less than the FY2018 enacted amount ($3.06 billion). Most Indian programs would be funded at lower levels, including human services, natural resources management, and public safety and justice. Education and construction (including construction of educational facilities) were among the largest dollar decreases in the budget request. The House- and Senate-passed measures contained overall increases of 1.3% and 0.4% respectively for IA, with relatively stable funding for many programs and activities as compared with FY2018 enacted amounts. Indian Health ServiceUnder the Administration's FY2019 request, the Indian Health Service (HIS) would receive 2.1% less than the FY2018 appropriation ($5.54 billion). The overall decrease is comprised of a variety of program reductions and increases. For example, the Administration proposed cutting the Indian Health Facilities account (41.7%), including for maintenance and improvement of facilities and construction of both health care and sanitation facilities, and proposed no funding for programs including the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund, health education, and community health representatives. However, the Administration requested additional monies for clinical services including hospital and health clinics, mental health, and alcohol and substance abuse, and for contract support costs (to help tribes pay the costs of administering IHS-funded programs). The Administration also sought to fund the Special Diabetes Program for Indians through discretionary appropriations; currently the program has a direct appropriation. The House and Senate bills would approve increases of 6.7% and 4.2% respectively over FY2018 appropriations for IHS. Both chambers included higher funding for clinical services than enacted for FY2018 and requested by the Administration for FY2019, and both agreed with the Administration's proposed level for contract support costs. The House, but not the Senate, included appropriations for the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund and would provide more than the FY2018 appropriation for the fund. Both chambers would retain funding for health education and community health representatives. Both chambers also supported level funding for most Indian Health Facilities programs but provided additional funds for facilities and environmental health support. Neither chamber would fund the Special Diabetes Program for Indians through discretionary appropriations.33 Land and Water Conservation FundThe Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) has funded land acquisition for the four main federal land management agencies,34 a matching grant program to states to support outdoor recreation, and other purposes. The Administration did not seek discretionary appropriations for most programs appropriated from the LWCF in FY2018,35 and it proposed an overall reduction of $12.9 million due to rescisssions of prior-year funds for some program components. In contrast, the House and Senate would provide LWCF funding for the same programs as in FY2018, including land acquisition by the federal land management agencies. However, both the House and the Senate versions of the bill contained reductions from the FY2018 level ($425.0 million), of 15.2% and 3.8% respectively.36 National Park ServiceFor FY2019, the Administration requested 15.6% less for the National Park Service (NPS) than was enacted for FY2018 ($3.20 billion).37 Within the overall reduction, the President proposed cuts for each NPS account and many programs, including Construction, the Historic Preservation Fund, facility operations and maintenance, and heritage partnership programs. The President proposed the elimination of funding for other programs, including grants to states for outdoor recreation, line item acquisitions by the NPS, and the Centennial Challenge Program (a matching grant program to encourage donations). The House and Senate would approve overall increases of 1.9% and 0.5% respectively for the NPS for FY2019. Their bills would fund many accounts and programs at levels similar to those enacted for FY2018. However, both chambers included increases for some programs (e.g., facility operations and maintenance) and reductions for other programs (e.g., line-item acquisitions). In still other cases, the chambers differed as to the direction of the change, for instance, with the House supporting an increase for the Historic Preservation Fund and the Senate approving a decrease.38 Payments in Lieu of TaxesThe Payments in Lieu of Taxes Program (PILT) would be reduced from the FY2018 level ($553.2 million) under the President's request (15.9%), the House-passed bill (9.6%), and the Senate-passed bill (9.6%).39 PILT compensates counties and local governments for nontaxable lands within their jurisdictions. The authorized level for the program is calculated under a formula that considers various factors and varies from year to year. The authorized payment is currently subject to annual appropriations.40 Smithsonian InstitutionFor FY2019, the Smithsonian