< Back to Current Version

Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

Changes from September 26, 2024 to September 15, 2025

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

Updated September 26, 2024

Congressional Research Service

https://crsreports.congress.gov

R44000

Congressional Research Service

SUMMARY

Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

U.S. relations with Turkey (Türkiye) take place within a complicated geopolitical environment, reflecting some shared and some divergent perceived national interests. Turkey and other “midsize powers” such as Saudi Arabia and India seek advantages in a global system with intensifying great-power competition. Some ongoing U.S.-Turkey disagreements stem from differences in the countries’ respective policies in Syria, and from Turkey’s 2019 procurement of a Russian S-400 surface-to-air defense system. Nevertheless, U.S. and Turkish officials emphasize the importance of the bilateral relationship on several foreign policy issues, and the significance of Turkey’s membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). Turkey’s proximity to conflicts in the Middle East and Eurasia has made the continuing availability of its territory valuable for its allies. Turkish officials have expressed interest in joining the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, the People’s Republic of China [PRC], South Africa) group and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)—both of which arguably position themselves as alternatives to Western-dominated organizations like the G7 and NATO. Questions persist about whether and when Turkey might join BRICS and/or SCO, and if doing so would be a signal of greater alignment with Russia and the PRC, or of increased Turkish strategic autonomy and regional prominence. Congressional and executive branch action regarding Turkey and its neighboring countries could have implications for bilateral ties and U.S. political-military options in the region. Congressional initiatives in the past decade have included conditions on some U.S. arms sales to Turkey, as well as support for certain sanctions against Turkey. The question of U.S. sales of fighter aircraft and other arms to Turkey has been particularly prominent since Turkey’s 2019 S-400 acquisition and consequent removal from the F-35 program. After Turkey’s parliament approved NATO accession for Sweden in January 2024, the Biden Administration formally notified Congress of a possible $23 billion Foreign Military Sale of 40 new F-16 aircraft, 79 modernization packages for existing F-16s, and associated munitions—apparently, a major step forward for U.S.-Turkey defense cooperation. Turkey’s strategic significance for NATO amid an evolving European security crisis after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine may have contributed to the Administration decision to advance the F-16 transaction. U.S. officials also have suggested that sanctions imposed on Turkey in 2020 for the S-400 acquisition could go away and the F-35 “conversation” can resume if U.S. and Turkish officials properly address the S-400 issue. While Turkish officials have reportedly placed the S-400 in a storage facility rather than activating it and risking additional U.S. retaliatory measures, they also have expressed unwillingness to give it up. Turkish policies on some other key foreign policy issues have relevance for U.S.-Turkey relations:

Russia and Ukraine. While Turkey’s economic and energy ties with Russia remain a cause for U.S. concern, its support for Ukraine’s defense after Russia’s 2022 invasion, limitation of Russian naval access to and from the Black Sea, and emergence as a mediator during the war has arguably increased Turkey’s importance for U.S. policy.

Israel and the Palestinians. Since Hamas led attacks into Israel on October 7, 2023, and war ensued, Turkey-Israel diplomatic and economic ties have come under strain. Turkey placed some restrictions on exports to Israel in April 2024, and announced an end to all trade with Israel in May. Additionally, Turkey has continued to provide political support to Hamas, and U.S. officials have imposed sanctions on some alleged Hamas operatives or funding sources in Turkey.

Syria. Sources of concern for Turkey include nearly four million Syrian refugees in Turkey, and U.S. efforts to counter the Islamic State by working with Syrian Kurds linked to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (Kurdish acronym PKK, a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization). Turkey and allied Syrian armed opposition groups have occupied various areas of northern Syria since 2016, and Turkey’s military continues to target Kurdish fighters in Syria and Iraq—apparently also damaging some civilian infrastructure in Syria.

Domestically, some observers voice concerns about the largely authoritarian rule of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has led Turkey since 2003 and consolidated his control over time—including after a failed 2016 coup attempt. Despite a serious electoral challenge in May 2023 during an economic crisis, Erdogan and his party retained power, though the government faces allegations of human rights and rule of law violations. With inflation near 70% despite measures over the past year to counter it, Erdogan’s party lost in March 2024 local elections. Analysts speculate about Erdogan’s potential interest in and prospects for another presidential term in the next national elections, scheduled for 2028.

R44000

September 26, 2024

Jim Zanotti Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs

Clayton Thomas Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs

Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

Congressional Research Service

Contents

Introduction: Bilateral Issues and Congress’s Role ......................................................................... 1

Domestic Issues ............................................................................................................................... 3

Political Developments Under Erdogan’s Rule ......................................................................... 3

March 2024 Local Elections ..................................................................................................... 5 Economic Issues ........................................................................................................................ 5

Selected Turkish Foreign Policy Issues ........................................................................................... 6

U.S./NATO Strategic Relationship and Military Presence ........................................................ 8

Possible BRICS and Shanghai Cooperation Organization Membership ................................... 9

Potential F-16 Sale and Other Defense Procurement Issues ................................................... 10 Russia and Ukraine ................................................................................................................. 12 Israel and the Palestinians (including Hamas) ........................................................................ 14 Syria ........................................................................................................................................ 17

Figures

Figure 1. Turkey at a Glance ........................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Turkey’s Military Presence .............................................................................................. 7 Figure 3. Map of U.S. and NATO Military Presence in Turkey ...................................................... 8 Figure 4. Syria Conflict Map ......................................................................................................... 18

Contacts

Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 19

Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

Congressional Research Service 1

Introduction: Bilateral Issues and Congress’s Role

This report provides background information and analysis on key issues affecting U.S.-Turkey (Türkiye)1 relations, including domestic Turkish developments and various foreign policy and defense matters. Turkey has been a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) since 1952. U.S. and Turkish officials maintain that cooperation on regional security matters remains mutually important,2 despite Turkey’s 2019 acquisition of an S-400 surface-to-air defense system from Russia and a number of other U.S.-Turkey differences (such as in Syria and on Cyprus).

Members of Congress may consider legislative and oversight options regarding Turkey with implications for bilateral ties and U.S. political-military engagement in the region. Congressional actions in response to Turkish policy decisions diverging from U.S. stances have influenced U.S.- Turkey relations. For example, Congress authorized sanctions against Turkey and placed conditions on some arms sales in response to the Turkey-Russia S-400 transaction (see “Potential F-16 Sale and Other Defense Procurement Issues” below). Future Turkish actions affecting major issues discussed below could influence how Members approach existing sanctions, possible arms sales, and other options regarding Turkey.

U.S.-Turkey relations are complex and reflect some shared and some divergent perceived national interests. Turkey and other “midsize powers” such as Saudi Arabia and India seek advantages in a global system with intensifying great-power competition, thus partly explaining their tendency to hedge between the United States and other great powers.3

While Turkey’s continued or deepening ties with Russia in energy and other areas remain a cause for concern for the Biden Administration and some Members of Congress, Turkey’s support for Ukraine’s defense and rapprochement with Greece and some Arab states have somewhat improved U.S.-Turkey relations. A significant sign of this improvement came in January 2024, when the Administration formally notified Congress of a potential U.S. sale of F-16 aircraft to Turkey.

The F-16 notification occurred shortly after Turkey’s parliament voted to admit Sweden into the NATO. Turkey had delayed its approval of NATO membership for Sweden, and previously Finland, partly because Turkey had demanded the two countries take certain steps regarding individuals and groups (including the Kurdistan Workers’ Party [Kurdish acronym PKK], a U.S.- designated foreign terrorist organization, or FTO) it deems to be terrorists. The delay had fueled U.S.-Turkey tensions, with some lawmakers expressing doubts about a possible F-16 sale until Turkey approved the two countries’ NATO accession—first Finland in March 2023, then Sweden in January 2024.

Turkey continues to conduct operations within Turkey to counter the PKK, which has fought an on-and-off Kurdish nationalist insurgency with Turkish authorities since 1984, while also targeting longtime PKK bases in northern Iraq and PKK-linked groups in northern Syria (see

1 In late 2021, President Erdogan directed the use of “Türkiye” (the country’s name in Turkish) in place of “Turkey” in Turkish government documents and communications. In June 2022, the United Nations accepted the Turkish request to change the country’s name at the body to “Türkiye.” In January 2023, the State Department spokesperson said that the department would use the revised spelling “in most formal diplomatic and bilateral contexts” where appropriate. The U.S. Board on Geographic Names retained both “Turkey” and “Republic of Turkey” as conventional names, and the spokesperson said that the State Department could use those names if it is in furtherance of broader public understanding. State Department Press Briefing, January 5, 2023.

2 State Department, “Joint Statement on the U.S.-Türkiye Strategic Mechanism,” March 9, 2024.

3 Stephen Kalin and Summer Said, “Saudi Prince Tests Nonaligned Policy,” Wall Street Journal, March 15, 2023.

Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

Congressional Research Service 2

“Syria” below). The Turkish military’s approach to neutralizing the PKK has routinely been criticized by Western governments and human rights organizations for being overly hard on ethnic Kurds, who constitute about 19% of Turkey’s population (see Figure 1). Turkish authorities have imprisoned thousands and displaced or disrupted the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of others for suspected PKK involvement or sympathies.4

Figure 1. Turkey at a Glance

Geography Area: 783,562 sq km (302,535 sq. mile), slightly larger than Texas

People Population: 83,593,483 (2023). Most populous cities: Istanbul 15.8 mil, Ankara 5.4 mil, Izmir 3.1 mil, Bursa 2.1 mil, Adana 1.8 mil, Gaziantep 1.8 mil. (2023) % of population 14 or younger: 22.1% (2023) Ethnic groups: Turks 70%-75%; Kurds 19%; Other minorities 6%-11% (2016) Religion: Muslim 99.8% (mostly Sunni), Others (mainly Christian and Jewish) 0.2% Literacy: 96.7% (male 99.1%, female 94.4%) (2019)

Economy GDP per capita (at purchasing power parity): $43,921 Real GDP growth: 3.6% Inflation: 52.0% (as of August 2024) Unemployment: 9.0% Budget deficit as % of GDP: 5.2% Public debt as % of GDP: 30.9% Current account deficit as % of GDP: 2.7%

Sources: Graphic created by CRS. Map boundaries and information generated by Hannah Fischer using State Department Boundaries (2011); Esri (2014); ArcWorld (2014); DeLorme (2014). Fact information (202415, 2025 (R44000) Jump to Main Text of Report

Summary

U.S. relations with Turkey (Türkiye), a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) ally, have alternated between close cooperation and notable division. Turkey and other "global swing states" such as Saudi Arabia and India seek advantages in a global system with intensifying great-power competition. While Turkey's NATO membership is important for its security and the European Union (EU) is Turkey's largest trading partner and foreign investor, Turkey reportedly seeks to join the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, the People's Republic of China [PRC], South Africa) group and the PRC- and Russia-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization as well.

Over the past decade, the United States and Turkey have differed sharply on some major issues, including the U.S. partnership with Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) against the Islamic State organization, Turkey's 2019 procurement of a Russian S-400 surface-to-air defense system, and U.S. actions in response to the acquisition (suspending a sale of F-35 fighter aircraft to Turkey and imposing sanctions). These U.S.-Turkey rifts may have diminished to some extent given U.S. and Turkish efforts to (1) strengthen NATO and Ukraine since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and (2) work with a new, generally pro-Turkish, Sunni Arab-led interim government in Syria after the 2024 fall of Bashar Al Asad.

Members of Congress may consider legislative and oversight options regarding Turkey, including on possible arms sales and how to address existing sanctions and legislative conditions. For example, U.S. legislation currently prohibits the transfer of F-35s to Turkey unless Turkey no longer possesses the Russian-origin S-400 system (or other associated items). President Donald Trump has reportedly expressed openness to an F-35 sale to Turkey if the S-400 is rendered inoperable, such as if the system were to be partially dismantled or moved to a U.S.-controlled base in Turkey. Amid heightened efforts to strengthen NATO and Ukraine since 2022, Congress has not blocked the advancement of possible U.S. sales of upgraded F-16 fighter aircraft or advanced munitions to Turkey, though some Members support restrictions or limitations on those proposed sales or other potential U.S.-Turkey defense transactions. A sale of F-35s to Turkey could decrease any relative military advantages that other countries possessing or seeking to acquire F-35s (including Israel and Greece) might have.

Developments in Syria, which are fluid, have relevance for U.S.-Turkey relations. The May 2025 decision by the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) to end more than four decades of armed struggle against the Turkish government may potentially resolve some of Turkey's differences with the PKK-linked SDF. Turkey may be the most influential foreign power today in Syria, as the transitional government confronts challenges of military integration, the extension of government authority, and sectarian conflict; both Turkey and Syria's interim government oppose Kurdish autonomy Turkey-Israel tensions have increased as the two countries vie for influence in Syria—further straining relations that were already worsened by Turkey-Israel differences over (1) Turkey's continuing support for the Palestinian Sunni Islamist group Hamas after its October 2023 attacks and hostage-taking in Israel, (2) Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza, and (3) Turkey's official suspension of goods trade with Israel.

Additionally, domestic issues in Turkey could affect the trajectory of U.S.-Turkey relations. After the steady consolidation of power by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party over 22 years of ruling Turkey, in 2025 Erdogan's government has taken arguably its strongest actions to date against Turkey's main opposition Republican People's Party. Those moves include the imprisonment of Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, perhaps the most serious rival Erdogan has faced in national leadership polls. Some observers speculate that Erdogan might be seeking to divide, demoralize, or disqualify the political opposition in Turkey in ways that could further consolidate or prolong his rule. Turkey also faces some economic challenges, including official annual inflation of over 30%.

As major developments evolve, Turkey reportedly seeks the following from the United States:

  • Purchases of advanced fighter aircraft—F-16s and possibly fifth-generation F-35s—and the removal of defense-related U.S. sanctions imposed in 2020.
  • Support in Syria for a transition from Kurdish-led SDF forces controlling key areas of northeast Syria and countering the Islamic State, to an arrangement in which Sunni Arab-led Syrian government forces take over these functions with backing from Turkey and other neighboring states.
  • Acceptance and encouragement of a larger Turkish role in surrounding regions.
Analysts debate whether potential strategic and economic advantages from U.S. partnership with Turkey should incline the Trump Administration and Congress toward greater engagement, or whether Turkey's hedging behavior, policies on regional issues, or domestic controversies should give U.S. policymakers and lawmakers pause on closer cooperation.

Introduction

Bilateral Issues and Congress's Role

This report provides background information and analysis on key issues affecting U.S.-Turkey (Türkiye)1 relations, including domestic Turkish developments and various foreign policy and defense matters. U.S. relations with Turkey, a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) since 1952, have been complex, alternating between close cooperation and notable division or tension. The United States has valued Turkey's geopolitical importance to and military strength within the NATO alliance, as its second-largest military force, while viewing Turkey's NATO membership as helping anchor Turkey to the West.2 Yet, over the past decade, the United States and Turkey have differed sharply on some major issues, particularly:

  • Turkey's 2019 acquisition of an S-400 surface-to-air defense system from Russia, and the U.S. measures in response (suspending some major arms sales and placing sanctions on Turkey, discussed below).
  • The U.S. military's partnership with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which has links to a militant group rooted in Turkey (the Kurdistan Workers' Party, or Kurdish acronym PKK, a U.S. designated foreign terrorist organization, or FTO), against the Islamic State organization (IS/ISIS).3 In May 2025, a PKK congress decided to disband the PKK and end its armed struggle against the Turkish government, subject to various implementation steps.4

These U.S.-Turkey rifts appear to have somewhat diminished given U.S. and Turkish efforts to (1) strengthen NATO and Ukraine since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and (2) work with a new, generally pro-Turkish, Sunni Arab-led transitional government in Syria after the 2024 fall of Bashar Al Asad.

Developments in Syria, which are fluid, have relevance for U.S.-Turkey relations. The May 2025 decision by a PKK congress to disband the PKK and end its more than four decades of armed struggle against the Turkish government may have the potential to resolve at least some political disagreements between Turkey and the U.S.-backed SDF without additional conflict. From 2016 to 2024, Turkey worked with other Syrian non-state forces to seize a number of areas from the SDF along or near the Turkey-Syria border. Within a context of Turkish and Syrian government opposition to Kurdish military autonomy, the SDF agreed in March 2025 to integrate into Syria's national military. However, SDF leaders (with reported support from PKK or PKK-linked figures) appear to support some measure of decentralization, amid violence this year among pro-government Sunni Arab Islamist groups and other Syrian minorities. Turkey-Israel tensions also have increased as the two countries vie for influence in Syria—further challenging relations that were already worsened by Turkey-Israel differences over (1) Turkey's continuing support for the Palestinian Sunni Islamist group Hamas (another FTO) after its October 2023 attacks and taking of hostages in Israel, (2) Israel's conduct of the war in Gaza, and (3) an official Turkish suspension of exports to Israel.

