Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health April 15August 12, 2022 , 2022
(ARPA-H): Congressional Action and Selected
Kavya Sekar
Policy Issues
Analyst in Health Policy
Analyst in Health Policy
Through FY2022 appropriations (P.L. 117-103), Congress provided $1 billion to the Department
Through FY2022 appropriations (P.L. 117-103), Congress provided $1 billion to the Department
Marcy E. Gallo
of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish the Advanced Research Projects Agency for
of Health and Human Services (HHS) to establish the Advanced Research Projects Agency for
Analyst in Science and
Analyst in Science and
Health (ARPA-H). The law
Health (ARPA-H). The law
createsprovided funding to a new ARPA-H account at HHS, a new ARPA-H account at HHS,
with funding available until available until
Technology Policy
Technology Policy
September 30, 2024, and
September 30, 2024, and
allowsallowed the HHS Secretary to place the new agency anywhere within the HHS Secretary to place the new agency anywhere within
the
the department within 30 days of enactment. On March 30, 2022, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra department within 30 days of enactment. On March 30, 2022, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra
submitted a notice to the appropriations committees that ARPA-H is to reside within the National submitted a notice to the appropriations committees that ARPA-H is to reside within the National
Institutes of Health (NIH), while the ARPA-H Director is to report directly to the HHS Secretary.
Institutes of Health (NIH), while the ARPA-H Director is to report directly to the HHS Secretary.
The Biden Administration originally proposed ARPA-H as part of the President’s FY2022 budget request for the NIH. The
The Biden Administration originally proposed ARPA-H as part of the President’s FY2022 budget request for the NIH. The
budget request sought $6.5 billion for ARPA-H over three years to “drive transformational health research innovation and budget request sought $6.5 billion for ARPA-H over three years to “drive transformational health research innovation and
speed medical breakthroughs by tackling ambitious challenges requiring large-scale, sustained, and cross-sector speed medical breakthroughs by tackling ambitious challenges requiring large-scale, sustained, and cross-sector
coordination.” As proposed by the Biden Administration, the initial focus of ARPA-H would have included building coordination.” As proposed by the Biden Administration, the initial focus of ARPA-H would have included building
platforms and capabilities to try to deliver cures for platforms and capabilities to try to deliver cures for
diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease,
diabetes, and other diseases. and diabetes.
Absent additional legislation, the FY2022 appropriation gives HHS considerable flexibility to design and structure the new
Absent additional legislation, the FY2022 appropriation gives HHS considerable flexibility to design and structure the new
agency. As proposed by the Biden Administration, ARPA-H is modelled after other “ARPAs,” especially the Defense agency. As proposed by the Biden Administration, ARPA-H is modelled after other “ARPAs,” especially the Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E). The Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E). The
“ARPA model” involves an organizational structure designed to be flat and nimble, staffed by tenure-limited program “ARPA model” involves an organizational structure designed to be flat and nimble, staffed by tenure-limited program
managers with a high degree of autonomy to select and fund research projects using a milestone-based contract approach. In managers with a high degree of autonomy to select and fund research projects using a milestone-based contract approach. In
contrast, NIH relies predominantly on the scientific peer review process to award most of its funding. Some evidence contrast, NIH relies predominantly on the scientific peer review process to award most of its funding. Some evidence
suggests that this investigator-driven and consensus-based process is less likely to fund suggests that this investigator-driven and consensus-based process is less likely to fund
transformative or “high-risk, high-high-risk, high-
rewardreward” projects. projects.
Supporters of the proposal argue that high-risk, high-reward biomedical research may lead to health breakthroughs on a faster Supporters of the proposal argue that high-risk, high-reward biomedical research may lead to health breakthroughs on a faster
timeline and is critical to ensuring U.S. competitiveness and addressing societal challenges. timeline and is critical to ensuring U.S. competitiveness and addressing societal challenges.
Several bills
Several bills
introducedare being considered in the 117th Congress in the 117th Congress
that would codify and further delineate ARPA-H’s goals, structure, placement, would codify and further delineate ARPA-H’s goals, structure, placement,
activities, and authorities. activities, and authorities.
These include H.R. 5585 and H.R. 6000 introduced in the House and S. 3819 introduced in the Senate. SubsequentlyA Senate proposal, S. 3819, S. 3819
, was incorporated into the PREVENT Pandemics Act (S. 3799), in an amendment in the nature was incorporated into the PREVENT Pandemics Act (S. 3799), in an amendment in the nature
of a substitute, and ordered to be reported by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on of a substitute, and ordered to be reported by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on
March 15, 2022. March 15, 2022. Meanwhile, the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health Act (H.R. 5585) passed the House on June 22, 2022. As Congress continues its deliberations on ARPA-H, several policy debates remain. Such debates include As Congress continues its deliberations on ARPA-H, several policy debates remain. Such debates include
(1) where to place ARPA-H within the federal government and how to facilitate its independence and autonomy, (2) what the (1) where to place ARPA-H within the federal government and how to facilitate its independence and autonomy, (2) what the
appropriate goals are for ARPA-H and how to prevent its activities and programs from duplicating the efforts of other federal appropriate goals are for ARPA-H and how to prevent its activities and programs from duplicating the efforts of other federal
agencies and the private sector, and (3) what the appropriate current and future appropriations levels are for ARPA-H. agencies and the private sector, and (3) what the appropriate current and future appropriations levels are for ARPA-H.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
link to page 4 link to page 5 link to page 7 link to page
link to page 4 link to page 5 link to page 7 link to page
87 link to page link to page
89 link to page 9 link to page link to page 9 link to page
910 link to page link to page
911 link to page 11 link to page 13 link to page 15 link to page link to page 11 link to page 13 link to page 15 link to page
1516 link to page link to page
3616 link to page 30 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Overview of the Biden Administration’s ARPA-H Proposal .................................................... 2
White House Listening Sessions for ARPA-H .................................................................... 4 Executive Action ................................................................................................................. 4
Congressional Action ................................................................................................................ 56
Appropriations .................................................................................................................... 56
Authorizations ..................................................................................................................... 67
Selected Policy Issues ..................................................................................................................... 68
Independence and Autonomy .................................................................................................... 68
Defining Goals and Preventing Duplication ............................................................................. 8 10
Funding ................................................................................................................................... 1012
Tables
Table A-1. Comparison of Key Provisions in APRAARPA-H Authorization Legislation ...................... 12. 13
Appendixes
Appendix. Comparison of Key Provisions in ARPA-H Authorization Legislation ....................... 1213
Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 3327
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Introduction
The federal government has long invested in biomedical science through the National Institutes of The federal government has long invested in biomedical science through the National Institutes of
Health (NIH). This investment has been credited with contributing to advances in treating disease Health (NIH). This investment has been credited with contributing to advances in treating disease
and providing medical care, increasing life expectancy, and preventing millions of deaths. For and providing medical care, increasing life expectancy, and preventing millions of deaths. For
much of its history, NIH has focused in large part on supporting basic research: research that much of its history, NIH has focused in large part on supporting basic research: research that
explores the fundamental mechanisms of biology and behavior. Such research facilitates scientific explores the fundamental mechanisms of biology and behavior. Such research facilitates scientific
knowledge that informs medical advances. Traditionally, the private sector, such as the knowledge that informs medical advances. Traditionally, the private sector, such as the
biopharmaceutical industry, has largely taken on the role of supporting research and development biopharmaceutical industry, has largely taken on the role of supporting research and development
(R&D) activities aimed at bringing new technologies and products to market, such as (R&D) activities aimed at bringing new technologies and products to market, such as
pharmaceutical drugs.1 pharmaceutical drugs.1
In recent years, legislation such as the 21st Century Cures Act (P.L. 114-255) and the provisions
In recent years, legislation such as the 21st Century Cures Act (P.L. 114-255) and the provisions
establishing the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)2 have expanded establishing the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)2 have expanded
NIH’s role in biomedical innovation, that is, research efforts aimed at driving new paradigms and NIH’s role in biomedical innovation, that is, research efforts aimed at driving new paradigms and
potentially breakthrough science and technologies.3 The Biden Administration continued this potentially breakthrough science and technologies.3 The Biden Administration continued this
trend by proposing a new Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) at NIH in its trend by proposing a new Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) at NIH in its
FY2022 budget request.4FY2022 budget request.4
In March 2022, Congress adopted the ARPA-H proposal in the In March 2022, Congress adopted the ARPA-H proposal in the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103), which Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103), which
providesprovided $1 billion to a new $1 billion to a new
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) account to establish ARPA-HDepartment of Health and Human Services (HHS) account to establish ARPA-H
. In addition, several bills have been introduced (in Division H, Labor, HHS, Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, LHHS). Both chambers are considering bills that would codify ARPA-H and define its goals, scope, that would codify ARPA-H and define its goals, scope,
placement, activities, and authorities (e.g., H.R. 5585placement, activities, and authorities (e.g., H.R. 5585
, H.R. 6000, and S. 3819). Subsequently, S. and S. 3819). Subsequently, S.
3819 was incorporated into the PREVENT Pandemics Act (S. 3799) as amended and ordered to 3819 was incorporated into the PREVENT Pandemics Act (S. 3799) as amended and ordered to
be reported by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on be reported by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) on
March 15, 2022. March 15, 2022.
The House passed H.R. 5585 on June 22, 2022.
The ARPA-H proposal responds to concerns by some in the scientific and patient advocacy
The ARPA-H proposal responds to concerns by some in the scientific and patient advocacy
communities that traditional funding processes are too risk averse—supporting incremental communities that traditional funding processes are too risk averse—supporting incremental
advances over high-risk, high-reward, or potentially transformative research.5 Support for high-advances over high-risk, high-reward, or potentially transformative research.5 Support for high-
risk, high-reward research is considered an important element in developing breakthrough risk, high-reward research is considered an important element in developing breakthrough
technologies that address societal challenges, including health-related challenges, and in technologies that address societal challenges, including health-related challenges, and in
maintaining the economic competitiveness of the United States.6 In addition, the recent rapid
1 For more information on NIH and the process of pharmaceutical drug development, see CRS Report R41705, 1 For more information on NIH and the process of pharmaceutical drug development, see CRS Report R41705,
The
National Institutes of Health (NIH): Background and Congressional Issues, by Judith A. Johnson and Kavya Sekar; , by Judith A. Johnson and Kavya Sekar;
and CRS Infographic IG10013, and CRS Infographic IG10013,
The Pharmaceutical Drug Development Process, by Agata Bodie and Kavya Sekar. , by Agata Bodie and Kavya Sekar.
2 NCATS was established by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (P.L. 112-74).
2 NCATS was established by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (P.L. 112-74).
3 The NIH defines 3 The NIH defines
innovation as “something new or improved, including research for (1) development of new as “something new or improved, including research for (1) development of new
technologies, (2) refinement of existing technologies, or (3) development of new applications for existing technologies, (2) refinement of existing technologies, or (3) development of new applications for existing
technologies.” NIH peer review criteria also uses the following criteria to evaluate innovation in a research proposal: technologies.” NIH peer review criteria also uses the following criteria to evaluate innovation in a research proposal:
“Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel “Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel
theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or
methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense? Is a
refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or
interventions proposed?” See https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/critiques/rpg.htm. interventions proposed?” See https://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/critiques/rpg.htm.
4 White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy, “Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-4 White House, Office of Science and Technology Policy, “Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-
H),” https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/advanced-research-projects-agency-for-health-arpa-h/. H),” https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/advanced-research-projects-agency-for-health-arpa-h/.
5 For example, see Suzanne Wright Foundation, “HARPA: Health Advanced Research Projects Agency,”
5 For example, see Suzanne Wright Foundation, “HARPA: Health Advanced Research Projects Agency,”
https://www.harpa.org/; and Bhaven N. Sampat, and Robert Cook-Deegan, “An ARPA for Health Research?,” https://www.harpa.org/; and Bhaven N. Sampat, and Robert Cook-Deegan, “An ARPA for Health Research?,”
Milbank
Quarterly, https://www.milbank.org/quarterly/opinions/an-arpa-for-health-research/. , https://www.milbank.org/quarterly/opinions/an-arpa-for-health-research/.
6 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Effective Policies to Foster High-Risk/High-
Reward Research, OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Policy Papers, No. 112, May 2021, https://read.oecd.org/
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
1
1
link to page
link to page
1516 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
maintaining the economic competitiveness of the United States.6 In addition, the recent rapid development of safe and effective Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines based on development of safe and effective Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines based on
novel technologies such as novel technologies such as
mRNAmessenger RNA (mRNA), built partly upon investments by the Defense Advanced , built partly upon investments by the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency (DARPA), has spurred increased interest in the usefulness and value of Research Projects Agency (DARPA), has spurred increased interest in the usefulness and value of
the “ARPA model” or other innovative approaches for biomedical research in general.7 the “ARPA model” or other innovative approaches for biomedical research in general.7
This report provides an overview of ARPA-H as proposed by the Biden Administration, outlines
This report provides an overview of ARPA-H as proposed by the Biden Administration, outlines
congressional action as of the date of the report, and discusses selected policy issues still under congressional action as of the date of the report, and discusses selected policy issues still under
debate as Congress considers legislation that would explicitly authorize ARPA-H. Thedebate as Congress considers legislation that would explicitly authorize ARPA-H. The
Appendix
provides a side-by-side comparison of key provisions in the legislative proposals that would provides a side-by-side comparison of key provisions in the legislative proposals that would
authorizecodify ARPA-H. ARPA-H.
Overview of the Biden Administration’s ARPA-H Proposal
The Biden Administration laid out its vision for the proposed ARPA-H in NIH’s FY2022 budget The Biden Administration laid out its vision for the proposed ARPA-H in NIH’s FY2022 budget
request. Administration officials also published an ARPA-H concept paper and an article in request. Administration officials also published an ARPA-H concept paper and an article in
Science magazine, authored by then-NIH Director Francis Collins, then-director of the White magazine, authored by then-NIH Director Francis Collins, then-director of the White
House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Eric Lander, and others, both of which House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Eric Lander, and others, both of which
laid out a more detailed vision and justification for the proposed agency.8 According to the laid out a more detailed vision and justification for the proposed agency.8 According to the
proposal, ARPA-H would be modeled after the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency proposal, ARPA-H would be modeled after the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), which is part of the Department of Defense (DOD), and would contain several “ARPA (DARPA), which is part of the Department of Defense (DOD), and would contain several “ARPA
model” characteristics, including a flat organizational structure designed to be nimble and staffed model” characteristics, including a flat organizational structure designed to be nimble and staffed
by tenure-limited program managers with a high degree of autonomy to select and fund projects by tenure-limited program managers with a high degree of autonomy to select and fund projects
using a milestone-based contract approach.9 NIH, in contrast, generally funds most of its research using a milestone-based contract approach.9 NIH, in contrast, generally funds most of its research
through the scientific peer review process—a committee-based review process to evaluate through the scientific peer review process—a committee-based review process to evaluate
scientific investigator-driven research proposals for funding.10 Some data suggests that this scientific investigator-driven research proposals for funding.10 Some data suggests that this
investigator-driven and consensus-based process may not adequately fund “high-risk, high-investigator-driven and consensus-based process may not adequately fund “high-risk, high-
reward” projects,11 a term often associated with projects that have high potential for meeting reward” projects,11 a term often associated with projects that have high potential for meeting
fundamental scientific or technological challenges, involve a high degree of novelty and/or multidisciplinary approaches, but also have a higher risk of failure than other projects.12
6 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Effective Policies to Foster High-Risk/High-Reward Research, OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Policy Papers, No. 112, May 2021, https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/06913b3b-en?format=pdf. 10.1787/06913b3b-en?format=pdf.
7 CRS Insight IN11446,
7 CRS Insight IN11446,
DARPA’s Pandemic-Related Programs, by Marcy E. Gallo; and Chiara Franzoni, Paula , by Marcy E. Gallo; and Chiara Franzoni, Paula
Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers, “Funding Risky Research,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers, “Funding Risky Research,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper,
June 2021. June 2021.
8 NIH,
8 NIH,
Congressional Justification: FY2022, May 28, 2021, https://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/pdfs/FY22/br/, May 28, 2021, https://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/pdfs/FY22/br/
2022%20CJ%20Overview%20Volume%20May%2028.pdf, pp. 1-11; White House, 2022%20CJ%20Overview%20Volume%20May%2028.pdf, pp. 1-11; White House,
Advanced Research Project
Agency for Health (ARPA-H): Concept Paper, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ARPA-H-, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ARPA-H-
Concept-Paper.pdf; NIH, “Lander, Collins Set Forth a Vision for ARPA-H,” press release, June 22, 2021, Concept-Paper.pdf; NIH, “Lander, Collins Set Forth a Vision for ARPA-H,” press release, June 22, 2021,
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/lander-collins-set-forth-vision-arpa-h; and Francis S. Collins et al., https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/lander-collins-set-forth-vision-arpa-h; and Francis S. Collins et al.,
“ARPA-H: Accelerating Biomedical Breakthroughs,” “ARPA-H: Accelerating Biomedical Breakthroughs,”
Science, vol. 373, no. 6551 (July 9, 2021). , vol. 373, no. 6551 (July 9, 2021).
9 For more information on DARPA, see CRS Report R45088, 9 For more information on DARPA, see CRS Report R45088,
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Overview
and Issues for Congress, by Marcy E. Gallo. , by Marcy E. Gallo.
10 See “Peer Review Process for Extramural Funding” in CRS Report R41705,
10 See “Peer Review Process for Extramural Funding” in CRS Report R41705,
The National Institutes of Health (NIH):
Background and Congressional Issues, by Judith A. Johnson and Kavya Sekar. , by Judith A. Johnson and Kavya Sekar.
11 Chiara Franzoni, Paula Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers, “Funding Risky Research,”
11 Chiara Franzoni, Paula Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers, “Funding Risky Research,”
National Bureau of Economic
Research Working Paper, June 2021; Mikko Packalen and Jay Bhattacharya, “NIH Funding and the Pursuit of Edge , June 2021; Mikko Packalen and Jay Bhattacharya, “NIH Funding and the Pursuit of Edge
Science,” Science,”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 22 (June 2, 2020), pp. 12011-12016; and , vol. 117, no. 22 (June 2, 2020), pp. 12011-12016; and
Pierre Azoulay, Erica Fuchs, and Anna Goldstein, “Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges of the Pierre Azoulay, Erica Fuchs, and Anna Goldstein, “Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges of the
‘ARPA Model,’” ‘ARPA Model,’”
National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2018. , June 2018.
