Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress

Changes from December 9, 2021 to January 19, 2022

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with ~~red strikethrough~~ and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea
~~December 9, 2021~~January 19, 2022
Vehicles: Background and Issues for Congress
Ronald O'Rourke
The Navy wants to develop and procure three types of large unmanned vehicles (UVs) called The Navy wants to develop and procure three types of large unmanned vehicles (UVs) called
Specialist in Naval Affairs Specialist in Naval Affairs
Large Unmanned Surface Vehicles (LUSVs), Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicles (MUSVs), Large Unmanned Surface Vehicles (LUSVs), Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicles (MUSVs),

and Extra-Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (XLUUVs). The Navy’s proposed FY2022 and Extra-Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (XLUUVs). The Navy’s proposed FY2022
budget requests $434.1 million in research and development funding for these large UVs and budget requests $434.1 million in research and development funding for these large UVs and

their enabling technologies. their enabling technologies.
The Navy wants to acquire these large UVs as part of an effort to shift the Navy to a more distributed fleet architecture. The Navy wants to acquire these large UVs as part of an effort to shift the Navy to a more distributed fleet architecture.
Compared to the current fleet architecture, this more distributed architecture is to include a smaller proportion of larger ships Compared to the current fleet architecture, this more distributed architecture is to include a smaller proportion of larger ships
(such as large-deck aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, large amphibious ships, and large resupply ships), a larger (such as large-deck aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, large amphibious ships, and large resupply ships), a larger
proportion of smaller ships (such as frigates, corvettes, smaller amphibious ships, and smaller resupply ships), and a new proportion of smaller ships (such as frigates, corvettes, smaller amphibious ships, and smaller resupply ships), and a new
third tier of large UVs. third tier of large UVs.
The Navy envisions LUSVs as being 200 feet to 300 feet in length and having full load displacements of 1,000 tons to 2,000 The Navy envisions LUSVs as being 200 feet to 300 feet in length and having full load displacements of 1,000 tons to 2,000
tons, which would make them the size of a corvette. (i.e., a ship larger than a patrol craft and smaller than a frigate). The tons, which would make them the size of a corvette. (i.e., a ship larger than a patrol craft and smaller than a frigate). The
Navy wants LUSVs to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships based on commercial ship designs, with ample Navy wants LUSVs to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships based on commercial ship designs, with ample
capacity for carrying various modular payloads—particularly anti-surface warfare (ASuW) and strike payloads, meaning capacity for carrying various modular payloads—particularly anti-surface warfare (ASuW) and strike payloads, meaning
principally anti-ship and land-attack missiles. Although referred to as UVs, LUSVs might be more accurately described as principally anti-ship and land-attack missiles. Although referred to as UVs, LUSVs might be more accurately described as
optionally or lightly manned ships, because they might sometimes have a few onboard crew members, particularly in the optionally or lightly manned ships, because they might sometimes have a few onboard crew members, particularly in the
nearer term as the Navy works out LUSV enabling technologies and operational concepts. nearer term as the Navy works out LUSV enabling technologies and operational concepts.
The Navy defines MUSVs as being 45 feet to 190 feet long, with displacements of roughly 500 tons, which would make The Navy defines MUSVs as being 45 feet to 190 feet long, with displacements of roughly 500 tons, which would make
them the size of a patrol craft. The Navy wants MUSVs, like LUSVs, to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships them the size of a patrol craft. The Navy wants MUSVs, like LUSVs, to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships
that can accommodate various payloads. Initial payloads for MUSVs are to be intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance that can accommodate various payloads. Initial payloads for MUSVs are to be intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
(ISR) payloads and electronic warfare (EW) systems. (ISR) payloads and electronic warfare (EW) systems.
The first five XLUUVs were funded in FY2019; they are being built by Boeing and are roughly the size of a subway car. The The first five XLUUVs were funded in FY2019; they are being built by Boeing and are roughly the size of a subway car. The
Navy wants procure additional XLUUVs starting in FY2024. The Navy wants to use XLUUVs to, among other things, Navy wants procure additional XLUUVs starting in FY2024. The Navy wants to use XLUUVs to, among other things,
covertly deploy the Hammerhead mine, a planned mine that would be tethered to the seabed and armed with an covertly deploy the Hammerhead mine, a planned mine that would be tethered to the seabed and armed with an
antisubmarine torpedo, broadly similar to the Navy’s Cold War-era CAPTOR (encapsulated torpedo) mine. antisubmarine torpedo, broadly similar to the Navy’s Cold War-era CAPTOR (encapsulated torpedo) mine.
The Navy’s large UV programs pose a number of oversight issues for Congress, including issues relating to the analytical The Navy’s large UV programs pose a number of oversight issues for Congress, including issues relating to the analytical
basis for the more distributed fleet architecture; the Navy’s acquisition strategies for these programs; technical, schedule, and basis for the more distributed fleet architecture; the Navy’s acquisition strategies for these programs; technical, schedule, and
cost risk in the programs; the proposed annual procurement rates for the programs; the industrial base implications of the cost risk in the programs; the proposed annual procurement rates for the programs; the industrial base implications of the
programs; potential implications for miscalculation or escalation at sea; the personnel implications of the programs; and programs; potential implications for miscalculation or escalation at sea; the personnel implications of the programs; and
whether the Navy has accurately priced the work it is proposing to do on the programs for the fiscal year in question. whether the Navy has accurately priced the work it is proposing to do on the programs for the fiscal year in question.
In marking up the Navy’s proposed FY2020 and FY2021 budgets, the congressional defense committees expressed concerns In marking up the Navy’s proposed FY2020 and FY2021 budgets, the congressional defense committees expressed concerns
over whether the Navy’s acquisition strategies provided enough time to adequately develop concepts of operations and key over whether the Navy’s acquisition strategies provided enough time to adequately develop concepts of operations and key
technologies for these large UVs, particularly the LUSV, and included legislative provisions intended to address these technologies for these large UVs, particularly the LUSV, and included legislative provisions intended to address these
concerns. In response to these markups, the Navy has restructured its acquisition strategy for the LUSV program so as to concerns. In response to these markups, the Navy has restructured its acquisition strategy for the LUSV program so as to
comply with these legislative provisions and provide more time for developing operational concepts and key technologies comply with these legislative provisions and provide more time for developing operational concepts and key technologies
before entering into serial production of deployable units. before entering into serial production of deployable units.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

Introduction
This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress for three types of This report provides background information and potential issues for Congress for three types of
large unmanned vehicles (UVs) that the Navy wants to develop and procure in FY2022 and large unmanned vehicles (UVs) that the Navy wants to develop and procure in FY2022 and
beyond: beyond:
 Large Unmanned Surface Vehicles (LUSVs);  Large Unmanned Surface Vehicles (LUSVs);
 Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicles (MUSVs); and  Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicles (MUSVs); and
 Extra-large Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (XLUUVs).  Extra-large Unmanned Undersea Vehicles (XLUUVs).
The Navy wants to acquire these large UVs as part of an effort to shift the Navy to a new fleet The Navy wants to acquire these large UVs as part of an effort to shift the Navy to a new fleet
architecture (i.e., a new combination of ships and other platforms) that is more widely distributed architecture (i.e., a new combination of ships and other platforms) that is more widely distributed
than the Navy’s current fleet architecture. The Navy’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $434.1 than the Navy’s current fleet architecture. The Navy’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $434.1
million in research and development funding for these large UVs and their enabling technologies. million in research and development funding for these large UVs and their enabling technologies.
The issue for Congress is whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s acquisition strategies The issue for Congress is whether to approve, reject, or modify the Navy’s acquisition strategies
and funding requests for these large UVs. The Navy’s proposals for developing and procuring and funding requests for these large UVs. The Navy’s proposals for developing and procuring
them pose a number of oversight issues for Congress. Congress’s decisions on these issues could them pose a number of oversight issues for Congress. Congress’s decisions on these issues could
substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements and the shipbuilding and UV substantially affect Navy capabilities and funding requirements and the shipbuilding and UV
industrial bases. industrial bases.
In addition to the large UVs covered in this report, the Navy also wants to develop and procure In addition to the large UVs covered in this report, the Navy also wants to develop and procure
smaller USVs and UUVs, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) of various sizes. Other smaller USVs and UUVs, as well as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) of various sizes. Other
U.S. military services are developing, procuring, and operating their own types of UVs. Separate U.S. military services are developing, procuring, and operating their own types of UVs. Separate
CRS reports address some of these efforts.1 CRS reports address some of these efforts.1
Background
Navy USVs and UUVs in General
UVs in the Navy
UVs are one of several new capabilities—along with directed-energy weapons, hypersonic UVs are one of several new capabilities—along with directed-energy weapons, hypersonic
weapons, artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities, and quantum technologies—that the Navy and weapons, artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities, and quantum technologies—that the Navy and
other U.S. military services are pursuing to meet emerging military challenges, particularly from other U.S. military services are pursuing to meet emerging military challenges, particularly from
China.2 UVs can be equipped with sensors, weapons, or other payloads, and can be operated China.2 UVs can be equipped with sensors, weapons, or other payloads, and can be operated
remotely, semi-autonomously, or (with technological advancements) autonomously. They can be remotely, semi-autonomously, or (with technological advancements) autonomously. They can be
individually less expensive to procure than manned ships and aircraft because their designs do not individually less expensive to procure than manned ships and aircraft because their designs do not
need to incorporate spaces and support equipment for onboard human operators. UVs can be need to incorporate spaces and support equipment for onboard human operators. UVs can be
particularly suitable for long-duration missions that might tax the physical endurance of onboard particularly suitable for long-duration missions that might tax the physical endurance of onboard
human operators, or missions that pose a high risk of injury, death, or capture of onboard human human operators, or missions that pose a high risk of injury, death, or capture of onboard human
operators—so-called “three D” missions, meaning missions that are dull, dirty, or dangerous.3 operators—so-called “three D” missions, meaning missions that are dull, dirty, or dangerous.3

1 See, for example, CRS Report R45519, 1 See, for example, CRS Report R45519, The Army’s Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle (OMFV) Program:
Background and Issues for Congress, by Andrew Feickert, and CRS In Focus IF11150, , by Andrew Feickert, and CRS In Focus IF11150, Defense Primer: U.S. Policy on
Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems, by Kelley M. Sayler. , by Kelley M. Sayler.
2 For a CRS report on advanced military technologies, see CRS In Focus IF11105, 2 For a CRS report on advanced military technologies, see CRS In Focus IF11105, Defense Primer: Emerging
Technologies, by Kelley M. Sayler. , by Kelley M. Sayler.
3 See, for example, Ann Diab, “Drones Perform the Dull, Dirty, or Dangerous Work,” Tech.co, November 12, 2014; 3 See, for example, Ann Diab, “Drones Perform the Dull, Dirty, or Dangerous Work,” Tech.co, November 12, 2014;
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1 1

link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 7 link to page 8 link to page 7 link to page 8 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

The Navy has been developing and experimenting with various types of UVs for many years, and The Navy has been developing and experimenting with various types of UVs for many years, and
has transitioned some of these efforts (particularly those for UAVs) into procurement programs. has transitioned some of these efforts (particularly those for UAVs) into procurement programs.
Even so, some observers have occasionally expressed dissatisfaction with what they view as the Even so, some observers have occasionally expressed dissatisfaction with what they view as the
Navy’s slow pace in transitioning UV development efforts into programs for procuring UVs in Navy’s slow pace in transitioning UV development efforts into programs for procuring UVs in
quantity and integrating them into the operational fleet. quantity and integrating them into the operational fleet.
March 2021 Campaign Framework Document for UVs
On March 16, 2021, the Department of the Navy released a “campaign framework” (i.e., overall On March 16, 2021, the Department of the Navy released a “campaign framework” (i.e., overall
strategy) document for developing and acquiring Navy and Marine UVs of various types and strategy) document for developing and acquiring Navy and Marine UVs of various types and
integrating them into U.S. naval operations.4 integrating them into U.S. naval operations.4
Navy USV and UUV Categories
As shown i As shown in Figure 1 anand Figure 2, the Navy organizes its USV acquisition programs into four the Navy organizes its USV acquisition programs into four
size-based categories that the Navy calls large, medium, small, and very small, and its UUV size-based categories that the Navy calls large, medium, small, and very small, and its UUV
acquisition programs similarly into four size-based categories that the Navy calls extra-large, acquisition programs similarly into four size-based categories that the Navy calls extra-large,
large, medium, and small. The large UVs discussed in this CRS report fall into the top two USV large, medium, and small. The large UVs discussed in this CRS report fall into the top two USV
categories icategories in Figure 1 and the top UUV category iand the top UUV category in Figure 2.
The smaller UVs shown in the other categories of The smaller UVs shown in the other categories of Figure 1 and Figure 2, which are not covered hich are not covered
in this report, can be deployed from manned Navy ships and submarines to extend the operational in this report, can be deployed from manned Navy ships and submarines to extend the operational
reach of those ships and submarines. The large UVs covered in this CRS report, in contrast, are reach of those ships and submarines. The large UVs covered in this CRS report, in contrast, are
more likely to be deployed directly from pier to perform missions that might otherwise be more likely to be deployed directly from pier to perform missions that might otherwise be
assigned to manned ships and submarines. assigned to manned ships and submarines.
Large UVs and Navy Ship Count
Because the large UVs covered in this report can be deployed directly from pier to perform Because the large UVs covered in this report can be deployed directly from pier to perform
missions that might otherwise be assigned to manned ships and submarines, some observers have missions that might otherwise be assigned to manned ships and submarines, some observers have
raised a question as to whether the large UVs covered in this report should be included in the top-raised a question as to whether the large UVs covered in this report should be included in the top-
level count of the number of ships in the Navy. level count of the number of ships in the Navy.
Part of More Distributed Navy Fleet Architecture
The Navy and DOD have been working since 2019 to develop a new Navy force-level goal to The Navy and DOD have been working since 2019 to develop a new Navy force-level goal to
replace the Navy’s current 355-ship force-level goal. This new Navy force-level goal is expected replace the Navy’s current 355-ship force-level goal. This new Navy force-level goal is expected
to introduce a change in fleet architecture, meaning basic the types of ships that make up the to introduce a change in fleet architecture, meaning basic the types of ships that make up the
Navy and how these ships are used in combination with one another to perform Navy missions. Navy and how these ships are used in combination with one another to perform Navy missions.
This new fleet architecture is expected to be more distributed than the fleet architecture reflected This new fleet architecture is expected to be more distributed than the fleet architecture reflected

Bonnie Robinson, “Dull, Dirty, Dangerous Mission? Send in the Robot Vehicle,” U.S. Army, August 20, 2015; Bonnie Robinson, “Dull, Dirty, Dangerous Mission? Send in the Robot Vehicle,” U.S. Army, August 20, 2015;
Bernard Marr, “The 4 Ds Of Robotization: Dull, Dirty, Dangerous And Dear,” Bernard Marr, “The 4 Ds Of Robotization: Dull, Dirty, Dangerous And Dear,” Forbes, October 16, 2017. , October 16, 2017.
4 Department of the Navy, 4 Department of the Navy, Department of the Navy Unmanned Campaign Framework, March 16, 2021, 37 pp. See also , March 16, 2021, 37 pp. See also
Megan Eckstein, “Navy, Marines Unveil How They Will Buy and Operate Future Pilotless Aircraft and Crewless Megan Eckstein, “Navy, Marines Unveil How They Will Buy and Operate Future Pilotless Aircraft and Crewless
Ships,” Ships,” USNI News, March 16, 2021; Gina Harkins, “Why You Should Trust Drone Ships and Unmanned Tech, , March 16, 2021; Gina Harkins, “Why You Should Trust Drone Ships and Unmanned Tech,
According to the Navy,” According to the Navy,” Military.com, March 16, 2021; Stew Magnuson, “Just In: Navy, Marine Corps Unmanned , March 16, 2021; Stew Magnuson, “Just In: Navy, Marine Corps Unmanned
Framework Calls For ‘Capabilities’ Over Platforms,” Framework Calls For ‘Capabilities’ Over Platforms,” National Defense, March 16, 2021; Seapower Staff, “Navy, , March 16, 2021; Seapower Staff, “Navy,
Marine Corps Release Unmanned Campaign Plan,” Marine Corps Release Unmanned Campaign Plan,” Seapower, March 16, 2021; Jordan Wolman, “Looking to the , March 16, 2021; Jordan Wolman, “Looking to the
Future of Combat and Competition, Navy Releases Much-Anticipated Campaign Plan on Unmanned Systems,” Future of Combat and Competition, Navy Releases Much-Anticipated Campaign Plan on Unmanned Systems,” Inside
Defense, March 16, 2021. , March 16, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2 2

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

in the 355-ship goal or previous Navy force-level goals. In particular, the new fleet architecture is in the 355-ship goal or previous Navy force-level goals. In particular, the new fleet architecture is
expected to feature expected to feature
 a smaller proportion of larger ships (such as large-deck aircraft carriers, cruisers,  a smaller proportion of larger ships (such as large-deck aircraft carriers, cruisers,
destroyers, large amphibious ships, and large resupply ships), destroyers, large amphibious ships, and large resupply ships),
 a larger proportion of smaller ships (such as frigates, corvettes, smaller  a larger proportion of smaller ships (such as frigates, corvettes, smaller
amphibious ships, and smaller resupply ships), and amphibious ships, and smaller resupply ships), and
 a new third tier of large UVs.  a new third tier of large UVs.
Figure 1. Navy USV Systems Vision

Source: Slide 3 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406), Slide 3 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406),
entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=
2019-01-15-165105-297. 2019-01-15-165105-297.
Navy and DOD leaders believe that shifting to a more distributed fleet architecture is Navy and DOD leaders believe that shifting to a more distributed fleet architecture is
  operationally necessary, to respond effectively to the improving maritime anti-, to respond effectively to the improving maritime anti-
access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities of other countries, particularly China;5 access/area-denial (A2/AD) capabilities of other countries, particularly China;5

5 See, for example, David B. Larter, “With China Gunning for Aircraft Carriers, US Navy Says It Must Change How It 5 See, for example, David B. Larter, “With China Gunning for Aircraft Carriers, US Navy Says It Must Change How It
Fights,” Fights,” Defense News, December 6, 2019; Arthur H. Barber, “Redesign the Fleet,” , December 6, 2019; Arthur H. Barber, “Redesign the Fleet,” U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, ,
January 2019. Some observers have long urged the Navy to shift to a more distributed fleet architecture, on the grounds January 2019. Some observers have long urged the Navy to shift to a more distributed fleet architecture, on the grounds
that the Navy’s current architecture—which concentrates much of the fleet’s capability into a relatively limited number that the Navy’s current architecture—which concentrates much of the fleet’s capability into a relatively limited number
of individually larger and more expensive surface ships—is increasingly vulnerable to attack by the improving A2/AD of individually larger and more expensive surface ships—is increasingly vulnerable to attack by the improving A2/AD
capabilities (particularly anti-ship missiles and their supporting detection and targeting systems) of potential capabilities (particularly anti-ship missiles and their supporting detection and targeting systems) of potential
~~adversaries, particularly China. Shifting to a more distributed architecture, these observers have argued, would~~
•
~~complicate an adversary’s targeting challenge by presenting the adversary with a larger number of Navy units~~
~~to detect, identify, and track;~~
•
~~reduce the loss in aggregate Navy capability that would result from the destruction of an individual Navy~~
~~platform;~~
•
~~give U.S. leaders the option of deploying USVs and UUVs in wartime to sea locations that would be~~
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

3 3

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

  technically feasible as a result of advances in technologies for UVs and for as a result of advances in technologies for UVs and for
networking widely distributed maritime forces that include significant numbers networking widely distributed maritime forces that include significant numbers
of UVs; and of UVs; and
  affordable—no more expensive than the current fleet architecture for generating —no more expensive than the current fleet architecture for generating
a given amount of naval capability. a given amount of naval capability.
Figure 2. Navy UUV Systems Vision

Source: Slide 2 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406), Slide 2 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406),
entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=
2019-01-15-165105-297. 2019-01-15-165105-297.
adversaries, particularly China. Shifting to a more distributed Shifting to a more distributed ~~force architecture, Navy and Marine Corps officials have~~
~~suggested, will support the implementation of the Navy and Marine Corps’ new overarching~~
~~operational concept, called Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO), and a supporting Marine~~
~~Corps operational concept called Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO). While Navy~~
~~officials have provided few details in public about DMO,6 the Navy did state in its FY2021~~
~~budget submission that~~

~~tactically advantageous but too risky for manned ships; and~~
•
~~increase the modularity and reconfigurability of the fleet for adapting to changing mission needs.~~
~~For more on China’s maritime A2/AD capabilities, see CRS Report RL33153,~~ ~~China Naval Modernization:~~
~~Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress, by Ronald O'Rourke.~~
~~6 Then-Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson, in explaining DMO, stated in December 2018 that “Our~~
~~fundamental force element right now in many instances is the [individual] carrier strike group. We’re going to scale up~~
~~so our fundamental force element for fighting is at the fleet[-wide] level, and the [individual] strike groups plug into~~
~~those [larger] numbered fleets. And they will be, the strike groups and the fleet together, will be operating in a~~
~~distributed maritime operations way.” (Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson, as quoted in Megan~~
~~Eckstein, “Navy Planning for Gray-Zone Conflict; Finalizing Distributed Maritime Operations for High-End Fight,”~~
USNI News, December 19, 2018.)
~~Congressional Research Service~~

4

~~link to page 10 link to page 10 link to page 10~~ ~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~MUSV and LUSV are key enablers of the Navy’s Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO)~~
~~concept, which includes being able to forward deploy and team with individual manned~~
~~combatants or augment battle groups. Fielding of MUSV and LUSV will provide the Navy~~
~~increased capability and necessary capacity at lower procurement and sustainment costs,~~
~~reduced risk to sailors and increased readiness by offloading missions from manned~~
~~combatants.7~~
~~On December 9, 2020, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that~~
~~presented the Trump Administration’s emerging successor to the Navy’s current 355-ship force-~~
~~level goal, which calls for a fleet of 355 manned ships. The document called for a Navy with a~~
~~more distributed fleet architecture, including 382 to 446 manned ships, 119 to 166 LUSVs and~~
~~MUSVs, and 24 to 76 XLUUVs.8~~architecture, these observers have argued, would • complicate an adversary’s targeting challenge by presenting the adversary with a larger number of Navy units to detect, identify, and track; • reduce the loss in aggregate Navy capability that would result from the destruction of an individual Navy platform; • give U.S. leaders the option of deploying USVs and UUVs in wartime to sea locations that would be tactically advantageous but too risky for manned ships; and • increase the modularity and reconfigurability of the fleet for adapting to changing mission needs. For more on China’s maritime A2/AD capabilities, see CRS Report RL33153, China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress, by Ronald O'Rourke. Congressional Research Service 4 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 11 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles Shifting to a more distributed force architecture, Navy and Marine Corps officials have suggested, will support the implementation of the Navy and Marine Corps’ new overarching operational concept, called Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO), and a supporting Marine Corps operational concept called Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO). While Navy officials have provided few details in public about DMO,6 the Navy did state in its FY2021 budget submission that MUSV and LUSV are key enablers of the Navy’s Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) concept, which includes being able to forward deploy and team with individual manned combatants or augment battle groups. Fielding of MUSV and LUSV will provide the Navy increased capability and necessary capacity at lower procurement and sustainment costs, reduced risk to sailors and increased readiness by offloading missions from manned combatants.7
On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the
Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the Navy’s current 355-ship force-level goal. The Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the Navy’s current 355-ship force-level goal. The
document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372
manned ships, 59 to 89 LUSVs and MUSVs, and 24 to 76 XLUUVs.manned ships, 59 to 89 LUSVs and MUSVs, and 24 to 76 XLUUVs.98
Acquisition Strategies and Enabling Technologies
Prototypes The LUSV and MUSV programs are building on USV The LUSV and MUSV programs are building on USV prototypes and other development work done by the development work done by the
Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO). SCO’s effort to develop Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO). SCO’s effort to develop
USVs is called Ghost Fleet, and its LUSV development effort within Ghost Fleet is called USVs is called Ghost Fleet, and its LUSV development effort within Ghost Fleet is called
~~Overlord.~~
~~As shown i~~n Figure 3Overlord. Figure 3 shows USV prototypes that have supported or are scheduled to support the LUSV and MUSV programs. Figure 4 shows one of those prototypes, the Sea Hunter medium displacement USV. Enabling Technologies As shown in Figure 5, Navy in 2019 identified five key enabling groups of technologies for its avy in 2019 identified five key enabling groups of technologies for its
USV and UUV programs.USV and UUV programs.109 Given limitations on underwater communications (most radio- 6 Then-Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson, in explaining DMO, stated in December 2018 that “Our fundamental force element right now in many instances is the [individual] carrier strike group. We’re going to scale up so our fundamental force element for fighting is at the fleet[-wide] level, and the [individual] strike groups plug into those [larger] numbered fleets. And they will be, the strike groups and the fleet together, will be operating in a distributed maritime operations way.” (Chief of Naval Operations Admiral John Richardson, as quoted in Megan Eckstein, “Navy Planning for Gray-Zone Conflict; Finalizing Distributed Maritime Operations for High-End Fight,” USNI News, December 19, 2018.) ~~Given limitations on underwater communications (most radio-~~
~~frequency electromagnetic waves do not travel far underwater), technologies for autonomous~~
~~operations (such as artificial intelligence) will be particularly important for the XLUUV program~~
~~(and other UUV programs).11~~
~~In May 2019, the Navy established a surface development squadron to help develop operational~~
~~concepts for LUSVs and MUSVs. The squadron was initially to consist of a Zumwalt (DDG-~~
~~1000) class destroyer and one Sea Hunter prototype medium displacement USV (Figure 4). A~~

7 Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates, Navy Justification Book Volume 2 of 5, Research, 7 Department of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 Budget Estimates, Navy Justification Book Volume 2 of 5, Research,
Development, Test & Evaluation, February 2020, PDF page 90 of 1,538. The statement also appears on PDF page 324 Development, Test & Evaluation, February 2020, PDF page 90 of 1,538. The statement also appears on PDF page 324
of 1,538. For more on the more distributed force architecture, DMO, and EABO, see CRS Report RL32665, of 1,538. For more on the more distributed force architecture, DMO, and EABO, see CRS Report RL32665, Navy
Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress, by Ronald O'Rourke. See also Kevin , by Ronald O'Rourke. See also Kevin
Eyer and Steve McJessy, “Operationalizing Distributed Maritime Operations,” Center for International Maritime Eyer and Steve McJessy, “Operationalizing Distributed Maritime Operations,” Center for International Maritime
Security (CIMSEC), March 5, 2019; Christopher H. Popa et al., Security (CIMSEC), March 5, 2019; Christopher H. Popa et al., Distributed Maritime Operations and Unmanned
Systems Tactical Employment, Naval Postgraduate School, June 2018, 171 pp. (Systems Engineering Capstone Report); , Naval Postgraduate School, June 2018, 171 pp. (Systems Engineering Capstone Report);
Lyla Englehorn, Lyla Englehorn, Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) Warfare Innovation Continuum (WIC) Workshop September
2017 After Action Report, Naval Postgraduate School, December 2017, 99 pp. , Naval Postgraduate School, December 2017, 99 pp.
8 U.S. Navy, 8 U.S. Navy, Report ~~to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels~~~~, December 2020,~~
~~23 pp.~~
~~9 U.S. Navy,~~ ~~Report~~ to Congress on the Annual Long-Range Plan for Construction of Naval Vessels for Fiscal Year
2022, June 2021, 16 pp. , June 2021, 16 pp.
109 For additional discussion of some of the enabling technologies shown For additional discussion of some of the enabling technologies shown inin Figure 35, see Pete Small, “Empowering the , ~~see Pete Small, “Empowering the~~
~~Unmanned Maritime Revolution,” Undersea Warfare, Spring 2019: 12-13.~~
~~11 For more on the use of artificial intelligence in defense programs, see CRS Report R45178,~~ ~~Artificial Intelligence~~
~~and National Security, by Kelley M. Sayler.~~
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

5 5

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~second Sea Hunter prototype was reportedly to be added around the end of FY2020, and LUSVs~~
~~and MUSVs would then be added as they become available.12~~
~~Figure 3. Enabling Technologies for USVs and UUVs~~

Source: Slide 4 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406),
~~entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at~~
~~https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=~~
~~2019-01-15-165105-297.~~
~~Figure 4. Sea Hunter Prototype Medium Displacement USV~~

Source: Photograph credited to U.S. Navy accompanying John Grady, “Panel: Unmanned Surface Vessels Wil be
~~Significant Part of Future U.S. Fleet,” USNI News, April 15, 2019.~~

12Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles frequency electromagnetic waves do not travel far underwater), technologies for autonomous operations (such as artificial intelligence) will be particularly important for the XLUUV program (and other UUV programs).10 Figure 3. Prototypes Supporting the LUSV and MUSV Programs Source: Slide 4 of Navy briefing entitled “PMS 406 Maritime Unmanned Systems, CAPT Pete Small,” briefing to Surface Navy Association (SNA) annual symposium, January 12, 2022. Surface Development Squadron In May 2019, the Navy established a surface development squadron to help develop operational concepts for LUSVs and MUSVs. The squadron was initially to consist of a Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer and one Sea Hunter prototype. A second Sea Hunter prototype was reportedly to be added around the end of FY2020, and LUSVs and MUSVs would then be added as they become available.11 Unmanned Maritime Revolution,” Undersea Warfare, Spring 2019: 12-13. 10 For more on the use of artificial intelligence in defense programs, see CRS Report R45178, Artificial Intelligence and National Security, by Kelley M. Sayler. 11 See, for example, Megan Eckstein, “Navy Stands Up Surface Development Squadron for DDG-1000, Unmanned See, for example, Megan Eckstein, “Navy Stands Up Surface Development Squadron for DDG-1000, Unmanned
Experimentation,” Experimentation,” USNI News, May 22, 2019; David B. Larter, “With Billions Planned in Funding, the US Navy , May 22, 2019; David B. Larter, “With Billions Planned in Funding, the US Navy
Charts Its Unmanned Future,” Charts Its Unmanned Future,” Defense News, May 6, 2019. See also Michael Fabey, “USN Seeks Path for Unmanned , May 6, 2019. See also Michael Fabey, “USN Seeks Path for Unmanned
Systems Operational Concepts,” Systems Operational Concepts,” Jane’s Navy International, May 16, 2019. , May 16, 2019.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

6 6

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles Figure 4. Sea Hunter Prototype Medium Displacement USV Source: Photograph credited to U.S. Navy accompanying John Grady, “Panel: Unmanned Surface Vessels Wil be Significant Part of Future U.S. Fleet,” USNI News, April 15, 2019. Figure 5. Enabling Technologies for USVs and UUVs Source: Slide 4 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406), entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=2019-01-15-165105-297. Congressional Research Service 7 link to page 12 link to page 13 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles Acquisition Schedules as of March 2021 Figure 6 and Figure 7 show the Navy’s schedules ~~link to page 11 link to page 12~~

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~LUSV, MUSV, and LXUUV Programs in Brief~~
~~Navy Vision and Schedule for USVs and UUVs~~
~~Figure 5 and Figure 6~~ ~~show the Navy’s vision and schedule~~ as of March 2021 for building, as of March 2021 for building,
testing, and conducting fleet experiments with USVs and UUVs, including the LUSV, the MUSV, testing, and conducting fleet experiments with USVs and UUVs, including the LUSV, the MUSV,
and the XLUUV, along with supporting efforts such as the Overlord and Sea Hunter prototype and the XLUUV, along with supporting efforts such as the Overlord and Sea Hunter prototype
USVs, as well as smaller USVs and UUVs that are not covered in this report. Under the Navy’s USVs, as well as smaller USVs and UUVs that are not covered in this report. Under the Navy’s
proposed FY2022 budget, proposed FY2022 budget, which was submitted in May 2021, the schedules shown in these two figures may have changed, the schedules shown in these two figures may have changed,
particularly so as to provide more time for maturing technologies prior to initiating larger-scale particularly so as to provide more time for maturing technologies prior to initiating larger-scale
procurement of USVs and UUVs. procurement of USVs and UUVs.
Figure 56. Navy USV Systems ~~Vision~~Acquisition Shedule as of March 2021

Source: Captain Pete Small, “PMS 406 Unmanned Maritime Systems,” briefing at NDIA Undersea Warfare Captain Pete Small, “PMS 406 Unmanned Maritime Systems,” briefing at NDIA Undersea Warfare
Conference, March 24, 2021, slide 3. Conference, March 24, 2021, slide 3.
Notes: GFE means government-furnished equipment, meaning equipment that the government wil provide to GFE means government-furnished equipment, meaning equipment that the government wil provide to
the firm that is building the USV, for incorporation into the USV. the firm that is building the USV, for incorporation into the USV.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

78

link to page link to page 1314 link to page link to page 1315 link to page link to page 1415

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

Figure 67. Navy UUV Systems ~~Vision~~Acquisition Schedule as of March 2021

Source: Captain Pete Small, “PMS 406 Unmanned Maritime Systems,” briefing at NDIA Undersea Warfare Captain Pete Small, “PMS 406 Unmanned Maritime Systems,” briefing at NDIA Undersea Warfare
Conference, March 24, 2021, slide 4. Conference, March 24, 2021, slide 4.
Notes: DDS is dry deck shelter, which is a module that can be attached to the top surface of a submarine for DDS is dry deck shelter, which is a module that can be attached to the top surface of a submarine for
the purpose of carrying a special payload. PHS is payload handling system. IPOE is intelligence preparation of the the purpose of carrying a special payload. PHS is payload handling system. IPOE is intelligence preparation of the
operational environment. MCM is mine countermeasures. TTL&R is torpedo tube launch and recovery. INC is operational environment. MCM is mine countermeasures. TTL&R is torpedo tube launch and recovery. INC is
increment (i.e., version). DIU is Defense Innovation Unit, which is a DOD organization. NSW is naval special increment (i.e., version). DIU is Defense Innovation Unit, which is a DOD organization. NSW is naval special
warfare. warfare.
LUSV, MUSV, and LXUUV Programs in Brief LUSV Program
Overview
The Navy envisions LUSVs as being 200 feet to 300 feet in length and having full load The Navy envisions LUSVs as being 200 feet to 300 feet in length and having full load
displacements of 1,000 tons to 2,000 tons, which would make them the size of a corvette (i.e., a displacements of 1,000 tons to 2,000 tons, which would make them the size of a corvette (i.e., a
ship larger than a patrol craft and smaller than a frigate)ship larger than a patrol craft and smaller than a frigate). Figure 78 shows a detail from a Navy shows a detail from a Navy
briefing slide showing images of prototype LUSVs and silhouettes of a notional LUSV and a briefing slide showing images of prototype LUSVs and silhouettes of a notional LUSV and a
notional MUSVnotional MUSV. Figure 89 aand Figure 910 show ships that have been used as LUSV prototypes. In show ships that have been used as LUSV prototypes. In
unclassified presentations on the program, the Navy has used images of offshore support ships unclassified presentations on the program, the Navy has used images of offshore support ships
Congressional Research Service 9 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles used by the oil and gas industry to illustrate the kinds of ships that might be used as the basis for used by the oil and gas industry to illustrate the kinds of ships that might be used as the basis for
LUSVs.LUSVs.13

~~13 Sam LaGrone, “Navy Wants 10-Ship Unmanned ‘Ghost Fleet’ to Supplement Manned Force,” USNI News, March~~
~~13, 2019.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

8

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

12 Figure 78. Prototype and Notional LUSVs and MUSVs

Source: Detail from Navy briefing slide entitled Unmanned Maritime Systems, slide 5 in a Navy briefing entitled Detail from Navy briefing slide entitled Unmanned Maritime Systems, slide 5 in a Navy briefing entitled
“Designing & Building the Surface Fleet: Unmanned and Small Combatants,” by Rear Admiral Casey Moton at a “Designing & Building the Surface Fleet: Unmanned and Small Combatants,” by Rear Admiral Casey Moton at a
June 20, 2019, conference of the American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE). June 20, 2019, conference of the American Society of Naval Engineers (ASNE).
~~Figure 8. LUSV Prototype~~

Source: Cropped version of photograph accompanying Mallory Shelbourne, “6 Companies Awarded Contracts
~~to Start Work on Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle,” USNI News, September 4, 2020. The caption to the~~
~~photograph states in part: “A Ghost Fleet Overlord test vessel takes part in a capstone demonstration during the~~
~~conclusion of Phase I of the program in September.” The photo is credited to the U.S. Navy.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

9

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~Figure 9. LUSV prototype~~

Source: Cropped version of photograph accompanying Mallory Shelbourne, “6 Companies Awarded Contracts
~~to Start Work on Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle,” USNI News, September 4, 2020. The caption to the~~
~~photograph states in part: “A Ghost Fleet Overlord test vessel takes part in a capstone demonstration during the~~
~~conclusion of Phase I of the program in September.” The photo is credited to the U.S. Navy.~~
The Navy wants LUSVs to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships based on The Navy wants LUSVs to be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships based on
commercial ship designs, with ample capacity for carrying various modular payloads—commercial ship designs, with ample capacity for carrying various modular payloads—
particularly anti-surface warfare (ASuW) and strike payloads, meaning principally anti-ship and particularly anti-surface warfare (ASuW) and strike payloads, meaning principally anti-ship and
land-attack missiles.land-attack missiles.1413 Although the Navy testified in June 2021 that each LUSV is to have 64 Although the Navy testified in June 2021 that each LUSV is to have 64
vertical launch system (VLS) missile-launching tubes,vertical launch system (VLS) missile-launching tubes,1514 the Navy subsequently said this was a the Navy subsequently said this was a
misstatement, and that the correct figure is 16 to 32 VLS cells.misstatement, and that the correct figure is 16 to 32 VLS cells.16
~~The Navy wants LUSVs to be capable of operating with human operators in the loop,17 or semi-~~
~~autonomously (with human operators on the loop),18 or fully autonomously, and to be capable of~~
~~operating either independently or in conjunction with manned surface combatants. Although~~
~~referred to as UVs, LUSVs might be more accurately described as optionally or lightly manned~~
~~ships, because they might sometimes have a few onboard crew members, particularly in the~~
~~nearer term as the Navy works out LUSV enabling technologies and operational concepts.19~~
~~LUSVs are to feature both built-in capabilities and an ability to accept modular payloads, and are~~
~~to use existing Navy sensors and weapon launchers. The Navy states that~~

1415 12 Sam LaGrone, “Navy Wants 10-Ship Unmanned ‘Ghost Fleet’ to Supplement Manned Force,” USNI News, March 13, 2019. 13 The Navy states that the LUSV “provides distributed fires” and will include an “offensive missile capability.” See The Navy states that the LUSV “provides distributed fires” and will include an “offensive missile capability.” See
slide 5 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406), entitled slide 5 of briefing by Captain Pete Small, Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems (PMS 406), entitled
“Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at https://www.navsea.navy.mil/“Unmanned Maritime Systems Update,” January 15, 2019, accessed May 22, 2019, at https://www.navsea.navy.mil/
Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=2019-01-15-165105-297. Portals/103/Documents/Exhibits/SNA2019/UnmannedMaritimeSys-Small.pdf?ver=2019-01-15-165105-297.
1514 See Rich Abott, “Officials Defend Cost Balancing In Cruiser Retirement Plans,” See Rich Abott, “Officials Defend Cost Balancing In Cruiser Retirement Plans,” Defense Daily, June 17, 2021; , June 17, 2021;
Richard R. Burgess, “Kilby: LUSV’s Missile Cells Would Replace Cells Lost with Decommissioned Cruisers,” Richard R. Burgess, “Kilby: LUSV’s Missile Cells Would Replace Cells Lost with Decommissioned Cruisers,”
Seapower, Jnue 17, 2021. , Jnue 17, 2021.
1615 Source: Navy FY2022 program briefing on LUSV and MUSV programs for CRS and CBO, July 14, 2021. Source: Navy FY2022 program briefing on LUSV and MUSV programs for CRS and CBO, July 14, 2021.
17 Congressional Research Service 10 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles Figure 9. LUSV Prototype Source: Cropped version of photograph accompanying Mallory Shelbourne, “6 Companies Awarded Contracts to Start Work on Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle,” USNI News, September 4, 2020. The caption to the photograph states in part: “A Ghost Fleet Overlord test vessel takes part in a capstone demonstration during the conclusion of Phase I of the program in September.” The photo is credited to the U.S. Navy. Figure 10. LUSV prototype Source: Cropped version of photograph accompanying Mallory Shelbourne, “6 Companies Awarded Contracts to Start Work on Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle,” USNI News, September 4, 2020. The caption to the photograph states in part: “A Ghost Fleet Overlord test vessel takes part in a capstone demonstration during the conclusion of Phase I of the program in September.” The photo is credited to the U.S. Navy. The Navy wants LUSVs to be capable of operating with human operators in the loop,16 or semi-autonomously (with human operators on the loop),17 or fully autonomously, and to be capable of operating either independently or in conjunction with manned surface combatants. Although 16 The Navy states that having the operator in the loop can be understood as referring to continuous or near-continuous The Navy states that having the operator in the loop can be understood as referring to continuous or near-continuous
observation and/or control of the UV by the operator. (Source: Navy email to CRS dated June 4, 2019.) observation and/or control of the UV by the operator. (Source: Navy email to CRS dated June 4, 2019.)
1817 The Navy states that having the operator on the loop can be understood as referring to a UV that is operating semi- The Navy states that having the operator on the loop can be understood as referring to a UV that is operating semi-
autonomously, with the UV controlling its own actions much of the time, but with a human operator potentially autonomously, with the UV controlling its own actions much of the time, but with a human operator potentially
intervening from time to time in response to either a prompt from the UV or data sent from the UV or other sources. intervening from time to time in response to either a prompt from the UV or data sent from the UV or other sources.
(Source: Navy email to CRS dated June 4, 2019.) (Source: Navy email to CRS dated June 4, 2019.)
~~19 See, for example, David B. Larter, “US Navy Looks to Ease into Using Unmanned Robot Ships with a Manned~~
~~Crew,” Defense News, January 29, 2019.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

10

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~
Congressional Research Service 11 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles referred to as UVs, LUSVs might be more accurately described as optionally or lightly manned ships, because they might sometimes have a few onboard crew members, particularly in the nearer term as the Navy works out LUSV enabling technologies and operational concepts.18 LUSVs are to feature both built-in capabilities and an ability to accept modular payloads, and are to use existing Navy sensors and weapon launchers. The Navy states that
The Navy’s LUSV builds upon work funded by DoD’s Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO) The Navy’s LUSV builds upon work funded by DoD’s Strategic Capabilities Office (SCO)
and experimentation executed by the Navy USVs in Project Overlord. LUSV will be a and experimentation executed by the Navy USVs in Project Overlord. LUSV will be a
high-endurance vessel based on commercial specifications, capable of weeks-long high-endurance vessel based on commercial specifications, capable of weeks-long
deployments and trans-oceanic transits. With a large payload capacity, the LUSV will be deployments and trans-oceanic transits. With a large payload capacity, the LUSV will be
designed to conduct a variety of warfare operations initially in conjunction with manned designed to conduct a variety of warfare operations initially in conjunction with manned
surface combatants while under the positive control of a man-in-the-loop for employment surface combatants while under the positive control of a man-in-the-loop for employment
of weapons systems. The Navy is taking an iterative, systems engineering approach to of weapons systems. The Navy is taking an iterative, systems engineering approach to
obtaining this technology and has designed an integration and experimentation plan that obtaining this technology and has designed an integration and experimentation plan that
will validate high reliability mechanical and electrical systems, autonomous navigation and will validate high reliability mechanical and electrical systems, autonomous navigation and
maneuvering, integration of combat system, and platform command and control maneuvering, integration of combat system, and platform command and control
capabilities prior to employment opportunities. capabilities prior to employment opportunities.
LUSV Design Studies contracts were awarded in September 2020 to six Industry teams to LUSV Design Studies contracts were awarded in September 2020 to six Industry teams to
provide robust collaboration with government and industry to assist in maturation of provide robust collaboration with government and industry to assist in maturation of
platform specifications, and ensure achievable technical requirements are in place for a platform specifications, and ensure achievable technical requirements are in place for a
follow on development contract. Both Industry and the Navy are using these collaborative follow on development contract. Both Industry and the Navy are using these collaborative
interactions to significantly advance the knowledge base that will feed into the LUSV interactions to significantly advance the knowledge base that will feed into the LUSV
program…. program….
The Navy has benefited through its prototyping and experimenting with Sea Hunter and The Navy has benefited through its prototyping and experimenting with Sea Hunter and
Overlord unmanned surface vessel prototypes accumulating over 3,100 hours of Overlord unmanned surface vessel prototypes accumulating over 3,100 hours of
autonomous operations to include teaming with other manned ships. The Navy will autonomous operations to include teaming with other manned ships. The Navy will
continue experimentation and reliability demonstration efforts in FY 2021 and FY 2022 on continue experimentation and reliability demonstration efforts in FY 2021 and FY 2022 on
the two SCO-funded Overlord vessels as ownership shifts to the Navy. The Navythe two SCO-funded Overlord vessels as ownership shifts to the Navy. The Navy is also is also
building two additional Overlord prototypes that will deliver in FY 2022 to support building two additional Overlord prototypes that will deliver in FY 2022 to support
continued experimentation, and future mission CONOPS. The Navy is evaluating other continued experimentation, and future mission CONOPS. The Navy is evaluating other
DMO applications to include logistics supply and refueling, Marine Corps expeditionary DMO applications to include logistics supply and refueling, Marine Corps expeditionary
options, and enhancements to other surface platform missions. As part of this evaluation, options, and enhancements to other surface platform missions. As part of this evaluation,
the Navy is collaborating with Military Sealift Command and the Marine Corps to modify the Navy is collaborating with Military Sealift Command and the Marine Corps to modify
a T-EPF [expeditionary fast transport ship] with autonomy to gain more autonomy a T-EPF [expeditionary fast transport ship] with autonomy to gain more autonomy
knowledge and reliability on a class of ship equipped with V-22 [tilt-rotor aircraft] landing knowledge and reliability on a class of ship equipped with V-22 [tilt-rotor aircraft] landing
capability, a large logistic and personnel size, weight and power capability, and the ability capability, a large logistic and personnel size, weight and power capability, and the ability
to operate at high speeds.to operate at high speeds.2019
An August 3, 2021, press report states: An August 3, 2021, press report states:
For the foreseeable future, the LUSVs will require a small crew detachment aboard to carry For the foreseeable future, the LUSVs will require a small crew detachment aboard to carry
out tasks not conducive to machines. out tasks not conducive to machines.
“We do envision accommodations for a small detachment of personnel. Those people are “We do envision accommodations for a small detachment of personnel. Those people are
not intended to be driving or operating the boat directly, but we provide those not intended to be driving or operating the boat directly, but we provide those
accommodations as a risk manager for operations, that can’t be automated or haven’t been accommodations as a risk manager for operations, that can’t be automated or haven’t been
~~automated yet, like refueling,” Capt. Pete Small, Navy Program Manager for USVs, said~~
~~Monday at the Sea Air Space 2021 symposium.~~
~~“They could still be aboard also for force protection or other measures that are required as~~
~~we continue to refine concepts of operations.”...~~
~~“The current way we operate them is that we pilot the USVs into and out of port in manual~~
~~mode with a small crew on board. This is consistent with the Navy’s plans for medium~~

20 18 See, for example, David B. Larter, “US Navy Looks to Ease into Using Unmanned Robot Ships with a Manned Crew,” Defense News, January 29, 2019. 19 Statement of Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Statement of Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and
Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfighting Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfighting
Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9) and Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant, Combat Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9) and Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant, Combat
Development and Integration, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the Development and Integration, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the
Subcommittee on Seapower of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2022 Subcommittee on Seapower of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2022
Budget Request for Seapower, June 8, 2021, pp. 14-15. Budget Request for Seapower, June 8, 2021, pp. 14-15.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1112

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

automated yet, like refueling,” Capt. Pete Small, Navy Program Manager for USVs, said Monday at the Sea Air Space 2021 symposium. “They could still be aboard also for force protection or other measures that are required as we continue to refine concepts of operations.”... “The current way we operate them is that we pilot the USVs into and out of port in manual mode with a small crew on board. This is consistent with the Navy’s plans for medium USV and large USV,” Small said last week at a virtual conference hosted by the USV and large USV,” Small said last week at a virtual conference hosted by the
Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI). Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI).
“Once the USVs is in the open ocean, we make the transition to autonomous mode and “Once the USVs is in the open ocean, we make the transition to autonomous mode and
continue with operations that include remote mission planning, command and control and continue with operations that include remote mission planning, command and control and
supervision.” supervision.”
In terms of how manning evolves for LUSV, “we’re going to flesh that out over the next In terms of how manning evolves for LUSV, “we’re going to flesh that out over the next
several years,” Small said.several years,” Small said.2120
In marking up the Navy’s proposed FY2020 and FY2021 budgets, the congressional defense In marking up the Navy’s proposed FY2020 and FY2021 budgets, the congressional defense
committees expressed concerns over whether the Navy’s acquisition strategies provided enough committees expressed concerns over whether the Navy’s acquisition strategies provided enough
time to adequately develop concepts of operations and key technologies for these large UVs, time to adequately develop concepts of operations and key technologies for these large UVs,
particularly the LUSV, and included legislative provisions intended to address these concerns.particularly the LUSV, and included legislative provisions intended to address these concerns.2221
In response to these markups, the Navy has restructured its acquisition strategy for the LUSV In response to these markups, the Navy has restructured its acquisition strategy for the LUSV
program so as to comply with these legislative provisions and provide more time for developing program so as to comply with these legislative provisions and provide more time for developing
operational concepts and key technologies before entering into serial production of deployable operational concepts and key technologies before entering into serial production of deployable
units. units.
Analysis of Alternatives (AOA)
The Navy is conducting an analysis of alternatives (AOA) to compare the cost-effectiveness of The Navy is conducting an analysis of alternatives (AOA) to compare the cost-effectiveness of
the LUSV to a range of alternative surface platforms, including modified naval vessel designs the LUSV to a range of alternative surface platforms, including modified naval vessel designs
such as amphibious ships, expeditionary fast transport (EPF) ships, and expeditionary sea base such as amphibious ships, expeditionary fast transport (EPF) ships, and expeditionary sea base
(ESB) ships, modified commercial vessel designs such as container ships and bulk carriers, new (ESB) ships, modified commercial vessel designs such as container ships and bulk carriers, new
naval vessel designs, and new commercial vessel designs.naval vessel designs, and new commercial vessel designs.2322
September 4, 2020, Contract Award
On September 4, 2020, DOD announced the following six contract awards for industry studies on On September 4, 2020, DOD announced the following six contract awards for industry studies on
the LUSV: the LUSV:
Huntington Ingalls Inc., Pascagoula, Mississippi (N00024-20-C-6319); Lockheed Martin Huntington Ingalls Inc., Pascagoula, Mississippi (N00024-20-C-6319); Lockheed Martin
Corp., Baltimore, Maryland (N00024-20-C-6320); Bollinger Shipyards Lockport LLC, Corp., Baltimore, Maryland (N00024-20-C-6320); Bollinger Shipyards Lockport LLC,
Lockport, Louisiana (N00024-20-C-6316); Marinette Marine Corp., Marinette, Wisconsin Lockport, Louisiana (N00024-20-C-6316); Marinette Marine Corp., Marinette, Wisconsin
(N00024-20-C-6317); Gibbs & Cox Inc., Arlington, Virginia (N0002420C6318); and (N00024-20-C-6317); Gibbs & Cox Inc., Arlington, Virginia (N0002420C6318); and
Austal USA LLC, Mobile, Alabama (N00024-20-C-6315), are each being awarded a firm-Austal USA LLC, Mobile, Alabama (N00024-20-C-6315), are each being awarded a firm-
fixed price contract for studies of a Large Unmanned Surface Vessel with a combined value fixed price contract for studies of a Large Unmanned Surface Vessel with a combined value
across all awards of $41,985,112. across all awards of $41,985,112.
~~Each contract includes an option for engineering support, that if exercised, would bring the~~
~~cumulative value for all awards to $59,476,146.~~

~~The contract awarded to Huntington Ingalls Inc. is $7,000,000;~~

~~the contract awarded to Lockheed Martin Corp. is $6,999,978;~~

~~the contract awarded to Bol inger Shipyards Lockport LLC, is $6,996,832;~~

~~the contract awarded to Marinette Marine Corp. is $6,999,783;~~

~~the contract awarded to Gibbs & Cox Inc. is $6,989,499; and~~

21 20 Sam LaGrone, “Navy: Large USV Will Require Small Crews for the Next Several Years,” Sam LaGrone, “Navy: Large USV Will Require Small Crews for the Next Several Years,” USNI News, August 3, , August 3,
2021. 2021.
2221 In the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (H.R. 6395 /P.L. 116- In the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (H.R. 6395 /P.L. 116-
283 of January 1, 2021), these provisions included Sections 122 and 227. 283 of January 1, 2021), these provisions included Sections 122 and 227.
2322 See Jason Sherman, “Navy Considering Alternatives to LUSV, Packing Amphibs, Commercial Designs More with See Jason Sherman, “Navy Considering Alternatives to LUSV, Packing Amphibs, Commercial Designs More with
Long-Range Missiles,” Long-Range Missiles,” Inside Defense, April 9, 2021. , April 9, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1213

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles


Each contract includes an option for engineering support, that if exercised, would bring the cumulative value for all awards to $59,476,146. -- The contract awarded to Huntington Ingalls Inc. is $7,000,000; -- the contract awarded to Lockheed Martin Corp. is $6,999,978; -- the contract awarded to Bollinger Shipyards Lockport LLC, is $6,996,832; -- the contract awarded to Marinette Marine Corp. is $6,999,783; -- the contract awarded to Gibbs & Cox Inc. is $6,989,499; and -- the contract awarded to Austal USA LLC is $6,999,020. the contract awarded to Austal USA LLC is $6,999,020.
Work will be performed in various locations in the contiguous U.S. in accordance with Work will be performed in various locations in the contiguous U.S. in accordance with
each contract and is expected to be complete by August 2021, and if option(s) are exercised, each contract and is expected to be complete by August 2021, and if option(s) are exercised,
work is expected to be complete by May 2022. work is expected to be complete by May 2022.
Fiscal 2020 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funds in the amount Fiscal 2020 research, development, test and evaluation (Navy) funds in the amount
$41,985,112 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current $41,985,112 will be obligated at time of award and will not expire at the end of the current
fiscal year. fiscal year.
These contracts were competitively procured via Federal Business Opportunities (now These contracts were competitively procured via Federal Business Opportunities (now
beta.SAM.gov) with eight offers received. The Naval Sea Systems Command, beta.SAM.gov) with eight offers received. The Naval Sea Systems Command,
Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity.Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity.2423
A September 4, 2020, press report about the contract awards stated A September 4, 2020, press report about the contract awards stated
“These contracts were established in order to refine specifications and requirements for a “These contracts were established in order to refine specifications and requirements for a
Large Unmanned Surface Vessel and conduct reliability studies informed by industry Large Unmanned Surface Vessel and conduct reliability studies informed by industry
partners with potential solutions prior to release of a Detail Design and Construction partners with potential solutions prior to release of a Detail Design and Construction
contract,” Navy spokesman Capt. Danny Hernandez told USNI News in a statement. contract,” Navy spokesman Capt. Danny Hernandez told USNI News in a statement.
“The studies effort is designed to provide robust collaboration with government and “The studies effort is designed to provide robust collaboration with government and
industry to assist in maturation of platform specifications, and ensure achievable technical industry to assist in maturation of platform specifications, and ensure achievable technical
requirements are in place for a separate LUSV DD&C competition.”… requirements are in place for a separate LUSV DD&C competition.”…
“The LUSV studies will support efforts that facilitate requirements refinement, “The LUSV studies will support efforts that facilitate requirements refinement,
development of an affordable and effective platform; provide opportunities to continue development of an affordable and effective platform; provide opportunities to continue
maturing the performance specifications and conduct analysis of alternative design maturing the performance specifications and conduct analysis of alternative design
approaches; facilitate reliability improvements and plans for government-furnished approaches; facilitate reliability improvements and plans for government-furnished
equipment and mechanical and electrical systems; and support development of cost equipment and mechanical and electrical systems; and support development of cost
reduction and other affordability initiatives,” Hernandez said.reduction and other affordability initiatives,” Hernandez said.2524
MUSV Program
The Navy defines MUSVs as being 45 feet to 190 feet long, with displacements of roughly 500 The Navy defines MUSVs as being 45 feet to 190 feet long, with displacements of roughly 500
tons, which would make them the size of a patrol craft. The Navy wants MUSVs, like LUSVs, to tons, which would make them the size of a patrol craft. The Navy wants MUSVs, like LUSVs, to
be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships that can accommodate various payloads. Initial be low-cost, high-endurance, reconfigurable ships that can accommodate various payloads. Initial
payloads for MUSVs are to be intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) payloads and payloads for MUSVs are to be intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) payloads and
electronic warfare (EW) systems. The Navy is pursuing the MUSV program as a rapid electronic warfare (EW) systems. The Navy is pursuing the MUSV program as a rapid
~~prototyping effort under what is known as Section 804 middle tier acquisition authority.26 The~~
~~first MUSV prototype was funded in FY2019.~~
~~The MUSV program is building on development work by the Defense Advanced Research~~
~~Projects Agency (DARPA) under its Anti-Submarine Warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel~~
~~(ACTUV) effort and the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under its Medium Displacement USV~~

24 23 Department of Defense, “Contracts For Sept. 4, 2020,” accessed September 8, 2020. The announcement is posted as Department of Defense, “Contracts For Sept. 4, 2020,” accessed September 8, 2020. The announcement is posted as
a single, unbroken paragraph. In reprinting the text of the announcement, CRS broke the announcement into the smaller a single, unbroken paragraph. In reprinting the text of the announcement, CRS broke the announcement into the smaller
paragraphs shown here to make the announcement easier to read. paragraphs shown here to make the announcement easier to read.
2524 Mallory Shelbourne, “6 Companies Awarded Contracts to Start Work on Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle,” Mallory Shelbourne, “6 Companies Awarded Contracts to Start Work on Large Unmanned Surface Vehicle,” USNI
News, September 4, 2020. See also Paul McLeary, “Navy Awards Study Contracts On Large Unmanned Ship—As , September 4, 2020. See also Paul McLeary, “Navy Awards Study Contracts On Large Unmanned Ship—As
Congress Watches Closely,” Congress Watches Closely,” Breaking Defense, September 4, 2020. , September 4, 2020.
~~26 This is a reference to Section 804 of the FY2016 National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1356/P.L. 114-92 of~~
~~November 25, 2015). The rapid prototyping authority provided by that section is now codified at 10 U.S.C. 2302 note.~~
~~For more on this authority, see “Middle Tier Acquisition (Section 804),” MITRE, undated, accessed May 24, 2019, at~~
~~https://aida.mitre.org/middle-tier/; and “Acquisition Process, Middle Tier Acquisition (Section 804),” AcqNotes,~~
~~updated March 26, 2019, accessed May 24, 2019, at http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/middle-tier-acquisitions.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

13

~~link to page 7 link to page 19~~ ~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~effort. As shown in Figure 1,~~ ~~this~~Congressional Research Service 14 link to page 20 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles prototyping effort under what is known as Section 804 middle tier acquisition authority.25 The first MUSV prototype was funded in FY2019. The MUSV program is building on development work by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under its Anti-Submarine Warfare Continuous Trail Unmanned Vessel (ACTUV) effort and the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under its Medium Displacement USV effort. This work led to the design, construction, and testing of the work led to the design, construction, and testing of the
prototype Sea Hunter medium displacement USV, which has a reported length of 132 feet (about prototype Sea Hunter medium displacement USV, which has a reported length of 132 feet (about
40.2 meters) and a displacement of about 140 tons.40.2 meters) and a displacement of about 140 tons.2726 The Navy’s MUSV program is also to The Navy’s MUSV program is also to
employ a fleet-ready command and control (C2) solution for USVs that was developed by the employ a fleet-ready command and control (C2) solution for USVs that was developed by the
Strategic Capabilities Office for the LUSV program. The Navy states that Strategic Capabilities Office for the LUSV program. The Navy states that
Medium unmanned surface vehicle (MUSV) is an unmanned sensor-ship, built to carry Medium unmanned surface vehicle (MUSV) is an unmanned sensor-ship, built to carry
modular payloads, and standardized for easy integration with current Navy systems. modular payloads, and standardized for easy integration with current Navy systems.
Inexpensive compared to manned combatants, MUSVs can be built in numbers, quickly Inexpensive compared to manned combatants, MUSVs can be built in numbers, quickly
adding capacity to the Fleet. MUSV delivers a distributed sensor network that can navigate adding capacity to the Fleet. MUSV delivers a distributed sensor network that can navigate
and operate with man in/on the loop oversight, and will be capable of weeks-long and operate with man in/on the loop oversight, and will be capable of weeks-long
deployments and trans-oceanic transits. The Navy awarded a design and fabrication deployments and trans-oceanic transits. The Navy awarded a design and fabrication
contract to develop the first MUSV prototype which is targeted for delivery in FY 2023.contract to develop the first MUSV prototype which is targeted for delivery in FY 2023.2827
On July 13, 2020, the Navy announced that it had awarded “a $34,999,948 contract to L3[Harris] On July 13, 2020, the Navy announced that it had awarded “a $34,999,948 contract to L3[Harris]
Technologies, Inc. for the development of a single Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle (MUSV) Technologies, Inc. for the development of a single Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle (MUSV)
prototype, with options to procure up to eight additional MUSVs. The award follows a full and prototype, with options to procure up to eight additional MUSVs. The award follows a full and
open competitive procurement process. Funding is in place on this contract for the initial open competitive procurement process. Funding is in place on this contract for the initial
prototype. With all options exercised, the contract is valued at $281,435,446 if additional funding prototype. With all options exercised, the contract is valued at $281,435,446 if additional funding
is provided in future budget years.”is provided in future budget years.”2928 The Navy reportedly stated that there were five competitors The Navy reportedly stated that there were five competitors
for the contract, but did not identify the other four.for the contract, but did not identify the other four.3029 Figure 1011 shows a rendering of L3Harris’s shows a rendering of L3Harris’s
design concept.design concept.
L3Harris states that L3Harris states that
will integrate the company’s ASView™ autonomy technology into a purpose-built 195- will integrate the company’s ASView™ autonomy technology into a purpose-built 195-
foot commercially derived vehicle from a facility along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana. The foot commercially derived vehicle from a facility along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana. The
MUSV will provide intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance to the fleet while MUSV will provide intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance to the fleet while
~~maneuvering autonomously and complying with international Collision Regulations, even~~
~~in operational environments.…~~
~~L3Harris will be the systems integrator and provide the mission autonomy and perception~~
~~technology as the prime contractor on the program. The program team includes Gibbs &~~
~~Cox and Incat Crowther who will provide the ship design and Swiftships will complete the~~
~~construction of the vehicle.~~

27 25 This is a reference to Section 804 of the FY2016 National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1356/P.L. 114-92 of November 25, 2015). The rapid prototyping authority provided by that section is now codified at 10 U.S.C. 2302 note. For more on this authority, see “Middle Tier Acquisition (Section 804),” MITRE, undated, accessed May 24, 2019, at https://aida.mitre.org/middle-tier/; and “Acquisition Process, Middle Tier Acquisition (Section 804),” AcqNotes, updated March 26, 2019, accessed May 24, 2019, at http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/middle-tier-acquisitions. 26 See, for example, Megan Eckstein, “Sea Hunter Unmanned Ship Continues Autonomy Testing as NAVSEA Moves See, for example, Megan Eckstein, “Sea Hunter Unmanned Ship Continues Autonomy Testing as NAVSEA Moves
Forward with Draft RFP,” Forward with Draft RFP,” USNI News, April 29, 2019; Evan Milberg, “DARPA “Sea Hunter,” World’s Largest , April 29, 2019; Evan Milberg, “DARPA “Sea Hunter,” World’s Largest
Autonomous Ship, Transferred to U.S. Navy,” Autonomous Ship, Transferred to U.S. Navy,” Composites Manufacturing Magazine, February 12, 2018; Sydney J. , February 12, 2018; Sydney J.
Freedberg Jr., “DSD [Deputy Secretary of Defense] Work Embraces DARPA’s Robot Boat, Sea Hunter,” Freedberg Jr., “DSD [Deputy Secretary of Defense] Work Embraces DARPA’s Robot Boat, Sea Hunter,” Breaking
Defense, April 7, 2016. , April 7, 2016.
2827 Statement of Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Statement of Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and
Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfighting Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfighting
Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9) and Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant, Combat Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9) and Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant, Combat
Development and Integration, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the Development and Integration, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the
Subcommittee on Seapower of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2022 Subcommittee on Seapower of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2022
Budget Request for Seapower, June 8, 2021, pp. 14-15. Budget Request for Seapower, June 8, 2021, pp. 14-15.
2928 PEO Unmanned and Small Combatants Public Affairs, “Navy Awards Contract for Medium Unmanned Surface PEO Unmanned and Small Combatants Public Affairs, “Navy Awards Contract for Medium Unmanned Surface
Vehicle Prototype,” Naval Sea Systems Command, July 13, 2020. Vehicle Prototype,” Naval Sea Systems Command, July 13, 2020.
3029 Rich Abott, “L3Harris Wins $35 Million MUSV Prototype Contract,” Rich Abott, “L3Harris Wins $35 Million MUSV Prototype Contract,” Defense Daily, July 13, 2020. See also Sam , July 13, 2020. See also Sam
LaGrone, “Navy Awards Contract for First Vessel In Its Family of Unmanned Surface Vehicles,” LaGrone, “Navy Awards Contract for First Vessel In Its Family of Unmanned Surface Vehicles,” USNI News, July 14 , July 14
(updated July 15), 2020; Paul McLeary, “Navy Inks Deal For New Unmanned Fleet,” (updated July 15), 2020; Paul McLeary, “Navy Inks Deal For New Unmanned Fleet,” Breaking Defense, July 13, 2020. , July 13, 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1415

link to page 8 link to page 8

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

maneuvering autonomously and complying with international Collision Regulations, even in operational environments.… L3Harris will be the systems integrator and provide the mission autonomy and perception technology as the prime contractor on the program. The program team includes Gibbs & Cox and Incat Crowther who will provide the ship design and Swiftships will complete the construction of the vehicle. L3Harris is a world leader in actively powered Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) systems, L3Harris is a world leader in actively powered Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) systems,
with over 115 USVs delivered worldwide. L3Harris’ USVs are actively serving the Navy, with over 115 USVs delivered worldwide. L3Harris’ USVs are actively serving the Navy,
universities, research institutions and commercial businesses.universities, research institutions and commercial businesses.3130
Figure 1011. Rendering of L3Harris Design Concept for MUSV

Source: L3Harris Technologies, “L3Harris Technologies Awarded Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle Program L3Harris Technologies, “L3Harris Technologies Awarded Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle Program
from US Navy,” August 18, 2020. See also Richard R. Burgess, “Navy’s Medium USV to Be Based on Commercial from US Navy,” August 18, 2020. See also Richard R. Burgess, “Navy’s Medium USV to Be Based on Commercial
Vehicle,” Vehicle,” Seapower, August 19, 2020. , August 19, 2020.
XLUUV Program
The XLUUV program, also known as the Orca program, was established to address a Joint The XLUUV program, also known as the Orca program, was established to address a Joint
Emergent Operational Need (JEON). As shown iEmergent Operational Need (JEON). As shown in Figure 2, the Navy defines XLUUVs as UUVs he Navy defines XLUUVs as UUVs
with a diameter of more than 84 inches, meaning that XLUUVs are to be too large to be launched with a diameter of more than 84 inches, meaning that XLUUVs are to be too large to be launched
from a manned Navy submarine.from a manned Navy submarine.3231 Consequently, XLUUVs instead will transported to a forward Consequently, XLUUVs instead will transported to a forward
operating port and then launched from pier. The Department of the Navy’s March 16, 2021, operating port and then launched from pier. The Department of the Navy’s March 16, 2021,
unmanned campaign framework document states that the XLUUV will be designed “to unmanned campaign framework document states that the XLUUV will be designed “to
accommodate a variety of large payloads….”accommodate a variety of large payloads….”3332 The Navy testified on March 18, 2021, that mines The Navy testified on March 18, 2021, that mines
will be the initial payload for XLUUVs.will be the initial payload for XLUUVs.3433 More specifically, the Navy wants to use XLUUVs to, More specifically, the Navy wants to use XLUUVs to,
among other things, covertly deploy the Hammerhead mine, a planned mine that would be among other things, covertly deploy the Hammerhead mine, a planned mine that would be
tethered to the seabed and armed with an antisubmarine torpedo, broadly similar to the Navy’s tethered to the seabed and armed with an antisubmarine torpedo, broadly similar to the Navy’s
Cold War-era CAPTOR (encapsulated torpedo) mine.Cold War-era CAPTOR (encapsulated torpedo) mine.35
~~The first five XLUUVs were funded in FY2019 through the Navy’s research and development~~
~~appropriation account. The Navy conducted a competition for the design of the XLUUV, and~~
~~announced on February 13, 2019, that it had selected Boeing to fabricate, test, and deliver the first~~34

3130 L3Harris Technologies, “L3Harris Technologies Awarded Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle Program from US L3Harris Technologies, “L3Harris Technologies Awarded Medium Unmanned Surface Vehicle Program from US
Navy,” August 18, 2020. Navy,” August 18, 2020.
3231 Navy submarines equipped with large-diameter vertical launch tubes can launch missiles or other payloads with Navy submarines equipped with large-diameter vertical launch tubes can launch missiles or other payloads with
diameters of up to about 83 inches. diameters of up to about 83 inches.
3332 Department of the Navy, Department of the Navy, Department of the Navy Unmanned Campaign Framework, March 16, 2021, p. 16. , March 16, 2021, p. 16.
3433 Richard R. Burgess, “Navy’s Orca XLUUV to Have Mine-Laying Mission, Adm. Kilby Says,” Richard R. Burgess, “Navy’s Orca XLUUV to Have Mine-Laying Mission, Adm. Kilby Says,” Seapower, March 18, , March 18,
2021. 2021.
3534 For a discussion of the Hammerhead mine, see, for example, David Hambling, “With Hammerhead Mine, U.S. Navy For a discussion of the Hammerhead mine, see, for example, David Hambling, “With Hammerhead Mine, U.S. Navy
~~Plots New Style Of Warfare To Tip Balance In South China Sea,” Forbes, October 22, 2020. See also Audrey Decker,~~
~~“Navy’s XLUUV Will Fill ‘Specific Mission’ in INDOPACOM,” Inside Defense, November 22, 2021.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

15

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~four Orca XLUUVs and associated support elements.36~~ Congressional Research Service 16 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles The first five XLUUVs were funded in FY2019 through the Navy’s research and development appropriation account. The Navy conducted a competition for the design of the XLUUV, and announced on February 13, 2019, that it had selected Boeing to fabricate, test, and deliver the first four Orca XLUUVs and associated support elements.35 (The other bidder was a team led by (The other bidder was a team led by
Lockheed Martin.) On March 27, 2019, the Navy announced that the award to Boeing had been Lockheed Martin.) On March 27, 2019, the Navy announced that the award to Boeing had been
expanded to include the fifth Orca.expanded to include the fifth Orca.3736 Boeing has partnered with the Technical Solutions division Boeing has partnered with the Technical Solutions division
of Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) to build Orca XLUUVs.of Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) to build Orca XLUUVs.~~38 (A separate~~37 (Another division of HII— division of HII—
Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS) of Newport News, VA—is one of the Navy’s two submarine Newport News Shipbuilding (NNS) of Newport News, VA—is one of the Navy’s two submarine
builders.) The Navy states builders.) The Navy states
Orca XLUUV is a multi-phased accelerated acquisition effort using [Title 10] USC Sec. Orca XLUUV is a multi-phased accelerated acquisition effort using [Title 10] USC Sec.
2358 [acquisition] authorities [for research and development projects] to rapidly deliver 2358 [acquisition] authorities [for research and development projects] to rapidly deliver
capability to the Fleet. capability to the Fleet.
Phase 1 was a competitively sourced design effort. Two design contracts were awarded to Phase 1 was a competitively sourced design effort. Two design contracts were awarded to
Industry in FY 2017. Industry in FY 2017.
Phase 2 commenced with a down select in FY 2019 to one of the Phase 1 vendors for Phase 2 commenced with a down select in FY 2019 to one of the Phase 1 vendors for
fabrication and testing of the vehicle and support elements. Five (5) Orca XLUUV fabrication and testing of the vehicle and support elements. Five (5) Orca XLUUV
operationally relevant prototype systems (vehicles, mobile C2 equipment, and support operationally relevant prototype systems (vehicles, mobile C2 equipment, and support
equipment) are being fabricated for demonstration and use by the Fleet. Additional equipment) are being fabricated for demonstration and use by the Fleet. Additional
XLUUV technologies/capabilities risk reduction will occur in parallel, leveraging the XLUUV technologies/capabilities risk reduction will occur in parallel, leveraging the
competitive Industrial base.competitive Industrial base.3938
Phase 3 provides the option to fabricate up to four (4) additional systems from the vendor Phase 3 provides the option to fabricate up to four (4) additional systems from the vendor
who fabricated vehicles in Phasewho fabricated vehicles in Phase 2. Fabrication award of these additional Orca XLUUV 2. Fabrication award of these additional Orca XLUUV
systems is planned to be no earlier than FY24. Transition to an Acquisition Category systems is planned to be no earlier than FY24. Transition to an Acquisition Category
(ACAT) Program and production may occur as early as FY24, pending successful (ACAT) Program and production may occur as early as FY24, pending successful
completion of Government testing.completion of Government testing.4039
XLUUV will have a modular payload bay, including a universal payload module, with XLUUV will have a modular payload bay, including a universal payload module, with
defined interfaces that current and future payloads must adhere to for employment from defined interfaces that current and future payloads must adhere to for employment from
the vehicle. The Hammerhead [mine] payload is the next payload for integration with Orca the vehicle. The Hammerhead [mine] payload is the next payload for integration with Orca
XLUUV. Other potential future payloads, advanced energy solutions, and enhanced XLUUV. Other potential future payloads, advanced energy solutions, and enhanced
autonomy and command and control will be developed and evaluated under the Core autonomy and command and control will be developed and evaluated under the Core
Technologies PE [program element in the Navy’s research and development account] Technologies PE [program element in the Navy’s research and development account]
0604029N, and/or by other Science and technology organizations, and integrated into Orca 0604029N, and/or by other Science and technology organizations, and integrated into Orca
XLUUV when ready. XLUUV when ready.
~~The Navy is concurrently updating facilities at the Naval Base Ventura County site for~~
~~XLUUV testing, training, and work-ups, in coordination with large unmanned surface~~
~~vessel testing for cost efficiencies. In parallel, the Navy is evaluating options for future far-~~
~~forward basing locations.41~~

36 Plots New Style Of Warfare To Tip Balance In South China Sea,” Forbes, October 22, 2020. See also Audrey Decker, “Navy’s XLUUV Will Fill ‘Specific Mission’ in INDOPACOM,” Inside Defense, November 22, 2021. 35 Department of Defense, Department of Defense, Contracts for Feb. 13, 2019. .
3736 Department of Defense, Department of Defense, Contracts for March 27, 2019. .
3837 See, for example, Hugh Lessig, “Shipbuilder Lends a Hand with Rise of Robot Submarines,” See, for example, Hugh Lessig, “Shipbuilder Lends a Hand with Rise of Robot Submarines,” Defense News, May 26, , May 26,
2019. 2019.
3938 The Navy states: “Testing and delivery of the vehicles and support elements has been delayed to FY22 due to The Navy states: “Testing and delivery of the vehicles and support elements has been delayed to FY22 due to
contractor challenges and supplier issues. The Navy is working with Boeing to mitigate schedule delays and execute contractor challenges and supplier issues. The Navy is working with Boeing to mitigate schedule delays and execute
risk reduction testing under prototyping effort.” (risk reduction testing under prototyping effort.” (Department of Defense, Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget Estimates,
Navy Justification Book Volume 2 of 5, Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy, May 2021, p. 1301.) , May 2021, p. 1301.)
4039 The Navy states: “Fabrication awards of additional Orca XLUUV systems are planned for FY24 and out, gradually The Navy states: “Fabrication awards of additional Orca XLUUV systems are planned for FY24 and out, gradually
ramping up quantities in future fiscal years, depending on the progress from the first five systems.” (ramping up quantities in future fiscal years, depending on the progress from the first five systems.” (Department of
Defense, Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget Estimates, Navy Justification Book Volume 2 of 5, Research, Development, Test
& Evaluation, Navy, May 2021, p. 1301.) , May 2021, p. 1301.)
41 ~~Department of Defense, Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget Estimates, Navy Justification Book Volume 2 of 5, Research,~~
~~Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy, May 2021, p. 1306.~~
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1617

link to page link to page 2122 link to page link to page 2223 link to page link to page 2223

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

The Navy is concurrently updating facilities at the Naval Base Ventura County site for XLUUV testing, training, and work-ups, in coordination with large unmanned surface vessel testing for cost efficiencies. In parallel, the Navy is evaluating options for future far-forward basing locations.40 Boeing’s Orca XLUUV design will be informed by (but will differ in certain respects from) the Boeing’s Orca XLUUV design will be informed by (but will differ in certain respects from) the
design of Boeing’s Echo Voyager UUV design of Boeing’s Echo Voyager UUV (Figure 1112, Figure 1213, andnd Figure 1314)..4241 Echo Voyager is Echo Voyager is
roughly the size of a subway car—it is 51 feet long and has a rectangular cross section of 8.5 feet roughly the size of a subway car—it is 51 feet long and has a rectangular cross section of 8.5 feet
by 8.5 feet, a weight in the air of 50 tons, and a range of up to 6,500 nautical miles. It can by 8.5 feet, a weight in the air of 50 tons, and a range of up to 6,500 nautical miles. It can
accommodate a modular payload section up to 34 feet in length, increasing its length to as much accommodate a modular payload section up to 34 feet in length, increasing its length to as much
as 85 feet. A 34-foot modular payload section provides about 2,000 cubic feet of internal payload as 85 feet. A 34-foot modular payload section provides about 2,000 cubic feet of internal payload
volume; a shorter (14-foot) section provides about 900 cubic feet. Echo Voyager can also volume; a shorter (14-foot) section provides about 900 cubic feet. Echo Voyager can also
accommodate external payloads.accommodate external payloads.43 42 Figure 12. Boeing Echo Voyager UUV Source: Boeing photograph posted at https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/echo-voyager/index.page#/gallery. The Navy states that the XLUUV The Navy states that the XLUUV
is based off Boeing’s Echo Voyager, but incorporates significant changes to support is based off Boeing’s Echo Voyager, but incorporates significant changes to support
military mission requirements. This has resulted in challenges in establishing the military mission requirements. This has resulted in challenges in establishing the
manufacturing process, building up the industrial base, and aligning material purchases to manufacturing process, building up the industrial base, and aligning material purchases to
40 Department of Defense, Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Budget Estimates, Navy Justification Book Volume 2 of 5, Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy, May 2021, p. 1306. 41 See, for example, Hugh Lessig, “Shipbuilder Lends a Hand with Rise of Robot Submarines,” Defense News, May 26, 2019. 42 Source: Boeing product sheet on Echo Voyager, accessed May 31, 2019, at https://www.boeing.com/resources/boeingdotcom/defense/autonomous-systems/echo-voyager/echo_voyager_product_sheet.pdf. Congressional Research Service 18 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles produce the first group of prototype vehicles. Orca represents the leading edge of produce the first group of prototype vehicles. Orca represents the leading edge of
autonomous maritime vehicle technology and will have extended range and a autonomous maritime vehicle technology and will have extended range and a
reconfigurable, modular payload bay to support multiple payloads and a variety of reconfigurable, modular payload bay to support multiple payloads and a variety of
missions.missions.4443
Figure 1113. Boeing Echo Voyager UUV

Source: Boeing photograph posted at https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/echo-voyager/Boeing photograph posted at https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/echo-voyager/
index.page#/gallery. index.page#/gallery.

~~42 See, for example, Hugh Lessig, “Shipbuilder Lends a Hand with Rise of Robot Submarines,” Defense News, May 26,~~
~~2019.~~
~~43 Source: Boeing product sheet on Echo Voyager, accessed May 31, 2019, at https://www.boeing.com/resources/~~
~~boeingdotcom/defense/autonomous-systems/echo-voyager/echo_voyager_product_sheet.pdf.~~
44 Figure 14. Boeing Echo Voyager UUV Source: Navy briefing entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems,” Howard Berkof, Deputy Program Manager, Unmanned Maritime Systems, PMS 406, Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited, October 23, 2019, slide 5. 43 Statement of Fredrick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition Statement of Fredrick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition
(ASN [RD&A]) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems and (ASN [RD&A]) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Warfare Systems and
Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant Combat Development and Integration & Commanding Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant Combat Development and Integration & Commanding
General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the House Armed Services Committee Subcommittee
on Seapower and Projection Forces, on Department of the Navy Unmanned Systems, March 18, 2021, p. 12. on Seapower and Projection Forces, on Department of the Navy Unmanned Systems, March 18, 2021, p. 12.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1719

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~Figure 12. Boeing Echo Voyager UUV~~

Source: Boeing photograph posted at https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/echo-voyager/
~~index.page#/gallery.~~
~~Figure 13. Boeing Echo Voyager UUV~~

Source: Navy briefing entitled “Unmanned Maritime Systems,” Howard Berkof, Deputy Program Manager,
~~Unmanned Maritime Systems, PMS 406, Distribution A: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited,~~
~~October 23, 2019, slide 5.~~
Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles Issues for Congress
The Navy’s proposals for developing and procuring the large UVs covered in this report pose a The Navy’s proposals for developing and procuring the large UVs covered in this report pose a
number of oversight issues for Congress, including those discussed below. number of oversight issues for Congress, including those discussed below.
~~Congressional Research Service~~

18

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

Analytical Basis for More Distributed Fleet Architecture
One potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the analytical basis for the Navy’s desire to One potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the analytical basis for the Navy’s desire to
shift to a more distributed fleet architecture featuring a significant contribution from large UVs. shift to a more distributed fleet architecture featuring a significant contribution from large UVs.
Potential oversight questions for Congress include the following: Potential oversight questions for Congress include the following:
 What Navy analyses led to the Navy’s decision to shift toward a more distributed  What Navy analyses led to the Navy’s decision to shift toward a more distributed
architecture? architecture?
 What did these analyses show regarding the relative costs, capabilities, and risks  What did these analyses show regarding the relative costs, capabilities, and risks
of the Navy’s current architecture and the more distributed architecture? of the Navy’s current architecture and the more distributed architecture?
 How well developed, and how well tested, are the operational concepts  How well developed, and how well tested, are the operational concepts
associated with the more distributed architecture? associated with the more distributed architecture?
The Navy states The Navy states
As directed in the FY 2021 National Defense Authorization Act, As directed in the FY 2021 National Defense Authorization Act,4544 the Navy is conducting the Navy is conducting
a Distributed Offensive Surface Fires AoA [analysis of alternatives] to compare the a Distributed Offensive Surface Fires AoA [analysis of alternatives] to compare the
currently planned large unmanned surface vessel (LUSV) with an integrated missile currently planned large unmanned surface vessel (LUSV) with an integrated missile
launcher payload against a broad range of alternative surface platforms and capabilities to launcher payload against a broad range of alternative surface platforms and capabilities to
determine the most appropriate vessel to deliver additional missile capability and capacity determine the most appropriate vessel to deliver additional missile capability and capacity
to the surface force. We expect to complete this analysis and report our findings to to the surface force. We expect to complete this analysis and report our findings to
Congress before the end of this calendar year.Congress before the end of this calendar year.4645
Concept of Operations (CONOPS)
Overview Another potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the Navy’s concept of operations Another potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the Navy’s concept of operations
(CONOPS) for these large UVs, meaning the Navy’s understanding at a detailed level of how it (CONOPS) for these large UVs, meaning the Navy’s understanding at a detailed level of how it
will operatewill operate and support these UVs in conjunction with manned Navy ships in these UVs in conjunction with manned Navy ships in ~~various operational scenarios,~~
both combat operations and at other times, and consequently how, exactly, these UVs will fit into the Navy’s overall force structure and and consequently how, exactly, these UVs will fit into the Navy’s overall force structure and
~~operations. Potential oversight questions for Congress include the following:~~
~~ How fully has the Navy developed its CONOPS for these large UVs? What~~
~~activities is the Navy undertaking to develop its CONOPS for them?~~
~~ What is the Navy’s CONOPS for using these large UVs in day-to-day,~~
~~noncombat operations?~~
~~ How sensitive are the performance requirements that the Navy has established~~
~~for these large UVs to potential changes in their CONOPS that may occur as the~~
~~Navy continues to develop the CONOPS? How likely is it, if at all, that the Navy~~
~~will have to change the performance requirements for these large UVs as a~~
~~consequence of more fully developing their CONOPS?~~
~~As mentioned earlier, in May 2019, the Navy established a surface development squadron to help~~
~~develop operational concepts for LUSVs and MUSVs. The squadron was initially to consist of a~~

~~45 Section 227(e) of H.R. 6395/P.L. 116-283 of January 1, 2021.~~
~~46 Statement of Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and~~
~~Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfighting~~
~~Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9) and Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant, Combat~~
~~Development and Integration, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the~~
~~Subcommittee on Seapower of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2022~~
~~Budget Request for Seapower, June 8, 2021, p. 14. See also Jason Sherman, “Navy considering alternatives to LUSV,~~
~~packing amphibs, commercial designs more with long-range missiles,” Inside Defense, April 9, 2021.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

19

~~link to page 10~~ ~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

~~Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer and one Sea Hunter prototype medium displacement USV~~
~~(Figure 4)~~. operations. December 2021 Blog Posts Some observers have raised questions regarding the Navy’s CONOPs for operating and supporting large UVs, particularly large USVs. A December 10, 2021, blog post, for example, states 44 Section 227(e) of H.R. 6395/P.L. 116-283 of January 1, 2021. 45 Statement of Frederick J. Stefany, Acting Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) and Vice Admiral James W. Kilby, Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, Warfighting Requirements and Capabilities (OPNAV N9) and Lieutenant General Eric M. Smith, Deputy Commandant, Combat Development and Integration, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, before the Subcommittee on Seapower of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Department of the Navy Fiscal Year 2022 Budget Request for Seapower, June 8, 2021, p. 14. See also Jason Sherman, “Navy considering alternatives to LUSV, packing amphibs, commercial designs more with long-range missiles,” Inside Defense, April 9, 2021. Congressional Research Service 20 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles The U.S. Navy is moving forward with its plans for a more distributed fleet in which intelligent unmanned or autonomous platforms will play a significant role. Unfortunately, many of the details about these novel systems are left to the imagination—often a poor substitute for filling in the blanks. It may be that the blanks cannot be satisfactorily filled when describing the infrastructure for sustaining these unmanned systems. Rightly or wrongly, the Navy focuses most of its discussion on the direct offensive contributions of unmanned systems for combat with major powers on warfighting impact and metrics such as effects on targets, capacity, and tempo. Less discussion focuses on the indirect sustainment tasks.... Our concern ... is with offboard air, surface, and subsurface unmanned vehicles that will operate with some degree of autonomy. It matters logistically whether these offboard systems are expendable or recoverable because recoverable systems must not only be launched, but also retrieved, refueled (or recharged), and maintained during the potentially long pre-combat period.... ... most of the Navy’s discussions are couched in terms of operations after bullets have started flying, omitting details about what happens during the days, weeks, and months before combat begins. Because of that, there is little discussion of the infrastructure to support those pre-combat operations—infrastructure that would seem to include “motherships” and overseas land support bases for the unmanned systems if the Navy is employing tens to hundreds of these systems. Explanations from the Navy as to how this will happen are sparse, and one might be excused for thinking there is no significant cost or preparation required at all. This leads to a fundamental tradeoff without a good solution. If the Navy wants to develop small quantities of intelligent, precision offensive unmanned systems, then those systems should be regarded as valuable and require their own (costly) defensive measures. Otherwise they become effectively expendable. Conversely, if the Navy wants to emphasize quantity over quality with inexpensive mass (such as “swarms”), it needs to recognize that there is great advantage to the side that owns the nearby land where even larger quantities of such unmanned systems can be generated. In swarm warfare, quantity trumps quality. Either way, there is an infrastructure tail that cannot be ignored.... The Navy can sustain small numbers of unmanned systems today. If that is the future that the Navy envisions, with only small quantities of systems that may be superb in quality and capability, it should say so. But the illusion created by the Navy’s strategy, whether intentional or not, is that the number of offboard unmanned systems in use will not be small. Furthermore, unless the offboard systems have exceedingly long range and endurance, launching and recovering them must be done with some proximity to their operational locations, presumably at risk of attack from the adversary. This begs the question: What part of the Navy force structure and budget will be used for large-scale sustainment of unmanned systems at sea? There are some possibilities, but none look particularly attractive.... Unmanned or autonomous platforms have some roles to play (especially in surveillance and reconnaissance), but the quantities that are required for naval operations must be married with a sustainment plan — and maybe a shipbuilding plan — to support that level of operations both during combat and in the days, weeks, and months before combat operations ratchet up. A meaningful concept of operations must address this.46 A December 28, 2021, blog post states Two subjects are nearly inescapable in commentary about the U.S. Navy today. The first is the much-maligned, 15-year saga of the littoral combat ship (LCS), which has provided 46 Gregory V. Cox, “The U.S. Navy’s Plans for Unmanned and Autonomous Systems Leave Too Much Unexplained,” War on the Rocks, December 10, 2021. Congressional Research Service 21 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles an unfortunate case study for interest group capture, misalignment of ends and means, cost overruns, and engineering failures. The second subject is more hopeful: proposals for unmanned surface vessels that will deliver cost savings and increase the size of the fleet.... Very little commentary, however, explicitly connects the two subjects. This is unfortunate because, while the LCS is not unmanned, it is further on the unmanned spectrum than any other U.S. Navy vessel in operational use, making it the closest real-world test case for future surface fleet architecture.... ... replacing sailors [on the LCS] with technology reduced maintenance at the operator level, but increased it at the regional maintenance center and original equipment manufacturer levels. This raised costs overall, meaning fewer platforms could be purchased. Second, minimal manning made platforms less resilient. Fewer sailors meant fewer problems spotted, and less capacity to fix them while underway. Hence, if fielded in anything approximating combat conditions, the LCS would not remain effective for long. We argue that these two challenges are as—if not more—likely to occur on unmanned ships as they did on minimally manned ones.... Through direct experience operating their equipment while underway, LCS sailors have developed “tribal knowledge” of their systems. They have also acquired onsite knowledge by observing contractors and regional maintenance center engineers. As sailors transition to shore tours at regional maintenance facilities and training groups, designing programs to train the next generation of LCS sailors, the Navy achieves some self-sufficiency, an experiential economy of scale that can help recoup the costs of overreliance on original equipment manufacturers and contractors. Yet it is difficult to see how this optimistic scenario could occur with fully unmanned platforms. First, with no sailors aboard, the underway experimentation and practice that produced tribal knowledge in the LCS case can’t happen. Nor will sailors be present to observe and learn from contractors who repair equipment. Without the economy of scale that began developing in the LCS case, maintenance costs will remain beholden to third-party contractors. Second, while contractors can fly out to a manned platform that is underway, they cannot do so for an unmanned vessel. Without accommodations and life-support systems, unmanned vessels will have to return to port for repairs, or else be sustained at sea and in theater by amphibious ships, submarines, or expeditionary sea bases.... The minimal-manning construct of the LCS undermined its utility for distributed maritime operations in two ways. First, removing humans from the ship placed higher demands on contractor support. This drove up production and life-cycle costs, driving down the quantity of platforms that could be purchased. Second, the platform’s minimal manning made it less resilient to routine wear and tear, and consequently, the Navy both decommissioned four LCS hulls early and had to withdraw others from routine operations repeatedly to conduct repairs. We conclude with three recommendations to help future unmanned surface vessels avoid a similar fate. First, unmanned system development requires a different approach to project management than was used for the LCS.... ... unlike with the LCS, where adding personnel to the original manning concept helped resolve failed integration points, fully unmanned platforms will lack this backstop. As a result, there is an even higher premium on ensuring that the integration points of the ship’s networks and mechanical systems function properly before widespread fielding. Agile project management, a development style based on shorter timelines and multiple delivery dates, might help address the issue. The Navy’s program executive office, Integrated Warfare Systems, is currently working to incorporate agile continuous delivery processes. Congressional Research Service 22 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles In this approach, the product timeline is less definitive, changes to the product are frequent and expected, and the end user helps guide each iteration. The shipbuilding version of this would include the use of land-based testing sites, as it will for the Navy’s new Constellation-class frigate....47 Second, even with perfect equipment, unmanned vessels will face attacks with a redundancy chain that is always one link shorter than it would be with sailors present.... With a distributed fleet architecture, the Navy should only use unmanned vessels for those mission areas where the ability to survive the first few salvos matters little to the extended fight. Third, while purchasing and fielding a great number of vessels is necessary for distributed maritime operations, so is preventing them all from being sunk outright. Unmanned vessels should not be considered expendable if they are expected to provide quantity, so some proportion of them will have to be repaired in combat conditions....This suggests that, if future fleet architecture depends heavily on unmanned vessels, the Navy will eventually bear the costs of more manned support vessels as well.48 Navy Efforts to Develop CONOPs As mentioned earlier, in May 2019, the Navy established a surface development squadron to help develop operational concepts for LUSVs and MUSVs. The squadron was initially to consist of a Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class destroyer and one Sea Hunter prototype medium displacement USV. A second Sea Hunter prototype reportedly was to be added around the end of FY2020, A second Sea Hunter prototype reportedly was to be added around the end of FY2020,
and LUSVs and MUSVs would then be added as they become available.and LUSVs and MUSVs would then be added as they become available.4749 A September 9, 2020, A September 9, 2020,
press report states press report states
Development squadrons working with unmanned underwater and surface vehicles are Development squadrons working with unmanned underwater and surface vehicles are
moving out quickly to develop concepts of operations and human-machine interfaces, even moving out quickly to develop concepts of operations and human-machine interfaces, even
as they’re still using prototypes ahead of the delivery of fleet USVs and UUVs, officials as they’re still using prototypes ahead of the delivery of fleet USVs and UUVs, officials
said this week. said this week.
Capt. Hank Adams, the commodore of Surface Development Squadron One Capt. Hank Adams, the commodore of Surface Development Squadron One
(SURFDEVRON), is planning an upcoming weeks-long experiment with sailors in an (SURFDEVRON), is planning an upcoming weeks-long experiment with sailors in an
unmanned operations center (UOC) ashore commanding and controlling an Overlord USV unmanned operations center (UOC) ashore commanding and controlling an Overlord USV
that the Navy hasn’t even taken ownership of from the Pentagon, in a bid to get a head start that the Navy hasn’t even taken ownership of from the Pentagon, in a bid to get a head start
on figuring out what the command and control process looks like and what the supervisory on figuring out what the command and control process looks like and what the supervisory
control system must allow sailors to do. control system must allow sailors to do.
And Cmdr. Rob Patchin, commanding officer of Unmanned Undersea Vehicles Squadron And Cmdr. Rob Patchin, commanding officer of Unmanned Undersea Vehicles Squadron
One (UUVRON-1), is pushing the limits of his test vehicles to send the program office a One (UUVRON-1), is pushing the limits of his test vehicles to send the program office a
list of vehicle behaviors that his operators need their UUVs to have that the commercial list of vehicle behaviors that his operators need their UUVs to have that the commercial
prototypes today don’t have. prototypes today don’t have.
The two spoke during a panel at the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems The two spoke during a panel at the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems
International (AUVSI) annual defense conference on Tuesday, and made clear that they International (AUVSI) annual defense conference on Tuesday, and made clear that they
47 For more on the Constellation-class frigate program, see CRS Report R44972, Navy Constellation (FFG-62) Class Frigate Program: Background and Issues for Congress, by Ronald O'Rourke. 48 Jonathan Panter and Johnathan Falcone, “The Unplanned Costs of an Unmanned Fleet,” War on the Rocks, December 28, 2021. 49 See, for example, Megan Eckstein, “Navy Stands Up Surface Development Squadron for DDG-1000, Unmanned Experimentation,” USNI News, May 22, 2019; David B. Larter, “With Billions Planned in Funding, the US Navy Charts Its Unmanned Future,” Defense News, May 6, 2019. See also Michael Fabey, “USN Seeks Path for Unmanned Systems Operational Concepts,” Jane’s Navy International, May 16, 2019. Congressional Research Service 23 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles want to have the fleet trained and ready to start using UUVs and USVs when industry is want to have the fleet trained and ready to start using UUVs and USVs when industry is
ready to deliver them.ready to deliver them.4850
An October 30, 2020, press report stated: An October 30, 2020, press report stated:
The Navy is set to complete and release a concept of operations for the medium and large The Navy is set to complete and release a concept of operations for the medium and large
unmanned surface vehicles in “the next few months,” a Navy spokesman told Inside unmanned surface vehicles in “the next few months,” a Navy spokesman told Inside
Defense. Defense.
Alan Baribeau, a spokesman for Naval Sea Systems Command, said the Navy extended Alan Baribeau, a spokesman for Naval Sea Systems Command, said the Navy extended
the due date to allow for more flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic and allow for the due date to allow for more flexibility during the COVID-19 pandemic and allow for
sufficient time for review and staffing…. sufficient time for review and staffing….
The CONOPS is currently undergoing flag-level review after completing action officer- The CONOPS is currently undergoing flag-level review after completing action officer-
level review as well as O6-level review, Baribeau said.level review as well as O6-level review, Baribeau said.4951 A December 15, 2021, press report stated: The Navy has announced new plans for a “purpose-built” facility at its warfare center in Port Hueneme, Calif., dedicated to testing its latest unmanned surface and subsurface vehicles. “These facilities will be the focal point of Navy learning and experimentation on the capabilities, operations and sustainment of unmanned maritime vehicle prototypes to inform future programs,” Capt. Pete Small, the Navy officer leading the program office for unmanned maritime systems, said in a Dec. 14 statement. Some of the systems in Small’s portfolio that are destined for Port Heuenme include the Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV), as well as prototypes for the Medium and Large Unmanned Surface Vehicles.52 Potential Oversight Questions
~~Acquisition Strategies and Funding Method~~
~~Another potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the acquisition strategies that the Navy~~
~~wants to use for these large UV programs.~~ Potential oversight questions for Congress include the Potential oversight questions for Congress include the
~~following:~~
~~ Are the Navy’s proposed changes to the LUSV’s acquisition strategy appropriate~~
~~and sufficient in terms of complying with Congress’s legislative provisions and~~

