This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
The House and the Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) Appropriations Subcommittees are charged with providing annual appropriations for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and certain related agencies.
The annual appropriations process generally begins with the release of the President's budget, which is due in February. The second Trump Administration's FY2026 budget release was delayed due to the presidential transition and other factors. A "skinny" budget was released in early May, with more details—including Congressional Budget Justifications—released later. For the agencies that comprise the THUD budget, it proposes the following:
Prior to enactment of final full-year THUD appropriations, funding for THUD was maintained at FY2025 levels via a continuing resolution (Division A of P.L. 119-37), which was enacted following a government-wide funding lapse that lasted from October 1, 2025, through November 12, 2025.
Before the start of the fiscal year, the House and Senate took various appropriations actions.
On July 17, 2025,On July 17, the House Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (H.R. 4552; H.Rept. 119-212), following subcommittee markup on July 14. It includesThe committee reported the bill on July 21. It included the following:
Forgoing initial subcommittee markup, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (S. 2465; S.Rept. 119-47) on July 24, 2025. It included. It includes the following:
DOT, HUD, and the related agencies that would typically be funded for FY2026 by the annual THUD appropriations act are currently being funded under a continuing resolution (Div. A of P.L. 119-37) that largely extends FY2025 funding levels through January 30, 2026. Enactment of this law ended a government-wide funding lapse that lasted from October 1, 2025, through November 12, 2025.
The House and the Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) Appropriations Subcommittees are charged with providing annual appropriations for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and certain related agencies.
This report describes action on FY2026 annual appropriations for THUD, including detailed tables for each major agency and a brief overview of selected issues.
(Rounded funding figures are presented in the report, but unrounded figures are used to calculate percentages throughout.)The THUD bill funds two federal departments—DOT and HUD—and several smaller related agencies. Of the 12 regular appropriations bills, THUD is typically the fourth largest in terms of discretionary funding and it typically contains the largest number of Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending projects (earmarks).1
As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, the distribution of funding within the THUD bill differs depending on the inclusion or exclusion of mandatory funding associated with the bill. Including both mandatory and discretionary funding, DOT's budget is nearly twicelarger than that of HUD's and the related agencies make up a small share of total funding. Conversely, when looking only at net discretionary budget authority—the funding that counts for congressional scorekeeping purposes, which accounts for savings from offsets and rescissions but excludes mandatory funding—HUD's share is larger than DOT's share.
|
Figure 1. Distribution of THUD Funding by Title FY2025 Enacted |
|
Source: Comparative Statement of New Budget (Obligational) Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584. Notes: Discretionary funding reflects net discretionary funding. Excludes emergency funding, except emergency funding provided for regular program operations. |
|
Current Status Most federal agencies—including DOT, HUD, and the related agencies typically funded in the annual THUD appropriations act—are currently being funded under a continuing resolution (CR). The CR was enacted as Division A of the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-37). It was signed into law on November 11, 2025, ending a funding lapse and government shutdown that began at the start of FY2026 (October 1, 2025). The CR extends FY2025 funding levels through January 30, 2026. It contained three anomalies affecting THUD accounts:
|
The annual appropriations process generally begins with the release of the President's budget in February. The Trump Administration's FY2026 budget release was delayed. A "skinny"skinny budget was released in early May 2025, with more details—including Congressional Budget Justifications—released beginning at the end of May. Part of the delay may be attributable to the change in administration. It may also be attributable to the delayed resolution of the FY2025 annual appropriations process, which culminated with enactment of a full-year continuing resolution funding agencies at FY2024 levels, with some anomalies (including for THUD), on March 15, 2025 (P.L. 119-4).
In order to begin congressional deliberation of individual appropriations acts, generally an agreement is reached via a budget resolution or other vehicle to establish both a top-line funding level for annual appropriations (called a 302(a) level) as well as individual appropriations subcommittee allocations (called 302(b) allocations). As of the cover date of this report, no such formal topline agreement hasfor FY2026 had been reached in either the House or the Senate. On June 11, 2025, the House Committee on Appropriations ordered reported draft interim allocations for four of its 12 subcommittees, pending publication of the Appropriations Committee's 302(a) allocation in the Congressional Record by the Chair of the House Committee on the Budget; those draft allocations havewere subsequently been revised, including on July 17, when an allocation for THUD was adopted. The House THUD allocation was set at $89.9109 billion, a 4% increase over the FY2025 enacted level. Although Senate committee action has begun on FY2026 appropriations bills, asAs of the cover date of this report, no formal allocations for FY2026 have beenwere established for the Senate Committee on Appropriations or its subcommittees.
The following provides a brief overview of action on FY2026 THUD appropriations, including Table 1, which provides comparable funding levels at the THUD bill title level. That is followed by more detail, organized by bill Title.
For the agencies that comprise the THUD budget, the President's FY2026 budget requestsrequested the following:
On July 17, the House Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (H.R. 4552; H.Rept. 119-212), following subcommittee markup on July 14. The committee reported the bill on July 21. It includedIt includes the following:
Forgoing initial subcommittee markup, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (S. 2465; S.Rept. 119-47) on July 24. It includesincluded the following:
Prior to enactment of FY2026 full-year appropriations, most federal agencies—including DOT, HUD, and the related agencies typically funded in the annual THUD appropriations act—were funded under a continuing resolution (CR).3 The CR was enacted as Division A of the Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-37). It was signed into law on November 11, 2025, ending a funding lapse and government shutdown that began at the start of FY2026 (October 1, 2025). The CR extended FY2025 funding levels through January 30, 2026. It contained three anomalies affecting THUD accounts:
On February 3, 2026, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (P.L. 119-75) was signed into law, which included as Division D the Transportation, HUD, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026. It included the following:
FY2025 Enacted
FY2026 Request
|
FY2025 Enacted |
|
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
|
|
Title I: DOT |
106,785 |
109,937 |
105,078 |
109,807 |
— |
|
Discretionary |
25,246 |
26,652 |
21,793 |
26,522 |
— |
|
Mandatory |
81,539 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
— |
|
Title II: HUD |
60,690b |
36, |
67,751 |
73, |
— |
|
Title III: Related Agencies |
433 |
293 |
366 |
424 |
— |
|
Total |
167,908 |
146, |
173,195 |
183, |
— |
|
Total Discretionary |
86,369 |
63,514 |
89,910 |
100, |
— |
|
Total Mandatory |
81,539 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
— |
|
Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program Operations (HUD) |
8,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Supplemental Emergency Disaster Funding |
20,125 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Other Supplemental Funding (IIJA; DOT) f |
36, |
36, |
36, |
36, |
36, |
Sources: FY2025 Enacted figures from House Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority (H.Rept. 119-212). FY2026 President's Budget Request figures from FY2026 President's Budget Documents. FY2026 House committee and Senate committee figures from Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables in H.Rept. 119-212 and S.Rept. 119-47. Some figures have been adjusted for comparability.
Notes: Values may not sum to totals or exactly match source materials because of rounding. Amounts noted as "emergency" are excluded when calculating total funds countable toward 302(b) allocations.
a. Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. In FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. As such, figures provided in this report may not match those published in the President's budget documents.
b. Excludes $8 billion in appropriations for rental assistance programs designated as emergency spending in the bill, which are shown under "Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program Operations" later in this table.
Notes: Values may not sum to totals or exactly match source materials because of rounding. Amounts noted as "emergency" are excluded when calculating total funds countable toward 302(b) allocations. e. P.L. 119-75 included IIJA transfers totaling $2.3 billion. These transfers are not reflected in this total. For more information, see the "IIJA Transfers" section in this report. f. P.L. 119-75 made changes to current and prior year IIJA funds. These transfers are not reflected in this total. For more information, see the "IIJA Transfers" section in this report. The Department of Transportation (DOT) Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212 and text of H.R. 4552; "FY2026 Senate Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47 and text of S. 2465. "FY2025 Enacted," "President's budget" and "FY2026 Enacted" figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in January 22, 2026, Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909) and text of P.L. 119-75, as well as President's budget documents.
DOT is organized into 11 units. Five operating administrations each oversee a mode of transportation: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); Federal Transit Administration (FTA); Federal Railroad Administration (FRA); Maritime Administration (MARAD); and, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Three operating administrations oversee certain aspects of roadways: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA); and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Two offices have department-wide responsibilities: Office of the Secretary (OST) and Office of Inspector General (OIG). The Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLSDC) is the wholly owned government corporation that operates and maintains two locks on the St. Lawrence Seaway and other aspects of navigation infrastructure.74
The source of most of DOT's annual funding is provided by two periodic authorization acts, one for surface transportation programs and one for aviation programs. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58) authorized programs and funding for surface transportation programs for FY2022-FY2026. The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 (P.L. 118-63) authorized AATFAviation and Airways Trust Fund (AATF) taxes and revenue collections and civil aviation program expenditures through FY2028. Most of the funding for the programs in those acts is drawn from the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and the Aviation and Airways Trust Fund (AATF)AATF, respectively. HTF revenues come largely from fuel taxes and increasingly from transfers from the general fund of the Treasury.85 AATF revenues come largely from taxes on passenger tickets and aviation fuel and some general fund money.96
Most of the funding drawn from the HTF, and a portion of the funding drawn from the AATF, is in the form of contract authority, a type of budget authority that is considered mandatory (rather than discretionary). In addition to providing regular annual discretionary appropriations, the THUD bill includes obligation limitations on this mandatory budget authority. That mandatory budget authority does not count against the THUD bill's 302(b) discretionary suballocation.
Table 2 provides the detailed appropriations for DOT by agency and account (column 1) showing the FY2025 enacted funding levels (column 2), the FY2026 President's Budget Request (column 3)budget request, the FY2026 funding proposals from both the House Appropriations Committee (column 4) and the Senate Appropriations Committee (column 5), with column 6 reserved for, and FY2026 enacted funding levels. Total appropriations and net discretionary budget authority rows of the table reflect new discretionary budget authority. In addition to the total of budgetary resources provided at the conclusion of Table 2, the IIJA (P.L. 117-58, Division J) appropriated to DOT $36.8 billion in supplemental advance appropriations per year for various programs for each of FY2022-FY2026 (as shown Table 3).
|
Administrations and Accounts |
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Request |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
|||||
|
Appropriations |
||||||||||
|
Office of the Secretary (OST) |
1,168 |
507 |
875 |
1,119 |
— |
|||||
|
Salaries and Expenses |
191 |
200 |
205 |
186 |
— |
|||||
|
Research and Technology |
49 |
50 |
44 |
33 |
— |
|||||
|
National Infrastructure Investments |
345 |
0 |
0 |
250 |
— |
|||||
|
National Surface Transportation and Innovation Finance Bureau |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
— |
|||||
|
Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement |
25 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
— |
|||||
|
Financial Management Capital |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
— |
|||||
|
Cyber Security Initiatives |
49 |
75 |
75 |
60 |
— |
|||||
|
Office of Civil Rights |
18 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
— |
|||||
|
Transportation Planning, Research, and Development |
21 |
25 |
23 |
34 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
— |
|||||
|
Working Capital Fund (non-add) |
522 |
0 |
533 |
650 |
— |
|||||
|
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and Outreach |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
— |
|||||
|
Payments to Air Carriers (Essential Air Service) |
450 |
142 |
514 |
514 |
— |
|||||
|
Essential Air Service (Overflight Fees) (non-add) |
162 |
174 |
174 |
174 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) |
16,989 |
18,007 |
18,296 |
18,428 |
— |
|||||
|
Operations |
13,483 |
13,842 |
13,752 |
13,818 |
— |
|||||
|
Facilities & Equipment |
3,176 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
— |
|||||
|
Research, Engineering, and Development (Airport and Airways Trust Fund) |
280 |
165 |
230 |
290 |
— |
|||||
|
Airport Discretionary Grants |
50 |
0 |
314 |
319 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
284 |
269 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) |
341 |
770 b |
969 |
581 |
— |
|||||
|
Highway Infrastructure Program |
341 |
770 b |
969 |
581 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
954 |
581 |
— |
|||||
|
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) |
223 |
223 |
134 |
65 |
— |
|||||
|
Operations and Research |
223 |
223 |
134 |
65 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) |
2,925 |
3,239 |
347 |
2,916 |
— |
|||||
|
Safety and Operations |
268 |
268 |
265 |
265 |
— |
|||||
|
Railroad Research and Development |
54 |
44 |
44 |
43 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail |
75 |
0 |
0 |
75 |
— |
|||||
|
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements |
100 |
500 |
38 |
107 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
38 |
52 |
— |
|||||
|
Amtrak Grants |
2,428 |
2,427 |
0 |
2,427 |
— |
|||||
|
Northeast Corridor |
1,141 |
850 |
0 |
850 |
— |
|||||
|
National Network |
1,286 |
1,577 |
0 |
1,577 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) |
2,408 |
2,355 |
309 |
2,248 |
— |
|||||
|
Transit Infrastructure Grants |
46 |
0 |
97 |
141 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
96 |
59 |
— |
|||||
|
Technical Assistance and Training |
8 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
— |
|||||
|
Capital Investment Grants |
2,205 |
2,205 |
54 |
1,950 |
— |
|||||
|
Grants to Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
— |
|||||
|
Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLSLSDC) |
41 |
41 |
38 |
41 |
— |
|||||
|
Operations and Maintenance |
40 |
41 |
38 |
41 |
— |
|||||
|
Maritime Administration (MARAD) |
900 |
1, |
897 |
1,043 |
— |
|||||
|
Maritime Security Program |
318 |
372 |
380 |
390 |
— |
|||||
|
Cable Security Fleet |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
— |
|||||
|
Tanker Security Program |
60 |
120 |
91 |
122 |
— |
|||||
|
Operations and Training |
268 |
235 |
272 |
241 |
— |
|||||
|
State Maritime Academy Operations |
126 |
90 |
91 |
143 |
— |
|||||
|
Assistance to Small Shipyards |
9 |
105 |
0 |
30 |
— |
|||||
|
Ship Disposal |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
— |
|||||
|
Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program |
54 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
— |
|||||
|
Port Infrastructure Development Program |
50 |
550 |
43 |
96 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
43 |
21 |
— |
|||||
|
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) |
324 |
324 |
315 |
323 |
— |
|||||
|
Operational Expenses |
32 |
32 |
29 |
31 |
— |
|||||
|
Hazardous Material Safety |
75 |
75 |
69 |
74 |
— |
|||||
|
Pipeline Safety |
218 |
218 |
218 |
218 |
— |
|||||
|
Oil Spill Liability Fund |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
— |
|||||
|
Pipeline Safety Fund |
181 |
181 |
181 |
181 |
— |
|||||
|
Liquefied Natural Gas Siting Account |
* |
* |
* |
* |
— |
|||||
| i |
— |
— |
— |
* |
— |
|||||
|
Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
— |
|||||
|
Office of Inspector General |
116 |
116 |
105 |
116 |
— |
|||||
|
Salaries and Expenses |
116 |
116 |
105 |
116 |
— |
|||||
|
Total Appropriations |
25,435 |
27,065 |
22,286 |
26,881 |
— |
|||||
|
Rescissions |
— |
( |
(304) |
(170) |
— |
|||||
|
OST— |
— |
(35) |
— |
— |
— |
|||||
|
OST |
— |
— |
(10) |
— |
— |
|||||
|
|
— |
— |
— |
(1) |
— |
|||||
|
|
— |
— |
— |
(0) |
— |
|||||
|
|
— |
— |
— |
(20) |
— |
|||||
|
FRA ( |
— |
— |
(75) |
— |
— |
|||||
|
FRA ( |
— |
— |
— |
(2) |
— |
|||||
|
FRA (§158) — — — — (950) |
— |
— |
(40) |
— |
— |
|||||
|
MARAD |
— |
(190) j |
(179) |
(147) |
— |
|||||
|
Maritime Security Program |
— |
(27) |
(27) |
(33) |
— |
|||||
|
Cable Security Fleet |
— |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
— |
|||||
|
Tanker Security Program |
— |
(65) |
(54) |
(77) |
— |
|||||
|
Ship Disposal |
— |
— |
— |
(25) |
— |
|||||
|
Title XI ( |
— |
(86) j |
(86) |
— |
— |
|||||
|
User Fees |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
— |
|||||
|
PHMSA |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
— |
|||||
|
Pipeline Safety Fund |
(181) |
(181) |
(181) |
(181) |
— |
|||||
|
Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account |
(7) |
(7) |
(7) |
(7) |
— |
|||||
|
Design Review Fund i |
— |
— |
— |
* |
— |
|||||
|
Liquefied Natural Gas Siting |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
— |
|||||
|
Net Discretionary Budget Authority |
25,247 |
26,652 |
21,793 |
26,522 |
— |
|||||
|
Limitations on Obligations (Mandatory Funding) |
81,539 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
— |
|||||
|
FAA—Airport and Airways Trust Fund |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
— |
|||||
|
FHWA—Highway Trust Fund |
61,314 |
62,657 |
62,657 |
62,657 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)—Highway Trust Fund |
909 |
927 |
927 |
927 |
— |
|||||
|
NHTSA—Highway Trust Fund |
1,037 |
1,059 |
1,059 |
1,059 |
— |
|||||
|
FTA—Highway Trust Fund |
14,279 |
14,642 |
14,642 |
14,642 |
— |
|||||
|
PHMSA—Emergency Preparedness Fund (non-add) |
47 |
44 |
47 |
47 |
— |
|||||
|
106,786 |
109,937 |
105,078 |
109,807 |
— |
||||||
|
Additional Appropriations |
44,897 n |
36, |
36, |
36, |
36, |
|||||
|
Net new budget authority (incl. additional appropriations from P.L. 118-158 and P.L. 117-58) |
151, |
146,748 |
141, |
146, |
— |
Sources: FY2025 Enacted figures from FY2026 House Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority (H.Rept. 119-212). FY2026 President's Budget Request figures from FY2026 DOT Congressional Budget Justifications. FY2026 House committee and Senate committee figures from Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables in H.Rept. 119-212 and S.Rept. 119-47.
Notes: Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. In FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. For example, the net discretionary budget authority total does not include the changes in mandatory programs (CHIMPs) inconsistent with the FY2026 DOT Congressional Budget Justifications, but consistent with House and Senate committee figures in Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority in H.Rept. 119-212 and S.Rept. 119-47. Gross mandatory budget authority does not include $20 million of mandatory budget authority provided for Asset Concessions to the Office of Secretary in the IIJA. CRS has reorganized accounts when needed. Additionally, for the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, there is a discrepancy between the FY2026 President's budget documents as to whether or not the Administration is requesting new discretionary funding for this account, with FY2026 DOT Congressional Budget Justifications specifying a request of $41 million and the FY2026 President Budget Details specifying a request for no new funding. As such, the totals in this column may not match those published in the President's budget documents. Table 2 does not include proposed transfers from IIJA accounts as discussed in the subsequent sections of the report and includes new budget authority. An "*" indicates amount rounds to less than $1 million; and "—" indicates amount is not available or not applicable.
a. Highway Infrastructure Program account does not include transfers proposed by the Senate committee for FY2026.
b. Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements balances do not include the proposed transfers of IIJA funding by the House and Senate committees for FY2026.
c. Port Infrastructure Development Program and Assistance to Small Shipyards accounts do not include the transfers of IIJA funding proposed by the House committee for FY2026.
d. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposed the "Design Review Fund" account for PHMSA in FY2026, so there is no funding requested in the FY2026 President's Budget and proposed for FY2026 by the House Appropriations Committee and these cells have the notation "NA" for "not applicable."
Sources: "FY2026 House Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212 and text of H.R. 4552; "FY2026 Senate Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47 and text of S. 2465. "FY2025 Enacted," "President's budget," and "FY2026 Enacted" figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in January 22, 2026, Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909) and text of P.L. 119-75, as well as President's budget documents. l. P.L. 119-75 included IIJA transfers totaling $2.3 billion. These transfers are not reflected in this total. For more information, see the "IIJA Transfers" section in this report. m. P.L. 119-75 made changes to current and prior year IIJA funds. These transfers are not reflected in this total. For more information, see the "IIJA Transfers" section in this report. e145,236
In addition to regular annual appropriations and contract authority, some DOT agencies and programs receive supplemental advance appropriations. Specifically, DOT received $184.1 billion from Division J, Title VIII of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58). These supplemental funds were provided in FY2022 as an advance appropriation, divided into equal portions ($36.8 billion total) that become available each year of the authorization period (FY2022-FY2026), for DOT programs authorized in Divisions A-C and J of the IIJA. That $36.8 billion in annual supplemental funding equals slightly over one-third of the FY2026 funding recommended for DOT in the THUD FY2026 appropriations bills. Table 3 shows the distribution of the supplemental funding available to DOT during FY2026. The House and the Senate committee bills propose transferring some FY2026 IIJA funding between accounts (discussed later in this report; see the "IIJA Transfers" section).
|
DOT Accounts |
FY2026 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Office of the Secretary (OST) |
3,800 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Infrastructure Investments |
2,500 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Safe Streets and Roads for All grants |
1,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration grants |
200 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation Grant Program |
100 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) |
5,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Facilities and Equipment |
1,000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Airport Infrastructure Grants |
3,000 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Airport Terminal Program |
1,000 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) |
9,454 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Highway Infrastructure |
9,454 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) |
134 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Motor Carrier Safety Operations and Program |
10 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Motor Carrier Safety Grants |
125 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) |
322 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Crash Data |
150 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vehicle Safety and Behavioral Research Programs |
110 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Supplemental Highway Traffic Safety Programs |
62 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) |
13,200 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements |
1,000 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Northeast Corridor Grants to Amtrak |
1,200 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
National Network Grants to Amtrak |
3,200 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Railroad Crossing Elimination Program |
600 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants |
7,200 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) |
4,250 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Transit Infrastructure Grants |
2,050 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital Investment Grants |
1,600 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
All Stations Accessibility Program |
350 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Electric or Low-Emitting Ferry Program |
50 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ferry Service for Rural Communities |
200 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maritime Administration (MARAD) |
450 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Port Infrastructure Development Program |
450 * |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) |
200 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program |
200 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total Other Appropriations |
$36, Source: These funds were provided in Division J, Title VIII of the IIJA (P.L. 117-58) and are subject to transfers. Note: Asterisks (*) indicate accounts affected by transfers of FY2026 unobligated balances to other accounts. (in millions)
Source: FY2025 and FY2026 figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in the January 22, 2026, Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909) and text of P.L. 119-75. |
Source: These funds were provided in Division J, Title VIII of the IIJA (P.L. 117-58) and are subject to transfers.
The Secretary of Transportation leads DOT and is the principal adviser to the President on transportation and federal transportation programs. OST develops and oversees national transportation policy and administers some grant, research, and credit programs. OST houses the Office of the Under Secretary for Policy, which oversees the Offices of Transportation Policy; Multimodal Freight and Infrastructure Policy; and Research, Development, and Technology. OST is funded by contract authority, annual appropriations, and multiyear advance appropriations (IIJA, Division J).
For OST, FY2026 enacted funding levels are about 10% below FY2025. The FY2026 President's Budget includesbudget had proposed a 57% reduction in funding for the OST. It includes noOST.
Neither the President's budget request nor the House committee bill proposed funding for the Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement account, and no funding for or the Office of Civil Rights account. Notably, for the Payments to Air Carriers account, the President's FY2026 budget requests a 68% reduction from FY2025 funding levels. The House and the Senate committees each propose a 14% increase in funding for FY2026 above FY2025 funding levels.
The Senate committee-reported bill includes fundingThe FY2026 appropriations law provided funding for both accounts below FY2025 levels, matching the Senate committee's proposal. The Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement account received a 60% decrease and the Office of Civil Rights account saw about a 36% decrease in funding from FY2025 to FY2026.
The FY2026 appropriations law included $145 million for the National Infrastructure Investments account, the Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement account, the Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and Outreach account, and Office of Civil Rights account for FY2026, whereas neither the President's Budget request nor the House Appropriations Committee would provide FY2026 funding for these accounts.
The House and the Senate committees each propose a 14% increase in funding for FY2026 above FY2025 funding levels.
For Research and Technology, the President's budget includes a 2% increase above FY2025 levels. The House and Senate committee bills propose reductions to FY2025 funding levels for this account at 10% and 33% for the local and regional project assistance grant program defined under Section 6702 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code, a 58% decrease in additional funding compared to FY2025 enacted levels (-$200 million). This program is currently called BUILD, or Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development.7
For Research and Technology, the final FY2026 funding level is 52% above FY2025. The President's budget had proposed a 2% increase above FY2025. The House and Senate committee bills proposed reductions for this account of 10% and 33%, respectively, relative to FY2025.
FAA programs are funded under four broad budget accounts: Operations and Maintenance (such as air traffic control and aviation safety functions); Facilities and Equipment (such as control towers and navigation beacons); grants for airports under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP); and Research, Engineering and Development. Some important issues for the FAA are the age and operation of the air traffic control system, including the air traffic controller workforce, and aviation safety, including airline safety and aircraft certification.10
The FY2026 President's budget includes a 6% increase in funding for the FAA, including a 41% reduction for the Research, Engineering and Development account and a 26% increase in funding for the Facilities and Equipment account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. The House and Senate committees propose levels for the Operations and the Facilities and Equipment accounts for FY2026 that are generally similar ($13.752 billion and $13.818 billion, respectively) to FY2025 ($13.483 billion).
For the Research, Engineering, and Development account, the President's FY2026 request includes a 41% reduction in funding relative to the FY2025 enacted levels. The House committee bill proposes an 18% reduction in funding and the Senate committee bill proposes a four percent increase in FY2025 funding levels for FY2026.
For the Airport Discretionary Grants account, the President's FY2026 request includes no funding for this account. The House committee bill proposes a 527% increase in funding and the Senate committee bill proposes a 539% increase in FY2025 funding levels for FY2026. Of the funding proposed for this account, the House proposes to set aside 90% of funding for Community Project Funding and the Senate proposes to set aside 84% of funding for Congressionally Directed Spending (commonly referred to as earmarks).
Federal funding for highway infrastructure is provided primarily through the federal-aid highway program administered by FHWA.11
The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 126% increase in funding for the FHWA with $770 million for the Highway Infrastructure Programs account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. This amount was requested for the Infrastructure for Rebuilding America Program (INFRA; 49 U.S.C. §6701).
For the Airport Discretionary Grants account, the President's FY2026 request included no new funding. The House committee bill proposed a 527% increase in funding and the Senate committee bill proposed a 539% increase in funding relative to FY2025. Of the funding proposed for this account, the House committee bill proposed to set aside 90% for Community Project Funding and the Senate committee bill proposed to set aside 84% for Congressionally Directed Spending. The FY2026 appropriations law included a 317% increase in new discretionary budget authority relative to FY2025 for Airport Discretionary Grants. The law also transferred $369 million in prior-year unobligated funds from the IIJA to this account. This transfer increased funding available in the account for FY2026 to 1,056% above FY2025 levels. Of that total funding, 94% is directed to Community Project Funding and Congressionally Directed Spending projects. The remaining budget authority ($35 million) is available for Airport Discretionary Grants. Federal funding for highway infrastructure is provided primarily through the federal-aid highway program administered by FHWA.9 The majority of funding for the federal-aid highway program is provided through an authorization of appropriations from the Highway Trust Fund's highway account.10 For FHWA, the annual appropriations process provided funding for activities including, but not limited to, large infrastructure grants, rural highway construction, and Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending projects. The FY2026 President's budget requested $770 million for the Highway Infrastructure Programs account solely for grants under the Infrastructure for Rebuilding America Program (INFRA; 23 U.S.C. §117). The FY2026 appropriations law made $200 million available for INFRA grants. For the Highway Infrastructure Programs account, the House Appropriations Committee proposed a 185% increase in funding compared to FY2025. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposed a 71% increase for FY2026 compared to FY2025. The FY2026 appropriations law included $927 million for the Highway Infrastructure Programs account, which is 172% of FY2025 funding levels, nearly matching the House committee's funding proposal. The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 185% increase in funding for the Highway Infrastructure Programs account for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 71% increase in funding levels for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels. The House and the Senate committees propose8
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
NHTSA is responsible for motor vehicle safety, highway safety, behavioral safety programs, motor vehicle information, and automobile fuel economy programs.12
The FY2026 President's budget includesincluded no change in funding for the National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNHTSA, compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. The House Appropriations Committee proposesproposed a 40% reduction in funding for the Operations and Research account, the sole account for NHTSA, for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 71% reduction in funding levels for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levelsproposed a 71% compared to FY2025. In the FY2026 appropriations law, the Operation and Research account received $71 million in funding, which is 68% below FY2025.
The total funding available for NHTSA is $200 million, which includes the $71 million in new discretionary budget authority and $129 million in transfers from IIJA accounts. This brings FY2026 funding levels to 10% below (-$23 million) FY2025 funding levels ($223 million).
FRA provides funding to monitor and enforce compliance with rail safety regulations, conduct rail research and development, subsidize the capital and operating expenses of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), and award grants to improve passenger and freight rail infrastructure, service, and equipment. Amtrak is reliant on annual appropriations to continue operating its national system of passenger routes, and determining the level of funding available for Amtrak and rail infrastructure grants is likely to be an issue for appropriators.13 12
The FY2026 President's Budget includesbudget included an 11% increase in funding for FRA relative to FY2025 (+$314 million), whereas the House Appropriations Committee proposesproposed an 88% reduction (-$2.5786 billion) relative to FY2025 funding levels ($2.925($2.9 billion). The Senate Appropriations Committee proposesproposed funding levels for FY2026 was comparable to FY2025 enacted funding levels. In the final FY2026 appropriations law, FRA was funded at 5.5% (-$161 million) below FY2025.
FRA administers annual funding for Amtrak, which is divided into separate grants for the Northeast Corridor (the line connecting Boston, New York City, and Washington, DC) and the National Network (including short-distance routes that receive operating support from states and long-distance routes fully funded by Amtrak). The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 26% reduction in funding for the Northeast Corridor subaccount, and a 23% increase in funding for the National Network account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. For Amtrak grants, the House committee's proposal includes no funding for grants for the Northeast Corridor and National Network programs. The Senate committee proposes a 26% reduction to Northeast Corridor and a 23% increase of funding for National Network grants.
FRA also administers several grant programs that make funding available for states and/or rail carriers to improve or expand their infrastructure. These include the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) grant program established by the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST; P.L. 114-94), which can fund a wide variety of rail projects. The FY2026 President's Budget includesbudget included a 400% increase in funding (+$400 million) for CRISI compared to FY2025 enacted levels ($100 million). For the CRISI, theThe House committee proposesproposed a 62% reduction in new discretionary budget authority compared to the FY2025 enacted level. The House committee's proposal for this account was 100% ($38 million) for Community Project Funding. The House committee proposesfor CRISI compared to FY2025; the Senate committee proposed a 7% increase. The FY2026 appropriation law included just over $7 million for CRISI, which is 93% less than was appropriated in FY2025.
In addition to new regular discretionary appropriations, the House committee proposed the transfer of $500 million from IIJA Division J appropriations for the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants to the CRISI account. The Senate committee proposes a 7% increase in funding over FY2025 enacted funding levels with 48% of this funding for Congressionally Directed Spending. The Senate committee also proposes the transfer of $44.8 million of unobligated balances of the Highway Infrastructure Program account appropriated to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Formula Program to CRISI for grantsalso proposed the transfer of $44.8 million of unobligated balances of the Highway Infrastructure Program account appropriated to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Formula Program to CRISI for grants. The transferred IIJA funding would have been derived from unobligated balances previously appropriated for FY2025 and FY2026 for activities related to financial assistance oversight and technical assistance under the IIJA's FRA-CRISI account. The FY2026 appropriation law transferred $130 million in IIJA funding to CRISI, making $137 million in total funding available, a 37% increase from FY2025.
The House committee's proposal of new discretionary budget authority for CRISI was 100% ($38 million) for Community Project Funding. The Senate proposed 48% of new discretionary budget authority to the CRISI account for Congressionally Directed Spending. In the FY2026 appropriations law, 58% of the $137 million provided is for Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending projects.
The Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail program established by the IIJA is limited to projects that improve or expand intercity passenger (as opposed to commuter or freight) rail service. The House Appropriations Committee doesdid not propose any new funding for the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail account for FY2026. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposesproposed a funding level for FY2026 that matchesmatched the FY2025 enacted levellevel. The FY2026 appropriations law provides $25 million in new discretionary budget authority and $40 million in transfers of unobligated balances previously appropriated for FY2026 activities related to financial assistance oversight and technical assistance for IIJA's FRA-Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail account.
Federal funding assistance to public transportation agencies is provided primarily through the public transportation program administered by the Department of Transportation's Federal Transit Administration (FTA).14
The FTA's account for Capital Investment Grants supports state, local, and private investment in capital projects for new and expanded transit service. The final FY2026 appropriations law provided Capital Investment Grants with 23% less in new discretionary budget authority in FY2026 compared to the $2.2 billion authorized in FY2025. The law directed the funds to be distributed as follows: $1.4 billion to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(d), of the U.S. Code; $200 million to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(e), of the U.S. Code; $26 million to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(h), of the U.S. Code; and $100 million to projects authorized under Section 3005(b), of P.L. 114-94 (Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act); for a total of $1.7 billion. The law also directed that IIJA funding appropriated to FTA-Capital Investment Grants account be directed to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(d), of the U.S. Code ($735 million) and to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(h), of the U.S. Code ($850 million).
The House Appropriations Committee proposedHouse Appropriations Committee proposes an 87% reduction (-$2.0991 billion) in FY2026 discretionary budget authority tofor FTA compared to FY2025 funding dueattributable to a 98% proposed reduction (-$2.1512 billion) to the Capital Investment Grants account compared to FY2025 enacted levels ($2.205 billion). The Senate Appropriations Committee proposesproposed a 7% reduction in FY2026 discretionary funding tofor FTA compared to FY2025 funding levels, with the full decrease totaken from the Capital Investment Grants account. Overall, the Senate Appropriations Committee proposes 35proposed 36 times more in new discretionary budget authority tofor the Capital Investments Grants account ($1.952 billion) than the House Appropriations Committee ($54 million) does.
The FTA's Transit Infrastructure Grants account supports grants for ferry boat service, research and development, buses, bus facilities, earmarks, and more. The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 113% increase in funding for the Transit Infrastructure Grants account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. Of the amount proposed, 98% of the funding is proposed to be directed to Community Project Funding. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 209% increase in funding for FY2026 over FY2025 enacted level. Of that amount, 42% of funding would be directed to Congressionally Directed Spending. The Transit Infrastructure Grants account is 31% of House Appropriations Committee's proposal and 6% of the Senate Appropriation Committee's proposal for FTA.
The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 2% reduction in funding for the FTA, including no funding for the Transit Infrastructure Grants account and the Technical Assistance and Training account, and no change in funding for the Capital Investment Grants account compared to FY2025 enacted levelsFY2026 appropriations law provided a combined total of $211 million for the Transit Infrastructure Grants account, including new discretionary budget authority ($23 million) and transfers of unobligated IIJA balances ($188 million). The Transit Infrastructure Grants account was provided 49% less in new discretionary budget authority, a reduction of $23 million, compared to FY2025 ($46 million). The IIJA transfers came from the following accounts: FTA-Transit Infrastructure Grants ($41 million), FTA-Electric and Low-Emitting Ferry Program ($5 million), FTA-Ferry Service for Rural Communities ($5 million), and FRA-Federal-State for Intercity Partnership Passenger Rail Grants ($138 million).
The FY2026 appropriations law made $148 million available for Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending projects within the Transit Infrastructure Grants account, accounting for 70% of total funding for the account.
GLSDC is a wholly owned government corporation that operates and maintains two locks on the St. Lawrence Seaway at Massena, NY, as well as other aspects of navigation infrastructure. (Canada owns and operates the other 13 locks on the seaway). GLSDC's budget is funded entirely from the Harbor Maintenance Tax, which is an ad valorem tax on imported and domestic cargo shipped through U.S. coastal and Great Lakes ports.1514 The Harbor Maintenance Tax funds the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
The FY2026 appropriations law provided $38 million to the Operations and Maintenance isaccount, the sole account for the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLSLSDC). The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 5% reduction in funding for GLSLSDC for FY2026 compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. The reduction in funding to GLSLSDC would leave funding for Army Corps of Engineer water resource projectsThis funding level is a 7% reduction (-$3 million) compared to FY2025 ($41 million). The funding level matches the House Appropriations Committee's proposal. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 1% increaseproposed a 1% decrease in funding for FY2026 compared to FY2025 enacted levels, matching the President's FY2026 request for funding($41 million).
The Maritime Administration (MARAD) supports programs for U.S. shipyards, ports, waterways, ships and shipping, vessel operations, ship disposal, and maritime education. MARAD also supports the U.S.-flag ocean shipping fleet and U.S. commercial shipyards.
The FY2026 appropriations law provided a 16% increase in funding for MARAD compared to FY2025. The FY2026 President's budget requested a 54President's Budget includes a 106% increase in funding for the Maritime AdministrationMARAD, with the DOT budget documents1615 noting that the funding increase would support the Administration's executive order "Restoring America's Maritime Dominance." The request reflected" including a 100% increase tofor the Tanker Security Program account, a 1,100% increase to the Assistance to Small Shipyard account ($105 million), and a 1,000% increase to the Port Infrastructure Development account ($550 million) compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels ($9 million and $50 million, respectively). The request also includesproposed an increase in grants for small shipyards (shipyards with fewer than 1,200 employees).17
For the Assistance to Small Shipyards account, the Senate Appropriations Committee proposed $30 million, which is a 243% increase compared to the FY2025 enacted amount ($9 million). The House Appropriations Committee proposed no new funding for this account in FY2026. The FY2026 appropriations law provided a 300% increase (+ $26 million) compared to FY2025.
For the Maritime Guaranteed Loan account, the House and Senate Appropriations Committees each proposed $4 million, a 93% reduction compared to the FY2025 enacted level ($54 million). The FY2026 appropriations law funded the account at a 92% reduction (-$50 million) relative to FY2025.PHMSA is responsible for pipeline safety and the safe transport of hazardous materials (hazmat) by all transportation modes. PHMSA has the primary responsibility for the formulation, administration, and oversight of onshore pipeline safety regulations in the United States. The agency carries out such responsibilities through its Office of Pipeline Safety, which oversees pipeline operators, supports state pipeline safety agencies, and cooperates with other federal agencies that have pipeline safety responsibilities, among other duties. PHMSA also regulates the safe packaging of hazmat by road, rail, and water transport and provides grants for training emergency personnel to respond to hazmat incidents.18
The FY2026 President's Budget includes no change in funding for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. For the Hazardous Materials Safety account, the House Appropriations Committee and Senate Appropriations Committee propose reductions of 8% (-$6 million) and 1% (-$1 million), respectively, relative to FY2025 ($75 million).
The FY2026 appropriations law reduced funding by 4.3% (-$14 million) for PHMSA compared to FY2025. The FY2026 President's budget proposed no change in funding for PHMSA compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels.
The Senate Appropriations Committee proposesproposed a new account for Design Review for facility design safety reviews, with funding of $200,000, and that amount of funding was ultimately provided for this account in the FY2026 appropriations law, with funding of $200,000.
OIG conducts independent audits, investigations, and evaluations of DOT programs and operations, including contracts and grants. The FY2026 appropriations law reduced funding for OIG by 3% (-$3 million) compared to FY2025. The FY2026 President's Budget includesbudget proposed no change in funding for the Office of the Inspector General compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels.
OIG compared to FY2025. The House Appropriations Committee proposesproposed a 10% reduction in funding for the Salaries and Expenses account relative to FY2025, while the Senate Appropriations Committee proposesproposed a funding level that matches the FY2025 enacted level.
FMCSA was established to improve highway safety through regulation of equipment and operating standards for commercial motor vehicle operators. FMCSA receives budget authority through the IIJA in the form of contract authority, with funds drawn from the highway account of the Highway Trust Fund. The IIJA also provided funding to FMCSA through multiyear advance appropriations from the General Fund. FMCSA does not generally receive regular annual discretionary appropriations.
Both the House and Senate Appropriations Committee bills proposeAs noted earlier, the FY2026 appropriations law included a number of transfers of IIJA advance appropriation funding in FY2026. Those transferred funds serve to supplement—or in some cases replace—regular annual appropriations provided in the bill.
From the FHWA's IIJA Highway Infrastructure Program account, the following transfers of unobligated balances to other agency's accounts are proposed for FY2026, instead of, or in addition to, the provision of new budget authority:
For FHWA, the Senate committee proposes the transfer between programs of $555 million of IIJA funding within the Highway Infrastructure Program account. Of this total, $320 million would be derived from funding appropriated in the IIJA for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, and $75 million would be derived from funding appropriated for the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation. Both of these programs were newly established under the IIJA. The funding would be redirected to existing activities including the Appalachian Development Highway System, Federal Lands Transportation Program, the Northern Border Regional Commission, Southwest Border Regional Commission, and the Denali Commission.
Of the total $2.4 billion in funding made available for FHWA in FY2026, 61% ($1.5 billion) reflect transfers from other accounts. The FY2026 appropriations law transferred a total of $375 million in unobligated balances of amounts appropriated to various accounts and activities in Title VIII, Division J of the IIJA to FHWA's Highway Infrastructure Programs account, including the following: The remaining $1.1 billion of budget authority transferred to FHWA's Highway Infrastructure Programs account in FY2026 comes from unobligated balances of amounts appropriated to the IIJA's FHWA Highway Infrastructure Programs account. These include the following: $125 million in unobligated balances from amounts appropriated for FY2023, FY2024, FY2025, and FY2026 for operations and for administration for FHWA activities. For FAA, the FY2026 appropriations law transfers a total of $369 million in IIJA unobligated balances, including the following: Of the $65 million provided to the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail account in the FY2026 appropriations law, $40 million is derived from transfers of unobligated balances previously appropriated for FY2026 activities related to financial assistance oversight and technical assistance for IIJA's FRA-Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail account. Of the $137 million made available under the CRISI account in the FY2026 appropriations law, $130 million (95%) was derived from IIJA unobligated balances previously appropriated for FY2025 and FY2026 for activities related to financial assistance oversight and technical assistance under the IIJA's FRA-CRISI account.For FRA, the House committee proposes the transfer of $2.8 billion of unobligated balances of supplemental funding appropriated by the IIJA to Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants (49 U.S.C. §24911). Of this amount, the House bill would transfer The IIJA transfers included in P.L. 119-75 are summarized below.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Transfers to FHWA from Other Accounts
Transfers from FHWA's IIJA Accounts to FHWA's Highway Infrastructure Programs Account
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
The Senate committee bill does not propose transfers between IIJA accounts at the Federal Railroad Administration.
For NHTSA, the House and the Senate committees propose the transfer of IIJA advance appropriations to NHTSA's Vehicle Safety Account (instead of appropriating new discretionary budget authority). The House committee proposes transferring $78 million in IIJA funding from the Highway Traffic Safety Grant account. The Senate committee proposes the transfer of $145 million of IIJA funding, $95 million from the Highway Traffic Safety Grant account and $50 million from the Crash Data account.