12 For a discussion of definitions of “high-risk, high-reward research,” see pages 11-13 of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Effective Policies to Foster High-Risk/High-Reward Research, OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Policy Papers, No. 112, May 2021, https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/06913b3b-en?
Congressional Research Service
2
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Congressional Research Service
2
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
fundamental scientific or technological challenges, involve a high degree of novelty and/or multidisciplinary approaches, but also have a higher risk of failure than other projects.12
The FY2022 budget request included $6.5 billion for ARPA-H “to make pivotal investments in
The FY2022 budget request included $6.5 billion for ARPA-H “to make pivotal investments in
breakthrough technologies and broadly applicable platforms, capabilities, resources, and solutions breakthrough technologies and broadly applicable platforms, capabilities, resources, and solutions
that have the potential to transform important areas of medicine and health for the benefit of all that have the potential to transform important areas of medicine and health for the benefit of all
patients and that cannot readily be accomplished through traditional research or commercial patients and that cannot readily be accomplished through traditional research or commercial
activity.”13 According to the proposal, ARPA-H is to “build platforms and capabilities to deliver activity.”13 According to the proposal, ARPA-H is to “build platforms and capabilities to deliver
cures for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, and other diseases.”14 Additionally, the cures for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, and other diseases.”14 Additionally, the
Administration has provided a list of potential ARPA-H projects, including the development of Administration has provided a list of potential ARPA-H projects, including the development of
accurate, wearable, blood pressure technology; the preparation of mRNA vaccines against accurate, wearable, blood pressure technology; the preparation of mRNA vaccines against
common forms of cancer; drug or gene therapy delivery systems that can target any organ, tissue, common forms of cancer; drug or gene therapy delivery systems that can target any organ, tissue,
or cell type; and platforms to reduce health disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality, or cell type; and platforms to reduce health disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality,
among others.15 among others.15
Funding was requested for a period of three years to “allow for both scale-up in FY2022 and
Funding was requested for a period of three years to “allow for both scale-up in FY2022 and
redeployment of resources in the next two years if projects fail to meet performance milestones.” redeployment of resources in the next two years if projects fail to meet performance milestones.”
The vast majority of funding would support extramural research (i.e., research conducted outside The vast majority of funding would support extramural research (i.e., research conducted outside
the federal government), with a smaller amount of funding reserved for staffing and the federal government), with a smaller amount of funding reserved for staffing and
administrative functions. Unlike NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs), the proposed ARPA-H would administrative functions. Unlike NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs), the proposed ARPA-H would
not have its own intramural research program (i.e., research conducted at NIH facilities).16 not have its own intramural research program (i.e., research conducted at NIH facilities).16
The FY2022 budget request described the types of challenges ARPA-H would seek to address
The FY2022 budget request described the types of challenges ARPA-H would seek to address
through its investments, including: through its investments, including:
Support for complex research and development that requires large-scale,
Support for complex research and development that requires large-scale,
sustained, cross-sustained, cross-
sector coordination; sector coordination;
The creation of new capabilities (e.g., technologies, data resources, disease
The creation of new capabilities (e.g., technologies, data resources, disease
models); models);
Support for high-risk exploration that could establish entirely new paradigms; Support for high-risk exploration that could establish entirely new paradigms;
and and
The commercialization of biomedical innovations using financial incentives and The commercialization of biomedical innovations using financial incentives and
other
other mechanisms.17 mechanisms.17
Most ARPA-H awards would support industry, universities, and nonprofit research institutions
Most ARPA-H awards would support industry, universities, and nonprofit research institutions
and may involve some agreements with other federal agencies. While the proposed agency and may involve some agreements with other federal agencies. While the proposed agency
structure would be “operationally distinct” from NIH ICs, ARPA-H would still coordinate structure would be “operationally distinct” from NIH ICs, ARPA-H would still coordinate
research and activities with NIH ICs and other Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) research and activities with NIH ICs and other Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
agencies (e.g., the Food and Drug Administration [FDA]). agencies (e.g., the Food and Drug Administration [FDA]).
FY2023 Request
Announced on March 28, 2022, President Biden’s FY2023 budget request for NIH proposes $5 billion for ARPA-H in an NIH account, with funding available until September 30, 2025.18 The FY2023 request reiterates the same vision for ARPA-H as in the FY2022 request, and also notes
12 For a discussion of definitions of “high-risk, high-reward research,” see pages 11-13 of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Effective Policies to Foster High-Risk/High-Reward Research, OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Policy Papers, No. 112, May 2021, https://read.oecd.org/10.1787/06913b3b-en?format=pdf. format=pdf.
13 White House,
13 White House,
Advanced Research Project Agency for Health (ARPA-H): Concept Paper. .
14 NIH, 14 NIH,
Congressional Justification: FY2022, pp. 10-11. , pp. 10-11.
15 NIH, 15 NIH,
Congressional Justification: FY2022, pp. 10-11; and White House, , pp. 10-11; and White House,
Advanced Research Project Agency for
Health (ARPA-H): Concept Paper. .
16 NIH,
16 NIH,
Congressional Justification: FY2022, pp. 10-11. , pp. 10-11.
17 NIH, 17 NIH,
Congressional Justification: FY2022, pp. 10-11. , pp. 10-11.
18 NIH, Congressional Justification: FY2023, March 28, 2022, https://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/pdfs/FY23/br/Overview%20of%20FY%202023%20Presidents%20Budget.pdf, p. 33.
Congressional Research Service
3
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
that “opportunities or obstacles identified by the Cancer Moonshot may become candidates for the new approach to transformational change offered by ARPA-H.” The Beau Biden Cancer Moonshot is another one of President Biden’s major policy priorities related to biomedical research.19
Congressional Research Service
3
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
White House Listening Sessions for ARPA-H
In July and August 2021, OSTP and NIH held 15 listening sessions on the proposed ARPA-H
In July and August 2021, OSTP and NIH held 15 listening sessions on the proposed ARPA-H
with thousands of biomedical stakeholders. In September 2021, OSTP and NIH summarized with thousands of biomedical stakeholders. In September 2021, OSTP and NIH summarized
participant recommendations, which emphasized the following:participant recommendations, which emphasized the following:
2018
A focus on technologies, rather than specific diseases: Stakeholders : Stakeholders
emphasized that ARPA-H should focus on developing technologies that could
emphasized that ARPA-H should focus on developing technologies that could
have applications across a wide range of diseases, rather than focus on specific have applications across a wide range of diseases, rather than focus on specific
diseases. Stakeholders also noted specific types of technologies for the new diseases. Stakeholders also noted specific types of technologies for the new
agency to support, such as data-sharing platforms, diagnostics platforms, agency to support, such as data-sharing platforms, diagnostics platforms,
artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, and wearables and digital artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms, and wearables and digital
technologies. technologies.
Embracing equity and diversity as a cornerstone of the mission: Stakeholders Stakeholders
suggested that equity and diversity considerations should be incorporated into all
suggested that equity and diversity considerations should be incorporated into all
aspects of ARPA-H, from staffing to project selection and execution. Some also aspects of ARPA-H, from staffing to project selection and execution. Some also
suggested that ARPA-H should prioritize programs that take a holistic approach suggested that ARPA-H should prioritize programs that take a holistic approach
that considers health in the context of broader environmental, cultural, economic that considers health in the context of broader environmental, cultural, economic
and social factors. and social factors.
Coordination and collaboration: Participants emphasized the need to partner
and consult with diverse private, academic, and public sector entities. Stakeholders advised that ARPA-H should Stakeholders advised that ARPA-H should
avoid areas that are well-funded by NIH or the private sector, and should pursue avoid areas that are well-funded by NIH or the private sector, and should pursue
projects that are complementary to currently funded efforts. They also projects that are complementary to currently funded efforts. They also
emphasized a need for mechanisms to support commercialization of ARPA-H-emphasized a need for mechanisms to support commercialization of ARPA-H-
supported technologies and programs through collaboration with FDA and the supported technologies and programs through collaboration with FDA and the
Centers for Medicare Centers for Medicare
and& Medicaid Services Medicaid Services
(CMS).
Executive Action
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103), gave the HHS Secretary the ability to transfer ARPA-H to any HHS agency or office, including NIH, within 30 days of enactment. It required the Secretary to notify Congress at least 15 days in advance of such a transfer. On March 30, 2022, HHS Secretary Becerra submitted a notice to the appropriations committees that ARPA-H would reside within NIH, with the ARPA-H Director reporting directly to the HHS Secretary.19
On May 25, 2022, HHS Secretary Becerra announced the formal establishment of ARPA-H within NIH and named Dr. Adam H. Russell as the acting interim director for the agency.20 In addition, an organizational structure for ARPA-H was published in the Federal Register on May 27, 2022. As outlined in the federal notice, ARPA-H will be composed of 14 offices, as follows:
Acquisition and Contracting Office: Advises the ARPA-H Director and staff on
acquisition and contract and grant financial advisory services.
18 White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and NIH, Listening Sessions for ARPA-H: Summary Report, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/093021-ARPA-H-Listening-Session-Summary_Final.pdf.
19 Lev Facher, “Biden’s High-Stakes Biomedical Science Agency ARPA-H Will Be Part of the NIH—But There’s a Twist,” STAT, March 31, 2022. 20 Department of Health and Human Services, “HHS Secretary Becerra Establishes ARPA-H within NIH, Names Adam H. Russell, D.Phil. Acting Deputy Director,” press release, May 25, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2022/05/25/hhs-secretary-becerra-establishes-arpa-h-within-nih-names-adam-h-russell-phil-acting-deputy-director.html.
Congressional Research Service
4
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Comptroller's Office: Directs ARPA-H-wide budget policy, planning, analysis,
formulation, and presentation, in collaboration with HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources and NIH Office of Budget.
Engagement and Communications Office: Plans and directs activities to
communicate information about ARPA-H programs and accomplishments to the general public, scientific community, patients and patient groups, professional societies and organizations, and public advocacy groups.
Legislative and Governmental Affairs Office: Advises the ARPA-H Director
and staff on the full range of legislative and intragovernmental issues, and provides leadership and direction for ARPA-H legislative analysis, development, and liaison.
Strategic Resources Office: Advises the ARPA-H Director and staff on all
phases of ARPA-H-wide administration and management.
Treatment Innovation Office: Furthers development of novel and innovative
therapeutics or other interventions to manage, treat, or cure diseases and conditions.
Health Equity, Dissemination, and Implementation Office: Advances
programs that concentrate on promoting health equity, access to care, and ethical aspects of science and technology development.
Health Promotion and Disease Detection Office: Advances approaches,
interventions, and technologies that further the overall health and wellness of Americans and prevent diseases.
Health Resources and Policies Office: Advances progress in confronting
challenges to the overall ecosystem of biomedical and health research, whether they be processes, policies, or models, to enable acceleration of advances.
Systems Technology Office: Focuses on those systems that impact health—from
physiologic systems (e.g., immune) to the health care system and everything in between.
Equity and Inclusion Office: Coordinates, facilitates, and supports programs to
ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion in all aspects of ARPA-H’s work.
Strategic Planning, Evaluation, and Analytics Office: Oversees ARPA-H-wide
planning, evaluation, and analysis/analytic activities.
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Office: Inspires innovation and creativity
throughout ARPA-H, including stimulating the culture of innovation, ideation, and dynamic thinking and leveraging design research and design thinking.21
21 National Institutes of Health, “Establishment of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health,” 87 Federal Register 32174-32176, May 27, 2022.
Congressional Research Service
5
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
(CMS). Participants also emphasized the need to partner and consult with diverse private, academic, and public sector entities.
19 NIH, Congressional Justification: FY2023, pp. 4-13. 20 White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and NIH, Listening Sessions for ARPA-H: Summary Report,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/093021-ARPA-H-Listening-Session-Summary_Final.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
4
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
HHS ARPA-H Placement Decision
As discussed below, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103) gave the HHS Secretary the ability to transfer ARPA-H to any HHS agency or office, including NIH, within 30 days of enactment. In addition, the Secretary was required to notify Congress at least 15 days in advance of such a transfer. On March 30, 2022, HHS Secretary Becerra submitted a notice to the appropriations committees that ARPA-H is to reside within NIH, while the ARPA-H Director is to report directly to the HHS Secretary. See Lev Facher, “Biden’s High-Stakes Biomedical Science Agency ARPA-H Wil Be Part of the NIH—But There’s a Twist,” STAT, March 31, 2022.
Congressional Action
Appropriations
Congressional Action
Appropriations
FY2022 Enacted: On March 15, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103) was signed into On March 15, 2022, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103) was signed into
law. It law. It
providesprovided $1 billion in appropriations to a new account at HHS for ARPA-H, with funding $1 billion in appropriations to a new account at HHS for ARPA-H, with funding
available until September 30, 2024.available until September 30, 2024.
2122 Unlike earlier ARPA-H appropriations proposals, the law Unlike earlier ARPA-H appropriations proposals, the law
doesdid not condition the availability of funds on enactment of legislation specifically establishing not condition the availability of funds on enactment of legislation specifically establishing
ARPA-H. Thus, this legislation does not preclude the Administration from moving forward with ARPA-H. Thus, this legislation does not preclude the Administration from moving forward with
establishing ARPA-H and provides for the following implementation activities: establishing ARPA-H and provides for the following implementation activities:
presidential appointment of the ARPA-H Director;
presidential appointment of the ARPA-H Director;
hiring and appointment flexibilities; hiring and appointment flexibilities;
the ability to make awards as grants, contracts, cooperative agreement, and other the ability to make awards as grants, contracts, cooperative agreement, and other
transactions;
transactions;
2223
exemption from NIH scientific peer review requirements; and
exemption from NIH scientific peer review requirements; and
the ability of the HHS Secretary to transfer ARPA-H to any HHS agency or the ability of the HHS Secretary to transfer ARPA-H to any HHS agency or
office, including NIH, within 30 days of enactment. (The HHS Secretary’s
office, including NIH, within 30 days of enactment. (The HHS Secretary’s
response is noted in the text box above). response is noted in the text box above).
The explanatory statement accompanying the law does not provide further details on Congress’s
The explanatory statement accompanying the law does not provide further details on Congress’s
policy intentions for ARPA-H.policy intentions for ARPA-H.
23
Earlier appropriations proposals included higher funding levels for ARPA-H, but conditioned funding on authorizing legislation. However, these proposals were not enacted. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (H.R. 4502),24 which passed the House on July 29, 2021, would have provided $3 billion for ARPA-H in a new account at NIH available until September 30, 2024, with the condition that funds would be available only if legislation specifically establishing ARPA-H were enacted into law. Separately, the Senate-introduced Departments of Labor, Health 21 Title II, Division H of Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103). 2224 The report accompanying the House FY2022 LHHS appropriations bill (H.Rept. 117-96; incorporated by reference) “encourages NIH to collaborate with DARPA to develop the foundational policies, procedures, and staff training for ARPA–H employees.”25
FY2023 Request: Announced on March 28, 2022, President Biden’s FY2023 budget request for NIH proposes $5 billion for ARPA-H in an NIH account, with funding available until September 30, 2025.26 The FY2023 request reiterates the same vision for ARPA-H as in the FY2022 request, and notes that “opportunities or obstacles identified by the Cancer Moonshot may become candidates for the new approach to transformational change offered by ARPA-H.” The Beau Biden Cancer
22 Title II, Division H of Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103). 23 The law cites the definition of “other transaction” in Public Health Service Act (PHSA) Section 319L(a)(3), which The law cites the definition of “other transaction” in Public Health Service Act (PHSA) Section 319L(a)(3), which
means “transactions, other than procurement contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements.” For further information on means “transactions, other than procurement contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements.” For further information on
OT authorities, see CRS Report R45521, OT authorities, see CRS Report R45521,
Department of Defense Use of Other Transaction Authority: Background,
Analysis, and Issues for Congress, by Heidi M. Peters. , by Heidi M. Peters.
2324 See U.S. Congress, House Committee on Rules, See U.S. Congress, House Committee on Rules,
Division H- LHHS Appropriations 2022, Explanatory Statement, ,
committee print, 117th Cong., 1st sess., p. 119. committee print, 117th Cong., 1st sess., p. 119.
24 H.R. 4502 contains the text of seven regular appropriations bills reported by the House Appropriations Committee: H.R. 4502 (Labor-HHS-Education) (Div. A), H.R. 4356 (Agriculture) (Div. B), H.R. 4549 (Energy-Water) (Div. C), H.R. 4345 (Financial Services) (Div. D), H.R. 4372 (Interior) (Div. E), H.R. 4355 (Military Construction and Veterans Affairs) (Div. F), and H.R. 4550 (Transportation-HUD) (Div. G).
Congressional Research Service
5
link to page 15 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2022 (S. 3062) would have provided $2.4 billion for ARPA-H available through September 30, 2024, also with the condition that funds would be available only if legislation specifically establishing ARPA-H were enacted into law.25
Authorizations
House: An early version of the “Build Back Better Act” (H.R. 5376) budget reconciliation measure, reported in the House on September 27, 2021, included authorization language and funding of $3 billion for ARPA-H. The House-passed version on November 19, 2021, however, did not include ARPA-H related language.
Two other bills to authorize ARPA-H have been introduced in the House. Representative Anna Eshoo, chair of the House Energy and Commerce (E&C) Health Subcommittee, introduced the Advanced Research Project Agency–25 As directed in the Explanatory Statement cited in footnote 23 (page 1), “Unless otherwise noted, the language set forth in H.Rept. 117-96 carries the same weight as language included in this explanatory statement and should be complied with unless specifically addressed to the contrary in this explanatory statement.” 26 NIH, Congressional Justification: FY2023, March 28, 2022, https://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/pdfs/FY23/br/Overview%20of%20FY%202023%20Presidents%20Budget.pdf, p. 33.
Congressional Research Service
6
link to page 11 link to page 11 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Moonshot is another one of President Biden’s major policy priorities related to biomedical research.27
House: On July 5, 2022, the House Appropriations Committee reported an FY2023 appropriations bill (H.R. 8295) that would provide $2.75 billion, available until September 30, 2025, to an ARPA-H account under the Office of the Secretary—$1.75 billion above the FY2022-enacted level. Additionally, the report (H.Rept. 117-403) accompanying the bill states:
The Committee strongly supports the mission of ARPA–H to drive transformational innovation in health research. The Committee believes that given its focus on supporting high-risk, high reward projects and distinct approach to selecting and managing research projects, establishing ARPA–H as a separate entity within HHS will maximize the likelihood of the agency’s success.
Senate: On July 28, 2022, the Senate Appropriations Committee Majority Chair Patrick Leahy released draft Senate appropriations bills.28 The draft LHHS bill would provide $1 billion, available through September 30, 2025, to an ARPA-H account under NIH.29 This amount would be the same funding level as FY2022-enacted and $1.75 billion less than in the House-reported bill. Additionally, the draft report accompanying the bill states:30
Following the decision by the Secretary to transfer ARPA-H to NIH in May, funding is provided to ARPA–H as a standalone agency within NIH. However, the Committee believes ARPA–H will require a very different culture and mission than NIH’s other 27 Institutes and Centers. To foster the development of an entrepreneurial culture, the Committee expects ARPA–H to be physically located away from the main NIH campus. The Committee expects NIH to conduct a transparent and competitive process for a location site.
Authorizations
House:
On June 22, 2022, the House passed the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Health Act (H.R. Health Act (H.R.
5585), with amendments to the bill previously reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on June 13, 2022 (H.Rept. 117-365)5585) on October 15, 2021. This . This
standalone billstandalone bill, introduced by House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee Chair Representative Eshoo, would authorize and establish ARPA-H within HHS. would authorize and establish ARPA-H within HHS.
Two other bills to authorize ARPA-H were previously introduced in the House. Representatives Diana Representatives Diana
DeGette and Fred Upton introduced the Cures 2.0 Act (H.R. 6000) on November 17, 2021. DeGette and Fred Upton introduced the Cures 2.0 Act (H.R. 6000) on November 17, 2021.
Section 501 of this bill would authorize ARPA-H and establish it within NIH (see “Independence Section 501 of this bill would authorize ARPA-H and establish it within NIH (see “Independence
and Autonomy”and Autonomy”
for more on placement within the federal government). An early version of the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376) budget reconciliation measure, reported in the House on September 27, 2021, included authorization language and funding of $3 billion for ARPA-H. The
27 NIH, Congressional Justification: FY2023, pp. 4-13. 28 Senate Committee on Appropriations, “Chairman Leahy Releases Fiscal Year 2023 Senate Appropriations Bills,” press release, July 28, 2022, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/majority/breaking-chairman-leahy-releases-fiscal-year-2023-senate-appropriations-bills.
29 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, FY2023 LHHS Appropriations, committee print, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., July 28, 2022, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/LHHSFY2023.PDF.
30 U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies, Explanatory Statement for FY2023 LHHS Appropriations Bill, committee print, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., July 2022, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/LHHSFY23REPT.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
7
link to page 16 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
House-passed version on November 19, 2021, however, did not include ARPA-H related language. for more on placement within the federal government).
Senate: On March 10, 2022, Senators Patty Murray and Richard Burr, the chair and ranking On March 10, 2022, Senators Patty Murray and Richard Burr, the chair and ranking
member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee (the committee member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee (the committee
of jurisdiction for NIH), introduced S. 3819, the Advanced Research Project Authority for Health of jurisdiction for NIH), introduced S. 3819, the Advanced Research Project Authority for Health
Act, which would establish ARPA-H within NIH. This bill was incorporated as Section 331 of S. Act, which would establish ARPA-H within NIH. This bill was incorporated as Section 331 of S.
3799, the PREVENT Pandemics Act in an amendment in the nature of a substitute, which was 3799, the PREVENT Pandemics Act in an amendment in the nature of a substitute, which was
ordered to be reported by the Senate HELP Committee on March 15, 2022. ordered to be reported by the Senate HELP Committee on March 15, 2022.
Table A-1 provides a detailed side-by-side comparison of ARPA-H legislative proposals in the provides a detailed side-by-side comparison of ARPA-H legislative proposals in the
House (H.R. 5585House (H.R. 5585
and H.R. 6000) and Senate (S. 3799, as amended). ) and Senate (S. 3799, as amended).
Selected Policy Issues
The bills that would establish ARPA-H are generally similar; however, some key differences and The bills that would establish ARPA-H are generally similar; however, some key differences and
policy questions remain. The following sections describe select policies under debate and policy questions remain. The following sections describe select policies under debate and
potential issues for congressional consideration. potential issues for congressional consideration.
Independence and Autonomy
Independence at the agency level to shape a distinct mission and culture along with autonomy of Independence at the agency level to shape a distinct mission and culture along with autonomy of
program managers to select and fund projects are viewed as key components of the ARPA program managers to select and fund projects are viewed as key components of the ARPA
model.model.
2631 Stakeholders, the Biden Administration, and Members of Congress have debated where Stakeholders, the Biden Administration, and Members of Congress have debated where
to place ARPA-H within the federal government, particularly whether to house the new entity to place ARPA-H within the federal government, particularly whether to house the new entity
within NIH or as a separate agency under HHS (NIH’s parent department). As noted, HHS within NIH or as a separate agency under HHS (NIH’s parent department). As noted, HHS
Secretary Becerra has decided that ARPA-H is to reside within NIH, while the ARPA-H Director Secretary Becerra has decided that ARPA-H is to reside within NIH, while the ARPA-H Director
25 The text of the Senate majority draft Labor-HHS-Education bill and accompanying committee report is linked to the press release “Chairman Leahy Releases Remaining Nine Senate Appropriations Bills,” October 18, 2021, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/majority/chairman-leahy-releases-remaining-nine-senate-appropriations-bills. See also “Shelby: Democrats’ Partisan Bills Threaten FY22 Appropriations Process,” October 18, 2021, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/news/shelby-democrats-partisan-bills-threaten-fy22-appropriations-process.
26 Azoulay et al., “Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges of the ‘ARPA Model,’” pp. 9-10.
Congressional Research Service
6
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
is to report directly to the HHS Secretary. Congress could still decide to change ARPA-H’s is to report directly to the HHS Secretary. Congress could still decide to change ARPA-H’s
placement through legislation. Aside from placement, Congress is also debating further options of placement through legislation. Aside from placement, Congress is also debating further options of
ensuring ARPA-H’s independence and autonomyensuring ARPA-H’s independence and autonomy
. as discussed below.
The Biden Administration originally proposed placing ARPA-H within NIH, arguing that “the
The Biden Administration originally proposed placing ARPA-H within NIH, arguing that “the
goals of ARPA-H fall squarely within NIH’s mission” and that placing ARPA-H within NIH goals of ARPA-H fall squarely within NIH’s mission” and that placing ARPA-H within NIH
would promote scientific collaboration and help avoid duplication across programs.would promote scientific collaboration and help avoid duplication across programs.
2732 On the On the
other hand, some stakeholders see NIH’s culture as relatively conventional and risk-averse and other hand, some stakeholders see NIH’s culture as relatively conventional and risk-averse and
question whether NIH’s leadership and culture could affect ARPA-H’s ability to succeed in question whether NIH’s leadership and culture could affect ARPA-H’s ability to succeed in
research for transformational innovation.research for transformational innovation.
2833 Such stakeholders support placing ARPA-H outside of Such stakeholders support placing ARPA-H outside of
NIH to ensure independence and autonomy. For example, in a recent hearing before the House NIH to ensure independence and autonomy. For example, in a recent hearing before the House
Committee on Energy and Commerce, Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Science Policy and Committee on Energy and Commerce, Keith Yamamoto, Vice Chancellor for Science Policy and
Strategy at the University of California San Francisco, stated the following regarding housing Strategy at the University of California San Francisco, stated the following regarding housing
ARPA-H outside of NIH: ARPA-H outside of NIH:
The main force of that argument is that the mission and goals of ARPA-H are different.
The main force of that argument is that the mission and goals of ARPA-H are different.
NIH is a masterful agency at discovery of new knowledge, but does not actually extend to NIH is a masterful agency at discovery of new knowledge, but does not actually extend to
being able to develop applications for that new knowledge. And the route for being able to being able to develop applications for that new knowledge. And the route for being able to
31 Azoulay et al., “Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and Challenges of the ‘ARPA Model,’” pp. 9-10. 32 Collins et al., “ARPA-H: Accelerating Biomedical Breakthroughs.” 33 Sarah Omermohle, “Skeptics Question If Biden’s New Science Agency Is a Breakthrough or More Bureaucracy,” Politico, July 5, 2021; Jacqueline Alemany, “Biden Has Proposed a New Agency to Turbocharge Medical Treatments. But There’s a Fight over Where It Should Live,” Washington Post, June 23, 2021.
Congressional Research Service
8
link to page 9 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
do that has already been cast and demonstrated extremely well in DARPA and ARPA-E. do that has already been cast and demonstrated extremely well in DARPA and ARPA-E.
And so, I think that’s the reason that it should be outside. Setting up that new culture and And so, I think that’s the reason that it should be outside. Setting up that new culture and
operating model within the culture and operating model of NIH, as successful as it is, right, operating model within the culture and operating model of NIH, as successful as it is, right,
would be challenging at best.would be challenging at best.
2934
In the same hearing before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Esther Krofah,
In the same hearing before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Esther Krofah,
Executive Director of FasterCures and Center for Public Health at the Milken Institute, stated, Executive Director of FasterCures and Center for Public Health at the Milken Institute, stated,
“we do not see a reason ARPA-H could not be situated within NIH and still accomplish its “we do not see a reason ARPA-H could not be situated within NIH and still accomplish its
mission, including advantages to having easy access to other NIH infrastructure, personnel, mission, including advantages to having easy access to other NIH infrastructure, personnel,
programs, and expertise.”programs, and expertise.”
3035
There is precedent for innovative biomedical science efforts both at NIH and at other HHS units.
There is precedent for innovative biomedical science efforts both at NIH and at other HHS units.
NIH has supported projects such as the Human Genome Project; the Common Fund for cross-NIH has supported projects such as the Human Genome Project; the Common Fund for cross-
cutting and milestone-driven innovative projects; NCATS, which focuses on innovation in cutting and milestone-driven innovative projects; NCATS, which focuses on innovation in
medical product development; and, more recently, the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics program medical product development; and, more recently, the Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics program
to boost innovation for COVID-19 diagnostics.to boost innovation for COVID-19 diagnostics.
3136 The HHS Office of Science and Medicine under The HHS Office of Science and Medicine under
the Assistant Secretary for Health has managed InnovationX, which includes several public-the Assistant Secretary for Health has managed InnovationX, which includes several public-
private partnerships aimed at accelerating innovation, including for kidney disease and Lyme private partnerships aimed at accelerating innovation, including for kidney disease and Lyme
disease.disease.
3237 Additionally, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority Additionally, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
(BARDA) at HHS under the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response engages in (BARDA) at HHS under the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response engages in
efforts to develop medical countermeasures to address public health emergencies.efforts to develop medical countermeasures to address public health emergencies.
3338 Regardless of where the new agency is placed, it would likely need to consult with NIH programs, HHS programs such as BARDA, as well as biomedical programs at DOD to promote Regardless of where the new agency is placed, it would likely need to consult with NIH programs, HHS
27 Collins et al., “ARPA-H: Accelerating Biomedical Breakthroughs.” 28 Sarah Omermohle, “Skeptics Question If Biden’s New Science Agency Is a Breakthrough or More Bureaucracy,” Politico, July 5, 2021; Jacqueline Alemany, “Biden Has Proposed a New Agency to Turbocharge Medical Treatments. But There’s a Fight over Where It Should Live,” Washington Post, June 23, 2021. 29 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, ARPA-H: The Next Frontier
of Biomedical Research, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., February 8, 2022.
30 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, ARPA-H: The Next Frontier
of Biomedical Research, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., February 8, 2022.
31 White House, Advanced Research Project Agency for Health (ARPA-H): Concept Paper, p. 4. 32 HHS, “InnovationX,” https://www.hhs.gov/ash/osm/innovationx/index.html. 33 HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, “Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority,” https://phe.gov/about/barda/Pages/default.aspx.
Congressional Research Service
7
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
programs such as BARDA, as well as biomedical programs at DOD and FDA to promote collaboration and avoid duplication. collaboration and avoid duplication.
The authorizing bills
The authorizing bills
under consideration in the House (H.R. 5585in the House (H.R. 5585
and H.R. 6000) and Senate (S. 3799, as amended) ) and Senate (S. 3799, as amended)
differ in ARPA-H’s placement. H.R. 5585 would establish ARPA-H as an independent entity differ in ARPA-H’s placement. H.R. 5585 would establish ARPA-H as an independent entity
within HHS while within HHS while
H.R. 6000 and S. 3799, S. 3799 (as amendedas amended
,) would establish ARPA-H as an agency would establish ARPA-H as an agency
under NIH. under NIH.
Additionally, the authorizing bills include provisions that seek to ensure the independence and
Additionally, the authorizing bills include provisions that seek to ensure the independence and
autonomy of ARPA-H. Specifically, H.R. 5585 would prohibit another federal agency or autonomy of ARPA-H. Specifically, H.R. 5585 would prohibit another federal agency or
department from requiring that an ARPA-H official submit legislative recommendations, department from requiring that an ARPA-H official submit legislative recommendations,
testimony, or comments on legislation to any officer or agency for approval prior to submission to testimony, or comments on legislation to any officer or agency for approval prior to submission to
Congress if such recommendations, testimony, or comments are those of the Director or such Congress if such recommendations, testimony, or comments are those of the Director or such
officer, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the President or another agency. The provisions officer, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the President or another agency. The provisions
related to independence in S. 3799related to independence in S. 3799
: (1 (as amended) would ) would
(1) prohibit ARPA-H from being located on the NIH prohibit ARPA-H from being located on the NIH
campus and in close proximity to the National Capital Region and (2) campus and in close proximity to the National Capital Region and (2)
would prohibit the ARPA-prohibit the ARPA-
H Director from appointing personnel to the agency who were employed by NIH three years prior H Director from appointing personnel to the agency who were employed by NIH three years prior
to such appointment. Additionally, all of the authorizing bills would require that any budget to such appointment. Additionally, all of the authorizing bills would require that any budget
request for the agency be separate and distinct from either HHS or NIH (see “Appropriations”request for the agency be separate and distinct from either HHS or NIH (see “Appropriations”
below for additional discussion).
34 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, ARPA-H: The Next Frontier of Biomedical Research, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., February 8, 2022.
35 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, ARPA-H: The Next Frontier of Biomedical Research, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., February 8, 2022.
36 White House, Advanced Research Project Agency for Health (ARPA-H): Concept Paper, p. 4. 37 HHS, “InnovationX,” https://www.hhs.gov/ash/osm/innovationx/index.html. 38 HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, “Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority,” https://phe.gov/about/barda/Pages/default.aspx.
Congressional Research Service
9
link to page 16 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
below for additional discussion).
Some have argued that ARPA-H’s founding director would play a crucial role in developing a
Some have argued that ARPA-H’s founding director would play a crucial role in developing a
unique culture that guides the agency to success.unique culture that guides the agency to success.
3439 For example, the report accompanying the For example, the report accompanying the
House FY2022 LHHS appropriations bill (H.Rept. 117-96) “strongly encourages NIH to recruit House FY2022 LHHS appropriations bill (H.Rept. 117-96) “strongly encourages NIH to recruit
an ARPA-H Director with extraordinary technical and leadership skills, who has a proven track-an ARPA-H Director with extraordinary technical and leadership skills, who has a proven track-
record in innovation and partnership-building.”record in innovation and partnership-building.”
35 All40 Both of the proposals would require the ARPA- of the proposals would require the ARPA-
H H Director to be appointed by the President (consistent with enacted appropriations), though they Director to be appointed by the President (consistent with enacted appropriations), though they
differ in whether the Director would report to the NIH Director or the HHS Secretary. The differ in whether the Director would report to the NIH Director or the HHS Secretary. The
proposals also specify different appointment terms. H.R. 5585 proposals also specify different appointment terms. H.R. 5585
and H.R. 6000 would authorize a would authorize a
five-year appointment term for the ARPA-H Director while S. 3799five-year appointment term for the ARPA-H Director while S. 3799
, (as amendedas amended
,) would authorize would authorize
a four-year term. a four-year term.
AllBoth bills would allow for one consecutive term. bills would allow for one consecutive term.
AllBoth of the proposals similarly of the proposals similarly
specify that the Director have qualifications to manage advanced biomedical research programs, specify that the Director have qualifications to manage advanced biomedical research programs,
with some slight differences. with some slight differences.
Defining Goals and Preventing Duplication
Existing ARPAs address their mandate to advance Existing ARPAs address their mandate to advance
the development and application of high-risk, high-risk,
high-reward research and technologies by seeking to fill what is called the high-reward research and technologies by seeking to fill what is called the
white space, a , a
perceived gap or opportunity in the technology landscape.perceived gap or opportunity in the technology landscape.
3641 The Biden Administration has argued The Biden Administration has argued
that the current ecosystem of biomedical R&D—with curiosity-driven research funded by NIH that the current ecosystem of biomedical R&D—with curiosity-driven research funded by NIH
and the public sector and commercialization-driven R&D funded largely by industry—is and the public sector and commercialization-driven R&D funded largely by industry—is
34adequate for most biomedical innovation but leaves certain critical gaps that ARPA-H could fill. Specifically, project ideas that the Administration asserts are left unfunded by the current system include those that (1) are high risk and/or require significant funding, (2) involve complex coordination among multiple parties, (3) have a focus that is too applied for academia, and (4) have a scope that “is so broad that no company can realize the full economic benefit.”42 Some empirical research supports these claims: recent economic analyses provide some evidence that both the pharmaceutical industry and NIH underinvest in high-risk R&D.43
The ARPA-H bills (H.R. 5585 and S. 3799, as amended) define overall agency goals similarly, with some variations (see Table A-1). Both of the bills emphasize breakthrough biomedical technologies and innovation in ARPA-H’s proposed statutory goals. Neither of the bills establish ARPA-H to focus on specific diseases or areas of research. A main difference in ARPA-H goals between the bills is that H.R. 5585 explicitly names ensuring U.S. global leadership in science and innovation, especially with respect to global health threats, as an overall goal.
39 Jocelyn Kaiser, “The U.S. Just Created a Big New Biomedical Research Agency. But Questions Remain,” Jocelyn Kaiser, “The U.S. Just Created a Big New Biomedical Research Agency. But Questions Remain,”
Science,,
March 15, 2022, https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-just-created-big-new-biomedical-research-agency-March 15, 2022, https://www.science.org/content/article/u-s-just-created-big-new-biomedical-research-agency-
questions-remain. questions-remain.
3540 Omermohle, “Skeptics Question If Biden’s New Science Agency Is a Breakthrough or More Bureaucracy;” Sampat Omermohle, “Skeptics Question If Biden’s New Science Agency Is a Breakthrough or More Bureaucracy;” Sampat
and Cook-Deegan, “An ARPA for Health Research?”; and U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, and Cook-Deegan, “An ARPA for Health Research?”; and U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations,
Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies,
Report to Accompany H.R. H.R.
4502, 117th Cong., 1st sess., July 19, 2021, pp. 165-166. 4502, 117th Cong., 1st sess., July 19, 2021, pp. 165-166.
3641 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,
An Assessment of ARPA-E (Washington, DC: The (Washington, DC: The
National Academies Press, 2017), p. 95; and Azoulay et al., “Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and National Academies Press, 2017), p. 95; and Azoulay et al., “Funding Breakthrough Research: Promises and
Challenges of the ‘ARPA Model.’” Challenges of the ‘ARPA Model.’”
Congressional Research Service
8
link to page 15 link to page 15 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
adequate for most biomedical innovation but leaves certain critical gaps that ARPA-H could fill. Specifically, project ideas that the Administration asserts are left unfunded by the current system include those that (1) are high risk and/or require significant funding, (2) involve complex coordination among multiple parties, (3) have a focus that is too applied for academia, and (4) have a scope that “is so broad that no company can realize the full economic benefit.”37 Some empirical research supports these claims: recent economic analyses provide some evidence that both the pharmaceutical industry and NIH underinvest in high-risk R&D.38
The ARPA-H bills (H.R. 5585, H.R. 6000, and S. 3799, as amended) define overall agency goals similarly, with some variations (see Table A-1). All the bills emphasize breakthrough biomedical technologies and innovation in ARPA-H’s proposed statutory goals. None of the bills establish ARPA-H to focus on specific diseases or areas of research. Differences in ARPA-H goals among the bills include that H.R. 5585 names ensuring U.S. global leadership as an overall goal; that H.R. 6000 mentions reducing the human and economic cost of disease; and that S. 3799, as amended, focuses on advancements that cannot be readily accomplished through traditional commercial or research activity.
Some have expressed concern about the potentially broad scope of ARPA-H.39 All42 Collins et al., “ARPA-H: Accelerating Biomedical Breakthroughs.” 43 Joshua L. Krieger, Danielle Li, and Dimitris Papanikolaou, “Missing Novelty in Drug Development,” National Bureau of Economic Research, vol. 35, no. 2 (2022), pp. 636-679; Chiara Franzoni, Paula Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers, “Funding Risky Research,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, June 2021; and Mikko Packalen and Jay Bhattacharya, “NIH Funding and the Pursuit of Edge Science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 22 (June 2, 2020), pp. 12011-12016.
Congressional Research Service
10
link to page 16 link to page 16 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Some have expressed concern about the potentially broad scope of ARPA-H.44 Both of the of the
authorizing bills would require ARPA-H to develop and submit to Congress a strategic plan for authorizing bills would require ARPA-H to develop and submit to Congress a strategic plan for
the new agency and submit annual reports to Congress that detail current, proposed, and planned the new agency and submit annual reports to Congress that detail current, proposed, and planned
ARPA-H projects. ARPA-H projects.
Some have expressed concern that ARPA-H could duplicate existing medical and health research
Some have expressed concern that ARPA-H could duplicate existing medical and health research
efforts across the federal government.efforts across the federal government.
4045 Myriad federal agencies support medical and health Myriad federal agencies support medical and health
research, not only NIH—the largest supporter of such research—but also DOD, the Department research, not only NIH—the largest supporter of such research—but also DOD, the Department
of Veterans Affairs (VA), and other agencies within HHS.of Veterans Affairs (VA), and other agencies within HHS.
41 Additionally, other federal agencies would play a critical role in commercialization of implementation of ARPA-H technologies or innovations—for example, FDA would regulate many ARPA-H-supported medical products. Federal health care programs, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the VA, could end up implementing or paying for ARPA-H supported innovations.46 The The
authorizing bills address considerations related to aligning ARPA-H efforts with those of other authorizing bills address considerations related to aligning ARPA-H efforts with those of other
federal agencies, as shown in the sections on “Coordination and Cooperation” and “federal agencies, as shown in the sections on “Coordination and Cooperation” and “
AdviceAdvisory Committees” in ” in
tt
he Appendix. For exampleFor example, S. 3799, S. 3799
, (as amendedas amended
,) and H.R. 5585 would both require the and H.R. 5585 would both require the
establishment of an interagency advisory committee tasked with avoiding duplication and establishment of an interagency advisory committee tasked with avoiding duplication and
improving the coordination improving the coordination
of ARRPA-H’s efforts with other federal agencies. H.R. 5585 would also require the Government Accountability Office to conduct an independent review of HHS’s research portfolio every three years to assess the degree of unnecessary duplication and make recommendations regarding any potential reorganization, consolidation, or termination of duplicative program and projects.
Additionally, other federal agencies would play a critical role in commercialization of implementation of ARPA-H technologies or innovations—for example, FDA would regulate many ARPA-H-supported medical products. Both bills would require ARPA-H to coordinate with the FDA to expedite and facilitate the transformation and development of ARPA-H activities into medical products and solutions for patients. Federal health care programs, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the VA, could end up implementing or paying for ARPA-H supported innovations. H.R. 5585 would require ARPA-H to share timely information with CMS for coverage decisions. Both bills also provide for follow-on production or procurement and demonstration programs, as shown in the section on “Other Transactions, Follow-on Production, Technology Transfer, and Procurement and Demonstration” in Table A-1.
There is also concern about duplicating commercial or philanthropic research efforts. Both bills direct ARPA-H to prioritize investments in areas that are underfunded by the public and private sector, and to facilitate public-private partnerships. S. 3799 (as amended)of ARRPA-H’s efforts with other federal agencies. In addition, all three bills would require ARPA-H to coordinate with the FDA to expedite and facilitate the
37 Collins et al., “ARPA-H: Accelerating Biomedical Breakthroughs.” 38 Joshua L. Krieger, Danielle Li, and Dimitris Papanikolaou, “Missing Novelty in Drug Development,” National
Bureau of Economic Research, vol. 35, no. 2 (2022), pp. 636-679; Chiara Franzoni, Paula Stephan, and Reinhilde Veugelers, “Funding Risky Research,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, June 2021; and Mikko Packalen and Jay Bhattacharya, “NIH Funding and the Pursuit of Edge Science,” Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 22 (June 2, 2020), pp. 12011-12016.
39 See, for example, Jeff Tollefson, “The Rise of ‘ARPA-Everything’ and What It Means for Science,” Nature, July 8, 2021, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01878-z; and Bhaven N. Sampat and Robert Cook-Deegan, “An ARPA for Health Research?,” Milbank Quarterly, https://www.milbank.org/quarterly/opinions/an-arpa-for-health-research/.
40 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, ARPA-H: The Next Frontier
of Biomedical Research, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., February 8, 2022.
41 Research!America, U.S. Investments in Medical and Health Research and Development, 2019, https://www.researchamerica.org/sites/default/files/Publications/InvestmentReport2019_Fnl.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
9
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
transformation and development of ARPA-H activities into medical products and solutions for patients.
There is also concern about duplicating commercial or philanthropic research efforts. S. 3799, as amended, includes provisions that are aimed at preventing ARPA-H funding from crowding out includes provisions that are aimed at preventing ARPA-H funding from crowding out
private sector investment. For example, S. 3799private sector investment. For example, S. 3799
, (as amendedas amended
,) would require the ARPA-H would require the ARPA-H
Director to ensure that ARPA-H does not provide funding for a research program or project unless Director to ensure that ARPA-H does not provide funding for a research program or project unless
the applicant demonstrates that it has made sufficient unsuccessful attempts to secure private the applicant demonstrates that it has made sufficient unsuccessful attempts to secure private
financing, and that there is a lack of significant private support for the program or project. financing, and that there is a lack of significant private support for the program or project.
Another
Another
ARPA agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) faced similar agency, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) faced similar
concerns regarding potential duplication; however, a recent study by the U.S. Government concerns regarding potential duplication; however, a recent study by the U.S. Government
Accountability Office found that “ARPA-E has practices in place to help manage overlap and Accountability Office found that “ARPA-E has practices in place to help manage overlap and
44 See, for example, Jeff Tollefson, “The Rise of ‘ARPA-Everything’ and What It Means for Science,” Nature, July 8, 2021, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01878-z; and Bhaven N. Sampat and Robert Cook-Deegan, “An ARPA for Health Research?,” Milbank Quarterly, https://www.milbank.org/quarterly/opinions/an-arpa-for-health-research/.
45 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, ARPA-H: The Next Frontier of Biomedical Research, 117th Cong., 2nd sess., February 8, 2022.
46 Research!America, U.S. Investments in Medical and Health Research and Development, 2019, https://www.researchamerica.org/sites/default/files/Publications/InvestmentReport2019_Fnl.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
11
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
duplication during its program development cycle.”47duplication during its program development cycle.”42 Congress may consider whether to identify Congress may consider whether to identify
any best practices from ARPA-E that could be applied to ARPA-H program development. any best practices from ARPA-E that could be applied to ARPA-H program development.
Funding
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (P.L. 117-103)
providesprovided ARPA-H with $1 billion in ARPA-H with $1 billion in
funding available until September 30, 2024. This is in contrast with the $6.5 billion in initial funding available until September 30, 2024. This is in contrast with the $6.5 billion in initial
funding proposed by the Biden Administration for the same period.funding proposed by the Biden Administration for the same period.
4348 It is also lower than the It is also lower than the
authorized amountsauthorized amounts
included in H.R. 5585 in H.R. 5585
and H.R. 6000. H.R. 5585 would authorize $3 billion for ARPA-H, and H.R. 6000 would authorize appropriations at the Administration-requested level of $6.5 billion—both with funding available until expended. S. 3799, as amended,. H.R. 5585 would authorize $500 million for each of FY2023 through FY2027. S. 3799 (as amended) does not does not
specify an authorization level and instead would authorize “such sums as may be necessary” for specify an authorization level and instead would authorize “such sums as may be necessary” for
FY2023 through FY2027. In comparison, DARPA is funded at $3.9 billion for FY2022, ARPA-E FY2023 through FY2027. In comparison, DARPA is funded at $3.9 billion for FY2022, ARPA-E
has FY2022 funding of $450 million, and fewer than half of NIH ICs have an annual budget that has FY2022 funding of $450 million, and fewer than half of NIH ICs have an annual budget that
exceeds $1 billion (11 out of 25 accounts).exceeds $1 billion (11 out of 25 accounts).
4449 Taking a wider view, total U.S. investments in health and medical research (both public and private) were estimated at $194.175 billion in 2018.50
Stakeholders have debated the appropriate initial funding level for ARPA-H. Given that ARPA-H
Stakeholders have debated the appropriate initial funding level for ARPA-H. Given that ARPA-H
is an untested new agency, some argue that it should start small and grow over time depending on is an untested new agency, some argue that it should start small and grow over time depending on
its success.its success.
4551 However, in the context of the ARPA model, there is a risk of providing too little However, in the context of the ARPA model, there is a risk of providing too little
funding. Insufficient funding is seen by some as one of the reasons another agency modeled after funding. Insufficient funding is seen by some as one of the reasons another agency modeled after
DARPA, the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency (HSARPA), has not been DARPA, the Homeland Security Advanced Research Projects Agency (HSARPA), has not been
viewed as a success.viewed as a success.
4652 In addition, biomedical research—especially medical product R&D—tends In addition, biomedical research—especially medical product R&D—tends
to be expensive relative to some other areas of technology R&D.to be expensive relative to some other areas of technology R&D.
4753 Also, given the long lag time Also, given the long lag time
that generally exists between R&D activities and a commercially viable product or service, that generally exists between R&D activities and a commercially viable product or service,
measuring the contribution of R&D to end the product can be difficult.
42 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy: Agency Has Practices for Avoiding Duplication and Involving Stakeholders in the Development of Research Programs, GAO-22-104775, February 3, 2022, p. 1, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-104775.pdf.
43 NIH, Congressional Justification: FY2022, pp. 10-11. 44 See CRS Report R46869, Federal Research and Development (R&D) Funding: FY2022, coordinated by John F. Sargent Jr.
45 See, for example, Tollefson, “The Rise of ‘ARPA-Everything’ and What It Means for Science.” 46 For example, see Nate Bruggeman and Ben Rohrbaugh, “Closing Critical Gaps that Hinder Homeland Security Technology Innovation,” Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School, April 2020, p. 3, https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/HSP%20paper%20series%205-2.pdf.
47 GAO, Drug Industry: Profits, Research and Development Spending, and Merger and Acquisition Deals, GAO-18-40, November 2017, pp. 28-37.
Congressional Research Service
10
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
as well as the focus on high-risk projects, it can be difficult to determine the appropriate ARPA-H funding level in the short term.
In an effort to separate ARPA-H funding from other NIH programs,
In an effort to separate ARPA-H funding from other NIH programs,
all three bills would require a separate ARPA-H budget request from other NIH or HHS budget requests. H.R. 5585 would additionally create a new fund for financing ARPA-H. Both H.R. 5585 and H.R. 6000S. 3799 (as amended) would provide that ARPA-H’s budget be separate from other NIH budget requests. (As an independent agency, the ARPA-H established by H.R. 5585 would likely have a separate budget request). would allow for submission of a budget directly to Congress, similar to existing NIH “professional judgment budgets” or “bypass budgets.” Existing NIH professional judgment budgets—submitted directly from NIH to Congress for certain research areas—estimate funding needs based solely on scientific priorities and opportunities rather than through the traditional budget development process that weighs other policy objectives and funding priorities.48
Members of Congress also have considered whether and how to leverage private funding—such
Members of Congress also have considered whether and how to leverage private funding—such
as from industry or philanthropy—to help support ARPA-H’s efforts. Currently, NIH structures as from industry or philanthropy—to help support ARPA-H’s efforts. Currently, NIH structures
many of its medical product development and biomedical innovation programs as public-private many of its medical product development and biomedical innovation programs as public-private
partnerships. partnerships.
All threeBoth bills would direct ARPA-H to partner with a range of public and private bills would direct ARPA-H to partner with a range of public and private
entities. In addition, S. 3799entities. In addition, S. 3799
, (as amendedas amended
,) would direct the ARPA-H Director, as a part of the would direct the ARPA-H Director, as a part of the
Director’s duties, to prioritize investments in areas that require public-private partnerships. Director’s duties, to prioritize investments in areas that require public-private partnerships.
48 For other NIH professional judgment budgets, see National Cancer Institute, “NCI Professional Judgment Budget, President’s Budget and Appropriations,” https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/budget/fact-book/historical-trends/bypass-appropriations; National Institute on Aging, “Bypass Budget Proposal Archive,” https://www.nia.nih.gov/about/bypass-budget-proposal-archive; and NIH Office of AIDS Research, “NIH HIV Research Budget,” https://www.oar.nih.gov/hiv-policy-and-research/budget. For context, see CRS Report R47019, The Executive Budget Process: An Overview, by Dominick A. Fiorentino and Taylor N. Riccard.
Congressional Research Service
11
link to page 1547 U.S. Government Accountability Office, Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy: Agency Has Practices for Avoiding Duplication and Involving Stakeholders in the Development of Research Programs, GAO-22-104775, February 3, 2022, p. 1, https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-22-104775.pdf.
48 NIH, Congressional Justification: FY2022, pp. 10-11. 49 See CRS Report R46869, Federal Research and Development (R&D) Funding: FY2022, coordinated by John F. Sargent Jr.
50 Research!America, “U.S. Investments in Medical and Health Research and Development: 2013-2018,” Fall 2019, https://www.researchamerica.org/sites/default/files/Publications/InvestmentReport2019_Fnl.pdf.
51 See, for example, Tollefson, “The Rise of ‘ARPA-Everything’ and What It Means for Science.” 52 For example, see Nate Bruggeman and Ben Rohrbaugh, “Closing Critical Gaps that Hinder Homeland Security Technology Innovation,” Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School, April 2020, p. 3, https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/HSP%20paper%20series%205-2.pdf.
53 GAO, Drug Industry: Profits, Research and Development Spending, and Merger and Acquisition Deals, GAO-18-40, November 2017, pp. 28-37.
Congressional Research Service
12
link to page 16 ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Appendix. Comparison of Key Provisions in ARPA-
H Authorization Legislation
Table A-1 provides a side-by-side comparison of the provides a side-by-side comparison of the
three bills two bills under consideration that would authorize ARPA-H in that would authorize ARPA-H in
the 117th Congress. In the House, H.R. 5585 the 117th Congress. In the House, H.R. 5585
and H.R. 6000 have been introduced and were discussed in a hearing on March 17, 2022.49 was passed on June 22, 2022. In the Senate, the PREVENT Pandemics Act (S. In the Senate, the PREVENT Pandemics Act (S.
