This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 prohibits the employment of "oppressive child labor" in the United States, which the act defines—with some exceptions—as the employment of youth under the age of 16 in any occupation or the employment of youth under 18 years old in hazardous occupations. The act includes several exemptions, however, that create a complex set of thresholds that depend on the child's age, local school hours, the nature of the work (e.g., occupation, industry, and work environment), parental involvement in the child's employment, and other factors. Notably, exemptions to the act's child labor provisions create separate rules governing children's employment in agriculture and in non-agricultural work.
For non-exempt children, the minimum age for employment in non-agricultural occupations is
With some exceptions, the minimum age for employment in agricultural occupations is
Not all work performed by underage children is unlawful under the act. The FLSA provisions prohibit (1) the employment of oppressive child labor for children covered by the act, and (2) the interstate shipment of goods produced in an establishment in or about which oppressive child labor is employed. But not all work performed by underage children is unlawful under the act.
The FLSA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to conduct workplace inspections and investigations to determine if oppressive child labor is present and enforce the child labor provisions. The Secretary may assess civil money penalties to employers who violate the provisions or pursue action in federal courts.
Employers
In 2026, employers who violate the FLSA child labor provisions may be assessed a civil penalty of
Since FY2007, the Department of Labor (DOL) has concluded more than 9,700 cases in which employers violated FLSA child labor provisions.
U.S. district courts have jurisdiction to enjoin violations of the FLSA's child labor provisions. Criminal penalties are also prescribed for willful violations of the FLSA's child labor provisions. Any person who willfully violates these provisions will, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.
Since the enactment of the FLSA, various courts have resolved cases involving the meaning and operation of the law's child labor provisions. Early cases focused on the movement of goods produced by minors and whether an employer's activities were restricted by the provisions. More recent cases have examined the direct employment of minors in oppressive child labor. Although there do not appear to be a substantial number of recent reported cases, DOL continues to pursue enforcement of the child labor provisions through litigation, as evidenced by court filings in 2015.
This report describes the FLSA child labor provisions, accompanying DOL regulations, and their administration. Taken together, these constitute what is commonly known as "federal child labor law." In addition, all states have child labor laws, compulsory schooling requirements, and other laws that govern children's employment and activities. No state law may weaken the worker protections provided by the FLSA. However, state laws that impose greater worker protections will supersede those provided by the FLSA. Such state protections are not discussed in this report.
The
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938 defines and prohibits the employment of "oppressive child labor" in the United States.1 The act establishes a general minimum age of 16 years for employment in non-hazardous occupations and a minimum age of 18 years for employment in any occupation determined by the Secretary of Labor to be hazardous to the health or well-being of minors. However, children younger than 16 may work if certain conditions are met, and rules for agricultural and nonagricultural employment vary significantly.
Not all oppressive child labor is unlawful under the FLSA. The act's child labor provisions do not apply, for example, to child entrepreneurs and children who volunteer their time for charitable organizations.2 Certain occupations (e.g., newspaper delivery) are entirely excluded from coverage. Children who in no way participate, support, or work for enterprises that engage in interstate commercial activities nor work in proximity to establishments that ship goods across state lines are also not covered.
This report is a guide to the FLSA child labor provisions, accompanying Department of Labor (DOL) regulations, and their administration. Taken together, these constitute what is commonly known as "federal child labor law." In addition, all states have child labor laws, compulsory schooling requirements, and other laws that govern children's employment and activities. No state law may weaken the worker protections provided by the FLSA.3 However, state laws that impose greater worker protections will supersede those provided by the FLSA. Such state protections are not discussed in this report.2
The FLSA includes four child labor provisions, two of which address the employment of oppressive child labor, which the act defines—with some exceptions—as the employment of youth under the age of 16 in any occupation or the employment of youth under 18 years in hazardous occupations.34 These provisions—at Section 12(c) and Section 12(a) of the act—create a direct and an indirect prohibition on the employment of oppressive child labor, respectively.4
Section 12(c) of the FLSA creates a direct ban on the employment of oppressive child labor under certain conditions. Section 12(c) states,
No employer shall employ any oppressive child labor in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce or in any enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.5
Section 12(a) of the FLSA restricts the shipment of certain goods that have been produced in proximity to oppressive child labor—called "hot goods."67 It provides, in relevant part,
No producer, manufacturer, or dealer shall ship or deliver for shipment in commerce any goods produced in an establishment situated in the United States in or about which within thirty days prior to the removal of such goods therefrom any oppressive child labor has been employed.7
8
This provision does not ban the employment of oppressive child labor directly, but restricts the interstate shipment of goods made in proximity to oppressive child labor. Child workers are protected under this provision even if they are not employed by the establishment that produces and ships the goods.8
The FLSA child labor provisions may apply to an individual child, an enterprise in which a child works, or an establishment that produces goods in proximity to child labor.910 These three types of coverage—individual, enterprise, and establishment—have somewhat different formulations, but each requires three elements:
11Where one of these elements is missing—for example, where there is no employment relationship between a child and an employer—the FLSA child labor provisions do not apply.12 In addition, certain occupations (e.g., newspaper delivery) and work arrangements (e.g., children working for a parent) are explicitly exempt from the child labor provisions. Where so exempt, the provisions do not apply even if all three elements listed above are present.
A child worker may be covered by Section 12(c) on an individual or enterprise basis. The child is covered individually if he or she is employed in oppressive child labor and engages in interstate or foreign commerce (e.g., regularly handles interstate or international mail, completes credit card transactions, uses the telephone to make interstate or international calls) or produces goods for interstate or foreign commerce.10
13
An enterprise is covered by the FLSA child labor provisions—and coverage extends to children employed in oppressive child labor therein—if it has at least two employees who engage in interstate or foreign commerce and has "annual sales or business done" of at least $500,000.1114 Regardless of the dollar volume of business, the act applies to hospitals; residential institutions providing medical or nursing care; schools (including higher education institutions); and federal, state, and local government agencies.12
An establishment is covered by Section 12(a) of the act (i.e., the hot goods provision) if it produces goods in proximity to (i.e., "in or about") the employment of oppressive child labor.1316 The goods produced are called hot goods and they may not be shipped out of state while the oppressive child labor is present and for 30 days after the removal of the oppressive child labor.1417 An establishment is covered by Section 12(a) even if it is not the employer of the oppressive child labor and even if the child is not covered by the FLSA provisions on an individual or enterprise basis.
The FLSA excludes certain occupations and work arrangements entirely from coverage of its child labor provisions:
23The act also relaxes restrictions on oppressive child labor in select occupations or industries—notably agriculture—by exempting them from the child labor provisions when certain conditions are met. For example, children who are 14 years old—and in some cases, at any age—may by employed in agriculture outside of school hours.2024 Congress amended the FLSA to expand the set of permissible activities for 16- and 17-year-old children working with scrap balers and paper box compactors, for 17-year-old children to drive cars and trucks, and for children who are at least 14 years old and excused from compulsory schooling to work in establishments that operate power-driven woodworking machines (but they are not allowed to operate the machines).21
The FLSA defines oppressive child labor, generally, as the employment of a child under the age of 16 years in any occupation and the employment of a child under the age of 18 in an occupation determined to be hazardous to children by the Secretary of Labor. However, the act includes several exemptions to the child labor provisions and the oppressive child labor definition that create a complex set of thresholds that depend on the child's age, local school hours, the nature of the work (e.g., occupation, industry, and work environment), parental involvement in the child's employment, and other factors. Notably, exemptions tofrom the act's child labor provisions discussed below create separate rules governing children's employment in non-agricultural and agricultural work.
For non-exempt children, the minimum age for employment in non-agricultural occupations is
Under federal law, a child under the age of 14 may not be employed unless his or her employment is explicitly excluded from the definition of oppressive child labor (e.g., a parent is the child's sole employer in a non-hazardous occupation) or exempt from the FLSA child labor provisions (e.g., newspaper delivery).
The act directs the Secretary of Labor to establish a list of occupations—other than mining and manufacturing—that do not constitute oppressive child labor for children who are 14 and 15 years old, based on the Secretary's determination that "such employment is confined to periods which will not interfere with their schooling and to conditions which will not interfere with their health or well-being." 22
DOL regulations identify the following set of jobs and activities that—subject to hours-of-work restrictions—do not constitute oppressive child labor for children aged 14 and 15 years:2329
A minor who is at least 15 years of age and has received training and certification in aquatics and water safety by the American Red Cross (or a similar organization) may be employed as a lifeguard at "traditional swimming pools and water amusement parks."31
Any job not identified by the Secretary of Labor as permitted for children 14 and 15 years of age is prohibited. However, recognizing that additional guidance may be helpful in understanding the limits of the permitted work, DOL regulations also identify explicitly prohibited work for children 14 and 15 years old. For example, these regulations indicate that while office work is permitted for this age group, work that requires use of a ladder is expressly forbidden.2532 Consequently, the employment of a 14-year-old child in an office to stock shelves using a ladder appears to constitute oppressive child labor and would be prohibited.
Under DOL regulations, children aged 14 and 15 years may not work in any of the following jobs:26
DOL regulations require that work performed by 14- or 15-year-old children beoccur outside school hours when school is in session. Regulations limit the number of hours performed per day and per week and the time of day when the work may occur.28
35
When school is in session, children may perform no more than 3 hours per day on a school day (including Friday), 8 hours on a non-school day, and 18 hours in one week.2936 Otherwise, when school is not in session, children may perform up to 8 hours per day and 40 hours per week.3037 Work hours are confined to 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. except during the summer, when evening hours are extended to 9 p.m.31
38 DOL regulations provide some exceptions to the hours-of-work requirements:
The Secretary of Labor has identified 17 groups of occupations as hazardous or detrimental to the health or well-being of children between the ages of 16 and 18 years (Table 1).3643 Employment in these jobs—formalized in regulations as the Secretary's "hazardous occupation orders" or "orders"—is prohibited, with limited exemptions for registered apprentices and student learners.3744 In some instances, the orders ban children's employment in entire industries (e.g., coal mining, Order 3) with some exceptions for office, sales, or maintenance work; others prohibit children's exposure to certain materials (e.g., radioactive substances, Order 6) or equipment (e.g., power-driven hoisting apparatus, Order 7).
Hazardous Occupation Orders | Apprentices and Student Learners Exemptiona | Work Not Specifically Prohibited by the Order and Exemptionsb |
Regulation |
|||
Regulation |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.51 | |||
Order 2: Occupations of motor-vehicle driver and outside helper |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.52 | |||
Order 3: All occupations in or about any coal mine |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.53 | |||
Order 4: Forest fire fighting and forest fire prevention occupations, timber tract occupations, forestry service occupations, logging occupations, and occupations in the operation of any sawmill, lath mill, shingle mill, or cooperage stock mill. |
No |
No In addition, youth who are at least 14 years old and exempt from schooling beyond grade 8 may work in establishments that operate power-driven woodworking machines if regulatory conditions are met. These youth are prohibited, however, from operating or assisting the operation of power-driven woodworking machines.d | 29 C.F.R. §570.54 | |||
Order 5: Occupations involved in the operation of power-driven woodworking machines |
Yes |
Yes | 29 C.F.R. §570.55 | |||
Order 6: Exposure to radioactive substances and to ionizing radiations |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.57 | |||
Order 7: Occupations involved in the operation of power-driven hoisting apparatus |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.58 | |||
Order 8: Occupations involved in the operation of power-driven metal forming, punching, and shearing machines |
Yes |
Yes | 29 C.F.R. §570.59 | |||
Order 9: Occupations in connection with mining, other than coal |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.60 | |||
Order 10: Occupations in the operation of power-driven meat-processing machines and occupations involving slaughtering, meat and poultry packing, processing, or rendering. |
Yes |
Yes | 29 C.F.R. §570.61 | |||
Order 11: Occupations involved in the operation of bakery machines |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.62 | |||
Order 12: Occupations involved in the operation of balers, compactors, and paper-products machines |
Yes |
Yes | 29 C.F.R. §570.63 | |||
Order 13: Occupations involved in the manufacture of bricks, tile, and kindred products |
No |
No | 29 C.F.R. §570.64 | |||
Order 14: Occupations involved in the operation of circular saws, band saws, guillotine shears, chain saws, reciprocating saws, wood chippers, and abrasive cutting discs |
Yes |
Yes | 29 C.F.R. §570.65 | |||
Order 15: Occupations involved in wrecking, demolition, and shipbreaking operations |
No |
None |
No None 29 C.F.R. §570.66 | |||
Order 16: Occupations in roofing operations and on or about a roof |
Yes |
None |
Yes None 29 C.F.R. §570.67 | |||
Order 17: Occupations in excavation operations |
Yes |
Yes | 29 C.F.R. §570.68 |
Source: 29 C.F.R. Sections 570.50-570.68 and DOL, Wage and Hour Division, Field Operations Handbook, Rev 665, Chapter 33: Child Labor—FLSA, September 22, 2011, http://www.dol.gov/whd/FOH/FOH_Ch33.pdf.
Notes:
a. Conditions for apprenticeships and student learners are identified at 29 C.F.R. Section 570.50 (b) and (c).
b. This column includes work identified by DOL as "not specifically banned" under an order and work that is exempt by statute or regulation. It is not a complete cataloguing of permitted work. In addition, work that is excluded from a particular order is not permitted for minors if it is covered under a separate order. For a fuller discussion, including information on DOL enforcement decisions, see DOL, Field Operations Handbook.
c. See P.L. 105-334.
d. See P.L. 108-199.
e. See P.L. 104-174.
Three exemptions to the FLSA child labor provisions create separate minimum age thresholds and hazardous occupations rules for children employed in agriculture.38
With some exceptions, the minimum age for employment in agricultural occupations is
A child of any age who is employed exclusively by a parent on a farm owned or operated by the parent may work without restriction.43
With few exceptions, children employed in agriculture may not work during school hours until they are 16 years old.4451 The FLSA does not limit the number of hours per day or week that children can work in agriculture, nor does it place limits on when that work occurs outside of school hours (i.e., children may work in agriculture for any number of hours per day or week, and at any time during the day or night).
With few exceptions, a child below the age of 16 may not be employed in agriculture in an occupation that is determined by the Secretary of Labor to be particularly hazardous or detrimental to the health or well-being of children under 16 years old. This prohibition does not apply to children employed by a parent on a farm owned or operated by the parent.4552 When certain requirements are met, student learners and graduates of tractor or machine operation programs that meet regulatory criteria may be employed in select hazardous occupations.4653 DOL groups hazardous occupations in agriculture in 11 employment categories that are described in Table 2.
|
Employment Category |
Exemptions |
||||||
Employment Category Exemptions | Student Learnerb | Qualifying Tractor- or Machine-Operation Program Graduatec | |||||
Operating a tractor of over 20 power-take-off horsepower or connecting or disconnecting an implement or any of its parts to or from such a tractor. |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Yes Yes Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
||||
Yes Yes Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
Yes Yes No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
Yes Yes No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
Yes Yes No |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
||||
Yes Yes No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||
Yes No No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||
Yes No No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||
Yes No No |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||
|
Transporting, transferring, or applying anhydrous ammonia. |
Yes |
No |
No |
||||
Yes No No Transporting, transferring, or applying anhydrous ammonia. Yes No No
Source: Hazardous agricultural occupations described at 29 C.F.R.
Section §570.71. Exemptions to the ban on children's employment in hazardous agricultural occupations are identified at 29 C.F.R. Section §570.72.
Notes:
a. Children who work for a parent on a farm owned or operated by a parent are exempt from the prohibition on children's employment in hazardous agricultural occupations. See 29 U.S.C. Section §213(c)(3).
b. Student learner requirements are described at 29 C.F.R. Section §570.72(a).
c. The requirements of qualifying tractor- and machine-operation training programs are identified at 29 C.F.R. Section §570.72(b) and (c).
The FLSA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to conduct workplace inspections and investigations to determine if oppressive child labor is present and to enforce the child labor provisions.4754 The Secretary of Labor has delegated inspection authority to the DOL Wage and Hour Division (WHD), which oversees enforcement of several federal laws governing workplaces.48
55 Two remedies are available for violations of the FLSA child labor provisions. The Secretary of Labor may assess civil money penalties or seek other relief, including injunctive relief.
Employers who violate the FLSA child labor provisions may be assessed a civil penalty of49
FLSA amendments enacted in 1974 added civil money penalties for violations of the act's child labor provisions and set a maximum penalty of $1,000 per violation; they have been amended since then.56 The penalties were last amended in 2008, when they were raised to a maximum of $11,000 for each employee who was the subject of a child labor violation and a maximum of $50,000 for each violation that causes the death or serious injury of a minor employee.57 The amendments also provided that in the case of a violation that causes the death or serious injury of a child employee, the penalty may be doubled if the violation is a repeated or willful violation.
Civil penalties collected from employers for child labor violations are deposited in the general fund of the U.S. Treasury.5160 Employers may seek an exception to a civil penalty determination or may request an administrative hearing within 15 days of receiving a determination of penalty from WHD; such requests must be made in writing.52
An examination of WHD enforcement data reveals that, since FY2007, the agency has concluded over 9,700 cases (representing more than 176,000 violations) in which employers61
WHD enforcement data for fiscal year 2025 (FY2025) indicate that the agency resolved 976 cases in which employers were found to have violated FLSA child labor provisions.53 Well-represented among these cases were full-service restaurants (1983 cases), and limited-service restaurants (1,530 cases) and eating places (173 cases). Together these establishments represented more than 37% of concluded FLSA child labor cases. Overall, civil money penalties ranged from no penalty to $287,980.54
62 These cases collectively involved the illegal employment of more than 5,200 minors, with 773 such children employed in violation of the Secretary's hazardous occupation orders. Civil money penalties for child labor violations totaled $37,215,327 in FY2025.
Injunctions and Criminal Penalties
U.S. district courts have jurisdiction to enjoin violations of the FLSA's child labor provisions.5563 For example, a federal court may order an employer to halt employment of a minor in a hazardous occupation or may enjoin a producer from shipping goods out of state from an establishment in or about which a child labor violation has occurred.
Criminal penalties are also prescribed for willful violations of the FLSA's child labor provisions. Any person who willfully violates these provisions will, upon conviction, be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment for not more than six months, or both.5664 Imprisonment, however, will be sentenced only if a violator has a prior conviction for willful violation of the child labor provisions.57
Since the enactment of the FLSA, various courts have resolved cases involving the meaning and operation of the law's child labor provisions.
Many of the early cases brought under the child labor provisions considered whether they should apply when the movement of goods may not have occurred "in commerce" or when the items created by the employer were arguably not "goods" within the meaning of the provisions.5866 These early cases appear to have focused generally on the application of Section 12(a) of the FLSA. Subsection (c) was not added to Section 12 of the FLSA until 1949.5967 Thus, the courts in these early cases did not address the direct employment of minors, but rather whether an employer was transporting goods that were produced by minors.
in proximity to oppressive child labor.
In a 1945 decision, Western Union Telegraph v. Lenroot, the U.S. Supreme Court considered whether Section 12(a) applied to a telegraph company that employed messengers who were under the age of 16.6068 Lenroot, who served as the DOL's chief of the Children's Bureau, maintained that Western Union violated Section 12(a) by shipping or delivering for shipment in commerce telegraphic messages that were produced in an establishment where oppressive child labor was employed.6169 Whether the messages were "goods" for purposes of Section 12(a) was one of the questions considered by the Court.6270 While the Court found that the messages "are clearly 'subjects of commerce' and hence ... are 'goods' under the [FLSA]," it nevertheless concluded that Western Union was not a producer of these goods.6371 The Court maintained that Western Union simply transmitted the messages and did not handle them in such a way as to make it a producer of goods.6472 The Court also concluded that Western Union did not "ship" the messages in such a way as to find a violation of Section 12(a). The Court observed: "We do not think that 'ship' in this Act applies to intangible messages, which we do not ordinarily speak of as being 'shipped.'"65
73
In Tobin v. Grant, another early decision from 1948, a federal district court in California considered the meaning of the phrase "ship or deliver for shipment in commerce" as it is used in Section 12(a).6674 The employer in Tobin, a manufacturer of books and book covers, employed 22 minors under the age of 16 in processing and manufacturing occupations. Tobin, who served as Secretary of Labor at the time, alleged a violation of Section 12(a) even when the majority of the employer's goods were not shipped interstate.6775 Although the employer knew that its customers would eventually ship the books and book covers for use outside of the state, it maintained that knowledge of the goods' ultimate destination was immaterial.68
76
The court concluded that the employer's delivery of goods, albeit primarily intrastate, was prohibited by Section 12(a).6977 Citing the FLSA's legislative history, the court observed:
[T]he words "deliver for shipment in commerce" are sufficiently broad to cover a situation in which a manufacturer, knowing that the ultimate destination of his goods is in interstate commerce, sells to a concern which makes the actual shipment. If the Act did not cover such a transaction, manufacturers could violate the law with impunity by selling goods within the state of manufacture, regardless of the known interstate market.70
More recent cases have examined Section 12(c) of the FLSA and the direct employment of minors. For example, in McLaughlin v. Stineco, a 1988 decision, a federal district court in Florida found that a framing contractor violated Section 12(c) by employing minors under the age of 18 years in a hazardous occupation and by employing a minor under the age of 16 years during hours not permitted by DOL regulations.7179 The company employed a 17-year-old and a 15-year-old to perform roofing work, an occupation that the Secretary of Labor found to be hazardous.7280 Regulations promulgated by the Secretary defined all occupations in roofing operations to be hazardous for the employment of minors between 16 and 18.7381 Based on these regulations, the court further concluded that the employment of individuals between the ages of 14 and 16 years was also prohibited.7482 Ultimately, the court found that the framing contractor violated Section 12(c).