Institution (SI) would receive a decrease (8.2%) under the Administration's request, an increase (1.2%) under the House-passed bill, and essentially level funding under the Senate-passed bill as compared with the FY2018 appropriation ($1.04 billion). However, the Administration, House, and Senate all supported funding at or near the FY2018 level for most SI museums, research institutes, and other programs. A key difference was in funding for the Facilities Capital account, which includes revitalization, planning and design, and construction of facilities. The Administration requested a 29.6% decrease for this account, the Senate approved a smaller decrease of 2.7%, and the House approved an increase of 1.8%. In addition, the Administration, House, and Senate all supported an increase of 2.2% over the FY2018 level for Facilities Services, which encompasses maintenance, operation, security, and support of facilities. U.S. Geological SurveyRelative to FY2018 appropriations ($1.15 billion),41 the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) would receive a decrease (25.1%) under the Administration's request, an increase (2.1%) under the House-passed bill, and level funding under the Senate-passed bill. The request proposed reduced funding for all eight major USGS program areas, including ecosystems, land resources, natural hazards, and water resources. The request also would cut most subprograms, although in a few cases it contained additional funds (e.g., for mineral and energy resources). In contrast, both chambers would maintain level funding or would increase appropriations for all USGS program areas except natural hazards, which would decline by 4.8% in the House-passed bill and by 12.0% in the Senate-passed bill.42 Wildland Fire ManagementFor FY2019, the Administration proposed $3.79 billion in discretionary appropriations for Wildland Fire Management (WFM) of DOI and the FS, a 12.9% decrease from the FY2018 enacted level ($4.36 billion).43 However, the President also sought a $1.52 billion cap adjustment to the discretionary spending limits in law, so that funding for certain wildland fire suppression activities would not be subject to the limits. Including those funds, the total FY2019 request was $5.31 billion. This would be an increase of 22.0% over the FY2018 appropriation. The House and Senate bills would approve increases of 3.1% and 12.0% respectively over the FY2018 appropriation. Neither chamber's bill included a discretionary cap adjustment for wildland fire suppression for FY2019.44 Further, the Administration, House, and Senate did not support appropriations for FY2019 for the FS or DOI FLAME accounts.45 The FS FLAME account received $342.0 million in emergency supplemental appropriations in FY2018.46 Table 1. Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: FY2018-FY2019 Appropriations(in thousands of dollars)
|
Bureau or Agency
|
FY2018 Enacted Approps.
|
FY2019 Requested Approps.
|
% Change, FY2018 Enacted- FY2019 Request
|
FY2019 House Passed
|
% Change, FY2018 Enacted- FY2019 House Passed
|
FY2019 Senate Passed
|
% Change, FY2018 Enacted- FY2019 Senate Passed
|
Title I: Department of the Interior
|
Bureau of Land Management
|
$1,331,944
|
$1,023,278
|
-23.2%
|
$1,386,956
|
4.1%
|
$1,343,398
|
0.9%
|
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
|
$1,594,646
|
$1,226,129
|
-23.1%
|
$1,580,395
|
-0.9%
|
$1,574,934
|
-1.2%
|
National Park Service
|
$3,202,162
|
$2,701,969
|
-15.6%
|
$3,261,554
|
1.9%
|
$3,218,565
|
0.5%
|
U.S. Geological Survey
|
$1,148,457
|
$859,680
|
-25.1%
|
$1,173,090
|
2.1%
|
$1,148,457
|
0%
|
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
|
$114,166
|
$129,450
|
13.4%
|
$130,406
|
14.2%
|
$129,450
|
13.4%
|
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
|
$123,439
|
$132,051
|
7.0%
|
$135,642
|
9.9%
|
$134,051
|
8.6%
|
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
|
$255,476
|
$121,673
|
-52.4%
|
$258,515
|
1.2%
|
$252,852
|
-1.0%
|
Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education
|
$3,063,642
|
$2,414,260
|
-21.2%
|
$3,103,642
|
1.3%
|
$3,077,045
|
0.4%
|
Departmental Offices
|
$585,337
|
$443,976
|
-24.2%
|
$434,827
|
-25.7%
|
$466,464
|
-20.3%
|
Office of the Secretary
|
$124,182 $134,673 | $123,940 |
|
$ |
- |
$ |
|
|
Insular Affairs |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of the Solicitor |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$65, |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of Inspector General |
$ |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of the Special Trustee for American Indians |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department-Wide Programs a |
$1, |
$1, |
|
$1, |
|
$1, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wildland Fire Management |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central Hazardous Materials Fund |
$10,010 |
$2,000 |
-80.0% |
$10,010 |
0% |
$10,010 |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural Resource Damage Assessment Fund |
$7,767 |
$4,600 |
-40.8% |
$ |
|
