< Back to Current Version

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Changes from October 4, 2021 to November 10, 2021

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19
October 4November 10, 2021 , 2021
The COVID-19 The COVID-19 viral pandemic is an unprecedented global phenomenon that is also a highly viral pandemic is an unprecedented global phenomenon that is also a highly
personal experience with wide-ranging effects. On September 20, 2021, U.S. viral deaths personal experience with wide-ranging effects. On September 20, 2021, U.S. viral deaths
James K. Jackson,
surpassed the 675,446 total from the 1918 Spanish flu, the surpassed the 675,446 total from the 1918 Spanish flu, the previouspreviously worst U.S. pandemic- worst U.S. pandemic-related
Coordinator
related death total on record. The pandemic has disrupted lives across all countries and death total on record. The pandemic has disrupted lives across all countries and communities and
Specialist in International Specialist in International
communities and negatively affected global economic growth in 2020 beyond anything negatively affected global economic growth in 2020 beyond anything experienced in nearly a
Trade and Finance Trade and Finance
experienced in nearly a century. Estimates indicate the virus reduced global economic growth in century. Estimates indicate the virus reduced global economic growth in 2020 to an annualized 2020 to an annualized

rate of around -3.2%, with a recovery of rate of around -3.2%, with a recovery of 6.05.9% projected for 2021. Global % projected for 2021. Global trade is estimated to
Martin A. Weiss
trade is estimated to have fallen by 5.3% in 2020, but is projected to grow by 8.0% in 2021. have fallen by 5.3% in 2020, but is projected to grow by 8.0% in 2021. According to a consensus
Specialist in International Specialist in International
According to a consensus of forecasts, the economic downturn in 2020 was not as negative as of forecasts, the economic downturn in 2020 was not as negative as initially estimated, due in
Trade and Finance Trade and Finance
initially estimated, due in part to the fiscal and monetary policies governments adopted in 2020. part to the fiscal and monetary policies governments adopted in 2020. In most countries, In most countries,

economic growth fell sharply in the second quarter of 2020, rebounded quickly in the third economic growth fell sharply in the second quarter of 2020, rebounded quickly in the third
quarter, and has been mostly positive since. Although lessening, the total global quarter, and has been mostly positive since. Although lessening, the total global economic effects
Andres B. Schwarzenberg
economic effects continue to mount. In particular, the prolonged nature of the health crisis is continue to mount. In particular, the prolonged nature of the health crisis is affecting the global
Analyst in International Analyst in International
affecting the global economy beyond traditional measures with potentially long-lasting and far-economy beyond traditional measures with potentially long-lasting and far-reaching
Trade and Finance Trade and Finance
reaching repercussions. Economic forecasts reflect continuing risks to a sustained global repercussions. Economic forecasts reflect continuing risks to a sustained global recovery posed

recovery posed by a resurgence of infectious cases and potential inflationary pressures associated by a resurgence of infectious cases and potential inflationary pressures associated with pent-up
Rebecca M. Nelson
with pent-up consumer demand fueled by an increase in personal savings. On the supply side, consumer demand fueled by an increase in personal savings. On the supply side, shortages reflect
Specialist in International Specialist in International
shortages reflect lingering disruptions to labor markets, production and supply chain bottlenecks, lingering disruptions to labor markets, production and supply chain bottlenecks, disruptions in
Trade and Finance Trade and Finance
disruptions in global energy markets, and shipping and transportation constraints that are adding global energy markets, and shipping and transportation constraints that are adding to inflationary

to inflationary pressures. pressures.
Karen M. Sutter
Specialist in Asian Trade Specialist in Asian Trade
As some developed economies start recovering, central banks and national governments are As some developed economies start recovering, central banks and national governments are
and Finance and Finance
weighing the impact and timing of tapering off monetary and fiscal support as a result of weighing the impact and timing of tapering off monetary and fiscal support as a result of

concerns over potential inflationary pressures against the prospect of slowing the pace of the concerns over potential inflationary pressures against the prospect of slowing the pace of the
recovery. These concerns are compounded by the emergence of new disease variants and rolling recovery. These concerns are compounded by the emergence of new disease variants and rolling
Michael D. Sutherland
pandemic hotspots that challenge national efforts to contain infections and fully restore economic pandemic hotspots that challenge national efforts to contain infections and fully restore economic
Analyst in International Analyst in International
activities. Major advanced economies activities. Major advanced economies , comprising 60% of global economic activity, are projected , comprising 60% of global economic activity, are projected
Trade and Finance Trade and Finance
to operate below their potential output level through at least 2024, which indicates lower national to operate below their potential output level through at least 2024, which indicates lower national

and individual economic welfare relative to pre-pandemic levels. Compared with the and individual economic welfare relative to pre-pandemic levels. Compared with the
synchronized nature of the global economic slowdown in the first half of 2020, the global synchronized nature of the global economic slowdown in the first half of 2020, the global

economy has shown signs of a two-track recovery that began in the third quarter of 2020 and has economy has shown signs of a two-track recovery that began in the third quarter of 2020 and has
been marked by a nascent recovery in developed economies where rates of vaccinations are high, but a slower pace of growth been marked by a nascent recovery in developed economies where rates of vaccinations are high, but a slower pace of growth
in developing economies where vaccination rates are low. in developing economies where vaccination rates are low.
As a whole, developed economies have made strides in vaccinating growing shares of their populations, raising prospects of a As a whole, developed economies have made strides in vaccinating growing shares of their populations, raising prospects of a
sustained economic recovery in late 2021 and into 2022 and, in turn, a recovery in the broader global economy. However, sustained economic recovery in late 2021 and into 2022 and, in turn, a recovery in the broader global economy. However,
new variants of the COVID-19 virus and a surge in diagnosed cases in large developing economies and resistance to new variants of the COVID-19 virus and a surge in diagnosed cases in large developing economies and resistance to
vaccinations among some populations in developed economies raise questions about the speed and strength of an economic vaccinations among some populations in developed economies raise questions about the speed and strength of an economic
recovery over the near term. A resurgence of infectious cases in Europe, Latin America, Russia, the United States, Japan, recovery over the near term. A resurgence of infectious cases in Europe, Latin America, Russia, the United States, Japan,
Brazil,Brazil, India, and across much of Africa renewed calls for lockdowns and curfews and threatened to weaken or delay a India, and across much of Africa renewed calls for lockdowns and curfews and threatened to weaken or delay a
potential sustained economic recovery into late 2021. The economic fallout from the pandemic has had a disparate impact on potential sustained economic recovery into late 2021. The economic fallout from the pandemic has had a disparate impact on
certain sectors of the economy, particularly the service sector, and certain population groups and could risk continued labor certain sectors of the economy, particularly the service sector, and certain population groups and could risk continued labor
dislocations. In some cases, workers are reconsidering their career choices and work patterns, which may imply post-dislocations. In some cases, workers are reconsidering their career choices and work patterns, which may imply post-
pandemic economies marked by more varied labor arrangements and altered urban environments.pandemic economies marked by more varied labor arrangements and altered urban environments.
The human costs in terms of lives lost will permanently affect global economic growth in addition to the cost of elevated The human costs in terms of lives lost will permanently affect global economic growth in addition to the cost of elevated
levels of poverty, lives upended, careers derailed, and increased social unrest. Some estimates indicate that levels of poverty, lives upended, careers derailed, and increased social unrest. Some estimates indicate that 95 65 million to 75 million people million people
may have entered into extreme poverty in 2020 with 80 millionmay have entered into extreme poverty in 2020 with 80 million more undernourished compared to premore undernourished compared to pre --pandemic levels. In pandemic levels. In
addition, some estimates indicate that the decline in global trade in 2020 exacted an especially heavy economic toll on trade-addition, some estimates indicate that the decline in global trade in 2020 exacted an especially heavy economic toll on trade-
dependent developing and emerging economies. This report provides an overview of the global economic costs to date and dependent developing and emerging economies. This report provides an overview of the global economic costs to date and
the response by governments and international institutions to address these effects. the response by governments and international institutions to address these effects.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service


link to page 6 link to page 9 link to page 10 link to page 14 link to page 16 link to page link to page 6 link to page 9 link to page 10 link to page 14 link to page 16 link to page 1819 link to page 20 link to page link to page 20 link to page 2021 link to page 22 link to page 23 link to page 25 link to page 27 link to page 31 link to page 31 link to page 34 link to page 41 link to page 43 link to page 44 link to page link to page 22 link to page 23 link to page 25 link to page 27 link to page 31 link to page 31 link to page 34 link to page 41 link to page 43 link to page 44 link to page 4847 link to page 49 link to page 54 link to page 55 link to page 58 link to page 62 link to page 64 link to page link to page 49 link to page 54 link to page 55 link to page 58 link to page 62 link to page 64 link to page 6566 link to page 68 link to page 73 link to page 75 link to page 79 link to page 81 link to page 84 link to page 86 link to page 96 link to page 100 link to page 102 link to page 103 link to page 103 link to page 104 link to page 105 link to page link to page 68 link to page 73 link to page 75 link to page 79 link to page 81 link to page 84 link to page 86 link to page 96 link to page 100 link to page 102 link to page 103 link to page 103 link to page 104 link to page 105 link to page 106107 link to page 107 link to page 108 link to page 109 link to page 107 link to page 108 link to page 109 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Contents
Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ...... 1
Background............................................................................................................................... 4
Economic Policy Chal engesChallenges .............................................................................................. 5
Impact on Workers ............. 5 Impact on Workers........................................................................................................................... 9
U.S. Labor Market .................................................................................................................... 11 11
Financial Markets .................................................................................................................... 14 13
Economic Policy Responses .......................................................................................................... 15
Industry Measures ................................................................................................................... 16 Fiscal Measures ................ 15
Fiscal Measures....................................................................................................... 17
Fiscal Deficits ................................................................................................................... 18
Worker Assistance Programs ............................................................................................ 20
Monetary and Prudential Measures ......................................................................................... 22
Economic Forecasts ....................................................................................................... 26
Global Growth ................ 26 Global Growth ......................................................................................................................... 26
The OECD Forecast .......................................................................................................... 29
The IMF Forecast .............................................................................................................. 36
The World Bank Forecast ................................................................................................. 38
Global Trade ............................................................................................................................ 39
Supply Chains ................................................................................................................... 42 43
Global Foreign Investment ...................................................................................................... 44
Major Economic Developments .................................................................................................... 49
Financial Markets .................................................................................................................... 50
International Role of the Dollar .............................................................................................. 53
U.S. Monthly Trade ................................................................................................................. 57
Global Energy Markets ........................................................................................................... 59
Country Policy Responses ............................................................................................................. 61 60
The United States .................................................................................................................... 63
Monetary Policy ................................................................................................................ 68
Fiscal Policy ...................................................................................................................... 70 70
Personal Income and Outlays ............................................................................................ 74
GDP Output “Gap” ........................................................................................................... 76
Federal Reserve Forecast .................................................................................................. 79
Europe ..................................................................................................................................... 81
The United Kingdom ............................................................................................................... 91 Japan ............. 91
Japan ..................................................................................................................... 95
China...... 95 China ....................................................................................................................................... 97
Multilateral Response .................................................................................................................... 98
International Monetary Fund ................................................................................................... 98
World Bank and Regional Development Banks ............................................................................ 99
International Economic Cooperation .................................................................................... 100
Estimated Effects on Other Economies ....................................................................................... 102 101
Asian Development Bank 2021 Forecast .............................................................................. 102
International Economic Cooperation ........................................................................................... 103
Looming Debt Crises and Debt Relief Efforts ............................................................................ 104
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service


link to page 111 link to page link to page 111 link to page 112113 link to page 15 link to page 18 link to page 24 link to page 34 link to page 36 link to page 37 link to page 43 link to page 46 link to page 52 link to page 53 link to page 54 link to page 57 link to page 59 link to page 60 link to page 62 link to page 64 link to page 65 link to page 70 link to page 71 link to page 72 link to page 81 link to page 83 link to page 98 link to page link to page 15 link to page 18 link to page 24 link to page 34 link to page 36 link to page 37 link to page 43 link to page 46 link to page 52 link to page 53 link to page 54 link to page 57 link to page 59 link to page 60 link to page 62 link to page 64 link to page 65 link to page 70 link to page 71 link to page 72 link to page 81 link to page 83 link to page 98 link to page 107108 link to page 11 link to page 21 link to page 21 link to page link to page 11 link to page 21 link to page 21 link to page 2223 link to page 26 link to page 29 link to page 32 link to page 38 link to page 46 link to page 49 link to page 26 link to page 29 link to page 32 link to page 38 link to page 46 link to page 49 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Other Affected Sectors ................................................................................................................ 106
Issues for Congress ...................................................................................................................... 108 107

Figures
Figure 1. Composition of Working-Hours Lost by Region, 2020 ................................................. 10
Figure 2. Weekly Claims for Unemployment Insurance, 2020 and 2021 ...................................... 13
Figure 3. IMF Projected Government Fiscal Deficits Relative to GDP ........................................ 19
Figure 4. Major Economic Forecasts by Region ........................................................................... 29
Figure 5. Unemployment Rates Among Major OECD Countries ................................................. 31
Figure 6. Projected Time to Full Recovery in Employment in Selected OECD Countries ........... 32
Figure 7. IMF Forecast, Gross Domestic Product ......................................................................... 38
Figure 8. WTO Estimates of Quarterly Global Exports and Imports, Volumes and Values .......... 41
Figure 9. Annual Foreign Direct Investment Inflows by Major Country Groups ......................... 47
Figure 10. Global Foreign Direct Investment Inflows .................................................................. 48
Figure 11. U.S. Direct Investment; Inflows and Outflows ............................................................ 49
Figure 12. Dow Jones Industrial Average ...................................................................................... 52
Figure 13. U.S. Dollar Trade-Weighted Broad Index, Goods and Services .................................. 54
Figure 14. International Role of the Dollar ................................................................................... 55
Figure 15. Quarterly Price and Quantity Indexes, U.S. Goods Imports and Exports .................... 57
Figure 16. Monthly U.S. Exports and Imports of Goods and Services 2020-2021 ....................... 59
Figure 17. Brent Crude Oil Price Per Barrel in Dollars ................................................................. 60
Figure 18. U.S. GDP, Percentage Change From Preceding Quarter .............................................. 65
Figure 19. Change in Total Monthly U.S. Nonfarm Employment ................................................ 66
Figure 20. Change in U.S. Employment by Major Industrial Sector ............................................ 67
Figure 21. U.S. Personal Income, Consumption, and Saving ....................................................... 76
Figure 22. Real and Potential U.S. GDP and the Output Gap ....................................................... 78
Figure 23. UK Month Over Month QuarterlyQuarter Over Quarter Percentage Change in GDP ................................................ 93
Figure 24. Asian Development Bank 2020 and 2021 GDP Forecasts ......................................... 103 102

Tables
Table 1. Change in Gross Domestic Product by Major Country ..................................................... 6
Table 2. Investment Policy Instruments Adopted at the National and International level to
Address the COVID-19 Pandemic ............................................................................................. 16
Table 3. Elements of Announced Fiscal Measures to Address COVID-19 ................................ 17... 18
Table 4. Developed Economy Worker Support Programs During COVID-19 .............................. 21
Table 5. Selected Central Bank and Prudential Measures to Address COVID-19 ........................ 24
Table 6. Major Economic Forecasts .............................................................................................. 27
Table 7. OECD, IMF and World Bank Economic Forecasts ......................................................... 33
Table 8. WTO Forecast: Merchandise Trade Volume and Real GDP 2020-2021 2022.......................... 41
Table 9. Foreign Investment Screening Legislation Adopted During COVID-19 ........................ 44
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

link to page 51 link to page 51 link to page 55 link to page 63 link to page 63 link to page 82 link to page 83 link to page 83 link to page 85 link to page 88 link to page 90 link to page 98 link to page 99 link to page 101 link to page link to page 51 link to page 51 link to page 55 link to page 63 link to page 63 link to page 82 link to page 83 link to page 83 link to page 85 link to page 88 link to page 90 link to page 98 link to page 99 link to page 101 link to page 114115 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Table 10. Investment Policy Instruments Adopted at the National and International Levels
to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic ......................................................................................... 46
Table 11. Dow Jones Industrial Average Market Changes by Month ............................................ 50
Table 12. U.S. Goods and Services Exports and Imports, Change in Quarterly Price and
Quantity Indexes ........................................................................................................................ 58
Table 13. IMF Forecast of Major Advanced Economy GDP Output Gap ..................................... 77
Table 14. Congressional Budget Office Projection of Major U.S. Economic Indicators,
2021 to 2031 ............................................................................................................................... 78
Table 15. Federal Reserve Economic Projections, September 2021 ............................................. 80
Table 16. EU Real GDP Growth Rates 2020 and 2021 ................................................................. 83
Table 17. European Commission Economic Forecast ................................................................... 85
Table 18. UK Quarterly GDP Aggregates 2019-2021 ................................................................... 93
Table 19. UK Forecast of Major Aggregate National Accounts, 2020-2023 ................................. 94
Table 20. Japan Main Economic Accounts, 2020 and 2021 .......................................................... 96 96

Contacts
Author Information ....................................................................................................................... 110 109


Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Overview
The World Health Organization (WHO) first declared COVID-19 a global health emergency in The World Health Organization (WHO) first declared COVID-19 a global health emergency in
January 2020; on March 11 it announced the viral outbreak was January 2020; on March 11 it announced the viral outbreak was official yofficially a pandemic, the highest a pandemic, the highest
level of health emergency.1 Since then, the emergency evolved into a global public health and level of health emergency.1 Since then, the emergency evolved into a global public health and
economic crisis that affected the $90 economic crisis that affected the $90 tril iontrillion global economy beyond anything experienced in global economy beyond anything experienced in
nearly a century. In a variance of John Donne’s poem, “No Man is an Island,” the viral infection nearly a century. In a variance of John Donne’s poem, “No Man is an Island,” the viral infection
spread between and across countries and affected nearly every community, demonstrating the spread between and across countries and affected nearly every community, demonstrating the
highly interconnected nature of the global economy: the virus has been detected in every country highly interconnected nature of the global economy: the virus has been detected in every country
and and al all U.S. states.2 The focal point of infections shifted from China to Europe, U.S. states.2 The focal point of infections shifted from China to Europe, especial yespecially Italy, Italy,
by early March 2020, but by April, the focus had shifted to the United States, where the number by early March 2020, but by April, the focus had shifted to the United States, where the number
of infections had been accelerating. By Aprilof infections had been accelerating. By April 2021, India, Brazil, parts of Africa and Asia 2021, India, Brazil, parts of Africa and Asia
emerged as viral hot spots with the number of infections and deaths reaching daily record levels. emerged as viral hot spots with the number of infections and deaths reaching daily record levels.
By mid-September 2021, the more virulent COVID-19 Delta variant reportedly had become the By mid-September 2021, the more virulent COVID-19 Delta variant reportedly had become the
more more global y globally dominant strain of the virus and prompted various national leaders to dominant strain of the virus and prompted various national leaders to cal call for for
additional health measures, including reintroducing travel restrictions.3 Projections by the additional health measures, including reintroducing travel restrictions.3 Projections by the
European Center for Prevention and Disease Control (ECDC) indicated the variant European Center for Prevention and Disease Control (ECDC) indicated the variant was projected
to account could account for 90% of coronavirus infections across much of Europe by the end of August 2021 for 90% of coronavirus infections across much of Europe by the end of August 2021
and “could lead to a fast and significant increase in daily cases in and “could lead to a fast and significant increase in daily cases in al all age groups.”4 The Delta age groups.”4 The Delta
variant was also growing as a share of total cases in the United States, accounting for 97.9% of variant was also growing as a share of total cases in the United States, accounting for 97.9% of al
all cases in late August 2021, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC).5 After escaping the cases in late August 2021, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC).5 After escaping the
initial initial rounds of infections, cases were growing rapidly in Australia and New Zealand, which rounds of infections, cases were growing rapidly in Australia and New Zealand, which
instituted restrictions on social gatherings and movement.6 COVID-19 infections were rising in instituted restrictions on social gatherings and movement.6 COVID-19 infections were rising in
Russia in June 2021, reportedly due to the Russia in June 2021, reportedly due to the unwil ingnessunwillingness of the populace to receive the Russian- of the populace to receive the Russian-
developed Sputnik V vaccine. developed Sputnik V vaccine.
According to the World Health Organization, by According to the World Health Organization, by October 4November 1, 2021, the COVID-19 virus had , 2021, the COVID-19 virus had
sickened over sickened over 234.6 mil ion people global y with over 4.8 mil ion fatalities:7 246.6 million people globally with over 5.0 million fatalities:7 the United States the United States
reported that over reported that over 43.3 mil ion45.6 million Americans had been diagnosed and over Americans had been diagnosed and over 695.2740 thousand people thousand people
had died from the virus. At one point, more than 80 countries had closed their borders to arrivals had died from the virus. At one point, more than 80 countries had closed their borders to arrivals
from countries with infections, ordered businesses to close, instructed their populations to self-from countries with infections, ordered businesses to close, instructed their populations to self-
quarantine, and closed schools to an estimated 1.5 quarantine, and closed schools to an estimated 1.5 bil ionbillion children.8 On August 23, 2021, the children.8 On August 23, 2021, the

1 Bill 1 Bill Chappell, “COVID-19: COVID-19Chappell, “COVID-19: COVID-19 Is Now Officially a Pandemic, WHO Says,”Is Now Officially a Pandemic, WHO Says,” National Public Radio, March , March
11, 2020. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/11/814474930/COVID-19-COVID-19-is-now-officially-11, 2020. https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/11/814474930/COVID-19-COVID-19-is-now-officially-
a-pandemic-who-says. a-pandemic-who-says.
2 “Mapping the Spread of the COVID-19 in the U.S. and Worldwide,” 2 “Mapping the Spread of the COVID-19 in the U.S. and Worldwide,” Washington Post Staff, Washington Post Staff, Washington Post, March , March
4, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/01/22/mapping-spread-new-COVID-19/?arc404=true.4, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/01/22/mapping-spread-new-COVID-19/?arc404=true.
3 Ang, Katerina, Delta is By Far World’s Most Dominant Coronavirus Variant, WHO Says,3 Ang, Katerina, Delta is By Far World’s Most Dominant Coronavirus Variant, WHO Says, The Washington Post,
September 22, 2021; Gross, Anna, Leila Abboud,September 22, 2021; Gross, Anna, Leila Abboud, and John Burn-Murdoch, Delta Variant Beginsand John Burn-Murdoch, Delta Variant Begins to Spread, to Spread,
T hreateningThreatening EU’s Covid Progress, EU’s Covid Progress, Financial Tim esTimes, June 21, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/d4abbe5e-8650-4a76-, June 21, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/d4abbe5e-8650-4a76-
9fea-2d3efa2ed52b. 9fea-2d3efa2ed52b.
4 Miller, Michael E., Covid-19 Updates: Merkel Warns Europe is 4 Miller, Michael E., Covid-19 Updates: Merkel Warns Europe is ‘On T hin ‘On Thin Ice’ as Concerns About Delta Variant Ice’ as Concerns About Delta Variant
Grow,Grow, The Washington Post, June, June 25, 2021. 25, 2021.
5 Center for Disease Control. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions. 5 Center for Disease Control. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#variant-proportions.
6 Pannett, Rachael, Sydney Enters ‘Scariest’ Phase of Pandemic as6 Pannett, Rachael, Sydney Enters ‘Scariest’ Phase of Pandemic as Delta Variant Spreads,Delta Variant Spreads, Leader Says,Leader Says, The
Washington Post
, June, June 24, 2021. 24, 2021.
7 World Health Organization. https://covid19.who.int/. 7 World Health Organization. https://covid19.who.int/.
8 “8 “T heThe Day the World Stopped: How Governments Are Still Day the World Stopped: How Governments Are Still Struggling Struggling to Get Ahead of the COVID-19,” to Get Ahead of the COVID-19,” The
Econom ist
Economist, March 17, 2020. https://www.economist.com/international/2020/03/17/governments-are-still-struggling-to-, March 17, 2020. https://www.economist.com/international/2020/03/17/governments-are-still-struggling-to-
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

1 1

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave full approval to the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus
vaccine, leading various institutions and the U.S. military to begin mandating vaccinations for vaccine, leading various institutions and the U.S. military to begin mandating vaccinations for
employees and members.9 employees and members.9
As infectious cases began rising sharply in late February 2020, governments took unprecedented As infectious cases began rising sharply in late February 2020, governments took unprecedented
steps in March 2020 to lock down social activities to contain the spread of the pandemic, steps in March 2020 to lock down social activities to contain the spread of the pandemic,
inadvertently creating a global economic recession. Government responses in March 2020 were inadvertently creating a global economic recession. Government responses in March 2020 were
extraordinary in terms of the speed with which they took place, the broad scope of the fiscal and extraordinary in terms of the speed with which they took place, the broad scope of the fiscal and
monetary policies they adopted, and the number of countries that were involved, often without a monetary policies they adopted, and the number of countries that were involved, often without a
formal, coordinated plan. formal, coordinated plan. Initial yInitially, governments adopted monetary policies aimed at stabilizing , governments adopted monetary policies aimed at stabilizing
financial markets and ensuring the flow of credit. In the second phase, governments focused financial markets and ensuring the flow of credit. In the second phase, governments focused
policy actions on fiscal measures aimed at sustaining economic growth as they adopted policy actions on fiscal measures aimed at sustaining economic growth as they adopted
quarantines and social distancing measures. In the third phase, governments shifted policies to quarantines and social distancing measures. In the third phase, governments shifted policies to
developing, purchasing and distributing vaccines. As the health and economic effects have developing, purchasing and distributing vaccines. As the health and economic effects have
evolved and persisted, the phases of government actions have become less distinct: efforts to evolved and persisted, the phases of government actions have become less distinct: efforts to
vaccinate populations have coincided with additionalvaccinate populations have coincided with additional fiscal measures to sustain household fiscal measures to sustain household
income, for instance. income, for instance.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported that policy actions to lock down the economy The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported that policy actions to lock down the economy
pushed the U.S. GDP growth rate down to 9.0% in the second quarter of 2020 compared with the pushed the U.S. GDP growth rate down to 9.0% in the second quarter of 2020 compared with the
previous quarter, or at an annualized rate of -31%, the largest quarterly decline in U.S. GDP previous quarter, or at an annualized rate of -31%, the largest quarterly decline in U.S. GDP
recorded over the past 70 years.10 Subsequently, U.S. GDP grew by 7.5% in the third quarter, or at recorded over the past 70 years.10 Subsequently, U.S. GDP grew by 7.5% in the third quarter, or at
an annualized rate of 30%, based primarily on gains in personal consumption, reflecting an an annualized rate of 30%, based primarily on gains in personal consumption, reflecting an
increase in income and support through government transfer payments.11 Fourth quarter 2020 data increase in income and support through government transfer payments.11 Fourth quarter 2020 data
indicate the U.S. economy grew by slightly more than 1.0% over the third quarter, or at an indicate the U.S. economy grew by slightly more than 1.0% over the third quarter, or at an
annualized rate of 4.5%. On a year-over-year basis, U.S. real GDP is estimated to have declined annualized rate of 4.5%. On a year-over-year basis, U.S. real GDP is estimated to have declined
by 3.4% in 2020 compared with 2019.12 In the by 3.4% in 2020 compared with 2019.12 In the first and second quartersthird quarter of 2021, the annual rate of growth of U.S. GDP rose by 2.0%, after rising by 6.3% and 6.7% in the first and second quarters, of 2021, the U.S.
economy grew at annualized rates of 6.3% and 6.7%, respectively. respectively.
In its September 8, 2021, Beige Book analysis, the Federal Reserve In its September 8, 2021, Beige Book analysis, the Federal Reserve (Fed) reported that economic reported that economic
activity had slowed slightly in the July through August period compared with moderate to robust activity had slowed slightly in the July through August period compared with moderate to robust
growth in growth in al all 12 Federal Reserve Districts during the May to early July period. The Fed attributed 12 Federal Reserve Districts during the May to early July period. The Fed attributed
the slowdown in activity to lower levels of consumer dining and recreation activities arising from the slowdown in activity to lower levels of consumer dining and recreation activities arising from
concerns over the spread of infections by the Delta variant of the COVID-19 virus. Other sectors concerns over the spread of infections by the Delta variant of the COVID-19 virus. Other sectors
of the economy experienced slower growth as a result of labor and supply-side shortages. Low of the economy experienced slower growth as a result of labor and supply-side shortages. Low
inventory levels in the auto sector and reduced supplies of residential housing also constrained inventory levels in the auto sector and reduced supplies of residential housing also constrained
sales activity in these sectors; the Fed also reported mild gains in residential and nonresidential sales activity in these sectors; the Fed also reported mild gains in residential and nonresidential
construction and in the energy and agricultural sectors.13 In its Monetary Policy report on construction and in the energy and agricultural sectors.13 In its Monetary Policy report on
September 22, the Fed indicated the economy had recovered to the point where it could begin a September 22, the Fed indicated the economy had recovered to the point where it could begin a

get-ahead-of-the-COVID-19. get-ahead-of-the-COVID-19.
9 Guarino, Ben, Laurie McGinley9 Guarino, Ben, Laurie McGinley and T yler and Tyler Pager, Pfizer- Pager, Pfizer-BioNT echBioNTech Coronavirus Vaccine Gets Coronavirus Vaccine Gets Full Full FDA Approval, FDA Approval,
Potentially Persuading the Hesitant to Get a Shot, Potentially Persuading the Hesitant to Get a Shot, The Washington Post, August, August 23, 2021. 23, 2021.
10 10 Gross Domestic Product, 2nd Quarter 2020 (Advance Estimate) and Annual Update, Bureau of Economic Analysis, , Bureau of Economic Analysis,
JulyJuly 30, 2020. https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product30, 2020. https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product -2nd-quarter-2020-advance-estimate-and--2nd-quarter-2020-advance-estimate-and-
annual-update. annual-update.
11 11 Gross Domestic Product, Third Quarter 2020 (Advance Estimate), Bureau of Economic Analysis, October 29, 2020. Bureau of Economic Analysis, October 29, 2020.
12 12 Gross Domestic Product, SecondThird Quarter 2021 (Advance Estimate) and Annual Update, Bureau of Economic Bureau of Economic
Analysis, Analysis, July 29October 28, 2021. , 2021.
13 13 The Beige Book: Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by Federal Reserve District,, the Federal the Federal
Reserve System, September 8, 2021. https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/beige-book-default.htm. Reserve System, September 8, 2021. https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/beige-book-default.htm.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

2 2

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

gradual tapering off its monthly asset purchases in November, characterized as a “moderation in gradual tapering off its monthly asset purchases in November, characterized as a “moderation in
the pace of asset purchases,” and make adjustments to interest rates in 2022.14 the pace of asset purchases,” and make adjustments to interest rates in 2022.14
The Fed’s Beige Book The Fed’s Beige Book analytical period occurred prior to a strong Gulf-centered hurricane in late analytical period occurred prior to a strong Gulf-centered hurricane in late
August that compounded existing shipping and transportation issues through Gulf ports that were August that compounded existing shipping and transportation issues through Gulf ports that were
struggling with pandemic-related issues that had handicapped oil production, refining and struggling with pandemic-related issues that had handicapped oil production, refining and
transportation, and shipments of agricultural products. In addition, damage to housing stock, transportation, and shipments of agricultural products. In addition, damage to housing stock,
urban infrastructure, and increased need for medical assistance in Gulf Coast areas increased urban infrastructure, and increased need for medical assistance in Gulf Coast areas increased
strains on communities already struggling with the impact of the pandemic that further strains on communities already struggling with the impact of the pandemic that further
compounded efforts by workers to return to their jobs.15compounded efforts by workers to return to their jobs.15
Through the various stages of the pandemic-related health and economic crises, governments Through the various stages of the pandemic-related health and economic crises, governments
responded with a number of policy initiatives that often attempted to balance competing policy responded with a number of policy initiatives that often attempted to balance competing policy
objectives. As the health crisis subsides and economic activity resumes, policymakers may objectives. As the health crisis subsides and economic activity resumes, policymakers may
consider evaluating the various policy approaches for lessons learned and for best practices to consider evaluating the various policy approaches for lessons learned and for best practices to
employ in addressing similar crises, should they arise. Such an evaluation could includeemploy in addressing similar crises, should they arise. Such an evaluation could include:
 Assessing the short and long-term costs and benefits of fiscal policies that were  Assessing the short and long-term costs and benefits of fiscal policies that were
adopted during the crisis to address employment dislocations and support social adopted during the crisis to address employment dislocations and support social
safety nets, compared with the potential long-term impact of deficit spending on safety nets, compared with the potential long-term impact of deficit spending on
the rate of inflation and the long-term financial stability of the economy.the rate of inflation and the long-term financial stability of the economy.
 Evaluating the costs and benefits of economy-wide business and social  Evaluating the costs and benefits of economy-wide business and social
lockdowns compared with the impact and effectiveness of targeted closures or lockdowns compared with the impact and effectiveness of targeted closures or
other types of restrictions. other types of restrictions.
 Reviewing the effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies that were adopted to  Reviewing the effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policies that were adopted to
support credit markets and sustain economic activity broadly during the initial support credit markets and sustain economic activity broadly during the initial
stages of the crisis, compared with policies targeted to assist specific sectors and stages of the crisis, compared with policies targeted to assist specific sectors and
businesses as they experienced financial distress.businesses as they experienced financial distress.
 Assessing the effectiveness of transfer payments that were directed at supporting  Assessing the effectiveness of transfer payments that were directed at supporting
the most heavily affected households, the impact of such payments on household the most heavily affected households, the impact of such payments on household
saving rates, consumption, and decisions to return to full-time employment, the saving rates, consumption, and decisions to return to full-time employment, the
necessary conditions and timing for tapering off the support, and the impact on necessary conditions and timing for tapering off the support, and the impact on
the long-term rate of growth between public versus private debt. the long-term rate of growth between public versus private debt.
 Assessing the impact that central banks and monetary authorities had on financial  Assessing the impact that central banks and monetary authorities had on financial
markets and market liquidity by intervening in sovereign debt and corporate bond markets and market liquidity by intervening in sovereign debt and corporate bond
markets during the early stages of the health and economic crisis and the impact, markets during the early stages of the health and economic crisis and the impact,
if any, on the abilityif any, on the ability of the markets to perform their traditional functions of of the markets to perform their traditional functions of
pricing risk and pricing risk and al ocatingallocating capital. capital.
 Assessing the optimal combination and impact of fiscal policies during a national  Assessing the optimal combination and impact of fiscal policies during a national
or global economic crisis between assisting households, firms, or state and local or global economic crisis between assisting households, firms, or state and local
governments. governments.
 Evaluating the effectiveness of unemployment insurance systems that provide  Evaluating the effectiveness of unemployment insurance systems that provide
short-term unemployment insurance to sustain workers incomes, compared with short-term unemployment insurance to sustain workers incomes, compared with

14 Press Release, Board 14 Press Release, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 22, 2021; Smith, Colby and Kate of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 22, 2021; Smith, Colby and Kate
Duguid,Duguid, T he The Fed Prepares to Fed Prepares to T ighten: Five T akeawaysTighten: Five Takeaways From its Latest Meeting, From its Latest Meeting, Financial Tim esTimes, September 22, 2021. September 22, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/1cc28b4c-63ea-44c5-a0af-af681ee6a4a4. https://www.ft.com/content/1cc28b4c-63ea-44c5-a0af-af681ee6a4a4.
15 Plume, Karl, U.S. 15 Plume, Karl, U.S. Gulf Gulf Coast GrainCoast Grain Exports Slowly ResumeExports Slowly Resume After Ida as More Power Restored, After Ida as More Power Restored, Reuters, September , September
9, 2021; Mohindru, Sameer9, 2021; Mohindru, Sameer C., and Pradeep Rajan, Hurricane Ida Roils GlobalC., and Pradeep Rajan, Hurricane Ida Roils Global Shipping Market: Sources,Shipping Market: Sources, S&P Global, ,
September 17, 2021. September 17, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

3 3

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

European-style job retention programs that maintain pre-crisis employment, even European-style job retention programs that maintain pre-crisis employment, even
as those jobs could disappear once the support ends.16 as those jobs could disappear once the support ends.16
Background
According to the According to the JulyOctober 2021 2021 World Economic Outlook prepared by the International Monetary prepared by the International Monetary
Fund (IMF), global economic growth Fund (IMF), global economic growth fel fell to an annualized rate of around -3.2% in 2020, with a to an annualized rate of around -3.2% in 2020, with a
recovery of recovery of 6.05.9% projected for 2021 and 4.9% for 2022.17 The IMF also concluded % projected for 2021 and 4.9% for 2022.17 The IMF also concluded the decline in
economic activity in 2000 was more global in nature and exceeded the declinethat advanced economies would face continued economic challenges into 2022 as a result of supply shortages and that prospects for low-income developing economies “had darkened considerably” due to the disparities in access to vaccines and differences in economic policy support. The pandemic-related recession is characterized as being more global in nature than that experienced during experienced during
the 2009-2010 global financial crisis as a result of its effects on developing economies. In its the 2009-2010 global financial crisis as a result of its effects on developing economies. In its
recent forecast, the IMF projected geographic regions of the global economy would recover at recent forecast, the IMF projected geographic regions of the global economy would recover at
different speeds, reflecting differences in the pace of vaccinations, the extent of policy support, different speeds, reflecting differences in the pace of vaccinations, the extent of policy support,
and various structural conditions, such as the role of tourism in the economy. and various structural conditions, such as the role of tourism in the economy.
Through Through mid-Septemberlate October 2021, various key economic and financial indicators had rebounded 2021, various key economic and financial indicators had rebounded
from the depths of the pandemic-related economic recession, although not from the depths of the pandemic-related economic recession, although not al all parts of the global parts of the global
economy had recovered to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels.18 In addition, a resurgence in viral economy had recovered to pre-COVID-19 pandemic levels.18 In addition, a resurgence in viral
cases and the emergence of new and more virulent strains of the COVID-19 virus caused some cases and the emergence of new and more virulent strains of the COVID-19 virus caused some
institutions in institutions in Augustlate 2021 to lower their economic growth projections for 2021.19 Although 2021 to lower their economic growth projections for 2021.19 Although
vaccination rates increased in various developed economies, particularly the United States, vaccination rates increased in various developed economies, particularly the United States,
developingdeveloping economies struggled to get access to vaccines and their populations vaccinated, and economies struggled to get access to vaccines and their populations vaccinated, and
consequently, to get their economies operating at or above pre-pandemic levels. Financial market consequently, to get their economies operating at or above pre-pandemic levels. Financial market
indices largely recovered from the losses experienced in March and April 2020, international oil indices largely recovered from the losses experienced in March and April 2020, international oil
prices surpassed the pre-pandemic levels, pressure appreciating the dollar had prices surpassed the pre-pandemic levels, pressure appreciating the dollar had general y generally eased, eased,
and labor markets appeared to be stabilizing.and labor markets appeared to be stabilizing.
By early September By fall 2021, prior to the end of U.S. pandemic-related unemployment assistance, 2021, prior to the end of U.S. pandemic-related unemployment assistance,
U.S. and European consumers appeared to have adjusted to pandemic restrictions by relying on U.S. and European consumers appeared to have adjusted to pandemic restrictions by relying on
unemployment benefits, personal savings, and credit to sustain unemployment benefits, personal savings, and credit to sustain their consumption activities. Personal consumption expenditures generally increased and fell with the state of the spread of the virus and partial business closures. consumption activities. Increased Increased
household and business spending, however, increased demand for a broad range of products, household and business spending, however, increased demand for a broad range of products,
including housing, food, energy, and new and used cars and trucks, that were constrained by including housing, food, energy, and new and used cars and trucks, that were constrained by
supply shortages and raised U.S. consumer and producer prices in supply shortages and raised U.S. consumer and producer prices in AugustSeptember, which rose at a , which rose at a
monthly rate of 0.monthly rate of 0.34% and 0.% and 0.75%, or at annual rates of over %, or at annual rates of over 5.34.8% and % and 8.36.0%, respectively.20 %, respectively.20
Over the long run, damage to labor markets could be problematic with a large share of the labor Over the long run, damage to labor markets could be problematic with a large share of the labor
force unable to or, in some sectors, force unable to or, in some sectors, unwil ingunwilling to return to pre-pandemic jobs. In some cases, to return to pre-pandemic jobs. In some cases,
workers who were unemployed during the crisis reportedly reconsidered returning to their workers who were unemployed during the crisis reportedly reconsidered returning to their
previous jobs and were exploring other options, which potential y could affect the pace of the
economic recovery.21 Reportedly, employment in the U.S. child-care sector in August 2021was
down more than 137,000 workers compared with March 2020 levels and played a role in keeping

16 16 Job Retention Schemes During the COVID-19 Lockdown and Beyond, Organization for Economic Cooperation and , Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, August 3, 2020. Development, August 3, 2020.
17 17 World Economic Outlook Update, International Monetary Fund, International Monetary Fund, JulyOctober, 2021, p. 6. , 2021, p. 6.
18 Mapping the Spread18 Mapping the Spread of the COVID-19. of the COVID-19.
19 Platt, Eric and Colby Smith, Economists 19 Platt, Eric and Colby Smith, Economists T rimTrim Forecasts and Investors Feel Jitters Over Delta Variant, Forecasts and Investors Feel Jitters Over Delta Variant, Financial
Tim es
Times, August, August 19, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/c21958ff-80d2-4b3b-863c-c492b361b2a4. 19, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/c21958ff-80d2-4b3b-863c-c492b361b2a4.
20 20 Consumer Price Index AugustSeptember 2021, Bureau of Labor Statistics, , Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 14October 13, 2021; , 2021; Producer Price Index August
September 2021
. Bureau of Labor Statistics, . Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 10, 2021.
21 Dodd, Darren, Businesses Suffer Labor Pains as Economies Reopen, Financial Times, June 21, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/e47575aa-b6ec-4635-a0be-f4e623dacbdb.
Congressional Research Service

4

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

1.6 mil ion October 14, 2021. Congressional Research Service 4 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 previous jobs and were exploring other options, which potentially could affect the pace of the economic recovery.21 Reportedly, employment in the U.S. child-care sector in August 2021was down more than 137,000 workers compared with March 2020 levels and played a role in keeping 1.6 million women who are mothers of children under the age of 17 from returning to the labor women who are mothers of children under the age of 17 from returning to the labor
force.22 Similarly, economies could face long-term costs as a result of children who were held out force.22 Similarly, economies could face long-term costs as a result of children who were held out
of in-person education for over a year that could result in lower academic performance and of in-person education for over a year that could result in lower academic performance and
graduation rates and delayed entry into the labor market. On March 31, 2021, Kristalina graduation rates and delayed entry into the labor market. On March 31, 2021, Kristalina
Georgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Georgieva, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), also warned that an warned that an
emerging market debt crisis could unfold as the global economy begins recovering and interest emerging market debt crisis could unfold as the global economy begins recovering and interest
rates rise, which could cause a capital outflow from developing economies.23 rates rise, which could cause a capital outflow from developing economies.23
Economic Policy Challenges
Over the course of the pandemic and economic crises, policymakers have had to adjust to the Over the course of the pandemic and economic crises, policymakers have had to adjust to the
changing nature of the crises, while implementing targeted policies that address what had been changing nature of the crises, while implementing targeted policies that address what had been
expected to be short-term problems without creating distortions in economies that can outlast the expected to be short-term problems without creating distortions in economies that can outlast the
impact of the virus itself. impact of the virus itself. Initial y, Initially, policymakers were overwhelmed by the quickly changing policymakers were overwhelmed by the quickly changing
nature of the global health crisis and the immediate economic effects. The extended health crisis, nature of the global health crisis and the immediate economic effects. The extended health crisis,
however, however, has created wide-ranging created wide-ranging spil spill-over effects beyond those -over effects beyond those typical ytypically associated with associated with
monetary and fiscal policies in ways that have hampered national economic recoveries and monetary and fiscal policies in ways that have hampered national economic recoveries and
reinforced a more wide-spread global trade and economic crisis. During the initial stages of the reinforced a more wide-spread global trade and economic crisis. During the initial stages of the
pandemic, policymakers weighed the impact of policies that addressed the immediate economic pandemic, policymakers weighed the impact of policies that addressed the immediate economic
effects at the expense of longer-term considerations such as debt accumulation. effects at the expense of longer-term considerations such as debt accumulation. Initial yInitially, many , many
policymakers felt constrained in their ability to respond to the crisis as a result of limited policymakers felt constrained in their ability to respond to the crisis as a result of limited
flexibilityflexibility for monetary and fiscal support within conventional standards, given the broad-based for monetary and fiscal support within conventional standards, given the broad-based
synchronized slowdown in global economic growth, synchronized slowdown in global economic growth, especial yespecially in manufacturing and trade, which in manufacturing and trade, which
had developed prior to the viral outbreak. had developed prior to the viral outbreak.
Initial y, Initially, the economic effects of the pandemic had been expected to arise from short-term supply the economic effects of the pandemic had been expected to arise from short-term supply
issues as factory output issues as factory output fel fell, because workers were quarantined to reduce the spread of the virus , because workers were quarantined to reduce the spread of the virus
through social interaction. The drop in China’s GDP growth rate of 8.7% in the first quarter of through social interaction. The drop in China’s GDP growth rate of 8.7% in the first quarter of
2020, as indicated in 2020, as indicated in Table 1, had broad international repercussions that became evident in the , had broad international repercussions that became evident in the
second quarter of 2020 as firms experienced delays in supplies of intermediate and finished goods second quarter of 2020 as firms experienced delays in supplies of intermediate and finished goods
through supply chains. Concerns grew, however, that virus-related supply shocks had created through supply chains. Concerns grew, however, that virus-related supply shocks had created
more prolonged and wide-ranging demand shocks as reduced activity by consumers and more prolonged and wide-ranging demand shocks as reduced activity by consumers and
businesses led to a lower rate of economic growth in most countries and most areas. Nearly every businesses led to a lower rate of economic growth in most countries and most areas. Nearly every
country experienced a decline in economic activity in the second quarter of 2020, with the notable country experienced a decline in economic activity in the second quarter of 2020, with the notable
exception of China, which experienced a rebound in its rate of growth by 10% over the previous exception of China, which experienced a rebound in its rate of growth by 10% over the previous
quarter and was one of a few number of countries to post an quarter and was one of a few number of countries to post an overal overall positive rate of growth in positive rate of growth in
2020. In contrast to China’s positive rate of growth in the second quarter of 2020, a broad range 2020. In contrast to China’s positive rate of growth in the second quarter of 2020, a broad range
of countries experienced historic declines in growth, with India’s GDP of countries experienced historic declines in growth, with India’s GDP fal ingfalling by nearly 25%. by nearly 25%.
Similarly, most countries experienced a rebound in economic growth in the third quarter of 2020, Similarly, most countries experienced a rebound in economic growth in the third quarter of 2020,
although at rates that general y were lower than the rate of decline in the second quarter,
reflecting chal enges posed by the on-going health crisis.
As demand shocks unfolded, businesses experienced reduced activity and profits and potential y
escalating and binding credit and liquidity constraints. While manufacturing firms experienced
supply chain shocks, reduced consumer activity through social distancing affected the services

21 Dodd, Darren, Businesses Suffer Labor Pains as Economies Reopen, Financial Times, June 21, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/e47575aa-b6ec-4635-a0be-f4e623dacbdb. 22 22 The Employment Situation August 2021, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 3, 2021; Long, Heather, , Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 3, 2021; Long, Heather, T heThe Pay is Pay is
Absolute Crap: Child-careAbsolute Crap: Child-care Workers Are Quitting Rapidly:Workers Are Quitting Rapidly: A Red FlagA Red Flag for the Economy, for the Economy, The Washington Post, ,
September 20, 2021. September 20, 2021.
23 Giles,23 Giles, Chris, Prepare for Emerging Markets Debt Crisis,Chris, Prepare for Emerging Markets Debt Crisis, Warns IMF Head, Warns IMF Head, Financial Times, March 31, 2021. , March 31, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/487c30f4-7f21-4787-b519-dde52264d141. https://www.ft.com/content/487c30f4-7f21-4787-b519-dde52264d141.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

5 5

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

although at rates that generally were lower than the rate of decline in the second quarter, reflecting challenges posed by the on-going health crisis. As demand shocks unfolded, businesses experienced reduced activity and profits and potentially escalating and binding credit and liquidity constraints. While manufacturing firms experienced supply chain shocks, reduced consumer activity through social distancing affected the services sector of the economy, which accounts for two-thirds of annual U.S. economic output. In this sector of the economy, which accounts for two-thirds of annual U.S. economic output. In this
environment, manufacturing and services firms environment, manufacturing and services firms initial yinitially tended to hoard cash, which affected tended to hoard cash, which affected
market liquidity. In response, the Federal Reserve, along with other central banks, lowered market liquidity. In response, the Federal Reserve, along with other central banks, lowered
interest rates where possible and expanded lending facilities to provide liquidityinterest rates where possible and expanded lending facilities to provide liquidity to financial to financial
markets and to firms markets and to firms potential ypotentially facing insolvency. facing insolvency.
Table 1. Change in Gross Domestic Product by Major Country
Percentage change from previous period Percentage change from previous period
Country
2019
2020
2020
2021
Country 2019 2020


Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Argentina Argentina
-2.1% -2.1%
-9.9% -9.9%
-4.1% -4.1%
-15.8% -15.8%
13.2% 13.2%
4.4% 4.4%
2.6% 2.6%
.. ..
Australia Australia
-0.3 -0.3
-2.5 -2.5
-0.3 -0.3
-7.0 -7.0
3.6 3.6
3.2 3.2
1.9 1.9
0.7 0.7
Austria Austria
1.4 1.4
-6.3 -6.3
-2.6 -2.6
-10.6 -10.6
11.6 11.6
-3.1 -3.1
-1.1 -1.1
4.3 4.3
Belgium Belgium
1.8 1.8
-6.3 -6.3
-3.3 -3.3
-11.9 -11.9
11.8 11.8
-0.1 -0.1
1.1 1.1
1.7 1.7
Brazil Brazil
.. ..
.. ..
-2.3 -2.3
-9.0 -9.0
7.7 7.7
3.1 3.1
1.2 1.2
-0.1 -0.1
Canada Canada
1.9 1.9
-5.3 -5.3
-2.0 -2.0
-11.3 -11.3
9.1 9.1
2.2 2.2
1.4 1.4
-0.3 -0.3
Chile Chile
0.9 0.9
-5.8 -5.8
1.9 1.9
-12.7 -12.7
5.4 5.4
6.5 6.5
3.4 3.4
1.0 1.0
China China
6.1 6.1
2.3 2.3
-8.7 -8.7
10.0 10.0
2.8 2.8
3.0 3.0
0.4 0.4
1.3 1.3
Colombia Colombia
3.3 3.3
-6.8 -6.8
-2.6 -2.6
-14.8 -14.8
9.7 9.7
6.2 6.2
2.9 2.9
-2.4 -2.4
Costa Rica Costa Rica
2.2 2.2
-4.5 -4.5
-1.2 -1.2
-7.8 -7.8
2.2 2.2
2.6 2.6
1.4 1.4
.. ..
Czech R. Czech R.
3.0 3.0
-5.8 -5.8
-3.4 -3.4
-8.9 -8.9
6.8 6.8
0.7 0.7
-0.4 -0.4
1.0 1.0
Denmark Denmark
2.1 2.1
-2.1 -2.1
-0.7 -0.7
-6.4 -6.4
6.1 6.1
0.9 0.9
-0.9 -0.9
2.3 2.3
Finland Finland
1.3 1.3
-2.8 -2.8
-0.5 -0.5
-6.1 -6.1
4.6 4.6
0.5 0.5
0.1 0.1
2.1 2.1
France France
1.8 1.8
-7.9 -7.9
-5.7 -5.7
-13.5 -13.5
18.6 18.6
-1.1 -1.1
0.0 0.0
1.1 1.1
Germany Germany
1.1 1.1
-4.6 -4.6
-1.8 -1.8
-10.0 -10.0
9.0 9.0
0.7 0.7
-2.0 -2.0
1.6 1.6
Greece Greece
1.9 1.9
-8.2 -8.2
-0.4 -0.4
-13.0 -13.0
3.9 3.9
3.5 3.5
4.5 4.5
3.4 3.4
Hungary Hungary
4.6 4.6
-5.0 -5.0
-0.3 -0.3
-14.4 -14.4
10.6 10.6
1.6 1.6
2.0 2.0
2.7 2.7
India India
.. ..
.. ..
0.6 0.6
-24.5 -24.5
21.2 21.2
8.6 8.6
2.3 2.3
-10.2 -10.2
Indonesia Indonesia
5.0 5.0
-2.1 -2.1
-0.9 -0.9
-6.4 -6.4
3.1 3.1
2.3 2.3
0.3 0.3
1.3 1.3
Ireland Ireland
4.9 4.9
5.9 5.9
2.6 2.6
-2.9 -2.9
9.8 9.8
-4.6 -4.6
8.7 8.7
6.3 6.3
Israel Israel
3.8 3.8
-2.2 -2.2
-1.2 -1.2
-9.2 -9.2
8.9 8.9
2.4 2.4
-0.4 -0.4
3.9 3.9
Italy Italy
0.3 0.3
-8.9 -8.9
-5.6 -5.6
-13.1 -13.1
16.0 16.0
-1.8 -1.8
0.2 0.2
2.7 2.7
Japan Japan
0.3 0.3
-4.8 -4.8
-0.6 -0.6
-7.9 -7.9
5.4 5.4
2.8 2.8
-1.1 -1.1
0.5 0.5
Korea Korea
2.0 2.0
-1.0 -1.0
-1.3 -1.3
-3.2 -3.2
2.2 2.2
1.1 1.1
1.7 1.7
0.8 0.8
Luxembourg Luxembourg
2.3 2.3
-1.3 -1.3
-1.6 -1.6
-7.1 -7.1
9.2 9.2
1.9 1.9
1.4 1.4
.. ..
Mexico Mexico
-0.1 -0.1
-8.2 -8.2
-0.9 -0.9
-17.3 -17.3
12.7 12.7
3.3 3.3
1.1 1.1
1.5 1.5
Congressional Research Service 6 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 2020 2021 Country 2019 2020 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Netherlands Netherlands
2.0 2.0
-3.8 -3.8
-1.6 -1.6
-8.4 -8.4
7.5 7.5
0.0 0.0
-0.8 -0.8
3.1 3.1
New Zealand New Zealand
2.0 2.0
-1.1 -1.1
-1.4 -1.4
-9.9 -9.9
13.9 13.9
-1.0 -1.0
1.4 1.4
2.8 2.8
Norway Norway
0.9 0.9
-0.8 -0.8
-1.5 -1.5
-4.6 -4.6
4.3 4.3
0.8 0.8
-0.6 -0.6
1.1 1.1
Poland Poland
4.7 4.7
-2.7 -2.7
-0.1 -0.1
-9.2 -9.2
7.7 7.7
-0.3 -0.3
1.3 1.3
2.1 2.1
Congressional Research Service

6

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Country
2019
2020
2020
2021



Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Portugal Portugal
2.5 2.5
-7.6 -7.6
-4.0 -4.0
-14.0 -14.0
13.4 13.4
0.2 0.2
-3.2 -3.2
4.9 4.9
Russia Russia
2.0 2.0
.. ..
-0.7 -0.7
-2.6 -2.6
0.7 0.7
-0.2 -0.2
-0.0 -0.0
.. ..
Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
0.3 0.3
-4.1 -4.1
-1.6 -1.6
-5.5 -5.5
2.1 2.1
1.8 1.8
-0.5 -0.5
0.6 0.6
South Africa South Africa
0.2 0.2
-7.0 -7.0
-0.4 -0.4
-16.6 -16.6
13.7 13.7
1.4 1.4
1.1 1.1
.. ..
Spain Spain
2.0 2.0
-10.8 -10.8
-5.4 -5.4
-17.8 -17.8
17.1 17.1
0.0 0.0
-0.4 -0.4
2.8 2.8
Sweden Sweden
2.0 2.0
-2.8 -2.8
-0.8 -0.8
-8.1 -8.1
7.5 7.5
0.2 0.2
0.8 0.8
0.9 0.9
Switzerland Switzerland
1.2 1.2
-2.4 -2.4
-1.6 -1.6
-6.2 -6.2
6.4 6.4
-0.1 -0.1
-0.4 -0.4
1.8 1.8
Turkey Turkey
0.9 0.9
1.8 1.8
0.4 0.4
-10.8 -10.8
16.4 16.4
1.2 1.2
2.2 2.2
0.9 0.9
United Kingdom United Kingdom
1.4 1.4
-9.8 -9.8
-2.8 -2.8
-19.5 -19.5
16.9 16.9
1.3 1.3
-1.6 -1.6
4.8 4.8
United States United States
2.3 2.3
-3.4 -3.4
-1.3 -1.3
-8.9 -8.9
7.5 7.5
1.1 1.1
1.5 1.5
1.6 1.6
EU – 27 EU – 27
1.8 1.8
-5.9 -5.9
-3.1 -3.1
-11.3 -11.3
11.8 11.8
-0.2 -0.2
-0.1 -0.1
2.1 2.1
OECD OECD - Total Total
1.7 1.7
-4.7 -4.7
-1.8 -1.8
-10.4 -10.4
9.4 9.4
1.1 1.1
0.6 0.6
1.7 1.7
Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Quarterly National Accounts DatasetQuarterly National Accounts Dataset , ,
SeptemberSeptember 17, 2021. 17, 2021.
As the economic effects persisted through the spring and summer of 2020, the As the economic effects persisted through the spring and summer of 2020, the economic impact spread impact spread
through trade and financial linkages to an ever-broadening group of countries, firms and through trade and financial linkages to an ever-broadening group of countries, firms and
households. These growing economic effects households. These growing economic effects potential ypotentially increased liquidity constraints and credit increased liquidity constraints and credit
market tightening in global financial markets as firms hoarded cash, with negative market tightening in global financial markets as firms hoarded cash, with negative fal outfallout effects effects
on economic growth. At the same time, financial markets factored in what they anticipated would on economic growth. At the same time, financial markets factored in what they anticipated would
be an increase in government bond issuance in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere as be an increase in government bond issuance in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere as
government debt levels rose to meet spending obligations during an expected economic recession government debt levels rose to meet spending obligations during an expected economic recession
and increased fiscal spending to fight the effects of COVID-19. Unlike the 2008-2009 financial and increased fiscal spending to fight the effects of COVID-19. Unlike the 2008-2009 financial
crisis, reduced demand by consumers, labor market issues, and a reduced level of activity among crisis, reduced demand by consumers, labor market issues, and a reduced level of activity among
businesses, rather than risky trading by global banks, led to corporate credit issues and potential businesses, rather than risky trading by global banks, led to corporate credit issues and potential
insolvency.insolvency.
Liquidity Liquidity and credit market issues presented policymakers with a different set of and credit market issues presented policymakers with a different set of chal engeschallenges than than
addressing supply-side constraints. As a result, the focus of government policy expanded from a addressing supply-side constraints. As a result, the focus of government policy expanded from a
health crisis to macroeconomic and financial market issues that were addressed through a health crisis to macroeconomic and financial market issues that were addressed through a
combination of monetary, fiscal, and other policies, including border closures, quarantines, and combination of monetary, fiscal, and other policies, including border closures, quarantines, and
restrictions on social interactions. restrictions on social interactions. Essential yEssentially, while businesses attempted to address worker and , while businesses attempted to address worker and
output issues at the firm level, national leaders attempted to implement fiscal policies to prevent output issues at the firm level, national leaders attempted to implement fiscal policies to prevent
economic growth from contracting sharply by assisting workers and businesses that faced economic growth from contracting sharply by assisting workers and businesses that faced
financial strains, and central bankers adjusted monetary policies to address mounting credit financial strains, and central bankers adjusted monetary policies to address mounting credit
market issues. market issues.
In the initial In the initial stages of the health crisis, households were concerned about a repeat of the loss of stages of the health crisis, households were concerned about a repeat of the loss of
wealth they experienced during the 2008-2009 financial crisis when the value of their primary wealth they experienced during the 2008-2009 financial crisis when the value of their primary
residence dropped sharply. Instead, home prices rose in the United States and Europe as supply residence dropped sharply. Instead, home prices rose in the United States and Europe as supply
Congressional Research Service 7 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 bottlenecks raised the cost of construction materials and demand for housing increased due in part bottlenecks raised the cost of construction materials and demand for housing increased due in part
to low interest rates. Simultaneously, rising rates of unemployment and job losses raised concerns to low interest rates. Simultaneously, rising rates of unemployment and job losses raised concerns
that defaults on mortgages and delinquencies on rent payments could increase and would require that defaults on mortgages and delinquencies on rent payments could increase and would require
some financial institutions to provide loan forbearance or other mechanism to provide financial some financial institutions to provide loan forbearance or other mechanism to provide financial
assistanceassistance. Various central banks offered specific programs to forestall mortgage foreclosures and rent assistance to prevent an increase in homelessness. In the first stages of the economic downturn, mortgage defaults threatened to . In the first stages of the economic downturn, mortgage defaults threatened to
negatively affect the market for mortgage-backed securities, the availabilitynegatively affect the market for mortgage-backed securities, the availability of funds for of funds for
Congressional Research Service

7

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

mortgages, and negatively affected the mortgages, and negatively affected the overal overall rate of economic growth. Losses in the value of rate of economic growth. Losses in the value of
most equity markets in the U.S., Asia, and Europe were projected at that time to affect household most equity markets in the U.S., Asia, and Europe were projected at that time to affect household
wealth, wealth, especial yespecially that of retirees living on a fixed income and others who own equities. that of retirees living on a fixed income and others who own equities.
Subsequently, increased demand for housing outside large urban areas by workers shifting to at-Subsequently, increased demand for housing outside large urban areas by workers shifting to at-
home work and an increase in prices for construction materials raised the prices for U.S. housing home work and an increase in prices for construction materials raised the prices for U.S. housing
by an estimated 13.2% in 202024 and contributed to an increase in by an estimated 13.2% in 202024 and contributed to an increase in U.S. household wealth.25 household wealth.25
Within countries, the employment and earnings of youth, women, and the relatively lower- Within countries, the employment and earnings of youth, women, and the relatively lower-skil edskilled
workers have been affected disproportionately. The two-track nature of the economic recovery workers have been affected disproportionately. The two-track nature of the economic recovery
between developed and developing economies combined with new variants of the virus and viral between developed and developing economies combined with new variants of the virus and viral
outbreaks in some major developing economies outbreaks in some major developing economies have increased the impact of the crisis on the increased the impact of the crisis on the
global economy and complicated economic forecasts. The IMF estimated in global economy and complicated economic forecasts. The IMF estimated in AprilOctober 2021 the 2021 the
economic economic fal outfallout from the pandemic from the pandemic could push 95 mil ion people in Sub-Saharan Africa and
South Asiapushed 65 to 75 million people into extreme poverty, reversing a decades-long trend.26 However, the IMF also into extreme poverty, reversing a decades-long trend.26 However, the IMF also
concluded that spending on social programs to limit the impact of the pandemic could reduce the concluded that spending on social programs to limit the impact of the pandemic could reduce the
number of people number of people fal ing falling into extreme povertyinto extreme poverty to 80 to 90 mil ion. .
In addition to the asynchronous recovery, the IMF concluded that support provided by central In addition to the asynchronous recovery, the IMF concluded that support provided by central
banks may have had unintended consequences of supporting equity valuations that at times may banks may have had unintended consequences of supporting equity valuations that at times may
have been misaligned with their model-estimated fundamentals and may have increased financial have been misaligned with their model-estimated fundamentals and may have increased financial
risks risks overal overall that could become problematic should interest rates rise.27 These risks could increase that could become problematic should interest rates rise.27 These risks could increase
for non-financial firms and households that had high levels of debt relative to income prior to the for non-financial firms and households that had high levels of debt relative to income prior to the
pandemic crisis. Accommodative monetary and fiscal policies intended to limitpandemic crisis. Accommodative monetary and fiscal policies intended to limit the economic the economic
impact of the crisis may have aided non-financial firms and households, but such support may impact of the crisis may have aided non-financial firms and households, but such support may
also have come at the expense of higher debt levels for most countries and the prospect of a lower also have come at the expense of higher debt levels for most countries and the prospect of a lower
rate of economic growth in the future.28rate of economic growth in the future.28
The staggered economic recovery is projected to widen gaps in living standards between The staggered economic recovery is projected to widen gaps in living standards between
developed economies and others. Such differences in living standards are estimated to reflect developed economies and others. Such differences in living standards are estimated to reflect
differences in cumulative per capital income with losses in 2020 to 2022 projected to be differences in cumulative per capital income with losses in 2020 to 2022 projected to be
equivalent to 20% of 2019 global GDP, or about $18 equivalent to 20% of 2019 global GDP, or about $18 tril iontrillion. The largest losses are estimated to . The largest losses are estimated to
fal fall disproportionately on low-income and emerging market economies. In addition, the IMF disproportionately on low-income and emerging market economies. In addition, the IMF
estimated that 95 mil ion people may have entered into extreme poverty in 2020 with 80 mil ion
more people being undernourished compared to pre-pandemic levels, as estimated that (1) per capita incomes (1) per capita incomes
would remain below the pre-pandemic levels for several years, adversely affecting productivity; would remain below the pre-pandemic levels for several years, adversely affecting productivity;
(2) the demands placed on national health systems to address the pandemic could hinder the
treatment of other diseases; (3) business bankruptcies could reduce productivity; and (4) rising
debt levels could crowd out potential borrowing and investment.29
The IMF urged G-20 leaders to maintain supportive monetary and fiscal policies to lessen the
economic impact of the global recession, In particular, the IMF recommended a combination of

(2) the demands placed on national health systems to 24 Adamczyk, Alicia, 24 Adamczyk, Alicia, The Typical Home Price is Up a Record 13.2% Compared to Last Year, According to Zillow, ,
CNBC,CNBC, June June 16, 2021. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/16/typical-us-home-price-up-record-13point2percent-compared-16, 2021. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/16/typical-us-home-price-up-record-13point2percent-compared-
to-last-year.html. to-last-year.html.
25 According to the Federal Reserve, between Q1 2020 and Q1 2021, the value of U.S. 25 According to the Federal Reserve, between Q1 2020 and Q1 2021, the value of U.S. household holdingshousehold holdings of real estate of real estate
increased by nearly 10%, rising to $37.6 trillion and accounting for 84% of household wealth.increased by nearly 10%, rising to $37.6 trillion and accounting for 84% of household wealth. Financial Accounts of
the United States
, Board, Board of Governors of the Federalof Governors of the Federal Reserve System, First Quarter 2021, June 10, 2021.Reserve System, First Quarter 2021, June 10, 2021.
26 26 Fiscal Monitor, International Monetary Fund, , International Monetary Fund, AprilOctober 2021, p. 2021, p. 312. .
27 27 Global Financial Stability Report, International Monetary Fund, , International Monetary Fund, AprilOctober, 2021, p. , 2021, p. x2. .
28 Ibid., p. 36. 28 Ibid., p. 36.
29 G-20 Surveillance Note, International Monetary Fund, November, 2020, p. 6.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

8 8

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

address the pandemic could hinder the treatment of other diseases; (3) business bankruptcies could reduce productivity; and (4) rising debt levels could crowd out potential borrowing and investment.29 The IMF urged G-20 leaders to maintain supportive monetary and fiscal policies to lessen the economic impact of the global recession, In particular, the IMF recommended a combination of accommodative monetary policies characterized by low interest rates and central bank programs accommodative monetary policies characterized by low interest rates and central bank programs
to facilitate credit availability,to facilitate credit availability, a continuation of fiscal support for individuals and firms, and a continuation of fiscal support for individuals and firms, and
engagement in a synchronized infrastructure investment program to promote growth. According engagement in a synchronized infrastructure investment program to promote growth. According
to an IMF analysis, to an IMF analysis, al all other things being equal, an increase in infrastructure spending by G-20 other things being equal, an increase in infrastructure spending by G-20
countries of one-half percent of their GDP in 2021 and 1% in 2022 through 2025 would increase countries of one-half percent of their GDP in 2021 and 1% in 2022 through 2025 would increase
global GDP by 2% in 2025, compared with under 1.2% growth for an unsynchronized approach.30global GDP by 2% in 2025, compared with under 1.2% growth for an unsynchronized approach.30
On December 2, 2020, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva indicated the global On December 2, 2020, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva indicated the global
financial system had been resilient enough to withstand the impact of the global pandemic, but financial system had been resilient enough to withstand the impact of the global pandemic, but
she urged policymakers to “act quickly” to return economic growth to its re-pandemic levels and she urged policymakers to “act quickly” to return economic growth to its re-pandemic levels and
avoid widespread financial distress.31 The Director reportedly also urged policymakers to take avoid widespread financial distress.31 The Director reportedly also urged policymakers to take
“urgent, coordinated steps” to deliver investment in digital technology, infrastructure and the “urgent, coordinated steps” to deliver investment in digital technology, infrastructure and the
environment. She also indicated the IMF had projected that the loss of global economic output environment. She also indicated the IMF had projected that the loss of global economic output
between 2020 and 2025 as a consequence of the pandemic would total $28 between 2020 and 2025 as a consequence of the pandemic would total $28 tril iontrillion and that 120 and that 120
mil ion million jobs would be lost permanently in the tourism industry alone. The pandemicjobs would be lost permanently in the tourism industry alone. The pandemic -related -related
economic recession raised concerns over the growing debt problems in developing economies, economic recession raised concerns over the growing debt problems in developing economies,
where the IMF projected that as much as 40% of banks assets were in danger of becoming where the IMF projected that as much as 40% of banks assets were in danger of becoming
distressed. distressed.
Impact on Workers
In a report prepared for the January 25-29, 2021, World Economic Forum, the International Labor In a report prepared for the January 25-29, 2021, World Economic Forum, the International Labor
Organization (ILO) estimated that 93% of the world’s workers at that time were living under Organization (ILO) estimated that 93% of the world’s workers at that time were living under
some form of workplace restrictions as a result of the global pandemic and that 8.8% of global some form of workplace restrictions as a result of the global pandemic and that 8.8% of global
working hours were lost in 2020 relative to the fourth quarter of 2019, an amount equivalent to working hours were lost in 2020 relative to the fourth quarter of 2019, an amount equivalent to
255 255 mil ion million full-time jobs. The ILO estimated the loss in working hours was comprised of (1) full-time jobs. The ILO estimated the loss in working hours was comprised of (1)
workers who were unemployed, but actively seeking employment, (2) workers who were workers who were unemployed, but actively seeking employment, (2) workers who were
employed, but had their working hours reduced, and (3) workers who were unemployed and not employed, but had their working hours reduced, and (3) workers who were unemployed and not
actively seeking employment. Based on this approach, the ILO estimated that unemployment actively seeking employment. Based on this approach, the ILO estimated that unemployment
global y globally was equivalent to 0.9% of total working hours lost in 2020, while inactivity and reduced was equivalent to 0.9% of total working hours lost in 2020, while inactivity and reduced
hours accounted for 7.9% of total working hours lost, as indicated in hours accounted for 7.9% of total working hours lost, as indicated in Figure 1. .
Total working hours lost in 2020 compared with 2019 were highest in Europe (14.6%) and the Total working hours lost in 2020 compared with 2019 were highest in Europe (14.6%) and the
Americas (13.7%), where quarantines and lockdowns had been extensive, followed by lower-Americas (13.7%), where quarantines and lockdowns had been extensive, followed by lower-
middle income economies. The ILO also estimated that global job losses totaled 114 middle income economies. The ILO also estimated that global job losses totaled 114 mil ion million jobs jobs
in 2020 relative to 2019. The share of lost worker hours due to higher rates of unemployment in 2020 relative to 2019. The share of lost worker hours due to higher rates of unemployment
were highest in Europe (6.0%), the Americas (2.7%), including the United States, and Arab States were highest in Europe (6.0%), the Americas (2.7%), including the United States, and Arab States
(1.7%).32 The ILO also estimated that an increase in global economic activity through part of the
fourth quarter was equal to an increase of 130 mil ion full-time jobs.

29 G-20 Surveillance Note, International Monetary Fund, November, 2020, p. 6. 30 Ibid., p. 10. 30 Ibid., p. 10.
31 Wheatley, Jonathan, IMF Chief Warns Against Complacency on Global31 Wheatley, Jonathan, IMF Chief Warns Against Complacency on Global Economy, Economy, Financial Times, December 2, , December 2,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/fda34b47-33d2-457e-a0b6-45be6001920d. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/fda34b47-33d2-457e-a0b6-45be6001920d.
32 ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work, Seventh Edition, International Labor Organization, January 15,
2021, p. 2.
Congressional Research Service

9


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19
Congressional Research Service 9 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 (1.7%).32 The ILO also estimated that an increase in global economic activity through part of the fourth quarter was equal to an increase of 130 million full-time jobs.
Figure 1. Composition of Working-Hours Lost by Region, 2020

Source: ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work, International Labor Organization, 2021. International Labor Organization, 2021.
In In July 2021, the OECD estimated the pandemic-related recession cost 22 mil ion jobs in OECD
countries in 2020 and that 114 mil ion jobs had been lost global yJune 2021, the ILO published an updated report that estimated employment levels globally remained below pre-pandemic levels through the first half of 2021, due to waves of COVID-19 infectious cases. Consequently, the ILO estimated that working hours fell by 4.8% in the first quarter of 2021 and by 4.4% in the second quarter of 2021, or an amount equivalent to 140 million jobs and 127 million full-time jobs, respectively. The ILO also estimated the loss in total hours worked in the first half of 2021 was equivalent to 5.3% loss in global worker income, exclusive of government transfer payments and benefits, or an amount equivalent to $1.3 trillion. Despite a projected rebound in job growth in 2021 and 2022, the ILO estimated that employment levels would fall short by 75 million jobs in 2021 and 25 million in 2022 compared to the number of jobs that had been projected to be created in the absence of the pandemic.33 Similarly, the OECD estimated in July 2021 the pandemic-related recession cost 22 million jobs in OECD countries in 2020 and that 114 million jobs had been lost globally, compared with 2019., compared with 2019.3334 The The
estimate concluded that unprecedented government fiscal policies supported worker’s incomes, estimate concluded that unprecedented government fiscal policies supported worker’s incomes,
thereby likely limitingthereby likely limiting the impact of shutdowns and social restrictions on labor markets. the impact of shutdowns and social restrictions on labor markets.
Nevertheless, the OECD concluded the unique nature of the crisis accentuated and deepened Nevertheless, the OECD concluded the unique nature of the crisis accentuated and deepened
economic and social divides along economic and social divides along skil skill levels, education, income, and gender bases in OECD levels, education, income, and gender bases in OECD
countries and amplified longstanding trends toward increasing economic inequalities in many countries and amplified longstanding trends toward increasing economic inequalities in many
OECD countries.OECD countries.3435
A number of economists and others estimated that pandemic-related disruptions to labor markets A number of economists and others estimated that pandemic-related disruptions to labor markets
in developed and developing economies could have long-lasting effects. One group of economists in developed and developing economies could have long-lasting effects. One group of economists
estimated that even after the pandemic recedes and economic activity ramps up, firms may not estimated that even after the pandemic recedes and economic activity ramps up, firms may not
abandon the labor-saving lessons they learned, with fewer jobs created in retail stores, restaurants, abandon the labor-saving lessons they learned, with fewer jobs created in retail stores, restaurants,
32 ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work, Seventh Edition, International Labor Organization, January 15, 2021, p. 2. 33 World Employment and Social Outlook, Trends 2021, International Labor Organization, June 2021. 34 OECD Employment Outlook 2021: Navigating the COVID-19 Crisis and Recovery, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, July 2021, p. 4. 35 Ibid., p. 5. Congressional Research Service 10 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 auto dealerships, and meat-packing facilities, among other places.36auto dealerships, and meat-packing facilities, among other places.35 Other analysts estimated the Other analysts estimated the
pandemic could affect the structure of work in three main areas bypandemic could affect the structure of work in three main areas by
1. Creating a permanent presence of telework, which could account for 20% to 25% 1. Creating a permanent presence of telework, which could account for 20% to 25%
of workers in developed economies and 20% in developing economies working of workers in developed economies and 20% in developing economies working
from home three to five times per week, which could reduce demand for public from home three to five times per week, which could reduce demand for public
transportation, restaurants, and retail stores; transportation, restaurants, and retail stores;
2. Increasing the level of e-commerce that could disrupt jobs in travel and leisure, 2. Increasing the level of e-commerce that could disrupt jobs in travel and leisure,
low-wage jobs in brick-and-mortar stores and restaurants, and increase jobs in low-wage jobs in brick-and-mortar stores and restaurants, and increase jobs in
distribution centers. distribution centers.
3. Accelerating the adoption of artificial 3. Accelerating the adoption of artificial intel igence intelligence (AI) and robotics.(AI) and robotics.3637
Analysts with the Pew Research Center surveyed American workers in January 2021 who were Analysts with the Pew Research Center surveyed American workers in January 2021 who were
unemployed and looking for work. The results indicated that half of those surveyed were unemployed and looking for work. The results indicated that half of those surveyed were

33 OECD Employment Outlook 2021: Navigating the COVID-19 Crisis and Recovery, Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development, July 2021, p. 4.
34 Ibid., p. 5.
35 Autor, David, and Elizabeth Reynolds, The Nature of Work After the COVID Crisis: Too Few Low-Wage Jobs, T he
Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, July 2020, p. 2
36 McKinsey Global Institute, The Future of Work After COVID-19, February 18, 2021.
Congressional Research Service

10

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

pessimistic about finding another job in the near future and two-thirds had considered changing pessimistic about finding another job in the near future and two-thirds had considered changing
their occupations, a sentiment shared across income levels. The other third indicated they had their occupations, a sentiment shared across income levels. The other third indicated they had
already engaged in re-already engaged in re-skil ingskilling through job retraining programs or educational activities. through job retraining programs or educational activities.3738
U.S. Labor Market
In the United States, labor markets were recovering, but by September 2021 the In the United States, labor markets were recovering, but by September 2021 the overal overall rate of rate of
unemployment remained above pre-pandemic rates. In testimony before the Senate and House in unemployment remained above pre-pandemic rates. In testimony before the Senate and House in
mid-July 2021, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome mid-July 2021, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powel Powell indicated that vaccinations had led to a indicated that vaccinations had led to a
reopening of the economy and “strong economic growth and improvements in the labor market,” reopening of the economy and “strong economic growth and improvements in the labor market,”
but that there was but that there was stil still a long way to go.a long way to go.3839 He indicated the rate of unemployment had He indicated the rate of unemployment had fal enfallen, but , but
the rate was the rate was stil still elevated and the official published rate understated the actual elevated and the official published rate understated the actual shortfal shortfall in in
employment as a result of a workforce participation rate that remained below pre-pandemic employment as a result of a workforce participation rate that remained below pre-pandemic
levels. The Federal Reserve also indicated in an accompanying monetary policy report the levels. The Federal Reserve also indicated in an accompanying monetary policy report the
pandemic-related economic recession was disproportionately affecting certain groups in the pandemic-related economic recession was disproportionately affecting certain groups in the
economy: lower-wage and less-educated workers, racial and ethnic minorities, and women.economy: lower-wage and less-educated workers, racial and ethnic minorities, and women.39
40 According to the According to the U.S. Census Bureau, between March 2020 and February 2021, 115 Census Bureau, between March 2020 and February 2021, 115 mil ion
million Americans experienced a loss in employment income and 37 Americans experienced a loss in employment income and 37 mil ion million qualified for and received qualified for and received
unemployment insurance. In addition, an estimated 26 unemployment insurance. In addition, an estimated 26 mil ion million households reported receiving households reported receiving
Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) in February 2021, while nearly 12 Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) in February 2021, while nearly 12 mil ion
million households with children were estimated not to have had enough to eat.households with children were estimated not to have had enough to eat.40
Additional y, 41 Additionally, the Census Bureau data the Census Bureau data indicateindicated the stimulus checks appropriated under the the stimulus checks appropriated under the
COVID-19 Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (P.L. 116-136) were used by households to COVID-19 Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (P.L. 116-136) were used by households to
cover usual expenses such as food, housing, and gas. The Census Bureau reported that
 By late summer 2020, 76.5 mil ion American adults reported that it was
somewhat or very difficult for them to pay usual expenses: that number rose to
89.7 mil ion by December 2020.
 Households accumulated debt to meet their usual expenses with roughly 30% of
adults using credit cards, taking out loans or borrowing from family and friends
between June and December 2020 to pay for usual expenses.
 In June 2020, 33.7 mil ion adults were using debt rather than income to pay their
expenses. By late December, that number had increased to 43.7 mil ion adults.
 Households used the second stimulus check under the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2021 (P.L. 116-260) to cover usual expenses and reduced
the number of al adults in households struggling to cover usual costs to 80.5
mil ion. Households also used the second stimulus check to pay down debt.41

37cover usual expenses such as food, housing, and gas. The Census Bureau reported that 36 Autor, David, and Elizabeth Reynolds, The Nature of Work After the COVID Crisis: Too Few Low-Wage Jobs, The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, July 2020, p. 2 37 McKinsey Global Institute, The Future of Work After COVID-19, February 18, 2021. 38 Parker, Kim, Ruth Igielnik, and Rakesh Kochhar Parker, Kim, Ruth Igielnik, and Rakesh Kochhar Unemployed Americans are Feeling the Emotional Strain of Job
Loss; Most Have Considered Changing Occupations
, Pew Research Center. February 10, 2021. , Pew Research Center. February 10, 2021.
3839 Powell, Jerome, H., Powell, Jerome, H., T estimonyTestimony before the House Financial Services before the House Financial Services Committee and the Senate Committee on Committee and the Senate Committee on
Banking, Housing,Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Julyand Urban Affairs, July 15, 2021. 15, 2021.
3940 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Monetary Policy Report, July, July 9, 2021. 9, 2021.
4041 Monte M., Lindsay, Historical Look at Unemployment, Sectors Shows Magnitude Monte M., Lindsay, Historical Look at Unemployment, Sectors Shows Magnitude of COVID-19of COVID-19 Impact on Impact on
Economy, Economy, Census Bureau, March 15, 2021, https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/03/putting-economic-impact March 15, 2021, https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/03/putting-economic-impact -
of-pandemic-in-context.html.
41 Perez-Lopez, Daniel J. and Lindsay M. Monte, Household Pulse Survey Shows Stimulus Payments Have Eased
Financial Hardship, Census Bureau, March 24, 2021. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/03/many -american-
households-use-stimulus-payments-to-pay-down-debt.html.
Congressional Research Service

11

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

During the 79-week period from mid-March 2020 to end-September, 2021, 94 mil ion Americans
(more than half the 160 mil ion civilian work force) had filed for unemployment insurance at
some point during the preceding 18 months.42 On a seasonal y adjusted basis, the number of
insured unemployed individuals was 2.8 mil ion on September 18, 2021, down from a peak of 25
mil ion in mid-May, 2020. As indicated in Figure 2, weekly claims have fal en from the sharp
increases recorded in April and May, 2020. On a week-over-week basis, new claims totaled
362,000 in the week ending September 25, 2021, rising by 11-of-pandemic-in-context.html. Congressional Research Service 11 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19  By late summer 2020, 76.5 million American adults reported that it was somewhat or very difficult for them to pay usual expenses: that number rose to 89.7 million by December 2020.  Households accumulated debt to meet their usual expenses with roughly 30% of adults using credit cards, taking out loans or borrowing from family and friends between June and December 2020 to pay for usual expenses.  In June 2020, 33.7 million adults were using debt rather than income to pay their expenses. By late December, that number had increased to 43.7 million adults.  Households used the second stimulus check under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (P.L. 116-260) to cover usual expenses and reduced the number of all adults in households struggling to cover usual costs to 80.5 million. Households also used the second stimulus check to pay down debt.42 During the 82-week period from mid-March 2020 to end-October, 2021, 95.8 million Americans (more than half the 160 million civilian work force) had filed for unemployment insurance at some point during the preceding 18 months.43 On a seasonally adjusted basis, the number of insured unemployed individuals was 2.1 million on October 23, 2021, down from a peak of 25 million in mid-May, 2020. As indicated in Figure 2, weekly claims have fallen from the sharp increases recorded in April and May, 2020. On a week-over-week basis, new claims totaled 269,000 in the week ending October 30, 2021, falling by 14,000 from the previous week’s total ,000 from the previous week’s total
of 351of 283,000. This number is above the average number of weekly claims recorded prior to the ,000. This number is above the average number of weekly claims recorded prior to the
pandemic of about 200,000. In the week ending pandemic of about 200,000. In the week ending September 11, 2021, 5.0 mil ionOctober 16, 2021, 2.7 million people claimed people claimed
benefits in benefits in al all programs, down programs, down 6.2 mil ion158,000 from the previous week’s total. from the previous week’s total.
The insured unemployment rate for the week ending The insured unemployment rate for the week ending September 18October 23, 2021, was , 2021, was 2.01.6%, down 0.1 %, down 0.1
percentage point from the previous week. As workers approached, or surpassed, the traditional percentage point from the previous week. As workers approached, or surpassed, the traditional
26-week maximum for receiving standard unemployment benefits they had been able to apply for 26-week maximum for receiving standard unemployment benefits they had been able to apply for
benefits under the extended Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) benefits under the extended Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC)
program or the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program.program or the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program.4344 Between Between September 11October 16, ,
2021, and 2021, and September 4October 9, 2021, claims under the PEUC program , 2021, claims under the PEUC program fel by 2.3 mil ion to 1.0 mil ion,
fell by 10,695 to 233.684, while claims under the PUA program while claims under the PUA program fel by 3.8 mil ion to 1.1 mil ion. rose by 7,096 to 272,109. Benefits were extended by Benefits were extended by
P.L. 116-260, signed by President Trump on December 27, 2020. Subsequently, benefits were P.L. 116-260, signed by President Trump on December 27, 2020. Subsequently, benefits were
extended extended again through September 6, 2021, by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, P.L. 117-2, signed 42 Perez-Lopez, Daniel J. and Lindsay M. Monte, Household Pulse Survey Shows Stimulus Payments Have Eased Financial Hardship, Census Bureau, March 24, 2021. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/03/many-american-households-use-stimulus-payments-to-pay-down-debt.html. 43 Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims, Department of Labor, November 4, 2021. https://www.dol.gov/; Romm, Tony and Jeff Stein, 2.4 Million Americans Filed Jobless Claims Last Week, Bringing Nine Week Total to 38.6 Million, Washington Post, May 21, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/05/21/unemployment-claims-coronavirus/ 44 Both programs were authorized under P.L. 116-136, March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, with benefits ending by December 31, 2020. The PUA program provided 39 weeks of unemployment assistance, including $600 weekly benefits (expired in August 2020), under certain conditions, for workers who had exhausted regular unemployment benefits, were not eligible for regular benefits, or were not eligible for benefits under the PEUC program. On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (P.L. 116-260), extending PUA benefits for 11 weeks. The PEUC program provided 13 weeks of additional benefits to individuals who had exhausted standard unemployment assistance and met other eligibility requirements. Benefits were further extended through September 6, 2021, by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, P.L. 117-2, signed by President Biden on March 11, 2021. DOL, Unemployment Insurance Program Letter No. 14-21, March 15, 2021; DOL, Unemployment Insurance Program Letter No. 16-20, February 25, 2021. Congressional Research Service 12 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 by President Biden on March 11, 2021. On September 6, 2021, unemployment benefits under the two pandemic-related programs expired. In June, 2021, 26 states announced they were ending early the extended pandemic-related federal benefits, potentially affecting more than 7.5 million workers. Some state leaders argued the extended unemployment benefits enabled workers to remain unemployed, thereby creating a labor shortage and hobbling a return to full economic activity. The nearly equal division of states between those that maintained and those that ended the pandemic-related unemployment benefits prior to the September scheduled cutoff provided economists and other analysts the opportunity to assess the impact of the extended unemployment benefits on employment decisions. In general, most assessments concluded the benefits played a small role in workers’ decisions to return to work. Instead, such decisions were prompted by concerns over the spread of the virus, childcare arrangements, the status of schools openings, and retirements. In some cases, job openings were filled by individuals who had dropped out of the labor market, rather than by those recently unemployed, which altered the composition of the labor market rather than changing the rate of unemployment.45 Figure 2. Weekly Claims for Unemployment Insurance, 2020 and 2021 In millions of individual claims Source: Department of Labor. Created by CRS. At the beginning of the pandemic-related economic recession, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported on May 8, 2020, that 20 million Americans lost their jobs in April 2020 as a consequence of business lockdowns, pushing the total number of unemployed Americans to 23 million,46 out of a total civilian labor force of 158 million. The increase pushed the national unemployment rate to 14.7% (with some caveats), the highest since the Great Depression of the 1930s.47 In contrast, on October 8, 2021, BLS reported that nonfarm employment rose by 194,000 45 Iacurci, Greg, 26 States Ended Federal Unemployment Benefits Early. Data Suggests it’s Not Getting People Back to Work, Bloomberg, August 4, 2021; Smith, Colby and Christine Zhang, End of US’s Extra Unemployment Benefits Gives Little Boost to Labor Market, Financial Times, September 21, 2021; Ganong, Peter, Pascal J. Noel, and Joseph S. Vavra, US Unemployment Insurance Replacement Rates During The Pandemic, NBER Working Paper No. 27216, May 2020; Petrosky-Nadeau, Nicolas and Robert G. Valletta, UI Generosity and Job Acceptance: Effects of the 2020 CARES Act, Working Paper 2021-13, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, June 2021. 46 This total did not include 10.9 million workers who were working part time not by choice and 9.9 million individuals who were seeking employment. 47 The Employment Situation-September 2020, Bureau of Labor Statistics, October 8, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/. Congressional Research Service 13 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 in September to reach 147.6 million, rising by less than the previous month’s increase of 366,000; the total number of unemployed Americans was 7.7 million, down from the previous month’s total of 8.4 million;48 the unemployment rate fell to 4.8%, again with some caveats.49 Financial Markets Policymakers and financial and commodity market participants had generally estimated that a global economic recovery would take hold in the third quarter of 2020. A resurgence in infectious cases in developed and developing countries starting in September 2020, however, shifted more of the projected recovery to 2021. Various indicators in the third quarter suggested the worst of the economic crisis had passed, although the extent and strength of any global economic recovery remained difficult to predict. As previously indicated, the rate of economic growth slowed in the again through September 6, 2021, by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, P.L. 117-2,
signed by President Biden on March 11, 2021. On September 6, 2021, unemployment benefits
under the two pandemic-related programs expired.
In June, 2021, 26 states announced they were ending early the extended pandemic-related federal
benefits, potential y affecting more than 7.5 mil ion workers. Some state leaders argued the
extended unemployment benefits enabled workers to remain unemployed, thereby creating a
labor shortage and hobbling a return to full economic activity. The nearly equal division of states
between those that maintained and those that ended the pandemic-related unemployment benefits
prior to the September scheduled cutoff provided economists and other analysts the opportunity
to assess the impact of the extended unemployment benefits on employment decisions. In general,
most assessments concluded the benefits played a smal role in workers’ decisions to return to
work. Instead, such decisions were prompted by concerns over the spread of the virus, childcare
arrangements, the status of schools openings, and retirements. In some cases, job openings were
fil ed by individuals who had dropped out of the labor market, rather than by those recently
unemployed, which altered the composition of the labor market rather than changing the rate of
unemployment.44

42 Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims, Department of Labor, September 30, 2021. https://www.dol.gov/; Romm,
T ony and Jeff Stein, 2.4 Million Americans Filed Jobless Claims Last Week, Bringing Nine Week T otal to 38.6
Million, Washington Post, May 21, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/05/21/unemployment-
claims-coronavirus/
43 Both programs were authorized under P.L. 116-136, March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security (CARES) Act, with benefits ending by December 31, 2020 . T he PUA program provided 39 weeks of
unemployment assistance, including $600 weekly benefits (expired in August 2020), under certain conditions, for
workers who had exhausted regular unemployment benefits, were not eligible for regular benefits, or were not eligible
for benefits under the PEUC program. On December 27, 2020, President T rump signed the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2021 (P.L. 116-260), extending PUA benefits for 11 weeks. T he PEUC program provided 13
weeks of additional benefits to individuals who had exhausted standard unemployment assistance and met other
eligibility requirements. Benefits were further extended through September 6, 2021, by the America n Rescue Plan Act
of 2021, P.L. 117-2, signed by President Biden on March 11, 2021. DOL, Unem ploym ent Insurance Program Letter
No. 14-21
, March 15, 2021; DOL, Unem ployment Insurance Program Letter No. 16-20, February 25, 2021.
44 Iacurci, Greg, 26 States Ended Federal Unemployment Benefits Early. Data Suggests it’s Not Getting People Back to
Congressional Research Service

12


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 2. Weekly Claims for Unemployment Insurance, 2020 and 2021
In mil ions of individual claims

Source: Department of Labor. Created by CRS.
At the beginning of the pandemic-related economic recession, the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS) reported on May 8, 2020, that 20 mil ion Americans lost their jobs in April 2020 as a
consequence of business lockdowns, pushing the total number of unemployed Americans to 23
mil ion,45 out of a total civilian labor force of 158 mil ion. The increase pushed the national
unemployment rate to 14.7% (with some caveats), the highest since the Great Depression of the
1930s.46 In contrast, on September 3, 2021, BLS reported that nonfarm employment rose by
235,000 in August to reach 153.2 mil ion, down from the previous month’s increase of 1,053,000;
the total number of unemployed Americans was 8.4 mil ion, down from the previous month’s
total of 8.7 mil ion;47 the unemployment rate fel to 5.3%, again with some caveats.48
Financial Markets
Policymakers and financial and commodity market participants had general y estimated that a
global economic recovery would take hold in the third quarter of 2020. A resurgence in infectious
cases in developed and developing countries starting in September 2020, however, shifted more
of the projected recovery to 2021. Various indicators in the third quarter suggested the worst of
the economic crisis had passed, although the extent and strength of any global economic recovery
remained difficult to predict. As previously indicated, the rate of economic growth slowed in the

Work, Bloomberg, August 4, 2021; Smith, Colby and Christine Zhang, End of US’s Extra Unemployment Benefits
Gives Little Boost to Labor Market , Financial Tim es, September 21, 2021; Ganong, Peter, Pascal J. Noel, and Joseph
S. Vavra, US Unem ploym ent Insurance Replacem ent Rates During The Pandem ic, NBER Working Paper No. 27216,
May 2020; Petrosky-Nadeau, Nicolas and Robert G. Valletta, UI Generosity and Job Acceptance: Effects of the 2020
CARES Act
, Working Paper 2021-13, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, June 2021.
45 T his total did not include 10.9 million workers who were working part time not by choice and 9.9 million individuals
who were seeking employment.
46 The Employment Situation-August 2020, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 3, 2020. https://www.bls.gov/.
47 T his total does not include 4.5 million workers who were working part time not by choice and 5.7 million individuals
who were seeking employment.
48 The Employment Situation-June 2020. BLS indicated that some individuals had been misclassified in previous
months. Instead of being classified as unemployed, they were misclassified as employed, but absent from work due to
coronavirus-related business closures. If such individuals had been classified as unemployed, the unemployment rate
would have been 5 percentage points higher in April 2020.
Congressional Research Service

13

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

fourth quarter of 2020 and through the second quarter of 2021 in Europe and the broader OECD. fourth quarter of 2020 and through the second quarter of 2021 in Europe and the broader OECD.
The emergence of more infectious strains of the COVID-19 virus pushed governments to The emergence of more infectious strains of the COVID-19 virus pushed governments to
reimpose lockdowns and curtail social and economic activity during the fourth quarter. Updated reimpose lockdowns and curtail social and economic activity during the fourth quarter. Updated
forecasts indicate the pandemic affected global economic growth in 2020 less negatively than had forecasts indicate the pandemic affected global economic growth in 2020 less negatively than had
been forecasted in the spring, but that the effects could last longer with a slower rate of growth in been forecasted in the spring, but that the effects could last longer with a slower rate of growth in
2021 and 2022.2021 and 2022.
As one indicator of the economic impact of the pandemic, news concerning the pandemic As one indicator of the economic impact of the pandemic, news concerning the pandemic
dominated financial news and at times was a major factor driving market activity. For instance, dominated financial news and at times was a major factor driving market activity. For instance,
the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DJIA), along with other market indices, lost one-third of the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (DJIA), along with other market indices, lost one-third of
its value between February 14, 2022 and March 23, 2020. The Index rose steadily between March its value between February 14, 2022 and March 23, 2020. The Index rose steadily between March
and November and rose nearly three percentage points on Monday, November 9, 2020, reportedly and November and rose nearly three percentage points on Monday, November 9, 2020, reportedly
on news that a COVID-19 vaccine had been developed.on news that a COVID-19 vaccine had been developed.4950 During the period November 3 through During the period November 3 through
24, the DJIA rose over 9%. On November 24, 2020, the DJIA, along with global equities markets, 24, the DJIA rose over 9%. On November 24, 2020, the DJIA, along with global equities markets,
increased by 1.5%, and reached an index milestone of 30,000 for the first time and surpassed the increased by 1.5%, and reached an index milestone of 30,000 for the first time and surpassed the
previous high value recorded on February 14, 2020, prior to the pandemic-related economic previous high value recorded on February 14, 2020, prior to the pandemic-related economic
shutdown. Reportedly, the rise in market indices reflected a positive assessment by investors of shutdown. Reportedly, the rise in market indices reflected a positive assessment by investors of
announcements of effective vaccines against COVID-19, political developments in the United announcements of effective vaccines against COVID-19, political developments in the United
States, potential additionalStates, potential additional fiscal measures by governments to stimulate economic activity, and fiscal measures by governments to stimulate economic activity, and
prospects of stronger economic growth in 2021.prospects of stronger economic growth in 2021.5051 The DJIA has trended upward during 2021, The DJIA has trended upward during 2021,
rising above 35,000 for the first time on July 23 and rising by over 14% between January 4, 2021, rising above 35,000 for the first time on July 23 and rising by over 14% between January 4, 2021,
and September 17. and September 17.
Prospects of a vaccine Prospects of a vaccine initial y initially signaled an eventual end to the business lockdowns and social signaled an eventual end to the business lockdowns and social
restrictions and reduced demands on policymakers to implement additionalrestrictions and reduced demands on policymakers to implement additional fiscal and monetary fiscal and monetary
policies. policies. Until a vaccine can beIn places where vaccines have not been broadly distributed, broadly distributed, however, policymakers may have to policymakers may have to weigh
continuingcontinue weighing efforts that balance the competing requirements of households, firms, and state 48 This total does not include 4.5 million workers who were working part time not by choice and 5.7 million individuals who were seeking employment. 49 The Employment Situation-September 2021. BLS indicated that some individuals had been misclassified in previous months. Instead of being classified as unemployed, they were misclassified as employed, but absent from work due to coronavirus-related business closures. If such individuals had been classified as unemployed, the unemployment rate would have been 5 percentage points higher in April 2020. 50 Telford, Taylor, and Hamza Shaban, “Dow Climbs More Than 800 Points as Vaccine News, Biden Victory Rev Up Markets,” Washington Post, November 9, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/11/09/stocks-markets-biden-trump-coronavirus/. 51 Smith, Colby, Camilla Hodgson, and Hudson Lockett, US Stocks Set Record High as Investors Look to New Administration, Financial Times, November 24, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/433048a5-c489-4ddd-aebd-d56fb8f3edfc. Congressional Research Service 14 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 and efforts that balance the competing requirements of households, firms, and state and
local governments. Various U.S. states reversed course in late June 2021 to impose or reimpose local governments. Various U.S. states reversed course in late June 2021 to impose or reimpose
social distancing guidelines and close businesses that had begun opening as a result of a rise in social distancing guidelines and close businesses that had begun opening as a result of a rise in
new confirmed cases of COVID-19, raising the prospect of a delayed recovery. A prolonged new confirmed cases of COVID-19, raising the prospect of a delayed recovery. A prolonged
recovery could also increase the financial strains on recovery could also increase the financial strains on smal small and medium-sized firms that and medium-sized firms that face liquidity face
liquidity constraints and the prospects of insolvency.constraints and the prospects of insolvency.5152
Differences in policy approaches between countries Differences in policy approaches between countries initial y initially slowed a coordinated response. This slowed a coordinated response. This
lack of response may have inflicted longer-term damage to the global economy by impairing lack of response may have inflicted longer-term damage to the global economy by impairing
international political, trade, and economic relations, particularly between countries that international political, trade, and economic relations, particularly between countries that
promoted nationalism and those that argued for a coordinated international response to the promoted nationalism and those that argued for a coordinated international response to the
pandemic. Policy differences also strained relations between developed and developing pandemic. Policy differences also strained relations between developed and developing
economies and between northern and southern members of the Eurozone, economies and between northern and southern members of the Eurozone, chal enging al ianceschallenging alliances
and conventional concepts of national security, and raising questions about the future of global and conventional concepts of national security, and raising questions about the future of global
leadership.leadership.
In some countries, the pandemic elevated the importance of public health as a national security In some countries, the pandemic elevated the importance of public health as a national security
issue and as a national economic priority on a par with traditional national security concerns such issue and as a national economic priority on a par with traditional national security concerns such

49 T elford, T aylor, and Hamza Shaban, “ Dow Climbs More T han 800 Points as Vaccine News, Biden Victory Rev Up
Markets,” Washington Post, November 9, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/11/09/stocks-
markets-biden-trump-coronavirus/.
50 Smith, Colby, Camilla Hodgson, and Hudson Lockett , US Stocks Set Record High as Investors Look to New
Administration, Financial Tim es, November 24, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/433048a5-c489-4ddd-aebd-
d56fb8f3edfc.
51 Global Financial Stability Report, International Monetary Fund, October 2020, p. 1.
Congressional Research Service

14

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

as terrorism, cyberattacks, and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.52as terrorism, cyberattacks, and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.53 The pandemic- The pandemic-
related economic and human costs could have long-term repercussions for economies through the related economic and human costs could have long-term repercussions for economies through the
tragic loss of life and job losses that derail careers and permanently shutter businesses. Fiscal and tragic loss of life and job losses that derail careers and permanently shutter businesses. Fiscal and
monetary measures implemented to prevent a financial crisis and sustain economic activity may monetary measures implemented to prevent a financial crisis and sustain economic activity may
have inadvertently worsened income and wealth disparities that were being affected by the have inadvertently worsened income and wealth disparities that were being affected by the
disproportionate impact of quarantines and lockdowns on services sector workers. Within some disproportionate impact of quarantines and lockdowns on services sector workers. Within some
countries, the economic countries, the economic fal outfallout may have widened racial and socio-economic cleavages and may have widened racial and socio-economic cleavages and
increased social unrest.increased social unrest.
Economic Policy Responses
After a delayed response, central banks and monetary authorities in developed and emerging After a delayed response, central banks and monetary authorities in developed and emerging
market economies engaged in an ongoing series of interventions in financial markets and national market economies engaged in an ongoing series of interventions in financial markets and national
governments adopted an array of fiscal policy initiatives to stimulate their economies. The Bank governments adopted an array of fiscal policy initiatives to stimulate their economies. The Bank
for International Settlements (BIS) characterized the pandemic as fully global in nature, eliciting for International Settlements (BIS) characterized the pandemic as fully global in nature, eliciting
a fiscal, monetary, and prudential response that surpassed that of the global financial crisis of a fiscal, monetary, and prudential response that surpassed that of the global financial crisis of
2008-2009. In addition, the BIS argued the evolving nature of the health crisis caused the 2008-2009. In addition, the BIS argued the evolving nature of the health crisis caused the
financial crisis to evolve as financial crisis to evolve as wel well, changing from a liquidity crisis in the initial, changing from a liquidity crisis in the initial stages to a solvency stages to a solvency
crisis that could have been worse crisis that could have been worse ifhad the economic recovery the economic recovery had been delayed. As global economic been delayed. As global economic
conditions deteriorated in the first quarter of 2020, large conditions deteriorated in the first quarter of 2020, large international yinternationally active banks tripled the active banks tripled the
amount of assets they held as loss provisions, according to BIS.amount of assets they held as loss provisions, according to BIS.5354 With improving economic With improving economic
conditions in the second quarter, however, banks began reducing their asset holdings and by the conditions in the second quarter, however, banks began reducing their asset holdings and by the
end of 2020, loss provisions had returned to pre-pandemic levels. As a result of the potential end of 2020, loss provisions had returned to pre-pandemic levels. As a result of the potential
damage to the global economy arising from the pandemic, the BIS stated that future economic damage to the global economy arising from the pandemic, the BIS stated that future economic
historians may describe the pandemic as, “the defining moment of the 21st century.”54
For a complete list of actions193 countries have taken in response to the economic
chal enge of COVID-19, see the list compiled by the IMF.55
Industry Measures
During 2020, governments adopted a range of measures at both the national and international
level to address the health and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as indicated
in Table 2.56 These measure include incentives to increase domestic production of vaccines and
personal protective equipment (PPE) and direct state intervention through nationalization or
through directives to increase output at facilities that produced PPE materials or to initiate
production at other facilities. In some cases, policy changes included enhanced foreign

52 Harris, Shane and Missy Ryan, T ohistorians may describe the pandemic as, “the defining moment of the 21st century.”55 52 Global Financial Stability Report, International Monetary Fund, October 2020, p. 1. 53 Harris, Shane and Missy Ryan, To Prepare for the Next Pandemic, the U.S. Needs Prepare for the Next Pandemic, the U.S. Needs to Change its National Security to Change its National Security
Priorities, Experts Say, Priorities, Experts Say, Washington Post, June 16, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/to-, June 16, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/to-
prepare-for-the-next-pandemic-the-us-needs-to-change-its-national-security-priorities-experts-say/2020/06/16/prepare-for-the-next-pandemic-the-us-needs-to-change-its-national-security-priorities-experts-say/2020/06/16/
b99807c0-aa9a-11ea-9063-e69bd6520940_story.html. b99807c0-aa9a-11ea-9063-e69bd6520940_story.html.
5354 BIS Quarterly Review, March 2021, Bank for International Settlements, p. 10. , Bank for International Settlements, p. 10.
5455 Annual Economic Report 2020, Bank for International Settlements, June 2020, p. ix. , Bank for International Settlements, June 2020, p. ix.
55 See: International Monetary Fund, Policy Responses to COVID-19. https://www.imf.org/en/T opics/imf-and-
covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19.
56 Countries include Australia, Canada, the European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, India, Japan, Poland,
and Spain, among others. World Investm ent Report 2020, United Nations Conference on T rade and Development 2020,
p. 93.
Congressional Research Service

15

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

investment Congressional Research Service 15 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 For a complete list of actions 193 countries have taken in response to the economic challenge of COVID-19, see the list compiled by the IMF.56 Industry Measures During 2020, governments adopted a range of measures at both the national and international level to address the health and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as indicated in Table 2.57 These measure include incentives to increase domestic production of vaccines and personal protective equipment (PPE) and direct state intervention through nationalization or through directives to increase output at facilities that produced PPE materials or to initiate production at other facilities. In some cases, policy changes included enhanced screening of foreign investment for “public interest” reasons that may remain screening of foreign investment for “public interest” reasons that may remain as a legacy issue after the after the
pandemic crisispandemic crisis.57
has been resolved.58 The shift in approach toward the national security dimensions of foreign investment, The shift in approach toward the national security dimensions of foreign investment, especial y
especially by developed economies, by developed economies, is blurringhas blurred the distinction between foreign investment, trade, and the distinction between foreign investment, trade, and
national security and could reflect national security and could reflect the evolving nature ofa fundamental change in the concept of national security relative the concept of national security relative
to foreign investment. Arguably, changes in technology and the global economy have made it to foreign investment. Arguably, changes in technology and the global economy have made it
more difficult to assess the economic costs and benefits of changes in foreign investment policies more difficult to assess the economic costs and benefits of changes in foreign investment policies
taken on national security grounds. taken on national security grounds.
Table 2. Investment Policy Instruments Adopted at the National and International
level to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic
Investment policy areas
Policy measures
Policy actions at the national level
Investment facilitation Investment facilitation
Al eviate administrative Alleviate administrative burdens and bureaucratic burdens and bureaucratic
obstacles for firms. obstacles for firms.

Use of online tools and e-platforms. Use of online tools and e-platforms.
Investment retention and aftercare by investment Investment retention and aftercare by investment
COVID-19-related information services. COVID-19-related information services.
promotion agencies (IPAs) promotion agencies (IPAs)

Administrative Administrative and operational support during the and operational support during the
crisis. crisis.

Move to online services. Move to online services.
Investment incentives Investment incentives
Financial or fiscal incentives to produce COVID-19- Financial or fiscal incentives to produce COVID-19-
related medicalrelated medical equipment. equipment.

Incentives for conversion of production lines. Incentives for conversion of production lines.

Incentives for enhancement of contracted economic Incentives for enhancement of contracted economic
activities. activities.
State participation in crisis-affected State participation in crisis-affected industries industries
Acquisition of equity in companies, Acquisition of equity in companies, including nationalization. 56 See International Monetary Fund, Policy Responses to COVID-19. https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19. 57 Countries include Australia, Canada, the European Union, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, India, Japan, Poland, and Spain, among others. World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2020, p. 93. 58 World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 16, 2020, p. 96. Congressional Research Service 16 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Investment policy areas Policy measures Local small and medium enterprises including
nationalization.
Local smal and medium enterprises (SMEs) and supply (SMEs) and supply
Financial or fiscal support for domestic suppliers Financial or fiscal support for domestic suppliers (such (such
chains chains
as SMEs). as SMEs).
National security and public health National security and public health
Application and potential reinforcement Application and potential reinforcement of FDI of FDI
screening in pandemic-relevant industries. screening in pandemic-relevant industries.
Other State intervention in the health industry Other State intervention in the health industry
Mandatory production. Mandatory production.

Export bans. Export bans.

Import facilitation. Import facilitation.
Intel ectualIntellectual property (IP) property (IP)
General General authorization of non-voluntary licensing,authorization of non-voluntary licensing, to to
speed up research and development (R&D). speed up research and development (R&D).

IP holder-specific non-voluntary licensing, IP holder-specific non-voluntary licensing, to enable to enable
importsimports of medication. of medication.
Policy actions at the international level
International support measures International support measures for investmentfor investment
International pledges in support of cross-border International pledges in support of cross-border
investment. investment.

57 World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on T rade and Development, June 16, 2020, p. 96.
Congressional Research Service

16

link to page 23 link to page 23 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Investment policy areas
Policy measures
IIAs IIAs
Reform International Investment Agreements Reform International Investment Agreements (IIAs) to (IIAs) to
support public health policiessupport public health policies and to minimizeand to minimize investor–investor–
State dispute risks. State dispute risks.
Intel ectualIntellectual property (IP) property (IP)
General General authorization of non-voluntary licensing,authorization of non-voluntary licensing, to to
speed up research and development (R&D). speed up research and development (R&D).
Source: World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, June 16, 2020, June 16, 2020,
p. 89. p. 89.
Fiscal Measures
As indicated in As indicated in Table 3, central governments in advanced and emerging economies adopted , central governments in advanced and emerging economies adopted
various fiscal measures to provide financial support to the health sector, households, and firms, various fiscal measures to provide financial support to the health sector, households, and firms,
although the size and scope of the programs vary by country.although the size and scope of the programs vary by country.5859 These measures broadly include These measures broadly include
tax cuts and tax deferrals for individuals and businesses, wage and income supplements to tax cuts and tax deferrals for individuals and businesses, wage and income supplements to
individuals, including expanding unemployment insurance, and other payments to businesses. individuals, including expanding unemployment insurance, and other payments to businesses.
The U.S. Congress approved historic fiscal spending packages, while other governments The U.S. Congress approved historic fiscal spending packages, while other governments
abandoned traditional borrowing caps in order to increase fiscal spending to sustain economic abandoned traditional borrowing caps in order to increase fiscal spending to sustain economic
growth. In some emerging economies, governments reportedly adopted special programs to growth. In some emerging economies, governments reportedly adopted special programs to
provide financial assistance to “informal” workers, or workers outside traditional labor markets provide financial assistance to “informal” workers, or workers outside traditional labor markets
such as family businesses.such as family businesses.59
60 In developed economies, however, as governments adopted fiscal packages to assist households, In developed economies, however, as governments adopted fiscal packages to assist households,
consumers sharply increased their savings as they faced limited spending opportunities, or a form consumers sharply increased their savings as they faced limited spending opportunities, or a form
of involuntary saving, and concerns over lost jobs, incomes, and the course of their economies, or of involuntary saving, and concerns over lost jobs, incomes, and the course of their economies, or
precautionary saving. International organizations also took steps to provide loans and other precautionary saving. International organizations also took steps to provide loans and other
financial assistance to countries in need. These and other actions have been labeled financial assistance to countries in need. These and other actions have been labeled
“unprecedented,” a term that has been used frequently to describe the pandemic and the policy “unprecedented,” a term that has been used frequently to describe the pandemic and the policy
responses.
responses. 59 Ibid. 60 Ibid., p. 25. Congressional Research Service 17 link to page 23 link to page 23 link to page 23 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Table 3. Elements of Announced Fiscal Measures to Address COVID-19

Advanced Economies
Emerging Market Economies
Measures Measures
US US
JP JP
DE DE
FR FR
IT IT
ES ES
GB GB
BR BR
CN CN
ID ID
IN IN
KR KR
MX MX
RU RU
ZA ZA
Measures supporting the health the health sector

x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
Measures supporting households
Targeted Targeted
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x

x x
x x
transfer transfersa
Other Other
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x

x x
x x
labor labor
income income
supporsupportb
Wage Wage
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x

x x
x x

x x
x x
subsidies subsidies
Tax cuts Tax cuts
x x
x x
x x
x x

x x


x x
x x
x x
x x

x x
x x

58 Ibid.
59 Ibid., p. 25.
Congressional Research Service

17

link to page 23 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19


Advanced Economies
Emerging Market Economies
Measures
US
JP
DE
FR
IT
ES
GB
BR
CN
ID
IN
KR
MX
RU
ZA
Tax deferral Tax deferral
x x
x x
x x

x x
x x
x x



x x
x x
x x

x x
Measures supporting firms
Tax deferral Tax deferral
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
Liquidity Liquidity
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
suppor supportc
Tax cuts Tax cuts
x x
x x
x x

x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x
x x

x x

Targeted Targeted

x x
x x
x x
x x

x x

x x
x x



x x
x x
transfers transfers
Source: Annual Economic Report 2020, Bank for International Settlements,, Bank for International Settlements, June 2020, p. 24, based on data June 2020, p. 24, based on data
col ected by the International Monetary Fund and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and col ected by the International Monetary Fund and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development. Development.
Notes:
a. Includes cash and in-kind transfers to affected households. a. Includes cash and in-kind transfers to affected households.
b. Extended unemployment and sickb. Extended unemployment and sick leave benefits. leave benefits.
c. Non-budgetary measuresc. Non-budgetary measures such as equity injections,such as equity injections, asset purchases, loans and debt assumptions or asset purchases, loans and debt assumptions or
government guarantees and contingent liabilities, government guarantees and contingent liabilities, US: United States; JP: Japan; DE: Germany; FR: France; IT: US: United States; JP: Japan; DE: Germany; FR: France; IT:
Italy; ES: Spain; GB: Great Britain; BR: Brazil; CN: China; ID: Indonesia; IN: India; KR: South Korea; MX: Italy; ES: Spain; GB: Great Britain; BR: Brazil; CN: China; ID: Indonesia; IN: India; KR: South Korea; MX:
Mexico; RU: Russia; ZA:Mexico; RU: Russia; ZA: South Africa.South Africa.
Fiscal Deficits
As one measure of the extent of the global fiscal and monetary responses by governments, the As one measure of the extent of the global fiscal and monetary responses by governments, the
IMF estimated that government spending and revenue measures to sustain economic activity IMF estimated that government spending and revenue measures to sustain economic activity
adopted through adopted through mid-MarchSeptember 2021 amounted to $16 2021 amounted to $16 tril ion.60.9 trillion.61 The IMF also updated its estimate The IMF also updated its estimate
of the increase in borrowing by governments of the increase in borrowing by governments global yglobally to finance their fiscal responses to rise to to finance their fiscal responses to rise to
10.10.82% of global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020, before % of global gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020, before fal ing to 9.2falling to 7.9% in 2021 and 5.% in 2021 and 5.42% %
in 2022, as indicated in in 2022, as indicated in Figure 3. Other estimates indicate that central banks have committed $17 . Other estimates indicate that central banks have committed $17
tril ion trillion to support their economies to counter pandemic-related economic effects.to support their economies to counter pandemic-related economic effects.61

6062 61 Fiscal Monitor, International Monetary Fund, International Monetary Fund, AprilOctober 2021. p. 2021. p. 1.
617. 62 Wigglesworth, Robin, Long Live Jay Powell, the New Wigglesworth, Robin, Long Live Jay Powell, the New Monarch of the Bond Market, Monarch of the Bond Market, Financial Times, June 23, , June 23,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5db9d0f1-3742-49f0-a6cd-16c471875b5e. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5db9d0f1-3742-49f0-a6cd-16c471875b5e.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

18 18


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 3. IMF Projected Government Fiscal Deficits Relative to GDP
In percentage shares of Gross Domestic Product In percentage shares of Gross Domestic Product

Source: Fiscal Monitor, International Monetary Fund, International Monetary Fund, April October 2021. Created by CRS. 2021. Created by CRS.
Notes: Data for 2021 and 2022 are estimates. Data for 2021 and 2022 are estimates.
Among developed economies, the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio is projected to rise to Among developed economies, the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio is projected to rise to 11.710.8% in 2020, % in 2020,
before fal ing to 10.4before falling to 8.8% in 2021 and 4.% in 2021 and 4.68% in 2022; the ratio for the United States is projected to % in 2022; the ratio for the United States is projected to
rise to rise to 15.814.9% in 2020, the highest ratio for any country or region, before % in 2020, the highest ratio for any country or region, before fal ing to 15.0falling to 10.8% in 2021 % in 2021
and 6.and 6.19% in 2022.% in 2022.6263 For most areas and countries, the IMF forecasts that debt to GDP ratios For most areas and countries, the IMF forecasts that debt to GDP ratios wil
fal somewill fall in 2021, but in 2021, but fal more substantial yfall more substantially as percentage shares of GDP in 2022 as the as percentage shares of GDP in 2022 as the
economic recovery is projected to take hold. Some economists and others have raised concerns economic recovery is projected to take hold. Some economists and others have raised concerns
that fiscal deficits financed through borrowing in a low-interest rate environment could that fiscal deficits financed through borrowing in a low-interest rate environment could
substantial y substantially increase the debt servicing costs on government budgets under certain conditions, increase the debt servicing costs on government budgets under certain conditions,
particularly if national economic growth rates rise, which tend to push up central banks’ interest particularly if national economic growth rates rise, which tend to push up central banks’ interest
rates, and if the accumulated debt is refinanced at those higher rates, thereby increasing debt rates, and if the accumulated debt is refinanced at those higher rates, thereby increasing debt
servicing costs.servicing costs.63
64 According to the IMF, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom announced public According to the IMF, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom announced public
sector support measures in 2020 that total more than 10% of their annual GDP.sector support measures in 2020 that total more than 10% of their annual GDP.64 For developing
65 For emerging market economies, the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio is projected to rise from economies, the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio is projected to rise from 4.99.6% in % in 2019 to 9.8% in 2021,
significantly increasing their debt burden and raising prospects of defaults or debt rescheduling.65
2020 to 6.6% in 2021 and 5.8% in 2022, significantly increasing their debt burden.66 According to some estimates, the most According to some estimates, the most fiscal yfiscally vulnerable countries are Argentina, Venezuela, vulnerable countries are Argentina, Venezuela,
Lebanon, Jordan, Iran, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and South Africa.Lebanon, Jordan, Iran, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and South Africa.6667 The IMF concluded that among The IMF concluded that among

62 Fiscal Monitor, T able 1.1.
63low-income developing countries, near-term debt vulnerabilities remain high.68 63 Fiscal Monitor, Table 1.1. 64 Hagaman, Chase, Hagaman, Chase, Fiscal, Monetary, and Economic Challenges of the Post-Pandemic Economy, , T heThe Concord Concord
Coalition, February 18, 2021, Edelberg, Wendy, and LouiseCoalition, February 18, 2021, Edelberg, Wendy, and Louise Sheiner,Sheiner, The Macroeconom ic Im plications The Macroeconomic Implications of Biden’s $1.9
Trillion Fiscal Package,
T he, The Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, January 28, 2021. Hamilton Project, Brookings Institution, January 28, 2021.
64 Global Financial Stability Report Update. 65 Fiscal Monitor, International Monetary Fund, International Monetary Fund, AprilOctober 2021, p. 3. 2021, p. 3.
6566 Ibid., p. 3 Ibid., p. 3
6667 Wheatley, Jonathan, Wheatley, Jonathan, T ommyTommy Stubbington, Michael Stott, Andrew England, and Joseph Cotterill, Debt Relief: Stubbington, Michael Stott, Andrew England, and Joseph Cotterill, Debt Relief: Which Which
Countries Are Most Vulnerable?Countries Are Most Vulnerable? Financial Tim esTimes, May 6, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/31ac88a1-9131-4531-, May 6, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/31ac88a1-9131-4531-
99be-7bfd8394e8b999be-7bfd8394e8b9. 68 Global Financial Stability Report, October 2021, p. xi. .
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

19 19

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

low-income developing countries high debt levels could near-term debt vulnerabilities remain
high.67
The IMF argued the actions by central banks risked creating a disconnect between the pricing of The IMF argued the actions by central banks risked creating a disconnect between the pricing of
risk in financial markets and projected economic prospects, because investors apparently had risk in financial markets and projected economic prospects, because investors apparently had
expected a quick recovery in 2020 based on continued and unprecedented central bank expected a quick recovery in 2020 based on continued and unprecedented central bank
intervention. However, a perceived or real shift in central bank intervention in financial markets intervention. However, a perceived or real shift in central bank intervention in financial markets
could negatively affect investors’ concept of risk and, in turn, negatively affect asset markets and could negatively affect investors’ concept of risk and, in turn, negatively affect asset markets and
the economic recovery.the economic recovery.6869 In addition to central banks’ actions, the IMF concluded that a number In addition to central banks’ actions, the IMF concluded that a number
of preexisting vulnerabilitiesof preexisting vulnerabilities could affect the timing and the rate of the economic recovery. These could affect the timing and the rate of the economic recovery. These
vulnerabilitiesvulnerabilities include corporate and household debt levels in developed and some emerging include corporate and household debt levels in developed and some emerging
market economies that could become unmanageable in a prolonged recession; a rising number of market economies that could become unmanageable in a prolonged recession; a rising number of
insolvencies that could test the resilience of the banking sector; additional stresses that could insolvencies that could test the resilience of the banking sector; additional stresses that could
affect nonbank financial institutions; and the prospect of some developing economies facing high affect nonbank financial institutions; and the prospect of some developing economies facing high
external financing requirements.external financing requirements.6970
Worker Assistance Programs
As part of their fiscal policy measures, governments in advanced economies either enhanced As part of their fiscal policy measures, governments in advanced economies either enhanced
existing worker support programs, or adopted new programs. As indicated in existing worker support programs, or adopted new programs. As indicated in Table 4, the OECD , the OECD
categorized the various job retention programs into six major groups, which the OECD estimated categorized the various job retention programs into six major groups, which the OECD estimated
had supported 60 had supported 60 mil ionmillion workers in developed economies. workers in developed economies.70As71As would be expected, programs to would be expected, programs to
assist workers varied across countries, but they assist workers varied across countries, but they general ygenerally were comprised of increased subsidies were comprised of increased subsidies
for existing programs designed to support workers for work hours lost or extended wage subsidies for existing programs designed to support workers for work hours lost or extended wage subsidies
to maintain pre-pandemic employment levels. Other programs assisted individual firms in to maintain pre-pandemic employment levels. Other programs assisted individual firms in
retaining workers with the objective of facilitating a quick return to full activity once pandemicretaining workers with the objective of facilitating a quick return to full activity once pandemic --
related restrictions are lifted.related restrictions are lifted.7172 In some cases, benefits were increased by extending the length of In some cases, benefits were increased by extending the length of
time benefits were available and benefits were extended to workers in non-standard jobs such as time benefits were available and benefits were extended to workers in non-standard jobs such as
temporary and self-employed workers. New programs adopted by some OECD members were temporary and self-employed workers. New programs adopted by some OECD members were
designed to assist some temporary and non-standard workers quickly gain access to support designed to assist some temporary and non-standard workers quickly gain access to support
funds.funds.7273 Some countries also eased qualification requirements to facilitate workers or businesses Some countries also eased qualification requirements to facilitate workers or businesses
gaining access to support funds gaining access to support funds
In its July 2021 updated employment outlook, the OECD concluded that many workers in OECD In its July 2021 updated employment outlook, the OECD concluded that many workers in OECD
countries had not regained full-time employment by mid-2021 and that elevated rates of countries had not regained full-time employment by mid-2021 and that elevated rates of
unemployment could persist on average beyond 2022. In addition, the OECD concluded the unemployment could persist on average beyond 2022. In addition, the OECD concluded the
longer workers go without regaining employment, the more difficult it could be for them to longer workers go without regaining employment, the more difficult it could be for them to
compete with those whose jobs had been sustained during the recession and the greater the risks compete with those whose jobs had been sustained during the recession and the greater the risks
of a rapid increase in long-term unemployment.of a rapid increase in long-term unemployment.7374 The OECD also indicated that the timing of any The OECD also indicated that the timing of any
withdrawal of government fiscal support could affect the timing and strength of a recovery and it withdrawal of government fiscal support could affect the timing and strength of a recovery and it
urged governments to continue supporting families most in need of jobs, while providing urged governments to continue supporting families most in need of jobs, while providing

67 Global Financial Stability Report, April 2021, p. 8
68incentives for job creation and for returning workers. It also concluded that withdrawing support too soon “to the many still in need risks generating mass bankruptcies and job losses in sectors 69 Global Financial Stability Report Update., International Monetary Fund, December 2020, p. 4. International Monetary Fund, December 2020, p. 4.
6970 Ibid., pp. 6-7. Ibid., pp. 6-7.
7071 OECD Employment Outlook 2021, p. 15. , p. 15.
7172 Job Retention Schemes During the COVID-19 Lockdown and Beyond, Organization for Economic Cooperation and , Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development, October 12, 2020, p. 2. Development, October 12, 2020, p. 2.
7273 OECD Employment Outlook 2021, pp. 5-6. , pp. 5-6.
7374 Ibid., p. 15. Ibid., p. 15.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

20 20

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

incentives for job creation and for returning workers. It also concluded that withdrawing support
too soon “to the many stil in need risks generating mass bankruptcies and job losses in sectors
stil still deeply affected by containment measures, making the recovery more difficult and deeply affected by containment measures, making the recovery more difficult and
uncertain.”uncertain.”7475
In anticipation of governments reducing or eliminating worker support programs, the OECD In anticipation of governments reducing or eliminating worker support programs, the OECD
encouraged governments toencouraged governments to:
 Continue providing support to firms affected by social distancing restrictions and  Continue providing support to firms affected by social distancing restrictions and
reducing delays in providing payments. reducing delays in providing payments.
 Target workers support programs to jobs that are likely to remain viable in the  Target workers support programs to jobs that are likely to remain viable in the
medium term in firms or sectors where activity can resume. medium term in firms or sectors where activity can resume.
 Use worker support programs to limit excessive layoffs in cases of temporary  Use worker support programs to limit excessive layoffs in cases of temporary
reduction in business activity and not to support firms with structural reduction in business activity and not to support firms with structural
difficulties.difficulties.7576
Table 4. Developed Economy Worker Support Programs During COVID-19
Increased
access for
Preexisting
workers in
short-time
Increased
Increased
non-
New short-
New wage
work
access and
benefit
standard
time work
subsidy
scheme
coverage
generosity
jobs
scheme
scheme

Australia Australia
x x





Austria Austria
x x
x x
x x



Belgium Belgium
x x
x x
x x



Canada Canada
x x
x x




Chile Chile
x x
x x
x x
x x


Czech Republic Czech Republic
x x
x x
x x



Denmark Denmark
x x
x x
x x



Estonia Estonia
x x





Finland Finland
x x
x x
x x
x x


France France
x x
x x
x x
x x


Germany Germany
x x
x x
x x
x x


Greece Greece
x x





Hungary Hungary
x x





Iceland Iceland
x x





Ireland Ireland
x x
x x




Italy Italy
x x
x x
x x



Japan Japan
x x
x x
x x
x x


Korea Korea
x x
x x
x x



Latvia Latvia
x x






74 Ibid., p. 6.
75 Lithuania x Luxembourg x x x 75 Ibid., p. 6. 76 Ibid., p. 100. Ibid., p. 100.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

21 21

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Increased
access for
Preexisting
workers in
short-time
Increased
Increased
non-
New short-
New wage
work
access and
benefit
standard
time work
subsidy
scheme
coverage
generosity
jobs
scheme
scheme

Lithuania
x





Luxembourg
x
x
x



Netherland Netherland
x x
x x




New Zealand New Zealand
x x




Norway Norway
x x
x x
x x



Poland Poland
x x





Portugal Portugal
x x
x x
x x



Slovak Republic Slovak Republic
x x
x x
x x



Slovenia Slovenia
x x





Spain Spain
x x
x x
x x
x x


Sweden Sweden
x x
x x
x x



Switzerland Switzerland
x x
x x
x x



Turkey Turkey
x x
x x
x x



United Kingdom United Kingdom




x x

United States United States
x x
x x
x x



Source: Job Retention Schemes During the COVID-19 Lockdown and Beyond, Organization for Economic , Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development,Cooperation and Development, October 12, 2020, p. 7. October 12, 2020, p. 7.
Monetary and Prudential Measures
Among central banks, the Federal Reserve initiatedAmong central banks, the Federal Reserve initiated extraordinary steps not experienced since the extraordinary steps not experienced since the
2008-2009 global financial crisis to address the economic effects of COVID-19. According to a 2008-2009 global financial crisis to address the economic effects of COVID-19. According to a
March 2021 BIS review of the monetary policies adopted by the central banks of 11 advanced March 2021 BIS review of the monetary policies adopted by the central banks of 11 advanced
economies and 28 developing economies between February and July 2020 to address the impact economies and 28 developing economies between February and July 2020 to address the impact
of the pandemic, the banks moved quickly and on a massive scale,of the pandemic, the banks moved quickly and on a massive scale,7677 as indicated in as indicated in Table 5.
Central banks in advanced economies acted to prevent a financial crisis by purchasing assets and Central banks in advanced economies acted to prevent a financial crisis by purchasing assets and
providing liquidityproviding liquidity at favorable rates. In contrast, central banks in emerging economies responded at favorable rates. In contrast, central banks in emerging economies responded
less aggressively, in part reflecting the success of advanced economy central banks in easing less aggressively, in part reflecting the success of advanced economy central banks in easing
global financial pressures, which effectively made it possible for emerging economies to focus global financial pressures, which effectively made it possible for emerging economies to focus
their efforts on supporting domestic demand. their efforts on supporting domestic demand.
BIS grouped the central bank measures into five categories: (1) interest rates; (2) reserve policies; BIS grouped the central bank measures into five categories: (1) interest rates; (2) reserve policies;
(3) lending operations; (4) asset purchases; and (5) foreign exchange policies, including foreign (3) lending operations; (4) asset purchases; and (5) foreign exchange policies, including foreign
exchange swaps. In some cases, central banks also relaxed capital buffers and countercyclical exchange swaps. In some cases, central banks also relaxed capital buffers and countercyclical

76 77 Cantu, Carlos, Paolo Cavalino, Fiorella De Fiore, and James Yetnam, Cantu, Carlos, Paolo Cavalino, Fiorella De Fiore, and James Yetnam, A Global Database of Central Banks’
Monetary Responses to COVID-19,
BISBIS Working Papers No. 934,Working Papers No. 934, Bank for International Settlements, March 2021, p.5. Bank for International Settlements, March 2021, p.5.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

22 22

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

capital buffers, capital buffers,7778 adopted after the 2008-2009 financial crisis. adopted after the 2008-2009 financial crisis.78 General y79 Generally, however, banks did not , however, banks did not
use their capital buffers to supply credit in their respective economies.use their capital buffers to supply credit in their respective economies.7980
The five policy areas identified by BIS are The five policy areas identified by BIS are:
  Interest rates. Interest rates were reduced in most countries, except in Japan and . Interest rates were reduced in most countries, except in Japan and
the Euro area, where interest rates were zero. In numerous countries, monetary the Euro area, where interest rates were zero. In numerous countries, monetary
authorities attempted to ease the concerns of financial market participants by authorities attempted to ease the concerns of financial market participants by
announcing they would maintain accommodative policies (low interest rates) for announcing they would maintain accommodative policies (low interest rates) for
an extended period. an extended period.
  Reserve policies. With low interest rates, some central banks adjusted reserve With low interest rates, some central banks adjusted reserve
requirements for commercial banks, which alters the amount of assets banks are requirements for commercial banks, which alters the amount of assets banks are
required to hold. Some central banks also adjusted the remuneration rate, or the required to hold. Some central banks also adjusted the remuneration rate, or the
rate the central bank uses to pay interest on required and excess reserves. Some rate the central bank uses to pay interest on required and excess reserves. Some
banks also changed compliance requirements, or the types of assets that could be banks also changed compliance requirements, or the types of assets that could be
counted as reserves. counted as reserves.
  Lending operations. Central banks adjusted lending facilities to maintain Central banks adjusted lending facilities to maintain
liquidity, liquidity, either by expanding existing lendingeither by expanding existing lending facilities or by creating new facilities or by creating new
programs, which accounted for 60% of lending operations. In some cases, programs, which accounted for 60% of lending operations. In some cases,
policies were targeted to specific financial market segments, particularly banks policies were targeted to specific financial market segments, particularly banks
and and smal small and medium-sized enterprises. and medium-sized enterprises.
  Asset purchases. Central banks in advanced economies used targeted and non-. Central banks in advanced economies used targeted and non-
targeted lending operations to support monetary policies and maintain liquidity targeted lending operations to support monetary policies and maintain liquidity in in
the financial system. These goals were accomplished by increasing the size of the financial system. These goals were accomplished by increasing the size of
existing programs and by lengthening the maturities of loans. Central banks in existing programs and by lengthening the maturities of loans. Central banks in
emerging economies expanded their existing liquidityemerging economies expanded their existing liquidity facilities by lowering facilities by lowering
interest rates, broadening the types of eligible collateral, and increasing the interest rates, broadening the types of eligible collateral, and increasing the
number and types of eligiblenumber and types of eligible counterparties. The main difference between counterparties. The main difference between
existing and new lending policies was that a large share of the new facilities existing and new lending policies was that a large share of the new facilities
targeted the private sector, including lending measures to support the flow of targeted the private sector, including lending measures to support the flow of
credit to households and non-financial corporations. In advanced economies credit to households and non-financial corporations. In advanced economies
about 40% of asset purchase programs were new facilities, while the share of about 40% of asset purchase programs were new facilities, while the share of
new programs in emerging economies accounted for over 90%. In addition, asset new programs in emerging economies accounted for over 90%. In addition, asset
purchases were split nearly evenly between public and private assets in advanced purchases were split nearly evenly between public and private assets in advanced
economies economies
  Foreign exchange. The Federal Reserve implemented foreign exchange swaps . The Federal Reserve implemented foreign exchange swaps
initial y initially with five countries (Canada, Euro area, Japan, UK, Switzerland), with five countries (Canada, Euro area, Japan, UK, Switzerland),
followed by swap lines extended to nine other countries (Australia, Brazil, Korea, followed by swap lines extended to nine other countries (Australia, Brazil, Korea,
to relieve pressure in the dollar funding market. to relieve pressure in the dollar funding market.
Throughout the early stages of the economic crisis, central banks served as lenders of last resort Throughout the early stages of the economic crisis, central banks served as lenders of last resort
through large purchases of government debt and as the buyers or lenders of last resort for private through large purchases of government debt and as the buyers or lenders of last resort for private

77 78 Countercyclical capital buffers require Countercyclical capital buffers require banks to increase their capital buffers duringbanks to increase their capital buffers during periods of rapid periods of rapid gr owthgrowth in assets in assets
(when they are making a lot of loans), to ensure they have sufficient capital to absorb losses(when they are making a lot of loans), to ensure they have sufficient capital to absorb losses during during a recession. a recession.
Countercyclical Capital Buffers, Bank for International Settlements, April 3, 2020. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/ccyb/. , Bank for International Settlements, April 3, 2020. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/ccyb/.
7879 Arnold, Martin, “Regulators Free up $500bn Capital for Lenders to Fight Virus Arnold, Martin, “Regulators Free up $500bn Capital for Lenders to Fight Virus Storm,” Storm,” Financial Times, April 7, April 7,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9a677506-a44e-4f69-b852-4f34018bc45f. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9a677506-a44e-4f69-b852-4f34018bc45f.
7980 Lessons Learnt From the COVID-19 Pandemic From a Financial Stability Perspective: Interim Report, Financial , Financial
Stability Board, JulyStability Board, July 13, 2021, p. 9. 13, 2021, p. 9.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

23 23

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

sector securities, in many cases engaging in activities that previously had been considered off- sector securities, in many cases engaging in activities that previously had been considered off-
limits.limits.8081 As a result of these activities, the BIS argued that central banks effectively managed the As a result of these activities, the BIS argued that central banks effectively managed the
initialinitial liquidity liquidity crisis, the first of three phases often identified with financial crises. The second crisis, the first of three phases often identified with financial crises. The second
and third phases, insolvency and recovery, were also navigated successfully, but could and third phases, insolvency and recovery, were also navigated successfully, but could stil
still become more become more chal engingchallenging the longer the pandemic-related economic crisis persists. Capital the longer the pandemic-related economic crisis persists. Capital
buffers were raised after the 2008-2009 financial crisis to assist banks in absorbing losses and buffers were raised after the 2008-2009 financial crisis to assist banks in absorbing losses and
staying solvent during financial crises. Some governments directed banks to freeze dividend staying solvent during financial crises. Some governments directed banks to freeze dividend
payments and halt pay bonuses. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) argued in its July 13, 2021, payments and halt pay bonuses. The Financial Stability Board (FSB) argued in its July 13, 2021,
report to the G-20 Finance Ministers and Governors that the monetary and fiscal actions taken by report to the G-20 Finance Ministers and Governors that the monetary and fiscal actions taken by
central banks and national governments, respectively, in combination with regulatory and central banks and national governments, respectively, in combination with regulatory and
supervisory measures adopted following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis effectively supervisory measures adopted following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis effectively
contained the impact of the crisis, supported the functioning of the global financial system, and contained the impact of the crisis, supported the functioning of the global financial system, and
facilitated funding to the real economy.facilitated funding to the real economy.81
82 Since the beginning of the pandemic, central banks often adopted similar policies, although not Since the beginning of the pandemic, central banks often adopted similar policies, although not
always in unison. Most central banks followed the Federal Reserve in cutting interest rates as one always in unison. Most central banks followed the Federal Reserve in cutting interest rates as one
of their main policy tools to support economic activity; the ECB (Euro Area) and Japan are of their main policy tools to support economic activity; the ECB (Euro Area) and Japan are
notable exceptions, since they had reduced their main interest rates to zero prior to the economic notable exceptions, since they had reduced their main interest rates to zero prior to the economic
recession. The low interest rates had an additional, although not necessarily intended, impact on recession. The low interest rates had an additional, although not necessarily intended, impact on
currency markets by reducing arbitrage opportunities and, thereby, reducing volatility in currency markets by reducing arbitrage opportunities and, thereby, reducing volatility in
exchange rates.exchange rates.8283 According to some analysts, the period through mid-summer 2021 experienced According to some analysts, the period through mid-summer 2021 experienced
the longest period on record of low volatility between the dollar and the euro.the longest period on record of low volatility between the dollar and the euro.
Table 5. Selected Central Bank and Prudential Measures to Address COVID-19
Advanced Economies
Tool type Tool type
Measure Measure
US US
EA EA
JP JP
GB GB
CA CA
AU AU
CH CH
DK DK
NO NO
NZ NZ
SE SE
Interest Interest
Policy Rate cut Policy Rate cut
X X


X X
X X
X X


X X
X X
X X
Lending Lending
Liquidity provision Liquidity provision
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X

X X
X X
X X
X X
operations operations
Targeted lending Targeted lending
X X
X X
X X
X X

X X
X X


X X
X X
Asset Asset
Government Government
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X



X X
X X
purchases purchases
bonds bonds
Corporate paper Corporate paper
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X





X X
Corporate bonds Corporate bonds
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X





X X
Other Other

X X
X X

X X





X X
Foreign Foreign
US dol ar swap line US dol ar swap line

X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
exchange exchange
Swaps Swaps











Spot intervention Spot intervention






X X




Reserve Reserve
Remuneration Remuneration





X X
X X


X X

policy policy
Required Ratio Required Ratio
X X










Compliance Compliance












80 81 For a review of monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of Japan, and the Bank of England, see For a review of monetary policies of the Federal Reserve, the ECB, the Bank of Japan, and the Bank of England, see
Haas, Jacob, Christopher J. Neely, William B.Haas, Jacob, Christopher J. Neely, William B. Emmons, Responses of International Central Banks to the COVIDEmmons, Responses of International Central Banks to the COVID -19 -19
Crisis,Crisis, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,, Fourth Quarter 2020. Fourth Quarter 2020.
8182 Lessons Learnt From the COVID-19 Pandemic, p. 10. , p. 10.
8283 Duguid, Duguid, Kate and Kate and T ommyTommy Stubbington, Central Bank Sync Puts Foreign Exchange Market to Sleep, Stubbington, Central Bank Sync Puts Foreign Exchange Market to Sleep, Financial
Tim es
Times, September 21, 2021. , September 21, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

24 24

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Middle East and Asia
Tool type Tool type
Measure Measure
AE AE
DZ DZ
IL IL
KW KW
MA MA
SA SA
TR TR
ZA ZA



Interest Interest
Policy Rate cut Policy Rate cut
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X



Lending Lending
Liquidity provision Liquidity provision

X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X



operations operations

Targeted lending Targeted lending
X X

X X


X X
X X
X X



Asset Asset
Government Government

X X




X X
X X



purchases purchases
bonds bonds
Corporate paper Corporate paper











Corporate bonds Corporate bonds


X X








Other Other











Foreign Foreign
US dol ar swap line US dol ar swap line











exchange exchange

Swaps Swaps


X X









Spot intervention Spot intervention






X X




Reserve Reserve
Remuneration Remuneration






X X




policy policy

Required Ratio Required Ratio
X X
X X




X X





Compliance Compliance











Emerging Asia
Tool type Tool type
Measure Measure
CN CN
HK HK
ID ID
IN IN
KR KR
MY MY
PH PH
SG SG
TH TH
VN VN

Interest Interest
Policy Rate cut Policy Rate cut
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X

X X
X X

Lending Lending
Liquidity provision Liquidity provision
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X

X X

X X


operations operations
Targeted lending Targeted lending
X X


X X
X X

X X
X X
X X
X X

Asset Asset
Government Government


X X
X X
X X

X X

X X


purchases purchases
bonds bonds
Corporate paper Corporate paper




X X






Corporate bonds Corporate bonds




X X



X X


Other Other











Foreign Foreign
US dol ar swap line US dol ar swap line




X X


X X



exchange exchange
Swaps Swaps


X X
X X



X X



Spot intervention Spot intervention

X X
X X








Reserve Reserve
Remuneration Remuneration


X X








policy policy
Required Ratio Required Ratio
X X
X X
X X
X X







Compliance Compliance





X X
X X






Latin America

Eastern Europe
Tool type Tool type
Measure Measure
AR AR
BR BR
CL CO CL CO
MX MX
PE PE

CZ CZ
HU HU
PL PL
RO RO
Interest Interest
Policy Rate cut Policy Rate cut
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X

X X
X X
X X
X X
Lending Lending
Liquidity provision Liquidity provision

X X
X X
X X
X X
X X

X X
X X
X X
X X
operations operations

Targeted lending Targeted lending
X X
X X
X X

X X
X X



X X

Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

25 25

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Asset Asset
Government Government



X X
X X



X X
X X
X X
purchases purchases
bonds bonds

Corporate paper Corporate paper












Corporate bonds Corporate bonds








X X



Other Other


X X
X X




X X


Foreign Foreign
US dol ar swap line US dol ar swap line

X X


X X






exchange exchange

Swaps Swaps

X X
X X
X X
X X
X X


X X



Spot intervention Spot intervention


X X




X X



Reserve Reserve
Remuneration Remuneration
X X
X X

X X
X X






policy policy

Required Ratio Required Ratio
X X
X X

X X
X X
X X



X X


Compliance Compliance
X X
X X






X X


Source: Cantu, Carlos, Cantu, Carlos, Paolo Cavalino, Paolo Cavalino, Fiorel a Fiorella De Fiore,De Fiore, and James Yetnam,and James Yetnam, A Global Database of Central Banks’
Monetary Responses to COVID-19,
BIS WorkingBIS Working Papers No. 934,Papers No. 934, Bank for International Settlements,Bank for International Settlements, March 2021, March 2021,
p. 5. p. 5.
Notes: AE: United Arab Emirates; AR: Argentina; AU: Australia; BR: Brazil; CA: Canada; CH: Switzerland; CL: AE: United Arab Emirates; AR: Argentina; AU: Australia; BR: Brazil; CA: Canada; CH: Switzerland; CL:
Chile; CN: China; CO: Colombia; CZ: Czech Republic; DK:Chile; CN: China; CO: Colombia; CZ: Czech Republic; DK: Denmark; DZ: Algeria;Denmark; DZ: Algeria; EA: Euro Area; GB: Great EA: Euro Area; GB: Great
Britain; HK: Hong Kong; HU: Hungary; ID: Indonesia; IL: Israel; IN: India; JP: Japan; KR: South Korea; KW: Britain; HK: Hong Kong; HU: Hungary; ID: Indonesia; IL: Israel; IN: India; JP: Japan; KR: South Korea; KW:
Kuwait; MA: Morocco; MY: Malaysia; MX: Mexico; NO: Norway; NZ: New Zealand; PE: Peru; PH: the Kuwait; MA: Morocco; MY: Malaysia; MX: Mexico; NO: Norway; NZ: New Zealand; PE: Peru; PH: the
Philippines; PL: Poland; RO: Romania SG: Singapore; SA: Saudi Arabia; SE: Sweden; TH: Thailand; TR: Turkey; US: Philippines; PL: Poland; RO: Romania SG: Singapore; SA: Saudi Arabia; SE: Sweden; TH: Thailand; TR: Turkey; US:
United States; VN: Vietnam; ZA:United States; VN: Vietnam; ZA: South Africa; South Africa;
Economic Forecasts
Global Growth
As the COVID-19 pandemic began, the global economy was struggling to regain a broad-based As the COVID-19 pandemic began, the global economy was struggling to regain a broad-based
recovery. Global economic growth was being recovery. Global economic growth was being chal engedchallenged by the lingering impact of growing trade by the lingering impact of growing trade
protectionism, trade disputes among major trading partners, protectionism, trade disputes among major trading partners, fal ingfalling commodity and energy prices, commodity and energy prices,
and economic uncertainties in Europe over the impact of the UKand economic uncertainties in Europe over the impact of the UK withdrawal from the European withdrawal from the European
Union. Union. Individual yIndividually, each of these issues presented a solvable , each of these issues presented a solvable chal engechallenge for the global economy. for the global economy.
Collectively, however, the issues weakened the global economy and reduced the available policy Collectively, however, the issues weakened the global economy and reduced the available policy
flexibilityflexibility of many national leaders, of many national leaders, especial yespecially among the leading developed economies. While among the leading developed economies. While
the economic impact has become less uncertain, the combination of policy responses may the economic impact has become less uncertain, the combination of policy responses may
continue to have a significant and enduring impact on the way businesses organize their work continue to have a significant and enduring impact on the way businesses organize their work
forces, on global supply chains, and on government responses to a global health crisis.forces, on global supply chains, and on government responses to a global health crisis.8384 As a As a
result of the rapidly spreading virus and its compounding effects on global and national rates of result of the rapidly spreading virus and its compounding effects on global and national rates of
economic growth, forecasting the impact of the virus has been economic growth, forecasting the impact of the virus has been especial y chal engingespecially challenging. .
In the early stages of the global economic recession, economic forecasts were compounded In the early stages of the global economic recession, economic forecasts were compounded
further by a historic drop in the price of crude oil. Since then, oil prices recovered from the low of further by a historic drop in the price of crude oil. Since then, oil prices recovered from the low of
nearly $20 per barrel in April 2020 to a range of $40 to $45 per barrel by the end of 2020, in part nearly $20 per barrel in April 2020 to a range of $40 to $45 per barrel by the end of 2020, in part
reflecting the decline in global economic activity. By early June 2021, the international price of reflecting the decline in global economic activity. By early June 2021, the international price of

83 Rowland, 84 Rowland, Christopher and Peter Whoriskey, “U.S. Health System is ShowingChristopher and Peter Whoriskey, “U.S. Health System is Showing Why It’s Not Ready for a COVID-19 Why It’s Not Ready for a COVID-19
Pandemic,” Pandemic,” Washington Post, March 4, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-us-health-, March 4, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/the-us-health-
system-is-showing-why-its-not-ready-for-a-COVID-19-pandemic/2020/03/04/7c307bb4-5d61-11ea-b29b-system-is-showing-why-its-not-ready-for-a-COVID-19-pandemic/2020/03/04/7c307bb4-5d61-11ea-b29b-
9db42f7803a7_story.html. 9db42f7803a7_story.html.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

26 26

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Brent crude oil had crossed the $70 per barrel mark, where it remained through Brent crude oil had crossed the $70 per barrel mark, where it remained through the second week
of September 2021.
early October, when it rose above $80 dollars per barrel. Through the first half of 2021, economic forecasts turned more positive based on an expected Through the first half of 2021, economic forecasts turned more positive based on an expected
return to pre-pandemic rates of growth. Nevertheless, the economic situation has remained highly return to pre-pandemic rates of growth. Nevertheless, the economic situation has remained highly
fluid fluid global y globally and for most countries and regions. Uncertainty about the length and depth of the and for most countries and regions. Uncertainty about the length and depth of the
health crisis-related economic effects continue to influence perceptions of risk and volatility in health crisis-related economic effects continue to influence perceptions of risk and volatility in
financial markets and corporate decision-making. In addition, uncertainties concerning the global financial markets and corporate decision-making. In addition, uncertainties concerning the global
pandemic and the effectiveness of public policies intended to contain its spread and prevent a pandemic and the effectiveness of public policies intended to contain its spread and prevent a
subsequent round of infections have added to market volatility. At various times, corporations subsequent round of infections have added to market volatility. At various times, corporations
postponed investment decisions, laid off workers who previously had been furloughed, and in postponed investment decisions, laid off workers who previously had been furloughed, and in
some cases filed for bankruptcy.some cases filed for bankruptcy.
Progress in producing and administering vaccines through the first half of 2021 raised prospects Progress in producing and administering vaccines through the first half of 2021 raised prospects
that social distancing rules could be relaxed or removed, which could improve economic activity. that social distancing rules could be relaxed or removed, which could improve economic activity.
Most forecasts indicate that 2021 GDP growth rates for most countries could outpace pre-Most forecasts indicate that 2021 GDP growth rates for most countries could outpace pre-
pandemic forecasts; while economic growth in 2022 could return to more historic rates. However, pandemic forecasts; while economic growth in 2022 could return to more historic rates. However,
these forecasts may be dampened by: a resurgence in viral cases that could move governments to these forecasts may be dampened by: a resurgence in viral cases that could move governments to
reinstate business and social lockdowns, continuing reinstate business and social lockdowns, continuing shortfal sshortfalls in supplies through supply chains in supplies through supply chains
that have not fully recovered, and rising demand for construction materials that is driven by that have not fully recovered, and rising demand for construction materials that is driven by
government infrastructure projects and new residential housing construction. government infrastructure projects and new residential housing construction.
The IMF, the OECD, and The World Bank revised their forecasts downward between late 2019 The IMF, the OECD, and The World Bank revised their forecasts downward between late 2019
and mid-2020, reflecting the rapidly deteriorating state of the global economy and a marked and mid-2020, reflecting the rapidly deteriorating state of the global economy and a marked
decline in projected rates of growth. Between October 2019 and January 2021, for instance, the decline in projected rates of growth. Between October 2019 and January 2021, for instance, the
IMF lowered its global economic growth forecast for 2020 from a positive 3.4% to a negative IMF lowered its global economic growth forecast for 2020 from a positive 3.4% to a negative
3.5%. In its June 2020 forecast, the OECD forecasted the effects of a single and double wave of 3.5%. In its June 2020 forecast, the OECD forecasted the effects of a single and double wave of
infections, with the projections for a single wave reflected in infections, with the projections for a single wave reflected in Table 6. By late 2020 and early . By late 2020 and early
2021, most forecasts were revised upward to reflect assessments the recession would be less 2021, most forecasts were revised upward to reflect assessments the recession would be less
severe than had been forecasted for 2021, as indicated in severe than had been forecasted for 2021, as indicated in Figure 4. The OECD estimated in May The OECD estimated in May
2021 that global GDP had declined by 3.5% in 2020, compared with a December forecast 2021 that global GDP had declined by 3.5% in 2020, compared with a December forecast
of -4.2%, and would experience a stronger recovery in 2021 of 5.8% instead of a March forecast of -4.2%, and would experience a stronger recovery in 2021 of 5.8% instead of a March forecast
of 5.6%.of 5.6%.8485 Between January 2020 and January 2021, the World Bank also lowered its forecast of Between January 2020 and January 2021, the World Bank also lowered its forecast of
global growth from 2.5% to a negative 4.3%. In most forecasts, advanced economies were global growth from 2.5% to a negative 4.3%. In most forecasts, advanced economies were
projected to experience the steepest declines in economic growth from 2019 to mid-June 2020. projected to experience the steepest declines in economic growth from 2019 to mid-June 2020.
Table 6. Major Economic Forecasts
Percentage changes at annual rates Percentage changes at annual rates
World
Advanced economies Developing economies
United States


2020 2021 2020 2021
2020 2020
2021 2021
2020 2020
2021 2021
2020 2020
2021 2021
International Monetary Fund
October 2019 October 2019
3.4% 3.4%
3.6% 3.6%
1.7% 1.7%
1.6% 1.6%
4.6% 4.6%
4.8% 4.8%
2.1% 2.1%
1.7% 1.7%
April April 2020 2020
-3.0 3.0
5.8 5.8
-6.1 6.1
4.5 4.5
-1.0 1.0
6.6 6.6
-5.9 5.9
4.7 4.7
June 2020 June 2020
-4.9 -4.9
5.4 5.4
-8.0 -8.0
4.8 4.8
-3.0 -3.0
5.9 5.9
-8.0 -8.0
4.5 4.5
October 2020 October 2020
-4.4 4.4
5.2 5.2
-5.8 5.8
3.9 3.9
-3.3 3.3
6.0 6.0
–4.3
3.1

84-4.3 3.1 85 OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2021, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, , Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,
March, 2021. March, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

27 27

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

World
Advanced economies Developing economies
United States


2020 2021 2020 2021
2020 2020
2021 2021
2020 2020
2021 2021
2020 2020
2021 2021
January 2021 January 2021
-3.5 -3.5
5.5 5.5
-4.9 -4.9
4.3 4.3
-2.4 -2.4
6.3 6.3
-3.4 -3.4
5.1 5.1
July 2021 July 2021
-3.2 -3.2
6.0 6.0
-4.6 -4.6
5.6 5.6
-2.1 -2.1
6.3 6.3
-3.5 -3.5
7 7.0 October 2021 -3.1 5.9 -4.5 5.2 -2.1 6.4 -3.4 6.0 .0
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Nov 2019 Nov 2019
2.9 2.9
3.0 3.0
1.6 1.6
1.7 1.7
4.0 4.0
4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0
March 2020 March 2020
2.4 2.4
3.3 3.3
0.8 0.8
1.2 1.2
NA NA
NA NA
1.9 1.9
2.1 2.1
June 2020 single June 2020 single
-6.0 -6.0
5.2 5.2
-7.5 -7.5
4.8 4.8
-4.6 -4.6
5.6 5.6
-7.3 -7.3
4.1 4.1
June 2020 double June 2020 double
-7.6 -7.6
2.8 2.8
-9.3 -9.3
2.2 2.2
-6.1 -6.1
3.2 3.2
-8.5 -8.5
1.9 1.9
Sept. 2020 Sept. 2020
-7.6 -7.6
2.8 2.8
-9.3 -9.3
2,2 2,2
-6.1 -6.1
3.2 3.2
-8.5 -8.5
1.9 1.9
Dec. 2020 Dec. 2020
-4.2 -4.2
4.2 4.2
-5.5 -5.5
3,2 3,2
-3.0 -3.0
5.1 5.1
-3.7 -3.7
3.2 3.2
March 2021 March 2021
-3.4 -3.4
5.6 5.6
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
-3.5 -3.5
6.5 6.5
May 2021 May 2021
-3.5 -3.5
5.8 5.8
-4.8 -4.8
5.3 5.3
-2.3 -2.3
6.2 6.2
-3.5 -3.5
6.9 6.9
September September 2021 2021
-3.4 -3.4
5.7 5.7
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
NA NA
-3.4 -3.4
6.0 6.0
World Bank
January 2020 January 2020
2.5 2.5
2.6 2.6
1.4 1.4
1.5 1.5
4.1 4.1
4.3 4.3
1.8 1.8
1.7 1.7
June 2020 June 2020
-5.2 -5.2
4.2 4.2
-7.0 -7.0
3.9 3.9
-2.5 -2.5
4.6 4.6
-6.1 -6.1
4.0 4.0
January 2021 January 2021
-4.3 -4.3
4.0 4.0
-5.4 -5.4
3.3 3.3
-2.6 -2.6
5.0 5.0
-3.6 -3.6
3.5 3.5
SourceSources: World Economic Outlook,, various issues,various issues, International Monetary Fund; International Monetary Fund; OECD Economic Outlook, various various
issues,issues, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development;Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; Global Economic Prospects,, various issues, various issues,
WorldWorld Bank. Bank.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

28 28


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 4. Major Economic Forecasts by Region Projections in annual percent change

Source: OECD Economic Outlook, March 2021, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. , Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
March 2021; March 2021; World Economic Outlook, Update, International Monetary Fund, International Monetary Fund, July,October 2021; 2021; Global Economic Prospects, ,
World World Bank Group, January 2021Bank Group, January 2021,. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Notes: The OECD estimated The OECD estimated rates of growth as a result of two scenarios,rates of growth as a result of two scenarios, indicated as OECD1 and OECD2. indicated as OECD1 and OECD2.
The first scenario assumesThe first scenario assumes there is a singlethere is a single wave of infections from COVID-19, while the second scenario wave of infections from COVID-19, while the second scenario
estimated the effect of a two-wave scenario. estimated the effect of a two-wave scenario.
The OECD Forecast
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released an updated The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) released an updated
forecast in September 2021, which estimated that global economic growth had declined by 3.4% forecast in September 2021, which estimated that global economic growth had declined by 3.4%
in 2020, but also estimated that the global economy would grow at an annual rate of 5.7% in 2021 in 2020, but also estimated that the global economy would grow at an annual rate of 5.7% in 2021
and 4.5% in 2022, assuming continued strong support from macroeconomic policies and and 4.5% in 2022, assuming continued strong support from macroeconomic policies and
accommodative monetary policies.accommodative monetary policies.8586 In the updated forecast, the rate of GDP growth in the Euro In the updated forecast, the rate of GDP growth in the Euro
area was forecast to grow at a rate of 5.3% in 2021 and the U.S. economy would grow at rate of area was forecast to grow at a rate of 5.3% in 2021 and the U.S. economy would grow at rate of
6.0%. The G20, which includes both developed and major developing economies, was projected 6.0%. The G20, which includes both developed and major developing economies, was projected
to grow by 6.1% in 2021 and by a rate of 4.8% in 2022. The OECD estimated that global GDP to grow by 6.1% in 2021 and by a rate of 4.8% in 2022. The OECD estimated that global GDP
had surpassed the pre-pandemic level, but that output levels and employment in mid-2021 had surpassed the pre-pandemic level, but that output levels and employment in mid-2021
remained 3.5% below pre-pandemic projections, which was estimated to be equivalent to an remained 3.5% below pre-pandemic projections, which was estimated to be equivalent to an
income loss of about $4.5 income loss of about $4.5 tril iontrillion, or the value of a year of global, or the value of a year of global GDP growth. While inflation GDP growth. While inflation
began rising in developed economies, the OECD attributed the price increases to higher began rising in developed economies, the OECD attributed the price increases to higher
commodity and shipping costs and projected they would moderate by the end of 2022, unless commodity and shipping costs and projected they would moderate by the end of 2022, unless
higher rates of inflation became embedded in demands for higher wages.higher rates of inflation became embedded in demands for higher wages.86

8587 The OECD forecast also reflected recent analysis that an economic recovery would take place over the next two years, but that “the recovery would be uneven across countries, potentially 86 OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report: Keeping the Recovery on Track, Organization for Economic Cooperation , Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development, September 2020. and Development, September 2020.
8687 According to OECD calculations, global According to OECD calculations, global commodity prices werecommodity prices were 55% higher in July55% higher in July and Augustand August 2021 than in the 2021 than in the
previous year and were driven by higher metals and oil prices; containerized freight prices wereprevious year and were driven by higher metals and oil prices; containerized freight prices were estimated to be two to estimated to be two to
three times the level of the previous year. Ibid.,three times the level of the previous year. Ibid., p. 11. p. 11.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

29 29

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

The OECD forecast also reflected recent analysis that an economic recovery would take place
over the next two years, but that “the recovery would be uneven across countries, potential y
leading to lasting changes in the world economy.”leading to lasting changes in the world economy.”8788 In addition, the OECD concluded the In addition, the OECD concluded the
pandemic is fragmenting the global economy through a growing number of trade and investment pandemic is fragmenting the global economy through a growing number of trade and investment
restrictions and diverging policy approaches that are being implemented on a country-by-country restrictions and diverging policy approaches that are being implemented on a country-by-country
basis. The OECD concluded further that basis. The OECD concluded further that
….as long as the vast majority of the global population is not vaccinated, all of us remain
vulnerable to the emergence of new variants. Confidence could be seriously eroded as long as the vast majority of the global population is not vaccinated, all of us remain vulnerable to the emergence of new variants. Confidence could be seriously eroded by by
further lockdowns, and a stop-and-go of economic activities. Firms, so far well protected further lockdowns, and a stop-and-go of economic activities. Firms, so far well protected
butbut often often with higher debt than before the pandemic, could go bankrupt. The most vulnerable members of society would risk further suffering from prolonged spells with higher debt than before the pandemic, could go bankrupt. The most
vulnerable members of society would risk further suffering from prolonged spells of of
inactivity or reduced income, exacerbating inequalities, across and within countries, and inactivity or reduced income, exacerbating inequalities, across and within countries, and
potentially destabilizing economies.potentially destabilizing economies.8889
As a consequence of the slowdown in economic activity in the fourth quarter of 2020 and As a consequence of the slowdown in economic activity in the fourth quarter of 2020 and
projected slow growth and partial recovery in 2021, the OECD estimated there would be long-projected slow growth and partial recovery in 2021, the OECD estimated there would be long-
lasting effects on the global economy, including lasting effects on the global economy, including
 Output was projected to remain around 5% below pre-crisis expectations in many  Output was projected to remain around 5% below pre-crisis expectations in many
countries in 2022, raising the specter of substantial permanent costs, countries in 2022, raising the specter of substantial permanent costs,
disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations. disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations.
  Smal erSmaller firms and entrepreneurs are more likely to go out of business. firms and entrepreneurs are more likely to go out of business.
 Many low wage earners who lost their jobs and are only covered by  Many low wage earners who lost their jobs and are only covered by
unemployment insurance, at best, with poor prospects of finding new jobs unemployment insurance, at best, with poor prospects of finding new jobs
quickly. quickly.
 People living in poverty and  People living in poverty and usual y less wel usually less well covered by social safety nets covered by social safety nets
experienced a deterioration in their living standards. experienced a deterioration in their living standards.
 Children and youth from less  Children and youth from less wel well-off backgrounds, and less qualified adult -off backgrounds, and less qualified adult
workers struggled to learn and work from home, with workers struggled to learn and work from home, with potential ypotentially long lasting long lasting
damage.damage.8990
Through the third and fourth quarters of 2020 and the first and second quarters of 2021, most Through the third and fourth quarters of 2020 and the first and second quarters of 2021, most
OECD countries had not experienced extended periods of high rates of unemployment, in part OECD countries had not experienced extended periods of high rates of unemployment, in part
due to nationaldue to national income and wage maintenance programs, as indicated in income and wage maintenance programs, as indicated in Figure 5. The main . The main
exceptions were the United States and Canada, where unemployment rates spiked starting at the exceptions were the United States and Canada, where unemployment rates spiked starting at the
end of the first quarter 2020 and into the second quarter of 2020. By end of the first quarter 2020 and into the second quarter of 2020. By JulyAugust 2021, most OECD 2021, most OECD
economies had unemployment rates in the 6.5% to 9.0% range with some exceptions: Japan economies had unemployment rates in the 6.5% to 9.0% range with some exceptions: Japan
(2.8%) and Germany (3.6%) had rates below the OECD average of 6.2%, while Greece (14.6%), (2.8%) and Germany (3.6%) had rates below the OECD average of 6.2%, while Greece (14.6%),
Spain (14.3%), Colombia (13.7%), and Italy (9.3%) had rates that were higher than the OECD Spain (14.3%), Colombia (13.7%), and Italy (9.3%) had rates that were higher than the OECD
average. In a major difference between U.S. and EU data, EU workers absent from work due to average. In a major difference between U.S. and EU data, EU workers absent from work due to
temporary layoff are counted as employed, whereas, in the United States, they are counted as temporary layoff are counted as employed, whereas, in the United States, they are counted as
unemployed.

87unemployed. 88 OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2021, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. , Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
March 2021, p. 4. http://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/#resources. March 2021, p. 4. http://www.oecd.org/economic-outlook/#resources.
8889 OECD Economic Outlook May 2021, , Preliminary Version, p. 9. , p. 9.
8990 Ibid., p. 8. Ibid., p. 8.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

30 30


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 5. Unemployment Rates Among Major OECD Countries
In percentage terms In percentage terms

Source: OECD Dataset: Short-termOECD Dataset: Short-term Labor Market Statistics, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Labor Market Statistics, Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development.Development. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
The OECD estimated that global trade would contract by 9.5% in 2020 assuming the global The OECD estimated that global trade would contract by 9.5% in 2020 assuming the global
economy did not experience a strong second wave of infections that caused countries to reimpose economy did not experience a strong second wave of infections that caused countries to reimpose
stringent social and business lockdowns, as indicated in stringent social and business lockdowns, as indicated in Table 7..9091 In addition to current rates of In addition to current rates of
unemployment, the OECD projected the length of time it could take in quarters, or three-month unemployment, the OECD projected the length of time it could take in quarters, or three-month
periods, from the end of 2019 to the second quarter of 2025 for selected OECD countries to return periods, from the end of 2019 to the second quarter of 2025 for selected OECD countries to return
to full employment, as indicated in to full employment, as indicated in Figure 6. The OECD estimated in its July 2021 . The OECD estimated in its July 2021 Employment
Outlook
that by the end of 2020, around 22 that by the end of 2020, around 22 mil ionmillion jobs had been lost in the OECD compared to jobs had been lost in the OECD compared to
2019. The estimate indicates that four countries-Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Poland- 2019. The estimate indicates that four countries-Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and Poland-
could reach pre-pandemic rates of unemployment by mid-2021, or a year and a half after the start could reach pre-pandemic rates of unemployment by mid-2021, or a year and a half after the start
of the recession. On the other hand, OECD countries on average would not reach pre-pandemic of the recession. On the other hand, OECD countries on average would not reach pre-pandemic
level of unemployment untillevel of unemployment until after the end of 2022, or three years after the start of the recession.after the end of 2022, or three years after the start of the recession.9192
Other counties were projected not to reach pre-pandemic levels of unemployment until mid- Other counties were projected not to reach pre-pandemic levels of unemployment until mid-
2024, or more than four years after the recession began. The OECD indicated the delay in 2024, or more than four years after the recession began. The OECD indicated the delay in
returning to full employment reflected returning to full employment reflected chal engeschallenges that long-term unemployment present for that long-term unemployment present for
workers attempting to reenter the workforce.workers attempting to reenter the workforce.92

90 Ibid., p. 13.
9193 91 Ibid., p. 13. 92 OECD Employment Outlook 2021: Navigating the COVID-19 Crisis and Recovery, Organization for Economic , Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development, July 17, 2021, p. 4. Cooperation and Development, July 17, 2021, p. 4.
92 93 Ibid., Ibid., ppp. 39-40. . 39-40.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

31 31


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 6. Projected Time to Full Recovery in Employment in Selected OECD
Countries
Periods are in quarters by year Q4 2019 to Q2 2025 Periods are in quarters by year Q4 2019 to Q2 2025

Source: OECD Employment Outlook 2021. OECD Employment Outlook 2021.

Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

32 32


Table 7. OECD, IMF and World Bank Economic Forecasts
Percentage change in Real GDP Growth Percentage change in Real GDP Growth
OECD Sep. 2021
IMF JulyOct. 2021
World Bank Jan.


Projections


Projections


2021 Projections
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022

2019 2019
2020 2020
2021 2021


World World
-3.4% -3.4%
5.7% 5.7%
4.5% 4.5%
World World
–3. –3.2
6.01 5.9
4.9 4.9
World World
2.3% 2.3%
-4.3% -4.3%
4.0% 4.0%
Adv. Economies Adv. Economies
-4.8 -4.8
5.3 5.3
3.8 3.8
Adv. Economies Adv. Economies
–4. –4.65
5. 5.62
4. 4.45
Adv. Economies Adv. Economies
1.6 1.6
-5.4 -5.4
3.3 3.3
Australia Australia
-2.5 -2.5
4.0 4.0
3.3 3.3
United States United States
–3. –3.54
76.0 .0
4.95.2
United States United States
2.2 2.2
-3.6 -3.6
3.5 3.5
Canada Canada
-5.3 -5.3
5.4 5.4
4.1 4.1
Euro Area Euro Area
–6. –6.5
4.63 5.0
4.3 4.3
Euro Area Euro Area
1.3 1.3
-7.4 -7.4
3.6 3.6
Euro area Euro area
-6.5 -6.5
5.3 5.3
4.6 4.6
Germany Germany
–4. –4.86
3. 3.61
4. 4.16
Japan Japan
0.3 0.3
-5.3 -5.3
2.5 2.5
Germany Germany
-4.9 -4.9
2.9 2.9
4.6 4.6
France France
–8.0 –8.0
5.8
4.26.3 3.9
Emerging Emerging
3.6 3.6
-2.6 -2.6
5.0 5.0
France France
-8.0 -8.0
6.3 6.3
4.0 4.0
Italy Italy
–8.9 –8.9
4.95.8
4.2 4.2
E. Asia E. Asia
5.8 5.8
0.9 0.9
7.4 7.4
Italy Italy
-8.9 -8.9
5.9 5.9
4.1 4.1
Spain Spain
–10.8 –10.8
6.2
5.85.7 6.4
China China
6.1 6.1
2.0 2.0
7.9 7.9
Spain Spain
-10.8 -10.8
6.8 6.8
6.6 6.6
Japan Japan
–4. –4.76
2. 2.84
3. 3.02
Indonesia Indonesia
5.0 5.0
-2.2 -2.2
4.4 4.4
Japan Japan
-4.6 -4.6
2.5 2.5
2.1 2.1
United Kingdom United Kingdom
–9.8 –9.8
7.0
4.86.8 5.0
Thailand Thailand
2.4 2.4
-6.5 -6.5
4.0 4.0
Korea Korea
-0.9 -0.9
4.0 4.0
2.9 2.9
Canada Canada
–5.3 –5.3
6.35.7
4. 4.59
Cen. Asia Cen. Asia
2.3 2.3
-2.9 -2.9
3.3 3.3
Mexico Mexico
-8.3 -8.3
6.3 6.3
3.4 3.4
China China
2.3 2.3
8. 8.10
5. 5.76
Russia Russia
1.3 1.3
-4.0 -4.0
2.6 2.6
Turkey Turkey
1.8 1.8
8.4 8.4
3.1 3.1
India India
–7.3 –7.3
9.5 9.5
8.5 8.5
Turkey Turkey
0.9 0.9
0.5 0.5
4.5 4.5
United United
-9.8 -9.8
6.7 6.7
5.2 5.2
Russia Russia
–3.0 –3.0
4. 4.4
3.17 2.9
4.5 4.5
-3.4 -3.4
3.5 3.5
Kingdom Kingdom
Poland Poland
United States United States
-3.4 -3.4
6.0 6.0
3.9 3.9
Latin America Latin America
–7.0 –7.0
5.86.3
3. 3.20
Brazil Brazil
1.4 1.4
-4.5 -4.5
3.0 3.0
Argentina Argentina
-9.9 -9.9
7.6 7.6
1.9 1.9
Brazil Brazil
–4.1 –4.1
5. 5.32
1. 1.95
Mexico Mexico
-0.1 -0.1
-9.0 -9.0
3.7 3.7
Brazil Brazil
-4.4 -4.4
5.2 5.2
2.3 2.3
Mexico Mexico
–8.3 –8.3
6. 6.32
4. 4.20
Argentina Argentina
-2.1 -2.1
-10.6 -10.6
4.9 4.9
China China
2.3 2.3
8.5 8.5
5.8 5.8
Mid. East Mid. East
–2. –2.68
4. 4.0
3.71 4.1
Mid. East Mid. East
0.1 0.1
-5.0 -5.0
2.1 2.1
India India
-7.3 -7.3
9.7 9.7
7.9 7.9
Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
–4.1 –4.1
2. 2.48
4.8 4.8
Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
0.3 0.3
-5.4 -5.4
2.0 2.0
Indonesia Indonesia
-2.1 -2.1
3.7 3.7
4.9 4.9
Africa Africa
–1. –1.87
3. 3.4
4.17 3.8
Iran Iran
-6.8 -6.8
-3.7 -3.7
1.5 1.5
CRS-33 CRS-33


OECD Sep. 2021
IMF JulyOct. 2021
World Bank Jan.


Projections


Projections


2021 Projections
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022

2019 2019
2020 2020
2021 2021


S. Africa S. Africa
-7.0 -7.0
4.6 4.6
2.5 2.5
Nigeria Nigeria
–1.8 –1.8
2. 2.56
2. 2.67
Egypt Egypt
5.6 5.6
3.6 3.6
2.7 2.7




S. Africa S. Africa
– –7.0
46.4 5.0 .0
2.2 2.2
S. Asia S. Asia
4.4 4.4
-6.7 -6.7
3.3 3.3




World World Trade Trade
–8. –8.32
9.7 9.7
7.06.7
Volume Volume
India India
4.2 4.2
-9.6 -9.6
5.4 5.4




Oil prices Oil prices ($) ($)
–32.7 –32.7
56.6
–2.659.1 –1.8
Pakistan Pakistan
1.9 1.9
-1.5 -1.5
0.5 0.5








Bangladesh Bangladesh
8.2 8.2
2.0 2.0
1.6 1.6








Africa Africa
2.4 2.4
-3.7 -3.7
2.7 2.7








Nigeria Nigeria
2.2 2.2
-4.1 -4.1
1.1 1.1








S. Africa S. Africa
0.2 0.2
-7.8 -7.8
3.3 3.3








Angola Angola
-0.9 -0.9
-4.0 -4.0
0.9 0.9
Sources: OECD Economic Outlook: Interim Report, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, September September 2021; 2021; World Economic Outlook Update,
International Monetary Fund, International Monetary Fund, JulyOctober, 2021; , 2021; Global Economic Prospects,, World Bank Group, January 2021World Bank Group, January 2021,.

CRS-34 CRS-34

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Among developing and emerging economies, the economic downturn is projected to most Among developing and emerging economies, the economic downturn is projected to most
negatively affect countries that rely on commodity exports to support annual economic growth. In negatively affect countries that rely on commodity exports to support annual economic growth. In
addition to lower prices for commodity exports and reduced global demand for exports, addition to lower prices for commodity exports and reduced global demand for exports,
developing countries are projected to be negatively affected by reduced remittances, weaker developing countries are projected to be negatively affected by reduced remittances, weaker
currencies and tighter financial conditions. currencies and tighter financial conditions.
The OECD also concluded that The OECD also concluded that
 Real per capita income in 2020 was projected to decline by 8%, with substantial  Real per capita income in 2020 was projected to decline by 8%, with substantial
declines in declines in al all economies. Even with an economic recovery in 2021, real per economies. Even with an economic recovery in 2021, real per
capita income was projected to rise to only that of 2013. capita income was projected to rise to only that of 2013.
 Unemployment was projected to rise to its highest level in more than 25 years in  Unemployment was projected to rise to its highest level in more than 25 years in
2020, while the average unemployment rate was projected to rise to 7.4% in 2020, while the average unemployment rate was projected to rise to 7.4% in
2021and 6.9% in 2022. The OECD concluded that, “scarring effects from job 2021and 6.9% in 2022. The OECD concluded that, “scarring effects from job
losses are likely to be felt particularly by younger workers and lower-losses are likely to be felt particularly by younger workers and lower-skil edskilled
workers, with attendant risks of many people becoming trapped in joblessness for workers, with attendant risks of many people becoming trapped in joblessness for
an extended period.” an extended period.”
 Net productive investment (business and government) was weak prior to the  Net productive investment (business and government) was weak prior to the
pandemic, pandemic, fal ingfalling behind the average rate of investment during the previous behind the average rate of investment during the previous
decade. Investment was forecast to contract by half in 2020 as a percent of real decade. Investment was forecast to contract by half in 2020 as a percent of real
GDP, GDP, fal ingfalling from 4.7% to 2.3% and 2.0%, respectively for the one-wave and from 4.7% to 2.3% and 2.0%, respectively for the one-wave and
two-wave scenarios and increasing the risk of entrenched weak economic two-wave scenarios and increasing the risk of entrenched weak economic
growth. Investment is also expected to be negatively affected by bankruptcies growth. Investment is also expected to be negatively affected by bankruptcies
and insolvencies among corporations and financial institutions.and insolvencies among corporations and financial institutions.9394
Through its various forecasts, the OECD has estimated that increased direct and indirect Through its various forecasts, the OECD has estimated that increased direct and indirect
economic costs through global supply chains, reduced demand for goods and services, and economic costs through global supply chains, reduced demand for goods and services, and
declines in tourism and business travel mean that, “the adverse consequences of these declines in tourism and business travel mean that, “the adverse consequences of these
developments for other countries (non-OECD) are significant.”developments for other countries (non-OECD) are significant.”9495 Global trade, measured by trade Global trade, measured by trade
volumes, slowed in the last quarter of 2019 and had been expected to decline further in 2020, as a volumes, slowed in the last quarter of 2019 and had been expected to decline further in 2020, as a
result of weaker global economic activity associated with the pandemic, which is negatively result of weaker global economic activity associated with the pandemic, which is negatively
affecting economic activity in various sectors, including airlines, hospitality, ports, and the affecting economic activity in various sectors, including airlines, hospitality, ports, and the
shipping industry.shipping industry.95
96 According to the OECD’s assessment According to the OECD’s assessment
 The greatest impact of the containment restrictions has been on retail and  The greatest impact of the containment restrictions has been on retail and
wholesale trade, and in professional and real estate services, although there are wholesale trade, and in professional and real estate services, although there are
notable differences between countries. notable differences between countries.
 Countries dependent on tourism have been affected more severely, while  Countries dependent on tourism have been affected more severely, while
countries with large agricultural and mining sectors experienced less severe countries with large agricultural and mining sectors experienced less severe
effects.effects.
 Economic effects likely varied across countries reflecting differences in the  Economic effects likely varied across countries reflecting differences in the
timing and degree of containment measures. timing and degree of containment measures.96

93 Ibid., p. 31.
9497 94 Ibid., p. 31. 95 OECD Interim Economic Assessment: COVID-19: The World Economy at Risk, Organization for Economic , Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development. March 2, 2020, p. 2. Cooperation and Development. March 2, 2020, p. 2.
9596 Ibid., p. 4. Ibid., p. 4.
9697 Evaluating the Initial Impact of COVID Containment Measures on Activity, Organization for Economic Cooperation , Organization for Economic Cooperation
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

35 35

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

In addition, the OECD argued that China’s emergence as a global economic actor marked a In addition, the OECD argued that China’s emergence as a global economic actor marked a
significant departure from previous global health episodes. China’s growth, in combination with significant departure from previous global health episodes. China’s growth, in combination with
globalizationglobalization and the interconnected nature of economies through capital flows, supply chains, and the interconnected nature of economies through capital flows, supply chains,
and foreign investment, magnify the cost of containing the spread of the virus through and foreign investment, magnify the cost of containing the spread of the virus through
quarantines and restrictions on labor mobility and travel.quarantines and restrictions on labor mobility and travel.9798 China’s global economic role and China’s global economic role and
globalization globalization mean that trade has played a role in spreading the economic effects of COVID-19. mean that trade has played a role in spreading the economic effects of COVID-19.
More broadly, the economic effects of the pandemic were spread through three trade channels: More broadly, the economic effects of the pandemic were spread through three trade channels:
(1) directly through supply chains as reduced economic activity spread from intermediate goods (1) directly through supply chains as reduced economic activity spread from intermediate goods
producers to finished goods producers; (2) as a result of a drop producers to finished goods producers; (2) as a result of a drop overal overall in economic activity, in economic activity,
which reduced demand for goods in general, including imports; and (3) through reduced trade which reduced demand for goods in general, including imports; and (3) through reduced trade
with commodity exporters that supplied producers, which, in turn, reduced their imports and with commodity exporters that supplied producers, which, in turn, reduced their imports and
negatively affected trade and economic activity of exporters. negatively affected trade and economic activity of exporters.
The IMF Forecast
Having labeled the projected decline in global economic activity as the “Great Lockdown,” the Having labeled the projected decline in global economic activity as the “Great Lockdown,” the
IMF released an updated forecast in IMF released an updated forecast in JulyOctober 2021. The IMF concluded in its revised forecast that the 2021. The IMF concluded in its revised forecast that the
global economy was global economy was improvingrecovering, but cautioned , but cautioned thatthe recovery was hobbled by renewed waves of infections and new variants renewed waves of infections and new variants
of the virus could “pose concerns for the outlook.”98of the virus.99 The updated forecast estimated a slightly The updated forecast estimated a slightly
higherslower rate of growth in advanced economies than that forecasted in April 2021 rate of growth in advanced economies than that forecasted in April 2021, but and a slower rate a slower rate
of growth for emerging and developing economies. IMF concluded of growth for emerging and developing economies. IMF concluded the pandemic had “taken a
turn for the worse” in some parts of the world, that countries were experiencing diverging rates of
growth reflecting differences in vaccinations, and that smooth and durable recoveries were not
assured.99that health risks continue to abound and are holding back a full return to economic activity. In addition, the IMF concluded that pandemic outbreaks in critical links of global supply chains have “resulted in longer-than-expected supply disruptions,” which are feeding inflation in many countries. The IMF concluded that “risks to economic prospects have increased and policy trade-offs have become more complex.”100
In its baseline forecast, the IMF estimated the global rate of economic growth declined by 3.2% In its baseline forecast, the IMF estimated the global rate of economic growth declined by 3.2%
in 2020, slightly less negative than its Aprilin 2020, slightly less negative than its April forecast of -3.5%, before growing by 6.0% in 2021forecast of -3.5%, before growing by 6.0% in 2021 and 4.9% in 2022, ,
revised revised upupward from its previous forecast from its previous forecast of 5.2%; global. Global trade was projected to trade was projected to fal fall in 2020 by 8.in 2020 by 8.3%
2% and oil prices were projected to and oil prices were projected to fal fall by 32.7%. For 2021by 32.7%. For 2021 and 2022, the IMF forecast indicated that global , the IMF forecast indicated that global
trade could grow by 9.7% and trade could grow by 9.7% and 6.7%, respectively, and that oil prices could rebound by that oil prices could rebound by 56.6%59.0% in 2021, before falling by 1.8% in 2022. The forecast also indicated . The forecast also indicated
the economic recovery the economic recovery wil will be uneven across countries depending on, “access to medical be uneven across countries depending on, “access to medical
interventions, effectiveness of policy support, exposure to cross-country interventions, effectiveness of policy support, exposure to cross-country spil oversspillovers, and structural , and structural
characteristics entering the crisis.” India and China, in particular, were projected to outpace the characteristics entering the crisis.” India and China, in particular, were projected to outpace the
rate of global economic growth, experiencing a rate of growth in 2021 of 9.5% and 8.rate of global economic growth, experiencing a rate of growth in 2021 of 9.5% and 8.10%, %,
respectively. respectively.
The IMF’s forecasts reflect the impact of policy measures on the U.S. economy in the first half of The IMF’s forecasts reflect the impact of policy measures on the U.S. economy in the first half of
2020 that are larger than it had assumed in its earlier forecasts, a slower recovery in the second 2020 that are larger than it had assumed in its earlier forecasts, a slower recovery in the second
half of 2020, and the impact of U.S. spending measures adopted in 2021. Also, the IMF forecast half of 2020, and the impact of U.S. spending measures adopted in 2021. Also, the IMF forecast
reflects an estimated larger decline in consumption than previously assumed as consumers reflects an estimated larger decline in consumption than previously assumed as consumers
curtailed spending to increase their savings and the effects of social distancing on economic curtailed spending to increase their savings and the effects of social distancing on economic
activity. The IMF also stated that many countries have faced a multi-layered crisis that included a activity. The IMF also stated that many countries have faced a multi-layered crisis that included a
health crisis, a domestic economic crisis, health crisis, a domestic economic crisis, fal ingfalling external demand, capital outflows, and a collapse external demand, capital outflows, and a collapse
in commodity prices. In combination, these various effects interacted in ways that made in commodity prices. In combination, these various effects interacted in ways that made

and Development, March 27, 2020. and Development, March 27, 2020.
9798 Goldin, Goldin, Ian, “COVID-19 ShowsIan, “COVID-19 Shows How How Globalization SpreadsGlobalization Spreads Contagion of All Kinds,”Contagion of All Kinds,” Financial Times, March 2, , March 2,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/70300682-5d33-11ea-ac5e-df00963c20e6. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/70300682-5d33-11ea-ac5e-df00963c20e6.
9899 World Economic Outlook, Update, International Monetary Fund, , International Monetary Fund, JulyOctober, 2021. , 2021.
99100 Ibid., p. Ibid., p. 2xiii. .
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

36 36

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

forecasting difficult. As a result, the IMF indicated its forecast depends on a number of factors, forecasting difficult. As a result, the IMF indicated its forecast depends on a number of factors,
including including
 The length of the pandemic and required lockdowns.  The length of the pandemic and required lockdowns.
 Voluntary social distancing, which affects consumer spending. Voluntary social distancing, which affects consumer spending.
 The ability of displaced workers to secure employment, possibly in different  The ability of displaced workers to secure employment, possibly in different
sectors. sectors.
 The long-term impact of firm closures and unemployed workers leaving the  The long-term impact of firm closures and unemployed workers leaving the
workforce, compounding the ability of the economy to recover. workforce, compounding the ability of the economy to recover.
 The impact of changes to strengthen workplace safety—such as staggered work  The impact of changes to strengthen workplace safety—such as staggered work
shifts, enhanced hygiene and cleaning between shifts, new workplace practices shifts, enhanced hygiene and cleaning between shifts, new workplace practices
relating to proximity of personnel on production lines—which incur business relating to proximity of personnel on production lines—which incur business
costs.costs.
 Global supply chain reconfigurations that affect productivity as companies try to  Global supply chain reconfigurations that affect productivity as companies try to
enhance their resilience to supply disruptions. enhance their resilience to supply disruptions.
 The extent of cross-border  The extent of cross-border spil oversspillovers from weaker external demand as from weaker external demand as wel well as as
funding funding shortfal s.
shortfalls.  A resolution of the current disconnect between rising asset values, as reflected in  A resolution of the current disconnect between rising asset values, as reflected in
market indices, and forecasts of a synchronized downturn in global economic market indices, and forecasts of a synchronized downturn in global economic
activity. activity.
The IMF The IMF also forecastedforecasted indicated that advanced economies as a group that advanced economies as a group could experienceexperienced an economic an economic
contraction in 2020 of 4.contraction in 2020 of 4.65% of GDP, with a rebound of 5.% of GDP, with a rebound of 5.82% in 2021% in 2021 and 4.5% in 2022; the U.S. economic rate of ; the U.S. economic rate of
growth was estimated to have declined in 2020 by -3.growth was estimated to have declined in 2020 by -3.54%, greater than the rate of decline %, greater than the rate of decline
experienced in 2009 during the financial crisis, but grow by experienced in 2009 during the financial crisis, but grow by 76.0% in 2021.0% in 2021 and 5.2% in 2022, as indicated in , as indicated in Figure
7
. The rate of economic growth in Euro area GDP in 2020 was projected to decline by . The rate of economic growth in Euro area GDP in 2020 was projected to decline by 7.26.3%, but %, but
growing by 4.2% in 2021grow by 5.0% in 2021 and 4.3% in 2022. Most developing and emerging economies were projected to . Most developing and emerging economies were projected to
experience a decline in the average rate of economic growth of -2.experience a decline in the average rate of economic growth of -2.10% in 2020, reflecting % in 2020, reflecting
tightening global financial conditions and tightening global financial conditions and fal ingfalling global trade and commodity prices, but grow at global trade and commodity prices, but grow at
a rate of 6.a rate of 6.3% in 20210% in 2021 and 3.6% in 2022. In contrast, China was projected to experience . In contrast, China was projected to experience smal small, but positive rate of , but positive rate of
growth in 2020 of 2.3% and by 8.growth in 2020 of 2.3% and by 8.40% in % in 20212021 and 5.6% in 2020, while India’s rate of growth was projected to , while India’s rate of growth was projected to
decline by decline by 8.07.3% in 2020 and grow by % in 2020 and grow by 129.5% in 2021.5% in 2021 and 8.5% in 2020. The IMF estimated that recovery of the . The IMF estimated that recovery of the
global economy could be weaker than projected as a result of lingering uncertainty about possible global economy could be weaker than projected as a result of lingering uncertainty about possible
contagion, lack of confidence, and permanent closure of businesses and shifts in the behavior of contagion, lack of confidence, and permanent closure of businesses and shifts in the behavior of
firms and households.firms and households.100
101 The IMF concluded that fiscal and monetary actions by developed economies provided The IMF concluded that fiscal and monetary actions by developed economies provided
developing and emerging market economies the abilitydeveloping and emerging market economies the ability to avoid tightening monetary policy to to avoid tightening monetary policy to
stem capital outflows. Instead, the countries relied on movements in their exchange rates to carry stem capital outflows. Instead, the countries relied on movements in their exchange rates to carry
the brunt of the economic adjustment, while also following developed economies in easing the brunt of the economic adjustment, while also following developed economies in easing
monetary policy, providing liquiditymonetary policy, providing liquidity injections, and using unconventional monetary policy injections, and using unconventional monetary policy
measures such as purchases of government and corporate bonds.measures such as purchases of government and corporate bonds. The IMF also indicated that a
prolonged health crisis could push developing economies to take such measures as price controls,
export restrictions, and unorthodox measures to ease credit and financial regulation.101

100 Ibid., p. 9.
101 Mühleisen, Martin, T ryggvi Gudmundsson, and Hélène Poirson Ward, COVID-19 Response in Emerging Market
Econom ies: Conventional Policies and Beyond,
International Monetary Fund, August 6, 2020. https://blogs.imf.org/
2020/08/06/covid-19-response-in-emerging-market-economies-conventional-policies-and-beyond/?utm_medium=
email&utm_source=govdelivery 101 Ibid., p. 9. .
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

37 37


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 7. IMF Forecast, Gross Domestic Product
Percentage change Percentage change

Source: World Economic Outlook, Update,, International Monetary Fund, July, 2021. Created by CRS. International Monetary Fund, July, 2021. Created by CRS.
As a result of the various As a result of the various chal engeschallenges, the IMF qualified, the IMF qualified its forecast by arguing that its forecast by arguing that
A partial recovery is projected for 2021, with above trend growth rates, but the level of A partial recovery is projected for 2021, with above trend growth rates, but the level of
GDP will remain below theGDP will remain below the pre-viruspre-virus trend, with considerable uncertainty about trend, with considerable uncertainty about the the
strength of the rebound. Much worse growth outcomes are possible and maybe even likely. strength of the rebound. Much worse growth outcomes are possible and maybe even likely.
This would follow if the pandemic and containment measures last longer, emerging and This would follow if the pandemic and containment measures last longer, emerging and
developing economies are even more severely hit, tight financial conditions persist, or if developing economies are even more severely hit, tight financial conditions persist, or if
widespread scarring effects emerge due to firm closures and extended unemployment.102 widespread scarring effects emerge due to firm closures and extended unemployment.102
The World Bank Forecast
In January 2021, the World Bank released its updated economic forecast, which indicated that In January 2021, the World Bank released its updated economic forecast, which indicated that
global economic growth would reach 4.3% in 2020 and 4.0% in 2021, compared with June 2020 global economic growth would reach 4.3% in 2020 and 4.0% in 2021, compared with June 2020
projections of -5.2% for 2020 and 4.2% in 2021, but rise by a slower rate of 3.8% in 2022.103 The projections of -5.2% for 2020 and 4.2% in 2021, but rise by a slower rate of 3.8% in 2022.103 The
assessment also concluded that absent “substantial and effective reforms,” the global economy assessment also concluded that absent “substantial and effective reforms,” the global economy
would experience a decade of “disappointing growth.” The Bank concluded that the forecast was would experience a decade of “disappointing growth.” The Bank concluded that the forecast was
tilted toward downside risks. In particular, the Bank assessed that tilted toward downside risks. In particular, the Bank assessed that al all regions of the world remain regions of the world remain
vulnerable to renewed outbreaks of the virus, that there were logistical impediments to the vulnerable to renewed outbreaks of the virus, that there were logistical impediments to the
distribution of effective vaccines, that there are financial stresses in addition to elevated debt distribution of effective vaccines, that there are financial stresses in addition to elevated debt
levels and there is the possibility that the pandemic could have a more negative effect on incomes levels and there is the possibility that the pandemic could have a more negative effect on incomes
and growth.104 and growth.104
An earlier forecast published on June 8, 2020 indicated the economic recession in 2020 would be An earlier forecast published on June 8, 2020 indicated the economic recession in 2020 would be
the deepest since World War II. It also estimated that the global economic recession would affect the deepest since World War II. It also estimated that the global economic recession would affect
90% of the world’s economies, a percentage that is greater than what was experienced during the 90% of the world’s economies, a percentage that is greater than what was experienced during the
Great Depression.105 Similar to the OECD and the IMF forecasts, the World Bank argued that the Great Depression.105 Similar to the OECD and the IMF forecasts, the World Bank argued that the

102 World 102 World Economic Outlook, p. v. , p. v.
103 103 Global Economic Prospects, World Bank Group, January 2021, p. xvii. , World Bank Group, January 2021, p. xvii.
104 Ibid., p. xviii. 104 Ibid., p. xviii.
105 105 Global Economic Prospects, World Bank Group, June, World Bank Group, June 8, 2020, p. 15. 8, 2020, p. 15.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

38 38

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

economic impact of the global recession would economic impact of the global recession would fal fall most heavily on developing and emerging most heavily on developing and emerging
economies that rely on global trade, tourism, or remittances from abroad, and those that depend economies that rely on global trade, tourism, or remittances from abroad, and those that depend
on commodity exports. In addition, the World Bank forecasted that most emerging and on commodity exports. In addition, the World Bank forecasted that most emerging and
developing economies could experience rates of growth in 2020 that could be the lowest developing economies could experience rates of growth in 2020 that could be the lowest overal
overall since the 1960s, with 90% of such economies expected to experience contractions in per capita since the 1960s, with 90% of such economies expected to experience contractions in per capita
incomes and many incomes and many mil ionsmillions of people of people fal ingfalling back into poverty. back into poverty.
The World Bank also estimated that economic growth in advanced economies could decline by The World Bank also estimated that economic growth in advanced economies could decline by
5.4% in 2020 and recover to 3.3% in 2021, compared with the June forecast of 7.0% and 3.8%, 5.4% in 2020 and recover to 3.3% in 2021, compared with the June forecast of 7.0% and 3.8%,
respectively. The United States, the Euro area and Japan were respectively. The United States, the Euro area and Japan were al all estimated to experience a slower estimated to experience a slower
rate of growth in 2020 and rise at a rate of growth in 2020 and rise at a smal ersmaller rate in 2021 than the IMF forecast. rate in 2021 than the IMF forecast.
The global economic recession was projected to affect The global economic recession was projected to affect al all regions in a type of synchronous regions in a type of synchronous
downturn, with some regions faring worse than others. Differences in the magnitude of regional downturn, with some regions faring worse than others. Differences in the magnitude of regional
growth rates were attributed to the “scale of the domestic outbreak, vulnerability of the economy growth rates were attributed to the “scale of the domestic outbreak, vulnerability of the economy
to to spil oversspillovers from global economic and financial stress the severity of preexisting from global economic and financial stress the severity of preexisting chal engeschallenges such such
as widespread poverty, and the degree to which debt levels constrain the fiscal response.”106as widespread poverty, and the degree to which debt levels constrain the fiscal response.”106
According to the Bank’s baseline scenario, the projected economic recovery was expected to be According to the Bank’s baseline scenario, the projected economic recovery was expected to be
slow, reflecting shifts in consumption and work patterns as consumers attempted to rebuild slow, reflecting shifts in consumption and work patterns as consumers attempted to rebuild
savings and businesses strengthen balance sheets. The World Bank also issued both a downside savings and businesses strengthen balance sheets. The World Bank also issued both a downside
and an upside scenario in which government lockdown policies were required to remain in effect and an upside scenario in which government lockdown policies were required to remain in effect
for a longer or a shorter period of time, respectively. The downside scenario projects a contraction for a longer or a shorter period of time, respectively. The downside scenario projects a contraction
in global economic growth of 8% in 2020, as lockdown procedures are assumed to last an in global economic growth of 8% in 2020, as lockdown procedures are assumed to last an
additional three months, followed by a sluggish recovery. In contrast, the upside scenario projects additional three months, followed by a sluggish recovery. In contrast, the upside scenario projects
a decline in economic activity in 2020 of 4%, based on the assumption that economic activity a decline in economic activity in 2020 of 4%, based on the assumption that economic activity
rebounds quickly in the third quarter of 2020.107 rebounds quickly in the third quarter of 2020.107
The Bank also concluded that global value chains (GVCs) had been important conduits through The Bank also concluded that global value chains (GVCs) had been important conduits through
which macroeconomic developments associated with the pandemic had been transmitted across which macroeconomic developments associated with the pandemic had been transmitted across
national borders. The economic effects of the pandemic were spread through trade linkages but national borders. The economic effects of the pandemic were spread through trade linkages but
also amplifiedalso amplified through quarantines, production shutdowns and border closures.108 Estimates by through quarantines, production shutdowns and border closures.108 Estimates by
the World Bank indicated that nationalthe World Bank indicated that national policies adopted to blunt the spread of the virus affected policies adopted to blunt the spread of the virus affected
the global economy through four shocks: a decline in employment due to factory closures and the global economy through four shocks: a decline in employment due to factory closures and
social distancing, a trade shock as a result of an increase in the cost of traded goods, a tourism social distancing, a trade shock as a result of an increase in the cost of traded goods, a tourism
shock through a sharp contraction in international tourism, and a services shock. The magnitude shock through a sharp contraction in international tourism, and a services shock. The magnitude
of the shocks varies by country depended on various factors, including the composition of output, of the shocks varies by country depended on various factors, including the composition of output,
reliance on trade, and the level of GVC integration. reliance on trade, and the level of GVC integration.
Global Trade
According to an According to an August 18October 4, 2021, forecast update, the World Trade Organization (WTO) , 2021, forecast update, the World Trade Organization (WTO)
estimated that global trade volumes estimated that global trade volumes fel fell by 5.3% in 2020, nearly half as much as the drop of 9.2% by 5.3% in 2020, nearly half as much as the drop of 9.2%
the WTO had forecasted in October 2020.109 The WTOthe WTO had forecasted in October 2020.109 The WTO data indicated that in the first indicated that in the first quarterhalf of 2021, of 2021,
global merchandise global merchandise tradeexport and import volumes were up volumes were up 20% over the same period in the previous year and up

13% compared with the same 106 106 Global Economic Prospects June 8, 2020, p. 115. June 8, 2020, p. 115.
107 Ibid., p. 33. 107 Ibid., p. 33.
108 Ibid., p. 118. 108 Ibid., p. 118.
109 109 Goods Barometer Hits Record High, Confirming Strength of Trade Recovery, World T rade Organization, August
18Global Trade Rebound Beast Expectations But Marked by Regional Divergences, World Trade Organization, October 4, 2021. , 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

39 39

link to page 46 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

period in 2021. Similarly, trade volumes were up 20% over the same period in the previous year and up 5.7% quarter over quarter, as indicated 5.7% quarter over quarter, as indicated in Table 8. Gainsin Figure 8. Trade gains were more pronounced for North were more pronounced for North
America, Europe, and Asia, with other regions lagging behind. The WTO concluded the trade America, Europe, and Asia, with other regions lagging behind. The WTO concluded the trade
recovery was broad-based with recovery was broad-based with al all major goods categories experiencing year-over-year gains and major goods categories experiencing year-over-year gains and
reflected strong monetary and fiscal policy actions taken by many governments. In particular, the reflected strong monetary and fiscal policy actions taken by many governments. In particular, the
WTO attributed the improved growth performance to fiscal policies that supported personal WTO attributed the improved growth performance to fiscal policies that supported personal
incomes in advanced economies that, in turn, supported relatively higher levels of consumption incomes in advanced economies that, in turn, supported relatively higher levels of consumption
and global trade. The WTO indicated, however, that supply shortages, particularly of and global trade. The WTO indicated, however, that supply shortages, particularly of
semiconductor chips, could dampen the trade recovery in subsequent quarters.110 semiconductor chips, could dampen the trade recovery in subsequent quarters.110
The WTO’s comprehensive semi-annual forecast issued in March 2021 indicated the decline in The WTO’s comprehensive semi-annual forecast issued in March 2021 indicated the decline in
global trade in 2020 was not as severe as it had estimated in its previous forecast. The forecast global trade in 2020 was not as severe as it had estimated in its previous forecast. The forecast
reflectsreflected a marked revision from its earlier forecast that global trade volumes could decline a marked revision from its earlier forecast that global trade volumes could decline
between 13% and 32% in 2020 as a result of the economic impact of COVID-19. The updated between 13% and 32% in 2020 as a result of the economic impact of COVID-19. The updated
forecast also indicates the recovery in global trade in 2021 could be slightly faster than the WTO forecast also indicates the recovery in global trade in 2021 could be slightly faster than the WTO
had projected in October 2020, primarily reflecting expectations of a faster recovery in global had projected in October 2020, primarily reflecting expectations of a faster recovery in global
GDP in 2021 (5.1% compared with 4.9%). GDP in 2021 (5.1% compared with 4.9%).
In the first quarter of 2020, global exports and imports In the first quarter of 2020, global exports and imports fel fell by 7.8% and 6.8%, respectively, in by 7.8% and 6.8%, respectively, in
volume terms and 10.6% and 8.6% in value terms, reflecting the global economic impact of the volume terms and 10.6% and 8.6% in value terms, reflecting the global economic impact of the
pandemic, as indicated in pandemic, as indicated in Figure 8. In the second quarter, global exports and imports dropped by . In the second quarter, global exports and imports dropped by
11.6% and 11.1%, respectively, in volume and by 13.4% and 14.1%, in value terms. The WTO 11.6% and 11.1%, respectively, in volume and by 13.4% and 14.1%, in value terms. The WTO
estimated that some trade sectors were affected more than others, particularly trade in fuels and estimated that some trade sectors were affected more than others, particularly trade in fuels and
mineral products mineral products fel fell by 38%, while trade in agricultural products by 38%, while trade in agricultural products fel fell by 5%. In the third quarter, by 5%. In the third quarter,
however, export and import volumes rebounded, increasing by 15.7% and 12.9%, respectively, however, export and import volumes rebounded, increasing by 15.7% and 12.9%, respectively,
while export and import values increased by 20.7% and 18.3%, respectively. In the fourth quarter, while export and import values increased by 20.7% and 18.3%, respectively. In the fourth quarter,
global exports and imports increased by 6.1% and 7.2%, respectively, in volume terms and by global exports and imports increased by 6.1% and 7.2%, respectively, in volume terms and by
9.7% and 9.6%, in value terms. Although the WTO has no comprehensive data on trade in 9.7% and 9.6%, in value terms. Although the WTO has no comprehensive data on trade in
services, it concluded that the trend in trade in services likely matched that experienced in trade in services, it concluded that the trend in trade in services likely matched that experienced in trade in
merchandise goods. The updated forecast also projected that global GDP had declined at an merchandise goods. The updated forecast also projected that global GDP had declined at an
annual rate of 3.8% in 2020, but could recover in 2021 at an annual growth rate of 5.1%. The annual rate of 3.8% in 2020, but could recover in 2021 at an annual growth rate of 5.1%. The
WTO indicated in its March forecast that renewed economic lockdowns in response to a WTO indicated in its March forecast that renewed economic lockdowns in response to a
resurgence of COVID-19 cases in the resurgence of COVID-19 cases in the fal fall of 2020 of 2020 potential ypotentially shaved an additional shaved an additional 2% to 3% 2% to 3%
percentage points off the annual global GDP growth rate in 2021 and negatively affected global percentage points off the annual global GDP growth rate in 2021 and negatively affected global
trade. trade.
The WTO reported in its June 29, 2020 report on G-20 trade measures that during the mid- The WTO reported in its June 29, 2020 report on G-20 trade measures that during the mid-
October 2019 to mid-May 2020 period, countries had made “significant” progress in facilitating October 2019 to mid-May 2020 period, countries had made “significant” progress in facilitating
imports, including products related to COVID-19.111 According to the report, various imports, including products related to COVID-19.111 According to the report, various
governments governments initial y initially responded to the pandemic by introducing new trade restrictive measures, responded to the pandemic by introducing new trade restrictive measures,
90% of which were export bans on medical products, such as surgical masks, gloves, medicine 90% of which were export bans on medical products, such as surgical masks, gloves, medicine
and disinfectant. Since then, the WTO indicated that G20 economies have repealed 36% of the and disinfectant. Since then, the WTO indicated that G20 economies have repealed 36% of the
restrictions and lowered barriers to imports of many pandemic-related products. As of mid-May restrictions and lowered barriers to imports of many pandemic-related products. As of mid-May
2020, the WTO reported that 65 of the 93 pandemic-related trade measures implemented during 2020, the WTO reported that 65 of the 93 pandemic-related trade measures implemented during
the monitoring period were of a trade-facilitating measures, rather than trade-restricting
measures.112

110 Ibid., p. 1110 Ibid., p. 1.
111 111 WT OWTO Report on G20 Shows Report on G20 Shows Moves to Facilitate Imports Even as Moves to Facilitate Imports Even as T radeTrade Restrictions Remain Widespread, Restrictions Remain Widespread, World
Trade Organization,
June 29, 2020. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/trdev_29jun20_e.htm. June 29, 2020. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news20_e/trdev_29jun20_e.htm.
112 Report on G20 Trade Measures (Mid-October 2019 to Mid-May 2020), World T rade Organization, June 29, 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

40 40


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

the monitoring period were of a trade-facilitating measures, rather than trade-restricting measures.112 Figure 8. WTO Estimates of Quarterly Global Exports and Imports, Volumes and
Values

Source: Trade Trends, World World Trade Organization, Trade Organization, JulyOctober, 2021. Created by CRS, 2021. Created by CRS.
In its In its April 2020October 2021 forecast, the WTO estimated the impact on trade volumes was larger in 2020 than it had estimated in previous forecasts, but trade volumes were projected to recover stronger in 2021, by growing at 10.8%. The WTO’s various forecasts indicate that all geographic regions would experience a rise in trade volumes in 2021 and 2022 compared with 2020, while North America and Europe could experience a positive percentage increase in trade volumes in 2021, comparable to the decline in volumes in percentage terms experienced in 2020. The forecast also projected that sectors with extensive value chains, such as automobile products and electronics, could experience the steepest declines in 2020. Although services were not included in the WTO forecast, this segment of the economy could experience the largest disruption as a consequence of restrictions on travel and transport and the closure of retail and hospitality establishments. Such services as information technology, however, were growing to satisfy the demands of employees working from home. Table 8. WTO Forecast: Merchandise Trade Volume and Real GDP 2020-2022 Annual percentage change Forecast scenario Forecast scenario Forecast scenario (October 2020) (March 2021) (October 2021) 2020 2021 2020 2021 2022 2020 2021 2022 Volume of world -0.1% 0.1% -0.1% 0.1% 0.0% -5.8% 10.8% 4.7% merchandise trade Exports North America -14.7 10.7 -8.5 7.7 5.1 -8.6 8.1 6.9 South and Central America -7.7 5.4 -4.5 3.2 2.7 -4.7 7.2 2.0 Europe -11.7 8.2 -8.0 8.3 3.9 -7.9 9.7 5.6 112 Report on G20 Trade Measures (Mid-October 2019 to Mid-May 2020), World Trade Organization, June 29, 2020. Congressional Research Service 41 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Forecast scenario Forecast scenario Forecast scenario (October 2020) (March 2021) (October 2021) 2020 2021 2020 2021 2022 2020 2021 2022 CIS -3.9 4.4 1.9 -1.5 0.6 8.5 Africa -8.1 8.1 3.0 -8.8 7.0 6.0 Middle East -8.2 12.4 5.0 -11.6 5.0 9.6 Asia -4.5 5.7 0.3 8.4 3.5 0.3 14.4 2.3 Imports North America -8.7 6.7 -6.1 11.4 4.9 -6.1 12.6 4.5 South and Central America -13.5 6.5 6.5 -9.3 8.1 -9.9 19.9 2.1 Europe -10.7 8.7 -7.8 8.4 3.7 -7.6 9.1 6.8 CIS -4.7 5.7 2.7 -5.6 13.8 -0.8 Africa -8.8 5.5 4.0 -11.1 11.3 4.1 Middle East -11.3 7.2 4.5 -13.9 9.3 8.7 Asia -4.4 6.2 -1.3 5.7 4.4 -1.2 10.7 2.9 World Real GDP at -4.8 4.9 -3.8 5.1 3.8 -3.5 5.3 4.1 market exchange rates North America -4.4 3.9 -4.1 5.9 3.8 -4.0 5.6 3.7 South and Central America -7.5 3.8 -7.8 3.8 3.0 -7.5 4.9 2.9 Europe -7.3 5.2 -7.1 3.7 2.6 -6.4 4.3 4.0 CIS -0.5 1.0 1.2 -2.7 3.9 3.4 Africa -2.9 2.6 3.8 -2.8 3.5 4.1 Middle East -6.0 2.4 3.5 -4.6 2.9 4.5 Asia -2.4 5.9 -1.1 6.1 4.1 -0.9 6.1 4.7 Source: Global Rebound Beats Expectations But Marked by Regional Divergences, World Trade Organization, October 4, 2021. Notes: Data for 2021 and 2022 are projections; GDP projections are based on scenarios simulated with the WTO Global Trade Model. In the April and October forecasts, the CIS countries, Africa, and the Middle East were grouped together as “Other Regions.” CIS is the Commonwealth of Independent States: Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Ukraine. forecast, the WTO presented two estimates of global growth, reflecting the high
degree of uncertainty at that time concerning the length and economic impact of the pandemic.
According to the WTO, the more optimistic scenario assumed that trade volumes would recover
quickly in the second half of 2020 to their pre-pandemic trend, or that the global economy would
experience a V-shaped recovery. In comparison, the more pessimistic scenario assumed there
would be a partial recovery in global trade that lasted into 2021, or that global economic activity
would experience a U-shaped recovery. The updated forecast reflects the WTO’s estimate that
global trade volumes in 2020 did not fal by as much as it had projected under both of the
scenarios in its April 2020 forecast. The WTO concluded, however, the impact on global trade
volumes could exceed the drop in global trade during the height of the 2008-2009 financial
crisis.113
Table 8. WTO Forecast: Merchandise Trade Volume and Real GDP 2020-2021
Annual percentage change
Optimistic
Pessimistic
Forecast
scenario
scenario
scenario
Forecast scenario

(April 2020)
(April 2020)
(October 2020)
(March 2021

2020
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
2022
Volume of world
merchandise trade

-12.9%
21.3%
-31.9%
24.0%
-9.2%
7.2%
-5.3%
8.0%
4.0%
Exports









North America
-17.1
23.7
-40.9
19.3
-14.7
10.7
-8.5
7.7
5.1
South and Central America
-12.9
18.6
-31.3
14.3
-7.7
5.4
-4.5
3.2
2.7
Europe
-12.2
20.5
-32.8
22.7
-11.7
8.2
-8.0
8.3
3.9
CIS






-3.9
4.4
1.9
Africa






-8.1
8.1
3

113 Trade Set to Plunge as COVID-19 Pandemic Upends Global Economy, World T rade Organization, April 8, 2020.
https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres20_e/pr855_e.htm.
Congressional Research Service

41

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Optimistic
Pessimistic
Forecast
scenario
scenario
scenario
Forecast scenario

(April 2020)
(April 2020)
(October 2020)
(March 2021
Middle East






-8.2
12.4
5.0
Asia
-13.5
24.9
-36.2
36.1
-4.5
5.7
0.3
8.4
3.5
Other regions
-8.0
8.6
-8.0
9.3
-9.5
6.1



Imports









North America
-14.5
27.3
-33.8
29.5
-8.7
6.7
-6.1
11.4
4.9
South and Central America
-22.2
23.2
-43.8
19.5
-13.5
6.5
-9.3
8.1
3.7
Europe
-10.3
19.9
-28.9
24.5
-10.3
8.7
-7.6
8.4
3.7
CIS






-4.7
5.7
2.7
Africa






-8.8
5.5
4
Middle East






-11.3
7.2
4.5
Asia
-11.8
23.1
-31.5
25.1
-4.4
6.2
-1.3
5.7
4.4
Other regions
-10
13.6
-22.6
18.0
-16.0
5.6



World Real GDP at
market exchange rates

-2.5
7.4
-8.8
5.9
-4.8
4.9
-3.8
5.1
3.8
North America
-3.3
7.2
-9.0
5.1
-4.4
3.9
-4.1
5.9
3.8
South and Central America
-4.3
6.5
-11
4.8
-7.5
3.8
-7.8
3.8
3.0
Europe
-3.5
6.6
-10.8
5.4
-7.3
5.2
-7.1
3.7
3.6
CIS






-0.5
1.0
1.2
Africa






-2.9
2.6
3.8
Middle East






-6.0
2.4
3.5
Asia
-0.7
8.7
-7.1
7.4
-2.4
5.9
-1.1
6.1
4.1
Other regions
-1.5
6.0
-6.7
5.2
-5.5
3.5



Source: World Trade Primed for Strong but Uneven Recovery After COVID-19 Pandemic Shock, World Trade
Organization, March 31, 2021.
Notes: Data for 2021 and 2022 are projections; GDP projections are based on scenarios simulated with the
WTO Global Trade Model. In the April and October forecasts, the CIS countries, Africa, and the Middle East
were grouped together as “Other Regions.” CIS is the Commonwealth of Independent States: Azerbaijan,
Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan , and
Ukraine.
The WTO’s various forecasts indicate that al geographic regions would experience a rise in trade
volumes in 2021 and 2022 compared with 2020, while North America and Europe could
experience a positive percentage increase in trade volumes in 2021, comparable to the decline in
volumes in percentage terms experienced in 2020. The forecast also projected that sectors with
extensive value chains, such as automobile products and electronics, could experience the
steepest declines in 2020. Although services were not included in the WTO forecast, this segment
of the economy could experience the largest disruption as a consequence of restrictions on travel
and transport and the closure of retail and hospitality establishments. Such services as information
technology, however, were growing to satisfy the demands of employees working from home.
Congressional Research Service

42

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Supply Chains
The pandemic also raised questions about the costs and benefits of the global supply chains that The pandemic also raised questions about the costs and benefits of the global supply chains that
businesses have erected over the past three decades. Evidence indicates that growth in supply businesses have erected over the past three decades. Evidence indicates that growth in supply
chains had slowed prior to the pandemic, but there is little consensus on the long-term impact of chains had slowed prior to the pandemic, but there is little consensus on the long-term impact of
the crisis. According to a December 2020 report by DHL and the New York University Stern the crisis. According to a December 2020 report by DHL and the New York University Stern
Scholl of Business, global interconnectedness comprises four distinct types of transactions: trade, Scholl of Business, global interconnectedness comprises four distinct types of transactions: trade,
capital, information, and people.capital, information, and people.114113 This analysis concluded the pandemic affected cross-border This analysis concluded the pandemic affected cross-border
movements of people in response to travel restrictions and in trade through a sharp contraction in movements of people in response to travel restrictions and in trade through a sharp contraction in
113 Altman, Steven A. and Phillip Bastian, DHL Global Connectedness Index 2020, 2020 Congressional Research Service 42 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 the global economy. Capital flows also dropped during 2020 as a result of lower corporate the global economy. Capital flows also dropped during 2020 as a result of lower corporate
earnings, business travel restrictions, negative business prospects, and concerns over global earnings, business travel restrictions, negative business prospects, and concerns over global
supply chains.supply chains.115114
In some cases, businesses reportedly were reassessing their exposure to the risks posed by In some cases, businesses reportedly were reassessing their exposure to the risks posed by
extensive supply chains that extensive supply chains that potential ypotentially are vulnerable to numerous points of disruption. Also, are vulnerable to numerous points of disruption. Also,
some governments were assessing the risks supply chains pose to national supplies of items some governments were assessing the risks supply chains pose to national supplies of items
considered to be important to national security as a result of firms locating or shifting production considered to be important to national security as a result of firms locating or shifting production
offshore. For multinational businesses, changing suppliers and shifting production locations can offshore. For multinational businesses, changing suppliers and shifting production locations can
be be especial y especially costly for some firms and can introduce additional risks.costly for some firms and can introduce additional risks.116115 In addition, businesses In addition, businesses
may be reluctant to relocate from production locations, such as China, that serve not only as may be reluctant to relocate from production locations, such as China, that serve not only as
production platforms, but also represent important markets for their output. For instance, the production platforms, but also represent important markets for their output. For instance, the
Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reports that 10% of the global sales of the majority-owned reports that 10% of the global sales of the majority-owned
foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies is shipped back to the U.S. parent company. In foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies is shipped back to the U.S. parent company. In
contrast, 60% of such sales take place in the foreign country where the affiliate is located and contrast, 60% of such sales take place in the foreign country where the affiliate is located and
another 30% is shipped to other foreign countries in close proximity. For China, about 6% of the another 30% is shipped to other foreign countries in close proximity. For China, about 6% of the
sales of the majority-owned foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies is shipped to the U.S. sales of the majority-owned foreign affiliates of U.S. parent companies is shipped to the U.S.
parent, while 82% is sold in China and another 12% is shipped to other foreign countries.parent, while 82% is sold in China and another 12% is shipped to other foreign countries.117116
Beyond the current Beyond the current chal engeschallenges the pandemic poses to global supply chains, a recent report by the pandemic poses to global supply chains, a recent report by
McKinsey Global Institute catalogued a number of risks to supply chains.McKinsey Global Institute catalogued a number of risks to supply chains.118117 The report estimates The report estimates
that 16% to 26% of global goods exports, worth $2.9 that 16% to 26% of global goods exports, worth $2.9 tril ion to $4.6 tril ion, potential ytrillion to $4.6 trillion, potentially could could
move to new countries over the next five years “if companies restructure their supplier networks.” move to new countries over the next five years “if companies restructure their supplier networks.”
The report concluded, however, the pandemic had not caused firms to reshape their global The report concluded, however, the pandemic had not caused firms to reshape their global
production networks in dramatic ways, because the networks reflect, “economic logic, hundreds production networks in dramatic ways, because the networks reflect, “economic logic, hundreds
of of bil ions billions of dollars’ worth of investment, and long-standing supplier relationships.”of dollars’ worth of investment, and long-standing supplier relationships.”119118 In In
addition, the report concluded that although firms can shift production locations, the addition, the report concluded that although firms can shift production locations, the
interconnected nature of these chains “limits the economic case for making large-scale changes in interconnected nature of these chains “limits the economic case for making large-scale changes in
their physical location.”their physical location.”120119 Instead of shifting production locations, firms reportedly considered Instead of shifting production locations, firms reportedly considered
various strategies to withstand the various strategies to withstand the chal engeschallenges of a global economy by increasing sources of raw of a global economy by increasing sources of raw
materials and critical materials, expanding and diversifying supplier bases, investing in suppliers materials and critical materials, expanding and diversifying supplier bases, investing in suppliers

114 Altman, Steven A. and Phillip Bastian, DHL Global Connectedness Index 2020, 2020
115 Ibid., p. 32.
116 Beattie, Alan, Will Coronavirus Pandemic Finally Kill Off Global Supply to upgrade their capabilities, and regionalizing supply chains, among a number of possible actions.120 Amidst the decline in global trade, 15 countries, including Brunei, Colombia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam. Australia, China, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea, signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on November 15, 2020, to create potentially one of the largest free trade agreements.121 The 114 Ibid., p. 32. 115 Beattie, Alan, Will Coronavirus Pandemic Finally Kill Off Global Supply Chains?, Chains?, Financial Times, May 28, 2020. , May 28, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/4ee0817a-809f-11ea-b0fb-13524ae1056b. https://www.ft.com/content/4ee0817a-809f-11ea-b0fb-13524ae1056b.
117116 Activities of U.S. Multinational Enterprises: U.S. Parent Companies and Th eirTheir Foreign Affiliates, Preliminary 2017
Statistics
, Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Augustof Economic Analysis, August 23, 2019, 23, 2019, T ableTable II.E.2. https://www.bea.gov/news/2019/activities-us- II.E.2. https://www.bea.gov/news/2019/activities-us-
multinational-enterprises-2017. multinational-enterprises-2017.
118 117 Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains, McKinsey Global, McKinsey Global Institute, August 2020, p. 1 Institute, August 2020, p. 1
119118 Ibid., p. 2. Ibid., p. 2.
120119 Ibid., In Brief. 120 Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains, p. 16. 121 Shih, Gerry, and Simon Denyer, As Trump Era Ends, Massive New Asian Trade Deal Leaves U.S. on the Sidelines, Washington Post, November 16, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/trade-china-trump-obama- Congressional Research Service 43 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Ibid., In Brief.
Congressional Research Service

43

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

to upgrade their capabilities, and regionalizing supply chains, among a number of possible
actions.121
Amidst the decline in global trade, 15 countries, including Brunei, Colombia, Indonesia, Laos,
Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam. Australia, China, Japan, New
Zealand, and South Korea, signed the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) on
November 15, 2020, to create potential y one of the largest free trade agreements.122 The
agreement needs to be ratified by at least six ASEAN countries and three non-ASEAN countries. agreement needs to be ratified by at least six ASEAN countries and three non-ASEAN countries.
This agreement followed by two years the conclusion of negotiations over the Comprehensive This agreement followed by two years the conclusion of negotiations over the Comprehensive
and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) that replaced the proposed and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) that replaced the proposed
Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement after the United States pulled out of the negotiations. The Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement after the United States pulled out of the negotiations. The
agreement includes Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, agreement includes Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand,
Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. The UK reportedly applied to join the trade agreement and China Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. The UK reportedly applied to join the trade agreement and China
announced on September 17, 2021, that it had announced on September 17, 2021, that it had formal yformally applied to join the agreement. applied to join the agreement.123122
Global Foreign Investment
Similar to the negative impact on global trade of policy measures that were adopted to control the Similar to the negative impact on global trade of policy measures that were adopted to control the
spread of COVID-19, the measures negatively affected global foreign investment flows. In spread of COVID-19, the measures negatively affected global foreign investment flows. In
addition, national governments implemented new or expanded foreign investment policies related addition, national governments implemented new or expanded foreign investment policies related
to national security, while attempting to navigate between legitimate national security risks and to national security, while attempting to navigate between legitimate national security risks and
policies that some policymakers argue are policies that some policymakers argue are fundamental yfundamentally protectionist. During 2020, various protectionist. During 2020, various
governments adopted measures at both the national and international levelgovernments adopted measures at both the national and international level to address the health to address the health
and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as indicated in and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, as indicated in Table 8.1249.123 According to According to
UNCTADthe United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), these measure include incentives and subsidies to increase domestic production of , these measure include incentives and subsidies to increase domestic production of
vaccines and personal protective equipment (PPE) and direct state intervention through vaccines and personal protective equipment (PPE) and direct state intervention through
nationalization nationalization or through directives to increase output at facilities that currently produced PPE or through directives to increase output at facilities that currently produced PPE
materials or to initiate production at other facilities. EU members moved independently to amend materials or to initiate production at other facilities. EU members moved independently to amend
existing legislationexisting legislation or adopt new rules to expand their review of foreign investments for national or adopt new rules to expand their review of foreign investments for national
security reasons, particularly rules related to acquisitions of firms involved in the production of security reasons, particularly rules related to acquisitions of firms involved in the production of
medical care and health. Also, Australia, Canada, and Japan expanded the range of foreign medical care and health. Also, Australia, Canada, and Japan expanded the range of foreign
investments they screen. In some cases, policy changes included enhanced foreign investment investments they screen. In some cases, policy changes included enhanced foreign investment
screening of foreign investment for “public interest” reasons that may remain after the pandemic screening of foreign investment for “public interest” reasons that may remain after the pandemic
crisis.125
crisis.124 Table 9. Foreign Investment Screening Legislation Adopted During COVID-19
Country Country
Investment Measure Investment Measure
Spain Spain
Adopted a Royal Decree Adopted a Royal Decree to suspend its liberalizationto suspend its liberalization regime regime regarding listed and regarding listed and
unlisted Spanish companies and require authorization to acquire 10% or moreunlisted Spanish companies and require authorization to acquire 10% or more of stock of stock
in certain sectors,in certain sectors, including critical infrastructure, critical technologies,including critical infrastructure, critical technologies, media and food security. European Union The EU Commission issued a Guidance to Member States concerning efforts by non-EU investors to attempt to acquire health care capacities or related industries through foreign investment during the pandemic and recommended that EU members make ful use of FDI screening regimes or establish such regimes where they are not ful y developed. Australia Temporarily lowered the monetary screening threshold to zero for all foreign investments, requiring prior approval for all foreign investments and extended the timeframe for screening procedures from 30 days to six months. media and food
security.

121 Risk, Resilience, and Rebalancing in Global Value Chains, p. 16.
122 Shih, Gerry, and Simon Denyer, As T rump Era Ends, Massive New Asian T rade Deal Leaves U.S. on the Sidelines,
Washington Post, November 16, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/trade-china-trump-obama-
asia/2020/11/16/f02f43e4-27b7-11eb-9c21-3cc501d0981f_story.html. asia/2020/11/16/f02f43e4-27b7-11eb-9c21-3cc501d0981f_story.html.
123122 Qian, Colin, Qian, Colin, T winnie Siu, T omTwinnie Siu, Tom Daly, Gabriel Daly, Gabriel Crossley, Daniel Leussink, SakuraCrossley, Daniel Leussink, Sakura Murakami, Ben Blanchard, Jeanny Murakami, Ben Blanchard, Jeanny
Kao, and DavidKao, and David Brunnstrom, China Applies to Join Pacific Brunnstrom, China Applies to Join Pacific T radeTrade Pact to Boost Economic Clout, Pact to Boost Economic Clout, Reuters, September September
17, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-officially-applies-join-cptpp-trade-pact-2021-09-16/. 17, 2021. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-officially-applies-join-cptpp-trade-pact-2021-09-16/.
124123 World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on United Nations Conference on T radeTrade and Development, 2020, p. 93. and Development, 2020, p. 93.
125124 Ibid., p. 96. Ibid., p. 96.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

44 44

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Country Country
Investment Measure Investment Measure
European Union
The EU Commission issued a Guidance to Member States concerning efforts by non -EU
investors to attempt to acquire health care capacities or related industries through
foreign investment during the pandemic and recommended that EU members make ful
use of FDI screening regimes or establish such regimes where they are not ful y
developed.
Australia
Temporarily lowered the monetary screening threshold to zero for al foreign
investments, requiring prior approval for al foreign investments and extended the
timeframe for screening procedures from 30 days to six months.
Italy
Expanded the scope of its FDI screening regime, Italy Expanded the scope of its FDI screening regime, including acquisitions from within the including acquisitions from within the
EU, by adding finance, credit and insurance to its list of strategic sectors. EU, by adding finance, credit and insurance to its list of strategic sectors.
India India
Introduced a requirement Introduced a requirement for prior governmental approval for for prior governmental approval for al all investment originating investment originating
from countries that share land borders with India. from countries that share land borders with India.
Canada Canada
Announced “enhanced security” reviews Announced “enhanced security” reviews of foreign investmentsof foreign investments in Canadian firmsin Canadian firms to to
prevent foreign firmsprevent foreign firms from taking advantage of low stock valuations during the pandemic from taking advantage of low stock valuations during the pandemic
to acquire any Canadian firm,to acquire any Canadian firm, but particularly those related to public health or involved but particularly those related to public health or involved
in the supply of critical goods and servicesin the supply of critical goods and services to Canadians to protect Canadian’s health to Canadians to protect Canadian’s health
and safety. and safety.
France France
Added biotechnology to its list of critical sectors requiring Added biotechnology to its list of critical sectors requiring prior governmental approval prior governmental approval
for foreign acquisitions and temporarilyfor foreign acquisitions and temporarily lowered lowered the voting rights threshold for listed the voting rights threshold for listed
companies for FDI screeningcompanies for FDI screening from 25% to 10%. from 25% to 10%.
Germany Germany
Amended its Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance to emphasize critical public health Amended its Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance to emphasize critical public health
sectorssectors and require priorand require prior governmental approval for foreign acquisitions of 10% or governmental approval for foreign acquisitions of 10% or
moremore of the stock of German companies involved in developing,of the stock of German companies involved in developing, manufacturing or manufacturing or
producing vaccines, medicines,producing vaccines, medicines, protective medicalprotective medical equipment and other medical goods equipment and other medical goods
for the treatment of highly infectious diseases.for the treatment of highly infectious diseases. Also Also adopted measuresadopted measures to align German to align German
reviewsreviews with EU rules. with EU rules.
Hungary Hungary
Adopted a foreign investment screening mechanism Adopted a foreign investment screening mechanism that requiresthat requires approval for approval for
investments in 21 industries,investments in 21 industries, including health care,including health care, pharmaceuticals and medical device pharmaceuticals and medical device
manufacturing, and non-medical industries. An investment can be denied that violates or manufacturing, and non-medical industries. An investment can be denied that violates or
threatens public security or order,threatens public security or order, particularly the security of supply of basic social particularly the security of supply of basic social
needs. needs.
Japan Japan
Amended its list of sectors Amended its list of sectors considered critical to national security by adding the considered critical to national security by adding the
production of vaccines, medicinesproduction of vaccines, medicines and advanced medicaland advanced medical equipment, including equipment, including
ventilators. ventilators.
Poland Poland
Adopted a FDI screening regime Adopted a FDI screening regime for foreign acquisitions of 20 % or morefor foreign acquisitions of 20 % or more in publicly in publicly
listed companies,listed companies, companies control ing strategic infrastructure or developing critical IT companies control ing strategic infrastructure or developing critical IT
software, or companies active in 21 industries,software, or companies active in 21 industries, including pharmaceuticals, manufacturing including pharmaceuticals, manufacturing
of medicalof medical devices, food processing and utilities. devices, food processing and utilities.
Source: World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2020, 2020, ppp. 92-93.. 92-93.
The The UNU.N. also reported that governments adopted new regulations across a spectrum of areas and also reported that governments adopted new regulations across a spectrum of areas and
also supported joint international efforts to address public aspects of the pandemic, as indicated in also supported joint international efforts to address public aspects of the pandemic, as indicated in
Table 910. State intervention spanned policy approaches from investment incentives to promote the State intervention spanned policy approaches from investment incentives to promote the
production of medicines and medical equipment, assistance to affected firms and industries, production of medicines and medical equipment, assistance to affected firms and industries,
measures to circumvent measures to circumvent intel ectualintellectual property rights restrictions, and international efforts to speed property rights restrictions, and international efforts to speed
up vaccine production and cross-border sharing. up vaccine production and cross-border sharing.
The shift in approach toward the national security dimensions of foreign investment, The shift in approach toward the national security dimensions of foreign investment, especial yespecially
by developed economies, has tended to blur the distinction between foreign investment, trade, and by developed economies, has tended to blur the distinction between foreign investment, trade, and
national security and reflects the evolving nature of the concept of national security relative to national security and reflects the evolving nature of the concept of national security relative to
foreign investment. Conceivably, changes in technology and the global economy have made it foreign investment. Conceivably, changes in technology and the global economy have made it
Congressional Research Service

45

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

more difficult to assess the economic costs and benefits of changes in foreign investment policies more difficult to assess the economic costs and benefits of changes in foreign investment policies
taken on national security grounds. taken on national security grounds.
Congressional Research Service 45 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Table 10. Investment Policy Instruments Adopted at the National and International
Levels to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic
Investment policy areas
Policy measures
Policy actions at the national level
Investment facilitation Investment facilitation
Al eviate administrative Alleviate administrative burdens and bureaucratic burdens and bureaucratic
obstacles for firms. obstacles for firms.

Use of online tools and e-platforms. Use of online tools and e-platforms.
Investment retention and aftercare by investment Investment retention and aftercare by investment
COVID-19-related information services. COVID-19-related information services.
promotion agencies (IPAs) promotion agencies (IPAs)

Administrative Administrative and operational support during the and operational support during the
crisis. crisis.

Move to online services. Move to online services.
Investment incentives Investment incentives
Financial or fiscal incentives to produce COVID-19- Financial or fiscal incentives to produce COVID-19-
related medicalrelated medical equipment. equipment.

Incentives for conversion of production lines. Incentives for conversion of production lines.

Incentives for enhancement of contracted economic Incentives for enhancement of contracted economic
activities. activities.
State participation in crisis-affected State participation in crisis-affected industries industries
Acquisition of equity in companies, Acquisition of equity in companies, including including
nationalization. nationalization.
Local Local smal small and mediumand medium enterprises enterprises (SMEs) and supply (SMEs) and supply
Financial or fiscal support for domestic suppliers Financial or fiscal support for domestic suppliers (such (such
chains chains
as SMEs). as SMEs).
National security and public health National security and public health
Application and potential reinforcement Application and potential reinforcement of FDI of FDI
screening in pandemic-relevant industries. screening in pandemic-relevant industries.
Other State intervention in the health industry Other State intervention in the health industry
Mandatory production. Mandatory production.

Export bans. Export bans.

Import facilitation. Import facilitation.
Intel ectualIntellectual property (IP) property (IP)
General General authorization of non-voluntary licensing,authorization of non-voluntary licensing, to to
speed up research and development (R&D). speed up research and development (R&D).

IP holder-specific non-voluntary licensing, IP holder-specific non-voluntary licensing, to enable to enable
importsimports of medication. of medication.
Policy actions at the international level
International support measures International support measures for investmentfor investment
International pledges in support of cross-border International pledges in support of cross-border
investment. investment.
IIAs IIAs
Reform International Investment Agreements Reform International Investment Agreements (IIAs) to (IIAs) to
support public health policiessupport public health policies and to minimizeand to minimize investor–investor–
State dispute risks. State dispute risks.
Intel ectualIntellectual property (IP) property (IP)
General General authorization of non-voluntary licensing,authorization of non-voluntary licensing, to to
speed up research and development (R&D). speed up research and development (R&D).
Source: World Investment Report 2020, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2020, p. 89. 2020, p. 89.
According to According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)UNCTAD, global , global
foreign direct investment inflows foreign direct investment inflows fel fell by 42% in 2020 compared with the same period in 2019, by 42% in 2020 compared with the same period in 2019,
Congressional Research Service

46


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

with continued weakness expected in 2021, as indicated in with continued weakness expected in 2021, as indicated in Figure 9.1259.126 Global inflow totals were Global inflow totals were
driven in large part driven in large part bydue to the decline in foreign investment 125 Investment Trends Monitor, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, January, 2021. Investment Policy Instruments Adopted at the National and International level to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic Congressional Research Service 46 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 the decline in foreign investment inflows to developed economies, which inflows to developed economies, which
fel fell by 69%. Inflows to Europe by 69%. Inflows to Europe fel fell to -$4 to -$4 bil ionbillion, indicating an outflow, compared with inflows in 2019 of $344 , compared with inflows in 2019 of $344 bil ion.
billion. In contrast, inflows to developing economies In contrast, inflows to developing economies fel fell by 12% over the period, aided in large part by by 12% over the period, aided in large part by
positive inflows to China. Investment flows to developing Asia, at $476 positive inflows to China. Investment flows to developing Asia, at $476 bil ion, billion, dropped by 4% dropped by 4%
compared with 2019 and accounted for about half the total $859 compared with 2019 and accounted for about half the total $859 bil ion billion global direct investment global direct investment
inflows in 2020. inflows in 2020.
Figure 9. Annual Foreign Direct Investment Inflows by Major Country Groups
Inflows in Inflows in bil ions of dol arsbillions of dollars

Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
As indicated in As indicated in Figure 10, , al all major geographic areas except Asia experienced a drop in foreign major geographic areas except Asia experienced a drop in foreign
direct investment inflows in 2020 compared with 2019.direct investment inflows in 2020 compared with 2019.127126 This drop in foreign investment was This drop in foreign investment was
apparent in the three major types of foreign investment: cross-border investments; greenfield apparent in the three major types of foreign investment: cross-border investments; greenfield
investment, or investment in new business activity; and international project finance. In the three investment, or investment in new business activity; and international project finance. In the three
types of investment activity, global activity types of investment activity, global activity fel fell by 10%, 35%, and 2%, respectively in 2020 by 10%, 35%, and 2%, respectively in 2020
compared with 2019. Cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A) activity increased by 31% and compared with 2019. Cross-border merger and acquisition (M&A) activity increased by 31% and
147%, respectively, in Asia and Transition economies, but declined by 11% in developed 147%, respectively, in Asia and Transition economies, but declined by 11% in developed
economies and 67% in Latin America. International project finance, reportedly an important economies and 67% in Latin America. International project finance, reportedly an important
source of infrastructure finance, source of infrastructure finance, fel global yfell globally by 2%, but rose by 7% in developed economies, by 2%, but rose by 7% in developed economies,
primarily in Europe, and by 17% in Asia. primarily in Europe, and by 17% in Asia.

126 126 Investment Trends Monitor, United Nations Conference on , United Nations Conference on T rade and Development, January, 2021. Investment
Policy Instruments Adopted at the National and International level to Address the COVID -19 Pandemic
127 Investment Trends Monitor, United Nations Conference on T radeTrade and Development, January 24, 2021. and Development, January 24, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

47 47


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 10. Global Foreign Direct Investment Inflows
In In bil ions of dol arsbillions of dollars and percentage change and percentage change

Source: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
For the United States, BEA reported that U.S. direct investment abroad (outflows) and foreign For the United States, BEA reported that U.S. direct investment abroad (outflows) and foreign
direct investment in the United States (inflows) rose by 37% and direct investment in the United States (inflows) rose by 37% and fel fell by half, respectively, in the by half, respectively, in the
first half of 2020 compared with the first half of 2019, as indicated in first half of 2020 compared with the first half of 2019, as indicated in Figure 11..128127 The drop in The drop in
inbound foreign direct investment values partly reflect the lower values for equity, mirroring the inbound foreign direct investment values partly reflect the lower values for equity, mirroring the
declines in major equity markets in the first half of 2020. For 2020 as a whole, U.S. direct declines in major equity markets in the first half of 2020. For 2020 as a whole, U.S. direct
investment outflows rose by 155%, while foreign direct investment inflows investment outflows rose by 155%, while foreign direct investment inflows fel fell by 30% compared by 30% compared
with 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, U.S. direct investment abroad with 2019. In the first quarter of 2021, U.S. direct investment abroad fel fell by 20% compared with by 20% compared with
the previous quarter; foreign direct investment in the Unitedthe previous quarter; foreign direct investment in the United States States fel fell by 31%, reflecting the by 31%, reflecting the
continuing continuing chal engeschallenges facing the global economy that are affecting a sustained recovery. In the facing the global economy that are affecting a sustained recovery. In the
second quarter, U.S. direct investment outflows increased by 81% over the previous quarter to second quarter, U.S. direct investment outflows increased by 81% over the previous quarter to
reach $139 reach $139 bil ionbillion, the largest outflows , the largest outflows recorded preceding the pandemic, while foreign direct investment preceding the pandemic, while foreign direct investment
in the United States rose increased by 35% to reach $95 in the United States rose increased by 35% to reach $95 bil ion.

128billion. 127 U.S. International Transactions, Second Quarter 2021, Bureau of Economic Analysis, September 21, 2021. , Bureau of Economic Analysis, September 21, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

48 48


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 11. U.S. Direct Investment; Inflows and Outflows

Source: Bureau of Economic AnalysisBureau of Economic Analysis, . Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Notes: In the balance of payments, direct investment outflows are represented In the balance of payments, direct investment outflows are represented as a negative value, indicating an as a negative value, indicating an
outflow and direct investment inflowsoutflow and direct investment inflows are representedare represented as positiveas positive values. For presentation purposes, the signs values. For presentation purposes, the signs
for direct investment abroad, or outflows,for direct investment abroad, or outflows, have been reversed. have been reversed.
Major Economic Developments
Between late February 2020 and spring 2021, financial markets from the United States to Asia Between late February 2020 and spring 2021, financial markets from the United States to Asia
and Europe were whipsawed as investors alternated between optimism and pessimism amid and Europe were whipsawed as investors alternated between optimism and pessimism amid
concerns that COVID-19 would create a global economic and financial crisis with few metrics to concerns that COVID-19 would create a global economic and financial crisis with few metrics to
indicate how prolonged and extensive the economic effects could be.indicate how prolonged and extensive the economic effects could be.129128 February 24, in particular, February 24, in particular,
stands as a red-letter date as financial market indexes from Asia, Europe, and the United States stands as a red-letter date as financial market indexes from Asia, Europe, and the United States
dropped by large amounts. Investors searched for safe-haven investments, such as the benchmark dropped by large amounts. Investors searched for safe-haven investments, such as the benchmark
U.S. Treasury 10-year security, which experienced a historic drop in yield to below 1% on March U.S. Treasury 10-year security, which experienced a historic drop in yield to below 1% on March
3, 2020.3, 2020.130129 In response to concerns that the global economy was in a In response to concerns that the global economy was in a freefal freefall, the Federal Reserve , the Federal Reserve
lowered key interest rates on March 3, 2020, to shore up economic activity, while the Bank of lowered key interest rates on March 3, 2020, to shore up economic activity, while the Bank of
Japan engaged in asset purchases to provide short-term liquidity to Japanese banks; Japan’s Japan engaged in asset purchases to provide short-term liquidity to Japanese banks; Japan’s
government indicated it would also assist workers with wage subsidies. The Bank of Canada also government indicated it would also assist workers with wage subsidies. The Bank of Canada also
lowered its key interest rate. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced that it was lowered its key interest rate. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced that it was
making about $50 making about $50 bil ion available billion available through emergency financing facilities for low-income and through emergency financing facilities for low-income and
emerging market countries and through funds available in its Catastrophe Containment and Relief emerging market countries and through funds available in its Catastrophe Containment and Relief
Trust (CCRT).Trust (CCRT).131130 As assessments of risk by financial market participants lessened, pressure on the As assessments of risk by financial market participants lessened, pressure on the
dollar and on U.S. dollar and on U.S. treasuryTreasury securities lessened as securities lessened as wel .

129well. 128 Samson, Adam and Hudson Samson, Adam and Hudson Lockett Lockett, “Stocks Fall Again in Worst Week Since 2008 Crisis,”, “Stocks Fall Again in Worst Week Since 2008 Crisis,” Financial Times, ,
February 28. https://www.ft.com/content/4b23a140-59d3-11ea-a528-dd0f971febbc. February 28. https://www.ft.com/content/4b23a140-59d3-11ea-a528-dd0f971febbc.
130 T he129 The price and yield price and yield of a bond are inversely related; increased demandof a bond are inversely related; increased demand for T reasury for Treasury securities raises their price, securities raises their price,
which lowerswhich lowers their yield. Levisohn, Ben, “their yield. Levisohn, Ben, “ T heThe 10-Year 10-Year T reasuryTreasury Yield Fell Yield Fell Below Below 1% for the First 1% for the First T imeTime Ever. What Ever. What
T hatThat Means,” Means,” Barrons, March 3, 2020. https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-10-year-treasury-yield-fell-below-1-for-, March 3, 2020. https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-10-year-treasury-yield-fell-below-1-for-
the-first-time-ever-whatthe-first-time-ever-what -that-means-51583267310. -that-means-51583267310.
131 130 Georgieva, Kristalina, “Potential Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic: What We Know and What We Can Do,” Georgieva, Kristalina, “Potential Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic: What We Know and What We Can Do,”
International Monetary Fund, March 4, 2020. https://blogs.imf.org/2020/03/04/potential-impact-of-the-COVID-19-, March 4, 2020. https://blogs.imf.org/2020/03/04/potential-impact-of-the-COVID-19-
epidemic-what-we-know-and-whatepidemic-what-we-know-and-what -we-can-do/. -we-can-do/.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

49 49

link to page 55 link to page 55 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Financial Markets
Reflecting investors’ uncertainties, the DJIA lost about one-third of its value between February Reflecting investors’ uncertainties, the DJIA lost about one-third of its value between February
14, 2020, and March 23, 2020, as indicated in 14, 2020, and March 23, 2020, as indicated in Figure 12. Expectations that the U.S. Congress . Expectations that the U.S. Congress
would adopt a $2.0 would adopt a $2.0 tril ion trillion spending package moved the DJIA up by more than 11% on March 24, spending package moved the DJIA up by more than 11% on March 24,
2020. From March 23 to April 15, the DJIA moved higher by 18%, paring its initial2020. From March 23 to April 15, the DJIA moved higher by 18%, paring its initial losses by losses by
half. Since then, the DJIA trended upward, but moved half. Since then, the DJIA trended upward, but moved erratical yerratically at times as investors weighed at times as investors weighed
news about the human cost and economic impact of the pandemic and the prospects of various news about the human cost and economic impact of the pandemic and the prospects of various
medical treatments. Between March 23 and July 1, the DJIA regained 70% of the value lost medical treatments. Between March 23 and July 1, the DJIA regained 70% of the value lost
during the February to March decline. On Monday, November 9, 2020, the DJIA gained over 800 during the February to March decline. On Monday, November 9, 2020, the DJIA gained over 800
points, or nearly three percentage points, as markets responded positively to press reports that an points, or nearly three percentage points, as markets responded positively to press reports that an
effective COVID-19 vaccine had been developed. On November 10, the DJIA rose above 29,400 effective COVID-19 vaccine had been developed. On November 10, the DJIA rose above 29,400
for the first time since the index for the first time since the index fel fell in February 2020. Between January 1, 2021, and February 4, in February 2020. Between January 1, 2021, and February 4,
2021, the DJIA increased by about 3.0%, continuing a rise in the index of 17% since the end of 2021, the DJIA increased by about 3.0%, continuing a rise in the index of 17% since the end of
October 2020. Through April, 2021, the DJIA had gained more than 12% in value and was 16% October 2020. Through April, 2021, the DJIA had gained more than 12% in value and was 16%
higher than the value on February 14, 2020. On July 23, 2021, the DJIA crossed the 35,000 mark, higher than the value on February 14, 2020. On July 23, 2021, the DJIA crossed the 35,000 mark,
nearly doubling the value of the index since March 23, 2020. nearly doubling the value of the index since March 23, 2020.
As indicated i As indicated in Table 11, the DJIA lost the largest part of its market valuation in trading during the DJIA lost the largest part of its market valuation in trading during
February and March when the index lost nearly one-fourth of its value as more trading sessions February and March when the index lost nearly one-fourth of its value as more trading sessions
ended with ended with overal overall market values lower than higher. Since March, the index has posted more market values lower than higher. Since March, the index has posted more
trading sessions that closed with positive gains than losses. By October 23, 2020, the DJIA had trading sessions that closed with positive gains than losses. By October 23, 2020, the DJIA had
recovered most of the value lost in February and March. During the final week of Octoberrecovered most of the value lost in February and March. During the final week of October 2020, , the the
DJIA lost more than 1,800 points, the largest weekly loss since March 2020 as Germany, France DJIA lost more than 1,800 points, the largest weekly loss since March 2020 as Germany, France
and other European countries reinstituted lockdowns in response to a resurgence of COVID-19 and other European countries reinstituted lockdowns in response to a resurgence of COVID-19
cases. In the first three days of November, however, the Index regained three-fourths of the value cases. In the first three days of November, however, the Index regained three-fourths of the value
it lost the previous week. it lost the previous week.
Announcements of vaccines portending a resurgence of economic activity boosted market Announcements of vaccines portending a resurgence of economic activity boosted market
sentiment in November and December with the DJIA rising by over a combined 3,700 points or sentiment in November and December with the DJIA rising by over a combined 3,700 points or
by nearly 14%. In January 2021, the DJIA dropped by about 1% with more trading days ending by nearly 14%. In January 2021, the DJIA dropped by about 1% with more trading days ending
with the index down than days with the index up from the previous day. During the first six with the index down than days with the index up from the previous day. During the first six
months of 2021, the DJIA gained 15% in market value. During June 2021, the DJIA had one more months of 2021, the DJIA gained 15% in market value. During June 2021, the DJIA had one more
day of the index closing down than up as the index lost one-quarter of a point day of the index closing down than up as the index lost one-quarter of a point overal overall, the first , the first
such decline since January 2021. Through such decline since January 2021. Through AugustOctober 2021, however, more trading session closed higher , however, more trading session closed higher
than lower, the Index gained 1.24%, and closed above 35,000 for the first time on July 23, 2021. than lower, the Index gained 1.24%, and closed above 35,000 for the first time on July 23, 2021.
In SeptemberIn October, trading sessions closing lower outnumbered sessions closing higher 13 to , trading sessions closing lower outnumbered sessions closing higher 13 to 8, 7, with with
the index as a whole the index as a whole fal ing by 4.4rising by 5.57% in value, the largest decline since % in value, the largest decline since October 2020March 2021. .
Table 11. Dow Jones Industrial Average Market Changes by Month
Sessions up Sessions down
Open
Close
Change in index valuation

January 2020 January 2020
13 13
8 8
28,638.97 28,638.97
28,256.03 28,256.03
-382.94 -382.94
-1.34% -1.34%
February February
8 8
11 11
28,319.65 28,319.65
25,409.36 25,409.36
-2,910.29 -2,910.29
-10.28% -10.28%
March March
10 10
12 12
25,590.51 25,590.51
21,917.16 21,917.16
-3,673.35 -3,673.35
-14.35% -14.35%
April April
12 12
9 9
21,227.38 21,227.38
24,345.72 24,345.72
3,118.34 3,118.34
14.69% 14.69%
May May
10 10
10 10
24,120.78 24,120.78
25,383.11 25,383.11
1,262.33 1,262.33
5.23% 5.23%
June June
14 14
8 8
25,342.99 25,342.99
25,812.88 25,812.88
469.89 469.89
1.85% 1.85%
July July
13 13
9 9
25,879.38 25,879.38
26,428.32 26,428.32
548.94 548.94
2.12% 2.12%
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

50 50

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Sessions up Sessions down
Open
Close
Change in index valuation

August August
14 14
7 7
26,542.32 26,542.32
28,430.05 28,430.05
1,887.73 1,887.73
7.11% 7.11%
September September
12 12
9 9
28,439.61 28,439.61
27,781.70 27,781.70
-657.91 -657.91
-2.31% -2.31%
October October
10 10
12 12
27,816.90 27,816.90
26,501.60 26,501.60
-1,315.30 -1,315.30
-4.73% -4.73%
November November
12 12
8 8
26,691.28 26,691.28
29,638.64 29,638.64
2,947.36 2,947.36
11.04% 11.04%
December December
14 14
8 8
29,707.50 29,707.50
30,606.48 30,606.48
808.98 808.98
2.71% 2.71%
January 2021 January 2021
8 8
11 11
30,223.89 30,223.89
29,981.10 29,981.10
-242.79 -242.79
-0.80% -0.80%
February February
15 15
5 5
30,054.73 30,054.73
30,932.37 30,932.37
877.64 877.64
2.92% 2.92%
March March
13 13
10 10
31,065.90 31,065.90
32,981.55 32,981.55
1,915.65 1,915.65
6.17% 6.17%
April April
12 12
8 8
33,054.58 33,054.58
33,874.85 33,874.85
820.27 820.27
2.48% 2.48%
May May
13 13
7 7
33,904.89 33,904.89
34,529.45 34,529.45
624.56 624.56
1.84% 1.84%
June June
10 10
11 11
34,584.19 34,584.19
34, 502.51 34, 502.51
-81.68 -81.68
-0.24% -0.24%
July July
13 13
7 7
34,507.32 34,507.32
34,935.47 34,935.47
428.15 428.15
1,24% 1,24%
August August
13 13
9 9
34,968.56 34,968.56
35,360.73 35,360.73
392.17 392.17
1.12% 1.12%
September September
8 8
13 13
35,387.55 35,387.55
33,843.92 33,843.92
-1,543.63 -1,543.63
-4.36 -4.36% October 13 7 33,930.70 35,819.56 1,888.86 5.57% %
Source: Financial Times,; calculations by CRS. calculations by CRS.
Similar to the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, central banks implemented a series of monetary Similar to the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, central banks implemented a series of monetary
operations to provide liquidityoperations to provide liquidity to their economies. These actions, however, to their economies. These actions, however, initial yinitially were not were not
viewed entirely positively by viewed entirely positively by al all financial market participants who questioned the use of policy financial market participants who questioned the use of policy
tools by central banks that were similar to those employed during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, tools by central banks that were similar to those employed during the 2008-2009 financial crisis,
despite the fact that the COVID-19 and the previous crises were despite the fact that the COVID-19 and the previous crises were fundamental yfundamentally different in origin. different in origin.
During the previous financial crisis, central banks intervened to restart credit and spending by During the previous financial crisis, central banks intervened to restart credit and spending by
banks that had engaged in risky assets. In the 2020 environment, central banks attempted to banks that had engaged in risky assets. In the 2020 environment, central banks attempted to
address financial market volatilityaddress financial market volatility and prevent large-scale corporate insolvencies that reflected and prevent large-scale corporate insolvencies that reflected
the underlying economic uncertainty caused by the pandemic. the underlying economic uncertainty caused by the pandemic.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

51 51


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 12. Dow Jones Industrial Average
February 14, 2020, through February 14, 2020, through September 27November 8, 2021 , 2021

Source: Financial Times. Created by CRS. . Created by CRS.
The yield on U.S. Treasury securities dropped to historic levels on March 6, 2020, and March 9, The yield on U.S. Treasury securities dropped to historic levels on March 6, 2020, and March 9,
2020, as investors moved out of stocks and into Treasury securities and other sovereign bonds, 2020, as investors moved out of stocks and into Treasury securities and other sovereign bonds,
including UKincluding UK and German bonds, due in part to concerns over the impact the pandemic would and German bonds, due in part to concerns over the impact the pandemic would
have on economic growth and expectations the Federal Reserve and other central banks would have on economic growth and expectations the Federal Reserve and other central banks would
lower short-term interest rates.lower short-term interest rates.132131 On March 5, the U.S. Congress passed an $8 On March 5, the U.S. Congress passed an $8 bil ionbillion spending spending
bil bill to provide assistance for health care, sick leave, to provide assistance for health care, sick leave, smal small business loans, and international business loans, and international
assistance. At the same time, commodity prices dropped sharply as a result of reduced economic assistance. At the same time, commodity prices dropped sharply as a result of reduced economic
activity and disagreements among oil producers over production cuts in crude oil and lower activity and disagreements among oil producers over production cuts in crude oil and lower
global demand for commodities, including crude oil. global demand for commodities, including crude oil.
The drop in some commodity prices raised concerns about corporate profits and led some The drop in some commodity prices raised concerns about corporate profits and led some
investors to investors to sel sell equities and buy sovereign bonds. In overnight trading in various sessions equities and buy sovereign bonds. In overnight trading in various sessions
between March 8, and March 24, U.S. stock market indexes moved sharply (both higher and between March 8, and March 24, U.S. stock market indexes moved sharply (both higher and
lower), triggering automatic circuit breakers designed to halt trading if the indexes rise or lower), triggering automatic circuit breakers designed to halt trading if the indexes rise or fal by
fall by more than 5% when markets are closed and 7% when markets are open.more than 5% when markets are closed and 7% when markets are open.133132 By early April, the By early April, the
global mining industry had reduced production by an estimated 20% in response to global mining industry had reduced production by an estimated 20% in response to fal ing
falling demand and labor quarantines and as a strategy for raising prices.demand and labor quarantines and as a strategy for raising prices.134
133 On March 11, as the WHO designated COVID-19 a pandemic, governments and central banks On March 11, as the WHO designated COVID-19 a pandemic, governments and central banks
adopted additional monetary and fiscal policies to address the growing economic impact. The adopted additional monetary and fiscal policies to address the growing economic impact. The
Bank of England lowered its key interest rate, reduced capital buffers for UK banks, and provided Bank of England lowered its key interest rate, reduced capital buffers for UK banks, and provided
a funding program for a funding program for smal small and medium businesses. The UK and medium businesses. The UK Chancel orChancellor of the Exchequer of the Exchequer
proposed a budget that appropriated £30 proposed a budget that appropriated £30 bil ion billion (about $35 (about $35 bil ionbillion) for fiscal stimulus spending, ) for fiscal stimulus spending,

132 131 Smith, Colby, Richard Smith, Colby, Richard Henderson, Philip Georgiadis,Henderson, Philip Georgiadis, and Hudsonand Hudson Lockett, “Lockett, “ Stocks Stocks T umbleTumble and Government Bonds and Government Bonds
Hit HighsHit Highs on Viruson Virus Fears,” Fears,” Financial Tim esTimes, March 6, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9f94d6f8-5f51-11ea-b0ab-, March 6, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9f94d6f8-5f51-11ea-b0ab-
339c2307bcd4. 339c2307bcd4.
133132 Georgiadis, Georgiadis, Philip, Adam Samson, and HudsonPhilip, Adam Samson, and Hudson Lockett, “Stocks Plummet as Oil Crash ShakesLockett, “Stocks Plummet as Oil Crash Shakes Financial Markets,” Financial Markets,”
Financial Tim esTimes, March 9, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/8273a32a-61e4-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68. , March 9, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/8273a32a-61e4-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68.
134 133 Hume, Neil, “Mine Closures Hume, Neil, “Mine Closures Bolster Metals Prices as Demand Collapses,” Bolster Metals Prices as Demand Collapses,” Financial Times, April 7, 2020. , April 7, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/06ef38c9-18d8-427e-8675-a567227397c0. https://www.ft.com/content/06ef38c9-18d8-427e-8675-a567227397c0.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

52 52

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

including funds for sick pay for workers, guarantees for loans to including funds for sick pay for workers, guarantees for loans to smal small businesses, and cuts in businesses, and cuts in
business taxes. The European Commission announced a €25 business taxes. The European Commission announced a €25 bil ionbillion (about $28 (about $28 bil ionbillion) )
investment fund to assist EU countries and the Federal Reserve announced that it would expand investment fund to assist EU countries and the Federal Reserve announced that it would expand
its repo market purchases to provide larger and longer-term funding to provide added liquidity to its repo market purchases to provide larger and longer-term funding to provide added liquidity to
financial markets. financial markets.
International Role of the Dollar
Similar to conditions during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the dollar emerged as the preferred Similar to conditions during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the dollar emerged as the preferred
currency by investors, reinforcing its role as the dominant global reserve currency. As indicated in currency by investors, reinforcing its role as the dominant global reserve currency. As indicated in
Figure 13, the dollar appreciated more than 3.0% during the period between March 3 and March , the dollar appreciated more than 3.0% during the period between March 3 and March
13, 2020, reflecting increased international demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets. 13, 2020, reflecting increased international demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets.
Since the highs reached on March 23, the exchange value of the dollar has dropped between 1% Since the highs reached on March 23, the exchange value of the dollar has dropped between 1%
and 2% per month in a slow decline through December 2020 as financial strains eased and and 2% per month in a slow decline through December 2020 as financial strains eased and
demand for the dollar in international financial markets lessened. demand for the dollar in international financial markets lessened.
By the end of January 2021, the dollar had depreciated by more than 11% from the highest value By the end of January 2021, the dollar had depreciated by more than 11% from the highest value
it reached in March 2020. The development of COVID-19 vaccines likely affected the value of it reached in March 2020. The development of COVID-19 vaccines likely affected the value of
the dollar in various ways, including factors that tend to appreciate the dollar as a result of the dollar in various ways, including factors that tend to appreciate the dollar as a result of
renewed economic growth in the United States and opposing forces that tend to depreciate the renewed economic growth in the United States and opposing forces that tend to depreciate the
dollar if demand declines for the dollar as a safe-haven currency. As previously noted, common dollar if demand declines for the dollar as a safe-haven currency. As previously noted, common
central banks policies of keeping key interest rates low also affected movements in the foreign central banks policies of keeping key interest rates low also affected movements in the foreign
exchange value of the dollar in 2021 by reducing arbitrage opportunities and curtailing volatility. exchange value of the dollar in 2021 by reducing arbitrage opportunities and curtailing volatility.
Despite periods of appreciation and depreciation of the dollar through 2020 and 2021, by the end Despite periods of appreciation and depreciation of the dollar through 2020 and 2021, by the end
of April, 2021, the dollar was down 2% compared with the value on January 2, 2020. In part, the of April, 2021, the dollar was down 2% compared with the value on January 2, 2020. In part, the
resolution of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU has strengthened both the Euro and the pound, resolution of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU has strengthened both the Euro and the pound,
which tended to depreciate the value of the dollar. The decline in the value of the dollar which tended to depreciate the value of the dollar. The decline in the value of the dollar
reportedly pushed some countries to consider intervening to weaken their currencies.reportedly pushed some countries to consider intervening to weaken their currencies.135134 Between Between
June 10, 2021, and August 20, 2021, the dollar appreciated about 3.6%, nearly reaching the value June 10, 2021, and August 20, 2021, the dollar appreciated about 3.6%, nearly reaching the value
recorded on January 2, 2020. The strengthening in the value of the dollar is attributed to a number recorded on January 2, 2020. The strengthening in the value of the dollar is attributed to a number
of factors, including an anticipated change in Fed monetary policies.of factors, including an anticipated change in Fed monetary policies.136

135135 134 Szalay, Eva, Central Banks Szalay, Eva, Central Banks T akeTake Rare Step of Flagging Rare Step of Flagging Currency SalesCurrency Sales in Advance, in Advance, Financial Times, February 3, , February 3,
2021. https://www.ft.com/content/0383f3a4-41a0-464a-b831-fd1a09a6b1b0. 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/0383f3a4-41a0-464a-b831-fd1a09a6b1b0.
136 135 Stubbington, Stubbington, T ommyTommy, Federal Reserve’s , Federal Reserve’s T ilt T owards T ighterTilt Towards Tighter Policy Unleashes Dollar Bulls, Policy Unleashes Dollar Bulls, Financial Times, July July
19, 2021. 19, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

53 53


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 13. U.S. Dollar Trade-Weighted Broad Index, Goods and Services
January 2, 2020, through January 2, 2020, through September 17October 29, 2021 , 2021

Source: St. Louis Federal ReserveSt. Louis Federal Reserve Bank. Created by CRS. Bank. Created by CRS.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) emphasized the role of the dollar as a dominant The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) emphasized the role of the dollar as a dominant
global currency in its 2019 triennial survey of currency markets.global currency in its 2019 triennial survey of currency markets.137136 According to the survey, the According to the survey, the
dollar accounts for 88% of global foreign exchange market turnover and is key in funding an dollar accounts for 88% of global foreign exchange market turnover and is key in funding an
array of financial transactions, including serving as an invoicing currency to facilitate array of financial transactions, including serving as an invoicing currency to facilitate
international trade, as indicated ininternational trade, as indicated in Figure 14. It also accounts for about 60% of central bank It also accounts for about 60% of central bank
foreign exchange holdings, half of non-U.S. banks foreign currency deposits, and two-thirds of foreign exchange holdings, half of non-U.S. banks foreign currency deposits, and two-thirds of
non-U.S. corporate borrowings from banks and the corporate bond market.non-U.S. corporate borrowings from banks and the corporate bond market.138137 In comparison, the In comparison, the
United States accounts for about one-fourth of global GDP and about one-fifth of global trade United States accounts for about one-fourth of global GDP and about one-fifth of global trade
(exports plus imports).(exports plus imports).

137 136 Foreign Exchange Turnover in April 2019, Bank for International Settlements, September 16, 2019. , Bank for International Settlements, September 16, 2019.
https://www.bis.org/statistics/rpfx19_fx.htm. https://www.bis.org/statistics/rpfx19_fx.htm.
138 See CRS 137 See CRS In FocusIn Focus IF10112, IF10112, Introduction to Financial Services: The International Foreign Exchange Market. .
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

54 54


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 14. International Role of the Dollar

Source: U.S. Dol ar Dollar Funding: An International Perspective,, CGFS Papers No. 65, Bank for International Settlements, CGFS Papers No. 65, Bank for International Settlements,
June 2020. Created by CRS. June 2020. Created by CRS.
Notes: (1) Data refer to 2019. (2) Data refer to 2019. (3) U.S. (1) Data refer to 2019. (2) Data refer to 2019. (3) U.S. dol ar-denominated cross-borderdol ar-denominated cross-border loans by banks loans by banks
to counterparties in to counterparties in al all countries; data refer to Q4 2019 (excluding interoffice claimscountries; data refer to Q4 2019 (excluding interoffice claims but including interbank but including interbank
claimsclaims on account of loans and deposits); loans compriseon account of loans and deposits); loans comprise nonnegotiable debt instruments that are loaned by nonnegotiable debt instruments that are loaned by
creditorscreditors directly to a debtor or representeddirectly to a debtor or represented by evidence of a deposit.by evidence of a deposit. (4) US dol ar denominated international (4) US dol ar denominated international
debt securitiesdebt securities by al by all issuers;issuers; data referdata refer to Q4 2019; these securitiesto Q4 2019; these securities are issued outside the local marketare issued outside the local market of the of the
country where the borrowercountry where the borrower resides,resides, and capture issuesand capture issues conventional y conventionally known as eurobonds and foreign bonds known as eurobonds and foreign bonds
and exclude negotiable loans; instruments such as bonds, medium-termand exclude negotiable loans; instruments such as bonds, medium-term notes and money market instruments are notes and money market instruments are
included. (5) Data referincluded. (5) Data refer to 2019. (6) Data referto 2019. (6) Data refer to Q4 2019. (7) As estimated in Gopinath (2015). (8) Data refer to Q4 2019. (7) As estimated in Gopinath (2015). (8) Data refer
to February 2020. Sources:to February 2020. Sources: Gopinath (2015); Federal Reserve;Gopinath (2015); Federal Reserve; IMF; CPB WorldIMF; CPB World Trade Monitor; Bloomberg; Trade Monitor; Bloomberg;
SWIFT; BIS Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Over-the-counter (OTC) Derivatives SWIFT; BIS Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Over-the-counter (OTC) Derivatives
Markets; BIS locational banking statistics (LBS).Markets; BIS locational banking statistics (LBS).
As a result of the dominant role of the dollar as a global reserve currency, disruptions in the As a result of the dominant role of the dollar as a global reserve currency, disruptions in the
smooth functioning of the global dollar market can have far-reaching repercussions on smooth functioning of the global dollar market can have far-reaching repercussions on
international trade and financial transactions. A June 2020 report by BIS stressed the central role international trade and financial transactions. A June 2020 report by BIS stressed the central role
of the dollar in the global economy by concluding that dollar funding activities are highly of the dollar in the global economy by concluding that dollar funding activities are highly
complex, complex, geographical ygeographically dispersed, and interconnected in ways that provide benefits to the dispersed, and interconnected in ways that provide benefits to the
stability of the global financial system. This also means, however, that strains in the system can stability of the global financial system. This also means, however, that strains in the system can
easily be transmitted across different financial markets and across regions.easily be transmitted across different financial markets and across regions.139
138 In addition, the dominant role of the dollar in international trade pricing and trade financing In addition, the dominant role of the dollar in international trade pricing and trade financing
means the dollar plays a key role in the global economic recovery and that it means the dollar plays a key role in the global economic recovery and that it couldcan amplify the amplify the
impact of impact of the pandemiceconomic disruptions, according to the IMF., according to the IMF.140 Traditional y139 Traditionally, most economic models are based , most economic models are based
on the assumption that countries set their prices in their home currencies. As a result, on the assumption that countries set their prices in their home currencies. As a result,
domestical ydomestically produced goods and services become cheaper for trading partners when the produced goods and services become cheaper for trading partners when the
domestic currency weakens, leading to increased demand by trading partners and increased domestic currency weakens, leading to increased demand by trading partners and increased
exports. However, much international trade, including many commodities, is priced in dollars, exports. However, much international trade, including many commodities, is priced in dollars,
which means that trade volumes respond less than they would if goods were priced in exporters’ which means that trade volumes respond less than they would if goods were priced in exporters’
home currencies. Limited evidence indicates that a significant share of bilateral trade between home currencies. Limited evidence indicates that a significant share of bilateral trade between

139 138 Bank for International Settlements, Bank for International Settlements, U.S, Dollar Funding: An International Perspective, CGFS, CGFS Papers, No. 65, June Papers, No. 65, June
2020, p. 52. https://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs65.htm. 2020, p. 52. https://www.bis.org/publ/cgfs65.htm.
140139 Dominant Currencies and External Adjustment, IMF Staff Discussion, IMF Staff Discussion Note 20/05, International Monetary Fund, Note 20/05, International Monetary Fund,
JulyJuly 2020. 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

55 55

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

countries other than the United States is invoiced in U.S. dollars. countries other than the United States is invoiced in U.S. dollars.141140 As a result, an appreciation of As a result, an appreciation of
the dollar against other currencies, or a weakening in other currencies, has a muted effect on the dollar against other currencies, or a weakening in other currencies, has a muted effect on
export volumes by other countries, at least in the short run, as has been evident in movements in export volumes by other countries, at least in the short run, as has been evident in movements in
exchange rates and trade volumes of emerging market and developing economies. The IMF also exchange rates and trade volumes of emerging market and developing economies. The IMF also
concluded that because countries other than the United States price much of their trade in dollars, concluded that because countries other than the United States price much of their trade in dollars,
an appreciation in the value of the dollar, or a depreciation in the value of other currencies an appreciation in the value of the dollar, or a depreciation in the value of other currencies
relative to the dollar, reduces both exports and imports. As a result, a depreciation in other relative to the dollar, reduces both exports and imports. As a result, a depreciation in other
currencies relative to the dollar provides less of a boost in their exports and, therefore, less of a currencies relative to the dollar provides less of a boost in their exports and, therefore, less of a
countercyclical support.countercyclical support.
Together, these effects translate into movements in the exchange value of the dollar that at times Together, these effects translate into movements in the exchange value of the dollar that at times
contrast with traditional theory, since such movements do not affect trade volumes as much as contrast with traditional theory, since such movements do not affect trade volumes as much as
might be expected. For instance, after appreciating in March 2020, the trade-weighted value of might be expected. For instance, after appreciating in March 2020, the trade-weighted value of
the dollar steadily depreciated through December 2020 and then has roller-coasted through 2021. the dollar steadily depreciated through December 2020 and then has roller-coasted through 2021.
In standard models, the depreciation in the dollar would be expected to lower export prices and, In standard models, the depreciation in the dollar would be expected to lower export prices and,
in turn, increase demand for U.S. exports, or increase the volume of exports, while import in turn, increase demand for U.S. exports, or increase the volume of exports, while import
volumes would be expected to decline along with the rising price of foreign currencies relative to volumes would be expected to decline along with the rising price of foreign currencies relative to
the dollar. GDP data through the second quarter of 2021 indicate, however, that U.S. trade prices the dollar. GDP data through the second quarter of 2021 indicate, however, that U.S. trade prices
for exports and imports and trade volumes for exports and imports for exports and imports and trade volumes for exports and imports general ygenerally moved in tandem, as moved in tandem, as
indicated in indicated in Figure 15.
The international role of the dollar and the The international role of the dollar and the wel well-developed U.S. capital markets also provide the -developed U.S. capital markets also provide the
United States with greater latitude in financing its trade deficit. For some trade specialists, the United States with greater latitude in financing its trade deficit. For some trade specialists, the
widely accepted characterization of the current account as a product of a domestic saving-widely accepted characterization of the current account as a product of a domestic saving-
investment relationship fails to distinguish between a country’s domestic saving-investment investment relationship fails to distinguish between a country’s domestic saving-investment
balance, its abilitybalance, its ability to finance its trade deficit, and the role of cross-border capital flows. These to finance its trade deficit, and the role of cross-border capital flows. These
flows suggest that the ability of the United States to finance its trade imbalances through capital flows suggest that the ability of the United States to finance its trade imbalances through capital
inflows eases the constraint imposed by the domestic saving-investment balance. inflows eases the constraint imposed by the domestic saving-investment balance.
The international role of the dollar also increases pressure on the Federal Reserve The international role of the dollar also increases pressure on the Federal Reserve essential yessentially to to
assume the lead role as the global lender of last resort during crises. Reminiscent of the financial assume the lead role as the global lender of last resort during crises. Reminiscent of the financial
crisis, the global economy experienced a period of dollar shortage, requiring the Federal Reserve crisis, the global economy experienced a period of dollar shortage, requiring the Federal Reserve
to take numerous steps to ensure the supply of dollars to the U.S. and global economies, including to take numerous steps to ensure the supply of dollars to the U.S. and global economies, including
activating existing currency swap arrangements, establishing such arrangements with additional activating existing currency swap arrangements, establishing such arrangements with additional
central banks, and creating new financial facilities to provide liquiditycentral banks, and creating new financial facilities to provide liquidity to central banks and to central banks and
monetary authorities.monetary authorities.142 Typical y141 Typically, banks lend long-term and borrow short-term and can only , banks lend long-term and borrow short-term and can only
borrow from their home central bank. In turn, central banks can only provide liquidity in their borrow from their home central bank. In turn, central banks can only provide liquidity in their
own currency. Consequently, a bank can become own currency. Consequently, a bank can become il iquidilliquid in a panic, meaning it cannot borrow in in a panic, meaning it cannot borrow in
private markets to meet short-term cash flow needs. Swap lines are designed to private markets to meet short-term cash flow needs. Swap lines are designed to al owallow foreign foreign
central banks the funds necessary to provide needed liquidity to their country’s banks in dollars.central banks the funds necessary to provide needed liquidity to their country’s banks in dollars.

141 Ibid., p. 8.
142 140 Ibid., p. 8. 141 Politi, James, Brendan Greeley, and Colby Politi, James, Brendan Greeley, and Colby Smith, “Fed Sets Up Scheme to Meet Booming Foreign Demand for Smith, “Fed Sets Up Scheme to Meet Booming Foreign Demand for
Dollars,” Dollars,” Financial Tim esTimes, March 31, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/6c976586-a6ea-42ec-a369-9353186c05bb. , March 31, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/6c976586-a6ea-42ec-a369-9353186c05bb.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

56 56


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 15. Quarterly Price and Quantity Indexes, U.S. Goods Imports and Exports

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.Bureau of Economic Analysis. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Notes: 2012 = 100. 2012 = 100.
U.S. Monthly Trade
BEABEA data il ustrate data illustrate the sharp drop in U.S. trade volumes for both exports and imports of goods the sharp drop in U.S. trade volumes for both exports and imports of goods
and services in 2020 compared with 2019. Trade in services was and services in 2020 compared with 2019. Trade in services was especial yespecially hard hit as a result of hard hit as a result of
lockdowns that restricted tourism travel and lower transport revenues as a result of the lockdowns that restricted tourism travel and lower transport revenues as a result of the overal
overall decline in economic activity. Trade in services decline in economic activity. Trade in services fel fell sharply with the volume of services exports sharply with the volume of services exports
and imports declining by multiples of the percentage decline in goods trade, as indicated in and imports declining by multiples of the percentage decline in goods trade, as indicated in Table
12
. Prices for services exports and imports, however, . Prices for services exports and imports, however, fel fell slightly compared with the decline in slightly compared with the decline in
prices of goods imports and exports. The largest changes in prices and quantities for goods and prices of goods imports and exports. The largest changes in prices and quantities for goods and
services occurred in the second quarter of 2020 following the same pattern as the second quarter services occurred in the second quarter of 2020 following the same pattern as the second quarter
change in GDP. The quantity of U.S. exports and imports change in GDP. The quantity of U.S. exports and imports fel fell by 23% and 16%, respectively, in by 23% and 16%, respectively, in
second quarter 2020, compared with the preceding quarter.second quarter 2020, compared with the preceding quarter.143
142 In value terms, the prices of U.S. goods exports in second quarter 2020 In value terms, the prices of U.S. goods exports in second quarter 2020 fel fell by 6.0%, while the by 6.0%, while the
price of imports price of imports fel fell by 3.5%, compared with the first quarter. In the third quarter, both export and by 3.5%, compared with the first quarter. In the third quarter, both export and
import volumes increased by about 20%, while export and import prices rose by 3.8% and 2.1%, import volumes increased by about 20%, while export and import prices rose by 3.8% and 2.1%,
respectively. In fourth quarter 2020, U.S. export and import prices increased slightly, while export respectively. In fourth quarter 2020, U.S. export and import prices increased slightly, while export
and import volumes increased by 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively. As a result, the and import volumes increased by 6.0% and 7.0%, respectively. As a result, the overal overall value of value of
exports and imports rose slightly less than 5% in the fourth quarter of 2020. According to U.S. exports and imports rose slightly less than 5% in the fourth quarter of 2020. According to U.S.
balance of payments data, the balance of payments data, the overal overall annual value of U.S, goods exports and imports (the annual value of U.S, goods exports and imports (the
combined changes in prices and volumes) dropped by 35% and 16%, respectively year-over-year combined changes in prices and volumes) dropped by 35% and 16%, respectively year-over-year
(2020 compared to 2019).(2020 compared to 2019).144
143 In the first quarter of 2021, U.S. goods export volumes In the first quarter of 2021, U.S. goods export volumes fel fell slightly, while import volumes rose by slightly, while import volumes rose by
2.6%. Export and import price indexes both rose, reflecting an increase of 30% in petroleum 2.6%. Export and import price indexes both rose, reflecting an increase of 30% in petroleum
export prices and a rise in petroleum import prices of 38%. Compared to the decline in goods export prices and a rise in petroleum import prices of 38%. Compared to the decline in goods
export and import volumes in the second quarter of 2020, first quarter 2021 export and import export and import volumes in the second quarter of 2020, first quarter 2021 export and import
volumes were up 28% and 31%, respectively, reflecting an increase in the global rate of economic volumes were up 28% and 31%, respectively, reflecting an increase in the global rate of economic
growth. Relative to first quarter 2021, price indexes for exports and imports in the second quarter growth. Relative to first quarter 2021, price indexes for exports and imports in the second quarter

143 Gross 142 Gross Domestic Product, Second Quarter, 2021 (Advance Estimate) and Annual Update, Bureau of Economic Bureau of Economic
Analysis, JulyAnalysis, July 29, 2021. 29, 2021.
144 143 U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services June 2021 , Bureau of Economic Analysis, August, Bureau of Economic Analysis, August 5, 2021. 5, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

57 57

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

of 2021 rose by 5.8% and 3.4%, respectively. In contrast, goods export and import volumes of 2021 rose by 5.8% and 3.4%, respectively. In contrast, goods export and import volumes
increased by 1.4% and 1.6$, respectively. The combined price and quantity affects indicate that increased by 1.4% and 1.6$, respectively. The combined price and quantity affects indicate that
goods exports grew by 6.8% in the second quarter of 2021 compared with first quarter 2021, goods exports grew by 6.8% in the second quarter of 2021 compared with first quarter 2021,
while goods imports increased by 4.2%. while goods imports increased by 4.2%.
In the first half of 2020, trade in services experienced a sharp drop in quantity and price terms as In the first half of 2020, trade in services experienced a sharp drop in quantity and price terms as
travel exports travel exports fel fell by 61% and travel imports dropped by 90%. by 61% and travel imports dropped by 90%. Overal Overall, exports of services , exports of services
declined by 10.3% and 15.3% in the first and second quarters of 2020, but demonstrated mixed declined by 10.3% and 15.3% in the first and second quarters of 2020, but demonstrated mixed
changes in the subsequent four quarters. Similarly, total import services changes in the subsequent four quarters. Similarly, total import services fel fell by 9.7% and 24.6% by 9.7% and 24.6%
in the first two quarters of 2020, but experienced positive changes in volumes since. Travel-in the first two quarters of 2020, but experienced positive changes in volumes since. Travel-
related imports, in particular, rose by 97.9% in fourth quarter 2020 compared with the preceding related imports, in particular, rose by 97.9% in fourth quarter 2020 compared with the preceding
quarter. The quarterly prices of both services exports and imports increased over each of the quarter. The quarterly prices of both services exports and imports increased over each of the
subsequent four quarters. U.S. imports of services in the second quarter, however, grew twice as subsequent four quarters. U.S. imports of services in the second quarter, however, grew twice as
fast as exports of services; the fast as exports of services; the overal overall goods and services deficit in the second quarter increased goods and services deficit in the second quarter increased
by 1.4% over the first quarter.by 1.4% over the first quarter.145144
Table 12. U.S. Goods and Services Exports and Imports, Change in Quarterly Price
and Quantity Indexes
Percentage change Percentage change

Year over Year Year over Year %
% Change Quarter over Quarter % Change Quarter over Quarter % Change
Change

2019
2020
2020
2021

2020 2021 2019 2020 1q 1q
2q 2q
3q 3q
4q 4q
1q 1q
2q 2q
Goods

Exports Exports

Quantity Quantity
-0.1% -0.1%
-10.2% -10.2%
-1.2% -1.2%
-23.1% -23.1%
18.8% 18.8%
5.9% 5.9%
-0.4% -0.4%
1.4% 1.4%
Price Price
-1.6 -1.6
-4.0 -4.0
-1.1 -1.1
-6.0 -6.0
3.8 3.8
1.7 1.7
6.1 6.1
5.8 5.8
Imports Imports

Quantity Quantity
0.5 0.5
-5.6 -5.6
-1.9 -1.9
-15.6 -15.6
19.5 19.5
6.8 6.8
2.6 2.6
1.4 1.4
Price Price
-2.1 -2.1
-2.8 -2.8
-0.5 -0.5
-3.5 -3.5
2.1 2.1
0.4 0.4
3.5 3.5
3.4 3.4
Services








Exports Exports








Quantity Quantity
-0.1 -0.1
-19.7 -19.7
-10.3 -10.3
-15.3 -15.3
-1.3 -1.3
3.8 3.8
-1.5 -1.5
1.6 1.6
Price Price
1.7 1.7
0.4 0.4
0.4 0.4
-2.1 -2.1
2.1 2.1
1.2 1.2
2.2 2.2
1.7 1.7
Imports Imports








Quantity Quantity
3.9 3.9
-22.6 -22.6
-9.7 -9.7
-24.6 -24.6
6.7 6.7
8.3 8.3
0.5 0.5
4.6 4.6
Price Price
0.9 0.9
0.5 0.5
0.7 0.7
-1.0 -1.0
1.1 1.1
1.2 1.2
1.1 1.1
2.1 2.1
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Quarterly Quarterly GDP estimates,GDP estimates, export and importsexport and imports price and quantity indices. price and quantity indices.
Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Notes: Annual changes represent Annual changes represent percentage change in 4th quarter index values overpercentage change in 4th quarter index values over the 4th quarter of the the 4th quarter of the
preceding year; quarterly changes representpreceding year; quarterly changes represent the change in quarterlythe change in quarterly index values over the previous quarter. index values over the previous quarter.
On September 3 144 Ibid. Congressional Research Service 58 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 On October 5, 2021, the U.S. Census Bureau reported , 2021, the U.S. Census Bureau reported a decrease in the overal an increase in the overall U.S. goods and U.S. goods and
services trade deficit in services trade deficit in July 2021of over $3 bil ionAugust 2021 of about $3 billion to reach a monthly total of $73.3 billion (the largest monthly goods and services trade deficit on record), compared to the July total of $70.3 billion. The increase in the August to reach a monthly total of $70.1bil ion,

145 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service

58


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

compared to the June total of $73.2 bil ion. The decrease in the monthly goods and services goods and services
deficit primarily reflected a 1.deficit primarily reflected a 1.3% increase in goods and services exports, compared to a 0.15%
decrease in goods and services imports, as indicated in Figure 16.1468% increase in the goods trade deficit and a 7.7% decrease in the services trade surplus, compared to July data, as indicated in Figure 16.145 The August exports of goods were the highest on record, while the imports of goods and services was also the highest on record. According to BEA data, According to BEA data,
goods exports increased from $goods exports increased from $145.9 bil ion in June 2021 to $148.6 bil ion in July148.6 billion in July 2021 to $149.7 billion in August 2021; goods 2021; goods
imports imports fel from $239.2 bil ion to $236.3 bil ion. On a year-over-basis, the overal rose from $236.4 billion to $239.1 billion. Relative to services, U.S. services exports fell from $64.1 billion in July to $64.0 billion in August, while imports of services increased from $46.6 billion to $47.9 billion. On a year-over-basis, the overall goods and goods and
services trade deficit in 2020 increased by $105 services trade deficit in 2020 increased by $105 bil ion, billion, or 18.2%, compared with 2019 and or 18.2%, compared with 2019 and
demonstrates the impact that business lockdowns had on U.S. and global trade in the first quarter demonstrates the impact that business lockdowns had on U.S. and global trade in the first quarter
of 2020. Relative to 2019, U.S. goods exports in 2020 of 2020. Relative to 2019, U.S. goods exports in 2020 fel fell by 13.2%, while goods imports by 13.2%, while goods imports fel fell by by
6.6%, accounting for the largest part of the increase in the annual U.S. trade balance. Services 6.6%, accounting for the largest part of the increase in the annual U.S. trade balance. Services
exports declined by 21% in 2020 relative to 2019, while services imports exports declined by 21% in 2020 relative to 2019, while services imports fel fell by 22%, reflecting by 22%, reflecting
the drop the drop overal overall in services activities as a result of quarantines and business lockdowns. in services activities as a result of quarantines and business lockdowns.
Figure 16. Monthly U.S. Exports and Imports of Goods and Services 2020-2021

Source: Census Bureau,Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis.Bureau of Economic Analysis. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Global Energy Markets
The price of oil has served as an additional indicator of the impact of the pandemic on the global The price of oil has served as an additional indicator of the impact of the pandemic on the global
economy. As global economic activity economy. As global economic activity fel in fell in March and April 2020, demand for oil also March and April 2020, demand for oil also fel fell, ,
resulting in rising inventories and resulting in rising inventories and fal ing falling prices. In response, oil producers reduced oil prices. In response, oil producers reduced oil
production, only slowly restoring output as the global economic activity recovered. As financial production, only slowly restoring output as the global economic activity recovered. As financial
market indexes declined in 2020 and the dollar appreciated, the price of Brent crude oil dropped market indexes declined in 2020 and the dollar appreciated, the price of Brent crude oil dropped
close to $20 per barrel on March 20, as indicated in close to $20 per barrel on March 20, as indicated in Figure 17.
As a result of the steep drop in oil prices, oil producers agreed in April, 2020 to reduce global As a result of the steep drop in oil prices, oil producers agreed in April, 2020 to reduce global
supply by 10%, or 9.6 supply by 10%, or 9.6 mil ionmillion barrels per day. Since the low prices recorded in April, the price of barrels per day. Since the low prices recorded in April, the price of
Brent crude oil Brent crude oil general ygenerally moved within a range of $40 to $44 per barrel through late November moved within a range of $40 to $44 per barrel through late November
2020, when it began edging above $50 per barrel. In trading December 10, 2020, the price of 2020, when it began edging above $50 per barrel. In trading December 10, 2020, the price of
Brent crude oil breached the $50 per barrel mark for the first time since March 2020. As energy Brent crude oil breached the $50 per barrel mark for the first time since March 2020. As energy
145 Monthly U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, August 2021, Census Bureau, October 5, 2021. Congressional Research Service 59 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 demand showed signs of recovering in 2021, the cuts in oil production that began in Aprildemand showed signs of recovering in 2021, the cuts in oil production that began in April were were
trimmed to 7.7 trimmed to 7.7 mil ion million barrels per day and were trimmed by an additionalbarrels per day and were trimmed by an additional 2 mil ion 2 million barrels per barrels per
day starting in January 2021.