3799, as amended), which incorporates the previously introduced Advanced Research Project 3799, as amended), which incorporates the previously introduced Advanced Research Project
Authority for Health Act (S. 3819) as Section 331, was ordered to be reported by the Senate Authority for Health Act (S. 3819) as Section 331, was ordered to be reported by the Senate
HELP Committee on March 15, 2022. HELP Committee on March 15, 2022.
H.R. 5585 is used as a comparator bill, as it was first introduced. The provisions are not presented
H.R. 5585 is used as a comparator bill, as it was first introduced. The provisions are not presented
in the order they appear in the comparator bill, but rather are grouped categorically to facilitate in the order they appear in the comparator bill, but rather are grouped categorically to facilitate
topical comparison of the proposals. Provision references are included in brackets. In some topical comparison of the proposals. Provision references are included in brackets. In some
instances, similar language is used in different categorical sections of the bills; such instances are instances, similar language is used in different categorical sections of the bills; such instances are
noted throughout the table. noted throughout the table.
Table A-1. Comparison of Key Provisions in APRAARPA-H Authorization Legislation
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Project
Project Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Authorization
AmendsWould amend Public Health Service Public Health Service
Standalone provision. Does
AmendsAct
Would amend the PHSA the PHSA
, Title IV Title IV
to add at
Act (PHSA)(PHSA)
, Title IV (National Research
the end “Subpart 3—Advanced Research
Institutes) to add at the end “Part J— Title IV (National
not amend the PHSA.
to add new “Subpart 3—
Research Institutes) to add new [H.R. 6000 §501(a)]
Advanced Research
“Part J—Advanced Research
Projects Authority for
Projects Agency-Health” at the
Health” to include one
end with two sections: (1)
section, Section 483:
Section 499A: Advanced
Advanced Research
Research Projects Agency-
Projects Authority for
Health and (2) Section 499B:
Health.
Health Advanced Research and
[S. 3819 §2]
Development Fund. [H.R. 5585 §2
Projects Authority for Health,” which
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
includes one section, Section 483:
Health,” which includes one section, Section
Advanced Research Projects Authority for
499A: Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Health.
Health.
[H.R. 5585 §2]
[S.3799 §331]
Placement in
Placement: ]
Placement in
Would establish ARPA-H Would establish ARPA-H
Would direct the Secretary
Placement: Would establish ARPA-H
Federal
within the Department of Health and Human within NIH.
Government and Services (HHS) and, not later than 180 days
[Proposed PHSA §483(b)]
Organizational
after enactment, require the transfer of all
Structure
existing functions, personnel, missions,
activities, authorities, and funds of APRA-H
Organizational Structure: No similar
within NIH to the ARPA-H established by
provisions.
the bil . [Proposed PHSA §499A(a)(1)] Organizational Structure: Would require ARPA-H to be organized to include an Office of the Director; no more than six program offices; and such special project office as the Director may establish. [Proposed PHSA §499A(a)(2)(A)]. Would also require that no fewer than two-thirds of the program offices be exclusively dedicated to research and development. [Proposed PHSA §499A(a)(2)(B)].
Goals/PurposeWould establish ARPA-H
Federal
within the Department of
of HHS to establish ARPA-H within NIH.
Government
Health and Human Services
within the National
[Proposed PHSA §483(b)]
(HHS).
Institutes of Health (NIH).
[Proposed PHSA §499A(a)]
[H.R. 6000 §501(a)]
49 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Subcommittee on Health, The Future of Medicine:
Legislation to Encourage Innovation and Improve Oversight, 117th Cong., 1st sess., March 17, 2022.
Congressional Research Service
12
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Goals
The stated goals of ARPA-H
The stated goals of ARPA-H
The stated purpose of
would be to:
would be to deliver
ARPA-H would be to (key
breakthrough capabilities
The stated goals of ARPA-H would be to:
The stated purpose of ARPA-H would be
to (key differences from H.R. 5585differences from H.R. 5585
foster the development of
foster the development of
new, breakthrough new, breakthrough
throughcapabilities, technologies,
italicized):
Congressional Research Service
13
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
systems, and platforms to accelerate
support high-impact, cutting-edge
innovations in health and medicine that
research in biomedicine and broadly
are not being met by federal programs
applicable breakthrough technologies
or private entities;
that have the potential to significantly
revolutionize detection, diagnosis,
transform and advance areas of
mitigation, prevention, treatment technologies,
italicized):
capabilities, technologies,
systems, and platforms that
support high-impact,
systems, and platforms to
(key differences from H.R.
cutting-edge research
accelerate innovations in
5585 italicized):
in biomedicine and
health and medicine;
accelerate the
broadly applicable
discovery and
breakthrough
revolutionize diagnosis,
mitigation, prevention, and
application of
technologies that have
treatment of diseases
transformational
the potential to
through the development
innovations in health
significantly transform
of transformative health
and medical product
and advance areas of
technologies and high-need
development; and
biomedical science and
cures;
and
biomedical science and medicine medicine
in a manner
reduce the human and
that cannot readily be
economic cost of disease.
promote high-risk, high-
in a
curing of serious diseases and medical
manner that cannot readily be
conditions through the development of
accomplished through traditional
transformative health technologies;
biomedical research or commercial activity; and
promote high-risk, high-reward innovation for the development and accomplished through
reward innovation to
[H.R. 6000 §501(b)(1)]
traditional biomedical
develop high-need cures
research or commercial
(H.R. 6000 includes similar
activity; and
language in the ARPA-H activities category); and
overcome
overcome
long-term
and significant
ensure the United States
technological and
maintains global leadership
scientific barriers to
in science and innovation,
advancing such
and the highest quality of
technologies in order
life and health for its
to improve the
citizens.
prevention, diagnosis,
[Proposed PHSA
mitigation, treatment,
§499A(b)(1)]
and cure of health conditions.
[Proposed PHSA §483(b)]
Congressional Research Service
13
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Activities
Activitiesand significant
translation of transformative health
technological and scientific barriers to
technologies; and
advancing such technologies in order to improve the prevention, diagnosis,
contribute to ensuring the United
mitigation, treatment, and cure of
States maintains global leadership in
health conditions.
science and innovation; the highest quality of life and health for its citizens;
[Proposed PHSA §483(b)]
and an aggressive agenda for innovation to address global health threats that place U.S. citizens at risk.
[Proposed PHSA §499A(b)(1)]
Methods
Methods of the agency would include:
No similar category of provisions.
Comparable language in “Goals” and
discovering, identifying, of the agency would
Activities of the agency
No similar category of
(“Means”)
include:
would include (grouped for
provisions. Comparable
comparison; key differences
language in “Goals” and
identifying and promoting and promoting
revolutionary advances in revolutionary advances in
italicized):health
“Duties of the Director” sections.
sciences;
translating scientific discoveries into transformative health technologies;
providing resources and support to create platform capabilities that draw on multiple disciplines;
using researchers in a wide range of disciplines, including the life sciences, the physical sciences, engineering, and the computational sciences;
delivering advanced proofs of concept
that demonstrate clinically meaningful advances;
developing new capabilities, advanced computational tools, predictive models, or analytical techniques to identify potential targets and technological strategies for early disease detection and intervention;
accelerating transformational technological advances in areas with limited technical certainty; and
prioritizing investments based on such considerations as scientific opportunity and uniqueness of fit to the
“Duties of the Director”
health sciences;
Similar to H.R. 5585:
sections.
accelerating
identifying and
transformational
promoting
technological advances in
revolutionary advances
areas with limited funding
in biomedical and health
or technical certainty;
research that enable
new paradigms in
prioritizing investments based on such
health;
considerations as scientific
accelerating
opportunity and
transformational health
uniqueness of fit to the
advances in areas that
strategies and operating
the relevant industries by
practices of ARPA-H; the
themselves are not likely
effect on disease burden,
to undertake because of
including unmet patient need
technical, financial, or
and the fiscal liability of
other uncertainty; and
the federal government
prioritizing project
with respect to health
investments based on
care; and potential
scientific opportunity
opportunities to advance
and uniqueness of fit to
health equity;
ARPA-H strategies strategies
and operating practices of ARPA-H; the effect on disease burden, including unmet patient need, quality and
Congressional Research Service
14
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
disparity gaps, and the potential to preempt progression of serious disease; and the effect of the fiscal liability of the federal government with respect to health care and the ability to reduce the cost of care through innovation.
[Proposed PHSA §499A(b)(2)]
and
translating scientific
operating practice,
discoveries into
together with the
technological innovations
prospective impact on
and high-need cures;
disease burden
(regardless of disease
providing resources and support to create platform
prevalence), both human
capabilities that draw on
and fiscal, including the
multiple disciplines; and
health care fiscal liability of the federal
delivering advanced proofs
government.
of concept that demonstrate clinically
Different from H.R. 5585:
meaningful advances.
promoting high-risk,
[Proposed PHSA
high-reward innovation
§499A(b)(2)]
(H.R. 5585 includes similar language as an ARPA-H goal); and
partnering with, and providing funding to, a broad range of institutions, including universities, national laboratories, public sector organizations, private companies, nonprofit organizations, and foreign institutions. (H.R. 5585 lists partnering with a broad range of institutions as an ARPA-H Director authority.)
[H.R. 6000 §501(b)(2)]
Congressional Research Service
14
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
ARPA-H
The ARPA-H Director position
The ARPA-H DirectorARPA-H
The ARPA-H Director position would be
The ARPA-H Director position would be
Director
established as fol ows:
The ARPA-H Director
Director Position would be established as fol ows: position would be
position would be
established as fol ows (key
established as fol ows (key
established as fol ows (key
differences from H.R. 5855
differences from H.R. 5855
Appointment: Appointed by
italicized):
italicized):
the President. differences from
Position
H.R. 5855 italicized):
Appointment: Appointed by the President. Reports to the Reports to the
Secretary of HHS.Secretary of HHS.
Appointment: Appointed by the
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(1),
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(1),
Appointment: Appointed
Appointment: Appointed
(3)]
by the President.
by the (3)]
President. President.
Reports to
NIH Director.
[
[
H.R. 6000 §501(c)(1)]
[Proposed PHSA
Proposed PHSA §483(c)(1)]
Term: Five years. May be Five years. May be
§483(c)(1)]
reappointed for one reappointed for
one consecutive term.
Term: Four
Term: Five years. May be
consecutive term.
reappointed for one
years. May be reappointed for
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(5)]
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(5)]
up to one consecutive term consecutive term
at the
Term: Four years. May be
discretion of the President.
reappointed for up to one
[H.R. 6000 §501(c)(2)]
consecutive term at the
Qualifications: By
discretion of the President.
professional background and
[Proposed PHSA
experience is qualified to
Qualifications: By
§483(c)(3)]
manage: (1) research and
professional background and
advanced development
experience, is qualified to
discretion of the President.
[Proposed PHSA §483(c)(3)]
Qualifications: An individual who, by reason of professional background and
experience, is qualified to manage: (1)
Qualifications: Individual who, by
research and advanced development
professional background and experience, is
programs; and (2) large-scale, high-risk
qualified to
programs; and (2) large-scale,
advise the Secretary on, and
Qualifications: By
high-risk initiatives with respect
manage research programs
professional background
to health research across
addressing, matters
and experience, is qualified
multiple sectors, including
pertaining to long-term and
to advise the Secretary on,
generating high-need cures.
high-risk barriers to the
and manage research
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(2)]
development of health
programs that advance the
innovation.
purposes of ARPA-H in,
[H.R. 6000 §501(c)(2)]
promoting biomedical and
Autonomy Regarding
novel technology
Recommendations and
innovation, and who has
advise the Secretary on, and
initiatives with respect to health research
manage research programs that advance
and technology development across multiple
the purposes of ARPA-H in, promoting
sectors, including generating transformative
biomedical and novel technology
health technologies and improving health
innovation, and who has demonstrated
outcomes for patients.
ability to identify and develop partnerships
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(2)]
to address strategic needs in meeting such purposes.
[Proposed PHSA §483(c)(2)]
Autonomy Regarding Recommendations and Testimony: No
Testimony: No U.S. officer or
Autonomy: No
demonstrated ability to
agency has authority to require
U.S. officer or agency has authority to
Autonomy: No comparable provision.comparable provision.
require
identify and develop
the Director of ARPA-H or the Director of ARPA-H or
partnerships to address
any other ARPA-H officer to submit legislative recommendations, testimony, other ARPA-H officer to
strategic needs in meeting
submit legislative
such purposes.
recommendations, testimony,
[Proposed PHSA
or comments on legislation to or comments on legislation to
§483(c)(2)]
any officer or agency for any officer or agency for
approval prior to submission to approval prior to submission to
Congress if Congress if
such materials include a statement indicating such materials
Autonomy: No
include a statement indicating
comparable provision.
that the views expressed are that the views expressed are
those of such officer and do not those of such officer and do not
reflect the views of the reflect the views of the
President or another agency. President or another agency.
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(6)] [Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(6)]
Congressional Research Service
15
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Duties of theDuties and
Duties:
Duties: (grouped for comparison):
Authorities of
Approve and terminate the projects and Similar to H.R. 5585
the Director
programs of ARPA-H;
Approve all new programs within
Set research and development priorities
ARPA-H and terminate any program
with respect to ARPA-H goals and
within ARPA-H that is not achieving
manage the budget of ARPA-H;
its goals;
Congressional Research Service
15
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
Develop funding criteria and assess the
Establish strategic goals, objectives,
success of programs through the
and priorities for ARPA-H pursuant to
establishment of technical milestones;
ARPA-H’s purposes;
Advance ARPA-H goals through
Establish criteria for funding and
consideration of the advice of the
assessing (grouped for
Duties: (grouped for
Director
comparison):
comparison):
Set research and development priorities
Similar to H.R. 5585:
Similar to H.R. 5585
with respect to ARPA-H
Set national research
Establish strategic
goals and manage the
priorities to advance
goals, objectives, and
budget of ARPA-H;
the mission of the
priorities for ARPA-H
Advance ARPA-H goals
agency as informed by a
pursuant to ARPA-H’s
through consideration of
multi-sectoral board of
purposes;
the advice of the ARPA-H
advisors;
Approve all new
Interagency Advisory
Approve all new
programs within
Committee;
programs within ARPA-
ARPA-H and
Approve and terminate
H;
terminate any program
the projects and programs
within ARPA-H that is
Have final funding
of ARPA-H;
authority to initiate and
not achieving its goals;
Develop funding criteria
terminate program
Establish criteria for
and assess the success of
funding; and
funding and assessing
programs through the
the success of
Establish criteria for
establishment of technical
funding and assessing
programs through the
milestones;
the success of
establishment of
technical milestones;
Solicit data, as needed,
programs through the
from NIH and other
establishment of
and
relevant federal agencies,
technical milestones;
Facilitate coordination
private entities, academia,
Different from H.R. 5585:
between HHS and its
nonprofit organizations,
the success of programs
ARPA-H Interagency Advisory
through the establishment of technical
Committee;
milestones; and
Solicit data, as needed, from NIH and
Facilitate coordination between HHS
other relevant entities;
and its agencies, and other relevant
federal departments and agencies.
Coordinate with the agencies, and other
and international
Appoint the personnel
relevant federal
organizations;
necessary to
departments and
successful y execute the
agencies.
Coordinate with the
goals of ARPA-H (see
Director of NIH to ensure Director of NIH to ensure
“Personnel Authorities”that the programs of ARPA-H Different from H.R. 5585 build on and are informed by scientific
Ensure that applications for funding
research supported by NIH (see
disclose current and previous
“Cooperation and Coordination” below
research and development efforts,
for other relevant provisions);
including any scientific or technical
Coordinate with the heads of federal
barriers encountered in the course of
agencies and, to the extent practicable,
such efforts or challenges in securing
ensure that the activities of ARPA-H
funding;
supplement (and do not supplant) the
Support transformative, translational Different from H.R. 5585
that the programs of
below for other
Ensure that
ARPA-H build on and are
relevant provisions);
applications for funding
informed by scientific
and
disclose current and
research supported by
previous research and
NIH (see “Cooperation
Designate employees to
development efforts,
and Coordination” below
serve as program
including any scientific
for other relevant
managers for each of
or technical barriers
provisions); and
the programs established pursuant to
encountered in the
Coordinate with the heads
the responsibilities
course of such efforts
of federal agencies and, to
established for ARPA-H
or challenges in
the extent practicable,
(see “Program
securing funding.;
ensure that the activities
Managers” below for
Support
of ARPA-H supplement
other relevant
transformative,
(and do not supplant) the
provisions).
translational, applied,
efforts of other federal
and advanced research
agencies (see
[H.R. 6000 §501(c)(3)]
in ,
efforts of other federal agencies (see
applied, and advanced research in
“Cooperation and Coordination” below
areas of biomedical science to address
for other relevant provisions); and areas of biomedical
“Cooperation and
science to address
Coordination” below for
specific technical or
specific technical or
scientific
Ensure that ARPA-H does not provide
questions by (1) prioritizing
funding for a project unless the
investments based on scientific
program manager determines that the
other relevant provisions).
scientific questions by
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(4)]
(1) prioritizing
investments based on scientific potential and potential and
impact on the field of impact on the field of
project meets ARPA-H goals.
biomedicine, especial y biomedicine, especial y
in areas that in areas that
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(4)]
require require
public-private public-private
partnerships; (2) partnerships; (2)
translating scientific translating scientific
discoveries and discoveries and
cutting-edge innovation into
Authorities:
technological advancements; (3)
Delegate authorities, except the
encouraging opportunities to develop
appointment of the Deputy Director;
broadly applicable technologies using a multi-disciplinary approach; and (4)
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(7)]
making investments in high-risk, high-
Appoint a Deputy Director to serve as
reward research that may have
the first assistant to the office; and
application for medicine and health
[Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(8)]
(H.R. 5585 includes similar language in “Methods” category);
Waive Paperwork Reduction Act cutting-edge
Congressional Research Service
16
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
innovation into technological advancements; (3) encouraging opportunities to develop broadly applicable technologies using a multi-disciplinary approach; and (4) making investments in high-risk, high-reward research that may have application for medicine and health;
Encourage strategic
Encourage strategic
col aboration and col aboration and
requirements with respect to ARPA-H
partnerships with a partnerships with a
broad range of broad range of
methods (subsection (b)(2)).
entities, including entities, including
academia, industry, academia, industry,
[Proposed PHSA §499A(d)]
and non-profit and non-profit
organizations.organizations (H.R. (H.R.
