link to page 1  link to page 1 
 
 
 
Updated April 4, 2024
The Nordic Countries and U.S. Relations
Political and Economic Overview 
Figure 1. The Nordic Countries: Key Facts 
The five Nordic countries—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, 
Norway, and Sweden—share deep historical, linguistic, and 
cultural ties and many political and economic similarities. 
They are all stable democracies with parliamentary systems 
of government and prosperous market economies with 
relatively high standards of living. With a collective 
population of nearly 28 million people, the Nordic countries 
have a combined gross domestic product (GDP) of roughly 
$1.9 trillion (s
ee Figure 1). They have extensiv
e social 
welfare systems and relatively high tax rates but are 
considered to be innovative, business-friendly countries. 
The Nordics generally rank high on global
 competitiveness 
and
 innovation indexes. Foreign trade plays a key role in 
their economies. They also enjoy substantial natural 
resources. Norway in particular benefits from vast North 
Sea oil and natural gas deposits. 
The Nordic countries were affected economically by the 
 
COVID-19 pandemic and, since 2022, by Russia’s war 
Source: Graphic by CRS, as of April 2024, based on Economist 
against Ukraine.
 GDP contracted in all five Nordic 
Intel igence Unit data. 
countries in 2020 due to the pandemic, rebounded in 2021, 
but slowed in 2022 and 2023 amid the conflict in Ukraine, 
Foreign and Security Policies 
elevated energy prices, high
 inflation, and rising interest 
The Nordic countries generally share an international 
rates. GDP growth is expected to remain modest in all five 
outlook that prior
itizes cooperation, both among themselves 
Nordic countries in 2024 (between roughly 1% and 2%) as 
and with the international community. The Nordics work 
inflation eases and interest rates stabilize.
 Aging 
together on regional issues in th
e interparliamentary Nordic 
populations and other demographic and societal changes 
Council and th
e intergovernmental Nordic Council of 
raise questions about the long-term
 sustainability of the 
Ministers. They promote Nordic defense cooperation 
Nordics’ social welfare systems. 
through
 NORDEFCO, a forum that brings Nordic military 
officials together. Since the 1950s, th
e Nordic Passport 
Migration policy is a key political issue in the Nordics. The 
Control Agreement has allowed Nordic citizens to travel 
2015-2016 spike in refugees and migrants in Denmark, 
freely and reside in any Nordic country. The Nordics also 
Finland, Norway, and Sweden—mostly from the Middle 
are strong proponents of th
e United Nations and multilateral 
East, Afghanistan, and Africa—strained education, housing, 
solutions to global challenges. They are frequent 
and welfare systems. Most Nordic governments introduced 
contributors to international peacekeeping missions, major 
tougher asylum policies and curtailed some welfare 
providers of development and humanitarian assistance, and 
benefits. The refugee and migrant waves also stirred 
supporters of U.N. efforts to address climate change. 
debates about identity, integration, an
d security (in relation 
to both terrorism and crime).
 Refugees from Ukraine, 
As seen 
in Figure 1, all five Nordic countries are NATO 
however, generally have been welcomed by Nordic 
members. Finland and Sweden wer
e militarily nonaligned 
governments and societies. 
for decades, but Russia’s war against Ukrain
e upended 
Finnish and Swedish security policies that had sought to 
Over the past decade, concerns related to migration, 
balance ties to the West and relations with Russia (Finland 
globalization, and other political and economic challenges 
has long been particularly mindful of its 830-mile land 
have generated voter distrust of established center-right and 
border with Russia). Both Finland and Sweden applied to 
center-left political parties throughout the Nordics and 
join NATO in May 2022.
 Finland acceded to NATO in 
fueled the rise of populist parties. Most anti-establishment, 
April 2023 and
 Sweden acceded in March 2024 (see 
populist parties in the Nordics are on the right or far right 
below). Finland, Sweden, and Denmark also belong to the 
and hold nationalist and anti-immigrant views. In Sweden, a 
European Union (EU). Finland is the only Nordic country 
far-right party has provided
 parliamentary support for a 
that uses the euro, the EU’s common currency. Although 
center-right government since October 2022 (in exchange 
not in the EU, Iceland and Norway participate in the EU’s 
for tightening immigration, asylum, and criminal justice 
single market and Schengen area of free movement. 
policies). Following Finland’s April 2023 election, a far-
right party with nationalist, anti-immigrant v
iews joined a 
Nordic Security, Russia, and NATO 
coalition government led by a center-right party. 
Relations between the Nordic countries and Russia have 
been strained for over a decade in light of Russia’s military 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
 link to page 2 
The Nordic Countries and U.S. Relations 
resurgence, increased Russian military activity near Nordic 
Table 1. U.S.-Nordic Economic Relations 
borders, and Russia’s 2014 aggression in Ukraine. Since 
(direct investment [historical-cost basis] and employment) 
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, 
Nordic governments have backed increasingly punitive 
Workers 
Workers 
sanctions against Russia, including targeting Russia’s 
Employed 
Employed 
energy sector, and have provided military, financial, and/or 
U.S. 
Nordic 
in U.S. by 
in Nordics 
humanitarian aid to Ukraine. Denmark, Finland, Norway, 
Direct 
Direct 
Nordic-
by U.S.-
and Sweden also have been
 increasing defense spending 
Inv. in 
Inv. in 
Owned 
Owned 
amid heightened security concerns about Russia and to 
Nordic 
Nordics 
U.S. 
Affiliates 
Affiliates 
meet NAT
O defense spending and
 capability goals. 
Country 
(2022) 
(2022) 
(2021) 
(2021) 
Th
e Biden Administration and most allies assessed that 
Denmark  $14.0 bil 
$39.4 bil 
48,300 
38,200 
Finnish and Swedish NATO accession would enhance 
Finland 
$4.4 bil 
$9.9 bil 
34,200 
21,800 
alliance capabilities and strengthen NATO’s defense 
posture, especially in th
e Baltic Sea region. All but two 
Iceland 
$91 mil 
N/A 
400 
1,800 
NATO allies completed national ratification procedures to 
allow Finland and Sweden to
 accede to NATO within 
Norway 
$13.5 bil 
$36.9 bil 
7,200 
37,400 
months of their application in 2022, but consensus is 
Sweden 
$60.3 bil 
$94.1 bil 
208,700 
62,900 
required to
 admit new NATO members and Turkey 
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic 
(Türkiye) and Hungary raised concerns and delayed the 
Analysis
, International Trade and Investment Country Facts. 
accession process. Both Finland and Sweden worked to 
address Turkey’s concerns about terrorism and other 
U.S.-Nordic defense ties are strong. Since 1951, the United 
security issues. Hungary’s concerns largely centered on 
States h
as provided for Iceland’s defense
. Pituffik (formerly 
grievances over past EU and
 Swedish criticisms of 
Thule) Space Base in Greenland is th
e U.S. military’s 
Hungarian government policies perceived as eroding the 
northernmost installation, providing missile warning and 
rule of 
law. Turkey and
 Hungary ultimately approved 
space surveillance. Nor
way stores pre-positioned U.S. 
Finland’s accession to NATO in 2023 and
 Sweden’s in 
military equipment and h
as hosted U.S. Marines for winter 
early 2024. (Also see CRS Insight IN11949
, NATO 
warfare training; a
 2021 defense cooperation agreement 
Enlargement to Sweden and Finland.) 
(DCA) seeks to facilitate further U.S. military training in 
The Arctic 
Norway and permits U.
S. infrastructure investment at 
certain Norwegian military facilities. In 2023, the United 
The Arctic region (or High North) is a key focus of Nordic 
States concluded similar bilateral DCAs with
 Denmark, 
foreign policies. All of the Nordics are members of the 
Finland, and
 Sweden that provide for rotational U.S. troop 
eight-country
 Arctic Council (along with Russia, Canada, 
deployments and equipment storage on their respective 
and the United States) and have long supported peaceful 
territories (a separate agreement covers the U.S. presence in 
cooperation in the Arctic. Warming temperatures and 
Greenland).
 Denmark, Norway, an
d Finland also are 
melting ice are increasing access to Arctic sea routes and 
acquiring the U.S.-built F-35 fighter jet. 
natural resources, with environmental and geostrategic 
implications. Like the United States, the Nordic countries 
U.S.-Nordic relations experienced some tensions during the 
are wary of enhanced
 Russian military and commercial 
Trump Administration. Some Nordic officials expressed 
activity in the Arctic, as well as of
 China’s interest in the 
concern about President Trump’s views on
 NATO, trade, 
region, including with respect to Greenland (a largely self-
Iran, climate change, and
 other issues. U.S.-Danish 
governing part of the Kingdom of Denmark, with a 
relations wer
e strained in 2019 by President Trump’s 
population of around 56,000). 
expressed interest in purchasing Greenland due to its 
strategic location and natural resources. 
Russia’s war against Ukraine has affected the Arctic 
Council’s functioning. The Nordics, the United States, and 
The Biden Administration has sought to bolster relations 
Canada
 paused participation in the council in March 2022 
with the Nordic countries, especially in light of challenges 
and announced they wou
ld resume work on projects not 
posed by Russia in both Europe and the Arctic. The Biden 
involving Russia in June 2022
. Norway assumed the two-
Administration and majorities in th
e House and
 Senate 
year rotating chair of the council from Russia in May 2023 
supported NATO enlargement to Finland and Sweden. The 
and h
as sought to advance cooperation at th
e working level, 
Senate and President Biden completed the steps necessary 
bu
t questions persist about the council’s
 future. 
for
 U.S. ratification of Finnish and Swedish accession to 
NATO in August 2022. In July 2023, President Biden 
Relations with the United States 
attended the 3rd
 U.S.-Nordics Leaders’ Summit in Finland, 
The United States and the Nordic countries largely enjoy 
which focused on security, technology, and environmental 
close relations. Almost
 10 million Americans claim Nordic 
cooperation. Among other issues discussed at the summit, 
ancestry. The United States and the Nordics cooperate on 
leaders pledged to support Ukraine for “as long as it takes.” 
many global and regional issues, including supporting 
Some Nordic officials, however, have express
ed concern 
Ukraine; combating
 hybrid threats; countering
 terrorism; 
about the status of continued U.S. funding for Ukraine. 
addressing
 climate challenges; and promoting sustainable 
development, including in th
e Arctic. The United States 
Kristin Archick, Specialist in European Affairs   
also is an important trading partner for the Nordics, and 
IF10740
investment ties are extensive (see
 Table 1). 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
The Nordic Countries and U.S. Relations 
 
 
Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10740 · VERSION 11 · UPDATED