146 Monthly U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, July 2021, Census Bureau, September 3, 2021.
Congressional Research Service

59


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

day starting in January 2021. On February 23, 2021, the price of Brent crude oil rose above $67 per barrel, the highest price On February 23, 2021, the price of Brent crude oil rose above $67 per barrel, the highest price
since January 9, 2020, but dropped to $64 per barrel by March 3, 2021. On March 5, 2021, the since January 9, 2020, but dropped to $64 per barrel by March 3, 2021. On March 5, 2021, the
Brent crude price of a barrel of oil rose to $69 per barrel, the highest since January 2020, as Brent crude price of a barrel of oil rose to $69 per barrel, the highest since January 2020, as
OPEC and Russia decided against increasing petroleum output.OPEC and Russia decided against increasing petroleum output.147146 By the end of June 2021 the By the end of June 2021 the
price of Brent crude oil pushed above $75 per barrel. In meetings in early July 2021, OPEC price of Brent crude oil pushed above $75 per barrel. In meetings in early July 2021, OPEC
members agreed to increase production as the international price of crude oil reached nearly $78 members agreed to increase production as the international price of crude oil reached nearly $78
per barrel, but objections by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) over the calculation used to per barrel, but objections by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) over the calculation used to
increase production targets held up the agreement.increase production targets held up the agreement.148147 On July18, 2021, OPEC and Russia agreed On July18, 2021, OPEC and Russia agreed
to increase crude oil production by an additionalto increase crude oil production by an additional 400,000 barrels a day into 2022.400,000 barrels a day into 2022.149148 On August On August
11, 2021, the Biden Administration, citing concerns over the negative impact rising energy prices 11, 2021, the Biden Administration, citing concerns over the negative impact rising energy prices
could have on an economic recovery, could have on an economic recovery, cal edcalled on OPEC to increase oil production beyond levels on OPEC to increase oil production beyond levels
previously announced.previously announced.150149 According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. energy prices in June According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. energy prices in June
had increased by 35% over the previous year.had increased by 35% over the previous year.151150
Figure 17. Brent Crude Oil Price Per Barrel in Dollars
January 9, 2020, through January 9, 2020, through September 24November 9, 2021 , 2021

Source: Markets Insider.Markets Insider. Created by CRS. 146 Raval, Anjli, Oil Jumps as OPEC and Allies Decide Against Big Rise in Output, Financial TimesCreated by CRS.
Country Policy Responses
As previously indicated, after a delayed response, most central banks followed the actions of
Federal Reserve. In addition, national governments adopted various fiscal measures to sustain
economic activity. In response to growing concerns over the global economic impact of the
pandemic, G-7 finance ministers and central bankers released a statement on March 3, 2020,

147 Raval, Anjli, Oil Jumps as OPEC and Allies Decide Against Big Rise in Output, Financial T imes, March 5, 2021. , March 5, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/771ebf3a-cff0-4ff3-ab9a-0bbd01a33f55. https://www.ft.com/content/771ebf3a-cff0-4ff3-ab9a-0bbd01a33f55.
148147 Sheppard, David, Why is OPEC+ in Sheppard, David, Why is OPEC+ in T urmoilTurmoil When Oil Prices Are Elevated?, When Oil Prices Are Elevated?, Financial Times, July, July 5, 2021. 5, 2021.
149148 Rovnick, Naomi, Rovnick, Naomi, T ommyTommy Stubbington, Hudson Stubbington, Hudson Lockett, and Joe Rennison, GlobalLockett, and Joe Rennison, Global Markets Shaken by Fears Over Markets Shaken by Fears Over
Delta VariantDelta Variant , , Financial Tim esTimes, July 19, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/5b2248be-8f0e-4235-ba2e-2187c96f16a6. July 19, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/5b2248be-8f0e-4235-ba2e-2187c96f16a6.
150149 Fedor, Lauren and Derek Brower, White House Calls Fedor, Lauren and Derek Brower, White House Calls on OPEC to Boost Production to Contain Fuel Prices, on OPEC to Boost Production to Contain Fuel Prices,
Financial Tim esTimes, August, August 11, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/a8a631cf-de43-47e8-8cc4-99732c39c4da. 11, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/a8a631cf-de43-47e8-8cc4-99732c39c4da.
151150 Producer Price Indexes-June 2021, Bureau of Labor Statistics, July, Bureau of Labor Statistics, July 14, 2021. 14, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

60 60

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Country Policy Responses As previously indicated, after a delayed response, most central banks followed the actions of Federal Reserve. In addition, national governments adopted various fiscal measures to sustain economic activity. In response to growing concerns over the global economic impact of the pandemic, G-7 finance ministers and central bankers released a statement on March 3, 2020, indicating they would “use all indicating they would “use al appropriate policy tools” to sustain economic growth.appropriate policy tools” to sustain economic growth.152151 The The
Finance Ministers also pledged fiscal support to ensure health systems can sustain efforts to fight Finance Ministers also pledged fiscal support to ensure health systems can sustain efforts to fight
the outbreak.the outbreak.153152 In most cases, however, countries pursued their own divergent strategies, in some In most cases, however, countries pursued their own divergent strategies, in some
cases including banning exports of medical equipment. Following the G-7 statement, the U.S. cases including banning exports of medical equipment. Following the G-7 statement, the U.S.
Federal Reserve (Fed) lowered its federal funds rate by 50 basis points, or 0.5%, to a range of Federal Reserve (Fed) lowered its federal funds rate by 50 basis points, or 0.5%, to a range of
1.0% to 1.25% due to concerns about the “evolving risks to economic activity of the COVID-1.0% to 1.25% due to concerns about the “evolving risks to economic activity of the COVID-
19.”19.”154153 At the time, the cut was the largest one-time reduction in the interest rate by the Fed since At the time, the cut was the largest one-time reduction in the interest rate by the Fed since
the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. the 2008-2009 global financial crisis.
On April On April 15, 2021, the Director-General of the WTO 15, 2021, the Director-General of the WTO cal edcalled on WTO members and vaccine on WTO members and vaccine
manufacturers to increase production, reduce export restrictions, and suspend manufacturers to increase production, reduce export restrictions, and suspend intel ectualintellectual property property
rights on COVID-19 vaccines to increase immunizations.rights on COVID-19 vaccines to increase immunizations.155154 The WHO also reported that new The WHO also reported that new
COVID-19 cases had nearly doubled around the world over the preceding two months, COVID-19 cases had nearly doubled around the world over the preceding two months,
approaching the highest rates of infection since the start of the pandemic. Reportedly, new case approaching the highest rates of infection since the start of the pandemic. Reportedly, new case
numbers had spiked in every region of the world, with the largest outbreaks occurring in India, numbers had spiked in every region of the world, with the largest outbreaks occurring in India,
Brazil, Poland, Turkey and some other countries.Brazil, Poland, Turkey and some other countries.156155 Also on April 15, 2021, a group of 175 former Also on April 15, 2021, a group of 175 former
world leaders and Nobel laureates world leaders and Nobel laureates cal edcalled on the United States to suspend on the United States to suspend intel ectualintellectual property property
rights for COVID-19 vaccines to facilitate the international production and distribution of rights for COVID-19 vaccines to facilitate the international production and distribution of
vaccines by vaccines by al owingallowing developing countries the ability to manufacture their own vaccines. The developing countries the ability to manufacture their own vaccines. The
group warned that, “… inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent group warned that, “… inequitable vaccine access would impact the global economy and prevent
it from recovering.”it from recovering.”157
156 On April On April 16, the WHO announced that it would develop one or more COVID-19 technology hubs 16, the WHO announced that it would develop one or more COVID-19 technology hubs
to transfer a “comprehensive technology package and provide appropriate technology to to transfer a “comprehensive technology package and provide appropriate technology to
interested manufacturers” in developing economies.interested manufacturers” in developing economies.158157 Reportedly, the initiative’s goal is to make Reportedly, the initiative’s goal is to make
the technology either free of the technology either free of intel ectualintellectual property constraints in developing economies, or that property constraints in developing economies, or that
such rights are made available through nonexclusive licenses.
China, which experienced positive quarterly rates of economic growth throughout the pandemic-
related recession, reportedly considered a series of actions to support its economic growth rate
due to concerns over a slowing economy. On July 7, 2021, the Chinese Cabinet stated it would
scale back pandemic-related spending to address concerns over accumulated government debt
and potential y to maintain low borrowing costs for smal businesses. The statement also
indicated the cabinet supported cuts by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) in its required

152such rights are made available through nonexclusive licenses. 151 Statement of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, March 3, 2020. https://home.treasury.gov/news/, March 3, 2020. https://home.treasury.gov/news/
press-releases/sm927. Long, Heather, “press-releases/sm927. Long, Heather, “ G-7 Leaders Promise to Help Economy as COVID-19 Spreads,G-7 Leaders Promise to Help Economy as COVID-19 Spreads, But T hey But They Don’t Don’t
Announce Any NewAnnounce Any New Action,” Action,” Washington Post, March 3, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/, March 3, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/03/
03/economy-COVID-19-rate-cuts/. 03/economy-COVID-19-rate-cuts/.
153152 Giles Giles et al., “Finance Ministers Ready to et al., “Finance Ministers Ready to T akeTake Action.” Action.”
154153 Federal Reserve Releases FOMC Statement, March 3, 2020, https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/, March 3, 2020, https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/
pressreleases/monetary20200303a.htm. pressreleases/monetary20200303a.htm.
155154 Cunnigham, Erin, New Cunnigham, Erin, New African WT O African WTO Head Urges Head Urges Members to Members to T akeTake Action on Vaccine Inequity, Action on Vaccine Inequity, The Washington
Post
, April 15, 2021. , April 15, 2021.
156 155 Cunningham, Erin and Siobhan O’Grady, Cunningham, Erin and Siobhan O’Grady, New Global New Global Coronavirus CasesCoronavirus Cases Nearly DoubleNearly Double in T wo in Two Months, Months, The
Washington Post
, April 16, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/04/16/global-coronavirus-cases-surge-, April 16, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/04/16/global-coronavirus-cases-surge-
who/. who/.
157156 Williams, Aime, Former World Leaders Call Williams, Aime, Former World Leaders Call on Bidenon Biden to Suspendto Suspend Covid-19 VaccineCovid-19 Vaccine Patents, Patents, Financial Times, ,
April 15, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/43fd53f5-2b82-4e41-981c-8544a6ce996b. April 15, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/43fd53f5-2b82-4e41-981c-8544a6ce996b.
158157 World Health Organization, Establishment of a COVID-19 mRNA World Health Organization, Establishment of a COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine T echnology T ransfer Vaccine Technology Transfer Hub to Scale Hub to Scale Up Up
GlobalGlobal Manufacturing, April 16, 2021. Manufacturing, April 16, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

61 61

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

reserve ratio (RRR) – general y considered to be among the strongest actions central banks can
take – to support the economy.159China, which experienced positive quarterly rates of economic growth throughout the pandemic-related recession, reportedly considered a series of actions to support its economic growth rate due to concerns over a slowing economy. On July 7, 2021, the Chinese Cabinet stated it would scale back pandemic-related spending to address concerns over accumulated government debt and potentially to maintain low borrowing costs for small businesses. The statement also indicated the cabinet supported cuts by the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) in its required reserve ratio (RRR)—generally considered to be among the strongest actions central banks can take—to support the economy.158
According to the WHO, sixteen African countries experienced their worst period during the According to the WHO, sixteen African countries experienced their worst period during the
pandemic in early July 2021, as a result of rising rates of infections and deaths, with even larger pandemic in early July 2021, as a result of rising rates of infections and deaths, with even larger
numbers expected.numbers expected.160159 Some of the most severely affected countries were Namibia, Uganda, Some of the most severely affected countries were Namibia, Uganda,
Zambia, and South Africa, The WHO indicated the continent was experiencing a third wave of Zambia, and South Africa, The WHO indicated the continent was experiencing a third wave of
infections as a result of the rapidly spreading Delta variant. Reportedly, less than one percent of infections as a result of the rapidly spreading Delta variant. Reportedly, less than one percent of
the continent’s population has been vaccinated. the continent’s population has been vaccinated.
In the early stages of the pandemic, foreign investors pulled an estimated $26 In the early stages of the pandemic, foreign investors pulled an estimated $26 bil ion billion out of out of
developing Asian economies not including more than $16 developing Asian economies not including more than $16 bil ion billion out of India, increasing concerns out of India, increasing concerns
about a major economic recession in Asia. Some estimates indicate that 29 about a major economic recession in Asia. Some estimates indicate that 29 mil ion million people in Latin people in Latin
America could America could fal fall into poverty, reversing a decade of efforts to narrow income inequality. Some into poverty, reversing a decade of efforts to narrow income inequality. Some
analysts also expressed concern that Africa, after escaping the initial spread of infections, could analysts also expressed concern that Africa, after escaping the initial spread of infections, could
face a sharp increase in rates of infection outside South Africa, Egypt, Nigeria, Algeria, and face a sharp increase in rates of infection outside South Africa, Egypt, Nigeria, Algeria, and
Ghana, where most of the initial infections had occurred.Ghana, where most of the initial infections had occurred.161
160 In October 2020, the Bank of Canada indicated that Canada’s quarterly rate of growth declined by In October 2020, the Bank of Canada indicated that Canada’s quarterly rate of growth declined by
13.0% in the second quarter of 2020, but by 4.4% in the third quarter as business and other 13.0% in the second quarter of 2020, but by 4.4% in the third quarter as business and other
restrictions were relaxed and by a rebound in home sales. The Bank also estimated that growth restrictions were relaxed and by a rebound in home sales. The Bank also estimated that growth
for 2020 declined at an annual rate of 5.3% in 2020, but could increase by an estimated 6.0% in for 2020 declined at an annual rate of 5.3% in 2020, but could increase by an estimated 6.0% in
2021 and 4.6%in 2022.2021 and 4.6%in 2022.162161 On December 1, the Canadian government adopted a C$1 On December 1, the Canadian government adopted a C$1 tril iontrillion
spending package to support economic growth, reportedly the largest such fiscal stimulus spending package to support economic growth, reportedly the largest such fiscal stimulus
package adopted in the post-World War II period.package adopted in the post-World War II period.163162 The package provided relief to provinces and The package provided relief to provinces and
territories to improve infection in long-term care facilities, industries hard hit by the pandemic, territories to improve infection in long-term care facilities, industries hard hit by the pandemic,
such as tourism, travel and arts, and provide loans to eligible businesses and to lower and middle such as tourism, travel and arts, and provide loans to eligible businesses and to lower and middle
income families. income families.
India announced on March 25, 2021, that it was temporarily halting exports of COVID-19 India announced on March 25, 2021, that it was temporarily halting exports of COVID-19
vaccines and prioritizing local vaccinations in response to a resurgence in viral cases.vaccines and prioritizing local vaccinations in response to a resurgence in viral cases.164163 In early In early
April 2021, India and BrazilApril 2021, India and Brazil were designated global viral infection hot spots due to a resurgence were designated global viral infection hot spots due to a resurgence
in cases. On May 6, India reported a single-day total of 412,000 new cases.165 By July 2, India’s
death toll from the pandemic surpassed 400,000.166 Brazil reportedly has had over 350,000 viral-

159 158 Qian, Colin, Judy Qian, Colin, Judy Hua, Kevin Yao, GilesHua, Kevin Yao, Giles Elgood and Mark Heinrich, ChinaElgood and Mark Heinrich, China's Cabinet Sayss Cabinet Says It Will Use RRRIt Will Use RRR Cuts Cuts to to
Support RealSupport Real Economy, Economy, ReutersReuters, July 7, 2021. , July 7, 2021.
160159 Cunningham, Erin, Africa Suffers Cunningham, Erin, Africa Suffers ‘Worst Pandemic Week Ever’ as Cases‘Worst Pandemic Week Ever’ as Cases Surge,Surge, Vaccinations Lag, Vaccinations Lag, The Washington
Post,
July 9, 2021. July 9, 2021.
161160 Pilling, David, Pilling, David, T he The Pandemic is Getting Worse: Africa Prepares for Surge Pandemic is Getting Worse: Africa Prepares for Surge in Infections, in Infections, Financial Times, July 20, , July 20,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/1b3274ce-de3b-411d-8544-a024e64c3542. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/1b3274ce-de3b-411d-8544-a024e64c3542.
162 161 Monetary Policy Report July 2021, Bank of Canada, July, Bank of Canada, July 2021. 2021.
163162 Canada Unveils Largest Economic Relief Package Since Canada Unveils Largest Economic Relief Package Since WW2, BBC News,WW2, BBC News, December 1, 2020. December 1, 2020.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55139229. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-55139229.
164163 Findlay, Stephanie, Michael Peel, Donato Paolo Mancini, Andres Schipani and Jasmine Findlay, Stephanie, Michael Peel, Donato Paolo Mancini, Andres Schipani and Jasmine Cameron-Chileshe, India Cameron-Chileshe, India
Blocks VaccineBlocks Vaccine Exports in Blow to Dozens of Nations Exports in Blow to Dozens of Nations Financial Tim esTimes, March 25, 2021. , March 25, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/https://www.ft.com/content/5349389c-8313-41e0-9a67-58274e24a019. Congressional Research Service 62 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 in cases. On May 6, India reported a single-day total of 412,000 new cases.164 By July 2, India’s death toll from the pandemic surpassed 400,000.165 Brazil reportedly has had over 350,000 viral-related deaths: in some cities in Brazil, COVID-related daily deaths have outnumbered daily births.166 In April 2021, India reported that in the second quarter its GDP growth rate fell by 25.8% 5349389c-8313-41e0-9a67-58274e24a019.
165 Slater, Joanna, India Announces Record Number of Deaths and New Cases as Outbreak Rages on, The Washington
Post
, May 6, 2021; Parker, Claire, Paul Schemm, Sean Sullivan, India Sets Another Daily Coronavirus Case Record:
U.S. Pledges Help, The Washington Post, April 26, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-
coronavirus-deaths-pandemic/2021/04/25/ec0f208a-a51c-11eb-b314-2e993bd83e31_story.html.
166 Cunningham, Erin, Covid-19 Global Updates: India’s Death T oll T ops 400,000 as Delta Variant Gains Ground
Worldwide, The Washington Post, July 2, 2021.
Congressional Research Service

62

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

related deaths: in some cities in Brazil, COVID-related daily deaths have outnumbered daily
births.167
In April 2021, India reported that in the second quarter its GDP growth rate fel by 25.8%
compared with the first quarter, raising concerns that the country could experience its most severe compared with the first quarter, raising concerns that the country could experience its most severe
economic contraction on record.economic contraction on record.168167 Subsequent forecasts indicate that India’s economy grew by Subsequent forecasts indicate that India’s economy grew by
23.7% in the third quarter of 2020, reportedly reflecting higher levels of consumer activity, and 23.7% in the third quarter of 2020, reportedly reflecting higher levels of consumer activity, and
by 7.9% in the fourth quarter.by 7.9% in the fourth quarter.169168 On an annual basis, India’s economy reportedly grew at a rate On an annual basis, India’s economy reportedly grew at a rate
of -3.5%. On November 12, India’s finance minister announced a new package of fiscal measures of -3.5%. On November 12, India’s finance minister announced a new package of fiscal measures
totaling $35 totaling $35 bil ion billion to increase consumer spending and to assist manufacturing, agriculture, and to increase consumer spending and to assist manufacturing, agriculture, and
exports. The move followed an announcement by India’s cabinet that it had approved a spending exports. The move followed an announcement by India’s cabinet that it had approved a spending
package of $27 package of $27 bil ion billion to provide incentives over five years to manufacturing firms, including to provide incentives over five years to manufacturing firms, including
automobiles, auto parts, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and food products.automobiles, auto parts, pharmaceuticals, textiles, and food products.170169
As a consequence of the resurgence in cases and renewed lockdowns in economies, the IMF As a consequence of the resurgence in cases and renewed lockdowns in economies, the IMF
argued that advanced economies needed to sustain fiscal support for consumers and businesses as argued that advanced economies needed to sustain fiscal support for consumers and businesses as
the most effective means of stimulating their economies. The IMF argued this support was the most effective means of stimulating their economies. The IMF argued this support was
necessary because the global economy was experiencing what economists term a Keynesian necessary because the global economy was experiencing what economists term a Keynesian
liquidity liquidity trap, named after economist John Maynard Keynes. In theoretical terms, a liquidity trap trap, named after economist John Maynard Keynes. In theoretical terms, a liquidity trap
exists when central banks’ key interest rates are so low they have little impact through traditional exists when central banks’ key interest rates are so low they have little impact through traditional
means to affect business and consumer activity. According to the IMF, in 60% of the global means to affect business and consumer activity. According to the IMF, in 60% of the global
economy, central banks had pushed key interest rates below 1% and in one-fifth of the global economy, central banks had pushed key interest rates below 1% and in one-fifth of the global
economy, interest rates were below zero. In these circumstances, economists economy, interest rates were below zero. In these circumstances, economists general ygenerally argue that argue that
adjusting fiscal policy, or government taxing and spending, is the more effective policy tool for adjusting fiscal policy, or government taxing and spending, is the more effective policy tool for
raising the rate of economic growth.raising the rate of economic growth.171170 The IMF concluded that, “Fiscal policy must play a The IMF concluded that, “Fiscal policy must play a
leading role in the recovery.” leading role in the recovery.”
The United States
Recognizing the growing impact the pandemic was having on financial markets and economic Recognizing the growing impact the pandemic was having on financial markets and economic
growth, the Federal Reserve (Fed) took a number of steps to promote economic and financial growth, the Federal Reserve (Fed) took a number of steps to promote economic and financial
stability involving the Fed’s monetary policy and “lender of last resort” roles. Some of these
actions were intended to stimulate economic activity by reducing interest rates; other actions were
intended to provide liquidity to financial markets so firms would have access to needed funding.
In announcing its decisions, the Fed indicated that “[t]he COVID-19 outbreak has harmed
communities and disrupted economic activity in many countries, including the United States.
Global financial conditions have also been significantly affected.172” On March 31, 2020, the

167 Caverni, Alexandre, Brazil Sees 1,803 COVID-19 Deaths; Chinese Vaccine Found 50.7% Effective Against
Variant, Reuters 164 Slater, Joanna, India Announces Record Number of Deaths and New Cases as Outbreak Rages on, The Washington Post, May 6, 2021; Parker, Claire, Paul Schemm, Sean Sullivan, India Sets Another Daily Coronavirus Case Record: U.S. Pledges Help, The Washington Post, April 26, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/india-coronavirus-deaths-pandemic/2021/04/25/ec0f208a-a51c-11eb-b314-2e993bd83e31_story.html. 165 Cunningham, Erin, Covid-19 Global Updates: India’s Death Toll Tops 400,000 as Delta Variant Gains Ground Worldwide, The Washington Post, July 2, 2021. 166 Caverni, Alexandre, Brazil Sees 1,803 COVID-19 Deaths; Chinese Vaccine Found 50.7% Effective Against Variant, Reuters, April 11, 2021; Hassan, Jennifer, In Many Brazilian Cities, Deaths Have Overtaken Births, , April 11, 2021; Hassan, Jennifer, In Many Brazilian Cities, Deaths Have Overtaken Births, The
Washington Post,
April 15, 2021. April 15, 2021.
168167 Slater, Joanna, India’s Economy Contracts by Nearly 24%, Its Sharpest Drop On Record, Slater, Joanna, India’s Economy Contracts by Nearly 24%, Its Sharpest Drop On Record, Washington Post, August , August
31, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/indias-economy-contracts-by-nearly-24-percent-amid-31, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/indias-economy-contracts-by-nearly-24-percent-amid-
pandemic/2020/08/31/92318fbe-eb70-11ea-bd08-1b10132b458f_story.html?hpid=hp_world-rightpandemic/2020/08/31/92318fbe-eb70-11ea-bd08-1b10132b458f_story.html?hpid=hp_world-right -4-0_world-latest--4-0_world-latest-
feed%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans. feed%3Ahomepage%2Fstory-ans.
169 168 RBI BulletinNovember 2020, Reserve Bank of India, November 2020. , Reserve Bank of India, November 2020.
170169 Sharma, Ashok, India Announces $35 Billion Economic Stimulus Sharma, Ashok, India Announces $35 Billion Economic Stimulus Package, Package, ABCNews,, November 12, 2020. November 12, 2020.
https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/india-announces-35-billion-economic-stimulus-package-74165709. https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/india-announces-35-billion-economic-stimulus-package-74165709.
171170 Gopinath, Gita, Global Gopinath, Gita, Global Liquidity Liquidity T rapTrap Requires Requires a Big Fiscal a Big Fiscal Response, Response, Financial Times, November 3, 2020, , November 3, 2020,
https://www.ft.com/content/2e1c0555-d65b-48d1-9af3-825d187eec58. https://www.ft.com/content/2e1c0555-d65b-48d1-9af3-825d187eec58.
172 Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement, March 15, 2020. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

63 63

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

stability involving the Fed’s monetary policy and “lender of last resort” roles. Some of these actions were intended to stimulate economic activity by reducing interest rates; other actions were intended to provide liquidity to financial markets so firms would have access to needed funding. In announcing its decisions, the Fed indicated that “[t]he COVID-19 outbreak has harmed communities and disrupted economic activity in many countries, including the United States. Global financial conditions have also been significantly affected.171” On March 31, 2020, the Trump Administration announced that it was suspending for 90 days tariffs it had placed on Trump Administration announced that it was suspending for 90 days tariffs it had placed on
imports of apparel and light trucks from China, but not on other consumer goods and metals.imports of apparel and light trucks from China, but not on other consumer goods and metals.173172 In In
October, Congress and the Trump Administration negotiated over the substance of an additional October, Congress and the Trump Administration negotiated over the substance of an additional
spending package to support the U.S. economy. The U.S. Congress passed a $1.9 spending package to support the U.S. economy. The U.S. Congress passed a $1.9 tril iontrillion
economic stimulus economic stimulus bil bill, designated the American Rescue Plan Act (P.L. 117-2), that was signed by , designated the American Rescue Plan Act (P.L. 117-2), that was signed by
President Biden on March 11, 2021. President Biden on March 11, 2021.
On May 5, 2021, the Biden administration announced it would support international discussions On May 5, 2021, the Biden administration announced it would support international discussions
to waive to waive intel ectual intellectual property restrictions on COVID-19 vaccine production for developing property restrictions on COVID-19 vaccine production for developing
economies.economies.174173 Prior to this announcement, developed economies, including Britain, Switzerland, Prior to this announcement, developed economies, including Britain, Switzerland,
the EU, and the United States, had blocked a proposal by over 80 developing countries at the the EU, and the United States, had blocked a proposal by over 80 developing countries at the
World Trade Organization to suspend World Trade Organization to suspend intel ectualintellectual property rights restrictions on production of property rights restrictions on production of
COVID-19 vaccines.COVID-19 vaccines.175174 The EU announced on June 4, 2021, that it would reject the U.S. proposal The EU announced on June 4, 2021, that it would reject the U.S. proposal
to drop IP protections and offered a three-point plan of its own that included (1) maintaining to drop IP protections and offered a three-point plan of its own that included (1) maintaining
export restrictions; (2) encouraging vaccine manufacturers to negotiate agreements with export restrictions; (2) encouraging vaccine manufacturers to negotiate agreements with
producers in developing economies and increasing vaccine supplies to vulnerable countries; and producers in developing economies and increasing vaccine supplies to vulnerable countries; and
(3) using existing WTO rules to grant licenses to producers without the consent of the patent-(3) using existing WTO rules to grant licenses to producers without the consent of the patent-
holder.holder.176175 During the G-7 summit in England on June 11, 2021, the United States and the other G- During the G-7 summit in England on June 11, 2021, the United States and the other G-
7 leaders announced they would provide a combined total of 1 7 leaders announced they would provide a combined total of 1 bil ion billion doses of the COVID-19 doses of the COVID-19
vaccine in addition to lifesaving medical supplies, oxygen, diagnostics, therapeutics, and personal vaccine in addition to lifesaving medical supplies, oxygen, diagnostics, therapeutics, and personal
protective equipment (PPE) to low and middle income developing countries.protective equipment (PPE) to low and middle income developing countries.177
On September 30176 On October 28, 2021, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released , 2021, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) released updated estimated third quarter data on U.S. GDP, which indicated the U.S. economy grew at an annual rate of 2.0% growth and that the economy grew by annualized rates of data on U.S.
GDP growth for the first and second quarters of 2021 and updated data for 2020 that indicates the
economy grew by 6.3% in the first quarter and 6.7% in the second quarter of 2021, outpacing the 6.3% in the first quarter and 6.7% in the second quarter of 2021, outpacing the
4th quarter 2020 rate of 4.5%. In contrast, U.S. GDP fel at an 4th quarter 2020 rate of 4.5%. The deceleration in the rate of growth in the third quarter reflected lower levels of personal consumption expenditures on motor vehicles and parts and on food, services, and accommodation. In contrast, U.S. GDP fell at an annual rate of 31.4% in the second annual rate of 31.4% in the second
quarter of 2020, after quarter of 2020, after fal ingfalling by 5.0% at an annual rate in the first quarter, as indicated in by 5.0% at an annual rate in the first quarter, as indicated in Figure
18
..178177 On an annual basis, the 2020 rate of growth On an annual basis, the 2020 rate of growth fel fell by 3.4%, compared with a 2019 rate of by 3.4%, compared with a 2019 rate of
2.3%. In the second quarter of 2020, amidst a large decline overal in U.S. economic activity in
response to business lockdowns, some sectors experienced a decline in activity of 80% or more,
including recreation, food services and accommodation and transportation sectors. In the third
quarter, however, al sectors except mining experienced positive rate of growth. Personal
consumption increased by 41% in the third quarter, after fal ing by 31.4% in the second quarter,
sustaining economic growth.

2.3%. In the second quarter of 2020, amidst a large decline 171 Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement, March 15, 2020. https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/monetary20200315a.htm. pressreleases/monetary20200315a.htm.
173 172 Politi, James and Aime Williams, “ Politi, James and Aime Williams, “T rumpTrump to Suspend Some to Suspend Some T ariffsTariffs for 90 Days,” for 90 Days,” Financial Times, March 31, 2020. , March 31, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/46add447-2048-4348-bd34-2088ad0e3bc8. https://www.ft.com/content/46add447-2048-4348-bd34-2088ad0e3bc8.
174173 Diamond, Dan, Diamond, Dan, T ylerTyler Pager, and Jeff Stein, Biden Commits to Waiving Vaccine Pager, and Jeff Stein, Biden Commits to Waiving Vaccine Patents, Driving Wedge With Patents, Driving Wedge With
Pharmaceutical Companies, Pharmaceutical Companies, The Washington Post, May 5, 2021. May 5, 2021.
175174 Rich, Developing Economies Wrangle Over COVID COVID Patents, , ReutersReuters, March 10, 2021. , March 10, 2021.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-wto/rich-developing-nations-wrangle-over-covid-vaccine-https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-wto/rich-developing-nations-wrangle-over-covid-vaccine-
patents-idUSKBN2B21V9. patents-idUSKBN2B21V9.
176175 Blenkinsop, Phillip, Resisting Patent Waiver, EU Submits Vaccine Blenkinsop, Phillip, Resisting Patent Waiver, EU Submits Vaccine Plan to Plan to WT OWTO, , Reuters, June 4, 2021. , June 4, 2021.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-executive-submits-vaccine-access-proposal-wto-2021-06-04/. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-executive-submits-vaccine-access-proposal-wto-2021-06-04/.
177176 Scott, Eugene, G-7 Leaders Scott, Eugene, G-7 Leaders Commit to Making 1 Billion Coronavirus VaccinesCommit to Making 1 Billion Coronavirus Vaccines Available Starting Available Starting T hisThis Summer, Summer,
The Washington Post, June 11, 2021. , June 11, 2021.
178 177 Gross Domestic Product, (Third Estimate), Corporate Profits (Revised Estimates), and GDP by Industry, Second
Quarter 2021
Third Quarter 2021, (Advance Estimate), Bureau of Economic Analysis, , Bureau of Economic Analysis, September 30, October 28, 2021. 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

64 64


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

overall in U.S. economic activity in response to business lockdowns, some sectors experienced a decline in activity of 80% or more, including recreation, food services and accommodation and transportation sectors. In the third quarter, however, all sectors except mining experienced positive rate of growth. Personal consumption increased by 41% in the third quarter, after falling by 31.4% in the second quarter, sustaining economic growth. Figure 18. U.S. GDPFigure 18. U.S. GDP, Percentage Change From Preceding Quarter
Seasonal ySeasonally adjusted at annual adjusted at annual raterates

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis.Bureau of Economic Analysis. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Notes: Exports and imports Exports and imports represent the combination of goods and services. represent the combination of goods and services.
On On September 3October 8, 2021, the BLS released data on the employment situation in , 2021, the BLS released data on the employment situation in AugustSeptember, which , which
indicated that nonfarm payrolls rose by indicated that nonfarm payrolls rose by 235194,000, down from ,000, down from 1,053366,000 jobs gained in ,000 jobs gained in JulyAugust and and
represents the lowest number of job gains since January 2021; the rate of unemployment was represents the lowest number of job gains since January 2021; the rate of unemployment was
5.2%.1794.8%.178 The data also The data also indicate that 5.6 mil ion indicated that 5.0 million persons reported in persons reported in AugustSeptember they did not work they did not work at al

179 178 The Employment Situation-AugustSeptember 2021, Bureau of Labor Statistics, , Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 3October 8, 2021. https://www.bls.gov/., 2021. https://www.bls.gov/. T he The
unemployment number does not include 4.5 million workers who wereunemployment number does not include 4.5 million workers who were working part time not by choice and 6.0 millionworking part time not by choice and 5.7 million
individuals seeking employment. In addition, BLS indicated that some worker s had been misclassified as employed,
but should have been classified as unemployed, which would have raised the rate of unemployment by 0.3 percentage
points.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

65 65


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

at all or worked fewer hours at some point in the previous 4 weeks because their employer closed or worked fewer hours at some point in the previous 4 weeks because their employer closed or or
lost business due to the pandemic. lost business due to the pandemic.
As indicated in As indicated in Figure 19, with the exception of December, with the exception of December 2020, the U.S. economy experienced , the U.S. economy experienced
monthly gains in jobs since the loss of more than 20 monthly gains in jobs since the loss of more than 20 mil ion million jobs in April 2020. In general, the jobs in April 2020. In general, the
monthly gains in jobs has variedmonthly gains in jobs has varied and by August, but by September 2021 had not equaled the number of jobs lost in 2021 had not equaled the number of jobs lost in
April 2020. The number of unemployed workers was April 2020. The number of unemployed workers was 9.5 mil ion in June 2021, up7.7 million in September 2021, down 710,000 from the from the
previous month’s total of 8.4 previous month’s total of 8.4 mil ionmillion. Over the period from May 2020 through . Over the period from May 2020 through AugustSeptember 2021, job 2021, job
gains were notable in the leisure and hospitality industry (particularly in food services and gains were notable in the leisure and hospitality industry (particularly in food services and
drinking establishments), retail trade, public-sector education and health services, health care and drinking establishments), retail trade, public-sector education and health services, health care and
social assistance, professional and business services, and other services, while employment in social assistance, professional and business services, and other services, while employment in
utilities fel utilities fell. .
Figure 19. Change in Total Monthly U.S. Nonfarm Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics.Bureau of Labor Statistics. Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
In the first stages of the pandemic, the Department of Labor reported on May 8, 2020, that the In the first stages of the pandemic, the Department of Labor reported on May 8, 2020, that the
U.S. nonfarm unemployment rate in April, 2020, increased by 20 U.S. nonfarm unemployment rate in April, 2020, increased by 20 mil ionmillion workers, which raised workers, which raised
the total number of unemployed Americans to 23 the total number of unemployed Americans to 23 mil ion, million, or an unemployment rate of 14% of the or an unemployment rate of 14% of the
total civiliantotal civilian labor force of about 160 labor force of about 160 mil ionmillion. The unemployment rate did not include . The unemployment rate did not include
approximately 10 approximately 10 mil ion million workers who were involuntarily working part-time and another 9 workers who were involuntarily working part-time and another 9
mil ion individuals million individuals who were seeking employment. As indicated in who were seeking employment. As indicated in Figure 20, the number of , the number of
unemployed individualsunemployed individuals increased the most in the leisure and hospitalityincreased the most in the leisure and hospitality sector, reflecting sector, reflecting
nationalnational quarantining policies to reduce the spread of COVID-19 through social contact. The quarantining policies to reduce the spread of COVID-19 through social contact. The
employment losses were widely spread across the economy, affecting every nonfarm sector and employment losses were widely spread across the economy, affecting every nonfarm sector and
al all labor groups. Between March and Aril 2020, the number of U.S. labor groups. Between March and Aril 2020, the number of U.S. non-farmnonfarm civilian workers civilian workers
dropped from 150 dropped from 150 mil ionmillion to 130 to 130 mil ion. million. Between June 2020 and Between June 2020 and JulySeptember 2021, the nonfarm civilian labor force increased from 139 million to 148 million. individuals seeking employment. In addition, BLS indicated that some workers had been misclassified as employed, but should have been classified as unemployed, which would have raised the rate of unemployment by 0.1 percentage point. 2021, the non-farm
civilian labor force increased from 137.8 mil ion to 146.5 mil ion.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

66 66


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 20. Change in U.S. Employment by Major Industrial Sector

Source: The Employment Situation,, Bureau of Labor Statistics,Bureau of Labor Statistics, various months 2020 and 2021. Created by CRS. various months 2020 and 2021. Created by CRS.
In a speech on May 13, 2020, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome In a speech on May 13, 2020, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powel Powell reported that Federal reported that Federal
Reserve analyses indicated that of individuals working in February, 2020, “almost 40 percent of Reserve analyses indicated that of individuals working in February, 2020, “almost 40 percent of
those in households making less than $40,000 a year had lost a job in March.”those in households making less than $40,000 a year had lost a job in March.”180179 Chairman Chairman
Powel Powell also indicated that given the extraordinary nature of the current economic downturn the also indicated that given the extraordinary nature of the current economic downturn the
Fed would, “continue to use our tools to their fullest until the crisis has passed and the economic Fed would, “continue to use our tools to their fullest until the crisis has passed and the economic
recovery is recovery is wel well under way.”under way.”
In characterizing the monetary and fiscal response to the economic downturn, Chairman In characterizing the monetary and fiscal response to the economic downturn, Chairman Powel
Powell said in a speech on October 6, the monetary response included, “the full range of tools at our said in a speech on October 6, the monetary response included, “the full range of tools at our
disposal,” including cutting key interest rates, “unprecedented” asset purchases, establishing disposal,” including cutting key interest rates, “unprecedented” asset purchases, establishing
emergency lending facilities to support households, businesses and state and local governments, emergency lending facilities to support households, businesses and state and local governments,
and implementing targeted and temporary measures for banks to support their customers.and implementing targeted and temporary measures for banks to support their customers.181180 In In
addition, the fiscal response accomplished three objectives, it provided support to households, addition, the fiscal response accomplished three objectives, it provided support to households,
businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program, and financial markets. Chairman businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program, and financial markets. Chairman Powel
Powell concluded his remarks by arguing for the necessity of continued fiscal support for the economy: concluded his remarks by arguing for the necessity of continued fiscal support for the economy:
The expansion is still far from complete. At this early stage, I would argue that the risks of The expansion is still far from complete. At this early stage, I would argue that the risks of
policy intervention are still asymmetric. Too little support would lead to a weak recovery, policy intervention are still asymmetric. Too little support would lead to a weak recovery,
creatingcreating unnecessary hardship unnecessary hardship for households and businesses.for households and businesses. Over time, household Over time, household
insolvencies and business bankruptcies would rise, harming the productive capacity of the insolvencies and business bankruptcies would rise, harming the productive capacity of the
economy, and holding back wage growth. By contrast, the risks of overdoing it seem, for economy, and holding back wage growth. By contrast, the risks of overdoing it seem, for
now, to be smaller. Even if policy actions ultimately prove to be greater than needed, they now, to be smaller. Even if policy actions ultimately prove to be greater than needed, they
willwill not go to waste.not go to waste.182

180181 179 Current Economic Issues; Speech; Speech at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Jerome H. Powell, May 13, at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Jerome H. Powell, May 13,
2020. 2020.
181180 Recent Economic Developments and the Challenges Ahead , Jerome H Powell, Remarks at the National Association Jerome H Powell, Remarks at the National Association
for Businessfor Business Economists, October 6, 2020. Economists, October 6, 2020.
182 181 Ibid., p. 7. Ibid., p. 7.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

67 67

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Monetary Policy183Policy182
Forward Guidance
Forward guidance
refers to Fed public communications on its future plans for short-term interest refers to Fed public communications on its future plans for short-term interest
rates, and it took many forms following the 2008 financial crisis. As monetary policy returned to rates, and it took many forms following the 2008 financial crisis. As monetary policy returned to
normal in recent years, forward guidance was phased out. It is being used again today. For normal in recent years, forward guidance was phased out. It is being used again today. For
example, when the Fed reduced short-term rates to zero on March 15, it announced that it example, when the Fed reduced short-term rates to zero on March 15, it announced that it
“expects to maintain this target range until it is confident that the economy has weathered recent “expects to maintain this target range until it is confident that the economy has weathered recent
events and is on track to achieve its maximum employment and price stability goals.” events and is on track to achieve its maximum employment and price stability goals.”
Quantitative Easing
Large-scale asset purchases, popularly referred to as Large-scale asset purchases, popularly referred to as quantitative easing or or QE, were also used , were also used
during the financial crisis. Under QE, the Fed expanded its balance sheet by purchasing during the financial crisis. Under QE, the Fed expanded its balance sheet by purchasing
securities. Three rounds of QE from 2009 to 2014 increased the Fed’s securities holdings by $3.7 securities. Three rounds of QE from 2009 to 2014 increased the Fed’s securities holdings by $3.7
tril iontrillion. .
On March 23, the Fed announced that it would increase its purchases of Treasury securities and On March 23, the Fed announced that it would increase its purchases of Treasury securities and
mortgage-backed securities (MBS)—including commercial MBS—issued by government mortgage-backed securities (MBS)—including commercial MBS—issued by government
agencies or government-sponsored enterprises to “the amounts needed to support smooth market agencies or government-sponsored enterprises to “the amounts needed to support smooth market
functioning and effective transmission of monetary policy...functioning and effective transmission of monetary policy... . ” These would be undertaken at the ” These would be undertaken at the
unprecedented rate of up to $125 unprecedented rate of up to $125 bil ionbillion daily during the week of March 23. As a result, the value daily during the week of March 23. As a result, the value
of the Fed’s balance sheet is projected to exceed its post-financial crisis peak of $4.5 of the Fed’s balance sheet is projected to exceed its post-financial crisis peak of $4.5 tril iontrillion. One . One
notable difference from previous rounds of QE is that the Fed is purchasing securities of different notable difference from previous rounds of QE is that the Fed is purchasing securities of different
maturities, so the effect likely maturities, so the effect likely wil will not be concentrated on long-term rates. not be concentrated on long-term rates.
Actions to Provide Liquidity
Reserve Requirements
On March 15, the Fed announced that it was reducing reserve requirements—the amount of vault On March 15, the Fed announced that it was reducing reserve requirements—the amount of vault
cash or deposits at the Fed that banks must hold against deposits—to zero for the first time ever. cash or deposits at the Fed that banks must hold against deposits—to zero for the first time ever.
As the Fed noted in its announcement, because bank reserves are currently so abundant, reserve As the Fed noted in its announcement, because bank reserves are currently so abundant, reserve
requirements “do not play a significant role” in monetary policy. requirements “do not play a significant role” in monetary policy.
Term Repos
The Fed can temporarily provide liquidityThe Fed can temporarily provide liquidity to financial markets by lending cash through to financial markets by lending cash through
repurchase agreements (repos) with primary dealers (i.e., large government securities dealers who repurchase agreements (repos) with primary dealers (i.e., large government securities dealers who
are market makers). Before the financial crisis, this was the Fed’s routine method for targeting the are market makers). Before the financial crisis, this was the Fed’s routine method for targeting the
federal funds rate. Following the financial crisis, the Fed’s large balance sheet meant that repos federal funds rate. Following the financial crisis, the Fed’s large balance sheet meant that repos
were no longer needed, until they were revived in September 2019. On March 12, the Fed were no longer needed, until they were revived in September 2019. On March 12, the Fed
announced it would offer a three-month repo of $500 announced it would offer a three-month repo of $500 bil ionbillion and a one-month repo of $500 and a one-month repo of $500
bil ion billion on a weekly basis through the end of the month in addition to the shorter-term repos it had on a weekly basis through the end of the month in addition to the shorter-term repos it had
already been offering. These repos would be larger and longer than those offered since already been offering. These repos would be larger and longer than those offered since
September. On March 31, the Fed announced the Foreign and International Monetary Authorities September. On March 31, the Fed announced the Foreign and International Monetary Authorities
(FIMA) Repo Facility, which works like the foreign repo pool in reverse. This facility (FIMA) Repo Facility, which works like the foreign repo pool in reverse. This facility al ows
allows foreign central banks to convert their U.S. Treasury holdings into U.S. dollars on an overnight foreign central banks to convert their U.S. Treasury holdings into U.S. dollars on an overnight

183 T his section was 182 This section was prepared by Marc Labonte, Specialist in Macroeconomic Policy, Government and Finance prepared by Marc Labonte, Specialist in Macroeconomic Policy, Government and Finance
Division, CRS.Division, CRS. CRS CRS Insight IN11259, Insight IN11259, Federal Reserve: Recent Actions in Response to COVID-19, by Marc Labonte. , by Marc Labonte.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

68 68

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

basis. The Fed basis. The Fed wil will charge a (charge a (typical ytypically) above market interest rate of 0.25 percentage points above ) above market interest rate of 0.25 percentage points above
the interest rate paid on bank reserves. The facility is intended to work in tandem with currency the interest rate paid on bank reserves. The facility is intended to work in tandem with currency
swap lines to provide additional dollars to meet global demand and is availableswap lines to provide additional dollars to meet global demand and is available to a broader group to a broader group
of central banks than the swap lines.of central banks than the swap lines.
Discount Window
In its March 15 announcement, the Fed encouraged banks (insured depository institutions) to In its March 15 announcement, the Fed encouraged banks (insured depository institutions) to
borrow from the Fed’s discount window to meet their liquidity needs. This is the Fed’s traditional borrow from the Fed’s discount window to meet their liquidity needs. This is the Fed’s traditional
tool in its “lender of last resort” function. The Fed also encouraged banks to use intraday credit tool in its “lender of last resort” function. The Fed also encouraged banks to use intraday credit
available available through the Fed’s payment systems as a source of liquidity. through the Fed’s payment systems as a source of liquidity.
Foreign Central Bank Swap Lines
Both domestic and foreign commercial banks rely on short-term borrowing markets to access Both domestic and foreign commercial banks rely on short-term borrowing markets to access
U.S. dollars needed to fund their operations and meet their cash flow needs. But in an U.S. dollars needed to fund their operations and meet their cash flow needs. But in an
environment of strained liquidity, only banks operating in the United States can access the environment of strained liquidity, only banks operating in the United States can access the
discount window. Therefore, the Fed has standing “swap lines” with major foreign central banks discount window. Therefore, the Fed has standing “swap lines” with major foreign central banks
to provide central banks with U.S. dollar funding that they can in turn lend to private banks in to provide central banks with U.S. dollar funding that they can in turn lend to private banks in
their jurisdictions. On March 15, the Fed reduced the cost of using those swap lines and on March their jurisdictions. On March 15, the Fed reduced the cost of using those swap lines and on March
19 it extended swap lines to nine more central banks. On March 31, 2020, the Fed set up a new 19 it extended swap lines to nine more central banks. On March 31, 2020, the Fed set up a new
temporary facility to work in tandem with the swap lines to provide additionaltemporary facility to work in tandem with the swap lines to provide additional dollars to meet dollars to meet
global demand. The new facility global demand. The new facility al owsallows central banks and international monetary authorities to central banks and international monetary authorities to
exchange their U.S. Treasury securities held with the Federal Reserve for U.S. dollars, which can exchange their U.S. Treasury securities held with the Federal Reserve for U.S. dollars, which can
then be made availablethen be made available to institutions in their jurisdictions.to institutions in their jurisdictions.184183
Emergency Credit Facilities for the Nonbank Financial System
In 2008, the Fed created a series of emergency credit facilities to support liquidity in the nonbank In 2008, the Fed created a series of emergency credit facilities to support liquidity in the nonbank
financial system. This extended the Fed’s traditional role as lender of last resort from the banking financial system. This extended the Fed’s traditional role as lender of last resort from the banking
system to the system to the overal overall financial system for the first time since the Great Depression. To create financial system for the first time since the Great Depression. To create
these facilities, the Fed relied on its emergency lending authority (Section 13(3) of the Federal these facilities, the Fed relied on its emergency lending authority (Section 13(3) of the Federal
Reserve Act). To date, the Fed has created six facilities—some new, and some reviving 2008 Reserve Act). To date, the Fed has created six facilities—some new, and some reviving 2008
facilities—in response to COVID-19. facilities—in response to COVID-19.
 On March 17, the Fed revived the commercial paper funding facility to purchase  On March 17, the Fed revived the commercial paper funding facility to purchase
commercial paper, which is an important source of short-term funding for commercial paper, which is an important source of short-term funding for
financial firms, nonfinancial firms, and asset-backed securities (ABS). financial firms, nonfinancial firms, and asset-backed securities (ABS).
 Like banks, primary dealers are heavily reliant on short-term lending markets in  Like banks, primary dealers are heavily reliant on short-term lending markets in
their role as securities market makers. Unlike banks, they cannot access the their role as securities market makers. Unlike banks, they cannot access the
discount window. On March 17, the Fed revived the primary dealer credit facility, discount window. On March 17, the Fed revived the primary dealer credit facility,
which is akin to a discount window for primary dealers. Like the discount which is akin to a discount window for primary dealers. Like the discount
window, it provides short-term, fully collateralized loans to primary dealers. window, it provides short-term, fully collateralized loans to primary dealers.
 On March 19, the Fed created the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility  On March 19, the Fed created the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility
(MMLF), similar to a facility created during the 2008 financial crisis. The (MMLF), similar to a facility created during the 2008 financial crisis. The
MMLF makes loans to financial institutions to purchase assets that money MMLF makes loans to financial institutions to purchase assets that money
market funds are market funds are sel ingselling to meet redemptions. to meet redemptions.

184 183 For additional information about swap lines, see CRS For additional information about swap lines, see CRS In FocusIn Focus IF11489, IF11489, Federal Executive Agencies: Selected Pay
Flexibilities for COVID-19 Response
, by Barbara L. Schwemle. , by Barbara L. Schwemle.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

69 69

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

 On March 23, the Fed created two facilities to support corporate bond markets—  On March 23, the Fed created two facilities to support corporate bond markets—
the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility to purchase newly issued corporate the Primary Market Corporate Credit Facility to purchase newly issued corporate
debt and the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility to purchase existing debt and the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility to purchase existing
corporate debt on secondary markets. corporate debt on secondary markets.
 On March 23, the Fed revived the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to  On March 23, the Fed revived the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to
make nonrecourse loans to private investors to purchase ABS backed by various make nonrecourse loans to private investors to purchase ABS backed by various
nonmortgage consumer loans. nonmortgage consumer loans.
 On April  On April 6, the Fed announced the Payroll Protection Program Lending Facility 6, the Fed announced the Payroll Protection Program Lending Facility
(PPPLF) to provide credit to depository institutions (e.g., banks) making loans (PPPLF) to provide credit to depository institutions (e.g., banks) making loans
under the CARES Act (H.R. 748/P.L. 116-136) Payroll Protection Program. under the CARES Act (H.R. 748/P.L. 116-136) Payroll Protection Program.
Because banks are not required to hold capital against these loans, this facility Because banks are not required to hold capital against these loans, this facility
increases lending capacity for banks facing high demand to originate these loans. increases lending capacity for banks facing high demand to originate these loans.
The PPP provides low-cost loans to The PPP provides low-cost loans to smal small businesses to pay employees. These businesses to pay employees. These
loans do not pose credit risk to the Fed because they are guaranteed by the loans do not pose credit risk to the Fed because they are guaranteed by the Smal
Small Business Administration. Business Administration.
 On April  On April 9, the Fed announced the Main Street Lending Program (MSLP), which 9, the Fed announced the Main Street Lending Program (MSLP), which
purchases loans from depository institutions to businesses with up to 10,000 purchases loans from depository institutions to businesses with up to 10,000
employees or up to $2.5 employees or up to $2.5 bil ion billion in revenues. The loans to businesses would defer in revenues. The loans to businesses would defer
principal and interest repayment for one year, and the businesses would have to principal and interest repayment for one year, and the businesses would have to
make a “reasonable effort” to retain employees. make a “reasonable effort” to retain employees.
 On April  On April 9, the Fed announced the Municipal Liquidity9, the Fed announced the Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF) to Facility (MLF) to
purchase state and municipal debt in response to higher yields and reduced purchase state and municipal debt in response to higher yields and reduced
liquidityliquidity in that market. The facility in that market. The facility wil will only purchase debt of larger counties only purchase debt of larger counties
and cities. and cities.
Many of these facilities are structured as special purpose vehicles controlled by the Fed because Many of these facilities are structured as special purpose vehicles controlled by the Fed because
of restrictions on the types of securities that the Fed can purchase. Although there were no losses of restrictions on the types of securities that the Fed can purchase. Although there were no losses
from these facilities during the financial crisis, assets of the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization from these facilities during the financial crisis, assets of the Treasury’s Exchange Stabilization
Fund have been pledged to backstop any losses on several of the facilities today. Fund have been pledged to backstop any losses on several of the facilities today.
Fiscal Policy
In terms of a fiscal stimulus, Congress adopted H.R. 6074 on March 5, 2020 (P.L. 116-123), to In terms of a fiscal stimulus, Congress adopted H.R. 6074 on March 5, 2020 (P.L. 116-123), to
appropriate $8.3 appropriate $8.3 bil ion billion in emergency funding to support efforts to fight COVID-19; President in emergency funding to support efforts to fight COVID-19; President
Trump signed the measure on March 6, 2020. President Trump also signed on March 18, H.R. Trump signed the measure on March 6, 2020. President Trump also signed on March 18, H.R.
6201 (P.L. 116-127), the Families First COVID-19 Response Act, that provided paid sick leave 6201 (P.L. 116-127), the Families First COVID-19 Response Act, that provided paid sick leave
and free COVID-19 testing, expanded food assistance and unemployment benefits, and required and free COVID-19 testing, expanded food assistance and unemployment benefits, and required
employers to provide additionalemployers to provide additional protections for health care workers. Other countries indicated at protections for health care workers. Other countries indicated at
that time that they would also provide assistance to workers and to some businesses. Congress that time that they would also provide assistance to workers and to some businesses. Congress
also considered other possible measures, including contingency plans for agencies to implement also considered other possible measures, including contingency plans for agencies to implement
offsite telework for employees, financial assistance to the shale oil industry, a reduction in the offsite telework for employees, financial assistance to the shale oil industry, a reduction in the
payroll tax,payroll tax,185184 and extended of the tax filing deadline. and extended of the tax filing deadline.186185 President Trump took additional actions, President Trump took additional actions,
including

185 Armus, T heoincluding 184 Armus, Theo, “Federal, State Officials Attempt to Fight Virus , “Federal, State Officials Attempt to Fight Virus T hroughThrough Social Social Distancing, StimulusDistancing, Stimulus Package,” Package,”
Washington Post, March 11, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/11/Covid-19-live-updates/. , March 11, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/11/Covid-19-live-updates/.
186185 Sevastopulo, Demetri, “US Sevastopulo, Demetri, “US T reasury Considers T axTreasury Considers Tax Filing Extension to Ease Virus Filing Extension to Ease Virus Impact,” Impact,” Financial Times, ,
March 11, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/c65a6e40-639f-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5. March 11, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/c65a6e40-639f-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

70 70

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

 Announcing on March 11, 2020, restrictions on  Announcing on March 11, 2020, restrictions on al all travel from Europe to the travel from Europe to the
United States for 30 days, directing the United States for 30 days, directing the Smal Small Business Administration (SBA) to Business Administration (SBA) to
offer low-interest loans to offer low-interest loans to smal small businesses, and directing the Treasury businesses, and directing the Treasury
Department to defer tax payments penalty-free for affected businesses.Department to defer tax payments penalty-free for affected businesses.187
186  Declaring on March 13, a state of emergency that freed up disaster relief funding  Declaring on March 13, a state of emergency that freed up disaster relief funding
to assist state and local governments to address the effects of the pandemic. The to assist state and local governments to address the effects of the pandemic. The
President also announced additional testing for the virus, a website to help President also announced additional testing for the virus, a website to help
individualsindividuals identify symptoms, increased oil purchases for the Strategic Oil identify symptoms, increased oil purchases for the Strategic Oil
Reserve, and a waiver on interest payments on student loans.Reserve, and a waiver on interest payments on student loans.188
187  Invoking on March 18, 2020, the Defense Production Act (DPA) that gave him  Invoking on March 18, 2020, the Defense Production Act (DPA) that gave him
the authority to require some U.S. businesses to increase production of medical the authority to require some U.S. businesses to increase production of medical
equipment and supplies that were in short supply.equipment and supplies that were in short supply.189188
On March 25, 2020, the Senate adopted the COVID-19 Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act On March 25, 2020, the Senate adopted the COVID-19 Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
(S. 3548) to (S. 3548) to formal yformally implement President Trump’s proposal by providing direct payments to implement President Trump’s proposal by providing direct payments to
taxpayers, loans and guarantees to airlines and other industries, and assistance for taxpayers, loans and guarantees to airlines and other industries, and assistance for smal
small businesses, actions similar to those of various foreign governments. The House adopted the businesses, actions similar to those of various foreign governments. The House adopted the
measure as H.R. 748 on March 27, and President Trump signed the measure (P.L. 116-136) on measure as H.R. 748 on March 27, and President Trump signed the measure (P.L. 116-136) on
March 27. The law March 27. The law
 Provided funding for $1,200 tax rebates to individuals, with additional $500  Provided funding for $1,200 tax rebates to individuals, with additional $500
payments per qualifying child. The rebate begins phasing out when incomes payments per qualifying child. The rebate begins phasing out when incomes
exceed $75,000 (or $150,000 for joint filers). exceed $75,000 (or $150,000 for joint filers).
 Assisted  Assisted smal small businesses by providing funding forgivable bridge loans; and businesses by providing funding forgivable bridge loans; and
additional funding for grants and technical assistance; authorized emergency additional funding for grants and technical assistance; authorized emergency
loans to distressed businesses, including air carriers; and suspended certain loans to distressed businesses, including air carriers; and suspended certain
aviation excise taxes. aviation excise taxes.
 Created a $367  Created a $367 bil ion billion loan program for loan program for smal small businesses, established a $500 businesses, established a $500
bil ion billion lending fund for industries, cities and states, $150 lending fund for industries, cities and states, $150 bil ionbillion for state and for state and
local stimulus funds, and $130 local stimulus funds, and $130 bil ionbillion for hospitals. for hospitals.
 Increased unemployment insurance benefits, expanded eligibility  Increased unemployment insurance benefits, expanded eligibility and offered and offered
workers an additional $600 a week for four month, in addition to state workers an additional $600 a week for four month, in addition to state
unemployment programs.unemployment programs.190189
 Established special rules for certain tax-favored withdrawals from retirement  Established special rules for certain tax-favored withdrawals from retirement
plans; delayed due dates for employer payroll taxes and estimated tax payments plans; delayed due dates for employer payroll taxes and estimated tax payments
for corporations; and revised other provisions, including those related to losses, for corporations; and revised other provisions, including those related to losses,
charitable deductions, and business interest. charitable deductions, and business interest.

