Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
April 9, 2024 
Juvenile Justice Funding Trends
Updated July 1, 2025
            (R44879)
          Jump to Main Text of Report
Summary
Although juvenile justice is generally the purview of the states, the federal government has Although juvenile justice is generally the purview of the states, the federal government has 
played a role through the administration of grant programs. Congress has influenced statesplayed a role through the administration of grant programs. Congress has influenced states
’ 
Kristin Finklea 
' juvenile justice systems by authorizing and funding grant programs administered by the juvenile justice systems by authorizing and funding grant programs administered by the 
Specialist in Domestic 
Department of JusticeDepartment of Justice
’'s (DOJs (DOJ
’'s) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).s) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
  
Security   
 
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA; P.L. 93-415), enacted in 1974, The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA; P.L. 93-415), enacted in 1974, 
was the first comprehensive juvenile justice legislation passed by Congress. The JJDPA was the first comprehensive juvenile justice legislation passed by Congress. The JJDPA 
 
authorized a series of grant programs designed to support state juvenile justice systems and authorized a series of grant programs designed to support state juvenile justice systems and 
prevent juvenile delinquency. Since its enactment, the JJDPA has undergone several key amendments, including a significant prevent juvenile delinquency. Since its enactment, the JJDPA has undergone several key amendments, including a significant 
reorganization in 2002 (by the reorganization in 2002 (by the 
21st21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act; P.L. 107-273). Its grant  Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act; P.L. 107-273). Its grant 
programs were most recently amended and reauthorized by the Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385programs were most recently amended and reauthorized by the Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385
). 
).  
Funding for programs authorized by the JJDPA, as well as for other non-JJDPA grant programs administered by OJJDP, is Funding for programs authorized by the JJDPA, as well as for other non-JJDPA grant programs administered by OJJDP, is 
provided through the Juvenile Justice Programs account in the annual Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies provided through the Juvenile Justice Programs account in the annual Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies 
appropriations act. After the restructuring of juvenile justice grant programs in 2002, total funding for these programs began appropriations act. After the restructuring of juvenile justice grant programs in 2002, total funding for these programs began 
to decline. This decline generally continued through FY2007, after which funding for these programs started to increase. For to decline. This decline generally continued through FY2007, after which funding for these programs started to increase. For 
FY2010, Congress provided $424 million for juvenile justice programs—the largest appropriation since FY2003. Juvenile FY2010, Congress provided $424 million for juvenile justice programs—the largest appropriation since FY2003. Juvenile 
justice funding then generally declined again from FY2010 through FY2017. After appropriating a low of $247 million for justice funding then generally declined again from FY2010 through FY2017. After appropriating a low of $247 million for 
juvenile justice programs in FY2017, Congress increased juvenile justice funding annually from FY2018 through FY2023—juvenile justice programs in FY2017, Congress increased juvenile justice funding annually from FY2018 through FY2023—
the largest appropriation since FY2010—before decreasing it for FY2024. the largest appropriation since FY2010—before decreasing it for FY2024. 
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42Most recently, the Full Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 (P.L. 119-4), provides $375 million for juvenile justice programs for FY2025, the same amount that was provided for FY2024.
T), provides $375 million for juvenile justice programs for FY2024. 
Congressional Research Service 
 
 link to page 4  link to page 4  link to page 5  link to page 5  link to page 5  link to page 6  link to page 7  link to page 6  link to page 9  link to page 11 Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
Contents 
Juvenile Justice Legislation and Grant Programs ............................................................................ 1 
State Formula Grant Program ................................................................................................... 1 
Title V Incentive Youth Promise Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention ............................ 2 
Victims of Child Abuse Act Grants ........................................................................................... 2 
Juvenile Mentoring Program ..................................................................................................... 2 
Total Juvenile Justice Appropriations .............................................................................................. 3 
Historical Appropriations by Program ...................................................................................... 4 
 
Figures 
Figure 1. Total Juvenile Justice Programs Appropriations, FY2000-FY2024 ................................. 3 
  
Tables 
Table 1. Juvenile Justice Appropriations by Program, FY2015-FY2024 ........................................ 6 
  
Contacts 
Author Information .......................................................................................................................... 8 
  
Congressional Research Service 
 link to page 9 Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
he federal government has no juvenile justice system of its own. Rather, juvenile justice is he federal government has no juvenile justice system of its own. Rather, juvenile justice is 
administered by the states. The federal government, though, seeks to influence statesadministered by the states. The federal government, though, seeks to influence states
’ 
T' juvenile justice systems through the administration of grant programs and the provision of  juvenile justice systems through the administration of grant programs and the provision of 
funds.1  
funds.1 
This report provides a brief overview of funding for the juvenile justice-related grant programs This report provides a brief overview of funding for the juvenile justice-related grant programs 
administered by the Department of Justiceadministered by the Department of Justice
’'s (DOJs (DOJ
’'s) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency s) Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 
Prevention (OJJDP).Prevention (OJJDP).
 
