This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
Title IV of the Higher Education Act (HEA) authorizes programs that provide financial assistance to students to assist them in obtaining a postsecondary education at certain institutions of higher education (IHEs). These IHEs include public, private nonprofit, and proprietary institutions. For students attending such institutions to be able to receive Title IV assistance, an institution must be
These three requirements are known as the program integrity triad and are intended to provide a balance between consumer protection, quality
assurance, and oversight and compliance in postsecondary education.
Institutions also must offer at least one eligible program. Eligible programs are those that lead to certain defined degrees or certificates or prepare students for gainful employment and fulfill durational requirements.
Proprietary institutions must meet additional HEA requirements that are otherwise inapplicable to nonprofit institutions, including providers participating in
Title IV student aid programs.
An IHE must also fulfill a variety of other related requirements, including those that relate to
institutional recruiting practices, student policies and procedures, and the administration of the
Title IV student aid programs.
Finally, additional criteria may apply to an institution depending on its control or the type of
educational programs it offers. For example, proprietary institutions must meet HEA
requirements that are otherwise inapplicable to public and private nonprofit institutions, including
deriving at least 10% of their revenues from non-Title IV funds (also known as the 90/10 rule).
Specific criteria are required for Title IV participation if an institution offers distance or correspondence education. In addition to being authorized to operate within the state in which it is located, an institution offering distance or correspondence education must also be accredited by an agency recognized by ED as an accrediting agency able to evaluate distance education programs. Finally, an institution is ineligible to participate in Title IV programs if more than 50% of its courses are offered by correspondence or if 50% or more of its students are enrolled in correspondence courses.
As the 115th Congress considers HEA reauthorization, several issues related to institutional eligibility for Title IV programs may become a focus. These issues may include the sources from which proprietary institutions derive their revenue and whether current requirements should be applied or modified to address new types of postsecondary educational offerings.
This report first describes the types of institutions eligible to participate in Title IV programs and discusses the program integrity triad. Next, it discusses additional issues related to institutional eligibility, including recent statutory and regulatory changes pertaining to institutional eligibility requirements. Finally, this report explores some of the emerging issues that the 115th Congress might consider.
Title IV of the Higher Education Act (HEA); P.L. 89-329), as amended, authorizes programs that
provide financial assistance to students to attend certain institutions of higher education (IHEs). In academic year (AY) 2015-2016, 7,177 institutions were classified as Title IV eligible IHEs.1 Of
6,760 institutions were classified as Title IV eligible IHEs in academic year (AY) 2016-2017.1 Of
those IHEs eligible to participate in Title IV programs, approximately 27.829.4% were public
institutions, 26.727.8% were private nonprofit institutions, and 45.6% were private for-profit (or proprietary42.9% were proprietary (or private,
for-profit) institutions. It is estimated that $125.7122.5 billion was made available to students through
Title IV federal student aid in FY2016.2
FY2017.2 To be able to receive Title IV assistance, students must attend an institution that is
These three requirements—state licensure, accreditation, and certification of eligibility—are known as the program integrity triad. The state licensure and accreditation components were developed independently to address the issues of quality assurance and consumer protection, and the federal government
(ED specifically) generally relies on states and accrediting agencies to determine standards of
educational program quality. The federal government'’s only direct role in determining Title IV
eligibility is through the process of certification of eligibility. This and ensuring IHEs meet some
additional Title IV requirements. Certification, as a component of the program integrity triad ,
focuses on an institution'’s fiscal responsibility and administrative capacity to administer Title IV
funds.
An IHE must fulfill a variety of other related requirements, including those that relate to
institutional recruiting practices, student policies and procedures, and Title IV program
administration. Finally, additional criteria may apply to an institution depending on its control or
the type of educational programs it offers. For instance, proprietary institutions must derive at
least 10% of their revenues from non-Title IV funds (also known as the 90/10 rule). Failure to
fulfill some of these requirements does not necessarily end an IHE’s participation in the Title IV
1
Although 6,760 institutions were eligible to participate in Title IV FSA programs in AY2016-2017 (July 1, 2016-June
30, 2017), 5,963 institutions participated in and received funds through Title IV FSA programs in FY2017 (October 1,
2016-September 30, 2017). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Postsecondary
Institutions and Cost of Attendance in 2016-2017; Degrees and Other Awards Conferred: 2015-16; and 12-Month
Enrollment: 2015-16, First Look (Provisional Data), NCES 2017-075rev, Table 1, https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/
2017075rev.pdf and U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid, Annual Report FY 2018, Washington, DC,
November 15, 2018, p. 3, https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/2018report/fsa-report.pdf.
2 This includes federal loans, work-study, and grants. See U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid, Annual
Report 2018, Washington, DC, November 15, 2018, p. 8, https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/2018report/fsareport.pdf.
3 ED recognizes accrediting agencies both for Title IV and non-Title IV purposes. There are some differences in criteria
for ED recognition for each. ED-recognition of accrediting agencies for purposes of participation in non-Title IV
programs are beyond the scope of this report.
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
1
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
programs, but may lead to additional oversight from ED and/or restrictions placed an IHE’s Title
IV participation.
This report provides a general overview of HEA provisions that affect a postsecondary
institution’s eligibility for participation in Title IV student aid programs. It first describes general
funds.
This report provides a general overview of HEA provisions that affect a postsecondary institution's eligibility for participation in Title IV student aid programs and discusses in more detail some issues that may be of interest in the forthcoming HEA reauthorization process. This report first describes general eligibility criteria at both the institutional and programmatic level and then, in more detail, the
program integrity triad. Next, it discusses several issues that are closely related to institutional
eligibility: Program Participation Agreements, campus safety policies and crime reporting
required under the Clery Act, the return of Title IV funds, and distance education.
Eligibility Criteria
eligibility: Program Participation Agreements, the return of Title IV funds, and distance education. Finally, this report highlights major regulatory and statutory changes to institutional eligibility requirements made in recent decades and concludes by exploring some of the emerging issues that Congress may consider in the future.
To be eligible to participate in HEA Title IV student aid programs, institutions must meet certain several
criteria. These criteria include requirements related to programs offered by the institutions,
student enrollment, institutional operations, and the length of academic programs. This section
discusses the definition of an eligible IHE for the purposes of Title IV participation and program
eligibility requirements.
Eligible Institutions
The HEA contains two definitions of institutions of higher education. Section 101 provides a
general definition of IHE that is used to determine applies to institutional eligibility for participation in HEA programs
other than Title IV programs.34 The Section 102 definition of IHE is used only to determine
institutional eligibility to participate in HEA Title IV programs.
Section 101 of the HEA provides a general definition of IHE. This definition applies to
institutional participation in non-Title IV HEA programs. Section 101 IHEs can be public or
private nonprofit educational institutions. They must
Section 102 of the HEA defines IHE only for the purposes of Title IV participation. Section 102 IHEs must meet the Section 101 criteria. However, unlike Section 101, the Section 102 definition of IHE includes proprietary institutions of higher education (or for-profit institutions), postsecondary vocational The Section
102 definition includes all institutions included in the Section 101 definition (i.e., public and
private nonprofit IHEs) and also includes proprietary institutions, postsecondary vocational
institutions, and foreign institutions that have been approved by ED.8 Section 102 specifies that
proprietary and postsecondary vocational institutions must meet many of the same Section 101
requirements that are applicable to public and private nonprofit institutions. In addition, Section
102 specifies other criteria that all types of educational institutions must meet to be considered
Title IV eligible IHEs.
Proprietary Institutions of Higher Education
HEA Section 102 specifies that a proprietary IHEs is an institution that is neither a public nor a
private nonprofit institution.9 In addition to the basic Title IV eligibility criteria that all IHEs must
meet (e.g., state authorization, accreditation by an ED-recognized accrediting agency),
proprietary IHEs must meet additional criteria to be considered Title IV eligible. Specifically, a
proprietary IHE must (1) provide an eligible program of training “to prepare students for gainful
employment in a recognized occupation”10 or (2) provide a program leading to a baccalaureate
degree in liberal arts that has been continuously accredited by a regional accrediting agency since
6
34 C.F.R. §600.2. Under IRC Section 501(c)(3), an organization is exempt from federal taxation if no part of its
earnings insures to the benefit of an individual or private shareholder and if it is organized and operated exclusively for,
among other potential items, educational purposes.
7 HEA §101; 20 U.S.C. §1001.
8 HEA §102(a)(2); 20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(1). Department of Education, 2017-2018 Federal Student Aid Handbook, vol. 2,
pp. 3-5, https://ifap.ed.gov/fsahandbook/attachments/1718FSAHbkActiveIndex.pdf (hereinafter FSA Handbook).
9 HEA §102(b)(1)(C); 20 U.S.C. §1002(b)(1)(C).
10 HEA §102(b)(1)(A); 20 U.S.C. §1002(b)(1)(A).
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
3
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
October 1, 2007, and have provided the program continuously since January 1, 2009.
Additionally, it must have been legally authorized to provide (and have continuously been
providing) the same or a substantially similar educational program for at least two consecutive
years.11
Postsecondary Vocational Institutions
HEA Section 102 defines a postsecondary vocational institution as a public or private nonprofit
institution that provides an eligible program of training “to prepare students for gainful
employment in a recognized occupation,”12 and has been legally authorized to provide (and has
continuously been providing) the same or a substantially similar educational program for at least
two consecutive years.13 It is possible for a public or private nonprofit IHE that offers a degree
program (e.g., an associate’s or bachelor’s degree) to also qualify as a postsecondary vocational
institution by offering programs that are less than one academic year and that lead to a nondegree
recognized credential such as a certificate.
Foreign Institutions
Institutional participation in Title IV student aid programs allows students from the United States
to borrow through the federal Direct Loan program to attend postsecondary institutions located
outside of the United States.14 In general, a foreign institution is eligible to participate in the
Direct Loan program if it is comparable to an eligible IHE (as defined in HEA Section 101)
within the United States, is a public or private nonprofit institution,15 and has been approved by
ED. Foreign graduate medical schools, veterinary schools, and nursing schools are also eligible to
participate in Title IV student aid programs, but must meet additional requirements. Freestanding
foreign graduate medical schools, veterinary schools, and nursing schools may be proprietary
institutions.16 Additional requirements for foreign institutions to participate in Title IV student aid
programs are beyond the scope of this report and, generally, will not be discussed hereinafter.
Section 102 Institution of Higher Education
The definitions of proprietary institutions and postsecondary vocational institutions contained in
Section 102 have several overlapping components with the Section 101 definition of IHE.17 For
instance, both proprietary and postsecondary vocational institutions must (1) admit as regular
students only those individuals with a high school diploma or its equivalent, individuals beyond
11
HEA §102(b)(1)(E) and 34 C.F.R. § 600.5(b). See also FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 11.
HEA §102(c); 20 U.S.C. §1002(c).
