Nuclear Energy:
May 6October 20, 2021 , 2021
Overview of Congressional Issues
Mark Holt
The policy debate over the role of nuclear power in the nation’s energy mix is rooted in the
The policy debate over the role of nuclear power in the nation’s energy mix is rooted in the
Specialist in Energy Policy
Specialist in Energy Policy
technology’s fundamental characteristics. Nuclear reactors can produce potentially vast amounts
technology’s fundamental characteristics. Nuclear reactors can produce potentially vast amounts
of useful energy with relatively low consumption of natural resources and emissions of
of useful energy with relatively low consumption of natural resources and emissions of
greenhouse gases and other pollutants. However, facilities that produce nuclear fuel for civilian greenhouse gases and other pollutants. However, facilities that produce nuclear fuel for civilian
power reactors can also produce materials for nuclear weapons. In addition, the process of
power reactors can also produce materials for nuclear weapons. In addition, the process of
nuclear fission (splitting of atomic nuclei) to generate power produces radioactive material that can remain hazardous for nuclear fission (splitting of atomic nuclei) to generate power produces radioactive material that can remain hazardous for
thousands of years and must be contained. How to manage the weapons proliferation and safety risks of nuclear power, or thousands of years and must be contained. How to manage the weapons proliferation and safety risks of nuclear power, or
whether the benefits of nuclear power are worth those risks, are issues that have long been debated in Congress. whether the benefits of nuclear power are worth those risks, are issues that have long been debated in Congress.
The 93 licensed nuclear power reactors at 55 sites in the United States generate about 20% of the nation’s electricity. Two
The 93 licensed nuclear power reactors at 55 sites in the United States generate about 20% of the nation’s electricity. Two
new reactors are currently under construction. About a dozen more are planned, but with no specific construction dates. new reactors are currently under construction. About a dozen more are planned, but with no specific construction dates.
Whether they will eventually move forward will depend largely on their economic competitiveness with natural gas and Whether they will eventually move forward will depend largely on their economic competitiveness with natural gas and
renewable energy sources. Similar economic forces are affecting existing reactors. Twelve U.S. reactors were permanently renewable energy sources. Similar economic forces are affecting existing reactors. Twelve U.S. reactors were permanently
closed from 2013 through April 2021, and closed from 2013 through April 2021, and
seventhree more are planned for closure through the mid-2020s more are planned for closure through the mid-2020s
. However, several states have taken action to prevent planned reactor shutdowns, and several proposals to support existing reactors are pending in the 117th Congress as well. .
The Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies for decades have conducted research on “advanced” reactor
The Department of Energy (DOE) and its predecessor agencies for decades have conducted research on “advanced” reactor
technologies, such as fast neutron reactors, that would differ significantly from existing commercial nuclear plants and technologies, such as fast neutron reactors, that would differ significantly from existing commercial nuclear plants and
potentially be far smaller. Proponents of advanced reactors contend that they would be safer, more efficient, and less potentially be far smaller. Proponents of advanced reactors contend that they would be safer, more efficient, and less
expensive to build and operate than today’s conventional light water reactorsexpensive to build and operate than today’s conventional light water reactors
(LWRs). DOE is providing support for several . DOE is providing support for several
proposed advanced reactor demonstrationsproposed advanced reactor demonstrations
, which could indicate whether the anticipated benefits can be realized . .
Highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel that is regularly removed from nuclear reactors is currently stored
Highly radioactive spent nuclear fuel that is regularly removed from nuclear reactors is currently stored
primarily at power plant sites. at power plant sites.
Development of a permanent underground repository at Yucca Mountain, NV, was suspended by the Obama Administration. Development of a permanent underground repository at Yucca Mountain, NV, was suspended by the Obama Administration.
The Trump Administration requested funding for FY2018, FY2019,The Trump Administration requested funding for FY2018, FY2019,
and FY2020 to revive the program, but it was not and FY2020 to revive the program, but it was not
approved by Congress. No Yucca Mountain program funding was requested or provided for FY2021approved by Congress. No Yucca Mountain program funding was requested or provided for FY2021
, and the Biden Administration did not request any for FY2022. .
The Obama Administration had appointed the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future to recommend an
The Obama Administration had appointed the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future to recommend an
alternative approach to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act’s focus on Yucca Mountain for permanent high-level waste disposal. In alternative approach to the Nuclear Waste Policy Act’s focus on Yucca Mountain for permanent high-level waste disposal. In
response to the commission’s recommendations, DOE issued a waste strategy in January 2013 that called for the selection of response to the commission’s recommendations, DOE issued a waste strategy in January 2013 that called for the selection of
new candidate sites for nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities through a “consent-based” process. However, Congress new candidate sites for nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities through a “consent-based” process. However, Congress
has not enacted legislation for such a strategy, so Yucca Mountain remains the sole authorized candidate site, despite its has not enacted legislation for such a strategy, so Yucca Mountain remains the sole authorized candidate site, despite its
lackla ck of funding. of funding.
The March 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan increased attention to nuclear safety
The March 2011 disaster at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Japan increased attention to nuclear safety
throughout the world. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which issues and enforces nuclear safety requirements, throughout the world. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which issues and enforces nuclear safety requirements,
established a task force to identify lessons from Fukushima applicable to U.S. reactors. The task force’s report led to NRC’s established a task force to identify lessons from Fukushima applicable to U.S. reactors. The task force’s report led to NRC’s
first Fukushima-related regulatory requirements on March 12, 2012. Several other countries, such as Germany and Japan, first Fukushima-related regulatory requirements on March 12, 2012. Several other countries, such as Germany and Japan,
eliminated or reduced their planned future reliance on nuclear power after the accident. eliminated or reduced their planned future reliance on nuclear power after the accident.
The level of security that must be provided at nuclear power plants has been a high
The level of security that must be provided at nuclear power plants has been a high
-profile issue since the 9/11 terrorist -profile issue since the 9/11 terrorist
attacks on the United States in 2001. Since those attacks, NRC issued a series of orders and regulations that substantially attacks on the United States in 2001. Since those attacks, NRC issued a series of orders and regulations that substantially
increased nuclear plant security requirements, although industry critics contend that those measures are still insufficient. increased nuclear plant security requirements, although industry critics contend that those measures are still insufficient.
Encouraging exports of U.S. civilian nuclear products, services, and technology while making sure they
Encouraging exports of U.S. civilian nuclear products, services, and technology while making sure they
area re not used for not used for
foreign nuclear weapons programs has long been a fundamental goal of U.S. nuclear energy policy. Recent proposals to build foreign nuclear weapons programs has long been a fundamental goal of U.S. nuclear energy policy. Recent proposals to build
nuclear power plants in several countries in the less developed world, including the Middle East, have prompted concerns nuclear power plants in several countries in the less developed world, including the Middle East, have prompted concerns
that international controls may prove inadequate. that international controls may prove inadequate.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page
link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page 8 link to page
910 link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page link to page 10 link to page 11 link to page
1112 link to page 12 link to page 14 link to page link to page 12 link to page 14 link to page
1516 link to page link to page
1618 link to page link to page
1618 link to page link to page
1718 link to page link to page
1719 link to page link to page
1820 link to page link to page
1924 link to page link to page
2026 link to page link to page
2226 link to page link to page
2227 link to page link to page
2328 link to page link to page
2429 link to page link to page
2529 link to page link to page
2530 link to page link to page
2630 link to page link to page
2630 link to page link to page
2631 link to page link to page
2731 link to page link to page
2731 link to page link to page
2732 link to page link to page
2832 link to page link to page
2834 link to page link to page
3035 link to page link to page
3136 link to page link to page
3136 link to page link to page
3213 link to page link to page
1321 link to page link to page
3237 Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Contents
Synthesis of Key Issues ................................................................................................................... 1
Basic Facts and Statistics.............. 1 Basic Facts and Statistics................................................................................................... 2
Major Nuclear Energy Issues .......................................................................................................... 4
Radioactive Waste ..................................................................................................................... 4
Recent Events ..................................................................................................................... 4
Recent Congressional Action—117th Congress .................................................................. 5
116th Congress ........... 6
116th Congress .......................................................................................................... 6
CRS Reports ....................................................................................................................... 7
Additional References ......................................................................................................... 7 8
Nuclear Plant Economic Viability ............................................................................................. 8
Recent Events ................................................................................................................... 10
10
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress ............................................................... 11 12
116th Congress ................................................................................................................... 12 14
CRS Reports ..................................................................................................................... 12
Additional References ........... 14 Additional References ............................................................................................ 13 14
Advanced Nuclear Technology ............................................................................................... 13 15
Recent Events ................................................................................................................... 14
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress .............................................................. 15 16
116th Congress ................................................................................................................... 16
CRS Reports ......... 20 CRS Reports............................................................................................................ 18
Additional References ...... 22 Additional References ................................................................................................. 18 22
Safety ...................................................................................................................................... 19
Recent Events ............ 23
Recent Events ....................................................................................................... 20
24
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress .............................................................. 21 25
116th Congress ................................................................................................................... 21
CRS Reports ..... 25 CRS Reports................................................................................................................ 22 26
Additional References ....................................................................................................... 22 26
Security and Emergency Response ......................................................................................... 22 26
Recent Events ................................................................................................................... 23
CRS Reports .......... 27 CRS Reports........................................................................................................... 23
Additional References ....... 27 Additional References ................................................................................................ 23 27
Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation ......................................................................................... 24 28
Recent Events ................................................................................................................... 24
28
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress .............................................................. 26 30
116th Congress .................................................................................................... 31 CRS Reports............... 27
CRS Reports ....................................................................................... 32 Other References.............................. 27
Other References ........................................................................... 32
Tables Table 1. Recent and Announced U.S. Commercial Reactor Shutdowns .................................... 28
Tables9
Table 1. Recent and Announced U.S. Commercial Reactor Shutdowns 2. Planned Advanced Reactor Demonstration Plants................................................... 9
17
Contacts
Author Information ........................................................................................................................ 28 33
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Synthesis of Key Issues
The long-running policy debate over the future of nuclear energy is rooted in the technology’s The long-running policy debate over the future of nuclear energy is rooted in the technology’s
inherent characteristics. inherent characteristics.
InitiallyInitial y developed for its unprecedented destructive power during World developed for its unprecedented destructive power during World
War II, nuclear energy seemed to hold equal promise after the war as a way of providing limitless War II, nuclear energy seemed to hold equal promise after the war as a way of providing limitless
energy to energy to
all al humanity. International diplomacy has focused ever since on finding institutional humanity. International diplomacy has focused ever since on finding institutional
mechanisms for spreading the perceived benefits of nuclear energy throughout the world while mechanisms for spreading the perceived benefits of nuclear energy throughout the world while
preventing the technology from being used for the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Much of this preventing the technology from being used for the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Much of this
international effort is focused on key nuclear fuel cycle facilities—plants for enriching uranium in international effort is focused on key nuclear fuel cycle facilities—plants for enriching uranium in
the fissile isotope U-235 and for separating plutonium from irradiated nuclear fuel. Such plants the fissile isotope U-235 and for separating plutonium from irradiated nuclear fuel. Such plants
can be used to produce civilian nuclear reactor fuel as can be used to produce civilian nuclear reactor fuel as
well wel as fissile material for nuclear as fissile material for nuclear
warheads.warheads.
Yet even the use of nuclear power solely for peaceful energy production has proven
Yet even the use of nuclear power solely for peaceful energy production has proven
intrinsicallyintrinsical y controversial. The harnessing of nuclear fission in a reactor creates highly radioactive materials controversial. The harnessing of nuclear fission in a reactor creates highly radioactive materials
that must be kept from overheating and escaping from the reactor building, as occurred during the that must be kept from overheating and escaping from the reactor building, as occurred during the
accidents at Fukushima, Chernobyl, and, to a lesser extent, Three Mile Island. Spent nuclear fuel accidents at Fukushima, Chernobyl, and, to a lesser extent, Three Mile Island. Spent nuclear fuel
that is regularly removed from reactors during refueling must be isolated from the environment that is regularly removed from reactors during refueling must be isolated from the environment
for up to 1 for up to 1
million mil ion years. Proposed commercial technologies to reduce long-lived nuclear waste years. Proposed commercial technologies to reduce long-lived nuclear waste
through recycling through recycling
usuallyusual y involve separating plutonium that possibly could be used for nuclear involve separating plutonium that possibly could be used for nuclear
weapons, although technologies designed to reduce proliferation risks are also the subject of weapons, although technologies designed to reduce proliferation risks are also the subject of
worldwide research and development efforts. worldwide research and development efforts.
All Al nuclear energy technologies, even with nuclear energy technologies, even with
recycling, would recycling, would
still stil leave substantial amounts of radioactive waste to be stored and disposed of. leave substantial amounts of radioactive waste to be stored and disposed of.
Central storage and disposal sites for nuclear waste have proven difficult to develop throughout Central storage and disposal sites for nuclear waste have proven difficult to develop throughout
the world, as the world, as
illustratedil ustrated by the long-running controversy over the proposed U.S. waste repository by the long-running controversy over the proposed U.S. waste repository
at Yucca Mountain, NV. at Yucca Mountain, NV.
The March 2011 disaster at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, which forced the
The March 2011 disaster at Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, which forced the
evacuation of areas as far as 30 miles away, has slowed nuclear power expansion plans around the evacuation of areas as far as 30 miles away, has slowed nuclear power expansion plans around the
world, particularly in Japan and Western Europe. However, dozens of new reactors are world, particularly in Japan and Western Europe. However, dozens of new reactors are
still stil being being
planned and built in China, India, Russia, and elsewhere.1 In these areas, nuclear power’s initial planned and built in China, India, Russia, and elsewhere.1 In these areas, nuclear power’s initial
promise of generating large amounts of electricity without the need for often-imported fossil promise of generating large amounts of electricity without the need for often-imported fossil
fuels, along with the more recent desire to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, remains a fuels, along with the more recent desire to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, remains a
compelling
compel ing motivation. motivation.
With 93 licensed reactors, the United States has the largest nuclear power industry in the world.
With 93 licensed reactors, the United States has the largest nuclear power industry in the world.
But U.S. nuclear power growth has been largely stagnant for the past two decades, as natural gas But U.S. nuclear power growth has been largely stagnant for the past two decades, as natural gas
and renewable energy have captured most of the market for new electric generating capacity and and renewable energy have captured most of the market for new electric generating capacity and
improvements in energy efficiency have slowed electricity demand growth.2 Congress enacted improvements in energy efficiency have slowed electricity demand growth.2 Congress enacted
incentives for new nuclear plants in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58), including incentives for new nuclear plants in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58), including
production tax credits, loan guarantees, and insurance against regulatory delays. Those incentives, production tax credits, loan guarantees, and insurance against regulatory delays. Those incentives,
combined with rising natural gas prices and concerns about federal restrictions on carbon dioxide combined with rising natural gas prices and concerns about federal restrictions on carbon dioxide
emissions, prompted announcements by late 2009 of up to 30 new nuclear power reactors in the emissions, prompted announcements by late 2009 of up to 30 new nuclear power reactors in the
United States.3 However, subsequent declines in natural gas prices and uncertainty about carbon United States.3 However, subsequent declines in natural gas prices and uncertainty about carbon
1 World Nuclear1 World Nuclear
Association, “World Nuclear Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements,” Association, “World Nuclear Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements,”
MarchSeptember 2021, 2021,
http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/facts-and-figures/world-nuclear-power-reactors-and-uranium-http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/facts-and-figures/world-nuclear-power-reactors-and-uranium-
requireme.aspx. requireme.aspx.
2 Energy Information Administration, “
2 Energy Information Administration, “
New Electric Generating Capacity in 2020 Will Come Primarily from Wind and Solar,” January 14, 2020EIA Projects Renewables Share of U.S. Electricity Generation Mix Will Double by 2050,” February 8, 2021, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=
42495.
46676. 3 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Expected New Nuclear3 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Expected New Nuclear
Power Plant Applications,” updated March 28, 2008, Power Plant Applications,” updated March 28, 2008,
https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/nukerelapse/industry/expectednewrxapplications32808.pdf. https://www.nirs.org/wp-content/uploads/nukerelapse/industry/expectednewrxapplications32808.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
1
1
link to page 13
link to page 13
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
dioxide controls have put most of those projects on hold. Currently, two new reactors in Georgia
dioxide controls have put most of those projects on hold. Currently, two new reactors in Georgia
are under construction. Two identical reactors under construction in South Carolina were canceled are under construction. Two identical reactors under construction in South Carolina were canceled
July 31, 2017July 31, 2017
. The Georgia and South Carolina projects both experienced large cost overruns and schedule delays. An older reactor, Watts Bar 2 in Tennessee, received an NRC operating license on . An older reactor, Watts Bar 2 in Tennessee, received an NRC operating license on
October 22, 2015, after construction had been suspended for two decades and then completed. October 22, 2015, after construction had been suspended for two decades and then completed.
A A variety of incentives to renew the growth of nuclear power have been proposed. variety of incentives to renew the growth of nuclear power have been proposed.
Existing U.S. nuclear power plants are
Existing U.S. nuclear power plants are
facingcontinuing to face difficult competition from natural gas and difficult competition from natural gas and
renewable energy. Twelve U.S. reactors were permanently closed from 2013 through April renewable energy. Twelve U.S. reactors were permanently closed from 2013 through April
2021. 2021.
Three of those units closed because of the need for expensive repairs, three were retired under Three of those units closed because of the need for expensive repairs, three were retired under
agreements with state utility regulators, and six could not compete in their regional wholesale agreements with state utility regulators, and six could not compete in their regional wholesale
electricity markets. The most recent shutdowns were New Jersey’s Oyster Creek plant in electricity markets. The most recent shutdowns were New Jersey’s Oyster Creek plant in
September 2018,4 Pilgrim (MA) in May 2019, Three Mile Island (PA) in October 2019,September 2018,4 Pilgrim (MA) in May 2019, Three Mile Island (PA) in October 2019,
Indian Indian
Point 2 (NY) in April 2020, Duane Arnold (IA) in August 2020, and Indian Point 3 in AprilPoint 2 (NY) in April 2020, Duane Arnold (IA) in August 2020, and Indian Point 3 in April
2021. 2021.
All Al 12 units had substantial time remaining on their initial12 units had substantial time remaining on their initial
40-year operating licenses or had 40-year operating licenses or had
received or planned to apply for 20-year license extensions from the Nuclear Regulatory received or planned to apply for 20-year license extensions from the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC). Commission (NRC).
The owners of seven additional reactors have announced that they will permanently shut down by Three additional reactors are currently scheduled for permanent closure by the mid-the mid-
2020s (Table 1). The actual and planned shutdowns have . The actual and planned shutdowns have
prompted widespread discussion about the future of other aging U.S. reactors and proposals for prompted widespread discussion about the future of other aging U.S. reactors and proposals for
federal assistance. Action taken by states has federal assistance. Action taken by states has
forestalledforestal ed the announced shutdowns of the announced shutdowns of
1620 other other
U.S. reactors during U.S. reactors during
the past five years, and additional subsidies are currently under consideration in the 117th
Congressthe past five years. .
The extent to which the growth of nuclear power should be encouraged in the United States and
The extent to which the growth of nuclear power should be encouraged in the United States and
around the world around the world
will wil continue to be a major component of the U.S. energy policy debate. continue to be a major component of the U.S. energy policy debate.
Questions for Congress Questions for Congress
will wil include the implementation of policies to encourage or discourage include the implementation of policies to encourage or discourage
nuclear power, post-Fukushima safety standards, development of new nuclear power and fuel nuclear power, post-Fukushima safety standards, development of new nuclear power and fuel
cycle technologies, and nuclear waste management strategies. cycle technologies, and nuclear waste management strategies.
Basic Facts and Statistics
The 93 licensed nuclear power reactors at 55 sites in the United States generate about 20% of the The 93 licensed nuclear power reactors at 55 sites in the United States generate about 20% of the
nation’s electricity. The oldest of today’s operating reactors were licensed in 1969, and the most nation’s electricity. The oldest of today’s operating reactors were licensed in 1969, and the most
recently licensed was Watts Bar 2 in 2015. The most recent to start up before Watts Bar 2 was its recently licensed was Watts Bar 2 in 2015. The most recent to start up before Watts Bar 2 was its
twin unit, Watts Bar 1, in 1996.5 Alltwin unit, Watts Bar 1, in 1996.5 All
U.S. reactors were U.S. reactors were
initiallyinitial y licensed to operate for 40 years, licensed to operate for 40 years,
but nearly but nearly
all al of them have received or applied for 20-year license renewals by NRC.6 NRC of them have received or applied for 20-year license renewals by NRC.6 NRC
issued its first “subsequent license renewals,” which issued its first “subsequent license renewals,” which
allowal ow operation for up to 80 years, to the operation for up to 80 years, to the
Turkey Point 1 and 2 reactors in Florida in December 2019. Four more renewals to 80 years, for Turkey Point 1 and 2 reactors in Florida in December 2019. Four more renewals to 80 years, for
Peach Bottom 2 and 3 in Pennsylvania and Surry 1 and 2 in Virginia, were issued in March 2020 Peach Bottom 2 and 3 in Pennsylvania and Surry 1 and 2 in Virginia, were issued in March 2020
and May 2021. Subsequent license renewal applications for another and May 2021. Subsequent license renewal applications for another
fourseven reactors are currently
4 T he reactors are currently under review, and four more have been announced.7 Under the current mixture of 40- and 60- and
4 The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection issued an administrative consent order on December 9, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection issued an administrative consent order on December 9,
2010, allowing Oyster Creek to continue running without a cooling tower in return for an agreement by the plant’s 2010, allowing Oyster Creek to continue running without a cooling tower in return for an agreement by the plant’s
owner, Exelon, to retire the plant by the end of 2019, 10 years before the owner, Exelon, to retire the plant by the end of 2019, 10 years before the
expirationex piration of its NRC operating license. See of its NRC operating license. See
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1109357/000119312510277630/dex991.htm. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1109357/000119312510277630/dex991.htm.
5 Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
5 Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Information Digest, 2020-2021, NUREG-1350, vol. 32, Appendix A, , NUREG-1350, vol. 32, Appendix A,
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1350/index.html. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1350/index.html.
6 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “
6 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “
Status of Initial License RenewalStatus of Initial License Renewal
Applications and Industry Initiatives,” October Applications and Industry Initiatives,” October
9, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html. 9, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications.html.
7 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Status of Subsequent License Renewal Applications,” March 24, 2021, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/subsequent-license-renewal.html; and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “NRC Issues Subsequent Renewed Licenses for Surry Reactors,” May 4, 2021, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2021/21-019.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
2
Nuclear Congressional Research Service
2
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
under review, and two more applications are being reviewed for acceptance.7 Under the current mixture of 40- and 60- and 80-year licenses, al 80-year licenses, all of today’s operating reactors would shut down by 2055. If newer reactors of today’s operating reactors would shut down by 2055. If newer reactors
such as Watts Bar 1 and 2 such as Watts Bar 1 and 2
eventuallyeventual y were to receive license renewals to 80 years, the shutdown were to receive license renewals to 80 years, the shutdown
date for the existing fleet could be pushed back by two decades or more. However, as noted date for the existing fleet could be pushed back by two decades or more. However, as noted
above, many U.S. reactors have been retired before their license expirations, above, many U.S. reactors have been retired before their license expirations,
with with
seventhree more more
currently scheduled to do so. currently scheduled to do so.
Whether new reactors
Whether new reactors
will wil be constructed to replace the existing fleet or even to expand nuclear be constructed to replace the existing fleet or even to expand nuclear
power’s market share power’s market share
will wil depend largely on costs. The cost of building and operating a new depend largely on costs. The cost of building and operating a new
nuclear power plant in the United States is nuclear power plant in the United States is
generallygeneral y estimated to be significantly higher than estimated to be significantly higher than
natural gas combined-cycle plants (which use both combustion and steam turbines to generate natural gas combined-cycle plants (which use both combustion and steam turbines to generate
electricity) and above wind and solar as electricity) and above wind and solar as
wellwel . For example, the Energy Information . For example, the Energy Information
Administration (EIA) estimates that, for plants coming on line in 2026, the average cost of Administration (EIA) estimates that, for plants coming on line in 2026, the average cost of
electricity generation from a nuclear power plant would be 6.3 cents per kilowatt-hour (kwh), electricity generation from a nuclear power plant would be 6.3 cents per kilowatt-hour (kwh),
including tax credits, while advanced combined-cycle gas-fired generation would cost 3.7 including tax credits, while advanced combined-cycle gas-fired generation would cost 3.7
cents/kwh and an ultracritical coal plant would cost 7.3 cents/kwh. EIA estimates that electricity cents/kwh and an ultracritical coal plant would cost 7.3 cents/kwh. EIA estimates that electricity
from onshore wind would cost 3.7 cents/kwh, solar photovoltaics 3.0 cents/kwh, and geothermal from onshore wind would cost 3.7 cents/kwh, solar photovoltaics 3.0 cents/kwh, and geothermal
3.4 cents/kwh.8 Such estimates depend on a wide range of variables, such as future fuel costs, 3.4 cents/kwh.8 Such estimates depend on a wide range of variables, such as future fuel costs,
regional solar and wind availability,regional solar and wind availability,
current and future tax incentives, and environmental current and future tax incentives, and environmental
regulationsregulations
and mandates. The specific attributes of each generating technology, such as the . The specific attributes of each generating technology, such as the
intermittent nature intermittent nature
of solar and wind, are also important considerations in power plant of solar and wind, are also important considerations in power plant
construction decisions. construction decisions.
The two new U.S. reactors under construction at the Vogtle nuclear plant site in Georgia, after
The two new U.S. reactors under construction at the Vogtle nuclear plant site in Georgia, after
considerable construction delays and cost overruns, are now scheduled to begin operating in considerable construction delays and cost overruns, are now scheduled to begin operating in
November 2021 and November 2022the second quarter of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023.9 As noted above, construction of two new units in South .9 As noted above, construction of two new units in South
Carolina has been terminated. Licenses to build and operate 10 additionalCarolina has been terminated. Licenses to build and operate 10 additional
reactors have been reactors have been
issued by NRC. However, applications for 14 other new reactors have been withdrawn or issued by NRC. However, applications for 14 other new reactors have been withdrawn or
suspended. An application for a license to build a 1.5 megawatt microreactor at Idaho National suspended. An application for a license to build a 1.5 megawatt microreactor at Idaho National
Laboratory was submitted to NRC on March 11, 2020.10 Aside from the 2 new Vogtle units, the Laboratory was submitted to NRC on March 11, 2020.10 Aside from the 2 new Vogtle units, the
10 other planned reactors with issued licenses do not have specific schedules for moving toward 10 other planned reactors with issued licenses do not have specific schedules for moving toward
construction. construction.
Throughout the world,
Throughout the world,
443444 reactors are currently in service or operable, and reactors are currently in service or operable, and
5456 more are under more are under
construction. France is the most heavily nuclear-reliant country in the world, with 56 reactors construction. France is the most heavily nuclear-reliant country in the world, with 56 reactors
generating 71% of the country’s electricity in generating 71% of the country’s electricity in
20192020. Thirty-. Thirty-
onethree countries in countries in
20192020 (including (including
Taiwan) generated at least some of their electricity from nuclear power.11 Taiwan) generated at least some of their electricity from nuclear power.11
After the Fukushima accident, Germany, which had previously generated about 30% of its electricity with nuclear power, closed 8 of the country’s 17 power reactors and decided to shut the remainder by 2022. Japan, which had also generated about 30% of its electricity with nuclear
7 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “ Status of Subsequent License Renewal Applications,” August 13, 2021, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/subsequent -license-renewal.html; and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “ NRC Issues Subsequent Renewed Licenses for Surry Reactors,” May 4, 2021, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2021/21-019.pdf.
8 Energy Information Administration, “Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided8 Energy Information Administration, “Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided
Cost of NewCost of New
Generation ResourcesGeneration Resources
in in
the Annual Energy Outlook 2021,” the Annual Energy Outlook 2021,”
TableT able 1b, February 2021, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/ 1b, February 2021, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/
electricity_generation.pdf. Levelized costs include capital costs averaged over the life of the plant, plus fuel and electricity_generation.pdf. Levelized costs include capital costs averaged over the life of the plant, plus fuel and
maintenance costs and tax credits, in 2020 dollars. maintenance costs and tax credits, in 2020 dollars.
9 Georgia9 Georgia
Power Company, “Georgia PowerPower Company, “Georgia Power
’s New Vogtle Units Approximately 79% Complete,” August 30, 2019, Announces Revised Schedule, Cost Forecast for Vogtle Units 3 & 4,” July 29, 2021, https://www.georgiapower.com/company/news-center/https://www.georgiapower.com/company/news-center/
2019-articles/georgia-power-new-vogtle-units-approximately-79-percent-complete2021-articles/cost-forecast -for-vogtle.html. .html.
10 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “
10 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “
Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” May 6, 2020, Combined License Applications for New Reactors,” May 6, 2020,
https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col.html. https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col.html.
11 World Nuclear11 World Nuclear
Association, “Nuclear Share Figures,Association, “Nuclear Share Figures,
2009-2019,” 2010-2020,” June 2021, http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/ http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/
facts-and-figures/nuclear-generation-by-country.aspx; World Nuclear Association, “facts-and-figures/nuclear-generation-by-country.aspx; World Nuclear Association, “
World Nuclear World Nuclear Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements,” op. cit.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
3
3
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
After the Fukushima accident, Germany, which had previously generated about 30% of its electricity with nuclear power, closed 8 of the country’s 17 power reactors and decided to shut the remainder by 2022. Japan, which had also generated about 30% of its electricity with nuclear power and had planned to raise that level to 50%, now is planning for about 20% by 2030. power and had planned to raise that level to 50%, now is planning for about 20% by 2030.
All Al Japanese reactors were closed within a year after the tsunami, and only Japanese reactors were closed within a year after the tsunami, and only
910 of Japan’s 33 operable of Japan’s 33 operable
reactors are currently in commercial service. In addition to the reactors are currently in commercial service. In addition to the
910 currently approved to operate, currently approved to operate,
16
15 Japanese reactors have applied for restart, which involves safety upgrades to meet new regulatory Japanese reactors have applied for restart, which involves safety upgrades to meet new regulatory
requirements. It is not clear how many of Japan’s operable reactors requirements. It is not clear how many of Japan’s operable reactors
will wil ultimately resume ultimately resume
operation.12 France had planned to reduce nuclear power to 50% of the country’s total operation.12 France had planned to reduce nuclear power to 50% of the country’s total
generation generation
by 2025, although that goal has been delayed to 2035.13 by 2025, although that goal has been delayed to 2035.13
Major Nuclear Energy Issues
Radioactive Waste
After several years in a nuclear reactor, nuclear fuel (primarily uranium) can no longer After several years in a nuclear reactor, nuclear fuel (primarily uranium) can no longer
economicallyeconomical y sustain a nuclear chain reaction and becomes highly radioactive and sustain a nuclear chain reaction and becomes highly radioactive and
thermallythermal y hot. hot.
Such spent nuclear fuel must be Such spent nuclear fuel must be
periodicallyperiodical y removed from operating reactors and stored in removed from operating reactors and stored in
adjacent pools of water, which prevents overheating and provides radiation shielding. After adjacent pools of water, which prevents overheating and provides radiation shielding. After
several years of cooling, the spent fuel can be placed in dry casks for storage elsewhere on the several years of cooling, the spent fuel can be placed in dry casks for storage elsewhere on the
plant site. When existing U.S. reactors were built, spent fuel had been expected to be taken away plant site. When existing U.S. reactors were built, spent fuel had been expected to be taken away
for reprocessing (separation of plutonium and uranium to make new fuel) or permanent disposal. for reprocessing (separation of plutonium and uranium to make new fuel) or permanent disposal.
However, reprocessing has not become commercialized in the United States, for economic and However, reprocessing has not become commercialized in the United States, for economic and
nonproliferation reasons, and central waste storage and disposal facilities have proven difficult to nonproliferation reasons, and central waste storage and disposal facilities have proven difficult to
site. As a result, the vast majority of U.S. commercial spent fuel remains at the nuclear plants site. As a result, the vast majority of U.S. commercial spent fuel remains at the nuclear plants
where it was generated—estimated at 86,000 metric tons at the end of 2020 and increasing at the where it was generated—estimated at 86,000 metric tons at the end of 2020 and increasing at the
rate of about 2,rate of about 2,
000200 metric tons per year.14 metric tons per year.14
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-425, NWPA), as amended in 1987, named Yucca
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-425, NWPA), as amended in 1987, named Yucca
Mountain, NV, as the nation’s sole candidate site for a permanent high-level nuclear waste Mountain, NV, as the nation’s sole candidate site for a permanent high-level nuclear waste
repository. NWPA required the Department of Energy (DOE) to study the site and seek a license repository. NWPA required the Department of Energy (DOE) to study the site and seek a license
from NRC to build a repository there. from NRC to build a repository there.
Recent Events
Citing opposition from the State of Nevada, the Obama Administration decided to halt the Yucca
Citing opposition from the State of Nevada, the Obama Administration decided to halt the Yucca
Mountain project, and no Mountain project, and no
new funding has been appropriated for it since FY2010. The Trump funding has been appropriated for it since FY2010. The Trump
Administration included funding to restart Yucca Mountain licensing in its FY2018, FY2019, and Administration included funding to restart Yucca Mountain licensing in its FY2018, FY2019, and
FY2020 budget submissions to Congress, but the requests were not approved. The Trump FY2020 budget submissions to Congress, but the requests were not approved. The Trump
AdministrationAdministration
did not seek Yucca Mountain repository funding for FY2021, but only funds for did not seek Yucca Mountain repository funding for FY2021, but only funds for
interim storage planning. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260) included the interim storage planning. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260) included the
proposed interim storage planning funds with no Yucca Mountain project funding.
The Obama Administration appointed the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future to develop an alternative nuclear waste policy, and its final report was issued in January 2012. DOE largely adopted the Commission’s recommendations in a January 2013 waste strategy that
12 World Nuclear
Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements,” op. cit. 12 World Nuclear Association, “Nuclear Power in Japan,” Association, “Nuclear Power in Japan,”
February August 2021, http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-2021, http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-
library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/japan-nuclear-power.aspx. library/country-profiles/countries-g-n/japan-nuclear-power.aspx.
13 World Nuclear
13 World Nuclear
Association, “Nuclear Power in France,” January 2021, https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-Association, “Nuclear Power in France,” January 2021, https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-
library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/france.aspx. library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/france.aspx.
14 Oak Ridge
14 Oak Ridge
National Laboratory, Centralized Used FuelNational Laboratory, Centralized Used Fuel
Resource for Information Exchange (CURIE) Interactive Resource for Information Exchange (CURIE) Interactive
Map, viewedMap, viewed
April 13 September 27, 2021, https://curie.ornl.gov/map. , 2021, https://curie.ornl.gov/map.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
4
4
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
calledproposed interim storage planning funds with no Yucca Mountain project funding. The Biden
Administration submitted a similar request for FY2022.
The Obama Administration appointed the Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future
to develop an alternative nuclear waste policy, and its final report was issued in January 2012. DOE largely adopted the Commission’s recommendations in a January 2013 waste strategy that cal ed for a “consent-based” process to select nuclear waste storage and disposal sites and for a for a “consent-based” process to select nuclear waste storage and disposal sites and for a
surface storage pilot facility to open by 2021.15 DOE issued a surface storage pilot facility to open by 2021.15 DOE issued a
Draft Consent-Based Siting Process
shortly before the end of the Obama Administration.16 shortly before the end of the Obama Administration.16
A federal appeals court on August 13, 2013, ordered NRC to continue the Yucca Mountain
A federal appeals court on August 13, 2013, ordered NRC to continue the Yucca Mountain
licensing process with previously appropriated funds.17 In response, NRC issued the final licensing process with previously appropriated funds.17 In response, NRC issued the final
volumes of the Yucca Mountain Safety Evaluation Report (SER), which provided the NRC staff’s volumes of the Yucca Mountain Safety Evaluation Report (SER), which provided the NRC staff’s
determination that the repository would meet determination that the repository would meet
all al applicable standards. However, the staff said applicable standards. However, the staff said
upon completing the SER that NRC should not authorize construction of the repository until upon completing the SER that NRC should not authorize construction of the repository until
all al land and water rights requirements were met and a supplement to DOE’s environmental impact land and water rights requirements were met and a supplement to DOE’s environmental impact
statement (EIS) was completed.18 NRC completed the supplemental EIS in May 2016 and made statement (EIS) was completed.18 NRC completed the supplemental EIS in May 2016 and made
its database of Yucca Mountain licensing documents publicly available, using nearly its database of Yucca Mountain licensing documents publicly available, using nearly
all al the the
remaining previously appropriated licensing funds.19 remaining previously appropriated licensing funds.19
With
With
DOE’s efforts to develop spent fuel facilities currently stalled, two private companies have submitted applications to NRC to build consolidated interim storage facilities (CISFs)no spent fuel disposal or storage facilities currently under development by DOE, two private-sector storage facilities in New in New
Mexico and Texas. These facilities would store spent fuel from across the country in dry casks on or near the surface while awaiting permanent underground disposal.20 However, the CISF applications are strongly opposed by both governors of the proposed host states.21
Recent Congressional Action—117th Congress
Sensible, Timely Relief for America’s Nuclear Districts’ Economic Development
(STRANDED) Act (S. 1290, Duckworth)
For communities with closed nuclear power plants that are storing “stranded” spent nuclear fuel, authorizes annual grants of $15 for each kilogram of nuclear waste “to offset the economic and social impacts of stranded nuclear waste.” Authorizes DOE to establish a prize competition for alternative activities at closed reactor sites and to develop a pilot project for each proposal awarded a prize. Requires DOE to establish a task force to conduct a study on resources and options for communities hosting stranded spent fuel. Introduced April 21, 2021; referred to
Mexico and Texas have been proposed. The Texas facility
received an NRC license on September 13, 2021, and NRC plans to issue a decision on the New Mexico facility in January 2022. These near-surface Consolidated Interim Storage Facilities are intended to hold spent fuel from nuclear power plants around the country until a permanent underground repository is available. 20 However, they are facing strong opposition from the two proposed host states. New Mexico filed a lawsuit against NRC on March 29, 2021, and the Texas
governor signed a law banning new spent fuel storage facilities in the state on August 9, 2021.21
15 DOE, 15 DOE,
Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High -Level Radioactive Waste, January , January
2013, http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013%201-15%20Nuclear_Waste_Report.pdf. 2013, http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013%201-15%20Nuclear_Waste_Report.pdf.
16 DOE,
16 DOE,
Draft Consent-Based Siting Process for Consolidated Storage and Disposal Facilities for Spent Nuclear Fuel
and High-Level Radioactive Waste,,
January 12, 2017, https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/January 12, 2017, https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/
Draft%20ConsentDraft%20Consent
-Based%20Siting%20Process%20and%20Siting%20Considerations.pdf-Based%20Siting%20Process%20and%20Siting%20Considerations.pdf
. .
17 U.S.17 U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit,
In re: Aiken County et al., No. 11-1271, writ of ., No. 11-1271, writ of
mandamus, Augustmandamus, August
13, 2013, http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/13, 2013, http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/
BAE0CF34F762EBD985257BC6004DEB18/$file/11-1271-1451347.pdf. BAE0CF34F762EBD985257BC6004DEB18/$file/11-1271-1451347.pdf.
18 NRC,
18 NRC,
“ “NRC Publishes Final NRC Publishes Final
TwoT wo Volumes Volumes
of Yuccaof Yucca
Mountain Safety Evaluation,” news release 15-005, January 29. Mountain Safety Evaluation,” news release 15-005, January 29.
2015, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2015/. 2015, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2015/.
19 NRC,
19 NRC,
Supplement to the U.S. Department of Energy’s Environmental Impact Statement for a Geologic Repository
for the Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada , ,
NUREG-2184, Final Report, May 2016, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr2184/; “NUREG-2184, Final Report, May 2016, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr2184/; “
NRC NRC
Staff IssuesStaff Issues
Volume Volume 3 of Yucca Mountain Safety Evaluation Report,3 of Yucca Mountain Safety Evaluation Report,
” news release 14-069, October 16, 2014, ” news release 14-069, October 16, 2014,
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1949/v3/. http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr1949/v3/.
20 NRC,
20 NRC,
“Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF),”“Consolidated Interim Storage Facility (CISF),”
December 8, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-December 8, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/waste/spent-fuel-
storage/cis.htmlstorage/cis.html
; NRC, “ NRC Issues License to Interim Storage Partners for Consolidated Spent Nuclear Fuel Interim Storage Facility in T exas,” News Release No. 21-036, September 13, 2021, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2125/ML21257A091.pdf.
21 T exas.
21 Texas Governor Greg Governor Greg
Abbott, “Interim Storage Partners (ISP) Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project, Docket Abbott, “Interim Storage Partners (ISP) Consolidated Interim Storage Facility Project, Docket
ID NRC-2016-0231,” November 3, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2030/ML20309B061.pdf; ID NRC-2016-0231,” November 3, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2030/ML20309B061.pdf;
T exas Legislature Online, Actions, HB7, https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/Actions.aspx?LegSess=872&Bill=HB7; and New and New Mexico Mexico
Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, “Comments from Governor Michelle Lujan GrishamGovernor Michelle Lujan Grisham, “Comments from Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham
on Docket ID NRC-2018-on Docket ID NRC-2018-
0052,” September 22, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2026/ML20269A025.pdf. 0052,” September 22, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML2026/ML20269A025.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
5
5
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Committee on Environment and Public WorksRecent Congressional Action—117th Congress
Nuclear Waste Task Force Act of 2021 (S. 2871, Markey/H.R. 5401, Levin) Requires the EPA Administrator to establish a task force to examine whether removing exemptions from environmental laws for spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste would help gain state, local, and tribal consent for nuclear waste disposal facilities. Introduced September 28, 2021; Senate bil referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works and House bil
referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sensible, Timely Relief for America’s Nuclear Districts’ Economic Development (STRANDED) Act (S. 1290, Duckworth/H.R. 3731, Schneider)
For communities with closed nuclear power plants that are storing “stranded” spent nuclear fuel,
authorizes annual grants of $15 for each kilogram of nuclear waste “to offset the economic and social impacts of stranded nuclear waste.” Authorizes DOE to establish a prize competition for alternative activities at closed reactor sites and to develop a pilot project for each proposal awarded a prize. Requires DOE to establish a task force to conduct a study on resources and options for communities hosting stranded spent fuel. Senate bil introduced April 21, 2021;
referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works. House bil introduced June 4, 2021; referred to Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, Financial Services, and Ways and
Means. (Reintroduced from the 116th Congress, S. 1985 . (Reintroduced from the 116th Congress, S. 1985
and H.R. 5608.) and H.R. 5608.)
Storage and Transportation Of Residual and Excess (STORE) Nuclear Fuel Act
(H.R. 2097, Matsui)
Authorizes DOE to develop nuclear waste storage facilities and enter into a contract to store Authorizes DOE to develop nuclear waste storage facilities and enter into a contract to store
waste at a nonfederal facility. DOE must obtain state, local, and tribal consent for storage waste at a nonfederal facility. DOE must obtain state, local, and tribal consent for storage
facilities. Financialfacilities. Financial
and technical assistance authorized to states, local governments, and tribes. and technical assistance authorized to states, local governments, and tribes.
DOE required to give storage priority to waste from closed reactors and to waste shipments DOE required to give storage priority to waste from closed reactors and to waste shipments
necessary to address emergencies. Introduced March 19, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy necessary to address emergencies. Introduced March 19, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy
and Commerce. (Reintroduced from the and Commerce. (Reintroduced from the
116th116th Congress, H.R. 3136.) Congress, H.R. 3136.)
Nuclear Waste Informed Consent Act (H.R. 1524, Titus/S. 541, Cortez Masto)
Requires the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected state and Requires the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected state and
localloc al governments governments
before making expenditures from the Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository. Both before making expenditures from the Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository. Both
billsbil s introduced March 2, 2021. House introduced March 2, 2021. House
bill bil referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce;
Senate Senate
bill bil referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Reintroduced from the referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Reintroduced from the
116th Congress, H.R. 1544 and S. 649.) 116th Congress, H.R. 1544 and S. 649.)
116th Congress
Nuclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 2019 (H.R. 2699, McNerney/S. 2917,
Barrasso)
Would have addressed a major condition for licensing the Yucca Mountain repository by Would have addressed a major condition for licensing the Yucca Mountain repository by
withdrawing the repository site from use under public lands laws and placing it solely under withdrawing the repository site from use under public lands laws and placing it solely under
DOE’s control. Would also have authorized DOE to store spent fuel at an NRC-licensed interim DOE’s control. Would also have authorized DOE to store spent fuel at an NRC-licensed interim
storage facility owned by a nonfederal entity and increased the capacity limit on the Yucca storage facility owned by a nonfederal entity and increased the capacity limit on the Yucca
Congressional Research Service
6
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Mountain repository from 70,000 to 110,000 metric tons. House Mountain repository from 70,000 to 110,000 metric tons. House
bill bil introduced May 14, 2019; introduced May 14, 2019;
referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce; Natural Resources; Armed Services; Budget; referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce; Natural Resources; Armed Services; Budget;
and Rules. Approved by Energy and Commerce Committee’s Environment and Climate Change and Rules. Approved by Energy and Commerce Committee’s Environment and Climate Change
Subcommittee September 26, 2019, by voice vote. Passed the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee September 26, 2019, by voice vote. Passed the House Energy and Commerce
Committee by voice vote November 20, 2019. Legislative hearing on discussion draft of S. 2917 Committee by voice vote November 20, 2019. Legislative hearing on discussion draft of S. 2917
held May 1, 2019, by Senate Environment and Public Works Committee; introduced and referred held May 1, 2019, by Senate Environment and Public Works Committee; introduced and referred
to the committee on November 20, 2019. to the committee on November 20, 2019.
Nuclear Waste Administration Act of 2019 (S. 1234, Murkowski)
Would have established an independent Nuclear Waste Administration (NWA), which would have Would have established an independent Nuclear Waste Administration (NWA), which would have
been authorized to develop nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities with the consent of the been authorized to develop nuclear waste storage and disposal facilities with the consent of the
affected state, local, and tribal governments. In addition to receiving consent-based siting affected state, local, and tribal governments. In addition to receiving consent-based siting
authority, NWA would have taken over DOE’s authority under NWPA to construct and operate a authority, NWA would have taken over DOE’s authority under NWPA to construct and operate a
repository at Yucca Mountain and DOE’s waste disposal contractual obligations. The repository at Yucca Mountain and DOE’s waste disposal contractual obligations. The
bill specificallybil specifical y provided that it would not have affected the ongoing Yucca Mountain licensing provided that it would not have affected the ongoing Yucca Mountain licensing
process. Introduced April 30, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. process. Introduced April 30, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Hearing held June 27, 2019. Hearing held June 27, 2019.
Congressional Research Service
6
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Jobs, Not Waste Act (H.R. 1619, Susie Lee/S. 721, Rosen)
Would have prohibited the Secretary of Energy from taking any action relating to the licensing, Would have prohibited the Secretary of Energy from taking any action relating to the licensing,
planning, development, or construction of a nuclear waste repository until the Director of the planning, development, or construction of a nuclear waste repository until the Director of the
Office of Management and Budget submitted to Congress a study on alternative economic uses of Office of Management and Budget submitted to Congress a study on alternative economic uses of
the Yucca Mountain site and congressional hearings were held on the subject. Both the Yucca Mountain site and congressional hearings were held on the subject. Both
bills bil s
introduced March 7, 2019; House introduced March 7, 2019; House
bill bil referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce and referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce and
Senate Senate
bill bil referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works. referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Spent Fuel Prioritization Act of 2019 (H.R. 2995, Mike Levin)
Would have required DOE to give the highest priority for storage or disposal of spent nuclear fuel Would have required DOE to give the highest priority for storage or disposal of spent nuclear fuel
to reactors that have permanently shut down, have the highest surrounding population, and have to reactors that have permanently shut down, have the highest surrounding population, and have
the highest earthquake hazard. Introduced May 23, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and the highest earthquake hazard. Introduced May 23, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and
Commerce. Commerce.
Dry Cask Storage Act of 2019 (S. 2854, Markey)
Would have required spent fuel at nuclear power plants to be moved from spent fuel pools to dry Would have required spent fuel at nuclear power plants to be moved from spent fuel pools to dry
casks after it had sufficiently cooled, pursuant to NRC-approved transfer plans. Emergency casks after it had sufficiently cooled, pursuant to NRC-approved transfer plans. Emergency
planning zones would have had to be expanded from 10 to 50 miles in radius around any reactor planning zones would have had to be expanded from 10 to 50 miles in radius around any reactor
determined by NRC to be out of compliance with its spent fuel transfer plan. NRC would have determined by NRC to be out of compliance with its spent fuel transfer plan. NRC would have
been authorized to use interest earned by the Nuclear Waste Fund to provide grants to nuclear been authorized to use interest earned by the Nuclear Waste Fund to provide grants to nuclear
power plants to transfer spent fuel to dry storage. Introduced November 13, 2019; referred to power plants to transfer spent fuel to dry storage. Introduced November 13, 2019; referred to
Committee on Environment and Public Works. Committee on Environment and Public Works.
CRS Reports
CRS Report RL33461,
CRS Report RL33461,
Civilian Nuclear Waste Disposal, by Mark Holt , by Mark Holt
CRS In Focus IF11201, CRS In Focus IF11201,
Nuclear Waste Storage Sites in the United States, by Lance N. Larson, by Lance N. Larson
CRS Report R42513, CRS Report R42513,
U.S. Spent Nuclear Fuel Storage, by James D. Werner , by James D. Werner
Congressional Research Service
7
link to page 13 Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Additional References
Disposal of High-Level Nuclear Waste, Government Accountability Office, Key Issues website, , Government Accountability Office, Key Issues website,
https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/disposal_of_highlevel_nuclear_waste/issue_summary https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/disposal_of_highlevel_nuclear_waste/issue_summary
Six Overarching Recommendations for How to Move the Nation’s Nuclear Waste Management
Program Forward, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, April 2021, , Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, April 2021,
https://www.nwtrb.gov/our-work/reports/six-overarching-recommendations-for-how-to-move-https://www.nwtrb.gov/our-work/reports/six-overarching-recommendations-for-how-to-move-
the-nation-s-nuclear-waste-the-nation-s-nuclear-waste-
management-program-forward-(april-2020) management-program-forward-(april-2020)
Forging a Path Forward on US Nuclear Waste Management: Options for Policy Makers, Matt , Matt
Bowen, Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy, January 2021, Bowen, Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy, January 2021,
https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/research/report/forging-path-forward-us-nuclear-waste-https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/research/report/forging-path-forward-us-nuclear-waste-
management-options-policy-makers management-options-policy-makers
Preparing for Nuclear Waste Transportation, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, September , Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, September
2019, https://www.nwtrb.gov/2019, https://www.nwtrb.gov/
docs/default-source/reports/nwtrb_nuclearwastetransport_508.pdf?sfvrsn=6our-work/reports/preparing-for-nuclear-waste-transportation-
(september-2019)
Reset of America’s Nuclear Waste Management: Strategy and Policy,,
Stanford University Center Stanford University Center
for International Security and Cooperation and George Washington University for International Security and Cooperation and George Washington University
Elliott School of
Congressional Research Service
7
link to page 13 Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
El iott School of
International Affairs, October 15, 2018, https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/
International Affairs, October 15, 2018, https://fsi-live.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/
reset_report_2018_final.pdf reset_report_2018_final.pdf
Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, November 2017, Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, November 2017,
http://www.nwtrb.gov/docs/default-source/facts-sheets/commercial_snf.pdf?sfvrsn=12 http://www.nwtrb.gov/docs/default-source/facts-sheets/commercial_snf.pdf?sfvrsn=12
Commercial Nuclear Waste: Resuming Licensing of the Yucca Mountain Repository Would
Require Rebuilding Capacity at DOE and NRC, Among Other Key Steps, GAO-17-340, April 26, , GAO-17-340, April 26,
2017, https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-340 2017, https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-340
Report to the Secretary of Energy, Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future, , Blue Ribbon Commission on America’s Nuclear Future,
January 2012, http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/brc/20120620211605/http:/brc.gov January 2012, http://cybercemetery.unt.edu/archive/brc/20120620211605/http:/brc.gov
Nuclear Plant Economic Viability
U.S. nuclear power plants are facing severe financial pressure caused primarily by competition U.S. nuclear power plants are facing severe financial pressure caused primarily by competition
from low-cost natural gas, growing supplies of renewable energy, and stagnant electricity from low-cost natural gas, growing supplies of renewable energy, and stagnant electricity
demand. Twelve U.S. reactors were permanently closed from 2013 through April 2021, and demand. Twelve U.S. reactors were permanently closed from 2013 through April 2021, and
seventhree more are planned for closure through the mid-more are planned for closure through the mid-
2020s (Table 1). Plans for up to 30 new U.S. . Plans for up to 30 new U.S.
reactors announced during the past 10 years have largely been put on hold, with 2 currently under reactors announced during the past 10 years have largely been put on hold, with 2 currently under
construction and 2 canceled in 2017 after construction had begun. construction and 2 canceled in 2017 after construction had begun.
In light of that situation, Congress is considering whether federal action is needed to keep the
In light of that situation, Congress is considering whether federal action is needed to keep the
existing nuclear fleet operating and to encourage the construction of new reactors. A key element existing nuclear fleet operating and to encourage the construction of new reactors. A key element
of that debate is the appropriate role of nuclear power, if any, in meeting national energy and of that debate is the appropriate role of nuclear power, if any, in meeting national energy and
environmental goals. Nuclear power supporters environmental goals. Nuclear power supporters
generallygeneral y point to the technology as crucial for point to the technology as crucial for
providing a secure, domestic source of energy with low greenhouse gas and other emissions. providing a secure, domestic source of energy with low greenhouse gas and other emissions.
Supporters also see a viable and growing domestic nuclear power industry as crucial in providing Supporters also see a viable and growing domestic nuclear power industry as crucial in providing
a technology base for naval nuclear reactors and other defense nuclear programs, and in providing a technology base for naval nuclear reactors and other defense nuclear programs, and in providing
a base for nuclear power plant exports to counter reactor exports being pursued by Russia and a base for nuclear power plant exports to counter reactor exports being pursued by Russia and
China for geopolitical purposes. Opponents China for geopolitical purposes. Opponents
generallygeneral y counter that safety and proliferation risks, counter that safety and proliferation risks,
nuclear waste hazards, and high costs outweigh those benefits. nuclear waste hazards, and high costs outweigh those benefits.
Congressional Research Service
8
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Potential mechanisms for increased federal support of nuclear power include loan guarantees, tax Potential mechanisms for increased federal support of nuclear power include loan guarantees, tax
credits, clean energy mandates, emissions credits, and electricity market regulations. credits, clean energy mandates, emissions credits, and electricity market regulations.
Some states have taken action to prevent nuclear plant closures.
Some states have taken action to prevent nuclear plant closures.
An Il inois law signed September
15, 2021, provides “carbon mitigation credits” to nuclear plants at risk of closure for economic reasons, averting the planned shutdown of two plants with four operating reactors.22 New York New York
and Il inois and Illinois provided provided
“zero emission credits” to seven reactors that had been at risk of retirement by 2018.“zero emission credits” to seven reactors that had been at risk of retirement by 2018.
22 23 Connecticut enacted legislation in 2017 to make nuclear reactors eligible for a state procurement Connecticut enacted legislation in 2017 to make nuclear reactors eligible for a state procurement
process for zero-emission electricity sources, upon certification of financial need. process for zero-emission electricity sources, upon certification of financial need.
New Jersey New Jersey
enacted zero-emission credits for nuclear power in 2018.enacted zero-emission credits for nuclear power in 2018.
2324 Ohio enacted subsidies in July 2019 Ohio enacted subsidies in July 2019
that prompted the owner of the state’s two commercial reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, to rescind that prompted the owner of the state’s two commercial reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, to rescind
the units’ previously planned retirements, although the assistance was repealed in March 2021.the units’ previously planned retirements, although the assistance was repealed in March 2021.
24 25 The planned retirement of the two-unit Beaver The planned retirement of the two-unit Beaver
Valley Val ey nuclear plant in western Pennsylvania was nuclear plant in western Pennsylvania was
rescinded in March 2020, after Pennsylvania joined the Regional Greenhouse rescinded in March 2020, after Pennsylvania joined the Regional Greenhouse
Gas Initiative Gas Initiative 22 Zero-Emission Credits, Nuclear Energy Institute, April 2018, https://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/resources/reports-and-briefs/zero-emission-credits-201804.pdf.
23 Solutions for Maintaining the Existing Nuclear Fleet, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, May 2018, https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/solutions-for-maintaining-existing-nuclear-fleet.pdf.
24 “FirstEnergy Solutions Rescinds Deactivation Notices for Competitive Generating Plants in Ohio,” PR Newswire, July 26, 2019, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/firstenergy-solutions-rescinds-deactivation-notices-for-competitive-generating-plants-in-ohio-300891786.html.
Congressional Research Service
8
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
(RGGI). The plant’s owner, Energy Harbor, said RGGI would provide emissions (RGGI). The plant’s owner, Energy Harbor, said RGGI would provide emissions
credits “which wil credits “which will begin to help level the playing field for our carbon-free nuclear generators.”begin to help level the playing field for our carbon-free nuclear generators.”
2526
Table 1. Recent and Announced U.S. Commercial Reactor Shutdowns
Net
Summer
Generating
Major Factors
Capacity
Start-Up
Contributing to
Reactor
State
Shutdown Date
(Megawatts)
Year
Shutdown
Permanent Shutdowns Since 2012
Crystal River 3
Crystal River 3
Florida
Florida
February 2013
February 2013
860
860
1977
1977
Cost of major repairs
Cost of major repairs
to reactor to reactor
containment containment
Kewaunee
Kewaunee
Wisconsin
Wisconsin
May 2013
May 2013
566
566
1974
1974
Operating losses
Operating losses
San Onofre 2
San Onofre 2
California
California
June 2013
June 2013
1,070
1,070
1983
1983
Cost of replacing new
Cost of replacing new
steam generators steam generators
San Onofre 3
San Onofre 3
California
California
June 2013
June 2013
1,080
1,080
1984
1984
Cost of replacing new
Cost of replacing new
steam generators steam generators
Vermont Yankee
Vermont Yankee
Vermont
Vermont
December
December
2014
620
1972
Operating losses
22 Illinois General Assembly, Energy T ransition Act (Nuclear Plant Assistance), Public Act 102 -0662, https://ilga.gov/legislation/publicacts/102/102-0662.htm.
23 Zero-Emission Credits, Nuclear Energy Institute, April 2018, https://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/resources/reports-and-briefs/zero-emission-credits-201804.pdf. 24 Solutions for Maintaining the Existing Nuclear Fleet, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, May 2018, https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/solutions-for-maintaining-existing-nuclear-fleet.pdf.
25 “FirstEnergy Solutions Rescinds Deactivation Notices for Competitive Generating Plants in Ohio,” PR Newswire, July 26, 2019, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/firstenergy-solutions-rescinds-deactivation-notices-for-competitive-generating-plants-in-ohio-300891786.html. A bill repealing the Ohio nuclear plant assistance was signed by the governor on March 31, 2021. See Mike DeWine, Governor of Ohio, “ Governor DeWine Signs Ohio T ransportation Budget,” news release, March 31, 2021, https://governor.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/governor/media/news-and-media/transportation-budget-signed-03312021. 26 Energy Harbor, “Energy Harbor Corp Rescinds Deactivation Notice for Nuclear Generating Plant in Pennsylvania,” news release, March 13, 2020, https://energyharbor.com/en/about/news-and-information/energy-harbor-corp-rescinds-deactivation-notice-for-nuclear-gene.
Congressional Research Service
9
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Net
Summer
Generating
Major Factors
Capacity
Start-Up
Contributing to
Reactor
State
Shutdown Date
(Megawatts)
Year
Shutdown2014
620
1972
Operating losses
Fort Calhoun
Fort Calhoun
Nebraska
Nebraska
October 2016
October 2016
479
479
1973
1973
Operating losses
Operating losses
Oyster Creek
Oyster Creek
New Jersey
New Jersey
September
September
2018 2018
614
614
1969
1969
Agreement
Agreement
with state with state
to avoid building to avoid building
cooling towers cooling towers
Pilgrim
Pilgrim
Massachusetts
Massachusetts
May 2019
May 2019
685
685
1972
1972
Operating losses,
Operating losses,
rising capital rising capital
expenditures expenditures
Three Mile Island 1
Three Mile Island 1
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
October 2019
October 2019
803
803
1974
1974
Operating losses
Operating losses
Indian Point 2
Indian Point 2
New York
New York
April
April
30, 2020 30, 2020
1,020
1,020
1974
1974
Low electricity
Low electricity
prices; prices;
settlementsettlement
with state with state
Duane Arnold
Duane Arnold
Iowa
Iowa
August 2020
August 2020
601
601
1975
1975
Lower-cost
Lower-cost
alternative power alternative power
Indian Point 3
Indian Point 3
New York
New York
April
April
30, 2021 30, 2021
1,035
1,035
1976
1976
Low electricity
Low electricity
prices; prices;
settlementsettlement
with state with state
Announced Shutdowns
Palisades
Michigan
April 2022
784
1971Shutdowns
Byron 1
Il inois
September 2021
1,164
1985
Operating losses
Byron 2
Il inois
September 2021
1,136
1987
Operating losses
Dresden 2
Il inois
November 2021
902
1970
Operating losses
Dresden 3
Il inois
November 2021
895
1971
Operating losses
25 Energy Harbor, “Energy Harbor Corp Rescinds Deactivation Notice for Nuclear Generating Plant in Pennsylvania,” news release, March 13, 2020, https://energyharbor.com/en/about/news-and-information/energy-harbor-corp-rescinds-deactivation-notice-for-nuclear-gene. A bill repealing the nuclear plant assistance was signed by the governor on March 31. See Mike DeWine, Governor of Ohio, “Governor DeWine Signs Ohio Transportation Budget,” news release, March 31, 2021, https://governor.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/governor/media/news-and-media/transportation-budget-signed-03312021.
Congressional Research Service
9
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Net
Summer
Generating
Major Factors
Capacity
Start-Up
Contributing to
Reactor
State
Shutdown Date
(Megawatts)
Year
Shutdown
Palisades
Michigan
April 2022
784
1971
Operating losses, end of power purchase agreement
Diablo Canyon 1
California
November 2024
1,122
1985
Settlement with labor and environmental groups
Diablo Canyon 2
California
August 2025
1,118
1986
Settlement with labor and environmental groups
Source: Company news releases.
Recent Events
Operating losses, end of power purchase agreement
Diablo Canyon 1
California
November 2024
1,122
1985
Settlement with labor and environmental groups
Diablo Canyon 2
California
August 2025
1,118
1986
Settlement with labor and environmental groups
Source: Company news releases.
Recent Events
A new federal program to provide financial support to nuclear power plants at risk of closure is
included in the Infrastructure Assistance and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) as passed by the Senate on August 10, 2021. Reactors certified by the Secretary of Energy as being at risk of closure could submit bids to receive credits for four years, specifying an amount per megawatt-hour of electricity generated that would be paid for each credit. A tax credit for existing nuclear power plants of up to 1.5 cents per kilowatt-hour is included in budget reconciliation legislation, the
Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376), introduced September 27, 2021.
Congressional Research Service
10
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Federal tax credits for electricity production from new nuclear plants were extended by the
Federal tax credits for electricity production from new nuclear plants were extended by the
Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-123), signed into law February 9, 2018. Before the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (P.L. 115-123), signed into law February 9, 2018. Before the
extension, new nuclear plants had been required to begin operation before January 1, 2021, to extension, new nuclear plants had been required to begin operation before January 1, 2021, to
qualify for the production tax credit, which is limited to 6,000 megawatts of total generating qualify for the production tax credit, which is limited to 6,000 megawatts of total generating
capacity. The extension capacity. The extension
allowsal ows new reactors to use the credit after that date if the capacity limit new reactors to use the credit after that date if the capacity limit
has not been reached. Along with the extension, the tax credit was modified to has not been reached. Along with the extension, the tax credit was modified to
allowal ow non- non-
taxpaying partners in a nuclear project, such as public power agencies, to transfer their credits to a taxpaying partners in a nuclear project, such as public power agencies, to transfer their credits to a
project’s taxpaying partners. Two U.S. reactors are currently under construction, at the Vogtle project’s taxpaying partners. Two U.S. reactors are currently under construction, at the Vogtle
nuclear power plant in Georgia, totaling about 2,300 megawatts of capacity, nuclear power plant in Georgia, totaling about 2,300 megawatts of capacity,
well wel within the limit. within the limit.
Construction delays have pushed the planned completion dates of the new Vogtle reactors beyond Construction delays have pushed the planned completion dates of the new Vogtle reactors beyond
the 2021 deadline, and the production tax credits are widely considered crucial for their financial the 2021 deadline, and the production tax credits are widely considered crucial for their financial
viability. viability.
Recent filings by Georgia Power, the lead partner in the Vogtle consortium, with the Georgia
Recent filings by Georgia Power, the lead partner in the Vogtle consortium, with the Georgia
Public Service Commission indicate that the company’s share of the project’s construction and Public Service Commission indicate that the company’s share of the project’s construction and
financing costs financing costs
will wil total about $10.4 total about $10.4
billion. bil ion. That estimate does not include costs covered by That estimate does not include costs covered by
Georgia Power’s $1.5 Georgia Power’s $1.5
billionbil ion share of a Westinghouse contract settlement and $700 share of a Westinghouse contract settlement and $700
millionmil ion in in
unrecovered costs. Adding those amounts would bring the Georgia Power construction and unrecovered costs. Adding those amounts would bring the Georgia Power construction and
financing cost share to about $12.6 financing cost share to about $12.6
billion.26bil ion.27 With Georgia Power holding a 45.7% share of the With Georgia Power holding a 45.7% share of the
project, the total construction and financing cost of the new reactors is estimated to be about project, the total construction and financing cost of the new reactors is estimated to be about
$27.6 $27.6
billionbil ion, or $13.8 , or $13.8
billion bil ion per reactor. per reactor.
The two new reactors at the Vogtle plant have received loan guarantees from DOE totaling $12
The two new reactors at the Vogtle plant have received loan guarantees from DOE totaling $12
billion, bil ion, as authorized by Title 17 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58). Energy as authorized by Title 17 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58). Energy
Secretary Ernest Moniz announced the issuance of $6.5 Secretary Ernest Moniz announced the issuance of $6.5
billionbil ion in loan guarantees on February 19, in loan guarantees on February 19,
2014, to two of the three utility partners in the project, Georgia Power and Oglethorpe Power. 2014, to two of the three utility partners in the project, Georgia Power and Oglethorpe Power.
Another $1.8 Another $1.8
billion bil ion loan guarantee for another partner, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, loan guarantee for another partner, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia,
was issued June 24, 2015. Energy Secretary Rick Perry announced the finalization of an was issued June 24, 2015. Energy Secretary Rick Perry announced the finalization of an
additional $3.7 additional $3.7
billion bil ion in loan guarantees to the three partners in the Vogtle project on March 22, in loan guarantees to the three partners in the Vogtle project on March 22,
26 Georgia Power, Twentieth/Twenty-first Semi-annual Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report, Docket No. 29849, August 2019, p. 11, https://psc.ga.gov/search/facts-document/?documentId=178224.
Congressional Research Service
10
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
2019.27
2019.28 No other proposed nuclear plants have received any commitments for DOE loan No other proposed nuclear plants have received any commitments for DOE loan
guarantees. guarantees.
DOE’s Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program manages cost-shared research projects “to
DOE’s Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program manages cost-shared research projects “to
solve significant highest priority cost and technical problems threatening existing plants.”solve significant highest priority cost and technical problems threatening existing plants.”
2829 The The
program includes research on materials used in nuclear plants, modeling of plant aging, and plant program includes research on materials used in nuclear plants, modeling of plant aging, and plant
upgrades.upgrades.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260) included $47 The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260) included $47
million mil ion for for
the the
sustainability program for FY2021, the same as in FY2020. For FY2022, the Biden Administration requested $60 mil ion for the program, while the House approved $50 mil ion
(H.R. 4502) and the Senate Appropriations Committee recommended $45 mil ion (S. 2605).
27 Georgia Power, “Georgia Power Announces Revised Schedule, Cost Forecast for Vogtle Units 3 & 4,” July 29, 2021, https://www.georgiapower.com/company/news-center/2021-articles/cost-forecast -for-vogtle.html; Georgia Power, Twentieth/Twenty-first Sem i-Annual Vogtle Construction Monitoring Report, Docket No. 29849, August 2019, p. 11, https://psc.ga.gov/search/facts-document/?documentId=178224. 28 Department of Energy, “ Secretary Perry Announces Financial Close on Additional Loan Guarantees During T rip to Vogtle Advanced Nuclear Energy Project ,” news release, March 22, 2019, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-perry-announces-financial-close-additional-loan-guarantees-during-trip-vogtle.
29 Department of Energy, “Reactor T echnology Program Overview,” presentation by R. Shane Johnson, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear T echnology Demonstration and Deployment, to the Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee, July 9, 2018, https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/07/f53/RSJ%20Brief%20to%20NEAC%20-%20July%209%202018_0.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
11
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
sustainability program for FY2021, the same as in FY2020.
Federal policy on carbon dioxide emissions could also have a significant impact on the expansion
Federal policy on carbon dioxide emissions could also have a significant impact on the expansion
of nuclear power and the economic viability of existing reactors. The Biden Administration’s of nuclear power and the economic viability of existing reactors. The Biden Administration’s
American Jobs Plan, announced March 31, 2021, includes an Energy Efficiency and Clean American Jobs Plan, announced March 31, 2021, includes an Energy Efficiency and Clean
Electricity StandardElectricity Standard
(CES) that would require increasing percentages of power generation to come from that would require increasing percentages of power generation to come from
non-carbon-emitting sources, including existing nuclear plants. It would provide $15 billion for energy demonstration projects, including advanced nuclear reactors, and $46 billion in federal purchases to stimulate clean energy manufacturing, including advanced nuclear reactors and fuel.29
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Hearing on Nuclear Energy
The March 25, 2021, hearing focused on “ways to maintain and expand the use of nuclear energy in the United States and abroad.”30 Committee Chairman Joe Manchin followed up the hearing with a letter to President Biden on April 20, 2021, urging him “to take action to preserve our existing nuclear fleet and prevent further closures. I believe the federal government must use all the tools it has to protect this vital resource, to the maximum extent consistent with the health and safety of the public.”31 Hearing statements, testimony, and video available on the committee web site at https://www.energy.senate.gov/hearings/2021/3/full-committee-hearing-on-nuclear-energy.
Nuclear Industrial Base Act of 2021 (H.R. 1698, Latta)
Establishes DOE Nuclear Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Program to monitor and assess the needs of the domestic nuclear industry and supports nuclear power development and deployment partnerships between the federal government and private entities. Introduced March 9, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
27 Department of Energy, “Secretary Perry Announces Financial Close on Additional Loan Guarantees During Trip to Vogtle Advanced Nuclear Energy Project,” news release, March 22, 2019, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-perry-announces-financial-close-additional-loan-guarantees-during-trip-vogtle.
28 Department of Energy, “Reactor Technology Program Overview,” presentation by R. Shane Johnson, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Technology Demonstration and Deployment, to the Nuclear Energy Advisory Committee, July 9, 2018, https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2018/07/f53/RSJ%20Brief%20to%20NEAC%20-%20July%209%202018_0.pdf.
29 White House, “Fact Sheet: The American Jobs Plan,” March 31, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan.
30 Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, “Full Committee Hearing on Nuclear Energy,” March 25, 2021, https://www.energy.senate.gov/hearings/2021/3/full-committee-hearing-on-nuclear-energy.
31 Letter from Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe Manchin III to President Joseph R. Biden, April 20, 2021, https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/FC01A8FF-FC8F-4FFA-A44E-C3D81CF00A2E.
Congressional Research Service
11
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
CLEAN Energy Future Act (H.R. 1512, Pallone)
Establishes a national clean energy standard (CES), which would require electric utilities to provide specific amounts of power to their customers from low- or zero-carbon generating sources. A CES that includes nuclear energy could increase the demand for electricity from existing reactors and possibly provide an economic incentive for building new ones. Bill includes a CES that would gradually rise to 100% zero-emission electricity generation, including nuclear power, by 2035 and afterward. Introduced March 2, 2021, by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pallone Jr.; referred to House Energy and Commerce Committee, which held hearings on the bill starting March 18, 2021. Hearing statements, testimony, and video available non-carbon-emitting sources, including existing nuclear plants.30 The House budget reconciliation bil for FY2022, the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376), includes a Clean
Electricity Performance Program that is similar in some ways to a CES.31
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376, Yarmuth)
Budget reconciliation bil for FY2022 that includes provisions to support existing nuclear power plants and communities with closed plants. These include a tax credit of up to 1.5 cents per kwh for generation from existing nuclear plants (section 136109) and an FY2022 appropriation of $500 mil ion to communities with retiring energy facilities, including nuclear (section 110018). It
also includes the Clean Electricity Performance Program, authorizing grants and fees to encourage utilities to increase their supply of low-carbon electricity, including from nuclear power (section 30411). Introduced September 27, 2021, and placed on the Union Calendar
pursuant to budget reconciliation procedures.
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684, DeFazio)
As passed by the Senate, includes a federal program to provide financial support to nuclear power plants at risk of closure, with appropriations of $6 bil ion through FY2026, and appropriates $2.477 bil ion over four years for DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program. Introduced June 4, 2021; referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Reported by Committee June 22, 2021 (H.Rept. 117-70); passed by House July 1, 2021; passed by Senate with
an amendment August 10, 2021.
Preserving Existing Nuclear Energy Generation Act (H.R. 4960, Kinzinger)
Establishes DOE program to provide credits to nuclear power plants certified by the Secretary of Energy as being at risk of shutdown for financial reasons (similar to the program in H.R. 3684 as passed by the Senate). Each credit equals one megawatt-hour (MWh) of electric generation, and
certified reactors could submit bids specifying the price per MWh of the credits desired. Also authorizes grants for units of local government affected by nuclear plant retirements. Introduced August 6, 2021; referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce, Transportation and
Infrastructure, and Financial Services.
Energy Infrastructure Act (S. 2377, Manchin)
Section 3203 establishes credits for at-risk nuclear power plants similar to the program in H.R. 3684 as passed by the Senate. Introduced July 19, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources.
30 House Committee on Energy and Commerce, “Full Committee Markup of Legislative Recommendations for Budget Reconciliation,” staff memorandum, September 9, 2021, https://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/files/documents/Memo_FC%20MU_2021.9.9_0.pdf. 31 For more information on the Clean Electricity Performance Plan, see CRS Report R46934, The Clean Electricity Perform ance Program (CEPP): In Brief, by Ashley J. Lawson.
Congressional Research Service
12
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2021 (S. 2373, Capito)
Section 301 establishes credits for at-risk nuclear power plants similar to the program in H.R. 3684 as passed by the Senate, except that the program is run by EPA. Section 503 authorizes grants to units of local government affected by nuclear power plant shutdowns. Introduced July
15, 2021; referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Zero-Emission Nuclear Power Production Credit Act of 2021 (H.R. 4024, Pascrell/S. 2291, Cardin) Establishes tax credit of up to 1.5 cents per kwh of nuclear energy generation through the end of 2030. The credit amount is reduced as the price of electricity sold by a nuclear plant rises, and is to be adjusted for inflation. The credit amount also would be reduced based on similar state and local credits received. Nuclear plants would have to pay prevailing wages to receive the federal credit. House bil introduced June 21, 2021; referred to Committee on Ways and Means. Senate
bil introduced June 24, 2021; referred to Committee on Finance.
Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Hearing on Nuclear Energy
The March 25, 2021, hearing focused on “ways to maintain and expand the use of nuclear energy in the United States and abroad.”32 Committee Chairman Joe Manchin followed up the hearing with a letter to President Biden on April 20, 2021, urging him “to take action to preserve our
existing nuclear fleet and prevent further closures. I believe the federal government must use al the tools it has to protect this vital resource, to the maximum extent consistent with the health and safety of the public.”33 Hearing statements, testimony, and video available on the committee website at https://www.energy.senate.gov/hearings/2021/3/full-committee-hearing-on-nuclear-
energy.
Nuclear Industrial Base Act of 2021 (H.R. 1698, Latta)
Establishes DOE Nuclear Industrial Base Analysis and Sustainment Program to monitor and assess the needs of the domestic nuclear industry and supports nuclear power development and deployment partnerships between the federal government and private entities. Introduced March
9, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
CLEAN Energy Future Act (H.R. 1512, Pallone)
Establishes a national clean energy standard (CES), which would require electric utilities to provide specific amounts of power to their customers from low - or zero-carbon generating sources. A CES that includes nuclear energy could increase the demand for electricity from existing reactors and possibly provide an economic incentive for building new ones. Bil includes a CES that would gradual y rise to 100% zero-emission electricity generation, including nuclear
power, by 2035 and afterward. Introduced March 2, 2021, by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frank Pal one Jr.; referred to House Energy and Commerce Committee, which held hearings on the bil starting March 18, 2021. Hearing statements, testimony, and video
32 Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, “Full Committee Hearing on Nuclear Energy,” March 25, 2021, https://www.energy.senate.gov/hearings/2021/3/full-committee-hearing-on-nuclear-energy. 33 Letter from Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Joe Manchin III to President Joseph R. Biden, April 20, 2021, https://www.energy.senate.gov/services/files/FC01A8FF-FC8F-4FFA-A44E-C3D81CF00A2E.
Congressional Research Service
13
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
available on the committee website at https://energycommerce.house.gov/committee-on the committee website at https://energycommerce.house.gov/committee-
activity/activity/
hearings/hearing-on-the-clean-future-act-industrial-climate-policies-to-create. hearings/hearing-on-the-clean-future-act-industrial-climate-policies-to-create.
116th Congress
Energy Act of 2020, P.L. 116-260, Division Z
Includes authorization of $55 Includes authorization of $55
million mil ion per year for FY2021 through FY2025 for the Sustainability per year for FY2021 through FY2025 for the Sustainability
Program for Light Water Reactors to conduct research, development, demonstration, and Program for Light Water Reactors to conduct research, development, demonstration, and
commercial application of technologies to improve the economics, safety, and lifetime of existing commercial application of technologies to improve the economics, safety, and lifetime of existing
nuclear power plants (Section 2003). Signed into law December 27, 2020. Authorization of the nuclear power plants (Section 2003). Signed into law December 27, 2020. Authorization of the
sustainability program was also included in the Nuclear Energy Renewal Act of 2019 (S. 2368, sustainability program was also included in the Nuclear Energy Renewal Act of 2019 (S. 2368,
Coons), approved by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on November 11, 2019 Coons), approved by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on November 11, 2019
(S.Rept. 116-203). (S.Rept. 116-203).
Nuclear Powers America Act of 2019 (S. 1134, Cramer/H.R. 2314, LaHood)
Would have provided a 30% tax credit for fuel and capital expenses incurred by nuclear power Would have provided a 30% tax credit for fuel and capital expenses incurred by nuclear power
plants. The credit would have phased out from December 31, 2023, through January 1, 2026. To plants. The credit would have phased out from December 31, 2023, through January 1, 2026. To
receive the credit, nuclear power plants were to submit a license renewal to NRC or certify to receive the credit, nuclear power plants were to submit a license renewal to NRC or certify to
DOE that a license renewal would be submitted. Senate DOE that a license renewal would be submitted. Senate
bill bil introduced April 10, 2019; referred to introduced April 10, 2019; referred to
Committee on Finance. House Committee on Finance. House
bill bil introduced April 12, 2019; referred to Committee on Ways and introduced April 12, 2019; referred to Committee on Ways and
Means. Means.
American Nuclear Infrastructure Act (S. 4897, Barrasso)
Would have established an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) program to provide Would have established an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) program to provide
assistance, subject to appropriation, to nuclear power plants at risk of permanent shutdown. assistance, subject to appropriation, to nuclear power plants at risk of permanent shutdown.
Certified at-risk plants were to submit bids describing the amount of assistance they would Certified at-risk plants were to submit bids describing the amount of assistance they would
require to generate a specific amount of electricity for the subsequent four years. EPA would have require to generate a specific amount of electricity for the subsequent four years. EPA would have
allocated
al ocated the available the available
assistance to “as many certified nuclear reactors as possible” based on the assistance to “as many certified nuclear reactors as possible” based on the
bids. Hearings held by Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on discussion draft bids. Hearings held by Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on discussion draft
August 5, 2020 (H.Hrg. 116-270). August 5, 2020 (H.Hrg. 116-270).
Bill Bil introduced November 16, 2020; ordered reported with introduced November 16, 2020; ordered reported with
amendment December 2, 2020. amendment December 2, 2020.
CRS Reports
CRS Report
CRS Report
R46820, U.S. Nuclear Plant Shutdowns, State Interventions, and Policy Concerns,
by Mark Holt and Phil ip Brown
CRS Report R44715, R44715,
Financial Challenges of Operating Nuclear Power Plants in the United
States, by , by
Phillip Phil ip Brown and Mark Holt Brown and Mark Holt
CRS Report R44852,
CRS Report R44852,
The Value of Energy Tax Incentives for Different Types of Energy
Resources, by Molly F. Sherlock, by Molly F. Sherlock
Congressional Research Service
12
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Additional References
World Nuclear Industry Status Report 20202021, Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggat, , Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggat,
October 2, 2020September
2021, https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/ , https://www.worldnuclearreport.org/
Congressional Research Service
14
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Unlocking Reductions in the Construction Costs of Nuclear: A Practical Guide for Stakeholders,
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency, July 2020, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency, July 2020,
http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2020/7530-reducing-cost-nuclear-construction.pdf http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2020/7530-reducing-cost-nuclear-construction.pdf
Strategy to Restore American Nuclear Energy Leadership, Department of Energy Nuclear Fuel Department of Energy Nuclear Fuel
Working Group, April 23, 2020, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-Working Group, April 23, 2020, https://www.energy.gov/articles/secretary-
brouillettebrouil ette-announces--announces-
nuclear-fuel-working-groups-strategy-restore-american nuclear-fuel-working-groups-strategy-restore-american
The Changing Geopolitics of Nuclear Energy: A Look at the United States, Russia, and China,
Center for Strategic and International Studies,Center for Strategic and International Studies,
March 12, 2020, https://www.csis.org/analysis/March 12, 2020, https://www.csis.org/analysis/
changing-geopolitics-nuclear-energy-look-united-states-russia-and-chinachanging-geopolitics-nuclear-energy-look-united-states-russia-and-china
U.S. Nuclear Energy Leadership: Innovation and the Strategic Global Challenge, , Atlantic Atlantic
Council, May 20, 2019, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/us-Council, May 20, 2019, https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/report/us-
nuclear-energy-leadership-innovation-and-the-strategic-global-nuclear-energy-leadership-innovation-and-the-strategic-global-
challenge-2 chal enge-2
The Nuclear Power Dilemma: Declining Profits, Plant Closures, and the Threat of Rising Carbon
Emissions, Union of Concerned Scientists, November 2018, https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/Union of Concerned Scientists, November 2018, https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/
files/attach/2018/11/Nuclear-Power-Dilemma-full-report.pdffiles/attach/2018/11/Nuclear-Power-Dilemma-full-report.pdf
Promising Market and Federal Solutions for Existing Nuclear Power, Center for Climate and Center for Climate and
Energy Solutions, October 2018, https://www.c2es.org/document/promising-market-and-federal-Energy Solutions, October 2018, https://www.c2es.org/document/promising-market-and-federal-
solutions-for-existing-nuclear-power/ solutions-for-existing-nuclear-power/
Nuclear Costs in Context, Nuclear Energy Institute, September 2018, https://www.nei.org/, Nuclear Energy Institute, September 2018, https://www.nei.org/
CorporateSite/media/filefolder/resources/reports-and-briefs/nuclear-costs-in-context-201909.pdfCorporateSite/media/filefolder/resources/reports-and-briefs/nuclear-costs-in-context-201909.pdf
Economic and Market Challenges Facing the U.S. Nuclear Commercial Fleet—Cost and Revenue
Study,,
Idaho National Laboratory, September 2017, https://gain.inl.gov/SiteAssets/Teresa/Idaho National Laboratory, September 2017, https://gain.inl.gov/SiteAssets/Teresa/
Market%Market%
20Challenges20Chal enges%20for%20Nuclear%20Fleet-ESSAI%20Study%20Sept2017.pdf %20for%20Nuclear%20Fleet-ESSAI%20Study%20Sept2017.pdf
Keeping the Lights on at America’s Nuclear Power Plants,,
Jeremy Carl and David Fedor, Shultz-Jeremy Carl and David Fedor, Shultz-
Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy, Hoover Institution Press, 2017 Stephenson Task Force on Energy Policy, Hoover Institution Press, 2017
Advanced Nuclear Technology
Existing commercial nuclear power plants in the United States are based on light water reactor Existing commercial nuclear power plants in the United States are based on light water reactor
(LWR) technology, in which ordinary (light) water is used to cool the reactor and to moderate, or (LWR) technology, in which ordinary (light) water is used to cool the reactor and to moderate, or
slow, the neutrons in a nuclear chain reaction. In the chain reaction, neutrons cause the nuclei of slow, the neutrons in a nuclear chain reaction. In the chain reaction, neutrons cause the nuclei of
uranium and other heavy atoms to fission (split), releasing large amounts of energy and additional uranium and other heavy atoms to fission (split), releasing large amounts of energy and additional
neutronsneutrons
to maintain the reaction. The federal government developed LWRs for naval propulsion in the 1950s and funded . The federal government developed LWRs for naval propulsion in the 1950s and funded
the commercialization of the technology for electricity generation. DOE and its predecessor the commercialization of the technology for electricity generation. DOE and its predecessor
agencies for decades have also conducted research on “advanced” reactor technologies that use agencies for decades have also conducted research on “advanced” reactor technologies that use
different coolants and moderators, as different coolants and moderators, as
well wel as fast neutron reactors that have as fast neutron reactors that have
no moderator. no moderator.
The term “advanced nuclear reactor” is defined by the Energy Act of 2020 (P.L. 116-260,
The term “advanced nuclear reactor” is defined by the Energy Act of 2020 (P.L. 116-260,
Division Z) as a fission reactor that has “significant improvements” over existing commercial Division Z) as a fission reactor that has “significant improvements” over existing commercial
reactors, and any fusion reactor. Areas of improvement can include safety, waste generation, reactors, and any fusion reactor. Areas of improvement can include safety, waste generation,
performance, resistance to weapons proliferation, “modular sizes,” and integration of electric and performance, resistance to weapons proliferation, “modular sizes,” and integration of electric and
non-electric applications (such as heat and hydrogen production). That definition encompasses non-electric applications (such as heat and hydrogen production). That definition encompasses
small
smal modular reactors (SMRs) of any type. modular reactors (SMRs) of any type.
Congressional Research Service
13
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
To produce less long-lived radioactive waste than existing reactors, some advanced reactor To produce less long-lived radioactive waste than existing reactors, some advanced reactor
concepts would involve the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel to separate uranium, plutonium, concepts would involve the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel to separate uranium, plutonium,
Congressional Research Service
15
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
and other long-lived radioisotopes to make new fuel for fast reactors.and other long-lived radioisotopes to make new fuel for fast reactors.
3234 Such reprocessing, or Such reprocessing, or
recycling, would also reduce the need for newly mined uranium to fuel a recycling, would also reduce the need for newly mined uranium to fuel a
potentiallypotential y growing growing
worldwide reactor fleet, according to proponents. worldwide reactor fleet, according to proponents.
SMRs, which DOE defines as having generating capacity of 300 megawatts (MW) or below,
SMRs, which DOE defines as having generating capacity of 300 megawatts (MW) or below,
would be far would be far
smallersmal er than today’s commercial LWRs, which average about 1,000 MW of electric than today’s commercial LWRs, which average about 1,000 MW of electric
generating capacity. Most proposed advanced reactors, including generating capacity. Most proposed advanced reactors, including
small smal LWRs, would meet LWRs, would meet
DOE’s definition of SMRs. Supporters of SMRs contend that they would be DOE’s definition of SMRs. Supporters of SMRs contend that they would be
small smal enough to be enough to be
assembled in factories and shipped to reactor sites to reduce construction costs. In addition, SMRs assembled in factories and shipped to reactor sites to reduce construction costs. In addition, SMRs
could reduce the financial risks of building a new nuclear power plant, because each module could reduce the financial risks of building a new nuclear power plant, because each module
would cost less than today’s large reactors and revenues could begin when the first module was would cost less than today’s large reactors and revenues could begin when the first module was
complete, rather than after completion of a much larger unit. However, some analysts contend complete, rather than after completion of a much larger unit. However, some analysts contend
that SMRs would be too that SMRs would be too
small smal to achieve the economies of scale needed for economic viability.to achieve the economies of scale needed for economic viability.
3335
Very
Very
small smal SMRs are often SMRs are often
calledcal ed “microreactors,” defined by DOE as having thermal energy “microreactors,” defined by DOE as having thermal energy
capacity below 20 MW. They could provide heat or electric power at remote locations. Self-capacity below 20 MW. They could provide heat or electric power at remote locations. Self-
contained microreactor power units would be assembled in a factory, transported to a site in a contained microreactor power units would be assembled in a factory, transported to a site in a
shipping container, and set up to generate power within a week, according to DOE. Microreactors shipping container, and set up to generate power within a week, according to DOE. Microreactors
would be “self regulating,” in that their designs are intended to prevent overheating even without would be “self regulating,” in that their designs are intended to prevent overheating even without
operator intervention.operator intervention.
3436
Recent Events
The Energy Act of 2020, signed by
The Energy Act of 2020, signed by
the PresidentPresident Trump on December 27, 2020, authorized DOE on December 27, 2020, authorized DOE
programs on advanced nuclear energy R&D, fuel supply, and demonstration through FY2025. programs on advanced nuclear energy R&D, fuel supply, and demonstration through FY2025.
The Energy Act requires DOE to implement a program to help make high-assay low-enriched
The Energy Act requires DOE to implement a program to help make high-assay low-enriched
uranium (HALEU)uranium (HALEU)
available available for advanced reactor R&D and deployment. HALEU is uranium for advanced reactor R&D and deployment. HALEU is uranium
enriched above 5% of the fissile isotope uranium 235 but below 20%, which is the threshold for enriched above 5% of the fissile isotope uranium 235 but below 20%, which is the threshold for
high-enriched uranium that poses weapons proliferation concerns. Many proposed advanced high-enriched uranium that poses weapons proliferation concerns. Many proposed advanced
reactors are being designed to use HALEU.reactors are being designed to use HALEU.
DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program, DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program,
initially initial y funded in the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-94), was funded in the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (P.L. 116-94), was
authorized by the Energy Act at $405 authorized by the Energy Act at $405
million mil ion in FY2021, rising to $455 in FY2021, rising to $455
million mil ion in FY2025. in FY2025.
Legislation to stimulate the development of advanced nuclear technology, the Nuclear Energy
Legislation to stimulate the development of advanced nuclear technology, the Nuclear Energy
Innovation Capabilities Act of 2017 (NEICA), was signed by the President on September 28, Innovation Capabilities Act of 2017 (NEICA), was signed by the President on September 28,
2018 (P.L. 115-248). Key provisions authorize the construction of demonstration reactors funded 2018 (P.L. 115-248). Key provisions authorize the construction of demonstration reactors funded
by the private sector at DOE sites, authorize DOE to construct a Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) for by the private sector at DOE sites, authorize DOE to construct a Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) for
advanced nuclear fuels and materials, and authorize grants to help pay for advanced reactor advanced nuclear fuels and materials, and authorize grants to help pay for advanced reactor
licensing. The Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (P.L. 115-439), signed into law licensing. The Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (P.L. 115-439), signed into law
32January 14, 2019, requires NRC to develop a new licensing framework for advanced nuclear
34 Radioisotopes are radioactive isotopes; isotopes are forms of an element that have different numbers of neutrons. Radioisotopes are radioactive isotopes; isotopes are forms of an element that have different numbers of neutrons.
Different radioisotopes of the same element will behave the same chemically but have different halfDifferent radioisotopes of the same element will behave the same chemically but have different half
-lives and other -lives and other
radioactive characteristics. Long-lived radioisotopes separated from spent fuel couldradioactive characteristics. Long-lived radioisotopes separated from spent fuel could
in principle be fissioned or in principle be fissioned or
transmuted in a fast reactor into shorter-lived radioisotopes for disposal. transmuted in a fast reactor into shorter-lived radioisotopes for disposal.
3335 Deign, Jason, “ Deign, Jason, “
Interest in Small Modular NuclearInterest in Small Modular Nuclear
Reactors Is Growing.Reactors Is Growing.
So So Are Fears Are Fears
TheyT hey Aren’t Viable,” Aren’t Viable,”
Greentech Media, March 14, 2018, https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/interestGreentech Media, March 14, 2018, https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/interest
-in-small-modular-nuclear--in-small-modular-nuclear-
grows#gs.ph5LRao. grows#gs.ph5LRao.
3436 DOE Office of Nuclear DOE Office of Nuclear
Energy, “What Is a Nuclear Microreactor?,” October 23, 2018, https://www.energy.gov/ne/Energy, “What Is a Nuclear Microreactor?,” October 23, 2018, https://www.energy.gov/ne/
articles/whatarticles/what
-nuclear-microreactor. -nuclear-microreactor.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
1416
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
January 14, 2019, requires NRC to develop a new licensing framework for advanced nuclear technology. Proponents of the law contend that NRC’s existing licensing system is too focused on technology. Proponents of the law contend that NRC’s existing licensing system is too focused on
LWR technology and would LWR technology and would
potentiallypotential y cause delays in non-LWR applications. cause delays in non-LWR applications.
NRC is currently reviewing a design certification application for the NuScale SMR plant, which
NRC is currently reviewing a design certification application for the NuScale SMR plant, which
would consist of a dozen 60 MW(electric) reactors in a large pool of water.would consist of a dozen 60 MW(electric) reactors in a large pool of water.
35 37 DOE announced a cost-shared award of up to $1.4 bil ion for a NuScale demonstration plant on October 16, 2020.38 Oklo Power Oklo Power
submitted a combined construction permit and operating license application to NRC on March 11, submitted a combined construction permit and operating license application to NRC on March 11,
2020, for its 1.5 MW(electric) Aurora microreactor.2020, for its 1.5 MW(electric) Aurora microreactor.
3639 Both plants are proposed for construction at Both plants are proposed for construction at
Idaho National Laboratory. Idaho National Laboratory. DOE announced initial awards totaling $160 mil ion
for two demonstration plants under the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program on October 13, 2020.40 One of the award recipients, TerraPower, is proposing to build its demonstration plant on
the site of one of four closed coal-fired power plants in Wyoming.41
Table 2. Planned Advanced Reactor Demonstration Plants
Reactor
DOE
NRC
Reactor
Tech-
Power
Plant
DOE
Cost
Plant
Licensing
Designer
nology
(electric)
Owner
Funding
Share
Location
Status
NuScale
Light water
77 MW
Utah
Up to $1.4
50%
Idaho
Standard
SMR
Associated
bil ion
National
Design
Municipal
Laboratory
Certification
Power
application
Systems
submitted January 2017
Terra
Sodium-
345 MW
PacificCorp
Up to $1.6
50%
Wyoming, at
Pre-
Power
cooled fast
bil ion
1 of 4 closed
application
reactor
coal plants
activities
X-Energy
High-
80 MW
Energy
Up to $1.6
50%
Richland,
Pre-
temperature
Northwest
bil ion
WA
application
gas-cooled
activities
reactor
Oklo
Sodium-
1.5 MW
Oklo
$2.6 mil ion
50%
Idaho
COL
cooled fast
National
application
reactor
Laboratory
submitted 3/11/20
37 NRC, “ Application Review Schedule for the NuScale Design,” May 14, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/smr/nuscale/review-schedule.html. NuScale currently plans to increase each module’s electric generating capacity to 77 MW. See NuScale Power, “T echnology Overview,” https://www.nuscalepower.com/technology/technology-overview.
38 DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, “DOE Approves Award for Carbon Free Power Project,” October 16, 2020, https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/doe-approves-award-carbon-free-power-project. 39 NRC, “Aurora—Oklo Application,” June 17, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/aurora-oklo.html. 40 DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, “U.S. Department of Energy Announces $160 Million in First Awards under Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program,” October 13, 2020, https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/us-department-energy-announces-160-million-first-awards-under-advanced-reactor.
41 DOE Office of Nuclear Energy, “Next -Gen Nuclear Plant and Jobs Are Coming to Wyoming,” June 7, 2021, https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/next -gen-nuclear-plant -and-jobs-are-coming-wyoming.
Congressional Research Service
17
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Reactor
DOE
NRC
Reactor
Tech-
Power
Plant
DOE
Cost
Plant
Licensing
Designer
nology
(electric)
Owner
Funding
Share
Location
Status
Kairos
Fluoride-
140 MW
Kairos
Up to $303
48%
Oak Ridge,
Pre-
salt-cooled
mil ion
TN
application
high-
activities
temperature reactor
Sources: DOE, NRC. Notes: COL=combined construction permit and operating license.
The Department of Defense (DOD) awarded three contracts on March The Department of Defense (DOD) awarded three contracts on March
9, 2020, for design development of mobile microreactors. “A safe, 9, 2020, for design development of mobile microreactors. “A safe,
smallsmal , mobile nuclear reactor , mobile nuclear reactor
would enable units to carry a nearly endless clean power supply, enabling expansion and would enable units to carry a nearly endless clean power supply, enabling expansion and
sustainment of operations for extended periods of time anywhere on the planet,” according to sustainment of operations for extended periods of time anywhere on the planet,” according to
DOD’s announcement of the DOD’s announcement of the
awards.awards.
3742
DOE’s nuclear energy research and development program includes reactor modeling and
DOE’s nuclear energy research and development program includes reactor modeling and
simulation, experimental processing of spent nuclear fuel, development of advanced reactor simulation, experimental processing of spent nuclear fuel, development of advanced reactor
concepts, and testing of “accident tolerant fuels” for existing LWRs. The Energy and Water concepts, and testing of “accident tolerant fuels” for existing LWRs. The Energy and Water
Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260, Division D) includes Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260, Division D) includes
$1.508 $1.508
billion bil ion for DOE nuclear energy programs. The enacted funding measure provides $250 for DOE nuclear energy programs. The enacted funding measure provides $250
million mil ion for the Advanced Reactors Demonstration Program, including $160 for the Advanced Reactors Demonstration Program, including $160
million mil ion for two for two
advanced nuclear reactor demonstration projects, with a cost-share of at least 50% from advanced nuclear reactor demonstration projects, with a cost-share of at least 50% from
nonfederal sources, and $40 nonfederal sources, and $40
millionmil ion to reduce the technical risk of five additional to reduce the technical risk of five additional
reactor reactor
demonstration proposals, with a nonfederal cost-share of at least 20%. The measure also provides demonstration proposals, with a nonfederal cost-share of at least 20%. The measure also provides
$106 $106
million mil ion for accident-tolerant fuels, $45 for accident-tolerant fuels, $45
millionmil ion to continue development of the VTR, and to continue development of the VTR, and
$20 mil ion $20 million for processing HALEU from various sources at Idaho National Laboratory. for processing HALEU from various sources at Idaho National Laboratory.
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Strengthening American Nuclear Competitiveness Act (H.R. 1748, Bill Johnson)
Expedites DOE review of certain nuclear technology exports, enables increased investment in U.S. nuclear technology by American allies, and modifies licensing requirements for new nonelectric uses of nuclear energy and for improved manufacturing techniques. Introduced March 10, 2021; referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce and Foreign Affairs.
Advanced Nuclear Deployment Act (H.R. 1746, Hudson)
Facilitates licensing and deployment of advanced civilian nuclear technologies and authorizes federal agencies to enter into certain long-term power purchase agreements. Introduced March 10, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
35 NRC, “Application Review Schedule for the NuScale Design,” May 14, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/smr/nuscale/review-schedule.html. NuScale currently plans to increase each module’s electric generating capacity to 77 MW. See NuScale Power, “Technology Overview,” https://www.nuscalepower.com/technology/technology-overview.
36 NRC, “Aurora—Oklo Application,” June 17, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/col/aurora-oklo.html. 37 DOD, “DOD Awards Contracts for Development of a Mobile Microreactor,” March 9, 2020, https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2105863/dod-awards-contracts-for-development-of-a-mobile-microreactor.
Congressional Research Service
15
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act (H.R. 1578, Kinzinger)
Establishes timelines and modifies procedures for nuclear power plant permitting and licensing. Introduced March 3, 2021; referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Modernize Nuclear Reactor Environmental Reviews Act (H.R. 1559, Duncan)
Modifies requirements and procedures for NRC environmental reviews of nuclear power plant licensing and permitting decisions. Introduced March 3, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
116th Congress
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability Act (H.R. 1760, Flores)
Required DOE to establish a program to support the availability of HALEU as fuel for advanced nuclear reactors. Introduced March 14, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce. Passed House by voice vote September 9, 2019. HALEU authorization included in Energy Act of 2020.
Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (S. 903, Murkowski/H.R. 3306, Luria)
Would have authorized federal agencies to sign power purchase agreements (PPAs) with electric utilities for up to 40 years and required DOE to establish a pilot PPA program for new nuclear reactors. Included provisions directing DOE to demonstrate advanced reactor technologies, prepare a nuclear energy strategic plan, and make HALEU available for advanced nuclear reactors. DOE and NRC were to establish a program to support university research on advanced nuclear technologies. Senate bill introduced March 27, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Legislative hearings held April 30, 2019. Approved by Committee July 16, 2019 (S.Rept. 116-114). House bill introduced June 19, 2019; referred to Committees on Science, Space, and Technology; Energy and Commerce; Oversight and Reform; and Armed Services. Authorizations for HALEU program and university advanced reactor research support included in Energy Act of 2020.
Advanced Nuclear Energy Technologies Act (H.R. 3358, Higgins)
For FY2022, the Biden Administration is requesting $1.851 bil ion for nuclear energy programs, while the House approved $1.675 bil ion (H.R. 4502) and the Senate Appropriations Committee recommended $1.591 bil ion (S. 2605). The Administration’s American Jobs Plan would provide $15 bil ion for energy demonstration projects, including advanced nuclear reactors, and $46 bil ion in federal purchases to stimulate clean energy manufacturing, including advanced nuclear
reactors and fuel.43 The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (H.R. 3684) as passed by the Senate would appropriate $2.477 bil ion over four years for the Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program, and the Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376) includes $95 mil ion for the VTR. Selected
Congressional Action—117th Congress
Build Back Better Act (H.R. 5376, Yarmuth)
Budget reconciliation bil that includes FY2022 appropriations for advanced nuclear energy technology, including $95 mil ion for the VTR (section 90002) and $53 mil ion for research reactor infrastructure (section 90003). Introduced September 27, 2021, and placed on the Union
Calendar pursuant to budget reconciliation procedures.
42 DOD, “DOD Awards Contracts for Development of a Mobile Microreactor,” March 9, 2020, https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/2105863/dod-awards-contracts-for-development -of-a-mobile-microreactor. 43 White House, “Fact Sheet: T he American Jobs Plan,” March 31, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/31/fact-sheet-the-american-jobs-plan.
Congressional Research Service
18
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Nuclear Power Purchase Agreements Act (H.R. 4834, Luria)
Authorizes DOE to enter into power purchase agreements of up to 40 years from nuclear reactors licensed after January 1, 2020. Power purchase agreements that can provide reliable electricity to off-grid locations and national defense facilities, or for other purposes found to be in the national interest, can include above-market rates. Introduced July 29, 2021; referred to committees on
Energy and Commerce and Oversight and Reform.
National Nuclear University Research Infrastructure Reinvestment Act of 2021 (H.R. 4819, Anthony Gonzalez) Authorizes a DOE program to strengthen university research and training reactors, including a subprogram to demonstrate advanced nuclear reactor and microreactor concepts. Introduced July
29, 2021; referred to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Energy Infrastructure Act (S. 2377, Manchin)
Requires DOE to prepare a report on the potential use of SMRs and microreactors and authorizes DOE to support feasibility studies on deploying microreactors, SMRs, and advanced reactors in isolated communities. Introduced July 19, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
American Nuclear Infrastructure Act of 2021 (S. 2373, Capito)
Authorizes prizes for advanced nuclear reactors and fuel, and removes the costs of advanced reactor early site permits and pre-licensing activities from NRC fee recovery requirements.
Introduced July 15, 2021; referred to Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Strengthening American Nuclear Competitiveness Act (H.R. 1748, Bill Johnson)
Expedites DOE review of certain nuclear technology exports, enables increased investment in
U.S. nuclear technology by American al ies, and modifies licensing requirements for new nonelectric uses of nuclear energy and for improved manufacturing techniques. Introduced March
10, 2021; referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce and Foreign Affairs.
Advanced Nuclear Deployment Act (H.R. 1746, Hudson)
Facilitates licensing and deployment of advanced civilian nuclear technologies and authorizes
federal agencies to enter into certain long-term power purchase agreements. Introduced March 10, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce and in addition to the Committee on
Science, Space, and Technology.
Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act (H.R. 1578, Kinzinger)
Establishes timelines and modifies procedures for nuclear power plant permitting and licensing.
Introduced March 3, 2021; referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Modernize Nuclear Reactor Environmental Reviews Act (H.R. 1559, Duncan)
Modifies requirements and procedures for NRC environmental reviews of nuclear power plant licensing and permitting decisions. Introduced March 3, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy
and Commerce.
