Updated November 16, 2018December 23, 2019
Defense Primer: Defense Appropriations Process
The Constitution gives Congress the power of the purse in
Article I, Section 9, which provides that “No money shall
be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of
Appropriations made by Law.” To fulfill this duty,
Congress annually considers appropriations measures,
which provide funding for numerous activities—such as
national defense, education, and homeland security—
consistent with policies and priorities established through
legislation such as the National Defense Authorization Act.
The congressional appropriations process includes various
rules and practices that Congress has adopted to distinguish
appropriations measures and facilitate their consideration.
These measures generally provide funding authority in
response to the President’s budget request for a fiscal year
(October 1 -through September 30).
Committees of Jurisdiction
The House and Senate Committees on Appropriations
exercise jurisdiction over the annual appropriations
measures. Each committee has 12 subcommittees, with
each subcommittee having responsibility for developing
one regular annual appropriations bill to provide funding
for departments and activities within its jurisdiction. The
jurisdictions of the House and Senate Appropriations
subcommittees are generally parallel. The subcommittees
main
subcommittees dealing with defense matters are:
Subcommittees on Defense, with jurisdiction over
appropriations for the Departments of Army, Navy
(including Marine Corps), Air Force, Office of Secretary
of Defense, Defense Agencies, the Central Intelligence
Agency, and the Intelligence Community Staff.
Subcommittees on Military Construction, Veterans
Affairs and Related Agencies, with jurisdiction over
appropriations for Military Construction, Chemical
Demilitarization Construction, Military Family Housing
Construction and Operation and Maintenance, the Base
Realignment and Closure Account, NATO Security
Investment Program, as well as the Department of
Veterans Affairs, and other related agencies.
Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, with
jurisdiction over the Army Corps of Engineers, and all
defense-related activities of the Department of Energy,
including the National Nuclear Security Administration.
The Congressional Budget Resolution
The Congressional Budget Act of 1974 provides for the
annual consideration of a concurrent resolution on the
budget, which allows Congress to establish overall
budgetary and fiscal policy to be implemented through
enactment of subsequent legislation. The budget resolution,
in part, establishes a limit on total new budget authority and
outlay levels divided among 20 functional categories—such
as national defense, agriculture, and transportation—that set
spending priorities.
Section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act requires
that the total new budget authority and outlays in the budget
resolution be allocated among all committees with spending
jurisdiction. This establishes ceilings on spending for
legislation reported from each committee that can be
enforced procedurally through points of order during
consideration of the legislation. All discretionary spending
is allocated to the House and Senate Appropriations
Committees, which are required to subdivide this allocation
among their 12 subcommittees under Section 302(b) of the
Congressional Budget Act. These suballocations are also
enforceable during consideration of legislation, preventing
the consideration of amendments that would increase
funding above these limits. In the absence of agreement on
a budget resolution, the House and Senate may use
alternative means to establish enforceable limits.
Committee Processes
Upon receipt of the President’s budget request, the
appropriations subcommittees begin a series of hearings in
which the senior civilian and military leadership of the
Department of Defense, the military services, and certain
defense agencies are invited to testify before the
subcommittees on the budget request.
At the same time, Members of Congress may submit
requests and make recommendations concerning proposed
programmatic levels and language to be included in
appropriations bills and committee reports.
After conducting these hearings, the House and Senate
Appropriations Committees make their suballocations, and
the subcommittees begin to draft, mark up, and report the
appropriations bills to their respective full committees. The
full committees also hold a markup, and may adopt
amendments to a subcommittee’s recommendations before
reporting the bills and making them available for floor
consideration. In addition to drafting the bills, the
subcommittees also prepare reports, which include
information required by House and Senate rules, explain
committee actions, and provide guidance, and directives to
agencies. Committee reports may not be amended directly
during floor proceedings.
House and Senate Consideration
Traditionally, the House initiates consideration of regular
appropriations measures, although the Senate
Appropriations Committee may draft or report
appropriations legislation in anticipation of House action.
The House Appropriations Committee generally begins
reporting the appropriations bills to the House in May or
June. Once reported from committee, an appropriations bill
may be scheduled for floor consideration. In the House,
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: Defense Appropriations Process
current practice is to consider the bill under the terms of a
special rule (reported by the House Rules Committee) that
structures the conditions of debate and specifies possible
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: Defense Appropriations Process
floor amendments to the bill. After being debated, amended
and passed by the House, the measure is sent to the Senate.
The Senate Appropriations Committee typically begins
reporting the bills in June. The recent practice generally hashas generally
been for the Senate to consider the text of a bill as reported
by its Appropriations Committee in the form of a complete
substitute amendment for the House-passed bill. In the
Senate, floor debate and amendment consideration is
typically structured pursuant to multiple unanimous consent
agreements. However, one or more cloture processes (by
which three-fifths of the Senate, typically 60 Senators,
votes to limit consideration) may be necessary for the
Senate to reach a final vote on certain amendments, and on
the bill itself.
