 
 
March 23, 2015
The Rule of Law in Mexico and the Mérida Initiative
Background 
Enrique Peña Nieto proposed 10 actions to improve the 
Mexico, a top U.S. trade partner and political ally, has 
rule of law. One of those actions was the 
mando único 
struggled to address violence and human rights abuses 
(unified command), a constitutional reform that would 
perpetrated by criminal groups and corrupt officials. 
remove the command of police forces from municipalities 
Mexico’s problems have been exacerbated by the weakness 
and place it at the state level. This plan aims to reduce 
of many of its criminal justice institutions. Homicides have 
police corruption and improve coordination with federal 
decreased from record levels recorded in 2011, but 
forces. However, some experts question the notion that state 
kidnappings, disappearances, and extrajudicial killings 
forces are any less corrupt and maintain that this change 
persist. On average, more than 90% of reported crimes in 
will not prevent abuses or strengthen accountability. No 
Mexico go unpunished. Recent cases have drawn attention 
constitutional reform has been passed; however, several 
to the particular problem of impunity for human rights 
states have begun implementation of that police model. 
abuses. Reducing impunity in Mexico is a key goal of 
Little progress has been made on the other proposals, such 
efforts under the Mérida Initiative, a bilateral initiative for 
as establishing a national emergency hotline. 
which Congress has appropriated close to $2.4 billion. 
President Peña Nieto also replaced Attorney General 
In October 2014, Mexico’s National Human Rights 
Jesus Murillo Karam with former Senator Arely Gomez 
Commission (CNDH) issued a report concluding that at 
in February 2015. Attorney General Gomez has stated that 
least 12 people had been killed execution-style by the 
there are still pending issues in the Iguala case and is 
Mexican military in Tlatlaya, Mexico on July 1, 2014. 
working with experts from the Inter-American Commission 
The military originally claimed that the victims were 
on Human Rights (IAHCR)
 on the investigation. IAHCR 
criminals killed in a confrontation with soldiers. This case 
also intends to help the Mexican government develop 
has resulted in criticism of not only the military and state 
search plans for missing persons and improve services for 
prosecutors but federal prosecutors who originally failed to 
victims’ families. 
investigate these allegations of extrajudicial killings. The 
CNDH also documented claims of torture of two witnesses 
In February 2015, the Chamber of Deputies passed 
to the killings by the military and prosecutors from the state 
several constitutional changes to create an anti-
of Mexico. A December 2014 report by the U.N. Special 
corruption system, but Senate approval of the system is 
Rapporteur on Torture revealed that the use of torture is 
pending. The reform creates special courts to hear cases of 
“generalized” in Mexico and has been used to coerce 
corruption and an independent federal audit office for 
confessions. Seven soldiers and one lieutenant have since 
administrative offenses. That office and a special prosecutor 
been arrested for their involvement.  
can investigate members of government and independent 
contractors.  
The still unresolved case of 43 missing students who 
disappeared in Iguala, Guerrero, in September 2014 has 
also drawn attention to the issues of extrajudicial killings, 
According to the World Economic Forum, corruption 
enforced disappearances, and impunity. The disappearance 
costs up to 9% of Mexico’s GDP every year. 
and likely killing of the students—which involved the local 
police, the Iguala mayor, and his wife—galvanized large 
 
protests in Mexico and around the world against corruption 
Judicial Reform. As per constitutional reforms enacted in 
and impunity. The U.N. Committee on Enforced 
2008, Mexico has until June 2016 to move from a closed-
Disappearances released a report in February 2015 stating 
door judicial system based on written arguments presented 
that enforced disappearances such as these are common in 
to a judge to an adversarial public trial system with oral 
Mexico and have at times involved  authorities. It also 
identified the “near inexistence” of convictions for such 
arguments and the presumption of innocence. These 
changes aim to make Mexico’s system more transparent 
disappearances.  
and impartial. Through alternative dispute resolution, the 
system can also become more flexible and efficient, 
ensuring that trials are reserved for serious crimes.
 With 
According to figures released by Mexico’s attorney 
only four states fully operating under the new system 
general’s office in January 2015, more than 23,270 
and 24 partially operating under the new system, 
people have disappeared in Mexico since 2007.  
significant work remains to be done. 
 
The Mérida Initiative 
Mexico’s Rule of Law Reforms 
The Obama Administration considers its relationship 
In response to criticisms of his handling of these 
with Mexico to be among its most important. The 
incidents, in November 2014, Mexican President 
development and implementation of the Mérida Initiative 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 

The Rule of Law in Mexico and the Mérida Initiative 
has resulted in a significant increase in U.S.-Mexican 
bar associations to modify curricula and technical standards 
security and rule of law (ROL) cooperation.  
to be consistent with the new system.  
Human Rights. USAID has provided some $5 million for 
prevention, protection, prosecution, and advocacy efforts, 
particularly for journalists and human rights defenders
. The 
agency is working with the Mexican government to 
strengthen its Protection Mechanism for Journalists and 
Human Rights Defenders, which has been criticized as 
weak and insufficient. USAID also works with civil society 
on issues such as the prevention of torture. 
Congressional Concerns 
Congress has expressed ongoing concerns about human 
rights conditions and the rule of law in Mexico. Congress 
has continued monitoring adherence to vetting 
requirements, conditioned U.S. assistance to the Mexican 
military and police on compliance with certain human 
rights standards, and provided funding to support human 
rights training for security forces and to protect groups 
 
vulnerable to human rights abuses. Congress has also 
periodically withheld aid pending concerns about human 
Most ROL programs have been implemented by the State 
rights. The Obama Administration has requested $119 
Department, along with the U.S. Agency for International 
million for the Mérida Initiative for FY2016. As Congress 
Development (USAID). The Department of Justice’s (DOJ) 
considers that request and oversees the Mérida Initiative, 
Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance 
questions for oversight might include: 
and Training (OPDAT) and International Criminal 
Investigative Assistance Training Program are also 
  How is Mexico complying with the human rights 
supporting Mexico’s transition to a new justice system. 
conditions on Mérida Initiative funds that prohibit 
torture and require action to find missing persons? 
Police Training. The State Department has supported 
police training at both the federal and state levels. Capacity 
  Should additional conditions be added? 
building for law enforcement has been provided in a wide 
  Federal police have been vetted and trained by the State 
range of basic and specialized topics such officer safety, 
Department yet continue to have problems with 
crime scene preservation, investigation techniques, and 
corruption. How can Mérida aid be used to strengthen 
intelligence-gathering. The State Department is also 
ongoing internal and external accountability 
supporting Mexican efforts to professionalize law 
mechanisms for federal, state, and municipal police? 
enforcement by improving police recruitment, training, and 
professional career path development. DOJ has provided 
  How are OPDAT and USAID coordinating and 
training to agents of the PGR’s Criminal Investigations 
measuring the effectiveness of their training programs? 
Agency to better prepare them for their role in carrying out 
  Is U.S. training reaching all of the actors that need to be 
investigations in an accusatorial system.
  
trained in order for the new oral system to function 
(such as forensic experts, defense attorneys, and 
Judicial Sector Training (Federal and State). OPDAT 
judges)? 
efforts have focused on preparing prosecutors, judges, and 
other justice sector actors for the new accusatorial system. 
  Are USAID’s human rights programs effective? If so, 
Specialized training programs in anti-money laundering, 
should they receive additional funding? 
trafficking in persons, and anti-kidnapping within the new 
For more information, see CRS Report R41349, 
U.S.-
system are also being developed. The State Department is 
Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Initiative and 
also providing equipment and technical assistance to 
Beyond. 
prepare courtrooms in a number of states to host oral trials.
 
Ingrid Schulz, Research Associate, contributed to this 
USAID has invested an estimated $76 million in assistance 
product. 
of judicial reform implementation at both the federal and 
state levels. This assistance includes promotion of increased 
Clare Ribando Seelke, Specialist in Latin American 
prosecutorial efficiency, strengthened analytical and quality 
control capacity of justice sector institutions, and increased 
Affairs   
access to justice and improved victim’s assistance. USAID 
IF10160
also supports training for private lawyers, professors, and 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
The Rule of Law in Mexico and the Mérida Initiative 
 
 
 
Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10160 · VERSION 5 · NEW