Juvenile Justice Legislation and Grant Programs 
A number of federally funded juvenile justice grant programs are authorized by the Juvenile A number of federally funded juvenile justice grant programs are authorized by the Juvenile 
Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA, P.L. 93-415). Since its enactment, the Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (JJDPA, P.L. 93-415). Since its enactment, the 
JJDPA has been revised by several key amendments, including a significant reorganization in JJDPA has been revised by several key amendments, including a significant reorganization in 
2002 (by the 2002 (by the 
21st21st Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act; P.L. 107-273).  Century Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act; P.L. 107-273). 
Most recently, its grant programs were amended and reauthorized by the Juvenile Justice Reform Most recently, its grant programs were amended and reauthorized by the Juvenile Justice Reform 
Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385
). 
).  
The JJDPA as originally enacted had three main components: (1) it established OJJDP to The JJDPA as originally enacted had three main components: (1) it established OJJDP to 
coordinate and administer federal juvenile justice efforts; (2) it created grant programs to assist coordinate and administer federal juvenile justice efforts; (2) it created grant programs to assist 
states with their juvenile justice systems; and (3) it promulgated core mandates to which states states with their juvenile justice systems; and (3) it promulgated core mandates to which states 
must adhere in order to be eligible for certain grant funding. Although the JJDPA has been must adhere in order to be eligible for certain grant funding. Although the JJDPA has been 
amended several times over the past 40+ years, it continues to feature these three components.amended several times over the past 40+ years, it continues to feature these three components.
  
 
The JJDPA has been the primary channel through which the federal government has provided The JJDPA has been the primary channel through which the federal government has provided 
juvenile justice funding to states. However, other programs also administered by OJJDP have juvenile justice funding to states. However, other programs also administered by OJJDP have 
contributed to overall federal juvenile justice funding.contributed to overall federal juvenile justice funding.
  
 
The following section outlines various juvenile justice grant programs, including those authorized The following section outlines various juvenile justice grant programs, including those authorized 
by the JJDPA. Grant programs noted in this section have been congressionally authorized at some by the JJDPA. Grant programs noted in this section have been congressionally authorized at some 
point in time and have received an appropriation at least once in the 10-year period from point in time and have received an appropriation at least once in the 10-year period from 
FY2015 FY2016 through through 
FY2024FY2025. Congress has also provided appropriations for juvenile justice programs that do . Congress has also provided appropriations for juvenile justice programs that do 
not have separate authorizations of appropriations; these programs are not discussed in this not have separate authorizations of appropriations; these programs are not discussed in this 
section, but they are included section, but they are included 
inin Table 1, whichwhich outlines funding for juvenile justice programs  outlines funding for juvenile justice programs 
since since 
FY2015. FY2016.
State Formula Grant Program 
The JJDPA authorizes OJJDP to make formula grants to The JJDPA authorizes OJJDP to make formula grants to 
states2states2 for the planning, establishment,  for the planning, establishment, 
operation, coordination, and evaluation of projects that develop more effective juvenile operation, coordination, and evaluation of projects that develop more effective juvenile 
delinquency programs and improve juvenile justice systems.delinquency programs and improve juvenile justice systems.
33 Funds are allocated annually based  Funds are allocated annually based 
on each stateon each state
’'s relative population of people under age 18. States must adhere to certain core s relative population of people under age 18. States must adhere to certain core 
mandatesrequirements to receive their funding. to receive their funding.
44 The Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385 The Juvenile Justice Reform Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385
) ) 
 
1 For more information on the legislative history of juvenile justice and details on the grant programs outlined in this report, refer to CRS Report RL33947, Juvenile Justice: Legislative History and Current Legislative Issues. 
2 In this report, the term state includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the territories (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands). 
3 34 U.S.C. §11131. 4 There are four core mandates with which—unless for specified exceptions—states must generally comply: states must keep status offenders (such as truants) out of secure detention or correctional facilities; states cannot detain or confine (continued...) 
Congressional Research Service  
 
