Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R46471
Congressional Research Service
For decades, Congress has authorized, modified, and funded federal programs to help communities address water supply and water infrastructure needs, including both wastewater and drinking water. Departments and agencies that administer these assistance programs include the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration.
There are generally two approaches to authorization and funding: individual project authorization and program authorization. Reclamation and USACE administer a number of individual projects pursuant to direct authorizations from Congress. Other agencies administer programs with standing authorizations that establish eligibility criteria rather than identify specific projects. As a practical matter, individual project authorizations generally must be funded each year and provide no guarantee of funding or predictable assistance over time. By comparison, the authorized programs generally provide a relatively consistent source of funding for a range of eligible activities and recipients. Although these authorized programs are not guaranteed to receive annual appropriations, in recent years Congress has generally provided some level of annual appropriations to the water infrastructure programs identified in this report.
The federal agencies responsible for administering water-related projects and programs undertake these activities pursuant to wide-ranging missions with varying scopes. For example, EPA’s authorities relate to protecting public health and the environment, whereas the Economic Development Administration and HUD focus on community and economic development. Some agencies’ activities are national in scope (e.g., USDA and EPA), while others are regionally focused (e.g., Reclamation’s programs and projects, which are limited to the 17 “reclamation states” in the West). Some focus primarily on urban areas (HUD), whereas others concentrate mainly on rural areas (USDA).
Federal funding for these programs and projects varies greatly and continues to compete with many other programs that are supported by discretionary spending. Some of these programs have received supplemental appropriations, such as the funds provided in the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58). FY2024 appropriations highlights (including supplemental appropriations) are listed below:
• $851.2 million for capitalization grants to states under EPA’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) program, $494.4 million for EPA’s Drinking Water SRF program, $787.7 million for wastewater infrastructure, and $631.7 million for drinking water infrastructure through community project funding/congressionally directed spending (IIJA provided $2.403 billion for each SRF program);
• $3.0 billion for EPA’s Drinking Water SRF program for lead service line replacement and related activities;
• $64.6 million for subsidy costs for the EPA-administered Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) program, allowing the agency to provide credit assistance up to $12.5 billion;
• $255.0 million for grants, $960.0 million in direct loan authority, and $50.0 million for guaranteed loan authority for USDA’s rural water and waste disposal program;
• $3.3 billion for HUD’s Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program (water and wastewater projects are among many eligible uses);
• $133.0 million for the Economic Development Administration’s Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance programs (water and wastewater projects are among many eligible uses);
• $197.7 million for USACE environmental infrastructure projects;
• $376.0 million for Reclamation water storage projects and $232.8 million for Reclamation rural water projects; and
• $188.0 million for Reclamation’s Title XVI reclamation/recycling projects.
August 1, 2024
Jonathan L. Ramseur, Coordinator Acting Section Research Manager
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Department of the Interior ............................................................................................................. 12
Bureau of Reclamation ............................................................................................................ 12
“Traditional” Multipurpose Reclamation Projects ............................................................ 13
WIIN Act Water Storage Projects ..................................................................................... 15 Rural Water Supply Projects ............................................................................................. 16 Title XVI Projects ............................................................................................................. 18 Desalination Projects ........................................................................................................ 20
Department of Defense .................................................................................................................. 22
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Civil Works ........................................................... 22
USACE Civil Works Projects ........................................................................................... 22 USACE Assistance for Nonfederal Projects ..................................................................... 23 Storage of Municipal and Industrial Water at Multipurpose USACE Reservoirs ............. 24
Environmental Infrastructure Assistance .......................................................................... 26
Department of Agriculture ............................................................................................................. 28
Rural Utilities Service (Water and Waste Disposal Programs) ............................................... 28
Water and Wastewater Loans and Grants .......................................................................... 28
Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants ............................................................ 31 Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grants ...................................................................... 31
Natural Resources Conservation Service ................................................................................ 32
Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations .................................................................... 32
Small Watershed Loans ..................................................................................................... 34
Small Watershed Rehabilitation ........................................................................................ 34
Environmental Protection Agency ................................................................................................. 36
Clean Water State Revolving Fund Loan Program ................................................................. 36 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Loan Program ............................................................ 39 Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program ..................................................... 42
Other EPA Water Infrastructure Funding Programs ................................................................ 45
Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Grant Program ............................................................. 45 Technical Assistance for Rural, Small, and Tribal Wastewater Systems .......................... 46 Technical Assistance for Small, Rural, and Tribal Drinking Water Systems .................... 47 Small and Disadvantaged Communities Drinking Water Grant Program ......................... 47
Lead Reduction Projects Grant Program .......................................................................... 49 Small Water System Resilience and Sustainability Grant Program .................................. 49 Midsize and Large Drinking Water System Infrastructure Resilience and
Sustainability Program ................................................................................................... 50
Department of Housing and Urban Development ......................................................................... 51
Community Development Block Grants ................................................................................. 51 CDBG Section 108 Loan Guarantees ...................................................................................... 54
Department of Commerce ............................................................................................................. 56
Economic Development Administration Public Works Program ............................................ 56 Economic Development Administration Economic Adjustment Assistance Program ............ 58
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service
Table 1. Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water Supply Infrastructure: Federal Funding
for Projects and Programs ............................................................................................................ 3
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 62
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 1
This report provides background and funding information on water infrastructure projects, including those involving wastewater and drinking water, and water supply projects traditionally funded by the federal government. The report also discusses federal funding programs that provide assistance to communities to support these types of projects and related, eligible activities.
For decades, Congress has authorized, modified, and funded federal programs and projects to help communities address water supply and water infrastructure needs. The approaches and statutory frameworks supporting water infrastructure vary. For example, the Department of the Interior (DOI) Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) administer a number of individual projects that require direct, individual project authorizations from Congress prior to being eligible to receive appropriations.1
Other agencies administer programs with standing authorizations that establish eligibility criteria rather than identify specific projects. Although these authorized programs are not guaranteed to receive annual appropriations, Congress has generally provided some level of annual appropriations in recent years to the water infrastructure programs identified in this report. Agencies administering such programs covered in this report include
• the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA),
• the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
• the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and
• the Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA).
In addition, the projects and programs differ due to the varied scopes and missions of the implementing agencies. For example, the statutory requirements for EPA-administered programs generally focus on protecting public health and the environment. The EDA and HUD programs focus on community and economic development. Further, the scope of the specific programs and authorized projects discussed in this report—while all address either water supply or wastewater and drinking water infrastructure to some degree—differ in other respects. Some are national in scope (e.g., USDA and EPA), while others are regionally focused (e.g., Reclamation’s programs and projects). Some focus primarily on urban areas (HUD), whereas others concentrate mainly on rural areas (USDA).
For each of the projects and programs discussed, this report describes their purposes, financing mechanisms, eligibility requirements, recent funding, and statutory/regulatory authority. The report does not address special projects and programs aimed specifically at assisting Indian tribes, Alaska Native villages, colonias,2 or other regional programs, such as those associated exclusively with the Appalachian region or U.S. territories.
This report focuses on programs that support drinking water and wastewater infrastructure projects and also municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply projects and activities. This report generally does not address water projects and programs for irrigation, flood control, hydroelectricity, and recreation. However, in some cases (noted below), a federal program or
1 For Reclamation, this also includes some projects that must be submitted to, and approved by, Congress prior to funding (but no direct authorization is required). For more information, see the “Bureau of Reclamation” section below.
2 Colonias are typically rural, unincorporated communities or housing developments near the U.S.-Mexico border that lack some or all basic infrastructure, including plumbing and public water and sewer.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 2
agency (e.g., Reclamation and USDA) may primarily support one or more of these other objectives while providing some support for M&I activities, even if only incidentally.
Other federal authorities (e.g., ones administered by Reclamation and USACE) may be available to assist with the provision of emergency water and wastewater needs, such as improving access to water supplies during a drought. Such authorities are generally not discussed in this report.3
Table 1 summarizes financial and other key elements of the projects and program activities discussed in this report. As indicated in the table, the level and scope of federal funding for these programs and projects varies greatly. Congressional funding for the water programs continues to compete with many other federal programs supported by discretionary spending. Stakeholders and others continue to call for increased funding for these programs.
While Congress has maintained or increased federal support in recent years for some traditional financing tools—project grants, formula grants, capitalization grants, direct and guaranteed loans—policymakers have also considered alternative financing approaches and options to encourage private-sector investments and public-private partnerships (e.g., see the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program section below). Some supporters of these approaches see them as options to supplement or complement, without replacing, traditional financing tools. In addition, in recent years, Congress has revised some existing programs and authorized new grant programs in an effort to target water infrastructure needs of small and disadvantaged communities.
3 These programs are not discussed further in this report except for the Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). For more information, see CRS Report R46911, Drought in the United States: Science, Policy, and Selected Federal Authorities, coordinated by Charles V. Stern and Eva Lipiec.
CRS-3
Table 1. Wastewater, Drinking Water, and Water Supply Infrastructure:
Federal Funding for Projects and Programs
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
DOI Bureau of Reclamationb
Multipurpose projects, which may include some municipal and industrial (M&I) activities
De facto 40- to 50-year loan
0%/100%, with interest for M&I uses
Not applicable $1.90 billion $1.60 billion
DOI Bureau of Reclamation Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act Water Storage Projects
Multipurpose projects, which may include some M&I activities
Direct funding for the federal share of costs, with the reimbursable share of these costs subject to repayment (i.e., de facto loans)
50%/50% for federal projects; 25%/75% for nonfederal projects
Not applicable $134.0 million —
DOI Bureau of Reclamation (Title XVI, P.L. 102-575)b
Wastewater reclamation and reuse,c which may include some M&I activities
De facto grant Up to 25%/75%; dollar limits may apply
Not readily available
$30.0 million $4.0 million
DOI Bureau of Reclamation Rural Water Supplyd
Indian and non- Indian rural water supply
De facto grant, plus loan
Non-Indian projects: range from 75%/25% to 80%/20%; Indian projects: 100%/0%
Not applicable (see report text for details)
$124.8 million IIJA: $108.0 million
$58.5 million IIJA: $82.0 million
DOI Bureau of Reclamation Desalination Project Construction
Brackish and seawater desalination, which may include some M&I activities
Grant Up to 25%/75%; dollar limits may apply
Not readily available
$12.0 million $12.0 million
CRS-4
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
USACE Multipurpose Reservoirs with Storage for M&I Water
Reservoirs may provide M&I water storage through permanent or temporary storage agreements
Upfront federal financing of reservoirs; M&I storage is repaid through fees collected from nonfederal entities
0%/100%, with interest
Not applicable $46.1 millione $6.0 million
USACE Environmental Infrastructure Assistance
Assistance is typically for public drinking water and wastewater infrastructure and source water protection and development
Technical/planning and design services or grants; design and construction services or grants
75%/25% generally; some authorities are 65%/35%
Varies (see report text for details)
$197.7 million from prior unobligated IIJA appropriations
—
CRS-5
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
USDA Rural Utilities Service, Water and Waste Disposal Program
Municipal water supply and treatment, wastewater facilities, and waste disposal
Loans and grants to eligible entities
Up to 75%/25% for grants 0%/100% for loans
Not readily available
Direct loans: $74 million loan subsidy to support $860 million in loan authority Loan guarantees: No loan subsidy needed to support $50 million in loan authority Grants: $255 million CPF/CDS grants: $117 million
Direct loans: $140 million loan subsidy to support $1.350 billion in loan authority Direct loans (1% interest rate): $6 million loan subsidy to support $20 million in loan authority Loan guarantees: No loan subsidy needed to support $50.0 million in loan authority Grants: $385.0 million Grants (lead piping): $100.0 million
USDA Rural Utilities Service, Rural Decentralized Water Systems Program
Construction, refurbishing, and servicing of individual household water well systems and decentralized wastewater systems
Grants to private nonprofit organizations for the purpose of providing loans and subgrants to eligible individuals
100%/0% Loans up to $15,000 per household
Grants: $5.0 million Grants: $5.0 million
CRS-6
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
USDA Rural Utilities Service, Emergency Community Water Assistance Grants
For water treatment, storage, or distribution projects to secure adequate quantities of safe water
Grants for public or private nonprofit entities
100%/0% Water source grants up to $1.0 million Water transmission line grants up to $150,000
Grants: $10.0 million Grants: $15.0 million
USDA Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations Program
Multiple activities but must generally include flood control measures
Project grants and technical advisory services
100%/0% Varies according to purpose of improvement activity
Not applicable $35.0 million (discretionary) $50.0 million (mandatory) $20.4 million in CPF/CDS
$70.0 million (discretionary) $50.0 million (mandatory)
USDA Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program
Dam rehabilitation Project grants and technical advisory services
100%/0% Varies according to purpose of improvement activity
Not applicable $1.0 million $2.0 million
CRS-7
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
EPA, Clean Water State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program
Municipal wastewater treatment, stormwater infrastructure, and other eligible projects and activities
Grants to states to capitalize loan funds SRF loans made by states to local project sponsors States required to provide a minimum level of additional subsidization (e.g., principal forgiveness) and authorized to provide further subsidization
80%/20% for grants to states to capitalize SRFs 0%/100%f (project loans are repaid 100% to states)
Average capitalization grant to states and territories: $59.0 million (FY2024)g Average assistance from SRF: $5.2 million (FY2023)h
$851.2 million for capitalization grants $787.7 million (CPF/CDS) IIJA: $2.403 billion for capitalization grants $225.0 million for emerging contaminants
$1.240 billion for capitalization grants IIJA: $2.603 billion for capitalization grants $225.0 million for emerging contaminants
EPA, Drinking Water SRF Loan Program
Public water supply projects needed to meet federal drinking water standards and to address serious health risks
Grants to states to capitalize loan funds SRF loans made by states to local project sponsors States required to provide a minimum level of additional subsidization (e.g., principal forgiveness) and authorized to provide further subsidization
80%/20% for grants to states to capitalize SRFs 0%/100%f (project loans are repaid 100% to states)
Average capitalization grant to state: $20.3 million (through FY2023)i Average assistance from SRF: $2.9 million (FY2023)
$494.4 million for capitalization grants $631.7 million (CPF/CDS) IIJA: $2.403 billion for capitalization grants $3.0 billion for lead service line (LSL) replacement $800.0 million for emerging contaminants
Request: Capitalization grants $1.126 billion IIJA: $2.603 billion for capitalization grants $3.0 billion for LSL replacement $800.0 million for emerging contaminants
CRS-8
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
EPA, Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Program
Wastewater and drinking water projects with costs of $20.0 million or larger (or $5.0 million for rural areas)
Loans or loan guarantees
In general, WIFIA funding cannot exceed 49% of project costs
$157 million (average of 127 closed loans)j
$64.6 million to cover subsidy costs; authorized to provide no more than $12.5 billion in credit assistance
$72 million to cover subsidy costs; authorized to provide no more than $12.5 billion in credit assistance
EPA, Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Grant Program
Sewer overflow or stormwater infrastructure projects, with priority for financially distressed communities
Grants to states, which make grants to municipalities
55%/45% Average allotment to states and territories in FY2024 was $725,000k
$41.0 million $50.0 million
EPA, Technical Assistance for Rural, Small, and Tribal Wastewater Systems
Assist rural, small, and tribal publicly owned treatment works and decentralized wastewater treatment systems to comply with the Clean Water Act and apply for financing from the Clean Water SRF
Grants to qualified nonprofits to provide technical assistance
100%/0% EPA awarded $41 million to 9 organizations in 2023l
$25.5 million $18.0 million
EPA, Technical Assistance for Rural, Small, and Tribal Drinking Water Systems
Assist public water systems and particularly small systems (serving 25- 10,000 customers) with Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) compliance
Grants to qualified nonprofits to provide technical assistance
100%/0% FY2023 awards were made to three entities, average grant amount was $9.8 millionm
$26.0 million —
CRS-9
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
EPA, Small and Disadvantaged Communities Drinking Water Grant Program
Drinking water projects needed to meet federal drinking water standards, household water quality testing, assistance that benefits a community on a per-household basis
Grants to states on behalf of an underserved community, public water systems, tribal water systems
55%/45% for grants (EPA may waive match under certain circumstances)
Appropriations distributed noncompetitively to states
$28.5 million $30.2 million
EPA, Lead Reduction Projects Grant Program
Drinking water projects and activities to reduce lead in drinking water; replacement of LSLs; corrosion control activities
Grants to community water systems, tribal water systems, states, schools, and municipalities
80%/20% for grants (EPA may waive match under certain circumstances)
EPA awarded an average of $4.7 million to grant recipientsn
$22.0 million $64.5 million
EPA, Small Water Systems Resilience and Sustainability Grant Program
Projects that increase water use efficiency, enhance water supply through watershed management or desalination, and increase energy efficiency in the conveyance or treatment of drinking water
Grants to community water systems, tribal water systems, states
90%/10% for grants (EPA may waive match under certain circumstances)
No assistance provided to date
$6.5 million $25.0 million
CRS-10
Agency and
Projects or
Program
Project/
Program Purposes
Type of
Financial
Assistance
Federal/
Nonfederal Cost
Share
Average
Amount of
Assistance
FY2024 Enacted
Fundinga
FY2025 President
Funding Request
and FY2025 IIJA
Enacted
EPA, Midsize and Large Water Systems Resilience and Sustainability Grant Program
Projects include water conservation, desalination construction, and watershed management activities, among others
50% of grants for water systems serving 10,000 or more to 100,000 individuals, and 50% for systems serving more than 100,000 individuals
100%/0% No assistance provided to date
$2.3 million $5.0 million
HUD, Community Development Block Grant Programo
Multipurpose community development projects; may include water and waste disposal
Formula grants, 70% of which are reserved for urban areas, 30% for state grants
100%/0% Entitlement formula grants: $2.1 million; average award to state programs: $20.0 million (for sub-awards to communities) in FY2024
$3.3 billion $2.8 billion
Commerce, EDA, Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance (EAA)p
Multipurpose economic development projects; may include water and sewer
Project grants Generally 50%/50%
Average Public Works grant $1.4 million; average EAA grant $650,000 (FY2023)
$100 million allocated for the Public Works program and $33 million for the EAA program
$105.5 million requested for the Public Works program and $39.5 million for the EAA program
Source: CRS. Notes: An em dash (—) indicates that the President did not make a funding request. DOI = Department of the Interior; USACE = U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; HUD = Department of Housing and Urban Development; EDA = Economic Development Administration; CPF/CDS = community project funding/congressionally directed spending. a. Unless otherwise noted, FY2024 funding is provided in P.L. 118-42. In some cases, funding amounts may address other objectives.
b. These projects must generally be authorized by Congress prior to construction. Municipal water supply is not the primary purpose of these projects.
c. Title XVI supports what is generally considered water reuse and reclamation. Reclamation is treatment of wastewater or other impaired surface water (e.g., seawater) or groundwater (e.g., groundwater with high levels of contaminants, such as arsenic or salts) to make it usable or reusable for nonpotable or indirect
CRS-11
potable use (e.g., potable use after storage and recovery, such as after groundwater recharge). Reuse connotes planned beneficial use (e.g., landscape watering, agricultural irrigation, and industrial cooling) of treated municipal wastewater.
d. These projects must generally be authorized by Congress prior to construction.
e. This funding does not include costs for projects in the explanatory statement funded from prior unobligated IIJA appropriations.
f. This ratio does not account for additional subsidization. Under certain conditions, states may provide additional subsidization, including principal forgiveness, negative interest loans, or a combination. In addition, appropriations acts in recent years have required states to use minimum percentages of their allotted funds to provide additional subsidization, including grants.
g. This figure is based on FY2024 allotments to states and territories from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58). See Memorandum from Bruno Pigott, Acting Assistant Administrator, to Water Division Directors, Regions I-X, “Fiscal Year 2024 Allotments for the State Revolving Fund Provisions of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Base Program Funding,” Attachment I, April 3, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-04/fy24-joint-srf-allotments-memorandum_0.pdf.
h. This figure is based on FY2023 total dollars of annual assistance provided ($8.8 billion) and total number of assistance agreements (1,682) from the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) National Information Management System, “National Report,” at https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/clean-water-state-revolving-fund-cwsrf- national-information-management-system-reports.
i. “Average annual capitalization grant” includes emergency supplemental appropriations provided by IIJA (P.L. 117-58) directed toward specific project purposes (e.g., lead service line replacement). Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “Annual Allotment of Federal Funds for States, Tribes, and Territories,” at https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf/annual-allotment-federal-funds-states-tribes-and-territories.
j. EPA, “WIFIA Closed Loans,” at https://www.epa.gov/wifia/wifia-closed-loans.
k. Memorandum from Raffael Stein, Director, Water Infrastructure Division, to Regional Water Division Directors, “Allocation of Federal Fiscal Year 2024 Funding for the Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grant Program,” April 19, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-05/osg-fy-2024- allotment-memorandum.pdf.
l. For more information, see EPA, “Training and Technical Assistance (TA) Program for Rural, Small, and Tribal Wastewater Systems,” at https://www.epa.gov/small- and-rural-wastewater-systems/training-and-technical-assistance-ta-program-rural-small-and.
m. EPA, “Biden-Harris Administration Announces $30.7 Million to Support Water Systems in Small and Rural Communities,” May 21, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/
newsreleases/biden-harris-administration-announces-307-million-support-water-systems-small-and.
n. EPA, “WIIN Grant: Reduction in Lead Exposure Via Drinking Water,” at https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/wiin-grant-reduction-lead-exposure-drinking-water.
o. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) figures in this table do not include Community Development Fund set-asides.
p. The totals for the EAA program do not include supplemental appropriations or annual appropriations directed to the Assistance to Coal Communities (ACC), Assistance to Biomass Closure Communities (BCC), and Assistance to Energy Communities initiatives.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 12
The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) was established to implement the Reclamation Act of 1902, which authorized the construction of water works to provide water for irrigation in arid western states.6 Reclamation owns and manages 475 dams and 337 reservoirs, which are capable of storing 245 million acre-feet of water.7 These facilities serve approximately 31 million people, delivering a total of approximately 28.5 million acre-feet8 of water annually in nondrought years. Of this amount, M&I water deliveries total approximately 2.8 million acre-feet annually and have more than doubled since 1970.
Historically, Reclamation primarily supports M&I water supplies as part of larger, multipurpose federal reclamation projects serving irrigation, flood control, power supply, and recreation purposes. However, it has constructed few such projects in recent years. Since 1980, Congress has individually authorized construction of several “rural water supply” projects that have also served these purposes. Further, since 1992 Congress has also authorized nonfederal participation in reclamation wastewater and reuse/recycling projects. These projects, discussed below, are known as Title XVI projects because they were first authorized in 1992 under Title XVI of P.L. 102-575.
Congress has recently expanded Reclamation’s involvement in other types of nonfederal water supply projects. In the 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN Act; P.L. 114-322), Congress added authority for Reclamation to support nonfederal construction of brackish and seawater desalination projects and added new authority for Reclamation to support water storage project construction (generally referred to here as “WIIN Act water storage projects”) on a cost-shared basis, including construction of nonfederal water storage projects. Each of these areas is discussed below. In P.L. 117-169 (popularly known as the Inflation Reduction Act, or IRA), Congress appropriated $550.0 million for Reclamation to provide up to 100% of the cost for water projects where the primary purpose is to provide domestic water supplies to disadvantaged communities or households (see text box below).
4 This section was prepared by Charles V. Stern, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division, and Anna E. Normand, Analyst in Natural Resources Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
5 For more information on Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) water supply authorities and activities, see CRS Report R46303, Bureau of Reclamation: History, Authorities, and Issues for Congress, by Charles V. Stern and Anna E. Normand.
6 Reclamation is generally authorized to construct projects only in the 17 western states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming) unless otherwise directed by Congress. For example, in 1986, Congress authorized Reclamation to also work in U.S. territories (P.L. 99-396), and §8501(1) of P.L. 116-9 authorized Reclamation to provide grants for water efficiency improvements in Hawaii and Alaska, in addition to other authorized areas.
7 U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), Budget Justifications and Performance Information, Fiscal Year 2016: Bureau of Reclamation, February 2015, p. 2, at http://www.usbr.gov/budget/2016/FY16_Budget_Justifications.pdf.
8 An acre-foot is the amount of water needed to cover one acre of land one foot deep, or 325,851 gallons.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 13
Bureau of Reclamation’s Disadvantaged Community Domestic Water Supply
Projects
Section 50231 of P.L. 117-169, commonly referred to as the Inflation Reduction Act, appropriated $550.0 million, available through FY2031, for the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) to provide up to 100% of the cost for the planning, design, and/or construction of water projects where the primary purpose is to provide domestic water supplies to disadvantaged communities or households in a Reclamation state or territory (43 U.S.C. §391). The funding mechanism may be via grants, contracts, or financial assistance agreements at a cost share determined by the Commissioner of Reclamation. Utilizing Section 50231, Reclamation announced $320.0 million to assist tribes under a new Tribal Domestic Water Supplies Program. Reclamation has also announced that $16.5 million is available to the U.S. territories of American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands for projects to provide domestic water supplies to communities that do not have reliable access to potable water. In addition, Reclamation has supported some eligible proposals for WaterSMART Planning and Project Design Grants and WaterSMART Drought Resiliency Projects in FY2024 above the usual 50% federal cost share. Reclamation has stated that it continues to evaluate other funding options to implement Section 50231. Sources: Reclamation, “Biden-Harris Administration Announces $320 Million for Tribal Domestic Water Infrastructure,” April 2, 2024, at https://www.usbr.gov/newsroom/news-release/4789; Reclamation, “Biden-Harris Administration Announces $11 Million to Bolster Water Supply in U.S. Territories as Part of Investing in America Agenda,” May 23, 2024, at https://www.usbr.gov/newsroom/news-release/4846; Department of the Interior, “Biden-Harris Administration Delivers $147 Million from Investing in America Agenda for Drought Resiliency and Water Supply Reliability Across the West,” May 6, 2024, at https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/biden-harris- administration-delivers-147-million-investing-america-agenda-drought#:~:text= DURANGO%2C%20Colo.,42%20projects%20in%20ten%20states.
Historically, Reclamation constructed projects with federal funds, then established a repayment schedule based on the amount of total construction costs allocated to specific project purposes. Reclamation project authorizations typically require 100% repayment, with interest, for the M&I portion of water supply facilities, which makes Reclamation assistance a de facto long-term loan.9 A similar arrangement is required for the federal portion of WIIN Act water storage projects. For M&I projects under rural water, Title XVI, desalination, and disadvantaged community domestic water supply authorities, Congress has established terms providing some or all federal funding for projects on a nonreimbursable basis.
“Traditional” Multipurpose Reclamation Projects10
Reclamation undertakes “traditional” reclamation projects (i.e., projects authorized under the structure laid out in the Reclamation Act of 1902 and related laws) at the explicit direction of Congress. Local project sponsors may approach Reclamation or Congress with proposals for project construction and funding. However, except where blanket feasibility study authorizations exist (e.g., certain program areas described below), specific project feasibility studies must first be authorized by Congress.11 Once a feasibility study is completed, congressional authorization is
9 Repayment obligations are typically spread over a 40- or 50-year repayment term. In contrast to municipal and industrial (M&I) repayment, Reclamation-built irrigation facilities are generally repaid without interest over similar time periods.
10 This section discusses “traditional” authority for Reclamation to construct water resources projects. Reclamation also has a similar (but separate) authority to construct new surface water storage projects under Section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act (WIIN Act; P.L. 114-322). For more information about how this authority differs from Reclamation’s traditional construction authority, see CRS In Focus IF10626, Reclamation Water Storage Projects: Section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, by Charles V. Stern.
11 See Section 8 of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72; 16 U.S.C. §460l-19).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 14
typically sought prior to a request for construction appropriations.12 Because there is no “program” per se, there are no general eligibility or program criteria for selecting large, multipurpose projects. Rather, Congress relies on information provided in feasibility studies, including cost-benefit, engineering, and environmental analyses and policy considerations. While Reclamation maintains almost 200 of these projects throughout the country, it has constructed few new reclamation projects in recent years.
Individual authorization statutes establish project purposes. Generally, M&I projects are part of larger, multipurpose projects such as those built for irrigation water supply, flood control, and hydropower purposes.
Projects are financed and constructed up front by the federal government. Costs for M&I portions of such projects are generally considered reimbursable to the government and are thus scheduled to be repaid in full, with interest, over extended terms. Irrigation districts must also repay their share of project benefits, but such payments are not subject to interest charges. Other water supply costs, such as costs for fish and wildlife enhancement, are considered nonreimbursable pursuant to federal law, and repayment is not required.
Generally, local governments and organizations, such as irrigation, water, or conservation districts, may approach Reclamation and/or Congress for project support. All construction project funding must be appropriated by Congress. As noted earlier, Reclamation works only on projects located in the 17 western states (32 Stat. 388; 43 U.S.C. §§391 et seq.) unless otherwise specifically authorized.
Funding information for the M&I portions of multipurpose reclamation projects is not readily available. Total discretionary Reclamation appropriations (gross current authority for all Reclamation projects and programs, not including permanent funding) for FY2024 were $1.90 billion. The total FY2025 budget request for Reclamation was $1.60 billion.13
Reclamation generally carries out its water supply activities in 17 western states as authorized by the Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended (32 Stat. 388; 43 U.S.C. §§391 et seq.), as well as through hundreds of individual project authorization statutes.
12 Section 9(a) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939 (53 Stat. 1193; 43 U.S.C. §485h(a)) provides that, if the Secretary of the Interior finds that the allocable benefits of the project equal or outweigh anticipated costs, then the project shall be deemed authorized. Even so, the Secretary of the Interior has first sought congressional approval for large construction projects in recent decades. In any case, Congress would need to provide appropriations for any new project construction.
13 These amounts include funding requests for Rural Water and Title XVI programs, discussed below.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 15
WIIN Act Water Storage Projects14
Congress enacted new authority for Reclamation to support surface and groundwater storage projects (i.e., authority apart from the aforementioned “traditional” project authority) under Section 4007 of the WIIN Act.15 Congress authorized $335.0 million in discretionary appropriations for these projects, and approved a different approach than the traditional reclamation law process of federal project study and construction with full, up-front federal funding for individual projects.
Funding for water storage projects under Section 4007 is available for two primary project types. Federally owned storage projects (surface water storage projects to which the United States holds title and which were authorized to be constructed pursuant to reclamation law and regulations) may be no more than 50% federally funded. State-led storage projects (surface water or groundwater storage projects constructed, operated, and maintained by states or political subdivisions) may be no more than 25% federally funded. Prior to the WIIN Act, Congress had not authorized Reclamation to fund state-led water storage projects.
Before projects can receive federal support under the WIIN Act authority, several milestones must be met. The Secretary of the Interior must find that the project is feasible and provides benefits proportionate to the federal government’s cost share, and project sponsors must agree to pay their portion of project costs up front. Appropriations under the Section 4007 authority are available to individual projects only after the Secretary transmits a list of recommended projects and funding levels to Congress and Congress designates those projects by name in an enacted appropriations act.16
Any project that meets the aforementioned criteria is eligible for funding allocations by Reclamation. However, Congress also stipulated that in order to move forward, the Secretary must find projects feasible by January 1, 2021.17 As of March 30, 2024, Reclamation had recommended funding for 13 projects in three states; Reclamation also recommended 8 of these projects for construction prior to the aforementioned WIIN Act deadline. These projects are eligible for construction funding moving forward.
Congress did not specify purposes for WIIN Act water storage projects, only that a project must be feasible and have federal benefits “in accordance with the reclamation laws.”18 To date, projects receiving funding under this authority are expected to provide benefits related to agricultural irrigation and/or M&I uses, among other things.
Water storage projects determined by Reclamation to be eligible under Section 4007 of the WIIN Act may receive direct, up-front federal funding in amounts recommended by Reclamation and approved by Congress, subject to the WIIN Act’s authorized cost shares (i.e., 50% for federal
14 For more on this authority, see CRS In Focus IF10626, Reclamation Water Storage Projects: Section 4007 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, by Charles V. Stern, and CRS Report R47987, Bureau of Reclamation Support for Water Storage Projects, by Charles V. Stern.
15 43 U.S.C. §390b note.
16 For more information, see §4007(a) and (b) of P.L. 114-322.
17 P.L. 114-322, §4007(i).
18 P.L. 114-322, §4007(b)(3)(A), §4007(c)(2)(B)(i).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 16
projects, 25% for nonfederal projects). Similar to the “traditional” multipurpose federal reclamation projects discussed above, the federal share for WIIN Act storage projects is subject to a cost allocation by Reclamation during the study process that determines which portions of the federal cost share are reimbursable and nonreimbursable. Reimbursable costs, which include the portions of benefits estimated to accrue to M&I agricultural water supplies, must be repaid by project sponsors over a 40-year period (with interest for M&I water supply benefits, and without interest for agricultural irrigation benefits). Nonreimbursable costs, such as water supplies for fish and wildlife purposes and flood control, are considered federal benefits and do not have to be repaid.
Eligible projects must be located in the 17 western states and territories authorized in reclamation law and may include federal projects—projects to which the United States holds title and were authorized and constructed pursuant to reclamation laws. “State-led” projects—projects constructed, operated, and maintained by any state, department of a state, subdivision of a state, or public agency organized pursuant to state law—are also eligible for funding under this section.19
Similar to funding for traditional reclamation projects, there is no funding breakdown available for the M&I portions of WIIN Act water storage projects. Congress enacted $134.0 million in FY2024 discretionary funding for WIIN Act water storage projects in P.L. 117-103. Congress also appropriated $1.05 billion for these projects over the FY2022-FY2026 time period in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA; P.L. 117-58). Reclamation allocated $811.0 million in IIJA funding to be obligated on these projects in its FY2022-FY2025 IIJA spend plans.20 The Administration requested no funding for these projects in its FY2025 budget request, but it recommended allocation of another $207.2 million in IIJA funding for these projects in its FY2025 IIJA spend plan.
Water storage projects are authorized under Subtitle J, Section 4007, of the WIIN Act (130 Stat. 1863-1866, 43 U.S.C. §390b note).
Rural Water Supply Projects21
Similar to its traditional multipurpose projects, Reclamation has undertaken individual rural water projects, largely at the explicit direction of Congress. In lieu of the project-based approach to authorizing new rural water projects, Congress authorized a rural water supply program in the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006 (Title I of P.L. 109-451; 42 U.S.C. §§2401 et seq.). Under the program, Reclamation was authorized to work with rural communities and Indian tribes to identify M&I water needs and options to address such needs through appraisal investigations and, in some cases, feasibility studies. In 2008, Reclamation published an interim
19 P.L. 114-322, §4007(a)(1)-(2).
20 FY2022-FY2025 Bureau of Reclamation Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) Spend Plans are available at https://www.usbr.gov/bil/2022-spendplan.html.
21 See also CRS Report R46308, Bureau of Reclamation Rural Water Projects, by Anna E. Normand.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 17
final rule establishing future program criteria.22 According to Reclamation, between 2006 and 2016, it used this authority to study approximately 22 projects to varying extents. It did not recommend any projects for construction, as authorized by Congress. No projects have been constructed under this authority, which expired at the end of FY2016 and has not been renewed.
Congress continues to provide funding for previously authorized rural water projects. In addition, in the Clean Water for Rural Communities Act (Division FF, Title XI, §1110, of P.L. 116-260), Congress authorized a new rural water project, the Musselshell-Judith Rural Water System, and the review of the Dry-Redwater Regional Water Authority System study.23
Individual authorization statutes have established rural water project purposes. Some rural water project authorizations meet obligations under Indian water settlements or otherwise provide benefits to Indian tribes.
Projects are generally cost shared between the federal government and local sponsors. The federal government pays up to 100% of the cost of Indian rural water supply projects, including operation and maintenance, and the federal cost share for current nontribal projects ranges from 75% to 80%. Reclamation requests and distributes funding from Congress generally based on prioritization criteria aimed to reflect both the priorities identified in the statutes that authorized individual projects and the goals of the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006.
Local governments and organizations such as water and conservation districts or associations, including tribes, may approach Reclamation and/or Congress for project support. Currently, all construction project funding must be authorized at the project level and appropriated by Congress. As noted earlier, Reclamation works only on projects located in the 17 western states (32 Stat. 388; 43 U.S.C. §§391 et seq.) unless specifically authorized by Congress.
Reclamation previously published an interim final rule (43 C.F.R. Part 404) that established criteria for developing new rural supply projects.24 However, the authority for the program has since expired, and Congress last authorized a project in 2009.25 The rule does not apply to previously authorized projects. As previously stated, ongoing rural water construction activities are limited to ongoing, previously authorized projects.
22 43 C.F.R. §404.
23 The Clean Water for Rural Communities Act (§1110 of Title XI of Division FF of P.L. 116-260) directed the Secretary of the Interior to enter into a cooperative agreement to provide assistance at a 65% federal cost share for the planning, design, and construction of the Musselshell-Judith Rural Water System and authorized appropriations at $56.7 million subject to cost indexing for the 2014 cost estimate of the feasibility report. The act also authorized $5.0 million for reviewing the Dry-Redwater Regional Water Authority System submitted to Reclamation on September 1, 2010, and for completing any additional work to ensure the study complied with Reclamation’s feasibility standards.
24 DOI, “Reclamation Rural Water Supply Program,” 73 Federal Register 67782, November 17, 2008, at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-26584.pdf.
25 DOI, “Reclamation Rural Water Supply Program,” 73 Federal Register 67778-67791, November 17, 2008, at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-26584.pdf. Under the rule, priority was given to domestic, residential, and municipal uses. Communities or groups of communities with populations under 50,000 were also eligible. The use of water for commercial irrigation purposes was not allowed.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 18
Enacted funding for Reclamation rural water supply projects for FY2024 was $124.8 million from the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, and $108.0 million from IIJA. The amount provided for Reclamation rural water projects in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, included funding above the President’s budget request: $12.0 million of congressionally directed spending for the Lewis and Clark Rural Water System and $55.0 million in additional funding that Reclamation distributed to four projects in its spend plan.26 Reclamation released an FY2024 spend plan for IIJA appropriations that details the allocation of $108.0 million among rural water projects.27 The FY2025 budget proposal requested $58.5 million for seven authorized rural water projects, and the FY2025 Reclamation IIJA spend plan includes $82.0 million to allocate to rural water projects.28
The Rural Water Supply Program was authorized by the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006. This programmatic authority expired at the end of FY2016 and has not been renewed. Construction and operations and maintenance are ongoing for several geographically specific projects that were authorized under various individual acts.
Title XVI of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-575) directs the Secretary of the Interior to develop a program to “investigate and identify” opportunities to reclaim and reuse wastewater and naturally impaired ground and surface water. Water reclaimed via Title XVI projects is primarily used for M&I water supply (nonpotable and indirect potable purposes only). Other uses include irrigation supply, groundwater recharge, fish and wildlife enhancement, and outdoor recreation.
The original Title XVI legislation authorized construction of five reclamation wastewater projects and six wastewater and groundwater recycling/reclamation studies. The act has been amended on multiple occasions, resulting in a total of 53 projects individually authorized for construction.
Amendments to Title XVI enacted in the WIIN Act made changes to the program, including authorizing the Secretary of the Interior to accept and review nonfederal feasibility studies for
26 H.R. 2471 “Explanatory Statement Submitted by Mrs. Murray, Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Regarding H.R. 4366, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024,” Congressional Record, vol. 170, no. 39 (March 5, 2024), p. S1652, at https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2024/03/05/170/39/CREC-2024-03-05.pdf; Reclamation, FY 2024 Additional Funding for Ongoing Work, at https://www.usbr.gov/budget/2024/FY-2024-Distribution-of- Additional-Funds-for-Ongoing-Work.pdf.
27 Reclamation, Implementation of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, Addendum—Rural Water, WaterSMART Environmental, Aquatic Ecosystem, December 19, 2023, at https://www.usbr.gov/bil/docs/spendplan-2024/ Reclamation-BIL-Spend-Plan-Addendum-12-19-2023.pdf.
28 Reclamation, Budget Justifications and Performance Information, Fiscal Year 2025, p. W&RR - 4, at https://www.usbr.gov/budget/2025/FY-2025-Bureau-of-Reclamation-Budget-Justifications.pdf; Reclamation, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), Annual Spend Plan Update, 2025 OMB Submission, at https://www.usbr.gov/bil/ docs/spendplan-2025/FY-2025-Reclamation-BIL-Spend-Plan.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 19
potential planning, design, and construction projects.29 The WIIN Act also authorized a competitive grant program for construction of projects approved under this authority.30
In IIJA, Congress further amended the Title XVI authority and created a new category of “large- scale” Title XVI projects, defined as projects with total costs in excess of $500.0 million.31 In contrast to “regular” Title XVI projects (which are generally limited to the lesser of $20.0 million or 25% federal cost share), projects under this section are entitled to a federal cost share of 25% of project costs, with no dollar cap on federal support. As a result, Reclamation currently supports three types of water reuse and recycling projects: congressionally authorized Title XVI projects; WIIN Act Title XVI projects, and large-scale water reuse/recycling projects.
The general purpose of Title XVI projects is to provide supplemental water supplies by recycling/reusing agricultural drainage water, wastewater, brackish surface and groundwater, and other sources of contaminated water. Projects may be permanent or for demonstration purposes.
Title XVI projects are funded through grants that are available only to authorized projects (i.e., projects with individual authorizations from Congress or approved by the Administration and Congress pursuant to the WIIN Act). Title XVI project construction costs are shared by the federal government and a local project sponsor or sponsors. The federal share is nonreimbursable, and is generally limited to the lesser of $20.0 million (1996 dollars) or 25% of total project costs.32 The exception is large-scale water reuse and recycling projects funded pursuant to IIJA, which are eligible to receive up to 25% of project costs, with no comparable cost cap.
Similar to other Reclamation activities, the Title XVI water reclamation and wastewater recycling program is limited to projects and studies in the 17 western states, unless otherwise specified.33 Prior to enactment of the WIIN Act, Administration requests for construction funding had generally been limited to individual congressionally authorized projects where (1) an appraisal investigation and feasibility study had been completed and approved by the Secretary, (2) the Secretary determined that the project sponsor was capable of funding the nonfederal share of project costs, and (3) the local sponsor entered into a cost-share agreement with Reclamation. The WIIN Act provided DOI with additional authority to accept nonfederal feasibility studies and to approve and consider these projects for construction funding if they meet Title XVI program criteria.34 These criteria require that (1) the study comply with federal laws and regulations applicable to water reuse and recycling studies, and (2) the project is technically and financially
29 These guidelines were published in Reclamation, Reclamation Manual Directive and Standard WTR 11-01, February 8, 2017, at https://www.usbr.gov/recman/wtr/wtr11-01.pdf.
30 While selection criteria for WIIN Act grants have generally been the same as those for “traditional” Reclamation projects, the two groups of projects are typically allocated funding amounts separately by Congress, and Reclamation solicits grant proposals for each category separately.
31 See Title IX, §40905 of P.L. 117-58.
32 The exceptions are individually authorized projects where Congress authorized costs shares that differ from this amount, and large-scale water recycling and reuse projects receiving support under IIJA (authorized to receive up to 25% of total costs, with no dollar cap).
33 For example, Congress has authorized three projects for construction in Hawaii (P.L. 109-70).
34 See generally P.L. 114-322, §4009(c).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 20
feasible and provides a federal benefit in accordance with Reclamation laws. The WIIN Act authority has essentially rendered unnecessary the prior practice of obtaining specific authorizations for individual Title XVI projects before Reclamation can pursue funding, although Congress may still choose to authorize individual projects where it wishes to alter the terms for federal support.
Over time, Reclamation has issued and revised multiple documents outlining evaluation criteria for prioritizing Title XVI projects. Reclamation posted the most recent evaluation criteria for Title XVI projects in March 2018.35
The total regular appropriations for the Title XVI program in FY2024 was $30.0 million, with $20.0 million of this funding designated as being available for WIIN Act-authorized projects. The Administration has also allocated $511.0 million in IIJA funding for Title XVI projects in FY2022-FY2025 IIJA spend plans (including $29 million in FY2024) and an additional $308.0 million for large-scale Title XVI projects in FY2022-FY2025 IIJA spend plans (including $130 million in FY2024).36 The Administration’s FY2025 budget request for all Title XVI projects was $5.0 million and is coupled with FY2025 allocations of an additional $22 million in IIJA funding for traditional projects and $128 million for large-scale projects.37
The original statutory authority for the Reclamation wastewater and reuse program is the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act, Title XVI of P.L. 102-575, as amended (43 U.S.C. §§390h et seq.). Other statutes that authorized individual Title XVI projects include the Reclamation Recycling and Water Conservation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-266); the Oregon Public Land Transfer and Protection Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-321); the 1999 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA; P.L. 106-53, §595); the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 (P.L. 106-554, Division B, §106); a bill amending the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities Act (P.L. 107-344); the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003 (P.L. 108-7, Division D, §211); the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-11); the Irvine Basin Surface and Groundwater Improvement Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-233); the Williamson County Water Recycling Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-316); the Hawaii Water Resources Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-70); the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (P.L. 110-161); the Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 2009 (P.L. 110-229); and the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-11; Title IX, Subtitle B). Programmatic authority for Reclamation to approve studies and grant funding for individual Title XVI projects was provided in the WIIN Act (P.L. 114-322, Title III, Subtitle J) and IIJA (P.L. 117-58).
Desalination projects develop and supplement water supplies through the treatment of ocean or brackish water. Water supplies created by desalination projects are primarily used for M&I and
35 Reclamation, Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program, Updated Evaluation Criteria for Review and Comment, March 2018, at https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/title/docs/2018/Title%20XVI-Evaluation-Criteria- Review.pdf.
36 See footnote 20.
37 Reclamation, FY2024 Bureau of Reclamation Congressional Justification, at https://www.usbr.gov/budget/2024/FY- 2024-Bureau-of-Reclamation-Budget-Justifications.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 21
irrigation water supply, but they may also be used for other purposes. Congress authorized the Secretary of the Interior, through Reclamation, to support nonfederal construction of ocean or brackish water desalination projects in Section 4009(a) of the WIIN Act. Similar to congressionally authorized Title XVI projects, this funding is awarded as grants to projects with a completed feasibility study that has been submitted to Reclamation and that meets all of the requirements in Reclamation’s Directive and Standard for feasibility study review of Title XVI and Desalination Projects.38
The general purpose of desalination construction projects is to provide supplemental water supplies by treating seawater or brackish water. Projects may be permanent or for demonstration purposes.39
Desalination projects are funded through grants, which are available only to projects that have submitted a feasibility study to Reclamation. Project construction costs are shared by the federal government and a local project sponsor or sponsors. The maximum federal share is 25% of total project costs; thus, nonfederal sponsors must be capable of funding 75% of project costs.40 These costs may be made available through cash, costs contributed by the applicant, or third-party in- kind contributions. Other federal funding may not be counted toward the required nonfederal cost share, unless the statute authorizing a program stipulates that it may be made available for matching cost-share requirements.
Like other Reclamation activities, support for nonfederal desalination projects is limited to nonfederally owned and operated projects and studies in the 17 western United States or territories identified in the Reclamation Act of 1902, as amended. Projects must meet several other requirements, including having completed feasibility studies that have been submitted to Reclamation and that meet all of the requirements in Reclamation’s Directive and Standard for feasibility study review of Title XVI and Desalination Projects.41 Projects must also be included in a state-approved plan or, as an alternative, be requested by the governor of the state in which it is located. The sponsor of any project in a western state that meets the aforementioned criteria may be eligible to apply for grants under this authority.
Several types of projects are not eligible for funding under this authority, including projects with water reuse and recycling components (some of which may be eligible for funding from the aforementioned Title XVI program), research and/or demonstration projects, and operations, maintenance, and repair projects.
38 Reclamation, Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program and Desalination Construction Program Feasibility Study Review Process, Reclamation Manual, WTR 11-01, October 18, 2019, at https://www.usbr.gov/recman/wtr/ wtr11-01.pdf.
39 See generally P.L. 114-322, §4009(a).
40 Cost shares and other requirements under this section were established administratively. For more information, see Bureau of Reclamation, “WaterSMART: Desalination,” at https://www.usbr.gov/watersmart/desalination/index.html.
41 Reclamation, Title XVI Water Reclamation and Reuse Program and Desalination Construction Program Feasibility Study Review Process, Reclamation Manual, WTR 11-01, October 18, 2019, at https://www.usbr.gov/recman/wtr/ wtr11-01.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 22
Grants for desalination project construction are funded through Reclamation’s research and development program for desalination and water purification; total FY2024 regular appropriations for that program were $19.0 million, of which $12.0 million was designated for grants under the WIIN Act authority. Congress also appropriated $250.0 million for these projects in IIJA over the FY2022-FY2026 period; Reclamation funded $161.0 million for desalination projects in FY2022-FY2025 IIJA spend plans, including $101.6 million for these projects in its FY2025 IIJA spend plan. The Administration did not request any funding for desalination construction projects in its FY2025 budget.
Desalination projects were authorized under the Water Desalination Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-298, as amended by Section 4009(a) of Title II, Subtitle J, of the WIIN Act, P.L. 114-322).
As part of its civil works activities, USACE operates water resource projects throughout the country. USACE civil works projects and authorities are concentrated on three principal missions—navigation, flood damage reduction, and aquatic ecosystem restoration. Some USACE activities may also support M&I water supply storage, hydroelectric generation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The most common way that USACE infrastructure supports M&I water supply is through providing storage of M&I water at a USACE reservoir.43 M&I water supply is generally not a USACE reservoir’s or project’s primary purpose.44 These projects are discussed further under the heading “Storage of Municipal and Industrial Water at Multipurpose USACE Reservoirs.”
42 This section was prepared by Anna E. Normand, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division, and Nicole T. Carter, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
43 Prior to the enactment of the WIIN Act (P.L. 114-322), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) participated in water conservation at its reservoirs in two ways. First, Congress had authorized specific USACE projects to have water conservation as a purpose for project operations. This allowed USACE to provide for seasonal M&I use of storage space at those USACE reservoirs. The use could be either as a direct withdrawal from the reservoir or for enhancing groundwater supplies (e.g., the USACE dam would release water in a way that would benefit passive or active groundwater recharge efforts). Second, according to USACE planning guidance, “project operations may be modified to enhance ground water replenishment, to increase downstream flows, or to otherwise enhance usage of projects for M&I purposes. With WIIN Act Sections 1116, 1117, and 1118, Congress provided some general authority for USACE to operate reservoirs for “water conservation,” including groundwater recharge.
44 USACE developed a report “Water Resources Development Act of 2020: Section 221: Study on Water Supply and Water Conservation at Water Resources Development Projects” (dated August 2023) in response to congressional direction to provide the authorizing committees a report on benefits and consequences of including water supply and water conservation as a primary mission of USACE projects. The report is available at https://www.awwa.org/Portals/ 0/AWWA/Government/011923Insiders/WRDA-2020-Section-221-Water-Supply-Study.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 23
Congress has authorized two USACE civil works projects to have significant water supply components. Both projects are located in Arkansas and address groundwater overdraft: the Grand Prairie Area Demonstration Project and the Bayou Meto Basin Project. These projects received USACE funding most recently in FY2024 at $20.0 million and $19.0 million, respectively. These specific projects are not discussed further in this report.
In Section 155 of the WRDA of 2020 (Division AA of P.L. 116-260; 33 U.S.C. §2347c), Congress authorized USACE to carry out small water storage projects,45 including for water supply.46 In Section 8108 of the WRDA of 2022 (Title LXXXI of Division H of P.L. 117-263; 33 U.S.C. §2357), Congress authorized USACE to perform up to 10 feasibility studies (at 90% federal cost and 10% nonfederal cost) on managed aquifer recharge projects in drought-prone or water-scarce areas. Neither of these two authorities have been funded; they are not discussed further in this report.
At the direction of Congress, USACE also provides assistance for municipal EI, which typically consists of assistance with municipal drinking water and wastewater infrastructure projects and municipal source water protection and development. These authorities are discussed further under the heading “Environmental Infrastructure Assistance.”
The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 2014 (WIFIA) authorizes USACE and EPA to provide credit assistance—loans or loan guarantees—for a broad range of water projects.47 USACE’s program is known as Corps Water Infrastructure Financing Program (CWIFP) to differentiate it from EPA’s WIFIA program. The program offers long-term, low-cost loans with flexible repayment options for creditworthy nonfederal borrowers. Various state, local, and tribal government entities and various private entities (e.g., corporations, partnerships, and trusts) that are publicly sponsored are eligible for CWIFP loans.48
In December 2021, Congress created an account for USACE to implement its WIFIA authority. From FY2021 through FY2023, Congress provided USACE with a total of $81.0 million for credit assistance, as well as funding for program administration. Congress has limited the available appropriations for credit assistance to nonfederal dam safety projects (based on dam ownership information in the National Inventory of Dams).49 Dam safety projects can include
45 The provision provides various criteria for the maximum size of the storage projects and other specific project and program requirements (e.g., federal project costs are limited to $65.0 million; M&I costs are 100% nonfederal).
46 The water storage capacity of a project under the program is to be not less than 2,000 acre-feet and not more than 30,000 acre-feet. USACE’s April 2022 implementation guidance for the Section 155 program indicates that the policy of USACE not conducting single-purpose water supply studies is superseded for purposes of this program.
47 WIFIA 2014, Title V, Subtitle C, of P.L. 113-121; 33 U.S.C. §§3901-3914, as amended by P.L. 115-270.
48 33 U.S.C. §3907(a)(4).
49 Congress authorized USACE’s program for a broader set of activities than have been funded. Congress authorized (continued...)
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 24
work to upgrade, repair, and maintain a dam, and can include dam removals.50 USACE identifies 12 selection criteria for its CWIFP credit assistance, including the extent to which the project is nationally or regionally significant in generating public benefits (e.g., water quality and quantity, including aquifer recharge, and protection of drinking water, including source water protection). USACE may be able to make up to $7.5 billion in loans with the appropriations available through FY2023. USACE’s final rule for the program went into effect on June 21, 2023. In the fall of 2023, USACE solicited preliminary applications from prospective borrowers seeking credit assistance under CWIFP for nonfederal dam safety projects.51 The first loans are expected to close roughly two years later.
In FY2024, Congress provided USACE $7.2 million for CWIFP; $5.0 million is for program administration and $2.2 million is for credit assistance for nonfederal dam safety and levee projects. Given the program’s current focus on nonfederal dam safety and levee projects, CWIFP is not discussed further in this report. For more information on USACE’s program, see CRS Insight IN12021, Corps Water Infrastructure Financing Program (CWIFP), by Nicole T. Carter. For more information on the EPA WIFIA program, see “Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program” in the EPA portion of the report.
A total of 136 USACE reservoirs have roughly 9.8 million acre-feet of storage designated for M&I water.52 Most of this water was allocated to M&I purposes when the projects were constructed. Around 0.9 million acre-feet of this storage space has been assigned to M&I use from existing USACE reservoirs using USACE’s general water supply authorities.53 The storage of M&I water at USACE reservoirs, as discussed below, is subject to availability of storage space, and the associated costs are 100% a local, nonfederal responsibility.54 For its projects, USACE policy is that the agency does not acquire water rights for either M&I or agricultural water supply and conservation purposes. Rather, the water user is responsible for securing water rights.
