 
 
 
 INSIGHTi 
 
The Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot 
Program (DCIP): FY2020 Funding and 
Approved Projects 
September 17, 2020 
Investment in infrastructure near military installations that supports servicemembers and their families is 
of continued importance to many
 Members of Congress and other
 elected officials. Congress legislated 
the 
Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot Program (DCIP) to help address deficiencies in this type of 
infrastructure. 
What is DCIP? 
Enacted under Section 2861 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 
2019 
(P.L. 115-232) and codified i
n 10 U.S.C. §2391, DCIP is a Department of Defense (DOD) program 
that gives the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) the authority to 
...
make  grants,  conclude  cooperative  agreements,  and  supplement  funds  available  under 
Federal programs administered by agencies other than the Department of Defense to assist State and 
local governments 
to address deficiencies in community infrastructure supportive of a military 
installation... (Emphasis added) 
10 U.S.C. §2391 defines 
community infrastructure as a project or facility that includes:  
  any transportation project; 
  a school, hospital, police, fire, emergency response, or other community support facility; 
or 
  a water, waste-water, telecommunications, electric, gas, or other utility infrastructure 
project. 
It further clarifies the project or facility must be: 
  located off a 
military installation (as defined i
n 10 U.S.C. §2687); and 
  owned by either a State or local government; or 
  owned by a not-for-profit, member-owned utility service. 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11505 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
A statutory condition of this authority is that the SECDEF must make a determination that “such 
assistance will enhance the military value, resilience, or military family quality of life at such military 
installation.” Another statutory requirement is that eligible State or local governments must “contribute 
not less than 30% of the funding for the community infrastructure project,” except where projects are 
located in 
a rural area (a city/town/unincorporated area with 50,000 or less inhabitants) or for “reasons 
related to national security.” 
Beyond statutory requirements, DOD has specifie
d additional requirements. For instance, projects must 
be complete, useable, and “construction-ready”—meaning final planning and design, environmental 
planning, and local permitting actions are largely complete and the project can commence within 12 
months of an award. Projects must also be endorsed by the local installation commander and eligible 
proposers must “agree to contribute 50% or more of the funding for the project”—a 20% increase to the 
statutory minimum—except where a statutory exception is met. 
How is DCIP Managed? 
DOD’
s Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) is a
 DOD Field Activity that administers DCIP under its 
broader
 Community Investment program. OEA, together with the 
Defense Community Infrastructure 
Pilot Program Review Panel (hereafter the “review panel”) and the SECDEF, makes decisions regarding 
DCIP. OEA sets grant proposal requirements, the deadline for submitting proposals, and, with the 
SECDEF, the criteria that will be used to select proposals. The review panel scores and ranks proposals to 
recommend to the SECDEF for invitation of a formal grant application. The SECDEF then approves 
ranked proposals before funding is awarded. 
FY2020 Appropriations 
Although the FY2019 NDAA authorized DCIP, defense appropriations for FY2019 did not include 
funding for it. The FY2020 NDAA
 (S. 1790) authorized appropriations for DCIP up to $75,000,000, and 
in December 2019, Congress appropriated
 $50,000,000 in budget authority for DCIP in the
 Consolidated 
Appropriations Act, 2020. 
FY2020 Approved Projects 
On May 6, 2020, the SECDEF approved the launch of DCIP and specified that the program’s “priority 
focus” was “military family quality of life, military resilience, and military value (in that order).” On May 
26, 2020, DOD announced 
a Final Federal Funding Opportunity for those interested in obtaining DCIP 
funding. The notice provided the requirements for submitting proposals, outlined proposal selection 
criteria, and set a submission deadline of June 26, 2020. 
On August 12, 2020, DOD announced its list of approved projects whose proposers would be 
invited to 
submit a formal grant application
 for DCIP funding (
Table 1). OEA published the
 tiered rankings for all 
109 proposals evaluated. Invited proposals were all ranked as “Tier 1”—meaning they met t
he selection 
criteria for enhancing
 military family quality of life (versus 
military value or
 resilience). OEA also 
published the amount of funding each project would receive, allocating nearly all $50 million in DCIP 
appropriations. Pending grantee acceptance by September 23, 2020, all DCIP funding would be obligated 
in FY2020, and according to DOD would “remain available for expenses up to five years.” 
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
Table 1. FY2020 Invited Proposals 
By DCIP Funding Amount (Highest to Lowest) 
Project 
Proposer 
Supported 
State / 
Total Project  DCIP 
% Funded 
Installation 
Territory 
Cost 
Funding 
by DCIP 
Aim High - Big Sky 
City of Great 
Malmstrom Air  Montana 
$20,000,000 
$10,000,000 
50.0% 
Recreation Center 
Falls 
Force Base 
Watertown Family 
Jefferson County 
Fort Drum 
New York 
$18,100,000 
$9,000,000 
49.7% 
YMCA Community 
Industrial 
Development 
Campus 
Louisiana 
Fort Polk 
Louisiana 
$7,599,418 
$6,839,476 
90.0% 
Connections and 
Department of 
Learning Space 
Economic 
Development 
Recreation & 
South Dakota 
El sworth Air 
South 
$12,625,900 
$6,312,950 
50.0% 
Wellness Center 
El sworth 
Force Base 
Dakota 
Development 
Authority 
Magic City 
City of Minot 
Minot Air 
North 
$11,924,336 
$6,293,820 
52.8% 
Discovery Center 
Force Base 
Dakota 
Multipurpose 
Municipality of 
Joint Forces on  Guam 
$6,444,852 
$3,506,426 
54.4% 
Recreation and 
Chalan Pago-
Guam 
Emergency Center 
Ordot 
Learn D.C. Charter 
Lawndale 
Joint Base 
District of 
$2,988,432 
$1,494,216 
50.0% 
School 
Educational and 
Anacostia-
Columbia 
Regional 
Bol ing 
Network 
Emergency Medical 
City of Sierra 
Fort Huachuca 
Arizona 
$1,438,000 
$1,438,000 
100.0% 
Services 
Vista 
Reconstruction of 
City of 
Marine Corps 
North 
$5,000,000 
$1,000,000 
20.0% 
the Jack Amyette 
Jacksonvil e 
Base Camp 
Carolina 
Recreation Center 
Lejeune 
STEM Complex 
Abilene 
Dyess Air 
Texas 
$1,925,214 
$962,607 
50.0% 
Independent 
Force Base 
School District 
Air Power Park 
City of Hampton 
Joint Base 
Virginia 
$1,844,017 
$707,009 
38.3% 
Tidal Flooding 
Langley-Eustis 
Early Childhood 
Waynesvil e R-VI 
Fort Leonard 
Missouri 
$1,354,475 
$677,238 
50.0% 
Center 
School District 
Wood 
Silver Valley USD 
Silver Valley 
Fort Irwin 
California 
$521,695 
$521,695 
100.0% 
Sports Complex 
Unified School 
National 
District 
Training 
Center 
Facility Upgrades 
Mountain Home 
Mountain 
Idaho 
$426,500 
$426,500 
100.0% 
School District 
Home Air 
Force Base 
  
Congressional Research Service 
4 
Infrastructure 
Commonwealth 
Joint Region 
Northern 
$335,000 
$335,000 
100.0% 
Upgrades 
Bureau of 
Marianas 
Mariana 
Military Affairs 
Islands 
Fitness Challenge 
County of Prince 
Marine Corps 
Virginia 
$500,000 
$250,000 
50.0% 
Course  
Wil iam 
Base Quantico 
TOTAL DCIP FUNDS TO BE OBLIGATED: 
$49,764,937 
 
Source: DOD Office of Economic Adjustment.  
  
Author Information 
 G. James Herrera 
   
Analyst in U.S. Defense Readiness and Infrastructure  
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11505 · VERSION 1 · NEW