< Back to Current Version

The Crime Victims Fund (CVF): Federal Support for Victims of Crime

Changes from April 2, 2020 to May 21, 2024

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


The Crime Victims Fund (CVF): Federal Support May 21, 2024 for Victims of Crime Lisa N. Sacco : Federal Support for Victims of Crime

Updated April 2, 2020 (R42672)
Jump to Main Text of Report

Contents

Summary

In 1984, the Crime Victims Fund (CVF, or the Fund) was established by the Victims of Crime In 1984, the Crime Victims Fund (CVF, or the Fund) was established by the Victims of Crime Analyst in Illicit Drugs and Act (VOCA, P.L. 98-473) to provide funding for state victim compensation and assistance Crime Policy programs. Since 1984, VOCA has been amended several times to support additional victim- related activities including (1) discretionary grants for private organizations, (2) the Federal Victim Notification System, (3) funding for victim assistance staff within the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys, (4) funding for the Children's Justice Act Program, (5) assistance and compensation for victims of terrorism, (6) funding for sexual assault survivors' notification grants and ensuring rights of sexual assault survivors, and (7) restitution for victims of child pornography.

Aside from amendments for new programmatic purposes, VOCA has also been amended to include additional sources of funding for the CVF and adjust processes and requirements for VOCA grants. In 1988, the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) was formally established within the Department of Justice (DOJ) to administer VOCA programs. As authorized by VOCA, the OVC awards CVF money through grants to states, local units of government, individuals, and other entities. The OVC also distributes CVF money to specially designated programs, such as the Children'Children’s Justice Act Program and the Federal Victim Notification System.

Deposits to the CVF come from federal criminal fines, forfeited appearance bonds, and penalties and special assessments collected by the U.S. Attorneys' Offices, federal courts, and Federal Bureau of Prisons. Since 2002, Congress has allowed gifts, bequests, and donations from private entities to be deposited into the CVF. Of note, the largest source of deposits into the CVF is criminal fines. At the end of FY2019, the CVF had a balance of $6.353 billion.

Since the enactment of the VOCA Fix to Sustain the Crime Victims Fund Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-27), deposits to the CVF have also included monetary penalties from federal deferred prosecution and nonprosecution agreements. As of February 29, 2024, the CVF had a balance of $1.29 billion. When the CVF was created in 1984, Congress placed a cap on how much money could be deposited into the CVF each fiscal year. Congress eliminated the cap for deposits in 1993. From FY1985 to FY1998, deposits collected in each fiscal year were distributed in the following fiscal year to support crime victim services. In FY2000, Congress established an annual obligation cap on CVF funds available for distribution to reduce the effects of fluctuating deposits on the amount of funds available and to ensure the stability of funds for crime -victims programs and activities. Since 2000, Congress has established the annual obligation cap in appropriations law. Due to the fluctuating balance of the Fund, the obligation cap has sharply increased and decreased over last decade. Increases to the cap were sometimes accompanied by new draws on the Fund. The fluctuation of the cap from year to year and the new draws on the CVF affect the formula grant amounts made available for states and territories as well as the amount allocated for discretionary grants. Over the past decade, Congress has taken a number of actions involving the CVF. In the 114th Congress, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-74) included a provision (§702) that required the rescission of $1.5 billion from the balance of the Crime Victims Fund. In addition, from FY2017 to FY2023, Congress opted to calculate the obligation cap based on the most recent three-year average of deposits into the CVF. In FY2021, Congress passed and President Biden signed P.L. 117-27, which required that revenues collected from federal deferred prosecution and nonprosecution agreements be deposited into the CVF. In considering the CVF allocation for crime victim services and related activities, future caps, and sustainability of the CVF, policymakers may deliberate several issues. Congress may consider whether to adjust the manner in which funds from the CVF are allocated; amend VOCA to accommodate additional or fewer purpose areas; set limits on the use oflaw.

In FY2015, Congress set the CVF obligation cap at $2.361 billion, a more than 200% increase over the FY2014 cap ($745 million). In the following years, Congress maintained (more or less) the increased cap, but also directed DOJ to use funds from the CVF for purposes other than those explicitly authorized by VOCA; or make adjustments to the CVF and CVF cap—such as eliminating the cap or CVF altogether. Congressional Research Service link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page 11 link to page 12 link to page 12 link to page 13 link to page 14 link to page 14 link to page 14 link to page 16 link to page 18 link to page 19 link to page 19 link to page 20 link to page 20 link to page 21 link to page 22 link to page 22 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 24 link to page 11 link to page 9 link to page 12 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Financing of the Crime Victims Fund ............................................................................................. 2 Deposits to the CVF .................................................................................................................. 2 Fluctuation in Deposits and Growth of the Fund ................................................................ 3 Caps on the CVF ....................................................................................................................... 3 Cap on Deposits .................................................................................................................. 3 Obligation Cap .................................................................................................................... 3 Recent Changes to the CVF Obligation Cap and New Uses of Obligated Funds ............... 4 Carryover Balance of the CVF .................................................................................................. 4 VOCA-Authorized Distribution of the Crime Victims Fund .......................................................... 7 Children’s Justice Act Program ................................................................................................. 8 Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA) ........................................................................ 8 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ...................................................................................... 9 The Victim Notification System (VNS) .................................................................................. 10 Victim Compensation and Assistance ..................................................................................... 10 Victim Compensation Formula Grant Program ................................................................ 10 Victim Assistance Formula Grant Program ...................................................................... 12 Discretionary Grants ............................................................................................................... 14 Survivors’ Bill of Rights Act of 2016 ............................................................................... 15 Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve .......................................................................................... 15 Assistance for Victims of Terrorism and Mass Violence .................................................. 16 Assistance for Victims of 9/11 .......................................................................................... 16 Child Pornography Victims Reserve ....................................................................................... 17 Distribution of Crime Victim Fund Not Authorized by VOCA..................................................... 18 Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program ...................................................................... 18 Selected Issues for Congress ......................................................................................................... 19 Funding Activities Not Authorized by VOCA ........................................................................ 19 Eliminating or Adjusting the Calculation of the Obligation Cap ............................................ 19 Eliminating the CVF ............................................................................................................... 19 Revenue for the Fund .............................................................................................................. 20 Figures Figure 1. Annual VOCA-Authorized Distribution of the Crime Victims Fund ............................... 7 Tables Table 1. Crime Victims Fund (CVF): FY1985-FY2024 .................................................................. 5 Table 2. Annual Allocation for Children’s Justice Act Grants ......................................................... 8 Table 3. Annual Allocation and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for EOUSA Victim Witness Coordinators ......................................................................................... 9 Table 4. Annual Allocation and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for FBI Victim Witness Specialists .................................................................................................... 9 Congressional Research Service link to page 14 link to page 16 link to page 17 link to page 19 link to page 20 link to page 23 link to page 24 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Table 5. Annual Allocation for Victim Notification System (VNS) .............................................. 10 Table 6. Annual Allocation for Victim Compensation Grant Program .......................................... 12 Table 7. Annual Allocation for Victim Assistance Grant Program ................................................ 13 Table 8. Annual Allocation for Discretionary Grants .................................................................... 15 Table 9. Funds Obligated from the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve ......................................... 16 Table 10. Annual Allocation for Tribal Assistance Grants ............................................................ 19 Contacts Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 20 Congressional Research Service link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Introduction purposes not authorized by VOCA. From FY2015 to FY2020, Congress transferred funds from the CVF to the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) for programs authorized under the Violence Against Women Act (P.L. 103-322, as amended) and DOJ's Office of the Inspector General (OIG). From FY2018 to FY2020, Congress set aside 3%, 5%, and 5% (respectively) of the amount made available for obligation for tribal assistance grants. The cap has also decreased for two consecutive years, from a record high of $4.436 billion in FY2018, to $3.353 billion in FY2019, and down to $2.641 billion in FY2020. In FY2020, the tribal assistance grant amount was $132 million, the OVW transfer was $435 million, and the OIG transfer was $10 million. The amount made available for VOCA-authorized programs in FY2020 was $2.064 billion.

Over the past few years, Congress has taken a number of actions involving the CVF. In the 114th Congress, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-74) included a provision (§702) that required the permanent cancellation of $1.5 billion from the balance of the Crime Victims Fund. In addition, from FY2017 to FY2020 Congress opted to calculate the obligation cap based on a three-year average of deposits into the CVF.

In considering the CVF allocation and future caps, there are several issues which policymakers may deliberate. Congress may consider whether to adjust the manner in which the CVF is allocated, amend VOCA to accommodate additional victim activities or groups, further adjust the cap and allow funds from the CVF to be used for grant programs other than those explicitly authorized by VOCA, or make other adjustments to the CVF cap—such as eliminating the cap altogether.


Introduction

In 1984, the Crime Victims Fund (CVF, or the Fund) was established by the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA, P.L. 98-473) to provide funding for state victim compensation and assistance programs.1 1 Since 1984, VOCA has been amended several times to support additional victim-related activities. These amendments established that the CVF be used for

  • discretionary grants for private organizations,2
  • 2 • the Federal Victim Notification System,3
  • 3 • funding for victim assistance staff in the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Executive Office offor U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA),4
  • 4 • funding for the Children's Justice Act Program,5
  • 5 • assistance and compensation for victims of terrorism,6
  • 6 • sexual assault survivors' notification grants and ensuring rights of sexual assault survivors,7 and
  • restitution for victims of child pornography.8

survivors,7 and • restitution for victims of child pornography.8 VOCA has also been amended to include additional sources of funding for the CVF and to adjust, and allow for the waiver of, match requirements for VOCA grants.9 In 1988, the Office for Victims of Crime (OVC) was formally established within the Department of Justice (DOJ) to administer the CVF.910 As authorized by VOCA, the OVC awards CVF money through formula and discretionary grants to states, local units of government, individuals, and other entities. The OVC also distributes CVF money to specially designated programs, such as the Children'Children’s Justice Act Program and the Federal Victim Notification System (see Figure 1).10

The OVC'11 OVC’s mission is to enhance the nation's capacity to assist crime victims and to improve attitudes, policies, and practices that promote justice and help victims. According to the OVC, this mission is accomplished by (1) administering the CVF, (2) supporting direct services for victims, (3) providing training programs for service providers, (4) sponsoring the development of best practices for service providers, and (5) producing reports on best practices.11 The OVC funds victim-support programs in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, tribes, and the territories.12