~~47 See, for example, Megan Eckstein, “Navy Stands Up Surface Development Squadron for DDG-1000, Unmanned~~
~~Experimentation,” USNI News, May 22, 2019; David B. Larter, “With Billions Planned in Funding, the US Navy~~
~~Charts Its Unmanned Future,” Defense News, May 6, 2019. See also Michael Fabey, “USN Seeks Path for Unmanned~~
~~Systems Operational Concepts,” Jane’s Navy International, May 16, 2019.~~
48following:  How fully has the Navy developed its CONOPS for these large UVs? What activities is the Navy undertaking to develop its CONOPS for them?  What is the Navy’s CONOPS for operating and sustaining these large UVs, including both combat operations and day-to-day, noncombat operations?  How sensitive are the performance requirements that the Navy has established for these large UVs to potential changes in their CONOPS that may occur as the Navy continues to develop the CONOPS? How likely is it, if at all, that the Navy will have to change the performance requirements for these large UVs as a consequence of more fully developing their CONOPS? How do the Navy’s acquisition strategies for these large UVs address the possibility that the UVs’ performance requirements might need to evolve as the CONOPs are developed? 50 Megan Eckstein, “USV, UUV Squadrons Testing Out Concepts Ahead of Delivery of Their Vehicles,” Megan Eckstein, “USV, UUV Squadrons Testing Out Concepts Ahead of Delivery of Their Vehicles,” USNI News, ,
September 9, 2020. September 9, 2020.
4951 Aidan Quigley, “Navy Finishing Unmanned Surface Vehicles Concept of Operations ‘in Next Few Months,’” Aidan Quigley, “Navy Finishing Unmanned Surface Vehicles Concept of Operations ‘in Next Few Months,’” Inside
Defense, October 30, 2020. , October 30, 2020.
52 Justin Katz, “Navy Starts Building Hub for Surface, Subsurface Drones,” Breaking Defense, December 15, 2021. Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2024

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

Acquisition Strategies and Funding Method Another potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the acquisition strategies that the Navy wants to use for these large UV programs. Potential oversight questions for Congress include the following:  Are the Navy’s proposed changes to the LUSV’s acquisition strategy appropriate and sufficient in terms of complying with Congress’s legislative provisions and providing enough time to develop operational concepts and key technologies providing enough time to develop operational concepts and key technologies
before entering into serial production of deployable units? before entering into serial production of deployable units?
 To what degree, if any, can these large UV programs contribute to new  To what degree, if any, can these large UV programs contribute to new
approaches for defense acquisition that are intended to respond to the new approaches for defense acquisition that are intended to respond to the new
international security environment? international security environment?
Technical, Schedule, and Cost Risk
Another potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the amount of technical, schedule, and Another potential oversight issue for Congress concerns the amount of technical, schedule, and
cost risk in these programs, particularly given that these platforms potentially are to operate at sea cost risk in these programs, particularly given that these platforms potentially are to operate at sea
unmanned and semi-autonomously or autonomously for extended periods of time. Potential unmanned and semi-autonomously or autonomously for extended periods of time. Potential
oversight questions for Congress include the following: oversight questions for Congress include the following:
 How much risk of this kind do these programs pose, particularly given the  How much risk of this kind do these programs pose, particularly given the
enabling technologies that need to be developed for them? enabling technologies that need to be developed for them?
 In addition to the Navy’s proposed changes to the LUSV’s acquisition strategy,  In addition to the Navy’s proposed changes to the LUSV’s acquisition strategy,
what is the Navy doing to mitigate or manage cost, schedule, and technical risks what is the Navy doing to mitigate or manage cost, schedule, and technical risks
while it seeks to deploy these UVs? Are these risk-mitigation and risk-while it seeks to deploy these UVs? Are these risk-mitigation and risk-
management efforts appropriate and sufficient? management efforts appropriate and sufficient?
 At what point would technical problems, schedule delays, or cost growth in these  At what point would technical problems, schedule delays, or cost growth in these
programs require a reassessment of the Navy’s plan to shift from the current fleet programs require a reassessment of the Navy’s plan to shift from the current fleet
architecture to a more distributed architecture? architecture to a more distributed architecture?
A June 1, 2020, press report states A June 1, 2020, press report states
The U.S. military is banking on unmanned surface and subsurface vessels to boost its The U.S. military is banking on unmanned surface and subsurface vessels to boost its
capacity in the face of a tsunami of Chinese naval spending. But before it can field the capacity in the face of a tsunami of Chinese naval spending. But before it can field the
systems, it must answer some basic questions. systems, it must answer some basic questions.
How will these systems deploy? How will they be supported overseas? Who will support How will these systems deploy? How will they be supported overseas? Who will support
them? Can the systems be made sufficiently reliable to operate alone and unafraid on the them? Can the systems be made sufficiently reliable to operate alone and unafraid on the
open ocean for weeks at a time? Will the systems be able to communicate in denied open ocean for weeks at a time? Will the systems be able to communicate in denied
environments? environments?
As the Navy goes all-in on its unmanned future, with billions of dollars of investments As the Navy goes all-in on its unmanned future, with billions of dollars of investments
planed, how the service answers those questions will be crucial to the success or failure of planed, how the service answers those questions will be crucial to the success or failure of
its unmanned pivot.its unmanned pivot.5053
A June 23, 2020, press report states A June 23, 2020, press report states
The Navy’s transition from prototype to program of record for its portfolio of unmanned The Navy’s transition from prototype to program of record for its portfolio of unmanned
surface and undersea systems is being aided by industry, international partners and surface and undersea systems is being aided by industry, international partners and
developmental squadrons, even as the program office seeks to ease concerns that the developmental squadrons, even as the program office seeks to ease concerns that the
~~transition is happening too fast, the program executive officer for unmanned and small~~
~~combatants said today.~~
~~Rear Adm. Casey Moton said he’s aware of concerns regarding how unmanned systems –~~
~~particularly the Large Unmanned Surface Vessel – will be developed and used by the fleet,~~
~~but he’s confident in his team’s path forward.~~

5053 David B. Larter, “US Navy Embraces Robot Ships, But Some Unresolved Issues Are Holding Them Back,” David B. Larter, “US Navy Embraces Robot Ships, But Some Unresolved Issues Are Holding Them Back,” Defense
News, June 1, 2020. See also Bryan Clark, “Pentagon Needs To Go Faster—And Slower—On Unmanned Systems,” , June 1, 2020. See also Bryan Clark, “Pentagon Needs To Go Faster—And Slower—On Unmanned Systems,”
Forbes, June 11, 2020. , June 11, 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2125

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

transition is happening too fast, the program executive officer for unmanned and small combatants said today. Rear Adm. Casey Moton said he’s aware of concerns regarding how unmanned systems – particularly the Large Unmanned Surface Vessel – will be developed and used by the fleet, but he’s confident in his team’s path forward. “From my standpoint we are making a lot of great progress in working out the technical “From my standpoint we are making a lot of great progress in working out the technical
maturity, answering those kinds of questions (about how to employ and sustain the vessels) maturity, answering those kinds of questions (about how to employ and sustain the vessels)
and getting the requirements right before we move into production,” he said in a virtual and getting the requirements right before we move into production,” he said in a virtual
event today co-hosted by the U.S. Naval Institute and the Center for Strategic and event today co-hosted by the U.S. Naval Institute and the Center for Strategic and
International Studies.International Studies.5154
An August 17, 2020, press report states An August 17, 2020, press report states
As the U.S. Navy pushes forward with developing its large unmanned surface vessel, As the U.S. Navy pushes forward with developing its large unmanned surface vessel,
envisioned as a kind of external missile magazine that will tag along with larger manned envisioned as a kind of external missile magazine that will tag along with larger manned
surface combatants, a growing consensus is forming that the service needs to get its surface combatants, a growing consensus is forming that the service needs to get its
requirements and systems right before making a big investment.… requirements and systems right before making a big investment.…
In an exclusive July 16 interview with Defense News, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. In an exclusive July 16 interview with Defense News, Chief of Naval Operations Adm.
Michael Gilday said that while the [congressional] marks [on the program] were Michael Gilday said that while the [congressional] marks [on the program] were
frustrating, he agreed with Congress that requirements must be concrete right up front. frustrating, he agreed with Congress that requirements must be concrete right up front.
“The approach has to be deliberate,” Gilday said. “We have to make sure that the systems “The approach has to be deliberate,” Gilday said. “We have to make sure that the systems
that are on those unmanned systems with respect to the [hull, mechanical and electrical that are on those unmanned systems with respect to the [hull, mechanical and electrical
system], that they are designed to requirement, and perform to requirement. And most system], that they are designed to requirement, and perform to requirement. And most
importantly, are those requirements sound? importantly, are those requirements sound?
“I go back to [a question from years ago relating to the development of the Navy’s Littoral “I go back to [a question from years ago relating to the development of the Navy’s Littoral
Combat Ship (LCS)]: Do I really need a littoral combat ship to go 40 knots? That’s going Combat Ship (LCS)]: Do I really need a littoral combat ship to go 40 knots? That’s going
to drive the entire design of the ship, not just the engineering plant but how it’s built. That to drive the entire design of the ship, not just the engineering plant but how it’s built. That
becomes a critical factor. If you take your eye off the ball with respect to requirements, you becomes a critical factor. If you take your eye off the ball with respect to requirements, you
can find yourself drifting. That has to be deliberate.” can find yourself drifting. That has to be deliberate.”
Gilday has called for the Navy to pursue a comprehensive “Unmanned Campaign Plan” Gilday has called for the Navy to pursue a comprehensive “Unmanned Campaign Plan”
that creates a path forward for developing and fielding unmanned systems in the air, on the that creates a path forward for developing and fielding unmanned systems in the air, on the
sea and under the water. Right now, the effort exists in a number of different programs that sea and under the water. Right now, the effort exists in a number of different programs that
may not all be pulling in the same direction, he said. may not all be pulling in the same direction, he said.
“What I’ve found is that we didn’t necessarily have the rigor that’s required across a “What I’ve found is that we didn’t necessarily have the rigor that’s required across a
number of programs that would bring those together in a way that’s driven toward number of programs that would bring those together in a way that’s driven toward
objectives with milestones,” Gilday told Defense News. “If you took a look at [all the objectives with milestones,” Gilday told Defense News. “If you took a look at [all the
programs], where are there similarities and where are there differences? Where am I programs], where are there similarities and where are there differences? Where am I
making progress in meeting conditions and meeting milestones that we can leverage in making progress in meeting conditions and meeting milestones that we can leverage in
other experiments? other experiments?
“At what point do I reach a decision point where I drop a program and double down on a “At what point do I reach a decision point where I drop a program and double down on a
program that I can accelerate?”program that I can accelerate?”5255 A September 8, 2020, press report states 54
~~A September 8, 2020, press report states~~
~~Several Navy program officials and resource sponsors today outlined how they’ll spend~~
~~the next couple years giving Congress enough confidence in unmanned surface and~~
~~underwater vehicles to allow the service to move from prototyping into programs of record.~~
~~Across the entire family of USVs and UUVs, the Navy has prototypes in the water today~~
~~for experimentation and in tandem is making plans to design and buy the next better vehicle~~
~~or more advanced payloads, with the idea that the service will iterate its way to achieve~~

51 Megan Eckstein, “Program Office Maturing USVs, UUVs With Help From Industry, International Partners,” Megan Eckstein, “Program Office Maturing USVs, UUVs With Help From Industry, International Partners,” USNI
News, June 23, 2020. , June 23, 2020.
5255 David B. Larter, “In Developing Robot Warships, US Navy Wants to Avoid Another Littoral Combat Ship,” David B. Larter, “In Developing Robot Warships, US Navy Wants to Avoid Another Littoral Combat Ship,” Defense
News, August 17, 2020. See also Loren Thompson, “U.S. Navy Mounts Campaign To Convince Congress That , August 17, 2020. See also Loren Thompson, “U.S. Navy Mounts Campaign To Convince Congress That
Unmanned Vessels Are Critical To Winning Future Wars,” Unmanned Vessels Are Critical To Winning Future Wars,” Forbes, August 17, 2020. , August 17, 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2226 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles Several Navy program officials and resource sponsors today outlined how they’ll spend the next couple years giving Congress enough confidence in unmanned surface and underwater vehicles to allow the service to move from prototyping into programs of record. Across the entire family of USVs and UUVs, the Navy has prototypes in the water today for experimentation and in tandem is making plans to design and buy the next better vehicle or more advanced payloads, with the idea that the service will iterate its way to achieve

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

congressional confidence and authorization to move forward on buying these unmanned congressional confidence and authorization to move forward on buying these unmanned
systems in bulk. systems in bulk.
Rear Adm. Casey Moton, the program executive officer for unmanned and small Rear Adm. Casey Moton, the program executive officer for unmanned and small
combatants, spoke today at the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International combatants, spoke today at the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International
(AUVSI) annual defense conference and provided an update on the status of his portfolio (AUVSI) annual defense conference and provided an update on the status of his portfolio
of UUVs and USVs, some of which have run into trouble with lawmakers not convinced of UUVs and USVs, some of which have run into trouble with lawmakers not convinced
of their technical maturity and their tactical utility. of their technical maturity and their tactical utility.
Anticipating audience questions, he said in his speech, “what about Congress? What about Anticipating audience questions, he said in his speech, “what about Congress? What about
the marks and the report language and the questions? So I’m going to put some of that into the marks and the report language and the questions? So I’m going to put some of that into
context from my perspective. I believe the discussion with Congress has not been about if context from my perspective. I believe the discussion with Congress has not been about if
unmanned vessels will be part of the Navy. ‘If’ has not been the focus. I don’t even believe unmanned vessels will be part of the Navy. ‘If’ has not been the focus. I don’t even believe
right now that ‘if’ is a major question. The focus has been on ‘how,’ with a healthy dose right now that ‘if’ is a major question. The focus has been on ‘how,’ with a healthy dose
of ‘what,’ in terms of requirements and mission type. And of course, ‘how many’ is a of ‘what,’ in terms of requirements and mission type. And of course, ‘how many’ is a
question. How many, I will not focus on today. How many is dependent on Navy and question. How many, I will not focus on today. How many is dependent on Navy and
[Office of the Secretary of Defense] force structure work. But for PEO USC, how many is [Office of the Secretary of Defense] force structure work. But for PEO USC, how many is
ultimately important, but our focus now in this prototyping and experimentation and ultimately important, but our focus now in this prototyping and experimentation and
development phase is on the how, and working with our requirements sponsors and the development phase is on the how, and working with our requirements sponsors and the
fleet on the what.” fleet on the what.”
The most ambitious part of the Navy’s current plan calls for the start of a Large USV The most ambitious part of the Navy’s current plan calls for the start of a Large USV
program of record in Fiscal Year 2023, despite the LUSV being the piece of the family of program of record in Fiscal Year 2023, despite the LUSV being the piece of the family of
USVs that Congress takes issue with the most. The Navy intends for these ships to be USVs that Congress takes issue with the most. The Navy intends for these ships to be
armed with vertical launch system cells to fire off defensive and offensive missiles—with armed with vertical launch system cells to fire off defensive and offensive missiles—with
sailors onboard manned ships overseeing targeting and firing decisions, since there would sailors onboard manned ships overseeing targeting and firing decisions, since there would
be no personnel on the LUSV.be no personnel on the LUSV.5356
A March 26, 2021, press report about a March 18, 2021, hearing on Department of the Navy A March 26, 2021, press report about a March 18, 2021, hearing on Department of the Navy
unmanned vehicle programs before the Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee of the unmanned vehicle programs before the Seapower and Projection Forces subcommittee of the
House Armed Services Committee House Armed Services Committee ~~stated:~~states
On the unmanned underwater vehicle side, the Navy’s largest vehicle in development is On the unmanned underwater vehicle side, the Navy’s largest vehicle in development is
hitting some snags, though [Vice Adm. Jim Kilby, the deputy chief of naval operations for hitting some snags, though [Vice Adm. Jim Kilby, the deputy chief of naval operations for
warfighting requirements and capabilities (OPNAV N9)] said it was a production issue warfighting requirements and capabilities (OPNAV N9)] said it was a production issue
more than a fundamental issue with the service’s requirements. more than a fundamental issue with the service’s requirements.
Kilby said the Navy wanted the Orca Extra Large UUV to lay mines in the water, among Kilby said the Navy wanted the Orca Extra Large UUV to lay mines in the water, among
other clandestine operations. But building a UUV that can do that is more complex than it other clandestine operations. But building a UUV that can do that is more complex than it
sounds, he told lawmakers. sounds, he told lawmakers.
“I’ve got to avoid fishing nets and sea mounts and currents and all the things. I’ve got to “I’ve got to avoid fishing nets and sea mounts and currents and all the things. I’ve got to
be able to communicate with it, sustain it. I’ve got to maybe be able to tell it to abort a be able to communicate with it, sustain it. I’ve got to maybe be able to tell it to abort a
mission, which means it has to come up to the surface and communicate, or get mission, which means it has to come up to the surface and communicate, or get
communications from its current depth. Those are all complexities we’ve got to work communications from its current depth. Those are all complexities we’ve got to work
through with the [concept of operations] of this vehicle,” he said. through with the [concept of operations] of this vehicle,” he said.
“In its development, though, there have been delays with the contractor that we’re working “In its development, though, there have been delays with the contractor that we’re working
through, and we want to aggressively work with them to pursue, to get this vehicle down through, and we want to aggressively work with them to pursue, to get this vehicle down
56 Megan Eckstein, “Navy Pushing to Maintain 2023 USV Program of Record Timeline,” USNI News, September 8, 2020. Congressional Research Service 27 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles to Port Hueneme so we can start testing it and understand its capabilities. And to me the to Port Hueneme so we can start testing it and understand its capabilities. And to me the
challenges will be all those things – the C2, the endurance, the delivery of the payload, the challenges will be all those things – the C2, the endurance, the delivery of the payload, the
ability to change mission potentially – those are all things we have to deliver to meet the ability to change mission potentially – those are all things we have to deliver to meet the
needs of the combatant commander.” needs of the combatant commander.”

~~53 Megan Eckstein, “Navy Pushing to Maintain 2023 USV Program of Record Timeline,” USNI News, September 8,~~
~~2020.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

23

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

Boeing is on contract to build five XLUUVs, which were supposed to be delivered by 2022. Boeing is on contract to build five XLUUVs, which were supposed to be delivered by 2022.
Construction on the first vessel didn’t begin until late last year, though, and Kilby Construction on the first vessel didn’t begin until late last year, though, and Kilby
categorized the program as alive but delayed. categorized the program as alive but delayed.
Asked by seapower subcommittee chairman Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.) if Orca was Asked by seapower subcommittee chairman Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Conn.) if Orca was
proving to be a program that had failed and the Navy needed to cut its losses on, Kilby proving to be a program that had failed and the Navy needed to cut its losses on, Kilby
said, “I think we’re going to get these first five vessels, and in the spirit of the committee, said, “I think we’re going to get these first five vessels, and in the spirit of the committee,
we want to make sure we’ve got it right before we go build something else. I think it’s we want to make sure we’ve got it right before we go build something else. I think it’s
scoped out ideally, we’ve got to get through those technical and operational challenges to scoped out ideally, we’ve got to get through those technical and operational challenges to
go deliver on the capability we’re trying to close on.” go deliver on the capability we’re trying to close on.”
He said earlier in the hearing that “we are pursuing that vehicle because we have an He said earlier in the hearing that “we are pursuing that vehicle because we have an
operational need from a combatant commander to go solve this specific problem. That operational need from a combatant commander to go solve this specific problem. That
vessel really hasn’t operated – the XLUUV is, as you know, a migration from the Echo vessel really hasn’t operated – the XLUUV is, as you know, a migration from the Echo
Voyager from Boeing with a mission module placed in the middle of it to initially carry Voyager from Boeing with a mission module placed in the middle of it to initially carry
mines. We need to get that initial prototype built and start employing it start seeing if we mines. We need to get that initial prototype built and start employing it start seeing if we
can achieve the requirements to go do that mission set. And I think, to the point so far made can achieve the requirements to go do that mission set. And I think, to the point so far made
several times, if we can’t meet our milestones, we need to critically look at that and decide several times, if we can’t meet our milestones, we need to critically look at that and decide
if we have to pursue another model or another methodology to get after that combatant if we have to pursue another model or another methodology to get after that combatant
need. But in the case of the XLUUV, we haven’t even had enough run time with that vessel need. But in the case of the XLUUV, we haven’t even had enough run time with that vessel
to make that determination yet. Certainly, there’s challenges with that vehicle, though.”to make that determination yet. Certainly, there’s challenges with that vehicle, though.”5457
An April 13, 2021, press report states An April 13, 2021, press report states
The Navy is making arrangements for land-based testing of its Medium Unmanned Surface The Navy is making arrangements for land-based testing of its Medium Unmanned Surface
Vessel prototype and eyeing similar plans for its Large USV, as the sea service tries to get Vessel prototype and eyeing similar plans for its Large USV, as the sea service tries to get
Congress on board with its plans to rapidly field unmanned vehicles in all domains to create Congress on board with its plans to rapidly field unmanned vehicles in all domains to create
a hybrid manned-unmanned force. a hybrid manned-unmanned force.
Rear Adm. Casey Moton, the program executive officer for unmanned and small Rear Adm. Casey Moton, the program executive officer for unmanned and small
combatants, said today at an event hosted by AUVSI [Association for Unmanned Vehicle combatants, said today at an event hosted by AUVSI [Association for Unmanned Vehicle
Systems International] that the Navy and Pentagon already have four medium and large Systems International] that the Navy and Pentagon already have four medium and large
USV prototypes in the water today and will have three more delivered in the next few years. USV prototypes in the water today and will have three more delivered in the next few years.
“The testing we’re doing at sea on those systems is very important for [hull, mechanical “The testing we’re doing at sea on those systems is very important for [hull, mechanical
and electrical systems], and we’re going to continue that. Where we have definitely and electrical systems], and we’re going to continue that. Where we have definitely
expanded our plans is on the land-based side,” he said. expanded our plans is on the land-based side,” he said.
The Navy’s pitch was to begin buying prototype vessels in numbers so the service could The Navy’s pitch was to begin buying prototype vessels in numbers so the service could
learn a lot about both HM&E [hull, mechanical, and electrical] component reliability and learn a lot about both HM&E [hull, mechanical, and electrical] component reliability and
USV concepts of operations before beginning a program of record to buy new vessels in USV concepts of operations before beginning a program of record to buy new vessels in
bulk. Lawmakers had concerns that the Navy wouldn’t be able to collect enough data bulk. Lawmakers had concerns that the Navy wouldn’t be able to collect enough data
before beginning the programs of record and have insisted the Navy invest in land-based before beginning the programs of record and have insisted the Navy invest in land-based
testing to wring out components that will have to be able to operate for weeks or months testing to wring out components that will have to be able to operate for weeks or months
at sea without sailors around to perform routine maintenance or to take corrective action if at sea without sailors around to perform routine maintenance or to take corrective action if
something fails. something fails.
Moton said during the event that he appreciates that leadership, including House Armed Moton said during the event that he appreciates that leadership, including House Armed
Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee chairman Rep. Joe Courtney (D-Services seapower and projection forces subcommittee chairman Rep. Joe Courtney (D-
Conn.) and ranking member Rep. Rob Wittman (Va.), have expressed support for the idea Conn.) and ranking member Rep. Rob Wittman (Va.), have expressed support for the idea
of an unmanned fleet in general, and Moton promised that they’d see the Navy showing of an unmanned fleet in general, and Moton promised that they’d see the Navy showing
engineering rigor in every step along the way—including HM&E reliability testing, engineering rigor in every step along the way—including HM&E reliability testing,
57 Megan Eckstein, “Status Report: Navy Unmanned Aerial, Subsurface Platforms,” USNI News, March 26, 2021. Congressional Research Service 28 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles command and control testing, adjusting combat systems to operate on unmanned vehicles, command and control testing, adjusting combat systems to operate on unmanned vehicles,
developing common control stations, maturing autonomy software and more. developing common control stations, maturing autonomy software and more.
On land-based testing, Moton said, “on the Medium USV, we are right now in the process On land-based testing, Moton said, “on the Medium USV, we are right now in the process
of executing funding that we received from Congress to go do our work on Medium USV. of executing funding that we received from Congress to go do our work on Medium USV.

~~54 Megan Eckstein, “Status Report: Navy Unmanned Aerial, Subsurface Platforms,” USNI News, March 26, 2021.~~
~~Congressional Research Service~~

24

~~Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles~~

We are going to have representative equipment that we are buying” that can be tested We are going to have representative equipment that we are buying” that can be tested
ashore, where the gear can be run without human preventative or corrective maintenance ashore, where the gear can be run without human preventative or corrective maintenance
to see how reliable it would be on an unmanned vehicle operating independently. to see how reliable it would be on an unmanned vehicle operating independently.
“We are buying equipment, and some of the plans specifically about where it’s going to go “We are buying equipment, and some of the plans specifically about where it’s going to go
and the testing are still in the work, so I won’t say too much, but we are working on Medium and the testing are still in the work, so I won’t say too much, but we are working on Medium
USV land-based testing.” USV land-based testing.”
LUSV land-based testing is a little farther down the road, he said, but some of the lessons LUSV land-based testing is a little farther down the road, he said, but some of the lessons
from MUSV will apply directly to LUSV. from MUSV will apply directly to LUSV.
“It is true that propulsion plants are not all the same, but a lot of the things that we’re doing “It is true that propulsion plants are not all the same, but a lot of the things that we’re doing
– the ability to control machinery plants autonomously, the ability to improve the timeline – the ability to control machinery plants autonomously, the ability to improve the timeline
between [planned maintenance], to do things that are relatively straightforward like shift a between [planned maintenance], to do things that are relatively straightforward like shift a
lube oil strainer without a human having to do it—those things scale between medium and lube oil strainer without a human having to do it—those things scale between medium and
large, so a lot of what we’re doing in Medium is going to scale directly to Large,” he said. large, so a lot of what we’re doing in Medium is going to scale directly to Large,” he said.
“Where we are now going to add to our plan for Large is kind of at the big pieces of “Where we are now going to add to our plan for Large is kind of at the big pieces of
equipment, and some of this was in the [National Defense Authorization Act] for last year: equipment, and some of this was in the [National Defense Authorization Act] for last year:
the propulsion equipment, the electrical equipment. We’re still kind of working plans out, the propulsion equipment, the electrical equipment. We’re still kind of working plans out,
but our plan is to take representative pieces of equipment and to test them. I don’t want to but our plan is to take representative pieces of equipment and to test them. I don’t want to
get quite yet into specifics on where that’s going to happen or how that’s going to happen, get quite yet into specifics on where that’s going to happen or how that’s going to happen,
because we’re kind of working that out right now, but we are going to go down that path.” because we’re kind of working that out right now, but we are going to go down that path.”
Among the challenges is that neither the MUSV nor the LUSV has been designed yet— Among the challenges is that neither the MUSV nor the LUSV has been designed yet—
L3Harris was selected last year to build an MUSV prototype, and six companies are L3Harris was selected last year to build an MUSV prototype, and six companies are
working on LUSV design trade studies—so there isn’t a specific propulsion system or working on LUSV design trade studies—so there isn’t a specific propulsion system or
electrical distribution system yet that needs to be tested for reliability. electrical distribution system yet that needs to be tested for reliability.
Moton said that the “representative pieces of equipment” that prove themselves in land- Moton said that the “representative pieces of equipment” that prove themselves in land-
based testing will create a pool of “equipment that’s essentially been through our based testing will create a pool of “equipment that’s essentially been through our
qualification process to go on an LUSV, but we are also trying to come up with a way that’s qualification process to go on an LUSV, but we are also trying to come up with a way that’s
flexible” for industry to prove that their components meet Navy systems engineering flexible” for industry to prove that their components meet Navy systems engineering
standards and congressional intent. He said the Navy is working with the American Bureau standards and congressional intent. He said the Navy is working with the American Bureau
of Shipping to develop a framework for qualifying HM&E components as reliable enough of Shipping to develop a framework for qualifying HM&E components as reliable enough
for use in USVs. for use in USVs.
Moton said much still remains to be determined on MUSV and LUSV—and that’s by Moton said much still remains to be determined on MUSV and LUSV—and that’s by
design. Neither program has a formal capability development document (CDD) yet and are design. Neither program has a formal capability development document (CDD) yet and are
instead working off a less specific top-level requirement (TLR) document for now. Moton instead working off a less specific top-level requirement (TLR) document for now. Moton
said that was done on purpose, to give industry more space to look at cost and capability said that was done on purpose, to give industry more space to look at cost and capability
tradeoffs between potential designs and potential Defense Department requirements. All tradeoffs between potential designs and potential Defense Department requirements. All
the at-sea testing happening with the prototypes today, as well as the six LUSV industry the at-sea testing happening with the prototypes today, as well as the six LUSV industry
studies, will inform the path forward from today’s top-level requirements to more specific studies, will inform the path forward from today’s top-level requirements to more specific
requirements that will shape what the vessels look like and what capabilities they have. requirements that will shape what the vessels look like and what capabilities they have.
To keep cost down and to open up opportunities to more shipyards, “we are working our To keep cost down and to open up opportunities to more shipyards, “we are working our
best not to take just a typically manned combatant [specifications] and dial it back down; best not to take just a typically manned combatant [specifications] and dial it back down;
we are trying to start where we can the other way, kind of a clean sheet and only add we are trying to start where we can the other way, kind of a clean sheet and only add
requirements back in if theyrequirements back in if they are necessaryare necessary for the support of thefor the support of the functions of thefunctions of the ship,” ship,”
Moton said.Moton said.5558

5558 Megan Eckstein, “Navy Developing Land-Based Unmanned Vehicle Testing Sites as Early Design Work Megan Eckstein, “Navy Developing Land-Based Unmanned Vehicle Testing Sites as Early Design Work
Continues,” Continues,” USNI News, April 13, 2021. , April 13, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2529

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

Total Procurement Quantities and Annual Procurement Rates
Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the Navy’s Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the Navy’s ~~planned annual procurement rates for~~
~~the LUSV and XLUUV programs. Potential oversight questions for Congress include, What~~
~~factors did the Navy consider in arriving at them, and in light of these factors, are these rates too~~
~~high, too low, or about right?~~envisioned total procurement quantities and annual procurement rates for these large UVs, and how those total quantities and annual rates might be affected by the force-level goal that the Navy and DOD are developing to replace the Navy’s current 355-ship force-level goal.
Industrial Base Implications
Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the potential industrial base implications of these Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the potential industrial base implications of these
large UV programs as part of a shift to a more distributed fleet architecture, particularly since large UV programs as part of a shift to a more distributed fleet architecture, particularly since
UVs like these can be built and maintained by facilities other than the shipyards that currently UVs like these can be built and maintained by facilities other than the shipyards that currently
build the Navy’s major combatant ships. Potential oversight questions for Congress include the build the Navy’s major combatant ships. Potential oversight questions for Congress include the
following: following:
 What implications would the more distributed architecture have for required  What implications would the more distributed architecture have for required
numbers, annual procurement rates, and maintenance workloads for large surface numbers, annual procurement rates, and maintenance workloads for large surface
combatants (i.e., cruisers and destroyers) and small surface combatants (i.e., combatants (i.e., cruisers and destroyers) and small surface combatants (i.e.,
frigates and Littoral Combat Ships)? frigates and Littoral Combat Ships)?
 What portion of these UVs might be built or maintained by facilities other than  What portion of these UVs might be built or maintained by facilities other than
shipyards that currently build the Navy’s major combatant ships? shipyards that currently build the Navy’s major combatant ships?5659
 To what degree, if any, might the more distributed architecture and these large  To what degree, if any, might the more distributed architecture and these large
UV programs change the current distribution of Navy shipbuilding and UV programs change the current distribution of Navy shipbuilding and
maintenance work, and what implications might that have for workloads and maintenance work, and what implications might that have for workloads and
employment levels at various production and maintenance facilities? employment levels at various production and maintenance facilities?
Potential Implications for Miscalculation or Escalation at Sea
Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the potential implications of large UVs, Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the potential implications of large UVs,
particularly large USVs, for the chance of miscalculation or escalation in when U.S. Navy forces particularly large USVs, for the chance of miscalculation or escalation in when U.S. Navy forces
are operating in waters near potential adversaries. Some observers have expressed concern about are operating in waters near potential adversaries. Some observers have expressed concern about
this issue. A June 28, 2019, opinion column, for example, states this issue. A June 28, 2019, opinion column, for example, states
The immediate danger from militarized artificial intelligence isn't hordes of killer robots, The immediate danger from militarized artificial intelligence isn't hordes of killer robots,
nor the exponential pace of a new arms race. nor the exponential pace of a new arms race.
As recent events in the Strait of Hormuz indicate, the bigger risk is the fact that autonomous As recent events in the Strait of Hormuz indicate, the bigger risk is the fact that autonomous
military craft make for temping targets—and increase the potential for miscalculation on military craft make for temping targets—and increase the potential for miscalculation on
and above the high seas. and above the high seas.
While less provocative than planes, vehicles, or ships with human crew or troops aboard, While less provocative than planes, vehicles, or ships with human crew or troops aboard,
unmanned systems are also perceived as relatively expendable. Danger arises when they unmanned systems are also perceived as relatively expendable. Danger arises when they
lower the threshold for military action. lower the threshold for military action.
It is a development with serious implications in volatile regions far beyond the Gulf—not It is a development with serious implications in volatile regions far beyond the Gulf—not
least the South China Sea, where the U.S. has recently confronted both China and Russia…. least the South China Sea, where the U.S. has recently confronted both China and Russia….

5659 For an opinion piece addressing this issue, see Collin Fox, “Distributed Manufacturing for Distributed Lethality,” For an opinion piece addressing this issue, see Collin Fox, “Distributed Manufacturing for Distributed Lethality,”
Center for International Maritime Security (CIMSEC), February 26, 2021. Center for International Maritime Security (CIMSEC), February 26, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2630

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

As autonomous systems proliferate in the air and on the ocean, [opposing] military As autonomous systems proliferate in the air and on the ocean, [opposing] military
commanders may feel emboldened to strike these platforms, expecting lower repercussions commanders may feel emboldened to strike these platforms, expecting lower repercussions
by avoiding the loss of human life. by avoiding the loss of human life.
Consider when Chinese naval personnel in a small boat seized an unmanned American Consider when Chinese naval personnel in a small boat seized an unmanned American
underwater survey underwater survey ~~glider57~~glider60 in the sea approximately 100 kilometers off the Philippines in in the sea approximately 100 kilometers off the Philippines in
December 2016. The winged, torpedo-shaped unit was within sight of its handlers aboard December 2016. The winged, torpedo-shaped unit was within sight of its handlers aboard
the U.S. Navy oceanographic vessel Bowditch, who gaped in astonishment as it was the U.S. Navy oceanographic vessel Bowditch, who gaped in astonishment as it was
summarily hoisted aboard a Chinese warship less than a kilometer distant. The U.S. summarily hoisted aboard a Chinese warship less than a kilometer distant. The U.S.
responded with a diplomatic demarche and congressional opprobrium, and the glider was responded with a diplomatic demarche and congressional opprobrium, and the glider was
returned within the week…. returned within the week….
In coming years, the Chinese military will find increasingly plentiful opportunities to In coming years, the Chinese military will find increasingly plentiful opportunities to
intercept American autonomous systems. The 40-meter prototype trimaran Sea Hunter, an intercept American autonomous systems. The 40-meter prototype trimaran Sea Hunter, an
experimental submarine-tracking vessel, recently transited between Hawaii and San Diego experimental submarine-tracking vessel, recently transited between Hawaii and San Diego
without human intervention. It has yet to be used operationally, but it is only a matter of without human intervention. It has yet to be used operationally, but it is only a matter of
time before such vessels are deployed…. time before such vessels are deployed….
China’s navy may find intercepting such unmanned and unchaperoned surface vessels or China’s navy may find intercepting such unmanned and unchaperoned surface vessels or
mini-submarines too tantalizing to pass up, especially if Washington’s meek retort to the mini-submarines too tantalizing to pass up, especially if Washington’s meek retort to the
2016 glider incident is seen as an indication of American permissiveness or timidity. 2016 glider incident is seen as an indication of American permissiveness or timidity.
With a captive vessel, persevering Chinese technicians could attempt to bypass anti-tamper With a captive vessel, persevering Chinese technicians could attempt to bypass anti-tamper
mechanisms, and if successful, proceed to siphon off communication codes or proprietary mechanisms, and if successful, proceed to siphon off communication codes or proprietary
artificial intelligence software, download navigational data or pre-programmed rules of artificial intelligence software, download navigational data or pre-programmed rules of
engagement, or probe for cyber vulnerabilities that could be exploited against similar engagement, or probe for cyber vulnerabilities that could be exploited against similar
vehicles…. vehicles….
Nearly 100,000 ships transit the strategically vital Singapore Strait annually, where more Nearly 100,000 ships transit the strategically vital Singapore Strait annually, where more
than 75 collisions or groundings occurred last year alone. In such congested international than 75 collisions or groundings occurred last year alone. In such congested international
sea lanes, declaring a foreign navy’s autonomous vessel wayward or unresponsive would sea lanes, declaring a foreign navy’s autonomous vessel wayward or unresponsive would
easily serve as convenient rationale for towing it into territorial waters for impoundment, easily serve as convenient rationale for towing it into territorial waters for impoundment,
or for boarding it straightaway…. or for boarding it straightaway….
A memorandum of understanding signed five years ago by the U.S. Department of Defense A memorandum of understanding signed five years ago by the U.S. Department of Defense
and the Chinese defense ministry, as well as the collaborative code of naval conduct created and the Chinese defense ministry, as well as the collaborative code of naval conduct created
at the 2014 Western Pacific Naval Symposium, should be updated with an expanded right-at the 2014 Western Pacific Naval Symposium, should be updated with an expanded right-
of-way hierarchy and non-interference standards to clarify how manned ships and aircraft of-way hierarchy and non-interference standards to clarify how manned ships and aircraft
should interact with their autonomous counterparts. Without such guidance, the risk of should interact with their autonomous counterparts. Without such guidance, the risk of
miscalculation increases. miscalculation increases.
An incident without any immediate human presence or losses could nonetheless trigger An incident without any immediate human presence or losses could nonetheless trigger
unexpected escalation and spark the next conflict.unexpected escalation and spark the next conflict.5861
Personnel Implications
Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the potential personnel implications of Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the potential personnel implications of
incorporating a significant number of large UVs into the Navy’s fleet architecture. Potential incorporating a significant number of large UVs into the Navy’s fleet architecture. Potential
questions for Congress include the following: questions for Congress include the following:

5760 A glider is a type of UUV. The glider in question was a few feet in length and resembled a small torpedo with a pair A glider is a type of UUV. The glider in question was a few feet in length and resembled a small torpedo with a pair
of wings. For a press report about the seizure of the glider, see, for example, Sam LaGrone, “Updated: Chinese Seize of wings. For a press report about the seizure of the glider, see, for example, Sam LaGrone, “Updated: Chinese Seize
U.S. Navy Unmanned Vehicle,” U.S. Navy Unmanned Vehicle,” USNI News, December 16, 2016. , December 16, 2016.
5861 Evan Karlik, “US-China Tensions—Unmanned Military Craft Raise Risk of War,” Evan Karlik, “US-China Tensions—Unmanned Military Craft Raise Risk of War,” Nikkei Asian Review, June 28, , June 28,
2019. See also David B. Larter, “The US Navy Says It’s Doing Its Best to Avoid a ‘Terminator’ Scenario in Quest for 2019. See also David B. Larter, “The US Navy Says It’s Doing Its Best to Avoid a ‘Terminator’ Scenario in Quest for
Autonomous Weapons,” Autonomous Weapons,” Defense News, September 12, 2019; David Axe, “Autonomous Navies Could Make War More , September 12, 2019; David Axe, “Autonomous Navies Could Make War More
Likely,” Likely,” National Interest, August 17, 2020. , August 17, 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2731

link to page link to page 3236 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

 What implications might these large UVs have for the required skills, training,  What implications might these large UVs have for the required skills, training,
and career paths of Navy personnel? and career paths of Navy personnel?
 Within the Navy, what will be the relationship between personnel who crew  Within the Navy, what will be the relationship between personnel who crew
manned ships and those who operate these large UVs? manned ships and those who operate these large UVs?
Annual Funding
Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the funding amounts for these programs that the Another oversight issue for Congress concerns the funding amounts for these programs that the
Navy has requested for these programs for FY2022. Potential oversight questions for Congress Navy has requested for these programs for FY2022. Potential oversight questions for Congress
include the following: include the following:
 Has the Navy accurately priced the work on these programs that it is proposing to  Has the Navy accurately priced the work on these programs that it is proposing to
do in FY2022? do in FY2022?
 To what degree, if any, has funding been requested ahead of need? To what  To what degree, if any, has funding been requested ahead of need? To what
degree, if any, is the Navy insufficiently funding elements of the work to be done degree, if any, is the Navy insufficiently funding elements of the work to be done
in FY2022? in FY2022?
 How might the timelines for these programs be affected by a decision to reduce  How might the timelines for these programs be affected by a decision to reduce
(or add to) the Navy’s requested amounts for these programs? (or add to) the Navy’s requested amounts for these programs?
Legislative Activity for FY2022
Summary of Congressional Action on FY2022 Funding Request
Table 1 summarizes congressional action on the Navy’s FY2022 funding request for the LUSV, summarizes congressional action on the Navy’s FY2022 funding request for the LUSV,
MUSV, and XLUUV programs and their enabling technologies. MUSV, and XLUUV programs and their enabling technologies.
Table 1. Congressional Action on FY2022 Large UV Funding Request
Millions of dollars, rounded to the nearest tenth Millions of dollars, rounded to the nearest tenth

Authorization
Appropriation
Navy research and development
HASC-
account
Request HASC SASC
SASC
HAC
SAC
Conf.
PE 0603178N, Medium and Large PE 0603178N, Medium and Large
144.8 144.8
144.8 144.8
144.8 144.8
102.8 102.8
102.8 102.8
71.7 71.7

Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs) (line 28) Unmanned Surface Vessels (USVs) (line 28)
PE 0605512N Medium Unmanned Surface PE 0605512N Medium Unmanned Surface
60.0 60.0
101.7 101.7
60.0 60.0
60.0 60.0
60.0 60.0
60.0 60.0

Vehicles (MUSVs) (line 95) Vehicles (MUSVs) (line 95)
PE 0605513N, Unmanned Surface Vehicle PE 0605513N, Unmanned Surface Vehicle
170.8 170.8
123.8 123.8
170.8 170.8
123.8 123.8
83.6 83.6
164.2 164.2

Enabling Capabilities (line 96) Enabling Capabilities (line 96)
PE 0604536N, Advanced Undersea PE 0604536N, Advanced Undersea
58.5 58.5
58.5 58.5
58.5 58.5
51.3 51.3
47.8 47.8
42.4 42.4

Prototyping (line 90) Prototyping (line 90)
TOTAL
434.1
428.8
434.1
337.9
294.2
338.3

Sources: Table prepared by CRS based on FY2022 Navy budget submission, committee and conference reports, Table prepared by CRS based on FY2022 Navy budget submission, committee and conference reports,
and explanatory statements on the FY2022 National Defense Authorization Act and the FY2022 DOD and explanatory statements on the FY2022 National Defense Authorization Act and the FY2022 DOD
Appropriations Act. Appropriations Act.
Notes: PE is program element (i.e., a line item in a DOD research and development account). is program element (i.e., a line item in a DOD research and development account). HASC is House is House
Armed Services Committee; Armed Services Committee; SASC is Senate Armed Services Committee; is Senate Armed Services Committee; HAC is House Appropriations is House Appropriations
Committee; Committee; SAC is Senate Appropriations Committee; is Senate Appropriations Committee; HASC-SASC is HASC-SASC-negotiated proposal; is HASC-SASC-negotiated proposal;
Conf. is conference agreement. is conference agreement.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2832

link to page link to page 3236 link to page link to page 3236 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

FY2022 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 4350/S. 2792/S.
1605/P.L. 117-81)
House
The House Armed Services Committee, in its report (H.Rept. 117-118 of September 10, 2021) on The House Armed Services Committee, in its report (H.Rept. 117-118 of September 10, 2021) on
H.R. 4350, recommended the funding levels shown in the HASC column ofH.R. 4350, recommended the funding levels shown in the HASC column of Table 1. The The
recommended increase of $41.7 million for line 95 is for “Carry out execution of CLIN [Contract recommended increase of $41.7 million for line 95 is for “Carry out execution of CLIN [Contract
Line Item Number] 0101.” (Pages 415-416) The recommended reduction of $47.0 million for line Line Item Number] 0101.” (Pages 415-416) The recommended reduction of $47.0 million for line
96 is for “USV machinery qualification insufficient justification.” (Page 416) 96 is for “USV machinery qualification insufficient justification.” (Page 416)
H.Rept. 117-118 states: H.Rept. 117-118 states:
Comptroller General review of enabling technologies for unmanned systems
The committee recognizes that, as part of the Navy’s plan to counter increasing competition The committee recognizes that, as part of the Navy’s plan to counter increasing competition
among nations in the maritime environment, the Navy intends to field a future fleet among nations in the maritime environment, the Navy intends to field a future fleet
composed of a mix of manned and unmanned platforms. In doing so, the Navy identified composed of a mix of manned and unmanned platforms. In doing so, the Navy identified
core technologies and enabling capabilities it believes are necessary for its future core technologies and enabling capabilities it believes are necessary for its future
unmanned undersea and surface vehicles. The core technologies and enabling capabilities unmanned undersea and surface vehicles. The core technologies and enabling capabilities
are a broad range of efforts including autonomous management of ship systems and are a broad range of efforts including autonomous management of ship systems and
navigation, communications, manned-unmanned teaming, andnavigation, communications, manned-unmanned teaming, and payload development and payload development and
integration among others. Congress has previously expressed concern with the Navy’s integration among others. Congress has previously expressed concern with the Navy’s
proposed concurrent approach for the large unmanned surface vessel design, technology proposed concurrent approach for the large unmanned surface vessel design, technology
development, and integration. While the Navy takes action to address our concerns, the development, and integration. While the Navy takes action to address our concerns, the
committee would like a better understanding of the Navy’s technology development efforts committee would like a better understanding of the Navy’s technology development efforts
for unmanned maritime systems as a whole. for unmanned maritime systems as a whole.
The committee directs the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a review of The committee directs the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a review of
the Navy’s core technologies and enabling capabilities for unmanned undersea and surface the Navy’s core technologies and enabling capabilities for unmanned undersea and surface
vehicles and to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later vehicles and to provide a briefing to the House Committee on Armed Services not later
than March 1, 2022, on its findings. As part of this review, the Comptroller General should than March 1, 2022, on its findings. As part of this review, the Comptroller General should
examine: examine:
(1) the status of the Navy’s efforts to develop the core technologies and enabling (1) the status of the Navy’s efforts to develop the core technologies and enabling
capabilities for unmanned maritime systems; capabilities for unmanned maritime systems;
(2) the extent to which the Navy has successfully identified all critical technologies (2) the extent to which the Navy has successfully identified all critical technologies
necessary for unmanned maritime systems; necessary for unmanned maritime systems;
(3) the methods and documentation the Navy uses to track technology development for (3) the methods and documentation the Navy uses to track technology development for
unmanned maritime systems; unmanned maritime systems;
(4) the extent to which the technologies developed for unmanned maritime systems will (4) the extent to which the technologies developed for unmanned maritime systems will
meet Navy requirements and mission needs; meet Navy requirements and mission needs;
(5) the Navy’s process for tracking and prioritizing investments made into its technologies; (5) the Navy’s process for tracking and prioritizing investments made into its technologies;
and and
(6) any other areas the Comptroller General deems important. (Page 18) (6) any other areas the Comptroller General deems important. (Page 18)
Senate
The Senate Armed Services Committee, in its report (S.Rept. 117-39 of September 22 [legislative The Senate Armed Services Committee, in its report (S.Rept. 117-39 of September 22 [legislative
day, September 21], 2021) on S. 2792, recommended the funding levels shown in the SASC day, September 21], 2021) on S. 2792, recommended the funding levels shown in the SASC
column ofcolumn of Table 1.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2933

link to page link to page 3236 link to page link to page 3236 link to page link to page 3236 Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

~~HASC-SASC-Negotiated Proposal~~Enacted Version
The joint explanatory statement for the The joint explanatory statement for the ~~HASC-SASC-negotiated proposal for the~~ FY2022 FY2022
National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1605National Defense Authorization Act (S. 1605~~) that was released on~~/P.L. 117-81 of December December 727, 2021, 2021,
) recommends the funding levels shown in the HASC-SASC column ofrecommends the funding levels shown in the HASC-SASC column of Table 1. The The
recommended reduction of $42.0 million for line 28 is for “LUSV integrated combat system early recommended reduction of $42.0 million for line 28 is for “LUSV integrated combat system early
to need.” (PDF page 500 of 670) The recommended reduction of $47.0 million for line 96 is for to need.” (PDF page 500 of 670) The recommended reduction of $47.0 million for line 96 is for
“USV machinery qualification insufficient justification.” (PDF page 503 of 670) The “USV machinery qualification insufficient justification.” (PDF page 503 of 670) The
recommended reduction of $7.190 million for line 90 is for “Test and evaluation excess to need.” recommended reduction of $7.190 million for line 90 is for “Test and evaluation excess to need.”
(PDF page 502) (PDF page 502)
FY2022 DOD Appropriations Act (H.R. 4432/S. XXXX)
House
The House Appropriations Committee, in its report (H.Rept. 117-88 of July 15, 2021) on H.R. The House Appropriations Committee, in its report (H.Rept. 117-88 of July 15, 2021) on H.R.
4432, recommended the funding levels shown in the HAC column of4432, recommended the funding levels shown in the HAC column of Table 1.
The recommended reduction of $42.0 million for line 28 is for “LUSV integrated combat system The recommended reduction of $42.0 million for line 28 is for “LUSV integrated combat system
early to need.” (Page 265). early to need.” (Page 265).
The recommended reduction of $87.286 million for line 96 is for “USV machinery qualification The recommended reduction of $87.286 million for line 96 is for “USV machinery qualification
unjustified request” ($47.311 million), “Autonomy development concurrency” ($7.125 million), unjustified request” ($47.311 million), “Autonomy development concurrency” ($7.125 million),
“Unmanned communications excess growth” ($20.35 million), “Elevated sensors excess growth” “Unmanned communications excess growth” ($20.35 million), “Elevated sensors excess growth”
($5.5 million), and “USV operations center concurrency” ($7.0 million). (Page 268) ($5.5 million), and “USV operations center concurrency” ($7.0 million). (Page 268)
The recommended reduction of $10.707 million for lien 90 is for “Test and evaluation excess to The recommended reduction of $10.707 million for lien 90 is for “Test and evaluation excess to
need.” (Page 29) need.” (Page 29)
Senate
The Senate Appropriations Committee, in the explanatory statement it released on October 18, The Senate Appropriations Committee, in the explanatory statement it released on October 18,
2021, for the FY2022 DOD Appropriations Act (S. XXXX), recommended the funding levels 2021, for the FY2022 DOD Appropriations Act (S. XXXX), recommended the funding levels
shown in the SAC column ofshown in the SAC column of Table 1.
The recommended reduction of $73.1 million for line 28 is for “LUSV integrated combat system” The recommended reduction of $73.1 million for line 28 is for “LUSV integrated combat system”
($42.0 million), “LUSV land based test site early to need” ($18.2 million), and “Unjustified ($42.0 million), “LUSV land based test site early to need” ($18.2 million), and “Unjustified
experimentations” ($12.9 million). (PDF page 175 of 253) experimentations” ($12.9 million). (PDF page 175 of 253)
The recommended reduction of $6.66 million for line 96 is for “RAIL [Rapid Autonomy The recommended reduction of $6.66 million for line 96 is for “RAIL [Rapid Autonomy
Integration Lab] software factory acquisition strategy.” (PDF page 176 of 253) Integration Lab] software factory acquisition strategy.” (PDF page 176 of 253)
The recommended reduction of $16.098 million for line 90 is for “ORCA payload capacity The recommended reduction of $16.098 million for line 90 is for “ORCA payload capacity
increase” ($8.908 million) and “Development and testing of universal payload module” ($7.190 increase” ($8.908 million) and “Development and testing of universal payload module” ($7.190
million). (PDF page 176 of 253) million). (PDF page 176 of 253)
The explanatory statement for S. XXXX released by the committee on October 18, 2021, states: The explanatory statement for S. XXXX released by the committee on October 18, 2021, states:
Extra Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle.—The fiscal year 2022 President’s budget —The fiscal year 2022 President’s budget
request includes $58,173,000 to continue manufacturing and testing of 5 Extra Large request includes $58,173,000 to continue manufacturing and testing of 5 Extra Large
Unmanned Undersea Vehicles [XLUUV]. With submission of the budget request, the Navy Unmanned Undersea Vehicles [XLUUV]. With submission of the budget request, the Navy
informed the congressional defense committees of schedule delays of no less than 2 fiscal informed the congressional defense committees of schedule delays of no less than 2 fiscal
quarters in addition to an 18-month-delay previously revealed with the fiscal year 2021 quarters in addition to an 18-month-delay previously revealed with the fiscal year 2021
President’s budget request; and that the program will need to be restructured. The President’s budget request; and that the program will need to be restructured. The
CommitteeCommittee is is concerned,concerned, ~~therefore, that with the fiscal year 2022 request, the Navy is~~ therefore, that with the fiscal year 2022 request, the Navy is requesting funds for additional XLUUV requirements such as an increased payload
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

3034

Navy Large Unmanned Surface and Undersea Vehicles

~~requesting funds for additional XLUUV requirements such as an increased payload~~
capacity and a new payload module, when the baseline program is performing poorly. The capacity and a new payload module, when the baseline program is performing poorly. The
Committee recommends no funds to increase payload capacity or for the universal payload Committee recommends no funds to increase payload capacity or for the universal payload
in fiscal year 2022, a reduction of $8,908,000 and $7,190,000 to the request, respectively. in fiscal year 2022, a reduction of $8,908,000 and $7,190,000 to the request, respectively.
The XLUUV program was awarded in response to a Joint Emergent Operational Need The XLUUV program was awarded in response to a Joint Emergent Operational Need
using rapid acquisition authorities, and given the urgency of the requirement, the using rapid acquisition authorities, and given the urgency of the requirement, the
Committee questions the Navy’s analytical and engineering rigor conducted prior to Committee questions the Navy’s analytical and engineering rigor conducted prior to
program initiation. The Committee directs the Comptroller General to review the Navy’s program initiation. The Committee directs the Comptroller General to review the Navy’s
adherence to acquisition best practices for the XLUUV program, as adapted for rapid adherence to acquisition best practices for the XLUUV program, as adapted for rapid
acquisition programs, and report back to the congressional defense committees no later acquisition programs, and report back to the congressional defense committees no later
than 90 days after enactment of this act. than 90 days after enactment of this act.
Basing of Unmanned Undersea Vehicles.—The Committee directs the Secretary of the —The Committee directs the Secretary of the
Navy to provide to the congressional defense committees, with submission of the fiscal Navy to provide to the congressional defense committees, with submission of the fiscal
year 2023 President’s budget request, a report detailing the Navy’s plans for basing Navy year 2023 President’s budget request, a report detailing the Navy’s plans for basing Navy
unmanned undersea vehicles [UUVs], to include the infrastructure, personnel, and unmanned undersea vehicles [UUVs], to include the infrastructure, personnel, and
logistical requirements for testing, evaluation, docking, and maintenance of UUVs. (PDF logistical requirements for testing, evaluation, docking, and maintenance of UUVs. (PDF
page 180 of 253) page 180 of 253)

Author Information

Ronald O'Rourke Ronald O'Rourke

Specialist in Naval Affairs Specialist in Naval Affairs

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service
R45757 R45757 · VERSION 4445 · UPDATED
3135