187 186 McAuley, James, and Michael Birnbaum, “Europe Blindsided McAuley, James, and Michael Birnbaum, “Europe Blindsided by T rump’s T ravel by Trump’s Travel Restrictions, with Many Seeing Restrictions, with Many Seeing
Political Motive,” Political Motive,” Washington Post, March 12, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-, March 12, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/europe-
blindsided-by-trumps-travel-restrictions-with-many-seeing-political-motive/2020/03/12/42a279d0-6412-11ea-8a8e-blindsided-by-trumps-travel-restrictions-with-many-seeing-political-motive/2020/03/12/42a279d0-6412-11ea-8a8e-
5c5336b32760_story.html. 5c5336b32760_story.html.
188 187 Fritz, Angela and Meryl Kornfield, “President Fritz, Angela and Meryl Kornfield, “President T rumpTrump Declares a National Emergency, Freeing $50 Billion in Declares a National Emergency, Freeing $50 Billion in
Funding,”Funding,” Washington Post, March 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/13/Covid-19-latest-, March 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/13/Covid-19-latest-
news/. news/.
189188 Hellmann, Jessie, Hellmann, Jessie, “T rump “Trump Invokes Defense Production Act as Covid-19 Response,” Invokes Defense Production Act as Covid-19 Response,” The Hill, March 18, 2020. , March 18, 2020.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/488226-trump-invokes-defense-production-act-as-Covid-19-response. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/488226-trump-invokes-defense-production-act-as-Covid-19-response.
190 189 For additional information about unemployment and sick leave provisions, see CRS For additional information about unemployment and sick leave provisions, see CRS Insight IN11249, Insight IN11249, H.R. 6201:
Paid Leave and Unem ploym entUnemployment Insurance Responses to COVID-19
, by Sarah, by Sarah A. Donovan, Katelin P. Isaacs, and Julie A. Donovan, Katelin P. Isaacs, and Julie
M. Whittaker, and CRSM. Whittaker, and CRS In Focus IF11487, In Focus IF11487, The Fam iliesFamilies First Coronavirus Response Act Leave Provisions, by Sarah , by Sarah
A. Donovan and Jon O. ShimabukuroA. Donovan and Jon O. Shimabukuro.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

71 71

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

 Provided additional  Provided additional funding for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of funding for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of
COVID-19; limited COVID-19; limited liability liability for volunteer health care professionals; prioritized for volunteer health care professionals; prioritized
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of certain drugs; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of certain drugs; al ow edallowed
emergency use of certain diagnostic tests that had not been approved by the FDA; emergency use of certain diagnostic tests that had not been approved by the FDA;
expanded health-insurance coverage for diagnostic testing and required coverage expanded health-insurance coverage for diagnostic testing and required coverage
for preventative services and vaccines; and revised other provisions, including for preventative services and vaccines; and revised other provisions, including
those regarding the medical supply chain, the national stockpile, the health care those regarding the medical supply chain, the national stockpile, the health care
workforce, the Healthy Start program, telehealth services, nutrition services, workforce, the Healthy Start program, telehealth services, nutrition services,
Medicare, and Medicaid. Medicare, and Medicaid.
 Temporarily suspended payments for federal student loans and revised provisions  Temporarily suspended payments for federal student loans and revised provisions
related to campus-based aid, supplemental educational-opportunity grants, related to campus-based aid, supplemental educational-opportunity grants,
federal work-study, subsidized loans, federal work-study, subsidized loans, Pel Pell grants, and foreign institutions. grants, and foreign institutions.
 Authorized the Department of the Treasury temporarily to guarantee money-  Authorized the Department of the Treasury temporarily to guarantee money-
market funds. market funds.
On April On April 23, 2020, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 266 (P.L. 116-139), the Paycheck 23, 2020, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 266 (P.L. 116-139), the Paycheck
Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, following similar actions by the Senate Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act, following similar actions by the Senate
the previous day. The measure provided $484 the previous day. The measure provided $484 bil ion for smal billion for small business loans, health care business loans, health care
providers, and COVID-19 testing. In particular, the law providers, and COVID-19 testing. In particular, the law
 Provided additional  Provided additional lending authority for certain lending authority for certain Smal Small Business Administration Business Administration
(SBA) programs in response to COVID-19, increased the authority for (1) the (SBA) programs in response to COVID-19, increased the authority for (1) the
Paycheck Protection Program, under which the SBA may guarantee certain loans Paycheck Protection Program, under which the SBA may guarantee certain loans
to to smal small businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) advanced on businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) advanced on
emergency economic injury disaster loans made in response to COVID-19. The emergency economic injury disaster loans made in response to COVID-19. The
provision also expanded eligibilityprovision also expanded eligibility for disaster loans and advances to include for disaster loans and advances to include
agricultural enterprises. agricultural enterprises.
 Provided $100  Provided $100 bil ion billion in FY2020 supplemental appropriations to HHS for the in FY2020 supplemental appropriations to HHS for the
Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund, including $75 Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund, including $75 bil ion billion to to
reimburse health care providers for health care related expenses or lost revenues reimburse health care providers for health care related expenses or lost revenues
that were attributable to the coronavirus outbreak; and $25 that were attributable to the coronavirus outbreak; and $25 bil ionbillion for expenses to for expenses to
research, develop, validate, manufacture, purchase, administer, and expand research, develop, validate, manufacture, purchase, administer, and expand
capacity for COVID-19 tests to effectively monitor and suppress COVID-19. capacity for COVID-19 tests to effectively monitor and suppress COVID-19.
  Al ocatedAllocated specified portions of the $25 specified portions of the $25 bil ion billion for COVID-19 testing to states, for COVID-19 testing to states,
localities, territories, and tribes; the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention; localities, territories, and tribes; the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention;
the National Institutes of Health; the Biomedical Advanced Research and the National Institutes of Health; the Biomedical Advanced Research and
Development Authority; the Food and Drug Administration; community health Development Authority; the Food and Drug Administration; community health
centers; rural health clinics; and testing for the uninsured. centers; rural health clinics; and testing for the uninsured.
On May 12, House Democrats introduced H.R. 6800, the Heroes Act, to provide a $3 On May 12, House Democrats introduced H.R. 6800, the Heroes Act, to provide a $3 tril iontrillion
supplemental spending supplemental spending bil bill for additional financial resources to state and local governments. The for additional financial resources to state and local governments. The
measure passed the House on May 15 and was sent to the Senate for consideration. Among other measure passed the House on May 15 and was sent to the Senate for consideration. Among other
provisions, the provisions, the bil bill would have would have
 Appropriated $200  Appropriated $200 bil ion billion in hazard pay to essential workers. in hazard pay to essential workers.
 Extended additional Extended additional payments to individuals, for nutrition and housing payments to individuals, for nutrition and housing
assistance, and provide funding for additional testing and contact tracing. assistance, and provide funding for additional testing and contact tracing.
 Restored the tax deduction for state and local taxes.  Restored the tax deduction for state and local taxes.
 Provided FY2020 emergency supplemental appropriations to federal agencies.  Provided FY2020 emergency supplemental appropriations to federal agencies.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

72 72

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

 Provided payments and other assistance to state, local, tribal, and territorial  Provided payments and other assistance to state, local, tribal, and territorial
governments. governments.
 Provided additional  Provided additional direct payments of up to $1,200 per individual. direct payments of up to $1,200 per individual.
 Expanded paid sick days, family and medical leave, unemployment  Expanded paid sick days, family and medical leave, unemployment
compensation, nutrition and food assistance programs, housing assistance, and compensation, nutrition and food assistance programs, housing assistance, and
payments to farmers. payments to farmers.
 Modified and expanded the Paycheck Protection Program, which provides loans  Modified and expanded the Paycheck Protection Program, which provides loans
and grants to and grants to smal small businesses and nonprofit organizations.businesses and nonprofit organizations.
 Expanded several tax credits and deductions.  Expanded several tax credits and deductions.
 Provided funding and establish requirements for COVID-19 testing and contact  Provided funding and establish requirements for COVID-19 testing and contact
tracing. tracing.
 Eliminated  Eliminated cost-sharing for COVID-19 treatments; cost-sharing for COVID-19 treatments;
 Extended and expanded the moratorium on certain evictions and foreclosures;  Extended and expanded the moratorium on certain evictions and foreclosures;
and and
 Required employers to develop and implement infectious disease exposure  Required employers to develop and implement infectious disease exposure
control plans. control plans.
On December 2, the Federal Reserve released its “Beige On December 2, the Federal Reserve released its “Beige Book”—a mostly qualitativeBook”—a mostly qualitative assessment assessment
of the U.S. economy produced 8 times a year by the 12 regional Federal Reserve banks—that of the U.S. economy produced 8 times a year by the 12 regional Federal Reserve banks—that
provides an assessment of economic activity across the various regions of the country. The provides an assessment of economic activity across the various regions of the country. The
assessment indicated that economic activity in November had improved modestly, although was assessment indicated that economic activity in November had improved modestly, although was
negligible negligible in some Districts.in some Districts.191
190 On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 On December 27, 2020, President Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021
(P.L. 116-260) that provided funding for government operations and $900 (P.L. 116-260) that provided funding for government operations and $900 bil ionbillion in additional in additional
funding for COVID-19 related programs and a $1.4 funding for COVID-19 related programs and a $1.4 tril iontrillion budget that comprised 12 budget that comprised 12
appropriations appropriations bil sbills. In general, the measure provided . In general, the measure provided
 $600 in stimulus checks to qualifying individuals, including adults and children.  $600 in stimulus checks to qualifying individuals, including adults and children.
 Extended unemployment benefits of up to $300 per week through at least March  Extended unemployment benefits of up to $300 per week through at least March
14, 2021, and Pandemic Unemployment Assistance for qualifying individuals 14, 2021, and Pandemic Unemployment Assistance for qualifying individuals up up
to 11 weeks. to 11 weeks.
 Financial assistance to businesses, including forgivable Paycheck Protection  Financial assistance to businesses, including forgivable Paycheck Protection
Program loans, extensions of the PPP program to churches and the entertainment Program loans, extensions of the PPP program to churches and the entertainment
industry, and grants through the Economic Injury Disaster Loans program. industry, and grants through the Economic Injury Disaster Loans program.
 A moratorium on rental evictions through January 31, 2021, and emergency  A moratorium on rental evictions through January 31, 2021, and emergency
funding for renters. funding for renters.
 Funds to support vaccine production, distribution, and testing.  Funds to support vaccine production, distribution, and testing.
 Funds for schools, colleges, and child-care assistance.  Funds for schools, colleges, and child-care assistance.
 Assistance to the transportation industry through funds for busses, roads, airports,  Assistance to the transportation industry through funds for busses, roads, airports,
and Amtrak and assistance to the airline and Amtrak and assistance to the airline workers through the Payroll Support workers through the Payroll Support
Program. Program.
On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (P.L. 117-2) that On March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (P.L. 117-2) that
appropriated $1.9 appropriated $1.9 tril iontrillion to stimulating the U.S. economy. The major features of the act included to stimulating the U.S. economy. The major features of the act included

191 190 The Beige Book: Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by Federal Reserve District,, December December
2, 2020, the Federal Reserve2, 2020, the Federal Reserve System. System.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

73 73

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

 Expanded unemployment benefits with a $300 weekly supplement through  Expanded unemployment benefits with a $300 weekly supplement through
September 6, 2021. September 6, 2021.
 $1,400 in direct payments to individuals  $1,400 in direct payments to individuals making up to $75,000, $112,500 for making up to $75,000, $112,500 for
single parents, and $150,000 for couples. single parents, and $150,000 for couples.
 Emergency paid leave, expanded child tax credit up to $3,600 per child,  Emergency paid leave, expanded child tax credit up to $3,600 per child,
expanded child and dependent care credit, and earned income tax credit. expanded child and dependent care credit, and earned income tax credit.
 Over $50  Over $50 bil ion billion in grants and other payments to in grants and other payments to smal small businesses. businesses.
 $350  $350 bil ion billion in assistance to state, local, and tribal governments. in assistance to state, local, and tribal governments.
 Education funding: $130  Education funding: $130 bil ion billion for schools; $40 for schools; $40 bil ionbillion to colleges and to colleges and
universities. universities.
 Nearly $50  Nearly $50 bil ion billion in housing assistance, emergency rental assistance, in housing assistance, emergency rental assistance,
homeowner assistance, and other housing programs. homeowner assistance, and other housing programs.
 Over $160  Over $160 bil ion billion in health care-related programs, including COVID-19 in health care-related programs, including COVID-19
vaccines, testing, contact tracing and other health-care related funding. vaccines, testing, contact tracing and other health-care related funding.
 $50  $50 bil ion billion for transportation provisions, including funding for airports, airlines, for transportation provisions, including funding for airports, airlines,
Amtrak and other commuter rail services. Amtrak and other commuter rail services.
 $10.4  $10.4 bil ion billion for agriculture, including debt relief for farmers. for agriculture, including debt relief for farmers.
 $1.9  $1.9 bil ion billion to improve cybersecurity. to improve cybersecurity.
 Changes to other health care provisions.  Changes to other health care provisions.
Personal Income and Outlays
Another metric for assessing the impact of the pandemic on the U.S. economy is provided Another metric for assessing the impact of the pandemic on the U.S. economy is provided
through changes in personal income, consumption, and saving. The economic lockdown pushed through changes in personal income, consumption, and saving. The economic lockdown pushed
mil ions millions of Americans out of their jobs and left them without an income. During the pandemic-of Americans out of their jobs and left them without an income. During the pandemic-
related recession, transfer payments from the federal government to individuals, primarily related recession, transfer payments from the federal government to individuals, primarily
through unemployment insurance, offset some of their lost income and played an important role through unemployment insurance, offset some of their lost income and played an important role
in supporting household consumption. On August 27, 2020, the Bureau of Economic Analysis in supporting household consumption. On August 27, 2020, the Bureau of Economic Analysis
(BEA) reported that U.S. personal income (BEA) reported that U.S. personal income fel fell by 13.6% in Aprilby 13.6% in April and 2.1% in May, primarily and 2.1% in May, primarily
reflecting a decrease in government transfer payments to individuals from federal economic reflecting a decrease in government transfer payments to individuals from federal economic
recovery programs of 41.8% in April and 11.6% in May, as indicated in recovery programs of 41.8% in April and 11.6% in May, as indicated in Figure 21..192191 In contrast, In contrast,
personal income rose in June and July by 0.2% and 1.1%, respectively, reflecting an increase in personal income rose in June and July by 0.2% and 1.1%, respectively, reflecting an increase in
transfer payments by 1.8% in June and an increase of 2.9% in July. During the same period, transfer payments by 1.8% in June and an increase of 2.9% in July. During the same period,
personal consumption rose by 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively as consumers increased spending. The personal consumption rose by 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively as consumers increased spending. The
lower level of spending and income transfers were also associated with a lower level of personal lower level of spending and income transfers were also associated with a lower level of personal
savings rate of 8.8% in June and 8.6% in July as consumers attempted to sustain their level of savings rate of 8.8% in June and 8.6% in July as consumers attempted to sustain their level of
consumption by reducing their level of saving. consumption by reducing their level of saving.
In September 2021 the Census Bureau released its annual Income and In September 2021 the Census Bureau released its annual Income and Poverty193Poverty192 report and its report and its
Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM)Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM)194193 report. According to the SPM report, which measures report. According to the SPM report, which measures

192 191 Personal Income and Outlays, April 2020, Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis, May 29, 2020. of Economic Analysis, May 29, 2020.
193192 Shrider, Shrider, Emily A., MellissaEmily A., Mellissa Kollar, Frances Chen, and JessicaKollar, Frances Chen, and Jessica Semega,Semega, Income and Poverty in the United States:
2020
, U.S. Census, U.S. Census Bureau,Bureau, September 2021. September 2021.
194 193 Fox, Liana E. and Kalee Burns, Fox, Liana E. and Kalee Burns, The Supplemental Poverty Measure: 2020, U.S. Census, U.S. Census Bureau,Bureau, September 2021. September 2021.
According to the CensusAccording to the Census Bureau:Bureau: T he The SPM does not replace SPM does not replace t hethe official poverty measure and is not designed official poverty measure and is not designed to be used to be used
for program eligibility or funding distribution. for program eligibility or funding distribution. T heThe SPM is designed SPM is designed to provide information on aggregate levels of to provide information on aggregate levels of
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

74 74

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

the impact of government programs designed to assist low-income families and individuals that the impact of government programs designed to assist low-income families and individuals that
are not included in the official poverty measure, the are not included in the official poverty measure, the overal overall SPM poverty rate was 9.1%, which SPM poverty rate was 9.1%, which
was 2.6 percentage points below the 2019 rate of 11.8%, representing 8.5 was 2.6 percentage points below the 2019 rate of 11.8%, representing 8.5 mil ionmillion people lifted out people lifted out
of poverty due to the government stimulus payments.of poverty due to the government stimulus payments.195194 The SPM report also indicated that in The SPM report also indicated that in
2020: unemployment rates were down for 2020: unemployment rates were down for al all major age categories, Social Security continued to major age categories, Social Security continued to
be the most important anti-poverty program and moved 26.5 be the most important anti-poverty program and moved 26.5 mil ionmillion individuals individuals out of poverty, out of poverty,
and pandemic-related stimulus payments moved 11.7 and pandemic-related stimulus payments moved 11.7 mil ionmillion people out of poverty. people out of poverty.
During the first half of 2021, wages and salaries to individuals, During the first half of 2021, wages and salaries to individuals, general ygenerally the major source of the major source of
income for households, increased by 2.9%, compared with a drop in total personal income of income for households, increased by 2.9%, compared with a drop in total personal income of
4.0% and a drop in transfer receipts of 26% in 2020.4.0% and a drop in transfer receipts of 26% in 2020.196195 Similar to early 2020 data, transfer Similar to early 2020 data, transfer
payments to households in early 2021 increased personal income and sustained personal payments to households in early 2021 increased personal income and sustained personal
consumption. In addition, household savings rates were bolstered by the transfer payments, consumption. In addition, household savings rates were bolstered by the transfer payments,
although the peak saving rate in 2021 was lower than the rate in 2020. After peaking again in although the peak saving rate in 2021 was lower than the rate in 2020. After peaking again in
April 2021, the rate declined steadily as consumers drew down accumulated savings to support April 2021, the rate declined steadily as consumers drew down accumulated savings to support
consumption as economic activity began recovering. By August 2021, most measures had consumption as economic activity began recovering. By August 2021, most measures had
returned to their first quarter 2019 levels, except for the personal saving rate, which remained returned to their first quarter 2019 levels, except for the personal saving rate, which remained
slightly elevated compared with data for early 2020, prior to the pandemic. slightly elevated compared with data for early 2020, prior to the pandemic.


economic need at a national level or within large subpopulations or areas. As sucheconomic need at a national level or within large subpopulations or areas. As such, , the SPM provides an additional the SPM provides an additional
macroeconomic statistic for further understanding economic well-being,macroeconomic statistic for further understanding economic well-being, conditions, and trends. conditions, and trends.
195194 Ibid., p. 25. Ibid., p. 25.
196195 Personal Income and Outlays, AugustSeptember 2021, Bureau of Economic Analysis, October , Bureau of Economic Analysis, October 129, 2021. , 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

75 75


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 21. U.S. Personal Income, Consumption, and Saving

Source: Personal Income and Outlays, August September 2021, Bureau of Economic Analysis,, Bureau of Economic Analysis, October October 129, 2021. Created by , 2021. Created by
CRS. CRS.
GDP Output “Gap”
Another measure of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy is Another measure of the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy is
represented by the difference between actual economic performance, measured by gross domestic represented by the difference between actual economic performance, measured by gross domestic
product (GDP), and potential output, or the maximum amount an economy can produce at full product (GDP), and potential output, or the maximum amount an economy can produce at full
employment, referred to as the output gap.employment, referred to as the output gap.197196 The IMF estimated that the loss in economic output The IMF estimated that the loss in economic output
represented by the GDP output gap among major advanced economies, which as a group represented by the GDP output gap among major advanced economies, which as a group accountaccounts
for about 60% of global GDP, would be -3.6% in 2020, or that the economies operated at a rate for about 60% of global GDP, would be -3.6% in 2020, or that the economies operated at a rate
that was 3.6% below their combined potential, as indicated in that was 3.6% below their combined potential, as indicated in Table 13..198197 According to the According to the
IMF’s assessment, not only would the major advanced economies as a group operate below their IMF’s assessment, not only would the major advanced economies as a group operate below their
full potential through 2025, but none of the individual economies was projected to operate above full potential through 2025, but none of the individual economies was projected to operate above
potential during the 2020-2025 forecasting period. The Euro area as a whole, and France and Italy potential during the 2020-2025 forecasting period. The Euro area as a whole, and France and Italy
in particular, were projected to experience the largest output gap through 2022. At 3.2% the U.S. in particular, were projected to experience the largest output gap through 2022. At 3.2% the U.S.
output gap was among the output gap was among the smal estsmallest of the major advanced economies. of the major advanced economies.

197 196 According to the Congressional Budget According to the Congressional Budget Office, Office, T heThe output gap is the difference between output gap is the difference between GDP and potential GDP, GDP and potential GDP,
expressed as a percentage of potential GDP. A positive value indicates that GDP exceeds potential GDP; a negative expressed as a percentage of potential GDP. A positive value indicates that GDP exceeds potential GDP; a negative
value indicates that GDP falls short of potential GDP. Valuesvalue indicates that GDP falls short of potential GDP. Values for the output gap are for the fourth quarter of each year.for the output gap are for the fourth quarter of each year.
198 197 World Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund, October 2020, , International Monetary Fund, October 2020, T ableTable A.8. A.8.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

76 76

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Table 13. IMF Forecast of Major Advanced Economy GDP Output Gap
In percentage terms In percentage terms




Projected

2017 2017
2018 2018
2019 2019
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022
2023 2023
2024 2024
2025 2025
Major Advanced Major Advanced
-0.5% 0.5%
0.2% 0.2%
0.4% 0.4%
-3.6% -3.6%
-2.2% -2.2%
-1.0% -1.0%
-0.4% -0.4%
-0.2% -0.2%
-0.1% -0.1%
Economies Economies
United States United States
-1.0 1.0
0.4 0.4
1.0 1.0
-3.2 -3.2
-1.5 -1.5
-0.5 -0.5
-0.2 -0.2
-0.1 -0.1
-0.1 -0.1
Euro Area Euro Area
-0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
-5.1 -5.1
-3.2 -3.2
-1.6 -1.6
-0.6 -0.6
-0.2 -0.2
0.0 0.0
Germany Germany
1.0 1.0
1.2 1.2
0.4 0.4
-3.5 -3.5
-1.8 -1.8
-0.7 -0.7
-0.2 -0.2
-0.1 -0.1
0.0 0.0
France France
-1.3 1.3
-0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
-5.6 -5.6
-4.0 -4.0
-2.5 -2.5
-1.4 -1.4
-0.6 -0.6
0.0 0.0
Italy Italy
-1.2 1.2
-0.7 0.7
-0.7 0.7
-5.4 -5.4
-5.4 -5.4
-2.6 -2.6
-0.9 -0.9
-0.6 -0.6
-0.5 -0.5
Japan Japan
-0.3 0.3
-0.8 0.8
-0.7 0.7
-3.0 -3.0
-2.1 -2.1
-1.0 -1.0
-0.4 -0.4
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
United Kingdom United Kingdom
0.3 0.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
-3.9 -3.9
-3.5 -3.5
-1.7 -1.7
-1.0 -1.0
-0.5 -0.5
0.0 0.0
Canada Canada
0.4 0.4
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
-3.8 -3.8
-1.4 -1.4
-0.3 -0.3
-0.1 -0.1
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
Source: International Monetary Fund. International Monetary Fund.
Notes: The output gap is the difference between GDP and potential GDP, expressed The output gap is the difference between GDP and potential GDP, expressed as a percentage of as a percentage of
potential GDP. A positive value indicates that GDP exceeds potential GDP; a negative value indicates that GDP potential GDP. A positive value indicates that GDP exceeds potential GDP; a negative value indicates that GDP
fal sfalls short of potential GDP. short of potential GDP.
On July 2, 2021, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an updated estimate of the On July 2, 2021, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an updated estimate of the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. GDP output gap and on other major indicators.impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. GDP output gap and on other major indicators. 199
198 In the forecast, the U.S. output gap in 2020 was estimated at 3.3%, similar to the size of the gap In the forecast, the U.S. output gap in 2020 was estimated at 3.3%, similar to the size of the gap
estimated by the IMF, the largest difference between the actual and potential output in the U.S. estimated by the IMF, the largest difference between the actual and potential output in the U.S.
economy since the period following the 2008-2009 financial crisis, as indicated in economy since the period following the 2008-2009 financial crisis, as indicated in Figure 22. The . The
CBO also estimated that the output gap following the financial crisis persisted from 2009-2016, CBO also estimated that the output gap following the financial crisis persisted from 2009-2016,
reflecting the lengthy period of the recovery. In the current context, the CBO estimates that reflecting the lengthy period of the recovery. In the current context, the CBO estimates that
 a rise in vaccinations  a rise in vaccinations wil will lead to reductions in social distancing and an economic lead to reductions in social distancing and an economic
recovery; recovery;
 real GDP  real GDP wil will expand in 2021 and reach its pre-pandemic peak in mid-2021; expand in 2021 and reach its pre-pandemic peak in mid-2021;
 the labor force participation rate  the labor force participation rate wil will recover, but lag behind the pre-pandemic recover, but lag behind the pre-pandemic
rate through the estimation period. rate through the estimation period.200

199199 198 An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2021 to 2031, Congressional Budget, Congressional Budget Office, JulyOffice, July 2021. 2021.
200199 Ibid., p. 2. Ibid., p. 2.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

77 77


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Figure 22. Real and Potential U.S. GDP and the Output Gap

Source: CongressionalCongressional Budget Office, July 2021. Created by CRS. Budget Office, July 2021. Created by CRS.
Notes: The output gap is the difference between GDP and potential GDP, expressed The output gap is the difference between GDP and potential GDP, expressed as a percentage of as a percentage of
potential GDP. A positive value indicates that GDP exceeds potential GDP; a negative value indicates that GDP potential GDP. A positive value indicates that GDP exceeds potential GDP; a negative value indicates that GDP
fal sfalls short of potential GDP. Values for the output gap are for the fourth quarter of each year. short of potential GDP. Values for the output gap are for the fourth quarter of each year.
CBO also estimated that U.S. GDP would grow at an annual rate of 6.7% in 2021, outpacing the CBO also estimated that U.S. GDP would grow at an annual rate of 6.7% in 2021, outpacing the
CBO’s February forecast of 4.6%. The CBO attributes this higher growth estimate to three CBO’s February forecast of 4.6%. The CBO attributes this higher growth estimate to three
factors: added fiscal spending is projected to increase output; a more rapid return to pre-pandemic factors: added fiscal spending is projected to increase output; a more rapid return to pre-pandemic
levels of social activity; higher levels of consumer spending levels of social activity; higher levels of consumer spending propel edpropelled by savings accumulated by savings accumulated
during the pandemic.during the pandemic.201200 After growing by 5.0% in 2022, the economy is projected to grow at pre- After growing by 5.0% in 2022, the economy is projected to grow at pre-
pandemic rates in the 2024-2031 period, as indicated in pandemic rates in the 2024-2031 period, as indicated in Table 14. The unemployment rate was . The unemployment rate was
also projected to peak in 2020 at 8.1%, but trend downward and reach the pre-pandemic rate in also projected to peak in 2020 at 8.1%, but trend downward and reach the pre-pandemic rate in
the 2024 to 2025 period. Similarly, the growth rates of exports and imports were projected to the 2024 to 2025 period. Similarly, the growth rates of exports and imports were projected to fal
fall by 12.9% and 9.3%, respectively, in 2020, before growing at positive rates through the forecast by 12.9% and 9.3%, respectively, in 2020, before growing at positive rates through the forecast
period.period.
Table 14. Congressional Budget Office Projection of Major U.S. Economic Indicators,
2021 to 2031
Annual percentage change Annual percentage change








Average annual

2024-
2026-
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2025
2031








2017 2018 2019 2020
Projected
Gross Gross Domestic Domestic
2.3 2.3
3.0 3.0
2.2 2.2
-3.5 -3.5
6.7 6.7
5.0 5.0
1.5 1.5
1.2 1.2
1.6 1.6
Product (GDP) Product (GDP)
Potential GDP Potential GDP
1.7 1.7
1.8 1.8
1.9 1.9
1.9 1.9
1.9 1.9
2.1 2.1
2.1 2.1
1.9 1.9
1.7 1.7
Output Gap Output Gap
0.0 0.0
0.6 0.6
1.0 1.0
-3.3 -3.3
-1.3 -1.3
-0.8 -0.8
-0.4 -0.4
0.4 0.4
-0.1 -0.1
Civilian Unemp. Civilian Unemp.
4.4 4.4
3.9 3.9
3.7 3.7
8.1 8.1
5.5 5.5
3.8 3.8
3.7 3.7
4.1 4.1
4.4 4.4
Rate Rate

201 200 Ibid., p. 3. Ibid., p. 3.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

78 78

link to page 85 link to page 85 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19









Average annual

2024-
2026-
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2025
2031








2017 2018 2019 2020
Projected
Labor Force Labor Force
62.9 62.9
62.9 62.9
63.1 63.1
61.7 61.7
61.9 61.9
62.6 62.6
62.9 62.9
62.3 62.3
61.3 61.3
Participation Rate Participation Rate
Exports Exports
3.9 3.9
3.0 3.0
-0.1 -0.1
-12.9 -12.9
7.7 7.7
9.1 9.1
3.9 3.9
1.3 1.3
1.5 1.5
Imports Imports
4.7 4.7
4.1 4.1
1.1 1.1
-9.3 -9.3
14.4 14.4
4.0 4.0
1.9 1.9
0.7 0.7
2.1 2.1
Source: An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2021-2031, CongressionalCongressional Budget Office,Budget Office, July 2021. July 2021.
Federal Reserve Forecast
On June 16, 2021, the Federal Open Market Committee released an updated forecast of the U.S. On June 16, 2021, the Federal Open Market Committee released an updated forecast of the U.S.
economy. In testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, Fed economy. In testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, Fed
Chairman Chairman Powel Powell reviewed the major conclusions of the assessment and indicated the U.S. reviewed the major conclusions of the assessment and indicated the U.S.
economy was recovering at a faster pace than it had forecasted in March. According to economy was recovering at a faster pace than it had forecasted in March. According to Powel Powell, ,
“Widespread vaccinations have joined unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy actions in “Widespread vaccinations have joined unprecedented monetary and fiscal policy actions in
providing strong support to the recovery.”providing strong support to the recovery.”202201 Despite progress, Despite progress, Powel Powell indicated the pandemic indicated the pandemic
posed continued risks to the economic outlook in part due to a slower rate of vaccinations and posed continued risks to the economic outlook in part due to a slower rate of vaccinations and
new strains of the virus. He concluded by indicating that progress on vaccinations would support new strains of the virus. He concluded by indicating that progress on vaccinations would support
a return to more normal economic conditions and that the Fed was a return to more normal economic conditions and that the Fed was wil ingwilling to do “everything we to do “everything we
can to support the economy for as long as it takes to complete the recovery.”can to support the economy for as long as it takes to complete the recovery.”203202
The Fed’s June 2021 forecast also offered a more positive assessment of the economy than The Fed’s June 2021 forecast also offered a more positive assessment of the economy than
previous forecasts released in March and December, with the economy projected to grow by 7.0% previous forecasts released in March and December, with the economy projected to grow by 7.0%
in 2021, compared with the March forecast of 6.5%, as indicated iin 2021, compared with the March forecast of 6.5%, as indicated in Table 15. The forecast The forecast
typical ytypically makes three projections for such major economic variables as GDP, the unemployment makes three projections for such major economic variables as GDP, the unemployment
rate, and the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) measure of inflation compared with its rate, and the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) measure of inflation compared with its
March 2021 projections of the same variables. The three measures include (1) the median March 2021 projections of the same variables. The three measures include (1) the median
projected change; (2) the central tendency, which excludes the highest and lowest three projected change; (2) the central tendency, which excludes the highest and lowest three
projections; and (3) the range, which indicates forecasts from the highest to the lowest values. projections; and (3) the range, which indicates forecasts from the highest to the lowest values.
According to the June median forecast, U.S. GDP between 2021 and 2023 was projected grow at According to the June median forecast, U.S. GDP between 2021 and 2023 was projected grow at
a slightly faster pace in 2021, but at about the same pace for 2022 and 2023 compared with the a slightly faster pace in 2021, but at about the same pace for 2022 and 2023 compared with the
March forecast; the unemployment rate at 4.5% is the same as the previous forecast; the rate of March forecast; the unemployment rate at 4.5% is the same as the previous forecast; the rate of
inflation could rise by 1.0% above the rate forecasted in March. The possible range for GDP, inflation could rise by 1.0% above the rate forecasted in March. The possible range for GDP,
however could vary between 6.3% and 7.8% in 2021, or 0.5% to 1.0% above the previous however could vary between 6.3% and 7.8% in 2021, or 0.5% to 1.0% above the previous
forecast with a possible rate of unemployment between 4.2% and 5.0%, comparable to the forecast with a possible rate of unemployment between 4.2% and 5.0%, comparable to the
previous forecast. The Fed indicated it based its forecast on the best available information, but previous forecast. The Fed indicated it based its forecast on the best available information, but
cautioned there was “considerable uncertainty” about the forecast.cautioned there was “considerable uncertainty” about the forecast.204203
The Fed also announced it would continue its dollar liquidity The Fed also announced it would continue its dollar liquidity swap lines with nine central banks swap lines with nine central banks
until the end of 2021 to facilitate liquidityuntil the end of 2021 to facilitate liquidity in the global U.S. dollar funding market. The swap in the global U.S. dollar funding market. The swap

202 201 Powell, Jerome H., Powell, Jerome H., Statement, House of Representatives, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, House of Representatives, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis, June June 22, 22,
2021, p. 1. 2021, p. 1.
203202 Ibid., p. 4. Ibid., p. 4.
204203 Summary of Economic Projections, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 16, 2021, p. 17. , Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 16, 2021, p. 17. T heThe
FedFed indicated that due to the level of uncertainty, its forecasts could vary within a range of ±1.5% to ±2.0% for GDP; indicated that due to the level of uncertainty, its forecasts could vary within a range of ±1.5% to ±2.0% for GDP;
±0.9% to ±1.8% for unemployment; and ±0.9% to ±1.0% for prices.±0.9% to ±1.8% for unemployment; and ±0.9% to ±1.0% for prices.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

79 79

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

lines include providing up to $60 lines include providing up to $60 bil ion to:billion to the Reserve Bank of Australia, the Banco Central do the Reserve Bank of Australia, the Banco Central do
Brasil, the Bank of Korea, the Banco de México, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Brasil, the Bank of Korea, the Banco de México, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the
Sveriges Riksbank (Sweden); and up to $30 Sveriges Riksbank (Sweden); and up to $30 bil ionbillion each for the Danmarks Nationalbank each for the Danmarks Nationalbank
(Denmark), the Norges Bank (Norway), and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. (Denmark), the Norges Bank (Norway), and the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.
In previous statements, the FOMC had stated that the range of estimates is necessary to represent In previous statements, the FOMC had stated that the range of estimates is necessary to represent
the “extremely elevated” uncertainty related to the economic effects of the pandemic and the the “extremely elevated” uncertainty related to the economic effects of the pandemic and the
limited historical response of the U.S. economy to past economic shocks. As a result of the limited historical response of the U.S. economy to past economic shocks. As a result of the
“significant uncertainty and downside risks associated with the pandemic, including how much “significant uncertainty and downside risks associated with the pandemic, including how much
the economy would weaken and how long it would take to recover,” the assessment of a more the economy would weaken and how long it would take to recover,” the assessment of a more
pessimistic projection was judged to be no less pessimistic than the baseline scenario (median). pessimistic projection was judged to be no less pessimistic than the baseline scenario (median).
Another member of the Fed indicated that the pandemic-related economic crisis should be used to Another member of the Fed indicated that the pandemic-related economic crisis should be used to
distil distill lessons and “institute reforms so our system is more resilient and better able to withstand a lessons and “institute reforms so our system is more resilient and better able to withstand a
variety of possible shocks in the future, including those emanating from outside the financial variety of possible shocks in the future, including those emanating from outside the financial
system.system.205204
Table 15. Federal Reserve Economic Projections, September 2021
Percentage change, fourth quarter over previous year fourth quarter Percentage change, fourth quarter over previous year fourth quarter

Core Core
Change in Change in
June June
Unemploy- Unemploy-
June June
PCE PCE
June June
PCE PCE
June June
real GDP real GDP
projection projection
ment rate ment rate
projection projection
inflation projection inflation projection
inflation inflation
projection projection
Median1 Median1
2021 2021
5.9 5.9
7.0 7.0
4.8 4.8
4.5 4.5
4.2 4.2
3.4 3.4
3.7 3.7
3.0 3.0
2022 2022
3.8 3.8
3.3 3.3
3.8 3.8
3.8 3.8
2.2 2.2
2.1 2.1
2.3 2.3
2.1 2.1
2023 2023
2.5 2.5
2.4 2.4
3.5 3.5
3.5 3.5
2.2 2.2
2.2 2.2
2.2 2.2
2.1 2.1
2024 2024
2.0 2.0

3.5 3.5

2.1 2.1

2.1 2.1

Longer Longer
1.8 1.8
1.8 1.8
4.0 4.0
4.0 4.0
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0


run run
Central Tendency2 Central Tendency2
2021 2021
5.8–6.0 5.8–6.0
6.8–7.3 6.8–7.3
4.6–4.8 4.6–4.8
4.4–4.8 4.4–4.8
4.0–4.3 4.0–4.3
3.1–3.5 3.1–3.5
3.6–3.8 3.6–3.8
2.9–3.1 2.9–3.1
2022 2022
3.4–4.5 3.4–4.5
2.8–3.8 2.8–3.8
3.6–4.0 3.6–4.0
3.5–4.0 3.5–4.0
2.0–2.5 2.0–2.5
1.9–2.3 1.9–2.3
2.0–2.5 2.0–2.5
1.9–2.3 1.9–2.3
2023 2023
2.2–2.5 2.2–2.5
2.0–2.5 2.0–2.5
3.3–3.7 3.3–3.7
3.2–3.8 3.2–3.8
2.0–2.3 2.0–2.3
2.0–2.2 2.0–2.2
2.0–2.3 2.0–2.3
2.0–2.2 2.0–2.2
2024 2024
2.0–2.2 2.0–2.2

3.3–3.6 3.3–3.6

2.0–2.2 2.0–2.2

2.0–2.2 2.0–2.2

Longer Longer
1.8–2.0 1.8–2.0
1.8–2.0 1.8–2.0
3.8–4.3 3.8–4.3
3.8–4.3 3.8–4.3
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0


run run
Range3 Range3
2021 2021
5.5–6.3 5.5–6.3
6.3–7.8 6.3–7.8
4.5–5.1 4.5–5.1
4.2–5.0 4.2–5.0
3.4–4.4 3.4–4.4
3.0–3.9 3.0–3.9
3.5–4.2 3.5–4.2
2.7–3.3 2.7–3.3
2022 2022
3.1–4.9 3.1–4.9
2.6–4.2 2.6–4.2
3.0–4.0 3.0–4.0
3.2–4.2 3.2–4.2
1.7–3.0 1.7–3.0
1.6–2.5 1.6–2.5
1.9–2.8 1.9–2.8
1.7–2.5 1.7–2.5
2023 2023
1.8–3.0 1.8–3.0
1.7–2.7 1.7–2.7
2.8–4.0 2.8–4.0
3.0–3.9 3.0–3.9
1.9–2.4 1.9–2.4
1.9–2.3 1.9–2.3
2.0–2.3 2.0–2.3
2.0–2.3 2.0–2.3
2024 2024
1.8–2.5 1.8–2.5

3.0–4.0 3.0–4.0

2.0–2.3 2.0–2.3

2.0–2.4 2.0–2.4

Longer Longer
1.6–2.2 1.6–2.2
1.6–2.2 1.6–2.2
3.5–4.5 3.5–4.5
3.5–4.5 3.5–4.5
2.0 2.0
2.0 2.0


run run

205 204 Brainard, Lael, Brainard, Lael, Some Preliminary Financial Stability Lessons From the COVID -19 Shock, At the 2021 Annual , At the 2021 Annual
Washington Conference, Institute of International Bankers March 1, 2021. Washington Conference, Institute of International Bankers March 1, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

80 80

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Source: SummarySummary of Economic Projections,of Economic Projections, September 22, 2021.September 22, 2021.
Notes: (1) For each period, the median is the middle projection (1) For each period, the median is the middle projection when the projectionswhen the projections are arranged from lowest are arranged from lowest
to highest. (2) The central tendency excludes the three highest and three lowest projectionsto highest. (2) The central tendency excludes the three highest and three lowest projections for each variable in for each variable in
each year. (3) The range for a variable in a given year includes each year. (3) The range for a variable in a given year includes al all participants’ projections,participants’ projections, from lowest to from lowest to
highest, for that variable in that year. Projections for the unemployment rate representhighest, for that variable in that year. Projections for the unemployment rate represent the average civilian the average civilian
unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated. unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of the year indicated.
For additional information about the impact of COVID-19 on the U.S. economy see CRS Insight For additional information about the impact of COVID-19 on the U.S. economy see CRS Insight
IN11235, IN11235, COVID-19: Potential Economic Effects..206
205 Europe
In the early stages of the pandemic, European countries did not adopt a synchronized fiscal policy In the early stages of the pandemic, European countries did not adopt a synchronized fiscal policy
response similar to the one they developed during the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. For the response similar to the one they developed during the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. For the
most part, EU members used a combination of national fiscal policies and bond buying by the most part, EU members used a combination of national fiscal policies and bond buying by the
ECB to address the economic impact of the pandemic. Individual countries adopted quarantines ECB to address the economic impact of the pandemic. Individual countries adopted quarantines
and required business closures, travel and border restrictions, tax holidays for businesses, and required business closures, travel and border restrictions, tax holidays for businesses,
extensions of certain payments and loan guarantees, and subsidies for workers and businesses. extensions of certain payments and loan guarantees, and subsidies for workers and businesses.
The European Commission advocated for greater coordination among the EU members in The European Commission advocated for greater coordination among the EU members in
developing and implementing monetary and fiscal policies to address the economic developing and implementing monetary and fiscal policies to address the economic fal outfallout from from
the viral pandemic. the viral pandemic.
Over the summer of 2020, European governments attempted a phased reopening of businesses. Over the summer of 2020, European governments attempted a phased reopening of businesses.207206
These efforts generated a 12.4% increase in GDP in the Eurozone in the third quarter of 2020. These efforts generated a 12.4% increase in GDP in the Eurozone in the third quarter of 2020.
Initial estimates indicated the EU economic rate of growth nearly Initial estimates indicated the EU economic rate of growth nearly stal edstalled in the fourth quarter, in the fourth quarter,
fal ingfalling by 0.5% due to a resumption of lockdown measures. After several months of data by 0.5% due to a resumption of lockdown measures. After several months of data
indicating an economic rebound had begun in the Eurozone, surveys of business activity in indicating an economic rebound had begun in the Eurozone, surveys of business activity in
August 2020 indicated the recovery had slowed amid an increase in new COVID-19 cases after August 2020 indicated the recovery had slowed amid an increase in new COVID-19 cases after
countries had begun reimposing new quarantines and lockdowns in various parts of the Euro area, countries had begun reimposing new quarantines and lockdowns in various parts of the Euro area,
although most lockdowns did not include schools or some manufacturing firms.although most lockdowns did not include schools or some manufacturing firms.208207 Such Such
lockdowns became more widespread in September and October as infections cases began rising lockdowns became more widespread in September and October as infections cases began rising
in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Spain, and in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Spain, and
Poland.Poland.209208 By mid-October, Greece and Belgium also had begun implementing business By mid-October, Greece and Belgium also had begun implementing business
lockdowns and social distancing measures. Germany reportedly closed bars, restaurants, and most lockdowns and social distancing measures. Germany reportedly closed bars, restaurants, and most
public entertainment, France closed bars and restaurants and imposed travel restrictions, and on public entertainment, France closed bars and restaurants and imposed travel restrictions, and on
October 31, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a month-long lockdown across the October 31, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a month-long lockdown across the
UK.210

206 CRS UK.209 205 CRS Insight IN11235, Insight IN11235, COVID-19: Potential Economic Effects, by Marc Labonte. , by Marc Labonte.
207206 Stott, Michael, Coronavirus Set to Push 29m Latin Americans Into Poverty, Stott, Michael, Coronavirus Set to Push 29m Latin Americans Into Poverty, Financial Times, April 24, 2020. , April 24, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/3bf48b80-8fba-410c-9bb8-31e33fffc3b8; Hall, Benjamin, Coronavirus Pandemic https://www.ft.com/content/3bf48b80-8fba-410c-9bb8-31e33fffc3b8; Hall, Benjamin, Coronavirus Pandemic
T hreatensThreatens Livelihoods of 59m European Workers, Livelihoods of 59m European Workers, Financial Tim esTimes, April 19, 2020, https://www.ft.com/content/, April 19, 2020, https://www.ft.com/content/
36239c82-84ae-4cc9-89bc-8e71e53d6649, Romei, Valentina and Martin Arnold, Eurozone Economy Shrinks by 36239c82-84ae-4cc9-89bc-8e71e53d6649, Romei, Valentina and Martin Arnold, Eurozone Economy Shrinks by
Fastest Rate on Record, Fastest Rate on Record, Financial Tim esTimes, April 30, 2020, https://www.ft.com/content/dd6cfafa-a56d-48f3-a9fd-, April 30, 2020, https://www.ft.com/content/dd6cfafa-a56d-48f3-a9fd-
aa71d17d49a8. aa71d17d49a8.
208 207 Arnold, Martin, Eurozone Economic Rebound is Arnold, Martin, Eurozone Economic Rebound is Losing Steam, SurveysLosing Steam, Surveys Suggest,Suggest, Financial Times, August, August 21, 21,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/cc4fa3df-40e7-4e19-be9f-9d01efb74f69. Chazan, Guy and Anna Gross, Europe 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/cc4fa3df-40e7-4e19-be9f-9d01efb74f69. Chazan, Guy and Anna Gross, Europe
Battles to Contain SurgeBattles to Contain Surge in Coronavirus Cases.in Coronavirus Cases. Financial Tim esTimes, July, July 29, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/bcddc297-29, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/bcddc297-
b7f2-444d-908f-54e8ce6f4f98. b7f2-444d-908f-54e8ce6f4f98.
209208 Lockdown 2.0: Europe Imposes Painful Curbs Lockdown 2.0: Europe Imposes Painful Curbs as as Infections Surge, Infections Surge, Financial Times, October 16, 2020. , October 16, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/b1a7d1e8-4bb9-41cf-be5b-2f7f04bdb9bb. https://www.ft.com/content/b1a7d1e8-4bb9-41cf-be5b-2f7f04bdb9bb.
210 209 Peel, Michael, European Countries Impose Shutdowns Peel, Michael, European Countries Impose Shutdowns as Covid-19 Casesas Covid-19 Cases Rise,Rise, Financial Times, October 30, 2020. , October 30, 2020.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

81 81

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

The WHO indicated in early January 2021, that 230 The WHO indicated in early January 2021, that 230 mil ionmillion Europeans were living under Europeans were living under
lockdown restrictions at that time and that 26 lockdown restrictions at that time and that 26 mil ionmillion Europeans had contracted COVID-19 in Europeans had contracted COVID-19 in
2020.2020.211210 On April 13, 2021, the WHO estimated that 1 On April 13, 2021, the WHO estimated that 1 mil ion million Europeans had died from the Europeans had died from the
disease, nearly twice as many as in the United States. In an attempt to stop the spread of new disease, nearly twice as many as in the United States. In an attempt to stop the spread of new
variant strains of the virus, the UK, Ireland, Germany, Denmark, and some northern Italian variant strains of the virus, the UK, Ireland, Germany, Denmark, and some northern Italian
regions closed schools in January 2021 for several weeks.regions closed schools in January 2021 for several weeks.212211 Reportedly, disputes over vaccine Reportedly, disputes over vaccine
distribution within and among European countries and with Britain and the spread of more distribution within and among European countries and with Britain and the spread of more
virulent strains of the COVID-19 virus increased public criticism of government leaders in some virulent strains of the COVID-19 virus increased public criticism of government leaders in some
EU countries and prompted renewed business lockdowns and school closures.EU countries and prompted renewed business lockdowns and school closures.213
212 After protracted talks, European leaders agreed on July 21, 2020, to a €750 After protracted talks, European leaders agreed on July 21, 2020, to a €750 bil ion billion (about $859 (about $859
bil ion) billion) pandemic economic assistance package to support European economies. On December pandemic economic assistance package to support European economies. On December
11, 2020, EU members finalized the agreement, which took effect on February 2021. The package 11, 2020, EU members finalized the agreement, which took effect on February 2021. The package
consists of a Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) that consists of a Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) that wil will provide up to €312.5 provide up to €312.5 bil ion in
billion in grants and €360 grants and €360 bil ion billion in loans and support and funds for existing budget priorities to speed up in loans and support and funds for existing budget priorities to speed up
Europe’s recovery from the economic impact of the pandemic. The EU describes the Facility as Europe’s recovery from the economic impact of the pandemic. The EU describes the Facility as
the centerpiece of its NextGenerationEU program, a temporary recovery instrument that the centerpiece of its NextGenerationEU program, a temporary recovery instrument that al owsallows
the EC to raise funds to address the economic and social impact of the pandemic.the EC to raise funds to address the economic and social impact of the pandemic.214213 Individual Individual
EU members developed recovery and resilience plans to support clean technologies and EU members developed recovery and resilience plans to support clean technologies and
renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable transportation and recharging stations, renewable energy, energy efficiency, sustainable transportation and recharging stations,
broadband services, green transition, digital transformation, and education and broadband services, green transition, digital transformation, and education and skil sskills training, training,
among other areas. among other areas.
According to data released by Eurostat in August 2021, the EU rate of GDP growth during the According to data released by Eurostat in August 2021, the EU rate of GDP growth during the
second quarter of 2020 contracted by 11.1%, relative to the first quarter, and by 11.4% in the Euro second quarter of 2020 contracted by 11.1%, relative to the first quarter, and by 11.4% in the Euro
area from the previous quarter, reflecting negative rates of growth across area from the previous quarter, reflecting negative rates of growth across al all EU countries, as EU countries, as
indicated in indicated in Table 16. In contrast, the EU and the Euro area grew by 11.6% and 12.4%, . In contrast, the EU and the Euro area grew by 11.6% and 12.4%,
respectively, in the third quarter. Compared with growth during the third quarter in the previous respectively, in the third quarter. Compared with growth during the third quarter in the previous
year, however, EU and Euro area growth rates were down 3.9% and 4.0%, respectively. During year, however, EU and Euro area growth rates were down 3.9% and 4.0%, respectively. During
fourth quarter 2020 and first quarter 2021, the rate of economic growth declined by 0.4% and fourth quarter 2020 and first quarter 2021, the rate of economic growth declined by 0.4% and
0.1%, respectively, in the EU and by 0.6% 0.3% in the Euro area as a result of a renewed social 0.1%, respectively, in the EU and by 0.6% 0.3% in the Euro area as a result of a renewed social
activity restrictions and business lockdowns during the period that dampened expectations activity restrictions and business lockdowns during the period that dampened expectations
somewhat of a strong recovery across the EU in the first half of 2021. At 18.8%, the United somewhat of a strong recovery across the EU in the first half of 2021. At 18.8%, the United
Kingdom experienced the largest contraction in its GDP growth rate in the Kingdom experienced the largest contraction in its GDP growth rate in the sec ondsecond quarter of quarter of
2020, compared with the previous quarter among European countries, but third quarter growth 2020, compared with the previous quarter among European countries, but third quarter growth
rate rebounded by 16.0%, the third fastest rate behind France (18.8%) and Spain (17.1%). rate rebounded by 16.0%, the third fastest rate behind France (18.8%) and Spain (17.1%).

https://www.ft.com/content/a89f89ba-08be-44e2-8d21-3e9ada605e17; Packard, Jim, Boris Johnson Announces Second https://www.ft.com/content/a89f89ba-08be-44e2-8d21-3e9ada605e17; Packard, Jim, Boris Johnson Announces Second
Lockdown for England, Lockdown for England, Financial Tim esTimes, October 31, 2020, https://www.ft.com/content/8c2ede22-9dcf-4d31-81ef-, October 31, 2020, https://www.ft.com/content/8c2ede22-9dcf-4d31-81ef-
82ae4ee76e10. 82ae4ee76e10.
211 210 Clarfelt, Harriet, Pandemic at ‘tipping point’, Says WHO Europe Official, Clarfelt, Harriet, Pandemic at ‘tipping point’, Says WHO Europe Official, Financial Times, January 7, 2021. , January 7, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/9b42e8fa-dde1-3663-a4ad-7d6605121866. https://www.ft.com/content/9b42e8fa-dde1-3663-a4ad-7d6605121866.
212211 Hall, Ben, Bethan Staton, Joshua Chaffin, Guy Hall, Ben, Bethan Staton, Joshua Chaffin, Guy Chazan, European Capitals FollowChazan, European Capitals Follow UK With School ClosuresUK With School Closures as as
VirusVirus Surges,Surges, Financial Tim esTimes, January 7, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/8121ca0a-4d96-4cf5-b5df-a73adc16a606. , January 7, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/8121ca0a-4d96-4cf5-b5df-a73adc16a606.
213212 Chazan, Guy, Chazan, Guy, We Are a LaughingWe Are a Laughing Stock’: Covid-19 and Germany’s Political Malaise, Stock’: Covid-19 and Germany’s Political Malaise, Financial Times, April 1, , April 1,
2021. https://www.ft.com/content/bc5a3b02-a90d-4206-a441-1bada29feba2. 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/bc5a3b02-a90d-4206-a441-1bada29feba2.
214 213 European Commission, European Commission, The Recovery and Resilience Facility. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-
euro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en#the-recovery-and-resilience-task-force. euro/recovery-coronavirus/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en#the-recovery-and-resilience-task-force.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

82 82

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Table 16. EU Real GDP Growth Rates 2020 and 2021
Seasonal ySeasonally adjusted data adjusted data
Percentage change compared with
Percentage change compared with the
the previous quarter
same quarter of the previous year


2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2021 2021
2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2021 2021
Q1 Q1
Q2 Q2
Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4
Q1 Q1
Q1 Q1
Q2 Q2
Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4
Q1 Q1
EU EU
-3.2 -3.2
-11.1 -11.1
11.6 11.6
-0.4 -0.4
-0.1 -0.1
-2.6 -2.6
-13.6 -13.6
-3.9 -3.9
-4.3 -4.3
-1.3 -1.3
Euro area Euro area
-3.6 -3.6
-11.4 -11.4
12.4 12.4
-0.6 -0.6
-0.3 -0.3
-3.2 -3.2
-14.4 -14.4
-4.0 -4.0
-4.6 -4.6
-1.3 -1.3
Belgium Belgium
-3.3 -3.3
-11.9 -11.9
11.8 11.8
-0.1 -0.1
1.1 1.1
-2.0 -2.0
-14.0 -14.0
-4.3 -4.3
-4.9 -4.9
-0.5 -0.5
Bulgaria Bulgaria
0.4 0.4
-10.1 -10.1
4.3 4.3
2.2 2.2
2.5 2.5
2.3 2.3
-8.6 -8.6
-5.2 -5.2
-3.8 -3.8
-1.8 -1.8
Czechnia Czechnia
-3.4 -3.4
-8.9 -8.9
6.8 6.8
0.7 0.7
-0.3 -0.3
-1.5 -1.5
-10.9 -10.9
-5.4 -5.4
-5.3 -5.3
-2.4 -2.4
Denmark Denmark
-0.7 -0.7
-6.3 -6.3
6.0 6.0
0.9 0.9
-1.0 -1.0
0.2 0.2
-6.6 -6.6
-1.3 -1.3
-0.5 -0.5
-0.8 -0.8
Germany Germany
-1.8 -1.8
-10.0 -10.0
9.0 9.0
0.7 0.7
-2.1 -2.1
-1.9 -1.9
-11.3 -11.3
-3.7 -3.7
-2.9 -2.9
-3.2 -3.2
Estonia Estonia
-1.6 -1.6
-5.1 -5.1
2.7 2.7
2.8 2.8
4.8 4.8
-0.1 -0.1
-5.6 -5.6
-3.5 -3.5
-1.3 -1.3
5.0 5.0
Ireland Ireland
3.1 3.1
-1.4 -1.4
8.3 8.3
-5.2 -5.2
8.6 8.6
6.7 6.7
1.4 1.4
11.2 11.2
4.3 4.3
9.9 9.9
Greece Greece
-0.5 -0.5
-12.9 -12.9
3.8 3.8
3.4 3.4
4.4 4.4
-0.5 -0.5
-13.9 -13.9
-10.0 -10.0
-6.9 -6.9
-2.3 -2.3
Spain Spain
-5.4 -5.4
-17.8 -17.8
17.1 17.1
0.0 0.0
-0.4 -0.4
-4.3 -4.3
-21.6 -21.6
-8.6 -8.6
-8.9 -8.9
-4.2 -4.2
France France
-5.8 -5.8
-13.5 -13.5
18.8 18.8
-1.0 -1.0
0.0 0.0
-5.5 -5.5
-18.7 -18.7
-3.6 -3.6
-4.2 -4.2
1.7 1.7
Croatia Croatia
-0.6 -0.6
-15.1 -15.1
5.9 5.9
4.1 4.1
5.8 5.8
0.8 0.8
-14.6 -14.6
-10.1 -10.1
-6.9 -6.9
-0.9 -0.9
Italy Italy
-5.7 -5.7
-13.1 -13.1
16.0 16.0
-1.8 -1.8
0.2 0.2
-5.8 -5.8
-18.2 -18.2
-5.2 -5.2
-6.5 -6.5
-0.7 -0.7
Cyprus Cyprus
-0.8 -0.8
-13.0 -13.0
9.5 9.5
1.1 1.1
2.0 2.0
1.1 1.1
-12.5 -12.5
-4.6 -4.6
-4.4 -4.4
-1.6 -1.6
Latvia Latvia
-2.3 -2.3
-7.0 -7.0
6.9 6.9
1.1 1.1
-1.7 -1.7
-1.2 -1.2
-8.6 -8.6
-2.8 -2.8
-1.8 -1.8
-1.2 -1.2
Lithuania Lithuania
-0.3 -0.3
-6.2 -6.2
6.1 6.1
-0.3 -0.3
2.2 2.2
2.5 2.5
-4.7 -4.7
0.1 0.1
-1.1 -1.1
1.4 1.4
Luxem- Luxem-
-1.6 -1.6
-7.1 -7.1
9.2 9.2
1.9 1.9
1.4 1.4
1.1 1.1
-8.0 -8.0
-0.1 -0.1
1.7 1.7
4.9 4.9
bourg bourg
Hungary Hungary
-0.4 -0.4
-14.5 -14.5
9.7 9.7
2.8 2.8
2.0 2.0
2.1 2.1
-13.3 -13.3
-5.2 -5.2
-3.9 -3.9
-1.6 -1.6
Malta Malta
-3.9 -3.9
-13.9 -13.9
7.4 7.4
4.0 4.0
1.9 1.9
1.6 1.6
-14.8 -14.8
-9.6 -9.6
-7.7 -7.7
-2.0 -2.0
Nether- Nether-
-1.6 -1.6
-8.4 -8.4
7.5 7.5
0.0 0.0
-0.8 -0.8
-0.4 -0.4
-9.1 -9.1
-2.6 -2.6
-3.1 -3.1
-2.3 -2.3
lands lands
Austria Austria
-2.6 -2.6
-10.6 -10.6
11.6 11.6
-3.1 -3.1
-1.1 -1.1
-3.1 -3.1
-13.2 -13.2
-3.4 -3.4
-5.9 -5.9
-4.5 -4.5
Poland Poland
-0.2 -0.2
-8.9 -8.9
7.5 7.5
-0.5 -0.5
1.1 1.1
2.0 2.0
-7.9 -7.9
-2.0 -2.0
-2.7 -2.7
-1.4 -1.4
Portugal Portugal
-4.0 -4.0
-14.0 -14.0
13.4 13.4
0.2 0.2
-3.2 -3.2
-2.2 -2.2
-16.4 -16.4
-5.6 -5.6
-6.1 -6.1
-5.3 -5.3
Romania Romania
0.7 0.7
-11.8 -11.8
5.5 5.5
4.6 4.6
2.9 2.9
2.8 2.8
-10.0 -10.0
-5.5 -5.5
-2.0 -2.0
0.1 0.1
Slovenia Slovenia
-5.6 -5.6
-9.9 -9.9
12.6 12.6
-0.6 -0.6
1.4 1.4
-3.5 -3.5
-13.1 -13.1
-2.9 -2.9
-4.8 -4.8
2.3 2.3
Slovakia Slovakia
-4.6 -4.6
-7.5 -7.5
9.9 9.9
0.8 0.8
-2.0 -2.0
-3.3 -3.3
-10.9 -10.9
-2.5 -2.5
-2.3 -2.3
0.3 0.3
Finland Finland
-0.5 -0.5
-6.1 -6.1
4.5 4.5
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
-7.0 -7.0
-2.7 -2.7
-1.9 -1.9
-1.4 -1.4
Sweden Sweden
-0.9 -0.9
-7.8 -7.8
7.4 7.4
0.0 0.0
0.8 0.8
0.1 0.1
-8.1 -8.1
-1.8 -1.8
-1.8 -1.8
-0.1 -0.1
Other countries Other countries









United United
-3.0 -3.0
-18.8 -18.8
16.0 16.0
: :
: :
-2.4 -2.4
-20.8 -20.8
-8.6 -8.6
: :
: :
Kingdom Kingdom
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

83 83

link to page 90 link to page 90 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Percentage change compared with
Percentage change compared with the
the previous quarter
same quarter of the previous year


2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2021 2021
2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2020 2020
2021 2021
Q1 Q1
Q2 Q2
Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4
Q1 Q1
Q1 Q1
Q2 Q2
Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4
Q1 Q1
Iceland Iceland
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
: :
Norway Norway
-1.5 -1.5
-4.6 -4.6
4.3 4.3
0.8 0.8
-0.6 -0.6
0.4 0.4
-4.3 -4.3
-0.2 -0.2
-1.1 -1.1
-0.2 -0.2
Switzer- Switzer-
-1.7 -1.7
-6.8 -6.8
7.2 7.2
0.1 0.1
-0.5 -0.5
-0.3 -0.3
-7.5 -7.5
-1.4 -1.4
-1.7 -1.7
-0.5 -0.5
land land
Source: Eurostat,, August 13, 2021. August 13, 2021.
Draft budget estimates submitted by Eurozone governments in the Draft budget estimates submitted by Eurozone governments in the fal fall of 2020 indicated the of 2020 indicated the
countries could experience a combined budget deficit of nearly €1 countries could experience a combined budget deficit of nearly €1 tril ion, trillion, or equivalent to about or equivalent to about
9% of their annual GDP.9% of their annual GDP.215214 The rise in budget deficits reflects the growing cost to governments of The rise in budget deficits reflects the growing cost to governments of
supporting their economies to sustain economic activity and a marked change in attitudes toward supporting their economies to sustain economic activity and a marked change in attitudes toward
budget deficits also reflected in statements by the IMF and World Bank. Second quarter data budget deficits also reflected in statements by the IMF and World Bank. Second quarter data
indicated that employment among EU countries indicated that employment among EU countries fel fell by 2.6%, or 5.5 by 2.6%, or 5.5 mil ionmillion jobs in 2020. The jobs in 2020. The
jobs data, however, do not include roughly 45 jobs data, however, do not include roughly 45 mil ion million people, or a third of the workforce in people, or a third of the workforce in
Germany, France, Britain, Italy, and Spain, that were covered by employment protection Germany, France, Britain, Italy, and Spain, that were covered by employment protection
programs.programs.216
215 In its June summer 2021 economic forecast, the European Commission projected that EU GDP In its June summer 2021 economic forecast, the European Commission projected that EU GDP
growth rate would rise by 4.8% in 2021, after growth rate would rise by 4.8% in 2021, after fal ingfalling by 6.0% in 2020, more than a full by 6.0% in 2020, more than a full
percentage point lower than it had estimated in its Autumn forecast of -7.4%, as indicated in percentage point lower than it had estimated in its Autumn forecast of -7.4%, as indicated in
Table 17.217216 The EC forecast indicated a The EC forecast indicated a smal ersmaller drop in gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020 drop in gross domestic product (GDP) in 2020
among European economies than it had forecasted in its autumn 2020 report, as a result of a third among European economies than it had forecasted in its autumn 2020 report, as a result of a third
quarter rebound in growth before an anticipated slow-down in the fourth quarter as a result of the quarter rebound in growth before an anticipated slow-down in the fourth quarter as a result of the
resumption of business lockdowns. The forecast projects a rebound in the EU economy in the resumption of business lockdowns. The forecast projects a rebound in the EU economy in the
second and third quarters of 2021 before a slowdown in the fourth quarter. The forecast indicated second and third quarters of 2021 before a slowdown in the fourth quarter. The forecast indicated
that:that
 Firms and households were adapting to pandemic-related constraints and a more  Firms and households were adapting to pandemic-related constraints and a more
positive global environment combined with increased global trade and the effects positive global environment combined with increased global trade and the effects
of domestic economic stimulus policies that were contributing to growth. of domestic economic stimulus policies that were contributing to growth.
 A faster-than-expected recovery in travel, including intra-EU travel, was  A faster-than-expected recovery in travel, including intra-EU travel, was
reflecting higher levels of consumer spending. reflecting higher levels of consumer spending.
 Certain manufacturing sectors were continuing to experience supply shortages,  Certain manufacturing sectors were continuing to experience supply shortages,
but the impact was expected to be transitory. but the impact was expected to be transitory.
 Inflation pressures were increasing as a result of rising energy and commodity  Inflation pressures were increasing as a result of rising energy and commodity
prices, production bottlenecks, and rising demand, but there was uncertainty prices, production bottlenecks, and rising demand, but there was uncertainty
about whether the increase was transitory or could become entrenched. about whether the increase was transitory or could become entrenched.
 National public and private investment spending was expected to help sustain the  National public and private investment spending was expected to help sustain the
economic recovery in 2021 and 2022. economic recovery in 2021 and 2022.218

215217 214 Arnold, Martin and Sam Arnold, Martin and Sam Fleming, Eurozone BudgetFleming, Eurozone Budget Deficits RiseDeficits Rise Nearly Nearly T enfoldTenfold to Counter Pandemic, to Counter Pandemic, Financial
Tim es
Times, October 19, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5579361f-5aac-4cd3-9e93-190fffdc0baf. , October 19, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5579361f-5aac-4cd3-9e93-190fffdc0baf.
216215 Ben Hall, Ben, Delphine Strauss, Ben Hall, Ben, Delphine Strauss, and Daniel Dombey, Millions of European Jobsand Daniel Dombey, Millions of European Jobs at Risk When Furloughat Risk When Furlough Support Support
Ends, Ends, Financial Tim esTimes, August August 14, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/0f01a9ed-5b15-4e2d-921c-6eed7a80d0bd. 14, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/0f01a9ed-5b15-4e2d-921c-6eed7a80d0bd.
217216 European Economic Forecast Summer 2021, European Commission, July 2021. , European Commission, July 2021.
218217 Ibid., 2. Ibid., 2.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

84 84

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Table 17. European Commission Economic Forecast
Percentage change, real GDP Percentage change, real GDP

Summer Summer Forecast 2021 Forecast 2021
Spring Forecast Spring Forecast 2021 2021
Autumn Forecast 2020 Autumn Forecast 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022
2020 2020
2021 2021
2022 2022

EU EU
4.8 4.8
4.5 4.5
-6.0 -6.0
4.2 4.2
4.4 4.4
-7.4 -7.4
4.1 4.1
3.0 3.0
Euro area Euro area
4.8 4.8
4.5 4.5
-6.5 -6.5
4.3 4.3
4.4 4.4
-7.8 -7.8
4.2 4.2
3.0 3.0
Belgium Belgium
5.4 5.4
3.7 3.7
-6.3 -6.3
4.5 4.5
3.7 3.7
-8.4 -8.4
4.1 4.1
3.5 3.5
Germany Germany
3.6 3.6
4.6 4.6
-4.8 -4.8
3.4 3.4
4.1 4.1
-5.6 -5.6
3.5 3.5
2.6 2.6
Ireland Ireland
7.2 7.2
5.1 5.1
3.4 3.4
4.6 4.6
5.0 5.0
-2.3 -2.3
2.9 2.9
2.6 2.6
Greece Greece
4.3 4.3
6.0 6.0
-8.2 -8.2
4.1 4.1
6.0 6.0
-9.0 -9.0
5.0 5.0
3.5 3.5
Spain Spain
6.2 6.2
6.3 6.3
-10.8 -10.8
5.9 5.9
6.8 6.8
-12.4 -12.4
5.4 5.4
4.8 4.8
France France
6.0 6.0
4.2 4.2
-7.9 -7.9
5.7 5.7
4.2 4.2
-7.8 -7.8
4.2 4.2
3.0 3.0
Italy Italy
5.0 5.0
4.2 4.2
-8.9 -8.9
4.2 4.2
4.4 4.4
-9.4 -9.4
5.8 5.8
3.1 3.1
Luxembourg Luxembourg
4.8 4.8
3.3 3.3
-1.3 -1.3
4.5 4.5
3.3 3.3
-9.9 -9.9
4.1 4.1
2.8 2.8
Malta Malta
5.6 5.6
5.8 5.8
-7.8 -7.8
4.6 4.6
6.1 6.1
-4.5 -4.5
3.9 3.9
2.7 2.7
Netherlands Netherlands
3.3 3.3
3.3 3.3
-3.7 -3.7
2.3 2.3
3.6 3.6
-7.3 -7.3
3.0 3.0
6.2 6.2
Austria Austria
3.8 3.8
4.5 4.5
-6.3 -6.3
3.4 3.4
4.3 4.3
-5.3 -5.3
2.2 2.2
1.9 1.9
Portugal Portugal
3.9 3.9
5.1 5.1
-7.6 -7.6
3.9 3.9
5.1 5.1
-7.1 -7.1
4.1 4.1
2.5 2.5
Finland Finland
2.7 2.7
2.9 2.9
-2.8 -2.8
2.7 2.7
2.8 2.8
-9.3 -9.3
5.4 5.4
3.5 3.5
Denmark Denmark
3.0 3.0
3.4 3.4
-2.7 -2.7
2.9 2.9
3.5 3.5
-4.3 -4.3
2.9 2.9
2.2 2.2
Sweden Sweden
4.6 4.6
3.6 3.6
-2.8 -2.8
4.4 4.4
3.3 3.3
-3.9 -3.9
3.5 3.5
2.4 2.4
World World
5.9 5.9
4.2 4.2
-2.9 -2.9
5.9 5.9
4.2 4.2
-3.4 -3.4
3.3 3.3
2.4 2.4
Source: European Economic Forecast Summer 2021, European Commission,, European Commission, July 2021. July 2021.
The Commission indicated the EU economy was weaker in the The Commission indicated the EU economy was weaker in the fal fall of 2020 and weaker going into of 2020 and weaker going into
2021 than its earlier forecast had indicated as a result of a resurgence of COVID-19 cases and the 2021 than its earlier forecast had indicated as a result of a resurgence of COVID-19 cases and the
emergence of new, more virulent strains of the virus in the emergence of new, more virulent strains of the virus in the fal fall that led countries to reimpose that led countries to reimpose
restrictions. The Commission concluded, however, that the outlook for the EU economy had restrictions. The Commission concluded, however, that the outlook for the EU economy had
improved since its November 2020 forecast due to the development of vaccines and the pace of improved since its November 2020 forecast due to the development of vaccines and the pace of
vaccinations. The economic impact of the renewed lockdowns was projected to be unequal across vaccinations. The economic impact of the renewed lockdowns was projected to be unequal across
EU members due to differences in the stringency of containment measures, the severity of the EU members due to differences in the stringency of containment measures, the severity of the
infections and differences in economic institutions and policy responses.infections and differences in economic institutions and policy responses.219
218 The Commission forecast assumed that trade activity in the EU and the UK would be negatively The Commission forecast assumed that trade activity in the EU and the UK would be negatively
affected beginning in January 2021 due to the UK withdrawal from the EU. By country, Spain, affected beginning in January 2021 due to the UK withdrawal from the EU. By country, Spain,
France, Italy, Portugal, and Greece were forecasted to experience the largest declines in GDP in France, Italy, Portugal, and Greece were forecasted to experience the largest declines in GDP in
2020 due to a number of factors, including a dependence on tourism, which is expected to 2020 due to a number of factors, including a dependence on tourism, which is expected to
experience a slow economic recovery. Germany and other Northern European countries were experience a slow economic recovery. Germany and other Northern European countries were
projected to experience a more modest decline in economic activity. Some analysts argue that this projected to experience a more modest decline in economic activity. Some analysts argue that this
disparity in economic effects may complicate efforts to coordinate economic policies.disparity in economic effects may complicate efforts to coordinate economic policies.220

219219 218 European Economic Forecast Winter 2021, European Commission, February 2021, p. 1. , European Commission, February 2021, p. 1.
220219 Birnbaum, Michael, European Union Says Birnbaum, Michael, European Union Says T hat That Pandemic Recession Will be Worst in its History, Pandemic Recession Will be Worst in its History, Washington Post,
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

85 85

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

In assessing the In assessing the chal engechallenge of the crisis, the Commission argued that, “[t]he risk … is that the of the crisis, the Commission argued that, “[t]he risk … is that the
crisis crisis wil will lead to severe distortions within the Single Market and to entrenched economic, lead to severe distortions within the Single Market and to entrenched economic,
financial and social divergences between euro area Member States that could ultimately threaten financial and social divergences between euro area Member States that could ultimately threaten
the stability of the Economic and Monetary Union.”the stability of the Economic and Monetary Union.”221220 The Commission estimated that European The Commission estimated that European
countries would emerge from the recession at different rates and different paths, reflecting countries would emerge from the recession at different rates and different paths, reflecting
differences in the timing of the introduction and removal of social distancing measures, differences in the timing of the introduction and removal of social distancing measures,
dependency on tourism, and the magnitude and effectiveness of economic policies. The dependency on tourism, and the magnitude and effectiveness of economic policies. The
Commission also noted the rise in saving among EU households that it argued was mostly Commission also noted the rise in saving among EU households that it argued was mostly
involuntary, rather than precautionary and was projected to revert to pre-crisis levels once involuntary, rather than precautionary and was projected to revert to pre-crisis levels once
consumers resumed their regular spending patterns. consumers resumed their regular spending patterns.
In previous actions, the European Commission announced that it would relax rules on In previous actions, the European Commission announced that it would relax rules on
government debt to government debt to al owallow countries more flexibility countries more flexibility in using fiscal policies. Also, the European in using fiscal policies. Also, the European
Central Bank (ECB) announced that it was ready to take “appropriate and targeted measures,” if Central Bank (ECB) announced that it was ready to take “appropriate and targeted measures,” if
needed. France, Italy, Spain and six other Eurozone countries have argued for creating a needed. France, Italy, Spain and six other Eurozone countries have argued for creating a
“coronabond,” a joint common European debt instrument. Similar attempts to create a common “coronabond,” a joint common European debt instrument. Similar attempts to create a common
Eurozone-wide debt instrument have been opposed by Germany and the Netherlands, among Eurozone-wide debt instrument have been opposed by Germany and the Netherlands, among
other Eurozone members.other Eurozone members.222221 With interest rates already low, however, it indicated that it would With interest rates already low, however, it indicated that it would
expand its program of providing loans to EU banks, or buying debt from EU firms, and possibly expand its program of providing loans to EU banks, or buying debt from EU firms, and possibly
lowering its deposit rate further into negative territory in an attempt to shore up the Euro’s lowering its deposit rate further into negative territory in an attempt to shore up the Euro’s
exchange rate.exchange rate.223222 ECB President-designate Christine Lagarde ECB President-designate Christine Lagarde cal edcalled on EU leaders to take more on EU leaders to take more
urgent action to avoid the spread of COVID-19 from triggering a serious economic slowdown. urgent action to avoid the spread of COVID-19 from triggering a serious economic slowdown.
The European Commission indicated that it was creating a $30 The European Commission indicated that it was creating a $30 bil ionbillion investment fund to address investment fund to address
COVID-19 issues.COVID-19 issues.224223 In other actions taken in 2020 to address the economic crisis In other actions taken in 2020 to address the economic crisis:
 On March 12, 2020, the ECB decided to (1) expand its longer-term refinance  On March 12, 2020, the ECB decided to (1) expand its longer-term refinance
operations (LTRO) to provide low-cost loans to Eurozone banks to increase bank operations (LTRO) to provide low-cost loans to Eurozone banks to increase bank
liquidity;liquidity; (2) extend targeted longer-term refinance operations (TLTRO) to (2) extend targeted longer-term refinance operations (TLTRO) to
provide loans at below-market rates to businesses, provide loans at below-market rates to businesses, especial y smal especially small and medium-and medium-
sized businesses, directly affected by COVID-19; (3) provide an additional €120 sized businesses, directly affected by COVID-19; (3) provide an additional €120
bil ion billion (about $130 (about $130 bil ion) billion) for the Bank’s asset purchase program to provide for the Bank’s asset purchase program to provide
liquidityliquidity to firms that was in addition to €20 to firms that was in addition to €20 bil ion billion a month it previously had a month it previously had
committed to purchasing.committed to purchasing.225
224  On March 13, 2020, financial market regulators in the UK, Italy, and Spain  On March 13, 2020, financial market regulators in the UK, Italy, and Spain
intervened in stock and bond markets to stabilize prices after historic swings in intervened in stock and bond markets to stabilize prices after historic swings in

May 6, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/european-union-says-pandemic-recession-will-be-worst-in-its-May 6, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/european-union-says-pandemic-recession-will-be-worst-in-its-
history/2020/05/06/e787a70e-8f96-11ea-9322-a29e75effc93_story.html. history/2020/05/06/e787a70e-8f96-11ea-9322-a29e75effc93_story.html.
221 220 European Economic Forecast Autumn 2020. .
222221 Dombey, Daniel Dombey, Guy Dombey, Daniel Dombey, Guy Chazan, and Jim Brunsden,Chazan, and Jim Brunsden, “Nine Eurozone Countries Issue“Nine Eurozone Countries Issue Call for Call for
‘Coronabonds,’” ‘Coronabonds,’” Financial Times, March 26, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/258308f6-6e94-11ea-89df- March 26, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/258308f6-6e94-11ea-89df-
41bea055720b. 41bea055720b.
223222 “US Fed’s “US Fed’s Covid-19 Rate Cut Is First Move in a Dance with Markets,” Covid-19 Rate Cut Is First Move in a Dance with Markets,” Financial Times, March 4, 2020. , March 4, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/83c07594-5e3a-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. Giles, Chris, Martin Arnold, Samhttps://www.ft.com/content/83c07594-5e3a-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. Giles, Chris, Martin Arnold, Sam Jones, and Jones, and
Jamie Smyth,Jamie Smyth,Finance Ministers ‘ReadyFinance Ministers ‘Ready to T ake to Take Action’ on Covid-19,” Action’ on Covid-19,” Financial Tim esTimes, March 3, 2020. , March 3, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/b86f7d92-5d38-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. https://www.ft.com/content/b86f7d92-5d38-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4.
224223 Arnold, Martin and Guy Arnold, Martin and Guy Chazan, “Christine Lagarde CallsChazan, “Christine Lagarde Calls on EU Leaders to Ramp up Covid-19 Response,” on EU Leaders to Ramp up Covid-19 Response,”
Financial Tim esTimes, March 11, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/44eac1f2-6386-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68. , March 11, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/44eac1f2-6386-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68.
225224 Monetary Policy Decisions, , T heThe European Central Bank, March 12, 2020. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/ European Central Bank, March 12, 2020. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/
2020/html/ecb.mp200312~8d3aec3ff2.en.htm. 2020/html/ecb.mp200312~8d3aec3ff2.en.htm.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

86 86

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

indexes on March 12, 2020. indexes on March 12, 2020.226225 In addition, the ECB announced that it would do In addition, the ECB announced that it would do
more to assist financial markets in distress, including altering self-imposed rules more to assist financial markets in distress, including altering self-imposed rules
on purchases of sovereign debt.on purchases of sovereign debt.227
226  Germany’s Economic Minister announced on March 13, 2020, that Germany  Germany’s Economic Minister announced on March 13, 2020, that Germany
would provide unlimited loans to businesses experiencing negative economic would provide unlimited loans to businesses experiencing negative economic
activity (activity (initial y initially providing $555 providing $555 bil ion), billion), tax breaks for businesses,tax breaks for businesses,228227 and export and export
credits and guarantees.credits and guarantees.229
228  On March 18, the ECB indicated that it would: create a €750  On March 18, the ECB indicated that it would: create a €750 bil ion billion (about $800 (about $800
bil ion) billion) Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program to purchase public and private Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program to purchase public and private
securities; expand the securities it securities; expand the securities it wil will purchase to include nonfinancial purchase to include nonfinancial
commercial paper; and ease some collateral standards.commercial paper; and ease some collateral standards.230229 In announcing the In announcing the
program, President-designate Lagarde indicated that the ECB would, “do program, President-designate Lagarde indicated that the ECB would, “do
everything necessary.” In creating the program, the ECB removed or significantly everything necessary.” In creating the program, the ECB removed or significantly
loosened almost loosened almost al all constraints that applied to previous asset-purchase programs, constraints that applied to previous asset-purchase programs,
including a self-imposed limit of buying no more than one-third of any one including a self-imposed limit of buying no more than one-third of any one
country’s eligible bonds, a move that was expected to benefit Italy. country’s eligible bonds, a move that was expected to benefit Italy.
 The ECB also indicated that it would make available  The ECB also indicated that it would make available up to €3 up to €3 tril ion trillion in liquidity in liquidity
through refinancing operations. through refinancing operations.231230 Britain ($400 Britain ($400 bil ionbillion) and France ($50 ) and France ($50 bil ionbillion) )
also announced plans to increase spending to blunt the economic effects of the also announced plans to increase spending to blunt the economic effects of the
virus. Recent forecasts indicate that the economic effect of COVID-19 could virus. Recent forecasts indicate that the economic effect of COVID-19 could
push the Eurozone into an economic recession in 2020.push the Eurozone into an economic recession in 2020.232
231  On March 23, 2020, Germany announced that it would adopt a €750  On March 23, 2020, Germany announced that it would adopt a €750 bil ionbillion (over (over
$800 $800 bil ion) billion) package in economic stimulus funding. package in economic stimulus funding.
 On April  On April 15, Eurozone finance ministers announced a €500 15, Eurozone finance ministers announced a €500 bil ionbillion (about $550 (about $550
bil ion) billion) emergency spending package to support governments, businesses, and emergency spending package to support governments, businesses, and
workers and workers and wil will provide funds to the European Stability Mechanism, the provide funds to the European Stability Mechanism, the
European Investment Bank, and for unemployment insurance.European Investment Bank, and for unemployment insurance.233232
On May 5, 2020, Germany’s Constitutional Court issued a ruling On May 5, 2020, Germany’s Constitutional Court issued a ruling chal engingchallenging the legality the legality of a of a
bond-buying program conducted by the ECB since 2015, the Public Sector Purchase Program bond-buying program conducted by the ECB since 2015, the Public Sector Purchase Program
(PSPP). In its ruling, the court directed the German government to request clarification from the (PSPP). In its ruling, the court directed the German government to request clarification from the

226 225 Stafford, Philip and Adam Samson, Stafford, Philip and Adam Samson, “European Regulators Intervene in Bid to Stabilize“European Regulators Intervene in Bid to Stabilize Stock and Bond Prices,” Stock and Bond Prices,”
Financial Tim esTimes, March 13, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/77f57d4c-6509-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68. , March 13, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/77f57d4c-6509-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68.
227226 Arnold, Martin, “ECB Enters Damage-Limitation Mode with Pledge Arnold, Martin, “ECB Enters Damage-Limitation Mode with Pledge of More Action,” of More Action,” Financial Times, March 13, , March 13,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/f1cbd4f8-650f-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/f1cbd4f8-650f-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5.
228227 Loveday, Morris and Louisa Loveday, Morris and Louisa Beck, “Germany Announces ‘Bazooka’ Economic Plan to Mitigate Covid-19 Hit,” Beck, “Germany Announces ‘Bazooka’ Economic Plan to Mitigate Covid-19 Hit,”
Washington Post, March 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/13/Covid-19-latest-news/. , March 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/13/Covid-19-latest-news/.
229 228 Arnold, Martin, Guy Arnold, Martin, Guy Chazan, Victor Mallet, Miles Johnson, and Daniel Dombey, “How European Economies Are Chazan, Victor Mallet, Miles Johnson, and Daniel Dombey, “How European Economies Are
T ryingTrying to Mitigate the Covid-19 Shock,” to Mitigate the Covid-19 Shock,” Financial Tim esTimes, March 17, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/26af5520- March 17, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/26af5520-
6793-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3. 6793-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3.
230229 ECB Announces €759 Billion Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program , the European Central Bank, March 18, , the European Central Bank, March 18,
2020. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb.pr200318_1~3949d6f266.en.html. 2020. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ecb.pr200318_1~3949d6f266.en.html.
231 230 Lagarde, Christine, “ Lagarde, Christine, “T heThe ECB Will Do Everything Necessary to Counter the Virus,” ECB Will Do Everything Necessary to Counter the Virus,” Financial Times, March 20, , March 20,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/281d600c-69f8-11ea-a6ac-9122541af204. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/281d600c-69f8-11ea-a6ac-9122541af204.
232231 “Lagarde to Confront Covid-19 Crisis at ECB Policy Meeting,” “Lagarde to Confront Covid-19 Crisis at ECB Policy Meeting,” Financial Times, March 8, 2020. , March 8, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/79a280c6-5fb5-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. https://www.ft.com/content/79a280c6-5fb5-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4.
233232 Fleming, Sam Fleming, Sam and Mehreen Khan, “Eurozone Countries Strike Emergency Deal on Coronavirus Rescue,”and Mehreen Khan, “Eurozone Countries Strike Emergency Deal on Coronavirus Rescue,” Financial
Tim es
Times, April 9, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/b984101a-42b8-40db-9a92-6786aec2ba5c. , April 9, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/b984101a-42b8-40db-9a92-6786aec2ba5c.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

87 87

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

ECB about various aspects of the PSPP program that the court argued might exceed the ECB’s ECB about various aspects of the PSPP program that the court argued might exceed the ECB’s
legal mandate. The German government did not immediately respond to the ruling, but many legal mandate. The German government did not immediately respond to the ruling, but many
analysts contended the ruling—and the analysts contended the ruling—and the chal engechallenge to the authority of the ECB and the European to the authority of the ECB and the European
Court of Justice—could have far-reaching implications for future ECB activities. This Court of Justice—could have far-reaching implications for future ECB activities. This potential ypotentially
included included chal engeschallenges to the ECB’s Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program (PEPP) initiated in to the ECB’s Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program (PEPP) initiated in
March. The PEPP is a temporary program that authorized the ECB to acquire up to €750 March. The PEPP is a temporary program that authorized the ECB to acquire up to €750 bil ionbillion
(about $820 (about $820 bil ionbillion) in private and public sector securities to address the economic effects of the ) in private and public sector securities to address the economic effects of the
pandemic crisis. pandemic crisis.
The German court’s ruling heightened tensions between the court and the European Court of The German court’s ruling heightened tensions between the court and the European Court of
Justice. Following the 2008-2009 financial crisis and the subsequent Eurozone financial crisis, the Justice. Following the 2008-2009 financial crisis and the subsequent Eurozone financial crisis, the
ECB launched four asset purchase programs in 2014 to provide assistance to ECB launched four asset purchase programs in 2014 to provide assistance to financial yfinancially strapped strapped
Eurozone governments and to sustain financial liquidityEurozone governments and to sustain financial liquidity in Eurozone banks. Those programs in Eurozone banks. Those programs
included the Corporate Sector Purchase Program (CSPP), the Public Sector Purchase Program included the Corporate Sector Purchase Program (CSPP), the Public Sector Purchase Program
(PSPP), the Asset-Backed Securities Purchase Program (ABSPP), and the Third Covered Bond (PSPP), the Asset-Backed Securities Purchase Program (ABSPP), and the Third Covered Bond
Purchase Program (CBPP3). The programs operated from 2014 to 2018; the PSPP was restarted Purchase Program (CBPP3). The programs operated from 2014 to 2018; the PSPP was restarted
in November 2019. As of May 8, 2020, the PSPP program held €2.2 in November 2019. As of May 8, 2020, the PSPP program held €2.2 tril iontrillion (about $2.5 (about $2.5 tril iontrillion) )
with another €600 with another €600 bil ion billion (about $700 (about $700 bil ionbillion) held under other asset purchase programs.) held under other asset purchase programs.234233
Various groups in Germany Various groups in Germany chal engedchallenged the legality the legality of the ECB bond-buying programs before the of the ECB bond-buying programs before the
German Constitutional Court by arguing the programs exceeded the ECB’s legal mandate. In German Constitutional Court by arguing the programs exceeded the ECB’s legal mandate. In
turn, the German court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, which ruled in turn, the German court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, which ruled in
December 2019 that the ECB’s actions were fully within the ECB’s authority. December 2019 that the ECB’s actions were fully within the ECB’s authority.
In the German Constitutional Court’s May 5, 2020 ruling, the German judges characterized the In the German Constitutional Court’s May 5, 2020 ruling, the German judges characterized the
ECJ’s ruling as “incomprehensible,” and directly ECJ’s ruling as “incomprehensible,” and directly chal engedchallenged the ECB and the European Court of the ECB and the European Court of
Justice and the primacy of the European Court of Justice ruling over national law. The German Justice and the primacy of the European Court of Justice ruling over national law. The German
justices argued the ECB had exceeded its authority by not fully evaluating the economic costs and justices argued the ECB had exceeded its authority by not fully evaluating the economic costs and
benefits of previous bond-buying activities, including the impact on national budgets, property benefits of previous bond-buying activities, including the impact on national budgets, property
values, stock markets, life insurance and other economic effects. The German court also argued values, stock markets, life insurance and other economic effects. The German court also argued
that the ECB’s lack of a strategy for reducing its holdings of sovereign debt of Eurozone that the ECB’s lack of a strategy for reducing its holdings of sovereign debt of Eurozone
members increased risks for national governments that back up the ECB, and it members increased risks for national governments that back up the ECB, and it chal engedchallenged the the
ECB’s strategy for reducing its holdings of sovereign debt. By the end of June, however, the ECB’s strategy for reducing its holdings of sovereign debt. By the end of June, however, the
standoff appeared to be reaching a resolution. The ECB reportedly agreed to provide the German standoff appeared to be reaching a resolution. The ECB reportedly agreed to provide the German
court with the Bank’s analysis of the economic and fiscal policy impact of the ECB bond-buying court with the Bank’s analysis of the economic and fiscal policy impact of the ECB bond-buying
programs. The ECB reportedly programs. The ECB reportedly wil will also provide the unpublished full minutes of the central also provide the unpublished full minutes of the central
bank’s governing council monetary policy meetings, including the ECB’s discussions in March bank’s governing council monetary policy meetings, including the ECB’s discussions in March
2015 of its purchases of sovereign bonds.2015 of its purchases of sovereign bonds.235234
On March 26, 2021, Germany’s highest court stopped a law that would have ratified the PEPP On March 26, 2021, Germany’s highest court stopped a law that would have ratified the PEPP
bond-buying program. The program required ratification by each of the EU member’s national bond-buying program. The program required ratification by each of the EU member’s national
parliaments. The legislationparliaments. The legislation was adopted by both of Germany’s houses of Parliament and was was adopted by both of Germany’s houses of Parliament and was
expected to be signed by German president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier when the court expected to be signed by German president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier when the court
intervened.intervened.236
235 On May 18, German On May 18, German Chancel orChancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron
proposed a €500 proposed a €500 bil ion billion (about $620 (about $620 bil ionbillion) EU recovery fund in an effort to gain a coordinated ) EU recovery fund in an effort to gain a coordinated

234 233 European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/implement/pepp/html/pepp-qa.en.html. European Central Bank. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/mopo/implement/pepp/html/pepp-qa.en.html.
235234 Arnold, Martin, Berlin and Arnold, Martin, Berlin and ECB SignalECB Signal End to Legal Impasse Over Bond-Buying,End to Legal Impasse Over Bond-Buying, Financial Times, June 25, 2020. , June 25, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/5f000a25-3d54-4610-8579-cab9b21759ee. https://www.ft.com/content/5f000a25-3d54-4610-8579-cab9b21759ee.
236235 Chazan, Guy, Chazan, Guy, Germany’s Highest Court Blocks Ratification of EU Recovery Fund,Germany’s Highest Court Blocks Ratification of EU Recovery Fund, Financial Times, March 26, , March 26,
2021. https://www.ft.com/content/74841ea6-4fbf-4c7a-b015-66ba191ffc9b. 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/74841ea6-4fbf-4c7a-b015-66ba191ffc9b.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

88 88

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

EU fiscal response to the pandemic. EU fiscal response to the pandemic.237236 Reportedly, the funds would have been raised by the Reportedly, the funds would have been raised by the
European Commission and used to fund EU spending through grants to individual members to European Commission and used to fund EU spending through grants to individual members to
ease the economic strain in some of the southern EU members that have been the most negatively ease the economic strain in some of the southern EU members that have been the most negatively
affected. Austria, the Netherland, Denmark, and Sweden indicated they would only support affected. Austria, the Netherland, Denmark, and Sweden indicated they would only support
proposals that provided funds to members through loans that would be required to be repaid.proposals that provided funds to members through loans that would be required to be repaid.
On May 27, ECB President Lagarde indicated the ECB projected a drop in the EU On May 27, ECB President Lagarde indicated the ECB projected a drop in the EU economy of economy of
8% to 12% in 2020, twice as severe as the recession following the 2008 financial crisis, and 8% to 12% in 2020, twice as severe as the recession following the 2008 financial crisis, and
cal edcalled for a €500 for a €500 bil ion billion (about $620 (about $620 bil ion) billion) stimulus package.stimulus package.238237 In addition, European In addition, European
Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed a €750 Commission President Ursula von der Leyen proposed a €750 bil ion billion (about $820 (about $820 bil ion) billion) EU EU
recovery fund, termed the “Next Generation Fund,” that would provide €500 recovery fund, termed the “Next Generation Fund,” that would provide €500 bil ion ($550
bil ion) billion ($550 billion) in grants in a Recovery and Resilience Facility and €250 in grants in a Recovery and Resilience Facility and €250 bil ion ($270 bil ion) billion ($270 billion) in loans. in loans.
The proposal would take the unprecedented step of The proposal would take the unprecedented step of al owingallowing the EU to issues bonds the EU to issues bonds
independently from the other EU central banks.independently from the other EU central banks.239238 Questions remained over the source and Questions remained over the source and
distribution of the funds. The program may have limited appeal given various restrictions: distribution of the funds. The program may have limited appeal given various restrictions:
reportedly, the funds must be used to achieve certain EU goals, including increasing reportedly, the funds must be used to achieve certain EU goals, including increasing
competitiveness, shifting away from declining heavy industry, supporting a green economy, and competitiveness, shifting away from declining heavy industry, supporting a green economy, and
building the digital economy.building the digital economy.240239 Proposals for raising funds include issuing 30-year bonds and Proposals for raising funds include issuing 30-year bonds and
raising taxes on large technology firms, such as Google and Facebook. In addition to the recovery raising taxes on large technology firms, such as Google and Facebook. In addition to the recovery
fund, von der Leyen proposed a revised EC seven-year budget, the Multiannual Financial fund, von der Leyen proposed a revised EC seven-year budget, the Multiannual Financial
Framework (MFF), of €1.Framework (MFF), of €1.1tril ion1trillion for 2021 to 2027. for 2021 to 2027.
On May 28, several key political On May 28, several key political groups within the EU Parliament voiced their support for new groups within the EU Parliament voiced their support for new
rules that would rules that would al owallow the EU to retaliate the EU to retaliate in such trade areas as services and in such trade areas as services and intel ectualintellectual property property
protection without waiting for a WTO ruling. Some Parliamentarians reportedly argued that such protection without waiting for a WTO ruling. Some Parliamentarians reportedly argued that such
expanded authority, termed a “trade bazooka,” was necessary to respond to trade disputes, expanded authority, termed a “trade bazooka,” was necessary to respond to trade disputes,
because the United States had blocked the appointment of judges to the WTO’s because the United States had blocked the appointment of judges to the WTO’s appel ate body.241appellate body.240
European leaders, reportedly interested in finalizingEuropean leaders, reportedly interested in finalizing an investment agreement with China, an investment agreement with China,
announced they would not follow President Trump in applying trade restrictions on China for announced they would not follow President Trump in applying trade restrictions on China for
positioning itself to limitpositioning itself to limit Hong Kong’s autonomy granted by the “one country two systems” Hong Kong’s autonomy granted by the “one country two systems”
principle after the end of British rule in 1997.principle after the end of British rule in 1997.242241
The European Central Bank announced on June 4 that it would double to $1.5 The European Central Bank announced on June 4 that it would double to $1.5 tril ion trillion its its
Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program to stimulate the European economy; it also extended the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Program to stimulate the European economy; it also extended the
program to at least June 2021.program to at least June 2021.243242 At the same time, the German government announced a package At the same time, the German government announced a package
of fiscal measures, including tax cuts, aid to of fiscal measures, including tax cuts, aid to smal small businesses, cash payments to parents, and other businesses, cash payments to parents, and other

237 Fleming, Sam, 236 Fleming, Sam, Victor Mallet, and GuyVictor Mallet, and Guy Chazan, Germany and France Unite in CallChazan, Germany and France Unite in Call for €500 Billion Europefor €500 Billion Europe
Recovery Fund,Recovery Fund, Financial Tim esTimes, May 18, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/c23ebc5e-cbf3-4ad8-85aa-032b574d0562. , May 18, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/c23ebc5e-cbf3-4ad8-85aa-032b574d0562.
238237 Arnold, Martin, Coronavirus Hit to Eurozone Economy Set to Dwarf Financial Crisis, Arnold, Martin, Coronavirus Hit to Eurozone Economy Set to Dwarf Financial Crisis, Financial Times, May 27, May 27,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/a01424e8-089d-4618-babe-72f88184ac57. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/a01424e8-089d-4618-babe-72f88184ac57.
239 238 Birnbaum, Michael, and Loveday Morris, E.U. Proposes $825 Billion Coronavirus Rescue Birnbaum, Michael, and Loveday Morris, E.U. Proposes $825 Billion Coronavirus Rescue Plan GivingPlan Giving Brussels Brussels
Power to Raise Money for First Power to Raise Money for First T imeTime, , Washington Post, May 27, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/ May 27, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/
europe/angela-merkel-economic-rescue/2020/05/27/9d21b998-9f7c-11ea-be06-af5514ee0385_story.html. europe/angela-merkel-economic-rescue/2020/05/27/9d21b998-9f7c-11ea-be06-af5514ee0385_story.html.
240239 Brunsden, Brunsden, Jim and Sam Fleming,Jim and Sam Fleming, How WouldHow Would Ursula Ursula von der Leyen’s Coronavirus Recovery Fundvon der Leyen’s Coronavirus Recovery Fund Work?, Work?,
Financial Tim esTimes, May 27, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/ebaa7dcd-b6f7-418f-802b-7a8dbc9668f1. , May 27, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/ebaa7dcd-b6f7-418f-802b-7a8dbc9668f1.
241 240 Vela, Vela, Jakob Hanke, Jakob Hanke, T radeTrade Bazooka Gets Backing Bazooka Gets Backing From Main Political GroupsFrom Main Political Groups in EU Parliament, in EU Parliament, Politico Pro, May , May
28, 2020; 28, 2020; Draft Report, 2019/10273(COD), European Parliament, Committee on International , 2019/10273(COD), European Parliament, Committee on International T radeTrade, May 6, 2020., May 6, 2020.
242 241 Lau, Stuart Lau, Jakob Hanke Vela, Lau, Stuart Lau, Jakob Hanke Vela, Jacopo Barigazzi,Jacopo Barigazzi, and Finbarr Bermingham, EU Won't Follow and Finbarr Bermingham, EU Won't Follow T rumpTrump Into a Into a
T radeTrade War Over Hong Kong, Politico Pro, May 28, 2020. War Over Hong Kong, Politico Pro, May 28, 2020.
243 242 Arnold, Martin, ECB Boosts Bond-Buying Arnold, Martin, ECB Boosts Bond-Buying Stimulus Stimulus Package by €600, Package by €600, Financial Times, June 4, 2020. , June 4, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/c59ab92d-e614-4284-a028-46ee3bcf92f9. https://www.ft.com/content/c59ab92d-e614-4284-a028-46ee3bcf92f9.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

89 89

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

measures totaling €135 measures totaling €135 bil ion billion (about $150 (about $150 bil ionbillion). Austria, Denmark, the Netherland, and ). Austria, Denmark, the Netherland, and
Sweden resisted payouts in grants instead of loans that require repayment. The German plan Sweden resisted payouts in grants instead of loans that require repayment. The German plan
would have given households $336 per child, reduced value added taxes on daily items, and would have given households $336 per child, reduced value added taxes on daily items, and
reduced households’ utility reduced households’ utility bil sbills. The plan also included about $6 . The plan also included about $6 bil ion billion for the social security for the social security
system, $11 system, $11 bil ionbillion to assist cities cover housing and other costs, about $2 to assist cities cover housing and other costs, about $2 bil ionbillion for cultural for cultural
institutions and nonprofit groups and incentives for purchases of electric vehicles.institutions and nonprofit groups and incentives for purchases of electric vehicles.244243
On June 25, Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy announced that the German On June 25, Germany’s Minister for Economic Affairs and Energy announced that the German
government would provide more than €300 government would provide more than €300 mil ionmillion (about $330 (about $330 mil ionmillion), to acquire a 25% stake ), to acquire a 25% stake
in a privately owned German drug company that is conducting trials on a possible COVID-19 in a privately owned German drug company that is conducting trials on a possible COVID-19
vaccine. Reportedly, the U.S. Government had attempted to acquire part of the company to secure vaccine. Reportedly, the U.S. Government had attempted to acquire part of the company to secure
supplies of a potential vaccine. Germany placed legal restrictions on foreign investments in supplies of a potential vaccine. Germany placed legal restrictions on foreign investments in
critical industries such as energy and telecoms, but the German Parliament amended Germany’s critical industries such as energy and telecoms, but the German Parliament amended Germany’s
Foreign Trade Act, set to become law in 2020, that broadened the scope of transactions that must Foreign Trade Act, set to become law in 2020, that broadened the scope of transactions that must
be approved by the Federal government to include “critical” technologies, including robotics, be approved by the Federal government to include “critical” technologies, including robotics,
biotech, and quantum computing.biotech, and quantum computing.245244
On July 17, the European Commission met to approve the proposed €750 On July 17, the European Commission met to approve the proposed €750 bil ionbillion support fund to support fund to
assist European countries address the economic effects of the pandemic. assist European countries address the economic effects of the pandemic. Initial yInitially, the Commission , the Commission
was unable to agree on various aspects of the program, but talks continued over the weekend and was unable to agree on various aspects of the program, but talks continued over the weekend and
resumed on July 20. European leaders announced on July 21 they had approved a €750 resumed on July 20. European leaders announced on July 21 they had approved a €750 bil ionbillion
(about $859 (about $859 bil ionbillion) pandemic relief package and a multi-year EU budget, referred to as the ) pandemic relief package and a multi-year EU budget, referred to as the
MultiannualMultiannual Financial Framework (MFF), with a combined value of over €2 Financial Framework (MFF), with a combined value of over €2 tril iontrillion. The . The
pandemic plan was developed to direct funding to post-pandemic economic recovery efforts with pandemic plan was developed to direct funding to post-pandemic economic recovery efforts with
the European Commission set to borrow an unprecedented amount of funds on European capital the European Commission set to borrow an unprecedented amount of funds on European capital
markets.markets.246245 The €750 The €750 bil ionbillion relief fund reportedly included the proposed Recovery and relief fund reportedly included the proposed Recovery and
Resilience Facility of €672.5 Resilience Facility of €672.5 bil ionbillion, which included €360 , which included €360 bil ion billion in loans and €312.5 in loans and €312.5 bil ion billion in in
grants and half a dozen other initiatives to assist grants and half a dozen other initiatives to assist economical yeconomically weakened member states. The weakened member states. The
relief fund was coupled with rebates on EU budget contributions for so-relief fund was coupled with rebates on EU budget contributions for so-cal edcalled “frugal” states, or “frugal” states, or
EU members with stronger fiscal balances. Austria, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden EU members with stronger fiscal balances. Austria, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Sweden
reportedly would receive such budget rebates.reportedly would receive such budget rebates.247246
On March 31, 2021, French President Macron announced a four-week country-wide business On March 31, 2021, French President Macron announced a four-week country-wide business
lockdown to curb a resurgence in viral cases that were overwhelming French hospitals and lockdown to curb a resurgence in viral cases that were overwhelming French hospitals and
extending by one week a planned two week closure of schools.extending by one week a planned two week closure of schools.248247 The EU also blocked shipments The EU also blocked shipments
to Britainto Britain of the AstraZeneca vaccine produced in Belgium and the Netherlands until of the AstraZeneca vaccine produced in Belgium and the Netherlands until
commitments made to supply the EU had been met, or until other countries showed reciprocity in commitments made to supply the EU had been met, or until other countries showed reciprocity in
their distribution of vaccines.their distribution of vaccines.249At248At the same time, 16 European countries, including Germany, the same time, 16 European countries, including Germany,

244 Ewing, 243 Ewing, Jack, and MelissaJack, and Melissa Eddy,Eddy, ‘Europe Finally Got the Message’:‘Europe Finally Got the Message’: Leaders Act Leaders Act T ogetherTogether on Message, on Message, The New
York Tim es
Times, June 4, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/business/europe-coronavirus-economic-support.html?, June 4, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/04/business/europe-coronavirus-economic-support.html?
action=click&module=action=click&module=T opTop%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage. %20Stories&pgtype=Homepage.
245 244 Miller, Joe, Germany Flexes its Muscles Miller, Joe, Germany Flexes its Muscles on Foreign Investment, on Foreign Investment, Financial Times, June 25, 2020. , June 25, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/54f92ca5-5380-466b-95f8-3e98b40ebc82. https://www.ft.com/content/54f92ca5-5380-466b-95f8-3e98b40ebc82.
246245 Special Special Meeting of the European Council-Conclusions, EUCP 10/20, July 21, 2020. Meeting of the European Council-Conclusions, EUCP 10/20, July 21, 2020.
247246 Fleming, Sam, Fleming, Sam, Mehreen Khan and Jim Brunsden, EU LeadersMehreen Khan and Jim Brunsden, EU Leaders Strike Deal on €750bn Recovery FundStrike Deal on €750bn Recovery Fund After After
Marathon SummitMarathon Summit , , Financial Tim esTimes, July 21, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/713be467-ed19-4663-95ff-, July 21, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/713be467-ed19-4663-95ff-
66f775af55cc. 66f775af55cc.
248247 Mallet, Victor, Macron Extends Lockdown Across France to Combat Covid Mallet, Victor, Macron Extends Lockdown Across France to Combat Covid Surge,Surge, Financial Times, April 1, 2021. , April 1, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/731ec423-03dc-405c-9ff4-f8670b953f2d. https://www.ft.com/content/731ec423-03dc-405c-9ff4-f8670b953f2d.
249248 Fleming, Sam, Fleming, Sam, Michael Peel, and GeorgeMichael Peel, and George Parker, EU Warns ‘zero’ JabsParker, EU Warns ‘zero’ Jabs Shipped Shipped to UK Until AstraZeneca Meets to UK Until AstraZeneca Meets
Bloc’s Bloc’s T argetsTargets, , Financial Tim esTimes, April 1, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/28158bed-5f07-4504-9a00-2f3d8f7519df. , April 1, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/28158bed-5f07-4504-9a00-2f3d8f7519df.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

90 90

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

France, Italy, and Spain, temporarily suspended use of the AstraZeneca vaccine over concerns of France, Italy, and Spain, temporarily suspended use of the AstraZeneca vaccine over concerns of
possible negative side-effects, despite assurances by EU drug regulators that the benefits of the possible negative side-effects, despite assurances by EU drug regulators that the benefits of the
vaccine outweighed any risks.vaccine outweighed any risks.250249 On September 3, 2020, French Prime Minister Jean Castex On September 3, 2020, French Prime Minister Jean Castex
announced that France would implement a €100 announced that France would implement a €100 bil ion billion (about $130 (about $130 bil ionbillion) spending plan to ) spending plan to
speed the economy’s recovery from the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. speed the economy’s recovery from the economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Reportedly, the plan included funding for green energy (including hydrogen energy), Reportedly, the plan included funding for green energy (including hydrogen energy),
transportation (state railways), and industrial innovation.transportation (state railways), and industrial innovation.251250
The United Kingdom
The United Kingdom has taken a number of steps to support economic activity that were The United Kingdom has taken a number of steps to support economic activity that were
expected to limit the damage to the UK economy. The Bank of England (BOE)expected to limit the damage to the UK economy. The Bank of England (BOE) forecasted in May forecasted in May
2020 that the UK2020 that the UK economy would contract by 30% in the first half of 2020, but then rebound economy would contract by 30% in the first half of 2020, but then rebound
sharply in the second half of the year, exhibiting a “V” shaped recovery. During the initial stages sharply in the second half of the year, exhibiting a “V” shaped recovery. During the initial stages
of the economic crisis, the Bank of England announced a number of policy initiativesof the economic crisis, the Bank of England announced a number of policy initiatives including including
 On March 11, the BOE adopted a package of four measures to deal with any  On March 11, the BOE adopted a package of four measures to deal with any
economic disruptions associated with COVID-19. The measures included an economic disruptions associated with COVID-19. The measures included an
unscheduled cut in the benchmark interest rate by 50 basis points (0.5%) to a unscheduled cut in the benchmark interest rate by 50 basis points (0.5%) to a
historic low of 0.25%; the reintroduction of the Term Funding Scheme for historic low of 0.25%; the reintroduction of the Term Funding Scheme for Smal
Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (TFSME) that provides banks with over $110 and Medium-sized Enterprises (TFSME) that provides banks with over $110
bil ion billion for loans at low interest rates; a lowering of banks’ countercyclical capital for loans at low interest rates; a lowering of banks’ countercyclical capital
buffer from 1% to zero, which is estimated to support over $200 buffer from 1% to zero, which is estimated to support over $200 bil ionbillion of bank of bank
lending to businesses; and a freeze in banks’ dividend payments.lending to businesses; and a freeze in banks’ dividend payments.252
251  On March 15, the BOE reinstituted U.S. dollar swap lines with the Federal  On March 15, the BOE reinstituted U.S. dollar swap lines with the Federal
Reserve. Reserve.
 On March 17, the BOE and the UK  On March 17, the BOE and the UK Treasurytreasury introduced the COVID Corporate introduced the COVID Corporate
Financing Facility (CCFF) to provide assistance to UK firms to bridge through Financing Facility (CCFF) to provide assistance to UK firms to bridge through
Covid-19-related disruptions to their cash flow. Covid-19-related disruptions to their cash flow.
 On March 19, during a Special Monetary Policy Meeting, the Bank of England  On March 19, during a Special Monetary Policy Meeting, the Bank of England
reduced its main interest rate to 0.1%, increased the size of its TFSME fund, and reduced its main interest rate to 0.1%, increased the size of its TFSME fund, and
increased the stock of asset purchases by £200 increased the stock of asset purchases by £200 bil ionbillion to a total of £645 to a total of £645 bil ionbillion
financed by issuing UKfinanced by issuing UK government bonds and some additional nonfinancial government bonds and some additional nonfinancial
investment-grade corporate bonds.investment-grade corporate bonds.253252
 On March 20, the BOE participated in an  On March 20, the BOE participated in an international y internationally coordinated central bank coordinated central bank
expansion of liquidity expansion of liquidity through U.S. standing dollar liquiditythrough U.S. standing dollar liquidity swap line swap line
arrangements. arrangements.
 On March, the BOE activated the Contingent Term Repo Facility (CTRF).  On March, the BOE activated the Contingent Term Repo Facility (CTRF).

250 249 Paolo Mancini, Donato, Miles Johnson, Michael Peel, David Keohane, Richard Milne, and Sarah Neville, European Paolo Mancini, Donato, Miles Johnson, Michael Peel, David Keohane, Richard Milne, and Sarah Neville, European
Capitals Coordinated SuspensionCapitals Coordinated Suspension of Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid Jab,of Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid Jab, Financial Tim esTimes, April 1, 2021. , April 1, 2021.
https://www.ft.com/content/a046e340-892b-4e68-bfae-4f5c40a5506a. https://www.ft.com/content/a046e340-892b-4e68-bfae-4f5c40a5506a.
251 250 Mallet, Victor, France Launches €100 Billion Coronavirus Recovery Plan, Mallet, Victor, France Launches €100 Billion Coronavirus Recovery Plan, Financial Times, September 3, 2020. , September 3, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/0921c871-17b5-4e2e-bdea-aab78c2d0090. https://www.ft.com/content/0921c871-17b5-4e2e-bdea-aab78c2d0090.
252251 Romei, Valentina, “Covid-19 Fallout: Bank of England Launches 4 Key Measures,” Romei, Valentina, “Covid-19 Fallout: Bank of England Launches 4 Key Measures,” Financial Times. .
https://www.ft.com/content/4e60c08e-6380-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5. https://www.ft.com/content/4e60c08e-6380-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5.
253252 Johnson, Miles, Chris Giles, Johnson, Miles, Chris Giles, Martin Arnold, and James Politi, “Italy’s PM Urges BrusselsMartin Arnold, and James Politi, “Italy’s PM Urges Brussels to Unleash €500bn to Unleash €500bn
RescueRescue Fund,”Fund,” Financial Tim esTimes, March 18, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5b8205ac-6a06-11ea-800d- March 18, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5b8205ac-6a06-11ea-800d-
da70cff6e4d3. da70cff6e4d3.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

91 91

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

 On April  On April 6, announced the activation of the TFSME ahead of schedule. 6, announced the activation of the TFSME ahead of schedule.
 On April On April 23, the Bank of England indicated it would quadruple its borrowing 23, the Bank of England indicated it would quadruple its borrowing
over the second quarter of 2020, reflecting a contraction in the UK economy, over the second quarter of 2020, reflecting a contraction in the UK economy,
lower tax revenues, and increased financial demands to support fiscal policy lower tax revenues, and increased financial demands to support fiscal policy
measures.measures.254
253 In terms of fiscal policy, UK In terms of fiscal policy, UK Chancel orChancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak proposed a national of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak proposed a national
budget on March 11, 2020, that included nearly $3.5 budget on March 11, 2020, that included nearly $3.5 bil ion billion in fiscal spending to counter adverse in fiscal spending to counter adverse
economic effects of the pandemic and increased in statutory sick leave by about $2.5 economic effects of the pandemic and increased in statutory sick leave by about $2.5 bil ionbillion in in
funds to funds to smal small and medium businesses to provide up to 14 days of sick leave for affected and medium businesses to provide up to 14 days of sick leave for affected
employees. The plan provided affected workers up to 80% of their salary, or up to £2,500 a month employees. The plan provided affected workers up to 80% of their salary, or up to £2,500 a month
(about $2,800) if they were laid off. Some estimates indicated that UK spending to support its (about $2,800) if they were laid off. Some estimates indicated that UK spending to support its
economy would rise to about $60 economy would rise to about $60 bil ion billion in 2020.in 2020.255254 Identified as the Coronavirus Job Retention Identified as the Coronavirus Job Retention
Scheme (CJRS), the program was backdated to start on March 1 and had been expected to run Scheme (CJRS), the program was backdated to start on March 1 and had been expected to run
through May, but was extended to expire the end of June 2020. Prime Minister Johnson also through May, but was extended to expire the end of June 2020. Prime Minister Johnson also
announced that announced that al all pubs, cafés, restaurants, theatres, cinemas, nightclubs, gyms and leisure centers pubs, cafés, restaurants, theatres, cinemas, nightclubs, gyms and leisure centers
would be closed.would be closed.256255 Part of the fiscal spending package included open-ended funding for the Part of the fiscal spending package included open-ended funding for the
National Health Service (NHS), $6 National Health Service (NHS), $6 bil ion billion in emergency funds to the NHS, $600 in emergency funds to the NHS, $600 mil ionmillion hardship hardship
fund to assist vulnerable people, and tax cuts and tax holidays for fund to assist vulnerable people, and tax cuts and tax holidays for smal small businesses in certain businesses in certain
affected sectors.affected sectors.257
256 On July 8, On July 8, Chancel orChancellor Sunak proposed additional fiscal measures to support the UK economy. Sunak proposed additional fiscal measures to support the UK economy.258
257 The measures included raising threshold tax levels on home purchases, reducing taxes for the The measures included raising threshold tax levels on home purchases, reducing taxes for the
hospitality industry, and a “job retention bonus” of £1.000 (around $1,200) per worker to hospitality industry, and a “job retention bonus” of £1.000 (around $1,200) per worker to
companies that bring employees out of furlough, estimated at around 9 companies that bring employees out of furlough, estimated at around 9 mil ion million workers, and a workers, and a
subsidy of £2.000 for firms that hire new apprentices. In addition, the proposed plan includes a subsidy of £2.000 for firms that hire new apprentices. In addition, the proposed plan includes a
50% discount on meals and nonalcoholic drinks eaten at restaurants and cafes during August, 50% discount on meals and nonalcoholic drinks eaten at restaurants and cafes during August,
with some restrictions. with some restrictions.
After After fal ing falling in the first and second quarters of 2020, growth accelerated in the 3rd and 4th in the first and second quarters of 2020, growth accelerated in the 3rd and 4th
quarters, as indicated in quarters, as indicated in Table 18. Despite this growth,Despite this growth, the UK economy at the end of 2020 the UK economy at the end of 2020
remained 8.4% below the level where it was at the end of 2019. For 2020 as a whole, the rate of remained 8.4% below the level where it was at the end of 2019. For 2020 as a whole, the rate of
growth of the UK economic contracted by 9.8%. As was typical of other developed economies, growth of the UK economic contracted by 9.8%. As was typical of other developed economies,
the Q2 decline was driven by lower levels of activity by households (-20.8%), business the Q2 decline was driven by lower levels of activity by households (-20.8%), business
investment (gross fixed capital formation) (-20.7%)-primarily manufacturing, and construction investment (gross fixed capital formation) (-20.7%)-primarily manufacturing, and construction
(35%) and declines in both exports and imports, constituting the largest quarterly decline since (35%) and declines in both exports and imports, constituting the largest quarterly decline since
1955.1955.259258 In contrast, the Q3 and Q4 expansion occurred in services, industrial production, and In contrast, the Q3 and Q4 expansion occurred in services, industrial production, and
construction. construction.

254 Giles, Chris, and T ommy Stubbington, UK T reasury to Quadruple Borrowing 253 Giles, Chris, and Tommy Stubbington, UK Treasury to Quadruple Borrowing to £180bn Over Next Quarter, to £180bn Over Next Quarter,
Financial Tim esTimes, April 23, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/8886e002-c260-4daa-8b7b-509b3f7e6edb. , April 23, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/8886e002-c260-4daa-8b7b-509b3f7e6edb.
255254 Parker, George, Chris Giles, Parker, George, Chris Giles, and Sebastianand Sebastian Payne, “Sunak Payne, “Sunak T urnsTurns on Financial Firepower to Help Workers,” on Financial Firepower to Help Workers,”
Financial Tim esTimes, March 20, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/826d465a-6ac3-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75. March 20, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/826d465a-6ac3-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75.
256255 Ibid. Ibid.
257256 Payne, Sebastian and Chris Giles, Payne, Sebastian and Chris Giles, “Budget“Budget 2020: Sunak Unveils £30bn Stimulus2020: Sunak Unveils £30bn Stimulus to Counter UK Covid-19 Shock,” to Counter UK Covid-19 Shock,”
Financial Tim esTimes. https://www.ft.com/content/f7b27264-6384-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68. . https://www.ft.com/content/f7b27264-6384-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68.
258257 Pickard, Jim and Chris Giles, Pickard, Jim and Chris Giles, Sunak’sSunak’s Summer Statement: UK Government to Pay Companies to Bring Workers Summer Statement: UK Government to Pay Companies to Bring Workers
Back From Furlough,Back From Furlough, Financial Tim esTimes, July, July 7, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/ad1688ee-3d8d-4e52-9b16-7, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/ad1688ee-3d8d-4e52-9b16-
a3632eed8be9. a3632eed8be9.
259258 GDP Quarterly National Accounts, UK: October to December 2020, Office for National Statistics, March 31, 2021. , Office for National Statistics, March 31, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

92 92


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

On On August 12September 30, 2021, the UK Government announced that UK GDP in the second first quarter of , 2021, the UK Government announced that UK GDP in the second first quarter of
2021 grew by 2021 grew by 4.85.5%, after contracting by 1.%, after contracting by 1.64% in the first quarter of 2021, based on market prices, % in the first quarter of 2021, based on market prices,
as indicated in as indicated in Figure 23..260259 The Bank of England indicated in August 2021 that it would The Bank of England indicated in August 2021 that it would
maintain its base interest rate at 0.1% and begin reducing its bond purchases.maintain its base interest rate at 0.1% and begin reducing its bond purchases.261

260 Figure 23. UK Month Over Month QuarterlyQuarter Over Quarter Percentage Change in GDP

5.5% -1.4% Source: GDP First Quarterly EstimateQuarterly National Accounts, UK: April to June 2021, Office for National Statistics, Office for National Statistics, August 12, September 30, 2021. 2021.
Created by CRS. Created by CRS.
Table 18. UK Quarterly GDP Aggregates 2019-2021
PercentPercentage change from preceding period change from preceding period

Gross Fixed
Capital
GDP
Households
Formation
Government
Exports
Imports
2019 2019
1.4% 1.4%
1.1% 1.1%
1.5% 1.5%
4.0% 4.0%
2.7% 2.7%
1.9% 1.9%
Q1 Q1
0.6 0.6
0.0 0.0
2.1 2.1
1.4 1.4
-1.2 -1.2
6.5 6.5
Q2 Q2
0.1 0.1
0.6 0.6
-1.1 -1.1
2.3 2.3
-0.8 -0.8
-9.0 -9.0
Q3 Q3
0.5 0.5
0.1 0.1
1.3 1.3
-0.9 -0.9
5.3 5.3
1.5 1.5
Q4 Q4
0.0 0.0
-0.3 -0.3
-1.6 -1.6
0.0 0.0
3.8 3.8
-3.1 -3.1
2020 2020
-9.8 -9.8
-10.6 -10.6
-8.8 -8.8
-6.5 -6.5
-15.8 -15.8
-11.8 -11.8
Q1 Q1
-2.8 -2.8
-2.6 -2.6
-1.2 -1.2
-1.8 -1.8
-18.8 -18.8
-5.3 -5.3
Q2 Q2
-19.5 -19.5
-20.8 -20.8
-20.7 -20.7
-17.3 -17.3
-5.1 -5.1
-20.2 -20.2
Q3 Q3
16.9 16.9
19.7 19.7
19.0 19.0
15.8 15.8
-2.6 -2.6
20.9 20.9
Q4 Q4
1.3 1.3
-1.7 -1.7
4.4 4.4
6.7 6.7
9.0 9.0
14.3 14.3

260 Giles, 259 Giles, Chris and Valentina Romei, BoE Economist Warns Against Pessimism After Record Drop in GDP, Chris and Valentina Romei, BoE Economist Warns Against Pessimism After Record Drop in GDP, Financial
T imesTimes, September 30, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/fed4fe06-8c6a-4272-b0b3-a0759805eb64. , September 30, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/fed4fe06-8c6a-4272-b0b3-a0759805eb64.
261260 Milliken, David, Francesco Canepa, and William Schomberg, Bank of England Milliken, David, Francesco Canepa, and William Schomberg, Bank of England Sets Out Plans to Wean UK Sets Out Plans to Wean UK
Economy Off Stimulus,Economy Off Stimulus, Reuters, August August 5, 2021. 5, 2021.

Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

93 93

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19


Gross Fixed
Capital
GDP
Households
Formation
Government
Exports
Imports
2021 2021






Q1 Q1
-1.6 -1.6
-4.6 -4.6
-1.7 -1.7
1.5 1.5
-10.2 -10.2
-16.4 -16.4
Q2 Q2
4.8 4.8
7.3 7.3
-0.5 -0.5
6.1 6.1
9.6 9.6
10.0 10.0
Source: GDP First Quarterly Estimate, UK; April to June 2021 Office for National Statistics, Office for National Statistics, August 12, 2021. August 12, 2021.
Note: Chained volume measures. Chained volume measures.
The UK-EU The UK-EU trade arrangement, the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which became effective trade arrangement, the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, which became effective
on December 24, 2020, was projected to raise some barriers on UK-EU trade and increase on December 24, 2020, was projected to raise some barriers on UK-EU trade and increase
administrative costs, which could reduce UK trade and GDP by 10.5% and 3.25%, respectively, administrative costs, which could reduce UK trade and GDP by 10.5% and 3.25%, respectively,
over the long run, compared with earlier forecasts. Trade during first quarter 2021 was also over the long run, compared with earlier forecasts. Trade during first quarter 2021 was also
projected to be dampened as a consequence of UK firms adjusting to the new trade rules.projected to be dampened as a consequence of UK firms adjusting to the new trade rules.262261 As As
lockdowns and restrictions were lessened or removed in the second quarter of 2021, UK exports lockdowns and restrictions were lessened or removed in the second quarter of 2021, UK exports
and imports posted positive gains of 9.6% and 10.0%, respectively. Consumer spending also and imports posted positive gains of 9.6% and 10.0%, respectively. Consumer spending also
rebounded from the decline in the first quarter in response to renewed social restrictions and rebounded from the decline in the first quarter in response to renewed social restrictions and
buoyed by the extra 5% of savings households accumulated during 2020. buoyed by the extra 5% of savings households accumulated during 2020.
As indicated in As indicated in Table 19, the growth catch-up period is projected to last through 2022, before , the growth catch-up period is projected to last through 2022, before
slowing in 2023. The Bank of England also conducted stress tests on UK banks in 2020 and slowing in 2023. The Bank of England also conducted stress tests on UK banks in 2020 and
concluded the banks had sufficient capital buffers to absorb the losses that could arise under the concluded the banks had sufficient capital buffers to absorb the losses that could arise under the
Bank’s main projections.Bank’s main projections.263262 The Bank also concluded that UK businesses had successfully raised The Bank also concluded that UK businesses had successfully raised
the funds they needed to satisfy their cash-flow requirements. In addition, the government the funds they needed to satisfy their cash-flow requirements. In addition, the government
extended three financing facilities for businessesextended three financing facilities for businessesthe Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), the the Bounce Back Loan Scheme (BBLS), the
Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme and the Coronavirus Large Business Interruption Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme and the Coronavirus Large Business Interruption
Loan Scheme -through to the end of January 2021.Loan Scheme -through to the end of January 2021.264263 The forecast also projected an increase in The forecast also projected an increase in
unemployment and business insolvencies in 2021. unemployment and business insolvencies in 2021.
Table 19. UK Forecast of Major Aggregate National Accounts, 2020-2023
Percentage change from the preceding period Percentage change from the preceding period

Averages
Projection

2010-2019 2010-2019
2021 2021
2022 2022
2023 2023
GDP GDP
1.75% 1.75%
5.00% 5.00%
7.25% 7.25%
1.25% 1.25%
Households Households
1.75 1.75
4.25 4.25
11.75 11.75
1.00 1.00
Business Business
3.75 3.75
4.00 4.00
12.00 12.00
4.50 4.50
Exports Exports
3.25 3.25
-3.00 -3.00
5.25 5.25
4.25 4.25
Imports Imports
3.50 3.50
5.25 5.25
12.75 12.75
3.50 3.50
Source: GDP Quarterly National Accounts, UK: October to December 2020, Office of National Statistics,, Office of National Statistics, March 31, March 31,
2021. 2021.
On March 3, 2021, On March 3, 2021, Chancel orChancellor of the Exchequer Sunak proposed a £65 of the Exchequer Sunak proposed a £65 bil ionbillion financial assistance financial assistance
package spread out over two-years to assist UK businesses and households recover from the package spread out over two-years to assist UK businesses and households recover from the

262 Ibid., p. 4.
263 261 Ibid., p. 4. 262 Financial Stability Report, Bank of England, December 2020, p. ii. Bank of England, December 2020, p. ii.
264263 Ibid., p. 3. Ibid., p. 3.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

94 94

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

economic effects of the pandemic. The economic effects of the pandemic. The Chancel orChancellor argued the spending was necessary, because argued the spending was necessary, because
the UKthe UK economy was projected to not fully recover for at least five years. With a continuation of economy was projected to not fully recover for at least five years. With a continuation of
state supported measures into the summer, the total cost to the UK economy of addressing the state supported measures into the summer, the total cost to the UK economy of addressing the
pandemic-related economic recession was estimated at £407 pandemic-related economic recession was estimated at £407 bil ionbillion over two years. The spending over two years. The spending
initiativeinitiative was expected to be followed by large increases in corporate and individual taxes starting was expected to be followed by large increases in corporate and individual taxes starting
in 2023.in 2023.265264 Given the announced planned tax increases in subsequent years, some economists Given the announced planned tax increases in subsequent years, some economists
could argue the spending initiativecould argue the spending initiative could could fal fall short of the estimated stimulative effects. On June short of the estimated stimulative effects. On June
14, 2021, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a four-week extension in social 14, 2021, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a four-week extension in social
restrictions and business lockdowns in response to a rise in viral infections, further delaying the restrictions and business lockdowns in response to a rise in viral infections, further delaying the
return of the UK economy to pre-pandemic activity.return of the UK economy to pre-pandemic activity.266265 By early July, Prime Minister Johnson By early July, Prime Minister Johnson
announced that England (exclusive of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland) would remove announced that England (exclusive of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland) would remove al
all social restrictions by July 19, despite warnings from UK health officials that the rapidlysocial restrictions by July 19, despite warnings from UK health officials that the rapidly spreading spreading
Delta viral variant could result in 100,000 deaths per day by the end of summer, surpassing the Delta viral variant could result in 100,000 deaths per day by the end of summer, surpassing the
previous record of 60,000 deaths per day.previous record of 60,000 deaths per day.267
266 Japan
As a countermeasure to the pandemic-related economic crisis, the Bank of Japan, injected $4.6 As a countermeasure to the pandemic-related economic crisis, the Bank of Japan, injected $4.6
bil ion billion in liquidityin liquidity into Japanese banks in March 2020 to provide short-term loans for purchases into Japanese banks in March 2020 to provide short-term loans for purchases
of corporate bonds and commercial paper and twice that amount into exchange traded funds to of corporate bonds and commercial paper and twice that amount into exchange traded funds to
aid Japanese businesses. The Japanese government also pledged to provide wage subsidies for aid Japanese businesses. The Japanese government also pledged to provide wage subsidies for
parents forced to take time off due to school closures.parents forced to take time off due to school closures.268267 In March, Japan also adopted an In March, Japan also adopted an
emergency fiscal package of about $1.1 emergency fiscal package of about $1.1 tril iontrillion, roughly equivalent to 10% of Japan’s annual , roughly equivalent to 10% of Japan’s annual
gross domestic product (GDP). On April 27, 2020, the Bank of Japan announced it would gross domestic product (GDP). On April 27, 2020, the Bank of Japan announced it would
purchase unlimited amounts of government bonds and quadruple its purchases of corporate debt purchase unlimited amounts of government bonds and quadruple its purchases of corporate debt
to keep interest rates low and stimulate the Japanese economy.to keep interest rates low and stimulate the Japanese economy.269268
In May 2020, the Japanese Cabinet proposed a second supplemental appropriation measure that In May 2020, the Japanese Cabinet proposed a second supplemental appropriation measure that
included $296 included $296 bil ion billion in spending and a total value of about $1.1 in spending and a total value of about $1.1 tril iontrillion in loans and guarantees, in loans and guarantees,
funded through new bonds. This and a previous set of spending measures reportedly were funded through new bonds. This and a previous set of spending measures reportedly were
comparable to 40% of Japan’s GDP and included grants for businesses to pay rents through the comparable to 40% of Japan’s GDP and included grants for businesses to pay rents through the
Development Bank of Japan and funds to Development Bank of Japan and funds to smal small and medium-sized businesses through the and medium-sized businesses through the
Regional Economy VitalizationRegional Economy Vitalization Corporation of Japan, payments to assist furloughed workers, and Corporation of Japan, payments to assist furloughed workers, and
a reserve fund to provide capital injections to struggling firms through the Japan Investment a reserve fund to provide capital injections to struggling firms through the Japan Investment
Corporation.Corporation.270269
In terms of monetary policy, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) maintained its low interest rates policy In terms of monetary policy, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) maintained its low interest rates policy
of -0.1%, even as it increased its coronavirus lending facility from $700 of -0.1%, even as it increased its coronavirus lending facility from $700 bil ion to $1 tril ion and

265billion to $1 trillion and 264 Pickard, Jim, Chris Giles Pickard, Jim, Chris Giles and Georgeand George Parker, Rishi SunakParker, Rishi Sunak Delivers SpendDelivers Spend Now, Now, T axTax Later Budget to Kickstart UK Later Budget to Kickstart UK
Economy, Economy, Financial Tim esTimes, March 3, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/da66ce9a-6dfc-4a3a-bde7-d4f4faed6c4a. March 3, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/da66ce9a-6dfc-4a3a-bde7-d4f4faed6c4a.
266 265 Payne, Sebastian, Jim Pickard and Daniel Payne, Sebastian, Jim Pickard and Daniel T homasThomas, Four-week Extension to England’s Lockdown Dashes Business , Four-week Extension to England’s Lockdown Dashes Business
Hopes, Hopes, Financial Tim esTimes, June, June 14, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/2d00de1a-92d7-4b63-a151-53a6ae064368. 14, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/2d00de1a-92d7-4b63-a151-53a6ae064368.
267266 Cunningham, Erin, Britain’s Daily Infections Could Reach 100,000 Cunningham, Erin, Britain’s Daily Infections Could Reach 100,000 T hisThis Summer, Health Secretary Says, Summer, Health Secretary Says, The
Washington Post
, July, July 6, 2021. 6, 2021.
268 267 Harding, Robin Harding, Robin and Hudson Lockett, “and Hudson Lockett, “ BoJ Spurs AsiaBoJ Spurs Asia Markets ReboundMarkets Rebound with Vowwith Vow to Fight Covid-19,” to Fight Covid-19,” Financial
Tim esTimes,
March 2, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9fa91e06-5c3b-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. March 2, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9fa91e06-5c3b-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4.
269268 Harding, Robin, Bank of Japan Steps up Coronavirus Stimulus Harding, Robin, Bank of Japan Steps up Coronavirus Stimulus With Bond-buyingWith Bond-buying Pledge, Pledge, Financial Times, April , April
27, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/7ba5c507-df9e-4107-87eb-73afa2c13e91. 27, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/7ba5c507-df9e-4107-87eb-73afa2c13e91.
270269 Harding, Robin, Japan’s Cabinet Approves Extra $1.1 Harding, Robin, Japan’s Cabinet Approves Extra $1.1 T rillionTrillion Budget to Counter Recession, Budget to Counter Recession, Financial Times, May , May
27, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/ce7f3564-c997-339c-ad3d-c6d092fb7f1e. 27, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/ce7f3564-c997-339c-ad3d-c6d092fb7f1e.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

95 95

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

stated it would continue purchasing commercial paper, corporate bonds, and exchange traded stated it would continue purchasing commercial paper, corporate bonds, and exchange traded
funds at the rate of ¥12 funds at the rate of ¥12 tril iontrillion a year. a year.271270 The COVID-19 lending facility assisted banks in The COVID-19 lending facility assisted banks in
providing zero interest rate loans to businesses. In a separate program, the BOJ provided about providing zero interest rate loans to businesses. In a separate program, the BOJ provided about
¥110 ¥110 tril ion trillion to buy commercial paper and corporate bonds and provided dollars through swap to buy commercial paper and corporate bonds and provided dollars through swap
arrangements with the U.S. Federal Reserve. Japan reported on August 17 that its economy had arrangements with the U.S. Federal Reserve. Japan reported on August 17 that its economy had
contracted by 7.8% in the second quarter of 2020, compared with the previous quarter, or at an contracted by 7.8% in the second quarter of 2020, compared with the previous quarter, or at an
annual a rate of 27.8%. This drop in economic activity was precipitated by a drop in exports of annual a rate of 27.8%. This drop in economic activity was precipitated by a drop in exports of
18.5% from the preceding quarter (56.0% at an annual rate) and a decline in personal 18.5% from the preceding quarter (56.0% at an annual rate) and a decline in personal
consumption of 8.6% (30.1% at an annual rate).consumption of 8.6% (30.1% at an annual rate).272271
On July 19, 2021, the Bank of Japan issued a revised forecast that indicated Japan’s GDP had On July 19, 2021, the Bank of Japan issued a revised forecast that indicated Japan’s GDP had
contracted by 4.6% in Japan’s fiscal year ending March 2021, as indicated in contracted by 4.6% in Japan’s fiscal year ending March 2021, as indicated in Table 20. The The
economy was projected to grow by 3.5% to 4.0% in 2021 and by 2.6% to 2.9% the following economy was projected to grow by 3.5% to 4.0% in 2021 and by 2.6% to 2.9% the following
year. However, the Bank remained “highly uncertain” and its forecast faced large downside risks year. However, the Bank remained “highly uncertain” and its forecast faced large downside risks
that the impact of the pandemic would begin to wane in 2021 as a result of an increase in that the impact of the pandemic would begin to wane in 2021 as a result of an increase in
vaccinations.vaccinations.273272 The Bank also indicated that its forecast was based on the assumption that events The Bank also indicated that its forecast was based on the assumption that events
outside Japan, particularly growth in trade as other economies began reviving, and as domestic outside Japan, particularly growth in trade as other economies began reviving, and as domestic
consumer spending and business investment strengthened. As indicated, the Bank estimated the consumer spending and business investment strengthened. As indicated, the Bank estimated the
Japanese economy would grow by 0.3% in the second quarter of 2021, compared with a decline Japanese economy would grow by 0.3% in the second quarter of 2021, compared with a decline
of 0.9% in the first quarter. of 0.9% in the first quarter.
Table 20. Japan Main Economic Accounts, 2020 and 2021
(PercentPercentage change over previous period change over previous period)

2019
2020
2020
2021



2019 2020 Q1 Q1
Q2 Q2
Q3 Q3
Q4 Q4
Q1 Q1
Q2 Q2
GDP GDP
0.6% 0.6%
-3.8% -3.8%
-0.6% -0.6%
-7.9% -7.9%
5.3% 5.3%
2.8% 2.8%
-0.9% -0.9%
0.3% 0.3%
Household Household
0.2 0.2
-5.2 -5.2
-0.8 -0.8
-8.3 -8.3
5.1 5.1
2.3 2.3
-1.0 -1.0
0.8 0.8
consumption consumption
Government Government
2.2 2.2
2.3 2.3
-0.3 -0.3
0.7 0.7
2.8 2.8
1.8 1.8
-1.7 -1.7
0.5 0.5
spending spending
Gross Gross fixed capital fixed capital
1.7 1.7
-4.1 -4.1
0.2 0.2
-3.2 -3.2
-2.0 -2.0
2.9 2.9
-0.9 -0.9
1.1 1.1
formation formation
Exports (goods and Exports (goods and
-4.4 -4.4
-13.9 -13.9
-4.7 -4.7
-17.5 -17.5
7.3 7.3
11.7 11.7
2.4 2.4
2.9 2.9
services) services)
Imports (goods and Imports (goods and
-2.7 -2.7
-14.0 -14.0
-3.0 -3.0
-0.7 -0.7
-8.2 -8.2
4.8 4.8
4.0 4.0
5.1 5.1
services) services)
Source: Bank of Japan, Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices, Bank of Japan, Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices, July 19, 2021. July 19, 2021.
In other actions, Japan’s Prime Minister Suga announced on January 5, 2021, that Tokyo and In other actions, Japan’s Prime Minister Suga announced on January 5, 2021, that Tokyo and
three surrounding prefectures would initiate a voluntary “soft” state of emergency on January 8 three surrounding prefectures would initiate a voluntary “soft” state of emergency on January 8
that stressed teleworking, restricting unnecessary travel, and reducing sporting and cultural that stressed teleworking, restricting unnecessary travel, and reducing sporting and cultural
events.events.274273 On April 23, 2021, Japan announced new two-week lockdown protocols for Tokyo, On April 23, 2021, Japan announced new two-week lockdown protocols for Tokyo,

271 270 Harding, Bank of Japan Pledges Harding, Bank of Japan Pledges $1 trillion in Coronavirus Lending. $1 trillion in Coronavirus Lending.
272271 Quarterly Estimates of GDP for April - June 2020 (First Preliminary Estimates), Cabinet Office, August Cabinet Office, August 17, 2020. 17, 2020.
273272 Outlook for Economic Activity and Prices, Bank of Japan, July 19, 2021. , Bank of Japan, July 19, 2021.
274273 Harding, Robin Harding, Robin and Kana Inagaki, Japan Declares State of Emergency in and Kana Inagaki, Japan Declares State of Emergency in T okyoTokyo as Coronavirus Cases as Coronavirus Cases Surge, Surge,
Financial Tim esTimes, January 5, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/72ceb064-2231-4d17-bd8f-92bd7f99f33c. , January 5, 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/72ceb064-2231-4d17-bd8f-92bd7f99f33c.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

96 96

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Osaka, and two other large cities as Japan faced a rise in viral infections. The lockdowns were Osaka, and two other large cities as Japan faced a rise in viral infections. The lockdowns were
intended to encourage workers to work from home, to close intended to encourage workers to work from home, to close al all venues that serve alcohol and venues that serve alcohol and
supermarkets, but not close schools.supermarkets, but not close schools.275274 In April, May, and June, 2021, Japan again experienced a In April, May, and June, 2021, Japan again experienced a
resurgence of cases, reportedly raising the total number of diagnosed case to 811,000. On July 8, resurgence of cases, reportedly raising the total number of diagnosed case to 811,000. On July 8,
Japanese officials announced that no spectators would be Japanese officials announced that no spectators would be al owedallowed to attend the summer to attend the summer
Olympics, which began on July 23, after Japan declared a state of emergency amid a rise in Olympics, which began on July 23, after Japan declared a state of emergency amid a rise in
diagnosed COVID-19 cases.diagnosed COVID-19 cases.276275 Previously, Japan had indicated it would limit attendees to a Previously, Japan had indicated it would limit attendees to a
maximum of 10,000 Japanese residents per event. It is unclear if the new ban included sponsors maximum of 10,000 Japanese residents per event. It is unclear if the new ban included sponsors
and sporting federation officials.and sporting federation officials.277
276 China
According to a recent CRS In Focus,According to a recent CRS In Focus,278277 China emerged in June 2020 as the first major country to China emerged in June 2020 as the first major country to
announce a return to economic growth since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The announce a return to economic growth since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The
government reported 3.2% gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the second quarter and 4.9% government reported 3.2% gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the second quarter and 4.9%
GDP growth in the third quarter of 2020. China is still grappling with the economic effects of the GDP growth in the third quarter of 2020. China is still grappling with the economic effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic, however, including sluggish domestic consumption, slow recovery in its COVID-19 pandemic, however, including sluggish domestic consumption, slow recovery in its
top export markets, and reliance on government spending and exports to boost initial growth. top export markets, and reliance on government spending and exports to boost initial growth.
China also is facing growing restrictions on its overseas commercial activities and access to China also is facing growing restrictions on its overseas commercial activities and access to
foreign technology and pressures for firms to diversify China-based supply chains. Against this foreign technology and pressures for firms to diversify China-based supply chains. Against this
backdrop, China’s leadership is deliberating the country’s economic direction and national backdrop, China’s leadership is deliberating the country’s economic direction and national
industrial plans for the next 5 to 15 years. industrial plans for the next 5 to 15 years.
To boost economic growth, China has provided an estimated $506 To boost economic growth, China has provided an estimated $506 bil ion billion in stimulus since in stimulus since
February 2020 and increased the government’s budget deficit target to a record high of 3.6% of February 2020 and increased the government’s budget deficit target to a record high of 3.6% of
GDP, up from 2.8% in 2019. China reduced the value-added tax (VAT) rate and introduced VAT GDP, up from 2.8% in 2019. China reduced the value-added tax (VAT) rate and introduced VAT
exemptions for certain goods and services. China’s central bank extended monetary support with exemptions for certain goods and services. China’s central bank extended monetary support with
interest rate cuts, eased loan terms, and injected liquidity into banks. Shifting from efforts to interest rate cuts, eased loan terms, and injected liquidity into banks. Shifting from efforts to
reduce debt, the government announced the issuance of $142.9 reduce debt, the government announced the issuance of $142.9 bil ionbillion of special treasury bonds of special treasury bonds
for the first time since 2007; increased the quota for local government special bonds (a source of for the first time since 2007; increased the quota for local government special bonds (a source of
infrastructure funding); and fast-tracked issuance of corporate bonds to cover pandemic costs but infrastructure funding); and fast-tracked issuance of corporate bonds to cover pandemic costs but
with potential broader uses. The IMF estimates that the fiscal measures and financing plans with potential broader uses. The IMF estimates that the fiscal measures and financing plans
announced amounted to 4.1% of the China’s GDP, as of July 2020. The government says it seeks announced amounted to 4.1% of the China’s GDP, as of July 2020. The government says it seeks
to control credit risk but the need for additional fiscal and monetary support to boost growth may to control credit risk but the need for additional fiscal and monetary support to boost growth may
undermine this goal. undermine this goal.

275 274 Harding, Robin, Japan to Impose New State of Emergency as COVID-19 Harding, Robin, Japan to Impose New State of Emergency as COVID-19 Cases Cases Rise, Rise, Financial Times, April 23, April 23,
2021. https://www.ft.com/content/a3d3a8bc-6d0e-4b2b-9e09-3310db13222e. 2021. https://www.ft.com/content/a3d3a8bc-6d0e-4b2b-9e09-3310db13222e.
276 275 Dooley, Ben, Spectators Will Be Barred Dooley, Ben, Spectators Will Be Barred at T okyo at Tokyo Olympics Amid New Olympics Amid New Covid EmergencyCovid Emergency , T he, The New York New York T imesTimes, ,
JulyJuly 8, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/world/asia/tokyo-state-of-emergency-olympics.html. 8, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/08/world/asia/tokyo-state-of-emergency-olympics.html.
277276 Wade, Stephen, Wade, Stephen, T okyoTokyo Olympics to Allow Local Fans-But With Strict Limits, Olympics to Allow Local Fans-But With Strict Limits, AP, June, June 21, 2021. 21, 2021.
278277 CRS CRS In FocusIn Focus IF11667, IF11667, China’s Economy: Current Trends and Issues, by Karen M. Sutter and Michael D. , by Karen M. Sutter and Michael D.
Sutherland. Sutherland.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

97 97

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Multilateral Response279Response278
International Monetary Fund
Created in the aftermath of World War II, the IMF’s fundamental mission is to promote Created in the aftermath of World War II, the IMF’s fundamental mission is to promote
international monetary stability. To advance this goal, one of the key functions of the IMF is international monetary stability. To advance this goal, one of the key functions of the IMF is
providing emergency loans to countries facing economic crises. The COVID-19 pandemic has providing emergency loans to countries facing economic crises. The COVID-19 pandemic has
resulted in an unprecedented demand for IMF financial assistance. More than 100 of the IMF’s resulted in an unprecedented demand for IMF financial assistance. More than 100 of the IMF’s
189 member countries have requested IMF programs,189 member countries have requested IMF programs,280279 and IMF Managing Director Kristalina and IMF Managing Director Kristalina
Georgieva stated the IMF stands ready to deploy the entirety of its current lending capacity—Georgieva stated the IMF stands ready to deploy the entirety of its current lending capacity—
approximately $1 approximately $1 tril ion—in trillion—in response to the pandemic and resulting economic crises.response to the pandemic and resulting economic crises.281280 The The
IMF has already approved several COVID-related programs, including for Bolivia, Chad, the IMF has already approved several COVID-related programs, including for Bolivia, Chad, the
Democratic Republic of Congo, Kyrgyz Republic, Nigeria, Niger, Rwanda, Madagascar, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kyrgyz Republic, Nigeria, Niger, Rwanda, Madagascar,
Mozambique, Pakistan, and Togo, among others, and additional programs are expected.Mozambique, Pakistan, and Togo, among others, and additional programs are expected.282281
In addition to loans, the IMF has taken a number of other policy steps to bolster its COVID-19 In addition to loans, the IMF has taken a number of other policy steps to bolster its COVID-19
response. The IMF is tapping its Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT), a donor response. The IMF is tapping its Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust (CCRT), a donor
country trust fund at the IMF, to cover six months of debt payments owed by 29 low-income country trust fund at the IMF, to cover six months of debt payments owed by 29 low-income
countries to the IMF. The IMF also created a new a new Short-term Liquidity Line.countries to the IMF. The IMF also created a new a new Short-term Liquidity Line.283282 It is a It is a
revolving and renewable backstop for member countries with very strong economic policies in revolving and renewable backstop for member countries with very strong economic policies in
need of short-term and moderate financial support, and intends to support a country’s liquidity need of short-term and moderate financial support, and intends to support a country’s liquidity
buffers. The IMF also adopted proposals to accelerate Board consideration of member financing buffers. The IMF also adopted proposals to accelerate Board consideration of member financing
requests for emergency financing and doubled (to about $100 requests for emergency financing and doubled (to about $100 bil ionbillion) access to IMF emergency ) access to IMF emergency
assistance. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is providing funding to poor and emerging assistance. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is providing funding to poor and emerging
market economies that are short on financial resources.market economies that are short on financial resources.284283 If the economic effects of the virus If the economic effects of the virus
persist, countries may need to be proactive in coordinating fiscal and monetary policy responses, persist, countries may need to be proactive in coordinating fiscal and monetary policy responses,
similar to actions taken by of the G-20 following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis. similar to actions taken by of the G-20 following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis.
In August 2021, the IMF announced it was supporting low and middle-income countries in their In August 2021, the IMF announced it was supporting low and middle-income countries in their
response to the pandemic crisis through a $650 response to the pandemic crisis through a $650 bil ion al ocationbillion allocation in special drawing rights in special drawing rights
(SDRs)(SDRs)reportedly the largest increase on record. The SDR reportedly the largest increase on record. The SDR al ocationallocation is intended to supplement is intended to supplement
the existing financial reserves to reduce their need to turn to domestic or external sources of the existing financial reserves to reduce their need to turn to domestic or external sources of
funds. About $275 funds. About $275 bil ion billion of the funds is intended to be of the funds is intended to be al ocatedallocated to emerging and developing to emerging and developing
economies, with the rest intended for larger developed economies.economies, with the rest intended for larger developed economies.285284
For FY2021, the Administration had requested authorization for about $38 For FY2021, the Administration had requested authorization for about $38 bil ion billion for a for a
supplemental fund at the IMF (the New Arrangements to Borrow [NAB]). In March 2020, supplemental fund at the IMF (the New Arrangements to Borrow [NAB]). In March 2020,

279 278 For more information, see CRS For more information, see CRS Report R46342, Report R46342, COVID-19: Role of the International Financial Institutions, by , by
RebeccaRebecca M. Nelson and Martin A. Weiss. M. Nelson and Martin A. Weiss.
280 279 Remarks by IMF Managing Remarks by IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva DuringDirector Kristalina Georgieva During the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank
Governors Meeting, International Monetary Fund, April 15, 2020. Governors Meeting, International Monetary Fund, April 15, 2020.
281280 IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva’s Statement Following a G20 Ministerial Call IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva’s Statement Following a G20 Ministerial Call on the Coronavirus on the Coronavirus
Emergency, March 23, 2020. Some policy experts estimate the IMF’s current maximum Emergency, March 23, 2020. Some policy experts estimate the IMF’s current maximum lendin glending capacity is about $787 capacity is about $787
billion. billion.
282281 IMF Lending IMF Lending T rackerTracker, https://www.imf.org/en/, https://www.imf.org/en/T opicsTopics/imf-and-covid19/COVID-Lending-/imf-and-covid19/COVID-Lending-T racker.
283Tracker. 282 “IMF Adds “IMF Adds Liquidity Liquidity Line to Strengthen COVID-19 Response,” International Monetary Fund, April 15, 2020. Line to Strengthen COVID-19 Response,” International Monetary Fund, April 15, 2020.
284283 Politi, James, “ Politi, James, “ IMF Sets AsideIMF Sets Aside $50bn for Covid-19-Hit Countries,” $50bn for Covid-19-Hit Countries,” Financial Times, March 4, 2020, , March 4, 2020,
https://www.ft.com/content/83c07594-5e3a-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. https://www.ft.com/content/83c07594-5e3a-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4.
285284 Jonathan Wheatley in London and Colby Smith, IMF Allocates $650bn to Boost Pandemic-hit Economies, Jonathan Wheatley in London and Colby Smith, IMF Allocates $650bn to Boost Pandemic-hit Economies,
Financial Tim esTimes, August August 2, 2021. 2, 2021.
Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service

98 98

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Congress enacted this authorization in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Congress enacted this authorization in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act
(CARES Act, P.L. 116-136) as a way to bolster IMF resources available to support countries (CARES Act, P.L. 116-136) as a way to bolster IMF resources available to support countries
during the pandemic. There is ongoing debate about whether member countries should contribute during the pandemic. There is ongoing debate about whether member countries should contribute
additional resources to the IMF, whether the IMF should raise funds by additional resources to the IMF, whether the IMF should raise funds by sel ingselling a portion of its a portion of its
gold holdings, and whether the IMF should enact policies to buffer member state reserves, gold holdings, and whether the IMF should enact policies to buffer member state reserves,
through a process through a process cal edcalled an SDR an SDR al ocation.allocation. Despite the IMF’s various announcements and pledges of support for heavily indebted countries, through October 2021, it had played a small role in alleviating the economic impact of the pandemic.285 In addition, the G20 in cooperation with the Paris Club286initiated efforts to provide assistance through a Common Framework for Debt Treatments to support countries with unsustainable levels of debt. Due to opposition by China over various issues, through October 2021, the initiative had not progressed. In late October, the Biden Administration was pressing the G20 to speed up its response.287 As a percentage share of GDP, Multilateral Developments Banks provided commitments of funds that were much smaller than that of highly developed economy; nevertheless, the Banks reportedly increased their financial commitments by 39% to about $145 billion, with the World Bank providing about half of that mount.288
World Bank and Regional Development Banks
The World Bank, which finances economic development projects in middle- and low-income The World Bank, which finances economic development projects in middle- and low-income
countries, among other activities, is mobilizing its resources to support developing countries countries, among other activities, is mobilizing its resources to support developing countries
during the COVID-19 pandemic.during the COVID-19 pandemic.286289 As of June 1, 2020, the World Bank had approved, or was in As of June 1, 2020, the World Bank had approved, or was in
the process of approving, 150 COVID-19 projects, totaling $15 the process of approving, 150 COVID-19 projects, totaling $15 bil ionbillion, in 99 countries., in 99 countries.287
290 Examples of approved projects include $47 Examples of approved projects include $47 mil ionmillion for the Democratic Republic of Congo to for the Democratic Republic of Congo to
support containment strategies, train medical staff, and provide equipment for diagnostic testing support containment strategies, train medical staff, and provide equipment for diagnostic testing
to ensure rapid case detection; $11.3 to ensure rapid case detection; $11.3 mil ionmillion for Tajikistan to expand intensive care capacity; $20 for Tajikistan to expand intensive care capacity; $20
mil ion million for Haitifor Haiti to support diagnostic testing, rapid response teams, and outbreak containment; to support diagnostic testing, rapid response teams, and outbreak containment;
and $1 and $1 bil ion billion for India to support screening, contract tracing, and laboratory diagnostics, procure for India to support screening, contract tracing, and laboratory diagnostics, procure
personal protective equipment, and set up new isolation wards, among other projects.personal protective equipment, and set up new isolation wards, among other projects.288
Over the next 15 months, the291 The World Bank Group World Bank Group estimatesestimated it could deploy as much as $160 it could deploy as much as $160
bil ion billion to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, more than double the amount it committed in to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, more than double the amount it committed in
FY2019. In AprilFY2019. In April 2020, the World Bank also announced its plans to establish a new multi-donor 2020, the World Bank also announced its plans to establish a new multi-donor
trust fund to help countries prepare for disease outbreaks, the Health Emergency Preparedness trust fund to help countries prepare for disease outbreaks, the Health Emergency Preparedness
and Response Multi-Donor Fund (HEPRF).289and Response Multi-Donor 285 How Has the IMF Fared During the Pandemic? Economist, April 3, 2021, https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2021/04/03/how-has-the-imf-fared-during-the-pandemic?. 286 The Paris Club is an informal group of official creditors whose role is to find coordinated and sustainable solutions to the payment difficulties experienced by debtor countries. 287 U.S. Pushing to Speed up G20 Common Debt Restructuring Process, Reuters, October 21, 2021,https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-pushing-speed-up-g20-common-debt-restructuring-process-2021-10-27/. 288 Lee, Nancy and Rakan Aboneaaj, MDBs to the Rescue? The Evidence on COVID-19 Response, Center for Global Development, May 2021, https://www.cgdev.org/publication/mdbs-rescue-evidence-covid-19-response. 289 Remarks by World Bank Group President David Malpass on G20 Finance Ministers Conference Call on COVID-19, March 23, 2020. 290 https://maps.worldbank.org/. Accessed on June 1, 2020. 291 World Bank, “World Bank Group Launches First Operations for COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Emergency Health Support, Strengthening Developing Country Response,” Press Release, April 2, 2020. Congressional Research Service 99 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Fund (HEPRF).292 The new fund is to complement, and augment, the $160 billion The new fund is to complement, and augment, the
$160 bil ion of financing provided by the World Bank. of financing provided by the World Bank.
In addition to the World Bank, which has a near-global membership and operates in many sectors In addition to the World Bank, which has a near-global membership and operates in many sectors
in developing countries worldwide, a number of in developing countries worldwide, a number of smal ersmaller and more specialized multilateral and more specialized multilateral
development banks (MDBs) are also mobilizingdevelopment banks (MDBs) are also mobilizing resources in response to the COVID-19 resources in response to the COVID-19
pandemic. The United States is a member of a number of pandemic. The United States is a member of a number of regional y regionally focused MDBs, including the focused MDBs, including the
African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction
and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank, as and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank, as wel as the functional ywell as the functionally focused focused
International Fund for Agricultural Development. The United States does not belong to some International Fund for Agricultural Development. The United States does not belong to some
MDBs, including the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the New MDBs, including the Chinese-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the New
Development Bank created by the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Development Bank created by the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South
Africa), the European Investment Bank, or the Islamic Development Bank. Africa), the European Investment Bank, or the Islamic Development Bank.
In response to COVID-19, MDBs are reprogramming existing projects, establishing and funding In response to COVID-19, MDBs are reprogramming existing projects, establishing and funding
with existing resources lending facilities dedicated to the COVID-19 response, and streamlining with existing resources lending facilities dedicated to the COVID-19 response, and streamlining
approval procedures. According to the President of the World Bank, other multilateral approval procedures. According to the President of the World Bank, other multilateral
development banks have committed roughly $80 development banks have committed roughly $80 bil ion billion over the next 15 months to respond to COVID-19.293 Together with the World Bank’s commitment of $160 billion, $240 billion in financing is to be made available to developing countries from the MDBs during this time period.294over the next 15 months to respond to

286 Remarks by World Bank Group President David Malpass on G20 Finance Ministers Conference Call on COVID-19,
March 23, 2020.
287 https://maps.worldbank.org/. Accessed on June 1, 2020.
288 World Bank, “World Bank Group Launches First Operations for COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Emergency Health
Support, Strengthening Developing Country Response,” Press Release, April 2, 2020.
289 World Bank, “World Bank Group to Launch New Multi-donor T rust Fund to help Countries Prepare for Disease
Outbreaks,” Press Release, April 17, 2020.
Congressional Research Service

99

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

COVID-19.290 Together with the World Bank’s commitment of $160 bil ion, $240 bil ion in
financing is to be made available to developing countries from the MDBs during this time
period.291
To support the MDB response to COVID-19, Congress accelerated authorizations requested by To support the MDB response to COVID-19, Congress accelerated authorizations requested by
the Administration for FY2021 for two lending facilities at the World Bank and two lending the Administration for FY2021 for two lending facilities at the World Bank and two lending
facilities at the African Development Bank in the CARES Act (P.L. 116-136). Given the facilities at the African Development Bank in the CARES Act (P.L. 116-136). Given the
unprecedented demand for MDB resources, discussions are underway about whether the MDBs unprecedented demand for MDB resources, discussions are underway about whether the MDBs
should pursue fiduciary reforms that would should pursue fiduciary reforms that would al owallow them to expand their lending based on existing them to expand their lending based on existing
resources, particularly lending against donor country guarantees to the institutions (resources, particularly lending against donor country guarantees to the institutions (cal ed
“cal ablecalled “callable” capital). ” capital).
International Economic Cooperation
On March 16, 2020, the leaders of the G-7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the On March 16, 2020, the leaders of the G-7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the
United Kingdom, and the United States) held an emergency summit by teleconference to discuss United Kingdom, and the United States) held an emergency summit by teleconference to discuss
and coordinate their policy responses to the economic and coordinate their policy responses to the economic fal outfallout from the global spread of COVID- from the global spread of COVID-
19. In the joint statement released by the G-7 leaders after the emergency teleconference summit, 19. In the joint statement released by the G-7 leaders after the emergency teleconference summit,
the leaders stressed they are committed to doing “whatever is necessary to ensure a strong global the leaders stressed they are committed to doing “whatever is necessary to ensure a strong global
response through closer cooperation and enhanced cooperation of efforts.”response through closer cooperation and enhanced cooperation of efforts.”292295 The countries The countries
pledged to coordinate research efforts, increase the availability of medical equipment; mobilize pledged to coordinate research efforts, increase the availability of medical equipment; mobilize
“the full range” of policy instruments, including monetary and fiscal measures as “the full range” of policy instruments, including monetary and fiscal measures as wel well as targeted as targeted
actions, to support workers, companies, and sectors most affected by the spread of COVID-19; actions, to support workers, companies, and sectors most affected by the spread of COVID-19;
task the finance ministers to coordinate on a weekly basis, and direct the IMF and the World Bank task the finance ministers to coordinate on a weekly basis, and direct the IMF and the World Bank
Group, as wel 292 World Bank, “World Bank Group to Launch New Multi-donor Trust Fund to help Countries Prepare for Disease Outbreaks,” Press Release, April 17, 2020. 293 David Malpass, “Remarks to G20 Finance Ministers,” World Bank, April 15, 2020. 294 World Bank Group President David Malpass: Remarks to G20 Finance Ministers, April 15, 2020. 295 White House, G-7 Leaders’ Statement, March 16, 2020, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/g7-leaders-statement/. Congressional Research Service 100 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Group, as well as other international organizations, to support countries worldwide as part of a as other international organizations, to support countries worldwide as part of a
coordinated global response.coordinated global response.293
296 Saudi Arabia, the 2020 chair of the G-20, Saudi Arabia, the 2020 chair of the G-20, cal edcalled an emergency G-20 summit on March 25 to an emergency G-20 summit on March 25 to
discuss a response to the pandemic.discuss a response to the pandemic.294297 The G-20 is a broader group of economies, including the The G-20 is a broader group of economies, including the
G-7 countries and several major emerging markets.G-7 countries and several major emerging markets.295298 During the global financial crisis, world During the global financial crisis, world
leaders decided that henceforth the G-20 would be the premiere forum for international economic leaders decided that henceforth the G-20 would be the premiere forum for international economic
cooperation. Some analysts have been surprised that the G-7 has been in front of the G-20 in cooperation. Some analysts have been surprised that the G-7 has been in front of the G-20 in
responding to COVID-19, while other analysts have questioned whether the larger size and responding to COVID-19, while other analysts have questioned whether the larger size and
diversity of economies in the G-20 can make coordination more difficult.diversity of economies in the G-20 can make coordination more difficult.296299
Analysts are hopeful that the recent G-7 summit, and a G-20 summit, Analysts are hopeful that the recent G-7 summit, and a G-20 summit, wil will mark a shift towards mark a shift towards
greater international cooperation at the highest (leader) levels in combatting the economic greater international cooperation at the highest (leader) levels in combatting the economic fal outfallout
from the spread of COVID-19.from the spread of COVID-19.297300 An emergency meeting of G-7 finance ministers on March 3, 2020, fell An emergency meeting of G-7 finance ministers on March 3,

290 David Malpass, “ Remarks to G20 Finance Ministers,” World Bank, April 15, 2020.
291 World Bank Group President David Malpass: Remarks to G20 Finance Ministers, April 15, 2020.
292 White House, G-7 Leaders’ Statement, March 16, 2020, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/g7-
leaders-statement/.
293 Ibid.
294 “Spain Says Saudi Arabia to Cal G-20 to Meet on Covid-19 in Coming Days,” Reuters, March 16, 2020.
295 T he G-20 includes the G-7 countries plus Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia,
Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, T urkey, and the European Union (EU).
296 For more information about the G-20, see CRS Report R40977, International Economic Policy Coordination at the
G-7 and the G-20
, by Rebecca M. Nelson.
297 See for example, Jennifer Rankin, “EU Leaders Divided on How to Protect Economies after Covid-19,” The
Guardian
, March 14, 2020.
Congressional Research Service

100

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

2020, fel short of the aggressive and concrete coordinated action that investors and economists short of the aggressive and concrete coordinated action that investors and economists
had been hoping for, and U.S. and European stock markets had been hoping for, and U.S. and European stock markets fel fell after the meeting.after the meeting.298301 More More
general ygenerally, governments have been divided over the appropriate response and in some cases have , governments have been divided over the appropriate response and in some cases have
acted acted unilateral yunilaterally, particularly when closing borders and imposing export restrictions on medical , particularly when closing borders and imposing export restrictions on medical
equipment and medicine. Some experts argue that a large, early, and coordinated response is equipment and medicine. Some experts argue that a large, early, and coordinated response is
needed to address the economic needed to address the economic fal outfallout from COVID-19, but several concerns loom about the G- from COVID-19, but several concerns loom about the G-
20’s ability to deliver.20’s ability to deliver.299302 Their concerns focus on the Trump Administration’s prioritization of an Their concerns focus on the Trump Administration’s prioritization of an
“America First” foreign policy over one committed to multilateralism; the 2020 chair of the G-20, “America First” foreign policy over one committed to multilateralism; the 2020 chair of the G-20,
Saudi Arabia, is embroiled in its own domestic political issues and oil price war; and U.S.-China Saudi Arabia, is embroiled in its own domestic political issues and oil price war; and U.S.-China
tensions make G-20 consensus more difficult. tensions make G-20 consensus more difficult.
Meanwhile, international organizations including the IMF and multilateral Meanwhile, international organizations including the IMF and multilateral development banks, development banks,
have tried to forge ahead with economic support given their current resources. have tried to forge ahead with economic support given their current resources. Additional yAdditionally, the , the
Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body including the United States that monitors Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body including the United States that monitors
the global financial system and makes regulations to ensure stability, released a statement on the global financial system and makes regulations to ensure stability, released a statement on
March 20, 2020, that its members are actively cooperating to maintain financial stability during March 20, 2020, that its members are actively cooperating to maintain financial stability during
market stress related to COVID-19.market stress related to COVID-19.300303 The FSB is encouraging governments to use flexibility The FSB is encouraging governments to use flexibility
within existing international standards to provide continued access to funding for market within existing international standards to provide continued access to funding for market
participants and for businesses and households facing temporary difficulties from COVID-19, participants and for businesses and households facing temporary difficulties from COVID-19,
while noting that many FSB members have already taken action to release availablewhile noting that many FSB members have already taken action to release available capital and capital and
liquidity buffers.
liquidity buffers. 296 Ibid. 297 “Spain Says Saudi Arabia to Cal G-20 to Meet on Covid-19 in Coming Days,” Reuters, March 16, 2020. 298 The G-20 includes the G-7 countries plus Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, and the European Union (EU). 299 For more information about the G-20, see CRS Report R40977, International Economic Policy Coordination at the G-7 and the G-20, by Rebecca M. Nelson. 300 See for example, Jennifer Rankin, “EU Leaders Divided on How to Protect Economies after Covid-19,” The Guardian, March 14, 2020. 301 Jack Ewing and Jeanna Smialek, “Economic Powers Vow to Fight Crisis,” New York Times, March 3, 2020. 302 Matthew Goodman and Mark Sobel, “Time to Pull the G-20 Fire Bell,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 18, 2020. 303 “FSB Coordinates Financial Sector Work to Buttress the Economy in Response to Covid-19,” Financial Stability Board, Press Release 6/2020, March 20, 2020. Congressional Research Service 101 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 Estimated Effects on Other Economies
Travel bans and quarantines have had a heavy economic toll on a broad range of countries. The Travel bans and quarantines have had a heavy economic toll on a broad range of countries. The
OECD notes that production declines in China have had OECD notes that production declines in China have had spil overspillover effects around the world given effects around the world given
China’s role in producing computers, electronics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment, and China’s role in producing computers, electronics, pharmaceuticals and transport equipment, and
as a primary source of demand for many commodities.as a primary source of demand for many commodities.301304 Across Asia, some forecasters argue that Across Asia, some forecasters argue that
recent data indicate that Japan, South Korea, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, and recent data indicate that Japan, South Korea, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, and
Vietnam Vietnam could experience an economic recession in 2020.could experience an economic recession in 2020.302305
In early January 2020, before the COVID-19 outbreak, economic growth in developing In early January 2020, before the COVID-19 outbreak, economic growth in developing
economies as a whole was projected by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to be slightly economies as a whole was projected by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to be slightly
more positive than in 2019. This outlook was based on progress being made in U.S.-China trade more positive than in 2019. This outlook was based on progress being made in U.S.-China trade
talks that were expected to roll back some tariffs and an increase in India’s rate of growth. talks that were expected to roll back some tariffs and an increase in India’s rate of growth.
Growth rates in Latin America and the Middle East were also projected to be positive in 2020.Growth rates in Latin America and the Middle East were also projected to be positive in 2020.303
306 These projections likely These projections likely wil will be revised downward due to the slowdown in global trade associated be revised downward due to the slowdown in global trade associated
with COVID-19, lower energy and commodity prices, an increase in the foreign exchange value with COVID-19, lower energy and commodity prices, an increase in the foreign exchange value
of the dollar, and other secondary effects that could curtail growth. Commodity exporting of the dollar, and other secondary effects that could curtail growth. Commodity exporting

298 Jack Ewing and Jeanna Smialek, “Economic Powers Vow to Fight Crisis,” New York Times, March 3, 2020.
299 Matthew Goodman and Mark Sobel, “T ime to Pull the G-20 Fire Bell,” Center for Strategic and International
Studies, March 18, 2020.
300 “FSB Coordinates Financial Sector Work to Buttress the Economy in Response to Covid-19,” Financial Stability
Board, Press Release 6/2020, March 20, 2020.
301 Ibid., p. 5.
302 Arnold, Martin Arnold and Valentina Romei, “European Factory Output Plummets as Covid-19 Shutdown Bites,”
Financial Tim es, April 1, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/8646c0ee-8fba-4e4c-a047-cf445ff41cf6.
303 Tentative Stabilization, Sluggish Recovery? World Economic Outlook Update, January 20, 2020, T he International
Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/01/20/weo-update-january2020.
Congressional Research Service

101


Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

countries, in particular, likely wil countries, in particular, likely will experience a greater slowdown in growth than forecasted in experience a greater slowdown in growth than forecasted in
earlier projections as a result of a slowdown on trade with China and lower commodity prices. earlier projections as a result of a slowdown on trade with China and lower commodity prices.
Asian Development Bank 2021 Forecast
According to the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) July 2021 report, developing Asia GDP is According to the Asian Development Bank’s (ADB) July 2021 report, developing Asia GDP is
projected to grow by 7.2% in 2021, after projected to grow by 7.2% in 2021, after fal ingfalling by 0.1% in 2020, reportedly the first decline in by 0.1% in 2020, reportedly the first decline in
economic activity in the region in six decades, reflecting the slowdown in global trade and economic activity in the region in six decades, reflecting the slowdown in global trade and
national quarantines.national quarantines.304307 Similar to other groups, the ADB’s forecasts indicate progressively more Similar to other groups, the ADB’s forecasts indicate progressively more
positive rates of growth over the September 2020 to July 2021 period for most areas of Asia, led positive rates of growth over the September 2020 to July 2021 period for most areas of Asia, led
by a rebound in growth of 7% in India.by a rebound in growth of 7% in India.
ADB sub-regional forecasts indicate that South Asia, particularly India is projected grow at the ADB sub-regional forecasts indicate that South Asia, particularly India is projected grow at the
fastest rate in 2022. East Asia is similarlyfastest rate in 2022. East Asia is similarly projected to experience an projected to experience an overal overall positive rate of positive rate of
growth in 2022, reflecting the dominating influence of the Chinese economy, which is projected growth in 2022, reflecting the dominating influence of the Chinese economy, which is projected
to grow by 8% in 2021 and 5% in 2022, as indicated into grow by 8% in 2021 and 5% in 2022, as indicated in Figure 24. Hong Kong, which . Hong Kong, which
experienced a slowing rate of growth in 2020 due to domestic political turmoil and trade issues experienced a slowing rate of growth in 2020 due to domestic political turmoil and trade issues
between the United States and China, was projected to experience a 6.2% rate of growth in 2021 between the United States and China, was projected to experience a 6.2% rate of growth in 2021
and a 3.5% rate in 2022.and a 3.5% rate in 2022.
South Asia, which includes India, is projected to experience a decline in its annual GDP growth South Asia, which includes India, is projected to experience a decline in its annual GDP growth
rate of 5.5% in 2020, but a positive rate of growth in 2021 of 8.9% and 7.0% in 2022, driven in rate of 5.5% in 2020, but a positive rate of growth in 2021 of 8.9% and 7.0% in 2022, driven in
part by a turn-around in India’s growth rate from -7.3 in 2020 to a positive 10.0% in 2021 and part by a turn-around in India’s growth rate from -7.3 in 2020 to a positive 10.0% in 2021 and
7.5% in 2022. Countries in the region have implemented different measures to contain the spread 7.5% in 2022. Countries in the region have implemented different measures to contain the spread
of the virus, reflecting differences in the extent of viral infections. Across governments within the of the virus, reflecting differences in the extent of viral infections. Across governments within the
region, total fiscal support totaled $3.6 region, total fiscal support totaled $3.6 tril iontrillion by the end of August 2020, divided between by the end of August 2020, divided between
income support measures and measures intended to support liquidity. Similar to other regions and income support measures and measures intended to support liquidity. Similar to other regions and
304 Ibid., p. 5. 305 Arnold, Martin Arnold and Valentina Romei, “European Factory Output Plummets as Covid-19 Shutdown Bites,” Financial Times, April 1, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/8646c0ee-8fba-4e4c-a047-cf445ff41cf6. 306 Tentative Stabilization, Sluggish Recovery? World Economic Outlook Update, January 20, 2020, The International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2020/01/20/weo-update-january2020. 307 Asian Development Outlook Supplement, Asian Development Bank, July 2021. Congressional Research Service 102 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 countries, growth prospects in developing Asia depend on the length and depth of the health crisis countries, growth prospects in developing Asia depend on the length and depth of the health crisis
and the protracted nature of trade tensions between the United States and China. and the protracted nature of trade tensions between the United States and China.
Figure 24. Asian Development Bank 2020 and 2021 GDP Forecasts
In percentage change In percentage change

Source: Asian Development Outlook Supplement, Asian Development Bank, July 2021.Created by CRS.

304 Asian Development Outlook Supplement, Asian Development Bank, July 2021.
Congressional Research Service

102

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19
Outlook Supplement, Asian Development Bank, July 2021. Created by CRS.
International Economic Cooperation
Initial efforts at coordinating the economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic across countries Initial efforts at coordinating the economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic across countries
were uneven. Governments were divided over the appropriate response and in some cases acted were uneven. Governments were divided over the appropriate response and in some cases acted
unilateral y, unilaterally, particularly when closing borders and imposing export restrictions on medical particularly when closing borders and imposing export restrictions on medical
equipment and medicine. An emergency meeting of G-7 (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, equipment and medicine. An emergency meeting of G-7 (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,
the United Kingdom, and the United States) finance ministers on March 3, 2020, the United Kingdom, and the United States) finance ministers on March 3, 2020, fel fell short of the short of the
aggressive and concrete coordinated action that investors and economists had hoped for, and U.S. aggressive and concrete coordinated action that investors and economists had hoped for, and U.S.
and European stock markets and European stock markets fel fell sharply after the meeting.sharply after the meeting.305308 However, on March 16, 2020, the However, on March 16, 2020, the
leaders of the G-7 countries held an emergency summit by teleconference to discuss and leaders of the G-7 countries held an emergency summit by teleconference to discuss and
coordinate their policy responses to the economic coordinate their policy responses to the economic fal outfallout from the global spread of COVID-19. from the global spread of COVID-19.
In a joint statement released by the G-7 leaders after the emergency teleconference summit, the In a joint statement released by the G-7 leaders after the emergency teleconference summit, the
leaders stressed they were committed to doing “whatever is necessary to ensure a strong global leaders stressed they were committed to doing “whatever is necessary to ensure a strong global
response through closer cooperation and enhanced cooperation of efforts.”response through closer cooperation and enhanced cooperation of efforts.”306309 The countries The countries
pledged to coordinate research efforts, increase the availability of medical equipment; mobilize pledged to coordinate research efforts, increase the availability of medical equipment; mobilize
“the full range” of policy instruments, including monetary and fiscal measures as “the full range” of policy instruments, including monetary and fiscal measures as wel well as targeted as targeted
actions, to support workers, companies, and sectors most affected by the spread of COVID-19; actions, to support workers, companies, and sectors most affected by the spread of COVID-19;
tasked the finance ministers to coordinate on a weekly basis, and directed the IMF and the World tasked the finance ministers to coordinate on a weekly basis, and directed the IMF and the World
Bank Group, as Bank Group, as wel well as other international organizations, to support countries worldwide as part as other international organizations, to support countries worldwide as part
of a coordinated global response.of a coordinated global response.307310 G-7 coordination was problematic however, including 308 Jack Ewing and Jeanna Smialek, “Economic Powers Vow to Fight Crisis,” New York Times, March 3, 2020. 309 White House, G-7 Leaders’ Statement, March 16, 2020, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/g7-leaders-statement/. 310 Ibid. Congressional Research Service 103 link to page 109 link to page 109 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 G-7 coordination was problematic however, including
disagreement among G-7 foreign affairs ministers about how to refer to the virus (coronavirus or disagreement among G-7 foreign affairs ministers about how to refer to the virus (coronavirus or
the “Wuhan virus”) and concerns about collaboration on vaccine research.the “Wuhan virus”) and concerns about collaboration on vaccine research.308311 The United States The United States
chaired the G-7 in 2020, but the June summit at Camp David was canceled due to concerns about chaired the G-7 in 2020, but the June summit at Camp David was canceled due to concerns about
COVID-19. COVID-19.
The G-20, which has a broader membership of major advanced and emerging-market economies The G-20, which has a broader membership of major advanced and emerging-market economies
representing 85% of world GDP, was slower to respond to the pandemic.representing 85% of world GDP, was slower to respond to the pandemic.309312 Even though G-20 Even though G-20
coordination was widely viewed as critical in the response to the global financial crisis of 2008-coordination was widely viewed as critical in the response to the global financial crisis of 2008-
2009, several factors may have complicated G-20 coordination in the pandemic context: the 2009, several factors may have complicated G-20 coordination in the pandemic context: the
Trump Administration’s prioritization of an “America First” foreign policy over one committed to Trump Administration’s prioritization of an “America First” foreign policy over one committed to
multilateralism;multilateralism; the 2020 chair of the G-20, Saudi Arabia, was embroiled in its own domestic the 2020 chair of the G-20, Saudi Arabia, was embroiled in its own domestic
political issues and oil price war; and U.S.-China tensions make G-20 consensus more difficult.political issues and oil price war; and U.S.-China tensions make G-20 consensus more difficult.310313
The G-20 held a summit by teleconference on March 26, 2020, but the resulting communique was The G-20 held a summit by teleconference on March 26, 2020, but the resulting communique was
criticized for failing to include concrete action items beyond what national governments were criticized for failing to include concrete action items beyond what national governments were
already doing.already doing.311314 However, G-20 coordination appeared to be gaining momentum, most notably However, G-20 coordination appeared to be gaining momentum, most notably

305 Jack Ewing and Jeanna Smialek, “Economic Powers Vow to Fight Crisis,” New York Times, March 3, 2020.
306 White House, G-7 Leaders’ Statement, March 16, 2020, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/g7-
leaders-statement/.
307 Ibid.
308 “Pompeo, G-7 Foreign Ministers Spar over ‘Wuhan Virus’,” Politico, March 25, 2020; Katrin Bennhold and David
E. Sanger, “U.S. Offered ‘Large Sum’ to German Company for Access to Coronavirus Vaccine Research, German
Officials Say,” New York T imes, March 15, 2020.
309 T he G-20 includes the G-7 countries plus Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia,
Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, T urkey, and the European Union (EU).
310 Matthew Goodman and Mark Sobel, “T ime to Pull the G-20 Fire Bell,” Center for Strategic and International
Studies, March 18, 2020.
311 Matthew Goodman, Stephanie Segal, and Mark Sobel, “Assessing the G20 Virtual Summit,” Center for Strategic
and International Studies, March 27, 2020.
Congressional Research Service

103

link to page 109 link to page 109 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

with the G-20 agreement on debt relief for low-income countries (seewith the G-20 agreement on debt relief for low-income countries (see “Looming Debt Crises and
Debt Relief Efforts”). ).
Meanwhile, international organizations including the IMF and multilateral Meanwhile, international organizations including the IMF and multilateral development banks, development banks,
tried to forge ahead with economic support given their current resources. tried to forge ahead with economic support given their current resources. Additional yAdditionally, the , the
Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body including the United States that monitors Financial Stability Board (FSB), an international body including the United States that monitors
the global financial system and makes regulations to ensure stability, released a statement on the global financial system and makes regulations to ensure stability, released a statement on
March 20, 2020, that its members were actively cooperating to maintain financial stability during March 20, 2020, that its members were actively cooperating to maintain financial stability during
market stress related to COVID-19.market stress related to COVID-19.312315 The FSB encouraged governments to use flexibility within The FSB encouraged governments to use flexibility within
existing international standards to provide continued access to funding for market participants and existing international standards to provide continued access to funding for market participants and
for businesses and households facing temporary difficulties from COVID-19, while noting that for businesses and households facing temporary difficulties from COVID-19, while noting that
many FSB members had taken action to release availablemany FSB members had taken action to release available capital and liquiditycapital and liquidity buffers. buffers.
Looming Debt Crises and Debt Relief Efforts
COVID-19 could trigger a wave of defaults around the world.COVID-19 could trigger a wave of defaults around the world.313316 In Q3 2019—before the In Q3 2019—before the
outbreak of COVID-19—global debt levels reached an outbreak of COVID-19—global debt levels reached an al all-time high of nearly $253 -time high of nearly $253 tril iontrillion, about , about
320% of global GDP.320% of global GDP.314317 About 70% of global debt is held by advanced economies and about 30% About 70% of global debt is held by advanced economies and about 30%
is held by emerging markets. is held by emerging markets. Global yGlobally, most debt is held by nonfinancial corporations (29%), , most debt is held by nonfinancial corporations (29%),
governments (27%) and financial corporations (24%), followed by households (19%). Debt in governments (27%) and financial corporations (24%), followed by households (19%). Debt in
311 “Pompeo, G-7 Foreign Ministers Spar over ‘Wuhan Virus’,” Politico, March 25, 2020; Katrin Bennhold and David E. Sanger, “U.S. Offered ‘Large Sum’ to German Company for Access to Coronavirus Vaccine Research, German Officials Say,” New York Times, March 15, 2020. 312 The G-20 includes the G-7 countries plus Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, and the European Union (EU). 313 Matthew Goodman and Mark Sobel, “Time to Pull the G-20 Fire Bell,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 18, 2020. 314 Matthew Goodman, Stephanie Segal, and Mark Sobel, “Assessing the G20 Virtual Summit,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, March 27, 2020. 315 “FSB Coordinates Financial Sector Work to Buttress the Economy in Response to Covid-19,” Financial Stability Board, Press Release 6/2020, March 20, 2020. 316 John Plender, “The Seeds of the Next Debt Crisis,” Financial Times, March 4, 2020. 317 Emre Tiftik, Khadija Mahmood, Jadranka Poljak, and Sonja Gibbs, “Global Debt Monitor: Sustainability Matters,” Institute for International Finance, January 13, 2020.This includes debt held by governments, financial institutions, nonfinancial institutions, and households. Congressional Research Service 104 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 emerging markets has nearly doubled since 2010, primarily driven by borrowing from state-emerging markets has nearly doubled since 2010, primarily driven by borrowing from state-
owned enterprises. owned enterprises.
High debt levels make borrowers vulnerable to shocks that disrupt revenue and inflows of new High debt levels make borrowers vulnerable to shocks that disrupt revenue and inflows of new
financing. The disruption in economic activity associated with COVID-19 is a wide-scale financing. The disruption in economic activity associated with COVID-19 is a wide-scale
exogenous shock that exogenous shock that wil will make it significantly more difficult for many private borrowers make it significantly more difficult for many private borrowers
(corporations and households) and public borrowers (governments) around the world to repay (corporations and households) and public borrowers (governments) around the world to repay
their debts. COVID-19 has hit the revenue of corporations in a range of industries: factories their debts. COVID-19 has hit the revenue of corporations in a range of industries: factories are
ceasinghave ceased production, brick-and-mortar retail stores and restaurants production, brick-and-mortar retail stores and restaurants are closinghave closed, commodity prices , commodity prices
have plunged (Bloomberg commodity price index—a basket of oil, metals, and food prices—plunged (Bloomberg commodity price index—a basket of oil, metals, and food prices—has
dropped 27% since the start of the year and is now atinitially dropping by 27% to its lowest level since 1986), and overseas its lowest level since 1986), and overseas
and in some cases domestic travel and in some cases domestic travel is beingwas curtailed. curtailed.315318 Some governments, including Argentina Some governments, including Argentina
and Lebanon, were already experiencing debt pressures, which and Lebanon, were already experiencing debt pressures, which have beenwere exacerbated by the exacerbated by the
pandemic. Other countries pandemic. Other countries are facingfaced new debt pressures created by the pandemic, while some new debt pressures created by the pandemic, while some
countries, such as Abu Dhabi and Egypt, countries, such as Abu Dhabi and Egypt, have completed successful sovereign bond sales since completed successful sovereign bond sales since
the outbreak of the pandemic.the outbreak of the pandemic.316319
Households Households are facingfaced a rapid increase in unemployment and, in many developing countries, a a rapid increase in unemployment and, in many developing countries, a
decline in remittances. With fewer resources, corporations and households decline in remittances. With fewer resources, corporations and households mayfaced default on their default on their
debts, absent government intervention. debts, absent government intervention. TheseSuch defaults defaults wil could result in a decline in bank assets, result in a decline in bank assets,
making it difficult for banks to extend new loans during the crisis or, more severely, making it difficult for banks to extend new loans during the crisis or, more severely, creating
create solvency solvency problems for banks. Meanwhile, many governments increased problems for banks. Meanwhile, many governments are dramatical y increasing

312 “FSB Coordinates Financial Sector Work to Buttress the Economy in Response to Covid-19,” Financial Stability
Board, Press Release 6/2020, March 20, 2020.
313 John Plender, “T he Seeds of the Next Debt Crisis,” Financial Times, March 4, 2020.
314 Emre T iftik, Khadija Mahmood, Jadranka Poljak, and Sonja Gibbs, “Global Debt Monitor: Sustainability Matters,”
Institute for International Finance, January 13, 2020.This includes debt held by governments, financial institutions,
nonfinancial institutions, and households.
315 “Covid-19 Worsens Debt Crisis in Poor Countries,” Jubilee Debt Campaign, March 22, 2020.
316 T rieu Pham, “EM Sovereign Debt Issuance: Encouraging Signs but Not Yet Back to Business as Usual,” ING, May
26, 2020.
Congressional Research Service

104

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

spending to combat the pandemic, spending to combat the pandemic, and couldand are likely to face sharp reductions in revenue, putting face sharp reductions in revenue, putting
pressure on public finances and raising the pressure on public finances and raising the likelihood likelihood of sovereign (government) defaults. Debt of sovereign (government) defaults. Debt
dynamics are particularly problematic in emerging economies, where debt obligations dynamics are particularly problematic in emerging economies, where debt obligations
are denominated in foreign currencies (denominated in foreign currencies (usual yusually U.S. dollars). Many emerging market currencies U.S. dollars). Many emerging market currencies have
depreciated since the outbreak of the pandemic, raising the value of their debts in terms of local depreciated since the outbreak of the pandemic, raising the value of their debts in terms of local
currency. currency.
Governments Governments wil will face difficult choices if there is a widespread wave of defaults. Most face difficult choices if there is a widespread wave of defaults. Most
governments governments have signaled a commitment to or already implemented policies to support those signaled a commitment to or already implemented policies to support those
economical yeconomically impacted by the pandemic. These governments face decisions about the type of impacted by the pandemic. These governments face decisions about the type of
assistance to provide (loans versus direct payments), the amount of assistance to provide, how to assistance to provide (loans versus direct payments), the amount of assistance to provide, how to
al ocateallocate rescue funds, and what conditions if any to attach to funds. Governments have rescue funds, and what conditions if any to attach to funds. Governments have
undertaken extraordinary fiscal and monetary measures to combat the crisis. However, undertaken extraordinary fiscal and monetary measures to combat the crisis. However,
developing countries that are constrained by limited financial resources and where health systems developing countries that are constrained by limited financial resources and where health systems
couldcan quickly become overloaded quickly become overloaded are, making them particularly vulnerable. particularly vulnerable.
In terms of defaults by governments (sovereign defaults), emergency assistance is In terms of defaults by governments (sovereign defaults), emergency assistance is general ygenerally
provided by the IMF, and sometimes paired with additional rescue funds from other governments provided by the IMF, and sometimes paired with additional rescue funds from other governments
on a bilateral basis. The IMF and other potential donor countries on a bilateral basis. The IMF and other potential donor countries wil will need to consider whether need to consider whether
the IMF has adequate resources to respond to the crisis, how to the IMF has adequate resources to respond to the crisis, how to al ocateallocate funding if the demand for funding if the demand for
funding exceeds the amount available, what conditions should be attached to rescue funding, and funding exceeds the amount available, what conditions should be attached to rescue funding, and
whether IMF programs should be paired with a restructuring of the government’s debt (“burden whether IMF programs should be paired with a restructuring of the government’s debt (“burden
sharing” with private investors). sharing” with private investors).
International efforts are underway to help the most vulnerable developing countries grapple with International efforts are underway to help the most vulnerable developing countries grapple with
debt pressures. In mid-April 2020, the IMF tapped its Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust debt pressures. In mid-April 2020, the IMF tapped its Catastrophe Containment and Relief Trust
(CRRT), funded by donor countries, to provide grants to cover the debt payments of 25 poor and (CRRT), funded by donor countries, to provide grants to cover the debt payments of 25 poor and
vulnerable countries to the IMF for six months. The IMF hopes that additional donor vulnerable countries to the IMF for six months. The IMF hopes that additional donor
contributions contributions wil al owwill allow this debt service relief to be extended for two years. this debt service relief to be extended for two years. Additional y, the G-
Additionally, the G- 318 “Covid-19 Worsens Debt Crisis in Poor Countries,” Jubilee Debt Campaign, March 22, 2020. 319 Trieu Pham, “EM Sovereign Debt Issuance: Encouraging Signs but Not Yet Back to Business as Usual,” ING, May 26, 2020. Congressional Research Service 105 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 20 finance ministers agreed to suspend debt service payments for the world’s poorest countries 20 finance ministers agreed to suspend debt service payments for the world’s poorest countries
through the end of 2020. The Institute for International Finance (IIF), which represents 450 through the end of 2020. The Institute for International Finance (IIF), which represents 450
banks, hedge funds, and other global financial funds, also announced that private creditors banks, hedge funds, and other global financial funds, also announced that private creditors wil
will join the debt relief effort on a voluntary basis. This debt join the debt relief effort on a voluntary basis. This debt standstil wil standstill will free up more than $20 free up more than $20
bil ion billion for these countries to spend on improving their health systems and fighting the for these countries to spend on improving their health systems and fighting the
pandemic.pandemic.317320 Private sector commitments were critical for official creditors, so that developing Private sector commitments were critical for official creditors, so that developing
countries could redirect funds to improving health systems rather than repaying private creditors. countries could redirect funds to improving health systems rather than repaying private creditors.
However, the debt However, the debt standstil standstill is complicated. There is debate among creditor governments about is complicated. There is debate among creditor governments about
what debts should be included in the what debts should be included in the standstil standstill, and how it can be enforced. On May 1, the IIF in a , and how it can be enforced. On May 1, the IIF in a
letter laid out some of the obstacles facing private sector participation in the debt letter laid out some of the obstacles facing private sector participation in the debt stil still, including , including
reliance on “voluntary” participation, each participating creditor reliance on “voluntary” participation, each participating creditor wil will need to make its own need to make its own
assessments, the assessments, the standstil standstill could require a lengthy contract-by-contract approach, and the could require a lengthy contract-by-contract approach, and the
participating borrowing countries may face risks, such as rating downgrades and inability to participating borrowing countries may face risks, such as rating downgrades and inability to
borrow from financial markets (often referred to as “loss of market access”). Some economists borrow from financial markets (often referred to as “loss of market access”). Some economists
have characterized the letter as a list of reasons private creditors may cite as justification for their have characterized the letter as a list of reasons private creditors may cite as justification for their
refusal to participate in the debt refusal to participate in the debt standstil .318standstill.321 Reportedly, some African countries are opting to negotiate debt relief individually with China and other creditor nations because of concerns they will be blocked from financial markets if they participate in the G-20 debt standstill.322 Reportedly, some African countries are opting to

317 Davide Barbuscia, Marwa Rashad, and Andrea Shalal, “G20 Countries Agree Debt Freeze for World’s Poorest
Countries,” Reuters, April 15, 2020
318 Patrick Bolton, Lee Buchheit, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, et. al, “Sovereign Debt Standstills: An Update” VoxEU,
May 28, 2020.
Congressional Research Service

105

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

negotiate debt relief individual y with China and other creditor nations because of concerns they
wil be blocked from financial markets if they participate in the G-20 debt standstil .319
Other Affected Sectors
Since early 2000, concerns over the spread of the virus led to self-quarantines, reductions in Since early 2000, concerns over the spread of the virus led to self-quarantines, reductions in
airlineairline and cruise liner travel, the closing of such institutions as the Louvre, and and cruise liner travel, the closing of such institutions as the Louvre, and chal engeschallenges to to
existing parental leave policies.existing parental leave policies.320323 Work from home arrangements reportedly caused some Work from home arrangements reportedly caused some
businesses to consider new approaches to managing their workforces and work methods. These businesses to consider new approaches to managing their workforces and work methods. These
techniques build on, or in some places replace, such standard techniques as self-quarantines and techniques build on, or in some places replace, such standard techniques as self-quarantines and
travel bans. Some firms adopted an open-leave policy to ensure employees receive sick pay if travel bans. Some firms adopted an open-leave policy to ensure employees receive sick pay if
they are, or suspect they are, infected. Other firms adopted paid sick leave policies to encourage they are, or suspect they are, infected. Other firms adopted paid sick leave policies to encourage
sick employees to stay home and adopting remote working policies.sick employees to stay home and adopting remote working policies.321324 Microsoft and Amazon Microsoft and Amazon
initial y instructed al initially instructed all of their Seattle-based employees to work from home until the end of March of their Seattle-based employees to work from home until the end of March
2020, but Microsoft indicated in October it would 2020, but Microsoft indicated in October it would al owallow a large share of its employees to work a large share of its employees to work
from home permanently.from home permanently.322
The drop in business and tourist travel caused a sharp drop in scheduled airline flights by as much
as 10%; airlines estimated they lost $113 bil ion in 2020, an estimate that could prove optimistic
given various restrictions on flights between Europe to the United States and the growing list of
countries that similarly restricted flights.323 Airports in Europe estimated they lost $4.3 bil ion in
revenue in 2020 due to fewer flights.324 The loss of Chinese tourists was another economic blow
to countries in Asia and elsewhere that benefitted from the growing market for Chinese tourists
and the stimulus such tourism provided.
The decline in industrial activity in 2020 reduced demand for energy products such as crude oil
and caused prices to drop sharply, which negatively affected energy producers, renewable energy
producers, and electric vehicle manufacturers, but general y was positive for consumers and
businesses. In March 2020, Saudi Arabia pushed other OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries) members collectively to reduce output by 1.5 mil ion barrels a day to raise
market prices. U.S. shale oil producers, who are not represented by OPEC, supported the move to
raise prices.325 An unwil ingness by Russia to agree to output reductions added to other downward
pressures on oil prices and caused Saudi Arabia to engage in a price war with Russia that drove

319325 320 Davide Barbuscia, Marwa Rashad, and Andrea Shalal, “G20 Countries Agree Debt Freeze for World’s Poorest Countries,” Reuters, April 15, 2020 321 Patrick Bolton, Lee Buchheit, Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, et. al, “Sovereign Debt Standstills: An Update” VoxEU, May 28, 2020. 322 Jevans Nyabiage, “All Eyes on China as Africa Spurns Jevans Nyabiage, “All Eyes on China as Africa Spurns G20 Debt Relief Plan,” G20 Debt Relief Plan,” South China Morning Post, May 26, , May 26,
2020. 2020.
320 T aylor323 Taylor, Adam, , Adam, T eoTeo Armus, Rick Noak, “Covid-19 Armus, Rick Noak, “Covid-19 T urmoilTurmoil Widens as U.S. Widens as U.S. Death T oll Death Toll Mounts; Xi Cancels Japan Mounts; Xi Cancels Japan
T ripTrip,” ,” Washington Post, March 5, 2020; Strauss, Valerie,, March 5, 2020; Strauss, Valerie,1.5 Billion Children Around Globe1.5 Billion Children Around Globe Affected by School Affected by School
Closure.Closure. What Countries Are Doing to Keep KidsWhat Countries Are Doing to Keep Kids Learning During Pandemic,” Learning During Pandemic,” Washington Post, March 27, 2020. , March 27, 2020.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/03/26/nearly-14-billion-children-around-globe-are-out-school-heres-https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/03/26/nearly-14-billion-children-around-globe-are-out-school-heres-
whatwhat -countries-are-doing-keep-kids-learning-during-pandemic/. -countries-are-doing-keep-kids-learning-during-pandemic/.
321 324 Hill, Andrew Hill, Andrew and Emma Jacobs,and Emma Jacobs, “Covid-19 May Create Lasting Workplace Change,” “Covid-19 May Create Lasting Workplace Change,” Financial Times, February 27, , February 27,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5801a710-597c-11ea-abe5-8e03987b7b20. 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/5801a710-597c-11ea-abe5-8e03987b7b20.
322325 Armus, Armus, T eo, “ Teo, “Live Updates: Covid-19 Live Updates: Covid-19 T urmoilTurmoil Widens as U.S. Widens as U.S. Death Death T ollToll Mounts; Xi Cancels Mounts; Xi Cancels Japan Japan T ripTrip,”,”
Washington Post
, March 5, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/05/Covid-19-live-updates/. , March 5, 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/05/Covid-19-live-updates/.
323 T aylor, Adam, “Airlines Could Suffer up to $113 Billion in Lost Revenue Due to Covid-19 Crisis, IAT A Says,”
Washington Post
, March 5, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/05/Covid-19-live-updates/.
324 “Airlines Slash Flights to Cut Costs as Covid-19 Hits T ravel Demand,” Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/
content/c28b5790-62c6-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68.
325 Brower, Derek, “ Cash-Strapped US Shale Producers Pray for OPEC Aid,” Financial Times, March 3, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/9161e62c-5cb1-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4.
Congressional Research Service

106

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

oil prices below $25 per barrel at times, half the estimated $50 per barrel break-even point for
most oil producing countries.326 Rising oil supplies and fal ing demand combined to create an
estimated surplus of 25 mil ion barrels a day and overwhelmed storage capacity at times and
chal enged the viability of U.S. shale oil production.327 In 2019, low energy prices combined with
high debt levels reportedly caused U.S. energy producers to reduce their spending on capital
equipment, reduced their profits and, in some cases, led to bankruptcies.328 Reportedly, in late
2019 and early 2020, bond and equity investors, as wel as banks, reduced their lending to shale
oil producers and other energy producers that typical y use oil and gas reserves as collateral.329 Congressional Research Service 106 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 The drop in business and tourist travel caused a sharp drop in scheduled airline flights by as much as 10%; airlines estimated they lost $113 billion in 2020, an estimate that could prove optimistic given various restrictions on flights between Europe to the United States and the growing list of countries that similarly restricted flights.326 Airports in Europe estimated they lost $4.3 billion in revenue in 2020 due to fewer flights.327 The loss of Chinese tourists was another economic blow to countries in Asia and elsewhere that benefitted from the growing market for Chinese tourists and the stimulus such tourism provided. The decline in industrial activity in 2020 reduced demand for energy products such as crude oil and caused prices to drop sharply, which negatively affected energy producers, renewable energy producers, and electric vehicle manufacturers, but generally was positive for consumers and businesses. In March 2020, Saudi Arabia pushed other OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) members collectively to reduce output by 1.5 million barrels a day to raise market prices. U.S. shale oil producers, who are not represented by OPEC, supported the move to raise prices.328 An unwillingness by Russia to agree to output reductions added to other downward pressures on oil prices and caused Saudi Arabia to engage in a price war with Russia that drove oil prices below $25 per barrel at times, half the estimated $50 per barrel break-even point for most oil producing countries.329 Rising oil supplies and falling demand combined to create an estimated surplus of 25 million barrels a day and overwhelmed storage capacity at times and challenged the viability of U.S. shale oil production.330 In 2019, low energy prices combined with high debt levels reportedly caused U.S. energy producers to reduce their spending on capital equipment, reduced their profits and, in some cases, led to bankruptcies.331 Reportedly, in late 2019 and early 2020, bond and equity investors, as well as banks, reduced their lending to shale oil producers and other energy producers that typically use oil and gas reserves as collateral.332 As As
economic activity began recovering in 2021 and demand for energy increased, energy prices rose economic activity began recovering in 2021 and demand for energy increased, energy prices rose
to surpass the levels reached prior to the onset of the pandemic and put pressure on OPEC to surpass the levels reached prior to the onset of the pandemic and put pressure on OPEC
producers to increase output. producers to increase output.
Disruptions to industrial activity in China reportedly caused delays in shipments of computers, Disruptions to industrial activity in China reportedly caused delays in shipments of computers,
cel cell phones, toys, and medical equipment.phones, toys, and medical equipment.330333 Factory output in China, the United States, Japan, Factory output in China, the United States, Japan,
and South Korea and South Korea al all declined in the first months of 2020.declined in the first months of 2020.331334 Reduced Chinese agricultural exports, 326 Taylor, Adam, “Airlines Could Suffer up to $113 Billion in Lost Revenue Due to Covid-19 Crisis, IATA Says,” Washington Post, March 5, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2020/03/05/Covid-19-live-updates/. 327 “Airlines Slash Flights to Cut Costs as Covid-19 Hits Travel Demand,” Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/c28b5790-62c6-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68. 328 Brower, Derek, “Cash-Strapped US Shale Producers Pray for OPEC Aid,” Financial Times, March 3, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/9161e62c-5cb1-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. 329 Strauss, Delphine, “Why There Are No Winners from the Oil Price Plunge This Time Reduced Chinese agricultural exports,
including to Japan, created shortages in some commodities. In addition, numerous auto producers
faced shortages in parts and other supplies, including semiconductor chips that have been sourced
in China, leading to cal s by some producers for subsidies to restart production in the United
States. Reductions in international trade affected ocean freight prices, causing some freight
companies to face the prospect of shuttering businesses.332 Disruptions in the movements of
goods and people reportedly caused some companies to reassess how international they want their
supply chains to be.333 According to some estimates, nearly every member of the Fortune 1000
was affected by disruptions in production in China.334
Issues for Congress
According to numerous indicators, significant parts of the global economy appear to have
weathered the worst of the economic recession that resulted from the unprecedented pandemic-
related social distancing and business lockdowns in early 2020. However, rolling epidemic
hotspots and the emergence of new and virulent mutations of the COVID-19 virus continue to
add to the overal economic and human costs of the pandemic and add to uncertainties about the

326 Strauss, Delphine, “Why T here Are No Winners from the Oil Price Plunge T his T ime,” ,” Financial Times, March 10, March 10,
2020. https://www.ft.com/content/da2b0700-622c-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5; Mufson, Steve and Will Englund,2020. https://www.ft.com/content/da2b0700-622c-11ea-b3f3-fe4680ea68b5; Mufson, Steve and Will Englund,Oil Oil
Price War Price War T hreatensThreatens Widespread Collateral Damage,” Widespread Collateral Damage,” Washington Post, March 10, 2020. , March 10, 2020.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/oil-price-war-threatens-widespread-collateral-damage/2020/03/https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/oil-price-war-threatens-widespread-collateral-damage/2020/03/
09/3e42c9e2-6207-11ea-acca-80c22bbee96f_story.html. 09/3e42c9e2-6207-11ea-acca-80c22bbee96f_story.html.
327330 Sheppard, David and Derek Brower, “U.S. Crude Sheppard, David and Derek Brower, “U.S. Crude Oil Price Drops BelowOil Price Drops Below $20,” $20,” Financial Times, March 29, 2020. , March 29, 2020.
https://www.ft.com/content/bc938195-82d3-43eb-b031-740028451382. https://www.ft.com/content/bc938195-82d3-43eb-b031-740028451382.
328 “T exas331 “Texas Oil Groups: Oil Groups: Panhandling Ahead,” Panhandling Ahead,” The Financial Times, January 20, 2020. , January 20, 2020.
329332 Ibid. Ibid.
330333 Hille, Kathrin, Alistair Gray, and Patrick McGee, “Covid-19 Delays PC and Smartphone Shipments for Weeks,” Hille, Kathrin, Alistair Gray, and Patrick McGee, “Covid-19 Delays PC and Smartphone Shipments for Weeks,”
Financial Tim esTimes, March3, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/72742872-5c31-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4. March3, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/72742872-5c31-11ea-b0ab-339c2307bcd4.
331334 Newmyer, Newmyer, T ory, “ Tory, “The Finance 202: Stocks Stage Major Comeback, butThe Finance 202: Stocks Stage Major Comeback, but Manufacturing Report Points to Continued Manufacturing Report Points to Continued
Covid-19 Pain,” Covid-19 Pain,” Washington Post, March 3, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-, March 3, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/the-
finance-202/2020/03/03/the-finance-202-stocks-stage-major-comeback-but-manufacturing-reportfinance-202/2020/03/03/the-finance-202-stocks-stage-major-comeback-but-manufacturing-report -points-to-continued-
Covid-19-pain/5e5d84a6602ff10d49ac081f/?itid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-politics%3Ahomepage%2Fcard-ans.
332 Lynch, David J., “ Economic Fallout from China’s Covid-19 Mounts Around the World,” Washington Post,
February 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/economic-fallout -from-chinas-Covid-19-
mounts-across-the-globe/2020/02/13/7bb69a12-4e8c-11ea-9b5c-eac5b16dafaa_story.html?itid=lk_inline_manual_12
333 Ibid.
334 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service

107

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

timing of a sustained recovery. Over the course of the pandemic, governments adopted policies to
curtail the spread of the virus-points-to-continued- Congressional Research Service 107 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 including to Japan, created shortages in some commodities. In addition, numerous auto producers faced shortages in parts and other supplies, including semiconductor chips that have been sourced in China, leading to calls by some producers for subsidies to restart production in the United States. Reductions in international trade affected ocean freight prices, causing some freight companies to face the prospect of shuttering businesses.335 Disruptions in the movements of goods and people reportedly caused some companies to reassess how international they want their supply chains to be.336 According to some estimates, nearly every member of the Fortune 1000 was affected by disruptions in production in China.337 Issues for Congress According to numerous indicators, significant parts of the global economy appear to have weathered the worst of the economic recession that resulted from the unprecedented COVID-19-related social distancing and business lockdowns in early 2020. However, rolling epidemic hotspots and the emergence of new and virulent mutations of the COVID-19 virus continue to add to the overall economic and human costs of the pandemic and to uncertainties about the timing of a sustained recovery. Over the course of the pandemic, governments adopted policies to curtail the virus’s spread that inadvertently caused an economic recession and temporarily that inadvertently caused an economic recession and temporarily
altered the daily patterns of peoples’ lives. After a year and a half, it remains unclear how quickly altered the daily patterns of peoples’ lives. After a year and a half, it remains unclear how quickly
and to what extent people and to what extent people wil choose towill return to their pre-pandemic patterns. return to their pre-pandemic patterns.
For Members of Congress, the pandemic-related economic and social costs could influence public For Members of Congress, the pandemic-related economic and social costs could influence public
policy debates long after the crisis itself has passed. While various policy debates may emerge policy debates long after the crisis itself has passed. While various policy debates may emerge
from seemingly unlikelyfrom seemingly unlikely sources, some areas could include the following. sources, some areas could include the following.
 During the pandemic, segments of the labor force shifted from work on-site to  During the pandemic, segments of the labor force shifted from work on-site to
work at home. After a prolonged period of working off-site, some workers work at home. After a prolonged period of working off-site, some workers
question the need to return to pre-pandemic labor arrangements. Should new question the need to return to pre-pandemic labor arrangements. Should new
labor arrangements and work patterns become embedded in the economy, it labor arrangements and work patterns become embedded in the economy, it
potential ypotentially raises questions about the impact on housing, traffic patterns, raises questions about the impact on housing, traffic patterns,
including public transportation, labor force participation rates, and child care including public transportation, labor force participation rates, and child care
arrangements. What role should Congress play in assessing and addressing such arrangements. What role should Congress play in assessing and addressing such
potential changes to the economy? potential changes to the economy?
 The pandemic exposed weaknesses in supply chains and the production of certain  The pandemic exposed weaknesses in supply chains and the production of certain
types of equipment, including personal protective equipment that previously had types of equipment, including personal protective equipment that previously had
not featured prominently in national security priorities. Arguably, the pandemic not featured prominently in national security priorities. Arguably, the pandemic
raised the profile of public health as a national security issue. It also highlighted raised the profile of public health as a national security issue. It also highlighted
the importance of improving domestic health care-related supply chains and the importance of improving domestic health care-related supply chains and
potential ypotentially relocating parts of the health care supply chain from abroad. This shift relocating parts of the health care supply chain from abroad. This shift
in emphasis presents Congress with questions about the manner and extent to in emphasis presents Congress with questions about the manner and extent to
which government policy should alter existing production and supplier which government policy should alter existing production and supplier
arrangements. In particular, Congress could consider the costs and benefits of arrangements. In particular, Congress could consider the costs and benefits of
adopting policies that attempt to adopting policies that attempt to real ocatereallocate resources within the economy toward resources within the economy toward
developing domestic production of goods currently being imported, developing domestic production of goods currently being imported, potential y at
possibly at Covid-19-pain/5e5d84a6602ff10d49ac081f/?itid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-politics%3Ahomepage%2Fcard-ans. 335 Lynch, David J., “Economic Fallout from China’s Covid-19 Mounts Around the World,” Washington Post, February 13, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/economic-fallout-from-chinas-Covid-19-mounts-across-the-globe/2020/02/13/7bb69a12-4e8c-11ea-9b5c-eac5b16dafaa_story.html?itid=lk_inline_manual_12 336 Ibid. 337 Ibid. Congressional Research Service 108 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19 the expense of other domestic economic activities. Alternatively, Congress could the expense of other domestic economic activities. Alternatively, Congress could
reinforce U.S. support for global trade arrangements and agreements, while also reinforce U.S. support for global trade arrangements and agreements, while also
supporting the global presence of U.S. firms and supporting the global presence of U.S. firms and utilizingencouraging U.S. firms to utilize a greater diversity of a greater diversity of
foreign suppliers.foreign suppliers.
 The pandemic emphasized the interconnected nature of the global economy.  The pandemic emphasized the interconnected nature of the global economy.
Typical yTypically, these global connections facilitate a seamless flow of goods and , these global connections facilitate a seamless flow of goods and
services to the broadest number of people. However, during the pandemic-related services to the broadest number of people. However, during the pandemic-related
recession, these global supply channels were disrupted, exposing recession, these global supply channels were disrupted, exposing the
vulnerabilities of such highly segmented cross-border activitiestheir vulnerabilities. In turn, these . In turn, these
disruptions raised questions concerning the role and importance of certain disruptions raised questions concerning the role and importance of certain
industrial activities amid shifting concepts of national security and the extent to industrial activities amid shifting concepts of national security and the extent to
which domestic economic policy should attempt to sustain or subsidize certain which domestic economic policy should attempt to sustain or subsidize certain
industrial activities. Congress could consider whether and to what extent it industrial activities. Congress could consider whether and to what extent it
should engage in a direct role in should engage in a direct role in real ocatingreallocating resources in resources in the economy. the economy toward
certain activities viewed as important to national security, or whether it should
view this primarily as a market function?
 The pandemic had a disproportionate impact on various industrial sectors of the  The pandemic had a disproportionate impact on various industrial sectors of the
economy and on workers in those sectors. economy and on workers in those sectors. In particular, the disproportionate
effectsThese included certain segments of the labor force, including women, minority included certain segments of the labor force, including women, minority
populations, and workers in less populations, and workers in less skil ed skilled jobs. The depth and duration of the jobs. The depth and duration of the
recession recession chal engedchallenged the effectiveness of customary worker assistance programs. the effectiveness of customary worker assistance programs.
Congress may consider reviewing these programs to determine what if any Congress may consider reviewing these programs to determine what if any
Congressional Research Service

108

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

changes may be necessary to align the programs more closely with the needs of changes may be necessary to align the programs more closely with the needs of
workers experiencing similar periods of extended dislocationsworkers experiencing similar periods of extended dislocations?.
 Global trade activity  Global trade activity fel fell sharply as a result of the global economic recession, sharply as a result of the global economic recession,
which added to the depth and extent of the economic disruption. The impact on which added to the depth and extent of the economic disruption. The impact on
global trade raised questions concerning what actions, if any, Congress could global trade raised questions concerning what actions, if any, Congress could
take through U.S. trade policy that might strengthen the role of international trade take through U.S. trade policy that might strengthen the role of international trade
and consultative bodies such as the WTO, the IMF, and the OECD, in facilitating and consultative bodies such as the WTO, the IMF, and the OECD, in facilitating
a return to pre-crisis levels of activity during similara return to pre-crisis levels of activity during similar international crises. international crises.
 The economic recession placed increased demands on developed and developing  The economic recession placed increased demands on developed and developing
economies to abandon traditional deficit spending guidelines to stimulate their economies to abandon traditional deficit spending guidelines to stimulate their
economies. While the fiscal spending likelyeconomies. While the fiscal spending likely lessened the impact of the crisis, it lessened the impact of the crisis, it
sharply increased the debt burden of developing countries, in particular, that sharply increased the debt burden of developing countries, in particular, that
could could wel well outlast the health-related crisis. This debt burden could constrain the outlast the health-related crisis. This debt burden could constrain the
ability ability of developing economies to provide additional fiscal stimulus should the of developing economies to provide additional fiscal stimulus should the
health crisis persist, which could delay a global economic recovery with health crisis persist, which could delay a global economic recovery with spil overspillover
effects on developed economies. Developing economies could face effects on developed economies. Developing economies could face additional
chal enges ifrising costs costs rise for refinancing their accumulated debts for refinancing their accumulated debts shouldif developed developed
economies begin tapering off low-interest rate monetary policies. Congress could economies begin tapering off low-interest rate monetary policies. Congress could
consider examining the performance and the adequacy of resources of consider examining the performance and the adequacy of resources of
international financial institutions in addressing the financial and debt servicing international financial institutions in addressing the financial and debt servicing
needs of developing economies. needs of developing economies.
 During the initial  During the initial stages of the economic crisis, global financial markets were stages of the economic crisis, global financial markets were
severely disrupted severely disrupted in ways that required, requiring central banks to take unprecedented central banks to take unprecedented
actions. Following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, central banks and other actions. Following the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, central banks and other
financial market participants adopted wide-ranging reforms to strengthen the financial market participants adopted wide-ranging reforms to strengthen the
ability of ability of financial institutions to withstand an economic crisis. The pandemic-financial institutions to withstand an economic crisis. The pandemic-
related global economic crisis presents Congress with an opportunity to assess related global economic crisis presents Congress with an opportunity to assess
the effectiveness of these reforms and to determine if they were adequate in the effectiveness of these reforms and to determine if they were adequate in
preparing financialpreparing financial market participants to withstand a sever disruption to the market participants to withstand a sever disruption to the
global economy or whether additional reforms are necessary. global economy or whether additional reforms are necessary.
Congressional Research Service 109 Global Economic Effects of COVID-19

Author Information

James K. Jackson, Coordinator James K. Jackson, Coordinator
Rebecca M. Nelson Rebecca M. Nelson
Specialist in International Trade and Finance Specialist in International Trade and Finance
Specialist in International Trade and Finance Specialist in International Trade and Finance


Martin A. Weiss Martin A. Weiss
Karen M. Sutter Karen M. Sutter
Specialist in International Trade and Finance Specialist in International Trade and Finance
Specialist in Asian Trade and Finance Specialist in Asian Trade and Finance


Andres B. Schwarzenberg Andres B. Schwarzenberg
Michael D. Sutherland Michael D. Sutherland
Analyst in International Trade and Finance Analyst in International Trade and Finance
Analyst in International Trade and Finance Analyst in International Trade and Finance


Congressional Research Service

109

Global Economic Effects of COVID-19


Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank and acknowledge the expert assistance provided by Amber Wilhelm, The authors would like to thank and acknowledge the expert assistance provided by Amber Wilhelm,
Visual Information Specialist, CRS, in the preparation of this report.Visual Information Specialist, CRS, in the preparation of this report.

Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should n otnot be relied upon for purposes other be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

Congressional Research Service Congressional Research Service
R46270 R46270 · VERSION 7981 · UPDATED
110 110