The House and the Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) Appropriations Subcommittees are charged with providing annual appropriations for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and certain related agencies.
The annual appropriations process generally begins with the release of the President's budget, which is due in February. The second Trump Administration's FY2026 budget release was delayed due to the presidential transition and other factors. A "skinny" budget was released in early May, with more details—including Congressional Budget Justifications—released later. For the agencies that comprise the THUD budget, it proposes the following:
On July 17, the House Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (H.R. 4552; H.Rept. 119-212), following subcommittee markup on July 14. It includes the following:
Forgoing initial subcommittee markup, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (S. 2465; S.Rept. 119-47) on July 24. It includes the following:
The House and the Senate Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) Appropriations Subcommittees are charged with providing annual appropriations for the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and certain related agencies.
This report describes action on FY2026 annual appropriations for THUD, including detailed tables for each major agency and a brief overview of selected issues.
The THUD bill funds two federal departments—DOT and HUD—and several smaller related agencies. Of the 12 regular appropriations bills, THUD is typically the fourth largest in terms of discretionary funding and it typically contains the largest number of Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending projects (earmarks).1
As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, the distribution of funding within the THUD bill differs depending on the inclusion or exclusion of mandatory funding associated with the bill. Including both mandatory and discretionary funding, DOT's budget is nearly twice that of HUD's and the related agencies make up a small share of total funding. Conversely, when looking only at net discretionary budget authority—the funding that counts for congressional scorekeeping purposes, which accounts for savings from offsets and rescissions but excludes mandatory funding—HUD's share is larger than DOT's share.
Figure 1. Distribution of THUD Funding by Title FY2025 Enacted |
Source: Comparative Statement of New Budget (Obligational) Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 118-584. Notes: Discretionary funding reflects net discretionary funding. Excludes emergency funding, except emergency funding provided for regular program operations. |
The annual appropriations process generally begins with the release of the President's budget in February. The Trump Administration's FY2026 budget release was delayed. A "skinny" budget was released in early May, with more details—including Congressional Budget Justifications—released beginning at the end of May. Part of the delay may be attributable to the change in administration. It may also be attributable to the delayed resolution of the FY2025 annual appropriations process, which culminated with enactment of a full-year continuing resolution funding agencies at FY2024 levels, with some anomalies (including for THUD), on March 15, 2025 (P.L. 119-4).
In order to begin congressional deliberation of individual appropriations acts, generally an agreement is reached via a budget resolution or other vehicle to establish both a top-line funding level for annual appropriations (called a 302(a) level) as well as individual appropriations subcommittee allocations (called 302(b) allocations). As of the date of this report, no such formal topline agreement has been reached in either the House or the Senate. On June 11, 2025, the House Committee on Appropriations ordered reported draft interim allocations for four of its 12 subcommittees, pending publication of the Appropriations Committee's 302(a) allocation in the Congressional Record by the Chair of the House Committee on the Budget; those draft allocations have subsequently been revised, including on July 17, when an allocation for THUD was adopted. The House THUD allocation was set at $89.910 billion, a 4% increase over the FY2025 enacted level. Although Senate committee action has begun on FY2026 appropriations bills, as of the date of this report, no formal allocations for FY2026 have been established for the Senate Committee on Appropriations or its subcommittees.
The following provides a brief overview of action on FY2026 THUD appropriations, including Table 1, which provides comparable funding levels at the THUD bill title level. That is followed by more detail, organized by bill Title.
For the agencies that comprise the THUD budget, the President's FY2026 budget requests the following:
On July 17, the House Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (H.R. 4552; H.Rept. 119-212), following subcommittee markup on July 14. It includes the following:
Forgoing initial subcommittee markup, the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up and ordered reported its FY2026 THUD appropriations bill (S. 2465; S.Rept. 119-47) on July 24. It includes the following:
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Requesta |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
|
Title I: DOT |
106,785 |
109,937 |
105,078 |
109,807 |
— |
Discretionary |
25,246 |
26,652 |
21,793 |
26,522 |
— |
Mandatory |
81,539 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
— |
Title II: HUD |
60,690b |
36,569a |
67,751 |
73,280 |
— |
Title III: Related Agencies |
433 |
293 |
366 |
424 |
— |
Total |
167,908 |
146,799 |
173,195 |
183,511 |
— |
Total Discretionary |
86,369 |
63,514 |
89,910 |
100,226 |
— |
Total Mandatory |
81,539 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
— |
Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program Operations (HUD) |
8,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Supplemental Emergency Disaster Funding |
20,125 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Other Supplemental Funding (IIJA; DOT) |
36,810 |
36,810 |
36,810 |
36,810 |
36,810 |
Sources: FY2025 Enacted figures from House Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority (H.Rept. 119-212). FY2026 President's Budget Request figures from FY2026 President's Budget Documents. FY2026 House committee and Senate committee figures from Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables in H.Rept. 119-212 and S.Rept. 119-47. Some figures have been adjusted for comparability.
Notes: Values may not sum to totals or exactly match source materials because of rounding. Amounts noted as "emergency" are excluded when calculating total funds countable toward 302(b) allocations.
a. Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. In FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. As such, figures provided in this report may not match those published in the President's budget documents.
b. Excludes $8 billion in appropriations for rental assistance programs designated as emergency spending in the bill, which are shown under "Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program Operations" later in this table.
The Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for the federal regulation and funding of most modes of U.S. transportation. Among its various responsibilities, DOT operates the nation's air traffic control system; regulates aviation, commercial trucking, and motor vehicle safety; and provides grants to support aviation, highway, transit, and passenger rail infrastructure as well as highway, maritime, and pipeline safety.
DOT is organized into 11 units. Five operating administrations each oversee a mode of transportation: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA); Federal Transit Administration (FTA); Federal Railroad Administration (FRA); Maritime Administration (MARAD); and, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Three operating administrations oversee certain aspects of roadways: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA); Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA); and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Two offices have department-wide responsibilities: Office of the Secretary (OST) and Office of Inspector General (OIG). The Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLSDC) is the wholly owned government corporation that operates and maintains two locks on the St. Lawrence Seaway and other aspects of navigation infrastructure.4
The source of most of DOT's annual funding is provided by two periodic authorization acts, one for surface transportation programs and one for aviation programs. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58) authorized programs and funding for surface transportation programs for FY2022-FY2026. The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 (P.L. 118-63) authorized AATF taxes and revenue collections and civil aviation program expenditures through FY2028. Most of the funding for the programs in those acts is drawn from the Highway Trust Fund (HTF) and the Aviation and Airways Trust Fund (AATF), respectively. HTF revenues come largely from fuel taxes and increasingly from transfers from the general fund of the Treasury.5 AATF revenues come largely from taxes on passenger tickets and aviation fuel and some general fund money.6
Most of the funding drawn from the HTF, and a portion of the funding drawn from the AATF, is in the form of contract authority, a type of budget authority that is considered mandatory (rather than discretionary). In addition to providing regular annual discretionary appropriations, the THUD bill includes obligation limitations on this mandatory budget authority. That mandatory budget authority does not count against the THUD bill's 302(b) discretionary suballocation.
Table 2 provides the detailed appropriations for DOT by agency and account (column 1) showing the FY2025 enacted funding levels (column 2), the FY2026 President's Budget Request (column 3), the FY2026 funding proposals from both the House Appropriations Committee (column 4) and the Senate Appropriations Committee (column 5), with column 6 reserved for FY2026 enacted funding levels. Total appropriations and net discretionary budget authority rows of the table reflect new discretionary budget authority. In addition to the total of budgetary resources provided at the conclusion of Table 2, the IIJA (P.L. 117-58, Division J) appropriated $36.8 billion in supplemental advance appropriations per year for various programs for each of FY2022-FY2026 (as shown Table 3).
