link to page 1  link to page 1 
 
 
Updated November 15, 2017
Key Issues in Tax Reform: The Charitable Deduction for 
Individuals
The charitable deduction is a long-standing feature of the 
Figure 1. Limitations on Charitable Contributions 
individual income tax. It is also one of the largest individual 
Valuation 
income tax provisions in terms of annual forgone revenue, 
Type of 
Rules for 
an estimated $56.9 billion in 2017. This In Focus provides 
Donation
Recipient
Property
Limitation
background information on the charitable deduction for 
individual taxpayers and discusses the provision in the 
public charity; private 
Basis of the 
context of tax reform. Tax provisions for corporate 
cash or short-
operating foundation; federal, 
50% of AGI
property 
term capital 
state, local government
contributions and charitable bequests are not addressed.  
gain property
private non-operating 
Basis of the 
The Deduction 
30% of AGI
foundation; other*
property
Under current law, taxpayers who itemize their deductions 
public charity; private 
can—subject to certain limitations—deduct charitable 
long-term 
operating foundation; federal,  Fair market value
30% of AGI
donations to qualifying organizations. Qualifying 
capital gain 
state, local government
property
organizations are generally “public charities” or “private 
private non-operating 
Basis of the 
20% of AGI
foundations,” with tax-exempt status under Internal 
foundation; other*
property
 
Revenue Code (IRC) Section 501(c)(3); federal, state, or 
Source: Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 170.  
local governments; and other less common types of 
Notes: These are general rules, and there are numerous exceptions.  
qualifying organizations.  
*Includes qualifying contributions to veterans’ organizations, fraternal 
societies, and nonprofit cemeteries. Not al  non-operating 
Tax deductible donations to qualifying organizations can be 
foundations are subject to the 30% limit. 
in the form of cash or property. Property held for more than 
one year is often referred to as 
long-term capital gain 
Over time, Congress has modified the maximum amount 
property. Property held for less than a year is often referred 
that can be deducted in a given year by changing the 
to as 
short-term capital gain property. Depending on (1) the 
income limitation. In 1952, as part P.L. 82-465, Congress 
type of property donated and (2) the type of qualifying 
raised the limitation to 20% of AGI. In 1954, Congress 
organization that receives the donations, there are 
increased the maximum deduction limit to 30% of AGI 
limitations on the total dollar amount that can be deducted 
(P.L. 83-591) for donations to certain public charities. The 
by the taxpayer in a given tax year. The limitations are 
Tax Reform Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-172) raised the deduction 
defined as a percentage of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross 
limit to 50% of AGI for donations to public charities and 
income or AGI (computed without regard to net operating 
allowed deductions for contributions to private operating 
loss carrybacks), as noted in
 Figure 1. If the amount 
foundations. The 1969 act also imposed a 30% limit for 
deducted exceeds the taxpayer’s AGI limitation, the excess 
contributions of appreciated property and imposed other 
can be carried forward and deducted on future years’ tax 
restrictions on contributions of long-term capital gain 
returns for up to five years. 
property. The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-369) 
raised the limitation on the deduction for donations of cash 
For non-cash donations, there are rules on how to value the 
or short-term capital gain property to private non-operating 
property. Depending on the type of property and the 
foundations from 20% to 30% of AGI.  
recipient organizations, the property is generally valued at 
its basis (i.e., what the taxpayer originally paid for the 
There were exceptions to these limits for particularly large 
property with adjustments) or its fair market value (how 
gifts. The Revenue Act of 1924 (P.L. 68-176) specified that 
much the taxpayer would receive in an open market for the 
if a taxpayer made contributions exceeding 90% of net 
property at the time it is donated) as noted in
 Figure 1. 
income in the tax year and each of the past 10 years, a full 
deduction was allowed. A phaseout of the unlimited 
Selected Legislative Background 
deduction was included in the Tax Reform Act of 1969.  
The charitable deduction was first enacted to offset the 
potential negative effects of increased income taxes on 
In the early 1980s, temporary changes provided a charitable 
charitable giving as part of the
 War Income Tax Revenue 
deduction to non-itemizers. The Economic Recovery Act of 
Act of 1917 (P.L. 65-50). The overall amount that could be 
1981 (P.L. 97-34) allowed taxpayers who took the standard 
deducted was limited to 15% of net taxable income to 
deduction to claim an additional deduction for charitable 
prevent taxpayers from eliminating tax liability by claiming 
giving. This temporary provision went into effect in 1982, 
the deduction. The deduction has been changed dozens of 
and was allowed to expire as scheduled at the end of 1986.  
times since enactment. Key legislative changes relevant to 
this In Focus are highlighted next.  
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
 link to page 2  link to page 2 
 

Key Issues in Tax Reform: The Charitable Deduction for Individuals 
Cost 
the deduction. Other changes to the deduction might 
The charitable deduction is estimated to result in $60.9 
include modified AGI limits or changes related to valuation 
billion in forgone revenue in FY2017, $56.9 billion from 
of non-cash gifts. 
the individual income tax and $4.0 billion from the 
corporate income tax (see
 Figure 2). During the past 
Figure 3. Distribution of Returns Filed and Charitable 
decade, tax expenditures associated with the charitable 
Deduction Tax Expenditures, by Income Class 
deduction have fluctuated, largely following patterns in 
2017 
charitable giving. Individual charitable giving fell between 
2008 and 2009, as a result of the Great Recession. The post-
recession recovery in giving has increased in recent years, 
and is reflected in the tax expenditure estimates.  
Figure 2. Charitable Deduction Tax Expenditures 
FY2008 – FY2017 
 
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation. 
Notes: Calculations use 2017 rates and 2016 income levels. 
Changes in tax policy enacted as part of tax reform might 
also affect charitable giving incentives indirectly. Since the 
 
tax savings associated with charitable giving is a function 
Source: Joint Committee on Taxation. 
of the donor’s marginal tax rate, lower marginal tax rates 
 
Distribution of Benefits 
reduce the tax incentive to give. Policy changes that reduce 
the number of taxpayers itemizing deductions (like 
Tax expenditures for charitable deductions largely benefit 
increasing the standard deduction), while maintaining the 
higher-income taxpayers. Higher-income taxpayers tend to 
charitable deduction as an itemized deduction, could reduce 
(1) have a greater ability to give; and (2) derive a larger tax 
the number of taxpayers with a tax incentive for charitable 
benefit from each dollar given since they generally face 
contributions. 
higher marginal tax rates. An estimated 71% of tax 
expenditures for charitable giving in FY2017 will be 
Any tax reform is likely to have provisions that will affect 
claimed by taxpayers in the $200,000 and above income 
the tax incentives for charitable giving, either directly or 
class (see
 Figure 3). Overall, an estimated 6% of returns 
indirectly. The Unified Framework for Fixing Our Broken 
fall into this class. In contrast, an estimated 8% of the 
Tax Code, issued by the Office of the Speaker on 
charitable deduction tax expenditures are associated with 
September 27, 2017, would retain tax incentives for 
tax returns filed in income classes of $100,000 or less (78% 
charitable giving in tax reform.  
of tax returns filed fall into a $100,000 or less income 
class). Additionally, only taxpayers that itemize deductions 
Current tax reform legislation—H.R. 1, as reported, and the 
can claim a deduction for charitable donations. In 2014, 
Senate Finance Committee chairman’s mark—would make 
93% of taxpayers with AGI above $200,000 itemized 
several changes to the charitable giving deduction. For 
deductions, while 20% of taxpayers with AGI of less than 
example, both bills would increase the AGI limitation on 
$100,000 itemized.  
cash contributions from 50% to 60%. In addition, both bills 
Considerations for Tax Reform 
would repeal the deduction for contributions made to higher 
education institutions in exchange for the right to purchase 
There tends to be agreement that the tax code should 
seating at university athletic events. Both bills would also 
support charitable giving. Tax reform, however, could 
substantially increase the standard deduction, which would 
result in changes to tax incentives for charitable giving. 
result in fewer taxpayers claiming itemized deductions such 
These changes could be direct. For example, the deduction 
as the charitable deduction.  
could be modified to allow non-itemizers to receive tax 
benefits for donations. Alternatively, a floor could be 
Margot L. Crandall-Hollick, Specialist in Public Finance   
imposed, restricting deductions for charitable giving to 
Molly F. Sherlock, Specialist in Public Finance   
giving above some threshold. The deduction could also be 
converted to a credit, equalizing the subsidy for giving by 
IF10706
individuals in different tax brackets. Another way to 
equalize the value of the deduction for taxpayers in 
different tax brackets is to cap (or make fixed) the rate of 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Key Issues in Tax Reform: The Charitable Deduction for Individuals 
 
 
Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10706 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED