Changes to IRS Funding in the Debt Limit Deal




INSIGHTi

Changes to IRS Funding in the Debt Limit
Deal

Updated July 19, 2023
President Joseph Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy brokered a deal that would reduce federal
spending in FY2024 and FY2025 and raise the statutory debt limit through January 2025. P.L. 118-5, the
Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, enacts many of the components of the deal between the President and
the Speaker. President Biden signed the bill into law on June 3, 2023. If lawmakers had not raised the
statutory debt limit by June 5, 2023, according to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, the debt limit would
have bound and the Treasury would have legal authority only to expend as much as it collects in revenue.
Among the cuts to federal spending this deal makes are reductions in federal outlays for the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS).
Background
Normal IRS Appropriations
Congress funds the IRS through annual appropriations for four primary categories of spending:
1. Enforcement ($5.4 billion in FY2023), which refers to enforcing the tax code;
2. Operations support ($4.1 billion in FY2023), which refers to the agency’s ordinary
operating expenses (including information systems);
3. Taxpayer services ($2.8 billion in FY2023), which refers to efforts to help taxpayers
voluntarily pay their tax liabilities in a timely fashion and resolve taxpayer issues; and
4. Business system modernization ($0 in FY2023), which refers to the ongoing effort to
update the IRS’s legacy information technology systems.
IRS-Related Funds in the Inflation Reduction Act
Congress provided the IRS with $78.9 billion in mandatory funding from FY2022 to FY2031 in P.L. 117-
169,
commonly referred to as the Inflation Reduction Act. The law dedicated $45.6 billion of that amount
to enforcement, $25.3 billion to operations support, $3.2 billion to taxpayer services, and $4.8 billion to
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN12172
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress




Congressional Research Service
2
business system modernization. The law also provided roughly $700 million to related agencies to assist
with the administration and enforcement of the tax code.
Uses of Funds
These funds were meant to supplement regular appropriations and provide the agency with stable funding
for long-term projects. The IRS says it plans to use some of the funds to hire additional auditors and
improve its technical capabilities for selecting returns for audit, particularly for high-income individuals
and corporations, as well as within emerging tax issues such as cryptocurrency and complex international
transactions. IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel has said the agency intends to avoid increasing audit rates
above 2018 levels for households and businesses with annual incomes up to $400,000.
The agency also plans to use some of the IRA funds to expand its use of technologies that identify issues
with taxpayers’ returns before they file, conduct outreach to groups that qualify for tax benefits but fail to
claim them, and make taxpayer data more accessible to customer service representatives. The agency also
hopes to replace its Individual Master File and Business Master File, the core components of its IT
system, which are decades old.
Opposition
The IRA funding has been controversial. Supporters contend it is necessary to counteract a decline in the
IRS’s total budget authority, which fell by 20% from its peak in FY2010 through FY2022, after adjusting
for inflation. Spending on enforcement fell by 26% over that period. However, critics argue that
expanding enforcement will put an excessive burden on taxpayers. On January 9, 2023, the House of
Representatives passed H.R. 23, the Family and Small Business Protection Act, to repeal the IRA’s
funding for the IRS’s enforcement and operations support accounts.
Fiscal Responsibility Act
Among other changes, the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) rescinds $1.4 billion that the IRA made
available to the IRS for enforcement and operations support. While the legislation also identifies the
sections of the IRA that funded related agencies as possible sources of such funding, it clarifies that the
rescission must come from funds “appropriated or otherwise made available for activities of the Internal
Revenue Service,” suggesting that funds for other agencies would not qualify. The Congressional Budget
Office estimates that this rescission will reduce revenues by $2.3 billion through 2033, and raise the
federal deficit by $900 million over that period.
Deal on Future Appropriations
In addition to the FRA rescission, the White House said it agreed with House leadership to rescind
another $10 billion in funding for the IRS in both FY2024 and FY2025. The White House further says it
intends to move forward with the IRS’s planned uses for the IRA funds and may request additional
funding in future years to compensate for the rescinded funds.
On July 13, 2023, the House Appropriations Committee approved H.R. 4664, its Financial Services and
General Government appropriations bill for FY2024, by a vote of 34-26. This bill would reduce the IRS’s
annual appropriations by 9% relative to FY2023 levels. It would also rescind $6.065 billion in
enforcement funding and $4.101 billion in operations support funding that the IRA had appropriated to
the IRS.


Congressional Research Service
3
On the same day, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved S. 2309, the Financial Services and
General Government Appropriations Act, 2024, by a vote of 29-0. The bill would hold IRS annual
appropriations steady relative to FY2023 levels and rescind $10 billion of enforcement funds the IRA
made available to the IRS.

Author Information

Brendan McDermott

Analyst in Public Finance




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN12172 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED