< Back to Current Version

Libya and U.S. Policy

Changes from May 22, 2025 to July 21, 2026

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Libya and U.S. Policy
Updated May 22, 2025July 21, 2026 (IF11556)

Over a decadeFifteen years after a 2011 uprising and U.S.-backed military intervention that toppled longtime authoritarian leader Muammar al Qadhafi, Libya has yet to make a transition to stable governing arrangements. Elections and diplomacy have produced a series of interim governments, but militias, local leaders, and subnational coalitions backed by competing foreign patrons have remained the most powerful arbiters of public affairs. The postponement of planned elections since 2021, Libyans' continuing lack of consensus over electoral and constitutional arrangements, the potential fragility of a United Nations (UN)-backed ceasefire, and institutional rivalry are prolonging Libya's instability and pose challenges for U.S. decisionmakers.

powerful. Rival networks in western and eastern Libya have competed for national control. After the eastern Libya-based Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF, alt. Libyan National Army) coalition attempted to seize the capital, Tripoli, in 2019, UN-backed diplomacy halted fighting and produced a Government of National Unity (GNU). Planned elections were postponed in 2021, and Libyans have remained mired in confrontation, with a rival government re-emerging in the east. A lack of national consensus over electoral and constitutional arrangements and factional disputes over energy, financial, and security issues have prolonged Libya's instability.

The Trump Administration has attempted to help Libyans unify security, financial, and administrative institutions, reportedly proposing the creation of a new, inclusive executive authority to govern until elections can be held. Senior Adviser to the President for Arab and African Affairs Massad Boulos, Chargé d'Affaires Jeremy Berndt, and U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) officials have visited Libya repeatedly since 2025, encouraging agreement in April 2026 on Libya's first unified national budget in over a decade and promoting bilateral and intra-Libyan security cooperation.

Successive U.S. Administrations have sought to prevent Libya from serving as a permissive environment for transnational terrorist groups while reacting tomanaging the consequences of Libya's internal conflictdivisions and interventions there by other countries. The increased presence and influence in Libya of Russian officials and security actors since 2020, paired with the effects of ongoing conflict and political instability to Libya's south, have appeared to motivate the Biden Administration to attemptsuccessive U.S. Administrations to seek to unify Libyan institutions, despite. Hurdles have included deep-seated Libyan animosities and lingering international and Libyanlocal concerns about the behavior, legitimacy, and intentions of key Libyan actors. The Trump Administration has continued to engage with actors from across Libya, and U.S. officials continue to promote cooperation among Libyans.

The 118th Congress appropriated funds for U.S. diplomacy and aid programs, including pursuant toprominent actors in eastern and western Libya. In 2025, the Trump Administration made changes to U.S. foreign aid programs and implementing agencies, resulting in changes to or termination of some U.S. assistance efforts in Libya, including programs under the Global Fragility Act (GFA, Title V of Division J, P.L. 116-94). Changes by the Trump Administration to U.S. foreign aid programs and implementing agencies have resulted in changes to or cancellation of some U.S. assistance efforts in Libya. Congress provided funds in 2024 to enable the future reestablishment of a U.S. full-time diplomatic presence in Libya, which could enable more robust U.S. engagementSince 2024, Congress has provided funds to support additional U.S. diplomatic engagement in Libya and to enable the future reestablishment of a full-time U.S. diplomatic presence.

War, Ceasefire, and a Deferred Election

After Qadhafi's ouster and killing, Libya's 2012 election produced governing arrangements that devolved into conflict in 2014, effectively dividing the country along ideological, geographic, and institutional lines. Conflict re-erupted in April 2019, when the LAAF, a coalition of eastern Libya-based armed groups led by Qadhafi-era military defector Khalifa Haftar known as the Libyan National Army (LNA, alt. "Libyan Arab Armed Forces," LAAF), attempted to seize the capital, Tripoli,, attempted to seize Tripoli from the then-internationally recognized Government of National Accord (GNA)government. Russia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Egypt, and leaders of Libya's House of Representatives (HOR, an interim parliament last elected in 2014) backed the LNALAAF. With Turkish military support, the GNA and anti-LNAanti-LAAF western Libyan militias forced the LNALAAF to withdraw. Libya has remained dividedeffectively divided since, with foreign forces still present, and opposing coalitions separated by a line of control west of Sirte (Figure 1). Multilateral diplomacy in 2020 helped achieve a ceasefire, which the UN monitors.