13 HEA §102(b)(1)(E) and 34 C.F.R. § 600.6(b). See also FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 11.
14 Institutions can choose to participate in Title IV programs or can choose to be designated by ED as “eligibility-only.”
An eligibility-only designation allows an institution and its eligible students to qualify to participate in non-Title IV
programs and benefits, such as the American Opportunity Tax Credit. Additionally, students attending eligibility-only
institutions qualify for in-school deferment of payment on their federal student loans that they have previously
borrowed.
15 A foreign nonprofit institution is one that is owned and operated only by one or more nonprofit corporations of
associations and (1) is determined to be a nonprofit educational institution by the ED-recognized tax authority of the
institution’s home country or (2) if there is no ED-recognized tax authority of the institution’s home country, the
institution demonstrates to ED that it is a nonprofit educational institution. 34 C.F.R. §600.2.
16 HEA §102(a)(2); 20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(2). 34 C.F.R. §600.54.
17 Eligibility requirements differ somewhat for foreign institutions; a complete description of these differences is
beyond the scope of this report.
12
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
4
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
the age of compulsory school attendance, or individuals who are dually or concurrently enrolled
in both the institution and in a secondary school; (2) be legally authorized to provide a
postsecondary education by the state in which they are located; and (3) be accredited or
preaccredited by an accrediting agency recognized by ED to grant such statuses.18
In addition, all types of institutions (including public and private nonprofit institutions) must meet
requirements related to the course of study offered at the institution and student enrollment to be
considered Title IV eligible under Section 102. In general, any type of institution is considered
ineligible to participate in Title IV programs if more than 25% of its enrolled students are
incarcerated, or if more than 50% of the its enrolled students do not have a secondary school
diploma or equivalent and the institution does not provide a two-year associate’s degree or a fouryear bachelor’s degree. Also, in general, an institution is ineligible if more than 50% of the
courses offered are correspondence courses or if 50% or more of its students are enrolled in
correspondence courses. These “50% rules” are discussed in more detail in the distance education
section of this report.19 Finally, an institution is considered ineligible to participate in Title IV
programs if the institution has filed for bankruptcy or the institution (or its owner or chief
executive officer) has been convicted of or pled no contest or guilty to a crime involving the use
of Title IV funds.20
While the above-described criteria generally apply to most types of Section 102 institutions,
specific criteria apply to individual types of Section 102 institutions. The following sections
provide information on Title IV eligibility criteria that apply to those additional types of IHEs not
specified in Section 101, but specified in Section 102: proprietary IHEs, postsecondary vocational
institutions, and foreign institutions.
Hereinafter, unless otherwise noted, the term “institution of high education (IHE)” only refers to
Section 102 institutions.
Eligible Programs
To qualify as an eligible institution for Title IV participation, an institution must offer at least one
eligible program, but overall institutional eligibility does not necessarily extend to all programs
offered by the institution. Not all of an institution’s programs must meet program eligibility
requirements for an IHE to participate in Title IV, but, in general, students enrolled solely in
institutions, and foreign institutions that have been approved by ED.5
Title IV-eligible IHEs must meet requirements related to the course of study offered at the institution and student enrollment. Any type of Section 102 institution becomes ineligible to participate in Title IV programs if more than 25% of its enrolled students are incarcerated or if more than 50% of the IHE's enrolled students do not have a secondary school diploma or equivalent and the IHE does not provide a two-year associate's degree or a four-year bachelor's degree. Also, in general, an institution is ineligible if more than 50% of the courses offered are correspondence courses or if 50% or more of its students are enrolled in correspondence courses. These "50% rules" are discussed in more detail in the distance education section of this report.6
Finally, all eligible IHEs must meet other additional criteria to participate in Title IV programs. An institution must certify to ED that it has adopted and implemented a program to prevent alcohol abuse and illicit drug use by students,7 and an institution's owner or chief executive officer must not have been convicted of or pled no contest or guilty to a crime involving the use of Title IV funds.8
Hereinafter, unless otherwise noted, the term "institution of high education (IHE)" only refers to Section 102 institutions.
Proprietary institutions of higher education are private, for-profit educational institutions. To participate in Title IV programs, they must provide training for gainful employment in a recognized occupation or must provide a program leading to a baccalaureate degree in liberal arts that has been continuously accredited by a regional accrediting agency since October 1, 2007, and have provided the program continuously since January 1, 2009. Additionally, it must have been legally authorized to give the same postsecondary instruction for at least two years.
Proprietary IHEs must derive at least 10% of their revenue from non-Title IV funds (i.e., no more than 90% of their revenue can come from Title IV funds).9 Hereinafter, this is referred to as the 90/10 rule. However, if an institution violates this rule in one year, it does not immediately lose its eligibility. Rather, it is placed on a provisional eligibility status for two years. If the proprietary IHE violates the 90/10 rule for two consecutive years, then it loses its eligibility for at least two years.10
Postsecondary vocational institutions are public or private nonprofit education institutions. To participate in Title IV programs, they must provide training for gainful employment in a recognized occupation and meet the additional program criteria listed for proprietary IHEs, which include having been legally authorized to give the same postsecondary instruction for at least two years;11 however, the 90/10 rule does not apply to these institutions.
Institutional participation in Title IV student aid programs allows students from the United States to borrow through the federal Direct Loan (DL) Program to attend IHEs located outside of the United States.12 In general, a foreign institution may participate in the DL Program if it is comparable to an eligible IHE within the United States (i.e., it meets Section 101 requirements) and has been approved by ED. ED recognizes foreign public, private nonprofit, and proprietary institutions.13 Foreign proprietary institutions are subject to the same 90/10 rule as domestic proprietary IHEs.14
To qualify as an eligible institution for Title IV participation, an institution must offer at least one eligible program, but overall institutional eligibility does not necessarily extend to all programs offered. Not all of an institution's programs need to meet program eligibility requirements for an IHE to participate in Title IV, but students enrolled in ineligible programs cannot receive Title IV student aid.15ineligible programs cannot receive Title IV student aid.21 To be Title IV eligible, a program must lead to certain defined degrees or certificates
lead to a degree (e.g., an associate’s or bachelor’s degree) or certificate or prepare students for gainful employment. Programs must also fulfill durational requirements to be eligible for Title IV participation.
gainful employment in a recognized occupation.
Before awarding Title IV aid to students, an IHE must determine that the program in which a
student is participating is Title IV eligible, ensure that the program is included in its accreditation
notice, and ensure that itthe the IHE is authorized by the appropriate state to offer the program.
22
18
HEA §102(b) and (c).
HEA §102(a)(3); 20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(3).
20 HEA §102(a)(4); 20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(4).
21 HEA §484(a)(1); 20 U.S.C. §1091(a)(1). Students enrolled in certain preparatory or teacher certification courses,
may be eligible to receive limited forms of student aid. FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 19.
22 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 19.
19
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
5
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
In addition to the general criteria for all types of institutions, a program must meet specific
eligibility requirements depending on whether the institution at which it is offered is a public or
private nonprofit IHE, a proprietary IHE, or a postsecondary vocational IHE.
To be eligible for funding under Title IV, the HEA provides that an educational program at an IHE must lead to a degree (e.g., associate's degree, bachelor's degree) or prepare students for "gainful employment in a recognized occupation."16 While the gainful employment requirement applies to some programs offered by public and private nonprofit IHEs, most programs offered by proprietary IHEs must be gainful employment programs.17
In response to concerns about the quality of programs that prepare students for gainful
employment and the level of student debt assumed by individuals who attend these programs, ED
issued final rules on gainful employment on October 31, 2014.1833 The regulations require that
educational programs subject to gainful employment requirements offered by IHEs meet
minimum performance standards to be considered offering education that prepares students for
gainful employment in a recognized occupation and. They also require IHEs to disclose specified
information about each of its gainful employment programs to enrolled or prospective students.
28
Short-term programs are only eligible to participate in the Direct Loan Program. 34 C.F.R. §668.8(d)(3).
34 C.F.R. §668.8(d); FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 21.
30 The following types of nondegree programs offered by public and private nonprofit IHEs are not subject to gainful
employment requirements: (1) preparatory classwork necessary for enrollment in a Title IV eligible program; (2)
approved comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities; (3) transfer
programs that are at least two academic years in length and for which the school does not award a credential but that
are designed to be acceptable for full credit toward a bachelor’s degree; and (4) teacher certification programs for
which the institution does not award a credential. FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 23.
31 HEA §§101(b)(1); 20 U.S.C. §§1001(b)(1).
32 HEA §§ 102(b)(1)(A)(i) and 102(c)(1)(A); 20 U.S.C. §§ 1002(b)(1)(A)(i) and 1002(c)(1). The following programs
offered by proprietary IHEs are not subject to gainful employment requirements: (1) programs offered by proprietary
IHEs accredited by an ED-recognized regional accrediting agency that lead to a bachelor’s degree in liberal arts. The
school must have been continuously accredited by an ED-recognized accrediting agency since at least October 1, 2007,
and must have provided the program continuously since January 1, 2009; (2) preparatory classwork necessary for
enrollment in a Title IV eligible program; and (3) approved comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs for
students with intellectual disabilities. FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 23.
33 Previously, ED had issued rules on gainful employment in late 2010 and early 2011. On June 30, 2012, the day
before the final regulations related to gainful employment performance metrics were to go into effect, the U.S. District
Court for the District of Columbia vacated most of the gainful employment regulations. Association of Private Colleges
& Universities v. Duncan, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90434 (D.C. 2012). Rather than appealing the decision, ED
promulgated new gainful employment rules.
29
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
7
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
Finally, the gainful employment rules require IHEs to report information to ED necessary to
calculate the debt-to-earnings ratios.
Although the gainful employment regulations became effective July 1, 2015, various aspects of
them have not yet been fully implemented or have been delayed in implementation. For example,
ED delayed until July 1, 2019, some portions of the rule relating to certain disclosure
requirements.34 Additionally, to enable ED to calculate whether an IHE’s programs meet the
minimum performance standards (discussed below), regulations specify that ED obtains data
from the Social Security Administration (SSA).35 However, a memorandum of understanding
relating to data sharing between ED and SSA lapsed in 2018.36
In August 2018, ED issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that proposes to rescind the gainful
employment rules in their entirety.37 Based on HEA requirements relating to the implementation
date for Title IV regulations,38 the earliest possible date the proposed rules could go into effect is
July 1, 2020.39
information about each of its gainful employment programs to enrolled or prospective students. Although the gainful employment regulations became effective July 1, 2015, the rules have not yet been fully implemented. For instance, IHEs are currently required to report data to ED to enable it to calculate whether an IHE's programs meet the minimum performance standards (discussed below), but IHEs' programs will not be subject to potential loss of Title IV eligibility under those standards until winter 2017/2018. In addition, IHEs are not required to begin complying with the disclosure requirements (described below) until July 1, 2017.19
Recently, ED announced it would initiate a negotiated rulemaking to revise the current gainful employment regulations.20 It is unclear how the rules may be revised during the rulemaking process; however, until they are revised, the current gainful employment regulations remain in effect and IHEs may be subject to sanctions for failure to meet those standards.
Current Gainful Employment Regulations
The gainful employment regulations establish a framework within which educational programs
offered by IHEs must meet minimum performance standards to be considered offering education
that prepares students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation. Under the framework,
ED annually calculates two debt-to-earnings (D/E) rates for each gainful employment program
offered by an IHE, the discretionary income rate and the annual earnings rate.2140 These rates
measure a gainful employment program'’s completers' debt’ debt41 (their annual loan payments) as a
percentage of their post-completion earnings. Using these measures, institutions will be
determined to be "“passing," "” “in the zone,"” or "“failing."” Thresholds for each category are as follows:
Programs that are failing in two out of any three consecutive years or that are in the zone for four
consecutive years will be ineligible for Title IV participation for three years.
The gainful employment rules also contain several disclosure requirements. For any year in which
ED notifies an IHE that a gainful employment program could become ineligible in the next year
based on its debt-to-earnings ratios (i.e., one year of failure or three years in the zone), the IHE
must provide a warning to current and prospective students that the program does not meet the
gainful employment standards and that if the program does not meet the gainful employment
standards in the future, students maywould not be able to receive Title IV aid.25
45
In addition, an IHE must disclose specified information about each of its gainful employment
programs to enrolled and prospective students. Information to be disclosed includes the following:
Institutions must also certify that each of their gainful employment programs is included in the IHE's accreditation, meets any state or federal entity accreditation requirements, and meets any state licensing and certification requirements for the state in which the IHE is located. Finally, the gainful employment rules require IHEs to report information to ED necessary to calculate the debt-to-earnings ratios.
Many programs must fulfill requirements related to how much instructional time is provided to students. Some programs are measured by academic year, while others are measured by clock or credit hours.
Clock and credit hours are used as measurements to determine how much instruction time a program must provide to students for it to be Title IV eligible.
A clock hour is a period of time comprising
A credit hour is an amount of student work that reasonably approximates at least
In addition to measuring instructional time in clock and credit hours, many programs must meet a minimum number of weeks of instructional time to be eligible to participate in Title IV programs. For programs that measure instructional time in credit hours, an academic year must provide at least 30 weeks of instructional time; programs that measure instructional time in clock hours must provide at least 26 weeks of instructional time.30 For both of these, an academic year must also require an undergraduate course of study to contain an amount of instructional time in which a full-time student is expected to complete at least 24 semester or trimester credit hours, 36 quarter credit hours, or 900 clock hours.31
In addition to the general durational criteria and educational offerings criteria (e.g., degree or gainful employment program) described above, a program must meet eligibility requirements depending on whether the institution at which it is offered is a public or private nonprofit IHE, a proprietary IHE, or a postsecondary vocational IHE.
At a public or private nonprofit institution, the following programs are Title IV eligible: (1) programs that lead to an associate's, bachelor's, professional, or graduate degree; (2) programs that are acceptable for full credit toward a bachelor's degree and at least two academic years in length; (3) programs that lead to a certificate or other recognized non-degree credential, that prepare students for gainful employment, and that are at least one academic year in length; and (4) certificate or diploma training programs that are less than one year in length, if the institution also meets the definition of a postsecondary vocational institution.32
At proprietary and postsecondary vocational institutions, the following programs are Title IV eligible:
Program Integrity Triad
Title IV of the HEA sets forth three requirements to ensure program integrity in postsecondary
education, known as the program integrity triad. The three requirements are state authorization,
accreditation by an accrediting agency recognized by ED, and eligibility and certification by ED.
This triad is intended to provide a balance in the Title IV eligibility requirements. The states'’ role
is to provide consumer protection, the accrediting agencies'’ role is to provide quality assurance,
and the federal government'’s role is to provide oversight of compliance to ensure administrative
and fiscal integrity of Title IV programs at IHEs.
State Authorization
The state role in the program integrity triad is to provide legal authority for an institution to
operate a postsecondary educational program in the state in which it is located.35
physically located.49 There are two basic requirements for an IHE to be considered legally authorized by a state:
50
47
For information on how the loan repayment rate is calculated, see 34 C.F.R. §668.413.
The annual earnings rate is the percentage of a gainful employment program’s annual loan payments divided by the
higher of the mean or median annual earnings of the program’s completers during the applicable cohort period.
49 34 C.F.R. §600.9.
50 These two requirements do not apply to (1) institutions authorized by the federal government by name to operate
postsecondary educational programs and (2) institutions authorized by name by an Indian tribe to operate
48
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
10
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
An IHE can be authorized by name through a state charter, statute, constitutional provision, or
other action by an appropriate state agency (e.g., authorization to conduct business or operate as a
nonprofit organization). Additionally, an institution must also comply with any applicable state
approval or licensure requirements.37
51
The state agency responsible for the authorization of postsecondary institutions must also perform
three additional functions:
Finally, effective July 1, 2018,52
On December 19, 2016, ED issued final regulations related to state authorization for IHEs
offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education (discussed later in this report). The
regulations would require an IHE offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education to
students residing in a state in which itthe IHE is not physically located mustto meet any requirements within that state. An IHE may fulfill this criterion if it
within the student’s state of residence. Under the rules, an IHE may meet this requirement if it
participates in a state authorization reciprocity agreement. This provision is discussed later in this report.
53 These regulations were scheduled to
become effective July 1, 2018. However, on July 3, 2018 (and effective June 29, 2018), the
Secretary of Education (Secretary) issued a final rule delaying the implementation of these
requirements until July 1, 2020.54
Accreditation
The second component of the program integrity triad is accreditation by an ED-recognized
accrediting agency or association.3955 In higher education, accreditation is usedintended to help ensure
an acceptable level of quality within IHEs. For Title IV purposes, an institution must be
accredited or preaccredited by an ED-recognized accrediting agency. Each accrediting agency
must meet certainHEA-specified standards to be recognized by ED, and ED must follow specified procedures when determining whether to recognize an accrediting agency. The National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity advises the Secretary of Education (Secretary) on matters related to accreditation and agency recognition.
From its inception, accreditation has been a voluntary process. It developed with the formation of associations that distinguished between IHEs that merited the designation of college or university from those that did not. Since then, accreditation has been used as a form of "external quality review ... to scrutinize colleges, universities and programs for quality assurance and quality improvement."40
In 1952, shortly after the passage of the Veterans' Readjustment Act of 1952 (the Korean GI Bill; P.L. 82-550), the federal government began formally recognizing accrediting agencies. This was done as a means to assess higher education quality and link it to determining which institutions would qualify to receive federal aid under the Korean GI Bill. Rather than creating a centralized authority to assess quality, the federal government chose to rely on the existing expertise .
postsecondary educational programs, provided they are located on tribal lands and the tribal government has a process
to review and address complaints concerning the IHEs and enforces applicable tribal law. Additionally, religious
institutions are considered authorized to operate postsecondary educational programs within a state if they are exempt
under state law from state authorization as religious institutions. Federal Student Aid Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 5-6.
51 States may exempt institutions established through a state charter, statute, or constitutional provision from state
approval or licensure requirements based on the IHE’s having been in operation for at least 20 years or based on its
accreditation by one or more ED-recognized accrediting agencies. If the IHE was authorized by the state to conduct
business or operate as a nonprofit organization, the state may not exempt the IHE from state approval or licensure
requirements based on years in operation, accreditation, or comparable exemptions. Federal Student Aid Handbook,
vol. 2, p. 6.
52 HEA §495; 20 U.S.C. §1099a.
53 A state reciprocity agreement is “an agreement between two or more states that authorizes institutions located and
legally authorized in a state covered by the agreement to provide postsecondary education through distance education
or correspondence courses to students residing in other states covered by the agreement.” U.S. Department of
Education, “Program Integrity and Improvement,” 81 Federal Register 92262, December 19, 2016.
54 Department of Education, “Program Integrity and Improvement,” 83 Federal Register 31296, July 3, 2018.
55 For additional information on accreditation and the federal government’s role, see CRS Report R43826, An Overview
of Accreditation of Higher Education in the United States, by Alexandra Hegji.
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
11
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
Background
From its inception, accreditation has been a voluntary process. It developed with the formation of
associations that distinguished between IHEs that merited the designation of college or university
from those that did not. Since then, accreditation has been used as a form of “external quality
review ... to scrutinize colleges, universities and programs for quality assurance and quality
improvement.”56
In 1952, shortly after the passage of the Veterans’ Readjustment Act of 1952 (the Korean GI Bill;
P.L. 82-550), the federal government began formally recognizing accrediting agencies. This was
done as one means to assess higher education quality and link it to determining which institutions
would qualify to receive federal aid under the Korean GI Bill. Rather than creating a centralized
authority to assess quality, the federal government chose to rely in part on the existing expertise
of accrediting agencies.57 Today, ED’of accrediting agencies.41 Today, ED's formal recognition of accrediting agencies is important,
because an IHE'’s Title IV eligibility is conditioned upon accreditation from a federally recognized accreditation organization.42
an ED-recognized
accreditation organization.58
As part of the accreditation system'’s development, three types of accrediting agencies have
emerged:
59
Accreditation Process
Generally, an institution must be accredited by an ED-recognized accrediting agency that has the
authority to cover all of the institution'’s programs.4460 Alternatively, a public or private nonprofit
IHE may be preaccredited by an agency recognized by ED to grant such preaccreditation, and a public postsecondary educational institution may be accredited by a state agency that ED
56
Judith S. Eaton, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation, Council for Higher Education Accreditation, Washington, DC,
November 2015, p. 1, http://chea.org/pdf/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%202015.pdf (hereinafter CHEA,
An Overview of U.S. Accreditation).
57 For additional information on the history of accreditation and the federal role, see John R. Proffit, The Federal
Connection for Accreditation, The Journal of Higher Education, 1979, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1980935?seq=1.
58 HEA §101(a)(5); 20 U.S.C. §1001(a)(5).
59 CHEA, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation, p. 2.
60 Such an agency is known as the institution’s primary accrediting agency.
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
12
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
public postsecondary vocational institution may be accredited by a state agency61that ED
determines is a reliable authority. Proprietary institutions must be accredited by an ED-recognized
accrediting agency.45
62
The accreditation process begins with an institution or program requesting accreditation.
Institutional accreditation is cyclical, with a cycle ranging from every few years up to 10 years.
Initial accreditation does not guarantee subsequent renewal of the accredited status.46
63
Typically, an institution seeking accreditation will first perform a self-assessment to determine
whether its operations and performance meet the basic standards required by the relevant
accrediting agency. Next, an outside group of higher education peers (e.g., faculty and
administrators) and members of the public conduct an on-site visit at the institution during which
the team determines whether the accrediting organization'’s standards are, in fact, being met. Based on the
results of the self-assessment and site visit, the accrediting organization determines whether
accreditation will be awarded, renewed, denied, or provisionally awarded to an institution.47
Programs64
Educational programs within institutions can be accredited by programmatic accrediting agencies;
however, a program doesis not needrequired to be accredited by a programmatic accrediting agency for
Title IV purposes. Rather, it only needs to be covered by the IHE'’s primary accrediting agency.48 65
Frequently, programmatic accrediting agencies review a specific program within an IHE that is
accredited by a regional or national accrediting agency.
An institution that has had its accreditation revoked or terminated for cause cannot be recertified
as an IHE eligible to participate in Title IV programs for 24 months following the loss of
accreditation, unless the accrediting agency rescinds the loss. The same rules apply if an
institution voluntarily withdraws its accreditation. The Secretary can, however, continue the
eligibility of a religious institution whose loss of accreditation, whether voluntary or not, is
related to its religious mission and not to the HEA accreditation standards.66 If an institution’s
accredited by a regional or national accrediting agency.
If an IHE wants to change accrediting agencies, it must submit to ED materials related to its current accreditation and documents that show reasonable cause for the change. If the IHE does not do so, ED will no longer recognize the institution's existing accreditation and the IHE would no longer be eligible for Title IV participation. If an IHE seeks to be accredited by two agencies at the same time, it must designate which agency's accreditation will be used in determining its Title IV eligibility. The institution must also provide to ED and both accrediting agencies materials documenting the reasons for dual accreditation.49 If an institution's accrediting agency loses its recognition from ED, it has up to 18 months to obtain accreditation
from another ED-recognized agency.
An institution that has had its accreditation revoked or terminated for cause cannot be recertified as an IHE eligible to participate in Title IV programs for 24 months following the loss of accreditation, unless the accrediting agency rescinds the loss. The same rules apply if an institution voluntarily withdraws its accreditation. The Secretary can, however, continue the eligibility of a religious institution whose loss of accreditation, whether voluntary or not, is related to its religious mission and not to the HEA accreditation standards.50
Although the federal government does not set specific standards for institutional or programmatic accreditation, generally, it does require that institutions be accredited or preaccredited by a recognized accrediting organization to be eligible for Title IV participation. ED's primary role in accreditation is to recognize an accrediting agency as a "reliable authority regarding the quality of education or training offered" at IHEs through the processes and conditions set forth in the HEA 67
Federal Recognition of Accrediting Agencies
Although the federal government does not set specific standards for institutional or programmatic
accreditation, generally, it does require that institutions be accredited or preaccredited by a
61
This requirement is distinct from the state authorization requirement.
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 8.
63 CHEA, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation, p. 4.
64 Ibid., pp. 4-5. Accrediting agency terms such as “award” or “deny” that are used in this report are meant to provide
general descriptions of the types of actions taken by accrediting agencies, as accrediting agencies’ definitions for these
terms may vary.
65 Generally, although institutions are not required to have their programs accredited by programmatic accrediting
agencies, they may wish to have a program accredited for various reasons. For instance, many employers require
prospective employees to be graduates of an accredited program, and licensure requirements for some occupations in
certain states require programmatic accreditation. Under the gainful employment regulations, however, an institution
must certify to ED that each gainful employment program it operates is programmatically accredited, if such
accreditation is required by a federal government entity or by the state in which the institution is located to participate
in the Title IV student aid programs. This certification requirement effectively requires programmatic accreditation for
Title IV eligibility in certain instances. 34 C.F.R. §668.414(d)(1).
66 20 U.S.C. §1099b(j).
67 HEA §498(h)(2); 20 U.S.C. §1099c(h)(2).
62
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
13
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
recognized accrediting organization to be eligible for Title IV participation. ED’s primary role in
accreditation is to recognize an accrediting agency as a “reliable authority regarding the quality of
education or training offered” at IHEs through the processes and conditions set forth in the HEA
and federal regulations.68
and federal regulations.51
For ED recognition, Section 496 of the HEA specifically requires that an accrediting agency be a
state, regional, or national agency that demonstrates the ability to operate as an accrediting
agency within the relevant state or region or nationally. Additionally, agencies must meet one of
the following criteria:
Agencies that meet the first or third criterion listed above must also be administratively and
financially separate and independent of any related trade association or membership
organization.5270 For an agency that meets the third criterion and that was ED-recognized on or
before October 1, 1991, the Secretary may waive the requirement that the agency be
administratively and financially independent of any related organization, but only if the agency
can show that the existing relationship with the related organization has not compromised its
independence in the accreditation process.
All types of accrediting agencies must show that they consistently apply and enforce standards
that ensure that the education programs, training, or courses of study offered by an IHE are of
sufficient quality to meet the stated objectives for which the programs, training, or courses are
offered. The standards used by the accrediting agencies must assess student achievement in
relation to the institution'’s mission; this may include course completion, job placement rates, and
passage rates of state licensing exams. Agencies must also consider curricula, faculty, facilities,
fiscal and administrative capacity, student support services, and admissions practices.
Accrediting agencies must also meet requirements that focus on the review of an institution's ’s
operating procedures, including reviewing an institution'’s policies and procedures for
determining credit hours, the application of those policies and procedures to programs and coursework,53 and reviewing any newly established branch campuses. They must also perform regular on-site visits that focus on the quality of education and program effectiveness.
ED must follow certain HEA-prescribed procedures for recognizing an accrediting agency. Those requirements include conducting an independent evaluation of the agency, soliciting third party information, making publicly available records of the decision making process, and publishing any reasons for denying recognition. ED is explicitly prohibited from basing recognition decisions on any reason other than the requirements set forth in the HEA, but accrediting agencies are permitted to set additional standards.54
Although ED makes the final decision on whether to recognize an accrediting agency, the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) advises the Secretary on matters related to accreditation, including on whether to recognize an agency and the enforcement of criteria for recognition.55
The NACIQI was originally composed of 15 members, but the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA; P.L. 110-315) provided for an 18-member committee, with 6 members appointed by the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives,56 6 appointed by the President pro tempore of the U.S. Senate,57 and 6 appointed by the Secretary. The appointed members will serve staggered terms. Initially, the members appointed by the Secretary served for three years, those appointed by the U.S. House of Representatives served for four years, and those appointed by the U.S. Senate served for six years. After the initial round of NACIQI members, each subsequent member will serve a six-year term.58
The final component of the program integrity triad is eligibility and certification by ED. Here, ED
is responsible for verifying an institution'’s legal authority to operate within a state and its
accreditation status. ED must also evaluatealso evaluates an institution'’s financial responsibility and administrative
capability to administer Title IV student aid programs. An institution can be certified to
participate in Title IV for up to six years before applying for recertification.
Financial Responsibility
ED determines an IHE'’s financial responsibility based on its ability to provide the services
described in its official publications, to administer the Title IV programs in which it participates,
and to meet all of its financial obligations.73 A public IHE is deemed financially responsible if its
debts and liabilities are backed by the full faith and credit of the state or another government
entity.5974 A proprietary or private nonprofit IHE is financially responsible if it meets specific
financial ratios (e.g., equity ratio) established by ED,6075 has sufficient cash reserves to make any
required refunds (including the return of Title IV funds), is meeting all of its financial obligations,
and is current on its debt payments.
76
Even if an institution meets all of thethe above requirements, ED does not consider it financially responsible if a third-party financial audit is adverse or expresses doubt about the institution's continued existence or if the IHE
responsible if the IHE does not meet third-party financial audit requirements or if the IHE
violated past performance requirements, such as failing to satisfactorily resolve any compliance
issues identified in program reviews or audits.
77
Alternatively, if an institution does not meet the above standards of financial responsibility, ED
may still consider it financially responsible or give it provisional certification, under which it may
operate for a time, if it qualifies under an alternative standard. These alternative standards include
submitting an irrevocable letter of credit to ED that is equal to at least 50% of the FSA program
funds that the IHE received during its most recently completed fiscal year, meeting specific
monitoring requirements, or participating in the Title IV programs under provisional certification.61
Along with demonstrating financial responsibility, an institution must demonstrate its ability to properly administer the Title IV programs in which it participates and to provide the education it describes in public documents (e.g., marketing brochures). Administrative capability focuses on the processes, procedures, and personnel used in administering Title IV funds and indicators of
certification.78
71
34 C.F.R. §602.24.
34 C.F.R. §602.17.
73 HEA §498(c); 20 U.S.C. §1099c(c); 34 C.F.R. §668, Subpart L.
74 An IHE is considered to have the full faith and credit backing if it notifies ED that it is designated as a public
institution by the state, local, or municipal government entity; tribal authority; or other government entity that has the
legal authority to make such a designation. The IHE must provide ED with a letter from an appropriate official
confirming its status as a public institution. FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 89.
75 In evaluating an IHE’s financial responsibility, ED will calculate a composite score based on its equity, primary, and
net income ratios. 34 C.F.R. §668.172.
76 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 90.
77 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 89-90; 100-101.
78 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 96-99.
72
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
15
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
Administrative Capability
Along with demonstrating financial responsibility, an institution must demonstrate its ability to
properly administer the Title IV programs in which it participates and to provide the education it
describes in public documents (e.g., marketing brochures). Administrative capability focuses on
the processes, procedures, and personnel used in administering Title IV funds and indicators of
student success.79
Administrative capability standards address numerous aspects of Title IV administration. For
example, tostudent success.62
To administer Title IV programs, an institution must use ED'’s electronic processes63 and processes80 and
develop a system to identify and resolve discrepancies in Title IV information received by various
institutional offices. The IHE must also refer cases of Title IV student fraud or criminal
misconduct to ED'’s Office of Inspector General for resolution, and it must provide all enrolled
and prospective students financial aid counseling. Finally, the IHE must have an adequate internal
system of checks and balances that includes dividing the functions of authorizing payments and
disbursing funds between two separate offices.
81
Institutions are required to have a capable staff member to administer Title IV programs and
coordinate those programs with other aid received by students.6482 This person must also have an
adequate number of qualified staff to assist with aid administration. Before receiving Title IV
funds, an IHE must certify that neither it nor its employees have been debarred or suspended by a
federal agency; similar limitations apply to lenders, loan servicers, and third-party servicers.65
An83
Relating to indicators of student success, an institution must have satisfactory academic progress
(SAP) standards in place for students receiving Title IV funds that are at least as strict as its standards for students not receiving such funds. In measuring SAP, an IHE must. In general, IHEs must develop SAP
standards that establish a minimum grade point average (or its equivalent) for students and a
maximum time frame in which students must complete their educational program; aprograms. A student who
fails to meet the SAP requirements becomes ineligible to receive Title IV funds.66 For instance, students enrolled in a program that is more than two academic years in length must have at least a "C" grade point average or its equivalent, and for an undergraduate program, the institution's completion time frame cannot be longer than 150% of the published length of the program. Additionally84 Also related to
student success indicators, an institution that seeks to participate in Title IV programs for the first
time may not have an undergraduate withdrawal rate for regular students that is greater than 33%
during its most recently completed award year.67
An institution may be deemed administratively incapable if it has a high cohort default rate
(CDR). TheIn general, the CDR is the number of an IHE'’s federal loan recipients who enter
repayment in a given fiscal year (the cohort fiscal year) and who default within a certain period of
79
HEA §498(d); 20 U.S.C. § 1099c(d); 34 C.F.R. §668.16.