Administrations and Accounts |
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Request |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
Appropriations |
|||||
Office of the Secretary (OST) |
1,168 |
507 |
875 |
1,119 |
— |
Salaries and Expenses |
191 |
200 |
205 |
186 |
— |
Research and Technology |
49 |
50 |
44 |
33 |
— |
National Infrastructure Investments |
345 |
0 |
0 |
250 |
— |
National Surface Transportation and Innovation Finance Bureau |
10 |
10 |
9 |
10 |
— |
Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement |
25 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
— |
Financial Management Capital |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
— |
Cyber Security Initiatives |
49 |
75 |
75 |
60 |
— |
Office of Civil Rights |
18 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
— |
Transportation Planning, Research, and Development |
21 |
25 |
23 |
34 |
— |
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
— |
Working Capital Fund (non-add) |
522 |
0 |
533 |
650 |
— |
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and Outreach |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
— |
Payments to Air Carriers (Essential Air Service) |
450 |
142 |
514 |
514 |
— |
Essential Air Service (Overflight Fees) (non-add) |
162 |
174 |
174 |
174 |
— |
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) |
16,989 |
18,007 |
18,296 |
18,428 |
— |
Operations |
13,483 |
13,842 |
13,752 |
13,818 |
— |
Facilities & Equipment |
3,176 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
— |
Research, Engineering, and Development (Airport and Airways Trust Fund) |
280 |
165 |
230 |
290 |
— |
Airport Discretionary Grants |
50 |
0 |
314 |
319 |
— |
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
284 |
269 |
— |
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) |
341 |
770 |
969 |
581 |
— |
Highway Infrastructure Programa |
341 |
770 |
969 |
581 |
— |
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
954 |
581 |
— |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) |
223 |
223 |
134 |
65 |
— |
Operations and Research |
223 |
223 |
134 |
65 |
— |
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) |
2,925 |
3,239 |
347 |
2,916 |
— |
Safety and Operations |
268 |
268 |
265 |
265 |
— |
Railroad Research and Development |
54 |
44 |
44 |
43 |
— |
Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail |
75 |
0 |
0 |
75 |
— |
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvementsb |
100 |
500 |
38 |
107 |
— |
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
38 |
52 |
— |
Amtrak Grants |
2,428 |
2,427 |
0 |
2,427 |
— |
Northeast Corridor |
1,141 |
850 |
0 |
850 |
— |
National Network |
1,286 |
1,577 |
0 |
1,577 |
— |
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) |
2,408 |
2,355 |
309 |
2,248 |
— |
Transit Infrastructure Grants |
46 |
0 |
97 |
141 |
— |
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
96 |
59 |
— |
Technical Assistance and Training |
8 |
0 |
8 |
8 |
— |
Capital Investment Grants |
2,205 |
2,205 |
54 |
1,950 |
— |
Grants to Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority |
150 |
150 |
150 |
150 |
— |
Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLSLSDC) |
41 |
41 |
38 |
41 |
— |
Operations and Maintenance |
40 |
41 |
38 |
41 |
— |
Maritime Administration (MARAD)c |
900 |
1,482 |
897 |
1,043 |
— |
Maritime Security Program |
318 |
372 |
380 |
390 |
— |
Cable Security Fleet |
10 |
0 |
10 |
10 |
— |
Tanker Security Program |
60 |
120 |
91 |
122 |
— |
Operations and Training |
268 |
235 |
272 |
241 |
— |
State Maritime Academy Operations |
126 |
90 |
91 |
143 |
— |
Assistance to Small Shipyards |
9 |
105 |
0 |
30 |
— |
Ship Disposal |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
— |
Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program |
54 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
— |
Port Infrastructure Development Program |
50 |
550 |
43 |
96 |
— |
Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending (non-add) |
0 |
0 |
43 |
21 |
— |
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) |
324 |
324 |
315 |
323 |
— |
Operational Expenses |
32 |
32 |
29 |
31 |
— |
Hazardous Material Safety |
75 |
75 |
69 |
74 |
— |
Pipeline Safety |
218 |
218 |
218 |
218 |
— |
Oil Spill Liability Fund |
30 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
— |
Pipeline Safety Fund |
181 |
181 |
181 |
181 |
— |
Liquefied Natural Gas Siting Account |
* |
* |
* |
* |
— |
— |
— |
— |
* |
— |
|
Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account |
7 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
— |
Office of Inspector General |
116 |
116 |
105 |
116 |
— |
Salaries and Expenses |
116 |
116 |
105 |
116 |
— |
Total Appropriations |
25,435 |
27,065 |
22,286 |
26,881 |
— |
Rescissions |
— |
(225) |
(304) |
(170) |
— |
OST—TIFIA/RRIF |
— |
(35) |
— |
— |
— |
OST—ARPA-I (Sec. 109A) |
— |
— |
(10) |
— |
— |
Sec. 109E |
— |
— |
— |
(1) |
— |
Sec. 109F |
— |
— |
— |
(0) |
— |
Sec. 109G |
— |
— |
— |
(20) |
— |
FRA (Sec. 155) |
— |
— |
(75) |
— |
— |
FRA (Sec. 156) |
— |
— |
— |
(2) |
— |
FTA—Unobligated Balances (§164) |
— |
— |
(40) |
— |
— |
MARAD |
— |
(190) |
(179) |
(147) |
— |
Maritime Security Program |
— |
(27) |
(27) |
(33) |
— |
Cable Security Fleet |
— |
(12) |
(12) |
(12) |
— |
Tanker Security Program |
— |
(65) |
(54) |
(77) |
— |
Ship Disposal |
— |
— |
— |
(25) |
— |
Title XI (Sec. 171) |
— |
(86) |
(86) |
— |
— |
User Fees |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
— |
PHMSA |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
(188) |
— |
Pipeline Safety Fund |
(181) |
(181) |
(181) |
(181) |
— |
Underground Natural Gas Storage Facility Safety Account |
(7) |
(7) |
(7) |
(7) |
— |
Design Review Fund |
— |
— |
— |
* |
— |
Liquefied Natural Gas Siting |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
— |
Net Discretionary Budget Authority |
25,247 |
26,652 |
21,793 |
26,522 |
— |
Limitations on Obligations (Mandatory Funding) |
81,539 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
83,285 |
— |
FAA—Airport and Airways Trust Fund |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
— |
FHWA—Highway Trust Fund |
61,314 |
62,657 |
62,657 |
62,657 |
— |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)—Highway Trust Fund |
909 |
927 |
927 |
927 |
— |
NHTSA—Highway Trust Fund |
1,037 |
1,059 |
1,059 |
1,059 |
— |
FTA—Highway Trust Fund |
14,279 |
14,642 |
14,642 |
14,642 |
— |
PHMSA—Emergency Preparedness Fund (non-add) |
47 |
44 |
47 |
47 |
— |
106,786 |
109,937 |
105,078 |
109,807 |
— |
|
Additional Appropriationse |
44,897 |
36,811 |
36,811 |
36,811 |
36,811 |
Net new budget authority (incl. additional appropriations from P.L. 118-158 and P.L. 117-58) |
151,697 |
146,748 |
141,889 |
146,618 |
— |
Source: FY2025 Enacted figures from FY2026 House Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority (H.Rept. 119-212). FY2026 President's Budget Request figures from FY2026 DOT Congressional Budget Justifications. FY2026 House committee and Senate committee figures from Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables in H.Rept. 119-212 and S.Rept. 119-47.
