The Civilian Marksmanship Program

This document also available in PDF Image . The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) was initiated by Congress in the early 1900s. Throughout much of its existence as a government-sponsored and funded organization, little controversy surrounded the program, and in fact, it was (and remains today) a popular program among sportsmen, collectors, and various other groups. However, since the 1980s, with gun control becoming a key political issue, the CMP has been surrounded with contention (so much so that Congress made it a private, autonomous entity in October 1996). Some of the issues are: The M1 rifle. One amenity offered by the CMP to its affiliates is the opportunity to purchase the semi-automatic, M1 Garand rifle. Considered to be a collector's item by many sportsmen and gun collectors, the M1 rifle has not been used by the U.S. military since 1957. Gun control advocates have argued that this program is a "million dollar gun giveaway" by the government, voicing concern that the CMP is providing military weapons to the general public. Those in favor of the CMP's sale of the weapons respond that in order to purchase an M1 through the CMP, one must go through a much more rigorous process than those who purchase weapons in the market, in fact a rigorous form of gun control. Other issues surrounding the sale of the M1 rifle exist as well. Affiliation with the National Rifle Association. Some advocates of gun control have argued that the CMP is a front for the NRA. Although a supporter of the CMP, the NRA exists separate from the CMP, and members of one program are not required to participate in the other. By the nature of their existence, however, the two groups do interact with one another. The similarities the two organizations share have caused alarm among gun control advocates. Anti-government groups. Critics of the CMP claim that it is connected to paramilitary, anti-government organizations. Though the possibility for this does exist, it is highly unlikely, given the rigorous background check one must go through when applying to purchase weapons or participate. Under law, participants must submit an affidavit to participate in any programs either sponsored or supported by the CMP. Privatization of the CMP. With the privatization of the CMP in October 1996, Congress removed the government from its sponsorship of a citizens' military training program. However, because of the extensive ammunition and weapons that the Army still "holds" for the CMP, and because of the fact that these weapons were given to the program at the time of its privatization, the question of the government's role has now become an issue.



















































EveryCRSReport.com
The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.
EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to al Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.
Prior to our republication, we redacted names, phone numbers and email addresses of analysts
who produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentional y made
any other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.
CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.
Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.
EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.