This report provides a high-level introduction to tribal and other Indigenous issues as well as a brief overview of federal programs, services, and funding for federally recognized Tribes, tribal citizens, and other Indigenous entities. The report also lists related CRS products available as additional resources. Appendix A contains a glossary of terms related to tribal and other Indigenous entities, and Appendix B lists selected statutes that authorize the federal government to provide programs and services benefiting Tribes, tribal citizens, and other Indigenous entities.
The United States is home to 574 federally recognized Tribes (hereinafter Tribes)—entities formally recognized as having a government-to-government relationship with the United States entailing special rights, immunities, and privileges.1 Tribes are "domestic dependent nations" that exercise inherent sovereign authority, including over internal tribal affairs.2 Although tribal sovereignty preexists the Constitution,3 the Indian Commerce Clause and other constitutional provisions give Congress broad and exclusive authority to legislate on issues related to Tribes.4 Accordingly, Congress may circumscribe Tribes' sovereignty at its sole discretion, but state and local entities generally may not.5
Congress enacts various laws to fulfill the federal trust responsibility, a legal obligation under which the United States—through treaties, acts of Congress, and court decisions—"has charged itself with moral obligations of the highest responsibility and trust" toward Tribes and tribal citizens.6 Congress's approach to the trust responsibility, and to tribal issues generally, has fluctuated over time. In the 1700s and 1800s, Congress ratified treaties with Tribes whereby Tribes often ceded lands to the United States and were removed to areas, often including reservations held in trust for Tribes by the United States, that were far from those Tribes' ancestral lands.7 In the late 1800s and early 1900s, laws often focused on assimilating Tribes into mainstream American culture, including by dividing tribal lands into individual allotments.8 In the 1930s and 1940s, Congress ended the allotment policy and granted more administrative control to Tribes, especially with the passage of the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934.9 In the 1950s and 1960s, Congress began terminating the federal recognition of some Tribes in an effort to integrate them into the general population.10 That period ended with passage of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) in 1975, through which Congress established a policy of tribal self-determination, respecting and promoting Tribes' autonomy to manage their own affairs.11
The resources listed below provide additional background information on issues related to federally recognized Tribes:
In addition to legislating on issues related to federally recognized Tribes, Congress enacts legislation relating to other Indigenous entities, such as state-recognized tribes, Native Hawaiians and Native Hawaiian Organizations, and Alaska Native Corporations.12 State-recognized tribes are tribal entities that, although they may not have a government-to-government relationship with the United States, have had their tribal identity formally recognized by a state government. Although there are no Tribes in Hawaii, at times Congress has recognized a special trust responsibility toward Native Hawaiians and acknowledged certain Native Hawaiian Organizations whose mission is to preserve Native Hawaiian culture and identity.13 Alaska Native Corporations are unique, state-chartered nonprofit or for-profit entities authorized by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) to manage resources and investments for the benefit of their Alaska Native shareholders.14 Other Indigenous entities may include individuals who claim Indigenous ancestry or identity. Some Indigenous peoples live or have lived in the U.S. territories and other outlying and insular areas, which include American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.
The resources listed below provide background information on some of these other Indigenous entities:
The federal trust responsibility may include a duty to protect tribal treaty rights, lands, assets, and water resources, and to ensure tribal access to education, health care, or other services. Therefore, enrolled tribal members (also termed tribal citizens) may be eligible for certain federal programs and services. Generally, status as a tribal citizen is distinct from individual self-identification as American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) or Native American, which are categories of ethnic identity used in certain contexts, such as on surveys conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau.15
To fulfill the federal trust responsibility, Congress has enacted multiple laws authorizing programs, services, or funding for Tribes, tribal citizens, and other Indigenous entities. All federal departments must uphold the federal trust responsibility, but Congress specifically directed three agencies to serve Tribes and tribal citizens: the Bureau of Indian Affairs,16 the Bureau of Indian Education,17 and the Indian Health Service.18 At other federal departments, Congress has authorized programs and services for Tribes focused on agriculture, child welfare and placement, disaster assistance, education, the environment and natural resource management, housing, health care, gaming, transportation, and broadband internet access, among other things. Similarly, appropriations laws for various federal departments often include funding for Tribes, tribal citizens, and other Indigenous entities.
Since 2004, the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has produced an annual Native American Funding Crosscut (Crosscut), which is one of the few publicly available federal sources of information about federal funding of programs, projects, and activities that, in whole or in part, relate to AI/ANs.19 The FY2025 Crosscut defines AI/AN as including individuals, tribal governments, village governments, urban Indian organizations, and tribal communities.20 The Crosscut is therefore not limited to programs benefitting federally recognized Tribes but nonetheless provides perspective on a range of related programs.
The resources listed below provide information about various federal programs, services, and funding for Tribes, tribal citizens, and other Indigenous entities:
This glossary of common terms and acronyms related to tribal issues is provided for general reference. Terminology related to tribal and other Indigenous entities may vary by statute.
Appendix B. Selected Authorizing Statutes
The following list contains selected statutes that authorize the federal government to provide programs and services for Tribes, tribal citizens, and other Indigenous entities. This list does not include laws relating to specific Tribes or legal settlements. This list is not comprehensive and is intended for informational purposes only.
1. |
25 C.F.R. §83.2. |
2. |
Okla. Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Tribe of Okla., 498 U.S. 505, 509 (1991) (quoting Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 1, 17 (1831)). |
3. |
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49, 56 (1978). |
4. |
See United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193, 200 (2004) ("[T]he Constitution grants Congress" powers "we have consistently described as 'plenary and exclusive'" to "legislate in respect to Indian tribes."). |
5. |
Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Cmty., 572 U.S. 782, 788 (2014) (quoting United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313, 323 (1978) ("The sovereignty that the Indian tribes retain is of a unique and limited character. It exists only at the sufferance of Congress, and is subject to complete defeasance. But until Congress acts, the tribes retain their existing sovereign powers. In sum, Indian tribes still possess those aspects of sovereignty not withdrawn by treaty or statute, or by implication as a necessary result of their dependent status."). |
6. |
Seminole Nation v. United States, 316 U.S. 286, 296-297 (1942). |
7. |
The governments of the 13 original colonies and, later, the United States negotiated treaties with Indigenous peoples until about 1871, when Congress ended this practice through the Indian Appropriations Act of 1871 (25 U.S.C. §71, Act of March 3, 1871, ch. 120, §1, 16 Stat. 566). See also National Archives, "Native American Heritage: American Indian Treaties," https://www.archives.gov/research/native-americans/treaties. Reservations include lands reserved for a Tribe (or multiple Tribes) by treaty, statute, or other agreement (25 C.F.R. §151.2). |
8. |
See, for example, General Allotment Act of 1887 (Dawes Act), ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388. |
9. |
P.L. 73-383, 48 Stat. 984 (1934). |
10. |
See, for example, Felix S. Cohen, "Section 1.06 Termination (1943–1961)" in Handbook of Federal Indian Law (LexisNexis, 2005) (noting that, starting in the 1950s, the federal government adopted an official "policy of rapid assimilation through termination"). |
11. |
P.L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203 (1975) (current version codified at 25 U.S.C. ch. 46, §§5301-5423). |
12. |
See, for example, Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, P.L. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971). |
13. |
See, for example, 42 U.S.C. §11701. |
14. |
See P.L. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971). |
15. |
U.S. Census Bureau, "American Indian or Alaska Native," in Glossary, accessed April 2, 2025, https://www.census.gov/glossary/?term=American+Indian+or+Alaska+Native. |
16. |
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), https://www.bia.gov/. |
17. |
DOI, Bureau of Indian Education (BIE), https://www.bie.edu/. |
18. |
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Indian Health Service (IHS), https://www.ihs.gov/. |
19. |
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), "Tribal Consultation," May 23, 2022, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/tribal-consultation/. |
20. |
See OMB, FY 2025 Native American Funding Crosscut, November 2024, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2025-Native-American-Funding-Crosscut-Report_508.pdf. |
21. |
P.L. 96-487, 94 Stat. 2371 (1980). |
22. |
P.L. 92-203, §3(b), 85 Stat. 688, 689 (1971). |
23. |
P.L. 92-203, §3(g) and §3(j), 85 Stat. 691, 692 (1971). |
24. |
P.L. 92-203, §3(g) and §3(j), 85 Stat. 691, 692 (1971). |
25. |
See, for example, P.L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203 (1975); Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, 594 U.S. 338, 367 (2021). |
26. |
P.L. 95-341, 92 Stat. 469 (1978). |
27. |
DOI, BIA, "Office of the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs," https://www.bia.gov/as-ia. The other Indian Affairs bureaus are BIA, BIE, and the Bureau of Trust Fund Administration (BTFA). |
28. |
DOI, BIA, https://www.bia.gov/. |
29. |
P.L. 67-85, 42 Stat. 208 (1921). |
30. |
DOI, BIE, https://www.bie.edu/. |
31. |
DOI, BIE, https://www.bie.edu/. |
32. |
Snyder Act, P.L. 67-85, 42 Stat. 208 (1921). Other statutes include the Every Student Succeeds Act, P.L. 114-95, 129 Stat. 1802 (2015); and the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988, P.L. 100-297, 102 Stat. 130, 385. |
33. |
DOI, BTFA, https://www.bia.gov/btfa. |
34. |
25 U.S.C. §5325; 25 U.S.C. §5363. |
35. |
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, https://www.cbp.gov/. |
36. |
See 8 U.S.C. §1185 note (Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative); 8 C.F.R. §235.1(e). |
37. |
See 25 C.F.R. §83.2. |
38. |
P.L. 102-477, 106 Stat. 2302 (1992) (current version at 25 U.S.C. ch. 36). This authority and its associated tribal plans are popularly known as "477" after the original public law number. |
39. |
P.L. 95-608, 92 Stat. 3069 (1978). |
40. |
P.L. 90-284, 82 Stat. 73 (1968). See 25 U.S.C. §1302. |
41. |
P.L. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467 (1988). |
42. |
P.L. 94-437, 90 Stat. 1400 (1976). |
43. |
HHS, IHS, https://www.ihs.gov/. |
44. |
P.L. 67-85, 42 Stat. 208 (1921). |
45. |
P.L. 73-383, 48 Stat. 984 (1934). |
46. |
P.L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203 (1975). |
47. |
594 U.S. 338, 367 (2021). |
48. |
§4(b), 88 Stat. 2204; P.L. 103-454 §102(2), 108 Stat. 4791 (1994). |
49. |
See, e.g., National Historic Preservation Act, P.L. 89-665, 80 Stat. 915 (1966); Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, P.L. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971). |
50. |
Johnson-O'Malley Act means the Act of April 16, 1934 (48 Stat. 596). See also 25 U.S.C. §5342; 25 C.F.R. Part 273. |
51. |
108 Stat. 4791 (1994). |
52. |
National Indian Gaming Commission, https://www.nigc.gov/. |
53. |
P.L. 101-601, 104 Stat. 3048 (1990). |
54. |
P.L. 104-330, 110 Stat. 4016 (1996). |
55. |
See, for example, the definition of Native Hawaiian in the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (P.L. 101-601, 104 Stat. 3049 (1990)); see also Native Hawaiian Health Care Act of 1988, P.L. 100-579, 102 Stat. 2916 (1988); P.L. 113-287, §3, 128 Stat. 3190 (2014). |
56. |
36 C.F.R. §800.16. |
57. |
See 25 U.S.C. §5325(l). These leases are commonly called 105(l) leases because they are authorized under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), §105(l). |
58. |
67 Stat. 588 (1953). |
59. |
Act of April 11, 1968, P.L. 90-284, §403, 82 Stat. 79. |
60. |
ISDEAA, P.L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203, 2206 (1975). These contracts are popularly known as "638 contracts" after ISDEAA's original public law number. |
61. |
See, for example, the CARES Act, Title VI, P.L. 116-136, 134 Stat. 504 (2020). |
62. |
P.L. 93-638, §4(c), 88 Stat. 2204. |
63. |
25 U.S.C. §1603(29). |
64. |
P.L. 103-322, Title IV, 108 Stat. 1796, 1902-1955 (1994). |
65. |
P.L. 113-4, §904, 127 Stat. 54, 120-123 (2013). |
66. |
P.L. 103-454, 108 Stat. 4791 (1994). |
67. |
P.L. 73-383, 48 Stat. 984 (1934). |
68. |
P.L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203 (1975). |
69. |
P.L. 67-85, 42 Stat. 208 (1921). |
70. |
P.L. 115-334, 132 Stat. 4490 (2018). |
71. |
P.L. 103-177, 107 Stat. 2011 (1993). |
72. |
P.L. 101-630, Title IV, 104 Stat. 4531, 4544-4556 (1990). |
73. |
P.L. 95-608, 92 Stat. 3069 (1978). |
74. |
P.L. 114-165, 130 Stat. 415 (2016). |
75. |
P.L. 95-341, 92 Stat. 469 (1978). |
76. |
P.L. 101-601, 104 Stat. 3048 (1990). |
77. |
P.L. 101-644, 104 Stat. 4662 (1990). |
78. |
P.L. 116-261, 134 Stat. 3306 (2020). |
79. |
P.L. 102-477, 106 Stat. 2302 (1992). |
80. |
P.L. 93-262, 88 Stat. 77 (1974). |
81. |
P.L. 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467 (1988). |
82. |
P.L. 106-568, 114 Stat. 2868 (2000). |
83. |
P.L. 114-221, 130 Stat. 847 (2016). |
84. |
P.L. 73-167, 48 Stat. 596 (1934). |
85. |
P.L. 100-297, Title V, 102 Stat. 130, 363-422 (1988). |
86. |
P.L. 94-437, 90 Stat. 1400 (1976). |
87. |
P.L. 100-579, 102 Stat. 2916 (1988). |
88. |
P.L. 67-34, 42 Stat. 108 (1921). |
89. |
P.L. 104-330, 110 Stat. 4016 (1996). |
90. |
P.L. 90-284, 82 Stat. 73 (1968). |
91. |
P.L. 103-322, Title IV, 108 Stat. 1796, 1902-1955 (1994), amended by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, P.L. 113-4, §904, 127 Stat. 54, 120-123. |
92. |
P.L. 103-176, 107 Stat. 2004 (1993). |
93. |
P.L. 116-166, 134 Stat. 766 (2020). |
94. |
P.L. 83-280, 67 Stat. 588 (1953). |
95. |
P.L. 116-165, 134 Stat. 760 (2020). |
96. |
P.L. 111-211, 124 Stat. 2258 (2010). |
97. |
P.L. 103-322, Title IV, 108 Stat. 1796, 1902-1955 (1994). |
98. |
P.L. 96-487, 94 Stat. 2371 (1980). |
99. |
P.L. 92-203, 85 Stat. 688 (1971). |
100. |
P.L. 108-374, 118 Stat. 1773 (2004). |
101. |
P.L. 67-34, 42 Stat. 108 (1921). |
102. |
P.L. 106-462, 114 Stat. 1991 (2000). |
103. |
P.L. 114-178, 130 Stat. 432 (2016). |
104. |
P.L. 103-412, 108 Stat. 4239 (1994). |
105. |
P.L. 112-151, 126 Stat. 1150 (2012). |
106. |
P.L. 97-459, 96 Stat. 2515 (1983). |
107. |
P.L. 97-382, 96 Stat. 1938 (1982). |
108. |
P.L. 109-58, Title V, 119 Stat. 594, 763-779 (2005). |
109. |
P.L. 84-615, 70 Stat. 334 (1956). |
110. |
P.L. 101-630, Title III, 104 Stat. 4531, 4532-4544 (1990). |