Notes: Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. In FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. For example, the net discretionary budget authority total does not include the changes in mandatory programs (CHIMPs) inconsistent with the FY2026 DOT Congressional Budget Justifications, but consistent with House and Senate committee figures in Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority in H.Rept. 119-212 and S.Rept. 119-47. Gross mandatory budget authority does not include $20 million of mandatory budget authority provided for Asset Concessions to the Office of Secretary in the IIJA. CRS has reorganized accounts when needed. Additionally, for the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, there is a discrepancy between the FY2026 President's budget documents as to whether or not the Administration is requesting new discretionary funding for this account, with FY2026 DOT Congressional Budget Justifications specifying a request of $41 million and the FY2026 President Budget Details specifying a request for no new funding. As such, the totals in this column may not match those published in the President's budget documents. Table 2 does not include proposed transfers from IIJA accounts as discussed in the subsequent sections of the report and includes new budget authority. An "*" indicates amount rounds to less than $1 million; and "—" indicates amount is not available or not applicable.
a. Highway Infrastructure Program account does not include transfers proposed by the Senate committee for FY2026.
b. Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements balances do not include the proposed transfers of IIJA funding by the House and Senate committees for FY2026.
c. Port Infrastructure Development Program and Assistance to Small Shipyards accounts do not include the transfers of IIJA funding proposed by the House committee for FY2026.
d. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposed the "Design Review Fund" account for PHMSA in FY2026, so there is no funding requested in the FY2026 President's Budget and proposed for FY2026 by the House Appropriations Committee and these cells have the notation "NA" for "not applicable."
e. For FY2025, DOT received $8.1 billion in appropriations for emergency relief through the American Relief Act (P.L. 118-158). With the advance appropriations provided by the IIJA, FY2025's total of "Additional Appropriations" is $44.9 billion. For FY2026's "Additional Appropriations," these funds come from advance appropriations provided by the IIJA. See Table 3 for their distribution.
In addition to regular annual appropriations and contract authority, some DOT agencies and programs receive supplemental advance appropriations. Specifically, DOT received $184.1 billion from Division J, Title VIII of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58). These supplemental funds were provided in FY2022 as an advance appropriation, divided into equal portions ($36.8 billion total) that become available each year of the authorization period (FY2022-FY2026), for DOT programs authorized in Divisions A-C and J of the IIJA. That $36.8 billion in annual supplemental funding equals slightly over one-third of the FY2026 funding recommended for DOT in the THUD FY2026 appropriations bills. Table 3 shows the distribution of the supplemental funding available to DOT during FY2026. The House and the Senate committee bills propose transferring some FY2026 IIJA funding between accounts (discussed later in this report; see "IIJA Transfers".
DOT Accounts |
FY2026 |
Office of the Secretary (OST) |
3,800 |
National Infrastructure Investments |
2,500 |
Safe Streets and Roads for All grants |
1,000 |
National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration grants |
200 |
Strengthening Mobility and Revolutionizing Transportation Grant Program |
100 |
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) |
5,000 |
Facilities and Equipment |
1,000 |
Airport Infrastructure Grants |
3,000 |
Airport Terminal Program |
1,000 |
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) |
9,454 |
Highway Infrastructure Program |
9,454 |
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) |
134 |
Motor Carrier Safety Operations and Program |
10 |
Motor Carrier Safety Grants |
125 |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) |
322 |
Crash Data |
150 |
Vehicle Safety and Behavioral Research Programs |
110 |
Supplemental Highway Traffic Safety Programs |
62 |
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) |
13,200 |
Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements |
1,000 |
Northeast Corridor Grants to Amtrak |
1,200 |
National Network Grants to Amtrak |
3,200 |
Railroad Crossing Elimination Program |
600 |
Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants |
7,200 |
Federal Transit Administration (FTA) |
4,250 |
Transit Infrastructure Grants |
2,050 |
Capital Investment Grants |
1,600 |
All Stations Accessibility Program |
350 |
Electric or Low-Emitting Ferry Program |
50 |
Ferry Service for Rural Communities |
200 |
Maritime Administration (MARAD) |
450 |
Port Infrastructure Development Program |
450 |
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) |
200 |
Natural Gas Distribution Infrastructure Safety and Modernization Grant Program |
200 |
Total Other Appropriations |
$36,811 |
Source: These funds were provided in Division J, Title VIII of the IIJA (P.L. 117-58) and are subject to transfers.
The Secretary of Transportation leads DOT and is the principal adviser to the President on transportation and federal transportation programs. OST develops and oversees national transportation policy and administers some grant, research, and credit programs. OST houses the Office of the Under Secretary for Policy, which oversees the Offices of Transportation Policy; Multimodal Freight and Infrastructure Policy; and Research, Development, and Technology. OST is funded by contract authority, annual appropriations, and multiyear advance appropriations (IIJA, Division J).
The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 57% reduction in funding for the OST. It includes no funding for the Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement account, and no funding for the Office of Civil Rights account. Notably, for the Payments to Air Carriers account, the President's FY2026 budget requests a 68% reduction from FY2025 funding levels. The House and the Senate committees each propose a 14% increase in funding for FY2026 above FY2025 funding levels.
The Senate committee-reported bill includes funding for the National Infrastructure Investments account, the Rural and Tribal Infrastructure Advancement account, the Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization and Outreach account, and Office of Civil Rights account for FY2026, whereas neither the President's Budget request nor the House Appropriations Committee would provide FY2026 funding for these accounts.
The House and the Senate committees each propose a 14% increase in funding for FY2026 above FY2025 funding levels.
For Research and Technology, the President's budget includes a 2% increase above FY2025 levels. The House and Senate committee bills propose reductions to FY2025 funding levels for this account at 10% and 33%.
FAA programs are funded under four broad budget accounts: Operations and Maintenance (such as air traffic control and aviation safety functions); Facilities and Equipment (such as control towers and navigation beacons); grants for airports under the Airport Improvement Program (AIP); and Research, Engineering and Development. Some important issues for the FAA are the age and operation of the air traffic control system, including the air traffic controller workforce, and aviation safety, including airline safety and aircraft certification.7
The FY2026 President's budget includes a 6% increase in funding for the FAA, including a 41% reduction for the Research, Engineering and Development account and a 26% increase in funding for the Facilities and Equipment account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. The House and Senate committees propose levels for the Operations and the Facilities and Equipment accounts for FY2026 that are generally similar ($13.752 billion and $13.818 billion, respectively) to FY2025 ($13.483 billion).
For the Research, Engineering, and Development account, the President's FY2026 request includes a 41% reduction in funding relative to the FY2025 enacted levels. The House committee bill proposes an 18% reduction in funding and the Senate committee bill proposes a four percent increase in FY2025 funding levels for FY2026.
For the Airport Discretionary Grants account, the President's FY2026 request includes no funding for this account. The House committee bill proposes a 527% increase in funding and the Senate committee bill proposes a 539% increase in FY2025 funding levels for FY2026. Of the funding proposed for this account, the House proposes to set aside 90% of funding for Community Project Funding and the Senate proposes to set aside 84% of funding for Congressionally Directed Spending (commonly referred to as earmarks).
Federal funding for highway infrastructure is provided primarily through the federal-aid highway program administered by FHWA.8
The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 126% increase in funding for the FHWA with $770 million for the Highway Infrastructure Programs account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. This amount was requested for the Infrastructure for Rebuilding America Program (INFRA; 49 U.S.C. §6701).
The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 185% increase in funding for the Highway Infrastructure Programs account for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 71% increase in funding levels for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels. The House and the Senate committees propose funding for Community Project Funding ($954 million) and Congressionally Directed Spending ($581 million) in this account.
NHTSA is responsible for motor vehicle safety, highway safety, behavioral safety programs, motor vehicle information, and automobile fuel economy programs.9
The FY2026 President's budget includes no change in funding for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 40% reduction in funding for the Operations and Research account, the sole account for NHTSA, for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 71% reduction in funding levels for FY2026 compared to FY2025 funding levels.
FRA provides funding to monitor and enforce compliance with rail safety regulations, conduct rail research and development, subsidize the capital and operating expenses of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), and award grants to improve passenger and freight rail infrastructure, service, and equipment. Amtrak is reliant on annual appropriations to continue operating its national system of passenger routes, and determining the level of funding available for Amtrak and rail infrastructure grants is likely to be an issue for appropriators.10 The FY2026 President's Budget includes an 11% increase in funding for FRA (+$314 million), whereas the House Appropriations Committee proposes an 88% reduction (-$2.578 billion) to FY2025 funding levels ($2.925 billion). The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes funding levels for FY2026 comparable to FY2025 enacted funding levels.