In addition, the court also determined that the framing contractor violated DOL's child labor regulations by employing the 15-year-old for more than 40 hours per week.7583 The minor indicated that he worked for three to five weeks, arriving at work between 7:00 and 7:30 a.m., and quitting between 4:30 and 5:00 p.m., with a lunch break of 30 minutes to one hour.7684 Under the agency's regulations, a minor between the ages of 14 and 15 years may not work for more than 40 hours in any one week when school is not in session and not more than 18 hours in any one week when school is in session.77
85
In Martin v. Funtime, a 1991 decision, a federal district court in Ohio found that the operator of three amusement parks in Ohio and New York violated Section 12(c) by employing numerous 14- and 15-year-olds beyond the hours prescribed by the Secretary of Labor.7886 The minors were regularly employed for more than 40 hours per week when school was not in session and more than 18 hours per week when school was in session.7987 The minors were also employed before the start time identified in DOL's regulations and after the similarly prescribed end time.80
88
In enjoining the amusement park operator from further violations of Section 12(c), the court rejected the operator's argument that it was engaging in serious efforts to reduce the number of violations and that it was inherently difficult to monitor the hours of all of the minor employees.8189 The court maintained that the operator either knew about the violations or could have easily discovered them because they involved "an impermissible number of hours per week ... and were obvious from the defendant's own time records."82
90
In affirming the court's decision in Funtime, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit observed that an employer's responsibility for child labor violations "approaches strict liability."8391 The court noted, "[A]n employer cannot avoid liability by arguing that its supervisory personnel were not aware of the violation, or by simply adopting a policy against employing children in violation of the Act."
Although a review of recent FLSA cases produced few court decisions involving either Sections 12(c) or 12(a), it appears that the investigation of alleged child labor violations has continued steadily. In August 2015, for example, following a WHD investigation, DOL alleged violations of Section 12(c), as well as violations of the FLSA's minimum wage and overtime provisions, in a case involving an Ohio restaurant.84 In Perez v. Cathedral Buffet, Inc., DOL is seeking $207,975 in back wages, as well as an equal amount in liquidated damages for the wage and hour violations.85 The agency is also seeking to permanently enjoin future violations of the FLSA.86
In December 2015, DOL filed a similar complaint against an Oklahoma restaurant. In Perez v. Moranto, DOL is alleging violations of the FLSA's child labor, minimum wage, and overtime provisions.87 With regard to the child labor allegations, DOL maintains that the restaurant employed minors between the ages of 10 and 17 to work as bussers and that minors under 16 years worked more than the number of hours permitted by DOL regulations and beyond the start and end times permitted by such regulations.88 The agency also asserts that at least one minor operated hazardous equipment on a regular basis.89
Author Contact Information
| 1. |
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) also provides for a federal minimum wage, overtime pay, and employers' record-keeping responsibilities. For an overview of the FLSA see CRS Report R42713, The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): An Overview, by David H. Bradley, Benjamin Collins, and Sarah A. Donovan. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. |
29 U.S.C. §218(a) provides, in relevant part, that "no provision of this chapter relating to the employment of child labor shall justify noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a higher standard than the standard established under this chapter." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. |
29 U.S.C. §203(l). See section "Exemptions from the Child Labor Provisions" of this report for a discussion of the exemptions, and section "Minimum Age for Employment" for minimum age thresholds for employment that result from FLSA child labor provisions and exemptions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4. |
The other two child labor provisions authorize the Secretary of Labor to enforce the child labor provisions, including through investigations, inspections, and review of employer records. This authority is discussed in the section "Administration of Child Labor Provisions" of this report. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5. |
29 U.S.C. §212(c). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. |
Similar FLSA hot goods provisions also apply to goods produced in violation of minimum wage and overtime requirements; see 29 U.S.C. §215(a)(1). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7. |
In 2024, however, a federal district court in Alabama denied the Acting Secretary of Labor's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on various grounds, including that the Acting Secretary could not establish a likelihood of success on the merits because she had not shown that the defendant acted with the requisite scienter (i.e., knowledge of misconduct).92 In Su v. Mar-Jac Poultry of Alabama, the Acting Secretary alleged that the defendant employed six minors in oppressive child labor in its poultry processing plant. The court indicated that the Acting Secretary presented no evidence that the company knowingly employed any person under the age of 18.93 The company maintained that it "steadfastly adheres" to a corporate policy of not employing minors, and that the individuals were hired after being presented with documentation indicating they were over the age of 18.94 The company ran the documents through E-Verify, a U.S. government employment verification system, which confirmed their validity.95 According to the court, "[r]ejecting this documentation after verification by the United States could possibly have exposed Defendant to liability for discrimination under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1987 (IRCA)."96 In evaluating the preliminary injunction, the court in Mar-Jac Poultry also rejected the Acting Secretary's argument that the company knew or had reason to know that it was employing minors based on the individuals' appearance and mannerisms.97 The court observed that many people appear younger than their actual age, and the Acting Secretary's "appearance and mannerisms" test "would unfairly affect those individuals' employment opportunities, essentially discriminating against those individuals on the basis of appearance."98 In finding that the Mission employed oppressive child labor and granting summary judgment for the Secretary of Labor, the court noted that the participants worked four to seven hours a day during the week, including during school hours and on Saturdays.105 Participants below the age of 14 also worked in the program's pallet shop, an activity the court recognized as "a clear violation of 29 C.F.R. § 570.2(a)."106 Legislation introduced in the 119th Congress would amend the FLSA's child labor provisions. While some of these measures aim to further discourage the use of oppressive child labor by increasing civil monetary penalties or identifying additional activities as oppressive child labor, other measures would relax existing limits on when minors may work. The Protecting Children Act, for example, would increase the non-inflation-adjusted civil monetary penalty for child labor violations from a maximum of $11,000 for each employee who was the subject of a violation to a maximum of $150,000.107 If the violation caused the death or serious injury of an employee under the age of 18, the penalty would be increased from a maximum of $50,000 to $700,000.108 The Children Don't Belong on Tobacco Farms Act would amend the FLSA's definition of "oppressive child labor" to include the employment of "any employee under the age of eighteen years [who] has direct contact with tobacco plants or dried tobacco leaves."109 Other bills would allow minors to perform work in certain occupations that have been found to be hazardous by the Secretary of Labor or to work during hours not currently permitted. The Future Logging Careers Act would allow 16- and 17-year-old individuals to work in logging when the individual is employed by a parent or person standing in the place of a parent in a logging operation owned or operated by the parent or person.110 The Teenagers Earning Everyday Necessary Skills Act would amend the FLSA's definition of "oppressive child labor" to limit the Secretary's authority to determine appropriate work hours for minors.111 Under the bill, the Secretary would be required to allow a minor to work up to 24 hours in one week when school is in session, so long as the work hours are confined to 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) also provides for a federal minimum wage, overtime pay, and employers' record-keeping responsibilities. For an overview of the FLSA see CRS Report R42713, The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): An Overview, by David H. Bradley, Benjamin Collins, and Sarah A. Donovan. See the discussion in the "Coverage of FLSA Child Labor Provisions" section of this report. 29 U.S.C. §218(a) provides, in relevant part, that "no provision of this chapter relating to the employment of child labor shall justify noncompliance with any Federal or State law or municipal ordinance establishing a higher standard than the standard established under this chapter." 29 U.S.C. §203(l). See section "Exemptions from the Child Labor Provisions" of this report for a discussion of the exemptions, and section "Minimum Age for Employment" for minimum age thresholds for employment that result from FLSA child labor provisions and exemptions. The other two child labor provisions authorize the Secretary of Labor to enforce the child labor provisions, including through investigations, inspections, and review of employer records. This authority is discussed in the section "Administration of Child Labor Provisions" of this report. 29 U.S.C. §212(c). Similar FLSA hot goods provisions also apply to goods produced in violation of minimum wage and overtime requirements; see 29 U.S.C. §215(a)(1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To be "hot," the goods must be produced in and removed from an establishment in or about which oppressive child labor was employed. It is not necessary for the child to be involved in the production of the goods or in their shipment. After 30 days, the goods are said to have "cooled" and may be shipped out of state. However, any hot good that has already been shipped is permanently hot and may not be shipped out of state at all. See §33a02 of DOL, Wage and Hour Division, Field Operations Handbook, Rev 665, Chapter 33: Child Labor—FLSA, September 22, 2011, http://www.dol.gov/whd/FOH/FOH_Ch33.pdf. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FLSA provisions apply to workplaces located in the United States and certain U.S. territories. See 29 C.F.R. §776.7. Congress has addressed child labor (among other labor standards) internationally through U.S. trade agreements and trade preference programs, which generally require U.S. trade partners to have and enforce child labor laws. The legislation and efforts of 140 U.S. trade beneficiaries' to eliminate the "worst forms of child labor"—which include prostitution, forced labor, and hazardous work among other forms—are assessed annually by the U.S. Department of Labor's International Labor Affairs Bureau (ILAB), pursuant to the Trade and Development Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-200). ILAB reports are available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor/findings [https://perma.cc/D6UA-8R9C]. Per the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-164), ILAB also publishes a list of goods believed to be produced using forced labor or child labor that violates international standards. This list is available from https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-of-goods | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10. |
29 C.F.R. 776.8-9. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11. |
29 C.F.R. §§779.258-779.259. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12. |
29 U.S.C. §203(s)(1). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13. |
See footnote 7 for additional discussion of the phrase "in or about." |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 14. |
See footnote 8 for additional discussion of hot goods. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15. |
29 U.S.C. §203(b). DOL guidance indicates, for example, that "young entrepreneurs who use the family lawnmower to cut their neighbor's grass or perform babysitting on a casual basis are not covered under the FLSA." DOL, Wage and Hour Division, Child Labor Provisions for Nonagricultural Occupations Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Child Labor Bulletin 101), revised November 2016, p.2, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/legacy/files/childlabor101.pdf. 29 C.F.R. §776.8-9. 29 C.F.R. §§779.258-779.259. 29 U.S.C. §203(s)(1). See footnote 8 for additional discussion of the phrase "in or about." See footnote 9 for additional discussion of hot goods. DOL, Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2023-03, August 31, 2023, https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/WHD/fab/2023-3.pdf [https://perma.cc/MG33-H4WD]. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This exemption stems from the FLSA definition of "oppressive child labor" at 29 U.S.C. §203(1), which excludes children employed by their parents in most non-hazardous occupations. DOL regulations at 29 C.F.R. §570.126 clarify that the "exemption may apply only in those cases where the child is exclusively employed by his parent or a person standing in his parents' place." | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(c)(3). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(d). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(d). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See section "Employment of Children in Agriculture" of this report for a discussion. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P.L. 104-174 amended the FLSA to permit 16- and 17-year-old children to load materials into—but not operate or unload—certain scrap paper balers and paper box compactors, subject to safety and other requirements. P.L. 105-334 prohibits driving on public roads by employees under the age of 17 and provides conditions under which 17-year-old employees may operate cars or trucks on public roads. P.L. 108-199 amended the FLSA to create a limited exemption from the child labor provisions for certain children employed by establishments that use woodworking machinery. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 22. |
