INSIGHT
The Biden Administration’s One-Time
Student Loan Debt Relief Policy under the
HEROES Act of 2003
Updated July 10, 2023
On August 24, 2022,
invoking the HEROES Act of 2003, t
he Department of Education (ED) announced a
“one-time student loan debt relief” policy (the policy)
“to address the financial harms of the [COVID-19]
pandemic for low- and middle-income borrowers” that would have made available up to $20,000 of loan
cancellation benefits per individual to millions of federal student loan borrowers. On June 30, 2023, the
Supreme Court
ruled that the policy exceeded the Secretary of Education’s authority under the HEROES
Act. In doing so, the Court precluded ED from granting student loan cancellation under the policy. This
Insight describes the features of the planned policy. CRS Legal Sidebar LSB1099
7, Supreme Court
Invalidates Student Loan Cancellation Policy Under the HEROES Act, summarizes the Supreme Court’s
decision invalidating the policy.
This policy represented a departure from other types of student loan debt relief, which historically have
been available to borrowers on a more targeted basis and typically provide relief to individuals for
fulfilling employment requirements, for repaying their loans according to an income-driven repayment
plan, or following borrower hardships (e.g., total and permanent disability). These programs, to date, have
provided relief t
o hundreds of thousands of borrowers, and could ultimately provide relief to more. The
Administration’s new policy was broader in scope and would have been available t
o millions of
borrowers based on limited eligibility criteria.
The Policy
Approximately 45 million borrowers owe over $1.6 trillion in federal student loan debt. Under the
cancellation policy, t
he Biden Administration planned to cancel the following:
• up to $10,000 in student loans for borrowers who
se adjusted gross income (AGI) in 2020
or 2021 was less than $125,000 (for individuals or married borrowers who file federal
income taxes separately), or $250,000 (for married couples filing jointly, heads of
households, or qualifying widow(er)s); borrowers enrolled in postsecondary education as
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN11997
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service
2
dependent students between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2022, would have been eligible
for cancellation based on parental AGI; and
• an additional $10,000, for a total of up to $20,000, in student loans for borrowers who
met the above criteria and recei
ved at least one Pell Grant in any amount at any point.
A borrower’s cancellation benefit would have been capped at the amount of their outstanding debt.
Borrowers who made voluntary payments on their loans during the COVID-19 payment pause and
qualified for debt relief would have been eligible to automatically recei
ve refunds of those payments in
limited circumstances.
Cancellation benefits would have been available for ED-held loans and defaulted Federal Family
Education Loan (FFEL) program loans held by guaranty agencies. (ED-held loans include those loans
made under the Direct Loan program and those made under the FFEL or Perkins Loan programs that have
been transferred to ED.) For the Direct Loan and FFEL programs, Subsidized Loans, Unsubsidized
Loans, PLUS Loans made to graduate students or parents of dependent undergraduate students, and
Consolidation Loans were eligible. In general, loans disbursed on or
before June 30, 2022, would have
been eligible. Consolidation Loans would have been eligible if the underlying loans that were repaid by
the Consolidation Loan were disbursed on or before June 30, 2022. Direct Consolidation Loans
comprising any FFEL or Perkins Loan program loans not held by ED would have been eligible if the
borrower applied for consolidati
on before September 29, 2022. Borrowers with qualifying loans in any
status (e.g., in school, repayment, default) would have qualified for the cancellation benefit if they met the
income requirements.
For borrowers with multiple qualifying loans, ED developed the order in which it would have applied the
cancellation benefit. Generally, benefits would have been applied first to defaulted loans and then to non-
defaulted loans, with ED making allowances for whether a borrower had multiple defaulted or non-
defaulted loans and taking into consideration the specific program (e.g., Direct Loan program) under
which the loans were made. If a borrower had multiple loans within a program, ED would have applied
the benefits considering the loans’ interest rates (e.g., applying benefits to higher interest rate loans first),
subsidy status (e.g., applying benefits to unsubsidized loans first), date of disbursement, and outstanding
balance.
For borrowers with remaining loan balances after the cancellation benefit was applied, ED intended to
recalculate their monthly payment based on their new balance, which might have reduced borrowers’
monthly payments.
Policy Implementation
ED estimated that
nearly 8 million borrowers were eligible to receive the benefit automatically, based on
relevant income data already available to ED. Such borrowers would not have been required to take any
action and were to be informed by ED of the debt relief they were to receive; borrowers would have had
the opportunity t
o opt out of receiving the automatic debt relief. For borrowers for whom ED did not have
relevant income data, ED launched
an online application. For a short time,
ED accepted and processed
applications, but in light of the lawsuits challenging ED’s authority to effectuate the policy,
ED stopped
accepting applications and ultimately never cancelled any amount of student loan debt under the policy.
Estimated Impact of the Policy on Borrowers
The Biden Administration estimated that
•
over 40 million borrowers would have been eligible for some amount of relief under the
policy;
Congressional Research Service
3
•
about 27 million student loan borrowers would have been eligible to receive up to
$20,000 in cancellation benefits; and
•
about 20 million borrowers would have had the full balance of their loans cancelled.
The Administration has also released analyses of the characteristics of borrowers who might have
received relief under the polic
y by age and income and
by state.
Administration’s Planned Next Steps
Hours after the Supreme Court’s decision precluding ED from cancelling student loans under the policy,
the Biden Administrati
on announced it was beginning the
negotiated rulemaking process to consider
providing federal student loan cancellation under asserted authority under
Section 432(a) of the Higher
Education Act. Details of the scope of this rulemaking are currently unavailable, but ED has indicated that
the first step in the rulemaking process—a virtual public hearing—is scheduled for
July 18, 2023.
Author Information
Alexandra Hegji
Analyst in Social Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN11997 · VERSION 9 · UPDATED