The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for
FY2019 and Beyond
Grant A. Driessen
Analyst in Public Finance
May 21, 2018
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R45202
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Summary
The federal budget is a central component of the congressional “power of the purse.” Each fiscal
year, Congress and the President engage in a number of activities that influence short- and long-
run revenue and expenditure trends. This report offers context for the current budget debate and
tracks legislative events related to the federal budget.
After a decline in budget deficits over the past several years, the deficit is projected to increase
significantly in FY2019. Enactment of the 2017 tax revision (P.L. 115-97) and the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018; P.L. 115-123) are projected to decrease revenues and increase
outlays relative to past years, thus increasing deficits. The Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA; P.L.
112-25) implemented several measures intended to reduce deficits from FY2012 through
FY2021, and deficits declined from FY2012 through FY2015. In its April 2018 forecast, the
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) baseline projects that the FY2019 deficit will equal $981
billion (4.6% of GDP), its highest value since the economy was recovering from the Great
Recession in FY2012.
The 2017 tax revision and BCA will continue to affect budget outcomes in FY2019 and beyond.
Congress may debate amending the BCA as it has in the past through the American Taxpayer
Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA; P.L. 112-240), Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013 (BBA 2013; P.L. 113-
67), Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015; P.L. 114-74), and BBA 2018. The annual
appropriations process, the statutory debt limit, and further tax modifications may also draw
congressional attention in FY2019. Additionally, Congress may choose to debate structural
changes to the federal budget, including reforms to mandatory and discretionary spending
programs proposed by the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Trump Administration.
The Trump Administration released its FY2019 budget on February 12, 2018. Proposed policy
changes in the budget include increases in discretionary defense spending and relatively large
decreases in mandatory spending other than Social Security and Medicare and in nondefense
discretionary programs.
Following passage of full-year FY2018 appropriations, Congress has turned its attention to the
FY2019 budget. The Budget Committees in the House and Senate each develop budget
legislation as they receive information and testimony from a number of sources, including the
Administration, the Congressional Budget Office, and congressional committees with jurisdiction
over spending and revenues.
Trends resulting from current federal fiscal policies are generally thought by economists to be
unsustainable in the long term. Projections suggest that achieving a sustainable long-term
trajectory for the federal budget would require deficit reduction. Reductions in deficits could be
accomplished through revenue increases, spending reductions, or some combination of the two.
Congressional Research Service
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Contents
Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1
Budget Cycle ............................................................................................................................. 1
Budget Baseline Projections ..................................................................................................... 2
Spending and Revenue Trends .................................................................................................. 4
Federal Spending ................................................................................................................ 5
Size of Federal Spending Components Relative to Each Other .......................................... 7
Federal Revenue ................................................................................................................. 8
Deficits, Debt, and Interest ...................................................................................................... 10
Budget Deficits ................................................................................................................. 10
Federal Debt and Debt Limit ............................................................................................ 10
Net Interest ......................................................................................................................... 11
Recent Budget Policy Legislation and Events ................................................................................ 11
P.L. 115-97, the 2017 Tax Revision ........................................................................................ 12
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018) .................................................................... 13
Appropriations and Debt Limit Legislation ............................................................................ 14
Budget for FY2019 ........................................................................................................................ 14
Trump Administration’s FY2019 Budget ................................................................................ 15
Deficit Projections in the President’s FY2019 Budget ............................................................ 16
FY2019 Congressional Budget Activity ................................................................................. 19
Considerations for Congress.......................................................................................................... 19
Ongoing Budget Issues ........................................................................................................... 20
Long-Term Considerations ...................................................................................................... 20
Figures
Figure 1. Total Outlays and Revenues, FY1947-FY2017 ............................................................... 5
Figure 2. Outlays by Major Category, FY1962-FY2028 ................................................................. 6
Figure 3. Revenues by Major Category, FY1962-FY2028.............................................................. 9
Figure 4. Budget Deficit Projections, FY2018-FY2028 ................................................................ 17
Figure 5. Discretionary Cap Changes in the FY2019 Proposed President’s Budget ..................... 19
Tables
Table 1. Selected CBO Baseline Budget Projections ...................................................................... 3
Table 2. Estimated Budget Effects of 2017 Tax Revision, Selected Years .................................... 12
Table 3. Discretionary Caps on Budget Authority Established by the BCA as Amended ............. 13
Table 4. Budgetary Effects of President’s FY2019 Budget Proposals, FY2019-FY2028 ............. 15
Appendixes
Appendix. Budget Documents ....................................................................................................... 23
Congressional Research Service
link to page 28 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Contacts
Author Contact Information .......................................................................................................... 24
Congressional Research Service
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
ederal budget decisions express the priorities of Congress and reinforce its influence on
federal policies. Making budgetary decisions for the federal government is a complex
F process and requires the balance of competing goals. The Great Recession adversely
affected federal budget outcomes through revenue declines and spending increases from FY2008
through FY2013. The federal budget recorded a deficit of 9.8% of gross domestic product (GDP)
in FY2009, the largest value since World War II.1 Subsequent improvement of the economy and
implementation of policies designed to lower spending have improved the short-term budget
outlook, though federal deficits remain at relatively high levels. In FY2017, the federal budget
recorded a deficit of 3.5% of GDP, which was higher than the average deficit since FY1947
(2.7% of GDP).
Over the next several years, projections of a continued decline in discretionary spending are more
than offset by increases in mandatory spending, increases in net interest payments, and reductions
in revenues, leading to a rise in federal deficits. Increases in the long-term cost of federal
retirement and health care programs and debt servicing costs each contribute to upward pressure
on federal spending levels. Operating these programs in their current form may pass on
substantial economic burdens to future generations. Revenues are projected to decline as a
percentage of GDP over the next several years before increasing later in the 10-year budget
window as provisions enacted by the 2017 tax revision (P.L. 115-97) are scheduled to expire.
Congress and the President may consider proposals for deficit reduction if fiscal issues remain a
key item on the legislative agenda.
This report summarizes issues surrounding the federal budget, examines policy changes relevant
to the budget framework for FY2019, and discusses recent major policy proposals included in the
President’s FY2019 budget. It concludes by addressing major short- and long-term fiscal
challenges facing the federal government.
Overview
Each fiscal year Congress and the President engage in a number of practices that influence short-
and long-run revenue and expenditure trends. This section describes the budget cycle and
explains how budget baselines are constructed. Budget baselines are used to measure how
legislative changes affect the budget outlook and are integral to evaluating these policy choices.
Budget Cycle2
Action on a given year’s federal budget, from initial formation by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) until final audit, typically spans four calendar years.3 The executive agencies
begin the budget process by compiling detailed budget requests, overseen by OMB. Agencies
work on their budget requests in the calendar year before the budget submission, often during the
spring and summer (about a year and a half before the fiscal year begins). The President usually
submits the budget to Congress around the first Monday in February, or about eight months
1 Except where otherwise noted, all deficit and debt figures are expressed as a percentage of GDP, in order to account
for inflation and business cycle effects.
2 This section provides an outline for the formulation and execution of a budget and appropriations cycle for a fiscal
year. However, this timetable is not enforced by statute and often varies by year.
3 CRS Report 98-325, The Federal Fiscal Year, by Bill Heniff Jr.
Congressional Research Service
1
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
before the beginning of the fiscal year, although submissions are often later in the first year of an
Administration.4
Congress typically begins formal consideration of a budget resolution once the President submits
the budget request. The budget resolution is a plan, agreed to by the House and Senate, which
establishes the framework for subsequent budgetary legislation. Because the budget resolution is
a concurrent resolution, it is not sent to the President for approval.5 If the House of
Representatives and Senate cannot agree on a budget resolution, a substitute measure known as a
“deeming resolution” may be implemented by each chamber, which may give force to certain
budget enforcement measures.6
House and Senate Appropriations Committees and their subcommittees usually begin reporting
discretionary spending bills after the budget resolution is agreed upon. Appropriations
Committees review agency funding requests and propose levels of budget authority (BA).7
Appropriations acts passed by Congress set the amount of BA available for specific programs and
activities. Authorizing committees, which control mandatory spending, and committees with
jurisdiction over revenues also play important roles in budget decisionmaking.8
During the fiscal year, Congress and OMB oversee the execution of the budget.9 Once the fiscal
year ends on the following September 30, the Department of the Treasury and the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) begin year-end audits.
Budget Baseline Projections
Budget baseline projections are used to project the future influence of current laws and measure
the effect of future legislation on spending and revenues. They are not meant to predict future
budget outcomes. Baseline projections are included in both the President’s budget and the
congressional budget resolution. It is important to understand the assumptions and components
included in budget baselines. In some cases, slight changes in the underlying models or
assumptions can lead to large effects on projected deficits, receipts, or expenditures.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) computes current-law baseline projections using
assumptions set out in budget enforcement legislation.10 On the revenue side of the budget, the
2017 tax revision (P.L. 115-97; see additional discussion below) enacted several changes to
individual and corporate income tax rates and to other tax policy provisions that are set to expire
before the end of the 10-year budget baseline window. On the spending side, baseline
4 The contents of the presidential budget submission are governed by 31 U.S.C. §1105. For reasons why the budget
may be delayed, see CRS Report RS20179, The Role of the President in Budget Development, by Clinton T. Brass.
5 For more information, see CRS Report RL30297, Congressional Budget Resolutions: Historical Information, by Bill
Heniff Jr.
6 For information on deeming resolutions, see CRS Report R44296, Deeming Resolutions: Budget Enforcement in the
Absence of a Budget Resolution, by Megan S. Lynch.
7 Budget authority represents the amounts appropriated for a program, or the funds that may legally be spent. Outlays
represent the disbursed federal funds. There is generally a lag between when budget authority is appropriated and
outlays occur, sometimes across fiscal years.
8 For more information on the appropriations and authorization process, see CRS Report R42388, The Congressional
Appropriations Process: An Introduction, coordinated by James V. Saturno.
9 The fiscal year runs from October through September: FY2019 begins on October 1, 2018, and ends on September 30,
2019.
10 Many of the rules governing the baseline contained in Section 257 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit
Control Act, as amended, were extended or modified as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25).
Congressional Research Service
2
link to page 7 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
discretionary spending levels are largely constrained by the caps and automatic spending
reductions enacted as part of the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA; P.L. 112-25) and further
modified on several occasions, most recently with the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018;
P.L. 115-123).11
Since the CBO baseline assumes that current law continues as scheduled, it incorporates policy
provisions in current law that have historically been revised before taking effect. Specifically, the
CBO baseline assumes that discretionary budget authority from FY2019 through FY2021 will be
restricted by the caps as created by the BCA as amended, and that certain tax policy changes
enacted in the 2017 tax revision and in other laws will expire as scheduled under current law.12
This leads to baseline projections of lower spending and higher revenue levels relative to a
baseline that would reflect policy changes some would consider likely given past actions
(sometimes referred to as a “current policy” baseline).
In addition to these elements of current law, macroeconomic assumptions, including those related
to GDP growth, inflation, and interest rates, will also affect the baseline estimates and projections.
Minor changes in the economic or technical assumptions that are used to project the baseline also
could result in significant changes in future deficit levels.
A summary of budget outcomes in the latest CBO baseline is provided in Table 1. CBO’s current
baseline projections, released in April 2018, show rising budget deficits over the next several
years.13 This represents a reversal from the significant declines in inflation-adjusted deficits
experienced in the past few fiscal years. Those declines were primarily due to continued increases
in employment (which increased revenues collected from income and payroll taxes) and
reductions in discretionary spending. While the baseline projections include continued declines in
discretionary outlays, those reductions are more than offset by increases in mandatory spending.
Mandatory spending increases are largely due to the rising cost of Social Security and Medicare
programs, and declines in federal revenues.
Table 1. Selected CBO Baseline Budget Projections
(% of GDP)
FY2017 (actual)
FY2019
FY2023
FY2028
Budget Deficit
3.5
4.6
5.2
5.1
Debt Held by the Public
76.5
79.3
87.9
96.2
Source: Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028, April 2018, Summary
Table 2.
Baseline projections also include increases in debt held by the public (or debt held by all entities
other than the federal government) throughout the 10-year budget window. Debt held by the
public finances budget deficits and federal loan activity, and is a function of three things: (1) the
11 The BCA allows for discretionary spending to be adjusted for war funding, disaster, emergency, and program
integrity spending.
12 The 2017 tax revision included a number of reductions to individual income tax rates and tax expenditures that are
scheduled to expire under current law, as discussed later in this report. The Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act
of 2015 (PATH Act), passed as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113; see additional
discussion below), modified most of the previously expired tax provisions that had been extended several times by past
Congresses. The PATH Act made many of those provisions permanent, while others were extended through the 2016
or 2019 tax year. Provisions that were not made permanent are assumed to expire as scheduled under the CBO baseline.
13 Unless otherwise noted, budget data in this report are taken from tables in CBO, The Budget and Economic Outlook:
2018 to 2028, April 2018.
Congressional Research Service
3
link to page 9 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
size of existing debt, (2) economic growth, and (3) interest rates.14 Debt held by the public was
76.5% of GDP at the end of FY2017, and is projected to be 96.2% of GDP at the end of FY2028.
CBO also provides projections based on alternative policy assumptions, which illustrate levels of
spending and revenue if current policies continue rather than expire as scheduled under current
law. If discretionary spending increased with inflation after FY2018 instead of proceeding in
accordance with the limits instituted by the BCA and tax reductions in the 2017 tax revision are
extended, CBO projects an increase in the budget deficit of almost $2,400 billion relative to the
current-law baseline, exclusive of debt servicing costs, over the FY2019 to FY2028 period.
Beyond the 10-year forecast window, federal deficits are expected to grow unless major policy
changes are made. This is a result of increases in outlays largely attributable to rising health care
and retirement costs combined with little to no change in projected revenue levels over that
timeframe.
Spending and Revenue Trends
Over the last seven decades, federal spending has accounted for an average of 19.3% of the
economy (as measured by GDP), while federal revenues averaged roughly 17.2% of GDP.
Spending has exceeded revenues in each fiscal year since FY2002, resulting in annual budget
deficits. Between FY2009 and FY2012, spending and revenue deviated significantly from
historical averages, primarily as a result of the economic downturn and policies enacted in
response to financial turmoil. In FY2017, the U.S. government spent $3,982billion and collected
$3,316 billion in revenue. The resulting deficit of $665 billion, or 3.5% of GDP, was higher than
the average deficit from FY1947 through FY2017 of 2.1% of GDP. The trends in revenues and
outlays between FY1947 and FY2017 are shown in Figure 1.