Some of the required electronic processes include establishment of a Student Aid Internet Gateway mailbox to
transmit student data records to ED, use of the E-App to submit and update an institution’s eligibility information, and
use of the Default Management website to receive draft and official cohort default rate data. A list of required
electronic processes can be found at FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 64.
81 34 C.F.R. §668.16.
82 ED considers an individual capable for purposes of Title IV administration if the individual: (1) is certified as a
financial aid administrator, if the institution’s state requires such certification; (2) has successfully completed an EDprovided or ED-approved Title IV training program; or (3) has previous experience and success in administering Title
IV programs. This list is not definitive; ED may consider other relevant factors. 34 C.F.R. §668.16(b)(1).
83 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 50-58.
84 For more information about SAP and student eligibility for FSA programs, see FSA Handbook, vol. 1.
85 Withdrawal occurs when students drop out of all Title IV eligible coursework during an academic term. FSA
Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-14.
80
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
16
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
time after entering repayment (cohort default period; CDP), divided by the total number of
borrowers who entered repayment in the cohort fiscal year.68
86
Since 2014, ED has used a three-year CDP in calculating an institution'’s CDR.6987 An IHE will be
found administratively incapable if one of the following conditions is met:
When an IHE is determined to be administratively incapable due to a high CDR, it may become
ineligible to participate in the DLDirect Loan, Pell Grant, and/or Perkins Loan programs (but not
other Title IV programs). ED may grant provisional certification for up to three years to an
institution that would be deemed administratively capable except for its high cohort default
rates.89
Provisional Certification
rates.
If an institution is seeking initial certification, ED can grant it up to one year of provisional
certification. ED can also grant an institution provisional certification for up to three years if ED
is determining the IHE'’s administrative capacity and financial responsibility for the first time, if
the IHE has experienced a partial or total change in ownership, or if ED determines that the
administrative or financial condition of the IHE may hinder its ability to meet its financial
responsibilities. Additionally, if an accrediting agency loses its ED recognition, any institution
that was accredited by that agency may continue to participate in Title IV programs for up to 18
months after ED'’s withdrawal of recognition.71
Before granting Title IV eligibility or to90
Program Reviews
To ensure that a certifiedan institution is conforming to eligibility requirements, ED can conduct program
reviews. During a program review, ED evaluates an institution'’s compliance with Title IV
requirements and identifies actions the IHE must take to correct theany problem(s). Review priority
is given to those institutions with high cohort default rates; IHEs with significant fluctuations in
Pell Grant awards or Direct Loan volume that are not accounted for by changes in programs
offered; IHEs that are reported to have deficiencies or financial aid problems by their state or accrediting agency; IHEs with high annual dropout rates; and IHEs determined by ED to pose a significant risk of failing to comply with the administrative capability or financial responsibility
For institutions with fewer than 30 students entering repayment in a given cohort fiscal year, an “average rate” CDR
is used, which is calculated by dividing the number of borrowers who entered repayment in the current cohort fiscal
year and the two preceding cohort fiscal years, by the number who defaulted in the CDP for the cohort fiscal year in
which they entered repayment. HEA § 434(m)(1)(A); 20 U.S.C. §1085(m)(1)(A).
87 For instance, the 2013 cohort fiscal year includes the number of borrowers who entered repayment in 2013 and who
defaulted in 2013, 2014, or 2015. In 2016, the CDR for the 2013 cohort fiscal year was used to determine whether an
institution is administratively incapable based on that information. Prior to 2014, ED used a two-year CDP in
calculating an institution’s CDR.
88 These first two CDRs are calculated for Federal Family Education Loan program Subsidized and Unsubsidized
Stafford Loans and Direct Loan program Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans. An institution may be subject to
provisional certification if two of the three of its most recent CDRs are 30% or greater. 34 C.F.R. §668.16(m).
89 34 C.F.R. §668.16(m)(2)(i).
90 34 C.F.R. §668.13(c).
86
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
17
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
accrediting agency; IHEs with high annual dropout rates;91 and IHEs determined by ED to pose a
significant risk of failing to comply with the administrative capability or financial responsibility
requirements.92requirements.72 If, during a review, ED determines that an institution is not administratively
capable or financially responsible or is violating Title IV program rules, ED may give it grant it
provisional certification, take corrective actions, or impose sanctions.
ED has the authority to impose a variety of sanctions and corrective actions on an institution that
violates Title IV program rules;, a Program Participation Agreement (discussed later in this report)
or any other agreement made under the laws or regulations;, or if it substantially misrepresents the
nature of its educational programs, financial charges, or graduates'’ employability. Sanctions
include fines, limitations, suspensions, terminations, and emergency actionsemergency actions, and terminations. ED can also sanction
third-party servicers performing tasks related to the institution'’s Title IV programs.
ED may impose several types of sanctions on institutions for statutory and regulatory violations,
including fines, limitations, and suspensions. ED can fine an institution up to $27,50055,907 for each
statutory or regulatory violation it commits, depending on the size of the IHE and the seriousness
of the violation.
93
Under a limitation, ED imposes specific conditions or restrictions on an institution related to its
administration of Title IV funds. A limitation lasts for at least 12 months, and if an institution fails
to abide by the limitation, ED may initiate a termination proceeding.
Finally, under a suspension, an institution is not allowed to participate in Title IV programs for up
to 60 days.
Each of these sanctions may require an institution to take corrective actions as well, which may
include repaying illegally used funds or making payments to eligible students from the IHE'’s own
funds.94
Emergency Action
funds.73
ED can take emergency action to withhold Title IV funds from an institution if it receives reliable
information that an IHE is violating applicable laws or regulations, agreements, or limitations. ED
must determine that the institution is misusing federal funds, that immediate action is necessary to
stop misuses, and that the potential losses outweigh the importance of using established
procedures for limitation, suspension, or termination. An emergency action suspends an
“High annual dropout rates” is undefined.
HEA §498A(a)(2); 20 U.S.C. §1099c-1(a)(2).
93 HEA Section 487(c)(3)(B) (20 U.S.C. §1094(c)(3)(B)) specifies that fines may equal up to $25,000 for each
violation. However, the Inflation Adjustment Act (20 U.S.C. §2461, note) requires that each federal agency annually
adjust for inflation their civil monetary penalties. The $55,907 fine for institutional Title IV violations represents ED’s
most recent adjustment to its civil monetary penalties. Department of Education, “Adjustment to Civil Monetary
Penalties for Inflation,” 83 Federal Register 2062, January 16, 2018.
94 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 212.
91
92
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
18
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
institution’s participation in Title IV programs and prohibits it from disbursing such funds.
Typically, the emergency action may not last more than 30 days.95
Termination of Title IV Participation
The final action ED can take is the termination of an institution’s participation in Title IV
programs. Generally, an institution that has had its participation terminated cannot reapply to be
reinstated for at least 18 months. To request reinstatement, an institution must submit a fully
completed application to ED and demonstrate that it has corrected the violation(s) for which its
participation was terminated. ED may then approve, approve subject to limitations, or deny the
institution’s request.96
procedures for limitation, suspension, or termination. An emergency action suspends an institution's participation in Title IV programs and prohibits it from disbursing such funds. Typically, the emergency action may not last more than 30 days.74
The final action ED can take is the termination of an institution's participation in Title IV programs. Generally, an institution that has had its participation terminated cannot reapply to be reinstated for at least 18 months. To request reinstatement, an institution must submit a fully completed application to ED and demonstrate that it has corrected the violation(s) for which its participation was terminated. ED may then approve, approve subject to limitations, or deny the institution's request.75
An institution's participation in Title IV programs can end for one of several reasons, including
Table 1 details the types of IHEs that lost Title IV eligibility from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2016. During this time period, 1,284 institutions lost their Title IV eligibility. Over the 10-year period, approximately 64% of the institutions that lost Title IV eligibility were domestic proprietary institutions.77 Domestic private nonprofit institutions followed next, making up approximately 17% of the IHEs that lost Title IV eligibility in the 10-year time frame.
Institution Type |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013 |
2014 |
2015 |
2016 |
Total |
Domestic Public |
11 |
8 |
11 |
13 |
16 |
9 |
14 |
15 |
9 |
9 |
115 |
Domestic Private Nonprofit |
25 |
15 |
18 |
17 |
19 |
16 |
24 |
23 |
24 |
36 |
217 |
Domestic Proprietary |
64 |
62 |
57 |
64 |
58 |
61 |
118 |
84 |
96 |
154 |
818 |
Foreign Public |
6 |
22 |
4 |
16 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
75 |
Foreign Private Nonprofit |
11 |
19 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
57 |
Foreign Proprietary |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Total |
117 |
127 |
94 |
117 |
108 |
96 |
163 |
130 |
132 |
200 |
1,284 |
Source: Compiled by CRS using the U.S. Department of Education, Postsecondary Education Participants System at http://www2.ed.gov/offices/OSFAP/PEPS/index.html.
Other Related Issues
Several other issuesrequirements affect institutional eligibility for Title IV programs. Some of these issues
requirements include institution Program Participation Agreements, which include provisions
related to incentive compensation and teach-out planscampus crime reporting requirements; return of Title IV
funds; and distance education. The failure to meet the requirements for eachany of these may result in
the loss of Title IV eligibility.
Each or other sanctions.
Program Participation Agreements
HEA Section 487 specifies that each institution wanting to participate in Title IV student aid
programs is required to have a current Program Participation Agreement (PPA). A PPA is a
document in which the institution agrees to comply with the laws, regulations, and policies
applicable to the Title IV programs; it applies to all of an IHE'’s branch campuses and locations that
meet Title IV requirements, as well as its main campus. It also lists all of the Title IV programs in
which the IHE is eligible to participate, the date on which the PPA expires, and the date on which
the IHE must reapply for participation.