FRA administers annual funding for Amtrak, which is divided into separate grants for the Northeast Corridor (the line connecting Boston, New York City, and Washington, DC) and the National Network (including short-distance routes that receive operating support from states and long-distance routes fully funded by Amtrak). The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 26% reduction in funding for the Northeast Corridor subaccount, and a 23% increase in funding for the National Network account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. For Amtrak grants, the House committee's proposal includes no funding for grants for the Northeast Corridor and National Network programs. The Senate committee proposes a 26% reduction to Northeast Corridor and a 23% increase of funding for National Network grants.
FRA also administers several grant programs that make funding available for states and/or rail carriers to improve or expand their infrastructure. These include the Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) grant program established by the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST; P.L. 114-94), which can fund a wide variety of rail projects. The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 400% increase in funding (+$400 million) for CRISI compared to FY2025 enacted levels ($100 million). For the CRISI, the House committee proposes a 62% reduction in new discretionary budget authority compared to the FY2025 enacted level. The House committee's proposal for this account was 100% ($38 million) for Community Project Funding. The House committee proposes the transfer of $500 million from IIJA Division J appropriations for the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants to the CRISI account. The Senate committee proposes a 7% increase in funding over FY2025 enacted funding levels with 48% of this funding for Congressionally Directed Spending. The Senate committee also proposes the transfer of $44.8 million of unobligated balances of the Highway Infrastructure Program account appropriated to carry out the National Electric Vehicle Formula Program to CRISI for grants.
The Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail program established by the IIJA is limited to projects that improve or expand intercity passenger (as opposed to commuter or freight) rail service. The House Appropriations Committee does not propose funding for the Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail account for FY2026. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a funding level for FY2026 that matches the FY2025 enacted level.
Federal funding assistance to public transportation agencies is provided primarily through the public transportation program administered by the Department of Transportation's Federal Transit Administration (FTA).11
The FTA's account for Capital Investment Grants supports state, local, and private investment in capital projects for new and expanded transit service. The House Appropriations Committee proposes an 87% reduction (-$2.099 billion) in FY2026 discretionary budget authority to FTA compared to FY2025 funding due to a 98% proposed reduction (-$2.151 billion) to the Capital Investment Grants account compared to FY2025 enacted levels ($2.205 billion). The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 7% reduction in FY2026 discretionary funding to FTA compared to FY2025 funding levels with the decrease to the Capital Investment Grants account. Overall, the Senate Appropriations Committee proposes 35 times more new discretionary budget authority to the Capital Investments Grants account ($1.95 billion) than the House Appropriations Committee ($54 million) does.
The FTA's Transit Infrastructure Grants account supports grants for ferry boat service, research and development, buses, bus facilities, earmarks, and more. The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 113% increase in funding for the Transit Infrastructure Grants account compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. Of the amount proposed, 98% of the funding is proposed to be directed to Community Project Funding. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 209% increase in funding for FY2026 over FY2025 enacted level. Of that amount, 42% of funding would be directed to Congressionally Directed Spending. The Transit Infrastructure Grants account is 31% of House Appropriations Committee's proposal and 6% of the Senate Appropriation Committee's proposal for FTA.
The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 2% reduction in funding for the FTA, including no funding for the Transit Infrastructure Grants account and the Technical Assistance and Training account, and no change in funding for the Capital Investment Grants account compared to FY2025 enacted levels.
GLSDC is a wholly owned government corporation that operates and maintains two locks on the St. Lawrence Seaway at Massena, NY, as well as other aspects of navigation infrastructure. (Canada owns and operates the other 13 locks on the seaway). GLSDC's budget is funded entirely from the Harbor Maintenance Tax, which is an ad valorem tax on imported and domestic cargo shipped through U.S. coastal and Great Lakes ports.12 The Harbor Maintenance Tax funds the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.
Operations and Maintenance is the sole account for the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLSLSDC). The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 5% reduction in funding for GLSLSDC for FY2026 compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. The reduction in funding to GLSLSDC would leave funding for Army Corps of Engineer water resource projects. The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a 1% increase in funding for FY2026 compared to FY2025 enacted levels, matching the President's FY2026 request for funding.
The Maritime Administration (MARAD) supports programs for U.S. shipyards, ports, waterways, ships and shipping, vessel operations, ship disposal, and maritime education. MARAD also supports the U.S.-flag ocean shipping fleet and U.S. commercial shipyards.
The FY2026 President's Budget includes a 106% increase in funding for the Maritime Administration, with the DOT budget documents13 noting that the funding increase would support the Administration's executive order "Restoring America's Maritime Dominance" including a 100% increase to the Tanker Security Program account, a 1,100% increase to the Assistance to Small Shipyard account ($105 million), and a 1,000% increase to the Port Infrastructure Development account ($550 million) compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels ($9 million and $50 million, respectively). The request also includes an increase in grants for small shipyards (shipyards with fewer than 1,200 employees).14
PHMSA is responsible for pipeline safety and the safe transport of hazardous materials (hazmat) by all transportation modes. PHMSA has the primary responsibility for the formulation, administration, and oversight of onshore pipeline safety regulations in the United States. The agency carries out such responsibilities through its Office of Pipeline Safety, which oversees pipeline operators, supports state pipeline safety agencies, and cooperates with other federal agencies that have pipeline safety responsibilities, among other duties. PHMSA also regulates the safe packaging of hazmat by road, rail, and water transport and provides grants for training emergency personnel to respond to hazmat incidents.15
The FY2026 President's Budget includes no change in funding for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels. For the Hazardous Materials Safety account, the House Appropriations Committee and Senate Appropriations Committee propose reductions of 8% (-$6 million) and 1% (-$1 million), respectively, relative to FY2025 ($75 million).
The Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a new account for Design Review, with funding of $200,000.
OIG conducts independent audits, investigations, and evaluations of DOT programs and operations, including contracts and grants. The FY2026 President's Budget includes no change in funding for the Office of the Inspector General compared to FY2025 enacted funding levels.
The House Appropriations Committee proposes a 10% reduction in funding for the Salaries and Expenses account relative to FY2025, while the Senate Appropriations Committee proposes a funding level that matches the FY2025 enacted level.
FMCSA was established to improve highway safety through regulation of equipment and operating standards for commercial motor vehicle operators. FMCSA receives budget authority through the IIJA in the form of contract authority, with funds drawn from the highway account of the Highway Trust Fund. The IIJA also provided funding to FMCSA through multiyear advance appropriations from the General Fund. FMCSA does not generally receive regular annual discretionary appropriations.
Both the House and Senate Appropriations Committee bills propose transfers of IIJA advance appropriation funding in FY2026 to supplement—or in some cases replace—regular annual appropriations provided in the bill.
From the FHWA's IIJA Highway Infrastructure Program account, the following transfers of unobligated balances to other agency's accounts are proposed for FY2026, instead of, or in addition to, the provision of new budget authority:
For FHWA, the Senate committee proposes the transfer between programs of $555 million of IIJA funding within the Highway Infrastructure Program account. Of this total, $320 million would be derived from funding appropriated in the IIJA for the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, and $75 million would be derived from funding appropriated for the Joint Office of Energy and Transportation. Both of these programs were newly established under the IIJA. The funding would be redirected to existing activities including the Appalachian Development Highway System, Federal Lands Transportation Program, the Northern Border Regional Commission, Southwest Border Regional Commission, and the Denali Commission.
For FRA, the House committee proposes the transfer of $2.8 billion of unobligated balances of supplemental funding appropriated by the IIJA to Federal-State Partnership for Intercity Passenger Rail Grants (49 U.S.C. §24911). Of this amount, the House bill would transfer another $500 million in Federal-State Partnership funding to the existing Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) rail grant program, $925 million for the existing Northeast Corridor Grants to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation account (instead of appropriating new discretionary budget authority), and $1.39 billion for the existing National Network Grants to the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. The Senate committee bill does not propose transfers between IIJA accounts at the Federal Railroad Administration.
For NHTSA, the House and the Senate committees propose the transfer of IIJA advance appropriations to NHTSA's Vehicle Safety Account (instead of appropriating new discretionary budget authority). The House committee proposes transferring $78 million in IIJA funding from the Highway Traffic Safety Grant account. The Senate committee proposes the transfer of $145 million of IIJA funding, $95 million from the Highway Traffic Safety Grant account and $50 million from the Crash Data account.