See 29 U.S.C. §203(l). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 23. |
29 U.S.C. §203(l). 29 U.S.C. §203(l) and 29 U.S.C. §213(c). 29 U.S.C. §203(l). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per 29 U.S.C. §213(c)(7), the child must be at least 14 years of age and exempt by statute or judicial order from compulsory school attendance beyond grade 8. The work must be supervised by an adult relative or an adult who is a member of the "same religious sect or division" as the child. The child is prohibited from operating or assisting the operation of the power-driven woodworking machines and must be protected from wood particles, flying debris, and exposure to excessive levels of noise and saw dust. See related regulations at 29 C.F.R. §570.34 (m). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25. |
29 C.F.R. §570.34(l)(1). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 C.F.R. §570.33. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See Table 1 of this report. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hours standards are published at 29 C.F.R. §570.35(a). School hours are determined by the school district in which the child resides; see 29 C.F.R. §570.35(b). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 C.F.R. §570.35(a). Id. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 30. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 C.F.R. §570.35(c)(2). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 C.F.R. §570.36. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The number of workdays per week that may take place during school hours is determined by a formula established in DOL regulations at 29 C.F.R. §570.37(c). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 C.F.R. §570.35(c)(1). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 C.F.R. §§570.50-570.68. As noted in the "Explicitly Forbidden Work for 14- and 15-Year-Olds" section of this report, the employment of children ages 14 and 15 years is also forbidden in these occupations. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unlike agricultural hazardous orders (section "Agricultural Hazardous Occupations" of this report), the prohibition on minors' employment in the non-agricultural hazardous occupations applies even if the child is employed by a parent. The conditions under which a registered apprentice or student learner may participate in hazardous occupation tasks are described at 29 C.F.R. §570.50(b) and (c). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
These exemptions are codified at 29 U.S.C. §213(c)(1), (2), and (4). The FLSA definition of agriculture includes "farming in all its branches and among other things includes the cultivation and tillage of the soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growing, and harvesting of any agricultural or horticultural commodities (including commodities defined as agricultural commodities in Section 15(g) of the Agricultural Marketing Act, as amended), the raising of livestock, bees, fur-bearing animals, or poultry, and any practices (including any forestry, or lumbering operations) performed by a farmer or on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, including preparation for market, delivery to storage or to market or to carriers for transportation to market." See 29 U.S.C. §203(f). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(c)(1)(C). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(c)(1)(B). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The conditions under which the Secretary of Labor will grant a waiver permitting the employment of 10- and 11-year-old children to harvest certain crops are described at 29 U.S.C. §213(c)(4) and 29 C.F.R. pt. 575. However, as DOL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(c)(1)(A) applies to the employment of children on farms that are exempt from FLSA minimum wage provisions because they employed fewer than 500 "man-days of agricultural labor" during any calendar quarter in the previous calendar year. FLSA defines a man-day of agricultural labor as "any day during which an employee performs any agricultural labor for not less than one hour | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(c)(2) provides that children employed in agriculture by a parent on a farm owned or operated by a parent are exempt from the statutory prohibition on children's employment in hazardous agricultural occupations. See also §33f02(a)(1) for the Field Operations Handbook. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Children who work exclusively for a parent on a farm owned by the parent are excluded from the oppressive child labor definition and may be employed during school hours. See 29 U.S.C. §203(l) and §33f02(a)(1) of the Field Operations Handbook. In addition, DOL regulations note that district school hours "do not apply to minors who have graduated from high school," and therefore "the entire year would be considered 'outside of school hours' [for those children]" and "their employment in agriculture would be permitted at any time." Finally, interpretive guidance provided by DOL indicates that certain children who have been excused from compulsory schooling by their states of residence on religious grounds and have met other requirements are excused from the FLSA prohibition on work in agriculture during school hours. See 29 C.F.R. §570.123(b) and DOL, Wage and Hour Division, Child Labor Requirements in Agricultural Occupations under the Fair Labor Standards Act (Child Labor Bulletin 102), June 2007, p.4, http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/childlabor102.htm. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29 U.S.C. §213(c)(2). See Section 33f03 of the Field Operations Handbook for additional information. As part of a broader effort to revise FLSA regulations in 2011, DOL proposed a new regulation to formalize its interpretation of the parental exemption to hazardous agricultural employment. The proposed rule would have clarified that children under age 16 years of age are permitted to work for a parent on a farm owned by such parent at any time to perform any tasks in agriculture. Youth employed in agriculture by a parent on a farm operated (but not owned) by the parent may perform hazardous agricultural work only outside of school hours. The same proposed rule announced plans to create new agricultural hazardous orders (e.g., tobacco production and curing), define the conditions under which the parental exemption transferred to a close relative with temporary custody of a child, revise the student learner exemption, and eliminate two exemptions for children who have graduated from certain tractor and farm equipment training | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 46. |
29 C.F.R. §570.72. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 47. |
29 U.S.C. §212(b) and (d). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48. | newsroom/releases/whd/whd20120426-0 [https://perma.cc/C49J-WLWN].
29 C.F.R. §570.72. 29 U.S.C. §212(b) and (d). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49. |
29 U.S.C. §216(e) and 29 C.F.R. pt. 579. Current civil money penalties amounts were established, by amendment to the FLSA, by the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (P.L. 110-233). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50. |
P.L. 93-259, §25(c). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51. |
29 U.S.C. §216(e)(5). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52. |
29 U.S.C. §216(e)(4) and 29 C.F.R. §580.6. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53. |
DOL, Data: Enforcement, June 15, 2016, http://ogesdw.dol.gov/homePage.php. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54. |
The largest penalty was applied to the main office of Western Wats Center, a call center in Utah. In total, WHD investigated and found FLSA child labor violations in five of the company's Utah locations, with total civil money penalties assessed in excess of $500,000. For additional information see DOL, "US Department of Labor Resolves Case with Orem, Utah-Based Company for $500,000 in Civil Money Penalties for Child Labor Violations," press release, March 29, 2010, https://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/whd/WHD20100307.htm. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55. |
29 U.S.C. §217. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56. |
29 U.S.C. §216(a). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 57. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 58. |
See, for example, Tobin v. Grant, 79 F.Supp. 975 (N. D. Cal. 1948). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 59. |
See Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1949, §10(b), 63 Stat. 910, 917 (1949). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60. |
Western Union Telegraph v. Lenroot, 323 U.S. 490 (1945). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 61. |
Ibid., at 501-502. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62. |
Ibid., at 502-503. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 63. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 64. |
Ibid, .at 504. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 65. |
Ibid., at 506. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 66. |
79 F.Supp. 975 (N. D. Cal. 1948). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 67. |
Ibid., at 976-77. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69. |
Ibid., at 977-78. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71. |
McLaughlin v. Stineco, 697 F.Supp. 436 (M. D. Fla. 1988). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72. |
Ibid., at 453. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 74. | DOL, "Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Catch-Up Adjustments," 81 Fed. Reg. 43430, July 1, 2016, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/07/01/2016-15378/department-of-labor-federal-civil-penalties-inflation-adjustment-act-catch-up-adjustments. DOL, "Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Annual Adjustments for 2025," 90 Fed. Reg. 1854, Jan. 10, 2025, https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/10/2024-31602/federal-civil-penalties-inflation-adjustment-act-annual-adjustments-for-2025. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 2015 requires the Department of Labor to adjust the FLSA civil money penalties annually for inflation no later than January 15 of each year. The act requires penalties to be adjusted by the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the month of October of the prior year. Such data were not produced for October 2025 due to the 2025 lapse in appropriations. As a result, the Department announced on May 27, 2026, that it "is not making any adjustments to civil money penalties under the Inflation Adjustment Act in 2026." DOL, "Department of Labor Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustments Annual Adjustments for 2026," 91 Fed. Reg. 31358, May 27, 2026. 29 U.S.C. §216(e)(5). 29 U.S.C. §216(e)(4) and 29 C.F.R. §580.6. DOL, Forging the Future: A Year of Progress Focused on the American Workforce - Child Labor Data, https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/data/charts/child-labor. 29 U.S.C. §217. 29 U.S.C. §216(a). Id. See, e.g., Tobin v. Grant, 79 F.Supp. 975 (N. D. Cal. 1948). See Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 1949, §10(b), 63 Stat. 910, 917 (1949). Western Union Telegraph v. Lenroot, 323 U.S. 490 (1945). Id. at 501-502. Id. at 502-503. Id. Id. at 504. Id. at 506. 79 F.Supp. 975 (N. D. Cal. 1948). Id. at 976-77. Id. Id. at 977-78. Id. McLaughlin v. Stineco, 697 F.Supp. 436 (M. D. Fla. 1988). Id. at 453. Id. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 75. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 76. |
Ibid., at 443. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77. | Id. Id. at 443. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin v. Funtime, 792 F.Supp. 539 (N. D. Ohio 1991), aff'd, 963 F.2d 110 ( Id. at 541. Id. Id. Id. at 542. Martin v. Funtime, 963 F.2d 110, 115 (6th Cir. 1992). Su v. Mar-Jac Poultry of Ala., No. 6:24-cv-00569-LSC, 2024 WL 3278954 (N.D. Ala. July 2, 2024). Id. at *3. Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. In 2025, DOL and Mar-Jac Poultry settled the child labor claims, with the poultry company agreeing to pay $385,000 in civil money penalties and engage in various compliance practices, including mandatory management training and the hiring of a compliance specialist. See Chavez-Deremer v. Mar-Jac Poultry, No. 6:24-cv-00569-RDP (N.D. Ala. May 21, 2025). Chavez-DeRemer v. Mennonite Messianic Mission of the E. Pa. Mennonite Church, No. 1:22-cv-01355, 2025 WL 3653555 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2025), appeal docketed, No. 26-1334 (3d Cir. Feb. 19, 2026). Id. at *7. Id. at *3; see also *5 (describing the "considerable revenue" generated from the "work" of the minor participants and "mentors," individuals who worked with the minor participants in a supervisory capacity). Id. at *16 (noting that "[a]s it pertains to the Minors' status as employees, the Court is principally guided by the economic realities test and the expectation of compensation" as described by the Supreme Court in Walling v. Portland Terminal Co., 330 U.S. 148 (1947), and Tony & Susan Alamo Found. v. Sec'y of Lab., 471 U.S. 290 (1985)). In Walling, the Court indicated that the FLSA "covers trainees, beginners, apprentices, or learners if they are employed to work for an employer for compensation." Walling, 330 U.S. at 151. In Tony & Susan Alamo Found., the Court maintained that the "test of employment under the [FLSA] is one of 'economic reality.'" Tony & Susan Alamo Found., 471 U.S. at 301. Mennonite Messianic Mission, 2025 WL 3653555, at *16. Id. at *16-17. Id. at *3. Id. at *22. H.R. 3997, 119th Cong. §101(a)(1)(C)(i) (2025). Id. at §101(a)(1)(D). S. 1742, 119th Cong. §2(1)(B) (2025); H.R. 3335, 119th Cong. §2(1)(B) (2025). S. 509, 119th Cong. §2(2) (2025). H.R. 3545, 119th Cong. §2 (2025). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 79. |
Ibid., at 2-3. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 81. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 82. |
Ibid., at 4. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83. |
Martin v. Funtime, 963 F.2d 110, 115 (6th Cir. 1992). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 84. |
Complaint, Perez v. Cathedral Buffet, Inc., No. 5:15-cv-1577 (N.D. Ohio August 10, 2015). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 85. |
Ibid. See also DOL, "U.S. Department of Labor Files Suit Alleging Restaurant Classified Some Employees as Volunteers," press release, August 21, 2015, https://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/whd/WHD20151571.htm. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86. |
Ibid. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 87. |
Complaint, Perez v. Moranto, No. CIV-15-1378-D (W.D. Okla. Decemder 23, 2015). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 88. |
Ibid., at 5. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 89. |
Ibid. |