In 2021, members of a UN-appointed Libyan Political Dialogue Forum (LPDF) and the HOR approved an interim Presidential Council and Government of National Unity (GNU) to replace the GNA, with a mandate to serve until elections or through June 2022. The LPDF and HOR endorsed Abdul Hamid Dabaiba as GNU Prime Minister, along with a three-member Presidential Council. The UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) facilitated discussions among the GNU, the HOR, and the High Council of State (an advisory representative body), but was unable to establish a constitutional and legal basis for parliamentary and presidential elections then-planned for December 2021.

The elections were postponed indefinitely and have yet to be rescheduled amid ongoing disputes over electoral laws and the possibility of a new interim government. Since that time, eastern Libya-based actors have revived efforts to have a rival government, led by Osama Hamad, recognized as legitimate. Competition among Libyans has intensified for control over the National Oil Corporation (NOC) and Central Bank, which govern the oil operations, revenues, and public sector payments on which most Libyans rely. As of 2025, some Libyans are pushing for the replacement of the Dabaiba-led GNU and the Hamad government with a unified interim government to lead the country to elections.

Figure 1. Libya: Areas of Influence and Timeline

Source: Prepared by CRS using ArcGIS and media reporting.

Protracted Divisions and U.S. Policy

In January 2025, Hanna Tetteh of Ghana was named as Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General (SRSG) for Libya and head of UNSMIL. In April, Tetteh told the Security Council that "protracted institutional and political divisions, coupled with harmful unilateral actions and the struggle for control of resources by a privileged few, hold the aspirations and needs of the Libyan people captive. Overspending of Libya's vast resources in the absence of an agreed national budget could lead to an economic collapse." In May, militia violence erupted in Tripoli, spurring protests and calls for political change. An UNSMIL-appointed Advisory Committee has released its recommendations for resolving Libya's impasses.

Libya holds the largest proven oil reserves in Africa. Libya's ~1 million barrel per day output influences global markets and provides nearly all of the state's revenue. After an impasse over leadership and management of the Central Bank led eastern actors to halt oil production in 2024, UN mediators helped negotiate a settlement, and Libya's interim institutions approved the appointment of new Central Bank leadership and restarted oil operations. Billions in Qadhafi-era state assets remain frozen abroad pursuant to UN sanctions, and Libyan rivals have pressed foreign parties for access to these funds.

U.S. officials have reengaged actors on all sides of Libya's internal divides. This includes controversial figures alleged to be involved in corruption and human rights violations or whose past attempts to control Libya militarily and whose cooperation with Russia have prompted past proposals from some in Congress for the use of sanctions. The United States has backed UN mediation with the stated goals of providing for the reunification of Libyan institutions and an end to serial interim governing arrangements. In 2024, U.S. officials encouraged dialogue among Libyans and stated that elections were required to resolve Libyans' disputes over legitimacy. The Trump Administration has hosted GNU and LNA envoys in 2025. The USS Mount Whitney visited western and eastern Libya in April. After news reports in May said the Administration was considering Libya as a possible destination for third country nationals, a U.S. court intervened, and Libya's rival governments said they rejected the possibility of accepting U.S. deportees.

Egypt, Turkey (Türkiye), the UAE, Russia, France, and Italy all pursue discrete interests in Libya, influencing the actions and positions of Libyan groups and, at times, contributing to competition and stalemates. U.S. influence relative to these third parties may be limited and shaped by other U.S. priorities with each country.

Former U.S. Special Envoy for Libya Ambassador Richard Norland led U.S. diplomatic engagement from 2019 until May 2025. U.S. officials have operated from a Libya External Office (LEO) at the U.S. Embassy in Tunisia. In March 2024, the Biden Administration notified Congress of its intent to resume embassy operations in Libya by mid-2025, and requested funds for a planned Diplomatic Travel and Support Operations Facility in Tripoli. The Trump Administration has not commented on those plans.

