Army Corps Civil Works Funding: A Primer

link to page 1 link to page 2



May 12, 2014
Army Corps Civil Works Funding: A Primer
Overview
appropriations laws. The accompanying congressional
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is an agency in
reports, which are sometimes incorporated into law by
the Department of Defense with both military and civil
reference, often identify specific Corps projects to receive
works responsibilities. At the direction of Congress, the
appropriated funds. With the heightened attention to and
Corps plans, builds, operates, and maintains a range of
restrictions on congressionally directed spending, the
water resource and related recreation facilities. Its civil
projects identified in these reports have been limited largely
works responsibilities are principally to support navigation,
to the projects included in the President’s budget request
reduce flood and storm damage, and protect and restore
(i.e., new line items have not been added by Congress at the
aquatic ecosystems. The agency also has several water
project level). Since FY2010, congressional action on
resources regulatory responsibilities and issues multiple
Corps appropriations has generally been limited to (1)
types of permits. Congress typically funds Corps civil
alteration of the amounts requested for individual projects
works activities through annual Energy and Water
in the President’s request; and (2) provision of “additional
Development Appropriations acts. Congress often provides
funding” for sets of Corps activities that were not provided
more funds than requested by the Administration, as shown
for in the President’s Budget.
in Figure 1.
Prior to attention and restrictions on congressionally
Army Corps annual appropriations are increasingly
directed spending, much of the additional funding provided
directed to project operations and maintenance.
by Congress was designated for use on specific studies or
projects. More recently, Congress has provided “additional

funding” for sets of Corps activities, without identifying
specific projects. In doing so, Congress has provided
Figure 2 shows Corps funding by budget account since
guidance to the Administration on the types of projects that
FY2009. Funding for the Operations and Maintenance
should receive those funds and often requires the
(O&M) account has made up a growing portion of the
Administration to report back on which projects it selects to
Corps funds over this time, while the budget for the
receive these funds. “Additional funding” represented $777
Construction account has been reduced. Maintenance
million in FY2014 and $510 million in FY2012,
funding for harbor-related maintenance activities is funded
respectively representing 14% and 10% of the agency’s
in part from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund (HMTF).
budget in those years.
This trust fund receives revenues from taxes on waterborne
commercial cargo imports and on cruise ship passengers at
Figure 1. Annual Budget Request and Enacted
federally maintained ports. Similarly, roughly half of inland
Appropriations for Corps Civil Works
waterways construction appropriations are from the Inland
Waterways Trust Fund (IWTF), which receives the
proceeds of a fuel tax on barge fuel for vessels engaged in
commercial transport on designated waterways. While the
HMTF has a large surplus balance, the IWTF faces revenue
shortages that may prevent it from maintaining historical
levels of expenditures.
The nonfederal demand for and pace of congressional
authorization exceeds the agency’s construction funding.
The agency has roughly $60 billion in authorized new
construction and major rehabilitation work, while its
construction appropriations averaged $1.7 billion from
FY2010 to FY2014.

Source: Congressional Research Service, using Corps data.
Corps Funding Is Divided into Budget Accounts
Congress provides money to the Corps generally by
designating specific amounts for various budget accounts in
https://crsreports.congress.gov

link to page 2 link to page 2

Army Corps Civil Works Funding: A Primer
Figure 2. Corps Annual Appropriations by
Corps Annual Appropriations Have Been
Budget Account
Supplemented by Other Funds
Owing to storms and hurricanes, Congress in recent years
has regularly provided supplemental funds to the Corps for
its emergency response activities. The majority of the
supplemental funds were provided to the Corps Flood
Control and Coastal Emergencies (FCCE) account, with
supplemental funds also at times provided to the
Construction, O&M, and other accounts. These funds are
provided in addition to the annual appropriations shown in
Figure 2.

Since 1987, Congress has provided to the Corps
approximately $32.2 billion in supplemental appropriations.
Of this total, $30.8 billion has been provided since 2003;
this is about half of the agency’s $61.3 billion in total

Source: Congressional Research Service, using Corps data.
regular annual appropriations over the same period. The
majority of these supplemental appropriations funded Corps
Notes: Some smaller accounts have been grouped together.
flood-fighting activities, repairs, and storm damage
infrastructure investments (e.g., activities in response to the
FUSRAP = Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program.
2005 hurricanes including Hurricane Katrina, 2008
Army Corps Also Budgets by Business Line
Midwest floods, and 2011 Missouri and Mississippi floods).
In January 2013, Congress provided the Corps with $5.3
The Corps also organizes its funding by business line (i.e.,
billion in supplemental appropriations to respond to
type of activity), as shown in Figure 3. Navigation and
Hurricane Sandy’s landfall in 2012. Much of this funding is
flood and coastal storm damage reduction projects receive
expected to be available for construction projects over a
the majority of Corps appropriations. Navigation funding
multi-year horizon. (For detailed information on Corps
increased in enacted appropriations for FY2014, due in
supplemental spending, see CRS Report R42841, Army
large part to increased funding for Harbor Maintenance
activities. The Corps’ env
Corps Supplemental Appropriations: Recent History,
ironmental activities include
Trends, and Policy Issues, by Charles V. Stern and Nicole
aquatic ecosystem restoration, environmental stewardship,
T. Carter.)
and environmental remedial actions under the Formerly
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP).
Through FUSRAP, the Corps provides environmental
Charles V. Stern, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
remediation or control of sites involved in the early years of
Nicole T. Carter, Specialist in Natural Resources Policy
the U.S. nuclear weapons program.
IF10186
Figure 3. Corps Annual Civil Works Appropriations
by Business Line


Source: Congressional Research Service, using Corps data.

https://crsreports.congress.gov

Army Corps Civil Works Funding: A Primer



Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10186 · VERSION 2 · NEW