1 
Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
amended the program and reauthorized its funding through FY2023. While its authorization of amended the program and reauthorized its funding through FY2023. While its authorization of 
appropriations has expired, the program has continued to receive funding. For appropriations has expired, the program has continued to receive funding. For 
FY2024FY2025, this , this 
program was appropriated $65 million (P.L. program was appropriated $65 million (P.L. 
118-42119-4). ). 
Title V Incentive Youth Promise Grants for Local Delinquency 
Prevention 
Prevention
The JJDPA authorizes OJJDP to make grants to states, which are then transmitted through The JJDPA authorizes OJJDP to make grants to states, which are then transmitted through 
subgrants to units of local government (or nonprofits in partnership with units of local subgrants to units of local government (or nonprofits in partnership with units of local 
government) for delinquency prevention programs for juveniles who have come into contact with, government) for delinquency prevention programs for juveniles who have come into contact with, 
or are at risk to come into contact with, the juvenile justice system.or are at risk to come into contact with, the juvenile justice system.
55 The Juvenile Justice Reform  The Juvenile Justice Reform 
Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385) amended the program and reauthorized its funding through FY2023. Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-385) amended the program and reauthorized its funding through FY2023. 
The JJDPA also authorizes OJJDP to make grants to eligible Indian tribes to support delinquency The JJDPA also authorizes OJJDP to make grants to eligible Indian tribes to support delinquency 
prevention programs for at-risk youth or those who have come into contact with the juvenile prevention programs for at-risk youth or those who have come into contact with the juvenile 
justice system. Traditionally, Congress dedicates amounts from the total appropriation for the justice system. Traditionally, Congress dedicates amounts from the total appropriation for the 
Title V program for specific programs and purposes areas (e.g., the Tribal Youth program). While Title V program for specific programs and purposes areas (e.g., the Tribal Youth program). While 
its authorization of appropriations has expired, the program has continued to receive funding. For its authorization of appropriations has expired, the program has continued to receive funding. For 
FY2024FY2025, this program was appropriated $55 million (P.L. , this program was appropriated $55 million (P.L. 
118-42). 119-4).
Victims of Child Abuse Act Grants 
The Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (Title II of the Crime Control Act of 1990, P.L. 101-647The Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (Title II of the Crime Control Act of 1990, P.L. 101-647
) ) authorizes several grant programs administered by OJJDP.authorizes several grant programs administered by OJJDP.
 
Subtitle A authorizes support for regional and local ChildrenSubtitle A authorizes support for regional and local Children
’'s Advocacy Centers (CACs), s Advocacy Centers (CACs), 
including state chapters, and for related training and technical assistance (34 U.S.C. §§20301-including state chapters, and for related training and technical assistance (34 U.S.C. §§20301-
20307). The CAC program was most recently reauthorized (through FY2028) via Section 3 of the 20307). The CAC program was most recently reauthorized (through FY2028) via Section 3 of the 
Respect for Child Survivors Act (P.L. 117-354). For Respect for Child Survivors Act (P.L. 117-354). For 
FY2024FY2025, it received $41 million (P.L. , it received $41 million (P.L. 
118-42).  
119-4). 
Subtitle B authorizes support for Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASAs) (34 U.S.C. Subtitle B authorizes support for Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASAs) (34 U.S.C. 
§§20321-20323) and Subtitle C authorizes training of judicial personnel to improve handling of §§20321-20323) and Subtitle C authorizes training of judicial personnel to improve handling of 
child abuse and neglect proceedings (34 U.S.C. §§20331-20334). Funding for these activities was child abuse and neglect proceedings (34 U.S.C. §§20331-20334). Funding for these activities was 
most recently reauthorized through FY2027 in the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization most recently reauthorized through FY2027 in the Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization 
Act of 2022 (Division W of P.L. 117-103). For Act of 2022 (Division W of P.L. 117-103). For 
FY2024FY2025, CASA received $14 million and the , CASA received $14 million and the 
training program received nearly $5 million (training program received nearly $5 million (
P.L. 119-4).6 P.L. 118-42).6  
Juvenile Mentoring Program 
The Juvenile Mentoring Program was authorized by the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency The Juvenile Mentoring Program was authorized by the Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency 
Prevention Programs Act (P.L. 102-586). Grants under this program are awarded to local Prevention Programs Act (P.L. 102-586). Grants under this program are awarded to local 
educational agencies (in partnership with public or private agencies) to establish and support educational agencies (in partnership with public or private agencies) to establish and support 
mentoring programs to reduce delinquent behavior, improve scholastic performance, and reduce mentoring programs to reduce delinquent behavior, improve scholastic performance, and reduce 
 
juveniles in facilities in which they would have contact with adult inmates; juveniles cannot be detained or confined in any jail or lockup for adults; and states must show that they are working to address racial and ethnic disparities within their juvenile justice systems. 
5 34 U.S.C. §11313. 6 CASA is funded out of the State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance account rather than the Juvenile Justice Programs account; training for judicial personnel to improve handling of child abuse and neglect proceedings is funded out of the Juvenile Justice Programs account. 
Congressional Research Service  
 
2 
 link to page 6 
Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
school dropouts.7school dropouts.7 The program has continued to receive funding even though it was repealed in  The program has continued to receive funding even though it was repealed in 
the 2002 JJDPA reauthorization (P.L. 107-273). For the 2002 JJDPA reauthorization (P.L. 107-273). For 
FY2024FY2025, this program was appropriated $104 , this program was appropriated $104 
million (P.L. million (P.L. 
118-42119-4). ). 
Total Juvenile Justice Appropriations 
Congress appropriates funding for programs authorized by the JJDPA as well as for other non-Congress appropriates funding for programs authorized by the JJDPA as well as for other non-
JJDPA juvenile justice grant programs through the Juvenile Justice Programs account in the JJDPA juvenile justice grant programs through the Juvenile Justice Programs account in the 
annual Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Actannual Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act
. Figure 1 shows shows 
total appropriations for juvenile justice programs for the total appropriations for juvenile justice programs for the 
2530-year period from -year period from 
FY2000FY1996 through  through 
FY2024. FY2025.
Figure 1. Total Juvenile Justice Programs Appropriations, FY2000-FY2024 
FY1996-FY2025
(dollars in millions)(dollars in millions)
 
 
Sources: 
Sources: 1996 enacted taken from P.L. 104-134. FY1997 enacted taken from P.L. 104-208. FY1998 enacted taken from P.L. 105-119. FY1999 enacted taken from P.L. 105-277. FY2000 enacted taken from P.L. 106-113. FY2001 enacted taken from P.L. 106-553. FY2002 enacted FY2000 enacted taken from P.L. 106-113. FY2001 enacted taken from P.L. 106-553. FY2002 enacted 
taken from P.L. 107-77. FY2003 enacted taken from P.L. 108-7. FY2004 taken from P.L. 108-199. FY2005 taken taken from P.L. 107-77. FY2003 enacted taken from P.L. 108-7. FY2004 taken from P.L. 108-199. FY2005 taken 
from P.L. 108-447. FY2006 taken from P.L. 109-108. FY2007 appropriation is based on FY2006 enacted minus a from P.L. 108-447. FY2006 taken from P.L. 109-108. FY2007 appropriation is based on FY2006 enacted minus a 
1.28% rescission, as per P.L. 110-5. FY2008 enacted taken from P.L. 110-161. FY2009 enacted taken from P.L. 1.28% rescission, as per P.L. 110-5. FY2008 enacted taken from P.L. 110-161. FY2009 enacted taken from P.L. 
111-8. FY2010 enacted taken from P.L. 111-117. FY2011 enacted based on a CRS analysis of the text of P.L. 112-111-8. FY2010 enacted taken from P.L. 111-117. FY2011 enacted based on a CRS analysis of the text of P.L. 112-
1010. FY2012 enacted taken from P.L. 112-55. FY2013 amount provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. FY2014 . FY2012 enacted taken from P.L. 112-55. FY2013 amount provided by the U.S. Department of Justice. FY2014 
enacted taken from P.L. 113-76. FY2015 enacted taken from P.L. 113-235. FY2016 enacted taken from P.L. 114-enacted taken from P.L. 113-76. FY2015 enacted taken from P.L. 113-235. FY2016 enacted taken from P.L. 114-
113. FY2017 enacted taken from P.L. 115-31. FY2018 enacted taken from P.L. 115-141. FY2019 enacted taken 113. FY2017 enacted taken from P.L. 115-31. FY2018 enacted taken from P.L. 115-141. FY2019 enacted taken 
from P.L. 116-6. FY2020 enacted taken from P.L. 116-93. FY2021 enacted taken from P.L. 116-260. FY2022 from P.L. 116-6. FY2020 enacted taken from P.L. 116-93. FY2021 enacted taken from P.L. 116-260. FY2022 
enacted taken from P.L. 117-103. FY2023 enacted taken from P.L. 117-328. FY2024 enacted taken from enacted taken from P.L. 117-103. FY2023 enacted taken from P.L. 117-328. FY2024 enacted taken from 
P.L. 118-42. FY2025 enacted taken from P.L. 119-4.P.L. 118-42. 
 
7 For more information on the Juvenile Mentoring Program and youth mentoring, see CRS Report RL34306, Vulnerable Youth: Federal Mentoring Programs and Issues. 
Congressional Research Service  
 
3 
 link to page 9 Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
Notes: Numbers are rounded. Amounts are in nominal  Numbers are rounded. Amounts are in nominal 
dol arsdollars. The amounts include all rescissions of current . The amounts include all rescissions of current 
year budget authority. The FY2013 funding level also reflects sequestration pursuant to the Budget Control Act year budget authority. The FY2013 funding level also reflects sequestration pursuant to the Budget Control Act 
of 2011 (P.L. 112-25). JJDPA = Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (P.L. 93-415of 2011 (P.L. 112-25). JJDPA = Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (P.L. 93-415
).
In nominal dollars, funding). 
Funding for juvenile justice programs peaked in 2002 at $565 million. From FY2002 to FY2007,  for juvenile justice programs peaked in 2002 at $565 million. From FY2002 to FY2007, 
however, overall funding fell by 38% to $348 million. The majority of this reduction came from however, overall funding fell by 38% to $348 million. The majority of this reduction came from 
cuts to the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) program.cuts to the Juvenile Accountability Block Grant (JABG) program.
88 From FY2007 to FY2010,  From FY2007 to FY2010, 
total funding for juvenile justice programs increased by almost 22% to $424 million, with funding total funding for juvenile justice programs increased by almost 22% to $424 million, with funding 
for JJDPA programs increasing by 27% to $331 million over this same period. This was the for JJDPA programs increasing by 27% to $331 million over this same period. This was the 
largest juvenile justice appropriation since FY2003.largest juvenile justice appropriation since FY2003.
  
 
Funding for juvenile justice programs again began to decline in FY2011, and that decline Funding for juvenile justice programs again began to decline in FY2011, and that decline 
generally continued through FY2017. From FY2010 to FY2017, total funding for juvenile justice generally continued through FY2017. From FY2010 to FY2017, total funding for juvenile justice 
programs decreased by nearly 42%, from $424 million to $247 million. Contributing to this drop, programs decreased by nearly 42%, from $424 million to $247 million. Contributing to this drop, 
Congress eliminated funding for the Challenge Congress eliminated funding for the Challenge 
Grants9Grants9 in FY2011 and for the JABG program in  in FY2011 and for the JABG program in 
FY2014. During this time period, Congress also started appropriating funding for programs that FY2014. During this time period, Congress also started appropriating funding for programs that 
had not previously been funded under the Juvenile Justice Programs account, including funding had not previously been funded under the Juvenile Justice Programs account, including funding 
for missing and exploited children programs and child abuse training programs for judicial for missing and exploited children programs and child abuse training programs for judicial 
personnel and practitioners.personnel and practitioners.
  
 
After appropriating $247 million for juvenile justice programs in FY2017, Congress increased After appropriating $247 million for juvenile justice programs in FY2017, Congress increased 
juvenile justice funding annually from FY2018 through FY2023. Congress increased funding for juvenile justice funding annually from FY2018 through FY2023. Congress increased funding for 
juvenile justice programs to nearly $283 million for FY2018, which included funds for a new juvenile justice programs to nearly $283 million for FY2018, which included funds for a new 
Opioid Affected Youth Initiative. Congress again increased juvenile justice program funding to Opioid Affected Youth Initiative. Congress again increased juvenile justice program funding to 
$287 million in FY2019, and it set aside money for an initiative serving children exposed to $287 million in FY2019, and it set aside money for an initiative serving children exposed to 
violence.violence.
1010 Congress then increased funding for juvenile justice programs to $320 million for  Congress then increased funding for juvenile justice programs to $320 million for 
FY2020 and included a new set-aside from the JJDPA Title V Incentive Grant program for grants FY2020 and included a new set-aside from the JJDPA Title V Incentive Grant program for grants 
to prevent trafficking of girls. Congress continued to increase funding for FY2021 through to prevent trafficking of girls. Congress continued to increase funding for FY2021 through 
FY2023, when it appropriated $400 million for juvenile justice programs—the largest FY2023, when it appropriated $400 million for juvenile justice programs—the largest 
appropriation since the $424 million provided in FY2010. Congress most recently decreased appropriation since the $424 million provided in FY2010. Congress most recently decreased 
funding for juvenile justice programs, appropriating $375 million for funding for juvenile justice programs, appropriating $375 million for 
FY2024each of FY2024 and FY2025. This included a . This included a 
$10 million reduction in funding for the JJDPA Title II State Formula Grants and a $10 million $10 million reduction in funding for the JJDPA Title II State Formula Grants and a $10 million 
reduction for the JJDPA Title V Incentive Grantsreduction for the JJDPA Title V Incentive Grants
.  relative to FY2023 levels.
Historical Appropriations by Program 
Table 1 provides a breakdown of funding for the Juvenile Justice Programs account by program provides a breakdown of funding for the Juvenile Justice Programs account by program 
for the 10-year period from for the 10-year period from 
FY2015 to FY2024.  
FY2016 to FY2025. 
Appropriations for specific programs in the Juvenile Justice Programs account can vary from year Appropriations for specific programs in the Juvenile Justice Programs account can vary from year 
to year. In addition, Congress sometimes provides funding for programs as a specific line item in to year. In addition, Congress sometimes provides funding for programs as a specific line item in 
the Juvenile Justice Programs account, but in other years funding for those programs is provided the Juvenile Justice Programs account, but in other years funding for those programs is provided 
as a set-aside from another program in the account. For example, the Community-Based Violence as a set-aside from another program in the account. For example, the Community-Based Violence 
Prevention Initiative, Web Portal for Children of Incarcerated Parents, and Competitive Grants 
 
8 Although the authorization for the JABG program was not a part of the JJDPA, it nevertheless was administered by OJJDP. The JABG program authorized the Attorney General to make grants to states and units of local government to strengthen their juvenile justice systems, including holding juveniles accountable for their actions. Authorization for this program expired in FY2009, but Congress continued to provide appropriations through FY2013.  
9 The Challenge Grants program authorized OJJDP to make discretionary grants to state, local, and tribal governments and private entities to carry out programs to develop, test, or demonstrate promising new initiatives that may prevent, control, or reduce juvenile delinquency. The program last received appropriations in FY2010. 
10 Funding for this purpose was previously provided under the State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Account from FY2012 to FY2016. 
Congressional Research Service  
 
4 
Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
Focusing on Girls in the Juvenile Justice System havePrevention Initiative received line-item appropriations in some  received line-item appropriations in some 
fiscal years and fiscal years and 
havehas been funded by set-asides from the Title V Incentive Grants program in  been funded by set-asides from the Title V Incentive Grants program in 
other years. By contrast, some programs, when funded, have consistently been funded through other years. By contrast, some programs, when funded, have consistently been funded through 
set-asides from the Title V program (e.g., the Tribal Youth program).set-asides from the Title V program (e.g., the Tribal Youth program).
 
 
Congressional Research Service  
 
5 
 link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  
Table 1. Juvenile Justice Appropriations by Program, FY2015-FY2024 
FY2016-FY2025
(dollars in millions)(dollars in millions)
 
Program 
FY2015 
FY2016  FY2017  FY2018  FY2019 
FY2020 
FY2021 
FY2022  FY2023  FY2024 
State Formula Grants 
55 
58 
55 
60 
60 
63 
67 
70 
75 
65 
Emergency Planning— 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
Juvenile Detention Facilities 
Juvenile Mentoring Program Grant 
90 
90 
80 
94 
95 
97 
100 
102 
107 
104 
Title V Incentive Grants for Local 
15 
18 
15 
28 
25 
42 
49 
50 
65 
55 
Delinquency Prevention 
Tribal Youth Program  
(5) 
(10) 
— 
(5) 
(5) 
(5) 
(10) 
(14) 
(17) 
(16) 
Gang Prevention 
(3) 
(5) 
(4) 
(4) 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
 FY2016 
 | 
 FY2017 
 | 
 FY2018 
 | 
 FY2019 
 | 
 FY2020 
 | 
 FY2021 
 | 
 FY2022 
 | 
 FY2023 
 | 
 FY2024 
 | 
 FY2025 
 | 
| 
 State Formula Grants 
 | 
 58 
 | 
 55 
 | 
 60 
 | 
 60 
 | 
 63 
 | 
 67 
 | 
 70 
 | 
 75 
 | 
 65 
 | 
 65 
 | 
Emergency Planning—Juvenile Detention Facilities
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
| 
 Juvenile Mentoring Program Grant 
 | 
 90 
 | 
 80 
 | 
 94 
 | 
 95 
 | 
 97 
 | 
 100 
 | 
 102 
 | 
 107 
 | 
 104 
 | 
 104 
 | 
| 
 Title V Incentive Grants for Local Delinquency Prevention 
 | 
 18 
 | 
 15 
 | 
 28 
 | 
 25 
 | 
 42 
 | 
 49 
 | 
 50 
 | 
 65 
 | 
 55 
 | 
 55 
 | 
| 
 Tribal Youth Program  
 | 
 (10) 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (10) 
 | 
 (14) 
 | 
 (17) 
 | 
 (16) 
 | 
 (16) 
 | 
| 
 Gang Prevention 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (4) 
 | 
 (4) 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
| 
 Community-Based Violence Prevention Initiative 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
| 
 Children of Incarcerated Parents Web Portal 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 (1) 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
| 
 Girls in the Juvenile Justice System 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (3) 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (6) 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
| 
 Opioid Affected Youth Initiative 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 (9) 
 | 
 (10) 
 | 
 (10) 
 | 
 (12) 
 | 
 (13) 
 | 
 (11) 
 | 
 (11) 
 | 
| 
 Children Exposed to Violence Initiative 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 (8) 
 | 
 (10) 
 | 
 (9) 
 | 
 (9) 
 | 
| 
 Prevention of Trafficking of Girls 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 (4) 
 | 
 (5) 
 | 
 (4) 
 | 
 (4) 
 | 
| 
 Vulnerable and At-Risk Youth Initiative 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 (3) 
 | 
 (2) 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
| 
 Victims of Child Abuse Act 
 | 
 20 
 | 
 21 
 | 
 21 
 | 
 23 
 | 
 27 
 | 
 30 
 | 
 33 
 | 
 41 
 | 
 41 
 | 
 41 
 | 
Community-Based Violence 
(6) 
— 
(8) 
(8) 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
Prevention Initiative 
National Forum on Youth Violence 
(1) 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
Prevention 
Children of Incarcerated Parents 
— 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
(1) 
— 
Web Portal 
Girls in the Juvenile Justice System 
— 
(2) 
(2) 
(2) 
(2) 
(2) 
(3) 
(5) 
(6) 
(5) 
Opioid Affected Youth Initiative 
— 
— 
— 
(8) 
(9) 
(10) 
(10) 
(12) 
(13) 
(11) 
Children Exposed to Violence 
— 
— 
— 
— 
(8) 
(8) 
(8) 
(8) 
(10) 
(9) 
Initiative 
Prevention of Trafficking of Girls 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
(2) 
(2) 
(4) 
(5) 
(4) 
Vulnerable and At-Risk Youth 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
(3) 
(2) 
— 
Initiative 
Victims of Child Abuse Act 
19 
20 
21 
21 
23 
27 
30 
33 
41 
41 
Community-Based Violence 
—a 
8 
—a 
—a 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
— 
Prevention Initiative 
Training for Judicial Personnel 
2 
2 
2 
2 
3 
4 
4 
4 
5 
5 
CRS-6 
 link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  link to page 10  
Program 
FY2015 
FY2016  FY2017  FY2018  FY2019 
FY2020 
FY2021 
FY2022  FY2023  FY2024 
Missing and Exploited Children 
68 
72 
73 
76 
82 
88 
94 
99 
105 
103 
Competitive Grants Focusing on 
2 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
Girls in the Juvenile Justice System 
Children of Incarcerated Parents 
1 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
—b 
Web Portal 
Improving Indigent Defense 
— 
3 
2 
2 
— 
— 
3 
3 
3 
3 
Total Juvenile Justice 
252 
270 
247 
283 
287 
320 
346 
360 
400 
375 
Appropriation Community-Based Violence Prevention Initiative
 8 
 | 
—a
—a
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
| 
 Training for Judicial Personnel 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 3 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 4 
 | 
 5 
 | 
 5 
 | 
 5 
 | 
| 
 Missing and Exploited Children 
 | 
 72 
 | 
 73 
 | 
 76 
 | 
 82 
 | 
 88 
 | 
 94 
 | 
 99 
 | 
 105 
 | 
 103 
 | 
 103 
 | 
| 
 Improving Indigent Defense 
 | 
 3 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 — 
 | 
 3 
 | 
 3 
 | 
 3 
 | 
 3 
 | 
 3 
 | 
| 
 Total Juvenile Justice Appropriation 
 | 
 270 
 | 
 247 
 | 
 283 
 | 
 287 
 | 
 320 
 | 
 346 
 | 
 360 
 | 
 400 
 | 
 375 
 | 
 375 
 | 
Sources:  FY2015 enacted taken from P.L. 113-235. FY2016 enacted taken from P.L. 114-113. FY2017 enacted taken from P.L. 115-31. FY2018 enacted taken from P.L. FY2016 enacted taken from P.L. 114-113. FY2017 enacted taken from P.L. 115-31. FY2018 enacted taken from P.L. 
115-141. FY2019 enacted taken from P.L. 116-6. FY2020 enacted taken from P.L. 116-93. FY2021 enacted taken from P.L. 116-260. FY2022 enacted taken from P.L. 117-115-141. FY2019 enacted taken from P.L. 116-6. FY2020 enacted taken from P.L. 116-93. FY2021 enacted taken from P.L. 116-260. FY2022 enacted taken from P.L. 117-
103. FY2023 enacted taken from P.L. 117-328. FY2024 enacted taken from P.L. 118-42103. FY2023 enacted taken from P.L. 117-328. FY2024 enacted taken from P.L. 118-42
. FY2025 enacted taken from P.L. 119-4.
. Notes: Numbers in parentheses are nonadds that have been set aside from other grant programs. Amounts may not add to totals due to rounding. Amounts are in Numbers in parentheses are nonadds that have been set aside from other grant programs. Amounts may not add to totals due to rounding. Amounts are in 
nominal dol ars. a.  For FY2015, FY2017,nominal dollars.
a. For FY2017 and FY2018, funding for the Community-Based Violence Prevention Initiative was appropriated as set-aside funding from the Title V Incentive  and FY2018, funding for the Community-Based Violence Prevention Initiative was appropriated as set-aside funding from the Title V Incentive 
Grants. 
b.  For FY2016-FY2024, funding for the Competitive Grants Focusing on Girls in the Juvenile Justice System and the Children of Incarcerated Parents Web Portal was 
appropriated as set-aside funding from the Title V Incentive Grants.  
CRS-7 
Juvenile Justice Funding Trends 
 
 
 
Author Information 
 Kristin Finklea 
   
Specialist in Domestic Security     
 
Acknowledgments 
An earlier version of this report was authored by former CRS Analyst Emily J. Hanson. 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
Congressional Research Service  
R44879 · VERSION 17 · UPDATED 
8 Grants.
An earlier version of this report was authored by former CRS Analyst Emily J. Hanson.
Footnotes
| 1.
             | 
  For more information on the legislative history of juvenile justice and details on the grant programs outlined in this report, refer to CRS Report RL33947, Juvenile Justice: Legislative History and Current Legislative Issues. 
 | 
| 2.
             | 
  In this report, the term state includes the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the territories (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands). 
 | 
| 3.
             | 
  34 U.S.C. §11131. 
 | 
| 4.
             | 
  There are four core requirements with which—unless for specified exceptions—states must generally comply: states must keep status offenders (such as truants) out of secure detention or correctional facilities; states cannot detain or confine juveniles in facilities in which they would have contact with adult inmates; juveniles cannot be detained or confined in any jail or lockup for adults; and states must show that they are working to address racial and ethnic disparities within their juvenile justice systems. 
 | 
| 5.
             | 
  34 U.S.C. §11313. 
 | 
| 6.
             | 
  CASA is funded out of the State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance account rather than the Juvenile Justice Programs account; training for judicial personnel to improve handling of child abuse and neglect proceedings is funded out of the Juvenile Justice Programs account. 
 | 
| 7.
             | 
  For more information on the Juvenile Mentoring Program and youth mentoring, see CRS Report RL34306, Vulnerable Youth: Federal Mentoring Programs and Issues. 
 | 
| 8.
             | 
  Although the authorization for the JABG program was not a part of the JJDPA, it nevertheless was administered by OJJDP. The JABG program authorized the Attorney General to make grants to states and units of local government to strengthen their juvenile justice systems, including holding juveniles accountable for their actions. Authorization for this program expired in FY2009, but Congress continued to provide appropriations through FY2013.  
 | 
| 9.
             | 
  The Challenge Grants program authorized OJJDP to make discretionary grants to state, local, and tribal governments and private entities to carry out programs to develop, test, or demonstrate promising new initiatives that may prevent, control, or reduce juvenile delinquency. The program last received appropriations in FY2010. 
 | 
| 10.
             | 
  Funding for this purpose was previously provided under the State and Local Law Enforcement Assistance Account from FY2012 to FY2016. 
 |