Teen Births in the United States: Overview and Recent Trends
Changes from August 28, 2024 to April 17, 2025
This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Updated August 28, 2024
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
R45184
Congressional Research Service
SUMMARY
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Teen Births in the United States: Overview and Recent Trends
Updated April 17, 2025 (R45184) Jump to Main Text of ReportContents
- Introduction
- Teen Births in the United States
- Teen Birth Rate Trends
- Recent Trends
- Factors Linked to Declines in Teen Births
- Financial and Social Costs of Teen Births
Figures
Tables
Summary
Adolescent childbearing is associated with significant social, health, and financial risks for teens, their families, and society more broadly. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), indicate that the teen birth rate has decreased steadily over time. However, the United States continues to have one of the highest rates of teen births among other industrialized countries.
This report focuses on teen birth rates—and the marked decline in recent years. The teen birth rate is defined as the number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19 each year. The earliest NCHS estimate of the teen birth rate (in 1940) was 54.1, which later peaked in 1957 at 96.3. It then decreased in most years from the 1960s through the 1980s, with a low of 50.2 in 1986. The birth rate increased over the next few years, to 61.8 in 1991. From 1992 onward, the teen birth rate declined except in two years, 2006 and 2007. From 2007 to 20222023, the rate declined by approximately 6768%, to a historical low in 20222023 of 13.6.
The teen birth rate has decreased across all racial and ethnic groups in recent years; however, the rates declined more for certain groups than others. From 2018 to 20222016 to 2023, birth rates fell by 3254% for non-Hispanic Asian teens, 2541% for non-Hispanic White teens, 2440% for non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native teens, 23% for non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander35% for Hispanic teens, 2334% for non-Hispanic Black teens, and 2026% for Hispanic teens. In 2022, the teen birth ratenon-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander teens. In 2023, the teen birth rates for non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (22.5teens (20.9 per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19), Hispanic (21.3), non-Hispanic Blackteens (20.3), and 8), non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (20.5) teens wasteens (21.2), and non-Hispanic Black teens (19.3) were each more than double the rate for non- Hispanic White (9.1) teensteens (8.4), and more than 10 times the rate for non-Hispanic Asian teens (1.8).(1.9) teens.
Teen birth rates have varied considerably by state and territory, which may be due to a variety of factors, such as population composition. (An analysis of these factors by state is beyond the scope of this report.) In 20222023, the state with the lowest teen birth rate was New Hampshire (4.6); the state with the highest teen birth rate was Mississippi (26.4).
Thirteen24.9).
Fifteen states had rates of less than 10 births per 1,000 teens aged 15 to 19 in 2023: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, VermontVermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, MinnesotaMaine, New Jersey, Rhode Island, MaineMinnesota, New York, Utah, California, Oregon, Washington, CaliforniaPennsylvania, and Wisconsin (ordered from lowest to highest). EightSeven states had the highest teen birth rates (20 or higher)of 20 births per 1,000 teens or higher: Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, and Texasand Alabama (ordered from highest to lowest). The rates for the territories ranged from 9.4 in the Northern Mariana11.6 in the U.S. Virgin Islands to 19.823.5 in Guam.
Teen birth rates have declined in rural areas over time but continue to remain relatively higher than teen birth rates in urban areas. The number of second (and additional) births to teen parents has also declined over time, with an 80% total decline from 2000 to 2022.
Research suggests that multiple factors have led to lower teen birth rates in the United States. From the 1990s through 2019, the risk of teen pregnancy decreased primarily because of improved contraceptive use, including an increase in the use of more effective contraceptive methods (e.g., long-acting and reversible methods) and an increase in the use of multiple methods of contraception. During this period, some of the risk of pregnancy among younger teens declined because of decreased sexual activity; however, general trends in adolescent sexual activity have remained relatively stable. Broad economic and social variables may also influence teen behaviors, such as expanded educational or labor opportunities.
Teen pregnancy has high costs for teen parents, their children, and society more generally. Teenage mothers and fathers tend to have less education and are more likely to have lower incomes than their peers who are not parents. Moreover, lower levels of education reduce teen parents’' potential for economic self-sufficiency. Children of adolescent parents are also more likely to face certain adverse health and social outcomes, such as preterm birth and other child morbidities.
This report accompanies CRS Report R45183, Adolescent Pregnancy: Federal Prevention Programs, which discusses Congress’s current approach of supportingfederal support for programs that seek to prevent pregnancy among adolescents, and CRS In Focus IF10877, Federal Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Programs, which includes summary information about the programs.
R45184
August 28, 2024
Alexandria K. Mickler Analyst in Health Policy
Jessica Tollestrup Specialist in Social Policy
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Teen Births in the United States ...................................................................................................... 2
Teen Birth Rate Trends .............................................................................................................. 2
Recent Trends ..................................................................................................................... 4
Factors Linked to Declines in Teen Births ...................................................................................... 7 Financial and Social Costs of Teen Births ..................................................................................... 10
Figures
Figure 1. Teen Birth Rate, 1950-2022 ............................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Teen Birth Rate, by Race and Hispanic Origin, 2018-2022 ............................................. 5
Figure 3. Teen Birth Rates, by State and Territory, 2022 ................................................................ 6 Figure 4. First and Second and Higher-Order Teen Birth Rates, 2022 ............................................ 7
Tables
Table A-1. Teen Birth Rate, 1950-2022 ......................................................................................... 12
Table B-1. Teen Birth Rates, by State............................................................................................ 13
Appendixes
Appendix A. Teen Birth Rate, 1950-2022 ..................................................................................... 12 Appendix B. Teen Birth Rates, by State ........................................................................................ 13
Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 14
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 1
Introduction
Introduction
This report provides context for Congress about trends in the U.S. teen birth rate—defined as the number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19—with a focus on recent trends.1 Since the 1950s1960s, the U.S. teen birth rate has generally been in decline, with the rate reaching a record low in 20222023 (the year for which the most recent data are available).2 Multiple factors have likely contributed to the decrease, though the influence of any single factor is not fully understood and may vary over time. These may include proximate factors, such as contraceptive use, and distal factors, such as broader social and economic factors.3
Teen births are a significant public health concern because of the range of health, social, and economic effects adolescent childbearing can have on adolescents, their children, and broader society.43 Despite substantial declines over time, the teen birth rate in the United States has remained higher than that of comparable high-income countries.54 Furthermore, there are persistent racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities.6
This report provides a description of teen birth rate trends and a brief discussion on (1) factors that may contribute to the ongoing decline in teen birth rates and (2) the adverse outcomes related to teen births. This report accompanies CRS Report R45183, Adolescent Pregnancy: Federal Prevention Programs, which discusses Congress’'s current approach of supporting programs that seek to prevent pregnancy among adolescents, and CRS In Focus IF10877, Federal Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Programs, which includes summary information about the programs.
1 This report uses the terms teenagers, teens, and adolescents interchangeably. This report also uses adolescent females and women to be consistent with the terms used by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), including official teen birth statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The teen birth rate age range reflects the standard definition used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other federal agencies. The CDC also disaggregates birth rates by other age ranges, including ages 10 to 14; however, this age group is not included in calculations of the national teen birth rate and has remained unchanged since 2021 at 0.2 births per 1,000 females. See “Births: Final Data for 2022,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-02.pdf.
2 In late August 2024, NCHS released a Data Brief that provides summary birth trends for 2023. The Data Brief indicates that the teen birth rate declined 4% from 2022 to 2023 to a rate of 13.1 births per 1,000 females aged 15-19. However, the Data Brief does not provide the full scope of 2023 teen birth data that are otherwise available in the “Births: Final Data for 2022” reference. As such, this report refers to final NCHS data from 2022, as it is the year for which the most comprehensive data are available. See “Births in the United States,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, NCHS Data Brief, no. 507, August 2024 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db507.pdf.
3 John Bongaarts, “A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility,” Population and Development Review, vol. 4, no. 1 (March 1978). Laura Lindberg, John Santelli, and Sheila Desai, “Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007-2012,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 59 (2016), p. 578.
4 Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy, edited by Saul D. Hoffman and Rebecca A. Maynard, 2nd ed., 2008. (Hereinafter, Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy.) See also, HHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Winnable Battles Final Report 2010-2015, https://www.cdc.gov/winnablebattles/index.html; Stefanie Mollborn, “Teenage Mothers Today: What we Know and How it Matters,” Child Development Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 1 (March 2017).
5 CDC, About Teen Pregnancy, May 15, 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/teen-pregnancy/index.html.
6 “Births: Final Data for 2022,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-02.pdf.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 2
Teen Births in the United States
Official data on births to adolescent females are provided by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), an agency of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).6 The NCHS, in collaboration with states and other jurisdictions, compiles and publishes official national data for all vital events (i.e., births, deaths, marriages, divorces, and fetal death) in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS).7 In particular, birth data in the NVSS draw upon information included in all registered birth certificates and account for nearly every birth in the United States.8
Data on births are distinct from data on pregnancies. Whereas the number of births—and related characteristics such as maternal age—are derived directly from vital records, information on pregnancies relies on estimates from several data sources. In addition to data on births, such figures also incorporate calculations of pregnancy losses (e.g. miscarriage, stillbirth) from the National Survey of Family Growth and estimates of induced abortion from both the CDC’'s Abortion Surveillance System and the Guttmacher Institute’'s Abortion Provider Census.9 Various statistical approaches have been implemented over time to account for strengths and shortfalls of the aforementioned sources, as well as the inherent complexities in measuring pregnancy loss. As this report exclusively focuses on teen birth data, an evaluation of the nuances and challenges with pregnancy data are beyond the scope of this report.
Teen Birth Rate Trends
Since 1940, NCHS has published birth rate data that allow for longitudinal comparison by the age of the birth mother. The earliest estimate of the teen birth rate (in 1940) was 54.1 births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19.10 Twenty years later, in 1960, NCHS began publishing teen birth rate data further disaggregated by subgroups; that is, the birth rate among teens aged 15 to 17 as well as among teens aged 18 to 19. Figure 1 shows the national U.S. teen birth rate from 19501940 through 20222023 (the rate excludes the territories).11 Broadly, the teen birth rate (for ages 15-19) hovered around an average 56.9 throughout the early to mid-1940s, and then ticked up in the baby boom era of the 1950s, peaking in 1957 at 96.3. It then decreased in most years from the 1960s
7 NCHS, About the National Vital Statistics System, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/about_nvss.htm.
8 NCHS estimates that more than 99% of all births occurring in the United States were registered and included in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS). See National Center for Health Statistics, User Guide to the 2022 Natality Public Use File, https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/ UserGuide2022.pdf.
9 Lauren M. Rossen, Brady E. Hamilton, Joyce C. Abma, et al., Updated Methodology to Estimate Overall and Unintended Pregnancy Rates in the United States, National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics: Series 2, Number 201, April 2023, pp. 1-4, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/124395.
10 Stephanie J. Ventura et al., “Births to Teenagers in the United States, 1940–2000,” National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 49, no. 10, September 2001, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_10.pdf.
11 The CDC began publishing birth rates inclusive of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959 and 1960, respectively. Data from these individuals were categorized as “Other Races,” which represented a subset of the broader “Nonwhite” category historically used in earlier NVSS reports. According to the CDC, birth data from both Hawaii and Alaska affected their tabulations of birth rates by race/ethnicity in 1960, but they did not further analyze the statistical effect of this changing demographic composition among teen births, specifically. However, summary tabulations of the teen birth rate among the overarching category of Nonwhite mothers indicate a decrease in births among teens aged 10-14 and 15-19 from 1957 to 1960. This may suggest that the changing demographic composition of the U.S did not significantly affect the downward trend in teen births; however, this also was not tested for statistical significance. See U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Vital Statistics of the United States, Volume I - Natality, 1960, Table 1-E, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/nat60_1.pdf.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 3
through the 1980s, with a low of 50.2 in 1986.12 The birth rate increased over the next few years, to 61.8 in 1991. From 1992 onward, the teen birth rate declined except in two years, 2006 and 2007. From 2007 to 2022, the rate decreased by approximately 67%, with a historical low 2022 teen birth rate of 13.6.
Figure 1. T een Birth Rate, 1950-2022
Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19
Figure 1. Teen Birth Rate, 1940-2023 Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19. Figure is interactive in HTML report version. Notes: Subgroup data for teens aged 15-17 and 18-19 did not become available until 1960.Source: Figure created by CRS using data from the following: 1950-1959 data are from Stephanie J. Ventura et al., “Births to Teenagers in the United States, 1940–2000,” through the 1980s, with a low of 50.2 in 1986.12 The birth rate increased over the next few years to 61.8 in 1991. From 1992 onward, the teen birth rate declined except in two years, 2006 and 2007. Since 2009, the teen birth rate has fallen to a new record low each year, with the most recent data reflecting a historical low of 13.1 in 2023—a 2% decrease from 2022 and a 68% decrease from the most recent peak observed in 2007.13
',
shared: true,
useHTML: true
},
series: [ {
name: '18 to 19 years old',
tooltipname: '18-19',
color: '#003865',
legendcolor: '#003865',
data: [null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
166.7,
155.2,
150.8,
147.6,
142.8,
124.5,
120.3,
116.7,
113.5,
112.4,
114.7,
105.3,
96.9,
91.2,
88.7,
85,
80.5,
80.9,
79.8,
81.3,
82.1,
80,
79.4,
77.4,
77.4,
79.6,
79.6,
78.5,
79.9,
84.2,
88.6,
94,
93.6,
91.1,
90.2,
87.7,
84.7,
82.1,
80.9,
79.1,
78.1,
75.5,
72.2,
69.6,
68.7,
68.4,
71.2,
71.7,
68.2,
64,
58.2,
54.1,
51.4,
47.1,
43.8,
40.7,
37.5,
35.1,
32.3,
31.1,
28.9,
26.6,
25.8,
24.6
],
},
{
name: '15 to 19 years old',
tooltipname: '15-19',
color: '#009483',
legendcolor: '#009483',
data: [54.1,
56.9,
61.1,
61.7,
54.3,
51.1,
59.3,
79.3,
81.1,
83.4,
81.6,
87.6,
86.1,
88.2,
90.6,
90.3,
94.6,
96.3,
91.4,
89.1,
89.1,
88.6,
81.4,
76.7,
73.1,
70.5,
70.3,
67.5,
65.6,
65.5,
68.3,
64.5,
61.7,
59.3,
57.5,
55.6,
52.8,
52.8,
51.5,
52.3,
53,
52.2,
52.4,
51.4,
50.6,
51,
50.2,
50.6,
53,
57.3,
59.9,
61.8,
60.3,
59,
58.2,
56,
53.5,
51.3,
50.3,
48.8,
47.7,
45,
42.6,
41.1,
40.5,
39.7,
41.1,
41.5,
40.2,
37.9,
34.2,
31.3,
29.4,
26.5,
24.2,
22.3,
20.3,
18.8,
17.4,
16.7,
15,
13.9,
13.6,
13.1
],
},
{
name: '15 to 17 years old',
tooltipname: '15-17',
color: '#F1B434',
legendcolor: '#CC8F2B',
data: [null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
null,
43.9,
43.8,
38.1,
36.9,
37.2,
36.6,
35.7,
35.3,
35.1,
35.7,
38.8,
38.2,
39,
38.5,
37.3,
36.1,
34.1,
33.9,
32.2,
32.3,
32.5,
32,
32.3,
31.8,
31,
31,
30.5,
31.7,
33.6,
36.4,
37.5,
38.6,
37.6,
37.5,
37.2,
35.5,
33.3,
31.4,
29.9,
28.2,
26.9,
24.5,
23.1,
22.2,
21.8,
21.1,
21.6,
21.7,
21.1,
19.6,
17.3,
15.4,
14.1,
12.3,
10.9,
9.9,
8.8,
7.9,
7.2,
6.7,
6.3,
5.6,
5.6,
5.5
],
},],
responsive: {
rules: [{
condition: {
maxWidth: 500
},
chartOptions: {
legend: {
enabled: true,
layout: 'horizontal',
align: 'center',
verticalAlign: 'bottom'
}
}
}]
}
//#### END container ####//
};
new Highcharts.Chart("IAG-3351589114", options);
}
}
});
</script>
Source: Figure created by CRS using data from the following: 1950-1959 data are from Stephanie J. Ventura et al., "Births to Teenagers in the United States, 1940–2000," National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 49, no. 10, September 2001, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_10.pdf; 1960-2009 data are from Stephanie J. Ventura et al., ' + this.series.options.tooltipname + ': ' + value + ' “"National and State Patterns of Teen Births in the United States, 1940–2013,” " National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 63, no. 4, August 2014, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr63/nvsr63_04.pdf; 2010- 20202023 data are from Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “"Births: Final Data for 2020,”2023," HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 7074, no. 17, February 2022, 1, March 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr74/nvsr74-1.pdf (hereinafter, Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023.")
nvsr/nvsr70/nvsr70-17.pdf; 2021- 2022 data are from “Births: Final Data for 2022,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-02.pdf. Notes: Subgroup data for teens aged 15-17 and 18-19 did not become available until 1960.
12 The baby boom era refers to individuals born in the U.S. between mid-1946 and mid-1964. Sandra L. Colby and Jennifer M. Ortman, “The Baby Boom Cohort in the United States: 2012 to 2016, Population Estimates and Projections,” Current Population Reports, CDC, May 2014.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 4
Recent Trends
In 2022, there were approximately 3.7 million births in the United States.13 About 144,000 of these births (3.9%) were to teenagers aged 15 to 19. This reflects a teen birth rate of 13.61 births per 1,000 females aged 15-19 in 20222023—the lowest rate on record, and a 2% decline from 2021.14 The 20222022.15 The 2023 birth rates for 15- to 17-year-olds (5.65 per 1,000) and 18- to 19-year-olds (25.824.6 per 1,000) were also the lowest on record, though the birth rate among older teens remains consistently higher than the birth rate among younger teens.15
The 20222023 rate reflects an overall decline of 6768% since the most recent high in 2007 and a 7879% decline from the second most recent high in 1991. In other words, about 6% of teens aged 15 to 19 gave birth in 1991 compared with less than 2% in 2022. Despite a decline in the overall teen birth rate, disparities exist among certain racial or ethnic groups. Teen birth rates in 20222023 varied based on race and ethnicity, with four groups—non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (22.5 per 1,000), non-Hispanic Black (20.3), Hispanic (21.3), and non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (20.520.9 per 1,000), Hispanic (20.8), non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (21.2), and non-Hispanic Black (19.3) teens—having more than double the teen birth rate for non- Hispanic White (9.18.4) teens, and more than 10 times the rate for non-Hispanic Asian (1.98) teens.16
Figure 2 shows the teen birth rate by race and Hispanic origin between 20182016 and 20222023. From 2018 to 20222016 to 2023, the teen birth rate generally decreased foracross all racial and ethnic groups; however, the rates declined more for certain groups compared with others and some groups experienced periodic increases.18.17 From 2018 to 20222016 to 2023, birth rates fell by 3254% for non-Hispanic Asian teens, 2541% for non-Hispanic White teens, 2440% for non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native teens, 23% for non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander35% for Hispanic teens, 2334% for non-Hispanic Black teens, and 20% for Hispanic teens. Broadly, birth rates have declined across Black, American Indian and Alaska Native, and White females; however, a 1% increase in teen births was observed among Hispanic females from 2021 to 2022.18
13 Table A-1 includes birth rates for teens since 1950. Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/ nvsr73/nvsr73-02.pdf. (Hereinafter, Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022.”)
14 Ibid.
15 The CDC also tracks births for youth aged 10 to 14. Their birth rate has been much lower than the rate of births for older teens and is therefore not included in this analysis. The birth rate was 0.2 births per 1,000 youth aged 10 to 14 in 2022, which reflects approximately 1,800 births. The 2022 birth rate for this group is unchanged from 2021.
16 Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” Table 2.
17 Ibid.
18 Recent changes in teen birth rates among Asian and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander females were determined to be not significant, according to the NCHS. See Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” p. 3.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 5
Figure 2. T een Birth Rate, by Race and Hispanic Origin, 2018-2022
Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19
Source: Figure created by CRS using data from Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/ nvsr73-02.pdf. Notes: NH = Non-Hispanic.
Teen birth rates have varied considerably by state and territory, which may be due to a variety of factors, such as population composition. An analysis of these factors by state are beyond the scope of this report. Figure 3 shows a map of the 2022 birth rate among teens aged 15 to 19. The teen birth rate is divided into four ranges to show variations across each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and four of the territories.19 The state with the lowest reported rate was New Hampshire (4.6 per 1,000); the state with the highest reported rate was Mississippi (26.4). Table B-1 in Appendix B displays the 2022 teen birth rates by state and age group.
Figure 2. Teen Birth Rate, by Race and Hispanic Origin, 2016-2023 Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19. Figure is interactive in HTML report version. Source: Figure created by CRS using data from Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023." Notes: NH = Non-HispanicThirteen states had rates of less than 10 births per 1,000 teens aged 15 to 19: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Vermont, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Maine, New York, Utah, Washington, California26% among non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander teens.
',
shared: true,
useHTML: true,
positioner: function() {
return {
x: this.chart.plotLeft,
y: this.chart.plotTop
};
},
},
plotOptions: {
column: {
pointPadding: 0.12,
groupPadding: 0.08,
borderWidth: 0,
borderRadius: 0,
}
},
series: [{
name: '2016',
data: [3.9, 14.3, 29.3, 28.6, 31.9, 35.1],
color: '#9B945F',
legendcolor: '#757048'
},{
name: '2017',
data: [3.3, 13.2, 27.5, 25.5, 28.6, 32.9],
color: '#0C90FC',
legendcolor: '#0C90FC'
},{
name: '2018',
data: [2.8, 12.1, 26.3, 26.5, 26.7, 29.7],
color: '#151c1f',
legendcolor: '#151c1f'
}, {
name: '2019',
data: [2.7, 11.4, 25.8, 26.2, 25.3, 29.2],
color: '#D36127',
legendcolor: '#D36127'
},{
name: '2020',
data: [2.2, 10.1, 23.7, 22.2, 23.0, 25.7],
color: '#52467f',
legendcolor: '#52467f'
}, {
name: '2021',
data: [2.0, 9.4, 21.8, 21.9, 21.1, 24.2],
color: '#6CC8BD',
legendcolor: '#009483'
},{
name: '2022',
data: [1.9, 9.1, 20.3, 20.5, 21.3, 22.5],
color: '#226bb5',
legendcolor: '#226bb5'
}, {
name: '2023',
data: [1.8, 8.4, 19.3, 21.2, 20.8, 20.9],
color: '#F1B434',
legendcolor: '#CC8F2B'
},]
//#### END container ####//
};
new Highcharts.Chart("IAG-2635509063", options);
}
}
});
</script>
${this.series.name}: ` +
`${(this.y).toFixed(1)}
Teen birth rates have varied considerably by state and territory, which may be due to a variety of factors, such as population composition as well as individual, family, and broader societal factors that may vary by state and geographic region (among other characteristics). An analysis of these factors by state are beyond the scope of this report. Figure 3 displays a map of the five-year teen birth rate averages across each state from 1990 to 2023.19 For these maps, the teen birth rate is divided into eight categories to show variations across each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Annual teen birth rates for each state and territory (where available) are presented in Table B-1, Table B-2, and Table B-2 in Appendix B. Figure B-1 in Appendix B compares individual state teen birth rates against the national teen birth rate for each year from 1940 through 2023.