14 For more information on the interaction of deficits and debt, see CRS Report R44383, Deficits and Debt: Economic
Effects and Other Issues, by Grant A. Driessen.
Congressional Research Service
4
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Figure 1. Total Outlays and Revenues, FY1947-FY2017
(as a % of GDP)
Source: Congressional Budget Office and Office of Management and Budget. CRS calculations.
Federal Spending
Federal outlays are often divided into three categories: discretionary spending, mandatory
spending, and net interest. Discretionary spending is controlled by the annual appropriations acts.
Mandatory spending encompasses spending on entitlement programs and spending controlled by
laws other than annual appropriations acts.15 Entitlement programs such as Social Security,
Medicare, and Medicaid make up the bulk of mandatory spending. Congress sets eligibility
requirements and benefits for entitlement programs, rather than appropriating a fixed sum each
year. Therefore, if the eligibility requirements are met for a specific mandatory program, outlays
are made without further congressional action. Net interest comprises the government’s interest
payments on the debt held by the public, offset by small amounts of interest income the
government receives from certain loans and investments.16
15 For more information on trends in discretionary and mandatory spending, see CRS Report RL34424, The Budget
Control Act and Trends in Discretionary Spending, by D. Andrew Austin, and CRS Report RL33074, Mandatory
Spending Since 1962, by D. Andrew Austin and Jeffrey M. Stupak.
16 Net interest is discussed in further detail in the section “Deficits, Debt, and Interest.”
Congressional Research Service
5
link to page 10
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Federal Spending Relative to the Size of the Economy (GDP)
In FY2000, total outlays equaled 17.6% of GDP, the lowest recorded level since FY1966. In
FY2009, outlays peaked at 24.4% of GDP. Outlays then fell steadily for the next few years,
equaling 20.3% of GDP in FY2014, before rising to 20.8% of GDP in FY2017. Under the CBO
baseline, total outlays are projected to continue rising and will reach 23.6% of GDP in FY2028.
Figure 2 provides historical data and CBO projections of federal spending between FY1962 and
FY2028. 17
Figure 2. Outlays by Major Category, FY1962-FY2028
(as a % of GDP)
Source: Office of Management and Budget, Historical Table 1.2, February 2018, and Congressional Budget Office,
The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028, April 2018.
Notes: FY1962-FY2017 figures represent actual data while FY2018-FY2028 figures are current law baseline
projections.
In FY1962, discretionary spending was consistently the largest source of federal outlays, peaking
at 13.1% of GDP in FY1968. In the ensuing decades discretionary spending as a share of the
economy underwent a gradual decline, and totaled 6.1% of GDP in FY2000. Discretionary
spending increased in most years between FY2000 and FY2010, largely due to increases in
security spending and federal interventions designed to stimulate the economy, and peaked in
17 Although both types of spending had previously existed, historical data distinguishing between discretionary and
mandatory spending in the federal budget were first collected in FY1962.
Congressional Research Service
6
link to page 10 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
FY2010 at 9.1% of GDP.18 Discretionary spending fell from FY2010 through FY2017, due to
both the wind down of stimulus programs and the implementation of restrictions established by
the BCA. In FY2017, discretionary spending totaled 6.4% of GDP. CBO’s most recent forecast
projects short-term increases in discretionary spending, largely due to enactment of the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018; P.L. 115-123). BBA 2018 allowed for large increases in
discretionary spending in FY2018 and FY2019. Baseline forecasts subsequently include
projections of lowered discretionary spending levels in FY2020 (the first year with spending caps
unaffected by BBA 2018) and beyond. By FY2021, discretionary spending is projected to fall to
5.9% of GDP, which would be its lowest level ever; discretionary spending is projected to total
5.4% of GDP by FY2028. The projected decline in discretionary spending in the baseline over the
next decade is largely due to the reductions under current law contained in the BCA.19
Figure 2 also shows mandatory spending as a share of GDP. Mandatory spending was a much
smaller source of outlays than discretionary spending in earlier years, totaling just 4.7% of GDP
in FY1962. Over time the share of mandatory spending has consistently grown, initially due to
the increase in subscription in large mandatory programs such as Social Security and Medicare
and then due to demographic and economic shifts that further increased the sizes of those
programs.20 Mandatory spending totaled 13.2% of GDP in FY2016, up from 9.4% of GDP in
FY2000. Mandatory spending peaked in FY2009 at 14.5% of GDP. Mandatory spending levels
during the FY2009-FY2012 period were elevated mainly because of increases in outlays for
income security programs as a result of the recession. The continuing economic recovery has
resulted in lower mandatory spending on certain programs. Mandatory spending is projected to
increase beginning in FY2019 due to growth in certain entitlement programs. Under current law,
CBO projects that mandatory spending will total 15.2% of GDP in FY2028, greater than the
FY2009 level.
Size of Federal Spending Components Relative to Each Other
It is also possible to evaluate trends in the share of total spending devoted to each component. In
FY2017, mandatory spending amounted to 63% of total outlays, discretionary spending reached
30% of total outlays, and net interest comprised 7% of total outlays. The largest mandatory
programs, Social Security, Medicare, and the federal share of Medicaid, constituted 48% of all
federal spending in FY2017. CBO’s baseline projections include a rise in net interest and a
decline in discretionary spending as a share of total federal expenditures. In FY2028, the baseline
projects that mandatory spending will total 64% of outlays, discretionary spending will total 23%
of outlays, and net interest will total 13% of outlays.
Discretionary spending currently represents less than one-third of total federal outlays. Some
budget experts contend that to achieve a long-term decline in federal spending, reductions in
18 The definition of security spending has varied over time. The Obama Administration defined security spending as
funding for the Department of Defense – Military, the Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security
Administration, International Affairs (budget function 150), the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department
of Veterans Affairs. Security spending has defense and nondefense components.
19 The caps on discretionary spending contained in the BCA expire after FY2021. Beginning in FY2022, the baseline
assumes that discretionary spending will grow at the rate of inflation, which is generally less than the projected growth
of nominal GDP. Therefore, discretionary spending continues to fall, as a percentage of GDP, throughout the budget
window.
20 The increase in subscription of Social Security and Medicare was due to those programs becoming actuarially mature
(i.e., the eligible population aging into coverage).
Congressional Research Service
7
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
mandatory spending are needed.21 Budget and social policy experts have also stated that cuts in
mandatory spending may cause substantial disruption to many households, because mandatory
spending comprises important parts of the social safety net.22 Future projections of increasing
deficits and resulting high debt levels may warrant further action to address fiscal health over the
long term.23
Federal Revenue
In FY2017, federal revenue collections totaled 17.3% of GDP, roughly equal to the historical
average since FY1947 (17.2% of GDP). Real federal revenues have increased in recent years, due
primarily to an improving economy. Between FY2009 and FY2013, revenue collection was
depressed as the result of the economic downturn and certain tax relief provisions. In FY2009 and
FY2010, revenue collections totaled 14.6% of GDP.
The 2017 tax revision (P.L. 115-97), enacted in December 2017, significantly altered federal
receipt projections. Changes to the federal code implemented by P.L. 115-97 include a temporary
reduction in individual income tax rates, a permanent reduction in the corporate income tax rate,
permanent modification of the international tax system, and a number of mostly temporary
modifications to income tax expenditures. Revenues are projected to decline from 17.8% of GDP
in FY2016 to 16.5% of GDP in FY2019. Revenues are projected to gradually increase to total
18.5% of GDP in FY2028 under the CBO baseline. Increases towards the end of the baseline
forecast are explained in part by the scheduled expiration of temporary provisions in the 2017 tax
revision.
21 Net interest payments are a function of the existing stock of publicly held debt, which is the product of past federal
budget outcomes, and prevailing interest rates, which are determined by economic conditions. Congress’s ability to
influence the level of short-term net interest payments is limited.
22 For more information, see CRS Report R41970, Addressing the Long-Run Budget Deficit: A Comparison of
Approaches, by Jane G. Gravelle, and CRS Insight IN10623, The Federal Budget Deficit and the Business Cycle, by
Grant A. Driessen and Marc Labonte.
23 In various reports, the Congressional Budget Office, the Government Accountability Office, and the Trump
Administration agree that the federal government’s budget is on an unsustainable path. For more information, see the
section of this report titled “Long-Term Considerations.”
Congressional Research Service
8
link to page 13
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Figure 3. Revenues by Major Category, FY1962-FY2028
(as a % of GDP)
Source: Office of Management and Budget, Historical Table 1.2, February 2018, and Congressional Budget Office,
The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028, April 2018.
Notes: FY1962-FY2017 figures represent actual data while FY2018-FY2028 figures are current law baseline
projections.
Figure 3 shows revenue collections between FY1962 and FY2028, as projected in the CBO
baseline. Individual income taxes have long been the largest source of federal revenues, followed
by social insurance (payroll) and corporate income taxes.24 In FY2017, individual income tax
revenues totaled 8.3% of GDP. While individual income taxes as a share of the economy have
remained relatively constant since the end of World War II, the share of federal revenues devoted
to social insurance programs has increased from 2.9% of GDP in FY1962 to 6.1% of GDP in
FY2017. That increase is largely attributable to growth in taxes that fund large entitlement
programs. Shares devoted to corporate income and other outlays have declined, from 3.5% and
2.8% of GDP, respectively, in FY1962 to 1.5% of GDP and 1.4% of GDP, respectively, in
FY2017. The CBO baseline projects that in FY2028 real individual tax revenues will be higher
than current levels, other receipts will be lower than present levels, and corporate and payroll
taxes will be roughly equivalent to FY2018 collections, though those projections would likely
change if expirations of provisions in the 2017 tax revision do not proceed as scheduled.
24 For more information, see CRS Report RL32808, Overview of the Federal Tax System, by Molly F. Sherlock and
Donald J. Marples.
Congressional Research Service
9
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Deficits, Debt, and Interest
The annual difference between revenue (i.e., taxes and fees) that the government collects and
outlays (i.e., spending) results in either a budget deficit or surplus.25 Annual budget deficits or
surpluses determine, over time, the level of publicly held federal debt and affect the level of
interest payments to finance the debt.
Budget Deficits
Between FY2009 and FY2012, annual deficits as a percentage of GDP were higher than deficits
in any four-year period since FY1945.26 The unified budget deficit in FY2017 was $665 billion,
or 3.5% of GDP. The unified deficit, according to some budget experts, gives an incomplete view
of the government’s fiscal conditions because it includes off-budget surpluses.27 Excluding off-
budget items (i.e., Social Security benefits paid net of Social Security payroll taxes collected and
the U.S. Postal Service’s net balance), the on-budget FY2017 federal deficit was $715 billion.
Budget Deficit for FY2018
The April 2018 CBO baseline projected the FY2018 budget deficit to be $804 billion, or 4.0% of
GDP. The rise in the estimated budget deficit for FY2018 relative to FY2017 is the result of
decreases in real revenues more than offsetting a small decrease in real outlays. FY2018 outlays
are projected to increase to 20.8% of GDP from 20.6% of GDP in FY2017; revenues are
projected to fall to 16.6% of GDP in FY2018, down from 17.3% of GDP in FY2017.
Federal Debt and Debt Limit
Gross federal debt is composed of debt held by the public and intragovernmental debt.
Intragovernmental debt is the amount owed by the federal government to other federal agencies,
to be paid by the Department of the Treasury, which mostly consists of money contained in trust
funds. Debt held by the public is the total amount the federal government has borrowed from the
public and remains outstanding. This measure is generally considered to be the most relevant in
macroeconomic terms because it is the debt sold in credit markets. Changes in debt held by the
public generally track the movements of the annual unified deficits and surpluses.28
Historically, Congress has set a ceiling on federal debt through a legislatively established limit.
The debt limit also imposes a type of fiscal accountability that compels Congress (in the form of a
vote authorizing a debt limit increase) and the President (by signing the legislation) to take visible
action to allow further federal borrowing when nearing the statutory limit.
The debt limit by itself has no direct effect on the borrowing needs of the government.29 The debt
limit, however, can hinder the Treasury’s ability to manage the federal government’s finances
25 Unlike many state and local governments, the federal government has no binding statutory balanced-budget
requirement or a separate budget for capital spending.
26 The budget deficit peaked at 9.8% of GDP in FY2009.
27 From an overall budget perspective, these surpluses are used to offset other federal spending, thereby decreasing the
current budget deficit while increasing the amount of Treasury securities held in the Social Security Trust Funds. Off-
budget surpluses have historically been large. However, declining surpluses in the Social Security program will lead to
off-budget deficits beginning in FY2019 according to the CBO baseline.
28 For more information on the components of federal debt, see CRS Report R44383, Deficits and Debt: Economic
Effects and Other Issues, by Grant A. Driessen.
29 The need to raise (or lower) the limit during a session of Congress is driven by previous decisions regarding revenues
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
10
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
when the amount of federal debt approaches this ceiling. In those instances, the Treasury has had
to take extraordinary measures to meet federal obligations, leading to inconvenience and
uncertainty in Treasury operations at times.30
A binding debt limit would prevent the Treasury from selling additional debt and could prevent
timely payment on federal obligations, resulting in default. Possible consequences of a binding
debt limit include (1) a reduced ability of Treasury to borrow funds on advantageous terms,
resulting in further debt increases; (2) possible turmoil in global economies and financial markets;
and (3) acquisition of penalties or fines from the failure to make timely payments. More broadly,
a binding debt limit may also affect the perceived credit risk of federal government borrowing.
Consequently, the federal government’s borrowing capacity could decline.31
Net Interest
In FY2017, the United States spent $263 billion, or 1.4% of GDP, on net interest payments on the
debt. What the government pays in interest depends on market interest rates as well as the size
and composition of the federal debt. Currently, low interest rates have held net interest payments
as a percentage of GDP below the historical average despite increases in borrowing to finance the
debt. Some economists, however, have expressed concern that federal interest costs could rise if
interest rates continue to increase, resulting in future strain on the budget. Interest rates are
projected to rise in the CBO baseline, resulting in net interest payments of $915 billion (3.1% of
GDP) in FY2028, a figure that well exceeds the historical average of 1.7% of GDP since
FY1940.32
Recent Budget Policy Legislation and Events33
The 115th Congress has adopted legislation with short- and long-term effects on the federal
budget. The 2017 tax revision included major changes to the federal tax code, including changes
to individual and corporate income taxes, international taxes, and a variety of tax expenditures
(deductions, exclusions, and credits available to taxpayers). BBA 2018 enacted a two-year
revision to the discretionary spending caps imposed by the BCA and also suspended the statutory
debt limit until March 2019. Congress has also enacted several pieces of legislation with
ramifications for the appropriations process and statutory debt limit.