As noted earlier, the THUD appropriations bill is one of the largest sources of Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending—commonly referred to as "earmarks"—in the annual appropriation process. In FY2025 no earmarks were included in the year-long continuing resolution. For FY2026, as is common, the President's budget requests no earmarked funding. The House Appropriations Committee bill proposes $1.43 billion for Community Project Funding in FY2006, which is 6.4% of total gross appropriations DOT. The Senate Appropriations Committee bill includes $992 million in Congressionally Directed Spending projects, which is 3.7% of total gross appropriations that would be provided to DOT in the bill.
For FHWA, the Senate committee would direct the agency to update the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure formula program guidance by presenting a draft for public comment within 30 days following the enactment of the act and issuing final program guidance within 120 days of enactment of the act.16
For FTA, the Senate committee would require that "none of the funds made available by the Act be used to impede or hinder project advancement and approval" for Capital Investment Grant projects where applicants are seeking a 40% federal contribution of project costs.17 The House committee bill would rescind the unobligated balances from prior year appropriations to the Transit Infrastructure Grants account.18 The Senate committee bill would make $146 million in unobligated balances available for programs under Safe, Accessible, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act (SAFETEA; P.L. 109-59) available for activities related to the 2026 Olympic and Paralympic Games ($68 million), and for the 2026 FIFA World Cup ($78 million).19 The Senate committee bill specifies four repealed or amended SAFETEA programs with unobligated balances to be used including the Clean Fuels Program (49 U.S.C. §5308), the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. §5339), the Jobs Access and Reverse Commute Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. §5316), and funding eligible for "bus and bus-related equipment and facilities" under the Capital Investment Grants program at 49 U.S.C. §5309.20
For FRA, the House and Senate committees would prohibit the use of funds to reduce Amtrak Police staffing below the May 1, 2019 levels.21 The House committee bill would prohibit the use of funds on high-speed rail corridor development in California, high-speed rail in Texas, and inter-city passenger rail in Minnesota.22
For FMCSA, the Senate committee bill would direct the agency to update regulations for the English language proficiency qualifications of commercial motor vehicle drivers at 49 C.F.R. §301.11(b)(2) so that non-compliance would result in out-of-service status for the driver.23 Another Senate committee bill provision would require DOT to provide updates to Congress on certificates issued by training providers of entry-level driver training for commercial driver's license pursuers.24
HUD is the nation's housing agency. The programs and activities it administers are designed primarily to address housing problems faced by households with very low incomes or other special housing needs, and to expand access to homeownership.25 The largest share of HUD's budget is devoted to its rental assistance programs: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers; project-based rental assistance via Section 8, Section 202, and Section 811; and public housing. These programs, which serve over 4.6 million households, provide subsidies to allow low-income recipients to pay below-market, income-based rent.
Two flexible block grant programs—the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) and the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program—help states and local governments finance a variety of housing and community development activities designed to serve low-income families. The Indian Housing Block Grant and the Indian Community Development Block Grant programs provide funds for Indian tribes to address their own housing and community development needs.
Other more specialized grant programs help communities meet the needs of homeless persons (through the Homeless Assistance Grants, namely the Continuum of Care and Emergency Solutions Grants programs), including those living with HIV/AIDS (through the Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS program). Additional programs fund fair housing enforcement activities and lead-based paint hazard identification and remediation, along with other healthy homes initiatives.
HUD's Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures mortgages made by lenders to homebuyers with low down payments and to developers of multifamily rental buildings containing relatively affordable units. FHA collects fees from borrowers with FHA-insured mortgages, which are used to sustain its insurance funds. The Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), or Ginnie Mae, is also a part of HUD and it guarantees securities made up of federally insured or guaranteed mortgages.
Table 4 provides detailed appropriations information for HUD accounts and selected subaccounts, comparing FY2025 enacted to FY2026.
Components of HUD Funding Nearly all of HUD's funding is provided via discretionary appropriations, generally contained in the annual THUD appropriations act. (HUD programs may also receive additional resources from supplemental or other funding laws in some years, most often in response to disasters.) The annual THUD bill provides budget authority via appropriations for HUD programs and activities for a given fiscal year. The cost of that budget authority, as determined by the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO's) scorekeeping process, is generally reduced by offsetting receipts from the FHA's loan programs and GNMA's securitization of federally insured or guaranteed mortgages. To a lesser extent, other collections and rescissions of prior-year appropriations can also offset the cost of the HUD budget. Deducting the savings from offsets and rescissions from the gross budget authority provided to HUD results in net budget authority. Generally, gross budget authority is the most useful measure of the new resources being provided for HUD's programs and activities, whereas net budget authority is used for budget enforcement purposes such as measuring against 302(b) allocations. Any funding designated as an emergency requirement provided in the regular annual appropriations acts or in supplemental spending bills is generally exempt for purposes of budget enforcement. HUD's rental assistance programs also receive advance appropriations, which is funding provided in a fiscal year but not available until the subsequent fiscal year; the amount available in the fiscal year (which were typically provided in the prior fiscal year) count for purposes of budget scoring against spending caps. HUD also generally receives a relatively small amount of mandatory funding outside of the annual appropriations process, such as statutorily required contributions from two Government Sponsored Enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) to fund the Housing Trust Fund. These mandatory funds are generally not reflected in this report. |
Table 4. Department of Housing and Urban Development, FY2025-FY2026 Detailed Appropriations
Dollars in Millions
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Request |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
|
1,803 |
1,470 |
1,469 |
1,511 |
— |
|
State Rental Assistance Program |
— |
36,212 |
— |
— |
— |
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (Sec. 8 Housing Choice Vouchers)a |
30,041 |
0b |
35,268 |
37,355 |
— |
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (Emergency Designated) |
6,000 |
0b |
0 |
— |
— |
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (inc. emergency) |
36,041 |
35,268 |
37,355 |
— |
|
32,145 |
32,145 |
33,164c |
— |
||
Administrative Fees (non-add) |
2,771 |
1,975 |
2,906 |
— |
|
Incremental VASH (non-add) |
15 |
0 |
15 |
— |
|
Incremental FUP (non-add) |
30 |
30 |
30 |
— |
|
Public Housing Fund |
8,811 |
0b |
7,334 |
8,397 |
— |
Operating Formula Grants (non-add) |
5,476 |
4,975 |
4,873 |
— |
|
Capital Formula Grants (non-add) |
3,200 |
2,286 |
3,200 |
— |
|
Operational Performance Evaluation and Risk Assessments |
50 |
0 |
50 |
50 |
— |
Choice Neighborhoods |
75 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
— |
Self Sufficiency Programs |
196 |
0 |
175 |
211 |
— |
Native American Programs |
1,344 |
887 |
1,344 |
1,354 |
— |
Native American Block Grants (Formula) (non-add) |
1,111 |
872 |
1,111 |
1,111 |
— |
Native American Block Grants (Competitive) (non-add) |
150 |
0 |
150 |
100 |
— |
Indian Community Development Block Grants (non-add) |
75 |
5 |
75 |
125 |
— |
10 |
10 |
— |
|||
Indian housing loan guarantee |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
— |
Native Hawaiian block grant |
22 |
0 |
18 |
22 |
— |
Housing, persons with AIDS (HOPWA) |
505 |
0 |
505 |
529 |
— |
Community Development Fund |
3,430 |
0 |
5,642 |
4,541 |
— |
CDBG Formula Grants |
3,300 |
0 |
3,300 |
3,100 |
— |
SUPPORT for Patients and Communities |
30 |
0 |
30 |
30 |
— |
Grants to Reduce Barriers to Affordable Housing/PRO Housing |
100 |
0 |
0 |
60 |
— |
Economic Development Initiatives |
— |
0 |
2,312 |
1,351 |
— |
HOME Investment Partnerships |
1,250 |
0 |
0 |
1,250 |
— |
Preservation and Reinvestment Initiative for Community Enhancement |
10 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
— |
Self-Help Homeownership |
60 |
16 |
56 |
70 |
— |
Self-Help and Assisted Homeownership Opportunity Program |
12 |
0 |
9 |
13 |
— |
Section 4 Capacity Building |
42 |
16 |
42 |
49 |
— |
Rural Capacity Building |
6 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
— |
Homeless Assistance Grants |
4,051 |
4,024 |
4,158 |
4,530 |
— |
Project-Based Rental Assistance (Sec. 8)e |
14,890 |
0b |
17,127 |
17,804 |
— |
Project-Based Rental Assistance—Emergency Designated |
2,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
— |
Project-Based Rental Assistance (inc. emergency) |
16,890 |
17,127 |
17,804 |
— |
|
Contract Renewals (inc. emergency) |
16,422 |
16,752 |
17,295 |
— |
|
Contract Administrators |
468 |
375 |
509 |
— |
|
Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) |
931 |
0b |
950 |
972 |
— |
Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) |
257 |
0b |
262 |
265 |
— |
Housing Counseling Assistance |
58 |
0 |
0 |
58 |
— |
Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fundf |
14 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
— |
Federal Housing Administration (FHA) Expensesf |
150 |
160 |
160 |
160 |
— |
Government National Mortgage Assn. (GNMA) Expensesf |
55 |
56 |
55 |
57 |
— |
Research and technology |
139 |
95 |
95 |
131 |
— |
Fair housing activities |
86g |
26 |
29 |
86 |
— |
Lead Hazard Reduction |
296 |
0 |
296 |
296 |
— |
Information Technology Fund |
383 |
365 |
299 |
365 |
— |
Inspector General |
153 |
143 |
143 |
146 |
— |
Flexible Subsidy Loan Modification (Sec. 238) |
— |
— |
— |
3 |
— |
Gross Appropriations Subtotal (non-emergency) |
69,061 |
43,469 |
75,450 |
80,229 |
— |
Gross Appropriations Subtotal (inc. emergency) |
77,061 |
43,469 |
75,450 |
80,227 |
— |
Offsetting Collections and Receipts |
|||||
Manufactured Housing Fees Trust Fund |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
-14 |
— |
FHA |
-6,794 |
-5,251h |
-5,251 |
-5,251 |
— |
GNMA |
-1,563 |
-1,635h |
-1,635 |
-1,635 |
— |
Offsets Subtotal |
-8,371 |
-6,900 |
-6,900 |
-6,900 |
— |
Rescissions |
— |
||||
Homeless Assistance Grants |
0 |
0 |
-107i |
0 |
— |
Research and technology |
0 |
0 |
-20j |
0 |
— |
Other Unobligated Balances |
0 |
0 |
-672k |
-49l |
— |
Recissions Subtotal |
0 |
0 |
-799 |
-49 |
— |
Net Discretionary Budget Authority (non-emergency) |
60,690 |
67,751 |
73,280 |
— |
|
Disaster Relief Emergency Funding |
12,039 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Emergency Appropriations for Regular Program Operations |
8,000 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
Other |
— |
— |
— |
— |
|
Total (inc. all Emergency Spending) |
68,690 |
67,751 |
73,278 |
— |
Source: FY2025 Enacted and FY2026 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212 and text of H.R. 4552; FY2026 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47 and text of S. 2465. President's Budget figures are taken from the FY2026 HUD Congressional Budget Justifications, except where otherwise noted.
Notes: Totals may not add due to rounding. Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. However, in FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. For example, the HUD total reflects the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate of offsetting receipts for FY2026, as opposed to estimates presented in President's budget documents. As such, the totals in the President's Budget column may not match those published in the President's budget documents. An "—" indicates not available or not applicable.
a. Total includes $4 billion in advanced appropriations provided in the prior FY. The bill provides an additional $4 billion in advance appropriations for the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance account in FY2027 that is not shown.
b. Under the President's Budget request, no new funding would be provided to HUD's rental assistance programs. Instead, the budget proposed funding a new State Rental Assistance block grant program.
c. This amount excludes $809 million in funding for Section 811 vouchers for comparability. The amount shown in committee documents for voucher renewals is $33.974 billion, which includes the Section 811 voucher funding.
d. Tribal HUD-VASH has historically been funded in the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) account. The President's budget and S. 2465 propose funding to renew existing tribal HUD-VASH in the Native American Programs account in FY2026. H.R. 4552 would provide $10 million to fund tribal HUD-VASH renewals through TBRA renewal amounts.
e. Total includes $400 million in advanced appropriations provided in the prior FY. The bill provides an additional $400 million in advance appropriations for the Project-Based Rental Assistance account in FY2027 that is not shown.
f. Some or all of the cost of funding these accounts is offset by the collection of fees or other receipts shown later in this table.
g. Section 250 of the General Provisions specifies that if the bill is enacted before the start of FY2026, then unobligated balances from the Fair Housing Activities account from FY2024 are to be permanently rescinded, but an amount of new budget authority in an equivalent amount is to be appropriated and is to be used to complete FY2024 fair housing awards.
h. Reflects Congressional Budget Office re-estimate of offsetting receipts for FY2026, as opposed to estimates presented in President's Budget documents. The President's Budget documents assumed FHA offsetting receipts of -$8.684 billion for FHA and -$1.598 billion for GNMA in FY2026.
i. Would rescind FY2025 funding from the Homeless Assistance Grants account for Youth Homelessness Demonstration Grants that have not yet been awarded by HUD.
j. Section 235 proposes to rescind FY2025 competitive grant funding that has not yet been awarded by HUD from various named accounts, including from the Public Housing Fund (health hazard elimination grants), Choice Neighborhoods program, CDBG Support Housing program, as well as previous years' unobligated balances from the Lead Hazard account and the Manufactured Housing Feed Trust Fund account.
k. Would rescind FY2025 funding from the Research and Technology account for competitive Eviction Prevention Grants that have not yet been awarded by HUD.
l. Section 249 of the General Provisions includes rescissions of prior year unobligated balances from various accounts, including a rescission of the $25 million provided for Assisted Housing Inspections and Risk Assessments in FY2025.
m. Total reflects CBO estimates of offsetting receipts, so will not match published totals from President's budget documents.
n. Section 249 proposes to rescind unobligated balances from specified emergency designated appropriations provided in prior years.
Among the largest expenses in HUD's budget are the annual costs of maintaining assistance for the nearly 5 million families who are served by rental assistance programs.26 Combined, funding for HUD's rental assistance programs accounted for 82% of HUD's gross discretionary appropriations in FY2025, most of which is used to maintain assistance for currently-assisted families. The cost of maintaining, or renewing, rental assistance—particularly in the Housing Choice Voucher and the project-based rental assistance programs—typically increases each year, driven largely by rental cost increases outpacing increases in tenant incomes.
The President's budget for FY2026 requested no new funding for HUD's rental assistance and related programs, and instead requests funding for a new State Rental Assistance Program. According to HUD's FY2026 Congressional Budget Justifications,27 under this new program, states would receive allocations based on a formula that would take into account data on rental assistance in prior years and could favor assistance provided to elderly or disabled residents over assistance to non-elderly, non-disabled households. The documents also state that the intent of the proposal is to allow states to design rental assistance programs that best meet their needs and to prioritize the housing needs of low-income elderly and disabled households. Under this proposal, rental assistance to nonelderly, nondisabled households would be capped at two years; currently, there is no time limit on rental assistance.
The President's budget documents note that this proposal would require enactment of authorizing legislation. As of the date of this report, no further details or draft authorizing legislation has been released.
As shown in Table 5, the amount of funding requested for the State Rental Assistance Program (SRAP) for FY2026 is 42% lower than the amount of funding allocated to federal subsidies for rental assistance in FY2025, when HUD's rental assistance programs received a combined $62.9 billion.
Neither the House nor Senate Appropriations Committee-reported bills would adopt the President's SRAP request and both would continue to fund each of HUD's rental assistance programs.
FY2025 Enacted Funding for Rental Assistance Programs (inc. emergency funding) |
FY2026 President's State Rental Assistance Program Proposal |
FY2026 House Committee Funding for Rental Assistance Programs |
FY2026 Senate Committee Funding for Rental Assistance Programs |
|
Total |
62,930 |
36,212 |
60,941 |
64,793 |
Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (Housing Choice Voucher program) |
36,041 |
— |
35,268 |
37,355 |
Public Housing Fund |
8,811 |
— |
7,334 |
8,397 |
Project-Based Rental Assistance (Section 8) |
16,890 |
— |
17,127 |
17,804 |
Housing for the Elderly (Section 202 program) |
931 |
— |
950 |
972 |
Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811 program) |
257 |
— |
262 |
265 |
Source: FY2025 Enacted and FY2026 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212 and text of H.R. 4552; FY2026 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47 and text of S. 2465. President's Budget figures are taken from the FY2026 HUD Congressional Budget Justifications, except where otherwise noted.
Notes: This table does not include programs related to the rental assistance programs that are also slated for elimination under the President's FY2026 funding request, including the various supportive service and self-sufficiency programs for rental assistance program recipients funded under the Self-Sufficiency Programs account (funded at $196 million in FY2025 and proposed to be funded at $175 million and $211 million in the House and Senate committee bills); the Choice Neighborhoods program for redeveloped distressed public and assisted housing (funded at $75 million in FY2025 and proposed to be funded at $40 million in the Senate committee bill); and the Operational Performance Evaluation and Risk Assessments account, which funds inspections and oversight of rental assistance properties (funded at $50 million in FY2025 and proposed for funding at the same level in each of the House and Senate committee bills).
The President's FY2026 budget proposes to fund the Homeless Assistance Grants account at just below (-0.7%) the FY2025 enacted level. However, the budget proposes a significant change in the way funding would be allocated to grantees. It would end funding for competitive Continuum of Care (CoC) grants and instead fund formula grants through the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) program. While CoC and ESG have some eligible activities in common, CoC grants can be used for two interventions that ESG grants cannot: permanent supportive housing and transitional housing. In FY2023, 63% of CoC funds were used for permanent supportive housing and 8% for either transitional housing or joint transitional housing/rapid rehousing projects.28
Neither the House committee-passed bill nor the Senate committee-passed bill includes the President's proposal to redirect CoC funding to ESG. The House committee bill would provide $3.858 billion for CoC grants (+9% relative to FY2025) and $290 million for ESG (the same level as FY2025); the Senate committee bill would provide $4.023 billion for CoC grants (+14% relative to FY2025) and the same level as the House committee bill and FY2025 for ESG.
HUD administers several programs specifically for federally-recognized Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages. These include formula and competitive grants through the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program and competitive grants through the Indian Community Development Block Grant (ICDBG) program, all of which are typically funded in the Native American Programs account, as well as funding for rental assistance through Tribal-HUD VASH, which has typically been funded in the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Account.
The President's FY2026 budget request proposes lower funding for IHBG formula grants (-21% relative to FY2025) and ICDBG (-93% relative to FY2025), and proposes no new funding for IHBG competitive grants. It also proposes including $10 million to renew existing Tribal HUD-VASH rental assistance in the Native American Programs account rather than the Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Account.
The House committee-reported bill would provide the same amount of funding for the Native American Programs account as FY2025; funding for the IHBG and ICDBG programs would be at the same levels as FY2025, and the bill would continue to fund Tribal HUD-VASH in the TBRA account. The Senate committee-reported bill would provide $10 million more for the Native American Programs account compared to FY2025, reflecting the inclusion of $10 million in Tribal HUD-VASH funding in the account, consistent with the President's budget request. The Senate committee bill would provide the same amount of funding for IHBG formula grants as FY2025, but it would provide $50 million less for IHBG competitive grants ($100 million compared to $150 million) and $50 million more for ICDBG ($125 million compared to $75 million).
Another program, the Native Hawaiian Housing Block Grant, provides funding to Hawaii's Department of Hawaiian Home Lands to use for housing activities for Native Hawaiians eligible to reside on the Hawaiian Home Lands. In FY2025, $22.3 million was appropriated for this program. The President's budget proposes no new funding, stating that it "recognizes a greater role for State and local governments, the private sector, and nonprofits to address community and economic development needs in localities across the Nation."29 The House committee-reported bill would provide $18.3 million for the program (-18% relative to FY2025), while the Senate committee bill would maintain the FY2025 funding level.
The President's FY2026 budget proposes to eliminate funding for several HUD grant programs.
The largest grant program slated for elimination, which was funded at $3.3 billion in FY2025, is the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. The program provides formula grant funding to states and localities to fund various community development activities. Eligible activities include planning, public works and facilities, housing, public services, and economic development. The President's budget request justified CDBG's elimination citing "poorly targeted" and "wasteful" projects.30 H.R. 4552 would fund the program at the FY2025 level and S. 2465 would fund it at $3.1 billion, a 6% reduction relative to FY2025 and the House committee-proposed level.
Two related competitive grant programs—funded in the CDBG account—are also proposed for no new funding in the President's budget: the SUPPORT program, which funds opioid recovery housing, and the CDBG PRO Housing competition, which provides grants for removing barriers to affordable housing development. SUPPORT would be funded at the FY2025 level ($30 million) by both the House and Senate committee bills; CDBG PRO-Housing would receive no funding in the House committee bill, but $60 million in the Senate committee bill.
The HOME Investment Partnerships block grant program, which provides formula grant funding to states and localities to fund various affordable housing activities, also is proposed for elimination by the President's FY2026 budget. Funded at $1.25 billion in FY2025, eligible activities include new construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of both rental and homeownership housing, as well as tenant-based rental assistance. The President's budget justifications for the HOME Investment Partnership's block grant contend as justification for the program elimination that "[t]he Federal Government's involvement increases the regulatory burden of producing affordable housing."31 H.R. 4552 would adopt the President's proposal to provide no new funding for the program in FY2026, but the committee report provides a different rationale, citing grantees' unspent balances of emergency funding allocated by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2).32 This emergency funding is referred to as HOME-ARP. Of the $4.95 billion in HOME-ARP funding allocated to state and local grantees (including $25 million to existing technical assistance providers), $4.09 billion was unspent as of June 2025, and an additional $22 million was unobligated.33 HOME-ARP funds, unlike formula HOME funds, must primarily benefit people who are homeless; are at risk of homelessness or housing instability; or are fleeing domestic violence. S. 2465 would fund the HOME program at its FY2025 level.
H.R. 4552 proposes to rescind unobligated balances of FY2025 funding for a number of competitive grant programs for which HUD has not yet made awards. These include
The Senate committee-passed bill does not include these rescissions, but does include one that was not included in the House committee-passed bill:
The Community Development Fund account is often used to fund Congressionally Directed Spending or Community Project Funds—commonly referred to as "earmarks." These are provided through a set-aside for Economic Development Initiative (EDI) grants. Under the terms of the FY2025 full year CR, no funding was provided for EDI earmarks for the first time since FY2022. For FY2026, the President's budget, as is typical, requests no funding for EDIs (it included no funding for the CDF account as a whole). The House committee bill proposes $2.31 billion in EDI earmarks for FY2026 and the Senate committee bill proposes $1.35 billion. These amounts reflect 3% and 2% of proposed total gross HUD appropriations, respectively.
Each year, the THUD appropriations act includes dozens of General Provisions (GPs) for HUD, which involve administrative guidance on how funding provided in the act should and should not be used and, in some cases, amendments to laws that govern the department's programs and activities. Many of these GPs are carried over from year to year, but some new GPs are generally added each year. Some of the new GPs under consideration for the FY2026 appropriations cycle are discussed below.