12 OVC funds victim- 1 P.L. 98-473, Title II, Chapter XIV, Victims of Crime Act of 1984, October 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2170. The Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) is codified at 34 U.S.C. §20101 et seq. 2 P.L. 109-162, Title XI, Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Subtitle B, §1132, January 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3107. 3 P.L. 107-77, Title I, §111, November 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 765. 4 P.L. 106-553, §1(a)(2), Title I, §113, December 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2762, 2762A-68; P.L. 106-554, §1(a)(4), Division A, §213(a)(2), December 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-179; and P.L. 106-113, Division B, §1000(a)(1) [H.R. 3421, Title I, §119], November 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A-22. 5 P.L. 106-177, Title I, §104(a), Child Abuse Prevention and Enforcement Act, March 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 36. 6 P.L. 104-132, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Title II, Subtitle C; P.L. 107-56, USA PATRIOT Act, Title VI, §621(a) to (d). 7 P.L. 114-236, Survivors’ Bill of Rights Act of 2016. 8 P.L. 115-299, Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018. 9 P.L. 117-27, VOCA Fix to Sustain the Crime Victims Fund Act of 2021. 10 P.L. 100-690, Title VII, Subtitle D – Victim Compensation and Assistance. 11 Grants are distributed according to a formula established by VOCA. 12 For more information on OVC and its mission, see DOJ, Office of Justice Programs (OJP), “Office for Victims of Crime (OVC),” https://www.ojp.gov/about/offices/office-victims-crime-ovc. Congressional Research Service 1 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime support programs in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, tribes, and the territories.13 In FY2018, Congress began setting aside specific percentages of the CVF obligation cap for tribal assistance grants to improve services for victims of crime in American Indian and Alaska Native communities.14 Notably, Congress did this through appropriations acts and did not create a permanent authorization for tribal assistance grants through VOCA. Notably, Congress has amended VOCA several times to provide support for victims of terrorism.1315 These amendments established CVF-funded programs for (1) assistance to victims of terrorism14terrorism16 who are injured or killed as a result of a terrorist act outside the United States, (2) compensation and assistance to victims of terrorism or mass violence within the United States, and (3) an antiterrorism emergency reserve fund to support victims of terrorism.

or mass violence. This report provides background and funding information for VOCA programs and the CVFthe CVF and VOCA programs. It describes the process through which funds in the CVF are allocated and explains how the CVF affects the annual budget for DOJ. It then provides an analysis of selected issues that Congress may consider regarding the CVF and, the federal budget.

, and VOCA programs. Financing of the Crime Victims Fund

Deposits to the CVF

The CVF does not receive appropriated funding.1517 Rather, deposits to the CVF come from a number of sources including criminal fines, forfeited bail bonds, penalties, and special assessments collected by the U.S. Attorneys' Offices, federal courts, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons from offenders convicted of federal crimes.1618 In 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act (P.L. 107-5656) established that gifts, bequests, or donations from private entities could also be deposited to the CVF.

The largest source of deposits into the CVF is criminal fines.17 Large criminal fines, if collected, can have a significant effect on deposits into receipts for In FY2021, Congress passed and President Biden signed the VOCA Fix to Sustain the Crime Victims Fund Act of 2021 (VOCA Fix Act; P.L. 117-37), which required that revenues collected from federal deferred prosecution and nonprosecution agreements be deposited into the CVF. Historically, the largest source of deposits into the CVF has been criminal fines collected from federal offenders. However, with the introduction of monetary penalties collected from deferred and non-prosecution agreements, that may not always be the case.19 Monetary penalties collected from deferred and nonprosecution agreements represented 62% of the total amount collected during the first six months of FY2024.20 Large criminal fines or other monetary penalties, if 13 For information on OVC grant allocations, see “About OVC Funding,” https://ovc.ojp.gov/funding. 14 For more information about this program and the annual set-aside, see OVC, Report on the OVC Fiscal Year 2023 Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program, https://ovc.ojp.gov/program/tribal/tribal-victim-services-set-aside/fy-2023-report.pdf. 15 P.L. 104-132, Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 1996, April 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1243; P.L. 106-386, Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, October 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1543; and P.L. 107-56, USA PATRIOT Act, Title VI, §621(a) to (d), October 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 370. 16 Victims who are eligible for assistance include nationals of the United States and employees of the U.S. government. 17 In January 2002, Congress enacted a one-time appropriation of $68.1 million for the Crime Victims Fund to assist in providing relief to 9/11 victims (P.L. 107-117, 115 Stat. 2294). 18 See 34 U.S.C. §20101. 19 CRS communications with DOJ, Office of Legislative Affairs in March 2020. Also see OVC, 2011 OVC Report to the Nation, p. 2. 20 Percentage calculated by CRS based on data from OVC, “FY 2007 – FY 2024 Crime Victims Fund Annual Receipts (as of 3/31/2024),” https://ovc.ojp.gov/about/crime-victims-fund/fy-2007-2024-cvf-annual-receipts.pdf. Congressional Research Service 2 link to page 9 link to page 9 link to page 9 link to page 9 link to page 9 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime collected, can have a significant effect on deposits into the CVF. For example, from FY1996 through FY2004, fines collected from 12 defendantsoffenders in federal courts accounted for 45% of all deposits to the CVF during this time period.1821 Table 1 provides the total amounts deposited into the CVF in each fiscal year from FY1985 to FY2019.

FY2024. Fluctuation in Deposits and Growth of the Fund

As As Table 1 illustrates, since FY2000 there has been considerable fluctuation in the amounts deposited each fiscal year. For example, from FY2013 to FY2014 the monetary amount collected rose by over 140.0% and then decreased by approximately 26.0% in FY2015. This was followed by a 43.7% decrease in FY2016, and then a 443.0% increase in FY2017. Table 1 provides the annual amounts collected from FY1985 through FY2019.

During the last decade, approximately $24March 31, 2024. Over the last two decades, more than $32 billion has been deposited into the CVF. Large criminal fines levied in cases of financial fraud and other white -collar crimes contributed to some of the sizeable growth of the Fund.19 during this time.22 Although OVC had expected deposits to remain high due to major fines levied against federal offenders (in particular, against corporate violators of federal law),2023 deposits into the Fund fluctuate from year to year and sometimes decrease, as they did in FY2016 and FY2018 relative to the previous fiscal year. Because of the large impact fines paid by offenders convicted for financial fraud and other white-collar crime have on deposits to the CVF, fluctuation in prosecutions of corporate violators may contribute to a fluctuation in depositsthey did from FY2015 to FY2016. Further, DOJ has identified the prosecution of violent offenders as a priority.21 While this does not mean that prosecutions against corporate offenders that pay substantial criminal fines will decline, if these prosecutions were to decline it may effect a further decline in the deposit amounts to the CVF.

to the CVF. Caps on the CVF

In the history of the CVF, two caps have affected the balance and distribution of the Fund: a cap on deposits and an obligation cap.

Cap on Deposits

In 1984, Congress placed a cap on how much could be deposited into the CVF each fiscal year. As shown inin Table 1, from FY1985 through FY1992, the annual cap on deposits ranged from $100 million to $150 million. In 1993, Congress lifted the cap on deposits, establishing that nearly all criminal fines, special assessments, and forfeited bail bonds couldmust be deposited into the CVF.

CVF (with certain exceptions).24 Obligation Cap

From FY1985 to FY1998, deposits collected each fiscal year were distributed the following fiscal year to support crime victim services. In 2000, Congress established an annual obligation cap on 21 Steve Derene, Crime Victims Fund Report: Past, Present, and Future, National Association of VOCA Assistance Administrators, March 2005, p. 3 (hereinafter Crime Victims Fund Report). 22 See Table 1 for receipts. For examples of these large criminal fines, see DOJ, Office of Public Affairs, “Attorney General Holder Announces Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force Executive Director,” press release, December 7, 2011, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-holder-announces-financial-fraud-enforcement-task-force-executive-director; and DOJ, Office of Public Affairs, “Volkswagen AG Agrees to Plead Guilty and Pay $4.3 Billion in Criminal and Civil Penalties and Six Volkswagen Executives and Employees Are Indicted in Connection with Conspiracy to Cheat U.S. Emissions Tests,” press release, January 11, 2017, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/volkswagen-ag-agrees-plead-guilty-and-pay-43-billion-criminal-and-civil-penalties-six. 23 DOJ, Office of Justice Programs (OJP), OVC, 2015 OVC Report to the Nation: Fiscal Years 2013-2014 (hereinafter, 2015 Report to the Nation), and 2013 OVC Report to the Nation: Fiscal Years 2011-2012. 24 Some federal criminal fines and penalty assessments are specifically directed toward other accounts and purposes. See 34 U.S.C. §20101(b). Congressional Research Service 3 link to page 9 link to page 22 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime year to support crime victim services. In 2000, Congress established an annual obligation cap on the amount of CVF funds available for distribution to reduce the effect of fluctuating deposits on grantees and ensure the stability of funds for related programs and activities. Congress establishes the CVF cap each year as a part of the appropriations for DOJ.

Recent Changes to the CVF Obligation Cap

and New Uses of Obligated Funds In FY2015, Congress set the CVF obligation cap at $2.3614 billion, a 216.9% increase over the FY2014 cap (see Table 1). Unlike subsequentprevious fiscal years, Congress did not direct DOJ to use any of the additional funding directed DOJ to use CVF funds for purposes other than those specified in VOCA, which was distributed to crime victims programs according to the formula established by VOCA.

. $10 million was designated for the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for oversight and auditing purposes.25 In FY2016, Congress further increased the obligation cap to $3.0420 billion; however, $379 million was transferred to the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) for purposes outside of VOCA and $10 million was again designated for the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for oversight and auditing purposes.2226 After deducting the transfers required by P.L. 114-113, the obligation cap was $2.6537 billion, a 12.4% increase over the FY2015 cap.

In FY2017, however, Congress set the cap at $2.5736 billion, a 15.4% decrease compared to the FY2016 cap. From this amount, $326 million was transferred to OVW (again for purposes outside of VOCA) and $10 million was again designated for the DOJ OIG for oversight and auditing purposes. In the accompanying explanatory statement for the Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017 (Division B, P.L. 115-31), Congress explained that deposits into the CVF had slowed, and to ensure solvency of the Fund the FY2017 obligation cap was calculated based on the most recent three-year average of deposits into the CVF. In the years since, Congress has continued to calculate the annual obligation cap in this manner.

From FY2018 to FY2020, Congress continued to transfer funds from the CVF to OVW and OIG. In addition, in FY2018 From FY2018 to FY2022, deposits to the CVF and the obligation cap continued to fluctuate, and Congress continued to transfer funds from the CVF to OVW and OIG. However, in FY2023 and FY2024 Congress again transferred $10 million to OIG but did not transfer funds to OVW. In addition, in FY2018, Congress set aside 3% of the cap (off the top before any other funds are allocated) for tribal victim assistance grants, which are also not authorized under VOCA. From FY2019 to FY2024, Congress set aside 5% of the obligation cap amount for these grants (see the “Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program” section). Carryover Balance of the CVF CVF and CHIMPs OVC is authorized to use the capped amount Federal spending can be divided into the budget for grant awards in a given fiscal year. After assistance grants. In FY2019 and FY2020, Congress set aside 5% of the cap for these grants.

Carryover Balance of the CVF

CVF and CHIMPs

Federal spending can be divided into the budget categories of discretionary spending, mandatory spending, and net interest. In certain circumstances, reductions in mandatory spending can generate offsets that allow higher levels of discretionary spending than would otherwise be permitted under congressional budget rules or under statutory caps on discretionary the yearly allocations are distributed, the reductions in mandatory spending can generate offsets remaining balance in the CVF is retained for that allow higher levels of discretionary spending than future obligation. The difference between the would otherwise be permitted under congressional fund’s balance (if there is one) and the budget rules or under statutory caps on discretionary obligation limit is scored as an offset (i.e., as a spending. CHIMPs are provisions in appropriations acts that reduce or constrain mandatory spending, and they can provide offsets to discretionary spending. The obligation limitation on the CVF has been the CHIMP item that has generated the largest offset of discretionary spending in recent years.23

Funding for a current fiscal year's grants is provided by the previous fiscal year's deposits to the CVF, and the OVC is authorized to use the capped amount for grant awards in a given fiscal year. After the yearly allocations are distributed, the remaining balance in the CVF is retained for future obligation. The difference between the fund's balance and the obligation limit is scored as an offset (i.e., as a Change in Mandatory Program or CHIMP) in DOJ's total discretionary spending in a given fiscal year.24 Moreover, that offset also affects Change in Mandatory Program or CHIMP) in can provide offsets to discretionary spending. Until the DOJ’s total discretionary spending in a given last several years, the CVF CHIMP item generated the fiscal year.28 Moreover, that offset also affects largest offset of discretionary spending.27 25 Congress did not specify beyond general OIG oversight and auditing purposes. 26 Congress did not specify beyond general OIG oversight and auditing purposes. 27 D. Andrew Austin, CRS Analyst in Economic Policy, contributed to this text box. 28 For the FY2020 DOJ Summary of Budget Authority by Appropriation, see https://www.justice.gov/doj/page/file/1246636/download. Congressional Research Service 4 link to page 9 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime the discretionary spending total in the annual Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies (CJS) appropriations act.25

VOCA law29 VOCA requires that all sums deposited in a fiscal year that are not obligated must remain in the CVF for obligation in future fiscal years.2630 If collections in a previous year exceed the obligation cap, amounts over the cap are credited to the CVF, also referred to as the "rainy day" fund, for future program benefits. For example, in FY2000 the obligation limit was set at $500 million despite the fact that deposits were over $985 million in FY1999. In FY2000, approximately $485 million remained in the CVF and was credited for future use.2731 Table 1 provides the balances that remain credited to the CVF at the end of each fiscal year from FY2000 through FY2019.

FY2023. Table 1. Crime Victims Fund (CVF): FY1985-FY2024 (dollars in millions) Amount Funds Made Carryover Fiscal Deposited to Enacted Cap on Obligation Cap Available for CVF Year CVF CVF Deposits on CVF Distributiona Balance 1985 $68.3 $100.0 — $68.3 — 1986 $62.5 $110.0 — $62.5 — 1987 $77.5 $110.0 — $77.5 — 1988 $93.6 $110.0 — $93.6 — 1989 $133.5 $125.0 — $124.2 — 1990 $146.2 $125.0 — $127.2 — 1991 $128.0 $150.0 — $128.0 — 1992 $221.6 $150.0 — $152.2 — 1993 $144.7 — — $144.7 — 1994 $185.1 — — $185.1 — 1995 $233.9 — — $233.9 — 1996 $528.9 — — $528.9 — 1997 $362.9 — — $362.9 — 1998 $324.0 — — $324.0 — 1999 $985.2 — — $500.0 — 2000 $777.0 — $500.0 $537.5 $485.2 2001 $544.4 — $537.5 $550.0 $785.2 2002 $519.5 — $550.0 $600.0 $792.0 2003 $361.3 — $600.0 $617.6b $718.9 2004 $833.7 — $621.3c $671.3d $422.1 2005 $668.3 — $620.0 $620.0 $1,307.4 2006 $641.8 — $625.0 $625.0 $1,333.5 29 While some may assume that the program that has its funding increased would be a DOJ program, this report does not assume this and recognizes that the program could also be from another agency or department aside from DOJ. 30 34 U.S.C. §20101(c). 31 Crime Victims Fund Report, p.16. Congressional Research Service 5 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Amount Funds Made Carryover Fiscal Deposited to Enacted Cap on Obligation Cap Available for CVF Year CVF CVF Deposits on CVF Distributiona Balance 2007 $1,018.0 — $625.0 $625.0 $1,784.0 2008 $896.3 — $590.0 $590.0 $2,084.0 2009 $1,745.7 — $635.0 $635.0 $3,146.5 2010 $2,362.3 — $705.0 $705.0 $4,801.5 2011 $1,998.0 — $705.0 $705.0 $6,099.7 2012 $2,795.5 — $705.0 $705.0e $8,186.1 2013 $1,489.6 — $730.0 $730.0e $9,004.0 2014 $3,591.0 — $745.0 $745.0e $11,842.0 2015 $2,640.0 — $2,361.0 $2,361.0e $12,130.0 2016 $1,486.4 — $3,042.0f $2,574.9g $9,093.0 2017 $6,583.9 — $2,573.0f $2,145.0g $13,082.0 2018 $444.8 — $4,436.0f $3,851.8g $9,171.0 2019 $524.0 — $3,353.0f $2,827.1g $6,448.0 2020 $503.0 — $2,641.0f $2,014.2g $4,422.0 2021 $774.0 — $2,015.0 $1,482.2g $3,193.0 2022 $822.0 — $2,600.0 $1,914.1g $1,499.0 2023 $1,386.0 — $1,900.0 $1,794.7g $1,019.0 2024 $662.0h — $1,353.0 NA NA Source: FY1985-FY2024 data were provided by the Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Communications. For FY2016-FY2023, CRS calculated the amounts made available for distribution by subtracting the management and administrative (M&A) costs and transfer amounts from the obligation cap amounts. Obligation cap amounts are taken from appropriations law. The FY2023 obligation cap amount was taken from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328). The FY2024 amount col ected into the CVF was taken from the Office for Victims of Crimes (OVC), “FY 2007 – FY 2024 Crime Victims Fund Annual Receipts (as of 3/31/2024),” bar graph, https://ovc.ojp.gov/about/crime-victims-fund/fy-2007-2024-cvf-annual-receipts.pdf. Notes: The Director of OVC is authorized to set aside $50 mil ionTable 1. Crime Victims Fund: FY1985-FY2020

(dollars in millions)

Fiscal
Year

Amount Collected to CVF

Enacted Cap on CVF Deposits

Obligation Cap on CVF

Funds Made Available for Distributiona

Carryover CVF Balance

1985

$68.3

$100

$68.3

1986

62.5

$110

62.5

1987

77.5

$110

77.5

1988

93.6

$110

93.6

1989

133.5

$125

124.2

1990

146.2

$125

127.2

1991

128.0

$150

128.0

1992

221.6

$150

152.2

1993

144.7

144.7

1994

185.1

185.1

1995

233.9

233.9

1996

528.9

528.9

1997

362.9

362.9

1998

324.0

324.0

1999

985.2

500.0

2000

777.0

500.0

537.5

485.2

2001

544.4

537.5

550.0

785.2

2002

519.5

550.0

600.0

792.0

2003

361.3

600.0

617.6b

718.9

2004

833.7

621.3c

671.3d

422.1

2005

668.3

620.0

620.0

1,307.4

2006

641.8

625.0

625.0

1,333.5

2007

1,018.0

625.0

625.0

1,784.0

2008

896.3

590.0

590.0

2,084.0

2009

1,745.7

635.0

635.0

3,146.5

2010

2,362.3

705.0

705.0

4,801.5

2011

1,998.0

705.0

705.0

6,099.7

2012

2,795.5

705.0

705.0e

8,186.1

2013

1,489.6

730.0

730.0e

9,004.0

2014

3,591.0

745.0

745.0e

11,842.0

2015

2,640.0

2,361.0

2,361.0e

12,130.0

2016

1,486.4

3,042.0f

2,653.0e,g

9,093.0

2017

6,583.9

2,573.0f

2,237.0

13,082.0

2018

444.8

4,436.0f

3,934.0

9,171.0

2019

524.0

3,353.0f

2,845.5

6,353.0

2020

2,641.0f

2,064.0

Source: FY1985-FY2019 data were provided by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs. Obligation cap amounts are taken from appropriations law. The FY2020 obligation cap amount was taken from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-93).

Notes: The Director of the OVC is authorized to set aside $50 million of CVF money in the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve to respond to the needs of victims of the 9/11September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and subsequentlysubsequently, to replenish any amounts expended so that not more than $50 millionmil ion is reserved in any fiscal year for any future victims of terrorism and/or mass violence. These funds do not fall under the annual cap of the CVF. Initial amounts set aside after 9/11 are reflected in footnotes b and d below, but amounts beyond those years are not provided in this table.

a. This column refers to funds administered by the OVC. From FY1985 to FY1998, deposits collectedcol ected in each fiscal year were distributed in the followingfol owing fiscal year to support crime victim services. From FY1985 to FY2002, the funds made available for distribution reflect the amounts distributed in the followingfol owing fiscal year.

b. b. FY2003 funds include $17.6 millionmil ion for the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve.

c. c. The original cap of $625.0 millionmil ion was reduced due to congressional rescission.

d. d. FY2004 funds include $50.0 millionmil ion for the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve.

e. Beginning in FY2012, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) assessed management and administrative (M&A)OJP assessed M&A costs for some programs funded by the CVF, but these amounts are not reflected here. See each individual program's respective table in this report. In FY2016, the total M&A cost assessment for VOCA programs (with the exception of the Children'OJP assesses M&A costs for all Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) programs except the Children’s Justice Act and victim compensation grant programs, which are not assessed this cost) was $78.1 million.

. f. From FY2016 to FY2020FY2022, Congress transferred funds from the obligation capped amount to the Office on Violence Against Women (OVW) and. From FY2016 to FY2024, Congress transferred funds from the obligation Congressional Research Service 6 link to page 11 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime capped amount to the DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG). Both amounts are reduced from the obligation capped amount before running the VOCA formula. The amount for OIG has been $10.0 million mil ion each year from FY2016-FY2020FY2015-FY2024, but the amount transferred for OVW has varied. In 2016, P.L. 114-113 transferred $379.0 millionmil ion to OVW, and from FY2017-FY2020 FY2022, P.L. 115-31 transferred $326.0 million, mil ion, P.L. 115-141 transferred $492.0 million, mil ion, P.L. 116-6 transferred $497.5 mil ion, 497.5 million, and P.L. 116-93 transferred $435.0 million, respectively.

g. The FY2016-FY2020P.L. 116-93 transferred $435.0 mil ion, P.L. 116-260 transferred $435.0 mil ion, and P.L. 117-103 transferred $575.0 mil ion, respectively. g. The FY2016-FY2023 distribution amounts reflect the deductions of the transfers to OVW and OIG highlighted in note f above.

as well as deductions for M&A costs described in the notes for Figure 1. h. This was the amount col ected in FY2024 as of March 31, 2024. VOCA-Authorized Distribution of the Crime Victims Fund

As previously discussed, the OVC awards CVF money through formula and discretionary grants to states, local units of government, individuals, and other entities. The OVC also awards CVF money to specially designated programs. Grants are allocated as required by VOCA (see Figure 1). The programs supported with funding from the CVF are discussed in more detail below.

Figure 1. Annual VOCA-Authorized Distribution of the Crime Victims Fund

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Source: Office for Victims of Crime (OVC), “, Crime Victims Fund, Figure 2, https://www.ovc.gov/pubs/crimevictimsfundfs/intro.html; and U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs.