Terrorism and Foreign Military Forces

UN and U.S. reports describe transnational terrorist threats in Libya as much reduced since peaking circa 2015-2016. Successive U.S. Administrations have sought to foster the departure from Libya of foreign military forces and mercenaries. AFRICOM has expressed concern about Russian personnel and military equipment in Libya, since 2018. Libya reportedly remains a logistical hub for Russian operations in sub-Saharan Africa. An enduring Russian military presence in Libya would create complications for U.S. and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military planners. In 2024, U.S. officials drew international attention to reports of shipments of Russian weaponry and reported transfers of Russian "Africa Corps" personnel to LNA-controlled eastern and southern Libya, including shipments following the fall of the Asad regime in Syria. Turkish military advisers train and assist western Libyan forces, and Turkey has extended its military presence to 2026. The LNA and its opponents reportedly have recruited fighters from Syria, Chad, and Sudan.

UN Bodies and UN and U.S. Sanctions

The UN Security Council has authorizedA UN mission supports implementation of an October 2020 ceasefire. Haftar's forces have asserted more influence and security control in southern Libya, partnering with local forces in the southwest toward Algeria and south toward the remote borders with Niger, Chad, and Sudan.

Figure 1. Libya: Areas of Influence

Source: Prepared by CRS using ArcGIS and media reporting.

In 2021, the UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL, established by the UN Security Council) backed a Libyan-led process that selected a three-member Presidential Council and Government of National Unity (GNU), with a mandate to serve until elections or through June 2022. Abdul Hamid Dabaiba was chosen as GNU Prime Minister. Elections were postponed indefinitely amid disputes over electoral laws and sequencing. Dabaiba has remained in power in Tripoli, challenged by an LAAF-backed government in the east, led by Osama Hamad. To break the deadlock, UNSMIL has proposed a roadmap and convened dialogues on electoral arrangements and other national issues. Libyan political bodies in June 2026 set a 2027 target for presidential and parliamentary elections.

Intense Libyan competition for control over the National Oil Corporation (NOC) and Central Bank fueled confrontation and crises through 2024; these institutions govern the oil operations, revenues, and public sector payments on which most Libyans (and both rival governments) rely. The UN Panel of Experts for Libya reported in March 2026 that leaders from the west and east have colluded with NOC officials and others to provide "an umbrella of impunity" for large-scale irregular financing schemes that have drained state coffers. Libya holds the largest proven oil reserves in Africa, and its ~1.4 million barrel per day output provides nearly all state revenues.

Since 2024, the LAAF has improved its military capabilities (including drones) and strengthened its control in the east and south. Khalifa Haftar's sons have assumed leadership roles in reconstruction and security bodies. In May 2025, GNU forces killed a prominent militia figure, setting off violence and protests in Tripoli. In May 2026, militia fighting resumed in the western port of Zawiya. Major east-west fighting has not resumed since 2020.

Division, Unity, Elections, and U.S. Policy

U.S. engagement is expanding in a context shaped by continuing Libyan division and fragile security. U.S. naval ships have visited western and eastern Libya, and, in 2026, AFRICOM held part of its annual FLINTLOCK exercise near Sirte. U.S. officials have engaged actors across Libya's internal divides, travelling frequently to Libya and also hosting GNU and LAAF envoys in Washington, DC, including separate June 2026 visits by GNU Deputy Defense Minister Abdulsalam Al Zoubi and LAAF Deputy Commander Saddam Haftar (Khalifa's son). U.S. officials have promoted commercial ties, including 2026 oil and gas agreements with Chevron and a $20 billion production improvement deal with ConocoPhillips and TotalEnergies.

UNSMIL mediation is continuing in parallel, with Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General (SRSG) for Libya and head of UNSMIL Hanna Tetteh proposing and seeking Libyan and international support for a roadmap to elections and an end to Libya's transition. In June 2026, Tetteh briefed the Security Council on the recommendations of an UNSMIL-convened Structured Dialogue, which she said "call for the restoration of unified, effective, legitimate and accountable state institutions" and emphasize "the need for broad political consensus on credible national elections and through clear legal frameworks, with adequate resources and effective governance across institutions including the security sector." Boulos has described U.S. policy as "completely complementary" to UNSMIL's efforts and a short-term initiative to stabilize the country in support of UNSMIL's longer-term vision. Some observers argue U.S.-backed unity talks risk further entrenching fractious Libyan elites.

