 
 
 
 INSIGHTi  
The Military’s COVID-19 Vaccination 
Mandate 
Updated November 8, 2021 
Since the onset of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Members of Congress have 
expressed interest i
n Force Health Protection (FHP) measures the Department of Defense (DOD) might 
implement to protect servicemembers and mitigate pandemic-related threats to military operations. DOD 
has implemented a variety of
 conditions-based FHP measures that mirror t
he U.S. Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention’s recommended protective measures, to limit the spread of COVID-19 among 
military personnel. On August 9, 2021, the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) issued 
a Message to the 
Force indicating his intent to require COVID-19 vaccination for servicemembers “no later than mid-
September, or immediately upon the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensure [of a COVID-
19 vaccine], whichever comes first.” 
On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved t
he licensing application for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 
vaccine for individuals aged 16 years and older. The vaccine, marketed as 
Comirnaty, is also available to 
individuals  aged 12 through 15 years old under 
an existing emergency use authorization (EUA). SECDEF 
issued a memorandum on August 24, 2021, directing the Secretaries of the Military Departments 
(MILDEPs) to “immediately begin full vaccination of al  members of the Armed Forces under DoD 
authority on active duty or in the
 Ready Reserve, including the National Guard, who are not fully 
vaccinated against COVID-19.”  
This Insight summarizes the COVID-19 vaccination mandate for servicemembers and offers 
considerations for Congress as the MILDEPs implement the mandate. For an overview of DOD’s 
vaccination policy and program, se
e CRS InFocus 11816.  
Military Mandate for COVID-19 Vaccination 
T
he SECDEF memorandum mandates that servicemembers become “fully vaccinated against COVID-
19” and directs that only FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccines be used for mandatory vaccination. 
Servicemembers may also volunteer to receive another COVID-19 vaccine to meet the requirement. DOD 
defines “fully vaccinated” status as starting “two weeks after completing” the dosing regiments of 
  the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11764 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
 link to page 3 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
  a COVID-19 vaccine subject to an FDA EUA  (e.g., Moderna or Johnson & Johnson), or 
  a COVID-19 vaccine approved on t
he World Health Organization’s Emergency Use 
Listing. 
The memorandum states that servicemembers previously infected with COVID-19 are not considered 
“fully vaccinated.” Servicemembers may be vaccinated through t
he Military Health System or another 
clinic at no cost. 
Each MILDEP has issued directives to establish the requirement, establish deadlines, and clarify the 
process for requesting an exemption. The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG), under the Department of Homeland 
Security
, issued a similar mandate for active and reserve members on August 26, 2021. 
COVID-19 Vaccination Exemptions 
Servicemembers may request an administrative or medical exemption to the vaccination requirement 
usi
ng similar  procedures established for othe
r mandatory vaccinations.  
Medical Exemptions 
Temporary (≤365 days) medical exemptions may be authorized by a DOD or USCG medical provider if a 
servicemember has a
n underlying health condition contraindicated with vaccination (e.g., the individual is 
immunocompromised or experienced a previous adverse health effect from an immunization), or a 
clinical issue that requires further medical evaluation. Certain military services may also authorize a 
permanent (>365 days) medical exemption when approved by a senior medical official. The SECDEF 
memorandum exempts servicemembers participating i
n COVID-19 clinical trials from mandatory 
vaccination until the end of the research project. 
Administrative Exemptions 
Temporary or permanent administrative exemptions may be authorized under certain circumstances. A 
unit commander may authorize exemptions for those pending separation or retirement. Senior service 
officials may authorize religious exemptions after the servicemember is counseled by the unit 
commander, a medical provider, and a military chaplain. These requests must also be endorsed by the 
servicemember’s chain of command and reviewed by a military lawyer prior to consideration by an 
approving authority. In general, servicemembers may appeal a denied exemption request to a higher-level 
authority for a final adjudication decision. 
Figure 1 identifies the military services’ vaccination deadlines and the approval authorities for medical 
and administrative exemptions. 
  

Congressional Research Service 
3 
Figure 1. COVID-19 Vaccination Deadlines and Approval Authorities for Exemptions 
 
Sources: CRS graphic based on analysis of Department of the Army,  
FRAGO 5 to HQDA EXORD 225-21 COVID-19 Steady 
State Operations,  September 14, 2021; Army Regulation 600-2
0, Army Command  Policy,  July 24, 2020; Department of the Air 
Force memorandum,  
Mandatory  Coronavirus  Disease 2019 Vaccination  of Department  of the  Air Force Military  Members, 
September  3, 2021; U.S. Naval Administrative  Message 190/21
, 2021-2022 Navy Mandatory  COVID-19 Vaccination  and 
Reporting Policy,  August 31, 2021; Bureau of Naval Personnel Instruction 1730.11A
, Standards  and Procedures  Governing the 
Accommodation  of Religious Practices,  March 16, 2020; U.S. Marine Corps Administrative  Message 462/21
, Mandatory  COVID-
19 Vaccination  of Marine  Corps Active and Reserve Components,  September 1, 2021; Marine Corps Order 1730.9, 
Accommodation  of Religious Practices  in the Marine Corps,  July 12, 2021; DOD
, Joint Services  Regulation on Immunizations  and 
Chemoprophylaxis  for the Prevention of Infectious Diseases,  October 7, 2013; and email  communication with DOD and USCG 
officials,  September 2021. 
Addressing Noncompliance 
The MILDEP directives authorize unit commanders to counsel and take action against noncompliant 
servicemembers who have not requested or received an exemption, which is considered a violation of 
Article 92 (i.e., Failure to Obey order or regulation) of t
he Uniform Code of Military  Justice. A unit 
commander may pursue the following actions against a noncompliant servicemember: 
  no action, 
  
administration action, 
  
Congressional Research Service 
4 
  
nonjudicial punishment,   disposition of charges (i.e., court-martial), or 
  
forwarding (to another court-martial authority) for disposition of charges. 
Considerations for Congress 
Congress may consider the following lines of inquiry to gather further information on DOD and USCG 
implementation of the COVID-19 vaccination mandate:  
  What barriers, if any, do servicemembers experience in requesting an exemption or 
accommodation?  
  How are unit commanders and senior service leaders trained to evaluate and decide on 
religious accommodations and other personnel matters? 
  How do unit commanders determine which action is appropriate for noncompliant 
servicemembers? 
  What
 discharge characterization wil  separated or dismissed servicemembers receive? Are 
discharge characterizations after an adverse separation consistent and comparable across 
al  military services? 
  How might the mandate affect military recruitment and retention? 
  How wil  DOD or the MILDEPs record the number or percentage of noncompliant 
servicemembers? Wil  that data be made available  to Congress? 
 
 
Author Information 
 Bryce H. P. Mendez 
   
Analyst in Defense Health Care Policy  
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11764 · VERSION 5 · UPDATED