Congress has given USACE limited general authority for M&I water supply under two statutes:
1. The Water Supply Act of 1958 authorized USACE (and Reclamation) to
recommend economically justified M&I water supply storage space in new or existing reservoirs.55
USACE to provide credit assistance for water resource projects, such as flood control, hurricane and storm damage reduction; aquatic ecosystem restoration; and navigation; and multipurpose projects that are supported by USACE and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) WIFIA authorities (e.g., drinking water, wastewater, and/or stormwater system improvements).
50 An eligible dam safety project must also be a project for flood damage reduction, hurricane and storm damage reduction, environmental restoration, coastal or inland harbor navigation improvement, or inland and intracoastal waterways navigation improvement that the Secretary determines is technically sound, economically justified, and environmentally acceptable.
51 USACE, Department of Defense, “Notice of Funding Availability for Applications for Credit Assistance Under the Corps Water Infrastructure Financing Program,” 88 Federal Register 64892-64897, September 20, 2023.
52 U.S. Army Engineer Institute for Water Resources (IWR), FY 2016 Municipal, Industrial, and Irrigation Water Supply Database Report, 2017-R-02, Alexandria, VA, June 2017, p. 6, at https://publibrary.planusace.us/#/document/ e71cd9b9-faff-4d63-8d42-8ee1baa3cc7f.
53 Ibid., p. 8.
54 33 U.S.C. §2213(c)(2).
55 43 U.S.C. §390b.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 25
2. The Flood Control Act of 1944 authorizes USACE to provide, through temporary
agreements, surplus water from USACE reservoirs.56 Surplus water contracts have generally been limited to five-year terms with options to extend.
Pursuant to these statutes, the agency can enter into agreements with nonfederal entities for water supply storage.
While much of USACE’s water supply activities are conducted using the above general authorities, Congress has also at times authorized M&I water supply activities at specific USACE projects, principally USACE reservoirs.
As previously noted, Congress authorized USACE to allocate a portion of its multipurpose reservoirs for permanent M&I storage or to provide M&I water from USACE reservoirs under temporary agreements for surplus water.57 Under these authorities, USACE delivers water if it is available and if delivery does not substantially affect other authorized purposes.
Most agreements for new M&I water supply storage are associated with existing USACE reservoirs. USACE policy generally is to obtain full payment of M&I allocated costs from nonfederal entities prior to or during construction.58
For USACE’s water supply activities conducted using the above general authorities, nonfederal entities can contact USACE directly about pursuing water supply activities under the general authorities. Otherwise, nonfederal entities may submit a proposal to add or adjust water supply aspects of specific USACE projects through an annual public proposal submission process.59 Congress has used submitted Section 7001 proposals to identify activities to be authorized in USACE authorization legislation.
For new USACE projects with M&I water supply, existing law and agency policy require that the water supply allocation for anticipated demand at any project not exceed 30% of the total estimated construction cost.60 Congress has enacted occasional exceptions to USACE’s general authority, which is generally limited to storage of water supply at existing projects that does not “seriously affect” other project purposes.61
USACE primarily uses annual appropriations for administration of its water supply authorities. From FY2024 annual appropriations, USACE plans to use $46.1.0 million for USACE’s costs for
56 33 U.S.C. §708.
57 43 U.S.C. §390b; 33 U.S.C. §708.
58 USACE, Policy for Conducting Civil Works Planning Studies, Engineer Regulation (ER) 1105-2-103, November 2023, p. 77 (hereinafter “ER 1105-2-103”). For more on payments for reallocation to M&I at existing USACE projects, see ER 1105-2-103, p. 78.
59 For more information, see CRS Insight IN11118, Army Corps of Engineers: Section 7001 Report on Future Studies and Projects, by Anna E. Normand.
60 43 U.S.C. §390b; ER 1105-2-103, p. 77.
61 43 U.S.C. §390b(e).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 26
implementing its reservoir-related water supply authorities.62 The Administration’s FY2025 budget request included $6.0 million for USACE’s implementation costs.63
Statutory authority is provided in the Water Supply Act of 1958 (Title III, 72 Stat. 320, as amended; 43 U.S.C. §390b),64 the Flood Control Act of 1944 (§6, 58 Stat. 890, as amended, 33 U.S.C. §708), and project-specific authorities in WRDAs or similar legislation.
Since 1992, Congress has enacted more than 400 authorizations allowing USACE to provide designated communities, counties, and states with design and construction assistance for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure (including treatment and distribution/collection facilities), source water protection and development, and other nonfederal projects. This assistance is known as environmental infrastructure (EI) assistance.65 The authorizations of federal appropriations for these activities have varied widely, from $0.1 million for a water monitoring station to $1.0 billion for a seven-state EI program.
Under most USACE EI assistance authorizations, federal assistance typically requires a 75% federal and 25% nonfederal cost share. Congress typically provides the federal portion in annual Energy and Water Development Appropriations acts. How USACE and nonfederal financing is managed varies according to the specifics of the authorization. USACE is authorized to perform design and/or construction work with appropriated funds and, generally for programmatic authorities, may use appropriated funds to reimburse nonfederal sponsors for work they perform.
Because EI assistance activities are not part of a national USACE program per se, there are no general eligibility criteria. Most USACE EI authorities specify a specific geographic location (e.g., a city, county, or state) and a type of project (e.g., municipal drinking water) as the principal eligibility requirements. Consequently, USACE evaluates an activity’s eligibility by identifying whether there is an authorization for the geographic area of the activity and whether the type of activity is eligible under that authorization. Based on a review of enacted legislation likely to include EI assistance authorities, CRS identified authorized EI assistance in at least 46 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands. CRS did not identify authorities for EI assistance in Iowa, Maine, Nebraska, Rhode
62 This does not include such costs for projects in the explanatory statement funded from prior unobligated IIJA appropriations.
63 USACE, Fiscal Year 2025 Civil Works Budget of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, press book, March 2024, p. 6, at https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll6/id/2476.
64 For information on USACE’s civil works program, see USACE, “Missions: Civil Works,” https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/. For more information on the process associated with USACE water resources projects, see CRS Report R47946, Process for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Projects, by Nicole T. Carter and Anna E. Normand.
65 For more information, see CRS Report R47162, Overview of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Infrastructure (EI) Assistance, by Anna E. Normand.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 27
Island, and other U.S. territories. Because this assistance is not associated with traditional USACE water resources projects, it is not subject to USACE planning requirements (e.g., a benefit-cost analysis is not performed).
Only a subset of the approximately $12.8 billion in authorized USACE EI activities has received appropriations. Congress typically funds EI assistance through USACE’s Construction account in annual Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies appropriations acts. The FY2024 President’s budget request included $5.0 million for EI assistance; this was the first time an Administration had requested EI assistance funding.66 In FY2024, Congress provided $197.7 million for USACE EI assistance authorities using prior unobligated IIJA appropriations.67 The explanatory statement accompanying Division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), included recommendations to fund $179.8 million for EI assistance specifically requested by Members as community project funding or congressionally directed spending items (48 requests were funded). In addition, the act recommended $17.9 million for USACE to allocate to EI assistance authorities in an agency work plan; USACE allocated the funding to eight authorities. The FY2025 President’s budget did not request funding for EI assistance.68
Prior to 1992, USACE was generally not widely involved with municipal drinking water treatment and distribution and wastewater collection and treatment. The agency is now authorized to contribute to more than 400 EI projects and programs. A WRDA or similar legislation is the typical legislative vehicle for USACE authorizations. Beginning with WRDA 1992 (P.L. 102- 580), Congress has authorized USACE to assist local interests with planning, design, and construction assistance for EI projects. Subsequent USACE authorization acts have included new EI assistance activities and raised the authorized funding ceilings for previously authorized projects. Most recently, WRDA 2022 (Title LXXXI of Division H of P.L. 117-263) increased the authorization of appropriations for EI by $6.6 billion, more than doubling the authorization of appropriations previously provided by EI authorities. In WRDAs, Congress has also authorized various processes to deauthorize existing authorities meeting certain criteria. In two instances, these processes have resulted in the deauthorization of EI assistance authorities.69
66 USACE, Fiscal Year 2024 Civil Works Budget of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, press book, March 2023, https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll6/id/2317.
67 See FY2024 USACE Construction work plan available at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/ Budget/#Work-Plans.
68 USACE, Fiscal Year 2025 Civil Works Budget of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, press book, March 2024, https://usace.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p16021coll6/id/2476.
69 CRS did not identify any enacted provisions where Congress has deauthorized individual EI assistance authorities.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 28
USDA administers a variety of water and waste disposal71 programs that provide loans and grants for drinking water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage facilities in rural communities. Eligibility is limited to rural communities with populations of 10,000 or fewer for grants and direct loans and 50,000 or fewer for guaranteed loans. These programs are administered at the national level by the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) at USDA. RUS allocates program funds to the USDA State Rural Development offices through an allocation formula based on rural population, poverty, and unemployment. Loans originate at the USDA’s State Rural Development offices.
In FY2023, RUS obligated $1.043 billion to 328 direct loans for water and waste disposal projects.72 During that time, RUS obligated $24 million for 8 guaranteed loans and $493 million for over 263 grants for water and waste disposal projects.73
The purpose of these programs is to provide basic human amenities, alleviate health hazards, and promote the orderly growth of the nation’s rural areas by meeting the need for new and improved rural water and waste disposal facilities. Eligible projects can include drinking water facilities, sanitary sewers, and stormwater drainage and disposal facilities. Funds may be used for installation, repair, improvement, or expansion of rural water facilities, including costs of distribution lines and well-pumping facilities.
USDA is required to use 3% to 5% of the water and waste grants appropriation to make grants to qualified nonprofits to provide technical assistance and training to help communities identify solutions to water and waste problems, prepare applications for grants and loans, and improve operation and maintenance of existing water and waste disposal facilities in rural areas.74 The 2018 farm bill (P.L. 115-334) directed the Secretary to reserve 3% to 5% of total water and waste grant funding for this technical assistance and training.
USDA supports water and waste disposal projects through direct loans, guaranteed loans, and grants. USDA provides loans and grants for water and waste disposal projects that serve the “most financially needy communities.”75
70 This section was prepared by Lisa S. Benson, Specialist in Agricultural Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
71 The programs’ official titles contain “Waste Disposal,” but the vast majority of the waste disposal projects are for wastewater infrastructure. A very small amount of funding, typically less than 1%, goes to technical assistance related to solid waste management, although Congress authorizes annual appropriations for solid waste management grants.
72 USDA, Office of Budget and Program Analysis, “2025 USDA Explanatory Notes – Rural Utilities Service,” at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/33-RUS-2025-ExNotes.pdf.
73 Ibid.
74 7 U.S.C. §1926(a)(14)(C), Rural Water and Wastewater Technical Assistance Training Programs.
75 7 C.F.R. §1780.2.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 29
Water and Waste Disposal Loans. Water and Waste Disposal Program loans are authorized by Section 306 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.76 Among other activities, loans can be used (direct and guaranteed) for projects for the development, storage, treatment, purification, or distribution of water or the collection, treatment, or disposal of waste in low- income rural areas.77 Applicants must certify in writing that they are unable to obtain financing for the project through commercial credit institutions at reasonable rates and terms.78 Loans are repayable in not more than 40 years or the useful life of the facilities, whichever is less.79 USDA makes either direct loans to applicants or guarantees up to 90% of loans made by third-party lenders such as banks and savings and loan associations.
Loan interest rates are based on the community’s economic capacity and health environment. Interest rates are designated as poverty, market, or intermediate. Poverty-rate loans are made in areas where the median household income (MHI) falls below 80% of the statewide nonmetropolitan MHI or the poverty level, whichever is higher, and where the project is needed to meet health or sanitary standards.80 By law, this rate is set at 80% of the market rate and cannot exceed 5% annually.81 The intermediate rate applies to loans that do not meet the criteria for the poverty rate and where the MHI is not more than 100% of the statewide nonmetropolitan MHI.82 By law, this rate is set at 80% of the market rate and cannot exceed 7% annually.83 The market rate applies to all loans that do not qualify for poverty-rate loans or intermediate-rate loans.84 The market rate is set using the Bond Buyer Index.85
Water and Waste Disposal Grants. Water and Waste Disposal Program grants are also authorized by Section 306 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.86 Grants can be used for projects for the development, storage, treatment, purification, or distribution of water or the collection, treatment, or disposal of waste in low-income rural areas.87 The 2018 farm bill (P.L. 115-334) authorized appropriations at $15 million annually for FY2019-FY2024 for these grants.88
Grant funds may be available for up to 75% of the cost of a project.89 Priority is given to projects that (1) serve rural areas with lower populations, (2) support health initiatives, and (3) support populations with lower MHIs.90
76 7 U.S.C. §1926.
77 7 U.S.C. §1926(a)(1).
78 7 C.F.R. §1780.7(d).
79 7 C.F.R. §1780.13(e).
80 7 C.F.R. §1780.13(b).
81 Ibid.
82 7 C.F.R. §1780.13(c).
83 Ibid.
84 7 C.F.R. §1780.13(d).
85 Ibid.
86 7 U.S.C. §1926.
87 7 U.S.C. §1926(a)(2).
88 Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 farm bill; P.L. 115-334), Furthering Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-22).
89 7 C.F.R. §1780.10(c).
90 7 C.F.R. §1780.17.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 30
Eligible entities are municipalities, counties, and other political subdivisions of a state; associations, cooperatives, and organizations operated on a not-for-profit basis; Indian Tribes on federal and state reservations; and other federally recognized Tribes.91 USDA’s loan and grant programs are limited to community service areas (including areas in cities or towns) with populations of 10,000 or fewer for grants and direct loans and 50,000 or fewer for guaranteed loans.92 To be eligible for assistance, communities must be unable to get financing for the proposed projects from their own resources or through commercial credit at reasonable rates and terms.93
Statutory authority for the water and waste disposal loan and grant programs, water technical assistance, and other rural water assistance programs is the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended (§306, 7 U.S.C. §1926). Regulations for these programs are codified at Title 7, Parts 1779-1780, of the Code of Federal Regulations.94
FY2024 appropriations for USDA’s water and waste disposal programs and related programs were included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42). Division B, Title III, provided $596 million in total for FY2024.95 The appropriations included $255 million in water and waste disposal grants; $1 million for grants to capitalize revolving funds for water and waste disposal projects; and $65 million for water and waste disposal grants for colonias, Alaska Native and rural villages, and Native American tribes. Congress provided a $74 million loan subsidy to support $860 million in loan authority for water and waste disposal direct loans, and $50 million in loan authority for water and waste disposal loan guarantees (no loan subsidy was needed to support the loan authority). Congress also included $35 million for water and waste disposal technical assistance grants and $22 million for the Circuit Rider Program.
For FY2025, the Administration requested $785 million for USDA’s water and waste disposal and related programs.96 The request included $385 million in water and waste disposal grants; $100 million for water and waste disposal grants for lead piping projects; $1 million for grants to capitalize revolving funds for water and waste disposal projects; and $66 million for water and waste disposal grants for colonias, Alaska Native and rural villages, and Native American tribes. The request provided $1.350 billion in loan authority for water and waste disposal direct loans (with a loan subsidy of $140 million to support the loan authority), $20 million in loan authority for 1% interest rate water and waste disposal direct loans (with a loan subsidy of $6 million to support the loan authority), and $50 million for water and waste disposal loan guarantees (no loan subsidy is needed to support the loan authority). The request included $38 million for waste
91 7 C.F.R. §1780.7.
92 7 C.F.R. §1780.3 and 7 C.F.R. §5001.3.
93 7 C.F.R. §1780.7(d).
94 For additional information on RUS water and environmental programs, see USDA, “Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program,” at http://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/water-waste-disposal-loan-grant-program.
95 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, committee print, 118th Cong., 1st sess., H.Rept. 118-122.
96 USDA, Office of Budget and Program Analysis, “2025 USDA Explanatory Notes – Rural Utilities Service,” at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/33-RUS-2025-ExNotes.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 31
disposal technical assistance grants and $25 million for the Circuit Rider Program, which provides technical assistance for rural water systems.
RUS is also authorized to help eligible communities prepare for or recover from an emergency that threatens the availability of safe, reliable drinking water.97 Grants ranging from $10,000 to a maximum of $1.0 million are provided for projects to serve a rural area with a population of 10,000 or fewer that has an MHI not in excess of the statewide nonmetropolitan MHI. Grants for repairs, partial replacement, or significant maintenance of an established system cannot exceed $150,000. Communities use the funds for new systems, waterline extensions, construction of water source and treatment facilities, and repairs or renovation of existing systems, and may be awarded for 100% of project cost. Applicants compete on a national basis for available funding. Funding for this program is provided primarily through a reservation of 5%-7% of appropriated water and waste disposal grant funds. The 2018 farm bill also authorized appropriations of an additional $50.0 million per year through FY2024 for this program.98
Statutory authority for the emergency community water assistance grant program is the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended, Section 306A (7 U.S.C. §1926a). Regulations for this program are codified at Title 7, Part 1778, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Congress provided $10 million for the Emergency Community Water Assistance Grant Program for FY2024.99 The FY2025 Administration request also includes $15 million for the program.100
USDA is also authorized to make grants to private nonprofit organizations for the purpose of providing loans to eligible individuals for construction, refurbishing, and servicing of “individual household water well systems and individually owned decentralized wastewater systems.”101 Loans are limited to $15,000 per household. The 2018 farm bill authorized $20 million for each fiscal year through FY2024 for the program.102
Statutory authority for the rural decentralized water systems grant program is the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended, Section 306E (7 U.S.C. §1926e). Regulations for this program are codified at Title 7, Part 1776, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
97 7 U.S.C. §1926a.
98 Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 farm bill; P.L. 115-334), Furthering Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-22).
99 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, committee print, 118th Cong., 1st sess., H.Rept. 118-122.
100 USDA, Office of Budget and Program Analysis, “2025 USDA Explanatory Notes – Rural Utilities Service,” at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/33-RUS-2025-ExNotes.pdf.
101 7 U.S.C. §1926e.
102 Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 farm bill; P.L. 115-334), Furthering Continuing Appropriations and Other Extensions Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-22).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 32
Congress provided $5 million for the Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant Program for FY2024.103 The FY2025 Administration request also included $5 million for the program.104
The USDA provides assistance for watershed activities under four closely related authorities that are administered by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations Program (WFPO) consists of two authorities—P.L. 83-566 and P.L. 78-534. Projects funded under these authorities are referred to as P.L. 566 and P.L. 534 projects, respectively. These authorize NRCS to provide technical and financial assistance to state and local organizations to plan and install measures to prevent erosion, sedimentation, and flood damage and to conserve, develop, and utilize land and water resources. Dams constructed under the WFPO program may also be eligible to receive assistance under the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program. The fourth watershed authority is an emergency program that is not discussed in this report.106
The WFPO program consists of projects built under two authorities—the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954 (P.L. 83-566) and the Flood Control Act of 1944 (P.L. 78-534). In FY2023, NRCS funded 155 projects in 34 states and territories.107 The vast majority of the projects have been built pursuant to the authority of P.L. 83-566 (and are referred to as P.L. 566 projects). This law authorizes the chief of the NRCS to approve construction of smaller projects (defined below). Larger projects must be approved by Congress. Eleven specific projects were authorized by P.L. 78-534 (referred to as P.L. 534 projects). They are much larger and more expensive than P.L. 566 projects. In total, the P.L. 534 projects encompass almost 37.9 million acres and are divided into component projects in sub-watersheds. Approximately 90% of the work on the P.L. 534 projects is complete.108
The purpose of the WFPO program is to provide technical and financial assistance to states and local organizations to plan and install watershed projects. Both P.L. 566 and P.L. 534 projects have similar objectives and are implemented following similar procedures. Both project types fund land treatment and nonstructural and structural facilities for flood prevention, erosion reduction, agricultural water management, public recreation development, fish and wildlife habitat development, and municipal or industrial water supplies. Structural measures can include
103 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, committee print, 118th Cong., 1st sess., H.Rept. 118-122.
104 USDA, Office of Budget and Program Analysis, “2025 USDA Explanatory Notes – Rural Utilities Service,” at https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/33-RUS-2025-ExNotes.pdf.
105 This section was prepared by Megan Stubbs, Specialist in Agricultural Conservation and Natural Resources Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
106 The Emergency Watershed Protection (EWP) program is used to restore the natural functions of a watershed after a natural disaster has occurred and to minimize the risks to property and life posed by floods by purchasing easements on flood plains. For more information on the EWP program, see CRS Report R42854, Emergency Assistance for Agricultural Land Rehabilitation, by Megan Stubbs.
107 USDA, FY2025 USDA Budget Congressional Justification, “2025 USDA Explanatory Notes—Natural Resources Conservation Service,” at https://www.obpa.usda.gov/explan_notes.html (hereinafter FY2025 USDA Budget Justification).
108 FY2025 USDA Budget Justification.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 33
dams, levees, canals, and pumping stations. Local sponsors agree to operate and maintain completed projects.
USDA provides partial project grants plus technical advisory services. Financing for water projects under the WFPO program varies depending on project purposes. The federal government pays all costs related to construction for flood control purposes only. Costs for nonagricultural water supply must be repaid by local organizations. However, up to 50% of costs for land, easements, and rights-of-way allocated to public fish and wildlife and recreational developments may be paid with program funds. Additionally, sponsors may apply for RUS Water and Waste Program loans to finance the local share of project costs. Participating state and local organizations pay all operation and maintenance costs.109
P.L. 566 has been called the “small watershed program” because no project may exceed 250,000 acres and no structure may exceed more than 12,500 acre-feet of floodwater detention capacity or 25,000 acre-feet of total capacity.110 The Senate and House Agriculture Committees must approve projects that need an estimated federal contribution of more than $25.0 million for construction or include a storage structure with a capacity in excess of 2,500 acre-feet. If the storage structure will have a capacity in excess of 4,000 acre-feet, approval is also required from the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. There are no population or community income-level limits on applications for P.L. 566 projects, but at least 20% of the total benefits of the project must directly relate to agriculture (including rural communities).111
The Consolidated Appropriation Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42, Division B) provided WFPO with $35.0 million, all of which is directed either to specific projects or to specific types of projects. Of the $35.0 million, $20.4 million (58%) is directed to CPF/CDS projects, which some have referred to as “earmarks.” The remaining $14.3 million is directed to projects that are multi-benefit irrigation modernization projects that increase fish or wildlife habitat, reduce drought impact, improve water quality or instream flow, or provide off-channel renewable energy production. The Administration’s FY2025 budget requested $70.0 million in discretionary funding for the WFPO program.112
In addition to discretionary funding through appropriations, the 2018 farm bill permanently authorizes $50.0 million annually from mandatory sources.113 This mandatory funding will be
109 For additional information on financing requirements, see USDA, NRCS, “Watershed Programs – Sponsor Guide,” at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Sponsor%20Guide.pdf.
110 The enacted FY2024 appropriation included a policy provision that waives the 250,000-acre project limit when the project’s primary purpose is something other than flood prevention. This provision did not amend the WFPO authorization. Therefore, it is effective only for the funds provided through the FY2024 annual appropriation.
111 16 U.S.C. §1002.
112 FY2025 USDA Budget Justification.
113 The 2018 farm bill authorizes mandatory funding from the Commodity Credit Corporation, a government-owned entity that finances programs supporting U.S. agriculture. For more information, see CRS Report R44606, The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC), by Megan Stubbs.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 34
available unless otherwise amended by Congress. Mandatory funds are authorized for P.L. 566 projects as well as rehabilitation work under the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program.
The WFPO program consists of two authorities: the Flood Control Act of 1944, P.L. 78-534, as amended, 58 Stat. 905 (33 U.S.C. §701b-1); and the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954, P.L. 83-566, as amended, 68 Stat. 666 (16 U.S.C. §§1001-1008). Regulations are codified at Title 7, Part 622, of the Code of Federal Regulations.114
As part of its lending responsibilities, RUS makes loans to local organizations to finance the local share of the cost of installing, repairing, or improving facilities, purchasing sites and easements, and related costs for P.L. 566 and P.L. 534 projects (see discussion above). Loans are limited to $10.0 million, they must be repaid within 50 years, and the cost-share assistance may not exceed the rate of assistance for similar projects under other USDA conservation programs. NRCS and the local organization must also agree on a plan of work before a loan is obligated. Over the life of the program, 495 RUS loans have been made.115
Some of the oldest P.L. 566 projects that have exceeded their design life (dams were constructed starting in 1948) need rehabilitation work to continue to protect public health and safety by reducing any possibility of dam failure and to meet changing resource needs. By the end of 2025, 6,782 watershed dams will have reached the end of their designed life spans. In response to this concern, Congress created a dam rehabilitation program, known as the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program, in Section 313 of the Grain Standards and Warehouse Improvement Act of 2000 (P.L. 106-472), which revised the WFPO program. From 2000 to 2023, the program authorized the rehabilitation of 276 dams in 28 states. Of this total, 178 projects are complete, 42 are in the design phase, 19 are in the construction phase, and the remaining 37 are on hold due to land rights, funding, or other sponsor-related issues.116
The purpose of rehabilitation is to extend the service life of the dams and bring them into compliance with applicable safety and performance standards or to decommission the dams so they no longer pose a threat to life and property.
Partial project grants, plus provision of technical advisory services, are provided. NRCS may provide 65% of the total rehabilitation costs but no more than 100% of the actual construction cost and is prohibited from funding operation and maintenance expense. Rehabilitation projects also provide an opportunity to modify projects to provide additional benefits, including municipal water supplies. Local watershed project sponsors provide 35% of the cost of a rehabilitation
114 For information on the program, see NRCS, “Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations (WFPO) Program,” at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/programs-initiatives/watershed-and-flood-prevention-operations-wfpo-program.
115 FY2025 USDA Budget Justification.
116 Ibid.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 35
project and obtain needed land rights and permits. The source of these funds varies from state to state and may include bonds, local taxing authority, state appropriations, or in-kind technical services.117
Only dams constructed under the P.L. 83-566 authority, the Resource Conservation and Development program, and pilot watershed projects from 1953 are eligible for assistance under the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program.118
The Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program has discretionary funding authority of up to $85.0 million annually through the end of FY2024.119 Congress appropriated $1.0 million for FY2024, half of the $2.0 million provided in FY2023. The Administration’s FY2025 budget requested $2.0 million in discretionary funding for the program.120
Mandatory funds authorized for WFPO through the 2018 farm bill may also be used for rehabilitation work under the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program.121 In FY2023, USDA obligated $3.2 million of the $50 million in mandatory funds authorized for WFPO to the rehabilitation program. The mandatory funding authority is permanent.
The Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program is authorized by the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954, P.L. 83-566, as amended by Section 313 of the Grain Standards and Warehouse Improvement Act of 2000, P.L. 106-472, 114 Stat. 2077 (16 U.S.C. §1012). Regulations are codified at Title 7, Part 622, of the Code of Federal Regulations.122
117 For additional information on financing requirements, see USDA, NRCS, “Watershed Programs – Sponsor Guide,” at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-08/Sponsor%20Guide.pdf.
118 16 U.S.C. §1012.
119 The program is authorized through omnibus farm bills, most recently the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-334). Congress enacted a one-year extension (P.L. 118-22, Division B, §102) of farm bill authorizations through FY2024, which includes the Small Watershed Rehabilitation Program’s discretionary funding authority. For additional information on farm bill expiration and extension, see CRS Report R47659, Expiration of the 2018 Farm Bill and Extension in 2024, by Jim Monke, Megan Stubbs, and Randy Alison Aussenberg.
120 FY2025 USDA Budget Justification.
121 For additional information, see CRS Report R45698, Agricultural Conservation in the 2018 Farm Bill, by Megan Stubbs.
122 For information on the program, see NRCS, “Watershed Rehabilitation Program,” at https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/ programs-initiatives/watershed-rehabilitation.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 36
In 1987, Congress amended the Clean Water Act (CWA)124 to establish the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) program.125 The CWSRF program is a federal and state partnership: all 50 states, plus Puerto Rico, implement their own program.126 EPA receives annual appropriations to support the CWSRF program and distributes grants to the states based on a CWA statutory formula.127 States provide matching funds equal to 20% of the federal grant to capitalize their revolving loan funds and use their funds primarily to provide loans to cities and other eligible recipients. Over the long term, the loan programs are intended to be sustained through repayment of loans to states, thus creating a continuing source of assistance for other communities. According to the most recent estimate by EPA and states (published in 2024 and based on data from 2022), an additional $630.1 billion nationwide is needed over the next 20 years for all types of projects eligible for funding through the CWSRF program.128
EPA data indicate that since 1988, 68% of all awarded agreements (i.e., loans and other assistance) have gone to assist communities with 10,000 people or fewer. These loans and assistance have accounted for 23% of total CWSRF funding.129
The CWSRF program provides assistance in constructing and upgrading publicly owned municipal wastewater treatment plants and related equipment (including stormwater infrastructure), implementing nonpoint pollution management programs, developing and implementing management plans under the National Estuary Program, and supporting a range of other eligible activities that were added to the program in 2014 and in subsequent amendments.
EPA grants (from appropriated funds) and state matching funds help capitalize state CWSRF programs. These programs may provide seven general types of financial assistance: making loans; buying or refinancing existing local debt obligations; guaranteeing or purchasing insurance for local debt obligations; guaranteeing CWSRF debt obligations (i.e., to be used as security for
123 This section was prepared by Jonathan L. Ramseur, Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
124 The official statutory name is the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (P.L. 92-500), as amended, codified at Title 33, Sections 1251 et seq., of the U.S. Code.
125 Prior to 1989 (when the CWSRF program became effective), EPA states used their annual allotment to make grants to cities and other eligible recipients.
126 U.S. territories, Indian tribes, and the District of Columbia receive grants from EPA under separate CWA authorities.
127 For more information, see CRS Report RL31073, Allocation of Wastewater Treatment Assistance: Background and Formula History, by Jonathan L. Ramseur.
128 EPA, 2022 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-survey- cwns-2022-report-and-data. The previous survey (issued in 2016 and based on 2012 data) estimated needs of $271.0 billion over an analogous time period. See EPA, Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2012, 2016, at https://www.epa.gov/ cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-survey-cwns-past-reports-and-data.
129 Based on data in EPA’s National Information Management System (February 2024) at https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/ clean-water-state-revolving-fund-cwsrf-national-information-management-system-reports.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 37
leveraging the assets in the CWSRF); providing loan guarantees for local government revolving funds; earning interest on fund accounts; and supporting reasonable costs of administering the CWSRF.130 Loans are made at or below market interest rates, including zero interest loans, as determined by the state in negotiation with the applicant.
Although the CWSRF program is generally a loan program, states may (under certain conditions) provide “additional subsidization”—such as principal forgiveness, negative interest loans, or a combination—to eligible entities that meet the state’s affordability criteria and for particular projects, such as those that implement water or energy efficiency goals or mitigate stormwater runoff. IIJA (P.L. 117-58) amended the CWSRF statutory provisions to direct states to use at least 10% of their capitalization grants for additional subsidization under certain conditions.131
Prior to the enactment of IIJA, appropriations acts in recent years have required states to use minimum percentages of their allotted funds to provide additional subsidization. This trend began with the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5), which required states to use at least 50% of their funds for this purpose. Recent appropriations acts included an identical condition, requiring 10% of the CWSRF grants be used “to provide additional subsidy to eligible recipients in the form of forgiveness of principal, negative interest loans, or grants (or any combination of these).”132 In an EPA memorandum on May 12, 2022, EPA interprets the additional subsidization provided in appropriations act to be “additive” to the 10% floor in the CWA.133 Therefore, as long as these appropriations acts’ provisions continue, states are effectively required to provide at least 20% of their annual financing as additional subsidization.
All principal and interest payments on loans must be credited directly to the SRF, and loans are to be repaid within 30 years of a project’s completion, not to exceed the project’s useful life. States are required to ensure that CWSRF-funded projects use American iron and steel products and apply the prevailing wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.134
In general, eligible loan recipients for CWSRF assistance are any municipal, intermunicipal, interstate, or state agency. Private utilities are not eligible to receive funds for construction of wastewater treatment works and most other eligible activities, but in some cases, privately owned projects are eligible for certain types of activities (e.g., decentralized wastewater treatment projects; projects to manage, reduce, or treat stormwater; or development of watershed management projects).
Projects or activities eligible for funding were initially those needed for constructing or upgrading (and planning and designing) publicly owned municipal wastewater treatment plans. As defined in Section 212 of the CWA, devices and systems used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal sewage are eligible.135 These include construction or upgrading of
130 33 U.S.C. §1383(d).
131 For more information, see CRS Report R46892, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA): Drinking Water and Wastewater Infrastructure, by Elena H. Humphreys and Jonathan L. Ramseur.
132 For example, see the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42); the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328); and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103).
133 Memorandum from Michael Deane, EPA Office of Wastewater Management, to EPA Regions, “FY 2022 CWSRF Base Allotment Availability,” May 12, 2022, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-05/ FY%202022%20CWSRF%20Base%20Allotment%20Availability.pdf.
134 For more information, see U.S. Department of Labor, “Davis-Bacon and Related Acts,” at https://www.dol.gov/ whd/govcontracts/dbra.htm.
135 33 U.S.C. §1292.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 38
secondary or advanced treatment plants; construction of new collector sewers, interceptor sewers, or storm sewers; and projects to correct existing problems of sewer system rehabilitation, infiltration/inflow of sewer lines, and combined sewer overflows. Operation and maintenance are not eligible activities. All funds in the CWSRF resulting from federal capitalization grants are first to be used to assure compliance with enforceable deadlines, goals, and requirements of the act, including municipal compliance.136 After satisfying the “first use” requirement, funds may be used to implement other eligible uses. The statutory list of eligible activities initially included nonpoint source management programs and estuary activities in approved State Nonpoint Management Programs and estuarine Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plans, respectively.137 The Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA; P.L. 113- 121) amended the list of eligible projects by adding several types of projects and activities, including
• replacement of decentralized treatment systems (e.g., septic tanks),
• energy-efficiency improvements at treatment works,
• reuse and recycling of wastewater or stormwater, and
• security improvements at treatment works.
In 2018, the America’s Water Infrastructure Act of 2018 (AWIA; P.L. 115-270) amended the list of eligible activities to allow qualified nonprofits to provide assistance to certain individuals for the repair or replacement of existing decentralized wastewater treatment systems or for the connection of an individual household to a centralized publicly owned treatment works.
Since the first appropriations for the CWSRF program in FY1989, Congress has provided approximately $60 billion in grants to states and Puerto Rico to capitalize their CWSRFs. According to EPA’s national CWSRF funding data report, federal funds—together with state matching contributions, repaid loans, and other funds—have provided approximately $172 billion in SRF assistance to support approximately 49,000 SRF loans and debt refinance agreements.138
The FY2023 CWSRF appropriation included both supplemental appropriations from IIJA of $2.202 billion (and $225.0 million for SRFs to address emerging contaminants) and regular appropriations of $1.639 billion (P.L. 117-328), a portion of which did not go directly to the CWSRF program. P.L. 117-328 included CPF/CDS items. The act sets aside 53% ($863.1 million) of the FY2023 CWSRF appropriation to CPF/CDS.
The FY2024 CWSRF appropriation includes both supplemental appropriations from IIJA of $2.402 billion (and $225.0 million for SRFs to address emerging contaminants) and regular appropriations of $1.639 billion (P.L. 118-42), a portion of which will not go directly to the CWSRF program. P.L. 118-42 includes CPF/CDS items and sets aside 48% ($787.7 million) of the FY2024 CWSRF appropriation to CPF/CDS.
136 33 U.S.C. §1382(b)(5).
137 For a detailed breakdown of SRF funding by category that is updated annually, see EPA, Clean Water SRF Program Information, National Summary, at https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/clean-water-state-revolving-fund-cwsrf-national- information-management-system-reports.
138 This figure includes funds through the end of FY2023, as it is based on data in EPA’s National Information Management System (February 2024) at https://www.epa.gov/cwsrf/clean-water-state-revolving-fund-cwsrf-national- information-management-system-reports.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 39
The CPF/CDS funds are to be distributed directly to recipients, instead of to states’ SRF programs. Thus, the reservation of funds effectively decreases the total amount available for allotment as state capitalization grants.139
For FY2025, the President requested $1.240 billion for the CWSRF program.140 This would be in addition to the FY2024 supplemental appropriations of $2.603 billion provided by IIJA (and $225 million for SRFs to address emerging contaminants).
Through a separate process, EPA provides direct grants for the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.141 EPA also provides direct grants to Indian tribes.142 The funding for the District of Columbia, U.S. territories, and Indian tribes is part of the SRF appropriations to EPA.