In 2023, the state with the lowest teen birth rate was New Hampshire (4.6 per 1,000); the state with the highest rate was Mississippi (24.9). Fifteen states had rates of less than 10 births per 1,000 teens aged 15 to 19 in 2023: New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maine, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Minnesota, New York, Utah, California, Oregon, Washington, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin (ordered from lowest to highest). Seven states had teen birth rates of 20 per 1,000 teens or higher
, and Wisconsin (ordered from lowest to highest).20 Eight states had the highest teen birth rates (20 or higher): Mississippi, Arkansas, Louisiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Alabama, and Texasand Alabama (ordered from highest to lowest). The rates for the territories ranged from 9.4 in the Northern Mariana11.6 in the U.S. Virgin Islands to 19.823.5 in Guam.21 From 2007 (when the birth rate last ticked up) to 2022increased) to 2023, the teen birth rate decreased in each state or territory by between 5851.9% and 78.5%.20%.22
19 Updated data were not available for American Samoa (2017 teen birth rate of 38.4).
20 Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” Table 8.
21 Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” Table 8. Data for 2022 are not reported for American Samoa (2017 teen birth rate of 38.4). Joyce A. Martin et al., “Births: Final Data for 2017,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 67, no. 8, November 7, 2018.
22 This is based on a Congressional Research Service analysis comparing data from 2007 to 2022.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 6
Teen birth rates have also declined in rural areas over time but remain relatively higher than rates in urban areas.23
Figure 3. T een Birth Rates, by State and T erritory, 2022
Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19
Source: Figure created by CRS using data from Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” Table 8, HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-02.pdf. Notes: The national rate of teen births was 13.6 in 2022 (this rate does not include the territories). Data were not available for American Samoa (2017 teen birth rate of 38.4).
Although the majority of teen births are first births, some teens have additional children while still in their adolescent years.24 These births, sometimes referred to as repeat births, affect the overall teen birth rate and are associated with further risks to teen parents and their children.25 Recent NVSS data categorize all subsequent births as second and higher-order births (see Figure 4). Over the past approximately two decades (2000 to 2022), the rate of second and higher-order births to teens aged 15 to 19 declined by 80%, with larger declines observed among younger teenagers. The current prevalence of repeat births remains higher among non-Hispanic Black (7.0
23 Brady E. Hamilton, Lauren M. Roseen, and Amy M. Branum, “Teen Birth Rates for Urban and Rural Areas in the United States, 2007-2015,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, NCHS Data Brief, no. 264, November 2016; and April Sutton, Daniel T. Lichter, and Sharon Sassler, “Rural–Urban Disparities in Pregnancy Intentions, Births, and Abortions Among US Adolescent and Young Women, 1995–2017,” American Journal of Public Health, 109(12), December 2019, pp. 1762- 1769. See also Sylvester O. Orimaye, “Adolescent Birth Rates and Rural–Urban Differences by Levels of Deprivation and Health Professional Shortage Areas in the United States, 2017–2018,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 11, no. 1 (2021).
24 Anne K. Driscoll et al., “Changes in First and Second Births to US Teenagers from 2000 to 2022,” HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 6, July 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73- 06.pdf.
25 Ibid.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 7
per 1,000), Hispanic (7.1), and non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native teens (8.5) compared with non-Hispanic, White teens (2.7).
Figure 4. First and Second and Higher-Order T een Birth Rates, 2022
Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19
Source: Figure created by CRS using data from Anne K. Driscoll et al., “Changes in First and Second Births to US Teenagers from 2000 to 2022,” Figure 2, HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 6, July 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-06.pdf. Notes: NH = Non-Hispanic; AI/AN = American Indian or Alaska Native. Data were not available for Asian and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Island groups due to (1) small numbers that prevent statistical reliability and (2) changes in how these groups were defined from 2000 to 2022.
Factors Linked to Declines in Teen Births
Researchers suggest that multiple factors have contributed to the near continuous decline in U.S. teen birth rates; these factors include a variety of individual, family, and broader societal factors, each of which may influence teen births to varying degrees.26
Over time, individual behaviors among teens have contributed to the declining teen birth rate in various manners. For instance, data from 1995 to 2002 indicated that an older age at first sexual experience accounted for 23% of the decline in teen pregnancy among younger teens (i.e., teens aged 15 to 17).27
Figure 3. Five-Year Average Teen Birth Rates, by State
Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19.
Source: Figure created by CRS using data from Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023."
Notes: Due to the degree of missing longitudinal data, teen birth rates for U.S. territories are not included in the figure. All available individual-year data for each territory are included in Table B-1, Table B-2, and Table B-3 in Appendix B. Although the majority of teen births are first births, some teens have additional children while still in their adolescent years. These births, sometimes referred to as repeat births, affect the overall teen birth rate and are associated with further risks to teen parents and their children.22 The total teen birth rate can also be understood as a combination of the "first child" teen birth rate and the "second child and over" teen birth rate, also referred to as "second and higher-order" births. Over the past two decades, teenagers have experienced greater declines in the number, rate, and percentage of "second child and over" births than for first births.23 Figure 4 displays trends in the total teen birth rate alongside the rate of "first child" and "second child and over" births. Based on available data, the highest "first child" teen birth rate (63.7) occurred in 1955, whereas the highest "second child and over" teen birth rate (27.7) occurred in 1960 (Figure 4).24 As with the total teen birth rate, the "first child" and "second child and over" rates declined in most years from the 1960s to the 1980s; however, the "first child" teen birth rate increased slightly in 1966 and 1970, while the "second child and over" rate continued to decline. Both rates generally declined from 1971 to 1986, reaching a record low (at the time) "first child" teen birth rate of 38.8 and a record low (at the time) "second child and over" teen birth rate of 11.4, both of which occurred in 1986.25 Over the next few years, both rates began ticking upwards again, with the "first child" teen birth rate reaching 46.3 and the "second child and over" teen birth rate reaching 15.5 in 1991.As with the total teen birth rate, both rates declined from 1992 onwards, aside from increases in both rates in 2006 and a subsequent increase in "first child" teen birth rates in 2007. The 2023 "first child" teen birth rate of 11.3 reflects a historical low and a 65.8% decrease from the most recent high in 2007; the "second child and over" teen birth rate of 1.8 also reflects a historical low and a 77.8% decrease from the most recent high of 8.1 (observed in both 2006 and 2007).
Figure 4. Repeat Teen Birth Rates (TBR), 1940-2023
Number of live births per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19. Figure is interactive in HTML report version.
<script type="text/javascript">//Based on IAG in AP 7.4.1 (Revised 20240624) // $(function () { $('#IAG-2357146532').bind('mousedown', function () { /* saveRptHighChartClick(); */ }); //#### HIGHCHART LIBRARIES ####// var files = ["https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts.js","https://code.highcharts.com/highcharts-more.js","https://code.highcharts.com/modules/exporting.js","https://code.highcharts.com/modules/export-data.js","https://code.highcharts.com/modules/accessibility.js"], loaded = 0; if (typeof window["HighchartsEditor"] === "undefined") { window.HighchartsEditor = { ondone: [cl], hasWrapped: false, hasLoaded: false }; include(files[0]); } else { if (window.HighchartsEditor.hasLoaded) { cl(); } else { window.HighchartsEditor.ondone.push(cl); } } function isScriptAlreadyIncluded(src) { var scripts = document.getElementsByTagName("script"); for (var i = 0; i < scripts.length; i++) { if (scripts[i].hasAttribute("src")) { if ((scripts[i].getAttribute("src") || "").indexOf(src) >= 0 || (scripts[i].getAttribute("src") === "http://code.highcharts.com/highcharts.js" && src === "https://code.highcharts.com/stock/highstock.js")) { return true; } } } return false; } function check() { if (loaded === files.length) { for (var i = 0; i < window.HighchartsEditor.ondone.length; i++) { try { window.HighchartsEditor.ondone[i](); } catch (e) { console.error(e); } } window.HighchartsEditor.hasLoaded = true; } } function include(script) { function next() { ++loaded; if (loaded < files.length) { include(files[loaded]); } check(); } if (isScriptAlreadyIncluded(script)) { return next(); } var sc = document.createElement("script"); sc.src = script; sc.type = "text/javascript"; sc.onload = function () { next(); }; document.head.appendChild(sc); } function each(a, fn) { if (typeof a.forEach !== "undefined") { a.forEach(fn); } else { for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) { if (fn) { fn(a[i]); } } } } var inc = {}, incl = []; each(document.querySelectorAll("script"), function (t) { inc[t.src.substr(0, t.src.indexOf("?"))] = 1; }); function cl() { if (typeof window["Highcharts"] !== "undefined") { //#### HIGHCHART LIBRARIES END ####// //##### CRS THEME START (v1.2, 20220510)#####// Highcharts.theme = { colors: ['#0C90FC', '#003865', '#F1B434', '#7060A8', '#6CC8BD', '#757048', '#B4C7D0', '#D36127'], chart: {backgroundColor: 'white',}, title: { style: { color: 'black', font: '15px "Calibri", Verdana, sans-serif', fontWeight: 'bold' } }, subtitle: { style: { color: 'black', font: '14px "Calibri", Verdana, sans-serif' }}, credits: { enabled: false }, legend: { itemStyle: { fontFamily: '"Calibri", Verdana, sans-serif', fontSize: '14px', color: 'black', "text-decoration": 'none !important' }, verticalAlign: 'top', itemMarginBottom: 7, }, yAxis: { title: { style: { font: '14px "Calibri", Verdana, sans-serif', fontWeight: 'bold', color: 'black'} }, labels: { style: { font: '14px "Calibri", Verdana,sans-serif', color: 'black'}}, }, xAxis: { title: { style: { font: '14px "Calibri", Verdana, sans-serif', fontWeight: 'bold', color: 'black'}, y: 8 }, labels: { style: { font: '14px "Calibri", Verdana, sans-serif', color: 'black' }, }, lineColor: 'black', lineWidth: 0.5 } }; Highcharts.setOptions(Highcharts.theme); Highcharts.setOptions({ lang: {thousandsSep: ','}, chart: {style: {fontFamily: 'Calibri'}}, exporting: { enabled: false } }); //##### CRS THEME END #####// //#### START chart elements before Highcharts container ####// //#### END chart elements before the Highcharts container ####// var options = { //#### START code inside Highcharts.chart('container', { ####// title: { text: null }, subtitle: { text: null }, yAxis: { title: { text: 'Repeat Birth Rate', rotation: -89.9 }, min: 0, max: 100, tickInterval: 20 }, xAxis: { labels: { rotation: -89.9, formatter: function() { return this.value; } }, categories: [ '1940', '1941', '1942', '1943', '1944', '1945', '1946', '1947', '1948', '1949', '1950', '1951', '1952', '1953', '1954', '1955', '1956', '1957', '1958', '1959', '1960', '1961', '1962', '1963', '1964', '1965', '1966', '1967', '1968', '1969', '1970', '1971', '1972', '1973', '1974', '1975', '1976', '1977', '1978', '1979', '1980', '1981', '1982', '1983', '1984', '1985', '1986', '1987', '1988', '1989', '1990', '1991', '1992', '1993', '1994', '1995', '1996', '1997', '1998', '1999', '2000', '2001', '2002', '2003', '2004', '2005', '2006', '2007', '2008', '2009', '2010', '2011', '2012', '2013', '2014', '2015', '2016', '2017', '2018', '2019', '2020', '2021', '2022', '2023', ], tickLength: 8, tickWidth: 1, crosshair: true }, legend:{ enabled: true, layout: 'vertical', align: 'right' }, plotOptions: { series: { lineWidth: 2, label: { enabled: false, connectorAllowed: false, style: { fontSize: '17px' } }, marker: { enabled: true, symbol: 'circle', radius: 2 }, } }, tooltip: { headerFormat: '{point.key}', pointFormatter: function () { let value = this.y === 0 ? '0' : (this.y).toFixed(1); return '' + ''; }, footerFormat: '| ' + this.series.options.tooltipname + ': | ' + value + ' |
Source: Figure created by CRS using NVSS data provided by NCHS in November 2024.
Notes: Individual year data from 1940 through 1959 are unavailable because these population rates were not revised with more accurate populations provided by the Census Bureau. However, the rates for 1940, 1945, 1950, and 1955 include the revised populations and are presented above.
Researchers suggest that multiple factors have contributed to the near continuous decline in U.S. teen birth rates; these factors include a variety of individual, family, and broader societal factors, each of which may influence teen births to varying degrees.26
Over time, individual behaviors among teens have contributed to the declining teen birth rate in various manners. For instance, data from 1995 to 2002 indicate that an older age at first sexual experience accounted for 23% of the decline in teen pregnancy among younger teens (i.e., teens aged 15 to 17).27
More recent data indicate that trends in adolescent sexual activity have not changed significantly, but rather that decreases in the teen birth rate are attributed to an increased use of contraception. From 2006 through 2019, teens reported an increase in the use of contraception and more consistent use of highly effective methods.28 Teens more frequently report the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs; e.g., intrauterine devices, or IUDs, and birth control implants),More recent data indicate that trends in adolescent sexual activity have not changed significantly, but rather that decreases in the teen birth rate are attributed to an increased use of contraception. From 2006 through 2019, teens reported an increase in the use of contraception and more consistent use of highly effective methods.28 Teens more frequently report the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs; e.g., intrauterine devices, or IUDs, and birth control implants),
26 HHS, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of Population Affairs, “Trends in Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing,” https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/reproductive-health-and-teen-pregnancy/trends-teen-pregnancy- and-childbearing.
27 Heather D. Boonstra, “What is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?” Guttmacher Policy Review, vol. 17, issue 3, September 3, 2014, https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2014/09/what-behind-declines-teen-pregnancy-rates.
28 Laura D. Lindberg, Lauren Firestein, and Cynthia Beavin, “Trends in U.S. adolescent sexual behavior and contraceptive use, 2006-2019,” Contraception X, vol. 3 (2021).
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 8
though data concerning the use of condoms remains mixed.29 Further, the choice to use certain contraceptive methods in conjunction with or instead of other methods may be influenced by a variety of factors, including clinical guidelines and related updates, physical and financial access, and individual preferences (a discussion of these influences among adolescents are beyond the scope of this report).30 Differences observed in some trends in adolescent sexual behavior and contraceptive use may also depend on the sampling approach used by particular surveys.31
Broad economic and social variables may influence teen behaviors, such as whether they will abstain from sex or use contraceptives.32 Behavioral changes may have been driven by a confluence of factors, such as expanded educational and labor market opportunities for women and improvements in contraceptive technology.33 Some observers theorize that the long-term downward trend in teen birth rates is attributable to the recession that began in 2007. They contend that during economic downturns the decrease in teen births—like the decrease in overall births—is partly due to teenagers being more careful as they witness the economic difficulties faced by their families.34 Despite this rationale, the teen birth rate continued to diminish after the recession (as well as during periods of economic expansion in the 1990s).35 Some researchers have aimed to quantify how media exposure may affect teen birth rates and related attitudes about
29 Laura D. Lindberg, Lauren Firestein, and Cynthia Beavin, “Trends in U.S. adolescent sexual behavior and contraceptive use, 2006-2019,” Contraception X, vol. 3 (2021). See also, Leigh E. Szucs et al., “Condom and Contraceptive Use Among Sexually Active High School Students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019,” HHS, CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplements, vol 69, no. 1 (August 2020), pp. 11-18.
30 The CDC, as well as various independent professional membership organizations, publishes clinical guidance about the use of contraceptive methods by certain population subgroups. CDC’s U.S. Medical Eligibility for Contraceptive Use (also known as the MEC) is adapted from global guidance developed by the World Health Organization. It describes who can safely use various methods of contraception based on specific health conditions and other characteristics. A companion document, known as the Selected Practice Recommendations (SPR), addresses more timely challenges regarding the initiation and/or use of certain contraceptive methods. In 2013, the SPR clarified the safety and efficacy of the use of LARC methods among adolescents, updating concerns that were previously outlined in the 2010 U.S. MEC. The 2016 update to the U.S. MEC affirmed the safety of LARC use among adolescents and women who had not previously given birth. National survey data (see footnote 29 above) indicate that adolescents used LARCs prior to these updates; however, the prevalence of LARC use has increased over time. See CDC, U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, July 29, 2016, p. 4-5, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/rr/pdfs/rr6503.pdf.
31 Laura D. Lindberg, Rachel H. Scott, Sheila Desai, et al., “Comparability of estimates and trends in adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviors from two national surveys: National Survey of Family Growth and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7 (2021). See also, Elizabeth Wildsmith, Kate Welti, Jane Finocharo, et al., The 30-Year Decline in Teen Birth Rates Has Accelerated Since 2010, Child Trends, December 23, 2022, https://www.childtrends.org/publications/the-30-year-decline-in-teen-birth-rates-has-accelerated-since-2010.
32 Heather D. Boonstra, “What Is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?,” and Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, “Investigating Recent Trends in the U.S. Teen Birth Rate,” Journal of Health Economics, vol., 41, 2015. See also, Sarah Kliff, “The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate,” Vox, January 21, 2015. (Hereinafter, Sarah Kliff, “The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate.”)
33 Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, “Investigating Recent Trends in the U.S. Teen Birth Rate,” Journal of Health Economics, vol. 41, 2015. S.M. Goodreau, “Declines in Pregnancies among U.S. Adolescents from 2007 to 2017: Behavioral Contributors to the Trend,” Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, vol. 36, no 6 (December 2022).
34 Sarah Kliff, “The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate.”
35 Melissa S. Kearney, Phillip B. Levine, and Luke Pardue, “The Puzzle of Falling U.S. Birth Rates since the Great Recession,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 36, no. 1 (Winter 2022), pp. 151-176, and Paul Taylor, Gretchen Livingston, and Seth Motel, In a Down Economy, Fewer Births, Pew Research Center, Social and Demographic Trends, October 10, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2011/10/12/in-a-down-economy-fewer-births/.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 9
contraceptive use and adolescent childbearing. The extent of this influence is not well understood.36
Some observers contend that teen pregnancy prevention programs, such as those supported with federal funding, could potentially play a role in the declining birth rate for teenagers.37 The extent to which these programs have contributed to a decline in the teen birth rate is not fully known.38 Some researchers have found that the proportion of teens who receive formal sex education has changed little in recent years, and that teens are less likely to be instructed on topics such as how to access contraception, how to refuse sex, and/or how to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs).39 Additionally, the receipt of this information can vary by teens’ sociodemographic characteristics.40
While the U.S. teen birth rate has decreased over time, it has been higher than that of most other industrialized countries.41 For instance, the 2021 U.S. teen birth rate of 13.9 per 1,000 was higher than the rate of the United Kingdom (8.2), France (5.1), Canada (4.9), and Sweden (2.5) (based on the most recent international data available that include the teen birth rate).42 The reasons for the high teen birth rate in the United States relative to other industrialized countries have not been fully explored. Economic conditions and income inequality within and between countries, as well as societal differences, such as rates of alcohol consumption, may play a role.43 Further, the research literature, which is somewhat limited, indicates that use of contraceptives among teens appears to be greater in other developed countries compared with the United States.44
36 Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, Media Influences on Social Outcomes: The Impact of MTV’s 16 and Pregnant on Teen Childbearing, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 19795, Cambridge, MA, August 2015, https://www.nber.org/papers/w19795; David A. Jaeger, Theodore M. Joycs, and Robert, “A Cautionary Tale of Evaluating Identifying Assumptions: Did Reality TV Really Cause a Decline in Teenage Childbearing?,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 38(2) (2018), pp. 317-326, https://doi.org/10.1080/ 07350015.2018.1497510.
37 See CRS Report R45183, Adolescent Pregnancy: Federal Prevention Programs, for further information about current programs that are federally funded.
38 Sarah Kliff, “The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate,” and Heather D. Boonstra, “What Is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?”
39 Laura D. Lindberg and Leslie M. Kantor, “Adolescents’ Receipt of Sex Education in a Nationally Representative Sample, 2011-2019,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 70 (2022), pp. 294-296.
40 Ibid.
41 Gilda Sedgh, “Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Recent Trends,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 56 (2015). See also Table 10 in United Nations, Demographic Yearbook, 71st Ed., 2020. (Hereinafter, Gilda Sedgh et al., “Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Trends.”)
42 United Nations, Statistics Division, “Demographic Yearbook 2022,” https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic-social/ products/dyb/dyb_2022/. (See Table 10, “Live births by age of mother and sex of child, general and age-specific fertility rates: latest available year, 2013–2022.”) See also, Gilda Sedgh et al., “Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Trends.”
43 John S. Santelli, Vinit Sharma, and Russell Viner, “Inequality, National Wealth, Economic Development and Global Trends in Teenage Birth Rates, 1990-2010,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 52, no. 1 (February 2013); and Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, “Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Spring: 26(2), 2012, pp. 141-166. (Hereinafter, Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, “Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?”); John S. Santelli et al., “Global Trends in Adolescent Fertility, 1990–2012, in Relation to National Wealth, Income Inequalities, and Educational Expenditures,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 60, no. 2 (February 2017), pp. 161-168; and Torleif Halkjelsvik and Vegard Fykse Skirbekk, “Concurrent Decline in Teenage Fertility Rate and Binge Drinking? An Observational Study Across 45 Nations,” Drug and Alcohol Review, 2024.
44 Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, “Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does (continued...)
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 10
Financial and Social Costs of Teen Births
Adolescent childbearing has high costs for the families of teen parents and society more generally.45 Teenage mothers and fathers tend to have less education and are more likely to have lower income than their peers who are not teen parents. For example, approximately 90% of women who do not give birth during adolescence graduate from high school, whereas about 50% of teen mothers receive a high school diploma by 22 years of age.46 In addition, according to the HHS Office of Population Affairs, adolescents who have children before turning 20 (compared with older parents) are
• more likely to need public assistance;
• more likely to have low income as adults; and
• more likely to have children who face challenges such as poorer educational, behavioral, and health outcomes.47
These adverse outcomes may be explained in part by the accompanying stressors and risk factors linked to having a child as a teen. They are also partly explained by underlying differences between those who give birth as teens and those who delay childbearing. Lower levels of education reduce teen parents’ potential for economic self-sufficiency. At the same time, having lower income and less education can also increase the likelihood of teens becoming pregnant in the first place.48 Compared with their counterparts who have children at a later age, teen mothers often come from more disadvantaged backgrounds (e.g., family more likely to receive public welfare benefits, parents have lower levels of education) or, as discussed below, may be the children of teen parents themselves.49 In addition, teen sexual activity, even among those who do not become pregnant, can increase the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which can led to long-term health issues. Some STIs are disproportionately common among adolescents and young adults.50
Adolescent childbearing can also affect the children of teen parents. Children of teenage mothers have poorer outcomes than children of mothers who give birth in their early 20s or later. They are generally more likely to (1) have chronic medical conditions, (2) use public health care, (3) have lower school readiness scores, (4) do poorly in school, (5) give birth during their teen years (females), and (6) be incarcerated (males).51 Relatedly, NVSS data examining linked infant and
It Matter?” See also, Gilda Sedgh et al., “Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Trends”; Rachel H. Scott, Kaye Willings, and Laura Lindberg, “Adolescent Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Pregnancy in Britain and the U.S.: A Multidecade Comparison,” Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 66, no. 5 (May 2020), pp. 582-588.