5585 lists partnering 5585 lists partnering
with a broad range of institutions as an ARPA-H Director authoritywith other entities in “Program Managers” category); and ); and
Ensure that the United
Ensure that the United
States maintains global States maintains global
leadership in leadership in
researching and researching and
developing health developing health
technologiestechnologies
. (H.R. (H.R.
5585 includes similar 5585 includes similar
language in the language in the
“Goals” “Goals”
category.)category).
[Proposed PHSA
[Proposed PHSA
§483(c)(4)] §483(c)(4)]
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
1716
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Project
Project Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Agency—Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)331 of S. 3799, as amended)
Authorities: No additional authorities specified.
Funding Awards
The ARPA-H Director would
The ARPA-H Director would
The ARPA-H Directorbe authorized
The ARPA-H Director would be
to make awards in the form of grants,
authorized to make awards in the form of
contracts (including multi-year contracts),
grants, contracts (including multi-year
cooperative agreements, prizes, and other
contracts), cooperative agreements, prizes,
transactions.
and other transactions. Defines “other
transactions” to mean “transactions, other than procurement contracts, grants, and
Grants and cooperative agreements awarded cooperative agreements.” (by reference to
would be subject to the uniform
PHSA §319L(a)(3) in the Proposed PHSA
administrative requirements, cost principles,
§483(a)(3)).
and audit requirements for federal awards under part 200 of Title 2, Code of Federal
[Proposed PHSA §483(e)(1)]
Regulations. Total line-item and itemized
facilities and administrative costs would be
Would allow the ARPA-H Director to use
required to be made publicly available and
authorities and processes under the
published in a machine-readable format.
Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation
Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. §3719) for prize
Contracts awarded would be subject to
competitions (H.R. 5585 references the
Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Stevenson-Wydler definition for “prize” in the Definitions section).
[Proposed PHSA §483(e)(3)]
Funded research would not be subject to NIH peer review or advisory council review
or approval.
Funded research would not be subject to
[Proposed PHSA §499A(h)]
NIH peer review or advisory council review or approval.
The ARPA-H Director
be authorized to make awards
would be authorized to
would be authorized to
in the form of grants, contracts, make awards in the form of
make awards in the form of
including multi-year contracts,
grants, contracts, including
grants, contracts, including
cooperative agreements, prizes,
multi-year contracts,
multi-year contracts,
and other transactions.
cooperative agreements,
cooperative agreements,
prizes, and other
prizes, and other
transactions. Funded
transactions. Defines
Contracts awarded would be
research would not be
“other transactions” to
subject to Federal Acquisition
subject to NIH peer review
mean “transactions, other
Regulations (48 C.F.R. Chapter
or advisory council review
than procurement
1), but not to regulations in 48
or approval.
contracts, grants, and
C.F.R. Chapter 3.
[H.R. 6000 §501(i)]
cooperative agreements.”
[Proposed PHSA §499A(g)]
(by reference to PHSA
Specified information
§319L(a)(3) in the Proposed
col ected from award
PHSA §483(a)(3)])
recipients would be
[Proposed PHSA
exempted from Freedom of
§483(e)(1)]
Information Act disclosures (FOIA), including
commercialization plans,
Funded research would not
market studies, and
be subject to NIH peer
investments provided to the
review or advisory council
awardee from third parties,
review or approval.
among others.
[Proposed PHSA
[H.R. 6000 §501(j)]
§483(e)(5)]
The ARPA-H Director
Would require the ARPA-
would have authority to
H Director to ensure that
execute contracts developed ARPA-H does not provide by in-house program
funding for a research
managers who select
program or project unless
external performers, and
[Proposed PHSA §483(e)(5)]
In accordance with existing federal requirements as specified, the ARPA-H
Director would be required to only award
Would require the ARPA-H Director to
new awards to recipients who do not have
ensure that ARPA-H does not provide
more than three ongoing ARPA-H awards.
funding for a research program or project
[Proposed PHSA §499A(o)(4)]
unless the applicant demonstrates the applicant demonstrates
maintain, enhance, or
that it that it
has made sufficient unsuccessful attempts
to secure private financing, and that there
Domestic Prioritization: In making
is a lack of significant private support for
awards, the ARPA-H Director would be
has made sufficient
terminate projects based on
unsuccessful attempts to
performance against explicit
secure private financing,
milestones.
and that there is a lack of
[H.R. 6000 §501(c)(2)(B)]
significant private support for the program or project.
the program or project. In addition, the
required to prioritize domestic recipients
In addition, the ARPA-H ARPA-H
Director would be required Director would be required
to to
conducting research on transformative
ensure that the program ensure that the program
or project is in or project is in
health technology in the United States. As
the best the best
interests of the United interests of the United
States and States and
appropriate and practicable, the Director
has the potential has the potential
to significantly transform to significantly transform
and advance biomedicine.
would be required to ensure that
and advance biomedicine.
nondomestic recipients are conducting
[Proposed PHSA [Proposed PHSA
§483(f)(2)] §483(f)(2)]
Congressional Research Service
18
research in col aboration with a domestic recipient.
Domestic Prioritization: No similar provisions. (Note: May fol ow NIH policy
The ARPA-H Director would not be allowed for foreign award eligibility, see NIH,
to make awards to nondomestic recipients
“Who is Eligible?”
organized under the laws of Russia, Iran,
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/who-is-
North Korea, China or other countries as
eligible.htm).
determined to be a covered foreign country
Congressional Research Service
17
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Project
Project Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Agency—Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Cooperative331 of S. 3799, as amended)
under section 119C of the National Security Act of 1947. [Proposed PHSA §499A(o)]
Other
ARPA-H Director would be authorized to
The ARPA-H Director would be
Transactions,
award other transactions.
authorized to enter into other
Follow-on
[Proposed PHSA §499A(h)(1)(E)]
transactions.
Production,
[Proposed PHSA §483(e)(1)]
Technology
Transfer, and
Follow-On Production Award
Procurement
Authority: An “other transaction” entered
To the maximum extent practicable,
and
into may provide for the award of a fol ow-
competitive procedures would be required
Demonstration
on production contract or transaction,
when entering into other transactions to
either to the participants in the transaction
carry out projects.
by ARPA-H or another federal agency. For
Would authorize other transaction
the purposes of this authority, “other
authorities to be exercised for a project if
transaction” would include all individual
ARPA-H Director would be
When entering into
To the maximum extent
Agreements and
authorized to award other
cooperative agreements and
practicable, competitive
Other
transactions or prototype
other transactions, the
procedures would be
Transactions
projects that are directly
ARPA-H Director would be
required when entering
relevant to enhancing ARPA-H
required to ensure that:
into other transactions to
goals.
carry out projects.
Federal funds under the
[Proposed PHSA §499A(g)(5)]
agreement do not
Authorizes other
exceed the total
transaction authorities to
amount provided by
be exercised for a project if
other parties;
the project manager
the project manager submits a proposal to submits a proposal to
the
Such agreements are used only when the use
subprojects awarded under the transaction
the ARPA-H Director for each use of such
to a consortium of United States industry
authority ARPA-H Director for each
of standard contracts
use of such authority
or grants is not feasible
before conducting or
or appropriate; and
supporting before conducting or supporting
and academic institutions.
a project, a project,
including why other
To the maximum
transaction authority is
extent practicable, such
essential to project success.
agreements do not
The project manager must
duplicate research
receive approval from the
being conducted under
ARPA-H Director before
existing HHS and other
using including why other transaction
A fol ow-on production contract may be
authority is essential to project success.
awarded without the use of competitive
The project manager must receive approval
procedures (as defined in federal
from the ARPA-H Director before using
requirements) if (1) competitive procedures
other transaction other transaction
federal programs.
authority, and then must
In addition, cooperative
report to the Director on
agreements and other
project activities for each
transactions would be
fiscal year in which the
authorized to include a
project authority, and then must
were used for the selection of parties for
report to the Director on project activities
participation in the other transaction; and (2) for each fiscal year in which the project the participants in the other transaction
manager used the authority.
successful y completed the project provided
[Proposed PHSA §483(e)(2)]
for in the transaction.
As a precondition, the ARPA-H Director would be allowed to award a fol ow-on
Procurement and Demonstration:
production contract or transaction when the The ARPA-H Director would have Director determines that the individual
authority to seek opportunities to partner
project or subproject as a part of a
with procurement programs of other
consortium is successful y completed by the
federal agencies to demonstrate
participants. However, the award may not
technologies resulting from ARPA-H
be made contingent on successful
activities.
completion of all activities within a
manager used the
clause that requires
authority.
payments to ARPA-H (or
[Proposed PHSA
any other federal entity) as a §483(e)(2)]
condition for receiving support under such agreement. Authorizes payments to be credited to a Treasury account established for support of advanced research projects provided for in cooperative agreements and other transactions. [H.R. 6000 §501(i)(1)-(4)]
Congressional Research Service
19
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Facilities
The ARPA-H Director would
Same as H.R. 5585.
Same as H.R. 5585.
have the authority to:
[H.R. 6000 §501(c)(4)]
[Proposed PHSA
Acquire (by purchase,
§483(h)(1)]
lease, condemnation, or
otherwise), construct, improve, repair, operate,
Would require that ARPA-
and maintain such real and
H, including its
personal property as are
headquarters, not be
necessary; and
located near the National Capital Region and not on
Lease an interest in
any part of the NIH
property for not more
campus. Would require the
than 20 years,
ARPA-H Director to
notwithstanding Section
consider characteristics of
1341(a)(1) of title 31,
the intended location and
United States Code.
the extent to which such
[Proposed PHSA §499A(h)]
location would facilitate
advancement of ARPA-H’s purposes. [Proposed PHSA §483(h)(2)]
Congressional Research Service
20[Proposed PHSA §483(e)(4)]
consortium. Contracts and other
transactions under this authority may be
Technology Transfer Office: No
awarded pursuant to existing federal
comparable provisions.
procurement law or under such procedures, terms, and conditions as the Director may
establish by regulation. [Proposed PHSA §499(s)] Technology Transfer Office: The ARPA-H Director would be allowed to establish an Office of Technology Transfer to facilitate
the transfer of federally-owned or federally-originated technology to recipients of an ARPA-H award (other than federal government entities). [Proposed PHSA §499(r)]
Congressional Research Service
18
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Project
Project Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
Confidentiality
The fol owing types of information col ected
Would provide that nothing in the new
and Protection
by ARPA-H from award recipients would be
ARPA-H PHSA section is to be construed
of Information
considered commercial and financial
as authorizing disclosure of trade secrets
information from a person, which is not
or other privileged or confidential
subject to disclosure under the Freedom of
information under FOIA or other laws.
Information Act (FOIA; 5 U.S.C. §552(b)(4)):
[Proposed PHSA §483(j)(1)]
Plans for commercialization of
technologies developed under the award, including business plans, technology-to-market plans, market studies, and cost and performance models;
Investments provided to an awardee from third parties, including amounts and the percentage of ownership of the awardee provided in return for the investments;
Additional financial support that the awardee (1) plans to invest or has invested in the technology developed under the award, or (2) is seeking from third parties; and
Revenue from the licensing or sale of new products or services resulting from research conducted under the award.
[Proposed PHSA §499(e)]
Facilities
The ARPA-H Director would have the
The ARPA-H Director would have the
authority to:
authority to (key differences from H.R.
5855 italicized):
Acquire (by purchase, lease,
condemnation, or otherwise),
Acquire (by purchase, lease,
construct, improve, repair, operate, and
condemnation, or otherwise),
maintain such real and personal
construct, improve, repair, operate,
property as are necessary; and
and maintain such real and personal
property as are necessary; and
Lease any nonexcess real property and related personal property under the
Lease an interest in property for not
jurisdiction of ARPA-H.
more than 20 years, notwithstanding
The Director would be required to deposit
Section 1341(a)(1) of title 31, United
amounts received for a lease into the ARPA-
States Code.
H account as discretionary offsetting
[Proposed PHSA §483(h)(1)]
col ections, and such amounts would be
available to the extent, and in the amounts provided in advance appropriations acts, to
Would require that ARPA-H, including its
cover ARPA-H costs for the lease and for
headquarters, not be located near the
maintenance and other property
National Capital Region and not on any part
improvements as specified.
of the NIH campus. Would require the ARPA-H Director to consider
[Proposed PHSA §499A(i)]
characteristics of the intended location and
Would require that ARPA-H, including its
the extent to which such location would
headquarters, not be located on any part of
facilitate advancement of ARPA-H’s
the existing NIH campus. Would require the
purposes.
ARPA-H Director to consider characteristics [Proposed PHSA §483(h)(2)]
of the intended location and the extent to
Congressional Research Service
19
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
which such location would facilitate advancement of ARPA-H’s purposes. [Proposed PHSA §499A (i)(4)]
Personnel
Would grant theAuthority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Other
The ARPA-H Director would
Does not specify other
Does not specify other
Authorities of
have the authority to:
ARPA-H Director
ARPA-H Director
the Director
authorities.
authorities.
Partner with public and private entities as specified (H.R. 6000 lists partnering with a broad range of institutions in the “activities” category; S. 3799 lists partnering with a broad range of institutions as an “ARPA-H Director duties” category); [Proposed PHSA §499A(e)]
Delegate authorities, except the appointment of the Deputy Director; [Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(7)]
Appoint a Deputy Director to serve as acting ARPA-H Director in the absence of the Director; and [Proposed PHSA §499A(c)(8)]
Waive Paperwork Reduction Act requirements with respect to activities under (c)(3)(F) (NOTE: appears to be drafting error as referenced provision does not exist). [Proposed PHSA §499A(d)]
Congressional Research Service
21
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Personnel
Would grant the ARPA-H
Similar to H.R. 5585 (key
Similar to H.R. 5585:
Authorities
Director the authority to waive
differences italicized):
Would grant the ARPA-H
certain civil service personnel
Would grant the ARPA-H
Director the authority to
requirements with regard to:
Director the authority to
waive certain civil service
Personnel hired under
waive certain civil service
personnel requirements in
PHSA Section 207(f);
personnel requirements with making and rescinding
regard to:
scientific, medical, and
Additional appointments of scientific, medical, and
professional personnel
Personnel hired under
professional personnel;
PHSA Section 207(f);
appointments.
and
[Proposed PHSA
Additional
§483(d)(4)(A)]
Appointments to positions
appointments of
of administration or
scientific, medical, and
management of ARPA-H.
professional personnel
In making personnel or staff
Such authorities are in addition
(would place a limitation
appointments, the ARPA-H
to existing hiring authorities
each year on additional
Director would be
granted to the Secretary of
payments an employee
authorized to consider as
HHS.
could receive under such
appropriate factors such
appointment to the lesser
The ARPA-H Director would
factors as populations that
of $25,000 or the
also be directed to make efforts
are traditionally
amount equal to 25% of
to recruit and retain a diverse
underrepresented in the
the employee’s annual
workforce, including individuals
biomedical research
rate of basic pay); and
underrepresented in science
enterprise.
and medicine and racial and
Appointments to
[Proposed PHSA
ethnic minorities.
positions of
§483(d)(3)(B)]
administration or
The ARPA-H Director would
management of ARPA-
also be authorized to contract
H.
The ARPA-H Director
with private entities in
would be authorized to
appointing qualified personnel.
Would allow ARPA-H Director the
Similar to H.R. 5585:
Authorities
authority to waive certain civil service
Would grant the ARPA-H Director the
personnel requirements in making and
authority to waive certain civil service
rescinding scientific, medical, and
personnel requirements in making and
professional personnel appointments.
rescinding scientific, medical, and
Would grant the ARPA-H Director the
professional personnel appointments.
ability to use existing hiring authorities
[Proposed PHSA §483(d)(4)(A)]
granted to the Secretary of HHS to hire administrative, financial, contracts, legislative
affairs, information technology, ethics, and
In making personnel or staff appointments,
communications staff as necessary.
the ARPA-H Director would be authorized
The ARPA-H Director would also be
to consider as appropriate factors such
directed to make efforts to recruit and
factors as populations that are traditionally
retain a diverse workforce, including
underrepresented in the biomedical
individuals underrepresented in science and
research enterprise.
medicine and racial and ethnic minorities (as
[Proposed PHSA §483(d)(3)(B)]
long as such efforts comply with applicable
federal civil rights law).
The ARPA-H Director would be
The ARPA-H Director would also be
authorized to contract with private
authorized to contract with private entities
recruiting firms for hiring of qualified
in hiring qualified personnel.
technical staff.
Would allow the ARPA-H Director to use
the ARPA-H
contract with private
Director to use all
Would provide the ARPA-H
recruiting firms for hiring of
authorities in existence on
Director with the authority to
qualified technical staff.
the date of enactment that
use the Intergovernmental
are provided to the
[Proposed PHSA
Personnel Act to staff ARPA-H
Secretary of HHS to hire
§483(d)(4)(D)]
with employees from other
administrative, financial,
federal agencies, state and local
information technology staff,
governments, Indian tribes and
Different from H.R. 5585
and any other staff the ARPA-
tribal organizations, institutions
H Director determines are
In designating program
of higher education, and other
necessary.
managers, the ARPA-H
organizations.
Director would be required
Would also authorize the
[Proposed PHSA §499A(i)]
to consider individuals with
ARPA-H Director to recruit
demonstrated scientific
and retain a diverse
expertise and management
workforce, including
skil s required to advance
individuals underrepresented ARPA-H and who
in science and medicine and
represent a diverse set of
racial and ethnic minorities.
professional experiences or
[H.R. 6000 §501(d)]
backgrounds, including
experience in academia, industry, government, nonprofit organizations, or other sectors. [Proposed PHSA [Proposed PHSA
§483(d)(§483(d)(
3)(A4)(D)]
the Intergovernmental Personnel Act to staff
ARPA-H with employees from other federal agencies, state and local governments, Indian
Different from H.R. 5585
tribes and tribal organizations, institutions of
Would require the ARPA-H Director to
higher education, and other organizations.
ensure that personnel appointed to staff or
Would al ow the ARPA-H Director to
support ARPA-H are individuals who, at
accept detailees from other federal agencies
the time of appointment and for three
for a period of up to three years.
)] Would require the ARPA-H Director to ensure that personnel appointed to staff or support ARPA-H
Congressional Research Service
22
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
are individuals who, at the time of appointment and for three years prior to years prior to
such appointment, were such appointment, were
not employed by NIH. not employed by NIH.
[Proposed PHSA §499A(j)]
[Proposed PHSA §483 [Proposed PHSA §483
(d)(4)(E)(i)] (d)(4)(E)(i)]
The ARPA-H Director The ARPA-H Director
would be authorized to would be authorized to
appoint no more than 120 appoint no more than 120
personnel under the personnel under the
agency’s hiring authority. agency’s hiring authority.
The ARPA-H Director The ARPA-H Director
would be required to notify would be required to notify
Congress if he/she Congress if he/she
determines that additional determines that additional
personnel are required. personnel are required.
[Proposed PHSA §483 [Proposed PHSA §483
(d)(4)(E)(i )]
Congressional Research Service
23
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Program
Term: Three years. May serve
Term:
Term: Three years. May
Managers
two terms.
Three years. May serve two
serve two terms.
Duties:
terms.
[Proposed PHSA
Duties (grouped for
§483(d)(C)]
Establish research and development goals for
comparison):
Duties (grouped for
programs in accordance
Similar to H.R. 5585:
comparison):
with guidance from the
Define the research and Similar to H.R. 5585
Director;
development goals and
Establish research and
Select, on the basis of
milestones of the
development goals for
merit, each of the projects
program involved, in
the programs in
to be supported under a
line with guidance from
consultation with the
program carried out by
the ARPA-H Director;
Director, including
ARPA-H, taking into
Select, on the basis of
timelines and
consideration the novelty
merit and need, each of
milestones, and make
and scientific and technical
the projects to be
such goals available to
merit of the proposed
supported under the
the public;
projects; the
program involved after
demonstrated capabilities
Select the projects to
considering the novelty
of the applicants to
be supported under
and scientific and
successful y carry out the
the program after
technical merit of the
proposed project; the
considering: (1) the
proposed projects; the
unmet needs within
novelty and scientific
demonstrated
patient populations; the
and technical merit of
capabilities of the
consideration by the
the proposed project;
applicants to
applicant of future
(2) the demonstrated
successful y carry out
commercial applications of
capabilities of the
the proposed project;
the project, including the
applicants; (3)
the consideration by
feasibility of partnering
potential future
the applicant of future
with one or more
commercial
commercial applications
commercial entities; and
applications as
of the project; or the
such other criteria as are
proposed; (4) the
unmet need within
established by the
degree to which the
patient populations;
Director of ARPA-H;
project addresses a
Track progress and
(d)(4)(E)(i )]
Program
Recruitment: Would require the ARPA-H
Recruitment: In designating program
Managers
Director to recruit program managers with
managers, the ARPA-H Director would be
expertise in a wide range of disciplines,
required to consider individuals with
including life sciences, physical sciences,
demonstrated scientific expertise and
engineering, and computational sciences.
management skil s required to advance
[Proposed PHSA §499A(j)(3)(C)]
ARPA-H and who represent a diverse set of professional experiences or
backgrounds, including experience in
Term: Three years. May serve two terms.
Congressional Research Service
20
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
academia, industry, government, nonprofit
Duties:
organizations, or other sectors.
[Proposed PHSA §483(d)(3)(A)]
Establish research and development goals for programs, including timelines
and milestones, in consultation with the
Term: Three years. May serve two terms.
Director, and make such goals publicly available;
[Proposed PHSA §483(d)(C)]
Col aborate with experts from NIH and other federal agencies and experts in
Duties (grouped for comparison):
relevant scientific fields to identify
Similar to H.R. 5585
research and development gaps and
Establish research and development
opportunities;
goals for the programs in consultation
Convene workshops and meetings, as
with the Director, including timelines
needed, with entities such as patients,
and milestones, and make such goals
patient advocacy groups, practitioners,
available to the public;
professional societies, and other
Communicate with leaders in the
stakeholders to solicit input on
health care and biomedical research
programs and goals;
and development fields, from both the
Manage applications and proposals for
public and private sectors,
making grants, cooperative agreements,
representatives of patient
contracts, prizes and other transaction
organizations, institutions of higher
awards for advanced research that may
education, and nonprofit organizations
show particular promise, especial y in
to identify areas of need and scientific
areas in which the federal government
opportunity with the potential to
and the private sector may not have
transform biomedicine.
undertaken sufficient research;
Select the projects to be supported
Issue funding opportunity
under the program after considering:
announcements using uniform
(1) the novelty and scientific and
administrative processes;
technical merit of the proposed
project; (2) the demonstrated
Select, on the basis of merit, each of the projects to be supported under a
capabilities of the applicants; (3)
program carried out by ARPA-H, taking
potential future commercial
into consideration the scientific and
applications as proposed; (4) the
technical merit of the proposed
degree to which the project addresses
projects; the capabilities of the
a scientific or technical question and
applicants to successful y carry out the
has the potential to transform
proposed project; the unmet needs or
biomedicine; and (5) other criteria as
ability to improve outcomes within
established by the ARPA-H Director;
patient populations; future commercial
Encourage research col aborations,
applications of the project or feasibility
including by identifying and supporting
of partnering with one or more
applicable public-private partnerships;
commercial entities; the potential for
and
interdisciplinarity of the approach of the Recommend program restructuring,
project; and such other criteria as are
expansion, or termination of research
established by the ARPA-H Director;
scientific or technical
Identify milestones and
course-correct projects
question and has the
monitor progress of such
when needed; and
potential to transform
milestones with respect to
biomedicine; and (5)
each project;
Recommend, as necessary, the
other criteria as
Provide recommendations
restructuring or
established by the
to the Director of ARPA-
termination of projects
ARPA-H Director;
H with respect to
supported by ARPA-H.
Encourage research
advancing the goals of the
col aborations,
agency;
[H.R. 6000 §501(e)]
including by identifying
Provide recommendations
and supporting
to expand, restructure, or
applicable public-
terminate research
private partnerships;
partnerships or projects;
Recommend program
Col aborate with experts
restructuring,
from NIH and other
expansion, or
federal agencies and
termination of
experts in relevant
research projects or
scientific fields to identify
whole projects, as
research and development
necessary; and
opportunities;
Communicate with
Convene workshops, as
leaders in the health
needed, with relevant
care and biomedical
federal agencies,
research and
institutions of higher
development fields,
education, nonprofit
from both the public
Congressional Research Service
24projects or whole projects, as
and
necessary.
Conduct project reviews within 18
months of funding awards to identify milestones and monitor progress of
Different from H.R. 5585
such milestones with respect to each
Provide project oversight and
project and prior to the disbursement
management of strategic initiatives to
of new funds;
advance the purpose of the program.
Congressional Research Service
21
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Project
Project Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
Provide recommendations to the
[Proposed PHSA §483(d)(2)(B)]
ARPA-H Director with respect to advancing the goals of the agency;
Cultivate opportunities for the commercial application or community use of successful projects, including through the establishment of partnerships between or among awardees;
Identify innovative cost-sharing arrangements for ARPA-H projects;
Provide recommendations to expand, restructure, or terminate research partnerships or projects; and
Ensure that animal studies meet requirements in the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and applications apply statistical modeling approaches and appropriately justify animal sample sizes to meet project goals.
[Proposed PHSA §499A(k)]
Coordination
Would require the ARPA-H Director to Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
research institutions,
and private sectors, to
companies, venture capital
identify areas of need
firms, and nonprofit
and scientific
organizations for the
opportunity with the
development of high-need
potential to transform
cures;
biomedicine.
Issue funding opportunity
announcements; and
Different from H.R. 5585
Identify opportunities for
Provide project
the commercial application
oversight and
of successful projects,
management of
including through the
strategic initiatives to
establishment of
advance the purpose
partnerships between or
of the program.
among awardees.
[Proposed PHSA
[Proposed PHSA §499A(j)]
§483(d)(2)(B)]
Congressional Research Service
25
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Coordination and Would require the ARPA-H
Would require the ARPA-H
Would require the ARPA-
Cooperation
Director to coordinate with
Director to ensure effective,
H Director to ensure, to
the Commissioner of Food and
early, and frequent
the maximum extent
Drugs and
Would require the ARPA-H Director to
and Cooperation share timely and relevant information with
ensure, to the maximum extent
the Administrator of the Centers forthe Administrator of
coordination between
practicable, that ARPA-H
practicable, that ARPA-H
the Centers for Medicare &
ARPA-H and: (1) the heads
activities are coordinated
activities are
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicaid Services (CMS)
to
of the research, public
that
coordinated with and do not duplicate with and do not duplicate
expedite the development,
health, and regulatorymay help to expedite determinations of
efforts of: (1) other HHS
efforts of: (1) other HHS
application, coverage, and
agencies of HHS, including
programs, including NIH
implementation of high-need
NIH, the Food and Drug
and BARDA programs, and
cures.
Administration (FDA), CMS,
(2) other relevant efforts or
[Proposed PHSA §499A(f)]
the Centers for Disease
research operated or
Control and Prevention
overseen by other federal
(CDC), and the Assistant
departments and agencies.
Secretary for Preparedness
[Proposed PHSA
and Response; (2) the
§483(f)(1)]
Director of the National Science Foundation; and (3)
the Director of the Office of The ARPA-H Director Science of the Department
would have authority to
of Energy.
seek opportunities to
[H.R. 6000 §501(g)(1)]
partner with procurement programs of other federal
The ARPA-H Director
agencies to demonstrate
would also be required to
technologies resulting from
coordinate among the ful
ARPA-H activities.
set of advanced research
[Proposed PHSA
projects agencies, including
§483(e)(4)]
the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency,
the Advanced Research
Would authorize the FDA
Projects Agency-Energy, and
to meet with ARPA-H and
others that may be
appropriate federal
established.
partners such as BARDA at
[H.R. 6000 §501(g)(2)]
appropriate intervals to
discuss the development
Would authorize the
status and actions that may
Secretary of HHS, acting
be taken to facilitate the
through the FDA and in
development of medical
consultation with ARPA-H,
products and projects that
to take actions to facilitate
are of highest priority for
the transformation of
ARPA-H. Would require
biomedical breakthroughs
the ARPA-H Director to
into tangible solutions for
reimburse FDA for FDA
patients and expedite the
activities conducted under
development and review of
the authority of the section.
medical products. The
[Proposed PHSA
ARPA-H Director must
§483(f)(4)]
reimburse the FDA for related expenditures. This
authorization is not to be
construed as programs,
coverage of transformative health
including NIH and the Biomedical
technologies developed by ARPA-H.
Advanced Research and Development
[Proposed PHSA §499A(f)]
Authority (BARDA) programs, and (2) other relevant efforts or research operated
or overseen by other federal departments
Would authorize the HHS Secretary,
and agencies.
through the Commissioner of Food and
[Proposed PHSA §483(f)(1)]
Drugs and in consultation with the ARPA-H Director, to take actions to facilitate the
translation of transformative health
Would authorize the FDA to meet with
technologies into solutions for patients and
ARPA-H and appropriate federal partners
to expedite the development of drugs,
such as BARDA at appropriate intervals to
devices, and biological products, including
discuss the development status and actions
through:
that may be taken to facilitate the
development of medical products and
Helping to ensure that drug, device, or biological product development
projects that are of highest priority for
programs gather the nonclinical and
ARPA-H. Would require the ARPA-H
clinical data necessary to advancing the
Director to reimburse FDA for FDA
development of such products and to
activities conducted under the authority of
obtaining their approval, licensure, or
the section.
clearance by the U.S. Food and Drug
[Proposed PHSA §483(f)(4)]
Administration (FDA);
Expediting review of investigational new
drug applications, review of
investigational device exemptions, and review of applications for approval
Congressional Research Service
22
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
licensure, and clearance of drugs, devices, or biological products; and
Meeting at appropriate intervals with the ARPA-H Director and any member of the ARPA-H Interagency Research Council to discuss the development status of drugs, devices, or biological products that the highest priorities to the ARPA-H Director, unless determined the meetings are not necessary.
The authority is not to be construed as limiting FDA’s authority with respect to drugs, devices, or biological products. The ARPA-H Director may reimburse FDA for related expenditures. [Proposed PHSA §499A(g)]
Advisory
Advisory Committee: Would require the
Advisory Committee: Would establish
Committee
ARPA-H limiting FDA’s
authorities for medical product review and approval. [H.R. 6000 §501(k)]
Congressional Research Service
26
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advice
Advisory Committee:
Advisory Committee
Advisory Committee:
Would require the ARPA-H
Consultation: Would
Would establish an ARPA-
Director to establish an
authorize theDirector to establish an interagency an ARPA-H ARPA-H
H Interagency Advisory
interagency advisory committee Director to seek advice on
Committee to coordinate
tasked with advising the
any aspect of the agency
efforts and provide advice
Director, including by making
from any advisory
and assistance on specific
recommendations on research
committee that, as of the
program or project tasks
priorities that would provide
date of enactment, provides
and the overall direction of
the greatest return on
advice to the Secretary of
ARPA-H. Members are to
investment with respect to
HHS (or any head of a
include the heads of the
improving human health,
research, public health, or
fol owing agencies or their
avoiding duplication of efforts in regulatory agency of HHS),
designees: NIH, CDC, FDA,
the federal government, and
as well as an advisory
HHS Office of the Assistant
improving coordination with
committee established on or Secretary for Preparedness
other federal agencies; and
after enactment to support
and Response, HHS Office
identifying and developing
the programs of ARPA-H.
of the Assistant Secretary
strategies to address market
[H.R. 6000 §501(h)(1)]
of Health, DARPA, the
barriers to commercialization
DOE Office of Science,
or adoption of high-need cures.
Other Advice: Would also
NSF, and any other agency
Members could include (1) the
authorize the ARPA-H
with subject matter
heads of several HHS operating
Director to seek advice and
expertise that the ARPA-H
divisions or their designees,
review from the President’s
Director determines
including NIH, FDA, CMS,
Committee of Advisors on
appropriate. The Federal
CDC, and BARDA; (2) the
Science and Technology; any
Advisory Committee Act (5
Director of Office of Science
professional or scientific
U.S.C. App.) would not
Interagency Advisory advisory committee—the ARPA-H
Committee to coordinate efforts and
Interagency Research Council—tasked with
provide advice and assistance on specific
advising the Director, including by making
program or project tasks and the overall
recommendations on research priorities that direction of ARPA-H. Members would would provide the greatest return on
include the heads of the fol owing agencies
investment with respect to improving human or their designees: NIH, CDC, FDA, ASPR, health, avoiding duplication of efforts in the
HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary of
federal government, and improving
Health, DARPA, the DOE Office of
coordination with other federal agencies;
Science, NSF, and any other agency with
and identifying and developing strategies to
subject matter expertise that the ARPA-H
address regulatory, reimbursement, and
Director determines appropriate. The
market barriers to commercialization or
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C.
adoption of transformative health
App.) would not apply to this committee. The
technologies, including technologies intended Committee would be advisory in nature to preempt serious disease. Members could
only.
include (1) the heads of several HHS
[Proposed PHSA §483(g)]
operating divisions or their designees, including NIH, FDA, CMS, BARDA, the
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Other Advice: Would also authorize the
(CDC), the National Center for Advancing
ARPA-H Director to seek input from
Translational Sciences [part of NIH], the
PCAST; representatives of professional or
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, scientific organizations with expertise in the Office of Minority Health, the Assistant
technology under consideration or
Secretary for Preparedness and Response
development by ARPA-H; and
(ASPR), the Health Resources and Services
representatives of patient organizations,
Administration; (2) the Director of Office of
public health, innovators, and other public
Science and Technology Policy; (3) Director
and private entities.
and Technology Policy; (3)
organization with expertise
apply to this committee.
Director of DARPA; (4) the
in specific processes orof DARPA; (4) the Director of the National
[Proposed PHSA §483(
[Proposed PHSA §483(
g)]
f)(3)]
Science Foundation (NSF); (5) the Director Director
of the Office of Science of the Department of Energy (DOE); (6) Director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E); and (7) representatives of any federal agency with subject matter expertise
Congressional Research Service
23
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
as determined by the ARPA-H Director. The Council would be advisory in nature only. The council would be required to meet one year after enactment, then, during subsequent fiscal years, the Director would convene the committee as needed. The Council may function through established or ad-hoc committees, task forces, or interagency groups to share information on health innovations funded by ARPA-H and receive input on areas of particular promise for ARPA-H projects. [Proposed PHSA §499A(q)]
of the National
technologies under
Science Foundation (NSF); (5)
development by ARPA-H;
the Director of the Office of
and representatives of
Other Advice: Would
Science of the Department of
patient communities.
also authorize the ARPA-H
Energy (DOE), and (6)
[H.R. 6000 §501(h)(2)]
Director to seek input
representatives of any federal
from the President’s
agency with subject matter
Council of Advisors on
expertise as determined by the
Science and Technology;
ARPA-H Director. The Federal
representatives of
Advisory Committee Act (5
professional or scientific
U.S.C. App.) would not apply to
organizations with
this committee.
expertise in technology
[Proposed PHSA §499A(n)]
under consideration or development by ARPA-H;
Other Advice: Would also
and representatives of
Other Advice: Would also authorize the authorize the
ARPA-H Director to consult with the President’s Committee of ARPA-H Director
patient organizations, public
to seek advice from the
health, innovators, and
President’s Committee of
other public and private
Advisors on Advisors on
Science and Technology (PCAST); peers in the scientific community, including academia and industry; an existing advisory committee providing advice to the HHS Secretary or head of other HHS operating division; the new interagency research council (above); and any other entity the Director may deem appropriate. [Proposed PHSA §499A(p)]
Annual Report
Annual Report: Beginning not later than
Annual Report: As part of the annual
and Strategic
Science and
entities.
