Early Voting and Mail Voting: Overview and Issues for Congress

https://crsreports.congress.gov

Updated September 13, 2024

Early Voting and Mail Voting: Overview &and Issues for Congress

Although voting

Voting in person at a polling place on Election Day is the most widespread voting practice, states. States and localities also offer some or all eligible voters opportunities to vote without going to the polls on Election Day. Sending voters ballots by mail (mail voting) and designating a pre- Election Day period when they can receive and cast a ballot in person (early voting) are two common options (see Figure 1). Some states and localities also use mail voting as their primary voting method, automatically mailing ballots to all registered voters and offering limited in-person voting options (all-mail elections).).

Policy Overview

Alternative voting methods mightcan differ from in-person voting at a polling place on Election Day in any of the following ways: when voters receive or cast a ballot, where they receive or cast it, and how they receive or cast it.

The defining differences between in-person Election Day voting and early and mail voting are when voters receive and cast ballots and how they receive them, respectively. EarlyIn practice, early and mail voting might also differ from in-person Election Day voting in other ways in practice. For example, voters who receive ballots by mail typically return them by mail or in a drop box rather than casting them in person.

All states are required by federal law to allow certain military Federal law requires all states to allow certain military and overseas voters to use mail voting in federal elections. Some states and localities also make early and/or mail voting available to all other eligible voters (no-excuse early or mail voting), while others offer them only to those with an approved excuse for not voting in person on Election Day. Approved excuses vary by state or localityvary by jurisdiction but commonly include circumstances like being out of the area on Election Day or having a long-term illness or disability.

Mail Voting The “mail”"mail" in mail voting refers to the method by which election officials deliver ballots to voters, although voters who receive their ballots by mail often choose to return them by mail as well. Depending on the state or localityjurisdiction, voters might also have the option of depositingdepositing their mail ballots in a drop box, having them submittedcollected by a third party, or returning them at the polls or an election office.

Some states and localities provideprovide prepaid return envelopes with mail ballots, while others do not. Deadlines for requesting and returning mail ballots also vary. For example, some states require mail ballots to be returned by the close of polls on Election Day, while others will accept them if they are postmarked by that date.

requesting and returning mail ballots also vary. A case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court as of this writing, Watson v. Republican National Committee, could have implications for some current mail ballot return deadlines. For more on that case and its potential implications, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11419, Election Law and the Supreme Court in 2026: Pending Cases on Redistricting, Campaign Finance, and Mail-In Ballots.

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), as of March 2026as of December 2023, all states and the District of Columbia (DC) allowed at least some voters to receive their

ballots by mail and 36 states and DC offered some form of no-excuse mail voting. Eight of those states and DC allowedused all-mail elections for all elections (California, Colorado, DC, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington) or all general elections (Vermont) as of January 2024, and; a number of the others gavegave counties the option of holding all-mail elections or permitted use of all-mail elections in certain jurisdictions or for certain types of elections or jurisdictions.

.

Figure 1. Reported Methods of Voting, 2002-2022

2004-2024

Source: CRS, using data from the Voting and Registration Supplement to the U.S. Census Bureau’s 's Current Population Survey. . Notes: Respondents were asked whether they voted in person or by mail and, if the former, whether on or before Election Day. Some respondents who received their ballots by mail and returned them in person may have reported voting in person.

Early Voting States that offer early voting designate days prior to Election Day when voters can receive and cast a ballot in person. Exactly where voters can vote early varies by state and localityjurisdiction, but early voting is usually available at select locations like vote centers or local election offices.

Forty-seven states and DC offered early voting for all eligible voters as of April 2026as of August 2024, according to NCSL. The length of the early voting period varied by state—ranging from 3 days to 46—and many states offered early voting only on certain days of the week. StatesDC and 17 of the 21 states that allowed voters to register to vote on Election Day may or may not have also allowed same-day registration during early voting; one state, North Carolina,, as of March 2026, and three states offered same-day registration during early voting but not on Election Day.

Considerations for Policymakers

Proponents of providing voters with options for when, where, and how they receive or cast their ballots often present such measures as ways to improve voter participation—particularly for people Proponents of alternatives to in-person voting on Election Day present such options as a way to increase access to the ballot—particularly for eligible voters who work during regular polling hours, will be out of town on Election Day, or have long-term illnesses or mobility issues. Alternative

Early Voting and Mail Voting: Overview & Issues for Congress

https://crsreports.congress.gov

voting methods could also help reduce voter demand on Election Day and address certain logistical or security concerns. For example, early or mail voting could help prevent long lines on Election Day, reduce administrative costs, minimize the need for additional polling places or poll workers, limit demands on election equipment, or reduce the need for provisional ballots. Jurisdictions that offer alternative voting methods may also be better equipped to handle unforeseen events, such as the COVID- 19 pandemic or a tornado that struck Tennessee the night before its 2020 primary.

Alternatives to voting in person at polling places on Election Day could also raise concerns, which may vary with the particular policy proposal or voting method. Expanding voting options can impose costs like printing and postage for mail ballots or operating expenses for early voting locations. Early and mail voting may also present security concerns, including challenges related to longer- term storage of blank and completed ballots for early voting and to voter verification and the reliability of postal delivery for mail voting. Other concerns some have expressed about mail voting include that it presents opportunities for voter errors, fraud, or coercion and that waiting for returned ballots may delay final election results. Alternative voting methods could also diminish the role of Election Day as a shared civic experience, and voters who cast ballots early might miss information that could have affected their choices or vote for a candidate who is no longer in the race on Election Day.

States have typically implementedvoting options might also have other benefits, such as reducing certain costs of conducting elections, giving voters more time to address issues with their ballots or registration records, and better positioning jurisdictions to handle unforeseen events like the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 or Hurricanes Helene and Milton in 2024.

Such options might also have drawbacks. A particular concern expressed by opponents of policies like no-excuse mail voting and all-mail elections is that mail voting introduces opportunities for voter fraud, errors, and coercion. Other possible downsides of some alternative voting methods include potential to contribute to delays in reporting election results, introduce logistical challenges associated with longer-term storage of ballots or reliance on postal delivery, and lead voters who cast their ballots early to miss information that might have affected their choices.

States have typically introduced changes gradually when expanding voting options beyond in-person Election Day voting. Voting from outside the voter’'s home election jurisdiction was available as an option for some soldiers in the Civil War, for example, but no-excuse mail voting was not introduced until the 1970s. Often, states or localities have providedused transition periods or tested early or mail voting on a smaller scale (e.g., for certain categories of voters or local or lower-turnout elections) before rolling the policies out more widely. For example, Oregon began using mail voting for all elections all-mail elections for all races in 2000 but approved a test of mail votingthe process for local elections in 1981 and used it for select elections through the 1990s.

The following questions may be helpful for policymakersMembers who are considering proposals regardingrelated to early or mail voting:

• If considering expandingIf considering a policy that would expand access to early or mail voting, would the

policy be an optional alternative or the standardoption states or localities could choose to offer or a requirement for all elections? Which details of implementation would be specified in federal law versus left to state or local discretion? Would the policy include protections against potential issues like fraud or unreliable mail delivery?

• If considering limitinga policy that would limit early or mail voting, which

what concerns would the limitslimitations be intended to address and how would they address them? Would accommodations be available for voters who facefaced obstacles to voting in person? Would the policy include provisions for high voter demand or unforeseen events affecting the election?

• ? In either case, would federal resources be available to provided to help cover cover

potential additional costs of implementing the new policy? How

quickly could the policy be implemented? Would time or resources need to be allotted for changing state or local laws or ordinances, testing the new procedures,or transitioning to full implementationnew procedures, or educating voters and election workers?

Executive Order (E.O.) 14248, E.O. 14399, and Selected Recent Legislation

President Donald Trump issued executive orders on March 25, 2025, and March 31, 2026, that include provisions related to mail voting. Among other topics, E.O. 14248 addresses deadlines for returning mail ballots and E.O. 14399 addresses the design and transmission of mail balloting materials. As of this writing, litigation related to the executive orders was pending and the United States Postal Service (USPS) had proposed a rule related to E.O. 14399. For more on some of the pending litigation, see CRS Legal Sidebar LSB11368, Executive Order on Elections: Legal Background and Court Challenges.