(...continued)
and spending stemming from legislation enacted earlier in the session or in prior years. The consideration of debt limit
legislation often is viewed as an opportunity to reexamine fiscal and budgetary policy.
30 For more information, see CRS Report R41633, Reaching the Debt Limit: Background and Potential Effects on
Government Operations, by D. Andrew Austin et al., and U.S. Government Accountability Office, Delays Create Debt
Management Challenges and Increase Uncertainty in the Treasury Market, GAO-11-203, February 2011.
31 For historical information about notable federal borrowing events, see CRS Report R44704, Has the U.S.
Government Ever “Defaulted”?, by D. Andrew Austin.
32 For more information on the relationship between federal borrowing and net interest payments, see CRS Report
R44383, Deficits and Debt: Economic Effects and Other Issues, by Grant A. Driessen.
33 This section is not meant to address all recently enacted changes in budget policy, but rather to highlight some of the
major legislative actions and events. For more information on budget-related legislation in 2017, see CRS Report
R44799, Budget Actions in 2017, by Grant A. Driessen and Megan S. Lynch.
Congressional Research Service
11
link to page 16 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
P.L. 115-97, the 2017 Tax Revision
The 2017 tax revision, signed into law on December 22, 2017, made extensive changes to the
federal tax system. A comprehensive list of the modifications made in the 2017 Tax Revision is
available in CRS Report R45092, The 2017 Tax Revision (P.L. 115-97): Comparison to 2017 Tax
Law, coordinated by Molly F. Sherlock and Donald J. Marples. Changes made in the 2017 tax
revision include the following:
temporary modifications (scheduled to expire at the end of tax year 2025) to
individual income tax brackets, with a reduction in the top rate from 39.6% to
37%, an increase in the income threshold for the top bracket, and a temporary
increase in the individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) exemption;
a permanent modification in corporate income tax rates from a graduated rate
structure with a top rate of 35% to a flat rate of 21%, and a permanent repeal of
the corporate AMT;
numerous modifications, mostly temporary, to the tax expenditures available to
individual and corporate income tax filers, which include changes made to the
standard deduction, the mortgage interest deduction, and the deduction for state
and local taxes paid;
a temporary (scheduled to expire at the end of tax year 2025) increase in the
federal estate and gift tax exclusion; and
a permanent shift in the taxation of foreign income from a modified version of a
worldwide basis (where all income from U.S. firms earned in other countries is
subject to U.S. taxation) to a modified version of a territorial profits basis (where
profits are taxed on the basis of the country where they are earned).
Summary data from the final cost estimate conducted by the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT)
for the 2017 tax revision are provided in Table 2. The law was estimated to increase deficits by a
total of $1,456 billion from FY2018-FY2027, with deficit increases from FY2018-FY2026 and a
small deficit decrease in FY2027 as many of the temporary provisions included in the act expire.
That estimate excluded macroeconomic feedback effects: JCT estimated that such effects would
reduce deficits by a total of $385 billion over the FY2018-FY2027 period.34
Table 2. Estimated Budget Effects of 2017 Tax Revision, Selected Years
(in billions of dollars)
Tax Category
FY2019
FY2023
FY2027
FY2018-FY2027
Individual
-188.8
-144.0
83.0
-1,126.6
Business
-133.8
-16.4
-49.4
-653.8
International
42.6
22.5
-0.8
324.4
Total
-280.0
-137.9
32.9
-1,456.0
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation, JCX-67-17, Estimated Budget Effects of the Conference Agreement for H.R.
1, https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=5053.
Notes: Column and row totals may not sum due to rounding. Estimate is not inclusive of macroeconomic
feedback; see text for further discussion of those effects.
34 JCT, JCX-69-17, Macroeconomic Analysis of the Conference Agreement for H.R.1, the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”,
https://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=5055.
Congressional Research Service
12
link to page 17 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
CBO included an estimated effect of the 2017 tax revision on the federal budget in its April 2018
baseline release, which incorporated an additional year (FY2028) and included the effects on debt
servicing costs and of implementation details learned since the date of enactment. That estimate
projected that exclusive of macroeconomic feedback, the 2017 tax revision increased total deficits
by $2,314 billion from FY2018-FY2028; including macroeconomic feedback, which reduced
deficits by $461 billion, the act was estimated to increase deficits by $1,854 billion over the same
period.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA 2018)
BBA 2018, enacted into law on February 9, 2018, is the latest modification to the deficit
reduction measures imposed by the BCA. The BCA was enacted on August 2, 2011, and
contained a variety of measures intended to reduce future deficits by at least $2,100 billion over
the FY2012-FY2021 period. Most of the direct reduction in deficits imposed by the BCA was to
be generated by caps on discretionary budget authority, with the remainder produced by a
sequester on some types of mandatory spending.35
Before enactment of BBA 2018, the deficit reduction measures established by the BCA were
amended by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA; P.L. 112-240), the Bipartisan
Budget Act of 2013 (BBA 2013; P.L. 113-67), and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA 2015;
P.L. 114-74). The specific changes made by each amending law differ, but all three laws provided
for short-term increases in discretionary spending by raising the discretionary budget authority
caps established by the BCA in certain years while reducing mandatory spending by extension of
the sequester on mandatory programs. Unlike BBA 2013 and BBA 2015, the direct and indirect
budgetary effects to the BCA made in BBA 2018 were not offset (according to standard
legislative cost estimation procedures) by other changes included in the law.
Table 3 shows how the discretionary caps from FY2014 through FY2021 have changed since
enactment of the BCA. BBA 2018 raised the discretionary caps in FY2018 and FY2019 by a
combined $296 billion, a much greater increase than provided for in previous amendments to the
BCA. FY2018 and FY2019 discretionary budget authority as provided for in BBA 2018 is
projected to be a combined $114 billion higher than the initial caps established by the BCA,
though the caps in FY2020 and FY2021 remain virtually unchanged since 2012.
Table 3. Discretionary Caps on Budget Authority Established by the BCA as
Amended
(in billions of dollars)
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
FY2021
Original limits established by the BCA
Defense
556
566
577
590
603
616
630
644
Nondefense
510
520
530
541
553
566
578
590
Revised limits following Automatic Enforcement Measures
Defense
501
511
522
535
548
561
575
589
Nondefense
472
483
493
505
517
531
545
557
35For more information on the BCA as amended, see CRS Report R44874, The Budget Control Act: Frequently Asked
Questions, by Grant A. Driessen and Megan S. Lynch.
Congressional Research Service
13
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
FY2014
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
FY2021
Current limits following legislative changes and revised projections
Defense
520
521
548
551
629
647
576
591
Nondefense
492
492
518
519
579
597
542
555
Source: CRS Report R44874.
Notes: See CRS Report R44874 for more detail on the automatic enforcement measures established by the
BCA. Legislative changes were enacted in ATRA, BBA 2013, BBA 2015, and BBA 2018. The BCA requires CBO
and OMB to periodically revise future discretionary limits to ensure that the deficit reduction targets established
by the BCA as amended are reached.
Appropriations and Debt Limit Legislation
Each year Congress enacts a set of laws providing for discretionary appropriations, which gives
federal agencies the authority to incur obligations. Appropriations acts typically provide authority
for a single fiscal year, and may come in the form of regular appropriations (providing authority
for the next fiscal year), supplemental appropriations (providing additional authority for the
current fiscal year), or continuing appropriations (providing stop-gap authority for agencies
without a regular appropriation).36 Most recently, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2018 (P.L.