Notes: This figure illustrates the annual distribution process as authorized under VOCA. From FY2018 to FY2020, Congress set aside 3%, 5%, and 5%, respectively, of the annual cap (off the top) for tribal assistance grants. Beginning in FY2012, OJP assessed management and administration (M&A) costs for programs funded by the CVF. OJP does not assess M&A costs for the Children'Crime Victims Fund,” https://ovc.ojp.gov/about/crime-victims-fund. Congressional Research Service 7 link to page 12 link to page 12 link to page 12 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Notes: This figure il ustrates the annual distribution process as authorized under the Victims of Crime Act (VOCA). This figure does not reflect allocations not authorized under VOCA. Beginning in FY2018, Congress set aside a percentage of the annual cap (off the top) for tribal assistance grants. Congress set aside 3% for tribal assistance grants in FY2018 and 5% each year after. Beginning in FY2012, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) assessed management and administrative (M&A) costs for programs funded by the Crime Victims Fund (CVF). OJP does not assess M&A costs for the Children’s Justice Act Program and state victim compensation grants. In FY2012, state victim assistance grants were assessed 11.6% in M&A costs and all other CVF-funded grants were assessed 8.1% in M&A costs. In FY2013, state victim assistance grants were assessed 9.9% in M&A costs and all other CVF-funded grants were assessed 7.4% in M&A costs. In FY2014, CVF grants were assessed a 7.9% M&A costs. In FY2015, CVF grants were assessed 2.7% ($59.96 millionmil ion) in M&A costs. OJP reduced the percentage for FY2015 due to the substantial increase in the obligation cap for that year, and has generally kept a similar percentage over the last several years. From FY2016 through FY2020FY2023, CVF grants were assessed $78.06 million, $92.01 million, $82.16 million, $80.90 million, and $81.77 million, mil ion, $92.0 mil ion, $82.2 mil ion, $80.9 mil ion, $81.8 mil ion, $87.8 mil ion, $100.9 mil ion, and $95.4 mil ion, respectively. a. As of FY2023, there were 224respectively.

a. As of FY2020, there were 192 Victim Witness Coordinators supported by the CVF.

b. As of FY2020FY2023, there were 186238 Victim Witness Specialists supported by the CVF.

Children's Justice Act Program

The OVC and the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) manage the Children's Justice Act Program, a grant program designed to improve the investigation, handling, and prosecution of child abuse cases. Up to $20 million must be distributed annually to the Children's Justice Act Program.2832 Of the designated funds, the ACF receives up to $17 million to manage this program for the states, while the OVC distributes up to $3 million for tribal populations.29 In FY202033 In FY2023, the ACF received $1715.2 million from the CVF to fund the Children's Justice Act Program. Table 2 provides funding data from FY2016 to FY2020.

FY2019 to FY2023.34 Table 2. Annual Allocation for Children's Justice Act Grants

(dollars in millions) (Administrative Agency in Parentheses) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 State Allocation (ACF) $15.7a $17.0 $17.0 $17.0 $15.2a Tribal Allocation (OVC) $3.0 $3.0 $3.0 $3.0 $3.0 Source: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Communications. Notes: ACF = Administration for Children and Families, OVC = Office for Victims of Crime. a. The Department of Health and Human Services had carryover funding from the previous fiscal year and did not need the ful allocation for this fiscal year. (dollars in millions)

Allocation Type (Administrative Agency in Parentheses)

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

FY2020

State Allocation (ACF)

$10.36a

$17.00

$15.97a

$15.74a

$17.00

Tribal Allocation (OVC)

3.00

2.95b

3.00

3.00

NA

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs.

Notes: As of the date of publication, the FY2020 tribal allocation amount was not yet determined.

a. HHS had carryover funding from the previous fiscal year, and did not need the full allocation for this fiscal year.

b. According to OVC, the awards did not cover the full $3 million in this year as applications came with lower cost proposals.

Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA)

The Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA) OVC provides annual funding to support victim-witness coordinators (sometimes referred to as specialists) within each of the 93 U.S. Attorney's Offices, and 12 victim-witness coordinators exclusively serving Indian Country.3035 In accordance with the Attorney General Guidelines for 32 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(2). 33 For more information regarding the Children’s Justice Act Program, see CRS Report R40899, The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA): Background, Programs, and Funding. 34 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. 35 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3). Congressional Research Service 8 link to page 13 link to page 11 link to page 13 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime In accordance with the Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance,3136 these personnel provide direct support for victims of federal crime by assisting victims inthem during criminal proceedings and advising them of their rights, such as their right to make oral and written victim impact statements at an offender's sentencing hearing. Table 3 provides the number of full-time employees supported with CVF funding and the amount of CVF funding that the EOUSA victim-witness coordinator program received from the OVC from FY2016 to FY2020.

FY2019 to FY2023. Table 3. Annual Allocation and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for EOUSA Victim Witness Coordinators (dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Allocation to EOUSA $26.0 $25.7 $28.1 $27.9 $31.5 Number of FTEs 193 192 192 192 224 Source: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Communications. Notes: EOUSA = Executive Office for U.S. AttorneysTable 3. Annual Allocation and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for EOUSA Victim Witness Coordinators

(dollars in millions)

 

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

FY2020

Allocation to EOUSA

$29.38

$19.86

$27.77

$26.00

$25.71

Number of FTEs

213

180

181

193

192

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs. Allocation figures reflect final enacted levels including reductions for management and administrative (M&A) costs. For more information on the M&A cost assessment for CVFCrime Victims Fund (CVF) programs, see the notes ofin Figure 1.

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

The OVC provides annual funding to support victim witness specialists within the 56 FBI field offices.3237 These specialists, or coordinators, personally assist victims of federal crime and provide information on criminal cases throughout case development and court proceedings.3338 Table 4 provides the amount of CVF funding that the FBI's Victim Witness Program received from the OVC from FY2016 to FY2020.

FY2019 to FY2023.39 Table 4. Annual Allocation and Full-Time Employees (FTEs) for FBI Victim Witness Specialists (dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Allocation to FBI $29.3 $34.0 $34.8 $34.8 $43.3 Number of FTEs 186 233 233 238 238 Source: Allocations and FTE numbers were provided by the Office of Justice Programs, Office of Communications. Notes: Allocation figures reflect final enacted levels including reductions for management and administrative (M&A) costs. For more information on the M&A cost assessment for Crime Victims Fund (CVF)Table 4. Annual Allocation and Full-Time Employees for FBI Victim Witness Specialists

(dollars in millions)

 

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

FY2020

Allocation to FBI

$17.29

$13.95

$28.11

$29.34

$34.00

Number of FTEs

192

203

227

186

206

Source: Allocations and FTE numbers were provided by U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs. Allocation figures reflect final enacted levels including reductions for M&A costs. For more information on the M&A cost assessment for CVF programs, see the notes offor Figure 1. 36 DOJ, Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance, 2022 Edition. 37 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3). 38 For more information on the FBI Victim Assistance Program, see DOJ, FBI Victim Services, 2018, https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-victim-services-brochure-2018.pdf/view. 39 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. Congressional Research Service 9 link to page 14 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime The Victim Notification System (VNS) OVC provides annual funding to support the VNS Figure 1.

The Victim Notification System

The OVC provides annual funding to support the Victim Notification System (VNS), a program administered by the EOUSA and jointly operated by the FBI, EOUSA, OVC, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.3440 VNS is the vehicle through which victims of federal crime35crime41 are notified of major case events relating to the offender, such as the release or detention status of the offender.3642 Table 5 provides the amount of CVF funding that the VNS received from the OVC from FY2016 to FY2020.

FY2019 to FY2023.43 Table 5. Annual Allocation for Victim Notification System (VNS) (dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Allocation to $4.9 $5.4 $6.0 $4.5 $7.0 EOUSA Source: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Communications. Notes: EOUSA = Executive Office of U.S. AttorneysTable 5. Annual Allocation for Victim Notification System

(dollars in millions)

 

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

FY2020

Allocation to EOUSA

$4.03

$7.45a

$5.23

$4.85

$5.44

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs. Allocation figures reflect final enacted levels including reductions for management and administrative (M&A)M&A costs. For more information on the M&A cost assessment for CVFCrime Victims Fund (CVF) programs, see the notes offor Figure 1. CRS asked OJP why the VNS received more than $5 mil ion in FY2020, FY2022, and FY2023. OJP stated that the primary drivers of increased costs are that (1) the number of agencies participating in the VNS has increased, which increases the costs of both personnel support and equipment/software required to meet the demands; and (2) the VNS architecture was redesigned and updated with the latest technologies and to comply with new statutory requirements for victim notification. Figure 1.

a. The FY2017 amount for the VNS included an extra $3.00 million allocated specifically to upgrade, enhance, and operate the VNS.

Victim Compensation and Assistance

After the Children's Justice Act, federal victim witness coordinators/specialists, and VNS programs are funded, remaining CVF money under the obligation cap is distributed as follows: Victim Compensation Formula Grants (47.5%); Victim Assistance Formula Grants (47.5%); and OVC Discretionary Grants (5%).3744 Amounts not used for state compensation grants are made available for state victim -assistance formula grants.

Victim Compensation Formula Grant Program

As mentioned, 47.5% of the remaining annual CVF money is for grant awards to state crime -victim compensation programs.3845 All 50 states, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, and Puerto Rico have victim compensation programs.39 The46 OVC awards each state 6075% of the total amount the state paid (from state funding sources) to victims in the prior fiscal year.40

47 40 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3). 41 Notifications may include whether the case is being referred to state or local authorities. 42 For more information on VNS, see https://www.notify.usdoj.gov/. 43 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. 44 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(4). 45 Ibid. 46 Territories and the District of Columbia are treated as states for grant eligibility and distribution purposes. See 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(4). The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa do not have victim compensation programs. 47 34 U.S.C. §20102(a). In 2021, P.L. 117-27 increased the federal grant calculation for funding to a state’s victim compensation formula grant from 60% to 75% of the amount the state paid (from state funding sources) to victims in the prior fiscal year. Congressional Research Service 10 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime According to VOCA, a state is eligible to receive a victim compensation formula grant if the state program meets the following requirements: (1) • offers compensation48 to victims and survivors of victims of criminal violence; • promotes victim cooperation with reasonable requests of law enforcement authorities, (2) authorities;49 • certifies that grants received will not be used to supplant state funds, (3) ensures that non-resident victims; • ensures that nonresident victims (as to compensable crimes occurring within the state) receive compensation awards onusing the same basiscriteria as victims residing within the state, (4) ; • ensures that compensation provided to victims of federal crimes is given on the same basis as the compensation given to victims of state crime, and (5) ; • provides compensation to residents of the state who are victims of crimes occurring outside the state.41