Terrorism and Foreign Military Forces

Terrorists killed four U.S. personnel in Libya in the 2012 Benghazi attacks, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. UN and U.S. reports describe transnational terrorist threats in Libya as much reduced since peaking circa 2015-2016, when U.S. military strikes helped local forces defeat an Islamic State affiliate.

Egypt, Turkey (Türkiye), the UAE, Russia, France, and Italy all have pursued discrete interests, influencing the actions and positions of Libyan groups. U.S officials have balanced Libya goals with other priorities in bilateral relations with these countries. Successive U.S. Administrations have sought to foster the departure from Libya of foreign military forces and mercenaries. U.S. officials have expressed concern about Russia's presence in Libya since 2018, including reported transfers of Russian personnel and weapons systems to LAAF-controlled eastern and southern Libya. Since 2024, Libya reportedly has been a growing logistical hub for Russian operations in North Africa and the Sahel. LAAF-controlled areas reportedly also have served as a conduit for support to the Rapid Support Forces in neighboring Sudan. Turkish military advisers have trained and assisted western Libyan forces, while cooperating at times with the LAAF.

UN Bodies and UN and U.S. Sanctions

The UN Security Council has authorized UNSMIL through October 2026 UNSMIL through October 2025. The Security Council has authorizedestablished an arms embargo on Libya and financial and travel sanctions on entities threatening peace in Libyathere, undermining the political transition, or supporting others who do so. U.S. executive orders provide for comparable U.S. sanctions. In July 2023, the House did not pass H.J.Res. 70, which would have rescindedResolution 2819 (2026) addresses the arms embargo and illicit oil exports. In February 2026, President Trump extended for one year the national emergency related to Libya cited in Executive Orders 13566 and 1372613566 and 13726 that provide for comparable U.S. sanctions. UN sanctions have frozen tens of billions of dollars in Qadhafi-era state assets abroad, and Libyans have sought access and accommodations to enable fund management.U.S. sanctions.

Migration

Libya remains a transit point for irregular migration to Europe, and migrants remain vulnerable to extortion, detention, sexual violence, and other abuses. UN officials in April condemned a "surge in xenophobic and racist hate speech" associated with Libyan domestic campaigns against migrant resettlement. As of March 2025In 2026, UN agencies hadhave identified more than 824936,000 foreign migrants, more than 32,000 internally displaced persons, and and nearly 86113,000 refugees and asylum seekers in Libya, including, most of the latter of whom are new arrivals since 2023 from Sudan. The State Department reported in 2024 that "endemic corruption and militias' influence over government ministries contributed to the GNU's inability to effectively address2025 that "armed groups, militias, and criminal networks infiltrated the administrative ranks of the government and engaged in illicit activities, including human trafficking."

Issues in the 119th Congress

Congress appropriated funding for transition support, stabilization, security assistance, and humanitarian programs for Libya from 2011 to 2024. The FY2024 foreign operations appropriations act provided "not less than $32,000,000 under titles III and IV of the Act for stabilization assistance for Libya, including support for a UN-facilitated political process and border security." Recent changes to U.S. aid programs appear to have terminated some efforts undertaken pursuant to a March 2023 10-year GFA plan for Libya. Congress has appropriated funds that could provide for Worldwide Security Protection (WSP) and Overseas Program (OP) initiatives to support the resumption of diplomatic operations in Libya as outlined in FY2024 and FY2025 budget requests. Congress may seek to ascertain and shape the Administration's Libya policy, including with regard to aid, engagement with Libyan factions, frozen Libyan assets, and the possible return of U.S. diplomatsIn 2025, the Trump Administration terminated some programs undertaken pursuant to a March 2023 10-year GFA plan for Libya. International Military Education and Training (IMET) assistance has continued in support of efforts to promote unity among military officers affiliated with western and eastern forces. Since 2014, U.S. officials have operated from a Libya External Office (LEO) at the U.S. Embassy in Tunisia. Congress has made funds available for an interim Diplomatic Travel and Support Operations Facility in Tripoli and to eventually resume embassy operations. Congress may conduct oversight of and/or seek to shape the Administration's policy, including on aid, engagement with the LAAF and others, security cooperation, commercial ties, frozen Libyan assets, and the U.S. diplomatic presence.