By signing a PPA, an institution agrees that it will act as a fiduciary responsible for properly
administering Title IV funds, will not charge students a processing fee to determine a student's ’s
eligibility for such funds, and will establish and maintain administrative and fiscal procedures to
ensure the proper administration of Title IV programs. The PPA reiterates many provisions
required for institutional eligibility and ED certification discussed earlier in this report, including certifying that the institution has a drug and alcohol abuse program and reporting general institutional information and
contains several additional notable requirements that may affect an IHE’s Title IV eligibility,
which are described below. Along with the general participation requirements with which an
institution must comply, a PPA may also contain institution-specific requirements.78
One specific provision of a PPA is that the institution agrees it will not provide any commission or incentive compensation to individuals based directly or indirectly on their success in enrolling students or obtaining financial aid; however, some exceptions apply to this general rule. For instance, IHEs can provide incentive compensation to individuals for the recruitment of foreign students who are ineligible to receive Title IV funds or they can provide incentive compensation 97
90/10 Rule
As part of their PPAs, domestic and foreign proprietary IHEs must agree to derive at least 10% of
their revenue from non-Title IV funds (i.e., no more than 90% of their revenue can come from
Title IV funds). This is known as the 90/10 rule. Examples of non-Title IV funds include private
education loans and some military and veterans’ benefits, such as benefits provided under the
Post-9/11 GI Bill program. If an IHE violates the 90/10 rule in one year, it does not immediately
95
Ibid.
Ibid.
97 34 C.F.R. §668.14.
96
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
19
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
lose its Title IV eligibility. Rather, it is placed on a provisional eligibility status for two years. If
the IHE violates the 90/10 rule for two consecutive years, it loses its eligibility for at least two
years.98
Incentive Compensation
In a PPA, an IHE must agree it will not provide any commission or incentive compensation to
individuals based directly or indirectly on their success in enrolling students or the enrolled
students’ obtaining financial aid; however, some exceptions apply to this general rule. For
instance, IHEs can provide incentive compensation to individuals for the recruitment of foreign
students who are ineligible to receive Title IV funds or they can provide incentive compensation
through a profit-sharing plan.99
through a profit-sharing plan.79
The ban on incentive compensation only applies to the activities of securing enrollment
(recruitment) and securing financial aid. Other activities are not banned, and ED draws a
distinction between activities that involve directly working with individual students and policy-levelpolicylevel determinations that affect recruitment and financial aid awards. For instance, an individual
who is responsible for contacting potential student applicants or assisting students in filling out an
enrollment application cannot receive incentive compensation, but an individual who conducts
marketing activities, such as the broad dissemination of informational brochures or the collection
of contact information, can receive incentive compensation.100
Clery Act Requirements
HEA Section 485(f), referred to as the Clery Act,101 requires domestic Title IV participating IHEs
(1) to report to ED campus crime statistics and (2) establish and disseminate campus safety and
security policies. Both the campus crime statistics and campus safety and security policies must
be compiled and disseminated to current and prospective students and employees in an IHE’s
annual security report (ASR).
Campus crime statistics required to be reported to ED and included in an ASR include data on the
occurrence on campus102 of a range of offenses specified in statute, including murder, burglary,
robbery, domestic violence, rape, and other forms of sexual violence.
In addition to campus crime statistics, ASRs must include statements of campus safety and
security policies regarding, for example,
98
20 U.S.C. §1094(a)(24) and (d)(2). Of the 1,764 IHEs reporting revenues for purposes of the 90/10 rule, between
July 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017, a total of 12 had Title IV revenues that were greater than 90%, and all remained Title
IV eligible because they satisfied the 90/10 rule in the previous year. Source: Letter from Diane Auer Jones, Principal
Deputy Under Secretary, Delegate the Duties of Under Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, to Virginia Foxx,
Chairwoman, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives, December 10, 2018, and
Office of Federal Student Aid, Data Center, 2016-2017 Award Year: Report and Summary Chart.
99 34 C.F.R. §668.14(22).
100 For a detailed list of activities covered by the incentive compensation prohibition, see FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 5962, Tables 1-3 and U.S. Department of Education, “Higher Education: Program Integrity Questions and Answers—
Incentive Compensation,” http://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2009/compensation.html.
101 For additional information, see Department of Education, The Handbook for Campus Safety and Security Report:
2016 Edition, June 2016.
102 For purposes of the Clery Act, “campus” includes campus areas, noncampus areas, and public property, if certain
criteria are met. HEA §485(f)(6)(A)(ii); 20 U.S.C. §1092(f)(6)(A)(ii).
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
20
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
procedures and facilities for students and others to report criminal actions or
other emergencies occurring on campus and an IHE’s response to such reports;
security and access to campus facilities;
campus law enforcement, including the law enforcement authority of campus
security personnel, and the working relationship between campus security
personnel and state and local law enforcement;
programs designed to inform students and employees about the prevention of
crimes; and
the possession, use, and sale of alcoholic beverages and illegal drugs;
enforcement of state underage drinking laws; enforcement of federal and state
drug laws; and any drug or alcohol abuse education programs required under the
HEA.103
An ASR must also include statements of policies specifically relating to incidence of domestic
and sexual violence. For example, an ASR must include statements of policy regarding
programs to prevent such incidents;
procedures a victim should follow if such an incident as occurred;
procedures an IHE will follow once such an incident has been reported and
procedures for institutional disciplinary actions in cases of alleged incidents
(including a statement of the standard of evidence that will be used in any school
proceeding arising from the incident report); and
possible sanctions and protective measures that an IHE may impose following a
final determination in an institutional proceeding regarding such incidences.
The Clery Act prohibits the Secretary of Education from requiring IHEs to adopt particular
policies, procedures, or practices; and prohibits retaliation against anyone exercising his or her
rights or responsibilities under the act.
Return of Title IV Funds
HEA Section 484B specifies that when a Title IV aid recipient withdraws from an IHE before the
end of the payment or enrollment period for which funds were disbursed, Title IV funds must be
returned to ED according to a statutorily prescribed schedule. In general, when a student
withdraws from an IHE, an IHE first determines the portion of Title IV aid considered to be
“earned” by the student while enrolled and the portion considered to be “unearned.” Unearned aid
must be returned to ED. Up to the 60% point of a payment or enrollment period, unearned funds
must be returned on a pro rata schedule. After the 60% point of a payment or enrollment period,
the total amount of funds awarded is considered to have been earned by the student and no funds
are required to be returned. Whether an IHE and/or the student is required to return the funds to
ED depends on a variety of circumstances, including whether Title IV funds have been applied
directly to a student’s institutional charges.104 Unearned funds must be returned to their respective
programs in a specified order, with loans being returned first, followed by Pell Grants, and then
103
HEA Section 120 requires that IHEs adopt and implement a program to prevent the use of illicit drugs and the abuse
of alcohol by students and employees.
104 Generally, institutional charges are defined as charges for tuition and fees, institution-provided or contracted room
and board, and other educational expenses that are paid directly to the institution (e.g., charges for supplies, equipment,
and materials).
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
21
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
other Title IV aid.105 In some instances, a student may have earned more aid than has been
disbursed, and the difference is disbursed to the student after the student withdraws. 106
Distance Education and Correspondence Education
Generally, distance education and correspondence education refers to educational instruction with
a separation in time, place, or both between the student and instructor. It is a way in which
institutions can increase student access to postsecondary education by offering alternatives to
traditional on-campus instruction. Recently, due to the greater availability of new technologies,
there has been substantial growth in the amount and types of courses institutions offer.
Section 103(7)(A) and (B) of the HEA and the accompanying regulations define distance
education as instruction that uses “(1) the internet; (2) one-way and two-way transmissions
through open broadcast, closed circuit, cable, microwave, broadband lines, fiber optics, satellite,
or wireless communications devices; [or] ... (3) audio conferencing” to deliver instruction to
students separated from the instructor. A course taught through a video cassette, DVD, or CDROM is considered a distance education course if one of the above-mentioned technologies is
used to support student-instructor interaction. Regardless of the technology used, “regular and
substantive interaction between the students and the instructor” must be ensured.107
Correspondence courses are expressly excluded from the definition of distance education.108 A
correspondence course is one for which an institution provides instructional materials and exams
for students who do not physically attend classes at the IHE, but does not include those courses
that are delivered with “regular and substantive interaction between the students and the
instructor” via one of the above-described technologies.109
105
Under certain circumstances, portions of Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants are excluded from
the return of Title IV calculations. Federal Work-Study funds are not included in the calculation. FSA Handbook, vol.
5, p. 27.
106 For additional information on the return of Title IV funds, including examples of how to calculate the amount of
Title IV funds to be returned, see FSA Handbook, vol. 5.
107 HEA §103(7); 20 U.S.C. §1003(7); 34 C.F.R. §600.2.
108 The original HEA definition of distance education did not reference correspondence courses and courses offered via
telecommunications; rather, such courses were considered subsets of distance education. Before July 1, 2010, Section
484(l)(4) of the HEA defined a telecommunications course as one offered principally through television, audio, or
computer transmission, and a correspondence course was defined as a home-study course in which an IHE provided
students who were separated from their instructor with instructional materials, including examinations, either by mail
or electronic transmission. For correspondence courses and telecommunications courses, students completed the
instructional materials and corresponding examinations and returned the examinations to the IHE for grading.
Interaction between the instructor and the student was not regular and substantive, and the correspondence course was
predominantly offered by an IHE via print-based media. For the purposes of Title IV aid eligibility,
telecommunications programs were treated the same as traditional on-campus programs, while correspondence courses
were subject to stricter requirements. With the substantial growth in the use of technology for educational instruction,
the separate definition of telecommunications courses became unnecessary. Therefore in 2010, the Higher Education
Opportunity Act (P.L. 110-315) eliminated the separate definition for telecommunications and incorporated the various
technologies referenced in that definition into the definition of distance education. Department of Education, “Federal
Student Aid Programs,” 71 Federal Register 45667, August 9, 2006.
109 34 C.F.R. §600.2. In certain instances, elements of a correspondence course may be combined with noncorrespondence course elements. These multi-component courses may or may not be considered correspondence
courses for the purposes of Title IV eligibility. For specific examples of such courses, see FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 37.
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
22
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
50% Rule for Correspondence Courses
In 1992, partially in response to cases of some correspondence institutions’ fraudulent and
abusive practices used to attract unqualified students to enroll in programs of poor or questionable
quality, Congress incorporated provisions referred to as the “50% rules” into the HEA. The rules
affected both the eligibility of institutions offering correspondence courses and their students’
eligibility for Title IV aid. In general, under the rules, an institution is ineligible for Title IV aid if
more than 50% of its courses are offered by correspondence,110 or if 50% or more of its students
are enrolled in correspondence courses.111
State Authorization for Correspondence and Distance Education Courses
As discussed earlier in this report, rules promulgated in 2016 would have required an IHE
offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education in a state in which it is not
physically located to meet any state authorization requirements within that state. Under the
regulations, an IHE could meet this requirement if it participates in a state authorization
reciprocity agreement. These regulations were scheduled to become effective July 1, 2018.