Statutory authority for the clean water SRF program is the CWA, as amended, Sections 601-609 (33 U.S.C. §§1381-1389). Regulations are codified at Title 40, Section 35.3100, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires public water systems to comply with federal drinking water regulations promulgated by EPA.144 Through these regulations, EPA has set standards to control the levels of 100 contaminants in drinking water, and more regulations are under development. To help communities meet these federal mandates and to meet the act’s public health objectives, Congress amended SDWA in 1996 to establish a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan program.145 The program is patterned closely after the CWSRF and authorizes EPA to make grants to states to capitalize drinking water state revolving loan funds. States use their DWSRFs to provide assistance to public water systems for infrastructure and other drinking water projects.146 States may use a portion of their annual grants to administer the DWSRF program and to implement other SDWA requirements.147 States must match 20% of the federal capitalization grant.148
Each year, states are required to develop an “intended use plan” that includes a list of projects the state intends to fund through the DWSRF.149 The law generally directs states to give funding
139 For more information, see CRS Report R47633, The Role of Earmarks in CWSRF and DWSRF Appropriations in the 117th Congress, by Elena H. Humphreys, and CRS Report R48066, The Role of Earmarks in SRF Appropriations in the 118th Congress, by Elena H. Humphreys.
140 Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Budget of the U.S. Government, FY2025, Appendix, at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2025-APP/pdf/BUDGET-2025-APP-1-22.pdf.
141 See 33 U.S.C. §1384 note.
142 See 33 U.S.C. §1377.
143 This section was prepared by Elena H. Humphreys, Analyst in Environmental Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
144 See CRS Report RL31243, Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA): A Summary of the Act and Its Major Requirements, by Elena H. Humphreys and Mary Tiemann.
145 P.L. 104-182.
146 Private, residential wells are not regulated under the SDWA and are not eligible for assistance through this program.
147 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(a)(2).
148 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(e).
149 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(b).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 40
priority to projects that (1) address the most serious health risks; (2) are needed to ensure compliance with SDWA regulations; and (3) assist systems most in need on a per household basis, according to state affordability criteria.150 The law also directs states to make available at least 15% of their annual allotment to public water systems that serve 10,000 or fewer persons (to the extent the funds can be obligated to eligible projects).151 Over the life of the program, roughly 71% of DWSRF assistance agreements and 38% of funds have gone to these smaller systems. Capitalization grants are allotted among the states according to the results of the most recent quadrennial survey of the capital improvements needs of eligible water systems.152 Needs surveys are prepared by EPA and the states, and the most recent survey (2023) indicates that public water systems need to invest at least $625 billion (2021 dollars) in infrastructure improvements over 20 years ($31.25 billion annually) to ensure the provision of safe drinking water and compliance with federal standards.153
This state-administered program provides assistance for infrastructure projects and other expenditures that facilitate compliance with federal drinking water regulations or that promote public health protection. The SDWA directs states to give funding priority to infrastructure projects that are needed to achieve or maintain compliance with SDWA requirements, protect public health, and assist systems with economic need. Further, states may use a portion of the capitalization grant for specified purposes, including programs for protecting sources of drinking water and improving the managerial and technical capacity of water systems.
States may use the DWSRF to make low- or zero-interest loans to public water systems. Loan recipients must generally repay the entire loan plus any interest to the state. DWSRFs may also be used to buy or refinance local debt obligations, guarantee or purchase insurance for a local obligation, provide revenue or security for payment of principal and interest on state revenue or general obligation bonds if the proceeds of bond sale are deposited into the DWSRF, and earn interest on DWSRF accounts.154
The statute authorizes states to use up to 35% of their annual DWSRF grants to provide additional subsidies (e.g., principal forgiveness and negative interest rate loans) to help economically disadvantaged communities of any size.155 The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118- 42), requires states to use 14% of their DWSRF capitalization grants for additional subsidization to eligible recipients. In EPA memorandum from 2023, the agency clarified its interpretation that
150 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(b)(3).
151 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(a)(2)(F).
152 Detailed national and state program data are available at EPA, “Drinking Water State Revolving Fund National Information Management System Reports,” at https://www.epa.gov/drinkingwatersrf/drinking-water-state-revolving- fund-national-information-management-system-reports.
153 This estimate is not adjusted for inflation. EPA, 7th Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment, April 2023, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/Final_FAQ_DWINSA_4.4.23.v1.pdf. For more details, see CRS Report R47878, Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs: Background and Issues for Congress, by Elena H. Humphreys.
154 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(a)(2).
155 SDWA Section 1452(d)(2)(B) (42 U.S.C. §300j-12(d)(2)(B)) conditionally requires states to use at least 12% of their capitalization grants to further subsidize DWSRF loans. A disadvantaged community is one in which the service area of a public water system meets state-established affordability criteria. For more details, see CRS Report R47935, Changes to the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) Program, by Elena H. Humphreys.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 41
the appropriations act’s additional subsidization percentage is additive to the SDWA additional subsidization statutory floor of 12% for the DWSRF, meaning that states are required to dedicate 26% of their capitalization grant amounts to additional subsidization.156
Drinking water systems that are eligible to receive DWSRF assistance include community water systems, whether publicly or privately owned, and not-for-profit noncommunity water systems. Federally owned systems are not eligible to receive assistance from this program.157
Projects eligible for DWSRF assistance include (1) capital investments to rehabilitate or replace infrastructure in order to continue providing the public with safe drinking water (e.g., storage facilities and transmission and distribution pipes); (2) projects needed to address violations of SDWA regulations (e.g., treatment facilities); and (3) project design and planning and associated preconstruction activities.158 Assistance may also be available for construction of new wells to replace contaminated wells, source water protection, land acquisition, security measures (including infrastructure improvements), and consolidation of water supplies (e.g., in cases where individual homes or public water systems have a water supply that is contaminated or a system is unable to maintain compliance for financial or managerial reasons).159
Projects and activities not eligible for funding include projects primarily intended to serve future growth or to provide fire protection, construction of dams or reservoirs (except reservoirs for treated water), monitoring, and operation and maintenance. Ineligible systems include those that lack the financial, technical, or managerial capacity to maintain SDWA compliance and systems in significant noncompliance with any SDWA regulation (unless the project is likely to ensure compliance).
For FY2023, two acts provided appropriations for the DWSRF program. IIJA (P.L. 117-58) provided three appropriations for the DWSRF. It included $2,202.0 million for the DWSRF program, $3,000.0 million through the DWSRF for lead service line replacement projects and related activities, and $800.0 million through the DWSRF for grants to support projects to address emerging contaminants with a focus on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $1,126.1 million for the DWSRF. Of this total appropriation, the act dedicates $609.3 million to CPF/CDS items. Accordingly, the act provides $516.9 million for the DWSRF program.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provided $1,126.1 million for the DWSRF. Of this total appropriation, $631.7 million is dedicated to earmarks and the remaining $494.4 million is for the DWSRF program. In addition, for FY2024, IIJA (P.L. 117-58) provides three appropriations for FY2023 of
1. $2,403.0 million for the DWSRF program,
156 EPA, “FY 2023 Allotments for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund based on the Seventh Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment,” May 2023, at https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf/annual-allotment-federal- funds-states-tribes-and-territories.
157 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(a)(2)(A).
158 42 U.S.C. §300j-12(a)(2)(B).
159 For more information, see EPA’s website “DWSRF Eligibility Handbook” at https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf/dwsrf- eligibility-handbook.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 42
2. $3,000.0 million through the DWSRF for lead service line replacement projects
and related activities,160 and
3. $800.0 million through the DWSRF for grants to support projects to address
emerging contaminants with a focus on PFAS.
For FY2025, the President requested $1,126.1 million for the DWSRF program.161
From FY1997 through FY2023, more than 20,062 projects had received DWSRF financial assistance, and 13,894 had been completed.162
The statutory authority for the DWSRF program is the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 (P.L. 104-182, §1452, 42 U.S.C. §300j-12). Regulations are codified at Title 40, Section 35.3500, of the Code of Federal Regulations.163
Localities are primarily responsible for providing water infrastructure services, which include both drinking water and wastewater infrastructure. According to the most recent estimates by states and EPA, funding needs for projects eligible for CWSRF or DWSRF funding—described in the sections above (i.e., projects needed to address water quality and public health-related problems or regulations)—total over $1.2 trillion over a 20-year period.165 However, many water infrastructure capital needs are ineligible for assistance through the SRF programs or are too large or otherwise not suited for those programs.
WIFIA authorizes EPA to provide credit assistance—secured (direct) loans or loan guarantees— for a broad range of drinking water and wastewater projects.166 In contrast to SRF programs, EPA provides credit assistance directly to eligible recipients. Thus far, EPA has provided credit assistance in the form of secured loans, and the agency does not expect much demand for loan guarantees.167
160 For more information, see CRS Report R47717, Lead Service Lines (LSLs) Replacement: Funding Developments, by Elena H. Humphreys.
161 EPA, Fiscal Year 2025 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for the Committee on Appropriations, EPA- 190R24002, March 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/fy-2025-congressional-justification- all-tabs.pdf.
162 Detailed national and state program data are available at EPA, “State Revolving Fund Public Portal Home,” at https://sdwis.epa.gov/ords/sfdw_pub/r/sfdw/owsrf_public/home.
163 DWSRF program information, regulations, facts, and statistics are available at https://www.epa.gov/dwsrf.
164 This section was prepared by Jonathan L. Ramseur, Specialist in Environmental Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
165 These estimates are not adjusted for inflation. EPA published its most recent estimate of capital needs for wastewater infrastructure in 2024. See EPA, 2022 Clean Watersheds Needs Survey, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/ cwns/clean-watersheds-needs-survey-cwns-2022-report-and-data. EPA published its most recent survey of drinking water needs in 2023. See EPA, 7th Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey and Assessment, April 2023, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-04/Final_FAQ_DWINSA_4.4.23.v1.pdf.
166 The Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 established a five-year WIFIA pilot program. In 2018, AWIA (P.L. 115-270) amended the WIFIA provisions to remove the pilot designation from the program. For more details, see CRS Report R43315, Water Infrastructure Financing: The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) Program, by Jonathan L. Ramseur, Mary Tiemann, and Elena H. Humphreys.
167 See EPA, WIFIA Program Handbook, 2023, footnote 23, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-09/ WIFIA-Program-Handbook.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 43
Section 4201 of AWIA (P.L. 115-270) amended WIFIA to authorize EPA to enter into agreements with relevant federal agencies to administer and service loans that such agencies are authorized to make.168 Section 4301 of AWIA directs EPA and Reclamation to enter into such an agreement. In October 2019, EPA and Reclamation entered into a memorandum of understanding for administering and servicing credit instruments. Under this agreement, EPA is responsible for providing support in administering and servicing Reclamation federal credit instruments, including determining project creditworthiness and loan terms, among other responsibilities.169
WIFIA provides an additional source of financing for water infrastructure projects, including projects eligible for CWSRF and DWSRF assistance. Some stakeholders have argued that the clean water and drinking water SRF programs are structured in a way that makes them useful primarily for smaller communities and smaller projects. The WIFIA program can provide credit assistance to large water infrastructure projects that otherwise have difficulty obtaining financing. Moreover, SRF funding is generally limited to projects that promote CWA or SDWA compliance and other statutory objectives. WIFIA can provide capital at a low cost to the borrower, because Treasury rates are typically lower than traditional municipal bonds.
In federal budgetary terms, WIFIA assistance has much less of an impact on federal spending than a grant, which is not repaid to the U.S. Treasury. The volume of loans and other types of credit assistance that the programs can provide is determined by the size of congressional appropriations and calculation of the subsidy amount. WIFIA defines the subsidy amount as follows:
The amount of budget authority sufficient to cover the estimated long-term cost to the Federal Government of a Federal credit instrument, as calculated on a net present value basis, excluding administrative costs and any incidental effects on governmental receipts or outlays in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (2 U.S.C. §661 et seq.).170
Although subsidy rates are project-specific, in the Administration’s FY2025 budget proposal, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) estimated a 0.91% subsidy rate for WIFIA in FY2025.171 At this subsidy rate, $10.0 million in appropriations could support direct loans totaling $990.0 million.172 Thus, one advantage of the WIFIA program is that it can provide a large amount of credit assistance relative to the amount of budget authority provided.
168 33 U.S.C. §3909(g).
169 See EPA’s WIFIA website at https://www.epa.gov/wifia/mou-administering-and-servicing-federal-credit- instruments.
170 33 U.S.C. §3901(13).
171 OMB, Budget of the United States Government, FY2025, Federal Credit Supplement, Table 1, at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2025-APP/pdf/BUDGET-2025-APP-1-22.pdf.
172 The subsidy rate, which is often expressed in percentage terms or as a ratio, largely determines the amount of credit assistance that can be made available to project sponsors. For example, if a project’s subsidy rate is 10% and is the only charge against available budget authority, a $20.0 million budgetary allocation could theoretically support a $200.0 million loan. A lower subsidy rate would support a larger loan amount.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 44
WIFIA credit assistance is available to state infrastructure financing authorities for a group of projects and individual project sponsors, which may include
• a corporation;
• a partnership;
• a joint venture;
• a trust; or
• a federal, state, local, or tribal government (or consortium of tribal governments).
Categories eligible for assistance by EPA include
• wastewater treatment and community drinking water facilities;
• enhanced energy efficiency of a public water system or wastewater treatment works;
• repair or rehabilitation of aging wastewater and drinking water systems;
• desalination, water recycling, aquifer recharge, or development of alternative water supplies to reduce aquifer depletion;
• prevention, reduction, or mitigation of the effects of drought;173 or
• a combination of eligible projects.
The act authorizes EPA to provide credit assistance for a range of wastewater and drinking water projects. Generally, project costs must be $20.0 million or larger to be eligible for credit assistance. For projects in less populous communities (defined by WIFIA as populations of 25,000 or fewer), project costs must be $5.0 million or more.174
For FY2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided 75.6 million for WIFIA (including $7.6 million for administrative costs). For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provides $72.3 million for WIFIA (including $7.6 million for administrative costs).175
To receive funding, a prospective borrower submits a letter of interest to EPA. The letter must document project eligibility, financial creditworthiness, engineering feasibility, and alignment with EPA’s policy priorities. From these submittals, the agency selects projects for funding.176 In 2023, EPA’s WIFIA website announced that the program has funding available on an “ongoing basis” that allows for a “rolling selection process.”177 Prior to this announcement, EPA provided funding on an annual basis, with notices of funding in the Federal Register.
173 The WIIN Act (P.L. 114-322) expanded WIFIA eligibility to include projects involving aquifer recharge; development of alternative water supplies to reduce aquifer depletion; and prevention, reduction, or mitigation of the effects of drought.
174 33 U.S.C. §3907(a).
175 EPA, Fiscal Year 2025 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for the Committee on Appropriations, EPA- 190R24002, March 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/fy-2025-congressional-justification- all-tabs.pdf.
176 For more up-to-date details of project selection, see EPA’s WIFIA website at https://www.epa.gov/wifia.
177 See EPA, “WIFIA Available Funding,” at https://www.epa.gov/wifia/wifia-available-funding.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 45
The statutory authority for the WIFIA program is WRRDA (P.L. 113-121, Title V, codified at 33 U.S.C. §§3901-3914). The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act; P.L. 114-94) and AWIA amended WIFIA provisions in 2015 and 2018, respectively. EPA promulgated an interim final rule for the program on December 19, 2016 (81 Federal Register 91822). Regulations are codified at Title 40, Section 35.10000, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
In recent WRDAs and in IIJA (P.L. 117-58), Congress has authorized several new drinking water and wastewater infrastructure funding programs. These programs are discussed below.179
In 2000, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001, authorized EPA to establish a new grant program in the CWA to address overflows from municipal combined sewer systems and from municipal separate sanitary sewers (“wet weather” projects).180 At that time, Congress authorized annual appropriations of $750.0 million for FY2002 and FY2003, but the program never received appropriations.
In 2018, AWIA Section 4106 amended the grant program by modifying the eligibility provisions to include stormwater infrastructure, among other changes.181 In addition, AWIA reauthorized appropriations for the grant program for $225.0 million for FY2019 and FY2020.182 IIJA reauthorized appropriations for $280.0 million annually for FY2022 through FY2026.183
Under this program, EPA provides grants to states, which in turn, provide sub-awards to eligible entities. The grants to states are allocated based on a formula prepared by EPA.184 In November 2022, EPA announced the availability of FY2022 funding and invited states to apply for grants to support eligible projects.185 In August 2023, EPA announced the availability of FY2023 funding,
178 This section was prepared by Elena H. Humphreys, Analyst in Environmental Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division, and Jonathan L. Ramseur, Specialist in Environmental Policy, Resources, Science, and Industry Division.
179 Other drinking water grant programs include the Voluntary Lead Testing in Drinking Water at Schools and Child Care Program Grant Program (authorized in SDWA §1464(d), added by P.L. 114-322, §2107) and the Drinking Water Fountain Replacement for Schools Grant Program (authorized in SDWA §1465, added by P.L. 115-270, §2006(b)).
180 P.L. 106-554.
181 P.L. 115-270.
182 AWIA §4106.
183 IIJA §50204.
184 EPA, “State Formula Allocations for Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Grants,” 86 Federal Register 11287, February 24, 2021, at https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/02/24/2021-03756/state-formula-allocations- for-sewer-overflow-and-stormwater-reuse-grants.
185 Memorandum from Radhika Fox, Assistant Administrator, to EPA Regional Water Division Directors, “Amendments to the Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grants Program and Allocation of Federal Fiscal Year 2022 Funding,” November 18, 2022, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-11/OSG-BIL- amendments-and-FY22-allotment.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 46
providing approximately $50 million to the states and territories.186 In April 2024, EPA announced FY2024 funding, providing approximately $41 million to the states and territories.187
For FY2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $50.0 million for the program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provides $41.0 million for the program. For FY2025, the President requested $50.0 million for this program.188
The statutory authority for this program is CWA Section 221 (codified at 33 U.S.C. §1301). The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2001 (P.L. 106-554), amended the CWA in 2000 to provide this authority. CWA Section 221 was subsequently amended in 2018 by AWIA (P.L. 115-270).
In 2018, AWIA amended the CWA (adding Section 104(b)(8)) to authorize EPA to make grants to qualified nonprofits to provide technical assistance to help rural, small, and tribal publicly owned treatment works and decentralized wastewater treatment systems to comply with the CWA and apply for financing from the CWSRF.189 For this purpose, AWIA authorized appropriations of $25.0 million per year for FY2019 through FY2023. IIJA reauthorized appropriations of $75.0 million per year for FY2022 through FY2026 to carry out grant programs in Section 104(b)(8), as well as Section 104(b)(3) and Section 104(g). These latter two programs have not received appropriations in recent years.
For FY2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $27.0 million for the program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provides $25.5 million for the program. For FY2025, the President requested $18.0 million to carry out this grant program.190
186 Memorandum from Radhika Fox, Assistant Administrator, to EPA Regional Water Division Directors, “Allocation of Federal Fiscal Year 2023 Funding for the Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grant Program,” August 9, 2023, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-08/OSG-FY2023-Allotment-August-2023.pdf.
187 Memorandum from Raffael Stein, Director, Water Infrastructure Division, to Regional Water Division Directors, “Allocation of Federal Fiscal Year 2024 Funding for the Sewer Overflow and Stormwater Reuse Municipal Grant Program,” April 19, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-05/osg-fy-2024-allotment- memorandum.pdf.
188 OMB, Budget of the U.S. Government, FY2025, Appendix, at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2025- APP/pdf/BUDGET-2025-APP-1-22.pdf.
189 For more information, see EPA, “Technical Assistance for Treatment Works,” at https://www.epa.gov/dwcapacity/ training-and-technical-assistance-small-systems-funding.
190 OMB, Budget of the U.S. Government, FY2025, Appendix, at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BUDGET-2025- APP/pdf/BUDGET-2025-APP-1-22.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 47
The statutory authority for this technical assistance is CWA Section 104(b)(8) (codified at 33 U.S.C. §1254(b)(8)). This provision was added to the CWA in 2018 by AWIA (P.L. 115-270, §4106).
Added in 1996, SDWA Section 1442(e) authorizes EPA and states to provide compliance assistance to public water systems and particularly to small systems (serving 25-10,000 customers).191 Accounting for 92% of community water systems, these small systems frequently lack both economies of scale and the financial, managerial, and technical capacity to meet statutory requirements.
This technical assistance is intended to enable small systems to achieve and maintain compliance with drinking water regulations. Assistance may include circuit-rider and multistate regional technical assistance programs, training, and assistance in implementing regulations; source water protection plans; monitoring plans; and water security enhancements. The WIIN Act (P.L. 114- 322) amended Section 1442 to specify that technical assistance grants to tribes may be used for operator training and certification.
For FY2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103), provided $22.0 million for this program. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $26.0 million for this program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provides $26.0 million for this grant program.192 For FY2025, the President did not request funds for this program.
The statutory authority for this technical assistance is SDWA Section 1442(e) (codified at 42 U.S.C. §300j-1(e)).
In 2016, Congress amended SDWA to add a drinking water grant program to help assist disadvantaged or small communities afford projects needed to comply with SDWA regulations.193 Eligible projects include investments needed for SDWA compliance, household water quality testing, and assistance that benefits a community on a per-household basis.194 Eligible grant recipients include public water systems or tribal water systems that serve a disadvantaged community or a community of 10,000 or fewer individuals or a state on behalf of an underserved community.195 For the purposes of this grant program, underserved community is defined to mean “a political subdivision of a State that, as determined by the Administrator, has an inadequate
191 42 U.S.C. §300j-1(e).
192 P.L. 118-42 also provides $3.45 million to EPA for grants to qualified nonprofits for technical assistance to private well owners.
193 P.L. 114-322.
194 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a(c).
195 Ibid.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 48
system for obtaining drinking water.”196 This grant program requires a cost share of no less than 10% of total project costs in the form of monetary funding, services, materials, supplies, or other in‐kind services.197 EPA may waive this matching requirement if the grant recipient would experience significant financial hardship from providing the nonfederal share.198
In April 2019, EPA announced the distribution of FY2018 and FY2019 funding for these grants among the states and territories, using a formula similar to the DWSRF allotment formula, with a 2% allotment for tribes.199 EPA reports that states need to develop a list of fundable projects that meet the grant program’s eligibility criteria to receive their allotment of funding.200 For FY2020, EPA announced that the agency would distribute $20.0 million for public water systems serving tribal communities.201 For FY2021 funding, EPA allotted $23.2 million among the states by using “an algorithmic formula that includes factors for population below poverty, small water systems, and underserved communities,” after reserving 10% of available funds for projects serving Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages.202 For the FY2022 and FY2023 funding, EPA waived the 10% statutory cost share and allotted $50.4 million among the states, after reserving $5.6 million for projects serving Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages.203 For the FY2024 funding, EPA allotted $25.1 million among the states and territories after reserving $2.85 million for projects serving Indian tribes and Alaska Native villages.204
Beginning in FY2018, Congress has appropriated funds each year to support this grant program. For FY2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $30.2 million for this grant program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provided $28.5 million for this grant program. In addition, IIJA provided this grant program with
196 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a(a)(2).
197 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a(h).
198 Ibid.
199 EPA, “Final Allotments of FY2018 and FY2019 Appropriations for the Assistance to Small and Disadvantaged Communities Grants, Authorized Under Section 2104 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act,” April 29, 2019, at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-04/documents/ wiin_2104_allotment_memo_april_2019.pdf.
200 EPA, Assistance for Small and Disadvantaged Communities Drinking Water Grant Program: Grant Implementation Document, August 2019, at https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2019-08/documents/ assistance_for_small_and_disadvantaged_communities_grant_implementation_document_08_27_19.pdf.
201 EPA, “WIIN Act Section 2104: Assistance for Small and Disadvantaged Communities Tribal Grant Program,” at https://www.epa.gov/tribaldrinkingwater/wiin-act-section-2104-assistance-small-and-disadvantaged-communities- tribal.
202 EPA, “Final Allotments of FY2021 Appropriations for the Assistance to Small and Disadvantaged Communities Grants, Authorized Under Section 2104 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act,” July 27, 2021, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-08/fy2021-initial-state-allotment-memo.pdf.
203 EPA, “Allotments for Fiscal Year 2022 and 2023 for the Assistance to Small, Underserved and Disadvantaged Communities Grant, Authorized Under Section 1459A of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as Amended by Section 2104 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act,” June 23, 2023, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/ documents/2023-06/SUDC%20Grant%20Allotments%20for%20Fiscal%20Year%202022%20and%202023_0.pdf.
204 Following direction in the FY2024 appropriations act, EPA announced that states or territories could use this grant for “one or more owners of drinking water wells that are not public water systems or connected to a public water system.” See EPA, “Allotments for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 for the Assistance to Small, Underserved, and Disadvantaged Communities (SUDC) Grant, Authorized Under Section 1459A of the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), as Amended by Section 2104 of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act,” May 20, 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-05/fy24-allotments_sudc_05092024.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 49
$1.0 billion dedicated to emerging contaminant projects each year between FY2022 and FY2026. For FY2025, the President requested $30.2 million for this grant program.205
The statutory authority for the Assistance for Small and Disadvantaged Communities Drinking Water Grant program is SDWA Section 1459A (codified at 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a, added by the WIIN Act, P.L. 114-322, §2104).
In 2016, Congress amended SDWA to direct EPA to establish a grant program for projects and activities that reduce lead in drinking water.206 These grants may be used to replace a publicly owned lead service line; to test, plan, or perform other relevant activities to control lead in drinking water; and to provide assistance to low-income homeowners to replace their portions of lead service lines.207 Eligible grant recipients include public water systems; tribal water systems; qualified nonprofits with experience in lead reduction; and local, state, or municipal governments.208 This grant program generally requires recipients to provide a 20% match. EPA may waive this matching requirement for reasons of affordability.
Congress first appropriated funds for this grant program in FY2018. For FY2021, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260), provided $21.5 million for this grant program. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103), provided $22.0 million for this grant program for FY2022. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $25.0 million for this grant program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provided $22.0 million for this grant program. For FY2025, the President requested $64.5 million.209
The statutory authority for this grant program is SDWA Section 1459B (codified at 42 U.S.C. §300j-19b, added by the WIIN Act, P.L. 114-322, §2105).
In 2018, Congress amended SDWA to authorize EPA to establish the Drinking Water System Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Program, a grant program for small and disadvantaged public water systems.210 EPA is to award grant funds to eligible public water systems for projects that increase resilience to natural hazards, including hydrologic changes.
205 EPA, Fiscal Year 2025 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for the Committee on Appropriations, EPA- 190R24002, March 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/fy-2025-congressional-justification- all-tabs.pdf.
206 P.L. 114-322.
207 42 U.S.C. §300j-19b(a)(2).
208 42 U.S.C. §300j-19b(a)(1).
209 EPA, Fiscal Year 2025 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for the Committee on Appropriations, EPA- 190R24002, March 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/fy-2025-congressional-justification- all-tabs.pdf.
210 P.L. 115-270.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 50
Eligible projects include those that increase water use efficiency, enhance water supply through watershed management or desalination, and increase energy efficiency in the conveyance or treatment of drinking water.211 This grant program generally requires recipients to provide a 10% cost share that EPA can waive.212
Congress first appropriated funds for this grant program in FY2020. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $7.0 million for this grant program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provides $6.5 million. For FY2025, the President requested $25.0 million.213
The statutory authority for the Small Water System Resilience and Sustainability grant program is SDWA Section 1459A(l) (codified at 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a(l), added by AWIA (P.L. 115-270, §2005)).
In 2021, Congress amended SDWA to direct EPA to establish a grant program for public water systems serving 10,000 or more individuals to improve resilience to natural hazards and to address cybersecurity vulnerabilities.214 Eligible uses of funds include various water conservation, desalination construction, and watershed management activities, among others.215 EPA is directed to use 50% of amounts available for grants for water systems serving 10,000 or more to 100,000 individuals, and 50% for systems serving more than 100,000 individuals.216
Congress first provided appropriations for this grant program for FY2023. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (P.L. 117-328), provided $5.0 million for this grant program. For FY2024, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), provides $2.3 million for this grant program. For FY2025, the President requested $5.0 million.217
211 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a(l)(3).
212 42 U.S.C. §300j-19a(l)(5).
213 EPA, Fiscal Year 2025 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for the Committee on Appropriations, EPA- 190R24002, March 2024, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-03/fy-2025-congressional-justification- all-tabs.pdf.
214 P.L. 117-58.
215 42 U.S.C. §300j-19(g)(1)(c).
216 42 U.S.C. §300j-19(g)(1)(f).
217 EPA, Fiscal Year 2024 Justification of Appropriation Estimates for the Committee on Appropriations, EPA- 190R23001, March 2023, at https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-03/fy-2024-congressional-justification- all-tabs.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 51
The statutory authority for the Midsize and Large Drinking Water System Resilience and Sustainability grant program is SDWA Section 1459F (codified at 42 U.S.C. §300j-19g, added by IIJA (P.L. 117-58, §50107)).
HUD administers assistance in support of neighborhood revitalization, including infrastructure improvements, primarily under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, for states, local governments, and insular areas (i.e., U.S. territories). The program’s primary objective is to develop viable communities by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. CDBG grantees use program funds for a broad range of neighborhood revitalization and community and economic development activities intended to meet one of three national objectives. Specifically, eligible activities must
1. principally benefit low- or moderate-income persons, 2. aid in preventing or eliminating slums and blight, or 3. address an imminent threat to the health and safety of residents.219
The program statute requires that at least 70% of a grantee’s funds must benefit low- and moderate-income persons.220
As a block grant, the CDBG program provides grantee discretion in selecting the eligible activities to be undertaken in pursuit of national objectives. CDBG grantees may distribute program funds across several broad activity categories, including the acquisition and demolition of real property, planning and administrative activities, housing, public services, and public improvements such as water and wastewater treatment facilities. From FY2019 to FY2023, water and sewer improvements accounted for an average of 12% of the annual total of CDBG expenditures. CDBG expenditures for public improvements overall—including water, sewer, and related improvements—accounted for approximately 36% of all CDBG expenditures, annually, during the same five-year span.221
Congress has also used the program to provide supplemental appropriations to assist communities and states in response to certain events, including natural disasters, the mortgage foreclosure crisis of 2008, economic recessions, terrorist attacks, and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID- 19) pandemic. Since 1993, for example, Congress has appropriated more than $99 billion in supplemental CDBG funding to assist targeted states and local governments in their recovery and
218 This section was prepared by Joseph V. Jaroscak, Analyst in Economic Development Policy, Government and Finance Division.
219 24 C.F.R. §570.208.
220 42 U.S.C. §5301(c).
221 Between FY2019 and FY2023, disbursements by CDBG recipients for water and sewer improvements averaged $404.7 million per year. See Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), CDBG Expenditure Reports, National Expenditure Reports (FY2001-FY2023), All CDBG Disbursements, at https://www.hudexchange.info/ programs/cdbg/cdbg-expenditure-reports/.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 52
mitigation efforts, as CDBG-Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) and CDBG-Mitigation (CDBG- MIT) funding.222
As noted, the primary goal of the CDBG program is the development of viable communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. Funds may also be used to aid in preventing or eliminating slums and blight or to address an imminent threat to residents of the impacted area.
The CDBG funding allocation process is outlined in the program’s statute.223 After amounts specified in an appropriations act are allocated, 70% of CDBG funds (the entitlement program) are allocated by formula to entitlement communities.224 Entitlement communities are defined as principal cities of metropolitan areas, metropolitan cities with populations of 50,000 or more, and statutorily defined urban counties.225 These funds are not available for projects in rural communities. Funds are awarded to entitlement communities based on the higher yield from one of two weighted formulas. The first formula uses population, overcrowded housing, and poverty data, while the second formula allocates funds based on an entitlement community’s relative share of poverty, housing built before 1940, and the lag in population growth rate relative to the total for all entitlement communities.
The remaining 30% of CDBG funding (the state program) is allocated by a similar formula process to the states for distribution to nonentitlement communities for use in areas that are not part of a CDBG entitlement community allocation. These funds, which are administered by each state, may be available for rural community water projects, among other eligible activities.226
In order to receive CDBG funds, eligible grantees are required to participate in HUD’s Consolidated Plan process, in which grantees assess conditions and needs related to community development and housing to inform the selection of program activities. Under this process, grantees submit three- to five-year consolidated plans as well as annual strategic plans that must be developed with community input and conform to HUD specifications. Grantees also report annually on performance against their stated goals for the previous year through a Comprehensive Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER).227
States do not undertake eligible CDBG activities directly. Instead, states act as fiscal agents charged with three distinct responsibilities: (1) determining the method or methods to be used to distribute funds to nonentitlement communities, including seeking the input of affected local governments; (2) selecting local governments that will receive funds; and (3) monitoring local
222 HUD, CDBG Grant History Report (as of June 2024), at https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/ cdbg-dr/reports.
223 42 U.S.C. §5306.
224 HUD, Awards and Allocations, at https://www.hudexchange.info/grantees/allocations-awards/.
225 42 U.S.C. §5302.
226 HUD, CDBG Expenditure Reports, National Expenditure Reports (FY2001-FY2020), All CDBG Disbursements, at https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg/cdbg-expenditure-reports/.
227 HUD, Consolidated Plan Process, Grant Programs, and Related HUD Programs, at https://www.hudexchange.info/ programs/consolidated-plan/consolidated-plan-process-grant-programs-and-related-hud-programs/; for more information on the HUD Consolidated Plan, see CRS Report R48073, HUD’s Consolidated Planning Process: An Overview, coordinated by Joseph V. Jaroscak.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 53
government grant recipients and project implementation to ensure compliance with rules governing the program.
Before funds are allocated to states and entitlement communities, a statutory amount of $7.0 million is set aside annually for the U.S. territories or insular areas of Guam, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. These funds are awarded annually based on each insular area’s relative share of aggregate population for all insular areas.
There are three categories of recipients eligible for direct allocations of CDBG program funds: entitlement communities, states (for distribution to nonentitlement communities), and insular areas.
Eligible activities include a wide range of projects such as public facilities and improvements, housing, public services, economic development, and brownfields redevelopment. Grantees must ensure that each activity meets one of the program’s three national objectives: benefiting low- and moderate-income persons (the primary objective), aiding in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or assisting other community development needs that present a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. Under the state program that assists smaller communities, states develop their own program and funding priorities and have considerable latitude to define community eligibility and criteria, within general criteria in law and regulations.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024 (P.L. 118-42), appropriated $6.7 billion for the Community Development Fund (CDF),228 including $3.3 billion in CDBG entitlement, nonentitlement, and insular area funds. The act included about $3.3 billion in the CDF for Economic Development Initiative funding, for congressionally directed community project spending, among other provisions.229 Of the amount appropriated for CDBG grants in FY2024, $2.3 billion was allocated to entitlement communities, $987.9 million to states for distribution to nonentitlement communities, and $7.0 million to insular areas.230 The Administration’s FY2025 budget requested $2.93 billion for the CDF, of which $2.9 billion was requested for the CDBG program.231
Statutory authority for the CDBG program is Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§5301 et seq.). Regulations are codified at Title 24, Part 570, of the Code of Federal Regulations. Regulations covering the CDBG state program for
228 The CDBG program is funded in an account called the Community Development Fund.
229 HUD, Economic Development Initiative—Community Project Funding Grants, April 2024, at https://www.hud.gov/ program_offices/comm_planning/economic_development_initiative_community_project_funding_grants.
230 HUD’s Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD) administers the CDBG program. CPD’s Appropriations Budget/Allocations table provides the FY2024 amount of funding allocated for entitlement (called “local governments” in the table) and state CDBG programs. See HUD, “CPD Appropriations Budget/Allocations,” at https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/comm_planning/appropriations_budget_allocations.
231 OMB, Budget of the U.S. Government, FY2025, Appendix, p. 538, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2024/03/hud_fy2025.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 54
nonentitlement communities are codified at Title 24, Part 570, Subpart I (§570.480).232 CDBG has operated under an expired authorization since 1994.
Authorized under the same title (Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974) as the formula-based CDBG program, the Section 108 Loan Guarantee program provides loan guarantees to CDBG grantees. The program allows entitlement communities, states (on behalf of a nonentitlement community), and insular areas to leverage its annual CDBG allocation in support of large-scale economic development and housing rehabilitation projects and the construction, reconstruction, or installation of public facilities.
Consistent with the goals and objectives of the CDBG program, Section 108 loan guarantees are intended to supplement CDBG program activities. The program allows entitlement communities, states, and insular areas to extend the reach of the formula-based CDBG program, giving them access to additional financial resources to undertake large-scale, transformative neighborhood revitalization efforts.
Eligible activities include acquiring and rehabilitating publicly owned real property; housing rehabilitation; economic development activities, including those carried out by for-profit and nonprofit entities; debt service reserves; payment of interest on the guaranteed loan; issuance cost of the public offering; and the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, and installation of public facilities, including water and sewer improvements.233
Upon approval of a Section 108 Loan Guarantee application, HUD generates loan documents and coordinates with the recipient on any necessary revisions. Typically, Section 108 loans are financed initially through an interim variable rate product. Periodically, HUD releases public offerings for permanent financing of Section 108 loans, once a sufficient aggregate amount in loan guarantees has been awarded.
Section 108 loans can be repaid over periods of up to 20 years. Repayment structures vary depending on the individual project and borrower. The interest rates for Section 108 interim loans are based on the three-month Treasury Auction Bill Rate. Interest rates for loans funded by a public offering are fixed and are based on U.S. Treasury borrowing rates.
Under the program, entities are allowed to borrow up to five times their annual CDBG allocation, minus any existing Section 108 commitments or outstanding principal balances. CDBG grantees applying for Section 108 loans must pledge their current and future CDBG allocations as security against default of the bonds or notes. Section 108 funds are made available on an ongoing basis, allowing communities to apply for funds any time during the year. Section 108 loan funds are made available to eligible public entities that may reloan the funds to private participants in a
232 For more program information on CDBG entitlements grants, see HUD Exchange, “CDBG Entitlement Program Eligibility Requirements,” 2024, at https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg-entitlement/cdbg-entitlement- program-eligibility-requirements/. For information on the CDBG state program, see HUD Exchange, “CDBG State Program,” 2024, at https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/cdbg-state/.
233 42 U.S.C. §5308(a).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 55
redevelopment project. Applicants are encouraged to meet with HUD staff prior to submitting a formal application.
Only CDBG grantees are eligible to apply for Section 108 loan guarantees. However, recipients of Section 108 loans may execute planned activities directly or relend the funds to a third party, including private companies, to carry out the eligible activities.
All eligible activities must meet at least one of the three national objectives of the regular CDBG program: the project must principally benefit low- and moderate-income persons, aid in eliminating or preventing slums and blight, or address an imminent threat to the health and safety of residents. The program has an open application process, allowing CDBG grantees to submit applications anytime during the year. The application process governing the Section 108 program can be grouped into several distinct stages: application presubmission, citizen participation, application submission, application review and notification, award allocation, and reporting.
When submitting formal Section 108 applications, CDBG grantees must include a description of activities to be carried out, financing structure, source of loan repayment, citizen participation plan, antidisplacement strategy, and a pledge of the applicant’s CDBG allocation as security for the Section 108 guaranteed loan.234
For FY2024, Congress authorized a loan commitment ceiling of $400.0 million and directed HUD to collect fees from borrowers that result in a credit subsidy cost of zero for guaranteeing Section 108 loans.235 Until FY2015, Congress appropriated an amount necessary to cover the estimated long-term liability to the federal government of a Section 108 loan guarantee (credit subsidy). The Department of Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Act of FY2014236 changed that arrangement, allowing HUD to collect a fee from the borrower to cover the cost of the credit subsidy. The amount of the fee is determined annually by HUD based on a percentage of the principal amount of the Section 108 guaranteed loan. For FY2025, the Administration requested $400.0 million in Section 108 loan guarantee authority.237
Statutory authority for the Section 108 program is Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. §5308). Regulations are codified at Title 24, Part 570, Subpart M, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
234 24 C.F.R. §570.704.
235 P.L. 118-42
236 P.L. 113-76, 128 Stat. 617.
237 OMB, Budget of the U.S. Government, FY2025, Appendix, p. 539, at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2024/03/hud_fy2025.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 56
The Department of Commerce’s EDA is authorized to provide certain types of development assistance to areas experiencing substantial economic distress.239 EDA grants for community water and sewer projects are available primarily through its Public Works program.240 Similar assistance is also available under the agency’s Economic Adjustment Assistance (EAA) program, which is discussed in the subsequent section.241
Under the Public Works program, grants are awarded competitively to eligible applicants to revitalize, expand, and upgrade their physical infrastructure. These investments in public works improvements are generally linked to projects intended to enable communities to attract new industry, encourage business expansion and retention, diversify local economies, and generate or retain private-sector jobs in EDA-designated distressed regions. Grants may be used for a wide range of purposes, and may have a water supply or wastewater element.
The types of projects funded include business and science parks, expansion of port and harbor facilities, business incubator facilities, skill-training facilities, telecommunications infrastructure, redevelopment of brownfields, and water and wastewater facilities primarily serving industry and commerce.242 Federal law requires that eligible recipients retain ownership of EDA-funded projects.243 Because EDA grants are designed to primarily support economic development, foster job creation, and attract private investment, these grants are generally not available for residential sewer and water supply development.244
The purpose of EDA’s Public Works program is to promote long-term economic development and assist in the construction of public works and the development of facilities needed to initiate and support the creation or retention of permanent private-sector jobs in areas experiencing long-term economic deterioration and distress. The program supports investments that help distressed areas address their competitive disadvantages.245
EDA competitively awards public works grants directly to approved applicants. Generally, EDA investment assistance may not exceed 50% of the project cost. Projects may receive an additional amount, not to exceed 30%, based on the relative needs of the region in which the project will be
238 This section was prepared by Julie M. Lawhorn, Analyst in Economic Development Policy, Government and Finance Division.
239 42 U.S.C. §3161.
240 42 U.S.C. §3141.
241 42 U.S.C. §3149.
242 Economic Development Administration (EDA), “Public Works,” at https://www.eda.gov/funding/programs/public- works.
243 13 C.F.R. §314.7.
244 EDA, “FY2023 Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Notice of Funding Opportunity,” p. 10, at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=346815. For additional information, see EDA, “Public Works,” at https://www.eda.gov/funding/programs/public-works.
245 42 U.S.C. §3141(b).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 57
located, as determined by EDA.246 In the case of certain Indian tribes, nonprofit organizations that have exhausted their effective borrowing capacity, or a state or political subdivision of a state that has exhausted its effective taxing and borrowing capacity, grants totaling 100% of a project’s cost may be awarded.247 Credit may be given toward the nonfederal share for in-kind contributions, including contributions of space, equipment, and services.248 No minimum or maximum project amount is specified in law.
Public works grants may be made to states, cities, counties and other political subdivisions of states, Indian Tribes, economic development districts, institutions of higher education or a consortium of such institutions, and private or public not-for-profit organizations acting in cooperation with officials of a political subdivision of a state.249 Individuals and for-profit, private-sector entities do not qualify.250
Qualified projects must fill a pressing need of the area and must (1) be intended to improve the opportunities for the successful establishment or expansion of businesses, (2) assist in the creation of additional long-term private-sector employment, and (3) benefit long-term unemployed or underemployed persons and low-income families.251 Projects must also be consistent with the region’s certified Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) or equivalent EDA- accepted regional economic development strategy252 and have an adequate share of nonfederal funds.253 In addition, eligible projects must be located in areas that meet at least one of the following criteria: low per capita income, unemployment above the national average, or “special need” as determined by EDA.254
In FY2020, Congress directed EDA to allocate $118.5 million of total appropriations for the Public Works grant program.255 The amount of Public Works funding increased by $1.0 million
246 42 U.S.C. §3144. Additionally, agency regulations describe the economic distress criteria at 13 C.F.R. Part 301, Subpart D—Investment Rates and Matching Share Requirements.
247 42 U.S.C. §3144(c).
248 42 U.S.C. §3144(b).
249 Under this program, the term state includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau. Under this program, the term Indian tribe includes any Indian tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or Regional Corporation (as defined in or established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. §§1601 et seq.)), that is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians (42 U.S.C. §3122).
250 42 U.S.C. §3122(4).
251 42 U.S.C. §3141(b).
252 42 U.S.C. §3141(b)(3).
253 42 U.S.C. §3144.
254 42 U.S.C. §3161. Additionally, agency regulations describe the economic distress criteria at 13 C.F.R. Part 300, Subpart C—Economic Distress Criteria. See also EDA’s Notice of Funding Opportunity, Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs, FY2023, at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId= 346815.
255 Congressional Record, vol. 165, no. 204 (December 17, 2019), pp. H10961-H10962, at https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/CREC-2019-12-17/pdf/CREC-2019-12-17-house-bk2.pdf.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 58
each fiscal year through 2023, reaching $121.5 million in FY2023.256 In FY2024, the amount decreased by over 17% to $100.0 million.257 For FY2025, the Administration requested $105.5 million for the Public Works program.258
The statutory authority for the Public Works program is the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, P.L. 89-136 (42 U.S.C. §§3121 et seq.). Regulations are codified at Title 13, Chapter III, Parts 302, 305, 316, and 317, of the Code of Federal Regulations.
EDA, through its EAA grant program, awards development assistance to areas experiencing long- term economic deterioration and distress or sudden and substantial economic dislocation. This may include assisting communities/regions affected by natural disasters, natural resource depletion, mass layoffs, and other severe economic shocks that communities experience in restructuring and diversifying their regional economies. Funds have also been made available to aid communities experiencing chronic unemployment and underinvestment, and communities affected by military base realignments and closures.259
EAA funds are competitively awarded to qualified applicants to assist them in developing and implementing a five-year CEDS or for implementation grants that support the activities and strategies identified in a CEDS. Examples of EAA activities may include
• construction of public infrastructure projects, including water and sewer facilities, industrial parks, and business incubators;
• strategic planning activities that include short-term action plans intended to stabilize a distressed community and regionally oriented, long-term development strategies intended to assess and redirect the region’s economic future;
• capitalization of revolving loan funds, which would allow qualifying businesses and other borrowers to borrow funds at favorable interest rates; or
• market or industry research and analysis; technical assistance, including feasibility studies; public services; and training.260
256 Congressional Record, vol. 166, no. 28 (December 21, 2020), p. H7922, at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ CREC-2020-12-21/pdf/CREC-2020-12-21-house-bk3.pdf; Congressional Record, vol. 168, no. 42 (March 9, 2022), p. H1772, at https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2022/03/09/168/42/CREC-2022-03-09-bk3.pdf; and Congressional Record, vol. 168, no. 198 (December 20, 2022), p. S7898, at https://www.congress.gov/117/crec/2022/12/20/168/198/ CREC-2022-12-20-pt1-PgS7819-2.pdf.
257 Sen. Patricia Murray, “Explanatory Statement Submitted by Ms. Murray, Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Regarding H.R. 4366, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024,” Congressional Record, vol. 170, no. 39 (March 5, 2024), p. S1399, at https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2024/03/05/170/39/CREC-2024-03-05.pdf.
258 U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), FY2025 EDA Congressional Budget Justification, p. 31, at https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/EDA-FY2025-Justification-Congressional-Submission.pdf.
259 42 U.S.C. §3149. For additional information, see EDA, “Economic Adjustment Assistance,” at https://www.eda.gov/economic-adjustment-assistance.
260 13 C.F.R. Part 307 and EDA, “FY2023 Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Notice of Funding Opportunity,” at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=346815.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 59
Federal law requires that eligible recipients retain ownership of EDA-funded projects.261 Because EDA grants are designed to primarily support economic development, foster job creation, and attract private investment, these grants are generally not available for residential sewer and water supply development.262
The purpose of the program is to promote long-term economic development in areas experiencing sudden economic dislocation or long-term economic distress. EDA’s EAA program supports investments intended to help distressed areas address their competitive disadvantages and evaluate their economic futures. EDA also administers program funds for state and local entities to plan and implement disaster economic recovery efforts through the EAA program.263
EDA competitively awards EAA grants directly to eligible applicants. Generally, EAA investment assistance may not exceed 50% of the project cost. Projects may receive an additional amount, not to exceed 30%, based on the relative needs of the region in which the project will be located, as determined by EDA.264 In the case of certain Indian tribes and nonprofit organizations that have exhausted their effective borrowing capacity, or a state or political subdivision of a state that has exhausted its effective taxing and borrowing capacity, grants totaling 100% may be awarded.265 Credit may be given toward the nonfederal share for in-kind contributions, including contributions of space, equipment, and services.266 No minimum or maximum project amount is specified in law.
EAA grants may be made to states, cities, counties and other political subdivisions of states, Indian Tribes, economic development districts, institutions of higher education or a consortium of such institutions, and private or public not-for-profit organizations acting in cooperation with officials of a political subdivision of a state.267 Individuals and for-profit, private-sector entities do not qualify.268
261 13 C.F.R. §314.7.
262 EDA, “FY2023 Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Notice of Funding Opportunity,” p. 10, at https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=346815. For additional information, see EDA, “Public Works,” at https://www.eda.gov/funding/programs/public-works.
263 For more information, see CRS Infographic IG10045, Economic Development Administration (EDA) Disaster Recovery Funding, by Julie M. Lawhorn.
264 42 U.S.C. §3144. Additionally, agency regulations describe the economic distress criteria at 13 C.F.R. Part 301, Subpart D—Investment Rates and Matching Share Requirements.
265 42 U.S.C. §3144(c).
266 42 U.S.C. §3144(b).
267 Under this program, the term state includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau. Under this program, the term Indian tribe includes any Indian tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or Regional Corporation (as defined in or established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. §§1601 et seq.)), that is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians (42 U.S.C. §3122).
268 42 U.S.C. §3122(4).
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 60
Qualified projects must fill a pressing need of the area arising from actual or threatened severe unemployment or economic adjustment problems resulting from severe changes in economic conditions.269 Projects must also have an adequate share of local funds.270 With the exception of strategy grants, EAA projects must also be consistent with the area’s CEDS.271 In addition, eligible projects must be located in areas that meet at least one of the following criteria: low per capita income, unemployment above the national average, or “special need” as determined by EDA.272
Congress directed EDA to allocate $37.5 million to the program in FY2021 and FY2022.273 Congress directed EDA to allocate $39.5 million to the EAA program in FY2023 and $33.0 million in FY2024.274 For FY2025, the Administration’s budget requested $39.5 million for the EAA program.275
Congress has approved additional funding for EDA grant programs that support economic transition strategies and help affected communities build economic development capacity through Assistance to Energy Transition initiatives (e.g., the Assistance to Coal Communities [ACC], the Assistance to Nuclear Closure Communities [NCC], and Assistance to Biomass Closure Communities [BCC] initiatives). Congress directed EDA to allocate $10.0 million in FY2015 and $15.0 million in FY2016 to the ACC initiative.276 Funding for the ACC initiative remained at $30.0 million each year for FY2017 through FY2020 and increased each fiscal year through FY2024. In FY2024, Congress directed EDA to provide $75 million to the ACC initiative. In FY2020, Congress directed EDA to allocate $15.0 million for the first time to the NCC initiative and increased the amount to $16.5 million each fiscal year from FY2021 through FY2023; funding was not set aside for NCC in FY2024. For the first time in FY2022, Congress directed EDA to provide funding ($4.5 million) through the EAA program to biomass power plant closure communities. Each year in FY2023 and FY2024, Congress again directed EDA to provide $4.5 million to the BCC initiative. For FY2025, the Administration requested $46.0 million for the Assistance to Energy Transition Communities and proposes to allocate the entire amount to coal
269 42 U.S.C. §3149.
270 42 U.S.C. §3144.
271 42 U.S.C. §3149(b)(2).
272 42 U.S.C. §3161. Additionally, agency regulations describe the economic distress criteria at 13 C.F.R. Part 300, Subpart C—Economic Distress Criteria. See also EDA, “Notice of Funding Opportunity, Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs, FY2020,” at https://www.eda.gov/funding/funding-opportunities/fiscal-year-2020- public-works-and-economic-adjustment-assistance.
273 See explanatory statements accompanying P.L. 115-141, P.L. 116-6, P.L. 116-93, P.L. 116-260, and P.L. 117-103.
274 Sen. Patrick Leahy, “Explanatory Statement Submitted by Mr. Leahy, Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Regarding H.R. 2617, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023,” Congressional Record, vol. 168, no. 198 (December 20, 2022), p. S7898, at https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-168/issue-198/senate- section/article/S7819-2, and Sen. Patricia Murray, “Explanatory Statement Submitted by Ms. Murray, Chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, Regarding H.R. 4366, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024,” Congressional Record, vol. 170, no. 39 (March 5, 2024), p. S1399, at https://www.congress.gov/118/crec/2024/03/05/170/39/CREC- 2024-03-05.pdf.
275 U.S. Department of Commerce, FY2025 EDA Congressional Budget Justification, p. 51, at https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/EDA-FY2025-Justification-Congressional-Submission.pdf
276 In FY2015 and FY2016, the ACC initiative was administered as a component of the multiagency POWER Initiative—a coordinated federal effort to assist coal-impacted communities. For more information, see CRS Report R46015, The POWER Initiative: Energy Transition as Economic Development, by Julie M. Lawhorn.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service 61
communities.277 ACC, NCC, and BCC grants are administered primarily under the authority of EDA’s EAA program and can be used for a variety of eligible activities, including infrastructure, water, and wastewater projects.278
Additionally, in FY2020 and FY2021, Congress approved two rounds of supplemental funding, primarily through the EAA program. Congress approved $1.5 billion of supplemental funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act (P.L. 116-136) in FY2020. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA; P.L. 117-2) included $3.0 billion in supplemental funding to EDA for EAA activities. Congress directed EDA to use CARES Act and ARPA funding to prevent, prepare for, and respond to COVID-19 and for responding to economic injury as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which could include infrastructure, water, and wastewater activities.279
The statutory authority for the EAA program is the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended, P.L. 89-136 (42 U.S.C. §§3121 et seq.). Regulations are codified at Title 13, Chapter III, Parts 302, 305, 316, and 317 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
277 U.S. Department of Commerce, FY2025 EDA Congressional Budget Justification, p. 65, at https://www.commerce.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/EDA-FY2025-Justification-Congressional-Submission.pdf.
278 For more information, see “Assistance to Energy Transition Communities” in CRS Report R46991, Economic Development Administration: An Overview of Programs and Appropriations (FY2011-FY2024), by Julie M. Lawhorn; CRS Insight IN11648, The Economic Development Administration’s Assistance to Coal and Nuclear Closure Communities Initiatives for Economic Transitions, by Julie M. Lawhorn; and EDA, “Notice of Funding Opportunity, Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs, FY2023,” at https://www.eda.gov/funding/funding- opportunities/fiscal-year-2023-public-works-and-economic-adjustment-assistance.
279 In March 2021, EDA announced that the agency had awarded more than $1 billion in Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act grants. See EDA, “U.S. EDA Marks Milestone $1 Billion in CARES Act Grants Awarded,” March 22, 2021, at https://www.eda.gov/news/blogs/2021/03/22/eda-marks-cares-act-milestone.htm.
Federally Supported Water Projects and Programs
Congressional Research Service R46471 · VERSION 11 · UPDATED 62
Jonathan L. Ramseur, Coordinator Acting Section Research Manager
Julie M. Lawhorn
Analyst in Economic Development Policy
Lisa S. Benson Specialist in Agricultural Policy
Anna E. Normand
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
Nicole T. Carter Acting Section Research Manager
Charles V. Stern
Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
Elena H. Humphreys Analyst in Environmental Policy
Megan Stubbs
Specialist in Agricultural Conservation and Natural Resources Policy
Joseph V. Jaroscak Analyst in Economic Development Policy
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.