< Back to Current Version

Brazil’s Presidential Election

Changes from October 16, 2018 to November 16, 2018

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


Brazil—the fifth most populous country and ninth-largest economy in the world—held general elections on October 7, presidential, legislative, and state elections in October 2018. Antiestablishment sentiment carried the day, as Brazilians replaced almost half of their congressional representatives and nearly elected a right-wing populist to the presidency. A presidential runoff election, scheduled for October 28, will have significant implications for the economic and foreign policies of this U.S. "strategic partner."

Domestic Context

Over the past several years, Brazil has struggledvoters elected Jair Bolsonaro, a far-right populist, to the presidency and replaced nearly half of congress. The results could have significant implications for Brazil's domestic policies as well as its relationship with the United States.

Domestic Context

The 2018 election took place as Brazil was struggling to emerge from a series of domestic crises. The country fell into a deep recession in 2014, due to a decline in global commodity prices and economic mismanagement under the center-left Workers Party (PT) government of President Dilma Rousseff (2011-2016). The unemployment rate more than doubled as real gross domestic productthe economy contracted by more than 8% from 2015 to 2016. Although economic growth returned in 2017, conditions remain difficult. More than Nearly 12% of the population is unemployed, and several million formerly middle-class Brazilians now live in poverty. Budget cuts have exacerbated the situation, limiting the capacity of Brazilian authorities' capacity to provide social services and address challenges such as escalating crime and violence.

Brazil also is contending with the repercussions of massive corruption scandals. Since 2014, investigators have uncovered arrangements throughout the public sector in which businesses provided bribes and illegal campaign donations to politicians in exchange for contracts or other favorable government treatment. The revelations discredited much of Brazil's political establishment and contributed to the controversial impeachment and removal from office of President Rousseff in August 2016. These repeated political crises have polarized Brazilian society and significantly eroded Brazilians' faith in democracy.

President Michel Temer, who succeeded Rousseff, is deeply unpopular. Hishas been extremely unpopular. In October 2018, 89% of Brazilians disapproved of his administration. Temer's center-right government has enacted several major economic reforms, including measures to freeze government spending for 20 years, weaken worker protections, and allow greater private sector participation in Brazil's oil sector. Temer also has worked with the Brazilian congress to shield himself from corruption charges. Although international investors have applauded Temer's economic policies, 89% of Brazilians disapprove of his administration.

Election Results

The October 7 elections demonstrated widespread dissatisfaction with Brazil's political class. VotersThose policies were applauded by international investors but had little support among the Brazilian people. Temer's efforts to shield himself from corruption charges further alienated the population.

Election Results

Brazilians' discontent with the political class manifested itself at the polls. In legislative elections, voters ousted 75% of incumbents running for reelection to the federal senate and 43% of incumbents running for reelection to the chamber of deputies. Both houses of congress also grew more fragmented as small- and mid-sized parties won seats formerly held by the country's principal governing partiesThe new congress will be the most fragmented in Brazilian history, with 30 parties represented in at least one chamber.

In the presidential election, Jair Bolsonaro, a right-wing congressmanmember of congress and former army captain backed by the Social Liberal Party, won 46% of the vote, falling just short of the absolute majority needed to avoid a runoff. He has served in Brazil's lower house since 1991 but is running as a political outsider. Bolsonaro is a longtime defender ofdefeated the PT's Fernando Haddad 55% to 45% in a second-round runoff. Prior to his presidential campaign, Bolsonaro was considered a fringe figure in the Brazilian congress. He exercised little influence over policy and was best known for his controversial remarks defending the country's military dictatorship (1964-1985), and his running mate—a retired army general—has suggested the armed forces could intervene if the political system is unable to address corruption or lawlessness. In recent months, Bolsonaro has asserted that police officers should be free to kill suspected criminals and that land rights activists should be considered terrorists. Although his law-and-order message appeals to many Brazilians fed up with crime and corruption, others view him as a threat to democracy and human rights. On September 6, Bolsonaro was stabbed at a political rally in an apparent assassination attempt. He remained hospitalized until September 29 and did not return to the campaign trail until October 12.

Bolsonaro will face the PT's Fernando Haddad, who finished second with 29% of the valid vote. Haddad is a former education minister (2005-2012) and mayor of São Paulo (2013-2016). He did not formally enter the presidential race until mid-September, when electoral authorities ruled former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010)—who is currently serving a 12-year prison sentence for corruption—ineligible to run. Lula remains popular among many Brazilians whose standard of living improved significantly during his tenure, and his support was crucial in helping Haddad advance to the runoff. Anti-Lula and anti-PT sentiment is also widespread, however, since many Brazilians blame the former president and his party for the country's recent economic and political crises. Haddad has called on the country's "democratic forces" to unite against Bolsonaro for the runoff election, but most centrist and center-right parties have opted to remain neutral.

A poll released on October 15 found Bolsonaro leading Haddad 52%-37%. Another 2% are undecided, and 9% intend to cast protest votes. Other polls of the second round have found similar results.

Potential Policy Shifts

Many economists argue that Brazil's economic recovery depends on the next president enacting extensive reforms, including measures to reduce pension costs, simplify the tax system, and liberalize trade flows. It remains unclear, however, whether either candidate would be willing or able to implement such changes. Bolsonaro expressed support for market-oriented reforms during the campaign but has advocated economic nationalism throughout his political career. Haddad has pledged to address the fiscal deficit, but he also intends to reverse most of the Temer Administration's reforms and to reassert a stronger role for the state in development. Even with presidential support, far-reaching reforms could run into opposition in Brazil's congress, where patronage-based parties will and expressing prejudice toward marginalized sectors of Brazilian society. Bolsonaro also lacked the finances and party machinery of his principal competitors, and he largely remained off the campaign trail after he was stabbed in an assassination attempt on September 6. Nevertheless, Bolsonaro's social media-driven campaign and populist law-and-order message quickly attracted a strong base of support. He was able to outflank his opponents by exploiting anti-PT and antiestablishment sentiment and aligning himself with the few institutions that Brazilians still trust: the military and the church.

Policy Implications

President-elect Bolsonaro is to be inaugurated to a four-year term on January 1, 2019. His administration could usher in far-reaching changes to Brazil's economic and foreign policies and potentially could test the strength of the country's democratic institutions.

Economy
Many economists argue that Brazil's economic recovery depends on the incoming administration implementing extensive reforms, including measures to reduce the fiscal deficit, simplify the tax system, and liberalize trade flows. Bolsonaro embraced such policies during the campaign but previously had been a strong proponent of economic nationalism. His designated economy minister has indicated the administration's top priorities will be the enactment of a cost-reducing pension reform and the privatization of state-owned enterprises. Bolsonaro has expressed reservations about both initiatives, however, indicating he favors gradual changes to the pension system and opposes the sale of strategic companies such as the state-owned oil producer, Petrobras. Significant reforms also could run into opposition in Brazil's congress, where patronage-based parties will continue to hold a crucial bloc of votes. Any deterioration in the Brazilian economy could weaken demand for U.S. exports, which totaled $63.7 billion in 2017.

International Affairs
Preoccupied with domestic crises, Brazilian leaders have dedicated little attention to foreign affairs over the past five years. The next presidentnew administration could reassert Brazilian influence abroad, particularly if the domestic situation stabilizes. Bolsonaro has suggested he would pursueAlthough Brazil traditionally has pursued an independent foreign policy, Bolsonaro has called for closer alignment with the United States. HeDuring the campaign, he indicated he would follow President Trump's lead in taking a more confrontational approach toward China and withdrawing from multilateral organizations and accords such as the Paris agreement on climate change. Haddad is more likely to maintain an independent foreign policy and Brazil's long-standing commitments to multilateralism, peaceful dispute settlement, and nonintervention. Like previous PT presidents, he likely would prioritize ties with other developing countries while maintaining cordial relations with the United States.

withdrawing from the Paris agreement on climate change, constraining Chinese trade and investment flows, taking a more confrontational approach toward the Cuban and Venezuelan governments, and moving Brazil's embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Bolsonaro has since backed away from some of those positions in response to domestic and international criticism. The Trump Administration views Bolsonaro as a "likeminded leader," and President Trump has called for Brazil and the United States to "work closely together" on trade, defense, and other issues. Nevertheless, trade policy is likely to generate some bilateral tensions, as both leaders are inclined toward protecting domestic producers.
Democracy and Human Rights

Many observers are concerned that Bolsonaro may pose a threat to Brazil's democratic institutions. During the campaign, he pledged to purge his leftist political opponents from the country, classify land rights activists as terrorists, and give police greater freedom to kill suspected criminals. He also regularly attacked the press while surrounding himself with retired generals, several of whom are expected to serve in his Cabinet. Since his election, Bolsonaro has vowed to defend democracy and uphold the constitution. Those commitments could be put to the test, however, once Bolsonaro's agenda faces resistance from civil society or other branches of government.