< Back to Current Version

Millennium Challenge Corporation

Changes from January 17, 2025 to September 10, 2026

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


https://crsreports.congress.gov

Updated January 17, 2025

Millennium Challenge Corporation

Overview Millennium Challenge Corporation

Updated September 10, 2026 (IF12850)
The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) is an independent agency established in 2004 by the Millennium Challenge Act (Title VI of Division D, P.L. 108-199). Congress). It was created MCC amid intense congressional debate over U.S. foreign aid effectiveness. MCC reflects some views that emerged from that debate, with features such as the following:

Singular Mission. Congress created MCC to focus

exclusively on economic growth and poverty reduction, refraining from setting sectoral or geographic priorities.

debate over U.S. foreign aid effectiveness. Some MCC features reflect key elements of that debate:

  • Singular Mission. Congress created MCC to focus solely on global development, refraining from directing MCC to focus on select sectors, regions, or initiatives.
  • Competitive Selection. MCC is to select countries

    through "objective and quantifiable indicators,” rewarding well-governed poor countries where MCC may produce sustained, substantial poverty reduction.

    Country Ownership. " awarding funds in comparatively well-governed poor countries assessed as promising opportunities for reducing poverty. Country-Led Programs. Recipients must design and implement MCC activitiesRecipients must design and

    implement their own programs, under MCC oversight.

    Fixed Timeline. MCC obligates all funds upon program

    approval and strictly limits implementation timelines.

    Evidence and Openness. MCC subjects programs to

    extensive evaluation and releases nearly all reporting and congressional notifications publicly.

    For more information on MCC, see CRS Report RL32427, Millennium Challenge Corporation: Overview and Issues.

    Selection MCC awards assistance through a competitive annual selection process based on countries' performance on a quantitative “scorecard”"scorecard" of indicators sourced from third-party organizations. The Board of Directors chooses countries in a three-step process, usually between August and December, and is currently making selections for FY2025.

    in the fall, and is nearing its selection cycle for FY2027.

    Candidacy. Countries are “candidates”"candidates" if their per capita gross national income (GNI) is below the World Bank’s lower-middle-income threshold ($4,515 for FY2025's threshold for beginning negotiations to graduate from assistance ($8,105 for FY2027) and if they are not prohibited from receiving U.S. foreign aid.

    Scorecards. MCC issues a scorecard for every country under the GNI threshold, including prohibited countries. Countries pass or fail on each of 2022 indicators, organized by three themes: investing in people, economic freedom, and ruling justly. Countries pass by outperforming the median in their income group (low-income and, lower-middle- , and upper-middle-income) for most indicators, but some have a set minimum value. Countries must meet three minimum “hard hurdles” forFor the Boardboard to consider them for a compact: pass more than half of the indicators, meet a minimum score on one of the two democracy indicators (civil liberties and political

    rights), and, countries must pass 11 indicators and clear two "hard hurdles": meet a minimum score on a "personal freedom" indicator and either surpass the median on a control of corruption indicator.

    or meet a minimum score for government accountability.

    Selection. MCC’s Board's board reviews countries’ scorecards alongside other factors, such as MCC’s budget availability, candidates' track record with previous compacts (if any), potential impact on poverty, and the country's governance trajectory, among other factors.

    Programs and—since 2025—opportunities to advance "America First" priorities.

    Programs

    MCC offers two types of programs for selected countries. MCC's flagship program is the compact, a five-year grant agreement generally valued between $100- million and $700 million. Partner governments develop and implement compacts under MCC guidelines and oversight. First, countries perform a "growth diagnostic," an analysis of the principal constraints (usually one to three) to faster economic growth and poverty reduction. Countries select constraint(s) andthen propose corresponding projects to MCC’s Board's board. If the Boardboard approves, MCC and the partner country sign a compact. Compacts do not launch immediately. A usually years-long interim periodAn interim period usually lasting years follows, during which countries continue preparatory activities to make implementation feasible within five years. The Board may deselect countriesboard may retract eligibility during this period if governance erodes.

    Compacts generally invest in hard physical infrastructure and incorporate complementary, complemented by policy reforms and administrative capacity-building. As with broader U.S. development aid, sub-Saharan Africa is a top MCC focus region (Figure 1). Transport and energy are the top sectors.

    Figure 1. MCC Compacts, 2004-2024 By sector focus and by region, by dollar value

    building. Sub-Saharan Africa has been the top MCC recipient region to date (Figure 1), but new country selections in 2025 were exclusively outside of Africa. Transport and energy are the top sectors. Since its creation, MCC has signed 50 compacts in 33 countries worth over $18 billion. Not all have been fully implemented.

    Figure 1. MCC Compacts, 2004-2026

    Sector and region distribution, by dollar value

    Source: MCC budget request, FY2025FY2027; CRS analysis of MCC data.

    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    https://crsreports.congress.gov

    Note: Signed compacts as of September 2024; data do not reflect terminated compacts or de-obligations after signature Notes: Does not reflect terminations or funding cuts. Figures may not sum to 100% due to rounding.

    As of September 30, 2024, eight countries were actively implementing compacts: Côte d’Ivoire, Mongolia, Senegal, Nepal, Lesotho, Kosovo, Malawi, and Indonesia, in order of launch. MCC had signed but not yet launched compacts with four other countries (Timor-Leste, Benin, Mozambique, and Belize). Since its creation, MCC has signed 45 compacts in 32 countries worth over $17 billion, although not all have been fully implemented.

    MCC provides smaller threshold programs to pilot partnerships with countries on the cusp of passing their scorecards. These programs, generally with budgets of tens of millions of dollars, target an issue likely to feature in a future compact and are used by MCC to test a country’svalued between $10 and $60 million, target issues of likely focus in a compact. MCC uses them to test countries' ability to run a full compact. MCC countries have implemented 32 threshold programs to date, with programs ongoing in Togo, The Gambia, the Solomon Islands, Kenya, and Kiribati as of September 30, 2024. Mauritania, Tanzania, and the Philippines are developing thresholdshas funded 32 threshold programs to date.

    Organization The MCC Boardboard is vested with all decisionmaking power. A Chief Executive Officer leads day-to-day operations and reports to the Boardboard. For all compacts and thresholds, the Board makes selections, approves the agreementsthreshold programs, the board selects countries, approves programs, and may suspend or terminate activities. The Board consists of five, guided by statutory criteria. The board has nine seats. Five are government officials: the Secretaries of State (chair) and the Treasury (vice chair), the U.S. Trade Representative, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Administrator, and MCC's CEO—and. The President is to nominate four private sector members nominated by the Presidentfor Senate confirmation from lists submitted by the Majority and Minority Leaders of Congress’s two chambers. The Senate must confirm Board members. Four MCC departments administer agency operations, such as compact design and oversight's two chambers. Four MCC departments administer agency operations. MCC also has an Advisory Council and an Economic Advisory Council comprisingwith outside experts, whicheach generally meetsmeeting twice a year.

    Budget The Biden Administration proposed $937 million in MCC funding for FY2025, matched in House-passed (H.R. 8771) and Senate-proposed (S. 4797) measures (Table 1). Since FY2011, annual appropriations have settled near $900 million, supporting two new compacts a year on average.

    Table 1. MCC Funding, Millions Current USD

    Fiscal Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

    Request $800 $912 $930 $1,073 $937

    Enacted $912 $912 $930 $930 n.a.

    Rescission -$515 -$100 -$475

    Source: Public Laws and MCC budget requests. Note: Enacted does not include rescissions, which may apply to prior year appropriations.

    Issues for Congress In MCC’s third decade, Congress may examine MCC’s impact and model in the context of active issues like MCC’s budget, operational challenges, and program focus.

    Budget Management. Enacted funding has never approached the $5 billion annual budget MCC once envisioned. MCC administers a modest share of total U.S. foreign assistance—less than 1% of FY2022 obligated nonmilitary aid, compared with 8.8% in 2008, MCC’s peak funding year. Congress has rescinded over $1 billion in prior-year MCC funding since FY2022, after the Board canceled some compacts due to policy concerns. Congress may consider whether MCC’s flat budget trendline is consistent with the agency’s mandate and current U.S. development priorities. These trends coincide with a two- decade U.S. reorientation in aid toward health and humanitarian assistance and away from MCC’s focus on governance and economic growth.

    Compact Timelines. In MCC’s first decade, compacts launched about three years after initial selection; during its second decade, that period grew to around five years, as countries delayed launches to stand up implementation units and meet policy conditions. MCC says reforms in 2021 have begun to accelerate that timeline. Members may assess such delays, their contributing factors, and possible consequences for impact.

    Board Membership. The Senate has not confirmed a private sector Board member since 2019, leaving three of the four seats vacant. The sole remaining member’s term expired in 2024, but Congress granted a term extension allowing the Board to maintain a decisionmaking quorum. Congress may address this issue again before that extension expires at the end of December 2024.

    Threshold Authority. Congress has restrained MCC’s threshold programs, first with a hard cap on funding in FY2011 and later with a decade-long restriction on threshold programs in prior compact countries. Congress lifted the latter restriction in FY2024 after MCC identified some past compact recipients whose governance had eroded and then improved. Members may consider merits or drawbacks of using threshold programs to not only reward democratic progress but also arrest democratic decline, notably where committed governments face external threats such as malign foreign influence and transnational crime.

    Country Candidacy Thresholds. Economists have increasingly focused on a “middle-income trap” for countries that escape extreme poverty only for growth to stagnate. Potentially in keeping with this focus, Congress amended MCC’s income ceiling for candidacy (Section 5122 of P.L. 118-159) from low- and lower-middle-income status up to the World Bank’s graduation threshold for concessional lending ($7,895 GNI in FY2025). Members may assess how an expanded pool may affect MCC programs and budget.

    Countering China. MCC’s mission is meant to focus on development rather than great power competition, and the agency has touted its ability to work in certain places because of that lack of focus on geopolitics. Officials have justified some recent programs on foreign policy grounds, and MCC is a partner to some executive initiatives to counter China. Members may weigh MCC’s role, if any, in

    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12850 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED

    countering China and potential consequences for the organization’s mission and overseas reputation. Nick M. Brown, Analyst in Foreign Assistance

    IF12850

    Disclaimer

    This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

    Budget

    MCC annual appropriations, which do not expire, remained near $900 million until FY2026, when Congress enacted a 10.7% cut (Table 1). Congress also rescinded $1.2 billion of enacted MCC funding from FY2023 to FY2026, a third of appropriations over the same period. The budget request for FY2027 proposed $609 million in MCC funding, plus $385 million in rescissions. Table 1. MCC Funding, Millions Current USD

    Fiscal Year

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    2027

    Request

    $930

    $1,073

    $937

    $224

    $609

    Enacted

    $930

    $930

    $930

    $830

    n.a.

    Rescission

    -$100

    -$475

    $0

    -$661

    n.a.

    Source: Public laws and MCC budget requests.

    Note: Rescissions may apply to prior years. Requested rescissions not reflected. Rounded to nearest million.

    Recent Developments

    As part of the Trump Administration's 2025 foreign assistance review, MCC terminated some programs and made new selections. Table 2 details the results. The Trump Administration's plans are unclear for a strategic review carried out on MCC's 20th anniversary in 2024, which was intended to chart the agency's future. Table 2. MCC Programs Following 2025 Aid Review

    Activity

    Status

    Countries

    Compact (Dev.)

    Retained

    Mozambique, Belize, Sierra Leone, Côte d'Ivoire, Zambia, Liberia

    Terminated

    Cabo Verde, the Gambia, Senegal

    New

    Fiji, Ecuador

    Compact (Ongoing)

    Retained

    Senegal, Nepal, Kosovo, Benin, Indonesia, Mongolia, Côte d'Ivoire

    Terminated

    Timor-Leste, Malawi, Togo, Lesotho

    Threshold (Dev.)

    Retained

    The Philippines

    Terminated

    Tanzania, Mauritania

    New

    Tonga, Guatemala, Bolivia

    Threshold (Ongoing)

    Retained

    Solomon Islands, Kiribati

    Terminated

    The Gambia, Kenya, Togo

    Source: MCC.

    Notes: (Dev.) means in development, which includes signed but not yet launched compacts. Mongolia and Côte d'Ivoire compacts have since ended on schedule. MCC signals about a developing compact in Albania have been mixed.

    Issues for Congress

    As the Trump Administration's MCC approach comes into focus, Congress may engage on these issues, among others.

    Development Mandate. The Millennium Challenge Act sets criteria the board may use to select new countries and approve or terminate compacts, criteria oriented on governance and development impact. MCC in 2025 added "America First" and "American Returns" criteria that are not authorized in statute and lack a public assessment methodology. Such criteria may conflict with MCC's practice of country-led compact design and implementation. Congress may seek definitions for new criteria and how they inform decisions, enact measures prohibiting use of nonstatutory criteria for decisions, or legislate new provisions formalizing "America First" criteria.

    Transparency. Breaking from past practice, MCC did not publicly post congressional notifications (CNs) of its 2025 terminations of ongoing compacts. MCC historically asserted that its open, data-led decisions give an actionable roadmap for countries to compete for funding. Congress may address this change in transparency by directing MCC to publish its CNs, publishing CNs itself, making board meetings open to the public, directing compacts be restored absent a statutory justification, or taking no action.

    Funding and Future. MCC administered less than 2% of U.S. foreign aid in FY2024 and has faced significant funding rescissions amid coups, other governance issues, and the 2025 foreign aid review. With the dismantling of other aid entities, MCC could play a bigger role in a smaller foreign aid apparatus, particularly as Congress in 2024 authorized MCC to support upper-middle-income countries. MCC's timeline from award to launch, which has slowed from three to five years, on average, may be a hurdle to an expanded role. Congress may evaluate MCC's funding given the new aid landscape and direct MCC to award funding faster to ensure it is an agile conduit for aid priorities. Congress may also inquire on MCC's plans following its 2024 strategic review.

    Board Membership. One of MCC's four private board seats is filled, which allows the board to make quorum. The person holding this position is to step down in December 2026 absent congressional action, which would make MCC unable to execute any board decisions. President Trump has not named new candidates. Congress could extend his term, as was done in past appropriations measures; ask the President to nominate replacements; change quorum requirements; or allow board paralysis by taking no action.