FY2023 Immigration Court Data: Case Outcomes
INSIGHTi
FY2023 Immigration Court Data: Case
Outcomes
February 7, 2024
U.S. immigration courts within the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review
(EOIR) adjudicate removal cases involving foreign nationals whom the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) has charged with an immigration violation under the Immigration and Nationality Act
(INA). During removal proceedings, immigration judges (IJs) determine whether such individuals
(respondents) are subject to removal from the United States, and if so, whether they qualify for relief or
protection from removal for which they have applied (e.g., asylum). Respondents who fail to appear for
their hearings are ordered removed in absentia.
This Insight reviews immigration court case outcomes for FY2023, including removal case decisions, in
absentia removal orders, and asylum application decisions. Another Insight describes FY2023 caseload
data, including case receipts and the pending cases backlog.
Removal Case Decisions
Possible outcomes for removal cases include:
• Removal Order: The IJ orders the respondent removed; DHS is responsible for
removing the foreign national from the United States to his/her country or to a third
country.
• Dismissal: DHS may move to dismiss proceedings against the respondent (e.g., as a
matter of prosecutorial discretion).
• Termination: The respondent may move to terminate a case if the charges on the NTA
are substantively or procedurally defective; the IJ may also terminate a case if he/she
determines the respondent has established eligibility for U.S. citizenship.
• Relief granted: The IJ grants the respondent a form of relief from removal—such as
asylum (described below) or, less commonly, cancellation of removal.
• Voluntary departure: The respondent may request to leave the United States during a
specific timeframe at his/her own expense without being ordered removed.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12318
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
link to page 2
Congressional Research Service
2
• Withholding or Deferral of Removal: The respondent may be eligible for forms of
limited protection against return to a country where his/her life or freedom would be
threatened (under the INA) or where it is more likely than not that he/she would face
torture (under the United Nations Convention Against Torture). These forms of protection
permit DHS to remove the respondent to a third country and provide no path to lawful
permanent resident (LPR) status.
In FY2023, EOIR issued 492,981 initial case decisions (parties may file an appeal). The most common
decision was issuance of a removal order (47%). The next most common outcomes were dismissals and
terminations (collectively, 42%). Such outcomes likely reflect DHS’s use of prosecutorial discretion to
dismiss nonpriority cases; they may also capture instances in which DHS issues an NTA to a respondent
but has failed to file it in immigration court, resulting in a failure to prosecute. In such cases, DHS may
file the NTA and reschedule the hearing.
Approximately 9% of cases decided ended with a grant of relief (such as asylum); less than 1% of cases
were granted withholding or deferral of removal. Voluntary departure represented 2% of outcomes.
Figure 1. Removal Case Outcomes, FY2023
Source: EOIR, “FY2023 Decision Outcomes,” Adjudication Statistics, October 2023.
Notes: N=492,981. Includes outcomes for removal proceedings and deportation and exclusion proceedings, the precursor
to removal proceedings.
In Absentia Removal Orders
Individuals failing to appear for any of their hearings must be ordered removed in absentia by the IJ if
DHS presents “clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence” notice was provided and the respondent is
removable. The removal order may be rescinded if the respondent demonstrates the failure to appear
occurred because of exceptional circumstances (e.g., serious illness), not receiving notice, or being in
federal or state custody.
Among the 231,095 total removal orders issued in FY2023 (Figure 1), 69% (159,379) were in absentia
removal orders. Measuring the rate at which respondents fail to appear for their hearings has been subject
to debate. EOIR publishes rates that are the number of in absentia removal orders divided by the number
of initial case completions in a given year. Other observers argue this method fails to account for the large
volume of pending removal cases (2.5 million at the end of FY2023) (i.e., that EOIR’s rate fails to
account for court appearances for individuals whose cases have not yet been adjudicated).
Congressional Research Service
3
Asylum Decisions
Individuals may qualify for asylum if they demonstrate persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution
based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Persons
granted asylum, and their spouses and minor children, may remain in the United States and are authorized
to work. After one year of physical presence in the United States, they may apply to adjust to LPR status.
During removal proceedings, respondents may apply for asylum as a form of relief from removal. IJs also
adjudicate applications during asylum-only proceedings for individuals who may be removed without
being placed in removal proceedings, including crewmembers, stowaways, and individuals who entered
under the Visa Waiver Program. Asylum applied for in immigration court is referred to as defensive
asylum.
Otherwise, individuals who are physically present in the United States and not in removal proceedings,
regardless of their immigration status, may apply for affirmative asylum with DHS’s U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS). If the USCIS asylum officer determines an applicant is ineligible for
asylum and appears to be inadmissible or deportable, the officer refers the application to EOIR.
Therefore, EOIR’s asylum outcomes include decisions on both defensive asylum applications initially
filed in immigration court and affirmative referrals.
EOIR’s FY2023 asylum case outcomes include asylum granted, asylum denied, “Other” (cases that were
abandoned, not adjudicated, or withdrawn), and cases that were administratively closed. Administratively
closed cases are temporarily removed from the docket (e.g., while the respondent pursues an application
for relief outside immigration court). EOIR does not consider administrative closures to be case
completions.
In FY2023, EOIR reported 220,590 asylum case decisions. The majority (61%) were “Other” outcomes.
These may reflect terminated and dismissed removal cases, as described above. Individuals whose cases
are dismissed or terminated may pursue an affirmative asylum application with USCIS. Outcomes also
included denials (16%), grants (14%), and administratively closed cases (9%).
Figure 2. Asylum Outcomes, FY2023
Source: EOIR, “Asylum Decision Rates,” Adjudication Statistics, October 2023.
Notes: N=220,590. Includes removal, deportation, exclusion, and asylum-only proceedings. AC=administratively closed
cases.
Congressional Research Service
4
Author Information
Holly Straut-Eppsteiner
Analyst in Immigration Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN12318 · VERSION 1 · NEW