Of the $211 million made available under the Transit Infrastructure Grants account in the FY2026 appropriations law, $188 million is derived from transfers of unobligated balances previously appropriated to the following IIJA accounts: FTA-Transit Infrastructure Grants ($41 million), FTA-Electric and Low-Emitting Ferry Program ($5 million), FTA-Ferry Service for Rural Communities ($5 million), and FRA-Federal-State for Intercity Partnership Passenger Rail Grants ($138 million).
Further, the law transferred funding previously appropriated to the IIJA's FTA-Capital Investment Grants account to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(d), of the U.S. Code ($735 million) and to projects authorized under Title 49, Section 5309(h), of the U.S. Code ($850 million).
For NHTSA, the FY2026 appropriations law included transfers totaling $129 million in IIJA unobligated balances, including the following:
The transfer of $129 million and the $71 million in new discretionary budget authority for "Operations and Research" bring the FY2026 funding levels to 10% below (-$23 million) FY2025 funding levels ($223 million).
EarmarksAs noted earlier, the THUD appropriations bill is one of the largest sources of Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending—commonly referred to as "earmarks"earmarks—in the annual appropriation process. In FY2025 no earmarks were included in the year-long continuing resolution. For FY2026, as is common, the President's budget requestsrequested no earmarked funding. The House Appropriations Committee bill proposesproposed $1.43 billion for Community Project Funding in FY2006, which is 6.4% of total gross appropriations the bill proposed for DOT. The Senate Appropriations Committee bill includesproposed $992 million in Congressionally Directed Spending projects, which is 3.7% of total gross appropriations that would be provided to DOT in the bill.
For FHWA, the Senate committee would direct the agency to update the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure formula program guidance by presenting a draft for public comment within 30 days following the enactment of the act and issuing final program guidance within 120 days of enactment of the act.19
For FTA, the Senate committee would require that "none of the funds made available by the Act be used to impede or hinder project advancement and approval" for Capital Investment Grant projects where applicants are seeking a 40% federal contribution of project costs.20 The House committee bill would rescind the unobligated balances from prior year appropriations to the Transit Infrastructure Grants account.21 The Senate committee bill would make $146 million in unobligated balances available for programs under Safe, Accessible, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA; P.L. 109-59) available for activities related to the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games ($68 million), and for the 2026 FIFA World Cup ($78 million).22 The Senate committee bill specifies four repealed or amended SAFETEA programs with unobligated balances to be used including the Clean Fuels Program (49 U.S.C. §5308), the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. §5339), the Jobs Access and Reverse Commute Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. §5316), and funding eligible for "bus and bus-related equipment and facilities" under the Capital Investment Grants program at 49 U.S.C. §5309.23
For FRA, the House and Senate committees would prohibit the use of funds to reduce Amtrak Police staffing below the May 1, 2019 levels.24 The House committee bill would prohibit the use of funds on high-speed rail corridor development in California, high-speed rail in Texas, and inter-city passenger rail in Minnesota.25
For FMCSA, the Senate committee bill would direct the agency to update regulations for the English language proficiency qualifications of commercial motor vehicle drivers at 49 C.F.R. §301.11(b)(2) so that noncompliance would result in out-of-service status for the driver.26 Another Senate committee bill provision would require DOT to provide updates to Congress on certificates issued by training providers of entry-level driver training for commercial driver's license pursuers.27
FAA–Airport Discretionary Grants received nearly 13% more in earmarked funding in FY2026 compared to FY2024. OST–Transportation Planning, Research, and Development received 233% more funding for earmarked projects in FY2026 compared to FY2024. The following accounts received less earmarked funding in FY2026 compared to FY2024: FHWA–Highway Infrastructure Programs (-24%), FTA–Transit Infrastructure Grants (-29%), FRA–Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (-12%), and MARAD–Port Infrastructure Development Program (-7%). (in millions) Account FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FHWA–Highway Infrastructure Programs 1,884 — 1,515 FAA–Facilities and Equipment 15 — — FAA–Airport Discretionary Grants 482 — 542 FTA–Transit Infrastructure Grants 207 — 148 FRA–Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements 99 — 87 MARAD–Port Infrastructure Development Program 70 — 65 OST–Transportation Planning, Research, and Development 3 — 10 Total 2,759 — 2,367 Source: FY2024 figures are taken from the funding table of the Explanatory Statement published in the March 5, 2024, Congressional Record for Division F (pp. S2185-S2207); FY2025 and FY2026 figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in January 22, 2026, Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909). Note: In FY2025, no Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending was included in the year-long continuing resolution. The following summarizes selected administrative provisions, by agency, that were included in the FY2026 appropriations law. For FAA, there are several administrative provisions addressing air traffic controllers: For FHWA, Section 124 allows states or territories that have been awarded Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending funding to apply funds within 25 miles of the original general geographic area of a project if less than 10% of project funding available as of October 1, 2025, has been obligated. In Sections 125 and 126, the law rescinds and then re-appropriates unobligated balances of funds provided by the IIJA for Nationally Significant Freight and Highway Projects program (also known as INFRA–Infrastructure for Rebuilding America and for the Bridge Investment Program): For FMCSA, in Section 130, the FY2026 appropriations law prohibits DOT from using funding to "implement, administer, or enforce" requirements of Section 31137 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code or regulations related to the use of electronic logging devices by commercial motor vehicle operators. Section 131 requires the Secretary of Transportation to update regulations to ensure that non-compliance with Section 391.11(b)(2) of Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations results in an out-of-service order. This provision was included in the Senate committee's bill.18 For FRA, Section 156 of the FY2026 appropriations law rescinds $950 million unobligated balances, including $929 million in funding once directed to high-speed rail corridor development in California.19 The House committee bill would have prohibited the use of funds on high-speed rail corridor development in California, high-speed corridor rail development in Texas, and inter-city passenger corridor rail development in Minnesota.20 For NHTSA, Section 141 of the FY2026 appropriations law prohibits the use of funds to encourage illegal drug or alcohol use in NHTSA's national impaired driving advertising campaigns. For FTA, Section 164 of the FY2026 appropriations law requires that "none of the funds made available by the Act be used to impede or hinder project advancement and approval" for Capital Investment Grant projects where applicants are seeking a 40% federal contribution of project costs.21 This provision was included in the Senate committee's bill. Sections 165 and 166 make $195 million in FTA's unobligated balances available for activities related to the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games ($94 million), as authorized by Section 1223(e) of P.L. 105-178, and for the 2026 FIFA World Cup ($100 million). The FY2026 appropriations law directs that funding for activities related to the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games is to be derived from unobligated balances from the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. §5339), funding eligible for "bus and bus-related equipment and facilities" under the Capital Investment Grants program at 49 U.S.C. §5309, and ''Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands'' (49 U.S.C. §5320). Further, funding for activities related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup is to be derived from unobligated balances from the Clean Fuels Program (49 U.S.C. §5308), the Jobs Access and Reverse Commute Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. §5316), the ''New Freedom'' program (49 U.S.C. §5317), and the ''Rural Transportation Accessibility Incentive Program'' (P.L. 105-178 §5316). The Senate committee bill would have made $146 million in unobligated balances available for activities related to the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games ($68 million) as authorized by Safe, Accessible, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA; P.L. 109-59), and for the 2026 FIFA World Cup ($78 million).22 Section 194 of the FY2026 appropriations law directs the Secretary of Transportation to issue a notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) to award unobligated and uncommitted funding provided under prior appropriations acts and at Section 11101(c)(1)(E) of the IIJA for six new university transportation centers (UTC).23 The law directs the Secretary to prioritize specific applicants. Applicants previously selected as a UTC for transportation infrastructure durability and composite materials research were required to re-compete for funding prior to the end of their five-year term, and applicants currently participating in DOT's Advanced Research Projects Agency—Infrastructure (ARPA-I) program are prioritized for funding in the law. Applicants with former UTC designations that were cancelled by DOT in May 2025 and have not been reinstated are also prioritized. Of the 35 UTCs established in 2023, there are currently 6 that focus on transportation infrastructure durability research.24 DOT cancelled seven grants to UTCs in May 2025.25HUD is the nation's housing agency. The programs and activities it administers are designed primarily to address housing problems faced by households with very low incomes or other special housing needs, and to expand access to homeownership.28proposed for DOT by the bill.
The FY2026 appropriations law provided a total of $2.4 billion for earmarks, as shown in Table 5. This total is 14% less funding for Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending than was provided in FY2024.
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Railroad Administration
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
Federal Transit Administration
Two flexible block grant programs—the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) and the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program—help states and local governments finance a variety of housing and community development activities designed to serve low-income families. The Indian Housing Block Grant and the Indian Community Development Block Grant programs provide funds for Indian tribes to address their own housing and community development needs.
Other more specialized grant programs help communities meet the needs of homeless persons (through the Homeless Assistance Grants, namely the Continuum of Care and Emergency Solutions Grants programs), including those living with HIV/AIDS (through the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program). Additional programs fund fair housing enforcement activities and lead-based paint hazard identification and remediation, along with other healthy homes initiatives.
HUD's Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures mortgages made by lenders to homebuyers with low down payments and to developers of multifamily rental buildings containing relatively affordable units. FHA collects fees from borrowers with FHA-insured mortgages, which are used to sustain its insurance funds. The Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), or Ginnie Mae, is also a part of HUD and it guarantees securities made up of federally insured or guaranteed mortgages.
Table 46 provides detailed appropriations information for HUD accounts and selected subaccounts, comparing FY2025 enacted to FY2026.
|
Components of HUD Funding Nearly all of HUD's funding is provided via discretionary appropriations, generally contained in the annual THUD appropriations act. (HUD programs may also receive additional resources from supplemental or other funding laws in some years, most often in response to disasters.) The annual THUD bill provides budget authority via appropriations for HUD programs and activities for a given fiscal year. The cost of that budget authority, as determined by the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO's) scorekeeping process, is generally reduced by offsetting receipts from the FHA's loan programs and GNMA's securitization of federally insured or guaranteed mortgages. To a lesser extent, other collections and rescissions of prior-year appropriations can also offset the cost of the HUD budget. Deducting the savings from offsets and rescissions from the gross budget authority provided to HUD results in net budget authority. Generally, gross budget authority is the most useful measure of the new resources being provided for HUD's programs and activities, whereas net budget authority is used for budget enforcement purposes such as measuring against 302(b) allocations. Any funding designated as an emergency requirement provided in the regular annual appropriations acts or in supplemental spending bills is generally exempt for purposes of budget enforcement. HUD's rental assistance programs also receive advance appropriations, which is funding provided in a fiscal year but not available until the subsequent fiscal year; the amount available in the fiscal year (which were typically provided in the prior fiscal year) count for purposes of budget scoring against spending caps. HUD also generally receives a relatively small amount of mandatory funding outside of the annual appropriations process, such as statutorily required contributions from two Government Sponsored Enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) to fund the Housing Trust Fund. These mandatory funds are generally not reflected in this report. |
Table 46. Department of Housing and Urban Development, FY2025-FY2026 Detailed Appropriations
(dollars in millions)
|
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Request |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
||||||
|
1,803 |
1, |
1,469 |
1,511 |
— |
||||||
|
State Rental Assistance Program b |
— |
36,212 |
— |
— |
— |
|||||
|
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance ( |
30,041 |
0 |
35,268 |
37,355 |
— |
|||||
|
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (Emergency Designated) |
6,000 |
|
0 |
— |
— |
|||||
|
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (inc. emergency) e |
36,041 |
d |
35,268 |
37,355 |
— |
|||||
|
32,145 |
d |
32,145 |
33, |
— |
||||||
|
Administrative Fees (non-add) |
2,771 |
d |
1,975 |
2,906 |
— |
|||||
|
Incremental VASH |
15 |
d |
0 |
15 |
— |
|||||
|
Incremental FUP |
30 |
d |
30 |
30 |
— |
|||||
|
Public Housing Fund |
8,811 |
0 |
7,334 |
8,397 |
— |
|||||
|
Operating Fund Formula Grants (non-add) |
5,476 |
d |
4,975 |
4,873 |
—
|
Operating Fund Shortfall (non-add)
|
0d
25
|
25
|
214
|
Capital Fund 337 |
|
3,200 |
d |
2,286 |
3,200 |
— |
|||||
|
Operational Performance Evaluation and Risk Assessments |
50 |
0 |
50 |
50 |
— |
|||||
|
Choice Neighborhoods |
75 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
— |
|||||
|
Self Sufficiency Programs |
196 |
0 |
175 |
211 |
— |
|||||
|
Native American Programs |
1,344 |
887 |
1,344 |
1,354 |
— |
|||||
|
Native American Block Grants (Formula) (non-add) |
1,111 |
872 |
1,111 |
1,111 |
— |
|||||
|
Native American Block Grants (Competitive) (non-add) |
150 |
0 |
150 |
100 |
— |
|||||
|
Indian Community Development Block Grants (non-add) |
75 |
5 |
75 |
125 |
— |
|||||
| e | — |
10 |
— |
10 |
— |
|||||
|
Indian housing loan guarantee |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
— |
|||||
|
Native Hawaiian block grant |
22 |
0 |
18 |
22 |
— |
|||||
|
Housing, persons with AIDS (HOPWA) |
505 |
0 |
505 |
529 |
— |
|||||
|
Community Development Fund |
3,430 |
0 |
5,642 |
4,541 |
— |
|||||
|
CDBG Formula Grants |
3,300 |
0 |
3,300 |
3,100 |
— |
|||||
|
SUPPORT for Patients and Communities |
30 |
0 |
30 |
30 |
— |
|||||
|
Grants to Reduce Barriers to Affordable Housing/PRO Housing |
100 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
— |
|||||
|
Economic Development Initiatives |
— |
0 |
2,312 |
1,351 |
— |
|||||
|
HOME Investment Partnerships |
1,250 |
0 |
0 |
1,250 |
— |
|||||
|
Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for Community Enhancement |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
— |
|||||
|
Self-Help Homeownership |
60 |
16 |
56 |
70 |
— |
|||||
|
Self-Help and Assisted Homeownership Opportunity Program |
12 |
0 |
9 |
13 |
— |
|||||
|
Section 4 Capacity Building |
42 |
16 |
42 |
49 |
— |
|||||
|
Rural Capacity Building |
6 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
— |
|||||
|
Homeless Assistance Grants |
4,051 |
4,024 |
4,158 |
4,530 |
— |
|||||
|
Project-Based Rental Assistance ( |
14,890 |
0 |
17,127 |
17,804 |
— |
|||||
|
Project-Based Rental Assistance—Emergency Designated |
2,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
— |
|||||
|
Project-Based Rental Assistance (inc. emergency) |
16,890 |
d |
17,127 |
17,804 |
— |
|||||
|
Contract Renewals (inc. emergency) |
16,422 |
d |
16,752 |
17,295 |
— |
|||||
|
Contract Administrators |
468 |
d |
375 |
509 |
— |
|||||
|
Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) |
931 |
0 |
950 |
972 |
— |
|||||
|
Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) |
257 |
0 |
262 |
265 |
— |
|||||
|
Housing Counseling Assistance |
58 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
— |
|||||
|
Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
— |
|||||
|
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Expenses |
150 |
160 |
160 |
160 |
— |
|||||
|
Government National Mortgage Assn. (GNMA) Expenses |
55 |
56 |
55 |
57 |
— |
|||||
|
Research and technology |
139 |
95 |
95 |
131 |
— |
|||||
|
Fair housing activities |
86 |
26 |
29 |
86 |
— |
|||||
|
Lead Hazard Reduction |
296 |
0 |
296 |
296 |
— |
|||||
|
Information Technology Fund |
383 |
365 |
299 |
365 |
— a |
|||||
|
Inspector General |
153 |
143 |
143 |
146 |
— |
|||||
|
Flexible Subsidy Loan Modification |
— |
— |
— |
3 |
— |
|||||
|
Gross Appropriations Subtotal (non-emergency) |
69,061 |
|
75,450 |
80,229 |
— |
|||||
|
Gross Appropriations Subtotal (inc. emergency) |
77,061 |
|
75,450 |
80,227 |
— |
|||||
|
Offsetting Collections and Receipts |
||||||||||
|
Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
— |
|||||
|
FHA |
-6,794 |
-5,251 |
-5,251 |
-5,251 |
— |
|||||
|
GNMA |
-1,563 |
-1,635 |
-1,635 |
-1,635 |
— |
|||||
|
Offsets Subtotal |
-8,371 |
-6,900 |
-6,900 |
-6,900 |
— |
|||||
|
Rescissions |
— |
|||||||||
|
Homeless Assistance Grants |
0 |
0 |
-107 |
0 |
— |
|||||
|
Research and technology |
0 |
0 |
-20 |
0 |
— |
|||||
|
Other Unobligated Balances |
0 |
0 |
-672 |
- |
— |
|||||
|
Recissions Subtotal |
0 |
0 |
-799 |
- |
— |
|||||
|
Net Discretionary Budget Authority (non-emergency) |
60,690 |
67,751 |
73, |
— |
||||||
|
Disaster Relief Emergency Funding |
12,039 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|||||
|
Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program Operations |
8,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|||||
|
Other |
— |
— |
— |
— |
||||||
Total (inc. all Emergency Spending) |
68,690 |
67,751 |
73,278 |
— |
Sources: FY2025 Enacted and "FY2026 House Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212 and text of H.R. 4552; "FY2026 Senate Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47 and text of S. 2465. President's Budget figures are taken from the FY2026 HUD Congressional Budget Justifications, except where otherwise noted.
Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding. Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. However, in FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. For example, the HUD total reflects the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate of offsetting receipts for FY2026, as opposed to estimates presented in President's budget documents. As such, the totals in the President's Budget column may not match those published in the President's budget documents. An "—" indicates not available or not applicable.
Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding. "—" = not applicable.a"FY2025 Enacted," "President's Budget" and final "FY2026 Enacted" figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in the January 22, 2026, Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909) and text of P.L. 119-75, as well as President's budget documents.
bd. Under the President's Budgetbudget request, no new funding would behave been provided to HUD's rental assistance programs. Instead, the budget proposedrequested funding a newnewly proposed State Rental Assistance Program (SRAP) block grant program.
c. This amount excludes $809 million in funding for Section 811 vouchers for comparability. The amount shown in committee documents for voucher renewals is $33.974 billion, which includes the Section 811 voucher funding.
d.
e. Tribal HUD-VASH has historically been funded in the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) account. The President's budget and S. 2465 proposeproposed funding to renew existing tribal HUD-VASH assistance in the Native American Programs account in FY2026. H.R. 4552 would provideincluded $10 million to fund tribal HUD-VASH renewals through TBRA renewal amounts.
e The FY2026 appropriations law adopted the President's budget proposal to move HUD-VASH funding to the Native American Programs account.
f. This amount includes $809 million in funding for the renewal costs of Section 811 vouchers. Funding for these costs has typically been provided as a separate set-aside. As such, this renewal funding total is not fully comparable to the House committee total or the FY2025 total, which do not include Section 811 voucher renewals.
g. The FY2026 funding law adopts the Senate committee bill's proposal to include funding for Section 811 mainstream vouchers within the amount provided for voucher renewals. However, neither the bill nor the explanatory statement specifies how much of the total provided is designated for Section 811 vouchers.
h. Total includes $400 million in advanced appropriations provided in the prior FY. The bill provides an additional $400 million in advance appropriations for the Project-Based Rental Assistance account in FY2027 that is not shown.
fi. Some or all of the cost of funding these accounts is offset by the collection of fees or other receipts shown later in this table.
gj. Section 250 of the General Provisions specifies that if the bill is enacted before the start of FY2026, then unobligated balances from the Fair Housing Activities account from FY2024 are to be permanently rescinded, but an amount of new budget authority in an equivalent amount is to be appropriated and is to be used to complete FY2024 fair housing awards.
hk. The authority to modify these loans, and the accompanying funding for such modifications, was included in Section 238 of the general provisions of the Senate Committee bill and Section 239 of the HUD general provisions in the final appropriations law.
l. Total includes requested funding for HUD's SRAP proposal, so it may not match other published President's budget totals for HUD that exclude SRAP funding.
m. Reflects Congressional Budget Office re-estimate of offsetting receipts for FY2026, as opposed to estimates presented in President's Budgetbudget documents. The President's Budgetbudget documents assumed FHA offsetting receipts of -$8.684 billion for FHA and -$1.598 billion for GNMA in FY2026.
in. Would rescind FY2025 funding from the Homeless Assistance Grants account for Youth Homelessness Demonstration Grants that havehad not yet been awarded by HUD.
jo. Section 235 proposesproposed to rescind FY2025 competitive grant funding that hashad not yet been awarded by HUD from various named accounts, including from the Public Housing Fund (health hazard elimination grants), Choice Neighborhoods program, CDBG Support Housing program, as well as previous years' unobligated balances from the Lead Hazard account and the Manufactured Housing Feed Trust Fund account.
k. Would rescindp. Proposed recission of FY2025 funding from the Research and Technology account for competitive Eviction Prevention Grants that havehad not yet been awarded by HUD.
lq. Section 249 of the General Provisions includesincluded rescissions of prior year unobligated balances from various accounts, including some emergency designated funding. It also proposed a rescission of the $25 million provided for Assisted Housing Inspections and Risk Assessments in FY2025.
m. Total reflects CBO estimates of offsetting receipts, so will not match published totals from President's budget documents.
n. Section 249 proposes to rescind unobligated balances from specified emergency designated appropriations provided in prior yearsr. Section 234 rescinds unobligated balances from a range of accounts, including $22 million in Assisted Housing Inspections and Risk Assessments that was appropriated in FY2025 and $2 million in emergency designated funding, along with small amounts of unobligated balances from other accounts.
Among the largest expenses in HUD's budget areis the annual costscost of maintaining assistance for the nearly 5 million families who are served by rental assistance programs.2927 Combined, funding for HUD's rental assistance programs accounted for 82% of HUD's gross discretionary appropriations in FY2025, most of which is used to maintain assistance for currently-assisted families. The cost of maintaining, or renewing, rental assistance—particularly in the Housing Choice Voucher and the project-based rental assistance programs—typically increases each year, driven largely by rental cost increases outpacing increases in tenant incomes.
The President's budget for FY2026 requested no new funding for HUD's rental assistance and related programs, and instead requestsrequested funding for a new State Rental Assistance Program. According to HUD's FY2026 Congressional Budget Justifications,3028 under this new program, states would receivehave received allocations based on a formula that would take into account data on rental assistance in prior years and could favor assistance provided to elderly or disabled residents over assistance to non-elderly, non-disabled households. The documents also statestated that the intent of the proposal iswas to allow states to design rental assistance programs that best meet their needs and to prioritize the housing needs of low-income elderly and disabled households. Under this proposal, rental assistance to non-elderly, non-disabled households would be capped at two years; currently, there is no time limit on rental assistance.
The President's budget documents note that this proposal would require enactment of authorizing legislation. As of the date of this report, no further details or draft authorizing legislation has been released.
As shown in Table 57, the amount of funding requested for the State Rental Assistance Program (SRAP) for FY2026 is 42% lower than the amount of funding allocated to federal subsidies for rental assistance in FY2025, when HUD's rental assistance programs received a combined $62.9 billion.
NeitherLike the House norand Senate Appropriations Committee-reported bills would, the FY2026 appropriations act did not adopt the President's SRAP request and both would continueinstead continues to fund each of HUD's rental assistance programs. The FY2026 enacted funding level for the rental assistance programs combined reflects a 6% increase over FY2025.
Table 7.
|
Program/Account |
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 President's
|
FY2026 House Comm.
|
FY2026 Senate Comm.
|
FY2026 Enacted Total Rental Assistance Funding |
FY2026 House Committee Funding for Rental Assistance Programs |
FY2026 Senate Committee Funding for Rental Assistance Programs |
|||||
Total |
62,930 |
36,212 |
60,941 |
64,793 |
||||||||
|
64,793 |
66,619 |
|||||||||||
|
State Rental Assistance Program (proposed) |
— |
36,212 |
— |
— |
— |
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (Housing Choice Voucher program) |
36,041 |
— |
35,268 |
37,355 |
||
|
Public Housing Fund |
8,811 |
— |
7,334 |
8,397 |
||||||||
|
Project-Based Rental Assistance (Section 8) |
16,890 |
— |
17,127 |
17,804 18,543 |
||||||||
|
Housing for the Elderly (Section 202 program) |
931 |
— |
950 |
972 1,031 |
||||||||
|
Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811 program) |
257 |
— |
262 |
265 |
287
Sources: "FY2025 Enacted" and "FY2026 House Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212 and text of H.R. 4552; "FY2026 Senate Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47 and text of S. 2465. "President's Budget" figures are taken from the FY2026 HUD Congressional Budget Justifications, except where otherwise noted. "FY2026 Enacted" figures are taken from the Explanatory Statement published in the January 22, 2026, Congressional Record and text of P.L. 119-75.
Notes: This table does not include programs related to the rental assistance programs that are also slated for elimination under the President's FY2026 funding request, including the various supportive service and self-sufficiency programs for rental assistance program recipients funded under the Self-Sufficiency Programs account (funded at $196 million in FY2025 and, proposed to be funded at $175 million and $211 million in the House and Senate committee bills, repectively, and ultimately funded at $206 million in FY2026); the Choice Neighborhoods program for redeveloped distressed public and assisted housing (funded at $75 million in FY2025 and, proposed to be funded at $40 million in the Senate committee bill, and ultimately funded at $25 million in FY2026); and the Operational Performance Evaluation and Risk Assessments account, which funds inspections and oversight of rental assistance properties (funded at $50 million in FY2025 and, proposed for funding at the same level in each of the House and Senate committee bills).
Emergency Housing Vouchers (EHVs) are Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) for persons who are homeless or at high risk of housing instability. They were funded by a one-time mandatory appropriation of $5 billion in Section 3202 of the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021 (ARPA; P.L. 117-2). HUD used this funding to award via formula allocation 70,000 new vouchers to local public housing authorities (PHAs) across the country in May 2021.29 HUD stated at the time that it was providing five years of funding for each voucher, and that future funding would be determined at a later time. Thus, the number of EHV vouchers was intended to decrease over time, as families exited the program and their vouchers were not reissued. HUD obligated remaining EHV funding to PHAs in spring 2025. The Department estimated that funding would be sufficient to support EHV vouchers into calendar year 2026,30 but later guidance acknowledged that funding may not be sufficient to last through the end of 2026.31 HUD's EHV data dashboard indicated there were approximately 50,000 EHV vouchers under lease as of the beginning of calendar year 2026.32 A number of low-income housing advocacy groups and others called for Congress to provide additional funding to renew EHVs as a part of FY2026 HUD appropriations.33 Funding for the renewal of EHVs was not included in the President's FY2026 budget request to Congress, nor in the House or Senate committee versions of the FY2026 THUD spending bill. The final full-year funding law did include funding that may be used to support EHVs. Specifically, the law provided increased funding for tenant protection vouchers in the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance account (relative to FY2025 and the House and Senate committee bills) and expanded the traditional eligible uses of those funds to include providing assistance to PHAs that would otherwise be required to terminate EHVs for families as a result of insufficient funding. The act also contains a provision allowing PHAs to engage in "over-leasing" (administering more than their authorized number of vouchers) on a temporary basis in order to absorb EHV families into their regular voucher programs.The President's FY2026 budget proposes to fund the Homeless Assistance Grants account at just below (-0.7%) the FY2025 enacted level. However, the budget proposes a significant change in the way funding would be allocated to grantees. It would end funding for competitive Continuum of Care (CoC) grants and , and ultimately funded at that level in FY2026).
Emergency Housing Vouchers
FY2023, 63FY2024, 62% of CoC funds were used for permanent supportive housing and 87% for either transitional housing or joint transitional housing/rapid rehousing projects.3134
Neither the House committee-passed bill nor the Senate committee-passed bill includesincluded the President's proposal to redirect CoC funding to ESG. The House committee bill would providehave provided $3.858 billion for CoC grants (+9% relative to FY2025) and $290 million for ESG (the same level as FY2025); the Senate committee bill would providehave provided $4.023 billion for CoC grants (+14% relative to FY2025) and the same level as the House committee bill and FY2025 for ESG.
The FY2026 appropriations law also contained a general provision governing the allocation of FY2025 CoC grants. Specifically, it provided that FY2025 CoC grants expiring through March 2026 must be renewed for 12 months, and that if FY2025 awards have not been made at the start of the second and third quarters of calendar year 2026, remaining expiring grants shall also be renewed. This directive follows proposed policy changes and related litigation about the FY2025 CoC grant award process (for more information, see CRS Insight IN12626, HUD's FY2025 Continuum of Care Program Competition).
HUD administers several programs specifically for federally- recognized Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages. These include formula and competitive grants through the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program and competitive grants through the Indian Community Development Block Grant (ICDBG) program, all of which are typically funded in the Native American Programs account, as well as funding for rental assistance through Tribal-HUD VASH, which has typically been funded in the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Account.
The President's FY2026 budget request proposesproposed lower funding for IHBG formula grants (-21% relative to FY2025) and ICDBG (-93% relative to FY2025), and proposesproposed no new funding for IHBG competitive grants. It also proposesproposed including $10 million to renew existing Tribal HUD-VASH rental assistance in the Native American Programs account rather than the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Account.
The House committee-reported bill would provideproposed the same amount of funding for the Native American Programs account as FY2025; funding for the IHBG and ICDBG programs would behave been kept at the same levels as FY2025, and the bill would continuehave continued to fund Tribal HUD-VASH in the TBRA account. The Senate committee-reported bill would provideproposed $10 million more for the Native American Programs account compared to FY2025, reflecting the inclusion of $10 million in Tribal HUD-VASH funding in the account, consistent with the President's budget request. The Senate committee bill would providehave provided the same amount of funding for IHBG formula grants as FY2025, but it would providehave provided $50 million less for IHBG competitive grants ($100 million compared to $150 million) and $50 million more for ICDBG ($125 million compared to $75 million).
The FY2026 appropriations law included the same overall funding level for Native American Programs as proposed by the Senate committee bill, but with a different distribution. The law includes the same funding for formula grants as FY2025, but less for competitive grants ($125 million, compared to $150 million in FY2025) and more for ICDBG ($100 million, compared to $75 million in FY2025). Like the Senate committee bill and as proposed by the President, Tribal HUD-VASH is included in the Native American Programs account ($10 million)..3 million was appropriated for this program. The President's budget proposesproposed no new funding, stating that it "recognizes a greater role for State and local governments, the private sector, and nonprofits to address community and economic development needs in localities across the Nation."3235 The House committee-reported bill would provide $18.3proposed $18 million for the program (-18% relative to FY2025), while the Senate committee bill would maintain the FY2025 funding level.
The President's FY2026 budget proposesproposed to eliminate funding for several HUD grant programs, all of which were ultimately funded in the FY2026 final appropriations law.
The largest grant program that was slated for elimination, which was funded at $3.3 billion in FY2025, is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The program provides formula grant funding to states and localities to fund various community development activities. Eligible activities include planning, public works and facilities, housing, public services, and economic development. The President's budget request justified CDBG's elimination citing "poorly targeted" and "wasteful" projects.3336 H.R. 4552 would fundproposed funding the program at the FY2025 level and S. 2465 would fundproposed funding it at $3.1 billion, a 6% reduction relative to FY2025 and the House committee-proposed level.
Two related competitive grant programs—funded in the CDBG account—arewere also proposed for no new funding in the President's budget: the SUPPORT Substance Use-Disorder Prevention that Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment (SUPPORT) program, which funds opioid recovery housing, and the CDBG PRO HousingPathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing (CDBG-PRO Housing) competition, which provides grants for removing barriers to affordable housing development. SUPPORT wouldwas proposed to be funded at the FY2025 level ($30 million) by both the House and Senate committee bills; CDBG PRO-Housing would receivehave received no funding in the House committee bill, but $60 million in the Senate committee bill.
The HOME Investment Partnerships block grant program, which provides formula grant funding to states and localities to fund various affordable housing activities, also iswas also proposed for elimination by the President's FY2026 budget. Funded at $1.25 billion in FY2025, eligible activities include new construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of both rental and homeownership housing, as well as tenant-based rental assistance. The President's budget justifications for the HOME Investment Partnership's block grant contend as justification for the program elimination that "[t]he Federal Government's involvement increases the regulatory burden of producing affordable housing."3437 H.R. 4552 would adoptincluded the President's proposal to provide no new funding for the program in FY2026, but the committee report providesprovided a different rationale, citing grantees' unspent balances of emergency funding allocated by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2).3538 This emergency funding is referred to as HOME-ARP. Of the $4.95 billion in HOME-ARP funding allocated to state and local grantees (including $25 million to existing technical assistance providers), $4.09 billion was unspent as of June 2025, and an additional $22 million was unobligated.3639 HOME-ARP funds, unlike formula HOME funds, must primarily benefit people who are homeless; are at risk of homelessness or housing instability; or are fleeing domestic violence. S. 2465 wouldproposed to fund the HOME program at its FY2025 level, which is what was ultimately adopted in the FY2026 appropriations law.
H.R. 4552 proposed.
H.R. 4552 proposes to rescind unobligated balances of FY2025 funding for a number of competitive grant programs for which HUD hashad not yet made awards. These include
The Senate committee-passed bill does not include these rescissions, but doesdid include one that was not included in the House committee-passed bill:
The Community Development Fund account is often used to fund Congressionally Directed Spending or Community Project Funds—commonly referred to as "earmarks."earmarks. These are provided through a set-aside for Economic Development Initiative (EDI) grants. Under the terms of the FY2025 full year CR, no funding was provided for EDI earmarks for the first time since FY2022. For FY2026, the President's budget, as is typical, requestsrequested no funding for EDIs (it included no funding for the CDF account as a whole). The House committee bill proposes $2.31proposed $2.3 billion in EDI earmarks for FY2026 and the Senate committee bill proposes $1.35 billion. These amounts reflectproposed $1.3 billion; accounting for 3% and 2% of proposed total gross HUD appropriations, respectively.
Each year, the THUD appropriations act includes dozens of General Provisions (GPs) for HUD, which involve administrative guidance on how funding provided in the act should and should not be used and, in some cases, amendments to laws that govern the department's programs and activities. Many of these GPs are carried over from year to year, but some new GPs are generally added each year. Some of the new GPs that were under consideration for the FY2026 appropriations cycle are discussed below.
The Committee notes that HUD has recently announced its intention to move out of its headquarters building, and that a budget and timeline for such a move is still being developed. As such, the Department has not requested any funding in fiscal year 2026 to facilitate a transition out of the current headquarters space, and the Committee recommendation does not include any funding for that purpose at this time. The Committee directs the Department to brief the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations within 30 days of enactment of this act on: (1) the program of requirements developed for the HUD headquarters, (2) the total budget for the move, build-out, and maintenance of the new headquarters space, with agency responsibilities and sources of funding delineated between HUD and the General Services Administration, (3) the detailed timeline for the proposed move, and (4) any analysis of alternative buildings considered this year.
While the FY2026 appropriations law did not contain this provision, the accompanying explanatory statement included the following:
In addition to the direction provided under the heading ''Weaver Building'' in Senate Report 119–47, the agreement directs the Department to coordinate with the General Services Administration to identify and brief the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations on all potential financing options for Weaver Building close-out costs, including the substantial outstanding liability associated with prior capital improvements, given the uncertain availability of future funding.In addition to the general provisions already noted, the law contained several others that were not included in either the House or Senate committee-reported bills. These include the following:
The annual THUD appropriations bill generally provides funding for seven independent agencies that undertake activities related to transportation and/or housing:
|
Related Agency |
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Request |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
|
Access Board |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
— |
|
Federal Maritime Commission |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
— |
|
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Office of Inspector General |
29 |
31 |
31 |
29 |
— |
|
National Transportation Safety Board |
145 |
145 |
145 |
145 |
— |
|
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NeighborWorks) |
158 |
27 |
100 |
158 |
— |
|
Surface Transportation Board |
47 |
41 |
41 |
41 |
— |
|
Offsetting Collections |
-1 |
-1 |
-1 |
-1 |
— |
|
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
— |
|
Total |
433 |
293 |
366 |
424 |
— |
Sources: FY2025 Enacted and FY2026 House Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212. and text of H.R. 4552; "FY2026 Senate Comm." figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47. President's Budget figures are taken from the FY2026 Appendix and text of S. 2465. "FY2025 Enacted," "President's Budget," and "FY2026 Enacted" figures are taken from the funding table in Book II of the Explanatory Statement published in January 22, 2026, Congressional Record (pp. H1888-H1909).
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.
Both the FY2026 President's budget and the House committee-reported bill proposeproposed to eliminate funding for the USICH, while the Senate committee-reported bill wouldproposed to cut funding in half, from $4 million in FY2025 to $2 million. The FY2026 appropriations law included $3 million for the USICH.
The USICH, authorized as part of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (P.L. 100-77, as amended), is made up of representatives from multiple federal agencies who, together with the USICH executive director and staff, are to coordinate efforts to address homelessness nationally. The USICH is also responsible for releasing a National Strategic Plan to End Homelessness and for supporting state and local governments and nonprofit organizations in their efforts to provide assistance to people experiencing homelessness, among other activities.
| 1. |
The House and Senate use various terms when referring to these spending directives. The House Committee on Appropriations refers to this type of funding as Community Project Funding, and the Senate Committee on Appropriations refers to it as Congressionally Directed Spending. Both chambers have disclosure rules that these spending directives be disclosed in committee reports accompanying appropriations bills. Collectively, this type of spending is commonly known as "earmarks" and sometimes referred to as such for commonality and brevity. This report uses the terms Community Project Funding (CPF) when referring to disclosed House spending and Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) when referring to disclosed Senate spending. These disclosed spending projects collectively are referred to as CPF/CDS or earmarks throughout the report. See CRS Report RS22866, Earmark Disclosure Rules in the House: Member and Committee Requirements, and CRS Report RS22867, Earmark Disclosure Rules in the Senate: Member and Committee Requirements. |
||||||||||
| 2. |
| ||||||||||
| 3. |
DOT, "Reports for Subsidized EAS Communities—48 Contiguous States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico," October 2025, https://www.transportation.gov/EASreport_48_states_HI_PR_Oct2025.pdf; DOT, "Reports for Subsidized EAS Communities—Alaska," October 2025, https://www.transportation.gov/Subsidized_EAS_report_AK_Oct2025. |
||||||||||
| 4. |
DOT, "MCSAC," https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/advisory-committees/mcsac/welcome-fmcsa-mcsac. |
||||||||||
| 5. |
Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. However, in FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. As such, figures provided in this report may not match those published in the President's budget documents. |
||||||||||
| 6. |
|
||||||||||
|
|
4.
For more information about continuing resolutions, see CRS Report R46595, Continuing Resolutions: Overview of Components and Practices. |
For background on DOT modal agencies, see CRS Report R48651, U.S. Department of Transportation: Background on Modal Administrations, coordinated by John Frittelli. |
|||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R48472, The Highway Trust Fund's Highway Account, by Ali E. Lohman. |
|||||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R44749, The Airport and Airway Trust Fund (AATF): An Overview, by Rachel Y. Tang and Bart Elias. |
|||||||||||
|
|
For more information, see CRS Report R48863, Local and Regional Project Assistance Program: Background and Selected Considerations, by Jennifer J. Marshall. 8.
|
For more information, see |
|
||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R47022, Federal Highway Programs: In Brief. In FY2025, FHWA received 11% of total budget authority in annual appropriations with ten percent ($8.1 billion) being emergency relief appropriated through the American Relief Act, 2025 (P.L. 118-158). For more on emergency relief see CRS Report R47724, Emergency Relief Program for Disaster-Damaged Highways and Bridges, by Ali E. Lohman. |
|||||||||||
|
|
11.
For more information, see CRS Report R48472, The Highway Trust Fund's Highway Account, by Ali E. Lohman. |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), "Laws and Regulations," https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations; 49 U.S.C. §301; 49 U.S.C. §303; 49 U.S.C. §321; 49 U.S.C. §325; 49 U.S.C. §327; 49 U.S.C. §329; and 49 U.S.C. §331. |
|||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R47260, Intercity Passenger Rail: Federal Policy and Programs, by Ben Goldman |
|||||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R47002, Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief, by William J. Mallett |
|||||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R44664, The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation System: Options for Growth, by John Frittelli; and CRS Report R47550, Shipping on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway: An Update, by John Frittelli. |
|||||||||||
|
For example, see DOT FY2026 Budget Highlights, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2025-05/DOT_FY_2026_Budget_Highlights_508c.pdf. |
|||||||||||
|
Maritime Administration, "Small Shipyard Grants," https://www.maritime.dot.gov/grants-finances/small-shipyard-grants. |
|||||||||||
|
For more information, see CRS Report R44201, DOT's Federal Pipeline Safety Program: Background and Issues for Congress, by Paul W. Parfomak. |
|||||||||||
|
S. 2465 |
|||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 20.
|
|
H.R. 4552 §§153, 156, 157. |
H.R. 4552 §164. |
||||||||
|
S. 2465 § |
|||||||||||
|
S. 2465 §§169-169A.; the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21; P.L. 112-141) repealed the Clean Fuels Program (49 U.S.C. §5308) and the Jobs Access and Reverse Commute Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. §5316). MAP-21 amended the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. §5339) and the general authority for the Capital Investment Grants program to remove "bus and bus-related equipment and facilities" as an eligible activity at 49 U.S.C. §5309. Under SAFETEA, funding authorized for these programs |
|||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| 25.
|
|
DOT, "U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy Defunds Woke University Grants," May 2, 2025, https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/us-transportation-secretary-sean-p-duffy-defunds-woke-university-grants. |
S. 2465 §132. |
||||||||
| 27. |
S. 2465 §133. |
||||||||||
|
For more information about federal housing assistance programs, see CRS Report RL34591, Overview of Federal Housing Assistance Programs and Policy, by Maggie McCarty, Libby Perl, and Katie Jones. |
|||||||||||
|
Rental assistance programs include the Public Housing, Housing Choice Voucher, Section 8 project-based rental assistance, Section 202 Housing for the Elderly and Section 811 Housing for Persons with Disabilities programs. |
|||||||||||
|
See https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CFO/documents/2026_CJ_Program_SRAP.pdf. |
|||||||||||
| 31. | HUD Notice PIH 2021-15. HUD Notice PIH 2025-07. HUD Notice PIH 2025-19. EHV Dashboard, accessed January 12, 2026. For example, see https://nlihc.org/resource/us-conference-mayors-passes-resolution-supporting-extension-emergency-housing-voucher; and https://clpha.org/sites/default/files/5.19.25_%20Housing%20Groups%20EHV%20Letter%20to%20Appropriations.pdf. | ||||||||||
|
HUD FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification, |
|||||||||||
|
Administration's | |||||||||||
|
Administration's |
|||||||||||
|
H.Rept. 119-212, p. 98. |
|||||||||||
|
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Standard Form 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources, FY2025, Q3. MAX.gov, https://portal.max.gov/portal/document/SF133/Budget/FY%202025%20-%20SF%20133%20Reports%20on%20Budget%20Execution%20and%20Budgetary%20Resources.html. |
|||||||||||