However, on July 3, 2018 (and effective June 29, 2018), the Secretary of Education issued a final
rule delaying the implementation of these requirements until July 1, 2020.112
Foreign IHE Eligibility
The distinction between distance education and traditional instruction is also important for the
purposes of Title IV program eligibility. Distance education programs provided by domestic IHEs
are eligible for Title IV participation if they have been accredited by an accrediting agency
recognized by ED to evaluate distance education programs.113 A program offered by a foreign
IHE, in whole or in part, through distance education (including telecommunications) or
correspondence is ineligible for Title IV participation.114
110 HEA
§ 102(a)(3)(A) and (B); 20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(3)(A) and (B). This rule does not apply to “a public nonprofit
technical institution or career and technical education school used exclusively or principally for the provision of career
and technical education to individuals who have completed or left secondary school and who are available for study in
preparation for entering the labor market.” 20 U.S.C. §2302(3)(C).
111 34 C.F.R. 600.7(a)(1)(i) and (ii). This second limitation may be waived if an IHE offers a two-year associate’s
degree or four-year bachelor’s degree program and it demonstrates to ED that in the award year, students who were
enrolled in correspondence courses received 5% or less of the total FSA funds received by all of the IHE’s students.
ED, FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 103.
112 Department of Education, “Program Integrity and Improvement,” 83 Federal Register 31296, July 3, 2018.
113 FSA Handbook, vol. 2, 36.
114 34 C.F.R. §600.51(d).
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
23
Institutional Eligibility for Participation in Title IV Student Financial Aid Programs
Author Information
Alexandra Hegji
Analyst in Social Policy
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan
shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and
under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other
than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in
connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not
subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in
its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or
material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to
copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
Congressional Research Service
R43159 · VERSION 14 · UPDATED
24
of contact information, can receive incentive compensation.80
In 2008, the Higher Education Opportunity Act (P.L. 110-315) amended the HEA to require institutions to agree, in their PPAs, to prepare a teach-out plan for submission to their accrediting agencies in certain circumstances. A teach-out plan is a "written plan that provides for the equitable treatment of students if an [IHE] ceases to operate before all students have completed their program of study."81 An IHE must submit a teach-out plan to its accrediting agency if
As part of a teach-out plan, an institution may enter a teach-out agreement with another institution, under which the new institution must
Title IV funds must be returned to the federal government if a student withdraws from an institution before the end of the payment period for which funds were disbursed.83 Regulations do not dictate the institutional refund policy, but IHEs must follow a schedule for the return of Title IV funds based on the pro-rata calculation of the amount of Title IV aid a student earned while enrolled, through the 60% point in each payment or enrollment period.84 These procedures are described below.
As the first step in calculating how much Title IV funds should be returned, institutions must first determine how much aid was received by the student in the relevant payment or enrollment period.85 IHEs must then determine the date of the student's withdrawal.86
If an institution is required to take attendance,87 its determination of the student's withdrawal date should be no later than 14 days after the student's last date of attendance, as determined by the IHE's attendance records. If an IHE is not required to take attendance and the student formally notifies it of their withdrawal, the date of withdrawal is the date on which the student began the official withdrawal process. If a student does not formally withdraw from an IHE not required to take attendance, the withdrawal date is no later than 30 days after the end of the earlier of (1) the payment or enrollment period; (2) the academic year; or (3) the student's educational program. If a student formally notifies an institution of his or her withdrawal, the date of withdrawal is the date on which the student began the official withdrawal process.88
The calculation of the percentage of the payment or enrollment period varies depending on whether an institution measures its programs in credit or clock hours. If an IHE measures its programs in credit hours, then the percentage of Title IV aid earned by the student is equal to the percentage of the payment or enrollment period completed. This is determined by dividing the number of calendar days in the payment or enrollment period that the student completed by the total number of calendar days in the payment or enrollment period. If a student completed over 60% of the payment or enrollment period, the student has earned 100% of the Title IV aid, and neither the institution nor the student is required to repay the funds. If the student completed 60% or less of the payment or enrollment period, then the percentage of Title IV aid is prorated. For example, if a student withdrew at the 25% mark, the student earned 25% of the Title IV aid.
If an institution uses clock hours to measure its programs, then the percentage of the payment or enrollment period is equal to the percentage of scheduled hours that a student actually completed. This is determined by dividing the total number of clock hours scheduled to have been completed, as of the date a student withdraws,89 by the total number of hours included in the payment or enrollment period. As with credit hours, if a student completed over 60% of the payment or enrollment period, the student has earned 100% of the Title IV aid, and neither the institution nor the student is required to repay the funds.90
The amount of Title IV aid earned by a student is equal to the percentage of the payment or enrollment period completed, multiplied by the sum of the Title IV aid disbursed to a student and the Title IV aid that could have been disbursed to the student. If a student received less Title IV aid than the amount earned, then the institution must make a post-withdrawal disbursement to the student, which is equal to the difference between the amount of aid a student earned and the amount the student received.91 If a student received more Title IV aid than they earned, then the institution, the student, or both must return the unearned funds. The amount of aid to be returned is equal to the difference between the amount of Title IV aid earned and the amount of Title IV aid that was disbursed.92
Institutions must return the lesser of (1) the amount of Title IV funds not earned by the student or (2) the amount of institutional charges93 incurred by the student during the payment or enrollment period, multiplied by the percentage of unearned funds. Title IV funds must be returned to the programs from which a student received aid during the applicable time period, up to the net amount disbursed.94 Funds must be returned to their respective programs within 45 days of an IHE's determination that a student has withdrawn and in the following order:
An institution has up to 45 days after the date on which a student withdrew to return its share of the funds.
The student is responsible for all unearned Title IV funds that the institution is not required to return. This initial amount due from the student is equal to the difference between the total amount of unearned Title IV funds to be returned and the amount returned by the institution. This is called the initial amount due from the student because a student is not required to return the full amount of a Title IV grant repayment that is due. Therefore, a student may not be required to return the full initial amount due. The maximum amount of unearned Title IV grant funds (overpayment) that a student is required to repay is the amount by which the original Title IV grant overpayment exceeds 50% of the total Title IV grant funds disbursed or that could have been disbursed to the student.95 However, a student is not required to repay a Title IV grant overpayment of $50 or less.96
Generally, distance education refers to educational instruction with a separation in time, place, or both between the student and instructor. It is a way in which institutions can increase student access to postsecondary education by offering alternatives to traditional on-campus instruction. Recently, due to the greater availability of new technologies, there has been substantial growth in the amount and types of courses institutions offer. Some programs may be full-time distance education programs in which the student and instructor are always separated by time, place, or both. Other programs may be hybrids, including both traditional (e.g., in-person classroom time) and distance education components.
Institutions that provide distance education are subject to the same Title IV eligibility requirements as other IHEs, but may also be subject to additional requirements.
Section 103(7)(A) and (B) of the HEA and the accompanying regulations define distance education as instruction that uses "(1) the internet; (2) one-way and two-way transmissions through open broadcast, closed circuit, cable, microwave, broadband lines, fiber optics, satellite, or wireless communications devices; [or] ... (3) audio conferencing" to deliver instruction to students separated from the instructor. A course taught through a video cassette, DVD, or CD-ROM is considered a distance education course if one of the above-mentioned technologies is used to support student-instructor interaction. Any of the technologies must be used to support "regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor."97
The original HEA definition of distance education did not reference the above-mentioned technologies; rather, correspondence courses and telecommunications courses were considered subsets of distance education. Before July 1, 2010, Section 484 (l)(4) of the HEA defined a telecommunications course as one offered principally through television, audio, or computer transmission, and a correspondence course was defined as a home-study course in which an IHE provided students who were separated from their instructor with instructional materials, including examinations, either by mail or electronic transmission. Students completed the instructional materials and corresponding examinations and returned the examinations to the IHE for grading. Interaction between the instructor and the student was not regular and substantive, and the course was predominantly offered by an IHE via print-based media. For the purposes of Title IV aid eligibility, telecommunications programs were treated the same as traditional on-campus programs, while correspondence courses were subject to stricter requirements.98
With the substantial growth in the use of technologies for educational instruction, the separate definition of telecommunications courses became unnecessary. Therefore, in 2010, the Higher Education Opportunity Act (P.L. 110-315) eliminated the separate definition for telecommunications and incorporated the various technologies referenced in that definition into the definition of distance education. Correspondence courses were expressly excluded from the definition of distance education. Thus, a correspondence course is one for which an institution provides instructional materials and exams for students who do not physically attend classes at the IHE, but does not include those courses that are delivered in support of "regular and substantive interaction between the students and the instructor" via the Internet; one- and two-way transmissions through open broadcast, satellite, or other such communications devices; and technologies such as DVDs and CD-ROMs. IHEs offering correspondence courses are still subject to additional Title IV requirements.99
In 1992, partially in response to cases of some correspondence institutions' fraudulent and abusive practices used to attract unqualified students to enroll in programs of poor or questionable quality, Congress incorporated provisions referred to as the "50% rules" into the HEA. The rules affected both correspondence institutions' eligibility and their students' eligibility for Title IV aid.
Under the rules, an institution is ineligible for Title IV aid if more than 50% of its courses are offered by correspondence,100 or if 50% or more of its students are enrolled in correspondence courses.101
Generally, for an institution to be eligible to participate in Title IV programs, it must be legally authorized by the state in which it is physically located to provide postsecondary educational services within that state.102
In final regulations issued on October 29, 2010, ED required an institution offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education in a state in which it was not physically located to meet any requirements within that state, thus requiring it to obtain permission to operate in every state in which it enrolled at least one student.103 However, in a July 2012, "Dear Colleague" letter, in response to a ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which vacated the provision on procedural grounds,104 ED announced it would not enforce the provision against institutions offering distance education programs.105
Subsequently, on December 19, 2016, ED issued final regulations again requiring that, effective July 1, 2018, an IHE offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education in a state in which it is not physically located must meet any requirements within that state. Unlike the prior final regulations, however, the new regulations stipulate that an IHE may meet this requirement if it participates in a state authorization reciprocity agreement. A state authorization reciprocity agreement is "an agreement between two or more states that authorizes institutions located and legally authorized in a state covered by the agreement to provide postsecondary education through distance education or correspondence courses to students residing in other states covered by the agreement."106
The distinction between distance education and traditional instruction is also important for the purposes of Title IV program eligibility. Distance education programs provided by domestic IHEs are eligible for Title IV participation if they have been accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by ED to evaluate distance education programs.107 A program offered by a foreign IHE, in whole or in part, through distance education (including telecommunications) or correspondence is ineligible for Title IV participation.108
This section briefly highlights major statutory and regulatory provisions adopted in recent decades pertaining to institutional eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. It is presented to provide contextual information on institutional eligibility-related issues that have received attention in congressional deliberations in the recent past, and to provide a backdrop for a subsequent discussion of issues that may receive attention in an upcoming reauthorization. Typically, provisions that have been adopted have addressed issues related to program integrity, fiscal accountability, fraud and abuse, and, most recently, program outcome measures.