Beyond the Middle East, U.S.-Turkey differences may persist on some issues, such as Turkey's continued economic and energy cooperation with Russia, and long-standing tensions with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus. Washington and Ankara may align on other matters, such as assisting with an Azerbaijan-Armenia peace process that could lead toward normalization of Turkey-Armenia relations.

Additionally, domestic issues in Turkey could affect the trajectory of U.S.-Turkey relations. After the steady consolidation of power by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party (Turkish acronym AKP) over 22 years of ruling Turkey, in 2025 his government has taken arguably its strongest actions to date against Turkey's main opposition Republican People's Party (CHP). Those moves included the imprisonment of Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, perhaps the most serious rival Erdogan has faced in national leadership polls. Turkey also faces some economic challenges; while official inflation in Turkey has dropped considerably in the last two years, it remains far higher (over 30%) than in any other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) country.5

To date, the second Trump Administration has outwardly welcomed closer relations with Turkey, with some reported softening by each side toward the other on certain foreign policy matters, and U.S. officials possibly downplaying the controversial Turkish domestic issues mentioned above.6 President Donald Trump has congratulated President Erdogan on Turkey's increased influence in Syria while surmising that the Trump Administration could solve any problem with Turkey "as long as you're reasonable."7 U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack has indicated that Turkey has a key role in the Middle East, saying, "Türkiye has never gotten the elevation of the relevance that it should have as such a major regional player."8 However, according to one source, "There is still no consensus in the State Department and at US Central Command on how to deal with Turkey, analysts say, and even less sympathy there for Mr Erdogan."9

Members of Congress may consider legislative and oversight options regarding Turkey, including on possible arms sales and how to address existing sanctions and legislative conditions. Congressional actions in response to Turkish policies that diverge from U.S. stances have influenced U.S.-Turkey relations. For example, in response to Turkey's 2019 S-400 acquisition from Russia, Congress placed conditions on some arms sales, and some Members urged the first Trump Administration to impose related congressionally authorized sanctions on Turkey, which it did in 2020.10 However, amid heightened efforts to strengthen NATO and Ukraine since 2022, Congress has not blocked the advancement of possible U.S. sales of upgraded F-16 fighter aircraft or advanced munitions to Turkey, though some Members support restrictions or limitations on those proposed sales or other potential U.S.-Turkey defense transactions. A motion failed in the Senate in February 2024 (by a 13-79 vote) to discharge a proposed joint resolution of disapproval (S.J.Res. 60 from the 118th Congress) regarding the possible F-16 sale from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.11

For additional background, see CRS Report R41368, Turkey (Türkiye): Background and U.S. Relations, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas. See Figure 1 for a map and basic facts about Turkey.

Figure 1. Turkey at a Glance

Geography

Area: 783,562 sq km (302,535 sq. mile), slightly larger than Texas

People

Population: 84,119,531 (2024). Most populous cities: Istanbul 15.8 mil, Ankara 5.4 mil, Izmir 3.1 mil, Bursa 2.1 mil, Adana 1.8 mil, Gaziantep 1.8 mil. (2023)

% of population 14 or younger: 21.7% (2024)

Ethnic groups: Turks 70%-75%; Kurds 19%; Other minorities 6%-11% (2016)

Religion: Muslim 99.8% (mostly Sunni), Others (mainly Christian and Jewish) 0.2%

Literacy: 97% (male 99%, female 95%) (2021)

Economy

GDP per capita (at purchasing power parity): $47,350

Real GDP growth: 2.7%

Inflation: 33.0% (as of August 2025)

Unemployment: 9.4%

Budget deficit as % of GDP: 3.8%

Public debt as % of GDP: 26.7%

Current account deficit as % of GDP: 1.2%

Sources: Graphic created by CRS. Map boundaries and information generated by Hannah Fischer using State Department Boundaries (2011); Esri (2014); ArcWorld (2014); DeLorme (2014). Fact information (2025 projections unless otherwise specified) from International Monetary Fund (IMF); IMF World Economic Outlook Database; Economist Intelligence Unit; Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook; and the Turkish Statistical Institute. Outlook

Turkey's apparent interest in acting more independently, along with leverage that may come from its status as a regional power, could lead Turkey and the United States to adopt or accept more of a case-by-case approach to bilateral cooperation than in earlier eras. Turkey and other "global swing states" such as Saudi Arabia and India appear to increasingly seek advantages in a global system with intensifying great-power competition, including a tendency to hedge between the West and other countries that project global influence.12 While Turkey's NATO membership is important for its security and the European Union (EU) is Turkey's largest trading partner and foreign investor (accounting for 70% of foreign direct investment in Turkey),13 Turkey reportedly seeks to join the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, the People's Republic of China [PRC], South Africa) group and the PRC- and Russia-led Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) as well.14 President Erdogan has said, "Turkey can become a strong, prosperous, prestigious and effective country if it improves its relations with the East and the West simultaneously."15

As major developments evolve with implications for bilateral relations, Turkey reportedly seeks the following from the United States:

  • Purchases of advanced fighter aircraft—F-16s and possibly fifth-generation F-35s—and the removal of defense-related U.S. sanctions imposed in 2020 under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA, P.L. 115-44). U.S. legislation currently prohibits the transfer of F-35s (or certain related items) to Turkey unless Turkey no longer possesses the Russian-origin S-400 system (or other associated items).
  • Support for a transition in Syria from Kurdish-led SDF forces controlling key areas of northeast Syria and countering the Islamic State, to an arrangement in which Sunni Arab-led Syrian government forces take over these functions with backing from Turkey and other neighboring states (Jordan, Iraq, and perhaps Lebanon).
  • Acceptance and encouragement of a larger Turkish role in surrounding regions, including the Middle East, eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, and the South Caucasus.

Analysts debate whether potential strategic and economic advantages from U.S. partnership with Turkey, including potential cooperation on defense technology and rare earth minerals, should incline the Trump Administration and Congress toward greater engagement, or whether Turkey's policies on regional issues, or controversies with civil liberties and rule of law should give U.S. policymakers and lawmakers pause about closer cooperation.16 U.S. policy on Turkey could be shaped by the following considerations:

  • Potential benefits and drawbacks of closer partnership. What are potential benefits from maintaining and/or strengthening relations with Turkey given its geopolitical centrality to key areas of conflict and strategic land and maritime corridors; its demonstrated ability and potential to affect military, political, and economic developments in several surrounding regions; and the potentially greater options regional powers like Turkey may have in an era of intensifying great-power competition? What are potential drawbacks to easing restrictions on and deepening partnership with Turkey when Turkey may still: contend with Syrian Kurds that have partnered with U.S. forces; be unwilling to give up certain aspects of its cooperation with Russia; support and perhaps host Hamas while taking political and economic action against Israel; and maintain longtime disagreements with Greece and the Republic of Cyprus on various political-military, geographic, and energy issues?
  • Impact of Turkish leadership on key issues. To what extent do Turkish policies that differ from U.S. preferences reflect Turkish national consensus, and to what extent might they be more specific to President Erdogan and the AKP (such as on support for Hamas or the level of cooperation with Russia)? What U.S. approaches to Turkey might cultivate more or less productive bilateral ties, either with Erdogan or other potential leaders?
  • Turkey-Israel regional dynamics. In Syria and the broader region, can Turkey and Israel minimize their disagreements and pursue common interests (like reducing Iran's influence), or do tensions that have arisen in 2025 foreshadow greater contention between Turkey and Israel over their respective roles in the regional order?
  • Risks of Turkish alignment with U.S. rivals. What, if anything, could lead to greater Turkish alignment with U.S. rivals like Russia or the PRC? U.S. unwillingness to share advanced defense technology with Turkey, or disagreements with Turkey on key foreign policy issues? Russian or PRC initiatives to bolster Turkish military or economic strength? Domestic Turkish developments toward authoritarianism or instability? If Turkey became more adversarial to U.S. interests, what would be the regional and global consequences?

The 119th Congress may face some decision points on Turkey, among them possible F-35 sales. Ambassador Barrack predicted in June 2025 that by the end of the year, U.S. and Turkish officials will resolve their impasse on a possible sale of F-35s, and "Congress will support an intelligent conclusion."17 In a July 2025 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Chairman Jim Risch said that he had previously placed a "hold" on the F-35s and would "continue to have that hold for a lot of different reasons."18 Additionally, Congress may take further action on legislative proposals with relevance for U.S.-Turkey relations, including some from the 119th Congress or that may resurface in some form from bills or resolutions introduced previously.19

Domestic Issues Political Developments Under Erdogan's Rule President Erdogan (who became prime minister in 2003, was elected president in 2014, and then reelected twice) has probably been the most consequential political figure for the Turkish republic since its founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. As he and the AKP have steadily deepened their control over the country's populace and institutions, U.S. and EU officials have expressed a number of concerns about authoritarian governance and erosion of rule of law and civil liberties in Turkey.20 Many observers describe Erdogan as a polarizing figure, and elections have reflected roughly equal portions of the country supporting and opposing his rule.

2016 Coup Attempt and Erdogan's Further Consolidation of Power

In 2016, rogue military officers in Turkey staged a coup attempt in which hundreds were killed and thousands injured, after which the government detained tens of thousands, enacted sweeping changes to military and civilian agencies, and took over or closed various businesses, schools, and media outlets. Erdogan has argued, with considerable popular support, that the Fethullah Gulen movement orchestrated the coup attempt,21 which military forces and citizen groups loyal to the government ultimately thwarted. Some leading opposition figures in Turkey have accused Erdogan of planning, controlling, and/or using the failed coup to suppress dissent and consolidate power.22 Erdogan then formed a coalition with Turkey's Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) and adopted more aggressively populist tactics in both domestic and foreign policy contexts. Erdogan cemented Turkey's shift from a prime ministerial to a presidential system of governance through victories in a 2017 constitutional referendum and 2018 presidential and parliamentary elections. In 2023 elections reelecting Erdogan and the AKP-led coalition, international observation missions asserted that limits on freedom of expression and other measures affecting media coverage appeared to give Erdogan and the AKP an "unjustified advantage."23

The AKP was dealt a setback in March 2024 local elections. The main opposition and secular-leaning CHP retained control over key mayoralties it won in 2019, won additional mayoralties, and captured a larger share of the nationwide vote, reportedly with considerable support from Kurdish political actors and voters.

In 2025, Erdogan and his nationalist coalition partners may be seeking to draw Kurdish support from the CHP in hopes of obtaining a parliamentary supermajority. Doing so could allow Erdogan to seek another presidential term in May 2028 or earlier, and possibly amend the constitution. During his first years in office, Erdogan had courted Kurdish support, until a previous initiative at Kurdish reconciliation broke down with the end of a Turkey-PKK ceasefire in 2015. Since the PKK began its on-and-off insurgency against Turkish authorities in the early 1980s, the Turkish military's approach to neutralizing the PKK has routinely been criticized by Western governments and human rights organizations for being overly punitive towards ethnic Kurds, who constitute about 19% of Turkey's population (see Figure 1). Turkish authorities have imprisoned thousands and displaced or disrupted the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of others for suspected PKK involvement or sympathies.24

Since late 2024, the government has engaged with imprisoned PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan in talks to get the PKK to renounce violence, possibly in exchange for the formalization of certain Kurdish rights in Turkey. In February 2025, Ocalan called for the PKK to disarm and dissolve. In response, the PKK declared a ceasefire and has publicly appealed for Ocalan's release from prison so he can oversee any potential dissolution.25 In May, a PKK congress decided to disband the organization and end armed struggle against the Turkish government, and Turkish officials welcomed the news while awaiting "practical steps" such as the potential disarmament and demobilization of PKK fighters in Turkey, Iraq, Syria, and elsewhere.26 Turkey's parliament formed a committee in August "charged with proposing and supervising legal and political reforms aimed at advancing the peace process."27

In parallel with the Turkey-PKK rapprochement, government authorities have taken a number of actions against leaders from both the main opposition CHP and pro-Kurdish circles.28 In the apparent crackdown against the CHP, as of September 2025, 16 mayors and more than 500 people have reportedly been arrested.29 These and other government measures have prompted some opposition supporters and observers to speculate that Erdogan might be seeking to further divide, demoralize, or disqualify the opposition.30 For example, CHP figures assert that cases targeting party chairman Ozgur Ozel are politically motivated. A court could determine by late October whether to nullify Ozel's chairmanship on the basis of alleged irregularities in the 2023 party congress that elected him.31 In apparent hopes of countering or preempting a possible annulment of the 2023 party congress, the CHP is reportedly seeking to hold new leadership elections in late September.32 A September court decision to replace the CHP's Istanbul leader has exacerbated domestic tensions.33

In March 2025, Istanbul's CHP mayor and Erdogan's likeliest presidential rival Ekrem Imamoglu was imprisoned on various corruption-related charges, removing him from office at least temporarily and exacerbating political and economic uncertainty.34 Imamoglu's arrest came days before a CHP primary officially selecting Imamoglu as the party's next presidential candidate. Imamoglu and other CHP leaders denounced his arrest as politically motivated and encouraged nonviolent protests that attracted hundreds of thousands of people. In response, Erdogan's government insisted that Imamoglu's detention came from an independent investigation, and arrested more than 2,000 protesters while blaming the CHP for fomenting instability. Erdogan may see parallels between Imamoglu's rise and his own, having leveraged his status as Istanbul's mayor during the 1990s to become the country's most popular political figure. One Turkish journalist wrote that the timing of Imamoglu's arrest may have stemmed from a relative lack of U.S. concern about Turkish domestic developments, a possible unwillingness by pro-Kurdish leaders to confront the government amid efforts toward Turkey-PKK rapprochement, and a calculation by Erdogan that he has time to recover from any effect the arrest and its fallout may have on his popularity.35 Following Imamoglu's arrest, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the Administration does not like to see "these things happening inside countries that we hope to partner with on a bunch of things," and that U.S. concerns are balanced with an interest in working with Turkey on various issues.36

Economic Issues For more than a decade, Turkey's currency (the lira) has been trending downward relative to the dollar, with its decline probably driven in part by broader concerns by foreign investors about Turkey's policymaking and economy.37 It has lost more than 91% of its value against the dollar since 2018, with much of the decrease coming after major interest rate cuts that President Erdogan backed from 2021 to 2023. Official annual inflation reached a 24-year peak of 86% in October 2022.38 While inflation has dropped considerably in the last two years, it remains over 30%.

The currency and inflation crisis in Turkey has dramatically affected consumers' cost of living and the cost of international borrowing (mostly conducted in U.S. dollars) for banks and private sector companies. Turkey's manufacturing-based economy has remained relatively resilient and is anchored by its customs union with the EU.

Turkey's large population, relative lack of domestic hydrocarbon resources, and Eurasian geography make it an important global energy consumer and transit country.39 The Turkish government seeks to diversify both the mix of its energy sources and its import partners. Turkey receives much of its oil and natural gas via pipelines from Russia and other countries, with some of it transiting Turkey to other destinations, including Europe. A Russian-owned company is assisting Turkey with its first nuclear power plant—currently scheduled to go online in 2026—on the Mediterranean coast at Akkuyu. During the 2020s, Turkey has increased liquefied natural gas imports from the United States and other countries, and broader U.S.-Turkey cooperation may be possible on a variety of energy initiatives. Turkish disputes with neighboring countries over offshore energy rights and eastern Mediterranean energy transit routes remain. Meanwhile, Turkey began production in 2023 from the offshore Sakarya natural gas field in the Black Sea.

U.S.-Turkey Economic Interaction

Turkey's economy—the 17th-largest in the world (according to World Bank data for 2024)—presents attractions and challenges for potential U.S. trade and investment partners. The United States and Turkey have various bilateral agreements to promote economic cooperation, though no free trade agreement. Bilateral trade volume for 2024 (according to the Commerce Department) was estimated at $43 billion. In 2019, the first Trump Administration set a goal with Turkish counterparts to expand this volume to $100 billion.40

U.S.-Turkey economic ties account for a small fraction of U.S. international trade and investment. Turkey has a far closer economic relationship with the EU (with which it has had a customs union on manufactured goods since 1995). In 2024, for merchandise trade, the United States comprised 6.2% of Turkey's exports and 4.7% of its imports (according to the Turkish Statistical Institute). For purposes of comparison, in the same year the EU bloc comprised 41.4% of Turkey's exports and 32.1% of its imports. From 2003 to 2023, EU countries provided more than 50% of foreign direct investment in Turkey, and the United States supplied 7.9%.41

Since January 2025, the Trump Administration has taken a number of U.S. tariff actions.42 For example, the Trump Administration imposed a 10% additional "reciprocal tariff" on most U.S. imports in April 2025, and then imposed country-specific rates, including 15% for Turkey, in July 2025 (becoming effective in early August).43 Effects of U.S. tariff actions on U.S.-Turkey trade may be uncertain. In an August statement, Turkey's trade ministry said that Turkey seeks to have U.S.-Turkey trade progress within a "predictable, fair, and sustainable" framework, while also indicating that Turkey's inclusion in the "15% tier" put it in a better position than many other countries.44 Turkey could be impacted if the Administration levies tariffs on countries with digital services taxes.45

Selected Foreign Policy and Defense Issues Regular parts of Turkey's foreign policy and defense agenda include
  • continued expansion of Turkey's arms industry and arms exports, including a renowned drone program and plans for integrated air defense;46
  • attempts to broaden Turkish influence and strengthen ties with countries in surrounding regions (such as Eastern Europe and the Balkans, the Middle East, Africa, the Caucasus, and Central Asia);47 and
  • a mix of military, economic, and diplomatic means to maximize Turkish self-reliance, deter neighboring countries or groups that may present current or potential threats, and prevent active conflicts or political disputes near Turkey (such as in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Cyprus) from undermining Turkish national security or domestic stability (see Figure 2).48

    Figure 2. Turkey's Military Presence: Selected Sites

    Source: Bloomberg, March 2024, with minor modifications by CRS.

    U.S./NATO Strategic Relationship and Military Presence Turkey's proximity to conflict in the Middle East and Eurasia has made the continuing availability of its territory for the stationing and transport of arms, cargo, and personnel valuable for the United States and NATO. In addition to Incirlik Air Base near the southern Turkish city of Adana, other key U.S./NATO sites include an early warning missile defense radar in eastern Turkey and a NATO ground forces command in Izmir (see Figure 3). Turkey also controls access to and from the Black Sea through the Bosphorus (alt. Bosporus) and Dardanelles Straits (the Straits).

    Figure 3. Map of U.S. and NATO Military Presence in Turkey

    Sources: Created by CRS using data gathered from the Department of Defense, NATO, and various media outlets since 2011.

    Note: All locations are approximate.

    For Turkey, NATO's traditional importance has been to mitigate Turkish concerns about encroachment by neighbors, such as the Soviet Union's aggressive post-World War II posturing leading up to the Cold War. Additionally, NATO security guarantees compensate Turkey for a general lack of nationally owned strategic defense and deterrence capabilities.49 In more recent arenas of conflict like Ukraine and Syria, Turkey's possible interest in countering Russian objectives may be partly motivating Turkey's military operations and arms exports.50 In April 2024, Turkey suspended its obligations under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, joining other NATO allies who had previously taken this step after Russia withdrew from the agreement in 2023.51 In June 2025, an unnamed Turkish defense ministry source was cited as saying that Turkey supports NATO's decision to "more than double its defense spending benchmark to 5% of GDP by 2035 and is already exceeding the previous 2% benchmark."52

    Some of Turkey's actions in the 2020s have arguably undermined NATO unity. While seeking to persuade or compel other alliance members to distance themselves from PKK-linked Syrian Kurds that Turkey views as adversaries, Turkey delayed the following NATO initiatives before ultimately agreeing to them:

    Finland's and Sweden's NATO membership applications, which came shortly after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

    A NATO defense plan proposed in 2020 for Poland and the Baltic states.

    Tensions between Turkey and other NATO members during the 2020s have fueled internal U.S./NATO discussions about the continued use of Turkish bases. Some reports suggest that expanded or potentially expanded U.S. military presences in places such as Greece, Cyprus, and Jordan might be connected with concerns about Turkey.53

    U.S.-Turkey Defense Cooperation (F-16s, F-35s, and Sanctions)

    In June 2024, five months after the Biden Administration's formal notification to Congress of a proposed F-16 fighter aircraft sale to Turkey, the State Department announced that Turkey had signed a letter of offer and acceptance. The original deal was estimated at $23 billion for the purchase of 40 new F-16s, 79 modernization kits for existing F-16s, and related munitions and equipment.54

    In November 2024, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler stated in a Turkish parliamentary hearing that Turkey would no longer purchase the 79 F-16 modernization kits because he said Turkish Aerospace Industries is capable of making similar upgrades domestically. Under those terms, a modified deal would likely be worth $7 billion.55 Reportedly, Turkey may seek U.S. agreement to give Turkey access to F-16 source codes and embedded software controlling the aircraft's systems (also known as the Operational Flight Program), possibly enabling greater integration of Turkish domestically produced weapons and systems into the F-16s.56

    Alternatively, if U.S. and Turkish officials reach an arrangement to allow Turkey to acquire F-35 fifth-generation fighter aircraft, Turkey may seek to scrap the F-16 deal altogether. Turkish acquisition of F-35s could decrease any relative military advantages other countries might have, including Israel (which already operates F-35s) and Greece (which expects to acquire them).57

    Turkey was an original member of the U.S.-led consortium formed to contribute to the development and manufacture of the F-35, but was removed in July 2019 due to its procurement of the Russian S-400 surface-to-air defense system.58 In announcing the removal, Defense Department59 officials cited concerns about possible Russian use of the S-400 to collect intelligence on F-35 stealth capabilities.60 Turkey's S-400 acquisition also led the first Trump Administration to impose some sanctions in December 2020 on a Turkish defense procurement agency and associated officials for their role in the transaction, under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA); those sanctions designations remain in place.

    Congress enacted a provision (Section 1245) in the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, P.L. 116-92) prohibiting the Defense Department from transferring F-35s to Turkey unless Turkey no longer possesses the S-400 (or other associated items). Six Turkish-owned F-35s remain in storage in the United States, and the $1.7 billion paid for the F-35s apparently is still in U.S. hands.61 In the FY2021 NDAA (P.L. 116-283), Congress enacted another provision (Section 1241) relating to the S-400 transaction and the possible imposition and termination of CAATSA sanctions.

    Some reports since 2024 indicate that U.S. and Turkish officials have been discussing options regarding the S-400's status that might lead to U.S. approval of an F-35 sale.62 In a March 2025 phone call between President Erdogan and President Donald Trump, President Trump (according to two unnamed sources) reportedly expressed openness to an F-35 sale if the two countries can agree to an arrangement by which the S-400 is rendered inoperable. Two possible options could be a partial dismantling of the system or moving it to a U.S.-controlled base in Turkey.63 Other reports have stated that U.S. and Turkish officials have agreed to begin technical talks for the removal of sanctions. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan stated in April that CAATSA sanctions have to date obstructed the procurement of around $20 billion in spare parts for F-16s by entities involved with Turkey's defense industry.64 It is unclear how the FY2020 and FY2021 NDAA provisions mentioned above might apply to U.S. actions in response to potential changes to the status of Turkey's S-400 system. In response to an August 2025 letter from 40 Members of Congress, the State Department stated that the Administration is committed to complying with U.S. law, including CAATSA, and that the U.S. position "on Turkey's acquisition and continued possession of the Russian S-400 system has not changed."65

    Some House Members proposed amendments to the House Armed Services Committee-reported FY2026 NDAA (H.R. 3838) that would have placed additional conditions or restrictions on U.S. defense transactions with Turkey, stemming from apparent concerns by some lawmakers regarding Turkish policies with respect to Russia, Greece, Cyprus, Israel, Hamas, Syria, Iran, and/or China.66 The House passed H.R. 3838 in September 2025 without including any of these proposed amendments.

    Amid speculation regarding potential U.S.-Turkey fighter aircraft transactions, in May 2025, the Trump Administration formally notified Congress of an estimated $304 million possible sale to Turkey of air-to-air missiles.67

    Additionally, Turkish officials have reportedly expressed interest in acquiring 40 Eurofighter Typhoon fighter aircraft.68 If Turkey does procure these jets, it would follow a practice that several other U.S. partners in the region—including Greece and a number of Arab states—have established in diversifying their Western suppliers of combat aircraft.69

    Turkey also is moving forward with efforts to build the TF Kaan, a domestically produced fighter with some stealth capabilities, but mass production would reportedly—according to some estimates—begin at earliest in the late-2020s, and perhaps several years later.70 Prototypes of the TF Kaan use U.S.-origin General Electric F110 engines, and initial production versions of the aircraft would depend on acquiring more of these engines while Turkey reportedly seeks to overcome challenges in developing a domestic engine for later versions.71

    Syria and Regional Implications (Kurds, U.S. Forces, Israel, and Iran)

    Turkey may be the most influential outside actor in Syria following the December 2024 collapse of Bashar al Asad's (alt. Assad) regime, and with the diminished influence of Asad's main foreign protectors Russia and Iran. Ankara has provided various forms of support to Syria's interim authorities—led mainly by figures from Hay'at Tahrir al Sham (HTS, an Al Qaeda-rooted organization that was an FTO until the Trump Administration lifted this designation in July 2025, and remains a Specially Designated Global Terrorist entity)—in apparent hopes of exercising leverage and securing close political, military, and commercial ties.72 President Trump's elimination or waiver of many U.S. sanctions on Syria via actions in May 2025 and a June executive order (EO 14312) may facilitate Turkish economic and other engagement that could bolster Turkey's influence in Syria and the broader region. Nevertheless, the United States retains the option to impose sanctions on entities for actions in Syria.

    Turkish officials also have sought to weaken the U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led SDF, largely owing to its links to the PKK, which waged a decades-long insurgency in Turkey before announcing its intention to disband in May 2025. Since 2016, Turkey and its allied militias known as the Syrian National Army (SNA, which began to integrate with Syrian government forces in 2025) captured much of the northern Syria border area from the SDF, including some strategically located towns after Asad's ouster in December 2024 (see Figure 4). Additionally, Turkey is encouraging the voluntary return of some of the two to three million Syrian refugees in Turkey; the Turkish interior ministry reported in August 2025 that more than 400,000 refugees have returned since the end of Asad's rule.73 These developments could affect Syria's domestic cohesion and have repercussions for the presence of several hundred U.S. troops currently supporting the SDF's counter-IS efforts.

    Figure 4. Syria: Areas of Influence and Operation

    (as of July 29, 2025)

    Source: CRS using CJTF-OIR reporting to Lead Inspector General, media and social media reporting, and ESRI and U.S. State Department data. All areas of influence approximate and subject to change.

    U.S. forces and counter-IS mission. Trump Administration decisions regarding U.S. troop deployments in Syria are factors affecting future developments. In April 2025, the Pentagon chief spokesperson announced a consolidation of U.S. forces in Syria, in which a "deliberate and conditions-based process" could bring the direct U.S. presence down from about 2,000 to less than 1,000. The spokesperson reiterated U.S. support for counter-IS efforts in Syria, and a media report citing two unnamed senior U.S. officials said that U.S. personnel would continue to assist the Kurdish-led SDF and help operate IS-related detention camps.74 According to the U.S.-led Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve, as of mid-2025, "Coalition forces are not providing any support to the SDF against the Turkish military or the Turkish-backed fighters."75 The withdrawal of U.S. forces from Syria or the lack of U.S. assurances of force protection to partner forces could affect the various parties' actions, with possible implications for Syrian domestic and regional stability, counterterrorism concerns, and humanitarian needs. Some U.S. troops have reportedly pulled back from areas with Arab-majority populations, apparently limiting the SDF's effective control over these regions.76

    Turkey has sought to partner with Syria's interim government, as well as Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon, to establish a multilateral counter-IS mechanism that could eventually replace the SDF.77 When President Trump met Syria's interim president Ahmed Al Sharaa in May 2025 in Saudi Arabia, the White House press secretary said that President Trump urged Sharaa to (among other things) "Assume responsibility for ISIS detention centers in Northeast Syria."78

    Kurdish-led SDF: potential next steps. In March 2025, Syria's interim authorities and the Kurdish-led SDF announced a deal in which the parties agreed to integrate "all civil and military institutions in northeastern Syria into the administration of the Syrian state, including border crossings, the [Qamishli International] airport, and oil and gas fields," while guaranteeing citizenship and constitutional rights to the Kurdish community in Syria.79 Turkish leaders have expressed hopes that the deal between Syrian interim authorities and the SDF will end SDF efforts to obtain Kurdish political and military autonomy in Syria, and will lead the SDF to expel any PKK fighters from Syria. Turkey and the SNA reportedly halted attacks on the SDF a few weeks after the March deal between the SDF and Damascus.80 Since then, some clashes have reportedly occurred in northern Syria between the SDF and factions aligned with the Syrian government.81

    While a broad array of Syrian Kurdish political groups (including those affiliated with non-PKK Iraqi Kurds) have expressed support for some decentralization within Syria, Syria's interim authorities, with Turkey's support, have rejected the prospect of formal decentralization or federal autonomy. Possible resolution of Turkey's tensions with the SDF could be linked to potential rapprochement between Turkey and the PKK, though Kurdish SDF leaders insist that their group is separate from the PKK.82 Initial dialogue led to an SDF handover of security control to Syrian national authorities in some Kurdish-populated areas in or near Aleppo.83 The SDF has insisted on preserving its "distinct identity" within Syria's military, amid ongoing challenges in addressing mutual concerns expressed by Kurds and Sunni Arabs in areas of northeast Syria about possible mistreatment if the other ethnic group controls governance there.84

    In light of violence among pro-government Sunni Arab Islamist groups and other Syrian minorities (Druze, Alawites, and Christians), the SDF has expressed concern that ceding its autonomy would leave Syrian Kurds vulnerable to attack.85 In July 2025, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan called on the SDF to integrate with Syria's central government and for the leading Kurdish force in the SDF—the People's Defense Units (Kurdish acronym YPG)—to "lay down its arms."86 PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan has reportedly agreed with "top PKK operatives" that the YPG should only disarm "when an acceptable agreement is struck with the central government."87 In August 2025, a media source cited sources indicating that SDF delays in integrating with Syria's national authorities would not likely lead to direct Turkish intervention against the SDF, but Turkey might indirectly support "a limited operation by the Syrian army."88

    Regional implications (including Iran and Israel). Turkey's role in Syria and related developments could lead to closer Turkish cooperation with the United States, Israel, and Arab states against Iran, or could intensify tensions with these actors regarding Syria's future and its implications for the region. Turkey may seek to take advantage of recent Iranian setbacks in the region, and perhaps leverage potential rapprochement with the PKK, to increase its sway in Syria, Iraq, and elsewhere.89

    Israeli actions since Asad's ouster targeting Syrian bases and other strategic sites, advancing its military into parts of southern Syria, and seeking to protect Syrian minorities, may be partly aimed at countering Turkish influence and preventing the possible Turkish deployment of military assets in central Syria.90 Reportedly, Israeli and Turkish officials have held talks aimed at preventing an Israel-Turkey military clash and otherwise coordinating on Syria. According to one source as of June 2025, "A hotline now reportedly connects the two countries' militaries to prevent direct confrontation between the two inside Syria. However, getting the two sides to agree on each other's red lines will likely prove far more difficult."91 Turkish officials apparently have sought to convince Israel that the two countries' interests align in preventing Iran from regaining influence in post-Asad Syria.92

    In August 2025, Turkey and Syria signed a "joint training consultancy memorandum of understanding [MOU]" as an apparent step toward a substantive military cooperation deal.93 Turkish officials reportedly anticipate strengthening Syria's regular army with arms and other forms of support, with the apparent goal of helping the Syrian army establish long-term stability.94 While Turkish and Syrian officials apparently are discussing the potential deployment of Turkish troops to some Syrian bases, the MOU supposedly does not address it.95 According to one media report, Turkey may seek to avoid providing any weapons that could provoke Israel given existing tensions.96 Nevertheless, in September, an unnamed Israeli "security source" was cited as saying that an Israeli strike in Syria targeted depots purportedly holding Turkish-made missiles and air defense equipment.97 Later in September, Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan stated that Israel is pursuing "regional expansionism" aimed at leaving Israel's neighboring states divided.98

    Israel and the Palestinians (Including Hamas)

    Since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks and hostage-taking in Israel, and ensuing war, Turkey-Israel ties have come under strain. Turkey and Erdogan had been improving relations with Israel prior to October 2023, and Turkey had said that the countries were contemplating closer energy cooperation.99 Tension between Turkey and Israel on Palestinian issues flared up previously on a number of previous occasions, including in 2010 when Israeli commandos killed ten Turkish citizens in clashes aboard the Mavi Marmara, part of a private Turkish flotilla seeking to provide relief supplies to the Gaza Strip despite Israeli maritime restrictions. The ongoing Israel-Hamas war and humanitarian crisis in Gaza have sharpened tensions. Despite maintaining diplomatic relations to date, Turkey and Israel may face challenges in restoring bilateral ties to their pre-October 2023 status.100 Israel withdrew its diplomats from Turkey in October 2023, and Turkey withdrew its ambassador from Israel in November 2023.101 In August 2025, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu labeled World War I-era Ottoman Empire actions toward Armenians as "genocide";102 Turkey's foreign ministry condemned and rejected Netanyahu's remarks.103

    Since the outbreak of Israel-Hamas conflict, President Erdogan has strongly criticized Israel for its actions in Gaza,104 and the United States for supporting Israel. In May 2024, Turkey's trade ministry announced that Turkey had officially stopped import and export transactions with Israel in all goods until "a permanent cease-fire is established and uninterrupted humanitarian aid is allowed into Gaza."105 (Israeli trade data and other open sources reportedly reveal that exports possibly continue at a reduced level via third countries.106)

    Adding to strains with Israel, Turkey has provided consistent political support to Hamas, and has hosted Hamas political officials from time to time. Turkey also maintains ties with Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Chairman and Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas, who administers partial PA self-rule in the West Bank107 and heads Hamas's secular rival faction Fatah. Erdogan may be interested in helping broker future agreements between the two factions.