; • does not deny compensation to any victim because of the victim’s familial relationship to the offender or because the victim shares a residence with the offender;50 • does not compensate any individual who has previously been convicted of a federal offense, if that person is delinquent in paying a fine, other monetary penalty, or restitution imposed for the offense; • complies with VOCA nondiscrimination requirements; • provides a waiver51 for any application filing deadline for a crime victim if the delay in filing the application was a result of a delay in the testing of, or a delay in the DNA profile matching from, a sexual assault forensic examination kit or biological material collected as evidence related to a sexual offense; and • provides other information and assurances as the Director of OVC may reasonably require.52 Grant funds may be used to reimburse crime victims for out-of-pocket expenses such as medical and mental health counseling expenses, lost wages, funeral and burial costs, and other costs (except property loss, with limited exceptions)42 authorized in a state's compensation statute. Victims are reimbursed for crime-related expenses that are not covered by other resources, such as private insurance. From FY1999 to FY2016, medical and dental services accounted for close to half of the total payout in annual compensation expenses.43 In FY2017, 37.0%, or $136.67 48 34 U.S.C. §20102(b)(1). Compensation is used for (1) medical expenses attributable to a physical injury resulting from a compensable crime, including expenses for mental health counseling and care; (2) loss of wages attributable to a physical injury resulting from a compensable crime; and (3) funeral expenses attributable to a death resulting from a compensable crime. 49 34 U.S.C. §20102(b)(2). The program must promote victim cooperation with the reasonable requests of law enforcement “except if a program determines such cooperation may be impacted due to a victim’s age, physical condition, psychological state, cultural or linguistic barriers, or any other health or safety concern that jeopardizes the victim’s wellbeing.” 50 A program may do this if pursuant to rules issued by the program to prevent unjust enrichment of the offender. 51 Programs must begin doing this by March 15, 2025. 52 34 U.S.C. §20102(b). Under VOCA victim compensation grant guidelines, for residents victimized outside their own State, “[a] state must provide compensation to state residents who are victims of crimes occurring outside the state if the crimes would be compensable crimes had they occurred inside that state and the crimes (1) occurred in a state without an eligible VOCA crime victim compensation program, or (2) in cases of terrorism, occurred outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The state must make these awards according to the same criteria used to make awards to those who are victimized while in the state.” For nonresidents of a state, “the state, in making awards for compensable crimes occurring within the state, must make compensation awards to nonresidents of the state on the basis of the same criteria used to make awards to victims who are residents of the state.” See DOJ, “Victims of Crime Act Victim Compensation Program,” 66 Federal Register 27162, May 16, 2001. Congressional Research Service 11 link to page 16 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime (except property loss, with limited exceptions)53 authorized in a state’s compensation statute. Victims are reimbursed for crime-related expenses that are not covered by other resources, such as private insurance. In FY2021 and FY2022, 32%, or $228.9 million, of the total payments were for medical and dental expenses.4454 According to OVC data, assault victims generally represent the highest percentage of victims receiving compensation each year.45 Victims of assault represented 36.0% all claims paid46 during FY2017.

; however, in FY2021 and FY2022 child sexual abuse victims were the highest.55 In FY2021 and FY2022, victims of child sexual abuses represented 31% of all claims paid56 and victims of assault represented 26%.57 On February 5, 2024, OVC published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to propose changes and generally replace the existing Victim Compensation Guidelines published in 2001. While the proposed rule would retain most of the substance of the existing guidelines, it would also account for various statutory changes and clarify existing provisions.58 Table 6 provides the amount of CVF funding that was allocated to OVC's Victim Compensation Program from FY2015 to FY2019.

FY2019 to FY2023.59 Table 6. Annual Allocation for Victim Compensation Grant Program

(dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 (dollars in millions)

 

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

Allocation for Compensation $135.4 $133.9 $186.8 $177.8 $169.9 Grants Source: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Communications. Compensation Grants

$141.29

$164.42

$103.80

$178.84

$135.35

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs.

Notes: At the time of publication, the FY2020 allocation amount had not yet been determined.

Victim Assistance Formula Grant Program

Victim Assistance Formula Grant Program The other 47.5% of the remaining annual CVF money (seesee Figure 1) is for the Victim Assistance Formula Grants Program (Victim Assistance Program). Amounts not used for state compensation grants are made available for the Victim Assistance Formula Grants Program. This program Program. The Victim Assistance Program provides grants to state crime -victim assistance programs to administer funds for state- and community-based victim service program operations.4760 The grants support direct services to 53 The Final Guidelines for the VOCA Victim Compensation Grant Program clarify that states may not include property replacement or repair cost as compensable expenses, except for replacement or repair of locks and windows, and replacement of bedding and clothing held as evidence, in their annual certification of payments. See Section IV. B.2 (b) (ii) 4 & 5. 54 Medical and dental services do not include mental health services. OVC records these mental health costs in a separate category. For additional compensation data, as well as the number of victims served, by victim types and service categories, see DOJ, OJP, OVC, 2023 Report to the Nation, Exhibit 4, https://ovc.ojp.gov/2023-report-nation/exhibits. 55 OVC, Performance Reports and 2023 Report to the Nation. The 16 crimes for which grantees provided funding to claimants are assault, sexual assault, stalking, child sexual abuse, child pornography, homicide, child physical abuse/neglect, driving under the influence, other vehicular crimes, arson, burglary, fraud/financial crimes, robbery, human trafficking, kidnapping, and terrorism. See OVC, Victims of Crime Act Victim Compensation Formula Grant Program, Fiscal Year 2020 Data Analysis Report, p.11; and 2023 Report to the Nation, Exhibit 3. 56 Of the total applications paid that indicated that a victimization type was related to a crime. 57 OVC, 2023 Report to the Nation, Exhibit 3. 58 OVC, “Victims of Crime Act (VOCA) Victim Compensation Grant Program: A Proposed Rule by the Justice Programs Office,” 89 Federal Register 7639-7652, February 5, 2024. 59 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. 60 34 U.S.C. §20103(c). Congressional Research Service 12 link to page 17 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime The grants support direct services to crime victims including information and referral services, crisis counseling, temporary housing, criminal justice advocacy support, and other assistance needs.

Assistance grants are distributed by states according to guidelines established by VOCA.61 States are required to prioritize the following groups: (1) underserved populations of victims of violent crime,4862 (2) victims of child abuse, (3) victims of sexual assault, and (4) victims of spousal abuse.4963 States may not use federal funds to supplant state and local funds otherwise available for crime victim assistance.

VOCA establishes the amount of funds allocated to each state and territory. Each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico receive a base amount of $500,000 each year.5064 The territories of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and American Samoa receive a base amount of $200,000 each year.5165 The remaining funds are distributed to states and territories according to their respective share of the total population based on U.S. census datacensus population data. Table 7 provides the amount of CVF funding that the OVC allocated for the Victim Assistance Grant Program from FY2015 to FY2019.

FY2019 to FY2023.66 Table 7. Annual Allocation for Victim Assistance Grant Program

(dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 (dollars in millions)

 

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

Allocation for Assistance Grants $2,253.3 $1,668.3 $1,041.2 $1,434.3 $1,349.7 Source: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Communications. Notes:Assistance Grants

$1,958.83

$2,219.90

$1,1846.51

$3,328.06

$2,253.33

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs.

Notes: At the time of publication, the FY2020 allocation amount had not yet been determined. Allocation figures reflect final enacted levels including reductions for management and administrative (M&A)M&A costs. For more information on the M&A cost assessment for CVFCrime Victims Fund (CVF) programs, see the notes offor Figure 1.

According to the OVC, domestic or family violence victimizations made up the largest victimization type among those receiving services under the Victim Assistance Formula Grants Program in FY2017; 43.0% of the 5,088,858Program in FY2021 and FY2022; 23% of the victims served by these grants reported family or domestic violence victimization.5267 This percentage has remained relatively stable, although it has declined slightlydeclined since 2000, when 50.1% of all victims served by the victim assistance grants were victims of domestic or family violence.53

68 61 For the most recent rule implementing the Victim Assistance Program, see OVC, “Victims of Crime Act Victim Assistance Program,” 81 Federal Register 44515-44535, July 8, 2016. 62 States have flexibility in determining the populations of victims of violent crimes that are considered underserved in their respective states. 63 34 U.S.C. §20103(a). 64 34 U.S.C. §20103(a)(5)(A). 65 34 U.S.C. §20103(a)(5)(B). While the Republic of Palau is listed as an authorized recipient of victim assistance formula grant funds, this country does not receive victim assistance formula grant funds from OVC. For the history of Palau’s relationship with the United States, see CRS Report R46573, The Freely Associated States and Issues for Congress. 66 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. 67 OVC, 2023 Report to the Nation, Exhibit 5. Victim assistance organizations provided assistance to 31,388,852 individuals in FY2021 and FY2022. Victims served could report more than one type of victimization, and the total includes individuals that have been counted in multiple victimization types. 68 OVC, 2000 Victims of Crime Act Performance Report, State Assistance Program. For additional annual reports on the Victim Assistance Formula Grants Program, see https://ovc.ojp.gov/program/victims-crime-act-voca-administrators/performance-reports. Congressional Research Service 13 link to page 9 link to page 11 link to page 19 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime The Effect of the Fluctuating Obligation Cap on States’ Victim Assistance Funds Fluctuations in the annual CVF obligation cap affect the amount made available for the Victim Assistance Program more than any other VOCA program. As shown in Table 1, the CVF annual obligation cap has fluctuated considerably since Congress sharply increased the cap in FY2015. In FY2015, Congress set the obligation cap at $2.361 billion—more than triple the amount set in FY2014. Due to this increase, in FY2015 states received more than quadruple the victim assistance formula grant funds they received in FY2014. For example, in FY2014 Texas received $35.92 million in victim assistance formula grant funds, and in FY2015 it received $161.83 million. Since that initial sharp increase, the amount Texas has received in victim assistance funds has ranged from a high of $284.10 million in FY2018 to a low of $68.28 million in FY2024.69 To accommodate decreases in victim assistance formula funding, some states reduce funding for organizations that provide direct services to victims (and warn of consequences for victims of crime).70 Discretionary Grants Discretionary Grants

Five percent of the CVF money available annually (after the specially designated program allocations have been made; seesee Figure 1) is for discretionary grants.5471 According to VOCA, discretionary grants must be distributed for (1) demonstration projects, program evaluation, compliance efforts, and training and technical assistance services to crime victim assistance programs; (2) financial support of services to victims of federal crime; andor (3) nonprofit victim service organizations and coalitions to improve outreach and services to victims of crime.55 The OVC 72 Further, OVC may use discretionary grant funding to support the development and implementation of victim notification systems73 and crime victims legal assistance grants.74 OVC awards discretionary grants each year through a competitive application process.56

75 Table 8 provides the amount of CVF funding that the OVC allotted for discretionary grants from FY2016 to FY2020.

Table 8. Annual Allocation for Discretionary Grants

(dollars in millions)

 

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

FY2020

Allocation for Discretionary Grants

$126.56

$103.80

$178.84

$125.90

$94.85

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative AffairsFY2019 to FY2023.76 69 Data taken from OVC, Funding, https://ovc.ojp.gov/funding/formula-grant-allocations-archive and https://ovc.ojp.gov/funding/fy-2024-voca-compensation-allocation.pdf. 70 National Association of Attorneys General, RE: Support Bridge Funding for VOCA Fund, https://www.naag.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/VOCA-Funding-_-Finale.pdf. 71 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(4). 72 34 U.S.C. §20103(c). 73 34 U.S.C. §20108(a). These grants may be awarded to state, tribal, and local prosecutors’ offices, law enforcement agencies, courts, jails, and correctional institutions, and to qualified public or private entities provided that the jurisdiction has laws substantially equivalent to the crime victims’ rights provisions of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 237. In contrast to the federal VNS, which notifies victims of federal crime, state and local victim notification systems notify victims of state and local crime. 74 34 U.S.C. §20107(a). These grants may be awarded to state, tribal, and local prosecutors’ offices, law enforcement agencies, courts, jails, and correctional institutions, and to qualified public and private entities, to develop, establish, and maintain programs for the enforcement of crime victims’ rights. 75 For more information on discretionary programs, see https://ovc.ojp.gov/funding/types-of-funding/discretionary-grants. 76 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. Congressional Research Service 14 link to page 11 link to page 12 link to page 13 link to page 13 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Table 8. Annual Allocation for Discretionary Grants (dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 Allocation for Discretionary Grants $125.9 $94.9 $64.6 $84.9 $80.0 Source: Office of Justice Programs, Office of Communications. Allocation figures reflect final enacted levels including reductions for management and administrative (M&A)M&A costs. For more information on the M&A cost assessment for CVFCrime Victims Fund (CVF) programs, see the notes offor Figure 1.