45 HHS, CDC, Winnable Battles Final Report.
46 HHS, CDC, “About Teen Pregnancy,” November 15, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/teenpregnancy/about/index.htm.
47 HHS, OPA, OASH, “About Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing,” https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/reproductive- health-and-teen-pregnancy/about-teen-pregnancy-and-childbearing.
48 Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy.
Some observers contend that teen pregnancy prevention programs, such as those supported with federal funding, could potentially play a role in the declining birth rate for teenagers.37 The extent to which these programs have contributed to a decline in the teen birth rate is not fully known.38 Some researchers have found that the proportion of teens who receive formal sex education has changed little in recent years, and that teens are less likely to be instructed on topics such as how to access contraception, how to refuse sex, and/or how to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STIs).39 Additionally, the receipt of this information can vary by teens' sociodemographic characteristics.40 While the U.S. teen birth rate has decreased over time, it has been higher than that of most other industrialized countries.41 For instance, the 2021 U.S. teen birth rate of 13.9 per 1,000 was higher than the rate of the United Kingdom (8.2), France (5.1), Canada (4.9), and Sweden (2.5) (based on the most recent international data available that include the teen birth rate).42 The reasons for the high teen birth rate in the United States relative to other industrialized countries have not been fully explored. Economic conditions and income inequality within and between countries, as well as societal differences, such as rates of alcohol consumption, may play a role.43 Further, the research literature, which is somewhat limited, indicates that use of contraceptives among teens appears to be greater in other developed countries compared with the United States.44 Adolescent childbearing has high costs for the families of teen parents and society more generally.45 Teenage mothers and fathers tend to have less education and are more likely to have lower income than their peers who are not teen parents. For example, approximately 90% of women who do not give birth during adolescence graduate from high school, whereas about 50% of teen mothers receive a high school diploma by 22 years of age.46 In addition, according to the HHS Office of Population Affairs,47 adolescents who have children before turning 20 (compared with older parents) are These adverse outcomes may be explained in part by the accompanying stressors and risk factors linked to having a child as a teen. They are also partly explained by underlying differences between those who give birth as teens and those who delay childbearing. Lower levels of education reduce teen parents' potential for economic self-sufficiency. At the same time, having lower income and less education can also increase the likelihood of teens becoming pregnant in the first place.49 Compared with their counterparts who have children at a later age, teen mothers often come from more disadvantaged backgrounds (e.g., family more likely to receive public welfare benefits, parents have lower levels of education) or, as discussed below, may be the children of teen parents themselves.50 In addition, teen sexual activity, even among those who do not become pregnant, can increase the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs), which can lead to long-term health issues. Some STIs are disproportionately common among adolescents and young adults.51 Adolescent childbearing can also affect the children of teen parents. Children of teenage mothers have poorer outcomes than children of mothers who give birth in their early 20s or later. They are generally more likely to (1) have chronic medical conditions, (2) use public health care, (3) have lower school readiness scores, (4) do poorly in school, (5) give birth during their teen years (females), and (6) be incarcerated (males).52 Relatedly, NVSS data examining linked infant and maternal health records indicated that infants born to teen mothers are more likely to face higher rates of neonatal and infant mortality and morbidity, including preterm birth or low birth weight, while teen mothers also face heightened risk of maternal health complications.53 Birth rate is per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19 Year Birth Rate Year Birth Rate Year Birth Rate 1940 54.1 1968 65.6 1996 53.5 1941 56.9 1969 65.5 1997 51.3 1942 61.1 1970 68.3 1998 50.3 1943 61.7 1971 64.5 1999 48.8 1944 54.3 1972 61.7 2000 47.7 1945 51.1 1973 59.3 2001 45.0 1946 59.3 1974 57.5 2002 42.6 1947 79.3 1975 55.6 2003 41.1 1948 81.1 1976 52.8 2004 40.5 1949 83.4 1977 52.8 2005 39.7 1950 81.6 1978 51.5 2006 41.1 1951 87.6 1979 52.3 2007 41.5 1952 86.1 1980 53.0 2008 40.2 1953 88.2 1981 52.2 2009 37.9 1954 90.6 1982 52.4 2010 34.2 1955 90.3 1983 51.4 2011 31.3 1956 94.6 1984 50.6 2012 29.4 1957 96.3 1985 51.0 2013 26.5 1958 91.4 1986 50.2 2014 24.2 1959 89.1 1987 50.6 2015 22.3 1960 89.1 1988 53.0 2016 20.3 1961 88.6 1989 57.3 2017 18.8 1962 81.4 1990 59.9 2018 17.4 1963 76.7 1991 61.8 2019 16.7 1964 73.1 1992 60.3 2020 15.0 1965 70.5 1993 59.0 2021 13.9 1966 70.3 1994 58.2 2022 13.6 1967 67.5 1995 56.0 2023 13.1 Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
Figure B-1. Teen Birth Rates, by State and Territory Birth rate is per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19. Figure is interactive in the HTML report version. Source: Figure prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. State/Territory 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Alabama 71.0 73.6 72.0 69.2 70.6 68.5 67.1 64.5 63.9 60.9 60.7 Alaska 65.3 66.0 65.2 59.7 59.5 54.5 50.8 49.3 47.5 47.7 49.0 Arizona 75.5 79.7 80.2 78.1 76.8 73.5 71.5 68.7 68.8 68.0 67.9 Arkansas 80.1 79.5 74.8 72.8 74.8 71.9 73.5 70.8 68.7 66.1 66.2 California 70.6 73.8 72.8 71.8 70.2 66.8 61.0 55.7 52.0 49.1 47.0 Colorado 54.5 58.3 58.4 55.8 55.2 52.3 50.7 49.3 50.2 50.0 51.3 Connecticut 38.8 40.1 39.0 38.8 39.7 38.6 36.6 35.1 34.9 32.7 31.1 District of Columbia 54.5 60.4 58.7 58.0 57.8 54.6 53.8 52.3 50.6 50.7 48.0 Delaware 93.1 109.6 106.7 112.8 97.0 85.2 79.2 67.1 62.0 56.0 53.2 Florida 69.1 67.9 65.2 63.7 63.0 60.2 57.2 55.8 53.9 51.7 51.1 Georgia 75.5 76.0 74.2 72.0 70.6 69.8 66.8 65.6 64.0 63.5 62.8 Hawaii 61.2 59.2 54.2 53.7 54.4 48.8 48.9 44.4 47.0 45.0 46.1 Idaho 50.6 53.9 51.5 50.3 46.1 48.7 46.9 43.0 44.6 43.5 42.9 Illinois 62.9 64.5 63.0 62.0 61.5 58.4 55.3 52.7 51.8 49.7 48.0 Indiana 58.6 60.4 58.5 57.9 57.0 56.6 55.1 52.8 52.2 50.5 49.1 Iowa 40.5 42.5 40.5 40.7 39.3 38.3 37.4 35.3 34.9 35.4 34.2 Kansas 56.1 55.4 55.6 55.5 53.3 52.0 49.4 48.4 47.5 48.1 46.1 Kentucky 67.6 68.8 64.8 63.7 64.2 62.3 61.2 59.0 57.2 56.4 55.1 Louisiana 74.2 76.0 76.1 75.9 74.5 69.9 66.8 65.9 65.6 63.0 62.1 Maine 43.0 43.5 40.0 37.1 35.6 33.9 31.7 32.3 30.7 30.2 29.2 Maryland 53.2 54.1 50.6 49.7 49.3 47.2 45.7 43.1 42.6 42.2 41.3 Massachusetts 35.1 37.5 37.5 37.2 36.4 33.3 31.1 30.4 29.5 27.4 25.9 Michigan 59.0 58.9 56.6 53.1 52.0 49.1 46.4 44.3 43.5 41.4 40.2 Minnesota 36.3 37.3 35.9 35.0 34.4 32.5 32.3 32.1 30.9 30.3 30.1 Mississippi 81.0 85.3 83.6 82.2 81.7 79.2 74.0 71.8 71.4 70.9 70.1 Missouri 62.8 64.4 63.1 59.4 58.6 55.1 53.2 51.1 51.0 49.4 48.7 Montana 48.4 46.8 46.0 46.1 41.6 42.4 39.3 38.2 38.0 36.0 36.7 Nebraska 42.3 42.4 41.1 40.5 42.9 37.8 38.9 37.4 37.5 37.5 37.7 Nevada 73.3 74.5 70.6 73.2 73.4 73.4 69.5 67.4 65.6 63.9 63.0 New Hampshire 33.0 33.1 31.3 30.5 29.9 30.3 28.2 28.2 26.8 23.8 23.3 New Jersey 40.5 41.3 38.9 37.9 39.0 37.7 35.2 34.8 34.7 32.8 31.8 New Mexico 78.2 79.5 79.7 80.6 77.0 74.0 70.5 67.8 68.7 66.8 65.6 New York 43.6 45.5 44.5 44.6 44.3 42.2 39.9 36.7 36.4 34.7 33.2 North Carolina 67.6 70.0 69.2 66.1 65.3 63.0 62.3 59.9 59.8 58.0 58.6 North Dakota 35.4 35.5 36.9 36.3 33.9 32.9 31.6 29.2 29.7 27.0 27.3 Ohio 57.9 60.5 58.0 56.7 54.9 53.4 50.4 49.8 48.5 46.5 46.0 Oklahoma 66.8 72.1 69.8 68.3 65.6 63.7 63.1 63.7 61.4 60.1 59.7 Oregon 54.6 54.8 53.0 50.8 50.2 50.1 50.5 46.2 47.1 46.1 42.8 Pennsylvania 44.9 46.7 44.8 43.7 42.9 40.9 38.4 36.1 35.9 35.1 34.0 Rhode Island 43.9 44.7 46.2 47.6 45.0 39.8 38.9 38.3 36.5 33.5 33.6 South Carolina 71.3 72.5 69.7 64.7 64.7 62.8 60.2 58.8 58.3 58.5 58.0 South Dakota 46.8 47.6 48.3 44.4 43.0 40.9 40.1 40.6 39.8 38.5 38.1 Tennessee 72.3 74.8 70.9 69.2 69.7 66.6 64.5 62.4 62.5 60.8 59.5 Texas 75.3 78.4 78.2 77.7 77.2 75.6 73.1 71.2 70.5 69.6 68.9 Utah 48.5 48.0 45.7 43.4 41.4 40.9 41.2 41.0 39.6 38.8 38.3 Vermont 34.0 39.2 35.6 34.8 32.4 28.1 29.5 26.3 23.8 25.0 23.4 Virginia 52.9 53.4 51.7 49.6 50.5 48.4 45.4 44.0 43.4 42.6 40.9 Washington 53.1 53.7 51.0 50.5 48.6 48.0 45.6 43.0 42.4 41.0 39.2 West Virginia 57.3 58.0 56.3 55.6 54.3 52.7 50.5 49.1 49.6 48.5 46.5 Wisconsin 42.6 43.7 42.0 41.0 38.8 37.9 36.9 35.8 35.2 36.3 35.2 Wyoming 56.3 54.3 49.8 49.9 48.7 47.9 44.7 43.9 48.9 41.4 41.7 Total—United States 59.9 61.8 60.3 59.0 58.2 56.0 53.5 51.3 50.3 48.8 47.7 American Samoa n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 43.9 43.9 46.4 38.1 Guam n/a 95.