Some Members have introduced legislation in the 119^th Congress to codify or nullify the executive orders. Some Members have also offered proposals to require or prohibit use of alternatives to in-person voting on Election Day. For example, the Voter Empowerment Act, the Universal Right to Vote by Mail Act, and the Vote at Home Act would require states to offer early and no-excuse mail voting, no-excuse mail voting, and all-mail elections, respectively, for federal races. The Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act, the Mail Ballot Integrity Act, and a proposed amendment to the House-passed Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE America) Act would prohibit states from sending voters ballots for federal elections except on request, and the latter two measures would limit mail voting in federal elections to voters in specified categories.

Some of the above proposals, along with other measures introduced in the 119^th Congress, would also specify or suggest how early or mail voting should be conducted for federal elections. For example, the Voter Empowerment Act and the People Over Long Lines (POLL) Act would provide for federal standards for certain aspects of early voting, and various measures would address one or more of the following aspects of mail voting:

• How USPS approaches mail voting, such as by limiting the operational changes it can make in the period before Election Day and directing it to prioritize processing of mail ballots, postmark ballots, or carry ballots free of postage.
• How mail balloting materials are designed, such as by requiring mail ballots or related materials to be accessible to individuals with disabilities or ballot envelopes to include markings like the Official Election Mail logo or an intelligent mail barcode.
• How mail ballots are requested and provided, such as by requiring or limiting use of permanent absentee lists, requiring or limiting information voters must provide to obtain a mail ballot, and setting timelines for voters to request mail ballots or election officials to send them.
• How mail ballots are returned, such as by permitting or limiting third-party ballot collection, requiring tracking of ballots returned by mail, and specifying how or where voters can return their mail ballots.
• How mail ballots are processed and counted, such as by requiring opportunities to remedy ballot defects, setting timelines to begin processing mail ballots, and requiring or prohibiting acceptance of ballots postmarked by Election Day that arrive after the close of polls.

, or educating voters and election workers?

Selected Recent Legislation

States and localities are currently responsible for determining whether or how to offer alternatives to in- person Election Day voting, and Congress may choose to defer to state and local officials on decisions about early and mail voting.

Members might also offer proposals to require or prohibit use of alternative voting methods. The 118^th Congress’s Early Voting Act (H.R. 1295) and Freedom to Vote Act (H.R. 11/S. 1/S. 2344) would require early voting for federal elections, for example, and the American Confidence in Elections (ACE) Act (H.R. 4563) would require early voting for all elections in DC. The Accessible Voting Act of 2024 (H.R. 7389/S. 3748), Vote at Home Act of 2023 (H.R. 1439/S. 700), and Freedom to Vote Act would require no-excuse mail voting for federal elections, while the Clean Elections in America Act (H.R. 8499) would limit mail voting in federal elections to individuals with one of a specified list of excuses.

Most of those bills, among others introduced in the 118^th Congress, would also specify or suggest how early or mail voting should be conducted. For example, various bills would set requirements for early or mail voting in federal elections, and the ACE Act and related bills would specify one or more aspects of mail voting in DC. The ACE Act and other bills, such as the No Federal Funds for Ballot Harvesting Act (H.R. 4544) and the One Citizen One Vote Act (H.R. 512), would withhold certain federal funds from states and/or localities with specified mail voting policies, such as allowing certain third parties to collect mail ballots.

Legislation has also been introduced in the 118^th Congress to help facilitate mail voting—either for eligible voters in general or for members of certain groups. For example, bills like the Election Integrity Mail Reform Act of 2023 (H.R. 4476) and the Election Mail Act (H.R. 2987/S. 1391) would direct the U.S. Postal Service to take certain steps to improve mail ballot delivery, such as marking election mail and prioritizing its processing. Other bills would require efforts to address access to mail voting for voters with disabilities (e.g., Accessible Voting Act of 2024), military and overseas voters (e.g., Freedom to Vote Act; Supporting Military Voters Act, H.R. 4251/S. 2197), unhoused voters (e.g., Unhoused Voter Opportunity Through Elections Act, H.R. 5294/S. 2971), incarcerated voters (e.g., Inclusive Democracy Act of 2023, H.R. 6643/S. 3423), or voters on Indian lands (e.g., ACE Act; Election Mail Act).

Sarah J. Eckman, Analyst in American National Government Karen L. Shanton, Analyst in American National Government

IF11477

Early Voting and Mail Voting: Overview & Issues for Congress

https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11477 · VERSION 2 · UPDATED

Disclaimer

This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.