Technology; peers in the
[Proposed PHSA
scientific community, including
§483(f)(3)]
academia and industry; experts in other federal agencies; any professional or scientific organization with expertise in technologies under development by ARPA-H or a relevant scientific discipline; and representatives of patient communities. [Proposed PHSA §499A(m)]
Congressional Research Service
27
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Annual Report
Annual Report: Beginning not Annual Report: As part of
Annual Report: As part
and Strategic
later than one year after the
the annual budget request
of the annual budget
Plan
one year after the date of the enactment, date of the enactment,
and each
budget request submitted for each fiscal submitted for each fiscal
request submitted forPlan
and each each
fiscal year thereafter, the fiscal year thereafter, the
year, the ARPA-H Director
fiscal ARPA-H
year, the ARPA-H year, the ARPA-H
ARPA-H Director would be Director would be
would be required to
Director would be required Director would be required
required to submit a to submit a
report
required to to
provide Congress a report provide Congress a report
report to to provide Congress a
Congress on the actions Congress on the actions
describing:
describing:
report describing:
undertaken, and results
undertaken, and results
(1) Projects supported by generated, by ARPA-
(1) Projects supported by
(1) Projects supported by
generated, by ARPA-H,
ARPA-H during the previous ARPA-H during the
including
fiscal year,ARPA-H during
H, including:
the previous fiscal year including the stage including the
previous fiscal year
(1) A description of projects
transition of project
including the stage of
supported by ARPA-H in the
outcomes to clinical
development and details as
previous fiscal year and
practice; the impact on
to whether the project is
whether such projects are
clinical outcome; and the
meeting its milestones.
meeting the goals developed by
creation of biomedical
(2) Projects supported by
the Director;
capabilities;
ARPA-H during the
(2) A description of projects
(2) Successes and barriers to previous fiscal year that
terminated in the previous fiscal scientific interchanges;
were terminated and the
year, and the reason for such
(3) Rapid knowledge
reasons for termination.
termination;
transfer;
(3) Projects supported by
(1) A description of projects supported by
of development and details as to whether
ARPA-H in the previous fiscal year and
the project is meeting its milestones;
whether such projects are meeting the goals
(2) Projects supported by ARPA-H during
developed by the Director;
the previous fiscal year that were
(2) A description of projects terminated in
terminated and the reasons for
the previous fiscal year, and the reason for
termination;
such termination;
(3) Projects supported by ARPA-H during
(3) A description of projects starting in the
the previous fiscal year that examine topics
next fiscal year, as available;
and technologies related to other activities
(4) Activities conducted in coordination with funded by HHS, including an analysis of other federal agencies;
whether in supporting such projects, the ARPA-H Director is in compliance with
(5
(3) A description of projects
(4) Resource optimization;
ARPA-H during the
starting in the next fiscal year,
and
previous fiscal year that
as available; activities conducted
examine topics and
in coordination with other
(5) Heightened investment
technologies related to
federal agencies; and
impact among col aborators. other activities funded by
(4) An analysis of the extent of
[H.R. 6000 §501(f)(2)]
HHS, including an analysis
coordination with NIH, FDA,
Strategic Vision: Not later of whether in supporting
and CMS, including successes
than 180 days after
such projects, the ARPA-H
and barriers with respect to
enactment, the ARPA-H
Director is in compliance
achieving the goals of the
Director would be required
with relevant requirements.
agency.
to provide Congress with a
(4) Current, proposed, and
[Proposed PHSA §499A(k)(1)]
report describing the
planned projects to be
strategic vision that ARPA-H carried out.
Strategic Plan: Not later than wil use to guide the choices [Proposed PHSA
one year after the date of the
for future health investments §483(k)(1)]
enactment) An analysis of the extent of coordination
relevant requirements; and
with NIH and CMS, including successes and barriers with respect to achieving the goals
(4) Current, proposed, and planned
of the agency.
projects to be carried out.
(6) A description of the demographic
[Proposed PHSA §483(k)(1)]
diversity (including racial and gender) if
available of direct recipients and performers
Strategic Plan: Not later than 180 days
in funded projects and of the ARPA-H
after the appointment of the first ARPA-H
workforce; and
Director, and every four , and every four
over the fol owing three
years thereafter, the years thereafter, the
ARPA-H Director would be required to
Congressional Research Service
24
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
(7) Disclosure by the reward recipient of
ARPA-H
fiscal years beginning on or
Director would be required to
after the date of enactment.
Strategic Plan: Not later
provide Congress a strategic
than 180 days after the
plan describing how ARPA-H
[H.R. 6000 §501(f)(1)]
appointment of the first
wil carry out investments each
ARPA-H Director, and
fiscal year in the next four-year
every four years thereafter,
period.
the ARPA-H Director
[Proposed PHSA §499A(l)]
would be required to submit to Congress a plan
describing the submit to Congress a plan describing the
whether the principal investigators named on strategic plan strategic plan
that ARPA-H wil use to that ARPA-H wil use to
the award participate in foreign talent
guide future investments guide future investments
over the fol owing over the fol owing
programs, including the provision of copies
four four
fiscal years. Every two years fiscal years. Every two years
after after
of all grants, contracts, or other agreements
initial submission, the initial submission, the
ARPA-H Director ARPA-H Director
or supporting documentation related to such would be would be
required to submit a required to submit a
programs as a condition of receipt of federal
supplemental strategic plan supplemental strategic plan
that details any that details any
biomedical research funds.
changes. changes.
Requirements for NIH Requirements for NIH
Institute Institute
[Proposed PHSA §499A(l)(1)]
and Center and Center
strategic plans would not strategic plans would not
apply apply
to ARPA-H.
Strategic Plan: Not later than one year
[Proposed PHSA §483(k)(2)]
after the date of the enactment, and every three years thereafter, the ARPA-H
Director would be required to provide
Congress a strategic plan describing how
ARPA-H wil carry out investments each fiscal year in the next three-year period. [Proposed PHSA §499A(mto ARPA-H.
Congressional Research Service
28
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
[Proposed PHSA §483(k)(2)]
Evaluation and
Evaluation by the National
No similar provisions.)]
Evaluation and
Evaluation by the National Academies
NASEM Evaluation: Not Not later than three
Performance
Academies of Sciences,
later than three years after
Measurement
of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
enactmentyears after enactment, the ARPA-H Director
Measurement , the ARPA-H
(NASEM): Not later than Not later than
Director would be required
eight years after the date of
five years after
would be required to enter into a contract to enter into a contract
the date of enactment, the Secretary of enactment, the Secretary of
HHS
with NASEM for an
with NASEM for an
HHS would be required to
evaluation of ARPA-H, evaluation of ARPA-H,
would be required to enter into an enter into an
agreement with
including the goals and
including the goals and
NASEM to study and evaluate
purposes of ARPA-H and
purposes of ARPA-
agreement with NASEM to study and
H and the degree to which ARPA-H
evaluate whether ARPA-H has met its goals.
activities support and align with such goals
NASEM would be required to submit the
and purposes. The evaluation may include
results whether ARPA-H has met its
the degree to which ARPA-
goals. NASEM would be
H activities support and
required to submit the results
align with such goals and
of the evaluation to Congress
purposes. The evaluation
and the of the evaluation to Congress and the (1) recommendations to improve ARPA-H, Secretary of HHS. Secretary of HHS.
which may include may include
(1)lessons learned from
[Proposed PHSA §499A(
[Proposed PHSA §499A(
kl)(2)]
)(2)]
recommendations to improve ARPA-H, which may include lessons learned from other advanced other advanced
research and development research and development
agencies or authorities in agencies or authorities in
HHS or elsewhere in the HHS or elsewhere in the
federal government; (2) federal government; (2)
lessons learned from lessons learned from
ARPA-H’s establishment ARPA-H’s establishment
and their applicability to and their applicability to
other HHS programs, and other HHS programs, and
(3) an analysis of whether (3) an analysis of whether
ARPA-H projects were ARPA-H projects were
duplicative of other duplicative of other
research programs research programs
supported by HHS or other supported by HHS or other
federal agencies. NASEM federal agencies. NASEM
would be required to would be required to
submit the evaluation to submit the evaluation to
Congress and make it Congress and make it
publicly available. publicly available.
[Proposed PHSA §483(l)] [Proposed PHSA §483(l)]
Performance Measures
Framework: Would Would
require the ARPA-H require the ARPA-H
Director, in consultation Director, in consultation
with the advisory with the advisory
committee, to develop a committee, to develop a
performance measures performance measures
framework for ARPA-H framework for ARPA-H
programs and projects in programs and projects in
order to facilitate order to facilitate
evaluation required under evaluation required under
subsection (m), including subsection (m), including
data needed to perform data needed to perform
such evaluation assuch evaluation as consistent with the NASEM evaluation. [Note: There appears to be drafting error as subsection (m) is an authorization of appropriations.] [Proposed PHSA §483(g)(5)]
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
2925
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Project
Project Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
Other Reports
Independent Review: Not later than one
Report on Personnel: The ARPA-H
year after enactment and every three years
Director would be required to maintain
thereafter, the Government Accountability
records regarding the use of ARPA-H
Office (GAO) would conduct an
personnel authorities, including the number
independent review of the research portfolio of positions fil ed with such authorities, of HHS, including ARPA-H, NIH, FDA, and
types of appointments, demographic
BARDA, to assess the degree of unnecessary information, and other specified duplication of existing federal programs and
Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
consistent with the NASEM evaluation. [NOTE: Appears to be drafting error as subsection (m) is an authorization of appropriations.] [Proposed PHSA §483(g)(5)]
Other Reports
No additional reports.
Report on Cooperative
Report on Personnel:
Agreements and Other
The ARPA-H Director
Transactions: Not later
would be required to
than 90 days after the end of maintain records regarding each fiscal year, the ARPA-H the use of ARPA-H Director would be required
personnel authorities,
to submit a report to
including the number of
Congress on all cooperative
positions fil ed with such
agreements and other
authorities, types of
transactions entered into
appointments, demographic
during such fiscal year. The
information, and other
report would be required to
specified information. Not
detail specific information,
information. Not later than one year after later than one year after
including a general
enactment and annually
description of the
thereafter, the Director
cooperative agreement or
projects; and to make recommendations
enactment and annually thereafter, the
regarding any potential reorganization,
Director would be required to submit a
consolidation, or termination of such
report to specified congressional
program and projects.
committees on the total number of
[Proposed PHSA §499A(n)]
appointments fil ed and would be required to
other transaction and the
submit a report to specified
reasons for not using a
congressional committees
contract or grant to provide
on the total number of
support for such advanced
appointments fil ed and
research, and the amount of
how the positions how the positions
relate to ARPA-H’s purposes. [Proposed PHSA §483(d)(4)(B)-(C)] relate to
payments received by the
ARPA-H’s purposes.
federal government, among
[Proposed PHSA
other things.
§483(d)(4)(B)-(C)]
[H.R. 6000 §501(f)(3)]
GAO Report on
Personnel: Not later than Not later than
two years after enactment, two years after enactment,
Government Accountability Office (GAO) GAO would be would be
required to report to required to report to
Congress Congress
on the on use of ARPA-use of ARPA-
H personnel authorities, H personnel authorities,
including on the number of including on the number of
positions, the types of positions, the types of
appointments, how the appointments, how the
positions relate to ARPA-positions relate to ARPA-
H’s mission, how the H’s mission, how the
appointments were made, appointments were made,
sources used for identifying sources used for identifying
candidates, and aggregate candidates, and aggregate
demographic information. demographic information.
Would also require GAO Would also require GAO
to report on any challenges, to report on any challenges,
limitations, or gaps related
Congressional Research Service
30
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
to limitations, or gaps related to the use of personnel the use of personnel
authorities, and any related authorities, and any related
recommendations. recommendations.
[Proposed PHSA [Proposed PHSA
§483(d)(4)(F)] §483(d)(4)(F)]
Confidentiality
Clarification and
Reporting: Would provide that nothing in the new ARPA-H PHSA section is to be construed as authorizing disclosure of trade secrets or other privileged or confidential information under FOIA or other confidentiality laws.
Clarification and Reporting: Beginning not later thanBeginning not later than
one year oneyear after the date of after the date of
enactment, and each fiscal enactment, and each fiscal
year thereafter, the ARPA-year thereafter, the ARPA-
H H Director would be Director would be
required to submit a report required to submit a report
to Congress on the number to Congress on the number
of times the Secretary has of times the Secretary has
used the authority to used the authority to
withhold information from withhold information from
disclosure and the nature of disclosure and the nature of
any request for information any request for information
that was denied. [Proposed PHSA §483(j)]
Congressional Research Service
31
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Funding
Would require the
Would authorize the
Would authorize the
establishment of the Health
appropriation of $6.5 bil ion
appropriation of such sums
Advanced Research and
to ARPA-H in FY2022 to
as may be necessary for
Development Fund in the
remain available until
each of FY2023 through
Treasury to be administered by
expended.
FY2027.
the ARPA-H Director. Would
[H.R. 6000 §501(l)(1)]
[Proposed PHSA §483(m)]
authorize the appropriation of $3 bil ion to the fund in FY2022 Would require that the
to remain available until
budget of ARPA-H be a
Would provide that any
expended.
separate line item in the
budget request for ARPA-H
[Proposed PHSA §499B(a),
annual budget request
be separate from other
(c)(1)]
submitted by the President
NIH budget requests.
to Congress and that ARPA-
[Proposed PHSA §483(n)]
Would require that the annual
H have the authority to
budget request for that was denied. [Proposed PHSA §483(j)]
Funding
Would authorize to be appropriated $500
Would authorize the appropriation of such
mil ion for each of FY2023 through FY2027
sums as may be necessary for each of
to remain available until expended.
FY2023 through FY2027.
[Proposed PHSA §499A(v)(1)]
[Proposed PHSA §483(m)]
Would authorize the use of not more than 15 percent of the amounts made available to
Would provide that any budget request for
ARPA-H for any fiscal year for administrative ARPA-H be separate from other NIH expenses to operate ARPA-H.
budget requests.
Congressional Research Service
26
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research Projects
Advanced Research Projects Agency-
Authority for Health Act
Provision(s)
Health Act (H.R. 5585)
(Section 331 of S. 3799, as amended)
[Proposed PHSA §499A(v)(2)]
[Proposed PHSA §483(n)] ARPA-H be
submit its annual budget
separate from the rest of the
request directly to Congress
budget for HHS and that the
concurrently with its
ARPA-H Director prepare and
submission to the Office of
submit directly to the
Management and Budget.
President, for review and
[H.R. 6000 §501(l)(2)]
transmittal to Congress, an annual budget for ARPA-H after Also specifically establishes reasonable opportunity for
an account for other
comment (but without change)
transactions and cooperative
by the Secretary of HHS.
agreements; see
[Proposed PHSA §499B(b)]
“Cooperative Agreements and Other Transactions.”
Would require that
[H.R. 6000 §501(i)(7)]
appropriations to the Fund be separate and distinct from other appropriations for HHS. Would require for each fiscal year beginning with FY2022 that discretionary new budget
authority provided in an appropriations act for ARPA-H be made available for that fiscal year and include advance discretionary new budget authority that first becomes available for the first fiscal year fol owing the budget year. [Proposed PHSA §499B(c)]
Congressional Research Service
32
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Advanced Research
Advanced Research Project
Project Authority for
Agency—Health Act (H.R.
Section 501 of Cures Act
Health Act (Sec. 331 of
Provision(s)
5585)
2.0 (H.R. 6000)
S. 3799, as amended)
Definitions
Advanced Proofs of
Medical Product: means
Definitions
Advanced Proofs of Concept: data, a
No definitions for these terms, although
prototype, or other experimental evidence
definitions a
No definitions for these
Concept: data, a prototype, or “drug,” “device,” or
terms, although definitions
other experimental evidence
“biological product,” as
provided for other specified provided for other specified
that may precede the
that may precede the
defined in relevant sectionsdevelopment of
terms as noted elsewhere.
terms as noted elsewhere.
development of a high-need
of the Federal Food, Drug,
[Proposed PHSA 483(a)]
cure or health technology and
and Cosmetic Act and thetransformative health technologies and
[Proposed PHSA 483(a)]
demonstrates the feasibility of a
demonstrates the feasibility of a
PHSA. new new
concept. Transformative Health Technology: a drug, biological product, intervention, platform, tool, or concept.
[H.R. 6000 §501(k)(4)]
High-Need Cure: means a drug, biological product, or device that should be device that should be
prioritized to detect, diagnose, prioritized to detect, diagnose,
mitigate, prevent, mitigate, prevent,
cure, or treat or treat
any a serious disease or medical conditiondisease or medical condition
; and for which for which there are unmet needs; and for which significant scientific uncertainty and regulatory risk exist, or incentives in incentives in
the commercial commercial
marketsmarket are are
unlikely to result in the unlikely to result in the
adequate or timely adequate or timely
development of such drug, development of such drug,
biological biological
product, intervention, platform, tool, or product, or device. device.
Also references existing terms Also references existing terms
in statute for “biologic in statute for “biologic
product,” “drug,” “device,” product,” “drug,” “device,”
“federal acquisition regulation,” “federal acquisition regulation,”
“federal agency,” and and
“prize“prize competitions.” .”
[Proposed PHSA §499A([Proposed PHSA §499A(
pu)] )]
Source: CRS analysis of H.R. 5585, CRS analysis of H.R. 5585,
H.R. 6000, and S. 3799as passed by the House on June 22, 2022, at Congress.gov and text of the amendment in the nature of a substitute to S. 3799 at https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/PREVENT%20Pandemics%20Managers.pdf. .
Notes: H.R. 5585 serves as the baseline for comparison. H.R. 5585 serves as the baseline for comparison.
Author Information
Kavya Sekar Kavya Sekar
Marcy E. Gallo
Marcy E. Gallo
Analyst in Health Policy
Analyst in Health Policy
Analyst in Science and Technology Policy
Analyst in Science and Technology Policy
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
3327
ARPA-H: Congressional Action and Selected Policy Issues
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
R47074
R47074
· VERSION 1 · NEW
343 · UPDATED
28