The Committee notes that HUD has recently announced its intention to move out of its headquarters building, and that a budget and timeline for such a move is still being developed. As such, the Department has not requested any funding in fiscal year 2026 to facilitate a transition out of the current headquarters space, and the Committee recommendation does not include any funding for that purpose at this time. The Committee directs the Department to brief the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations within 30 days of enactment of this act on: (1) the program of requirements developed for the HUD headquarters, (2) the total budget for the move, build-out, and maintenance of the new headquarters space, with agency responsibilities and sources of funding delineated between HUD and the General Services Administration, (3) the detailed timeline for the proposed move, and (4) any analysis of alternative buildings considered this year.
The annual THUD appropriations bill generally provides funding for seven independent agencies that undertake activities related to transportation and/or housing:
Related Agency |
FY2025 Enacted |
FY2026 Request |
FY2026 House Comm. |
FY2026 Senate Comm. |
FY2026 Enacted |
Access Board |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
— |
Federal Maritime Commission |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
— |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) Office of Inspector General |
29 |
31 |
31 |
29 |
— |
National Transportation Safety Board |
145 |
145 |
145 |
145 |
— |
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NeighborWorks) |
158 |
27 |
100 |
158 |
— |
Surface Transportation Board |
47 |
41 |
41 |
41 |
— |
Offsetting Collections |
-1 |
-1 |
-1 |
-1 |
— |
U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
— |
Total |
433 |
293 |
366 |
424 |
— |
Sources: FY2025 Enacted and FY2026 House Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in H.Rept. 119-212. FY2026 Senate Comm. figures are taken from the Comparative Statement of New Budget Authority table, as published in S.Rept. 119-47. President's Budget figures are taken from the FY2026 Appendix.
Note: Totals may not add due to rounding.
Both the FY2026 President's budget and the House committee-reported bill propose to eliminate funding for the USICH, while the Senate committee-reported bill would cut funding in half, from $4 million in FY2025 to $2 million. The USICH, authorized as part of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (P.L. 100-77), is made up of representatives from multiple federal agencies who, together with the USICH executive director and staff, are to coordinate efforts to address homelessness nationally. The USICH is also responsible for releasing a National Strategic Plan to End Homelessness and for supporting state and local governments and nonprofit organizations in their efforts to provide assistance to people experiencing homelessness, among other activities.
1. |
The House and Senate use various terms when referring to these spending directives. The House Committee on Appropriations refers to this type of funding as Community Project Funding, and the Senate Committee on Appropriations refers to it as Congressionally Directed Spending. Both chambers have disclosure rules that these spending directives be disclosed in committee reports accompanying appropriations bills. Collectively, this type of spending is commonly known as "earmarks" and sometimes referred to as such for commonality and brevity. This report uses the terms Community Project Funding (CPF) when referring to disclosed House spending and Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) when referring to disclosed Senate spending. These disclosed spending projects collectively are referred to as CPF/CDS or earmarks throughout the report. CRS Report RS22866, Earmark Disclosure Rules in the House: Member and Committee Requirements, and CRS Report RS22867, Earmark Disclosure Rules in the Senate: Member and Committee Requirements. |
2. |
Historically, CRS reports have used the CBO re-estimate of the President's budget as reflected in the Comparative Statement of New (Obligational) Budget Authority tables published in the House and Senate committee reports as the source for comparable President's Budget figures. However, in FY2026, no President's Budget column was included in these documents, so CRS instead used President's budget documents, adjusted to reflect historic committee reporting norms, to the extent possible. As such, figures provided in this report may not match those published in the President's budget documents. |
3. |
Related agencies include U.S. Access Board, Federal Maritime Commission, Amtrak Inspector General, National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation (NeighborWorks America), Surface Transportation Board, and Interagency Council on Homelessness. These agencies are discussed in the "Title III: Related Agencies" section of this report. |
4. |
For background on DOT modal agencies see CRS Report R48651, U.S. Department of Transportation: Background on Modal Administrations, coordinated by John Frittelli. |
5. |
CRS Report R48472, The Highway Trust Fund's Highway Account, by Ali E. Lohman. |
6. |
CRS Report R44749, The Airport and Airway Trust Fund (AATF): An Overview, by Rachel Y. Tang and Bart Elias. |
7. |
CRS Report R47608, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Reauthorization Issues for the 118th Congress, coordinated by Bart Elias and Rachel Y. Tang. |
8. |
CRS Report R47022, Federal Highway Programs: In Brief. In FY2025, FHWA received 11% of total budget authority in annual appropriations with ten percent ($8.1 billion) being emergency relief appropriated through the American Relief Act, 2025 (P.L. 118-158). For more on emergency relief see CRS Report R47724, Emergency Relief Program for Disaster-Damaged Highways and Bridges, by Ali E. Lohman. |
9. |
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), "Laws and Regulations," https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations; 49 U.S.C. §301; 49 U.S.C. §303; 49 U.S.C. §321; 49 U.S.C. §325; 49 U.S.C. §327; 49 U.S.C. §329; and 49 U.S.C. §331. |
10. |
CRS Report R47260, Intercity Passenger Rail: Federal Policy and Programs, by Ben Goldman |
11. |
CRS Report R47002, Federal Public Transportation Program: In Brief, by William J. Mallett |
12. |
CRS Report R44664, The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation System: Options for Growth, by John Frittelli; and CRS Report R47550, Shipping on the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway: An Update, by John Frittelli. |
13. |
For example, see DOT FY2026 Budget Highlights, https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2025-05/DOT_FY_2026_Budget_Highlights_508c.pdf. |
14. |
Maritime Administration, "Small Shipyard Grants," https://www.maritime.dot.gov/grants-finances/small-shipyard-grants. |
15. |
CRS Report R44201, DOT's Federal Pipeline Safety Program: Background and Issues for Congress, by Paul W. Parfomak. |
16. |
S. 2465 §127. |
17. |
S. 2465 §164. |
18. |
H.R. 4552 §164. |
19. |
S. 2465 §§169-169A. |
20. |
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21; P.L. 112-141) repealed the Clean Fuels Program (49 U.S.C. §5308) and the Jobs Access and Reverse Commute Formula Grants (49 U.S.C. §5316). MAP-21 amended the Alternatives Analysis Program (49 U.S.C. §5339) and the general authority for the Capital Investment Grants program to remove "bus and bus-related equipment and facilities" as an eligible activity at 49 U.S.C. §5309. Under SAFETEA, funding authorized for these programs were to remain available until expended (P.L. 109-59 §3036). |
21. | |
22. |
H.R. 4552 §§153, 156, 157. |
23. |
S. 2465 §132. |
24. |
S. 2465 §133. |
25. |
For more information about federal housing assistance programs, see CRS Report RL34591, Overview of Federal Housing Assistance Programs and Policy, by Maggie McCarty, Libby Perl, and Katie Jones. |
26. |
Rental assistance programs include the Public Housing, Housing Choice Voucher, Section 8 project-based rental assistance, Section 202 Housing for the Elderly and Section 811 Housing for Persons with Disabilities programs. |
27. |
See https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/CFO/documents/2026_CJ_Program_SRAP.pdf. |
28. |
See HUD FY2023 CoC Program Awards by Component, https://files.hudexchange.info/reports/published/CoC_AwardComp_NatlTerrDC_2023.pdf, accessed August 21, 2025. |
29. |
HUD FY2026 Congressional Budget Justification, page 11-1. |
30. |
Administration's "skinnny" budget request, Letter from Russell T. Vought, Director, Office of Management and Budget, to The Honorable Susan Collins, Chair, Senate Committee on Appropriations, May 2, 2025, p. 26, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Fiscal-Year-2026-Discretionary-Budget-Request.pdf. |
31. |
Administration's "skinnny" budget request, Letter from Russell T. Vought. |
32. |
H.Rept. 119-212, p. 98. |
33. |
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Standard Form 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources, FY2025, Q3. MAX.gov, https://portal.max.gov/portal/document/SF133/Budget/FY%202025%20-%20SF%20133%20Reports%20on%20Budget%20Execution%20and%20Budgetary%20Resources.html. |
34. | |
35. | |
36. | |
37. | |
38. | |
39. | |
40. |