 
 
January 6, 2017
Border-Adjusted Taxes: A Primer
The “Better Way” tax reform blueprint issued by House 
This relation reflects the requirement that dollars bought 
Speaker Paul Ryan on June 24, 2016, proposed replacing 
must equal dollars sold. Foreign purchasers must buy 
the current corporate and business income tax with a 
dollars to buy exports from the United States. Analogously, 
destination-basis cash-flow tax (with some minor 
U.S. purchasers must buy foreign currency (sell dollars) to 
modifications). A destination-basis tax is a border-
buy imports or investments abroad. The demands for 
adjustable tax that exempts exports from the tax and 
exports and imports are dependent on the relative prices of 
imposes the tax on imports. It taxes production consumed in 
U.S. goods and domestic goods and on the exchange rate, 
the United States, whereas the current corporate tax is 
P/(ePf). When the U.S. price rises, exports become more 
(largely) imposed on income produced in the United States.  
expensive in foreign markets and thus the quantity of 
X (exports) falls. If foreign prices rise, U.S. exports are more 
The most broadly known destination-based consumption 
attractive. Imports become more attractive when the U.S. 
tax in the world is the value-added tax (VAT). A VAT that 
prices rise because imports become relatively cheaper than 
taxes imports and exempts exports is sometimes mistakenly 
domestic goods. This relative price is the only price that 
viewed as permitting an export subsidy and an unfair 
matters, which can be seen by dividing each term in 
advantage to countries that have them. These border 
equation (1) by 
P to obtain equation (2); the relative price 
adjustments are irrelevant to any real trade effects in the 
will appear inverted in the equation in the middle term.  
case of a uniform VAT, which imposes the same rates on 
all products—that is, it does not affect real imports, real 
(2) 𝑋 − (𝑒 × 𝑃𝑓/𝑃) × 𝑀 − 𝐹 = 0 
exports, or the trade balance. (Taxes could have other 
effects unrelated to border adjustments, such as influencing 
The relative price appears in three locations: it determines 
savings or the composition of demand through 
the demand for exports, it determines the demand for 
distributional effects, but these would occur regardless of 
imports, and it determines the price of imports (the inverted 
the border adjustment.) The imposition of a tariff or an 
price relationship in the second term of equation (2)). The 
export subsidy in isolation, however, does have real effects. 
crucial point is that if the relative price 
P/(ePf) remains 
fixed, the balance of payments remains equal to zero with 
See CRS Report R40735, 
International Competitiveness: 
the same quantities and nothing changes. 
An Economic Analysis of VAT Border Tax Adjustments, by 
Donald J. Marples, for a more detailed discussion of the 
Suppose the United States were to enact a VAT of x% on 
material presented below. See CRS Report R44342, 
all goods consumed in the United States, including imports, 
Consumption Taxes: An Overview, by Jeffrey M. Stupak 
such that the U.S. price, 
P, rose by x%. By rebating the tax 
and Donald J. Marples, for a discussion of consumption 
on goods exported, the price, for the purpose of export 
taxes generally.   
demand, is its original pretax level. Thus, the relative price 
that drives export demand is unchanged. In the case of 
The Impact of Border Adjustments on 
imports, the U.S. price rises by x%, but at the same time a 
Trade for a Uniform Tax 
tax is imposed on the foreign price also at x%, so the 
Border adjustments can best be explained with a simple 
numerator of the relative price term rises but the 
equation for the balance of payments. Generally, the 
denominator rises by the same percentage. These effects 
balance-of-payments framework holds that if a country 
cancel out, leaving the same fixed relationship. The tax on 
maintains a trade deficit, the country must borrow foreign 
imports has increased the foreign price, for purchasers, by 
capital to finance the purchase of imports. The balance-of-
the same percentage as the increase in the domestic price, 
payments relationship (which says that dollars sold equal 
and imports are no more or less attractive relative to home-
dollars bought) is shown in equation (1): 
produced goods. 
(1) 𝑃 × 𝑋 − 𝑒 × 𝑃𝑓 × 𝑀 − 𝑃 × 𝐹 = 0 
Suppose the border adjustments were not made. Now the 
U.S. price level rises by x%, export demand falls, and 
where 
P is the U.S. price level, 
X is the quantity of exports, 
import demand rises. But these price and demand effects 
Pf is the foreign price level, 
e is the exchange rate relating 
create an imbalance in payments. In response, the exchange 
dollars to foreign currency, 
M is the quantity of imports, 
rate 
e will increase (the price of the dollar will fall). For 
and 
F is the quantity of net capital outflows and other 
example, if x is 10%, 
e will rise by 10% (this movement is 
financial flows for the United States. The value of 
e is the 
referred to as dollar depreciation, because it now takes more 
ratio of the dollar to foreign currency. For example, $1 for 
dollars to purchase a given amount of foreign currency). All 
¥115 (Japanese Yen) would be 1/115. Although there are 
that is required to restore the original balance with 
many trading partners and currencies, and many products 
unchanged quantities is a percentage change in the 
and thus multiple exports and imports, treating these as 
exchange rate of the same magnitude.  
composites does not change the analysis.  
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Border-Adjusted Taxes: A Primer 
Or suppose the money supply did not accommodate the tax 
income tax that other members of the WTO regarded as 
and was passed backward in lower nominal wages and asset 
prohibited export subsidies. Ultimately, as a WTO panel 
values (a consumption tax is effectively a tax on wages and 
found the third version of this provision to be in violation 
existing assets). This outcome would be expected for an 
and members of the European Union prepared to impose 
alternative version of a VAT, the flat tax. A VAT is a sales 
retaliatory tariffs, the United States repealed that provision 
tax imposed at each stage of production, and it consists of 
in 2004. 
receipts minus costs of goods and investments. A flat tax 
splits the VAT into two parts: it imposes a cash-flow tax on 
The Better Way border adjustments would affect both 
business (receipts minus expenditures and wages) along 
imports and exports and, from an economic view, are 
with a wage tax on workers, which is the equivalent of a 
considered, in general, consistent with the WTO agreement. 
VAT. Not making a border adjustment would preserve all 
Nevertheless, since the cash-flow tax system in the Better 
of the original nominal prices and lead to no effects. 
Way tax plan has a number of features that differ from a 
However, if a border adjustment is nevertheless made, so 
VAT (such as the deduction of wages and no allowance for 
the price of exports falls, while the price of imports rises, 
immediately refundable rebates on exports for firms 
the exchange rate will fall as a result (dollar appreciation), 
without sufficient tax liability, as losses will instead be 
again leaving relative prices—and therefore quantities of 
carried forward with interest), whether the border 
imports and exports—unchanged in the long run.  
adjustments will be found to be WTO compliant is in 
question. (See CRS Report RS20088, 
Dispute Settlement in 
This latter point is important because the cash-flow tax in 
the World Trade Organization (WTO): An Overview, by 
the Better Way blueprint is the type of tax that would not 
Daniel T. Shedd, Brandon J. Murrill, and Jane M. Smith, 
require a price accommodation. Unlike a VAT, it would not 
for a discussion.) The border adjustments also may be 
collect a large tax from producers (because wages are not in 
incompatible with U.S. tax treaties.    
the base) who would need to increase prices to pay the tax 
and maintain their profit margins. Making a border 
Further Caveats 
adjustment would, in the case of no domestic price increase, 
Although economic analysis indicates that exchange rates 
result in a currency adjustment. 
should adjust to keep imports and exports constant with a 
border-adjustment tax as outlined in the Better Way tax 
Why Border Adjustments Are Important  plan, the size of the adjustment is large. For the 20% tax 
Border adjustments are important because many VATs are 
rate in the Better Way, the exchange rate should fall by 
not imposed at a uniform rate across goods. The United 
20%. If that is expressed as dollar appreciation (the amount 
States itself has border-adjusted excise taxes on specific 
of currency a dollar can now purchase), it is t/(1-t) or 25%. 
products, such as alcohol and tobacco. A border tax 
(In the illustration of the exchange rate of $1 to ¥115, 80 
adjustment is appropriate when different tax rates are 
cents now buys ¥115 and $1 buys ¥143.75, or 25% more). 
imposed on commodities to allow each country to choose 
This effect is very large, and there may be some lag in the 
its own consumption tax regime. Exchange-rate 
adjustment. 
adjustments allow only for addressing the general price 
level.  
Some analysts point to the difficulty of predicting 
exchange-rate movements with macroeconomic models in 
Another reason that border adjustments matter is that the 
the near term. This difficulty may be tied in part to the large 
consumption base and the production base may differ. 
speculative component of exchange-rate trading. 
Because of financial flows, imports can be larger than 
Nevertheless, although the forces affecting the exchange-
exports or vice versa. In the United States, imports 
rate adjustments may be obscured, they should still be 
historically have been larger than exports, and that trend is 
operating.   
expected to continue in the future. A consumption tax base 
that includes imports and excludes exports is larger than 
Another issue is that some countries manage their currency 
one that does not do so and therefore collects more revenue 
(by changing investments, the 
F in equation (1), which can 
for a given tax rate. 
affect the exchange rates). Presuming these countries’ 
objective is competitiveness, however, they should 
Also, in the case of the Better Way tax, taxing domestic 
recognize that the exchange-rate adjustment is needed to 
consumption eliminates the many complications of taxing 
keep exports and imports at the same level (i.e., achieve 
income on a source basis. One of those complications is 
their original export and import goals) and not intervene in 
income-tax avoidance stemming from profit shifting.  
this case.  
Tariffs, Export Subsidies, and the WTO 
Note that this discussion does not address exchange rate 
The neutrality of border-tax adjustments does not apply 
effects that might occur due to other aspects of the Better 
with taxes and rebates that apply only on exports or only on 
Way tax proposal, such as repatriation of foreign profits, 
imports. For example, imposing a tariff (imposing the tax 
exempting dividends from foreign subsidiaries of U.S. 
only on imports and not rebating the tax on exports) will 
firms, or increasing investment incentives in the United 
affect the quantities of imports and exports. The World 
States.  
Trade Organization (WTO) agreements are in conflict with 
practices such as allowing border adjustments for corporate 
Jane G. Gravelle, Senior Specialist in Economic Policy   
income taxes. The United States was embroiled in a three-
decade controversy involving a series of provisions of the 
IF10583
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Border-Adjusted Taxes: A Primer 
 
 
Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10583 · VERSION 3 · NEW