This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
Congress has debated various measures to generate additional funds for the National Park System in light of a large backlog of deferred maintenance on system lands. One option under discussion has been to raise park entrance fees for international visitors, in line with policies of some other nations that assess different national park fees for domestic versus international visitors. On July 3, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order (E.O.EO) 14314, which directed the Secretary of the Interior to increase specified National Park Service (NPS) fees for "nonresidents" of the United States" and also directed a price increase for multiagency passes sold to nonresidents. In response to the E.O.EO, NPS announced international visitornonresident fee increases that began on January 1, 2026. Some bills in the 119th Congress also would authorize fee surcharges for international visitors to U.S. national parks and other federal lands that began on January 1, 2026. Congress may evaluate the fee increases and their implementation. Also, Congress could consider bills introduced in the 119th Congress related to park entrance fees and passes for international visitors.
E.O.EO 14314 directed the Secretary of the Interior to "appropriately" increase NPS "entrance fees and recreation pass fees for nonresidents," in order to "increase revenue and improve the recreational experience at national parks." The E.O.EO also directed the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture, working together, to take steps to increase the price nonresidents pay for the America the Beautiful—National Parks and Federal Recreational Lands Pass (ATB pass), which provides access to recreational lands ofmanaged by multiple federal agencies, including NPS.
The E.O.EO directed that the revenues generated from these changes be used to improve infrastructure and enhance enjoyment of or access to federal recreational areasor access, consistent with fee use provisions (16 U.S.C. §6807) in the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA). FLREA authorizes NPS and other agencies to charge entrance and/or recreation fees on federal recreational lands and to set fee levels according to specified criteria. FLREA also authorizes the establishment and sale of the ATB pass. The act directs the use of fee and pass revenues for certain purposes to benefit visitors, such as facility repair and maintenance, interpretation, and visitor services. Under FLREA, an individual park unit or other federal site generally retains at least 80% of revenues generated at that site from fees and pass sales.
Among its additional provisions, the E.O.EO directed a review of the NPS maintenance backlog and actions to "fully implement" infrastructure investments, including those funded through the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund (LRF; 54 U.S.C. Chapter 2004). Also, the Secretary of the Interior must ensure that NPS gives U.S. residents "preferential treatment" (consistent with applicable law) for permits, lotteries, and other types of recreational access.
In the 119th Congress, S. 2308 and H.R. 4604 would amend FLREA to authorize entrance fee surcharges for "international visitors" to National Park System units. The surcharges could be established at individual park units in an amount that "maximizes revenue ... while retaining international visitation." Revenues from the surcharges would be retained at the park unit and could be used for "maintenance, visitor services, staffing, and related needs." The bills also would direct the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to establish a surcharge for the sale of multiagency ATB passes to international visitors, with proceeds to be deposited into the LRF.
On November 25, 2025, the Department of the Interior (DOI) announced it would increase the fees charged to non-U.S. residentsnonresidents for both multiagency ATB passes and park-specific entrance fees to 11 national parks (Acadia, Bryce Canyon, Everglades, Glacier, Grand Canyon, Grand Teton, Rocky Mountain, Sequoia & Kings Canyon, Yellowstone, Yosemite, and Zion). The price increases took effect on January 1, 2026. The nonresident price for the ATB pass is $250 (as compared with $80 for a resident ATB pass), and the nonresident entrance fee for the 11 parks is an additional $100 per person on top of those parks' standard entrance fees (e.g., $35 per private vehicle).
In the 119th Congress, H.R. 9250 (as ordered reported by the House Committee on Natural Resources) and S. 1547 (as reported by the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources) would amend FLREA by directing NPS to establish entrance fee surcharges at its fee-collecting units for "foreign tourists" (H.R. 9250) or "nonresident visitors" (S. 1547). The Secretary of the Interior would be required to determine surcharge amounts that maximize revenue for the NPS unit while retaining international visitation. The surcharge revenues would be deposited in the LRF for deferred maintenance of five federal agencies' assets, under specified conditions (similar but not identical for the House and Senate versions). Other bills, S. 2308 and H.R. 4604, also would authorize NPS surcharges and would further direct a surcharge for multiagency ATB passes. Under these bills, NPS units would retain the surcharges from individual park entrance fees, with ATB pass surcharges deposited in the LRF.
Revenue Potential from Fee SurchargesIn general, potential revenue from fee surcharges for international visitors to the National Park System has been challenging to project, because NPS has not collected systematic data on numbers of international park visitors. The International Trade Administration surveyed a sample of the 48.3 million international air travelers visiting the United States in 2024 and found that 33% of those surveyed visited "national parks and monuments." (It is unclear whether all these visits were to the National Park System, since some national monuments are managed by other agencies.) For comparison, total park system visits in 2024 were estimated at 331.9In 2025, the International Trade Administration (ITA) surveyed passengers on a random sample of scheduled flights departing the United States to overseas or Mexican destinations and found that 31% of those surveyed reported visiting "national parks and monuments." (The ITA estimated 46.4 million international air travelers in total visiting the United States in 2025.) For comparison, total park system recreation visitors in 2025 were estimated at 323.0 million. Yellowstone National Park conducted summer visitor use surveys in 2016, 2018, and 2024, which found that international visitors to that park constituted 17% of total summer visitors in 2016, 30% in 2018, and 15% in 2024. The percentage of visitors coming from foreign countries could belikely is higher at some parks than others across the system—among other reasons, because some parks may be especially well-known internationally.
The 2026 fee increases may provide new data on international visitation to parks and on revenue amounts realized by the new surcharges. The lack of prior data on international visitation could make it difficult to assess whether the fee increases may have any negative impact on international visitor numbers. Some researchers have found price elasticity of demand for national parks to be relatively low, meaning that "considerable increases in entry fees would be needed to reduce visitor numbers substantially" (Eco-Environment & Health, June 2025). One recent study of Yellowstone National Park projected the park would see revenue benefits from a $100 international visitor surcharge despite a small dampening effect on international visitation (using assumptions about the proportional cost of the surcharge to the international visitor's overall travel costs).
To implement the differential pricing, NPS is requiring Congress is considering bills, discussed above, to require NPS entrance fee surcharges for international visitors (and in some bills, also surcharges for multiagency ATB passes). Separately, the Trump Administration has implemented surcharges for 11 parks and for the ATB pass. It is unclear how any pending legislation, if enacted, would interact with the fee changes already implemented administratively (for instance, whether any legislatively directed fees would replace or add to the current surcharges). Under H.R. 9250 and S. 1547, the NPS surcharges generally would go into the LRF for deferred maintenance of multiple agencies' assets, whereas the administratively established surcharges for the 11 parks currently are retained by NPS under FLREA. Congress may consider which international visitors would be affected by the different bills compared with the current administrative surcharges. For instance, H.R. 9250, as ordered reported, and S. 1547, as reported, define the affected population differently. H.R. 9250 would apply the fee to "foreign tourists," which the bill defines as individuals age 16 or older traveling on B visas or without a visa under the Visa Waiver Program. S. 1547 would apply the fee to "nonresident visitors," which would be broader than the population covered by H.R. 9250, in that it would include anyone without lawful permanent resident status or U.S. citizenship (e.g., tourists, foreign students, and temporary workers). resident ATB pass holders to show a U.S. passport, U.S. driver's license or state ID, or permanent resident card ("green card") when entering parksU.S. residents with ATB passes to show a photo ID when entering parks to confirm eligibility for the resident pass. For non-ATB pass holders entering the 11 parks with individual surcharges, news reports have cited internal NPS guidance directing park staff to verbally ask about U.S. residency for fee purposes. Previously, NPS staff did not check U.S. residency at park entrance points (although ATB pass holders had to show photo ID to verify pass ownership). The new requirements haveinitially led to some reports of delays at park entrances, which could exacerbate existing concerns about overcrowding and long entrance lines at parks. DOI officials reportedly have stated have stated that staffing and traffic flow will be monitored to address any issues.
Issues for Congress
that staffing and traffic flow will be monitored to address any issues. Separately, some Members of Congress have questioned whether residency information collected at park entrances would be stored and whether it would be accessible by other agencies.
Many units of the National Park System do not charge entrance or recreation fees, and a consideration could be whether the international visitor surcharge will benefit non-fee-charging park units. To the extent that E.O. 14314 is interpreted to apply FLREA's provisions for revenue distribution, that law allows for a portion of fee and pass revenues (typically 20%) to be available for agency-wide expenditures, and NPS has used these funds to address visitor needs at non-fee-charging park units. For ATB passes not purchased at a specific site (e.g., purchased online), FLREA provides for revenues to be shared according to interagency agreements. Some stakeholders have proposed alternative distributions for the international visitor fees; for example, S. 2308 and H.R. 4604 would provide that all proceeds from the NPS surcharge on international visitors would be retained at the unit collecting the surcharge, and revenues from the surcharge on ATB pass sales would be deposited in the LRF, which provides deferred maintenance funding for multiple agencies.
Congress could consider whether to conduct oversight of NPS's implementation of E.O. 14314, such as assessing revenue amounts and uses, collection strategies, or impacts on international visitation. For instance, some Members of Congress have questioned whether DOI's decisionmaking process for the fee increases complied with requirements in FLREA (16 U.S.C. §6803) to seek public input on fee change proposals. FLREA requires federal officials to "provide the public with opportunities to participate in the development or changing of a recreation fee" (such as by providing advance notice in local newspapers). Others have questioned whether FLREA's fee-setting criteria allow for a surcharge on international visitors. Congress could consider whether to explicitly address international visitor surcharges in statute, either by authorizing them (e.g., as proposed in S. 2308 and H.R. 4604) or by prohibiting them. Alternatively, Congress could rely on current authorities as sufficient for agency interpretation.
Some Members of Congress have have expressed concern that the fee increases will result in fewer international visitors to national parks. As discussed, it could be difficult to assess any changes and to measure compliance with some of the bills' requirements (such as the requirement to "retain" international visitation) because of a lack of baseline data on international visitors to NPS parks. Some contend that fees like the current $100 surcharge imposed by NPS, while high compared to park fees for U.S. residents, represent a small portion of the overall costs of a U.S. vacation for most international travelers.
Some also have expressed concernexpressed concern that the fee increases will result in fewer international visitors to national parks. There is also concern that these increases, combined with other recent policy changes affecting travel to the United States, may exacerbate a decline inin U.S. tourism more broadly. For example, the FY2025 budget reconciliation act (P.L. 119-21) increased costs for international visitors to the United States, including by adding a new (potentially reimbursable) $250 "visa integrity fee" and raising admission fees and fees under the Department of Homeland Security's Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA, a requirement for those traveling under the Visa Waiver Program). In addition, the Trump Administration has implemented visitor visa bonds of up to $15,000 for nationals of 3850 countries (to date), reduced the visa validity periodperiod for many countries, and suspended the entry of travelers from 39 countries.imposed a "travel ban" on nationals of 39 countries. (For more information and a map of countries affected, see CRS Report IR10004, Nationality-Based Immigration Restrictions.) Because visa fees typically are based on the principle of reciprocity, another question could beconcern is whether other countries would impose additional fees for Americans traveling abroad.
In the 116th Congress, S. 2783 proposed an alternative approach to raise revenue for the National Park System from international tourism. This billIt would have increased fees for U.S. tourist visas and ESTA and would have deposited the additional revenue in a new fund to address NPS's "priority deferred maintenance needs." Such an approach could be preferred by some over an entrance fee increase, because it would not require NPS to validate U.S. residency at park entrance stations. By imposing charges on all international visitors to the United States (rather than just those who visit national parks), it also could potentially raise more revenue, although it could be seen as unfairly charging nonusers of the park system.
As another alternative, some stakeholders have proposed to supplement NPS funding by raising fees for all park visitors, as opposed to just international travelers. Under FLREA's authorities, NPS has periodically implemented fee changes across the park system, for example,such as in 2018. (Individual park units also may alter fees absent a system-wide initiative.) A 2017 proposal to more than double peak-season fees at some parks drew opposition (including from some Members of Congress) based on concerns about the affordability of park visits for Americans with varying income levels. The proposal also generated support from some stakeholders based on the potential for the increased fee revenues to address deferred maintenance and improve visitor services in the National Park System.