Notes: The allocations reflect the funds allocated for discretionary grants, but not necessarily committed, to, discretionary grants. For example, in FY2016, $125.27 millionFY2022 $84.7 mil ion was committed for discretionary grants ($1.29 million 212,000 less than the annual allocation).

Survivors' Bill of Rights Act of 2016

The Survivors' Bill of Rights Act of 2016 (P.L. 114-236) established statutory rights for sexual assault survivors in the federal justice system.5777 The act requires CVF funds made available to U.S. Attorneys and the FBI (see "Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys (EOUSA)" and "” and “Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)")58”)78 for victim and witness assistance to be used to carry out the requirements of the act, subject to specified exceptions. Further, it authorizesauthorized OVC to make grants to states (using discretionary grant funds) to develop sexual assault survivors' rights and policies and to disseminate written notice of such rights and policies to medical centers, hospitals, forensic examiners, sexual assault service providers, law enforcement agencies, and other state entities.

Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve

The Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve was established under P.L. 104-132 to meet the immediate and long-term needs of victims of terrorism and mass violence.59 The79 OVC accomplishes this mission by providing supplemental grants to state and local jurisdictions (where an incident has occurred) for victim compensation and assistance and by providing direct compensation to victims (U.S. nationals or officers or employees of the U.S. government, including Foreign Service Nationals working for the U.S. government) of terrorist acts that occur abroad.

The Director of the OVC is authorized to set aside $50 million of CVF money in the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve to respond to the needs of victims of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and subsequently, to replenish any amounts expended so that not more than $50 million is reserved in any fiscal year for any future victims of terrorism.6080 After funding all other program 77 18 U.S.C. §3772. These rights include the right to (1) not be prevented from receiving a forensic medical examination and not be charged for an examination; (2) have a sexual assault evidence collection kit (i.e., a rape kit) preserved for 20 years or the maximum applicable statute of limitations, whichever is shorter; (3) be informed of any result, including a DNA profile match, toxicology report, or other information collected as part of a medical forensic examination, if such disclosure would not impede or compromise an ongoing investigation; (4) be informed of policies governing the collection and preservation of a rape kit and the status and location of a rape kit; (5) receive written notification prior to destruction or disposal of a rape kit; and (6) be informed of these rights and policies. 78 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3). 79 P.L. 104-132, Title II, Subtitle C. 80 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(5). The OVC also received a one-time $68.1 million appropriation in the FY2002 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-117, 115 Stat. 2294) to assist in its work of providing relief to 9/11 victims (USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 371). Congressional Research Service 15 link to page 20 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime After funding all other program areas, as listed above, the funds retained in the CVF may be used to replenish the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve.6181 This reserve fund supports the following programs:

  • Antiterrorism and Emergency Assistance Program (AEAP),
  • International Terrorism Victim Expense Reimbursement Program,
  • Crime Victim Emergency Assistance Fund at the FBI, and
  • Victim Reunification Program.

Table 9 provides the amounts of funding that OVC has committed from the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve from FY2015 to FY2019.

FY2018 to FY2023.82 Table 9. Funds Obligated from the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve

(dollars in millions) FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 (dollars in millions)

 

FY2015

FY2016

FY2017

FY2018

FY2019

Obligations for Programs Funded by the Antiterrorism Emergency $26.8 $25.5 $6.8 $19.4 $18.31 Reserve Source: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Office of Communications. Notes: Funds may be obligated to the fol owingby the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve

$8.01

$12.32

$36.57

$7.29

$26.79

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs.

Notes: Funds may be obligated to the following programs that are funded by the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve: the Antiterrorism and Emergency Assistance Program, International Terrorism Victim Expense Reimbursement Program, Crime Victim Emergency Assistance Fund at the FBI, and Victim Reunification Program. For grant award data, see U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, OJP, “OJP Award Data, ,” https://www.ojp.gov/funding/explore/ojp-award-data.

data. Assistance for Victims of Terrorism and Mass Violence

Over the past few years, the OVC has responded to several incidents of terrorism and/or mass violence in the United States with grants from the AEAP. Following incidents of terrorism or mass violence, jurisdictions62jurisdictions83 may apply for AEAP funds for crisis response, criminal justice support, crime victim compensation, and training and technical assistance expenses. In 20192024, for example, OVC awarded $16.73.49 million to the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services and $8.4 million to the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims BoardColorado Department of Public Safety to support victims of the November 19, 2022, mass shooting in Colorado Springs where a gunman killed 5 people and injured 32 others.84 Funding supported “counseling and other mental health-related services to victims and their families and other support for victims through the Colorado Springs Resiliency Center and the National Alliance on Mental Health (NAMI).”85 victims of the mass violence shooting at the Route 91 Harvest Festival in Las Vegas on October 1, 2017.63 A gunman killed 58 people and injured at least 622 others. Funding supported "supplemental crisis response and consequence management services to help victims continue to heal and cope with probable re-traumatization."64

Assistance for Victims of 9/11

Assistance for Victims of 9/11 In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the OVC used money available in the Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve account to respond to the needs of victims of the attack. . The OVC awarded $3.1 million in victim assistance funding and $13.5 million in victim compensation funding65 81 These funds do not fall under the annual cap of the CVF. 82 At the time of communication between CRS and OJP, FY2024 data were not yet available. 83 Eligible applicants include state victim assistance and victim compensation programs, U.S. Attorneys’ offices, victim service and nongovernmental organizations, and federal, state, and local governments. 84 OVC, OVC FY24 AEAP Club Q, https://ovc.ojp.gov/funding/awards/15povc-24-gg-00003-aerx. 85 Ibid. Congressional Research Service 16 link to page 11 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime compensation funding86 to the states of New York, Virginia, and Pennsylvania.87 to the states of New York, Virginia, and Pennsylvania.66 The funds were used by these states to coordinate and provide emergency assistance to victims in the form of crisis counseling and other direct services, and to offset out-of-pocket expenses for medical and mental health services, funeral costs, and lost wages.

In addition to providing funds to states, the OVC provided other assistance and services, including the following:

  • OVC staff worked to identify the short- and long-term needs of victims and related costs, as well as to coordinate its efforts with other federal agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
  • Immediately following the attacks, the OVC set up a call center that offered a 24- hour, toll-free telephone line for collecting victim information and providing referrals for financial, housing, and counseling assistance. Approximately 37,000 victims and family members received assistance and referrals through the call center.88 • center.67
  • The OVC also established a Victim and Family Travel Assistance Center, which handled all logistical arrangements and paid travel and lodging costs for 1,800 family members traveling to funerals and memorial services.68
  • The 89 • OVC designed and operated a special "Hope and Remembrance" website to provide victims with answers to frequently asked questions,; official messages from U.S. government sources,; and news releases, etc.69

.90 Child Pornography Victims Reserve

The Child Pornography Victims Reserve was established under the Amy, Vicky, and Andy Child Pornography Victim Assistance Act of 2018 (AVAA; P.L. 115-299).70).91 Among other changes, the act authorized a one-time $35,000 payment (adjusted for inflation) to victims of child pornography trafficking offenses. The Child Pornography Victims Reserve was established within the Crime Victims Fund to provide funding for these payments. Courts mustThe act requires courts to impose additional assessments on persons convicted of child pornography offenses,7192 and the additional assessments must be deposited into the Child Pornography Victims Reserve.

The Director of OVC may set aside up to $10 million of the amounts remaining in the CVF in any fiscal year (after distributing the amounts for VOCA programs listed in Figure 1) for in the Child Pornography Victims Reserve, which may be used by the Attorney General for payments under 18 U.S.C. Section §2259(d). Amounts in the reserve may be carried over from fiscal year to fiscal year, but the total amount of the reserve shall not exceed $10 million.72 As of February 29, 2020, $52,075 had been collected into the reserve fund, and no receipts had been used yet on OVC programs.73

Selected Issues

Congress may confront several issues when considering the balance of the CVF, the annual obligation cap on the CVF, and possible amendments to VOCA. These issues include using the CVF for purposes other than those explicitly authorized by VOCA, the solvency of the Fund, eliminating the annual obligation cap, and amending VOCA to accommodate new programs or to adjust the allocation formula. Congress may also consider the purposes for which certain pools of victim services monies can be used.

Issues in Considering the Balance of the Fund

Because the CVF balance remains larger than the amount distributed to victims each year, there are several issues Congress may consider, and in some cases already has considered, regarding the balance of the Fund. One is whether to use receipts from the CVF to fund grant programs that are not authorized by VOCA. In the past, Congress has passed legislation that made CVF money available to support programs authorized outside of VOCA.74 For example, the National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110-181) included a provision mandating that the Attorney General transfer from the emergency reserve of the CVF "such funds as may be required" to cover the costs of special masters appointed by U.S. district courts in civil cases brought against state sponsors of terrorism. Until FY2016, CVF money had not been used to fund grant programs outside of those authorized by VOCA; however, in the FY2016 through FY2020 CJS appropriations acts,75 CVF funds were transferred to OVW to be used for specified grant programs authorized under the Violence Against Women Act.76

While it could be argued that funds for the non-VOCA grant programs described above still support crime victims, it raises a question about whether these actions might pave the way for the CVF to be used to support grant programs that are not victim-focused. On the other hand, the CVF has a balance of more than $6 billion, which indicates that receipts to the Fund, for certain years, exceed the congressionally specified cap and that the extra funds could be used for other justice system needs. However, as mentioned, Congress already substantially increased the cap in FY2015 and more or less sustained the increased level since then (see Table 1). In addition, deposits into the Fund have decreased over the last two years. In a time of fiscal constraint, the CVF might provide an avenue to fund some DOJ grant programs while reducing DOJ's discretionary appropriation (i.e., grants funded through transfers from the CVF do not have to be funded through discretionary appropriations); however, as shown by the drop in CVF deposits over the last couple of years, there is no guarantee that receipts going into the CVF would be able to sustain a higher obligation cap. Therefore, if Congress were to increase the cap and continue or expand funding from the CVF for non-VOCA programs, it may not be possible to ensure that there will be a consistent level of funding to support these programs in future fiscal years.

Congress may also decide to rescind funds from the balance of the CVF, as it did in November 2015 through the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (P.L. 114-74). This law required the permanent cancellation of $1.5 billion from the balance of the CVF.77 This cancellation did not carry any specification as to any redirection for the funds, but rather was treated as a general offset. This action did not impact, at least not directly, the annual obligation cap on the CVF.

Congress could decide to eliminate the cap on the Crime Victims Fund altogether. If Congress should decide to eliminate the cap and allow all collected funds to be distributed in a given fiscal year, it could possibly have significant consequences for DOJ's budget. As mentioned, the difference between the obligation cap and the balance on the CVF is treated as a CHIMP and is scored as a credit against DOJs discretionary appropriations. Therefore, if Congress were to eliminate the cap, it would no longer have the CHIMP to offset some discretionary appropriations and this might result in Congress having to reduce discretionary funding for some DOJ programs (assuming that Congress did not increase the discretionary spending limit for CJS to offset eliminating the CHIMP). Moreover, Congress may consider whether VOCA programs would be able to use all the money in the fund if the obligation cap were eliminated.

Deposits into the Fund

Some victim advocates have expressed concern that funds collected from deferred and non-prosecution agreements between DOJ and defendants are not being deposited into the CVF, resulting in fewer deposits into the Fund.78 While criminal fines are deposited into the CVF, penalty assessments collected as part of a deferred or non-prosecution agreement between DOJ and defendants are not deposited into the CVF. For example, in December 2019 HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) SA (HSBC Switzerland) admitted to helping U.S. taxpayers conceal income and assets from the United States, and agreed to pay $192.4 million as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with DOJ. The $192.4 million penalty had three parts. First, $60.6 million was for restitution to the Internal Revenue Service, which represented the unpaid taxes resulting from HSBC Switzerland's participation in the conspiracy. Second, HSBC Switzerland forfeited $71.9 million to the United States, which represented gross fees (not profits) that the bank earned on its undeclared accounts between 2000 and 2010. Finally, HSBC Switzerland agreed to pay a penalty of $59.9 million.79 None of these funds went to the CVF. If DOJ had instead sought a criminal conviction involving the collection of criminal fines, those funds would have been deposited into the CVF.

According to DOJ, "in certain instances, it may be appropriate to resolve a corporate criminal case by means other than indictment. Non-prosecution and deferred prosecution agreements, for example, occupy an important middle ground between declining prosecution and obtaining the conviction of a corporation."80 It is unclear if DOJ has increased use of deferred and non-prosecution agreements in recent years. If Congress prefers that assessments collected as a result of deferred and non-prosecution agreements be deposited into the CVF, then it may amend VOCA to require this action.

Issues in Considering Amendments to VOCA

While VOCA may be amended in many possible ways, this report presents two options (beyond what has been discussed thus far) that Congress may choose to consider. Congress may decide to reassess the allocation formula of the CVF (see Figure 1) or consider adding new programs to be supported through the CVF.

VOCA Assistance Administrators have voiced concern that fluctuations in annual obligations can directly affect fund availability for victim assistance formula grants and, to a lesser extent, discretionary grants. The addition of new programs, increases in funding to other programs funded by the CVF, and new management and administration costs cause a reduction in funding available for victim assistance formula grants and discretionary grants. Congress may choose to review the allocation formula to determine if changes should be made to reduce the effect of fluctuations in obligated funds on these grants.

Since 1984, VOCA has been amended several times to support additional victim-related activities and accommodate the needs of specific groups of victims, such as child abuse victims and victims of terrorist acts. Congress may choose to continue amending VOCA to further accommodate the needs of additional special populations, such as victims of elder abuse and rural victims. While support for victims of elder abuse is an allowable use of the Fund, as the "baby boom" generation ages, it is possible that elder abuse will continue to grow as a social concern.81 For example, Congress may wish to consider expanding allowable uses of compensation funds to include property loss compensation for elder victims of financial fraud. Currently, VOCA funds may not be used to compensate for property loss (with limited exceptions). Similarly, victims in rural areas are supported through VOCA programs, but they face unique barriers to assistance such as lack of qualified service professionals and higher costs and limited availability of transportation to obtain services.82 Other populations with unique risks and needs may present themselves, and Congress may choose to use VOCA as one potential vehicle to address those risks and needs.

Author Contact Information

Lisa N. Sacco, Analyst in Illicit Drugs and Crime Policy ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])

Footnotes

1.

P.L. 98-473, Title II, Chapter XIV, Victims of Crime Act of 1984, October 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2170. VOCA is codified at 34 U.S.C. §20101 et seq.

2.

P.L. 109-162, Title XI, Subtitle B, §1132, January 5, 2006, 119 Stat. 3107.

3.

P.L. 107-77, Title I, §111, November 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 765.

4.

P.L. 106-553, §1(a)(2), Title I, §113, December 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2762, 2762A-68; P.L. 106-554, §1(a)(4), Division A, §213(a)(2), December 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-179; and P.L. 106-113, Division B, §1000(a)(1) [H.R. 3421, Title I, §119], November 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A-22.

5.

P.L. 106-177, Title I, §104(a), Child Abuse Prevention and Enforcement Act, March 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 36.

6.

P.L. 104-132, Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Title II, Subtitle C; P.L. 107-56, USA PATRIOT Act, Title VI, §621(a) to (d).

7.

P.L. 114-236

8.

P.L. 115-299.

9.

P.L. 100-690, Title VII, Subtitle D.

10.

Grants are distributed according to a formula established by VOCA.

11.

For more information on OVC and its mission, see https://www.ojp.gov/about/offices/office-victims-crime-ovc.

12.

For information on OVC grant allocations, see http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/grants/index.html.

13.

P.L. 104-132, Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act of 1996, April 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1243; P.L. 106-386, Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, October 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1543; and P.L. 107-56, USA PATRIOT Act, Title VI, §621(a) to (d), October 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 370.

14.

Victims who are eligible for assistance include nationals of the United States and employees of the U.S. government.

15.

In January 2002, Congress enacted a one-time appropriation of $68.1 million for the Crime Victims Fund to assist in providing relief to 9/11 victims (P.L. 107-117, 115 Stat. 2294).

16.

See 34 U.S.C. §20101.

17.

CRS communications with U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs, in March 2020. Also, see Office for Victims of Crime, 2011 OVC Report to the Nation, p. 2.

18.

Steve Derene, Crime Victims Fund Report: Past, Present, and Future, National Association of VOCA Assistance Administrators, March 2005, p. 3, (hereinafter Crime Victims Fund Report).

19.

See Table 1 for receipts. For examples of these large criminal fines, see U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, Attorney General Holder Announces Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force Executive Director, December 7, 2011, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-holder-announces-financial-fraud-enforcement-task-force-executive-director; and U.S. Department of Justice, U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Michigan, Volkswagen AG Agrees to Plead Guilty and Pay $4.3 Billion in Criminal and Civil Penalties and Six Volkswagen Executives and Employees Are Indicted in Connection with Conspiracy to Cheat U.S. Emissions Tests, January 11, 2017.

20.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, 2015 OVC Report to the Nation: Fiscal Years 2013-2014 (hereinafter, 2015 Report to the Nation); and 2013 OVC Report to the Nation: Fiscal Years 2011-2012, The Crime Victims Fund.

21.

Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Memorandum for all Federal Prosecutors: Commitment to Targeting Violent Crime, March 8, 2017, https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/946771/download.

22.

Congress did not specify beyond general OIG oversight and auditing purposes.

23.

D. Andrew Austin, CRS Analyst in Economic Policy, contributed this text box.

24.

For the FY2020 DOJ Summary of Budget Authority by Appropriation, see https://www.justice.gov/doj/page/file/1246636/download.

25.

While some may assume that the program that has its funding increased would be a DOJ program, this report does not assume this and recognizes that the program could also be from another agency or department aside from DOJ.

26.

34 U.S.C. §20101(c); U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, 2009 OVC Report to the Nation, p. 11.

27.

Crime Victims Fund Report, p.16.

28.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(2).

29.

For more information regarding the Children's Justice Act Program, see CRS Report R40899, The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA): Background, Programs, and Funding.

30.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3).

31.

U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Guidelines for Victim and Witness Assistance, http://www.justice.gov/olp/pdf/ag_guidelines2012.pdf.

32.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3).

33.

For more information on the FBI Victim Assistance Program, see https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/fbi-victim-assistance-program.pdf.

34.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3).

35.

Notifications may include whether the case is being referred to state or local authorities.

36.

For more information on VNS, see https://www.notify.usdoj.gov/.

37.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(4).

38.

Ibid.

39.

Territories and the District of Columbia are treated as states for grant eligibility and distribution purposes. See 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(4). The Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa do not have victim compensation programs.

40.

34 U.S.C. §20101(a).

41.

34 U.S.C. §20101(b). Under VOCA victim compensation grant guidelines, for residents victimized outside their own state "[a] state must provide compensation to state residents who are victims of crimes occurring outside the state if the crimes would be compensable crimes had they occurred inside that state and the crimes (1) occurred in a state without an eligible VOCA crime victim compensation program, or (2) in cases of terrorism, occurred outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The state must make these awards according to the same criteria used to make awards to those who are victimized while in the state." For nonresidents of a state, "the state, in making awards for compensable crimes occurring within the state, must make compensation awards to nonresidents of the state on the basis of the same criteria used to make awards to victims who are residents of the state." See U.S. Department of Justice, "Victims of Crime Act Victim Compensation Program," 66 Federal Register 27162, May 16, 2001.

42.

The Final Guidelines for the VOCA Victim Compensation Grant Program clarify that states may not include property replacement or repair cost as compensable expenses, except for replacement or repair of locks and windows, and replacement of bedding and clothing held as evidence, in their annual certification of payments. See Section IV. B.2 (b) (ii) 4 & 5.

43.

Medical and dental services do not include mental health services. OVC records these mental health costs in a separate category. For additional compensation data, as well as the number of victims served, by victim types and service categories, see U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, VOCA Nationwide Performance Reports, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/grants/vocareps.html.

44.

Office for Victims of Crime, Victims of Crime Act Victim Compensation Formula Grant Program, Fiscal Year 2017 Data Analysis Report, https://www.ovc.gov/grants/vocanpr_vc17_508.pdf (hereinafter, VOCA Victim Compensation Program, FY2017).

45.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, VOCA Nationwide Performance Reports, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/grants/vocareps.html. The 16 crimes for which grantees provided funding to claimants are assault, sexual assault, stalking, child sexual abuse, child pornography, homicide, child physical abuse/neglect, driving under the influence, other vehicular crimes, arson, burglary, fraud/financial crimes, robbery, human trafficking, kidnapping, and terrorism. See VOCA Victim Compensation Program, FY2017, p.11.

46.

Of the total applications paid that indicated that a victimization type was related to a crime.

47.

34 U.S.C. §20103(c).

48.

States have flexibility in determining the populations of victims of violent crimes that may be underserved in their respective states.

49.

34 U.S.C. §20103(a).

50.

34 U.S.C. §20103(a)(5)(A).

51.

34 U.S.C. §20103(a)(5)(B).

52.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, 2017 Victims of Crime Act Performance Report, State Assistance Program, https://www.ovc.gov/grants/vocanpr_va17.pdf. Victims served could report more than one type of victimization. Of the more than 5 million victims, 1,111,304 reported multiple victimization types.

53.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, 2000 Victims of Crime Act Performance Report, State Assistance Program, http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/grants/vocanpr_va00.html. For additional annual reports on the Victim Assistance Formula Grants Program, see http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/grants/vocareps.html.

54.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(4).

55.

34 U.S.C. §20103(c).

56.

For more information on discretionary programs, see http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/ovc/grants/types.html#discretionarygrants.

57.

18 U.S.C. §3772. These rights include (1) not being prevented from receiving a forensic medical examination and not being charged for an examination; (2) having a sexual assault evidence collection kit (i.e., a rape kit) preserved for 20 years or the maximum applicable statute of limitations, whichever is shorter; (3) receiving written notification prior to destruction or disposal of a rape kit; and (4) being informed of these rights and policies.

58.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(3).

59.

P.L. 104-132, Title II, Subtitle C.

60.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(5). The OVC also received a one-time $68.1 million appropriation in the FY2002 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-117, 115 Stat. 2294) to assist in its work of providing relief to 9/11 victims (USA PATRIOT Act, P.L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 371).

61.

These funds do not fall under the annual cap of the CVF.

62.

Eligible applicants include state victim assistance and victim compensation programs, U.S. Attorneys' offices, victim service and nongovernmental organizations, and federal, state, and local governments.

63.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Detailed information for award 2019-V7-GX-0001 and Detailed information for award 2019-V7-GX-0002.

64.

Ibid.

65.

Emergency funds were disbursed under the authority of the 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States (P.L. 107-38). The Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve was later reimbursed under the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-117).

66.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office for Victims of Crime, Meeting the Needs of the Victims of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks: Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2002, Report to Congress, April 2003, p. 4, https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/911victimsreptocongress03/meetingneedssept11.pdf.

67.

Ibid, p. 5.

68.

Ibid, p. 5.

69.

Ibid, p. 5.

70.

The Child Pornography Victims Reserve was established under Section 1402(d)(6) of VOCA (34 U.S.C. 20101(d)).

71.

These offenses include conduct proscribed by 18 U.S.C. Sections 2251(d), 2252, 2252A(a)(1) through (5), 2252A(g)(in cases in which the series of felony violations exclusively involves violations of Sections 2251(d), 2252, 2252A(a)(1) through (5), or 2260(b)), or 2260(b).

72.

34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(6).

73.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legislative Affairs.

74.

For expenditure guidelines, see 34 U.S.C. §20101(d).

75.

See table note f in Table 1.

76.

For more information on grant programs authorized under the Violence Against Women Act, see CRS Report R45410, The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA): Historical Overview, Funding, and Reauthorization.

77.

For guidance on rescission and cancellation of funds, see Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Circular No. A-11: Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget, July 2016, Section 20.

78.

David Dayen, "The Forgotten Victims," The New Republic, November 17, 2016.

79.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, Justice Department Announces Deferred Prosecution Agreement with HSBC Private Bank (Suisse) SA, December 10, 2019, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-deferred-prosecution-agreement-hsbc-private-bank-suisse-sa.

80.

U.S. Department of Justice, Justice Manual, 9-28.200 - General Considerations of Corporate Liability, 2015.

81.

Martin J. Gorbien and Amy R. Eisenstein, "Elder Abuse and Neglect: An Overview," Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, vol. 2 (May 21, 2005); and Karl Pillemer, Marie-Therese Connolly, and Risa Breckman et al., "Elder Mistreatment: Priorities for Consideration by the White House Conference on Aging," The Gerontologist, vol. 55, no. 2 (February 18, 2015), pp. 320-327.

82.

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office for Victims of Crime, Vision 21, Transforming Victim Services: Final Report, May 2013, p. 27, https://ovc.ncjrs.gov/vision21/pdfs/Vision21_Report.pdf.

86 Emergency funds were disbursed under the authority of the 2001 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Recovery from and Response to Terrorist Attacks on the United States (P.L. 107-38). The Antiterrorism Emergency Reserve was later reimbursed under the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-117). 87 OVC, Meeting the Needs of the Victims of the September 11th Terrorist Attacks: Department of Defense Appropriations Act of 2002, Report to Congress, April 2003, p. 4, https://www.ncjrs.gov/ovc_archives/reports/911victimsreptocongress03/meetingneedssept11.pdf. 88 Ibid, p. 5. 89 Ibid, p. 5. 90 Ibid, p. 5. 91 The Child Pornography Victims Reserve was established under section 1402(d)(6) of VOCA (34 U.S.C. §20101(d)). 92 These offenses include conduct proscribed by 18 U.S.C. §§2251(d), 2252, 2252A(a)(1) through (5), 2252A(g)(in cases in which the series of felony violations exclusively involves violations of §§2251(d), 2252, 2252A(a)(1) through (5), or 2260(b)), or 2260(b). Congressional Research Service 17 link to page 23 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime but the total amount of the reserve shall not exceed $10 million.93 From FY2020–FY2023, approximately $2 million has been collected from AVAA assessments, but none of these funds have been used.94 Distribution of Crime Victim Fund Not Authorized by VOCA In FY2015, Congress began to distribute CVF money for non-VOCA purposes through the annual appropriations process. • From FY2015 through FY2024, Congress designated $10 million of CVF funds for the DOJ OIG for oversight and auditing purposes. • From FY2016 through FY2022, Congress directed the transfer of CVF funds to OVW for grant programs authorized under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).95 • In FY2018, Congress set aside 3% of the amount made available for obligation for tribal victim assistance grants. From FY2019 to FY2024, Congress set aside 5% for this purpose. Unlike the funds transferred to the DOJ OIG and OVW, the funds for tribal victim assistance grants—known as the Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program—are administered by OVC. Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program During the first two years of the Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program (FY2018 and FY2019) OVC distributed the funds as competitive grant awards with a 36-month project period to all eligible applicants. Eligible applicants included federally recognized Indian tribal governments, legal entities acting as the authorized designees of federally recognized Indian tribes, and tribal consortia made up of two or more federally recognized Indian tribes. Beginning in FY2020 and each year since, OVC distributed these funds according to a population-based formula. Eligible applicants are required to submit a declaration, referred to as a Population Certificate, noting the size of the population to be served with the funds. Recipients may use these funds for victim services and choose an award period between 12 and 60 months.96 Table 10 provides the amounts of funding Congress allocated for the Tribal Assistance Grants from FY2020 to FY2024. 93 34 U.S.C. §20101(d)(6). 94 OJP, Office of Communications. According to OJP, OVC is working with DOJ leadership to help with implementation of required elements of the AVAA that will lead to and help support applications for and the processing and payment of claims. 95 For more information on grant programs authorized under the Violence Against Women Act, see CRS Report R45410, The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA): Historical Overview, Funding, and Reauthorization. 96 For more information about this program, see OVC, Report on the OVC Fiscal Year 2023 Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program, https://ovc.ojp.gov/program/tribal/tribal-victim-services-set-aside/fy-2023-report.pdf. Congressional Research Service 18 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime Table 10. Annual Allocation for Tribal Assistance Grants (dollars in millions) FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2024 Allocation for Tribal Assistance $132.1 $100.8 $130.0 $95.0 $67.7 Grants Source: Percentage calculated by CRS using the annual Crime Victims Fund (CVF) obligation cap data. Selected Issues for Congress Congress may consider several issues given the declining balance of the CVF since 2017 and its effect on funds available for VOCA programs from year to year as well as other considerations involving VOCA programs. These issues include (1) funding activities not authorized by VOCA, (2) eliminating or adjusting the calculation of the obligation cap, (3) eliminating the CVF and switching to discretionary appropriations, and (4) sources of revenue for the CVF. Funding Activities Not Authorized by VOCA VOCA Assistance Administrators have voiced concern that fluctuations in annual obligations can directly affect fund availability for victim assistance formula grants and, to a lesser extent, discretionary grants. The addition of new programs, increases in funding to other programs funded by the CVF, and management and administrative (M&A) costs cause a reduction in funding available for victim assistance formula grants and discretionary grants. Congress may consider whether to continue to use receipts from the CVF to fund activities that are not authorized by VOCA. Congress did not elect to fund VAWA programs with CVF funds in FY2023 and FY2024, but it continues to use the CVF for OIG auditing purposes. Congress also continues to use the CVF to fund victim assistance programs for tribes by allocating 5% of the initial obligation cap amount for the Crime Victims Fund Tribal Set-Aside Program. Congress might consider adjusting amounts for non-VOCA purposes, considering the declining balance of the CVF. Alternatively, Congress could amend VOCA to create permanent authorizations for these purposes. Further, Congress could appropriate funds to cover OVC’s M&A costs instead of having these costs covered with funds from the CVF. Eliminating or Adjusting the Calculation of the Obligation Cap Congress could decide to eliminate or adjust the calculation of the CVF annual obligation cap. If Congress should decide to eliminate the cap and allow all collected funds to be distributed in a given fiscal year, the fiscal issues for states that are caused by fluctuating amounts in victim assistance funds would likely continue and possibly be made more severe. Congress may also alter the way it determines the annual obligation cap on the CVF, and there are any number of ways that Congress may adjust its calculations. Congress is limited by the balance of the CVF, and may only set an obligation cap that is equal to or below the balance of the Fund. Eliminating the CVF Given that changes in the CVF balance and obligation cap cause fluctuations in victim assistance funds available for states, territories, and tribes, Congress might consider eliminating the Fund Congressional Research Service 19 The Crime Victims Fund: Federal Support for Victims of Crime altogether. Instead, Congress could authorize and appropriate annual funds from the Treasury for VOCA programs to provide more consistent funding each year. Revenue for the Fund In 2021, Congress and President Biden enacted P.L. 117-27, which requires monetary penalties from federal deferred prosecution and nonprosecution agreements to be deposited in the CVF. While the CVF has received this new revenue since July 2021, the declining balance of the CVF since 2017 and the ability to sustain stable funding for VOCA programs remain issues for Congress. Congress might consider further increasing revenue for the CVF by increasing federal criminal fines. Some federal criminal fines have not been adjusted in decades, and Congress could increase the fine amounts to adjust for inflation and possibly provide more funding for the CVF. For example, in 1982 Congress and President Reagan increased the maximum criminal fine for attempting to evade or defeat taxes from $10,000 to $100,000 for individuals and established a $500,000 maximum criminal fine for corporations.97 Author Information Lisa N. Sacco Analyst in Illicit Drugs and Crime Policy Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 97 See P.L. 97-248 and 26 U.S.C. §7201. Congressional Research Service R42672 · VERSION 21 · UPDATED 20