115-141) was signed into law on March 23, 2018, providing full-year appropriations for all
federal agencies without a regular appropriation through the end of FY2018 (which ends
September 30, 2018). Time periods for which no or incomplete appropriations are provided are
known as funding lapses, and may result in partial or full shutdown of federal operations. Short-
term funding lapses occurred in January and February 2018. 37
Recent legislation has also modified the statutory debt limit. BBA 2018 suspended the debt limit
until March 1, 2019, and dictated that the debt limit be increased upon reinstatement as needed to
accommodate any additional federal borrowing undertaken up to that point.38 Before enactment of
BBA 2018, Treasury had implemented extraordinary measures (which had been used in prior debt
limit episodes) to prevent the debt limit from binding upon its reinstatement from a previous
suspension on December 8, 2017.
Budget for FY2019
The Trump Administration submitted its FY2019 budget to Congress on February 12, 2018. The
President’s budget lays out the Administration’s views on national priorities and policy initiatives.
Congress has also begun consideration of the FY2019 budget.
36 For more information on the annual appropriations process, see CRS Report 98-721, Introduction to the Federal
Budget Process, coordinated by James V. Saturno.
37 For more information on lapses of appropriations, see CRS Report RL34680, Shutdown of the Federal Government:
Causes, Processes, and Effects, coordinated by Clinton T. Brass, and CRS Report RS20348, Federal Funding Gaps: A
Brief Overview, by Jessica Tollestrup.
38 For more information on recent debt limit events, see CRS Report R43389, The Debt Limit Since 2011, by D.
Andrew Austin.
Congressional Research Service
14
link to page 19 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Trump Administration’s FY2019 Budget
President Trump presented his policy agenda in the Administration’s FY2019 budget submission.
If the policies are fully implemented, the Administration estimates that total FY2018 outlays
would be $4,214 billion (21.0% of GDP) and revenues would be $3340 billion(16.7% of GDP),
resulting in a budget deficit of $873 billion (4.4% of GDP). The Administration estimates that
deficits under the proposed budget would increase in FY2019 and then decline as a share of
output over the course of the budget window, with the significance of the decline varying with
how certain macroeconomic effects are applied to the forecast.
A summary of the total deficit effects of the budget’s proposed changes is presented in Table 4.
The budget proposes reforms that would reduce several types of outlays. The largest spending cut
proposals are to (1) nondefense discretionary programs, with an outlay reduction of $1,669 billion
from FY2019 through FY2028; (2) Medicaid and other mandatory programs (including
Children’s Health Insurance and welfare), with $1,074 billion in FY2019-FY2028 outlay
reductions; (3) repeal and replacement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA;
P.L. 111-48), with $675 billion in FY2019-FY2028 deficit reductions; and (4) Medicare
programs, with a $236 billion reduction in FY2019-FY2028 outlays.
The budget proposes increases in infrastructure spending, which would result in total outlays
increasing by $199 billion over the FY2019-FY2028 period. Finally, the budget proposes
increases to the total defense budget, with increases in base defense spending and decreases in
Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) spending resulting in an increase in discretionary
defense outlays of $143 billion over the FY2019-FY2028 period.
The President’s budget assumes that those policy changes produce additional indirect budgetary
effects on net interest spending and through changes in economic output. The proposed policy
changes are estimated to reduce net interest spending by $319 billion over the FY2019-FY2028
period. Moreover, the budget assumes those policies increase economic growth in a manner that
reduces FY2019-FY2028 deficits by an additional $813 billion. The budget’s economic forecast
was based on information available in November 2017, and the budget states that this additional
growth accounts for enactment of the 2017 tax revision.39 As noted earlier, the CBO and JCT
included smaller deficit reduction estimates ($461 billion over the FY2019-FY2028 period and
$385 billion over the FY2018-FY2027 period, respectively) resulting from such macroeconomic
feedback.40
Table 4. Budgetary Effects of President’s FY2019 Budget Proposals, FY2019-FY2028
(in billions of dollars)
Increase (+) or Decrease (-) in FY2019-FY2028
Proposal (Major Budget Category)
Deficits from Policy Changes
Infrastructure Investment (Mandatory Outlays)
+199
Medicare (Mandatory Outlays)
-236
Medicaid & Other Programs (Mandatory Outlays)
-1,074
Defense (Discretionary Outlays)
+143
39 Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government for FY2019, Analytical Perspectives, p.12.
40 Joint Committee on Taxation, Macroeconomic Analysis of the Conference Agreement for H.R.1, the “Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act”, JCX-69-17, December 22, 2017.
Congressional Research Service
15
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Increase (+) or Decrease (-) in FY2019-FY2028
Proposal (Major Budget Category)
Deficits from Policy Changes
Nondefense (Discretionary Outlays)
-1,670
Net Interest (Net Interest Outlays)
-319
Repeal and Replace Affordable Care Act (Unspecified)
-675
Effect of Assumed Boost to Economic Growth (Unspecified)
-813
Total
-4,445
Source: OMB, Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2019, Tables S-1 through S-3.
Notes: Indirect budgetary effects are italicized. For past budgets CBO has provided an independent analysis of
proposals in the President’s budget. That information has not yet been released.
The President’s budget uses economic projections in its calculations that differ from those used in
congressional budget operations. The budget projects that the real economic growth rate
(measured as the percentage change in real GDP) will be 3.0% per year both in FY2018 and over
the FY2019 through FY2028 period. That total is higher than the assumptions included in CBO’s
April 2018 forecast, which includes real economic growth projections averaging 1.9% per year
from FY2019 through FY2028. Previous iterations of the President’s budget have also included
differences in economic projections with those produced by CBO, though such differences have
typically been smaller than the projection gap in the FY2018 and FY2019 budgets.41 The United
States last experienced real economic growth of greater than 3.0% in FY2005.42 The
Administration estimated that assuming real economic growth to be 1% lower over the FY2018-
FY2018 period would increase its projected budget deficits by $3,144 billion over the FY2018 to
FY2028 window.
Deficit Projections in the President’s FY2019 Budget
The Trump Administration provided two deficit projections in its FY2019 budget.43 First, OMB
projected a Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act (BBEDCA) baseline: the
BBEDCA baseline, or “pre-policy” baseline, assumes that discretionary spending remains
constant in real (i.e., inflation-adjusted) terms and revenue and mandatory (or direct) spending
continue as under current law.44 Under this scenario, the FY2019 deficit is projected to total
$0.969 trillion (4.6% of GDP), the FY2028 deficit is projected to be $1,378 billion (4.3% of
GDP), and cumulative deficits are projected to be $11,540 billion over the FY2019-FY2028
period.
The other deficit projection, the proposed budget, illustrates the effect on the budget outlook if all
of the policies proposed in the budget are implemented. In FY2019, the Administration projects
that the deficit will reach $984 billion (4.7% of GDP). Under the proposed budget, deficits would
41 For example, the first budget issued by the Obama Administration (released in 2009) included real economic growth
assumptions of 2.6% per year in FY2016 through FY2019, as compared with 2.3% growth over the same period issued
by CBO. Congressional Budget Office, A Preliminary Analysis of the President’s Budget and an Update of CBO’s
Budget and Economic Outlook, Table 2-6, March 2009, https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/111th-congress-2009-
2010/reports/03-20-presidentbudget.pdf.