Conference
The Constitution requires that the House and Senate
approve the same measure in precisely the same form
before it may be presented to the President for his signature
or veto. Consequently, once the House and Senate have
both completed initial consideration of an appropriations
measure, the Appropriations Committees in each chamber
will endeavor to negotiate a resolution of the differences
between their respective versions. The House and Senate
can agree to convene a conference committee to conduct
this negotiation and propose a package settlement of all
their disagreements. Alternatively, agreement may be
reached through an exchange of amendments between the
houses.
The practice has generally been to use a conference
committee to resolve differences between the houses on the
annual defense appropriations bill. Conferees are typically
drawn from the defense subcommittees of the House and
Senate Appropriations Committees. Conferees are generally
required by House and Senate rules to negotiate within the
scope of the differences between the versions of the bill,
and and
report the result of their negotiation in the form of a
conference report. Completion of the conference report is
not on a specified timeline, so that negotiations are
concluded concluded
only when a majority of the conferees from each
chamber chamber
sign the conference report. The conference
committee will
typically begin their work as soon as
possible following
passage in both chambers.
Once reported by the conference committee, a conference
report is subject to floor debate during consideration, but is
not amendable. (In the Senate, reaching a vote on the
conference report may require three-fifths of the Senate to
invoke cloture.) If the House and Senate each agree to the
conference report, the measure is enrolled for presentation
to the President.
While Congress has traditionally considered and approved
each regular appropriations bill separately, delays in their
consideration may lead to a combination of several
appropriations bills into a single legislative vehicle prior to
enactment, referred to as omnibus appropriations measures.
Statutory Spending Limit
Under the provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011,
there is a limit on the amount of discretionary spending that
can be provided in appropriations measures (through
FY2021). This amount is divided into separate limits for
defense and non-defense. If spending in excess of either of
these statutory limits is enacted, the President is required to
issue a sequester order making across-the-board cuts in
non-exempt programs and activities within the breached
category. The statute also provides, however, for the caps to
be adjusted for any appropriations designated for “Overseas
Contingency Operations/Global War on Terrorism,”
effectively making such spending exempt from the caps.
Continuing Resolutions
If this process is not completed prior to the start of the fiscal
year (October 1), Congress may need to enact one or more
measures to provide temporary funding authority pending
the final disposition of the regular appropriations bills,
either separately or as part of an omnibus measure. Because
budget authority is typically provided for a single fiscal
year, temporary funding measures are necessary if action on
a regular appropriations measure has not been completed
prior to the beginning of a fiscal year in order to prevent a
funding gap that could require an agency to cease nonexcepted activities. Traditionally, temporary funding has
been provided in the form of a joint resolution to allow
agencies or programs to continue to obligate funds at a
particular rate (such as the rate of operations for the
previous fiscal year), for a specific period of time, which
may range from a single day to an entire fiscal year. These
measures are known as continuing resolutions (or CRs).
Supplemental Appropriations
In addition to the amounts provided in a regular
appropriations measure, the President may request, and
Congress may enact, additional funding for selected
activities, in the form of one or more supplemental
appropriations measures (or supplementals). These have
been used to provide funding for unforeseen needs, such as
response to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001, and
recovery costs due to Hurricane Sandy in 2013. They have
also been used as vehicles to provide funding for Overseas
Contingency Operations. Like regular appropriations bills,
supplementals provide specific amounts of funding for
individual accounts rather than funding based on a rate of
operations (like a CR).
CRS Products
CRS Report R42388, The Congressional Appropriations Process:
An Introduction, coordinated by James V. Saturno
CRS ReportInfographic IG10005, From Bill to Law: Stages of the Legislative
Legislative Process, by Valerie Heitshusen and Jennifer E.
Manning
Note: For questions on the appropriations process, contact
James V. Saturno; for questions on defense appropriations,
contact Brendan W. McGarry. Acknowledgment: This
primer was originally co-authored by Lynn M. Williams,
former CRS Specialist in Defense Readiness and
Infrastructure.
Statutory Spending Limit
Under the provisions of the Budget Control Act of 2011,
there is a limit on the amount of discretionary spending that
can be provided in appropriations measures (through
FY2021). This amount is divided into separate limits for
James V. Saturno, Specialist on Congress and the
Legislative Process
Brendan W. McGarry, Analyst in US Defense Budget
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IF10514
Defense Primer: Defense Appropriations Process
IF10514
Brendan W. McGarry, Analyst in US Defense Budget
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10514 · VERSION 57 · UPDATED