< Back to Current Version

U.S. Strategic Bombers

Changes from January 6, 2026 to July 31, 2026

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


U.S. Strategic Bombers
Updated January 6July 31, 2026 (IF12945)

The U.S. Air Force deploys three strategic (or heavy) bombers—the B-52, B-1B, and B-2—to carry bombs or air-to-surface missiles for conventional and nuclear missions. Bombers carry heavy ordnance loads across long distances, for longextended periods of time, to strike adversary targets of tactical and strategic importance. The Air Force is also developing a new B-21 strategic bomber as thea next-generation stealth aircraft to conduct nuclear missions and as a component of a conventional family of systems including electronic attack, communications, and other systems. Congress authorizes and appropriates funds for, and conducts oversight of, Department of Defense (DOD) and Air Force development, acquisition, maintenance, and manning of the U.S. bomber fleet, as well as the nuclear weapons carried by these aircraft.

For FY2027, the Air Force requested $6.1 billion in discretionary funding for the B-21 bomber program. The service requested $3.1 billion in discretionary funding and $125 million in mandatory funding for B-52, B-1B, and B-2 upgrades and support.

Conventional and Nuclear Missions

The role of bombers has evolved over time. During World War II, the United States developed new bomber types and produced tens of thousands of bombers. A combined conventional bomber offensive with the United Kingdom from 1942 to 1945 aimed to destroy the German military industrial and economic system. In August 1945, on the orders of U.S. President Harry Truman, U.S. B-29 heavy bombers delivered the "only nuclear weapons ever used in combat" on targets in Japan. During the Cold War, reports about Soviet bomber prowess spurred the United States to increase defense spending and build up its bomber fleet.

Today, bombers are an essential component ofsupport one of the U.S. Air Force's core conventional functions: air superiority, or—that is, the degree of control of an airspace that allows for operations without interference from adversarial air and missile threats. Bombers aid the air superiority mission by providing the ability to carry out long-range precision strikestrikes.

The 2022 U.S. Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), the most recent version of a periodic executive branch review of U.S. nuclear policies, reaffirmed bombers as an integral part of the U.S. nuclear "triad" that also includes long-range land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and long-range submarine-launched ballistic missiles. The 2018 NPR stated that "heavy bombers are the most flexible and visible leg of the triad." The 2010 NPR stated that "heavy bombers can be visibly forward deployed, thereby signaling U.S. resolve and commitment in crisis."

The United States has periodically stationed bombers in allied countries, conducted continuous patrols, or maintained bombers on alert status. In 2018, Air Force Global Strike Command began Bomber Task Force deployments, which involve bomber flights to allied nations around the world to take part in patrols and exercises to "assure allies and deter adversaries." Since 2020, the command has refined the use of Agile Combat Employment of bombers to expand the number of bases from which bombers can operate, to include demonstrating the ability to land at civilian airfields.

The U.S. Strategic Bomber Fleet

B-52 Stratofortress

The B-52, which entered service in 1955, is a long-range heavy bomber that can fly 8,800 miles without refueling. Known as the Stratofortress, the B-52 can conduct conventional and nuclear bombing missions (or, it is i.e., dual-capable), offensive counter-air operations, and maritime surveillance and mine-laying operations. The B-52 can carry 70,000 lb.pounds of ordnance. Boeing built 744 B-52s, delivering the last H-model B-52 in 1962, and the. The Air Force plans to extend the life of the remaining 74 aircraft76 aircraft into the 2040s. The aircraft are based at Barksdale AFBAir Force Base (AFB) in Louisiana and Minot AFB in North Dakota.

According to DOD, 46a 2022 Department of State fact sheet (the most recent available), 46 B-52 aircraft are capable of carrying nuclear weapons. These nuclear-capable B-52s are equipped to carry air-launched cruise missiles (ALCMs) armed with the W80-1 warhead. The Air Force has stated that it is planning to replaceis developing a replacement for the aging ALCMs with a new advanced Long-Range Standoff (LRSO) cruise missile. The Air Force noted its plans to buy 1,087 LRSO missiles. The Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is extending the life of the W80 warhead to provide a warhead for the LRSO. Section 1626 of the FY2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) (for Fiscal Year 2025 (NDAA; P.L. 118-159) permitted the Air Force to reconvert for nuclear missions B-52 bombers that were modified to carry outmodified for conventional-only missions in accordance with the U.S.-Russian 2010 New START Treaty and mandated an Air Force report on the cost of a one-third increase in the LRSO planned purchase, which expired in February 2026.

The Air Force is in the midst ofundertaking two B-52 upgrade projects. The B-52 Commercial Engine Replacement Program (CERP) seeks to create a new version of the aircraft—the B-52J—with eight Rolls Royce F-130 engines and other design changes that were finalized in April 2026. The service anticipates modernizing 51 B-52s to J models by FY2032 and the remaining 23 aircraft in FY2033. The B-52 Radar Modernization Program (RMP) is an upgradedesigned to allow the aircraft to track moving surface and air targets to include hypersonic weapons. In 2025, the RMP incurred a significant Nunn-McCurdy cost breach. The first B-52 with the RMP flew to Edwards AFB for testing in December 2025.

crashed in June 2026, killing eight crew members. The Air Force is reportedly modifying a second test aircraft.

B-1B Lancer

The B-1B was designed to be a dual-capable bomber and the successor to the B-52. DODThe Department of Defense (DOD, which is "using a secondary Department of War designation" under Executive Order 14347, dated September 5, 2025) declared that the B-1B had reached initial operational capability (IOC) in 1986. During the 1990s, under the U.S.-Russian Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), the United States converted the B-1B to conventional missions. The B-1B can carry a 75,000 lb.-pound payload—the largest conventional weapons load in the U.S. Air Force's inventory, which includes—including general -purpose and precision-guided munitions. The B-1B conducts a variety of bomber task force and training missions. The 7th Bomb Wing,7th Bomb Wing based at Dyess AFB, in Texas;, and the 28th Bomb Wing from Ellsworth AFB, in South Dakota, operate the B-1B. As of April 2024, theThe Air Force reportedly had 45has 44 B-1Bs, down from an original fleet of 100. Congress has written provisions to limit retirementretirement of the B-1, which is sustained by Boeing. Section 146 of the FY2026 NDAA (P.L. 119-60) extends to 2030 a prior prohibition on reductions to the B-1B fleet. The B-1B conducts a variety of bomber task force and training missions.

Air Force plans to retain the B-1B through 2037. Section 151 of the House-passed FY2027 NDAA (H.R. 8800) would mandate an Air Force report on the feasibility of restoring the B-1B's capability to carry nuclear weapons.

B-2 Spirit

The B-2 is a dual-capable multi-role heavy bomber, powered by four engines. It. The aircraft is considered a stealthy, (or low-observable,) aircraft in that its design and materials limit its ability to be detected by enemy radar. For example, the B-2's flying wing design, or—its triangular shape, composite materials, and coating reduce its radar cross section so it canto penetrate air defenses. ItThe B-2 can carry a payload of 40,000 lbpounds. The B-2aircraft made its first flight in 1989 and began initial operations in 1997. The Air Force has 20 B-2 bombers based at Whiteman AFB in Missouri.

According to DOD, all B-2s are nuclear-capable. The B-2 can carry B61 and B83 nuclear gravity bombs, but it and is not equipped to carry cruise missiles. In 2025, NNSA said that it completedcompleted the B61-12 life-extension program. NNSA is developing a new B61-13 bomb, which, according to DOD, would give the President "additional options against certain harder and large-area military targets" as itthe Pentagon "works to retire" the B83. The B-2 is also certified to carry conventional munitions, including the GBU-57 Long Range Anti-Ship Missile and the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, which is , designed to defeat hard and deeply buried targets.

The Air Force continues to modernize the B-2. In 2024, Northrop Grumman won a contract of up to $7 billion through 2029 to maintain and improve B-2 stealth and communications capabilities, engines, and displays.

B-21 Raider

The B-21 is a dual-capable penetrating-strike stealth bomber, currently in development. The B-21 is similar to the B-2, but slightly smaller, with a distinctive beak domed center. The Air Force has designed the B-21 with an open -systems architecture to allow for faster new software integration. The Air Force saysplans for the B-21 will be able to "employ a broad mix of stand-off and direct-attack munitions." The B-21 is expected to carry the LRSO and gravity bombs. Air Force officials have reportedly said that the B-21 could fly without a human crew but that the current focus is on crewed operations. The Air Force has indicated it , although the service is focusing on operations with a two-pilot crew. In 2026, the Air Force and the aircraft's prime contractor, Northrop Grumman, announced plans to expand B-21 production capacity. The Air Force has plans to buy at least 100 B-21 aircraft that would begin entering the force in the mid-2020s, which are scheduled to begin arriving at Ellsworth AFB by 2027. The Air Force has approved Whiteman AFB and Dyess AFB as B-21 bases.

