Confederate Names and Military Installations
INSIGHTi
Confederate Names and Military Installations
Updated August 23, 2021
U.S. Military Bases Named in Honor of Confederate Military Leaders
There are 10 major military installations named after Confederate Civil War commanders located in the
former states of the Confederacy. These are all Army installations: Fort Rucker (after Col. Edmund W.
Rucker, who was given the honorary title of “General”) in Alabama; Fort Benning (Brig. Gen. Henry L.
Benning) and Fort Gordon (Maj. Gen. John Brown Gordon) in Georgia; Camp Beauregard (Gen. Pierre
Gustave Toutant “P.G.T.” Beauregard) and Fort Polk (Gen. Leonidas Polk) in Louisiana; Fort Bragg (Gen.
Braxton Bragg) in North Carolina; Fort Hood (Lt. Gen. John Bell Hood) in Texas; and Fort A.P. Hill (Lt.
Gen. Ambrose Powell “A.P.” Hill), Fort Lee (Gen. Robert E. Lee) and Fort Pickett (Maj. Gen. George
Edward Pickett) in Virginia. According to the U.S. Army Center of Military History, Camp Beauregard
and Forts Benning, Bragg, Gordon, and Lee were established during World War I while the other forts
(Hill, Hood, Pickett, Polk, and Rucker) were established in the 1940s.
The Naming Commission
Section 370 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year 2021 (P.L. 116-283) requires the Department of Defense (DOD) to implement a plan designed by a
commission established by the Secretary of Defense to conduct a study of Confederate States of America
(CSA) commemoratives with the intention of removing and replacing Confederate names from DOD
assets within three years of enactment. Officially named the “Commission on the Naming of Items of the
Department of Defense that Commemorates the Confederate States of America or Any Person Who
Served Voluntarily with the Confederate States of America,” it is also referred to as the Naming
Commission. It is tasked with renaming DOD assets and removing symbols, displays, monuments, and
paraphernalia that commemorate the CSA, by gathering input from local communities and developing an
implementation plan for renaming assets. The commission is to submit the plan to the House and Senate
Armed Services Committees by October 2022. The Defense Secretary is to implement the Commission’s
plan not later than January 1, 2024.
On February 12, 2021, Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin III announced the appointment of four of the
commissioners: retired Navy Adm. Michelle Howard (chair); retired Marine Corps Gen. Bob Neller; Dr.
Kori Schake, and retired Army Brig. Gen. Ty Seidule. Four more commissioners were appointed by the
chairs and ranking members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees: retired Army Lt. Gen.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN10756
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service
2
Thomas P. Bostick; Mr. Lonnie G. Bunch III; Mr. Jerry Buchanan; and U.S. Representative Austin Scott.
The commissioners were sworn in on March 2, 2021.
Each service has its own naming criteria and approval process, and these naming decisions typically do
not go through Congress. See the following for each service’s current naming policy.
Naming Policy by Military Service
Army: In general, the naming of Army installations is the responsibility of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Manpower
and Reserve Affairs (ASA (M&RA)). The Secretary of the Army retains final approval authority for the Army Memorial
Program—a program that oversees the naming of all Army real property. For the Army, the naming of a U.S. Army installation
after a deceased individual is considered a memorialization, while naming an installation after a living individual is termed a
dedication. The Army maintains separate criteria for memorialization and dedication of Army real property. The regulation that
sets these criteria is Army Regulation (AR) 1-33, The Army Memorial Program (October 2018). In addition to dedicating and
memorializing installations after people, the Army can also name an installation after an event. AR 1-33 provides a separate set
of criteria for this “naming” and is defined as “the non-permanent naming of Army real property after famous battles and
events.”
Navy: OPNAV INSTRUCTION 5030.12H (October 2017) explains the U.S. Navy’s policy and procedures for the naming of
streets, facilities, and structures. According to this instruction, “names selected should honor deceased members of the Navy.”
It may also be appropriate to honor deceased persons other than Navy personnel who have made significant contributions to
the benefit of the Navy. This instruction is applicable to naming a structure or building that is identified by a real property
unique identifier or a street. Naming designations of internal portions of buildings or spaces can be assigned at the discretion of
the local installation commander. The spokesman for the Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Mike Gilday announced on June 9,
2020, that Adm. Gilday directed his staff to draft an order that wil ban the Confederate battle flag from all public spaces and
work areas on Navy bases, ships, subs, and aircraft.
Marine Corps: The Manual for the Marine Corps Historical Program (February 2009) addresses the Commemorative Naming
Program and specifies that “property may be named for individuals highly regarded within the Marine Corps and/or local
communities. Names of deceased Marines, or members of other military organizations who died while serving with or in
support of Marine Corps units, wil be considered first.” A Marine Corps Installations Command Policy Letter 3-15 from
March 2, 2015, offers additional guidance for Marine Corps Installations Command. In addition, on June 5, 2020, Commandant
of the Marine Corps Gen. David Berger’s message (MARADMIN 331/20) instructed commanders to “identify and remove”
displays of the Confederate battle flag on Marine bases.
Air Force: Air Force Manual 36-2806, Awards and Memorialization Program (June 2019), sets Air Force policy for the Air
Force’s memorialization program. The manual states “The memorialization program is designed to provide enduring honor and
tribute to living and deceased military members and civilians with records of outstanding and honorable service through the
naming of Air Force installations, streets, buildings, and interior spaces of buildings.” Chapter 4 of the manual provides naming
criteria and approval authorities for Air Force installations, and states: “When naming an Air Force installation ensure only the
most deserving individuals are selected for memorialization. Selections should bring honor to the Air Force and reflect the
goodwil of the local community.”
Author Information
Barbara Salazar Torreon
Senior Research Librarian
Disclaimer
Congressional Research Service
3
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN10756 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED