Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

May 21, 2020 R46369

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In
Brief
May 21, 2020
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R46369

link to page 3 link to page 3 link to page 4 link to page 4 link to page 5 link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page 9 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 10 link to page 12

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

Introduction
Congress established the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) in 1968 through the
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA).1 The WSRA established a policy of preserving designated
free-flowing rivers for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. It
complemented the then-current national policy of constructing dams and other structures that
altered flow along many rivers.2 Rivers or river sections designated as part of the NWSRS are
usually referred to as “wild and scenic rivers” (WSRs). Congress sometimes authorizes studies of
rivers for inclusion in the NWSRS, which extends certain protections to those rivers (known as
“study rivers”) for a specific period of time.
Congress established several protective requirements to ensure that WSRs remain free-flowing.
The federal agencies that administer the WSRA (called “river-administering agencies”) are the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and National Park
Service (NPS) in the Department of the Interior (DOI), and the Forest Service (FS) in the
Department of Agriculture (USDA). These agencies administer WSRs to protect and enhance the
values for which they were included in the NWSRS.3 Congress directed that the agencies give
primary emphasis to protecting WSRs’ aesthetic, scenic, historic, archaeological, and scientific
values and any values identified as specific to individual WSRs through agency study.4 Congress
also prohibited the federal government from providing financial assistance, issuing licenses or
permits, or otherwise authorizing projects that would create certain impacts on a designated WSR
or study river.5 In addition to the general prohibitions, Section 7 of the WSRA contains specific
restrictions on certain actions by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which
regulates hydroelectric facilities.6 The WSRA’s prohibitions are considered by some to be the
act’s primary means of ensuring future free flow of designated rivers.7 Furthermore, the
prohibitions are the primary means for protecting WSRs located on nonfederal lands, where
federal agencies do not manage lands.
Prohibitions in Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic
Rivers Act
Section 7(a) of the WSRA contains restrictions on federal actions which, while broadly similar,
vary based on the type of action, the action’s location, and other factors.

1 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA; P.L. 90-542, 16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.). For further information, see CRS
Report R45890, Wild and Scenic Rivers: Designation, Management, and Funding, by Anne A. Riddle.
2 16 U.S.C. §1271.
3 16 U.S.C. §1281(a). These values are usually interpreted as being the “outstandingly remarkable values” (ORVs)
described in §1(b) of the WSRA (16 U.S.C. §1271). ORVs include features individual to a given river that are unique,
rare, or exemplary (e.g., geologic features that occur in a limited area or a particularly well-preserved prehistoric site)
and identified through study by the relevant river-administering agency. For further information on how these values
are identified, see CRS Report R45890, Wild and Scenic Rivers: Designation, Management, and Funding, by Anne A.
Riddle.
4 16 U.S.C. §1281(a).
5 16 U.S.C. §1278(a)-(b).
6 16 U.S.C. §1278(a).
7 Jackie Diedrich, Wild & Scenic Rivers Act: Section 7, Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating Council
(IWSRCC), 2004, at https://www.rivers.gov/documents/section-7.pdf. Hereinafter referred to as Diedrich, 2004.
Congressional Research Service
1

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

Projects Licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Under the Federal Power Act (FPA), FERC regulates the wholesale transmission and sale of
electric power, as well as the regulation of hydroelectric power.8 In executing its authorities,
FERC licenses new nonfederal hydropower projects, relicenses existing projects, and oversees
ongoing projects.9 Section 7(a) of the WSRA prohibits FERC from licensing projects on
designated WSRs:
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall not license the construction of any dam,
water conduit, reservoir, powerhouse, transmission line, or other project works under
the Federal Power Act (41 Stat. 1063), as amended (16 U.S.C. 791a et seq.), on or directly
affecting any river which is designated in section 1274 of this title as a component of the
national wild and scenic rivers system or which is hereafter designated for inclusion in
that system.10
Project works are defined under the FPA as the physical structures of a unit of hydropower
development, including powerhouses, water conduits, dams, reservoirs, transmission lines, and
any rights-of-way, ditches, dams, or other physical structures needed to maintain and operate the
hydropower development.11 Therefore, the WSRA prohibits FERC from licensing a hydropower
development, or any physical structures that are part of that development, on a WSR or study
river. Throughout this report, these prohibitions shall be referred to as “FERC prohibitions.”
Projects Assisted by the Federal Government
In addition to its specific restrictions on FERC, Section 7(a) also provides that
[No] department or agency of the United States shall assist by loan, grant, license, or
otherwise in the construction of any water resources project that would have a direct and
adverse effect on the values for which such river was established … no department or
agency of the United States shall recommend authorization of any water resources project
that would have a direct and adverse effect on the values for which such river was
established….12
Thus, Section 7(a) prohibits any part of the federal government from assisting a “water resources
project” that would have a “direct and adverse effect” on the values for which a river was
established. The values referred to above are typically interpreted as the WSR’s “outstandingly
remarkable values” (ORVs) and free flow.
Section 7(b) allows for federally assisted projects upstream, downstream, or on a tributary of
WSRs, but it establishes prohibitions on certain actions which could affect the WSR:
Nothing contained in the foregoing sentence, however, shall preclude licensing of, or
assistance to, developments below or above a wild, scenic or recreational river area or on
any stream tributary thereto which will not invade the area or unreasonably diminish the

8 16 U.S.C. §§791 et seq. For more information, see CRS In Focus IF11411, The Legal Framework of the Federal
Power Act, by Adam Vann.
9 Hydropower project ownership can be categorized as federal or nonfederal. The bulk of federal projects are owned
and managed by the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). These projects are
typically authorized and funded by Congress. Nonfederal projects are licensed and overseen by the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC). For more information, see CRS Report R42579, Hydropower: Federal and
Nonfederal Investment, by Kelsi Bracmort, Adam Vann, and Charles V. Stern.
10 16 U.S.C. §1278(a).
11 16 U.S.C. §796 (11)-(12).
12 16 U.S.C. §1278(a).
Congressional Research Service
2

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

scenic, recreational, and fish and wildlife values present in the area on the date of
designation of a river as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
Under these provisions, projects located off of designated WSR segments still face restrictions,
but those restrictions are narrower than for projects on designated WSRs. Section 7(a) prohibits
any part of the federal government from assisting development of such projects.
Water Resources Projects
The relevant river-administering agency determines whether a given project is a water resources
project that is subject to Section 7. In some cases, this decision may be clear—for example, if the
project type is explicitly mentioned in the agency’s definition of water resources project (see
below). In other cases, the decision may be unclear (e.g., when the project type is not explicitly
mentioned, when it is unclear whether the project will affect the river’s free flowing
characteristics, or both). In such cases, the river-administering agency must analyze the project to
determine whether it is a water resources project (see “The Section 7 Process”).13
Although the WSRA does not define water resources project, river-administering agencies have
generally interpreted the term to refer to any construction or development that could affect a
river’s free flow. USDA defines the term in regulation as any “construction of developments
which could affect the free flowing characteristics of a wild and scenic river or study river,” such
as dams, reservoirs, levee constructions, bank stabilization, channelization, or bridges.14 USDA’s
definition is inclusive of any project works under the FPA, as amended, and therefore is inclusive
of all hydropower developments. In addition, water resources projects must generally be located
on either the banks or bed of a river.15 NPS makes reference to the USDA’s definition.16 The
BLM definition uses identical phrasing and gives additional examples of project types.17 It is
unclear what definition FWS uses.18
Federal Assistance
River-administering federal agencies—BLM, FS, FWS, and NPS—have interpreted “assistance”
to apply to a broad range of federal actions, such as any form of
 funding, which may include loans, grants, or the provision of federal funds (e.g.,
discretionary or mandatory appropriations used for projects on federal lands);19
or

13 36 C.F.R. §297.3. Department of the Interior (DOI), National Park Service (NPS), “Director’s Order #46: Wild and
Scenic Rivers,” May 1, 2015. Hereinafter referred to as NPS, “Director’s Order #46.” Also see DOI, Bureau of Land
Management (BLM), Subject 6400 – Wild and Scenic Rivers – Policy and Program Direction for Identification,
Evaluation, Planning, and Management (Public), July 13, 2012. Hereinafter referred to as BLM, Wild and Scenic
Rivers.
14 36 C.F.R. §297.3. For more information, see Diedrich, 2004.
15 Diedrich, 2004.
16 NPS, “Director’s Order #46.”
17 BLM, Wild and Scenic Rivers.
18 As of June 3, 2019, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) did not have specific policy or other guidance relating to
wild and scenic rivers (WSRs). Personal communication, FWS Legislative Affairs office, June 3, 2019.
19 BLM and Forest Service (FS) define federal assistance in 36 C.F.R. §297.3 and BLM, Wild and Scenic Rivers,
respectively. FWS and NPS do not define federal assistance in policy documents.
Congressional Research Service
3

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

 permitting, licensing, or assistance otherwise authorizing project construction.20
Although these definitions come from river-administering agencies, Section 7 prohibitions apply
to any action taken by a portion of the federal government. Thus, Section 7 is applicable to all
federal agencies. Other federal agencies typically adhere to these definitions. Water resources
projects may be undertaken by federal agencies as part of their mission—for example, a federal
land management agency may do so as part of managing its lands, or the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) may do so under its civil works mission.
In addition, federal assistance contemplated under the WSRA may stem from actions initiated or
led by nonfederal agencies. For example, project sponsors, such as state, local, or county
governments, may be eligible to receive financial assistance through a federal grant or loan
program, may require a federal permit to conduct a proposed project, or may require or seek other
forms of federal assistance.
Examples of federal assistance include the following:
 authorization, planning, or funding for river management projects on federal
lands administered by BLM, FS, FWS, or NPS, such as fisheries habitat projects,
watershed restoration projects, or construction or repair of recreation facilities;
 permits or other forms of authorization granted by USACE, such as dredging,
bank stabilization, and other projects that affect the course, location, or condition
of navigable waters;21
 funding for bridge or roadway projects via programs administered by agencies
within the Department of Transportation (e.g., the Federal Highway
Administration);22 and
 funding for rural or urban development projects via programs administered by
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and USDA.23
In addition, many agency resources specify that FERC licensure of hydropower projects
constitutes federal assistance.
Is Section 7 a Project Ban?
Section 7 explicitly does not prohibit projects or developments that affect WSRs. Instead, it
prohibits federal assistance for such projects if—and only if—the relevant conditions given in

20 BLM and FS further specify that certain permits, licenses, or other authorizations are automatically considered
federal assistance. These are permits, licenses, or other authorizations given by FERC pursuant to §§4(e) and 4(f) of
the Federal Power Act, as well as those given by USACE pursuant to the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C.
§401 et seq.) and §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344).
21 Under §404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. §1344), permits are required to carry out activities involving disposal
of dredged or fill materials into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Under the Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899 (33 U.S.C. §403), permits are required for any structures or other work that affect the course, location, or
condition of navigable waters of the United States, such as piers, dredging, and navigation aids. For more information,
see CRS Report 97-223, The Army Corps of Engineers’ Nationwide Permits Program: Issues and Regulatory
Developments, by Nicole T. Carter.
22 For example, the Federal Highway Administration provides funding and oversight through the Federal-Aid Highway
Program, a grant-in-aid program implemented by state highway agencies. For more information, see CRS Report
R44332, Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP): In Brief, by Robert S. Kirk.
23 For example, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Agriculture (USDA) offer
various community development grant opportunities. For more information, see CRS Report R43520, Community
Development Block Grants and Related Programs: A Primer, by Eugene Boyd; and CRS Report RL31837, An
Overview of USDA Rural Development Programs, by Tadlock Cowan.
Congressional Research Service
4

link to page 10 Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

Section 7 are met. Depending on the nature of the federal assistance, a prohibition on that
assistance could in some cases result in a project’s de facto prohibition. For example, a fisheries
habitat project on a designated WSR on BLM lands requires BLM to plan, authorize, conduct,
and/or fund the project (i.e., requires federal assistance). Similarly, a bridge replacement project
on a WSR on nonfederal lands may require a permit from USACE (i.e., requires federal
assistance). However, these projects are not banned. These projects can proceed if the relevant
river-administering agency finds that any impacts would be acceptable under the conditions set in
the WSRA (see Table 1).
In some situations, federal assistance may not be required, and Section 7 conditions may not
necessarily apply (e.g., a waterfront development project on a WSR on nonfederal lands that
requires no federal permit or license to proceed). In situations where the project sponsors used
federal funding—for example, HUD-administered urban development grant funding—the project
would be subject to the WSRA. However, if the project sponsors were to forgo this federal
assistance, the project would not be subject to the WSRA.
Section 7 and Study Rivers
Congress sometimes directs the USDA Secretary or the DOI Secretary (as relevant) through
legislation to study a river’s suitability for inclusion in the NWSRS, making it a study river.
Congress established protections in the WSRA for study rivers for certain time periods and
circumstances.
For most cases, Section 7(b) of the WSRA creates protections for study rivers identical to the
protections on designated WSRs.24 Namely, FERC prohibitions and federal assistance
prohibitions are identical for designated WSRs and for study rivers.
Section 7(b) explicitly allows for federally assisted projects upstream, downstream, or on a
tributary of study rivers, but it protects study rivers under standards stronger than those for
designated WSRs.
Nothing contained in the foregoing sentence, however, shall preclude licensing of, or
assistance to, developments below or above a potential wild, scenic or recreational river
area or on any stream tributary thereto which will not invade the area or diminish the scenic,
recreational, and fish and wildlife values present in the potential wild, scenic or recreational
river area on the date of designation of a river for study as provided for in section 1276 of
this title.
The phrase “invade the area or diminish” for study rivers omits the qualifier “unreasonably
diminish,” which is the standard for designated WSRs (“invade the area or unreasonably
diminish”).25 According to one source, the effect of omitting the qualifier is to create greater
protections for study rivers during the study process.26
Congress established special timing for prohibitions for study rivers. Unless otherwise provided
by Congress, the prohibitions for study rivers last for three complete fiscal years following the act
of Congress designating the river for study, unless the relevant Secretary determines within this
time that the river is not suitable for inclusion in the NWSRS and follows specified notification

24 16 U.S.C. §1278(b).
25 16 U.S.C. §1278(a).
26 Dan Haas, A Compendium of Questions & Answers Relating to Wild & Scenic Rivers, IWSRCC, last revised August
2018.
Congressional Research Service
5

link to page 10 link to page 5 link to page 5 Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

procedures.27 These protections for study rivers also extend to the interim period from when a
study report is due to when it is submitted to Congress and for up to three additional years after
the report is submitted for congressional consideration.28 In the special case where a state
administratively requests designation of a study river, the prohibitions last for one year following
the state request.29
The Section 7 Process
The Section 7 process (or Section 7 determination process) is the procedure whereby a river-
administering federal agency determines whether a proposed project affecting a WSR meets the
conditions of Section 7 of the WSRA, called a Section 7 determination. This procedure is
required before any federal funding, licensing, or other assistance for the proposed project is
allowed. The relevant river-administering agency makes the final Section 7 determination;
however, the Section 7 process, and the other agencies involved in the process, differ depending
on a number of factors, such as the project, the river type and WSRA standard for rivers of that
type (see Table 1), and the nature of the federal involvement.30 In particular, this process varies
because water resources projects may involve federal assistance from a variety of agencies (see
“Federal Assistance”). The agency administering the federal assistance may differ from the
project sponsor and may differ from the river-administering agency.
Who Is Involved with the Section 7 Process?
As many as three possible groups may be involved in the Section 7 process, as follows:
 the project sponsor, the group initiating the project—a federal agency or a state,
local, or other entity eligible for federal assistance (see “Federal Assistance”);
 the lead agency, the federal agency initiating the federal action;31 or
 the river-administering agency, responsible for determining whether Section 7
prohibitions are applicable to the project and evaluating impacts on the river
under the Section 7 standards.

27 16 U.S.C. §1278(b)(i).
28 16 U.S.C. §1278(b)(ii)-(iii). Section 7(b) refers to “fiscal years” for the period after Congress designates the river for
study and to “years” for the period after the study report is submitted to Congress.
29 16 U.S.C. §1278(b)(iii). States may apply to the DOI Secretary for federal WSR designation for rivers protected
under state laws, which the Secretary must study for compliance with WSRA criteria (16 U.S.C. §1273(a)). There are
no specific Section 7 prohibitions on these rivers during the study period. This time limit refers to the specific situation
wherein Congress authorizes a study river, and a state subsequently requests that the Secretary designate the study river
as a WSR. For more information about WSR designation and study, see CRS Report R45890, Wild and Scenic Rivers:
Designation, Management, and Funding, by Anne A. Riddle.
30 Each federal agency is responsible for determinations related to WSRs on lands that it manages. In addition, NPS is
responsible for most determinations on rivers on nonfederal lands and rivers administered by states and included in the
National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) under §2(a)(ii).
31 Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), a federal agency initiating a federal action (the lead agency)
that may have an impact on the environment must review the impacts of that action. Within the context of reviewing
the impacts of that action, the lead agency would identify impacts that would trigger compliance responsibilities under
laws other than the NEPA. For more information on the role of lead agencies in identifying cross-cutting federal laws
as part of the environmental review process, see CRS Report RL33152, The National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA): Background and Implementation, by Linda Luther.
Congressional Research Service
6

link to page 10 Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

In some situations, the project sponsor, lead agency, and river-administering agencies may be the
same. In others, they may differ (e.g., a bridge replacement project crossing a WSR on nonfederal
lands). The project sponsor may be a local agency (e.g., a state highway commission), but the
project may require a permit from USACE (the lead agency) to proceed. NPS, the river-
administering agency for WSRs on nonfederal lands, is responsible for implementing Section 7.32
FERC is always the lead agency for FERC projects.
Section 7 Determinations
Section 7 prohibitions would be triggered if a proposed project were to meet the definition of a
water resources project, within the purpose and meaning of the WSRA, or were a project licensed
by FERC. Thus, in the case of water resources projects, the relevant river-administering agency
determines whether a project has the potential to impact the free flow of the river, whether it is
placed on the bed or banks of the river, and any other applicable conditions (see “Water
Resources Projects” for further discussion).33
If the river-administering agency determines the project is subject to Section 7 prohibitions, the
agency will verify which standards established in the WSRA are relevant to the determination
(see Table 1). Project impacts are analyzed according to the relevant standard. Any new projects
licensed by FERC that are on the WSR or study river are prohibited, and further analysis (as
described below) may not be required for such projects. New FERC projects “directly affecting”
the WSR or study river, or FERC project relicensures or modifications potentially affecting
WSRs or study rivers, generally require analysis.34

32 In general, NPS administers WSRs on nonfederal lands. For more information, see NPS, “Director’s Order #46”; and
CRS Report R45890, Wild and Scenic Rivers: Designation, Management, and Funding, by Anne A. Riddle.
33 36 C.F.R. §297(A) contains the definitions relevant to determining whether a project is a water resources project for
WSRs administered by USDA; other agencies typically adhere to these definitions. See, for example, NPS, “Director’s
Order #46.”
34 Modifying or relicensing existing FERC-licensed hydropower projects is not explicitly prohibited by the WSRA.
However, river-administering agencies could evaluate the proposed modification or relicensure as a water resources
project if a WSR’s free flow may be impacted. For more information, see Diedrich, 2004.
Congressional Research Service
7

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

Table 1.Section 7 Evaluation Standards
Project Location
Upstream,
Downstream, or
Project Type
River Type
On River
on a Tributary
Federal Energy
Designated wild and
May not be “on or directly affecting” a
Regulatory
scenic rivers
WSR or study river
Commission (FERC) (WSRs);

Hydropower
congressionally
Project
designated study
rivers
Federally Assisted
Designated WSR
No “direct and
May not invade or
Water Resources
adverse effect” on
unreasonably
Project
values for which
diminish designated
WSR was
WSR’s scenic,
designated
recreational, and
fish and wildlife
values
Congressionally
No “direct and
May not invade or
designated study
adverse effect” on
diminish study
river
values for which
river’s scenic,
river might be
recreational, and
designated
fish and wildlife
values
Source: Congressional Research Service, from the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (P.L. 90-542, 16 U.S.C. §§1271 et
seq.).
Notes: Projects potentially affecting WSRs are evaluated according to the standards described above. If the
project does not meet the standard, it cannot proceed (for FERC projects), or the federal government cannot
assist.
To make a Section 7 determination, the evaluating agency may use project plans or specifications,
other review documents (such as those prepared as part of the National Environmental Policy Act
process or to document compliance with other laws), and the WSR’s comprehensive river
management plan, river study, or other “foundation documents.”35 These items may contain
information on the site, the affected resources, and the project’s design and construction
specifications.36 Generally, the baseline for WSRA evaluations (i.e., both the Section 7
determination itself and a determination of whether the project is a water resources project) is the
resource condition on the date of designation. Some agencies (e.g., NPS) base evaluations on
current conditions if they have improved since the date of designation.37 Therefore, existing
transportation, recreation, and other infrastructure (such as existing hydropower facilities,
bridges, roads, culverts, docks, boat launches, and others) are considered as part of the evaluation
baseline.
The evaluating agency may consider the effects of the proposed project on channel, riparian,
floodplain, and upland (i.e., banks and corridor) conditions, hydrologic and biological processes,

35 Diedrich, 2004.
36 Diedrich, 2004.
37 NPS, “Director’s Order #46.”
Congressional Research Service
8

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

the magnitude and extent of changes, and the timing or duration of the changes.38 If the project is
directly on a designated WSR, the evaluating agency would also consider any particular effects
on ORVs for which the river was designated, including ORVs related to existing structures (e.g.,
if historic structures are present and were previously identified as part of the river’s ORVs).39
Results of a Determination
If the river-administering agency finds that a proposed project would not have impacts on the
designated WSR sufficient to trigger Section 7 prohibitions against federal assistance, then the
federal government may assist the project—meaning it may issue licenses or permits, provide
funding, or other forms of assistance. Alternatively, if the river-administering agency finds that a
proposed project’s impacts would violate the relevant standard specified in Section 7—for
example, that they would cause a “direct and adverse impact” to the designated WSR—then the
federal government cannot assist that project in its current form. In this case, the project sponsor
may select a project alternative or amend the initial project specifications until the evaluating
agency determines there will be no adverse effect. If the federal assistance provided is not
required for the project to proceed, the project sponsor may forgo it and proceed with the project
(because if no federal assistance is involved, the WSRA is not applicable). If federal assistance is
required for the project to proceed, and the sponsor is unable or unwilling to alter the project, the
project could be discontinued.
Timing
Stakeholders sometimes assert that the environmental review or analysis of a proposal, including
that required under the WSRA, delays projects subject to federal approval or authorization.40 With
respect to the WSRA, there are few data to confirm or dispute this assertion. It is unclear whether,
or to what extent, any procedures necessary to document compliance with Section 7 slow the
federal environmental review process or result in the denial of federal assistance. As with any
infrastructure project, numerous site- and project-specific factors affect the timing of overall
project development, including the timing of federal decisionmaking.
The Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating Council (IWSRCC) states that the degree
of analysis required for review under Section 7 is in direct proportion to the scope and complexity
of proposed projects.41 Less complex projects may require “only a few pages” of analysis to
support a determination.42 Section 7 determinations may take place in conjunction with analyses
required under other laws or regulations, which could increase complexity (e.g., if other federal
agencies must be consulted) or require coordinated efforts (e.g., if other laws require analysis of
the same resource impacts).

38 Diedrich, 2004; and Randy Welsh and Steve Chesterton, Section 7 Determinations: How to Complete a Section 7,
USDA FS, WRSA Training Course, at https://www.slideshare.net/rshimoda2014/welsh-r-and-chesterto-s-section-7-
wsra. Hereinafter referred to as Welsh and Chesterton, Section 7 Determinations.
39 This is because the relevant standard for projects on designated WSRs is “direct and adverse effect on the values for
which such river was established.” This is usually interpreted as the WSR or study river’s ORVs (16 U.S.C. §1278(a)).
Diedrich, 2004; and Welsh and Chesterton, Section 7 Determinations.
40 See, for example, Tom Giambroni, “Beaver Creek bridge replacement may finally be going to bid,” Morning
Journal, July 22, 2018.
41 Diedrich, 2004.
42 NWSRS, IWSRCC, “Introduction to IWSRCC WSRA Section 7 Examples.”
Congressional Research Service
9

Section 7 of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act: In Brief

Another timing factor is any necessary coordination between the lead agency, river-administering
agency, and other agencies or stakeholders. According to IWSRCC, the lead agency and river-
administering agency must collaborate to identify the data needed for a determination.43 It is the
lead agency’s responsibility to collect needed data and provide them to the river-administering
agency, if those agencies are different. Thus, IWSRCC finds that early identification of the
necessary data between the two agencies is a “key step,” and the degree of overall coordination
required by the process influences time to completion.44

Author Information

Anne A. Riddle

Analyst in Natural Resources Policy

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

43 Diedrich, 2004.
44 Jim MacCartney, A Compendium of Frequently Asked Questions Relating to Transportation and Infrastructure
Projects, IWSRCC, July 2018.
Congressional Research Service
R46369 · VERSION 1 · NEW
10

Download PDF

Download EPUB

Revision History

May. 21, 2020

HTML · PDF

Metadata

Topic areas

Energy Policy

Environmental Policy

Report Type: CRS Report

Source: CRSReports.Congress.gov

Raw Metadata: JSON