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 106.3 104.8 96.6 69.5 Northern Marianas n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 65.5 62.0 61.1 Puerto Rico n/a 72.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 77.8 n/a n/a n/a U.S. Virgin Islands n/a 77.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 66 62 55.2 46.8 Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. State/Territory 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Alabama 55.7 53.6 51.4 51.0 48.1 51.8 52.1 50.5 48.3 43.6 40.5 Alaska 42.9 42.4 41.2 41.7 39.9 41.8 42.9 44.2 43.2 38.3 36.2 Arizona 65.3 62.6 61.9 60.8 58.7 61.2 59.6 54.5 48.6 41.9 38.5 Arkansas 62.7 60.4 59.3 60.3 58.6 60.8 60.1 59.8 57.8 52.5 50.7 California 44.5 41.6 40.1 39.5 38.7 39.9 39.6 37.9 34.9 31.5 28.7 Colorado 47.0 46.9 43.1 43.3 41.8 41.9 41.6 40.5 37.7 33.4 28.9 Connecticut 28.1 25.7 24.6 24.4 23.3 23.5 23.0 22.6 21.2 18.7 16.4 District of Columbia 45.0 42.6 41.6 40.0 40.1 40.6 39.2 38.3 33.5 30.5 29.3 Delaware 50.1 47.3 42.3 43.5 42.1 48.1 50.4 51.1 48.5 45.4 42.8 Florida 48.1 45.1 43.0 42.7 42.3 43.1 43.0 40.0 36.6 32.0 29.5 Georgia 59.8 55.6 53.1 52.7 52.0 53.7 53.4 50.0 47.0 41.4 38.2 Hawaii 43.1 39.7 38.3 36.4 36.5 39.0 38.7 38.9 37.0 32.5 30.0 Idaho 40.1 38.0 38.3 37.5 36.4 38.1 39.9 39.6 35.9 33.0 25.7 Illinois 45.7 42.2 40.2 40.1 38.5 39.8 40.2 38.5 35.9 33.0 29.5 Indiana 45.8 43.7 42.6 42.6 42.1 41.8 43.0 41.2 40.8 37.3 34.8 Iowa 32.2 31.1 30.6 30.1 31.1 32.6 32.8 33.4 32.1 28.6 25.3 Kansas 43.4 42.1 40.3 39.7 40.1 40.9 42.5 44.1 42.7 39.3 35.4 Kentucky 51.5 50.3 49.2 48.7 48.1 52.3 52.6 52.5 49.7 46.2 43.5 Louisiana 58.2 57.2 54.8 54.6 47.3 53.6 55.2 54.0 51.7 47.7 45.1 Maine 27.2 25.2 24.9 24.3 24.4 24.9 26.0 25.0 24.0 21.4 20.8 Maryland 38.0 35.9 33.7 32.7 32.1 33.7 34.3 32.6 30.7 27.3 24.7 Massachusetts 23.8 21.7 21.3 20.5 20.0 20.6 21.4 19.8 19.5 17.2 15.4 Michigan 38.2 34.6 34.2 33.9 32.2 33.2 33.5 32.3 31.9 30.1 27.8 Minnesota 28.0 27.2 26.2 26.3 25.5 27.3 27.9 26.5 24.1 22.5 19.3 Mississippi 65.6 63.5 61.2 60.1 58.3 67.2 70.1 64.0 62.2 55.0 50.2 Missouri 46.0 43.7 42.8 42.9 41.7 44.1 44.0 43.5 40.6 37.1 34.5 Montana 35.6 36.4 34.8 35.4 34.5 37.6 35.3 38.9 38.4 35.0 29.2 Nebraska 35.8 35.9 34.9 34.8 33.1 32.8 35.5 35.8 34.8 31.1 27.2 Nevada 58.4 56.7 54.9 52.9 51.6 53.4 51.7 49.1 44.0 38.6 36.1 New Hampshire 20.7 19.5 18.0 18.1 18.0 18.1 19.3 19.1 16.4 15.7 13.7 New Jersey 29.7 27.8 26.5 25.0 24.2 24.8 24.9 24.0 22.0 20.1 18.7 New Mexico 63.7 63.1 62.8 60.6 61.2 62.7 63.9 61.4 60.3 53.0 48.8 New York 31.8 28.9 27.3 26.1 25.7 26.0 26.0 25.5 24.2 22.7 21.2 North Carolina 53.7 50.5 47.2 47.3 47.0 48.1 48.0 47.3 43.7 38.3 34.9 North Dakota 25.3 25.0 24.7 24.7 27.0 26.1 29.2 28.3 28.7 28.8 28.2 Ohio 42.8 39.6 39.2 38.2 38.3 38.9 39.9 39.5 37.9 34.1 31.5 Oklahoma 57.8 57.7 55.3 54.4 52.8 56.6 58.5 57.8 57.4 50.4 47.8 Oregon 40.4 36.8 34.2 33.1 32.7 34.5 34.5 35.6 32.5 28.2 25.8 Pennsylvania 32.3 30.5 30.1 29.4 29.2 30.4 30.7 30.4 28.7 27.0 24.9 Rhode Island 33.0 31.3 27.8 29.0 27.8 27.5 29.2 27.6 25.8 22.3 21.3 South Carolina 54.8 50.8 49.5 49.8 48.7 52.0 51.9 51.2 47.0 42.6 39.1 South Dakota 37.5 37.6 34.3 37.8 36.8 38.7 41.3 39.1 38.7 34.9 34.3 Tennessee 56.7 53.9 52.7 51.1 53.3 52.1 53.4 52.2 48.4 43.2 40.8 Texas 66.0 64.6 62.6 62.1 60.9 61.6 61.8 60.7 57.9 52.2 46.9 Utah 36.1 33.8 31.8 30.9 30.5 33.3 35.4 34.6 30.7 27.9 23.1 Vermont 22.6 22.5 17.8 19.5 17.4 19.8 21.0 20.3 17.3 17.9 16.8 Virginia 39.1 36.5 35.2 34.2 33.6 34.2 34.2 32.5 30.4 27.4 24.5 Washington 35.9 33.5 31.8 31.4 31.1 32.2 33.3 32.8 30.4 26.7 25.4 West Virginia 45.3 45.1 44.2 42.9 42.2 44.2 45.8 46.9 48.2 44.8 43.5 Wisconsin 33.4 31.7 30.8 29.7 29.7 29.9 31.1 30.3 29.4 26.2 23.2 Wyoming 39.5 41.0 41.6 42.8 42.7 46.0 49.9 47.5 43.4 39.0 35.2 Total—United States 45.0 42.6 41.1 40.5 39.7 41.1 41.5 40.2 37.9 34.2 31.3 American Samoa 38.9 46.2 40.4 45.8 34.2 37.1 28.9 37.1 38.4 34.1 38.4 Guam 70.5 64.7 64.3 62.6 59.2 58.7 60.0 55.0 57.1 60.1 62.1 Northern Marianas 56.8 42.3 42.3 39.3 30.4 31.6 35.1 42.3 46.6 53.4 47.2 Puerto Rico 68.0 62.2 59.5 61.7 61.2 60.0 57.1 54.9 54.7 51.4 51.7 U.S. Virgin Islands 51.5 56.8 50.9 52.7 50.0 49.6 51.5 51.1 57.4 50.5 59.3 Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. State/Territory 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Alabama 39.2 34.3 32.0 30.1 28.4 27.0 25.2 25.6 24.8 22.9 20.9 20.1 Alaska 34.5 30.3 27.8 29.3 25.8 22.0 19.3 18.3 17.7 17.5 16.9 16.0 Arizona 37.4 33.1 29.9 26.3 23.6 22.0 20.1 18.5 16.6 15.1 15.1 14.3 Arkansas 45.7 43.5 39.5 38.0 34.6 32.8 30.4 30.0 27.8 26.5 24.6 23.8 California 26.5 23.6 21.1 19.0 17.0 15.1 13.6 12.4 11.0 9.9 9.8 9.1 Colorado 25.4 23.4 20.3 19.3 17.8 16.1 14.3 13.9 12.5 11.4 11.1 10.9 Connecticut 15.1 12.9 11.5 10.1 9.4 8.8 8.3 7.7 7.6 7.1 6.4 6.8 District of Columbia 25.0 24.7 20.7 18.1 19.5 18.5 16.7 14.9 15.6 13.5 12.5 13.5 Delaware 38.6 32.1 28.4 25.6 24.0 21.0 19.3 16.8 14.6 13.9 14.7 12.3 Florida 28.0 24.6 22.5 20.8 19.3 18.2 16.7 16.2 15.2 13.5 13.1 12.7 Georgia 33.8 30.5 28.4 25.6 23.6 21.9 20.6 19.7 18.2 16.6 16.6 16.5 Hawaii 28.1 25.1 23.1 20.6 19.2 19.1 17.2 15.7 13.0 12.3 11.7 11.3 Idaho 27.7 28.3 23.2 22.5 20.1 18.6 16.0 14.9 14.6 12.0 10.9 10.5 Illinois 27.9 24.6 22.8 21.1 18.7 17.4 15.8 14.6 13.6 11.1 11.3 10.7 Indiana 33.0 30.3 28.0 26.0. 23.6 22.8 21.8 20.8 18.7 17.0 16.7 15.7 Iowa 24.1 22.1 19.8 18.6 17.2 16.0 15.3 14.1 13.3 12.7 12.4 11.8 Kansas 34.1 29.6 27.6 25.5 21.9 21.3 20.0 19.2 18.1 16.3 16.2 15.1 Kentucky 41.5 39.5 35.3 32.4 30.9 29.0 27.3 24.9 23.8 22.3 21.8 20.7 Louisiana 43.1 39.2 35.8 34.1 30.6 29.1 27.5 27.8 25.7 24.5 23.7 23.1 Maine 19.4 17.4 16.5 15.4 14.7 13.1 11.1 9.1 10.6 7.8 8.4 7.2 Maryland 22.1 19.4 17.8 17.0 15.9 14.2 14.1 13.9 13.1 11.3 10.9 10.8 Massachusetts 14.1 12.1 10.6 9.4 8.5 8.1 7.2 6.9 6.1 5.7 5.8 5.8 Michigan 26.3 23.6 21.1 19.4 17.7 16.4 15.8 15.1 13.5 12.2 11.6 10.9 Minnesota 18.5 16.8 15.5 13.7 12.6 12.1 10.2 10.1 9.1 8.5 8.2 7.8 Mississippi 46.1 42.6 38.0 34.8 32.6 31.0 27.8 29.1 27.9 25.6 26.4 24.9 Missouri 32.2 30.0 27.2 25.0 23.4 22.5 21.6 20.3 18.8 17.1 16.9 15.9 Montana 28.8 27.9 26.4 25.3 23.7 21.2 17.2 16.3 13.2 13.6 12.2 11.8 Nebraska 26.8 24.9 22.2 22.0 19.1 18.1 16.7 15.3 15.1 14.0 14.1 13.1 Nevada 33.4 30.3 28.5 27.6 24.2 21.9 20.5 18.9 16.8 15.1 14.0 13.1 New Hampshire 13.8 12.6 11.0 10.9 9.3 8.4 8.0 6.6 6.6 5.4 4.6 4.6 New Jersey 16.7 14.8 13.1 12.1 11.0 10.3 10.3 10.0 9.2 7.9 8.2 7.5 New Mexico 47.5 43.3 37.8 34.6 29.8 27.9 25.3 24.4 21.9 19.0 19.7 17.9 New York 19.7 17.7 16.1 14.6 13.2 12.5 11.7 11.4 10.0 9.1 8.6 8.5 North Carolina 31.8 28.4 25.9 23.6 21.8 20.6 18.7 18.2 17.3 16.0 15.0 14.8 North Dakota 26.5 24.1 23.9 22.2 20.3 16.2 16.4 15.6 13.7 12.9 11.7 11.2 Ohio 29.8 27.2 25.1 23.2 21.8 20.8 18.9 18.8 17.6 15.5 15.4 14.6 Oklahoma 47.3 42.9 38.5 34.8 33.4 29.7 27.2 27.4 25.0 24.1 21.2 20.6 Oregon 23.8 21.6 20.0 19.0 16.6 15.0 13.3 12.1 10.1 9.5 10.1 9.4 Pennsylvania 23.7 20.9 19.3 17.7 15.8 14.8 14.1 13.3 12.6 11.5 10.6 9.8 Rhode Island 19.9 17.7 15.8 14.3 12.9 11.4 11.5 10.0 9.4 7.8 8.3 7.5 South Carolina 36.6 31.6 28.5 26.2 23.7 21.7 22.0 21.6 19.3 18.3 17.3 17.1 South Dakota 33.3 29.1 26.2 26.4 25.1 22.6 20.4 19.2 18.7 17.0 17.4 16.6 Tennessee 38.5 34.7 33.0 30.5 28.0 26.6 25.3 23.7 23.3 21.5 21.0 20.4 Texas 44.4 41.0 37.8 34.6 31.0 27.6 25.3 24.0 22.4 20.3 20.4 19.4 Utah 23.3 20.6 19.4 17.6 15.6 15.2 13.1 12.0 10.8 9.7 9.0 8.7 Vermont 16.3 14.5 14.2 11.6 10.3 10.1 8.8 7.6 7.0 6.4 5.8 5.7 Virginia 22.9 20.1 18.4 17.1 15.5 15.0 14.3 13.6 13.1 11.7 11.2 10.9 Washington 23.4 20.5 19.1 17.6 16.6 14.8 12.7 12.7 11.3 10.1 9.6 9.7 West Virginia 44.1 40.1 36.6 31.9 29.3 27.1 25.4 25.2 22.5 20.9 19.8 18.5 Wisconsin 21.9 19.6 18.0 16.2 15.0 13.8 13.0 12.5 11.5 10.1 9.8 9.9 Wyoming 34.7 29.6 30.1 29.2 26.1 24.6 20.8 19.4 18.1 16.0 16.0 12.6 Total—United States 29.4 26.5 24.2 22.3 20.3 18.8 17.4 16.7 15.0 13.9 13.6 13.1 American Samoa 39.7 42.9 46.8 46.9 40.8 38.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Guam 54.7 54.1 48.4 38.3 38.0 40.1 34.4 33.3 33.0 23.8 19.8 23.5 Northern Marianas 37.9 44.3 38.6 36.9 27.4 16.1 28.3 20.7 17.9 14 9.4 16.9 Puerto Rico 48.8 44.6 40.4 33.9 29.6 24.3 19.3 19.1 15.5 13.2 12.6 12.3 U.S. Virgin Islands 42.8 n/a n/a 39.1 25.4 n/a n/a n/a 15.1 18.5 15.0 11.6 Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. This report was originally authored by Adrienne Fernandes-Alcantara, former CRS Specialist in Social Policy. The most recent edition of the report received invaluable assistance on graphics from Juan Pablo Madrid, CRS Visual Information Specialist, as well as data support from Sylvia Bryan, CRS Research Assistant. This report uses the terms teenagers, teens, and adolescents interchangeably. This report also uses adolescent females and women to be consistent with the terms used by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), including official teen birth statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). The teen birth rate age range reflects the standard definition used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other federal agencies. The CDC also disaggregates birth rates by other age ranges, including ages 10 to 14; however, this age group is not included in calculations of the national teen birth rate and has remained unchanged since 2021 at 0.2 births per 1,000 females. See Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023," HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 74, no. 1, March 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr74/nvsr74-1.pdf (Hereinafter, Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023.") John Bongaarts, "A Framework for Analyzing the Proximate Determinants of Fertility," Population and Development Review, vol. 4, no. 1 (March 1978). Laura Lindberg et al., "Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007-2012," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 59 (2016), p. 578.49 Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, “Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?”; and Urban Institute, contraceptive use and adolescent childbearing. The extent of this influence is not well understood.36
Footnotes
1.
2.
3.
Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy, edited by Saul D. Hoffman and Rebecca A. Maynard, 2nd ed., 2008. (Hereinafter, Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy.) See also, HHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Winnable Battles Final Report 2010-2015, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/43072; Stefanie Mollborn, "Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy.
50 HHS, CDC, National Overview of STIs, 2022, January 2024.
51 Emily Holcombe, Kristen Peterson, and Jennifer Manlove, Ten Reasons to Still Keep the Focus on Teen Childbearing, Child Trends, March 2009; Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy; and Stefanie Mollborn, “Teenage Mothers Today: What we Know and How it Matters,” " Child Development Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 1 (March 2017), pp. 63-69. See also Anna Aizer, Paul Devereux, and Kjell Salvanes, “Grandparents, Moms, or Dads? Why children of teen mothers do worse in life,” Journal of Human Resources (November 2020), pp. 1019-1052.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 11
maternal health records indicated that infants born to teen mothers are more likely to face higher rates of neonatal and infant mortality and morbidity, including preterm birth or low birth weight, while teen mothers also face heightened risk of maternal health complications.52
In addition to the consequences for teens and their families, teen childbearing has societal impacts. One study examined these societal impacts, specifically estimating the cost savings to public programs that were associated with avoiding unintended pregnancies during the teen years. The Power to Decide53 did a simulation analysis to estimate the number of births to teenagers that had been averted due to the decrease in teen fertility rates from 1991 to 2015. The analysis then estimated total savings of $4.4 billion for this period, taking into consideration the cost savings to Medicaid that would have been associated with labor and delivery, postpartum care for the mother, and infant care, and receipt of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), and Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) benefits. Additional research of decreased or delayed teenage pregnancy and childbearing could help to inform the impacts for teen parents, their children, and society more generally.54
52 Ashley M. Woodall and Anne K. Driscoll, Racial and Ethnic Differences in Mortality Rate of Infants Born to Teen Mothers: United States, 2017–2018, National Center for Health Statistics, Data Brief, No. 371, June 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db371-h.pdf.
53 The Power to Decide is a Washington, DC-based organization that promotes that all young people have access to the sexual health information, reproductive health services, and sense of possibility that they need—to decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. The Power to Decide, Progress Pays Off Savings Fact Sheet, https://powertodecide.org/sites/default/files/media/savings-fact-sheet-national.pdf.
54 Kelleen Kaye and Alison Ng, Estimating the State and National Savings Associated with Declines in Teen Childbearing, Power to Decide, January 2018. The decrease in teen births is based on the additional number of teen births estimated to have occurred in 2015 if the teen birth rate remained the same as in 1991.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 12
Appendix A. Teen Birth Rate, 1950-2022
Table A-1. T een Birth Rate, 1950-2022
Birth rate is per 1,000 females aged 15 to 19
Year Birth Rate Year Birth Rate Year Birth Rate
1950 81.6 1976 52.8 2002 42.6
1951 87.6 1977 52.8 2003 41.1
1952 86.1 1978 51.5 2004 40.5
1953 88.2 1979 52.3 2005 39.7
1954 90.6 1980 53.0 2006 41.1
1955 90.3 1981 52.2 2007 41.5
1956 94.6 1982 52.4 2008 40.2
1957 96.3 1983 51.4 2009 37.9
1958 91.4 1984 50.6 2010 34.2
1959 89.1 1985 51.0 2011 31.3
1960 89.1 1986 50.2 2012 29.4
1961 88.6 1987 50.6 2013 26.5
1962 81.4 1988 53.0 2014 24.2
1963 76.7 1989 57.3 2015 22.3
1964 73.1 1990 59.9 2016 20.3
1965 70.5 1991 61.8 2017 18.8
1966 70.3 1992 60.3 2018 17.4
1967 67.5 1993 59.0 2019 16.7
1968 65.6 1994 58.2 2020 15.0
1969 65.5 1995 56.0 2021 13.9
1970 68.3 1996 53.5 2022 13.6
1971 64.5 1997 51.3
1972 61.7 1998 50.3
1973 59.3 1999 48.8
1974 57.5 2000 47.7
1975 55.6 2001 45.0
Source: Table prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Notes: These data are presented in Figure 1.
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 13
Appendix B. Teen Birth Rates, by State
Table B-1. T een Birth Rates, by State
2022
State/Territory
Teen Birth Rate,
Total (Ages 15-19)
Teen Birth Rate,
Ages 15-17
Teen Birth Rate,
Ages 18-19
Alabama 20.9 9.4 37.4
Alaska 16.9 4.9 39.8
Arizona 15.1 6.0 28.8
Arkansas 24.6 9.5 48.9
California 9.8 3.8 18.9
Colorado 11.1 4.4 21.1
Connecticut 6.4 2.9 10.9
District of Columbia 12.5 7.7 16.1
Delaware 14.7 6.6 26.1
Florida 13.1 5.2 25.5
Georgia 16.6 6.6 32.5
Hawaii 11.7 3.9 24.7
Idaho 10.9 4.0 19.5
Illinois 11.3 4.4 22.2
Indiana 16.7 6.4 32.8
Iowa 12.4 5.6 22.1
Kansas 16.2 6.5 31.0
Kentucky 21.8 8.0 44.5
Louisiana 23.7 9.8 45.8
Maine 8.4 2.8 16.6
Maryland 10.9 4.8 20.4
Massachusetts 5.8 2.4 9.9
Michigan 11.6 4.4 22.6
Minnesota 8.2 3.2 16.2
Mississippi 26.4 11.6 49.1
Missouri 16.9 6.7 32.9
Montana 12.2 4.5 24.7
Nebraska 14.1 5.9 26.7
Nevada 14.0 4.8 31.0
New Hampshire 4.6 1.5 9.0
New Jersey 8.2 3.4 16.1
New Mexico 19.7 9.1 36.0
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service 14
State/Territory
Teen Birth Rate,
Total (Ages 15-19)
Teen Birth Rate,
Ages 15-17
Teen Birth Rate,
Ages 18-19
New York 8.6 3.4 15.7
North Carolina 15.0 6.5 27.1
North Dakota 11.7 4.4 20.9
Ohio 15.4 6.0 30.5
Oklahoma 21.2 8.7 40.7
Oregon 10.1 3.8 19.9
Pennsylvania 10.6 4.7 18.2
Rhode Island 8.3 3.8 13.0
South Carolina 17.3 8.3 30.3
South Dakota 17.4 7.7 32.7
Tennessee 21.0 8.4 41.6
Texas 20.4 9.0 38.6
Utah 9.0 3.1 18.1
Vermont 5.8 2.4 9.5
Virginia 11.2 4.3 31.0
Washington 9.6 3.2 20.0
West Virginia 19.8 6.7 39.3
Wisconsin 9.8 4.1 18.3
Wyoming 16.0 5.4 33.5
Total—United States 13.6 5.6 25.8
U.S. Territories
Guam 19.8 9.0 37.1
Northern Marianas 9.4 N/A N/A
Puerto Rico 12.6 4.4 24.7
U.S Virgin Islands 15 N/A 29.9
Source: Figure created by CRS using data from Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., “Births: Final Data for 2022,” Table 8, HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 2, April 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-02.pdf. Notes: The U.S. teen birth rate does not include the territories. Data were not available for American Samoa (2017 teen birth rate of 38.4). These data are presented in Figure 3.
Author Information
Alexandria K. Mickler Analyst in Health Policy
Jessica Tollestrup
Specialist in Social Policy
Teen Birth Trends: In Brief
Congressional Research Service R45184 · VERSION 7 · UPDATED 15
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
CDC, About Teen Pregnancy, May 15, 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/teen-pregnancy/index.html.
Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023."
On March 27, 2025, HHS issued a press release and fact sheet announcing the restructuring of HHS. The fact sheet indicated that this restructuring would decrease the CDC's workforce and "return [the CDC] to its core mission of preparing for and responding to epidemics and outbreaks." At the time of this report's publication, the potential effect of this restructuring on NCHS activities is unknown. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Fact Sheet: HHS' Transformation to Make America Healthy Again," press release, March 27, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-restructuring-doge-fact-sheet.html.
NCHS, About the National Vital Statistics System, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/about_nvss.htm.
NCHS estimates that more than 99% of all births occurring in the United States were registered and included in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS). See National Center for Health Statistics, User Guide to the 2022 Natality Public Use File, https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2022.pdf.
Lauren M. Rossen et al., Updated Methodology to Estimate Overall and Unintended Pregnancy Rates in the United States, National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics: Series 2, Number 201, April 2023, pp. 1-4, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/124395.
Stephanie J. Ventura et al., "Births to Teenagers in the United States, 1940–2000," National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 49, no. 10, September 2001, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr49/nvsr49_10.pdf.
The CDC began publishing birth rates inclusive of Alaska and Hawaii in 1959 and 1960, respectively. Data from these individuals were categorized as "Other Races," which represented a subset of the broader "Nonwhite" category historically used in earlier NVSS reports. According to the CDC, birth data from both Hawaii and Alaska affected their tabulations of birth rates by race/ethnicity in 1960, but they did not further analyze the statistical effect of this changing demographic composition among teen births, specifically. However, summary tabulations of the teen birth rate among the overarching category of Nonwhite mothers indicate a decrease in births among teens aged 10-14 and 15-19 from 1957 to 1960. This may suggest that the changing demographic composition of the United States did not significantly affect the downward trend in teen births; however, this also was not tested for statistical significance. See U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Vital Statistics of the United States, Volume I - Natality, 1960, Table 1-E, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/nat60_1.pdf.
The baby boom era refers to individuals born in the U.S. between mid-1946 and mid-1964. Sandra L. Colby and Jennifer M. Ortman, "The Baby Boom Cohort in the United States: 2012 to 2016, Population Estimates and Projections," Current Population Reports, CDC, May 2014.
Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023."
Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023."
The CDC also tracks births for youth aged 10 to 14. Their birth rate has been much lower than the rate of births for older teens and is therefore not included in this analysis. The birth rate was 0.2 births per 1,000 youth aged 10 to 14 in 2023, which has remained steady since 2015.
Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023," Table 2.
From 2017 to 2018, an increase of 3.8% was observed among non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander teens; an increase of 3.3% was also observed among this group from 2022 to 2023. From 2022 to 2023, a 0.9% increase in teen births was observed among Hispanic females. See Michelle J.K. Osterman et al., "Births: Final Data for 2023," Table 2.
Brady E. Hamilton et al., "Teen Birth Rates for Urban and Rural Areas in the United States, 2007-2015," HHS, CDC, NCHS, NCHS Data Brief, no. 264, November 2016; and April Sutton, Daniel T. Lichter, and Sharon Sassler, "Rural–Urban Disparities in Pregnancy Intentions, Births, and Abortions Among US Adolescent and Young Women, 1995–2017," American Journal of Public Health, 109(12), December 2019, pp. 1762-1769. See also Sylvester O. Orimaye, "Adolescent Birth Rates and Rural–Urban Differences by Levels of Deprivation and Health Professional Shortage Areas in the United States, 2017–2018," American Journal of Public Health, vol. 11, no. 1 (2021).
Anne K. Driscoll et al., "Changes in First and Second Births to US Teenagers from 2000 to 2022," HHS, CDC, NCHS, National Vital Statistics Report, vol. 73, no. 6, July 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr73/nvsr73-06.pdf. (Hereinafter Anne K. Driscoll et al., "Changes in First and Second Births to US Teenagers from 2000 to 2022.")
Anne K. Driscoll et al., "Changes in First and Second Births to US Teenagers from 2000 to 2022."
These figures reflect the record lows across all available data from 1940-1986. They are not the all-time record lows (both of which were observed in 2023).
HHS, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of Population Affairs, "Trends in Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing," https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/reproductive-health-and-teen-pregnancy/trends-teen-pregnancy-and-childbearing.
Heather D. Boonstra, "What is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?" Guttmacher Policy Review, vol. 17, issue 3, September 3, 2014, https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2014/09/what-behind-declines-teen-pregnancy-rates. (Hereinafter, Heather D. Boonstra, "What Is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?)
Laura D. Lindberg et al., "Trends in U.S. adolescent sexual behavior and contraceptive use, 2006-2019," Contraception X, vol. 3 (2021).
Laura D. Lindberg et al., "Trends in U.S. adolescent sexual behavior and contraceptive use, 2006-2019," Contraception X, vol. 3 (2021). See also, Leigh E. Szucs et al., "Condom and Contraceptive Use Among Sexually Active High School Students—Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019," HHS, CDC, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Supplements, vol. 69, no. 1 (August 2020), pp. 11-18.
The CDC, as well as various independent professional membership organizations, publishes clinical guidance about the use of contraceptive methods by certain population subgroups. CDC's U.S. Medical Eligibility for Contraceptive Use (also known as the MEC) is adapted from global guidance developed by the World Health Organization. It describes who can safely use various methods of contraception based on specific health conditions and other characteristics. A companion document, known as the Selected Practice Recommendations (SPR), addresses more timely challenges regarding the initiation and/or use of certain contraceptive methods. In 2013, the SPR clarified the safety and efficacy of the use of LARC methods among adolescents, updating concerns that were previously outlined in the 2010 U.S. MEC. The 2016 update to the U.S. MEC affirmed the safety of LARC use among adolescents and women who had not previously given birth. National survey data (see footnote 29 above) indicate that adolescents used LARCs prior to these updates; however, the prevalence of LARC use has increased over time. See CDC, U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, July 29, 2016, pp. 4-5, https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/rr/pdfs/rr6503.pdf.
Laura D. Lindberg et al., "Comparability of estimates and trends in adolescent sexual and contraceptive behaviors from two national surveys: National Survey of Family Growth and the Youth Risk Behavior Survey," PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 7 (2021). See also, Elizabeth Wildsmith et al., The 30-Year Decline in Teen Birth Rates Has Accelerated Since 2010, Child Trends, December 23, 2022, https://www.childtrends.org/publications/the-30-year-decline-in-teen-birth-rates-has-accelerated-since-2010.
Heather D. Boonstra, "What Is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?," and Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, "Investigating Recent Trends in the U.S. Teen Birth Rate," Journal of Health Economics, vol., 41, 2015. See also, Sarah Kliff, "The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate," Vox, January 21, 2015. (Hereinafter, Sarah Kliff, "The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate.")
Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, "Investigating Recent Trends in the U.S. Teen Birth Rate," Journal of Health Economics, vol. 41, 2015. S.M. Goodreau, "Declines in Pregnancies among U.S. Adolescents from 2007 to 2017: Behavioral Contributors to the Trend," Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, vol. 36, no. 6 (December 2022).
Sarah Kliff, "The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate."
Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, Media Influences on Social Outcomes: The Impact of MTV's 16 and Pregnant on Teen Childbearing, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 19795, Cambridge, MA, August 2015, https://www.nber.org/papers/w19795; David A. Jaeger et al., "A Cautionary Tale of Evaluating Identifying Assumptions: Did Reality TV Really Cause a Decline in Teenage Childbearing?," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 38(2) (2018), pp. 317-326, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2018.1497510.
See CRS Report R45183, Adolescent Pregnancy: Federal Prevention Programs, for further information about current programs that are federally funded.
Sarah Kliff, "The Mystery of the Falling Teen Birth Rate," and Heather D. Boonstra, "What Is Behind the Declines in Teen Pregnancy Rates?"
Laura D. Lindberg and Leslie M. Kantor, "Adolescents' Receipt of Sex Education in a Nationally Representative Sample, 2011-2019," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 70 (2022), pp. 294-296. (Hereinafter Laura D. Lindberg and Leslie M. Kantor, "Adolescents' Receipt of Sex Education in a Nationally Representative Sample, 2011-2019.")
Laura D. Lindberg and Leslie M. Kantor, "Adolescents' Receipt of Sex Education in a Nationally Representative Sample, 2011-2019."
Gilda Sedgh et al., "Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Recent Trends," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 56 (2015). See also Table 10 in United Nations, Demographic Yearbook, 71st Ed., 2020. (Hereinafter, Gilda Sedgh et al., "Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Trends.")
John S. Santelli et al., "Inequality, National Wealth, Economic Development and Global Trends in Teenage Birth Rates, 1990-2010," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 52, no. 1 (February 2013); and Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, "Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, Spring: 26(2), 2012, pp. 141-166. (Hereinafter, Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, "Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?"); John S. Santelli et al., "Global Trends in Adolescent Fertility, 1990–2012, in Relation to National Wealth, Income Inequalities, and Educational Expenditures," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 60, no. 2 (February 2017), pp. 161-168; and Torleif Halkjelsvik and Vegard Fykse Skirbekk, "Concurrent Decline in Teenage Fertility Rate and Binge Drinking? An Observational Study Across 45 Nations," Drug and Alcohol Review, 2024.
Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, "Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?" See also, Gilda Sedgh et al., "Adolescent Pregnancy, Birth, and Abortion Rates Across Countries: Levels and Trends"; Rachel H. Scott et al., "Adolescent Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Pregnancy in Britain and the U.S.: A Multidecade Comparison," Journal of Adolescent Health, vol. 66, no. 5 (May 2020), pp. 582-588.
HHS, CDC, Winnable Battles Final Report.
HHS, CDC, "About Teen Pregnancy," May 15, 2024, https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/teen-pregnancy/index.html.
On March 27, 2025, HHS issued a press release and fact sheet announcing the restructuring of HHS. At the time of this report's publication, the potential effect of this restructuring on activities within the Office of Population Affairs is unknown. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, "Fact Sheet: HHS' Transformation to Make America Healthy Again," press release, March 27, 2025, https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-restructuring-doge-fact-sheet.html.
HHS, OPA, OASH, "About Teen Pregnancy and Childbearing," https://opa.hhs.gov/adolescent-health/reproductive-health-and-teen-pregnancy/about-teen-pregnancy-and-childbearing.
Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy.
Melissa S. Kearney and Phillip B. Levine, "Why Is the Teen Birth Rate in the United States So High and Why Does It Matter?"; and Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy.
HHS, CDC, National Overview of STIs, 2022, January 2024.
Emily Holcombe et al., Ten Reasons to Still Keep the Focus on Teen Childbearing, Child Trends, March 2009; Urban Institute, Kids Having Kids: Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy; and Stefanie Mollborn, "Teenage Mothers Today: What we Know and How it Matters," Child Development Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 1 (March 2017), pp. 63-69. See also Anna Aizer et al., "Grandparents, Moms, or Dads? Why children of teen mothers do worse in life," Journal of Human Resources (November 2020), pp. 1019-1052.
Ashley M. Woodall and Anne K. Driscoll, Racial and Ethnic Differences in Mortality Rate of Infants Born to Teen Mothers: United States, 2017–2018, National Center for Health Statistics, Data Brief, No. 371, June 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db371-h.pdf.
The Power to Decide is a Washington, DC-based organization that promotes that all young people have access to the sexual health information, reproductive health services, and sense of possibility that they need—to decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. The Power to Decide, Progress Pays Off Savings Fact Sheet, https://powertodecide.org/sites/default/files/media/savings-fact-sheet-national.pdf.
Kelleen Kaye and Alison Ng, Estimating the State and National Savings Associated with Declines in Teen Childbearing, Power to Decide, January 2018. The decrease in teen births is based on the additional number of teen births estimated to have occurred in 2015 if the teen birth rate remained the same as in 1991.