The Post-2015 Global Development Agenda

July 8, 2015 The Post-2015 Global Development Agenda The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) established by the international community in the year 2000 sunset in 2015 and are likely to be replaced by a new global development agenda for the period 2016 through 2030. The “post-2015 development agenda,” as it is often called, has been the subject of an extensive United Nations-led process and debate that may culminate in the establishment of a formal new development agenda at the 69th session of the U.N. General Assembly in September 2015. This In Focus provides a brief overview of the MDGs, the draft “sustainable development goals” that are expected to succeed the MDGs, key events in the development and rollout of the post-2015 development agenda, and issues that may be of particular interest to Congress. Figure 1. MDG Progress by Region, 2015 The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) The MDGs are a group of eight broad development goals agreed to by 189 U.N. member states—including the United States—as part of the 2000 Millennium Declaration. They are aspirational, and commitments are non-binding. The goals, which governments aimed to achieve by the end of 2015, are (1) eradicating extreme hunger and poverty; (2) achieving universal primary education; (3) promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment; (4) reducing the under-five child mortality rate; (5) reducing the maternal mortality rate; (6) combating HIV/AIDS and other diseases; (7) ensuring environmental sustainability; and (8) developing a Global Partnership for Development. The goals were further refined by 21 targets and 60 measurable indicators for monitoring progress. Since 2000, governments have worked to achieve the MDGs with mixed results. Goals related to reducing extreme poverty, access to improved drinking water, and gender parity in elementary education, for example, have been achieved in many regions. Far less progress has been reported on reducing maternal mortality, access to reproductive health, and women’s representation in national parliaments, among others. Data also indicates that progress toward the goals is unevenly distributed across regions and countries. India and China, for example, have made considerable progress in achieving the MDGs, while many countries in sub-Saharan Africa are expected to meet few of the goals. For some of the goals and indicators, insufficient data are available to measure progress. According to the 2015 MDG progress report, the majority of MDGs are not likely to be fully achieved by the end of 2015. Development experts and political leaders have questioned whether the goals are realistic and appropriate, whether donor funding and government accountability are adequate, and whether progress that has been made can be attributed to the global goal-setting process. Source: CRS analysis of MDG 2015 Progress Chart. Note: Chart reflects the 16 of the 21 MDG targets for which data are reported in the 2015 progress report. The Post-2015 Development Agenda As U.N. member states and other stakeholders have made a final push to achieve the MDG targets in recent years, they have simultaneously begun a process to establish a global development agenda for the post-2015 period. Like the MDGs, this new agenda would be non-binding, intended to focus global development efforts. The post-2015 agenda setting process began at the 2012 U.N. Conference on Sustainable Development, in Rio de Janeiro, which produced an outcome document that assessed progress on the MDGs and recommended a process for developing a global post-2015 development agenda. The intergovernmental processes established by the Rio conference were completed at the end of 2014, and a synthesis report by the U.N. Secretary-General on the post2015 sustainable development agenda was released in December 2014. The draft goals in that report are referred to as the sustainable development goals (SDGs), named after the process started in Rio de Janeiro. U.S. Role. The United States has engaged in the SDG development process primarily through Tony Pipa, U.S. Special Coordinator for the Post-2015 Development Agenda, working with the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. State Department documents suggest that the U.S. focus in SDG negotiations has been on country ownership, the | 7-5700 The Post-2015 Global Development Agenda inclusion of marginalized populations, data transparency, and the equality of women and girls, among other things. Congress does not have a direct role in development or adoption of the SDGs, but may have a significant role in funding programs designed to support the SDGs. Sustainable Development Goals. Negotiation documents identify 17 SDGs and 169 related targets. Several SDGs build upon the MDGs, raising the bar in areas where progress has been made, while others emphasize new priorities. Most notably, the SDGs include goals related to peace and justice, infrastructure, and equality that were not in the MDGs, and expand upon the goals related to extreme poverty and environmental protection. Figure 2. Draft Sustainable Development Goals While the expanded goals and shifting focus are cited by some experts as reflecting the inclusive consultation process and lessons learned from the MDGs about the complexity of development, critics assert that the consensus approach to developing the agenda may result in a product that is not specific enough to be implementable or realistic enough to be achievable. Some observers are also concerned that the concept of varying national targets may undermine accountability and that the key theme of the process, sustainability, is not well defined. After years of planning, the post-2015 agenda development process is anticipated to culminate with three events in late 2015. • On July 13, the Third International Conference on Financing for Development is to convene in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, where donors are expected to affirm their financial commitments to global development and provide funding targets and timetables, while developing countries may discuss how their tax and expenditure policies align with their development goals. • On September 25, the U.N. General Assembly is to convene in New York for a summit to adopt the final post-2015 global development agenda. • On November 30, global leaders are to convene in Paris at a United Nations Climate Change Conference to negotiate a global climate agreement, viewed by many as essential to implementation of the SDGs. The SDGs, if adopted, would take effect in January 2016. Issues for Congress Source: CRS analysis of content/documents/1579SDGs%20Proposal.pdf. Aside from the specific goals, there are a few general ways in which the SDGs appear to differ from the MDGs: • Universality. Whereas the MDGs were largely viewed as developed country priorities for the developing world, the SDGs are intended to be universal, developed through an unprecedented global outreach process and applying to all countries. This means that the United States and other developed countries will also be assessed for progress against the targets. • Country specific. While there are global targets, as with the MDGs, many proposed SDG targets would be established at the country level, allowing success to be relative to each country’s starting point and unique challenges. • Broader financing. The MDGs were largely intended to be donor financed, while the SDGs focus more on mobilizing domestic and private sector resources, though aid is still an important component. As the world’s leading donor of official development assistance, the United States will likely play a key role in funding SDG implementation. Most of this funding would be appropriated by Congress through annual State Department, Foreign Operations and Related Agencies appropriations legislation. Foreign aid funding is shaped by U.S. foreign policy and congressional priorities, and it is unclear how much influence, if any, the SDGs will have on U.S. funding priorities. U.S. foreign assistance programs already align with the proposed SDGs to a large degree, but there may be areas of disagreement, particularly with respect to climate change. Domestically, Congress may consider whether legislative action is appropriate to achieve the SDGs within the United States. Many of the proposed SDGs are of limited relevance in the United States, where, for example, the vast majority of citizens have access to food, education, sanitation services, and energy. However, the United States may not currently meet targets on proposed goals related to inequality within countries, inclusive and safe cities, and representation of women in legislatures, among others. Marian L. Lawson,, 7-4475 | 7-5700 IF10249