link to page 2 
 
 
 
 INSIGHTi 
 
FY2024 NDAA: Reproductive Health Care 
Provisions 
Updated January 16, 2024 
Background 
The Department of Defense (DOD) administers a health entitlement (under
 Chapter 55 of Title 10, U.S. 
Code) through t
he Military Health System (MHS). The MHS offers health benefits and services through 
its TRICARE program to approximatel
y 9.6 million beneficiaries composed of servicemembers, military 
retirees, and dependents. Congress often specifies certain TRICARE coverage parameters (e.g., how 
health care services may be delivered, and cost-sharing requirements) through the National Defense 
Authorization Act (NDAA).  
During ongoing deliberations on an FY2024 NDAA, Congress has expressed interest in TRICARE 
coverage policies for reproductive health care services (see CRS Insight IN12210,
 FY2024 NDAA: Status 
of Legislative Activity). TRICARE currently covers 
•  
reproductive health screening and preventive services, •  
contraceptive services (i.
e., birth control), and 
•  
infertility services (e
.g., diagnostic services for
 assisted reproductive technologies or 
ART). 
Table 1 lists proposed and enacted reproductive health care-related provisions included in the House-
passe
d (H.R. 2670) Senate-passed 
(S. 2226), and enact
ed (P.L. 118-31) versions of the FY2024 NDAA. 
 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN12236 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
Table 1. FY2024 NDAA Selected Legislative Proposals 
House-passed H.R. 2670 
Senate-passed S. 2226 
Enacted Legislation (P.L. 118-31)  
Section 707 would have temporarily 
No similar provision. 
Not adopted. 
prohibited DOD from requiring and 
col ecting certain TRICARE cost shares 
for prescription contraceptives; 
contraceptive services, education, or 
counseling, and “any method of 
contraception approved, granted, or 
cleared by the Food and Drug 
Administration” offered under 
TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Select 
for certain members of the uniformed 
services their dependent family 
members. The temporary prohibition 
would have been in effect for a one-
year period starting 30 days after 
enactment.  
Section 711 would have required the 
Section 726 would have required the 
Not adopted. 
Secretary of Defense to establish a 
Secretary of Defense to conduct a 
one-year pilot program that provides 
study on family planning in the military, 
reimbursement for gamete 
including trends of servicemembers 
cryopreservation services for certain 
who leave the Armed Forces for family 
active duty servicemembers. The pilot 
planning reasons, the availability of 
program would have provided 
gamete cryopreservation services and 
reimbursement for no more than 200 
its effect on retention, and methods 
active duty servicemembers who are 
and cost for DOD to offer gamete 
awaiting or have received orders to 
cryopreservation services. The 
certain hazardous duty locations, 
provision would have also required the 
would be geographically separated 
Secretary of Defense to brief the 
from their spouse or partner, and have 
House and Senate armed services 
been approved to participate in the 
committees on the results of the study 
program. 
not later than April 1, 2024. 
Section 716 would have repealed the 
No similar provision. 
Not adopted. 
October 20, 2022, DOD 
memorandum on “Ensuring Access to 
Reproductive Health Care” and 
prohibit DOD from using funds to 
implement the memorandum or 
potential successor memorandum. The 
provision would have also amended 10 
U.S.C. §1093 to prohibit the Secretary 
of Defense from paying for or 
reimbursing fees or expenses for DOD 
health care providers to obtain a health 
care license in a state for the purpose 
of providing abortion services.  
No similar provision. 
Section 703 would have amended 10 
Not adopted. 
U.S.C. §§1074d, 1077, and 1086 to 
require TRICARE coverage of certain 
assisted reproductive technologies, 
including intrauterine insemination, for 
active duty servicemembers and their 
dependent family members. 
Source: CRS analysis of legislation on Congress.gov. 
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
Discussion 
The MHS offers care to approximately 4.7 million female beneficiaries, including 1.6 million women of 
reproductive age (15-45). Generally, active duty servicemembers incur no out-of-pocket cost for 
TRICARE-covered reproductive health services. Other beneficiaries may be subject to cost-sharing 
requirements based on their TRICARE health pl
an, beneficiary category, and type of medical service 
received. Since 2021, Congress has consider
ed legislation that would change how TRICARE covers 
certain reproductive health services. Som
e organizations have supported the elimination of existing 
TRICARE cost-sharing requirements for certain reproductive health services, whil
e others have 
advocated for expanded TRICARE coverage of ART.
 Other organizations have expressed concerns about 
broader federal “costs and side effects” to promoting reproductive health and “widespread contraceptive 
use.” 
For the FY2024 NDAA, Congress considered, but did not adopt, provisions that would have modified the 
availability or cost-sharing requirements for reproductive health services. 
Contraceptive Services 
DOD offers contraceptive services as part of it
s family planning benefit in accordance with the FY2016 
NDAA
 (P.L. 114-92 §718) 
and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for 
contraceptive use. 
House Section 707 would have established a one-year prohibition on cost shares for TRICARE-covered 
contraceptive services for certain beneficiaries. The provision would have required the Secretary of 
Defense to temporarily prohibit DOD from requiring or collecting certain TRICARE cost shares for 
contraceptive services, education, or counseling; and “any method of contraception approved, granted, or 
cleared by the Food and Drug Administration” offered under
 TRICARE Prime and
 TRICARE Select for 
all beneficiaries except members of the Coast Guard and their dependents. The provision would have also 
temporarily prohibited DOD from requiring or collecting cost shares for prescription contraceptives for 
all beneficiaries except servicemembers and dependents of the Coast Guard, National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration Commissioned Officer Corps, Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public 
Health Service.  
Infertility Services 
DOD offers certai
n infertility services as part of it
s family planning benefit. Federal regulation 
(32 C.F.R. 
§199.4(g)(34)) prohibits DOD from paying for other types of infertility services (i.e., ART), except for 
seriously ill or injured active duty servicemembers and their spouses diagnosed with infertility. Senate 
Section 703 would have amended
 10 U.S.C. §§1074d, 1077, and 1086 to require TRICARE coverage of 
certain ART (e
.g., intrauterine insemination) for all active duty servicemembers and their dependents.  
Senate Section 726 would have required the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study on family planning 
in the military, including an analysis of servicemembers who leave the military for family planning 
reasons, the availability of
 gamete cryopreservation services and its effect on retention, and methods and 
cost for DOD to offer these services. House Section 711 would have required the Secretary of Defense to 
establish a one-year pilot program to provide reimbursement to no more than 200 active duty 
servicemembers for gamete cryopreservation services. 
While these provisions were not enacted, th
e conferees directed the Secretary of Defense to conduct a 
study on the “feasibility and advisability of providing reimbursement to servicemembers for expenses 
incurred in the testing, cryopreservation, shipping, and storage of gametes in a private storage facility 
  
Congressional Research Service 
4 
deemed appropriate by the Secretary.” The Secretary is also required to brief the Armed Services 
committees on the study no later than April 1, 2024. 
Abortion-related Services 
Statute 
(10 U.S.C. §1093) prohibits DOD from directly providing or paying for abortions, “except where 
the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or in a case in which the 
pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.” DOD may provi
de medically necessary care and 
services when related to a 
covered abortion. On October 20, 2022, the Secretary of Defense
 issued a 
memorandum directing actions to ensure that servicemembers and their families “can access reproductive 
health care and [DOD] health care providers can operate effectively.” The memo directed the department 
to establi
sh travel and transportation allowances for servicemembers and their dependents to obtain non-
covered reproductive health care that is unavailable in the “local area of a Service member’s permanent 
duty station,” and establish a reimbursement program to assist a DOD health care provider with obtaining 
a professional license in another state “in order to support the performance of their official duties.”  
House Section 716 would have repealed the October 20, 2022, DOD memorandum and prohibit DOD 
from using funds to implement the memorandum or a potential successor memorandum. The provision 
would have also amended 10 U.S.C. §1093 to prohibit the Secretary of Defense from paying for or 
reimbursing fees or expenses for DOD health care providers to obtain a health care license in a state for 
the purpose of providing abortion services. 
For more on TRICARE coverage of reproductive health services, see 
•  CRS Report R4
6785, Federal Support for Reproductive Health Services: Frequently 
Asked Questions; 
•  CRS In Focus IF1
1504, Infertility in the Military; •  CRS In Focus IF111
09, Defense Health Primer: Selected Contraceptive Services; and 
•  CRS Insight IN119
60, FY2023 NDAA: Military Abortion Policies. 
  
 
Author Information 
 Bryce H. P. Mendez 
   
Specialist in Defense Health Care Policy  
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
  
Congressional Research Service 
5 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN12236 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED