U.S. Foreign Assistance
Changes from November 1, 2024 to August 20, 2025
This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Updated November 1, 2024
U.S. Foreign Assistance
What Is U.S. Foreign Assistance?
Foreign assistance ishas been an instrument of U.S. foreign policy through which the U.S. government provides resources to has provided resources to countries policymakers have deemed to be strategically important countries, countries in conflict, and other populations in need. Most U.S. foreign assistance isprior to 2025 was administered by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID); the U.S. Departments of State (State), Agriculture, Health and Human Services, the Treasury, and Defense; and the Millennium Challenge Corporation.
U.S. foreign assistance can take many forms. Most aid is (MCC). The Trump Administration has made changes to the U.S. government entities administering foreign assistance, including ceasing USAID's administration of ongoing foreign aid as of July 1, 2025. State appears now to be the lead U.S. foreign assistance provider, having assumed certain former USAID functions.
U.S. foreign assistance has taken many forms. Most aid has historically been provided on a grant basis through projects implemented by nonprofit organizations, businesses, U.S. government agencies, foreign governments, and multilateral organizations. Projects may support assetsSome aid has provided goods such as vaccines, malaria nets, food, weapons and other military hardware, textbooks, and roads and other infrastructure. It may also include interventions like expert technical advice, training, engineering advice, and research productsmilitary hardware, or textbooks. Some has included U.S. expertise like technical advice, training, and research products, or infrastructure like roads and power lines, among others, in a wide range of sectors (see Figure 1). Aid may also beSome aid also has been provided as direct budget support (cash) to foreign governments or multilateral organizations.
Congress authorizes and appropriateshas authorized and appropriated foreign assistance through legislation, including the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended, and annual Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs (SFOPS) appropriations laws. It also conducts oversight of foreign aid programs via reporting and notification requirements, oversight hearings, and examination of (In the 119th Congress, the House Appropriations Committee renamed its former SFOPS Subcommittee as the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs [NSRP]) Subcommittee.) Congress also has conducted oversight of foreign aid programs using reporting and notification requirements, hearings, and Office of Inspector General and Government Accountability Office audits and investigations, among other means.
Rationales for Policymakers present varied arguments for and against U.S. foreign assistance. Supporters of U.S. foreign assistance have tended to cite at least three rationales for providing foreign aid: national security, to help build stability and counter global threats; commercial interests, to expand U.S. export markets by supporting economic growth and trade integration; and U.S. goodwill, to meet vulnerable people's basic needs, such as food, shelter, and medicine. Critics have tended to cite at least three rationales for limiting or not providing foreign aid: ineffectiveness, that foreign aid does not produce intended results; waste, that taxpayer dollars are directed toward ill-advised or corrupt purposes; and prioritizing other federal spending that may more directly benefit U.S. citizens. Both supporters and critics have advocated for foreign assistance reform. Proposals have included consolidating aid authorities into a single agency (variously, merging all aid into State, or elevating USAID to a Cabinet Department); reforming the Foreign Assistance Act to adjust priorities; eliminating or streamlining funding directives in annual appropriations; conditioning foreign assistance on recipients' meeting certain standards; substituting or complementing official aid with private and charitable dollars (including substituting more trade for aid); channeling more aid through local entities; steering aid to the highest-impact projects; and delivering aid through multilateral institutions instead of U.S. agencies. Among 32 donors reporting development assistance expenditures (which exclude military assistance), the United States ranked first in 2024 in dollar terms, and 24th out of 32 as a share of gross national income.
Source: Foreignassistance.gov data last updated on July 31, 2025, and accessed on August 4, 2025; CRS calculations.
Source: Foreignassistance.gov data last updated on July 31, 2025, and accessed on August 4, 2025; CRS calculations. U.S. foreign assistance funding rose in the 1980s due to more aid to Central America and efforts at Middle East peace, peaking within the decade in 1985. The end of the Cold War and a deficit reduction law led to lower aid funding in the 1990s, though aid to Eastern Europe increased to support democracy, foster private markets, and advance European integration. Aid resurged in the 2000s with aid related to wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the launch of the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and MCC. In the early 2010s, foreign aid funding decreased as U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan scaled back alongside new fiscal constraints in the Budget Control Act of 2011. Assistance obligations remained steady through the late 2010s as Congress and the Administration assessed emerging crises and set new priorities, such as the Ebola epidemic in West Africa and the U.S. response to humanitarian needs amid the rise of the Islamic State. Providingand Against U.S. Foreign Assistance
How Much Is Spent on U.S. Foreign Assistance?
In FY2023, the most recent year for which near-complete data are available, the United States obligated an estimated $99.9 billion in foreign assistance from all sources, as reported by foreignassistance.gov. This represented about 1.5% of the total federal budget (Figure 1) and 5.4% of discretionary budget authority. The total comprises funds pursuant to the SFOPS appropriations and aid from other appropriations, including supplemental funding for the U.S. response to Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Who Has Received U.S. Foreign Assistance?
Approximately 175 countries and territories received U.S. assistance in FY2023. Top U.S. bilateral aid recipients have been strategic allies, countries in humanitarian crisis, counterterrorism partners, and global health focus countries. The top 10 FY2023 recipients accounted for about 62% of aid obligations (Figure 2).
Historical Trends
Foreign aid levels have fluctuated depending on U.S. policy, crises abroad, and budget constraints (Figure 3).
U.S. Foreign Assistance Members of Congress, executive branch officials, and other policymakers present a range of arguments for and against U.S. foreign assistance. Advocates cite three broad and overlapping rationales in support of foreign aid:
(1) National Security. Aid may help build stability and counter international threats by promoting global prosperity, public health, environmental protection, democracy and the rule of law, and the military readiness and security of U.S. partners and allies.
(2) Commercial Interests. Supporting economic growth and trade integration may expand markets for U.S. exports, fostering U.S. economic opportunity and jobs.
(3) U.S. Values and Goodwill. Meeting basic needs such as food, shelter, and medicine of vulnerable populations, and broadly fighting global poverty, may effectively reflect U.S. values and global leadership.
Critics maintain that foreign assistance efforts have often been ineffective and wasteful. Other critics argue that foreign aid funds would be better used to address domestic priorities, or to reduce the federal deficit.
How Much Is Spent on U.S. Foreign Assistance? In FY2022, the most recent year for which near- comprehensive data are available (and used throughout this In Focus for that reason), the United States obligated an estimated $70.3 billion in foreign assistance from all sources, as reported by the foreignassistance.gov database. This represented about 1% of the total federal budget (Figure 1) and 3.9% of discretionary budget authority. Assistance included funds pursuant to the SFOPS appropriations and aid from other agency appropriations.
Figure 1. Foreign Aid as a Portion of Federal Budget Authority and by Sector, FY2022
Source: Foreignassistance.gov data accessed on October 17, 2024; CRS calculations.
According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, among official development assistance donors, the United States ranked first in the world in 2022 in dollar terms, but near the bottom when assistance levels were presented as a percentage of gross national income.
Who Receives U.S. Foreign Assistance? Figure 2. Top Recipients of U.S. Aid, FY2022
Source: Foreignassistance.gov data accessed on October 17, 2024; CRS calculations.
Approximately 180 countries and territories received U.S. assistance in FY2022, reflecting the broad use of aid as a diplomatic and strategic tool. Top U.S. bilateral aid recipients are typically strategic allies, countries in humanitarian crisis, counterterrorism partners, or global
U.S. Foreign Assistance
https://crsreports.congress.gov
health focus countries. The top 10 recipient countries in FY2022 accounted for about 38% of aid obligations (see Figure 2). U.S. aid is geographically dispersed—75 countries received more than $100 million of U.S. aid in FY2022, and 121 received more than $10 million.
Historic Trends Since 1980, foreign aid spending has varied considerably depending on U.S. policy initiatives, international crises, and budget constraints (see Figure 3).
Aid to Central America and efforts at Middle East peace drove aid funding up in the 1980s, peaking within the decade in 1985. The end of the Cold War and a deficit reduction law led to lower aid funding in the 1990s, though aid to Eastern Europe increased at this time, supporting Euro-Atlantic integration and the transition from communism to democracy and market-driven economies.
Foreign aid levels rose sharply in the early 2000s with new military and reconstruction aid for Iraq and Afghanistan and the launch of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the Millennium Challenge Corporation.
The early 2010s saw reduced foreign aid funding, primarily as a result of fiscal constraints imposed by the Budget Control Act of 2011 together with a scaled-back U.S. military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan. Assistance obligations steadied in the late 2010s, however, largely reflecting emerging crises and new priorities, such as the Ebola epidemic in West Africa and humanitarian needs amid the rise of the Islamic State.
For FY2018-FY2021, the Trump Administration proposed deep annual cuts to foreign assistance; Congress opted to maintain or increase foreign aid. Focus areas included countering the global influence of the People’s Republic of
China and Russia (reflected, for example, in a new U.S. International Development Finance Corporation); humanitarian crises; and global heath, including COVID-19 response.
Upon assuming officeCOVID-19 response. Beginning in 2021, the Biden Administration set three cross-cutting priorities for foreign assistance: responding to climate change through bilateral and multilateral efforts, addressing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and combating authoritarianism. Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine led the Administration and Congress to prioritize a renewed expansion of U.S. aid to Ukraine and countries affected by the war. The 2023-2024 Israel-Hamas war also saw enactment of major foreign assistance packages, which are not reflected in this In Focus because obligations began in FY2024.
Role of Congress and Outlook Congress plays a significant role in shaping U.S. foreign assistance. In authorizing and appropriating aid, Members may consider Administration proposals, direct foreign assistance toward their own priority sectors and countries, mandate new strategies and initiatives, require reporting on select aid programs, and prohibit assistance for certain purposes. Congress also may focus on ensuring accountability and effective oversight of aid programs, particularly in conflict zones. When taking such actions, Members may consider how they affect the Administration’s ability to implement its foreign assistance strategies and to adjust assistance to meet emerging needs.
Congress has shaped U.S. foreign assistance. In authorizing and appropriating aid, Members may accept, reject, or otherwise respond to Administration budget requests and legislative proposals; seek to decrease, increase, or otherwise direct foreign assistance toward sectors and countries they assess to be priorities; authorize aid initiatives and agencies; require the Administration to produce aid strategies and reporting; and prohibit or condition certain assistance. Congress also may focus on the Administration's adherence to statutory requirements for foreign assistance, as well as the accountability and effective oversight of aid programs. Members may examine how, if at all, any such actions align with the Administration's foreign assistance aims and the Administration's ability to adjust assistance to meet what Congress assesses to be emerging needs.
For more detailed information on foreign assistance, see CRS Report R40213, Foreign Assistance: An Introduction to U.S. Programs and Policy, and CRS Report R48231, Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: FY2025, addressing the COVID-19 pandemic, and combating authoritarianism. U.S. aid reached new peaks with enactment of foreign assistance packages for the U.S. response to Ukraine.
The second Trump Administration has cancelled many U.S. aid programs, largely ended USAID's administration of foreign aid, and requested a more than 40% cut to SFOPS aid funding for FY2026, relative to FY2025 enacted funding. The Administration appears to prioritize aid for select purposes, such as countering the PRC, addressing migration, stopping the movement of illicit drugs, and maintaining aid to Israel and other Middle East partners.
Role of Congress and Outlook
.
Figure 3. Foreign Aid Funding in Historic Context
Source: Foreignassistance.gov data accessed on September 12, 2024; CRS calculations. Notes: DOD = Department of Defense; MCC = Millennium Challenge Corporation; PEPFAR = President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief; BCA = Budget Control Act of 2011.
Emily M. McCabe, Specialist in Foreign Assistance and Foreign Policy
Nick M. Brown, Analyst in Foreign Assistance
IF10183
U.S. Foreign Assistance
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10183 · VERSION 16 · UPDATED
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Source: Foreignassistance.gov data last updated on July 31, 2025, and accessed on August 4, 2025; CRS calculations.