 
 
 
 INSIGHTi 
 
New Presidential Directives on the Defense 
Production Act (DPA) and the COVID-19 
Pandemic 
February 5, 2021 
On January 21, 2021, the Biden Administration issued several executive orders invoking the Defense 
Production Act of 1950 (DPA) to address the COVID-19 pandemic. The DPA authorizes the President to 
mobilize domestic industry in service of the national defense, including emergency preparedness. DPA 
authorities include (1) provisions under Title I to prioritize contracts and allocate scarce goods, materials, 
and services; (2) financial incentives under Title III to expand productive capacity for critical materials 
and goods; and (3) coordination, information-gathering, and other supporting provisions under Title VII.  
This Insight examines the new Administration’s recent DPA actions and related congressional policy 
considerations. See
 CRS Report R43767 for an in-depth discussion of DPA history and authorities, and 
CRS Report R46628 for an analysis of the Trump Administration’s COVID-19 DPA policies regarding 
personal protective equipment (PPE). 
What New DPA Actions Has the Administration Taken? 
President Joseph R. Biden Jr. issued two Executive Orders (E.O.s) directly referencing the DPA on 
January 21: 
1.  
E.O. 13987: Establishes White House positions of COVID-19 Response Coordinator and 
Deputy Coordinator to manage government-wide public health countermeasures, 
including coordination of: (1) the production of pandemic response supplies using the 
DPA, (2) vaccine deployment, (3) school reopening, and (4) intergovernmental and 
interagency processes. 
2.  
E.O. 14001: Directs the Secretaries of State, Defense, Health and Human Services, 
Homeland Security, and other relevant agency heads to: (1) review and assess availability 
of “critical materials, treatments, and supplies” to combat COVID-19 
(“pandemic 
response supplies”); (2) examine how DPA and other emergency authorities could 
address shortfalls; and (3) use DPA authorities as necessary—for PPE and vaccines. 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11593 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
E.O. 14001 also directs a review of existing scarcity determinations and pricing for 
pandemic response supplies, as well as the development of a long-term manufacturing 
strategy for “future pandemics and biological threats.”  
On January 26, the President issued three more EOs with potential relevance to the DPA: 
  
E.O. 13994: Establishes data collection and collaboration for “high consequence public 
health threats,” including COVID-19. Data collection under this E.O. could be used to 
inform future DPA actions, or draw on DPA Title VII authority to solicit industry data to 
assess supply chain vulnerabilities. 
  
E.O. 13996: Creates a “Pandemic Testing Board” composed of the COVID-19 Response 
Coordinator and interagency representatives to coordinate federal COVID-19 testing 
efforts and intergovernmental outreach. Testing shortages could lead to employment of 
DPA authorities to prioritize production, allocate inputs and finished tests, or expand 
productive capacity—perhaps in coordination with EO 14001. 
  
E.O. 13999: Directs the Labor Secretary to: (1) issue revised guidance on pandemic 
workplace safety, to include potentially issuing new standards; (2) review COVID-19 
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) worker protections enforcement; 
and (3) engage with interagency and intergovernmental partners regarding pandemic 
workplace protections. This E.O. appears to reverse elements of President Donald J. 
Trump’
s E.O. 13917, which delegated DPA authority to the Agriculture Secretary in an 
effort to compel the reopening of meat processing plants closed over concerns about state 
and local worker protections, though t
he practical impact of that E.O.
 remains unclear. 
How Are DPA Directives Being Implemented? 
It is not yet clear how President Biden’s DPA directives will be implemented. According to the 
Administration’s
 COVID-19 strategy, the DPA will address supply shortfalls “for vaccination supplies, 
testing supplies, and PPE.” The strategy also suggests the DPA may be employed to bolster the public 
health industrial base and access to critical materials, which may involve Title III incentives to expand 
productive capacity.  
Media reports note the Administration may be negotiating with companies rather than issuing priority 
orders without consultation. Although it may compel action, including
 criminal and civil penalties (15 
C.F.R. §700.74), the DPA can also confer
 contract immunity and financial incentives to private industry, 
and it is typical for negotiations to precede DPA contract actions to ensure contract viability. With 
potentially broader use of DPA authorities, the Administration may require more involved negotiations 
with private parties. 
How Might the DPA Help with Vaccines? 
The Biden Administration’s COVID-19 response strategy emphasizes using DPA to develop and deploy 
vaccines, PPE, and tests. As an illustrative example of how DPA might address these challenges, the 
companies
 Moderna and Pfizer, which receiv
ed Emergency Use Authorizations for their COVID-19 
vaccines, have reported production bottlenecks with their component supply chains. DPA Title I authority 
could prioritize vaccine production directly, as well as production of constituent inputs. Other companies 
with available production capacity could also be employed under Title I. Title III incentives could be 
employed to expand upon existing productive capacity for vaccines and their material components. Title 
VII may be used to coordinate vaccine production among producers through the recently established 
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
Voluntary Agreement, or to “map” supply chains to identify production bottlenecks and future 
vulnerabilities. 
What Is Congress’s Role? 
The DPA statute includes a limited role for Congress (e.g., approving the use of price and wage controls 
and employing certain Title III instruments, many of which may be waived by the President). In addition 
to its inherent oversight authority, the appropriations process provides Congress with influence over the 
DPA Fund, a statutory account used for Title III actions. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic 
Security (CARES) Act 
(P.L. 116-136) appropriated $1 billion to the DPA Fund, though the intent for, and 
use of, those funds remain 
a source of dispute. Future appropriations to the DPA Fund could include a 
more explicit statement of intent. (Th
e Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 included language 
specifically reserving amounts for military-related purposes.) 
If Congress seeks to ensure long-term DPA planning and coordination, it may consider legislation to 
create permanent executive branch capabilities—such as those duties assigned to the COVID-19 
Response Coordinator and Pandemic Testing Board—that consider other future emergency situations. 
Pursuant to its oversight authority, and in support of data collection and transparency, Congress may also 
consider legislation that requires the tracking, collection, and appropriate public disclosure of all DPA 
authorized actions. 
 
Author Information 
 Michael H. Cecire 
  Heidi M. Peters 
Analyst in Intergovernmental Relations and Economic 
Analyst in U.S. Defense Acquisition Policy 
Development Policy 
 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11593 · VERSION 1 · NEW