An Overview of H.R. 4763, Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act
INSIGHTi
An Overview of H.R. 4763, Financial
Innovation and Technology for the 21st
Century Act
Updated May 17, 2024
On Friday May 10, the House Committee on Rules publicly noticed its intent to consider H.R. 4763, the
Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), which could lead to a floor vote
later this month. The bill, as amended, would introduce significant changes to the way digital assets are
regulated. Currently, various existing laws and regulations may apply to digital assets—including those
administered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC)—depending on the specific circumstances. Some policymakers believe existing
laws and regulations sufficiently accommodate digital assets, while others believe additional authorities
are required or that the regulatory framework otherwise needs to be reformed.
Decentralization and Digital Commodities Framework
H.R. 4763 would create specific classification criteria to determine whether a particular digital asset
should be regulated by the SEC, by the CFTC, or both, and would establish new regulatory requirements
based on how a digital asset is classified.
H.R. 4763 would classify a digital asset as a digital commodity, regulated by the CFTC, if the blockchain
(digital ledger) on which it runs is certified as decentralized. The bill would define a decentralized system
as, among other things, one in which no one person or entity has “unilateral authority” to control the
operation of or access to the blockchain. The proposal would provide parallel permissions for individuals
and firms to certify with the SEC or the CFTC that the digital assets they plan to list meet the
decentralization criteria. The proposal would provide the SEC and CFTC authority to reject such
certifications with cause within a specific time frame.
By explicitly classifying decentralized digital assets as digital commodities, the bill would grant CFTC
new authorities, providing it exclusive jurisdiction over “cash” or “spot” market digital commodity
transactions, and requiring that entities (including exchanges, brokers, dealers, etc.) offering trade in
digital commodities register with it. The bill would impose certain requirements on intermediaries,
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12223
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service
2
including ensuring trading is not susceptible to manipulation, requiring disclosures, and addressing
market integrity and recordkeeping requirements. Seeming to address concerns that platforms’ current
consolidation of various functions represents a conflict of interest, the bill would prohibit a digital
commodity exchange and its affiliates from trading for their own accounts on the exchange. However, the
bill would allow the CFTC to adopt rules to permit such trading for certain specified purposes. The bill
would prohibit platforms from comingling their own funds with those of customers but would permit a
customer to waive this for certain reasons.
Digital assets that run on blockchains that are not decentralized would, depending on certain
characteristics, be classified as restricted digital assets or securities, regulated by the SEC.
SEC Regulation of Offers, Sales, and Intermediaries
H.R. 4763 would provide an exemption from the Securities Act of 1933’s registration requirement for
offers of digital assets that meet certain conditions. Among other conditions, issuers relying on the
exemption must limit their sales to $75 million or less within a 12-month period and abide by certain
limits on participation by non-accredited investors. Issuers that rely on this exemption must make certain
initial disclosures and periodic reports.
For secondary markets, H.R. 4763 would establish new registration and compliance requirements for
digital asset trading systems and digital asset broker-dealers. While these intermediaries could also
register as national securities exchanges, broker-dealers, and alternative trading systems under existing
securities regulations, the bill would require the SEC to complete new rules for entities with multiple
registrations to reduce potential duplication and conflicts. It also would mandate new SEC rulemaking for
digital asset trading systems to include order display, fair access, system integrity, examination,
recordkeeping, reporting, and other requirements. Digital asset broker-dealers would face requirements
including custody, segregation of funds, capital, and reporting and recordkeeping. Selected aspects of
these requirements appear to reference existing regulations governing certain trading platforms and
broker-dealers.
In addition, H.R. 4763 would require selected intermediaries to develop conflict-of-interest procedures,
exempt qualifying digital assets from certain state securities registration requirements, and provide new
treatment for banks that offer digital asset custody services. The bill would reverse an SEC accounting
bulletin that provides interpretive guidance regarding the accounting treatment of digital assets an entity
holds for its platform users. It also would require the SEC to issue a rule requiring beneficial owners of
5% or more of the outstanding units of a digital asset to file a report with the SEC. The bill, as amended,
includes the Securities Clarity Act, which aims to clarify that certain fungible digital assets do not
automatically qualify as “securities” simply because they were initially sold or transferred pursuant to an
investment contract.
Provisional Registration and Other Provisions
The bill would establish a provisional registration process, which would require entities to file notices of
intent to register with the CFTC or SEC and to be members of a futures association or a national
securities association, respectively. This “notice of intent” regime would require entities to provide certain
disclosures and information regarding assets intended to be listed for trade, and the segregation of
customer funds, among other requirements. Firms that proceed with the provisional registration process
would be granted a limited safe harbor from SEC rules and regulations that would otherwise mandate
registration as a national securities exchange. However, the CFTC and/or SEC would be authorized to
force intermediaries to delist assets that do not comport with the bill’s provisions or broader securities
Congressional Research Service
3
and/or commodities laws. The bill would require the SEC and CFTC to jointly issue rules regarding the
process for delisting.
The bill would allow firms offering trading in both restricted digital assets and digital commodities to
register with both the CFTC and SEC. The bill would exempt payment stablecoins from both frameworks
but preserve the CFTC’s and SEC’s antifraud powers over their trade. Firms that solely perform “ancillary
activities,” such as participating in the operation of blockchains, would be exempt from the bill’s
provisions.
Author Information
Paul Tierno
Eva Su
Analyst in Financial Economics
Specialist in Financial Economics
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN12223 · VERSION 2 · UPDATED