$ |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Working Capital Fund |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of Natural Resources Revenue |
[$126,487] |
$137, |
[+8.9%] |
$137, |
[+8.9%] |
$137, |
[+8.9%] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments in Lieu of Taxes b |
$465,000 |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
$465,000 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Title I: Department of the Interior |
$ |
$10, |
- |
$1 |
|
$1 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Title II: Environmental Protection Agencyc |
$8,058,488 |
$ |
- |
$7, |
- |
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title III: Related Agencies |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dept. of Agri. Under Secretary for Natural Resources & Envt. $875 $875 0% $875 0% $875 0% Forest Service $5,934,664 | $5,596,313 |
$4, |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indian Health Service |
$5, |
$ |
- |
$5, |
|
$5,772,116 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences |
$77,349 |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry |
$74,691 |
$62,000 |
-17.0% |
$ |
-17.0% |
$74,691 |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Council on Environmental Quality and Office of Environmental Quality |
$3,000 |
$2,994 |
-0.2% |
$2,994 |
-0.2% |
$3, |
0.2% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board |
$11,000 |
$9, |
- |
$ |
|
$11,000 |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation |
$15,431 |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Institute of American Indian and Alaska Native Culture and Arts Development |
$ |
$ |
|
$9, |
|
$9, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Smithsonian Institution |
$ |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Gallery of Art |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts |
$ |
$ |
|
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars |
$ |
$7,474 |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Endowment for the Arts |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Endowment for the Humanities |
$ |
$42,307 |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commission of Fine Arts |
$2,762 |
$2, |
|
$2, |
|
$2, |
0.3% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs |
$2, |
$0 |
-100 |
$2, |
0% |
$2, |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation |
$6, |
$6, |
|
$6, |
|
$6, |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
National Capital Planning Commission |
$8,099 |
$7,948 |
-1.9% |
$ |
|
$7,948 |
-1.9% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum |
$ |
$ |
- |
$ |
|
$ |
0.8% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dwight D. Eisenhower Memorial Commission |
$46, |
$ |
|
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Women's Suffrage Centennial Commission |
$ |
$0 |
-100 |
$ |
-50.0% |
$1,000 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
World War I Centennial Commission |
$ |
$ |
— |
$3,000 |
— |
$ |
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal, Title III: Related Agencies |
$ |
$ |
- |
$12,041,833 |
$13,885,003 3.9% $13,918,923 4.1% Title IV: General Provisions Treatment of Certain Hospitals $8,000 $0 -100% $0 -100% $0 -100% EPA Water Infrastructure & Superfund $766,000 $0 -100% $365,000 -52.3% $766,000 | $12,513,153 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wind Turbine Funding Limitation |
$0 |
$0 |
0% |
$ |
— |
$0 |
0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treatment of Certain Hospitals |
$0 |
$0 |
0% |
$0 |
0% |
$4,000 |
—
|
—
|
$0
|
0%
|
Subtotal, Title IV: General Provisions
|
$774,000
|
$0
|
-100%
|
$373,000
|
-51.8%
|
$766,000 -1.0% |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total: Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies |
$ |
$ |
-16.5% |
$31,503,754 |
-3.5% |
$32,598,496 |
-19.8% $35,308,238 <-0.1% $35,914,720 1.7% $1,275,427 $0 -100% $0 -100% $0 -100% Total: Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies with Supplemental Emergency Appropriations $36,589,147 $28,338,610 -22.5% $35,308,238 -3.5% $35,914,720 -1.8% Source: Prepared by CRS with data from the House and Senate Appropriations Committees. |
Source: Prepared by CRS with data from the House and Senate Appropriations Committees.
a. In FY2017, the Office of Natural Resources Revenue was funded at $126.5 million as part of the Office of the Secretary.
b. As noted above, in FY2017, this office was funded at $126.5 million as part of the Office of the Secretary, within the Department of the Interior's (DOI's) Departmental Offices account. Thus, the FY2017 appropriation is shown in brackets in this row.
c. For additional information on appropriations for the Environmental Protection Agency, see CRS In Focus IF10665, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): FY2018 President's Budget Request, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed], and CRS In Focus IF10717, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FY2018 Appropriations: Congressional Action, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].
Author Contact Information
Key Policy Staff
Area of Expertise |
Name |
Phone |
| |
Interior Appropriations, coordinator |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Bureau of Indian Affairs, coordinator |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Bureau of Indian Education |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Bureau of Land Management |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management |
[author name scrubbed] [author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] [phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] [email address scrubbed] |
|
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement |
[author name scrubbed] [author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] [phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement [author name scrubbed] |
|
Environmental Protection Agency |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Fish and Wildlife Service |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Forest Service |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
Forest Service |
|
Indian Health Service |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Land and Water Conservation Fund |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Office of Insular Affairs |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Office of Natural Resources Revenue |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
National Park Service |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[ |
|
Smithsonian Institution |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
U.S. Geological Survey |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
|
Wildland Fire Management |
[author name scrubbed] |
[phone number scrubbed] |
[email address scrubbed] |
1. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For selected relevant reports, see Congressional Research Service (CRS), "Interior & Environment Appropriations," at http://www.crs.gov/search/#/0?termsToSearch=Interior%20%26%20Environment%20Appropriations&orderBy=Date&navIds=4294930742. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5. |
The exceptions are the Bureau of Reclamation and the Central Utah Project, which receive appropriations through Energy and Water Development appropriations laws. For information on |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. |
This statement is taken from the Department of the Interior (DOI) website at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. |
In addition, Interior appropriations bills provide funding within two broad DOI accounts covering diverse programs. In |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8. |
This is the acreage over which the Fish and Wildlife Service has primary jurisdiction in the United States and the territories, but the figure excludes acreage in marine national monuments over which the agency has jurisdiction. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9. |
For a discussion of state and federal waters, see CRS Report RL33404, Offshore Oil and Gas Development: Legal Framework, by [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10. |
Hereinafter, "Indian Affairs" refers to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Education. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11. |
Department of Health and Human Services, Indian Health Service (IHS), |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12. |
These statistics are from the Smithsonian Institution's website at http://www.si.edu/About. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14. |
Information on the President's FY2018 request for Indian Health Service appropriations is contained in CRS Report R44040, Indian Health Service (IHS) Funding: Fact Sheet, by [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15. | Congress enacted a budget cap adjustment for wildfire suppression costs, beginning in FY2020, as part of P.L. 115-141, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018. Information on the President's FY2019 request for appropriations for the Forest Service is contained in CRS In Focus IF10898, Forest Service: FY2018 Appropriations and FY2019 Request, by [author name scrubbed]. Information on the President's FY2019 request for appropriations for the Indian Health Service appropriations is contained in CRS Report R45201, Indian Health Service (IHS) FY2019 Budget Request and Funding History: A Fact Sheet, by [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Of the | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17. |
For historical information on wildfire suppression funding and related issues, see CRS Report R44082, Wildfire Suppression Spending: Issues and Legislation in the 114th Congress, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18. |
In addition to the decreases discussed here for some individual accounts, the President proposed a general rescission of $369.0 million of unobligated balances. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19. |
Funds are allocated for "categorical" grants generally to support day-to-day implementation of environmental laws, including a range of activities such as monitoring, permitting, standard setting, training, and other pollution control and prevention activities. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
20. |
This draft measure, and an accompanying draft explanatory statement, are on the website of the Senate Appropriations Committee at https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/majority/fy2018-interior-environment-appropriations-bill-released. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21. |
Both the House and Senate Appropriations Committees report "302(b)" allocations for the House and Senate Interior appropriations Subcommittees (and other appropriations subcommittees). These allocations function as ceilings on the Interior bill. For an overview of 302(b) allocations, see CRS Report RS20144, Allocations and Subdivisions in the Congressional Budget Process, by [author name scrubbed] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22. |
Budget authority designated for certain purposes would cause the limits to be adjusted, making it effectively not subject to the limits. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
23. |
For additional information on funding for wildland fire management, see CRS Report R45005, Wildfire Management Funding: Background, Issues, and FY2018 Appropriations, by [author name scrubbed] and CRS Report R44966, Wildfire Suppression Spending: Background, Issues, and Legislation in the 115th Congress, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.
|
|
Neither the House nor the Senate version of the bill contained the cap adjustment for FY2019. A cap adjustment was enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141), and is scheduled to go into effect in FY2020. 19.
|
|
In these descriptions, the names of appropriations accounts and major programs generally are capitalized. 20.
|
|
For additional information on the agencies and programs discussed in this section, as well as other agencies and programs in the Interior bill, see the CRS products referenced in this report and other products on the CRS website at http://www.crs.gov/search/#/0?termsToSearch=Interior%20%26%20Environment%20Appropriations&orderBy=Date&navIds=4294930742, or contact the CRS experts identified at the end of this report. 21.
|
|
For additional information on appropriations for BLM for FY2019, see CRS In Focus IF10381, Bureau of Land Management: FY2019 Appropriations, by [author name scrubbed]. 22.
|
|
The comparisons in this paragraph do not reflect EPA appropriations in Title IV of the Interior bill. Specifically, the FY2018 appropriations law included $766.0 million in Title IV (of Division G, P.L. 115-141) for EPA water infrastructure priorities and Superfund emergency response, removal, and remedial actions. (For a discussion of these monies, see CRS In Focus IF10717, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) FY2018 Appropriations: Congressional Action, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].) For these activities, Title IV of H.R. 6147 as passed by the Senate for FY2019 also included $766.0 million, and as passed by the House included $365.0 million. Title IV of the House-passed bill also included $10.0 million for EPA grants for reducing lead in drinking water. Further, for FY2018, an additional $63.2 million in emergency supplemental appropriations was provided (in P.L. 115-123) for the Hazardous Substance Superfund ($6.2 million), the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund ($7.0 million), and State and Tribal Assistance Grants ($50.0 million). 23.
|
|
The Administration's FY2019 request proposed a rescission totaling $220.5 million, but did not specify amounts within individual accounts. In contrast, the FY2018 enacted appropriation, and House-passed and Senate-passed bills for FY2019, included account specific rescissions of unobligated balances. 24.
|
|
Funds are allocated for "categorical" grants generally to support day-to-day implementation of environmental laws, including a range of activities such as monitoring, permitting, standard setting, training, and other pollution control and prevention activities. 25.
|
|
For information on EPA state revolving funds and other water infrastructure appropriations for FY2018, see CRS In Focus IF10883, Overview of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water Infrastructure Programs and FY2018 Appropriations, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed]. 26.
|
|
This program was included as Title V, Subtitle C, in the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-121). For additional information, see CRS Report R43315, Water Infrastructure Financing: The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Program, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed]. 27.
|
|
In addition, $210.6 million in emergency supplemental appropriations for FY2018 was provided (in P.L. 115-123) for Construction. 28.
|
|
See Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Budget Justifications and Performance Information, Fiscal Year 2019, p. CESCF-2 and RF-3, at https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/uploads/fy2019_fws_budget_justification.pdf. 29.
|
|
Both the Cooperative Endangered Species Conservation Fund and the National Wildlife Refuge Fund also receive mandatory funding under current law. 30.
|
|
For additional information on appropriations for FWS for FY2019, see CRS In Focus IF10846, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: FY2019 Appropriations, by [author name scrubbed]. 31.
|
|
In addition, $646.3 million in emergency supplemental appropriations for FY2018 was provided (in P.L. 115-72 and P.L. 115-123). Of the total, $184.5 million was for Wildland Fire Management, $342.0 million was for FLAME, $7.5 million was for State and Private Forestry, $20.7 million was for the National Forest System, and $91.6 million was for Capital Improvement and Maintenance. 32.
|
|
For additional information on appropriations for FS for FY2019, see CRS In Focus IF10898, Forest Service: FY2018 Appropriations and FY2019 Request, by [author name scrubbed]. 33.
|
|
For additional information on appropriations for IHS for FY2019, see CRS Report CRS Report R45201, Indian Health Service (IHS) FY2019 Budget Request and Funding History: A Fact Sheet, by [author name scrubbed]. 34.
|
|
These agencies are the Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park Service, all within the Department of the Interior, and the Forest Service within the Department of Agriculture. 35.
|
|
The state grant program for outdoor recreation also receives mandatory funding under current law (the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006, P.L. 109-432, Division C, §105). 36.
|
|
For an overview of LWCF funding, see CRS Report RL33531, Land and Water Conservation Fund: Overview, Funding History, and Issues, by [author name scrubbed]. 37.
|
|
In addition, $257.6 million in emergency supplemental appropriations for FY2018 was provided (in P.L. 115-123) for Construction ($207.6 million) and the Historic Preservation Fund ($50.0 million). 38.
|
|
For additional information on appropriations for NPS for FY2019, see CRS In Focus IF10900, National Park Service: FY2019 Appropriations, by [author name scrubbed]. For historical information on NPS appropriations, see CRS Report R42757, National Park Service Appropriations: Ten-Year Trends, by [author name scrubbed]. 39.
|
At the time the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141) was enacted, full funding for FY2018 was estimated to be $530.0 million. Table 1 of this report shows $530.0 million for FY2018, and the corresponding percentage change under the President's request, House-passed bill, and Senate-passed bill for FY2019.
40.
|
|
For on overview of PILT, including calculation of the payment, funding history, recent legislation, and related issues, see CRS Report RL31392, PILT (Payments in Lieu of Taxes): Somewhat Simplified, by [author name scrubbed]. 41.
|
|
In addition, $42.2 million in emergency supplemental appropriations for FY2018 was provided (in P.L. 115-123) for Surveys, Investigations, and Research. 42.
|
|
For additional information on appropriations for USGS for FY2019, see CRS In Focus IF10879, The U.S. Geological Survey: FY2019 Appropriations and Background, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed]. 43.
|
|
In addition, $576.5 million in emergency supplemental appropriations was provided for FY2018 (in P.L. 115-72), consisting of $526.5 million for the FS and $50.0 million for DOI. 44.
|
|
A cap adjustment was enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L. 115-141), and is scheduled to go into effect in FY2020. 45.
|
|
The FLAME accounts were established in FY2010 to cover the costs of large or complex fires and to be used when amounts provided in the FS and DOI Wildland Fire Management Accounts for suppression were exhausted. See 43 U.S.C. §1748a. 46.
|
For additional information on funding for wildland fire management, see CRS Report R45005, Wildfire Management Funding: Background, Issues, and FY2018 Appropriations, by [author name scrubbed] and CRS Report R44966, Wildfire Suppression Spending: Background, Issues, and Legislation in the 115th Congress, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed] |
H.R. 3354 as passed by the House provides that appropriations for the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund may be used for activities typically funded by the Indian Health Facilities account. For additional information on this fund, see CRS Report R41630, The Indian Health Care Improvement Act Reauthorization and Extension as Enacted by the ACA: Detailed Summary and Timeline, by [author name scrubbed]. |
25. |
The Office of Natural Resources Revenue manages revenues from the development of energy and natural resources on the outer continental shelf and onshore federal and Indian lands. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26. |
This program was included as Title V, Subtitle C, in the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-121). For additional information, see CRS Report R43315, Water Infrastructure Financing: The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Program, by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27. |
Comparisons of funding for the Forest Service in general and for particular programs and accounts within the agency is complicated because of differences in the structure of the FY2017 enacted appropriations and appropriations proposed for FY2018 by the President, House bill, and Senate chairmen's draft. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
28. |
This fund did not receive FY2017 appropriations. However, it received appropriations in some earlier years. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29. |
31 U.S.C. 1342. The authority to continue some activities during a lapse in appropriations is governed by the Antideficiency Act, as interpreted by Department of Justice legal opinions and reflected in Office of Management and Budget guidance to executive agencies. For additional information on lapses of government funding, see CRS Report RS20348, Federal Funding Gaps: A Brief Overview, by [author name scrubbed] and CRS Report RL34680, Shutdown of the Federal Government: Causes, Processes, and Effects, coordinated by [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30. |
These contingency plans for agencies throughout government are on the White House website at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/agency-contingency-plans/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31. |
These funds are provided under continuing appropriations laws, namely Division D of P.L. 115-56, the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2018, as extended by P.L. 115-90, P.L. 115-96, and P.L. 115-120. Also, P.L. 115-120 would make the provisions of the original CR (P.L. 115-56) applicable to the period during which there was a lapse in appropriations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32. |
For an overview of the general provisions of the initial CR (P.L. 115-56) that established the coverage, duration, and rate of spending, and of the exceptions to these general provisions, see CRS Report R44978, Overview of Continuing Appropriations for FY2018 (P.L. 115-56), coordinated by [author name scrubbed]. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33. |
These anomalies were included in P.L. 115-56, except that the provisions related to the Indian Health Service were contained in P.L. 115-96. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
34. |
Title II, P.L. 115-72. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
35. |
|