Digital Trade and Data Policy: Key Issues Facing Congress

Digital trade includes trade in all goods and services ordered digitally. E-commerce generally refers to digitally ordered goods. Services that are digitally ordered may also be delivered digitally (e.g., online banking) or provided through a subscription (e.g., streaming or cloud services). Cross-border data flows are essential to the technologies used to digitally order and deliver goods and services, and to many facets of the digital economy, including digital platforms. Because of this, much debate on digital trade is focused on data policy and technology. Issues facing Congress include approaches to data privacy, data localization, regulation of the technology sector, and the impact of foreign digital regulations on the U.S. economy. Congress could also consider legislation to encourage or require the executive branch to pursue certain objectives or respond to foreign regulation that impacts U.S. technology companies.

Measuring the Digital Economy

Output in the U.S. digital economy, consisting mainly of e-commerce, digital services (e.g., telecommunication, internet, and cloud services), and infrastructure (software and hardware), was $4.3 trillion (9% of the value of all goods and services produced in the United States) in 2022 (most recent data available), an increase of 42% since 2017 (Figure 1). As of 2022, e-commerce was the largest activity by output, while cloud services was the fastest growing.

Figure 1. Digital Economy Gross Output

Source: CRS calculations using U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) data. Note: Excludes federal nondefense digital services due to their small size ($402 million in 2017 and $457 million in 2022).

The total value of digital trade flows is difficult to estimate in part because official international trade statistics do not explicitly measure digital trade. Some measures of trade in digital services exist and provide insight into the growth of digital trade over time. The U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) tracks trade in services that could be delivered digitally, including telecommunications, business, and information services. U.S. exports of such services were $656 billion in 2023 (64% of total U.S. services exports), an increase of 31% since 2018. This growth outpaced the 19% growth in total U.S. services exports during this time. Some international organizations are discussing how to improve the accuracy of statistics on digital trade, including enhanced tracking of international business-to-consumer (B2C) or business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce and cross-border data flows (see text box).

U.S. Digital Trade and Data Policy

To date, the second Trump Administration has not announced specific objectives related to U.S. digital trade policy, but has indicated that foreign taxation and regulation of the digital economy may be a priority. In January 2025, the United States provided notice to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) that it will no longer be party to the OECD/G20 global tax framework addressing profit shifting and digital taxation. The second Trump Administration has also indicated that it will evaluate the impact of foreign regulation and taxation of digital services on U.S. firms, including considering whether to investigate foreign policies under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 or renew Section 301 investigations into foreign digital services taxes (DSTs) initiated in 2019 and 2020 under the first Trump Administration. USTR suspended its actions against foreign DSTs under the prior investigations because negotiations under the OECD/G20 meant to provide a global framework for digital taxation were ongoing. Some stakeholders and Members of Congress argue foreign DSTs disproportionately impact the U.S. firms. The stalled implementation of the OECD/G20 deal, which put a moratorium on DSTs, may result in the proliferation of DSTs. In 2024, Canada enacted a DST.

In addition to DSTs, a number of foreign jurisdictions are pursuing regulation of some aspects of the digital economy. The European Union (EU) has enacted several pieces of legislation (see text box). Some stakeholders have voiced concerns that some EU digital regulations discriminate against U.S. technology firms. The European Commission has investigated U.S. firms for violations of its digital regulations. In April 2025, the Commission found Apple and Meta in breach of the Digital Markets Act and subject to fines of hundreds of millions of euros. A number of investigations under EU digital regulations are ongoing.

Until 2023, the United States generally promoted the free flow of data in its free trade agreements (FTAs), including provisions to limit data localization (discussed below), with limited exceptions. The Biden Administration reassessed these policies. In fall 2023, the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) withdrew support for provisions on cross-border data flows, data localization, and the transfer of source code in the Joint Statement Initiative (JSI) on E-commerce, and suspended digital trade talks in the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF). The JSI, a plurilateral negotiation among 91 members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) who collectively account for over 90% of global trade, aims to establish rules on e-commerce that build on existing WTO standards and frameworks. A joint statement was released in July 2024 without the support of the United States and eight other members, despite the removal of the provisions the United States withdrew its support for in 2023.

USTR Katherine Tai attributed the decisions at the WTO and in IPEF to the need for policy space to address a lack of a domestic regulatory environment in the United States governing data flows and the technology sector. Key issues such as data privacy and regulation of the technology sector could have a significant impact on future innovation, data governance norms, and transparency in the digital economy. A coalition of technology companies that support more competition in the app marketplace praised the decision and urged the Administration to advance proposals that would regulate technology firms. Other industry groups across a range of sectors expressed concern with the potential for restrictions on data to harm American workers.

Some Members of Congress supported suspending support for the provisions, describing them as potential hindrances to data privacy, anti-monopoly, and other digital safeguards. Other Members criticized the decision, arguing that it was made without sufficient congressional consultation, ran against the interests of U.S. businesses and workers, and ceded U.S. leadership to other governments such as China. The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability began an investigation into the alleged lack of consultation. In a 2024 report on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the committee asserts the FTC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division may have pressured USTR to abandon certain digital trade provisions.

Data Localization

Until 2023, the United States sought provisions within trade agreements to limit the use of data localization and raised concerns over the use of these measures in other countries. Data localization policies require that data generated within a country be stored and processed on servers within that country or in a cloud environment hosted and controlled by a firm physically located in the country. This restriction on the movement of data across borders may act as a trade barrier by requiring firms to comply with different regulations across countries and increasing the cost of storing data. Countries may implement data localization policies to address privacy and national security concerns, particularly for the storage or transfer of sensitive data.

Data Protection

Data protection efforts generally aim to secure personal data through enhanced security requirements or restricting the collection and flow of sensitive data. Restricting certain cross-border data flows may ease privacy and national security concerns but may be a barrier to trade if it interferes with firms' ability to engage in e-commerce. Most U.S. trade agreements include mutual commitments to protect personal information but do not provide standards for parties to follow.

The United States has not enacted comprehensive federal data protection legislation. In 2024, both Congress and the Biden Administration pursued more limited data protection measures to restrict cross-border data flows in instances when national security or the security of sensitive data on U.S. citizens is at risk. An April 2025 rule by the DOJ, which followed a February 2024 executive order issued by President Biden, aims to restrict data brokerage activities and prohibit certain bulk data transactions with foreign adversaries. The Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (H.R. 7521), passed as part of a supplemental appropriation (P.L. 118-50), aims to protect U.S. citizens' data from access by adversaries.

Considerations for Congress

Congress has been active in some areas that may shape future negotiating objectives for digital trade, such as regulating foreign digital platforms operating in the United States. Congress may consider the impact of additional regulation of digital markets and emerging technologies (e.g., AI) on the U.S. economy. Congress could also consider issues related to taxation of digital services or digital regulations, such as whether to urge the executive branch to respond to foreign DSTs or regulations. Congress could also consider to what extent future policy may depart from or conflict with standards set in agreements such as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) that were negotiated by the first Trump Administration and are to undergo a joint review by all member countries in 2026.