Report on the Implementation of the Grace Commission Recommendations

111 1 :; ItEPOK'L' WAS COMPILED BY THE OFFICE OF '\I$ LNLT A F F A I R S AND REPRESENTS THEIR i ~ l 'ION l ~ OF i TllE STATUS O F IMPLEMENTATION 01 (,IUiCE COMMISSION RECOMIIENDATIONS. I) 1 1 I< 1.11ING O P I N I O N S MAY BE HELD BY OTHER I i x b1 L'l UTIONS, SUCH AS CONGRESSIONAL ( or 1.1 1'1TEES AND INTEREST GROUPS, -- t REPORT ON BTI 0lv OF THE GRACE COMMISSI Reproduced by the L~braryof Congress, Congress~onalResearch Serv~ce A fillirl ISxcciitive Office r e v i e w w i l l occur. for ~ . c c o ~ r ~ ~ r ~ c r i c l nwt il o~rc~~sirx ?c o r ~ s c r ~ s tor1 ~s i ~ o l ) l c r ~ ~ c ~ l t r ~ t i o ~ r nl o f rctviows is could riot bu ~.eaclredin i n i t i a l r e v i e w sessions. Such rwviuws w i l l b c g i r ~11flar C l ~ c !i ~ ~ t i t i1~bi111d I Rhny o f tlro Grace Co~rr~nission r e c o ~ n ~ n c n r l ~ \ t ialready o~,s lrr~voIHWII irrrl~lo~~rorrtctl. A ~ i t l1111 rlt~tor~rrrtc?cl irncltirrg system lrns beet1 osl111)lislrcd to or~suronpprwpriulo follow-up for 1111 r~ccepiotlr . c ~ u o ~ ~ ~ ~ t r c r ~ t l i ~ i i o r r ~ . Sjmilic: plnns for i ~ l r l ~ l o ~ n e ~will ~ i ~vl~t li royscc:orcli~rg ~~ l o wlreiher rltl~~ri~risi~.i~tivc!, IcgisIrrLiivo, o r ~ ~ ~ ; t ~ l i ~ t o ~ ~ y nclicm i s rccluired. A r.cpor-id o l ~ ~ i i iilre ~ l gdisposiiio~ro f r r I I r ~ c c o ~ ~ ~ r i ~ c r r t lo~f ~ih1! i i o:Hi i r sGrrrcc?Co111111issio1r 'I'irsI~I'orccs will IN! ~rrarloto\vard tho crld of 1986. U~)tluLcswill be issrrcrl periodicrrlly clt~rir~g tlrc irltorim. SOURCE OF GRACE C ~ I S S I O N SAVINGS R E M E N D A T I O N S DOLLAR SAVINGS: $424.4 BILLION eTd RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 0 DOO TASK FORCES CS: STAFF CONCEPT STLO1 ES PZd CROSSCtlTT lNG TASK FORCES 6 NOK-000 DEPARTMENTAL TASK FORCE El R E T I R M N T SYSTEMS C 2 iTTASK FOHCES L3 S T G F CONCEPT STUDIES C Z Q7OSSCUTT I NG TASK FWCES 5 lKN-DW DEPARTMENTAL TASK I'Of?CE GRACE CCEvlMlSSlON SAVINGS P?CPCSALS .COLLAR 7_'.' SAVINGS: $424.4 B l L L l C N ALREADY IMPLEMENTED O R APPR(3VED IN F Y I 9 8 5 BUDGET O R O C A PROCESS HELL) Ok A O T REVIE'nYED 7 A L R E A D Y I M P L E k E N E 3 OR APPROVED IN FYI985 BUDGET O R OC:i P R O C E S S t 3 H E L 3 Ot? NGT REVIE1NE3 COM?OSITION OF GRACE CONrdISSION SAVINGS ALREADY AGREED 10 0 2 IM?LEMEh'TED DOLLAR SAVINGS: $103.5 BILLION \,\,\ .,. .. ... . .,. ,. ,\ A ..\ , \ .~, i...+\, ~ : r \ ............. > I . . EXAMPLES 011' GRACE COMMISSION SAVINGS ALIWADY 1M 1~1,lWIL<lQr111311 E X A M P L E S OF GRACE COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDED I N P Y 1985 DUDCXT OIt AGItEED TO IN OCA I311OCI1ISS snvi~igsof $320 l~rillio~r ar~cl$96 rnilliotr cost nvoiduncc. . It1511UCI!: CIVIL S151tVICI5 OVI5ItGItAI)lNG ($6,164 ~irillion)--19115 Iluclgct i1lcluclos31 years. reduction in GS 11-16 over 1I1t.c~ 1 V 1 5 coiling 1~'01t15Sr1' SI5ItVIC15 SrI'AI~I'INC1Itl51)UC'I'ION (!&13!J ~rtillio!nJ--1'385 Ili~tlgclr.ctl~~c:cs to 39, 500 - 11 cu~nultrtive2'3% stilff retlucliot~sirrce 19HO pctrI(.