The Air Force has projected that the B-21 would cost $550 million apiece in 2010 dollars, based on the purchase of 100 aircraft. The B-21 A B-21 test flight aircraft has flown more than 200 sorties on a "flying test bed," and intest flights. In September 2025, the Air Force received a second flight-test aircraft. Prime contractor Northrop Grumman in late 2024 received a second low-rate initial production award. In FY2026, the Air Force requested $5.8 billion in discretionary funding and assumed $4.5 billion in mandatory funding available through FY2029 from the FY2025 reconciliation act (P.L. 119-21). In June 2026, the Air Force began operational testing concurrently with developmental testing. Section 150 of the FY2026 NDAA (P.L. 119-60), directsrequired annual assessments of the B-21's cost, schedule, and performance. Section 1634 directs set deadlines for the Air Force to certify and employ the LRSO on the B-21.

Potential Issues for Congress

Sizing the bomber fleet and the Air Force budget. The 2023 Final Report of the Congressional Commission on the Strategic Posture of the United States (Strategic Posture Commission, or SPC) recommended purchasing additional B-21 aircraft and supporting tanker aircraft. In March 2025, Commander of the U.S. Strategic Command (STRATCOM) testified to Congress of the potential need for 145 B-21s. Some experts sayIn April 2026, some Members of Congress supported increasing the B-21 fleet. Reports accompanying the committee-reported versions of an FY2027 NDAA (H.Rept. 119-698 and S.Rept. 119-127, respectively) directed DOD to report on B-21 force structure. Some experts have said that the Air Force needs at least 200 stealth bombers. Some cite, citing the high operational tempo of Bomber Task Forcesbomber task forces, especially for the aging bomber fleet, as a reason for future increased bomber acquisition. Others also note that. Operation Midnight Hammer, the June 2025 U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, relied on a significant portion of theseven of 20 U.S. B-2 stealth bomber forcebombers for strikes. Others were reportedly used as decoys. Section 151 of the FY2026 NDAA (P.L. 119-60) requiresrequired the Air Force to submit to Congressthe congressional defense committees a bomber aircraft force structure and transition roadmap. Members may draw on the results of this report to decide whether or not to authorize and appropriate funding for B-21s and, if so, how many, and whether to sustain and or upgrade the rest of the bomber fleet.

Re-alerting bombers. Unlike during the Cold War, U.S. bombers do not carry nuclear weapons day-to-day. Some Air Force officials have said that re-alerting bombers could increase demands on manpower and infrastructure. Section 1651 of the FY2022 NDAA (P.L. 117-81) requested the Air Force study the costs and impacts of re-alerting "in the absence" of ICBMs. The SPC report recommended that the Air Force plan and prepare for some "future" U.S. bombers to "be on continuous alert status." Members may consider whether the study mandated in the FY2022 NDAA provides sufficient information on the costs and impacts of alerting.

Base hardening. Some outside analysts and

Modernization of nuclear-capable bomber basing. The Air Force is upgrading and increasing the number of bomber bases capable of storing nuclear weapons. According to 2024 testimony of then-U.S. Strategic Command Commander Air Force General Anthony Cotton, Whiteman AFB, Minot AFB, Barksdale AFB, Ellsworth AFB, and Dyess AFB will host new weapons generation facilities. S.Rept. 119-127 requests an Air Force briefing on the potential reactivation of nuclear facilities at Grand Forks AFB in North Dakota.

Base security and hardening. The Air Force has sought to improve base protection against uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) and missile threats. Whiteman AFB is one of five bases participating in a directed-energy counter-UAS pilot program. Some Members have argued for base hardening and "passive defenses Air Force officials reportedly have raised the possibility of base hardening to improve protection against potential uncrewed aerial systems or missile strikes with improved logistics and reinforced shelters. Some Members of Congress have argued for such hardening and "passive defenses," in the Indo-Pacific. Members may consider whether or not to provide funding to bolster the infrastructure at its main operating bases and whether to also do sopotentially at smaller airfields to support theforce dispersion of forces.