    A Treasury Department official visited Turkey in November 2023 and raised concern about Hamas's ability to operate in Turkey to fund potential future attacks; Turkish officials reportedly responded that while they do not consider Hamas to be a terrorist group, Turkey "would not tolerate violations of domestic laws including money laundering and direct funding of violent acts."108 Since October 2023, Treasury has imposed sanctions on several Turkey-based Hamas operatives or Hamas-linked companies.109

    Russia and Ukraine After Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, U.S. and Turkish interests may overlap to some extent in countering Russian aims—including along the Black Sea coast. Turkey has helped strengthen Ukraine's defense capabilities in parallel with other NATO countries (even assisting with U.S. arms manufacturing),110 closed the Bosphorus and Dardanelles Straits to belligerent warships,111 and helped facilitate Ukrainian grain exports. Amid international efforts to facilitate a ceasefire in early 2025, Turkey became a venue for Russia-Ukraine talks (as it did previously in 2022), and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has openly sought Turkish security guarantees for Ukraine (alongside similar efforts to procure U.S. and EU guarantees).112

    Turkey-Ukraine Defense Cooperation

    Turkey and Ukraine have strengthened their relations since Russia's initial invasion of Ukraine in 2014. In 2017, a Turkish security analyst attributed these closer ties to growing mutual interests in countering Russian influence in the Black Sea region and in sharing military technology to expand and increase the self-sufficiency of their respective defense industries.113 Since 2020, the two countries have signed multiple agreements signifying closer cooperation, including a 2022 free trade agreement that came into force in August 2024.114

    In line with these agreements, Turkish and Ukrainian companies have engaged in or planned a significant expansion of defense transactions, including a number of joint development or co-production initiatives.115 Turkish expertise with drone and other aircraft and naval platforms complements Ukrainian skills in designing and constructing aerospace engines and missiles.116 As part of the deepening bilateral defense cooperation, Turkey has sold armed drones to Ukraine,117 and Turkish drone manufacturer Baykar Technology was reportedly close to beginning production at a newly built factory in Ukraine when the facility was reportedly struck by Russian forces in August 2025.118 Additionally, Turkey is helping establish Ukraine's naval capabilities by producing corvettes (small warships) for export.119

    Turkey retains close energy and economic ties with Russia, which is the top oil and natural gas supplier to Turkey. Russia reportedly provided about 65% of Turkey's oil imports and more than 45% of its gas imports in 2024. To avoid being targeted by U.S. sanctions against Russia's Gazprombank, Turkey reportedly arranged to route its payments for gas imports via the Russian subsidiary of an Austrian bank, with an unnamed senior Turkish official cited in May 2025 as saying that "Washington was comfortable with this solution."120 In August 2025, the Trump Administration imposed a 25% secondary tariff on India for importing oil from Russia; if the Administration imposed a similar tariff on Turkey, Turkey could "find itself in a difficult balancing act between energy security and trade interests."121

    Turkey has not joined Western economic sanctions against Russia. Turkish leaders have said they do not consider Turkey bound by other countries' sanctions against Russia, but would prevent the use of Turkish jurisdiction to evade sanctions. In February 2025, the Wall Street Journal reported that Justice Department investigators found that Russian transfers of more than $5 billion to banks in Turkey in 2022—ostensibly for Turkey's first nuclear power plant, which Russia's state-owned Rosatom is building—were used "to dance around U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia's central bank."122 Reportedly largely in response to U.S. actions (including sanctions designations on some Turkey-based entities and individuals123), Turkey has greatly decreased its trade with Russia in items with potential defense applications, according to some open sources.124

    Other Regional Relationships

    Since 2022, Turkey has improved relations with many surrounding countries that had clashed with Turkey politically over the previous decade on issues including the role of Islamist movements, maritime boundaries and energy cooperation, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. For example, Turkey has bolstered its political and economic relations with Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt. Turkey's relations with Greece have improved somewhat after a stretch between 2020 and 2022 that featured heated disputes—and apparent Turkish threats of potential military action—over various political-military, geographic, and energy issues involving Cyprus and the Aegean and eastern Mediterranean regions. Nevertheless, the decades-long Turkey-Greece differences on these issues remain unresolved.

    Moreover, prospects may be improving for Turkey-Armenia ties. Turkey (along with Israel) provided material support to Azerbaijan in its successful military campaigns in 2020 and 2023 to take control of the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region from Armenia. Since then, Azerbaijan-Armenia peace treaty talks and a Turkey-Armenia normalization process have proceeded in parallel. In August 2025 at the White House, Azerbaijan and Armenia initialed a peace agreement (apparently subject to future signing and ratification), and signed a joint declaration regarding their meeting.125 The joint declaration references an agreement by Armenia to cooperate with the United States "and mutually determined third parties, to set forth a framework for" a transit route (under Armenian sovereignty) that would fully connect Azerbaijan and Turkey; the declaration refers to the project as the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP). While the project could provide geopolitical and economic benefits to the United States and Turkey—including via commercial links to the energy-rich Caspian Sea basin and Central Asia—Iran has expressed concern about the project, and Russia also could potentially complicate its implementation. Additionally, various political and military obstacles remain to the signing and ratification of the Azerbaijan-Armenia peace deal, without which full Turkey-Armenia normalization may not be likely.

    Footnotes

    1. In 2021, President Erdogan directed the use of "Türkiye" (the country's name in Turkish) in place of "Turkey" in Turkish government documents and communications. In 2022, the United Nations accepted the Turkish request to change the country's name at the body to "Türkiye." In 2023, the State Department spokesperson said that the department would use the revised spelling "in most formal diplomatic and bilateral contexts" where appropriate. The U.S. Board on Geographic Names retained both "Turkey" and "Republic of Turkey" as conventional names, and the spokesperson said that the State Department could use those names if it is in furtherance of broader public understanding. State Department Press Briefing, January 5, 2023. The State Department website uses both "Turkey" and "Türkiye," as of September 2025; in April 2025, the Senate confirmed Thomas Barrack to be U.S. Ambassador to the Republic of Turkey. 2.

    State Department, Integrated Country Strategy: Turkey, May 13, 2022.

    3.

    In a July 2025 briefing, U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack said, "SDF is YPG [Kurdish acronym for People's Defense Units, a Syrian Kurdish militia]. YPG is a derivative of PKK…. But this is a huge thing in Türkiye, right. The PKK-Türkiye dilemma is really complicated. And YPG was a spinoff of PKK that we allied with to fight ISIS." State Department, "Strengthening U.S.-Türkiye Relations and Advancing Relations with Syria," July 11, 2025.

    4.

    "Full text: PKK's statement on disbanding decision," Bianet, May 13, 2025; Rebecca Lucas, "Disbanding the PKK: Political Engagement as the Key to Ending Insurgencies," RAND, June 10, 2025.

    5.

    OECD, "OECD headline inflation increases slightly to 4.2% in June 2025," August 5, 2025.

    6.

    "Turkey's strongman is becoming Donald Trump's point man," Economist, July 3, 2025.

    7.

    "Remarks: Donald Trump Holds a Bilat with Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel - April 7, 2025," Roll Call.

    8.

    Sumeyye Dilara Dincer and Fatma Zehra Solmaz, "Türkiye is 'key' on new road to peace in Middle East: US envoy," Hurriyet Daily News, June 29, 2025.

    9.

    "Turkey's strongman is becoming Donald Trump's point man," Economist.

    10.

    CRS Insight IN11557, Turkey: U.S. Sanctions Under the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    11.

    For the roll call, see https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1182/vote_118_2_00062.htm. See also Bryant Harris, "Turkey F-16 sale to proceed after Senate vote," Defense News, February 29, 2024.

    12.

    Richard Fontaine and Gibbs McKinley, Global Swing States and the New Great Power Competition, Center for a New American Security, June 2025.

    13.

    "European Union countries biggest investors in Türkiye," Hurriyet Daily News, September 13, 2024.

    14.

    In November 2024, BRICS (which now also includes Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates as members) reportedly offered Turkey "partner country" status, short of full membership. Turkey became a "dialogue partner" with the SCO in 2013.

    15.

    Selcan Hacaoglu and Firat Kozok, "Turkey Bids to Join BRICS in Push to Build Alliances Beyond West," Bloomberg, September 2, 2024.

    16.

    Morgan Phillips, "Trump eyes lifting sanctions, potential sale of prized fighter jet to Turkey," Fox News, March 21, 2025. See also Ragip Soylu, "Turkey joins western critical minerals club amid EU-China rivalry," Middle East Eye, September 20, 2024; Can Kasapoglu, "Hyperwar, artificial intelligence, and Homo sapiens," Atlantic Council, June 2, 2025.

    17.

    Dincer and Solmaz, "Türkiye is 'key' on new road to peace in Middle East: US envoy."

    18.

    Congressional Quarterly transcript of July 9, 2025 hearing at https://plus.cq.com/doc/congressionaltranscripts-8281722?3.

    19.

    See, for example, Turkey Diplomatic Realignment Act (H.R. 1890) and Condemning Turkey for its illegal occupation of Cyprus and encouraging President Trump to make the resolution of the Cyprus problem a top foreign policy priority (H.Res. 17) from the 119th Congress; and Countering Turkish Aggression Act of 2024 (S. 5643) from the 118th Congress.

    20.

    State Department, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2024, Turkey (Türkiye); European Commission, Türkiye Report 2024, October 30, 2024.

    21.

    Gulen (who was a permanent U.S. resident from the 1990s until his death in 2024) and the Gulen movement made common cause with Erdogan during his first decade in power, before a major falling out over corruption charges brought by Turkish prosecutors (possibly aligned with the Gulen movement) in late 2013 against ministers in Erdogan's government. For more on Gulen and the movement, see CRS In Focus IF10444, Fethullah Gulen, Turkey, and the United States: A Reference, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas. Partly because of Gulen's residence in the United States in the final decades of his life, many Turks reportedly subscribe to conspiracy theories about possible U.S. involvement in the 2016 coup attempt.

    22.

    Gareth Jenkins, "Five Years After July 15: Erdogan's New Turkey and the Myth of Its Immaculate Conception," Turkey Analyst, July 15, 2021; Dorian Jones, "Turkey Looks Back at Failed Coup," Voice of America, July 15, 2019.

    23.

    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights: Election Observation Mission Final Report: Republic of TürkiyeGeneral Elections 14 May and Presidential Election, Second Round 28 May 2023 (published September 29, 2023).

    24.

    See, for example, Cengiz Candar, Turkey's Mission Impossible: War and Peace with the Kurds, Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Lexington Books, 2020. See also Amberin Zaman, "Turkey hands Kurdish leaders heavy sentences, dimming hopes of democratic change," Al-Monitor, May 16, 2024.

    25.

    Safak Timur and Carlotta Gall, "Kurdish Insurgent Group Declares Cease-Fire in Conflict with Turkey," New York Times, March 1, 2025.

    26.

    Elvan Kivilcim and Sudarsan Raghavan, "Kurdish Militant Group PKK to End Four-Decade Conflict with Turkey," Wall Street Journal, May 12, 2025.

    27.

    "Turkish parliamentary committee begins work on PKK peace initiative," Associated Press, August 5, 2025.

    28.

    Ayla Jean Yackley, "Erdoğan crackdown spans Turkey's mayors and an astrologer," Financial Times, February 24, 2025; "Mayor of eastern district removed from office over PKK ties," Hurriyet Daily News, February 24, 2025.

    29.

    "Explainer: Why is Turkey's main opposition party facing a legal crackdown?" Reuters, September 12, 2025.

    30.

    Nate Schenkkan, "Erdogan Is Angling to Remain Turkey's Ultimate Authority," World Politics Review, July 1, 2025; Ezgi Akin, "As clock ticks down on Turkey's Sozcu TV, is Erdogan muting opposition?" Al-Monitor, July 8, 2025.

    31.

    "Explainer: Why is Turkey's main opposition party facing a legal crackdown?" Reuters; John Paul Rathbone, "Turkey's opposition head accuses Erdoğan of legal 'coup,'" Financial Times, September 7, 2025; "Turkey court delays ruling on opposition leader amid political crisis," Reuters, September 15, 2025.

    32.

    Selcan Hacaoglu, "Turkey Opposition Calls Extraordinary Congress to Shield Leader," Bloomberg, September 6, 2025.

    33.

    "Turkey opposition uses tables, chairs to block police besieging headquarters," Reuters, September 8, 2025.

    34.

    Ben Hubbard, "Turkey Jails Istanbul Mayor Who Was Expected to Run for President," New York Times, March 23, 2025; "Gezi protests in 2013 are Erdoğan's nightmare, protesters' inspiration," Turkish Minute, March 25, 2025. At the time of Imamoglu's detention, he was already appealing a criminal conviction from December 2022 for insulting members of Turkey's Supreme Electoral Council that he and some observers characterized as politically motivated. Istanbul's CHP-controlled municipal council elected CHP member Nuri Aslan to serve as interim mayor while Imamoglu is in prison.

    35.

    Ragip Soylu, "What's Erdogan's end game with Imamoglu's arrest?" Middle East Eye, March 24, 2025.

    36.

    State Department, "Secretary of State Marco Rubio Remarks to the Press," March 28, 2025.

    37.

    Justin Keay, "Turkey's Positive Prospects," Global Finance, March 14, 2024.

    38.

    Jared Malsin and Elvan Kivilcim, "Erdogan Faces Big Vote Test as Turkish Economy Suffers," Wall Street Journal, April 26, 2023.

    39.

    The sources for this paragraph are the Commerce Department's International Trade Administration, Turkey Country Commercial Guide at https://www.trade.gov/knowledge-product/turkey-oil-and-gas-equipment-lng-and-lng-terminals-upstream-downstream; and Francesco Siccardi, "Understanding the Energy Drivers of Turkey's Foreign Policy," Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, February 28, 2024.

    40. White House, "Remarks by President Trump and President Erdoğan of Turkey in Joint Press Conference," November 13, 2019, at https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-president-erdogan-turkey-joint-press-conference/. During the Senate Foreign Relations Committee nomination hearing for Ambassador (then Ambassador-designate) Barrack, he said, "I believe that we can reach the stated goal [of] President Trump and President Erdogan to try and get to $100 billion in shared trade on a bilateral basis a year." Congressional Quarterly transcript of April 1, 2025 hearing at https://plus.cq.com/doc/congressionaltranscripts-8211947?3. 41.

    Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, "FDI in Türkiye," available at https://www.invest.gov.tr/en/whyturkey/pages/fdi-in-turkey.aspx.

    42.

    CRS Report R48549, Presidential 2025 Tariff Actions: Timeline and Status, by Keigh E. Hammond and William F. Burkhart.

    43.

    White House, "Further Modifying the Reciprocal Tariff Rates," July 31, 2025.

    44.

    "Türkiye emerged 'positively' in light of new US tariffs: Trade Ministry," Anadolu Agency, August 1, 2025.

    45.

    Federal Register, "Defending American Companies and Innovators from Overseas Extortion and Unfair Fines and Penalties," February 21, 2025 (90 FR 10685).

    46.

    Can Kasapoglu, "Drones and More: Turkish Defense Cooperation Trends in the Air," Defense Journal by Atlantic Council IN TURKEY, Issue 3, June 2024; Barin Kayaoglu, "Turkey's Steel Dome air defense system: Game changer or work in progress?" Al-Monitor, September 7, 2025. For information on countries in Europe, Asia, and Africa that have reportedly acquired Turkish drone aircraft, see Ahmed Abouyoussef, "Turkish Drones: Expanding Influence and Bringing New Challenges," Al Habtoor Research Centre, November 25, 2024; Paul Iddon, "Turkey and Israel Drone Makers Compete for Asian Buyers," Forbes, September 3, 2025; "Turkey's Best Drones Are Being Shot Down over Middle East and Africa," Forbes, April 6, 2025.

    47.

    Sinem Adar, "Turkey's Geostrategy: Opportunism and Dissonance," Internationale Politik Quarterly, January 10, 2024.

    48.

    Amnon Aran and Mustafa Kutlay, Turkey's Quest for Strategic Autonomy in an Era of Multipolarity, Istanbul Policy Center (Sabanci University), February 2024.

    49.

    Can Kasapoglu, "Turkey," The Nations of NATO: Shaping the Alliance's Relevance and Cohesion, Thierry Tardy, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, p. 97.

    50.

    Dimitar Bechev, "Russia, Turkey and the Spectre of Regional Instability," Al Sharq Strategic Research, April 13, 2022; Mitch Prothero, "Turkey's Erdogan has been humiliating Putin all year," Business Insider, October 22, 2020.

    51.

    Selcan Hacaoglu, "Turkey Joins NATO Allies in Suspending Europe Arms Treaty," Bloomberg, April 5, 2024.

    52.

    "Turkey backs NATO's 5% defence spending goal, plans nationwide air shield, source says," Reuters, June 26, 2025. The 5% benchmark includes at least 3.5% for "core defence requirements," with the remainder for security-related infrastructure and preparedness. NATO, "The Hague Summit Declaration," June 25, 2025.

    53.

    "Pentagon pushes back on claim that US to leave Turkey's Incirlik base," Al-Monitor, September 16, 2020.

    54.

    State Department Press Briefing, June 6, 2024; Defense Security Cooperation Agency, "Türkiye – F-16 Aircraft Acquisition and Modernization," Transmittal No. 23-07, January 26, 2024.

    55.

    "Turkey scales down $23 bln F-16 jet deal with US, minister says," Reuters, November 27, 2024. For more on technical aspects of Turkey's domestic F-16 modernization plans, see Boyko Nikolov, "Turkey shocks the U.S.: Drops F-16 fighters deal, goes local," BulgarianMilitary.com, November 27, 2024.

    56.

    Barin Kayaoglu, "With F-35, Eurofighter jets on table, Turkey cools off on F-16 deal," Al-Monitor, April 13, 2025.

    57.

    Remi Daniel and Gallia Lindenstrauss, "The Procurement Journey of the Next Fighter Jet: Ankara's Dilemmas," Institute for National Security Studies (Israel), August 21, 2025.

    58.

    CRS Report R47493, Turkey (Türkiye): Possible U.S. Sale of F-16 Aircraft, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    59.

    Since President Trump issued Executive Order 14347 on September 10, 2025, the Defense Department has been operating under a secondary Department of War designation.

    60.

    Defense Department, "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Ellen M. Lord and Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy David J. Trachtenberg Press Briefing on DOD's Response to Turkey Accepting Delivery of the Russian S-400 Air and Missile Defense System," July 17, 2019.

    61.

    Kayaoglu, "With F-35, Eurofighter jets on table, Turkey cools off on F-16 deal."

    62.

    Laura Kelly, "Congress cheers Biden's Turkey gambit in Russia tug-of-war," The Hill, September 25, 2024.

    63.

    Phillips, "Trump eyes lifting sanctions, potential sale of prized fighter jet to Turkey."

    64.

    Kayaoglu, "With F-35, Eurofighter jets on table, Turkey cools off on F-16 deal."

    65.

    Jared Szuba, "Trump admin reaffirms F-35 ban on Turkey after letter from 40 Democrats," Al-Monitor, August 21, 2025. Text of August 7 letter at https://pappas.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/pappas.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/08.07.05-letter-to-secretary-rubio-on-f-35-sales-to-turkey.pdf.

    66.

    See https://rules.house.gov/bill/119/hr-3838. See also Marc Rod and Emily Jacobs, "Lawmakers take aim at Turkey in 2026 defense bill," Jewish Insider, September 4, 2025.

    67.

    Defense Security Cooperation Agency, "Türkiye – AIM-120C-8 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles" and "Türkiye – AIM-9X Sidewinder Block II Missiles," Transmittals No. 19-03 and 20-61, May 14, 2025.

    68.

    Levent Kenez, "Turkey open to previously owned Eurofighter purchase amid urgent air force needs" Nordic Monitor, February 7, 2025; Ezgi Akin, "New German government to decide on Eurofighter sale to Turkey: Officials," Al-Monitor, April 23, 2025.

    69.

    Paul Iddon, "Turkey Questions the Wisdom of Having an All-American Air Force," Forbes, February 6, 2023.

    70.

    "Turkish engine maker says fighter jet power unit almost ready," Daily Sabah, February 20, 2024; Sebastien Roblin, "Turkey's Very First Fighter Jet Made Its History-Shattering Flight," Popular Mechanics, February 29, 2024.

    71.

    Rebecca Lucas and Stuart Dee, "Crowning Achievement? Kaan and the Turkish Defense Industry," War on the Rocks, May 13, 2024; Selcan Hacaoglu, "Turkey Seeks US Approval to Buy GE Aerospace Engines for Military Jets," September 13, 2024; Paul Antonopoulos, "Turkey's ambitious '5th generation' KAAN fighter jet continues to face difficulties," Greek City Times, February 13, 2025.

    72.

    Agnes Helou, "From rebuilding the armed forces to selling drones, how Turkey can enhance Syria's defense," Breaking Defense, February 13, 2025.

    73.

    "Türkiye reports mass return by Syrians," Hurriyet Daily News, August 15, 2025.

    74.

    Department of Defense, "Statement from Chief Pentagon Spokesman Sean Parnell Announcing the Consolidation of Forces in Syria Under Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve," April 18, 2025; Eric Schmitt, "U.S. Starts Withdrawing Hundreds of Troops from Northeastern Syria," New York Times, April 18, 2025.

    75.

    Lead Inspector General Report to the U.S. Congress, Operation Inherent Resolve and Other U.S. Government Activities Related to Iraq and Syria, April 1, 2025-June 30, 2025.

    76.

    Amberin Zaman, "PKK ends 40-year war against Turkey, vows to pursue Kurdish rights," Al-Monitor, May 12, 2025.

    77.

    Ezgi Akin, "U.S. Starts Withdrawing Hundreds of Troops from Northeastern Syria," Al-Monitor, May 12, 2025; "Türkiye, Jordan, Syria, Iraq to Discuss Security Cooperation in Amman," Asharq Al Awsat, March 8, 2025.

    78.

    X, Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec), May 14, 2025 – 4:21 AM, https://x.com/PressSec/status/1922567846317392240.

    79.

    Didar Abdalrahman, "Syria's interim president, SDF chief sign landmark deal," Rudaw, March 10, 2025.

    80.

    Amberin Zaman, "Turkey's Erdogan rebukes Syrian Kurds over decentralization calls, but keeps tone mild," Al-Monitor, April 30, 2025.

    81.

    "Syria's Kurdish-led SDF, government forces clash in Aleppo province," Al Jazeera, August 4, 2025.

    82.

    Ragip Soylu, "PKK leader Ocalan's historic call to disarm faces a major obstacle," Middle East Eye, March 10, 2025.

    83.

    "Kurdish fighters leave northern city in Syria as part of deal with central government," Associated Press, April 4, 2025.

    84.

    Amberin Zaman, "Syrian Kurd commander: Aleppo power-sharing deal could be model for nation," Al-Monitor, April 12, 2025; Alissa J. Rubin and Daniel Berehulak, "Kurdish Distrust of Syria's New Government Runs Deep," New York Times, April 28, 2025.

    85.

    Ezgi Akin, "Turkey, Syria ink defense cooperation deal as Ankara ups pressure on Kurdish-led SDF," Al-Monitor, August 13, 2025.

    86.

    "Turkey calls on SDF to expedite integration with Damascus," Rudaw, July 26, 2025.

    87.

    Amberin Zaman, "Turkey-France rivalry disrupts US-led mediation between Damascus, Syrian Kurds," Al-Monitor, August 7, 2025.

    88.

    Ragip Soylu, "Turkey-Syria defence deal covers training and weapons supply," Middle East Eye, August 14, 2025.

    89.

    Amberin Zaman, "Iran spooked by Turkey's overtures to Kurds, rising role in Syria, Iraq," Al-Monitor, March 4, 2025.

    90.

    "Exclusive: Israel hit Syrian bases scoped by Turkey, sources say," Reuters, April 4, 2025. One media source has quoted an unnamed senior Israeli official as saying, "Turkey is engaged in acts that are a threat to Israel's national security, from training Hamas operatives to transferring money from Iran via Istanbul to Hezbollah and threatening Israeli aircraft overflying Syria." Zaman, "Iran spooked by Turkey's overtures to Kurds, rising role in Syria, Iraq."

    91.

    Barin Kayaoglu, "With Iran in decline, can Israel and Turkey align on Syria deconfliction?" Al-Monitor, June 29, 2025.

    92.

    Kayaoglu, "With Iran in decline, can Israel and Turkey align on Syria deconfliction?"

    93.

    Soylu, "Turkey-Syria defence deal covers training and weapons supply."

    94.

    Ezgi Akin, "After inking military pact, Turkey to provide Syria with weapons, training," Al-Monitor, August 14, 2025.

    95.

    Soylu, "Turkey-Syria defence deal covers training and weapons supply."

    96.

    Akin, "After inking military pact, Turkey to provide Syria with weapons, training."

    97.

    "Israeli strike on Syria targeted Turkish-supplied missiles: report," Turkish Minute, September 9, 2025.

    98.

    Ragip Soylu, "Israel seeking to expand into 'Greater Israel,' says Turkish foreign minister," Middle East Eye, September 15, 2025.

    99.

    "Erdogan says Turkey, Israel to take steps in energy drilling soon, media report," Reuters, September 21, 2023.

    100.

    Burak Ünveren, "Israel-Hamas war strains ties with Turkey," Deutsche Welle, November 4, 2023.

    101.

    The countries' ambassadors had arrived at their respective posts less than a year before, in December 2022, after having previously withdrawn on a reciprocal basis in 2018.

    102.

    Amberin Zaman, "Netanyahu makes ill-timed Armenian genocide nod as Yerevan courts Turkey," Al-Monitor, August 27, 2025.

    103.

    Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "No: 178, 27 August 2025, Regarding Netanyahu's Remarks About the Events of 1915."

    104.

    In August 2024, Turkey submitted a declaration of intervention to the International Court of Justice in support of the case filed by South Africa against Israel under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Some other countries have also intervened.

    105.

    Gulsin Harman and Ben Hubbard, "Turkey Halts Trade with Israel amid Deteriorating Relations," New York Times, May 3, 2024. In August 2025, Turkish officials said that Turkey is prohibiting Israeli ships from using Turkish ports, and vice versa, and is also prohibiting Israeli government aircraft and flights carrying arms for Israel from transiting Turkish airspace. "Turkey bars Israeli ships from its ports, restricts airspace," Reuters, August 29, 2025.

    106.

    "Turkey's exports to Israel hit $393.7 mln in early 2025 despite official embargo," Turkish Minute, July 2, 2025.

    107.

    Some Israelis and U.S. lawmakers refer to the West Bank as "Judea and Samaria," the biblical names for the region. Recognizing Judea and Samaria Act (S. 384 and H.R. 902); Ephrat Livni, "U.S. Evangelicals Press for Annexation of West Bank," New York Times, March 10, 2025. The State Department uses the term "West Bank" under regulations last updated in March 2024. See https://fam.state.gov/FAM/05FAH03/05FAH030410.html.

    108.

    "U.S. presses sceptical Turkey to curb Hamas fundraising," Reuters, November 30, 2023.

    109.

    Treasury Department, "U.S. and UK Target Additional Hamas Finance Officials and Representatives," December 13, 2023.

    110.

    Doug Cameron, "How a Texas Factory Is Emerging as a Key Ammo Supplier for the U.S., Ukraine," Wall Street Journal, June 24, 2024.

    111.

    Turkey generally closed the Straits to belligerents (affecting Russia far more than Ukraine because of the disparity between their Black Sea naval contingents) pursuant to Article 19 of the 1936 Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits (the "Montreux Convention"). In March 2022 correspondence with CRS, a Turkish official explained that Turkey had advised all countries to refrain from sending warships through the Straits, but had not formally closed the Straits to non-belligerent states. This stance toward non-belligerents generated debate over whether Turkey was putting NATO countries at a disadvantage. CRS Insight IN11885, Russia's Invasion of Ukraine: Turkey's Response and Black Sea Access Issues, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    112.

    "Ukraine's Zelenskiy says Turkey is a partner in security guarantees," Reuters, March 14, 2025; Ragip Soylu, "Turkey is still ready to deploy peace force in Ukraine," Middle East Eye, August 20, 2025.

    113.

    Metin Gurcan, "Turkey-Ukraine defense industry ties are booming," Al-Monitor, May 1, 2017.

    114.

    "Free trade agreement between Turkey and Ukraine comes into force," Platts, August 5, 2024.

    115.

    Can Kasapoglu, "Turkish Drone Strategy in the Black Sea Region and Beyond," Jamestown Foundation, October 12, 2022; Pinar Dost, "The Ukraine-Turkey defense partnership with the potential to transform Black Sea and Euro-Atlantic security," Atlantic Council, March 5, 2024.

    116.

    Kasapoglu, "Turkish Drone Strategy in the Black Sea Region and Beyond."

    117.

    Ivan Khomenko, "Ukraine's Bayraktar TB2 Returns to Combat—Why Now, and Where Has It Been?" United24 Media, June 26, 2025.

    118.

    "Russian strike hits Turkish drone maker Baykar's factory in Kyiv," Türkiye Today, August 28, 2025; Maria Tril, "Russia strikes Bayraktar drone factory in Kyiv for fourth time in six months," Euromaidan Press, August 28, 2025.

    119.

    Kate Tringham, "Update: Turkey launches first Ada-class corvette for Ukraine and cuts steel for second," Janes Navy International, October 3, 2022.

    120.

    Ragip Soylu, "Turkey taps Austrian bank for Russian gas payments to skip sanctions," Middle East Eye, May 24, 2025.

    121.

    Analyst quoted in Samuel Wendel, "As Trump plays Russia oil sanctions gambit, will Middle East profit or pay?" Al-Monitor, August 11, 2025. See also "Trump 'ready' to sanction Russia if Nato nations stop buying its oil," BBC News, September 13, 2025.

    122.

    Joe Wallace et al., "Moscow Has $2 Billion Stuck at JPMorgan," Wall Street Journal, February 2, 2025.

    123.

    Treasury Department, "Treasury Takes Aim at Third-Country Sanctions Evaders and Russian Producers Supporting Russia's Military Industrial Base," October 30, 2024; "U.S. Continues to Degrade Russia's Military-Industrial Base and Target Third-Country Support with Nearly 300 New Sanctions," May 1, 2024.

    124.

    Adam Samson et al., "Turkey blocks exports of military-linked goods to Russia after US warning," Financial Times, October 22, 2024.

    125.

    Text of peace agreement at https://mfa.gov.az/files/Birge%20Beyanname-ABS/Initialed%20Peace%20Agreement%20(EN).pdf. Text of joint declaration at https://mfa.gov.az/files/Birge%20Beyanname-ABS/JD_AZE_ARM_final_witness%20signature.pdf. Other sources discussing these agreements and their implications, as explained in this paragraph, include Barin Kayaoglu, "US-brokered Armenia-Azerbaijan deal hands Turkey South Caucasus opening," Al-Monitor, August 17, 2025; and Oxford Analytica, "Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan will move closer," August 14, 2025.

    World Economic Outlook

    4 See, for example, Cengiz Candar, Turkey’s Mission Impossible: War and Peace with the Kurds, Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Lexington Books, 2020. See also Amberin Zaman, “Turkey hands Kurdish leaders heavy sentences, dimming hopes of democratic change,” Al-Monitor, May 16, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 3

    Database; Economist Intelligence Unit; Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook; and the Turkish Statistical Institute.

    Since the Palestinian Sunni Islamist group Hamas (another FTO) led attacks into Israel in October 2023, and war ensued, Turkey’s ties with Hamas, Erdogan’s criticism of Israel, and Turkish restrictions on most exports to Israel have raised additional concerns with the Biden Administration and some Members.5 U.S. officials have consulted with Turkish counterparts regarding regional conflict and tensions. Following Iran’s first-ever direct attack against Israel on April 13, 2024, Secretary of State Antony Blinken had a call with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan to thank him for his “ongoing engagement to prevent further escalation in the region.”6 Media reports suggest that Turkey mediated communications between U.S. and Iranian officials as part of broader efforts to minimize the impact of direct Israel-Iran conflict.7

    For additional information, see CRS Report R41368, Turkey (Türkiye): Background and U.S. Relations, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    Domestic Issues

    Political Developments Under Erdogan’s Rule

    President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (pronounced air-doe-wan) has ruled Turkey since becoming prime minister in 2003, and has steadily deepened his control over the country’s populace and institutions. Many observers describe Erdogan as a polarizing figure, and elections have reflected roughly equal portions of the country supporting and opposing his rule. U.S. and European Union (EU) officials have expressed a number of concerns about authoritarian governance and erosion of rule of law and civil liberties in Turkey.8

    After Erdogan became president in August 2014 via Turkey’s first-ever popular presidential election, he claimed a mandate for increasing his power and pursuing a presidential system of governance, which he cemented through victories in a 2017 constitutional referendum and 2018 presidential and parliamentary elections. In 2016, rogue military officers staged a coup attempt in which hundreds were killed and thousands injured, after which the government detained tens of thousands, enacted sweeping changes to military and civilian agencies, and took over or closed various businesses, schools, and media outlets. Erdogan has argued, with considerable popular support, that the Fethullah Gulen movement (see text box below) orchestrated the coup attempt, which military forces and citizen groups loyal to the government ultimately thwarted.9 Some leading opposition figures in Turkey have accused Erdogan of planning, controlling, and/or using the failed coup to suppress dissent and consolidate power. Since the attempt, Erdogan and his Islamist-leaning Justice and Development Party (Turkish acronym AKP) have adopted more

    5 “Türkiye’s Erdogan Rejects US Pressure to Cut Hamas Ties,” Asharq Al-Awsat, December 3, 2023; Emily Jacobs et al., “U.S. lawmakers call for possible sanctions against Turkey in response to new trade restrictions against Israel,” Jewish Insider, April 9, 2024.

    6 State Department, “Secretary Blinken’s Call with Turkish Foreign Minister Fidan,” April 14, 2024.

    7 “Iran told Turkey in advance of its operation against Israel, Turkish source says,” Reuters, April 14, 2024.

    8 State Department, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2023, Turkey; European Commission, Türkiye 2023 Report, November 8, 2023.

    9 Gareth Jenkins, “Five Years After July 15: Erdogan’s New Turkey and the Myth of Its Immaculate Conception,” Turkey Analyst, July 15, 2021; Dorian Jones, “Turkey Looks Back at Failed Coup,” Voice of America, July 15, 2019. Partly because of Gulen’s residence in the United States, many Turks reportedly subscribe to conspiracy theories about possible U.S. involvement.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 4

    nationalistic domestic and foreign policy approaches, perhaps partly because of their reliance on parliamentary support from the Nationalist Movement Party (Turkish acronym MHP).

    Fethullah Gulen and Hizmet

    Gulen, who was born in Turkey between 1938 and 1941, is a former Turkish state-employed imam who left Turkey for medical treatment in the United States in 1999 and has reportedly been a permanent U.S. resident since 2008.10 Gulen lives in seclusion with some of his adherents at a retreat in Saylorsburg, Pennsylvania. The Gulen movement or community (commonly known by supporters as Hizmet, or “service” in Turkish) is an array of individuals, educational institutions, and other organizations in Turkey and abroad with a connection to Gulen or his teachings. These teachings come from a distinctly Turkish brand of Islam. Over time, Gulen-inspired schools, businesses, media enterprises, charitable organizations, and civil society groups came to exercise considerable influence in Turkey. Many observers claim that the movement aligned itself with Erdogan during his first decade in power, using its social connections, international reach, and media clout to bolster AKP rule at home and abroad.11 In 2013, after prosecutors brought corruption charges against several people, including some Turkish officials and others with apparent ties to Erdogan, Erdogan accused Gulen and his loyalists of an illegal effort to oust elected officials via a “parallel structure” within key state institutions. The Turkish government designated Gulen’s movement as a terrorist organization in May 2016 and accused it of perpetrating the unsuccessful July 2016 coup attempt; Gulen and his movement have denied any involvement.12

    Erdogan and the AKP have had a mixed electoral track record since his 2018 presidential victory. In 2019, candidates from the secular-oriented Republican People’s Party (CHP) won the mayoralties of some major Turkish cities, defeating the AKP, including in Istanbul, Turkey’s largest city and economic hub, and Ankara, its capital.

    With Turkey suffering through an economic crisis and major earthquakes in early 2023, Erdogan and the AKP were challenged in presidential and parliamentary elections held that May by a grouping of diverse opposition parties, led by the Republican People’s Party (CHP). Erdogan and the AKP-led coalition prevailed.

    Commenting on the election process for the presidential run-off, a joint Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)-Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe international election observation mission assessed that the election “offered voters a choice between genuine political alternatives and voter participation remained high, however … biased media coverage and the lack of a level playing field gave an unjustified advantage to the incumbent…. In an environment with restrictions on freedom of expression, both private and public media did not ensure editorial independence and impartiality in their coverage of the campaign, detracting from the ability of voters to make an informed choice. Election day was generally calm and well-administered. However, instances of deficient implementation of certain procedures, particularly during the vote count, were noted.”13 Some analysts challenged whether the elections could be characterized as free, given the government’s reported use of state resources and allied media to boost its standing.14

    10 Cameron Glenn, “Profile: Fethullah Gulen,” Wilson Center, July 18, 2016; Nahal Toosi, “The cleric, the coup and the conspiracy,” Politico, September 9, 2016.

    11 Dexter Filkins, “The Deep State,” New Yorker, March 4, 2012.

    12 Dylan Matthews, “Turkey’s coup: The Gulen Movement, explained,” Vox, September 13, 2016.

    13 OSCE, Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions, Republic of TürkiyePresidential Election, Second Round, 28 May 2023 (published May 29, 2023).

    14 Soner Cagaptay, “Erdogan cements his power with a victory in Turkey’s presidential runoff election,” Foreign Affairs, May 29, 2023; Gonul Tol, “Erdogan Won by Exploiting Fear,” Foreign Policy, May 31, 2023. The potential CHP presidential candidate with possibly the best chance to unseat Erdogan, Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, may have had his prospects to run in the election undermined by a criminal conviction (under broad laws prohibiting insults

    (continued...)

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 5

    March 2024 Local Elections

    The opposition coalition splintered in the wake of the 2023 defeat, but the CHP rebounded in March 2024 local elections amid lower turnout and persistent inflation. CHP candidates defended the Istanbul and Ankara mayoralties that they had won in 2019, and also won in some additional areas while outpolling the AKP nationwide—the first time another party received more votes than the AKP in an election it contested (going back to the 2002 national election).

    It is unclear what kind of lasting impact the local elections will have on Turkish political developments. President Erdogan’s five-year presidential term expires in 2028. He said in advance of the 2024 local races that they would be his “last” election, but some have speculated that he may seek to remain in office by getting a three-fifths majority of parliament to call early national elections (which arguably would allow him to run again).15 Another route would be via constitutional changes; Erdogan has previously talked of his desire to replace the 1982 military government-era constitution. While Erdogan has come back from previous political reverses and has four years until the next scheduled national elections, the 2024 local election results may signal vulnerability in future campaigns.

    Economic Issues

    For more than a decade, Turkey’s currency (the lira) has been trending downward relative to the dollar, with its decline probably driven in part by broader concerns by foreign investors about Turkey’s policymaking and economy.16 It has lost more than 88% of its value against the dollar since 2018, with much of the decrease coming after major interest rate cuts that President Erdogan backed from 2021 to 2023.17 Official annual inflation reached a 24-year peak of 86% in October 2022.18

    The currency and inflation crisis in Turkey has dramatically affected consumers’ cost of living and the cost of international borrowing (mostly conducted in U.S. dollars) for banks and private sector companies. The government has sought to lessen the impact of inflation by providing tax cuts, minimum wage increases, greater access to early retirement benefits, and subsidies for basic expenses, along with protection for consumers who keep their bank accounts in liras, and borrowing incentives for banks that hold liras.19 President Erdogan has insisted that Turkey will not turn to international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for assistance, after Turkey in 2013 paid off loans that—in the aggregate—had been outstanding for 52 years.20

    against public officials, and pending final resolution on appeal) that he and other opposition figures claim was politically motivated. Ben Hubbard and Safak Timur, “Conviction May Sideline Rival of Turkish Leader,” New York Times, December 15, 2022.

    15 “Justice minister says Erdoğan could run for presidency again if parliament calls early elections,” Turkish Minute, March 12, 2024.

    16 Justin Keay, “Turkey’s Positive Prospects,” Global Finance, March 14, 2024.

    17 Rumeysa Koc, “Why is the Turkish lira’s value still falling?” Al Jazeera, June 18, 2023.

    18 Jared Malsin and Elvan Kivilcim, “Erdogan Faces Big Vote Test as Turkish Economy Suffers,” Wall Street Journal, April 26, 2023.

    19 M. Murat Kubilay, “Already vulnerable, Turkey’s economy now faces massive earthquake recovery costs,” Middle East Institute, February 13, 2023; “Erdogan offers free gas pre-election after first Black Sea field shipment,” Reuters, April 23, 2023.

    20 “Turkey pays off the last installment of its debt to IMF,” Anadolu Agency, May 14, 2013.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 6

    In the wake of Erdogan’s May 2023 reelection, he named Mehmet Simsek—a prominent AKP figure and professional economist—as Turkey’s finance minister (his second stint in the position, after serving from 2009 to 2015). Under Simsek, Turkey’s central bank appears to have returned to a more orthodox approach to monetary policy in an effort to attract more foreign capital, raising its key interest rate from 8.5% to 50%—one of the highest in the world—since Simsek’s appointment. As of August 2024, the rate was close to official year-on-year inflation of 52.0%.

    Turkey’s manufacturing-based economy has remained relatively resilient and is anchored by its customs union with the EU. Turkish officials also are continuing efforts to bolster trade and foreign direct investment with several countries, including multiple Arab Gulf states.21

    U.S.-Turkey Economic Cooperation22

    Turkey’s economy—the 19th-largest in the world (according to World Bank data for 2022)—presents attractions and challenges for potential U.S. trade and investment partners. The United States and Turkey have various bilateral agreements to promote economic cooperation, though no free trade agreement. Bilateral trade volume for 2022 (per the Department of Commerce) topped $34 billion; Turkey seeks to expand it to $100 billion. U.S.-Turkey economic ties account for a small fraction of U.S. international trade and investment. Turkey has a far closer economic relationship with the EU (with which it has had a customs union on manufactured goods since 1995). In 2023, for merchandise trade, the United States comprised 5.8% of Turkey’s exports and 4.4% of its imports (per data from the Turkish Statistical Institute). For purposes of comparison, in the same year the EU bloc comprised 40.8% of Turkey’s exports and 29.3% of its imports. From 2003 to 2021, EU countries provided more than 50% of foreign direct investment in Turkey, and the United States supplied 8.1%.23

    Selected Turkish Foreign Policy Issues

    As a more multipolar global system has emerged in the past decade, Turkey has sought greater independence of action.24 Turkish leaders appear to compartmentalize their partnerships and rivalries with other influential countries—including other great powers such as Russia and China—as each situation dictates, partly in an attempt to reduce Turkey’s dependence on these actors and maintain its leverage with them.25 Observers debate whether or not this approach to foreign policy has been well-designed or -implemented.26 Turkey’s future foreign policy course could depend partly on the degree to which Turkish leaders feel either strengthened or constrained by their traditional security and economic ties with Western powers, and how these perceptions drive Turkey’s approach to its global relationships.

    As Turkish leaders determine how to best proceed in line with the foreign policy considerations described above, some features appear to have become regular parts of Turkey’s policy agenda. These include:

    21 Ezgi Akin, “Turkey, Iraq, UAE, Qatar ink $20B transportation deal during Erdogan visit,” Al-Monitor, April 22, 2024; Andrew England and Adam Samson, “UAE and Turkey sign multibillion-dollar agreements,” Financial Times, July 19, 2023; Paul Iddon, “How Saudi Arabia and UAE learned to stop worrying and love Turkey’s Bayraktar drones,” Business Insider, August 6, 2023.

    22 See CRS In Focus IF10961, U.S.-Turkey Trade Relations, by Shayerah I. Akhtar.

    23 Presidency of the Republic of Türkiye, “FDI in Türkiye,” available at https://www.invest.gov.tr/en/whyturkey/pages/ fdi-in-turkey.aspx.

    24 Remarks by James Jeffrey, Atlantic Council, “Post election transatlantic relations with Turkey,” May 31, 2023, at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/event/post-election-transatlantic-relations-with-turkey/.

    25 Evren Balta, “Normalizing transactionalism: Turkish foreign policy after the 2023 elections,” Middle East Institute, July 9, 2024.

    26 Marc Pierini, “Turkey’s Foreign Policy Ambitions Meet Reality,” Carnegie Europe, September 12, 2024; Yusuf Can, “Turkey’s Balancing Act: Navigating NATO, BRICS, and Other Global Partnerships,” Wilson Center, July 11, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 7

    • continued expansion of Turkey’s arms industry and arms exports, including a renowned drone program;27

    • attempts to broaden Turkish influence and strengthen ties with countries in various regions (such as Eastern Europe and the Balkans, the Middle East, Africa, the Caucasus, and Central Asia);28 and

    • a mix of military, economic, and diplomatic means to maximize Turkish self-reliance, deter neighboring countries or groups that may present current or potential threats, and prevent active conflicts or political disputes near Turkey (such as in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Armenia and Azerbaijan, and Cyprus) from undermining Turkish national security or domestic stability (see Figure 2).29

    Figure 2. Turkey’s Military Presence

    (as of July 2023)

    The following are some key foreign policy issues with relevance for U.S.-Turkey relations.

    27 Can Kasapoglu, “Drones and More: Turkish Defense Cooperation Trends in the Air,” Defense Journal by Atlantic Council IN TURKEY, Issue 3, June 2024.

    28 Sinem Adar, “Turkey’s Geostrategy: Opportunism and Dissonance,” Internationale Politik Quarterly, January 10, 2024.

    29 Amnon Aran and Mustafa Kutlay, Turkey’s Quest for Strategic Autonomy in an Era of Multipolarity, Istanbul Policy Center (Sabanci University), February 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 8

    U.S./NATO Strategic Relationship and Military Presence

    The United States has valued Turkey’s geopolitical importance to and military strength within the NATO alliance, while viewing Turkey’s NATO membership as helping anchor Turkey to the West. The State Department’s Integrated Country Strategy (ICS) for Turkey says that its sizable military (the second-largest in NATO) and its geographic location at the southeastern flank of the alliance give it a critical role in regional security.30 Turkey’s proximity to conflict in the Middle East and Eurasia has made the continuing availability of its territory for the stationing and transport of arms, cargo, and personnel valuable for the United States and NATO. In addition to Incirlik Air Base near the southern Turkish city of Adana, other key U.S./NATO sites include an early warning missile defense radar in eastern Turkey and a NATO ground forces command in Izmir (see Figure 3). Turkey also controls access to and from the Black Sea through the Bosphorus (alt. Bosporus) and Dardanelles Straits (the Straits).

    Figure 3. Map of U.S. and NATO Military Presence in Turkey

    Sources: Created by CRS using data gathered from the Department of Defense, NATO, and various media outlets since 2011. Note: All locations are approximate.

    For Turkey, NATO’s traditional importance has been to mitigate Turkish concerns about encroachment by neighbors, such as the Soviet Union’s aggressive post-World War II posturing leading up to the Cold War. Additionally, NATO security guarantees compensate Turkey for a general lack of nationally owned strategic defense and deterrence capabilities.31 In more recent or

    30 State Department, Integrated Country Strategy: Turkey, May 13, 2022.

    31 Can Kasapoglu, “Turkey,” The Nations of NATO: Shaping the Alliance’s Relevance and Cohesion, Thierry Tardy, ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022, p. 97.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 9

    ongoing arenas of conflict like Ukraine and Syria, Turkey’s possible interest in countering Russian objectives may be partly motivating Turkey’s military operations and arms exports.32

    Some of Turkey’s actions in the 2020s have arguably undermined NATO’s strength and unity. As discussed above, it delayed approving NATO accession for Sweden and Finland. Additionally, in 2020, Turkey delayed a NATO defense plan for Poland and the Baltic states, before ultimately agreeing to it. Turkey’s hesitation on the Poland-Baltic defense plan was reportedly related to efforts to persuade other alliance members to distance themselves from PKK-linked Syrian Kurds that the Turkish government views as adversaries.33

    Tensions between Turkey and other NATO members during the 2020s have fueled internal U.S./NATO discussions about the continued use of Turkish bases. Some reports suggest that expanded or potentially expanded U.S. military presences in places such as Greece, Cyprus, and Jordan might be connected with concerns about Turkey.34 In March 2022 congressional hearing testimony, Turkey expert and former congressional committee staff member Alan Makovsky said that while the United States should make efforts to keep Turkey in the “Western camp,” Turkish “equivocation in recent years” justifies the United States building and expanding military facilities in Bulgaria, Romania, and Greece to “hedge its bets.”35

    Turkey’s eventual support for Swedish-Finnish NATO accession, and its willingness to join certain alliance initiatives that appear focused on deterring Russia, may counterbalance the possible tensions or cohesion issues mentioned above. In April 2024, Turkey suspended its obligations under the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, joining other NATO allies who had previously taken this step.36

    Possible BRICS and Shanghai Cooperation Organization Membership

    As a sign that Turkey is willing to consider membership in international economic and security organizations that arguably position themselves as alternatives to Western-dominated organizations like the G7 and NATO, Turkish officials have sought to join the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, the People’s Republic of China [PRC], South Africa) group and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Questions persist about whether and when Turkey might join either or both organizations, and if doing so would be a signal of greater alignment with Russia and the PRC, or of increased Turkish strategic autonomy and regional prominence. President Erdogan has said, “Turkey can become a strong, prosperous, prestigious and effective country if it improves its relations with the East and the West simultaneously.”37

    32 Dimitar Bechev, “Russia, Turkey and the Spectre of Regional Instability,” Al Sharq Strategic Research, April 13, 2022; Mitch Prothero, “Turkey’s Erdogan has been humiliating Putin all year,” Business Insider, October 22, 2020.

    33 “NATO puts defence plan for Poland, Baltics into action, officials say,” Reuters, July 2, 2020.

    34 “Pentagon pushes back on claim that US to leave Turkey’s Incirlik base,” Al-Monitor, September 16, 2020.

    35 Prepared testimony of Alan Makovsky, Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress, “Opportunities and Challenges in the Eastern Mediterranean: Examining U.S. Interests and Regional Cooperation,” House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East, North Africa and Global Counterterrorism; and Subcommittee on Europe, Energy, the Environment and Cyber, March 31, 2022, at https://www.americanprogress.org/article/opportunities-and- challenges-in-the-eastern-mediterranean-examining-u-s-interests-and-regional-cooperation/.

    36 Selcan Hacaoglu, “Turkey Joins NATO Allies in Suspending Europe Arms Treaty,” Bloomberg, April 5, 2024.

    37 Selcan Hacaoglu and Firat Kozok, “Turkey Bids to Join BRICS in Push to Build Alliances Beyond West,” Bloomberg, September 2, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 10

    An AKP spokesperson confirmed in September that Turkey has formally applied to join BRICS— which also includes Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, and Ethiopia.38 In a September 2024 interview, the U.S. chargé d’affaires to Turkey said, “Neither I nor my government have an opinion on this matter [Turkey’s potential BRICS membership]. Turkey is a sovereign, independent state…it can establish ties with whomever it wants.”39 In June, then-U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Jeff Flake expressed hope that Turkey would not join BRICS, but said such a move would not change Turkey’s alignment with the West.40 Given that Turkey’s EU membership prospects appear dim,41 and that little or no discernible progress has taken place on updating the Turkey-EU customs union, one observer has expressed that Turkey might seek to join BRICS in efforts to attract “more investment, new markets and a better legal system and investment ecosystem to break free from the ‘middle-income trap.’”42

    Additionally, Erdogan has stated that Turkey wants to join the SCO.43 The SCO is a multilateral organization covering political, economic, and security matters that includes Russia, the PRC, and most Central Asian countries, as well as India, Pakistan, Iran, and Belarus. The SCO is not a formal alliance like NATO.

    Potential F-16 Sale and Other Defense Procurement Issues

    In January 2024, three days after Turkey’s parliament approved Sweden’s NATO accession, the Biden Administration formally notified Congress of a possible $23 billion Foreign Military Sale (FMS) that would provide Turkey with 40 new F-16 Block 70 aircraft, “modernize 79 existing F- 16 aircraft to V-Configuration,” and equip the aircraft with munitions.44 (The Administration notified a possible $8.6 billion FMS of 40 F-35 aircraft to Greece on the same day.45) After the prescribed Arms Export Control Act (AECA)-mandated review period has passed, Congress can use the regular legislative process to act at any time—up to the point of final delivery—to block, condition, or otherwise influence an arms sale.46 On February 29, a motion to discharge a proposed joint resolution of disapproval (S.J.Res. 60) regarding the possible F-16 sale from the Senate Foreign Relations Committee failed in the Senate by a 13-79 vote.47 In June, the State Department announced that Turkey had signed a letter of offer and acceptance to purchase the F- 16s.48 In July, one source reported that Turkey is seeking to reduce how many F-16s it modernizes

    38 Ezgi Akin, “Turkey, NATO member, submits formal application to join BRICS,” Al-Monitor, September 3, 2024.

    39 Didem Ozel Tumer, “‘Tam anlamiyla dehset verici,’” Milliyet, September 15, 2024.

    40 “Turkey is anchored in the West despite split on Gaza, US envoy says,” Reuters, June 12, 2024.

    41 For more on Turkey-EU relations, see CRS Report R41368, Turkey (Türkiye): Background and U.S. Relations, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    42 Barin Kayaoglu, “Turkey’s BRICS ambitions hinge on India, China accepting Ankara’s bid,” Al-Monitor, September 8, 2024.

    43 Selcan Hacaoglu and Firat Kozok, “NATO Ally Turkey Seeks Membership in China-Led SCO, Erdogan Says,” Bloomberg, July 5, 2024.

    44 Defense Security Cooperation Agency, “Türkiye – F-16 Aircraft Acquisition and Modernization,” Transmittal No. 23-07, January 26, 2024. For additional background on the possible sale and congressional views, see CRS Report R47493, Turkey (Türkiye): Possible U.S. Sale of F-16 Aircraft, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    45 Defense Security Cooperation Agency, “Greece – F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Conventional Take Off and Landing (CTOL) Aircraft,” Transmittal No. 23-01, January 26, 2024.

    46 CRS In Focus IF11533, Modifying or Ending Sales of U.S.-Origin Defense Articles, by Paul K. Kerr and Liana W. Rosen.

    47 For the roll call, see https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1182/vote_118_2_00062.htm. See also Bryant Harris, “Turkey F-16 sale to proceed after Senate vote,” Defense News, February 29, 2024.

    48 State Department Press Briefing, June 6, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 11

    and how many munitions it buys under the deal “amid spending cuts at home,” and also wants an offset agreement to produce some aircraft parts domestically.49

    After Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, Turkey’s strategic and military significance for NATO amid an evolving European security crisis may have contributed to the Administration decision to advance the F-16 transaction. Turkey uses F-16s in NATO missions based in the Baltic and Mediterranean Sea regions.50

    The advancement of the F-16 sale has prompted some renewed attention in bilateral relations to the issue of Turkey’s potential acquisition of F-35s. Turkey was an original member of the U.S.- led F-35 consortium, but was removed in July 2019 due to its procurement of the Russian S-400 surface-to-air defense system.51 Factors that may have influenced Turkey’s S-400 acquisition include a desire to diversify Turkey’s foreign arms sources, Turkey’s interest in future technology sharing and coproduction arrangements to bolster its domestic arms defense industry, and potentially defending against U.S.-origin aircraft such as those used in the 2016 coup attempt.52 Turkey’s S-400 acquisition also led to the Trump Administration imposing some sanctions in December 2020 on a Turkish defense procurement agency and associated officials for their role in the transaction, under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA).53 During a January 2024 visit to Turkey, then-Acting Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was quoted as saying, “If we can get through this issue, then the CAATSA issue will go away, and we can get back into an F-35 conversation.”54 Despite this overture, Turkish officials have indicated that they intend to keep the S-400.55 The FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA, P.L. 116-92) includes a provision (Section 1245) prohibiting the Defense Department from transferring F-35s to Turkey unless Turkey no longer possesses the S- 400. Turkish officials have reportedly placed the S-400 in a storage facility rather than activating it and risking additional U.S. retaliatory measures.56

    Turkish officials have reportedly expressed interest in acquiring 40 Eurofighter Typhoon fighter aircraft, in addition to the F-16s.57 In doing so, Turkey would follow a practice that several other U.S. partners in its region—including Greece and a number of Arab states—have established in diversifying their Western suppliers of combat aircraft.58 Turkey also is moving forward with

    49 Selcan Hacaoglu, “Turkey to Pare Back $23 Billion Deal for F-16 Jets with US,” Bloomberg, July 12, 2024.

    50 Ibid.; “U.S. Relations with Turkey (Türkiye),” Bilateral Relations Fact Sheet, January 9, 2023; Gareth Jennings, “Turkey joins NATO Baltic Air Policing for first time since 2006,” Janes Defence Weekly, July 7, 2021; NATO Allied Air Command, “Turkish E-7T Provides Airborne Command and Control for Exercise Ramstein Alloy,” April 14, 2022.

    51 CRS Report R47493, Turkey (Türkiye): Possible U.S. Sale of F-16 Aircraft, by Jim Zanotti and Clayton Thomas.

    52 Aaron Stein, “Putin’s Victory: Why Turkey and America Made Each Other Weaker,” Foreign Policy Research Institute, July 29, 2019; “Turkey is buying Russian missiles to diversify supply,” Oxford Analytica, January 26, 2018; Nicholas Danforth, “Frustration, Fear, and the Fate of U.S.-Turkish Relations,” German Marshall Fund of the United States, July 19, 2019.

    53 Ibid.

    54 Selcan Hacaoglu, “US Open to Turkey F-35 Talks if Dispute over Russian Air Defenses Is Resolved,” Bloomberg, January 30, 2024.

    55 Paul Iddon, “Greece and Turkey’s Strategic Russian Air Defense Missiles Briefly in Spotlight,” Forbes, February 15, 2024; Selcan Hacaoglu, “Turkey Signals Preference to Retain Russian S-400s in F-35 Row,” Bloomberg, February 4, 2024.

    56 Abdullah Bozkurt, “Turkey put Russian S-400 missiles in a storage facility to avoid further clashes with the US,” Nordic Monitor, December 8, 2022.

    57 Barin Kayaoglu, “Can warmer Germany-Turkey ties bring Ankara Eurofighters along with Airbuses?” Al-Monitor, May 5, 2024.

    58 Paul Iddon, “Turkey Questions the Wisdom of Having an All-American Air Force,” Forbes, February 6, 2023.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 12

    efforts to build a domestically produced fighter with some stealth capabilities, but mass production would reportedly—according to some estimates—begin at earliest in the mid-2030s.59

    Russia and Ukraine

    Turkey’s relations with Russia feature elements of cooperation and competition. Turkey has made a number of foreign policy moves since 2016 toward closer ties with Russia. A combination of factors may have motivated these decisions, including Turkey’s apparent desire to reduce dependence on the West in certain security matters, economic opportunism, and chances to increase its regional influence. Turkey retains significant differences with Russia, with which it has a long history of discord, and has pursued closer ties to a number of countries surrounding Russia (including Ukraine and Poland)—likely in part as a counterweight to Russian regional power.60 Turkey continues to rely on Russia for around 40% of its natural gas imports,61 but Turkey’s other domestic and foreign supply options—including some U.S. sources—may gradually reduce this dependence.62

    Turkey-Ukraine Defense Cooperation

    Turkey and Ukraine have strengthened their relations since Russia’s invasion of Crimea in 2014. In 2017, a Turkish security analyst attributed these closer ties to growing mutual interests in countering Russian influence in the Black Sea region and in sharing military technology to expand and increase the self-sufficiency of their respective defense industries.63 Since 2020, the two countries have signed multiple agreements signifying closer cooperation, including a 2022 free trade agreement that came into force in August 2024.64 In line with these agreements, Turkish and Ukrainian companies have engaged in or planned a significant expansion of defense transactions, including a number of joint development or co-production initiatives.65 Turkish expertise with drone and other aircraft and naval platforms complements Ukrainian skills in designing and constructing aerospace engines and missiles.66 As part of the deepening bilateral defense cooperation, Turkey has sold several Turkish-origin armed drones to Ukraine since 2019,67 and Turkish drone manufacturer Baykar Technology has started building a factory in Ukraine to produce some drone models.68 Additionally, Turkey is helping establish Ukraine’s naval capabilities by producing corvettes (small warships) for export.69

    Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine has heightened challenges Turkey faces in balancing its relations with the two countries, with implications for U.S.-Turkey ties. Turkey’s links with

    59 Sebastien Roblin, “Turkey’s Very First Fighter Jet Made Its History-Shattering Flight,” Popular Mechanics, February 29, 2024.

    60 Can Kasapoglu, “Turkish Drone Strategy in the Black Sea Region and Beyond,” Jamestown Foundation, October 12, 2022; Jeffrey Mankoff, “As Russia Reels, Eurasia Roils,” War on the Rocks, October 11, 2022.

    61 Megan Byrne and James Cockayne, “Turkey Gas Imports: Russia Still Dominant,” MEES, March 3, 2023.

    62 Francesco Siccardi, “Understanding the Energy Drivers of Turkey’s Foreign Policy,” Carnegie Europe, February 28, 2024; Jennifer Gnana, “Shell, Turkey's BOTAS sign 10-year LNG deal amid diversification plans,” Al-Monitor, September 2, 2024.

    63 Metin Gurcan, “Turkey-Ukraine defense industry ties are booming,” Al-Monitor, May 1, 2017.

    64 “Free trade agreement between Turkey and Ukraine comes into force,” Platts, August 5, 2024.

    65 Kasapoglu, “Turkish Drone Strategy in the Black Sea Region and Beyond”; Pinar Dost, “The Ukraine-Turkey defense partnership with the potential to transform Black Sea and Euro-Atlantic security,” Atlantic Council, March 5, 2024.

    66 Kasapoglu, “Turkish Drone Strategy in the Black Sea Region and Beyond.”

    67 Dorian Jones, “Turkey Strengthens Defense Industry with Its Ukraine Partnership,” Voice of America, February 4, 2022.

    68 “Turkey’s drone maker Baykar begins to build plant in Ukraine,” Reuters, February 7, 2024.

    69 Kate Tringham, “Update: Turkey launches first Ada-class corvette for Ukraine and cuts steel for second,” Janes Navy International, October 3, 2022.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 13

    Russia—especially its 2019 acquisition of the Russian S-400 system—have fueled major U.S.- Turkey tensions and triggered sanctions. However, following Russia’s invasion, U.S. and Turkish interests in countering Russian revisionist aims—including along the Black Sea coast—appear to have converged in some ways as Turkey has helped strengthen Ukraine’s defense capabilities in parallel with other NATO countries. In addition to denouncing Russia’s invasion, Turkey has closed the Straits to belligerent warships, opposed Russian claims to Ukrainian territory (including Crimea), and served as a transit hub for natural gas to Europe.70 Turkey also has supplied Ukraine with various types of military equipment—including armed drone aircraft and mine-resistant ambush-resistant (MRAP) vehicles71—as well as humanitarian assistance. In March 2024, a media source, citing unnamed officials, reported that the Defense Department has purchased sizable amounts of ammunition for delivery to Ukraine from a Turkish supplier, and that another Turkish contractor is expected to produce some 30% of U.S.-made 155mm artillery shells at a Texas facility by 2025, as part of efforts to continue assisting Ukraine despite strain on supply chains.72 Additionally, Turkish officials and their Ukrainian counterparts signed an agreement for a “Turkish-Ukrainian Reconstruction Task Force” in January 2024.73

    Turkey’s proximity to and ties with both Russia and Ukraine, and its ability to regulate access to the Straits, have put it in a position to mediate between the parties on various issues of contention. In July 2022, Turkey and the United Nations entered into parallel agreements with Russia and Ukraine to provide a Black Sea corridor for Ukrainian grain exports that partly alleviated global supply concerns.74 The arrangement lapsed in July 2023.75 Since then, Ukraine has established an alternative grain corridor that traverses the territorial waters of Romania, Bulgaria, and Turkey by hugging their coastlines, thus facilitating Ukrainian grain export levels unseen since before Russia’s 2022 invasion.76 Turkey has proposed establishing a new mechanism for Russia-Ukraine agreement on safe passage for grain exports through the Black Sea and the Straits.77

    Turkish officials have sought to minimize any negative economic impact Turkey might face from the Russia-Ukraine war, partly through boosting various forms of economic and energy cooperation with Russia. The Turkish government has not joined Western economic sanctions against Russia or closed its airspace to Russian civilian flights. Russia’s Rosatom has jointly built Turkey’s first nuclear power plant, but the company’s director general claimed in July 2024 that U.S. sanctions on Russia have delayed the plant from becoming operational.78 Turkish officials

    70 State Department, “Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu at a Joint Press Availability,” February 20, 2023.

    71 Burak Ege Bekdil, “Turkey sends 50 mine-resistant vehicles to Ukraine, with more expected,” Defense News, August 22, 2022; Stijn Mitzer and Joost Oliemans, “The Stalwart Ally: Türkiye’s Arms Deliveries to Ukraine,” Oryx, November 21, 2022.

    72 Natalia Drozdiak et al., “US Turns to Turkey for Explosives as War in Ukraine Saps Supply,” Bloomberg, March 27, 2024.

    73 “Turkey, Ukraine sign document allowing Turkish firms to help Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction,” Reuters, January 31, 2024.

    74 “Ukraine, Russia agree to export grain, ending a standoff that threatened food supply,” Associated Press, July 22, 2022.

    75 For background on Russian demands, see “Explainer: Have Western sanctions on Russia impacted its fertiliser exports?” Reuters, May 11, 2023.

    76 Noah Berman and Mariel Ferragamo, “How Ukraine Overcame Russia’s Grain Blockade,” Council on Foreign Relations, February 27, 2024.

    77 Ragip Soylu, “Why Russia may finally accept Turkey’s plans for Black Sea shipping,” Middle East Eye, March 6, 2024, at https://mailchi.mp/middleeasteye/why-russia-may-finally-accept-turkeys-plans-for-black-sea-shipping?e= b82e8edad4.

    78 Brendan Cole, “Putin’s Nuclear Project Inside NATO Country Dealt a Blow,” Newsweek, July 8, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 14

    are reportedly talking to counterparts from the United States, Russia, China, and South Korea about possibly partnering on future nuclear power projects.79

    Some of Turkey’s Russia-related dealings could potentially lead to Western secondary sanctions against Turkey for facilitating Russian sanctions evasion. Turkey has said it does not consider itself bound by other countries’ sanctions against Russia, but that it would prevent the use of its jurisdiction to evade sanctions. After reports surfaced in early 2023 about the possibility that Turkish businesses might have been exporting electronic or technological products with potential defense applications to Russia,80 Turkey supposedly began to enforce curbs on sanctioned goods transiting its territory to Russia.81 However, the Treasury Department has subsequently placed sanctions on some Turkey-based companies and individuals for assisting Russia or Russian entities.82 The Financial Times reported in November 2023, “In the first nine months of 2023, Turkey reported $158mn of exports of 45 goods the US lists as ‘high-priority’ to Russia and five former Soviet countries suspected of acting as intermediaries for Moscow [including microchips, communications equipment, and telescopic sights]. That was three times the level recorded over the same period in 2022, when the war in Ukraine began.”83

    In December 2023, President Joe Biden issued an executive order aimed at strengthening “U.S. sanctions authorities against financial facilitators of Russia’s war machine.”84 Facing the possibility of secondary sanctions, Turkish banks appear to have been responsive, reportedly cutting ties with most of their Russian counterparts (with the supposed exception of foreign subsidiary banks in Russia).85 Turkish efforts to comply with the executive order also have reportedly affected some Turkish payments for Russian oil imports and Russian payments for a broader range of Turkish exports.86 During 2024, the Administration has placed additional sanctions on some Turkish entities (as well as on individuals and entities from several other countries) alleged to have engaged in sanctions evasion and/or circumvention.87

    Israel and the Palestinians (including Hamas)

    Since Hamas led attacks into Israel on October 7, 2023, and war ensued, Turkey-Israel ties have come under strain. Turkey and Erdogan had been improving relations with Israel prior to October

    79 “Turkey, US in talks on nuclear plant projects, Turkish official says,” Reuters, July 2, 2024.

    80 State Department, “Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu at a Joint Press Availability.”

    81 “Turkey Blocks Transit of Goods Sanctioned by EU, US to Russia,” Bloomberg, March 10, 2023.

    82 Department of the Treasury, “U.S. Continues to Degrade Russia’s Military-Industrial Base and Target Third-Country Support with Nearly 300 New Sanctions,” May 1, 2024.

    83 Adam Samson et al., “Turkey’s exports of military-linked goods to Russia soar,” Financial Times, November 27, 2023.

    84 White House, “FACT SHEET: Biden Administration Expands U.S. Sanctions Authorities to Target Financial Facilitators of Russia’s War Machine,” December 22, 2023; “Executive Order 14114 of December 22, 2023: Taking Additional Steps with Respect to the Russian Federation’s Harmful Activities,” Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 246, December 26, 2023, pp. 89271-89274.

    85 Dimitar Bechev, “Closer Ties to the West Don’t Mean Turkey Will Give Up on Russia,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Carnegie), February 7, 2024.

    86 “Exclusive: Turkish-Russian trade hit by fresh US sanctions threat,” Reuters, February 19, 2024.

    87 Department of the Treasury, “Russia-related Designations; Issuance of Russia-related General Licenses and new and amended Frequently Asked Questions,” February 23, 2024; “As Russia Completes Transition to a Full War Economy, Treasury Takes Sweeping Aim at Foundational Financial Infrastructure and Access to Third Country Support,” June 12, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 15

    7, and Turkey had said that the countries were contemplating closer energy cooperation.88 Tension between Turkey and Israel on Palestinian issues flared up previously on a number of previous occasions, including in 2010 when Israeli commandos killed ten Turkish citizens in clashes aboard the Mavi Marmara, part of a private Turkish flotilla seeking to provide relief supplies to the Gaza Strip despite Israeli maritime restrictions. Despite maintaining diplomatic relations to date, Turkey and Israel may face challenges in restoring bilateral ties to their pre-October 7 status.89 Israel withdrew its diplomats from Turkey in October 2023, and Turkey withdrew its ambassador from Israel in November.90

    President Erdogan has strongly criticized Israel for its military actions in Gaza impacting Palestinian civilians, calling it a “terror state” and labeling Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the “butcher of Gaza” (and also comparing him to Hitler).91 Additionally, Erdogan has criticized the U.S. role in the conflict, saying in April 2024 that U.S. “unconditional military and diplomatic support” for Israel is “making the problem bigger.”92 While in Washington, DC for a NATO summit in July, Erdogan said that the Biden Administration was complicit in “Israeli war crimes and violations of international law,” called for sanctions against Israel, and said that Turkey would not approve NATO cooperation measures with Israel until “comprehensive, sustainable peace is established in Palestine.”93 Some Members of Congress have expressed concern about Erdogan’s “escalating hostility and inflammatory rhetoric toward Israel,” and urged the Administration to tell Erdogan that continued Turkish support for Hamas would harm U.S.-Turkey relations.94

    Erdogan’s escalation from rhetorical criticism to specific policy measures against Israel— including a general suspension of trade in May (see text box “Turkish Suspension of Trade with Israel”)—may be partly due to the success of an Islamist political party in peeling voters from Erdogan’s AKP in Turkey’s March 2024 local elections.95 In August 2024, Turkey applied to join South Africa as a co-plaintiff in the case South Africa has brought in the International Court of Justice accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza.96 In response to the September 2024 death of a Turkish-American activist in the West Bank—likely from Israeli military gunfire—Turkish prosecutors have opened a criminal investigation and Turkish leaders have said they will share information with various international courts and organizations.97

    Turkish Suspension of Trade with Israel

    88 “Erdogan says Turkey, Israel to take steps in energy drilling soon, media report,” Reuters, September 21, 2023.

    89 Burak Ünveren, “Israel-Hamas war strains ties with Turkey,” Deutsche Welle, November 4, 2023.

    90 The countries’ ambassadors had arrived at their respective posts less than a year before, in December 2022, after having previously withdrawn on a reciprocal basis in 2018.

    91 “Turkey’s Erdogan says Israeli PM Netanyahu no different from Hitler,” Reuters, December 27, 2023; “Turkey’s Erdogan calls Netanyahu ‘butcher of Gaza,’” Agence France Presse, November 29, 2023.

    92 Amberin Zaman, “Turkey postpones Erdogan White House visit,” Al-Monitor, April 26, 2024.

    93 “Erdogan says Biden, U.S. complicit in alleged Israeli war crimes,” and “Erdogan says Turkey will not approve NATO attempts to cooperate with Israel,” Reuters, July 11, 2024.

    94 Letter from 28 Representatives to Secretary of State Blinken dated July 9, 2024, at https://d12t4t5x3vyizu.cloudfront.net/gottheimer.house.gov/uploads/2024/07/Erdogan-Letter.pdf.

    95 Soner Cagaptay, “Will Turkey Cut Ties with Israel?” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, May 8, 2024.

    96 Suzan Fraser, “Turkey formally asks to join the genocide case against Israel at the UN court,” Associated Press, August 7, 2024.

    97 Ezgi Akin, “What Turkey’s legal campaign against Israel over slain activist entails,” Al-Monitor, September 18, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 16

    Tension over the ongoing war is affecting Turkey-Israel trade. In April, the Turkish trade ministry announced export restrictions on 54 product groups—mostly construction materials and jet fuel—to last until a cease-fire is declared.98 Israel’s foreign minister pledged to implement parallel measures against Turkey. Some Members of Congress suggested responsive U.S. measures against Turkey in support of Israel.99 Then in May, Turkey’s trade ministry announced that Turkey had stopped all import and export transactions with Israel “until a permanent ceasefire is achieved (in Gaza) and humanitarian aid is allowed without interruption.”100 As of September, it is unclear to what extent indirect Turkey-Israel trade via other countries might continue, after the end of a reported three-month phase-out period to allow some companies to “fulfill existing orders via third countries.”101 An Israeli source asserts that some bilateral trade may continue through a loophole permitting Palestinians to place orders with Turkish businesses and direct shipments to Israel.102 For 2023, trade amounted to $5.4 billion in Turkish exports and $1.6 billion in Israeli imports.103 Israel reportedly has normally received around 40% of its oil from Azerbaijan via Turkey; these shipments reportedly continue.104 Israel’s foreign minister argued that Turkey’s suspension of trade contravenes existing agreements; a Turkey-Israel free trade agreement has been effective since 1997.105 In May, Israel’s finance minister reportedly proposed to retaliate by suspending the free trade agreement and imposing a 100% tariff on all Turkish imports during the remainder of Erdogan’s presidency—measures that would be subject to the approval of Israel’s cabinet.106

    During Erdogan’s time as prime minister and president, Turkey has provided political support to Hamas (which President Erdogan has defended as “a liberation group”),107 and Turkish officials have hosted Hamas political officials from time to time.108 Some media outlets have presented allegations that Turkey-based or -linked private entities have provided substantial material support to Hamas.109 A Treasury Department official visited Turkey in November 2023 and raised concern about Hamas’s ability to operate in Turkey to fund potential future attacks; Turkish officials reportedly responded that while they do not consider Hamas to be a terrorist group, Turkey “would not tolerate violations of domestic laws including money laundering and direct

    98 Ezgi Akin and Rina Bassist, “Turkey restricts exports of 54 products to Israel until Gaza cease-fire,” Al-Monitor, April 9, 2024.

    99 Jacobs et al., “U.S. lawmakers call for possible sanctions against Turkey in response to new trade restrictions against Israel.”

    100 “Turkey says Israel trade halted until permanent Gaza ceasefire,” Reuters, May 3, 2024.

    101 Ezgi Akin and Rina Bassist, “Turkey, Israel tangle in fresh row over trade ban,” Al-Monitor, May 9, 2024.

    102 Dean Shmuel Elmas, “Turkish exports to ‘Palestine’ skyrocket,” Globes, August 7, 2024.

    103 “Turkey says Israel trade halted until permanent Gaza ceasefire,” Reuters, May 3, 2024.

    104 Ragip Soylu, “Does Turkey have a duty to turn off the taps on oil supplies to Israel?” Middle East Eye, September 6, 2024.

    105 Adam Samson and James Shotter, “Turkey halts trade with Israel over Gaza conflict,” Financial Times, May 2, 2024.

    106 Rina Bassist, “Israel’s Smotrich will abolish free trade deal with Turkey, slap 100% tariff,” Al-Monitor, May 16, 2024.

    107 “Turkey’s Erdogan says Hamas is not terrorist organisation, cancels trip to Israel,” Reuters, October 25, 2023.

    108 Aslı Aydıntaşbaş and Kevin Huggard, “Understanding Turkey’s response to the Israel-Gaza crisis,” Brookings Institution, December 7, 2023. An Israeli media source has reported, “While the country [Turkey] insisted that it only hosted the group’s political wing, in 2020, Israel provided Turkish intelligence with evidence that members of Hamas’s military wing operate in the office [that hosts Hamas political leaders], under the supervision of Beirut-based Saleh al- Arouri, who was killed in an alleged Israeli strike in Lebanon in January.” “Erdogan says Turkey ‘firmly’ backs terror group Hamas, compares Netanyahu to Hitler,” Times of Israel, March 9, 2024.

    109 Jo Becker and Justine Scheck, “Israel Found the Hamas Money Machine Years Ago. Nobody Turned It Off,” New York Times, December 16, 2023; Rory Jones et al., “Hamas ‘CEO’ Keeps Group Funded from Base in Turkey,” Wall Street Journal, January 5, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 17

    funding of violent acts.”110 Since October 2023, Treasury has imposed sanctions on several Turkey-based Hamas operatives or Hamas-linked companies.111

    Erdogan may hope to use Turkey’s good relations with Hamas to help reconcile it with its domestic rival, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), potentially boosting Turkey’s role in shaping potential Israeli-Palestinian diplomatic outcomes.112 In August 2024, Erdogan hosted PLO Chairman and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Turkey. Abbas gave an address to the Turkish parliament during his visit, calling for international legal measures against Israel and pledging to visit Gaza and Jerusalem.113

    During 2024, Turkey has arrested several people on suspicion of espionage for Israel’s Mossad, at least some apparently in connection with the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict.114 Erdogan has warned of “serious consequences” if Israel were to assassinate Hamas members on Turkish soil.115

    Syria116

    Turkey’s involvement in Syria since civil conflict broke out there in 2011 has been complicated and costly, and has severely strained U.S.-Turkey ties. Turkey’s priorities in Syria have evolved: while Turkey still opposes Syrian President Bashar al Asad, it has engaged in a mix of coordination and competition with him and his main supporters Russia and Iran since Turkey initiated military action against Syrian Kurdish forces in August 2016. Three significant Turkish military operations (in 2016, 2018, and 2019) have left Turkey, in cooperation with Turkish- supported Syrian armed opposition groups, in effective control of large swaths of northern Syria and created tensions with U.S. forces operating in the country (see Figure 4).

    110 “U.S. presses sceptical Turkey to curb Hamas fundraising,” Reuters, November 30, 2023.

    111 Department of the Treasury, “U.S. and UK Target Additional Hamas Finance Officials and Representatives,” December 13, 2023.

    112 Barin Kayaoglu, “As Qatar’s frustrations grow, can Turkey lead Gaza diplomacy between Hamas, Israel?” Al- Monitor, April 21, 2024.

    113 “Palestinian leader Abbas tells Turkish parliament he will visit Gaza, Jerusalem,” Reuters, August 15, 2024.

    114 Ezgi Akin, “Turkey arrests alleged Mossad operative running money network,” Al-Monitor, September 3, 2024; “Turkey detains 7 more people for allegedly selling information to Israel’s spy agency,” Associated Press, March 5, 2024; “Seven detained in Turkey for allegedly selling information to Israel’s Mossad spy agency,” Associated Press, February 2, 2024.

    115 “Seven detained in Turkey,” Associated Press.

    116 See CRS In Focus IF11930, Syria and U.S. Policy, by Christopher M. Blanchard.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service 18

    Figure 4. Syria Conflict Map

    Source: CRS, using ESRI and U.S. State Department data.

    Turkish military operations in Syria are largely focused on the Syrian Kurdish People’s Defense Units (YPG). The YPG is linked with the PKK,117 and has a leading role within the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), an umbrella group including Arabs and other non-Kurdish elements that has been the main U.S. ground force partner against the Islamic State since 2015. Turkey has actively sought to thwart the YPG from establishing an autonomous area along Syria’s northern border with Turkey, likely reflecting concerns that YPG gains have bolstered the PKK in its domestic conflict with Turkish authorities.118 President Erdogan has threatened additional military ground operations in Syria amid continued cross-border and air strikes.

    Looking ahead, Turkish priorities regarding Syria appear to focus on minimizing cross-border risk. Turkish attacks in northern Syria intensified after an October 2023 suicide bombing claimed by the PKK near a government building in Ankara.119 According to some reports, these attacks have caused severe damage to infrastructure in certain SDF-controlled areas of northeastern Syria. Turkey has taken some limited steps toward rapprochement with the Asad government— motivated at least in part by Turkey’s interest in the potential return of some of the four million Syrian refugees living in Turkey—but significant obstacles remain.120 While the Biden Administration has reportedly reviewed U.S. policy in Syria (where attacks by Iran-backed

    117 Sources citing links between the PKK and YPG (or PKK affiliates in Syria) include State Department, Country Reports on Terrorism 2022, Syria; Berkay Mandiraci, “Turkey’s PKK Conflict: A Regional Battleground in Flux,” International Crisis Group, February 18, 2022; Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Statement for the Record, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, “Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community,” February 13, 2018.

    118 See, for example, Soner Cagaptay, “U.S. Safe Zone Deal Can Help Turkey Come to Terms with the PKK and YPG,” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, August 7, 2019.

    119 Samer al Ahmed and Mohammed Hassan, “Turkish escalation in northeastern Syria amid changes in military strategy,” Middle East Institute, October 11, 2023; Amberin Zaman, “Syria’s Kurds face ISIS threat, US indifference as Turkey destroys critical infrastructure,” Al-Monitor, April 18, 2024.

    120 Omar al-Radad, “A New Era for Turkish-Syrian Ties?” Washington Institute for Near East Policy, August 16, 2024.

    Turkey (Türkiye): Major Issues and U.S. Relations

    Congressional Research Service R44000 · VERSION 118 · UPDATED 19

    groups against U.S. troops increased dramatically after October 2023),121 Turkish military operations have continued against the YPG in northern Syria and the PKK in northern Iraq.122

    Author Information

    Jim Zanotti Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs

    Clayton Thomas

    Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs

    Disclaimer

    This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

    121 Amberin Zaman, “Pentagon floats plan for its Syrian Kurd allies to partner with Assad against ISIS,” January 22, 2024.

    122 Steven Ganot, “Turkish Military Targets PKK and YPG in Cross-Border Strikes,” The Media Line, September 2, 2024.