42 Bureau of Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts, Table 1.1.1, May 2018.
43 For details of these projections, see U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal
Year 2019, Tables S-1 through S-10.
44 For a description of the policies included in the various baselines, see U.S. Office of Management and Budget,
Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2019, Analytical Perspectives.
Congressional Research Service
16
link to page 21
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
steadily decrease from FY2021 through FY2028, producing a budget deficit of $363 billion
(1.1% of GDP) in FY2028. The net budget deficit from FY2019-FY2028 totals $7,095 billion in
the proposed budget. Neither projection incorporates the budgetary effects of BBA 2018, which
was enacted just prior to the budget release. CBO estimated that BBA 2018 would increase
FY2018-FY2027 deficits by a combined $252 billion relative to current law, exclusive of debt
servicing costs.45 Figure 4 illustrates how federal deficits in the President’s pre-policy and
proposed budgets compare to current law (CBO baseline) over the next decade.46 The proposals
in the President’s budget are projected to result in deficit reductions of $4,445 billion over the
next decade relative to the pre-policy baseline.47
Figure 4. Budget Deficit Projections, FY2018-FY2028
(as a % of GDP)
Sources: Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2018 to 2028, April 2018, Table 1;
Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2018, Tables S-1 and S-3.
45 Congressional Budget Office, Cost Estimate for Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, February 8, 2018. Cited figure
incorporates both direct (mandatory spending and revenues) and indirect (discretionary spending) budget effects.
46 Structural variation in economic modeling typically accounts for a small difference between the baseline produced by
CBO and the President’s pre-policy baseline.
47 U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2019, Table S-2.
Congressional Research Service
17
link to page 23 The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Adjustments to BCA Discretionary Caps
The President’s budget proposes to adjust the caps on discretionary spending as originally
established by the Budget Control Act (BCA). In August 2011, the BCA placed limits on
discretionary budget authority and included provisions for additional spending cuts to be
implemented through an automatic process that were eventually triggered by the absence of
agreement from a committee tasked with passing deficit reduction legislation. Since enactment of
the BCA, Congress and the President have modified the BCA several times, primarily to allow
increases in discretionary spending (for more information, see the earlier section titled “Recent
Budget Policy Legislation and Events”).
A summary of the changes to the discretionary caps in the President’s budget is presented in
Figure 5. In FY2019, the President’s budget would leave the defense cap unchanged while
decreasing the nondefense cap by $57 billion; both caps were recently modified by BBA 2018.
The budget calls for increases to the defense caps by $84 billion and $87 billion in FY2020 and
FY2021, respectively, and proposes decreases in the nondefense caps of $87 billion and $109
billion in FY2020 and FY2021.
While the caps on discretionary budget authority as established by the BCA are scheduled to
expire after FY2021, the President’s budget also proposes changes to discretionary spending in
FY2022-FY2028 under the assumption that discretionary spending grows with current services
growth rates. Over the FY2022-FY2028 period the administration proposes increases to defense
spending in each year ranging from $87 billion to $92 billion. The budget proposes decreases in
nondefense spending that grow from $132 billion in FY2022 to $274 billion in FY2028.
Congressional Research Service
18
link to page 17
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Figure 5. Discretionary Cap Changes in the FY2019 Proposed President’s Budget
(billions of dollars of budget authority)
Source: Office of Management and Budget, Budget of the U.S. Government Fiscal Year 2018, Table S-7, and OMB,
Addendum to the President’s FY19 Budget to Account for the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018.
Notes: Discretionary caps are currently scheduled to expire at the end of FY2021: FY2022-FY2028 changes are
taken from OMB budget documents, which assume that those caps would grow at current services growth rates.
FY2019 Congressional Budget Activity
Following passage of full-year FY2018 appropriations, Congress has turned its attention to the
FY2019 budget. The budget committees in the House and Senate each may develop budget
legislation as they receive information and testimony from a number of sources, including the
Administration, the CBO, and congressional committees with jurisdiction over spending and
revenues. Absent legislative action, the limits on discretionary budget authority for FY2019 are
scheduled to be $647 billion for defense activities and $597 billion for nondefense activities,
which is a combined $36 billion higher than the limits in FY2018 (see Table 3).
Considerations for Congress
Ongoing federal budgetary challenges remain which may lead to congressional action. Issues
related to deficit reduction and the long-term budget outlook may continue to arise in policy
discussions. Increased spending on entitlement programs, as currently structured, will likely
contribute to rising deficits and debt, placing ever-increasing focus on how to achieve fiscal
sustainability over the long term.
Congressional Research Service
19
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Ongoing Budget Issues
Various budget issues may feature prominently in near-term congressional debates. Discussions
over FY2019 discretionary appropriations legislation may be held in advance of the beginning of
the fiscal year (or afterwards in the case of supplemental or continuing appropriations). Congress
may elect to revisit the deficit reduction measures imposed by the BCA as amended, which
include discretionary caps on defense and nondefense budget authority through FY2021 and
spending reduction measures on certain mandatory programs through FY2027. As discussed
earlier, Congress has already lifted the discretionary caps (to allow for more spending) in each
year from FY2013 through FY2019 relative to their values established in the BCA.48
Congress may also choose to modify the statutory debt limit. The debt limit is currently
suspended through March 2019, at which time it is to be reinstated to accommodate federal
borrowing levels. If faced with a nearly binding debt limit, Treasury may choose to enact
extraordinary measures to postpone when the debt limit binds. Short-run budget surpluses in
March and April of that year (primarily from the receipt of annual income tax returns) mean that
extraordinary measures enacted in March will likely postpone a binding debt limit by several
months.49 The latest CBO budget forecast projects a larger nominal budget deficit in FY2019
($981 billion) than the federal deficit in FY2017 ($665 billion), which was the last year
extraordinary measures were enacted in March. Such an increase may reduce the length of time
extraordinary measures would postpone a binding debt limit relative to what was experienced in
2017.
Long-Term Considerations
The federal government faces long-term budget challenges. Occasional budget deficits are not
necessarily problematic. Deficit spending can allow governments to smooth outlays and revenues
to shield taxpayers and program beneficiaries from abrupt economic shocks in the short term,
while also temporarily boosting GDP when the economy is underperforming. Persistent deficits,
however, lead to growing levels of federal debt that may lead to higher interest payments and may
also have adverse macroeconomic consequences in the long term, including slowing investment
and lowering economic growth. Indefinite growth of real debt will eventually lead to a borrowing
crisis, though the timing of such an event is subject to great uncertainty. Reducing large deficits
will require increases in taxes, reductions in spending, or both.
Some measures of fiscal solvency in the long term indicate that, under current policy, the United
State faces major future imbalance, specifically as it relates to rising retirement and health care
costs and the likely impact on government-financed health care spending. Existing deficit
reduction policies like the BCA had improved recent and near-term deficits but do not make
significant changes to the parts of the budget that are projected to grow the fastest in the long run.
Therefore, many budget analysts believe that additional deficit reduction is required to put the
budget on a sustainable path over the long term. CBO’s current law baseline projects inflation-
adjusted deficits (equal to 4.9% of GDP) from FY2019-FY2028 despite a real economic growth
48 Policy debate surrounding the BCA and subsequent amendments has often included a discussion of the “parity
principle,” which refers to equality between the changes made to the budgets of defense and nondefense programs. The
way the parity principle applies to the BCA as amended has shifted over time. For more information on the parity
principle and recent budget agreements, see CRS In Focus IF10657, Budgetary Effects of the BCA as Amended: The
“Parity Principle”, by Grant A. Driessen.
49 More information on seasonal changes in budget outcomes may be found in CRS In Focus IF10292, The Debt Limit,
by Grant A. Driessen.
Congressional Research Service
20
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
rate averaging 1.8% per year over the same period: that combination of sustained economic
growth and large federal deficits would be unprecedented in the postwar era.
CBO, GAO, and the Trump Administration agree that the current mix of federal fiscal policies is
unsustainable in the long term. The nation’s aging population, combined with rising health care
costs per beneficiary, may keep federal health costs rising faster than per capita GDP. CBO
projected in March 2017 that under current policy, federal spending on health programs
(including Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, and exchange subsidies) would grow from 5.5% of GDP in
FY2017 to 8.8% of GDP in FY2047.50 A 2017 GAO report on fiscal health also cited health
spending as a source of concern.51 Though these forecasts are highly uncertain, it seems probable
that spending on these programs will rise as a share of GDP over time.
In addition, growing debt and rising interest rates are projected to cause interest payments to
consume a greater share of future federal spending. CBO projects that under current law,
spending to service the federal debt (net interest payments) will grow rapidly, from 1.4% of GDP
in FY2017 to 5.2% of GDP in FY2047.52 GAO’s recent long-term fiscal simulations, under an
alternative policy scenario, projected that debt held by the public as a share of GDP would exceed
the post-World War II historical high in the next 15 to 25 years.53
Keeping future federal outlays at 20% of GDP, or approximately at their historical average, and
leaving fiscal policies unchanged, according to CBO projections, would require drastic reductions
in all spending other than that for Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid, or reining in the costs
of these programs. Under CBO’s extended baseline, maintaining the debt-to-GDP ratio at today’s
level (77%) in FY2047 would require an immediate and permanent cut in non-interest spending,
increase in revenues, or some combination of the two in the amount of 1.9% of GDP (or about
$380 billion in FY2018 alone) in each year. Maintaining this debt-to-GDP ratio beyond FY2047
would require additional deficit reduction. If policymakers wanted to lower future debt levels
relative to today, the annual spending reductions or revenue increases would have to be larger. For
example, in order to bring debt as a percentage of GDP in FY2047 down to its historical average
over the past 50 years (40% of GDP), spending reductions or revenue increases or some
combination of the two would need to generate net savings of roughly 3.1% of GDP (or $620
billion in FY2018) in each year.54
The alternative to decreased spending as a means of deficit reduction is to increase revenues
through modifications to the federal tax system. The 2017 tax revision represented the latest
major change to the federal tax code, and was estimated by CBO and JCT to reduce revenues
over the FY2018-FY2027 period. CBO’s latest budget and economic forecast projects that
revenues as a percentage of GDP will be at or below their postwar average (17.2% of GDP) from
FY2018 through FY2023 before reaching 18.5% of GDP in FY2028. Federal revenue levels
toward the end of the 10-year baseline window will depend in part on whether the temporary tax
provisions enacted as part of the 2017 tax revision expire as scheduled.
In the long run, increases in federal debt are constrained by the amount of remaining “fiscal
space,” which is the amount of government borrowing that creditors are willing to finance. The
50 Congressional Budget Office, The 2017 Long-Term Budget Outlook, March 2017.
51 Government Accountability Office, The Nation’s Fiscal Health: Action is Needed to Address the Federal
Government’s Fiscal Future, January 2017.
52 Congressional Budget Office, The 2017 Long-Term Budget Outlook, March 2017.
53 Government Accountability Office, The Nation’s Fiscal Health: Action is Needed to Address the Federal
Government’s Fiscal Future, January 2017.
54 Congressional Budget Office, The 2017 Long-Term Budget Outlook, March 2017.
Congressional Research Service
21
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
amount of fiscal space available depends on the current size of the debt, how fast it is increasing
relative to GDP, and the attractiveness of federal debt to investors relative to other market
instruments. Changes in debt relative to GDP depend on the size of deficits, the government’s
borrowing rate, and how quickly the economy is growing. With continuously increasing debt
levels, at some point debt would become so large that investors would no longer be willing to
finance deficits and fiscal space would be exhausted. Exactly when investors would stop
financing federal borrowing is uncertain. Because interest rates are presently lower than their
historical averages, there is little current concern that the federal government is in danger of
running out of fiscal space in the short run.55
55 For more information on fiscal space, see CRS Insight IN10624, “Fiscal Space” and the Federal Budget, by Grant
A. Driessen and Marc Labonte.
Congressional Research Service
22
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Appendix. Budget Documents
CBO Documents
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) provides data and analysis to Congress throughout the
budget and appropriations process. Each January, CBO issues a Budget and Economic Outlook
that contains current-law baseline estimates of outlays and revenues.56 In March, CBO typically
issues an analysis of the President’s budget submission with revised baseline estimates and
projections. These documents can be delayed as a result of the legislative agenda or if the
President’s budget is off schedule. In late summer, CBO issues an updated Budget and Economic
Outlook with new baseline projections.
In these documents, CBO sets a current-law baseline as a benchmark to evaluate whether
legislative proposals would increase or decrease outlays and revenue collection. Baseline
estimates are not intended to predict likely future outcomes, but to show what spending and
revenues would be if current law remained in effect. CBO typically evaluates the budgetary
consequences of most legislative proposals and the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) evaluates
the consequences of revenue proposals.
CBO also releases other periodic publications focusing on the future fiscal health of the United
States. In its publication The Long-Term Budget Outlook, CBO makes projections on the state of
the federal budget over the next 30 years. CBO discusses spending and revenue levels and the
related issues that it expects will arise under different policy assumptions. In its Budget Options
volumes, CBO provides specific policy options and the impact they will have on spending and
revenues over a 10-year budget window. CBO also provides arguments for and against enacting
each policy.
OMB Documents
The President’s budget contains five major volumes: (1) The Budget, (2) Historical Tables, (3)
Analytical Perspectives, (4) Appendix, and (5) Supplemental Materials.57 These documents lay
out the Administration’s projections of the fiscal outlook for the country, along with spending
levels proposed for each of the federal government’s departments and programs. The Historical
Tables volume also provides significant amounts of budget data, much of which extend back to
1962 or earlier. Along with the Administration’s budget documents, the Department of the
Treasury also releases its Green Book, which provides further detail on the revenue proposals that
are contained in the budget.58
56 At the request of the House and Senate Budget Committees, CBO delayed the release of their 2018 Budget and
Economic Outlook in order to incorporate the effects of the 2017 tax revision (P.L. 115-97) and of BBA 2018 (P.L.
115-123). A 2018 analysis of the President’s Budget has not been released at the time of this publication.
57 The President’s budget proposals can be found on the OMB website at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/. The
Supplemental Materials include the Federal Credit Supplement, the Object Class Analysis, the Balances of Budget
Authority, and the Public Budget Database.
58 The FY2019 Green Book has not yet been made available. For the FY2018 version, see U.S. Department of the
Treasury, General Explanations of the Administration’s Fiscal Year 2018 Revenue Proposals, available at
http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/Pages/general_explanation.aspx.
Congressional Research Service
23
The Federal Budget: Overview and Issues for FY2019 and Beyond
Author Contact Information
Grant A. Driessen
Analyst in Public Finance
gdriessen@crs.loc.gov, 7-7757
Congressional Research Service
24