Congressional Research Service
19
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
116th Congress
Advanced Nuclear Fuel Availability Act (H.R. 1760, Flores) Required DOE to establish a program to support the availability of HALEU as fuel for advanced nuclear reactors. Introduced March 14, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce. Passed House by voice vote September 9, 2019. HALEU authorization included in Energy Act of
2020.
Nuclear Energy Leadership Act (S. 903, Murkowski/H.R. 3306, Luria)
Would have authorized federal agencies to sign power purchase agreements (PPAs) with electric utilities for up to 40 years and required DOE to establish a pilot PPA program for new nuclear reactors. Included provisions directing DOE to demonstrate advanced reactor technologies, prepare a nuclear energy strategic plan, and make HALEU available for advanced nuclear reactors. DOE and NRC were to establish a program to support university research on advanced nuclear technologies. Senate bil introduced March 27, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources. Legislative hearings held April 30, 2019. Approved by Committee July 16, 2019 (S.Rept. 116-114). House bil introduced June 19, 2019; referred to Committees on Science, Space, and Technology; Energy and Commerce; Oversight and Reform; and Armed Services. Authorizations for HALEU program and university advanced reactor research support
included in Energy Act of 2020.
Advanced Nuclear Energy Technologies Act (H.R. 3358, Higgins)
Directed DOE to carry out two advanced nuclear reactor demonstrations by the end of 2025, to Directed DOE to carry out two advanced nuclear reactor demonstrations by the end of 2025, to
the extent practicable, and up to four additional demonstrations by the end of 2035. The the extent practicable, and up to four additional demonstrations by the end of 2035. The
demonstrations were to be cost-shared with nonfederal entities. Would have required DOE to demonstrations were to be cost-shared with nonfederal entities. Would have required DOE to
submit a nuclear energy strategic plan to specified congressional committees. Introduced June 19, submit a nuclear energy strategic plan to specified congressional committees. Introduced June 19,
2019; referred to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Authorization for DOE 2019; referred to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Authorization for DOE
Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program included in Energy Act of 2020. Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program included in Energy Act of 2020.
Nuclear Energy Renewal Act of 2019 (S. 2368, Coons)
Included authorizations of appropriations for DOE advanced nuclear R&D programs through Included authorizations of appropriations for DOE advanced nuclear R&D programs through
FY2029. Appropriations for the Advanced Reactor Technologies Development Program were to FY2029. Appropriations for the Advanced Reactor Technologies Development Program were to
be authorized at $120 be authorized at $120
million mil ion per year; Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program at $200 per year; Fuel Cycle Research and Development Program at $200
million mil ion per year; Material Recovery and Waste Form Development at $50 per year; Material Recovery and Waste Form Development at $50
millionmil ion per year; per year;
Advanced Fuels at $120 Advanced Fuels at $120
million mil ion per year; Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies at $150 per year; Nuclear Energy Enabling Technologies at $150
millionmil ion per year; Radiologicalper year; Radiological
Facilities Management at $30 Facilities Management at $30
million mil ion per year; and International Nuclear per year; and International Nuclear
Congressional Research Service
16
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Energy Cooperation at $10 Energy Cooperation at $10
million mil ion per year. Included authorization for DOE and NRC to develop per year. Included authorization for DOE and NRC to develop
certification and licensing criteria for advanced reactors and to provide assistance to advanced certification and licensing criteria for advanced reactors and to provide assistance to advanced
reactor license applicants. Appropriations were to be authorized at $15 reactor license applicants. Appropriations were to be authorized at $15
million mil ion per year through per year through
FY2029. The Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program, aimed at existing reactors, would also FY2029. The Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program, aimed at existing reactors, would also
have been authorized through FY2029. It would have have been authorized through FY2029. It would have
allowedal owed an exemption to the existing an exemption to the existing
minimum of 20% private-sector cost sharing for programs authorized by the minimum of 20% private-sector cost sharing for programs authorized by the
billbil . Introduced July . Introduced July
31, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Approved by Committee 31, 2019; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Approved by Committee
November 19, 2019 (S.Rept. 116-203). Authorizations of DOE nuclear energy programs included November 19, 2019 (S.Rept. 116-203). Authorizations of DOE nuclear energy programs included
in Energy Act of 2020. in Energy Act of 2020.
Congressional Research Service
20
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Integrated Energy Systems Act of 2019 (S. 2702, Risch)
Included provisions to establish an integrated energy systems program to integrate nuclear energy Included provisions to establish an integrated energy systems program to integrate nuclear energy
with renewable energy, fossil energy, and energy storage; and expand the use of emissions-with renewable energy, fossil energy, and energy storage; and expand the use of emissions-
reducing energy technologies into nonelectric sectors. Introduced November 19, 2019; referred to reducing energy technologies into nonelectric sectors. Introduced November 19, 2019; referred to
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and reported the same day with an amendment in Committee on Energy and Natural Resources and reported the same day with an amendment in
the nature of a substitute (S.Rept. 116-199). Integrated energy systems program authorization the nature of a substitute (S.Rept. 116-199). Integrated energy systems program authorization
included in Energy Act of 2020. included in Energy Act of 2020.
American Energy Innovation Act (S.Amdt. 1407, Murkowski)
Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to S. 2657, including provisions from several nuclear Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to S. 2657, including provisions from several nuclear
energy energy
billsbil s reported by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: S. 2368, S. 903, and S. reported by the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources: S. 2368, S. 903, and S.
2702. Amendment submitted March 3, 2020; cloture not invoked March 9, 2020, by vote of 47-2702. Amendment submitted March 3, 2020; cloture not invoked March 9, 2020, by vote of 47-
44. Many provisions included in Energy Act of 2020. 44. Many provisions included in Energy Act of 2020.
Nuclear Energy Research and Development Act (H.R. 6097, Lamb)
Included authorizations for DOE nuclear energy research and demonstration programs for Included authorizations for DOE nuclear energy research and demonstration programs for
existing commercial reactors; advanced reactor technologies; hybrid nuclear energy systems that existing commercial reactors; advanced reactor technologies; hybrid nuclear energy systems that
would operate in tandem with storage, renewable, or other technologies; HALEU for advanced would operate in tandem with storage, renewable, or other technologies; HALEU for advanced
reactors; used (spent) nuclear fuel, including recycling and waste disposal; and advanced reactors; used (spent) nuclear fuel, including recycling and waste disposal; and advanced
technology fuels. It would have authorized $3.016 technology fuels. It would have authorized $3.016
billionbil ion through FY2025 to construct a versatile through FY2025 to construct a versatile
neutron source, or versatile test reactor. Authorizations were included for DOE to enter into cost-neutron source, or versatile test reactor. Authorizations were included for DOE to enter into cost-
shared agreements for least two advanced reactor demonstration projects by 2027 and from two to shared agreements for least two advanced reactor demonstration projects by 2027 and from two to
five additional projects by 2035, for which $3.2 five additional projects by 2035, for which $3.2
billionbil ion was to be authorized through FY2025. was to be authorized through FY2025.
Authorizations are also included for international nuclear energy cooperation and university Authorizations are also included for international nuclear energy cooperation and university
scholarships and scholarships and
fellowshipsfel owships in nuclear R&D. Introduced March 5, 2020; referred to House in nuclear R&D. Introduced March 5, 2020; referred to House
Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Authorizations for HALEU, hybrid nuclear Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Authorizations for HALEU, hybrid nuclear
energy systems, spent fuel research, versatile neutron source, advanced reactor demonstrations, energy systems, spent fuel research, versatile neutron source, advanced reactor demonstrations,
international energy cooperation, and university scholarships and international energy cooperation, and university scholarships and
fellowshipsfel owships included in Energy included in Energy
Act of 2020. Act of 2020.
Nuclear Energy for the Future Act (H.R. 6796, Weber)
Included provisions requiring DOE to carry out an advanced reactor technologies research and Included provisions requiring DOE to carry out an advanced reactor technologies research and
development program through public-private partnerships, along with an authorization of $3.016 development program through public-private partnerships, along with an authorization of $3.016
billion bil ion through FY2025 to construct a versatile neutron source. Introduced May 8, 2020; referred through FY2025 to construct a versatile neutron source. Introduced May 8, 2020; referred
to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Versatile neutron source to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Versatile neutron source
authorization included in Energy Act of 2020. authorization included in Energy Act of 2020.
Congressional Research Service
17
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Hearing: Advanced Nuclear Technology: Protecting U.S. Leadership and
Expanding Opportunities for Licensing New Nuclear Energy Technologies
Hearing by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air Hearing by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Clean Air
and Nuclear Safety on the international and domestic outlook for advanced nuclear technologies, and Nuclear Safety on the international and domestic outlook for advanced nuclear technologies,
June 4, 2019. Witnesses included June 4, 2019. Witnesses included
William Wil iam D. Magwood, Director General of the Organization for D. Magwood, Director General of the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency, and representatives of Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency, and representatives of
advanced nuclear technology companies and public policy organizations. Video, written advanced nuclear technology companies and public policy organizations. Video, written
statements, and other material can be found at https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/statements, and other material can be found at https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/
Congressional Research Service
21
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
2019/6/advanced-nuclear-technology-protecting-u-s-leadership-and-expanding-opportunities-for-2019/6/advanced-nuclear-technology-protecting-u-s-leadership-and-expanding-opportunities-for-
licensing-new-nuclear-energy-technologies. licensing-new-nuclear-energy-technologies.
CRS Reports
CRS Report R45706,
CRS Report R45706,
Advanced Nuclear Reactors: Technology Overview and Current Issues, by , by
Danielle
Daniel e A. Arostegui and Mark Holt A. Arostegui and Mark Holt
CRS Report R46372,
CRS Report R46372,
Summary and Analysis of S. 2657, the American Energy Innovation Act, ,
coordinated by Brent D. Yacobuccicoordinated by Brent D. Yacobucci
Additional References
Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN), U.S. Department of Energy website, , U.S. Department of Energy website,
https://gain.inl.gov/SitePages/Home.aspx https://gain.inl.gov/SitePages/Home.aspx
Proposed U.S. Army Mobile Nuclear Reactors: Costs and Risks Outweigh Benefits, Alan J. Alan J.
Kuperman, University of Texas at Austin, LBJ School of Public Affairs, Nuclear Proliferation Kuperman, University of Texas at Austin, LBJ School of Public Affairs, Nuclear Proliferation
Prevention Project, April 22, 2021, http://mail01.tinyletterapp.com/NPPP/2-reports-army-Prevention Project, April 22, 2021, http://mail01.tinyletterapp.com/NPPP/2-reports-army-
reactors-space-reactors/19288238-sites.utexas.edu/nppp/files/2021/04/army-reactor-report-nppp-reactors-space-reactors/19288238-sites.utexas.edu/nppp/files/2021/04/army-reactor-report-nppp-
2021-april.pdf2021-april.pdf
?c=8fa9ce31-a094-4c01-9e10-c4dacc4c4398
Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Opportunities, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency, April 7, 2021, https://www.oecd.org/
publications/smal -modular-reactors-18fbb76c-en.htm
A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies, Andrew C. Kadak, Columbia University Andrew C. Kadak, Columbia University
Center on Global Energy Policy, March 2021, Center on Global Energy Policy, March 2021,
https://energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/https://energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/
files/A%20Comparison%20of%20Nuclear%files/A%20Comparison%20of%20Nuclear%
20Technologies20Technologies%20033017.pdf%20033017.pdf
“Advanced” Isn’t Always Better: Assessing the Safety, Security, and Environmental Impacts of
Non-Light-Water Nuclear Reactors, Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021, Edwin Lyman, Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2021,
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/advanced-isnt-always-better https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/advanced-isnt-always-better
Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Opportunities, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2021, https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2021-03/7560_smr_report.pdf
Raising the Next Generation of Nuclear: A Road Map for Deployment, Third Way, October 17, Third Way, October 17,
2019, https://www.thirdway.org/memo/raising-the-next-generation-of-nuclear-a-road-map-for-2019, https://www.thirdway.org/memo/raising-the-next-generation-of-nuclear-a-road-map-for-
deployment deployment
Metric and Method for Comparing Investments to Decarbonize the Electricity System, Rocky , Rocky
Mountain Institute, September 24, 2019, https://rmi.org/insight/decarbonizing-the-electricity-Mountain Institute, September 24, 2019, https://rmi.org/insight/decarbonizing-the-electricity-
system system
Nuclear Innovation and NEPA, Nuclear Innovation , Nuclear Innovation
AllianceAl iance, September 2019, , September 2019,
https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/5b05b3_e661eba94a224b28aac2a7e11d60e0c6.pdf https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/5b05b3_e661eba94a224b28aac2a7e11d60e0c6.pdf
Congressional Research Service
18
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Examination of Federal Financial Assistance in the Renewable Energy Market: Implications and
Opportunities for Commercial Deployment of Small Modular Reactors, Scully Capital and Kutak , Scully Capital and Kutak
Rock for the U.S. Department of Energy, October 2018, https://www.energy.gov/ne/downloads/Rock for the U.S. Department of Energy, October 2018, https://www.energy.gov/ne/downloads/
report-examination-federal-financial-assistance-renewable-energy-market report-examination-federal-financial-assistance-renewable-energy-market
Leading on SMRs, Nuclear Innovation , Nuclear Innovation
AllianceAl iance, October 2017, https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/, October 2017, https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/
5b05b3_d163208371134cc590a234100429a6fd.pdf 5b05b3_d163208371134cc590a234100429a6fd.pdf
Strategies for Advanced Reactor Licensing, Nuclear Innovation , Nuclear Innovation
AllianceAl iance, April 2016, , April 2016,
https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/5b05b3_71d4011545234838aa27005ab7d757f1.pdf https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/5b05b3_71d4011545234838aa27005ab7d757f1.pdf
Congressional Research Service
22
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Advanced Nuclear 101, Third Way, December 1, 2015, http://www.thirdway.org/report/advanced-, Third Way, December 1, 2015, http://www.thirdway.org/report/advanced-
nuclear-101 nuclear-101
Safety
The 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant disaster in Japan, triggered by a The 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant disaster in Japan, triggered by a
huge earthquake and 9.0-magnitude earthquake and 45-foot tsunami, greatly increased concerns about safety in the nuclear policy debate. The accident clearly tsunami, greatly increased concerns about safety in the nuclear policy debate. The accident clearly
demonstrated the potential consequences of a total loss of power (or “station blackout”) at today’s demonstrated the potential consequences of a total loss of power (or “station blackout”) at today’s
commercial nuclear plants. Even when the nuclear reaction shuts commercial nuclear plants. Even when the nuclear reaction shuts
down as designed, as at the down as designed, as at the
Fukushima plant after the initialFukushima plant after the initial
earthquake, residual radioactivity in the reactor core continues to earthquake, residual radioactivity in the reactor core continues to
generate “decay heat” that must be removed, generate “decay heat” that must be removed,
typically by electrically typical y by electrical y
driven or controlled cooling driven or controlled cooling
systems. systems.
When the tsunami knocked out power at the three Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors that had been
When the tsunami knocked out power at the three Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors that had been
operating when the earthquake struck, the buildup of heat and pressure from residual radioactivity operating when the earthquake struck, the buildup of heat and pressure from residual radioactivity
became so great that it melted the reactors’ nuclear fuel and exceeded the limits of their became so great that it melted the reactors’ nuclear fuel and exceeded the limits of their
containment structures. The decay heat also caused steam to containment structures. The decay heat also caused steam to
chemicallychemical y react with the nuclear react with the nuclear
fuel cladding in the reactor cores, generating additional heat along with hydrogen that escaped fuel cladding in the reactor cores, generating additional heat along with hydrogen that escaped
into the upper part of the reactor buildings and exploded. Cooling was also lost in Fukushima’s into the upper part of the reactor buildings and exploded. Cooling was also lost in Fukushima’s
spent fuel storage pools, causing concern that they could overheat, although later examination spent fuel storage pools, causing concern that they could overheat, although later examination
indicated that they did not. indicated that they did not.
Safety requirements for nuclear power plants are established and enforced in the United States by
Safety requirements for nuclear power plants are established and enforced in the United States by
NRC, an independent regulatory agency. NRC, an independent regulatory agency.
The Atomic Energy Act of 1954 requires NRC to ensure that licensed nuclear facilities “provide adequate protection to the health and safety of the public” (42 U.S.C. 2232). NRC may issue safety requirements that exceed the statutory “adequate
protection” standard if their benefits are found to exceed their costs.
NRC safety regulations address the effects of external NRC safety regulations address the effects of external
events such as earthquakes and floods, equipment failure such as breaks in coolant pipes, and events such as earthquakes and floods, equipment failure such as breaks in coolant pipes, and
other problems that could lead to radioactive releases into the environment. Critics of nuclear other problems that could lead to radioactive releases into the environment. Critics of nuclear
power contend that NRC is often power contend that NRC is often
reluctant to impose necessary safety requirements that would be reluctant to impose necessary safety requirements that would be
costly or disruptive to the nuclear industry. However, the industry has frequently contended that costly or disruptive to the nuclear industry. However, the industry has frequently contended that
costly safety proposals are costly safety proposals are
unnecessary and would not significantly increase large existing safety unnecessary and would not significantly increase large existing safety
margins. margins.
Following the Fukushima disaster, NRC established a task force to identify lessons applicable to
Following the Fukushima disaster, NRC established a task force to identify lessons applicable to
U.S. reactors and recommend safety improvements. The task force’s report led to NRC’s first U.S. reactors and recommend safety improvements. The task force’s report led to NRC’s first
Fukushima-related regulatory requirements, on March 12, 2012. NRC ordered Fukushima-related regulatory requirements, on March 12, 2012. NRC ordered
all al reactors to reactors to
develop strategies to maintain cooling and containment integrity during external events, such as develop strategies to maintain cooling and containment integrity during external events, such as
floods and earthquakes, that were more severe than anticipated by the plants’ designs (“beyond floods and earthquakes, that were more severe than anticipated by the plants’ designs (“beyond
design basis”). In addition, NRC required that U.S. reactors of similar design to the Fukushima design basis”). In addition, NRC required that U.S. reactors of similar design to the Fukushima
reactors have “reliable hardened vents” to remove excess pressure from their primary reactors have “reliable hardened vents” to remove excess pressure from their primary
Congressional Research Service
19
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
containments, and that better instrumentation be containments, and that better instrumentation be
installedinstal ed to monitor the condition of spent fuel to monitor the condition of spent fuel
pools during accidents.pools during accidents.
3844
The NRC commissioners on March 19, 2013, required NRC staff to study whether to require the
The NRC commissioners on March 19, 2013, required NRC staff to study whether to require the
newly mandated containment vents to include filters or other means to reduce the release of newly mandated containment vents to include filters or other means to reduce the release of
radioactive material if the vents have to be used. The idea of requiring filters had drawn praise radioactive material if the vents have to be used. The idea of requiring filters had drawn praise
44 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident: March 12, 2012,” updated May 30, 2012, http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan/timeline/03122012.html.
Congressional Research Service
23
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
from nuclear critics but opposition from the industry on cost grounds.from nuclear critics but opposition from the industry on cost grounds.
3945 NRC voted on August 19, NRC voted on August 19,
2015, not to proceed with rulemaking on filtered vents.2015, not to proceed with rulemaking on filtered vents.
40 46
Recent Events
Congressional controversy was generated by NRC’s final rule for Mitigation of Beyond-Design-
Congressional controversy was generated by NRC’s final rule for Mitigation of Beyond-Design-
Basis Events (MBDBE), announced January 24, 2019.Basis Events (MBDBE), announced January 24, 2019.
4147 The MBDBE regulation requires nuclear The MBDBE regulation requires nuclear
power plants to implement strategies to maintain reactor core cooling when electric power is lost, power plants to implement strategies to maintain reactor core cooling when electric power is lost,
as occurred during the Fukushima accident. The MBDBE proposed rule, published November 13, as occurred during the Fukushima accident. The MBDBE proposed rule, published November 13,
2015,2015,
4248 and the draft final rule, released by NRC on January 5, 2017, and the draft final rule, released by NRC on January 5, 2017,
4349 would have required the would have required the
equipment used in those strategies to be able to withstand newly evaluated flooding and seismic equipment used in those strategies to be able to withstand newly evaluated flooding and seismic
risks, and that regular risks, and that regular
drillsdril s and exercises be conducted. The final rule excluded those and exercises be conducted. The final rule excluded those
requirements, among other changes.requirements, among other changes.
4450 In supporting those exclusions, the Commission majority In supporting those exclusions, the Commission majority
asserted that the deleted requirements did not meet NRC’s cost-benefit standards.asserted that the deleted requirements did not meet NRC’s cost-benefit standards.
4551 NRC is NRC is
continuing to monitor the implementation of continuing to monitor the implementation of
all al post-Fukushima regulations and orders.post-Fukushima regulations and orders.
4652
The 10th anniversary of the Fukushima disaster in March 2021 was noted around the world with
The 10th anniversary of the Fukushima disaster in March 2021 was noted around the world with
retrospectives, status reports, and commentary. “An important lesson of Fukushima is that retrospectives, status reports, and commentary. “An important lesson of Fukushima is that
regulators must be strong, independent and adequately resourced,” the International Atomic regulators must be strong, independent and adequately resourced,” the International Atomic
Energy Agency said in marking the occasion.Energy Agency said in marking the occasion.
4753 The Japan Atomic Industrial Forum issued a The Japan Atomic Industrial Forum issued a
statement declaring, “We in the nuclear industry must reflect on the Fukushima statement declaring, “We in the nuclear industry must reflect on the Fukushima
Daiichi accident
38 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, “Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident: March 12, 2012,” updated May 30, 2012, http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan/timeline/03122012.html.
39 NRC, Dai chi accident and learn its lessons thoroughly as we firmly pledge never to al ow it to recur, through our
unwavering efforts to improve safety.”54
45 NRC, “Consideration of Additional Requirements for Containment Venting Systems “Consideration of Additional Requirements for Containment Venting Systems
forf or Boiling Boiling
Water Reactors with Water Reactors with
Mark I and Mark II Containments,” staff Mark I and Mark II Containments,” staff
requirementsrequirement s memorandum, SECY-12-0157, March 19, 2013, memorandum, SECY-12-0157, March 19, 2013,
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/srm/2012/2012-0157srm.pdf; Freebairn, William, “http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/commission/srm/2012/2012-0157srm.pdf; Freebairn, William, “
NRC NRC
Staff Recommends Ordering Filtered Vents for 31 Power Reactors,” Staff Recommends Ordering Filtered Vents for 31 Power Reactors,”
Inside NRC, November 5, 2012, p. 1. , November 5, 2012, p. 1.
4046 NRC, NRC,
“Hardened Vents and Filtration (for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II containment designs),” “Hardened Vents and Filtration (for Boiling Water Reactors with Mark I and Mark II containment designs),”
http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/hardened-vents.html. http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/japan-dashboard/hardened-vents.html.
41 NRC, “NRC To47 NRC, “ NRC T o Issue Final Rule Issue Final Rule
for Mitigating Severe Events at U.S.for Mitigating Severe Events at U.S.
Reactors,” newsReactors,” news
release, January 24, 2019, release, January 24, 2019,
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2019/19-005.pdf. https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/news/2019/19-005.pdf.
4248 NRC, NRC,
“Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events,” Proposed Rule, “Mitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis Events,” Proposed Rule,
Federal Register, November 13, 2015, Vol. 80, , November 13, 2015, Vol. 80,
No. 219, p. 70610, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-11-13/pdf/2015-28589.pdf. No. 219, p. 70610, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-11-13/pdf/2015-28589.pdf.
4349 NRC, NRC,
Final Rule:Final Rule:
Mitigation of Beyond-Design-BasisMitigation of Beyond-Design-Basis
Events, SECY-16-0142, Enclosure 1, January 5, 2017, Events, SECY-16-0142, Enclosure 1, January 5, 2017,
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1630/ML16301A005.html. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1630/ML16301A005.html.
4450 NRC, NRC,
“Staff Requirements—Affirmation Session,” SRM-M190124A, Enclosure 1, January 24, 2019, “Staff Requirements—Affirmation Session,” SRM-M190124A, Enclosure 1, January 24, 2019,
https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1902/ML19023A038.html. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1902/ML19023A038.html.
4551 Ibid., “Views Ibid., “Views
of the Commission.” of the Commission.”
4652 NRC, NRC,
“ “Plant-Specific Japan Lessons-Learned Activities,” AugustPlant-Specific Japan Lessons-Learned Activities,” August
13, 2018, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/13, 2018, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/
ops-experience/japan-dashboard/japan-plants.html. ops-experience/japan-dashboard/japan-plants.html.
4753 International Atomic Energy Agency, “Ten-Year Anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear International Atomic Energy Agency, “Ten-Year Anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear
Power Plant Power Plant
Accident: A DecadeAccident: A Decade
of Improving Nuclear Safetyof Improving Nuclear Safety
,” March 10, 2021,,” March 10, 2021,
https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/ten-https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/ten-
year-anniversary-of-the-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-power-plant-accidentyear-anniversary-of-the-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-power-plant-accident
-a-decade-of-improving-nuclear-safety. -a-decade-of-improving-nuclear-safety.
54 Japan Atomic Industrial Forum President Shiro Arai, “ Marking the T enth Anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident ,” February 26, 2021, https://www.jaif.or.jp/en/marking-the-tenth-anniversary-of-the-fukushima-daiichi-accident .
Congressional Research Service
24Congressional Research Service
20
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
and learn its lessons thoroughly as we firmly pledge never to allow it to recur, through our unwavering efforts to improve safety.”48
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act (H.R. 1578, Kinzinger)
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Whistleblower Protection Act (S. 2896, Duckworth)
Specifies that DOE and NRC employees are included in protections against management retaliation under the Energy Reorganization Act (42 U.S.C. 5851) for raising nuclear safety
concerns. Introduced September 29, 2021; referred to Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.
Nuclear Licensing Efficiency Act (H.R. 1578, Kinzinger)
Establishes timelines and modifies procedures for nuclear power plant permitting and licensing. Establishes timelines and modifies procedures for nuclear power plant permitting and licensing.
NRC would have to issue safety evaluation reports and final environmental impact statements for NRC would have to issue safety evaluation reports and final environmental impact statements for
nuclear reactor license applications “to the maximum extent practicable within 42 months after nuclear reactor license applications “to the maximum extent practicable within 42 months after
the application is accepted for docketing.” NRC could use informal procedures for licensing the application is accepted for docketing.” NRC could use informal procedures for licensing
hearings if it found formal adjudicatory procedures to be unnecessary. Introduced March 3, 2021; hearings if it found formal adjudicatory procedures to be unnecessary. Introduced March 3, 2021;
referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce. referred to House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Modernize Nuclear Reactor Environmental Reviews Act (H.R. 1559, Duncan)
Modifies requirements and procedures for NRC environmental reviews of nuclear power plant Modifies requirements and procedures for NRC environmental reviews of nuclear power plant
licensing and permitting decisions. Requires NRC within three years of enactment to promulgate licensing and permitting decisions. Requires NRC within three years of enactment to promulgate
a final rule “establishing an optional generic environmental impact statement that may be used in a final rule “establishing an optional generic environmental impact statement that may be used in
the licensing process for nuclear reactors” and the licensing process for nuclear reactors” and
allowingal owing for environmental assessments and for environmental assessments and
categorical exclusions for environmental reviews where appropriate. Introduced March 3, 2021; categorical exclusions for environmental reviews where appropriate. Introduced March 3, 2021;
referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce. referred to Committee on Energy and Commerce.
116th Congress
Low-Dose Radiation Research Act of 2019 (H.R. 4733, Posey)
Would have authorized a DOE research program on the effects of exposure to lowWould have authorized a DOE research program on the effects of exposure to low
-dose radiation. -dose radiation.
Introduced October 18, 2019; referred to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Introduced October 18, 2019; referred to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Whistleblower
Protection Act of 2019 (H.R. 5787, Horsford/S. 1330, Duckworth)
Would have Would have
specifically protected all specifical y protected al DOE and NRC employees from retaliation for raising DOE and NRC employees from retaliation for raising
nuclear safety concerns (whistleblowing). House nuclear safety concerns (whistleblowing). House
bill bil introduced February 6, 2020; referred to introduced February 6, 2020; referred to
Committee on Energy and Commerce; Senate Committee on Energy and Commerce; Senate
bill bil introduced May 6, 2019; referred to Committee introduced May 6, 2019; referred to Committee
on Energy and Natural Resources. on Energy and Natural Resources.
Hearing: Preserving and Expanding Clean, Reliable Nuclear Power: U.S.
Commercial Nuclear Reactor Performance Trends and Safety Initiatives
Hearing by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on the safety of existing and Hearing by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works on the safety of existing and
potential future nuclear power plants and other issues relating to commercial nuclear power. potential future nuclear power plants and other issues relating to commercial nuclear power.
Witnesses came from industry, government, and advocacy organizations. Video, written Witnesses came from industry, government, and advocacy organizations. Video, written
statements, and other material can be found at https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/statements, and other material can be found at https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/
48 Japan Atomic Industrial Forum President Shiro Arai, “Marking the Tenth Anniversary of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident,” February 26, 2021, https://www.jaif.or.jp/en/marking-the-tenth-anniversary-of-the-fukushima-daiichi-accident.
Congressional Research Service
21
Congressional Research Service
25
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
2019/11/preserving-and-expanding-clean-reliable-nuclear-power-u-s-commercial-nuclear-reactor-
2019/11/preserving-and-expanding-clean-reliable-nuclear-power-u-s-commercial-nuclear-reactor-
performance-trends-and-safety-initiatives. performance-trends-and-safety-initiatives.
CRS Reports
CRS Report R41694,
CRS Report R41694,
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, by Mark Holt, Richard J. , by Mark Holt, Richard J.
CampbellCampbel , and , and
Mary Beth D. Nikitin Mary Beth D. Nikitin
Additional References
Post-Fukushima Safety Enhancements,,
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web page, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web page,
reviewed/updated March 11, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/post-reviewed/updated March 11, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/ops-experience/post-
fukushima-safety-enhancements.html fukushima-safety-enhancements.html
Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors, World Nuclear Association, March 2021, https://www.world-World Nuclear Association, March 2021, https://www.world-
nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/safety-of-nuclear-power-nuclear.org/information-library/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/safety-of-nuclear-power-
reactors.aspx reactors.aspx
Nuclear Power 101,, Natural Resources Defense Council, May 14, 2020, https://www.nrdc.org/ Natural Resources Defense Council, May 14, 2020, https://www.nrdc.org/
stories/nuclear-power-101stories/nuclear-power-101
Nuclear Safety: Countries’ Regulatory Bodies Have Made Changes in Response to the Fukushima
Daiichi Accident, Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure, , Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure,
Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate, Government Accountability Office, Committee on Environment and Public Works, U.S. Senate, Government Accountability Office,
GAO-14-109, March 2014, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-109 GAO-14-109, March 2014, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-14-109
State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) Report, Nuclear Regulatory , Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, NUREG-1935, November 2012, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/Commission, NUREG-1935, November 2012, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/
nuregs/staff/sr1935 nuregs/staff/sr1935
Security and Emergency Response
The level of security that must be provided at nuclear power plants became a high-profile issue The level of security that must be provided at nuclear power plants became a high-profile issue
after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States in 2001. Since those attacks, NRC issued a after the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States in 2001. Since those attacks, NRC issued a
series of orders and regulations that series of orders and regulations that
substantiallysubstantial y increased nuclear plant security requirements, increased nuclear plant security requirements,
although industry critics contend that those measures are although industry critics contend that those measures are
still stil insufficient. Key measures include insufficient. Key measures include
an increase in the level of attacks that nuclear plant security forces must be able to repel, an increase in the level of attacks that nuclear plant security forces must be able to repel,
requirements for mitigating the effects of large fires and explosions, and a requirement that new requirements for mitigating the effects of large fires and explosions, and a requirement that new
reactors be capable of withstanding aircraft crashes without releasing radioactive material. NRC reactors be capable of withstanding aircraft crashes without releasing radioactive material. NRC
also modified its planning requirements for evacuations and other emergency responses after the also modified its planning requirements for evacuations and other emergency responses after the
9/11 attacks, and the Fukushima disaster 9/11 attacks, and the Fukushima disaster
illustratedil ustrated the importance of emergency response to the importance of emergency response to
radioactive releases from any cause. radioactive releases from any cause.
NRC issued wide-ranging revisions to its emergency preparedness regulations on November 1,
NRC issued wide-ranging revisions to its emergency preparedness regulations on November 1,
2011, dealing with duties of emergency personnel and the inclusion of hostile actions in 2011, dealing with duties of emergency personnel and the inclusion of hostile actions in
emergency planning emergency planning
drills.49dril s.55 In response to Fukushima, NRC staff recommended that nuclear In response to Fukushima, NRC staff recommended that nuclear
emergency plans be required to address events affecting multiple reactors and prolonged station emergency plans be required to address events affecting multiple reactors and prolonged station
49 NRC,
55 NRC, “Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations,” final rule, “Enhancements to Emergency Preparedness Regulations,” final rule,
Federal Register, November 23, 2011, p. , November 23, 2011, p.
72560. 72560.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
2226
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
blackout. NRC told nuclear power plants on March 12, 2012, to provide specific information and
blackout. NRC told nuclear power plants on March 12, 2012, to provide specific information and
analysis on those issues.analysis on those issues.
5056
The NRC Cyber Security Directorate was established in June 2013 to coordinate rulemaking,
The NRC Cyber Security Directorate was established in June 2013 to coordinate rulemaking,
guidance, and oversight of cybersecurity at nuclear power plants and other regulated nuclear guidance, and oversight of cybersecurity at nuclear power plants and other regulated nuclear
facilities. As part of the Directorate, NRC’s Cyber Assessment Team responds to cybersecurity facilities. As part of the Directorate, NRC’s Cyber Assessment Team responds to cybersecurity
events at NRC-licensed facilities and coordinates threat assessments with other federal agencies.events at NRC-licensed facilities and coordinates threat assessments with other federal agencies.
5157
Recent Events
NRC issued a draft final rule June 7, 2018, on “Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background
NRC issued a draft final rule June 7, 2018, on “Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background
Checks, and Security Event Notifications.”Checks, and Security Event Notifications.”
5258 The draft final rule, which is awaiting Commission The draft final rule, which is awaiting Commission
approval following a staff revision submitted February 4, 2020,approval following a staff revision submitted February 4, 2020,
5359 would establish procedures for would establish procedures for
nuclear power plants and other licensed nuclear facilities to apply for NRC authorization to arm nuclear power plants and other licensed nuclear facilities to apply for NRC authorization to arm
their security personnel with “enhanced” weapons, such as semiautomatic assault weapons and their security personnel with “enhanced” weapons, such as semiautomatic assault weapons and
machine guns, despite any state laws prohibiting such weapons. NRC is authorized to preempt machine guns, despite any state laws prohibiting such weapons. NRC is authorized to preempt
state laws for this purpose under Atomic Energy Act Section 161A, enacted by the Energy Policy state laws for this purpose under Atomic Energy Act Section 161A, enacted by the Energy Policy
Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58). The draft final rule would also modify NRC requirements for nuclear Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-58). The draft final rule would also modify NRC requirements for nuclear
power plants and other licensed facilities to report events related to physical security and would power plants and other licensed facilities to report events related to physical security and would
add requirements for reporting suspicious activities. add requirements for reporting suspicious activities.
CRS Reports
CRS In Focus IF10821,
CRS In Focus IF10821,
Price-Anderson Act: Nuclear Power Industry Liability Limits and
Compensation to the Public After Radioactive Releases, by Mark Holt, by Mark Holt
CRS Report RL34331,
CRS Report RL34331,
Nuclear Power Plant Security and Vulnerabilities, by Mark Holt , by Mark Holt
Additional References
Update on Radiological Emergency Preparedness Enhancement Activities Resulting from Lessons
Learned Following September 11, 2001, and Other Recent Natural Disasters, Nuclear Regulatory Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, July 19, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1911/ML19116A159.pdf Commission, July 19, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1911/ML19116A159.pdf
Backgrounder on Nuclear Security, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web page, last , Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web page, last
reviewed/updated May 31, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/reviewed/updated May 31, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/
security-enhancements.html security-enhancements.html
Backgrounder on Cyber Security, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, web page, last Reviewed/Updated March 28, 2019, https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/cyber-security-bg.html.
Nuclear Plant Security, Union of Concerned Scientists, web page, updated February 25, 2016, https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-power/nuclear-plant-security#.W2RtxtJKiUk
50 NRC, “Request for Information Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Nuclear Plant Security, Union of Concerned Scientists, web page, updated February 25, 2016,
https://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-power/nuclear-plant-security#.W2RtxtJKiUk
Protecting Our Nation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/BR-0314, Rev. 4, August
2015, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1523/ML15232A263.pdf
56 NRC, “Request for Information Pursuant to T itle 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations 50.54(f) Regarding 50.54(f) Regarding
Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-
Term TaskT erm T ask Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi
Accident,” March 12, 2012, http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12053A340.pdf. Accident,” March 12, 2012, http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1205/ML12053A340.pdf.
5157 NRC, NRC,
“Backgrounder on Cyber Security,”“Backgrounder on Cyber Security,”
October 2016 March 2019, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/fact-sheets/
cyber-security-bg.html. cyber-security-bg.html.
5258 NRC, NRC,
“Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications,”“Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications,”
draft final rule, SECY-draft final rule, SECY-
18-0058, June 7, 2018, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1626/ML16264A000.html. 18-0058, June 7, 2018, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1626/ML16264A000.html.
5359 NRC, NRC,
“Supplement to SECY-18-0058, ‘Draft Final “Supplement to SECY-18-0058, ‘Draft Final
RuleenhancedRule—Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Weapons, Firearms Background
Checks, and Checks, and
Security Event Notifications,’” February 4, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1901/ML19017A025.pdf. Security Event Notifications,’” February 4, 2020, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1901/ML19017A025.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
2327
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Protecting Our Nation, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/BR-0314, Rev. 4, August 2015, https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1523/ML15232A263.pdf
Nuclear Weapons Nonproliferation
Encouraging exports of U.S. civilian nuclear products, services, and technology while making Encouraging exports of U.S. civilian nuclear products, services, and technology while making
sure they are not used for foreign nuclear weapons programs has long been a fundamental goal of sure they are not used for foreign nuclear weapons programs has long been a fundamental goal of
U.S. nuclear energy policy. Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act requires that any country U.S. nuclear energy policy. Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act requires that any country
receiving U.S. nuclear technology, equipment, or materials implement a peaceful nuclear receiving U.S. nuclear technology, equipment, or materials implement a peaceful nuclear
cooperation agreement with the United States. These so-cooperation agreement with the United States. These so-
calledcal ed 123 agreements are intended to 123 agreements are intended to
ensure that U.S. nuclear cooperation with other countries does not result in the production of ensure that U.S. nuclear cooperation with other countries does not result in the production of
weapons materials or otherwise encourage the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Section 123 weapons materials or otherwise encourage the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Section 123
allowsal ows nuclear cooperation agreements to take effect after 90 days of continuous congressional nuclear cooperation agreements to take effect after 90 days of continuous congressional
session if they adhere to specified criteria. session if they adhere to specified criteria.
International controls and inspections are intended to ensure the peaceful use of civilian nuclear
International controls and inspections are intended to ensure the peaceful use of civilian nuclear
facilities and prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. However, recent plans or proposals to facilities and prevent the proliferation of nuclear weapons. However, recent plans or proposals to
build nuclear power plants in build nuclear power plants in
countries54countries60 that have not previously used nuclear energy, including that have not previously used nuclear energy, including
several in the Middle East and elsewhere in the less developed world, have prompted concerns several in the Middle East and elsewhere in the less developed world, have prompted concerns
that international controls may prove inadequate. Numerous recommendations have been made in that international controls may prove inadequate. Numerous recommendations have been made in
the United States and elsewhere to create new incentives for nations to forgo the development of the United States and elsewhere to create new incentives for nations to forgo the development of
uranium enrichment and spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities that could produce weapons uranium enrichment and spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities that could produce weapons
materials as materials as
well wel as civilian nuclear fuel. as civilian nuclear fuel.
Recent Events
Iran’s nuclear energy program is a major example of the tension between peaceful and weapons
Iran’s nuclear energy program is a major example of the tension between peaceful and weapons
uses of nuclear technology. Long-standing world concern had focused on the Iranian uranium uses of nuclear technology. Long-standing world concern had focused on the Iranian uranium
enrichment program, which Iran contended was solely for peaceful purposes but which the United enrichment program, which Iran contended was solely for peaceful purposes but which the United
States and other countries suspected was for producing weapons material. The U.N. Security States and other countries suspected was for producing weapons material. The U.N. Security
Council had imposed sanctions and passed several resolutions Council had imposed sanctions and passed several resolutions
callingcal ing on Iran to suspend its on Iran to suspend its
enrichment program and other sensitive nuclear activities. Iran finalized the Joint Comprehensive enrichment program and other sensitive nuclear activities. Iran finalized the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action (JCPOA) on July 14, 2015, with the United States and the other four permanent Plan of Action (JCPOA) on July 14, 2015, with the United States and the other four permanent
members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany to lift the U.N. sanctions in return for members of the U.N. Security Council plus Germany to lift the U.N. sanctions in return for
specified Iranian actions to preclude nuclear weapons development. President Trump announced specified Iranian actions to preclude nuclear weapons development. President Trump announced
on May 8, 2018, that the Administration would cease implementing the agreement and reimpose on May 8, 2018, that the Administration would cease implementing the agreement and reimpose
sanctions. Other parties to the JCPOA have not followed the U.S. lead, however.sanctions. Other parties to the JCPOA have not followed the U.S. lead, however.
5561 The Biden The Biden
Administration in AprilAdministration in April
2021 participated in indirect talks with Iran through other JCPOA 2021 participated in indirect talks with Iran through other JCPOA
participants about participants about
potentiallypotential y returning to compliance if Iran does as returning to compliance if Iran does as
well.56wel .62
An extension of the U.S. peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement with South Korea generated
An extension of the U.S. peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement with South Korea generated
controversy but no congressional action to block it. During negotiations on the U.S.-South Korea controversy but no congressional action to block it. During negotiations on the U.S.-South Korea
54 World Nuclear nuclear cooperation extension, which entered into force November 25, 2015, South Korea had sought advance U.S. consent for spent fuel reprocessing and uranium enrichment. The United States did not provide such consent, on general nonproliferation grounds and because such
60 World Nuclear Association, “World Nuclear Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements,” Association, “World Nuclear Power Reactors and Uranium Requirements,”
AprilOctober 2021, 2021,
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/reactors.html.
5561 European Union, “Joint Statement on the Re-imposition of U.S. Sanctions Due European Union, “Joint Statement on the Re-imposition of U.S. Sanctions Due
to Its Withdrawal from the Joint to Its Withdrawal from the Joint
Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),” June 8, 2018, https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA),” June 8, 2018, https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/
49141/joint49141/joint
-statement-re-imposition-us-sanctions-due-its-withdrawal-joint-statement-re-imposition-us-sanctions-due-its-withdrawal-joint
-comprehensive-plan-action_en. -comprehensive-plan-action_en.
5662 U.S. U.S.
Department of State, “Department of State, “
Briefing With Senior State Department Official On Recent U.S. Engagement in Vienna Briefing With Senior State Department Official On Recent U.S. Engagement in Vienna
RegardingRegarding
the JCPOA,” April 9, 2021, https://www.state.gov/briefing-with-senior-state-department-official-on-recent-the JCPOA,” April 9, 2021, https://www.state.gov/briefing-with-senior-state-department-official-on-recent-
u-s-engagementu-s-engagement
-in-vienna-regarding-the-jcpoa. -in-vienna-regarding-the-jcpoa.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
2428
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
nuclear cooperation extension, which entered into force November 25, 2015, South Korea had sought advance U.S. consent for spent fuel reprocessing and uranium enrichment. The United States did not provide such consent, on general nonproliferation grounds and because such consent could affect other ongoing issues on the Korean peninsula. The new agreement did, consent could affect other ongoing issues on the Korean peninsula. The new agreement did,
however, establish a bilateralhowever, establish a bilateral
“high level commission” to further consider those issues. The high-“high level commission” to further consider those issues. The high-
level commission’s deliberations are to be informed by the results of a 10-year Joint Fuel Cycle level commission’s deliberations are to be informed by the results of a 10-year Joint Fuel Cycle
Study by scientists from the two countries that was scheduled to be completed in April 2021. Study by scientists from the two countries that was scheduled to be completed in April 2021.
However, according to DOE, some aspects of the study have not been completed and discussions However, according to DOE, some aspects of the study have not been completed and discussions
on how to move forward are continuing.on how to move forward are continuing.
57 63
Japan’s long-standing nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States
Japan’s long-standing nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States
automaticallyautomatical y renewed on July 17, 2018, and renewed on July 17, 2018, and
will wil remain in force indefinitely unless terminated by either side.remain in force indefinitely unless terminated by either side.
58 64
The agreement The agreement
allowsal ows Japan to reprocess spent nuclear fuel from its U.S.-designed reactors, Japan to reprocess spent nuclear fuel from its U.S.-designed reactors,
separating plutonium and uranium for use in new fuel. A commercial reprocessing plant at separating plutonium and uranium for use in new fuel. A commercial reprocessing plant at
Rokkasho is scheduled to be completed in 2022.Rokkasho is scheduled to be completed in 2022.
5965 Some nuclear nonproliferation groups had Some nuclear nonproliferation groups had
urged the United States to use the renewal of the U.S.-Japan nuclear cooperation agreement as an urged the United States to use the renewal of the U.S.-Japan nuclear cooperation agreement as an
opportunity to urge Japan not to begin its reprocessing program. They noted that Japan already opportunity to urge Japan not to begin its reprocessing program. They noted that Japan already
has substantial stockpiles of previously separated plutonium that could has substantial stockpiles of previously separated plutonium that could
potentiallypotential y be used for be used for
weapons as weapons as
well wel as reactor fuel.as reactor fuel.
6066 Japan approved a new Strategic Energy Plan July 3, 2018, that Japan approved a new Strategic Energy Plan July 3, 2018, that
includes a pledge to reduce Japanese plutonium inventories, reportedly following pressure from includes a pledge to reduce Japanese plutonium inventories, reportedly following pressure from
the United States and other countries.the United States and other countries.
6167
Recent discussions between the United States and Saudi Arabia toward drafting a peaceful
Recent discussions between the United States and Saudi Arabia toward drafting a peaceful
nuclear cooperation agreement have prompted substantial controversy. The U.S. nuclear industry nuclear cooperation agreement have prompted substantial controversy. The U.S. nuclear industry
strongly supports an agreement so that it could supply reactors and other nuclear technology to strongly supports an agreement so that it could supply reactors and other nuclear technology to
Saudi Arabia.Saudi Arabia.
6268 However, nuclear nonproliferation groups want any nuclear cooperation However, nuclear nonproliferation groups want any nuclear cooperation
agreement to include a binding commitment from Saudi Arabia to forswear uranium enrichment agreement to include a binding commitment from Saudi Arabia to forswear uranium enrichment
and spent fuel reprocessing on its territory.and spent fuel reprocessing on its territory.
6369 Secretary of State Mike Pompeo testified to the Secretary of State Mike Pompeo testified to the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee May 24, 2018, that the United States was insisting that Senate Foreign Relations Committee May 24, 2018, that the United States was insisting that
Saudi Arabia accept such a commitment as part of any 123 agreement, despite Saudi arguments Saudi Arabia accept such a commitment as part of any 123 agreement, despite Saudi arguments
that the country has a right to enrich and reprocess under international inspections.that the country has a right to enrich and reprocess under international inspections.
64 Energy
57 Email from John Kroll70 Energy Secretary Rick Perry told reporters at a meeting in September 2019 that the United States also
would condition any U.S.-Saudi 123 Agreement on Saudi acceptance of the Additional Protocol,
63 Emails from John Krohn, DOE Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs, March 31, 2021, DOE Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs, March 31, 2021
. The, and June 28, 2021. T he March email email
says that “says that “
the US and ROKthe US and ROK
are continuing to talk to determine how to ‘finalize’ the study, as wellare continuing to talk to determine how to ‘finalize’ the study, as well
as as potential potential
continued work in this area.” continued work in this area.”
5864 U.S. U.S.
Department of State, “Department of State, “
U.S. Bilateral Agreements For Peaceful NuclearU.S. Bilateral Agreements For Peaceful Nuclear
Cooperation Pursuant to Section 123 of Cooperation Pursuant to Section 123 of
the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended,” January 20, 2017, https://www.state.gov/t/isn/rls/fs/2017/the U.S. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended,” January 20, 2017, https://www.state.gov/t/isn/rls/fs/2017/
266975.htm. 266975.htm.
5965 Japan Nuclear Japan Nuclear
Fuel Limited, “Reprocessing,” viewedFuel Limited, “Reprocessing,” viewed
April 27, 2021, https://www.jnfl.co.jp/en/business/April 27, 2021, https://www.jnfl.co.jp/en/business/
reprocessing. reprocessing.
6066 Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, “ Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, “
Tokyo and Washington Have Another Nuclear Problem,” August 17, Tokyo and Washington Have Another Nuclear Problem,” August 17,
2017, http://npolicy.org/article.php?aid=1341&rid=2. 2017, http://npolicy.org/article.php?aid=1341&rid=2.
6167 Japanese Ministry of Economy, Japanese Ministry of Economy,
TradeT rade, and Industry, “Cabinet Decision on the New Strategic Energy Plan,” July, and Industry, “Cabinet Decision on the New Strategic Energy Plan,” July
3, 3,
2018, http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/0703_002.html; Reuters, “2018, http://www.meti.go.jp/english/press/2018/0703_002.html; Reuters, “
Japan Pledges to Cut Plutonium Japan Pledges to Cut Plutonium
StockpileSt ockpile Amid GrowingAmid Growing
Concern by Neighbours,”Concern by Neighbours,”
July July 31, 2018, https://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/31, 2018, https://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/
idAFL4N1UQ3WD. idAFL4N1UQ3WD.
6268 Nuclear Energy Institute, “ Nuclear Energy Institute, “
As SaudiAs Saudi
Arabia ConsidersArabia Considers
New New Reactors, NEI Conducts Reactors, NEI Conducts
TradeT rade Mission,” April 26, 2018, Mission,” April 26, 2018,
https://www.nei.org/news/2018/saudi-arabia-considers-new-reactors.https://www.nei.org/news/2018/saudi-arabia-considers-new-reactors.
63
69 Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, “Letter to Congress on Nuclear Cooperation with Saudi Nonproliferation Policy Education Center, “Letter to Congress on Nuclear Cooperation with Saudi
Arabia,” May 24, Arabia,” May 24,
2018, http://npolicy.org/article.php?aid=1395&rtid=4. 2018, http://npolicy.org/article.php?aid=1395&rtid=4.
6470 Mufson, Steven, “Pompeo: Saudis Must Not Enrich Uranium If It Seeks Mufson, Steven, “Pompeo: Saudis Must Not Enrich Uranium If It Seeks
Civilian Nuclear Cooperation,” May 24, Civilian Nuclear Cooperation,” May 24,
2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pompeo-saudis-must-not-enrich-uranium-if-it-seeks-2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/pompeo-saudis-must-not-enrich-uranium-if-it-seeks-
civilian-nuclear-cooperation/2018/05/24/714c5e30-5f92-11e8-a4a4-c070ef53f315_story.html.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
2529
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Secretary Rick Perry told reporters at a meeting in September 2019 that the United States also would condition any U.S.-Saudi 123 Agreement on Saudi acceptance of the Additional Protocol, which allowswhich al ows strengthened international safeguards on nuclear facilities. strengthened international safeguards on nuclear facilities.
6571 Congress prohibited Congress prohibited
the use of the use of
FY2020FY2021 funds for Export-Import Bank support for nuclear exports to Saudi Arabia funds for Export-Import Bank support for nuclear exports to Saudi Arabia
until the kingdom has a 123 agreement in effect that commits to renouncing uranium enrichment until the kingdom has a 123 agreement in effect that commits to renouncing uranium enrichment
and reprocessing and has signed an Additionaland reprocessing and has signed an Additional
Protocol with the IAEA (Section 7041(h) of Protocol with the IAEA (Section 7041(h) of
DivisionDivision
G K, P.L. 116-260). The same prohibition was included in appropriations for FY2020 (P.L.
116-94).
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Iran Nuclear Treaty Act (S. 2031, Johnson) Declares that any agreement reached by the President regarding Iran’s nuclear program shal be a treaty subject to Senate advice and consent. Introduced June 10, 2021; referred to Committee on
Foreign Relations.
Stopping Activities Underpinning Development In Weapons of Mass Destruction (SAUDI WMD) Act (S. 1146, Markey)
Prohibits U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia if Saudi Arabia imports nuclear technology without adopting the Additional Protocol for international nuclear facility inspections and reached a
nuclear cooperation agreement with the United States. Introduced April 15, 2021; referred to
Committee on Foreign Relations., P.L. 116-94).
Selected Congressional Action—117th Congress
Strengthening American Nuclear Competitiveness Act (H.R. 1748, Bill Johnson)
Expedites DOE review of certain nuclear technology exports, enables increased investment in Expedites DOE review of certain nuclear technology exports, enables increased investment in
U.S. nuclear technology by American U.S. nuclear technology by American
alliesal ies, and modifies licensing requirements for new , and modifies licensing requirements for new
nonelectric uses of nuclear energy and for improved manufacturing techniques. Introduced March nonelectric uses of nuclear energy and for improved manufacturing techniques. Introduced March
10, 2021; referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce and Foreign Affairs. 10, 2021; referred to Committees on Energy and Commerce and Foreign Affairs.
Iran Nuclear Deal Advice and Consent Act of 2021 (H.R. 1479, Barr)
Prohibits federal funds to be used for rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action unless the Prohibits federal funds to be used for rejoining the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action unless the
Biden Administration commits to submitting any JCPOA successor to the Senate as a treaty rather Biden Administration commits to submitting any JCPOA successor to the Senate as a treaty rather
than as an international agreement. Introduced March 2, 2021; referred to Committee on Foreign than as an international agreement. Introduced March 2, 2021; referred to Committee on Foreign
Affairs. Affairs.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding United States
arms transfers to Saudi Arabia (H.Res. 175, Trone)
Calls
Cal s on the U.S. Government to rescind nuclear technology transfer authorizations and “cease on the U.S. Government to rescind nuclear technology transfer authorizations and “cease
significant nuclear cooperation” with Saudi Arabia until Saudi Arabia signs a nuclear cooperation significant nuclear cooperation” with Saudi Arabia until Saudi Arabia signs a nuclear cooperation
agreement with the United States that guarantees that the Saudi nuclear program is solely for agreement with the United States that guarantees that the Saudi nuclear program is solely for
civilian
civilian purposes and prohibits uranium enrichment and plutonium separation, among other purposes and prohibits uranium enrichment and plutonium separation, among other
provisions. Introduced February 26, 2021; referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs and provisions. Introduced February 26, 2021; referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs and
sequentially
sequential y to the Permanent Select Committee on to the Permanent Select Committee on
Intelligence.
Iran Diplomacy Act of 2021 (S. 434, Markey)
Intel igence.
71 Natter, Ari, “U.S. Says Saudis Must Forgo Enrichment for Nuclear Sharing Deal,” Bloomberg, September 18, 2019, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-19/u-s-says-saudis-must-forgo-enrichment -for-nuclear-sharing-deal.
Congressional Research Service
30
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Iran Diplomacy Act of 2021 (S. 434, Markey)
Declares it to be U.S. policy that the United States and Iran “should promptly return to full Declares it to be U.S. policy that the United States and Iran “should promptly return to full
compliance with compliance with
all al of their commitments under the JCPOA,” among other provisions. Introduced of their commitments under the JCPOA,” among other provisions. Introduced
February 24, 2021; referred to Committee on Foreign Relations. February 24, 2021; referred to Committee on Foreign Relations.
Iran Nuclear Verification Act (H.R. 1203, McClain)
Prohibits the United States from becoming a party to the JCPOA or any other nuclear agreement Prohibits the United States from becoming a party to the JCPOA or any other nuclear agreement
with Iran until United Nations inspectors are with Iran until United Nations inspectors are
allowedal owed full access to full access to
all al Iranian nuclear facilities Iranian nuclear facilities
and have completed a comprehensive report on those facilities. Introduced February 22, 2021; and have completed a comprehensive report on those facilities. Introduced February 22, 2021;
referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs. referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs.
civilian-nuclear-cooperation/2018/05/24/714c5e30-5f92-11e8-a4a4-c070ef53f315_story.html.
65 Natter, Ari, “U.S. Says Saudis Must Forgo Enrichment for Nuclear Sharing Deal,” Bloomberg, September 18, 2019, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-19/u-s-says-saudis-must-forgo-enrichment-for-nuclear-sharing-deal.
Congressional Research Service
26
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
116th Congress
Expressing the sense of Congress that any United States-Saudi Arabia civilian
nuclear cooperation agreement must prohibit the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia from
enriching uranium or separating plutonium on its own territory, in keeping with
the strongest possible nonproliferation “gold standard” (S.Con.Res. 2,
Merkley/H.Con.Res. 23, Andy Levin)
Would have expressed the sense of Congress that a 123 agreement with Saudi Arabia should Would have expressed the sense of Congress that a 123 agreement with Saudi Arabia should
prohibit uranium enrichment and plutonium separation in Saudi territory and require Saudi prohibit uranium enrichment and plutonium separation in Saudi territory and require Saudi
acceptance of the Additional Protocol for nuclear facility inspections. Senate resolution acceptance of the Additional Protocol for nuclear facility inspections. Senate resolution
introduced February 12, 2019; referred to Committee on Foreign Relations. House resolution introduced February 12, 2019; referred to Committee on Foreign Relations. House resolution
introduced February 28, 2019; referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs. introduced February 28, 2019; referred to Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Saudi Nuclear Nonproliferation Act of 2019 (H.R. 1471, Sherman/S. 612, Markey)
Would have established additional criteria for any 123 agreement with Saudi Arabia and Would have established additional criteria for any 123 agreement with Saudi Arabia and
prohibited such an agreement from taking effect without enactment of a joint resolution of prohibited such an agreement from taking effect without enactment of a joint resolution of
Congress. Both Congress. Both
billsbil s introduced February 28, 2018. House introduced February 28, 2018. House
bill bil referred to Committee on Foreign referred to Committee on Foreign
Affairs; Senate Affairs; Senate
bill bil referred to Committee on Foreign Relations. referred to Committee on Foreign Relations.
Preventing Nuclear Proliferation in Saudi Arabia Act of 2019 (S. 2338, Van
Hollen)
Would have prohibited the U.S. Export-Import Bank from financing nuclear exports to Saudi Would have prohibited the U.S. Export-Import Bank from financing nuclear exports to Saudi
Arabia unless Saudi Arabia signs the AdditionalArabia unless Saudi Arabia signs the Additional
Protocol and commits not to enrich uranium or Protocol and commits not to enrich uranium or
separate plutonium in its territory. Introduced July 30, 2019; referred to Committee on Banking, separate plutonium in its territory. Introduced July 30, 2019; referred to Committee on Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs. Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Hearing: Oversight of the Trump Administration’s Iran Policy
Hearing by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East, North Hearing by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East, North
Africa, and International Terrorism, June 19, 2019, with the U.S. Special Representative for Iran. Africa, and International Terrorism, June 19, 2019, with the U.S. Special Representative for Iran.
Video can be found at https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2019/6/oversight-of-the-trump-Video can be found at https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2019/6/oversight-of-the-trump-
administration-s-iran-policy. administration-s-iran-policy.
Congressional Research Service
31
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Hearing: An Examination of U.S.-Iran Policy
Hearing by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, October 16, 2019, with the U.S. Special
Hearing by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, October 16, 2019, with the U.S. Special
Representative for Iran. Video and testimony can be found at https://www.foreign.senate.gov/Representative for Iran. Video and testimony can be found at https://www.foreign.senate.gov/
hearings/an-examination-of-us-iran-policy. hearings/an-examination-of-us-iran-policy.
CRS Reports
CRS Report R41910,
CRS Report R41910,
Nuclear Energy Cooperation with Foreign Countries: Issues for Congress, ,
by Paul K. Kerr, Mary Beth D. Nikitin, and Mark Holt by Paul K. Kerr, Mary Beth D. Nikitin, and Mark Holt
CRS Report RS22937,
CRS Report RS22937,
Nuclear Cooperation with Other Countries: A Primer, by Paul K. Kerr , by Paul K. Kerr
and Mary Beth D. Nikitinand Mary Beth D. Nikitin
Congressional Research Service
27
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
CRS Report RL33192,
CRS Report RL33192,
U.S.-China Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, by Mark Holt, Mary Beth D. , by Mark Holt, Mary Beth D.
Nikitin, and Paul K. KerrNikitin, and Paul K. Kerr
CRS Report R44942,
CRS Report R44942,
U.S. Decision to Cease Implementing the Iran Nuclear Agreement, by , by
Kenneth Katzman, Paul K. Kerr, and ValerieKenneth Katzman, Paul K. Kerr, and Valerie
Heitshusen Heitshusen
CRS In Focus IF10799,
CRS In Focus IF10799,
Prospects for Enhanced U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Energy Cooperation, by , by
Christopher M. Blanchard and Paul K. Kerr Christopher M. Blanchard and Paul K. Kerr
Other References
Nuclear Nonproliferation, Government Accountability Office, Key Issues website, , Government Accountability Office, Key Issues website,
https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/nuclear_nonproliferation/issue_summary https://www.gao.gov/key_issues/nuclear_nonproliferation/issue_summary
Nuclear Cooperation Agreements, Nuclear Energy Institute website, https://www.nei.org/, Nuclear Energy Institute website, https://www.nei.org/
advocacy/compete-advocacy/compete-
globallyglobal y/nuclear-cooperation-agreements. /nuclear-cooperation-agreements.
The Nonproliferation Gold Standard: The New Normal?, , Arms Control Association, October Arms Control Association, October
2019, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-10/features/nonproliferation-gold-standard-new-2019, https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-10/features/nonproliferation-gold-standard-new-
normal normal
Abstinence or Tolerance: Managing Nuclear Ambitions in Saudi Arabia, ,
ElliottEl iott School of School of
International Affairs, George Washington University, International Affairs, George Washington University,
Washington Quarterly, Summer 2018, , Summer 2018,
https://twq.https://twq.
elliottel iott.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs2121/f/downloads/.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs2121/f/downloads/
TWQ_Summer2018_MillerVolpe
TWQ_Summer2018_Mil erVolpe.pdf .pdf
Avoiding a Nuclear Wild, Wild West in the Middle East, Nonproliferation Policy Education , Nonproliferation Policy Education
Center, Working Paper 1801, April 2018, http://npolicy.org/Articles/1801/1801.pdf Center, Working Paper 1801, April 2018, http://npolicy.org/Articles/1801/1801.pdf
The Case for a Pause in Reprocessing in East Asia: Economic Aspects, Nuclear Threat Initiative, , Nuclear Threat Initiative,
August 9, 2016, http://www.nti.org/analysis/reports/case-pause-reprocessing-east-asiaeconomic-August 9, 2016, http://www.nti.org/analysis/reports/case-pause-reprocessing-east-asiaeconomic-
aspects/
aspects/
Author Information
Mark Holt
Specialist in Energy Policy
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
2832
Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues
Author Information
Mark Holt
Specialist in Energy Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should
notn ot be relied upon for purposes other be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Congressional Research Service
Congressional Research Service
R42853
R42853
· VERSION 2325 · UPDATED
2933