Since its enactment in 1965, the HEA has undergone several reauthorizations and amendments. In the Higher Education Amendments of 1992 (P.L. 102-325), several amendments were made to the HEA, which were intended to strengthen program integrity in the wake of reported problems of Title IV fraud and abuse. These amendments excluded from Title IV participation institutions offering more than 50% of courses through correspondence or enrolling more than 50% of its students in correspondence courses (i.e., the "50% rules); denied Title IV participation to proprietary institutions that derived more than 85% of their revenues from Title IV funds; and reformed the process through which institutions became eligible to participate in Title IV programs.
The Higher Education Act Amendments of 1998 (P.L. 105-244) also made several changes to the HEA. Key provisions that related to institutional eligibility included requiring that proprietary institutions derive at least 10% of their revenues from non-Title IV sources109 and eliminating the requirement that accrediting agencies make unannounced visits to institutions. The Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2006 (Title VIII of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005; P.L. 109-171) amended the rules governing the percentage of courses offered through telecommunications courses and students participating therein and the return of Title IV funds requirements.
In 2008, the HEA was reauthorized under the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 (HEOA; P.L. 110-315), and several changes were made that affected institutional eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. These changes included extending eligibility to certain foreign proprietary institutions; creating a more stringent cohort default rate; including additional requirements in an institution's program participation agreement; amending the 90/10 rule for proprietary institutions; and requiring institutions to prepare teach-out plans under certain circumstances, such as an institution's closure or termination of its Title IV participation.110
More recently, in 2014, ED issued regulations that require, among other provisions, the use of established performance metrics to measure how effectively individuals in gainful employment programs offered by institutions are able to repay the student loans borrowed to attend such programs. Most of the regulations' provisions went into effect on July 1, 2015; although, IHEs may not be subject to loss of Title IV eligibility under these rules until at least winter 2017/2018.
Finally, in December 2016, ED promulgated new regulations requiring that, effective July 1, 2018, an IHE offering postsecondary distance or correspondence education in a state in which it is not physically located must meet any requirements within that state. An IHE may meet this requirement if it participates in a state authorization reciprocity agreement.
As the 115th Congress considers general issues that may be addressed during the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act,111 it may explore specific issues related to institutional eligibility to participate in HEA Title IV student aid programs. Some of these issues (e.g., institutional transparency) were of particular interest in the 114th Congress and could be revisited by the 115th Congress, while others (e.g., direct-assessment programs) have garnered some attention in the most recent sessions of Congress, and may become of increasing interest to the 115th Congress.
In general, proprietary IHEs have been subjected to congressional and media scrutiny over the past several years. Much of the concern has focused on the quality of education offered, withdrawal and completion rates, high default rates on student loans, and recruitment and advertising practices. One area of interest for the 114th Congress as it related to proprietary institutions was the 90/10 rule. As discussed earlier, proprietary IHEs must derive at least 10% of their revenue from sources other than Title IV funds, which may include federal revenues from military and veterans' education benefits.
In response to reports that some proprietary IHEs were recruiting individuals receiving military and veterans' education benefits as a way to meet the 10% revenue requirement, the 114th Congress introduced bills that would have amended the current 90/10 rule. For example, H.R. 2192 would have created a new federal funds provision that would have included revenue from most federal sources, including most military and veterans' education benefits. In addition, this new federal funds limit would be capped at 85%, effectively requiring proprietary institutions to derive at least 15% of the revenue from nonfederal funds. None of the proposed legislation was enacted,112 but Congress might consider whether to reintroduce legislation that would amend the 90/10 rule. Moreover, Congress might consider other ways to address concerns associated with quality and outcome measures that are specific to proprietary institutions.
An institution as a whole must be accredited by an ED-recognized accrediting agency to be eligible to participate in Title IV programs. ED began formally recognizing accrediting agencies in 1952 as a way of associating institutional eligibility for Title IV programs with an indicator of an institution's educational quality, and this federal interaction with accreditation has remained largely unchanged since that time. In the past several years, however, there have been calls to incorporate student outcome measures, such as graduation and retention rates, into the accreditation process or to restructure the accreditation system to better reflect and serve the variety of students and institutions in U.S. postsecondary education.113 It is possible that some of these ideas will be the focus of deliberations in the 115th Congress.
In addition to agencies that accredit entire institutions, thereby acting as gatekeepers to Title IV funds, there are many programmatic accrediting agencies that accredit individual programs within IHEs (e.g., law). While programmatic accreditation generally is not a requirement for Title IV eligibility,114 IHEs may seek to have a program accredited, as programmatic accreditation can demonstrate that a specific educational program meets established standards for a field of study. For example, many employers require prospective employees to have graduated from an accredited program, and licensure requirements for some occupations in certain states require graduation from an accredited program. Because programmatic accreditation is often viewed as a means of determining educational quality and because access to some employers hinges on programmatic accreditation, Congress may examine whether it is desirable to support attendance (through Title IV aid) at programs that lack professional recognition, but for which Title IV aid is available.
In light of efforts to provide access to postsecondary education to a variety of students (e.g., nontraditional or low-income students) and potentially reduce postsecondary educational costs, many alternative ways to deliver educational services have been receiving additional attention, and Congress may explore modifying regulations for such educational offerings.
Nontraditional providers include those postsecondary education providers that offer innovative approaches and pedagogies to providing a postsecondary education and often at more affordable prices compared to traditional postsecondary education providers (e.g., a university offering a four-year bachelor's degree program). They include, for instance, intensive "bootcamp"-style training, online courses (e.g., Massive Open Online Courses; MOOCs), and employer organizations offering short-term certificate programs. Although some of these programs may provide more flexible and affordable postsecondary education options to students, thereby potentially improving access to postsecondary education, these providers are often ineligible to participate in the Title IV programs because they fall outside the purview of many Title IV accreditors or do not meet Title IV program eligibility requirements.115
Congress might consider the extent to which nontraditional providers could be permitted to participate in the Title IV student aid programs and how education delivered by such providers could affect program and institutional eligibility requirements for Title IV participation. For instance, if education provided by MOOCs and similar offerings is considered distance education, the future growth and availability of these offerings may have broader implications for Title IV institutional eligibility requirements, including whether the interaction between student and instructor is regular and substantive enough to meet distance education (as opposed to correspondence education) Title IV requirements. Other implications may relate to whether standards related to ED's recognition of accrediting agencies that evaluate distance education should be updated to address any new quality concerns linked to this new educational medium. These are all issues that may garner attention during the 115th Congress.116
Another alternative delivery method of educational services is direct-assessment education (a form of competency-based education), and several postsecondary institutions have been actively exploring incorporating such programs into their curriculum.117 In direct-assessment programs, students are not assessed on how many credit or clock hours they complete but rather on their demonstration of skills and knowledge. Generally, to receive a degree or credential, students must master a set of competencies (skills) that are assessed by faculty reviewers. IHEs that offer direct-assessment programs are eligible to participate in Title IV programs but must establish a method to reasonably equate the direct assessment program to credit or clock hours. Several types of programs that might otherwise be eligible for Title IV purposes are not eligible if they involve direct assessment; these include programs at foreign IHEs, preparatory coursework required for entry into an eligible program, courses necessary for an elementary or secondary institution teaching credential or certification, and remedial coursework.118 Because more institutions are exploring and using direct assessment programs, Congress may consider whether to continue tying eligibility of direct assessment programs for Title IV funds to credit and clock hours and whether to expand the Title IV eligibility to those types of direct assessment programs that are currently excluded from Title IV eligibility.
Congress may consider whether to implement reforms that affect an institution's eligibility to participate in Title IV programs. Some issues for consideration are listed below.
Author Contact Information
1. |
Although 7,174 institutions were eligible to participate in Title IV FSA programs in AY2015-2016, only 6,051 institutions participated in and received funds through Title IV FSA programs. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Postsecondary Institutions and Price of Attendance in the United States: 2015-16; Degrees and Other Awards Conferred: 2014-15; and 12-Month Enrollment: 2014-15, First Look (Provisional Data), NCES 2016-112rev, Table 1, https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016112rev.pdf and U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid, Annual Report FY 2016, Washington, DC, November 14, 2016, p. 3, http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/2016report/fsa-report.pdf. |
2. |
This includes federal loans, work-study, and grants. See U.S. Department of Education, Federal Student Aid, Annual Report 2016, Washington, DC, November 14, 2016, p. 8, https://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/2016report/fsa-report.pdf. |
3. |
The Section 101 definition is also commonly used as a reference in many other non-HEA programs. |
4. |
20 U.S.C. §1001. |
5. |
20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(1). Department of Education, 2016-2017 Federal Student Aid Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-5 through 2-7, http://ifap.ed.gov/fsahandbook/attachments/1516FSAHbkActiveIndexMaster.pdf (hereinafter FSA Handbook). |
6. |
20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(3). |
7. |
20 U.S.C. §1011i. |
8. |
20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(4)(B). |
9. |
Examples of non-Title IV funds include private education loans and some military and veterans' benefits, such as the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program. |
10. |
20 U.S.C. §1094(a)(24) & (d)(2). Of the 1,897 IHEs reporting revenues for purposes of the 90/10 rule, between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2015, 17 had Title IV revenues that were greater than 90%. Fifteen of these institutions remained eligible for Title IV participation because they had met the 90/10 rule requirement for the previous year. Two institutions did not meet the requirements for two consecutive years and, therefore, lost its Title IV eligibility. Letter from Lynn B. Mahaffie, Delegated Duties of Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, to John Kline, Chairman, Committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives, December 21, 2016. |
11. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-11 through 2-12. |
12. |
Institutions can choose to participate in Title IV programs or can choose to be designated by ED as "eligibility only." An eligibility only designation allows an institution and its eligible students to qualify to participate in non-Title IV programs and benefits, such as the American Opportunity Tax Credit. Additionally, students attending eligibility only institutions qualify for in-school deferment of payment on their federal student loans that they have previously taken out. |
13. |
34 C.F.R. §600.54. Foreign medical, nursing, and veterinary institutions must meet additional requirements. See Department of Education, Foreign School Eligibility Criteria, Washington, DC, May 2010, p. 1, http://ifap.ed.gov/ForeignSchoolInfo/attachments/FSEligEligibilityCriteria.pdf. |
14. |
Ibid. |
15. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-17. |
16. |
20 U.S.C. §1002(b)(1). |
17. |
The following programs offered by proprietary IHEs are not considered gainful employment programs and, therefore, are not subject to the gainful employment rules: (1) programs that lead to a bachelor's degree in liberal arts at a proprietary IHE accredited by an ED-recognized regional accrediting agency are not subject to the gainful employment requirements. IHEs offering such programs must have been continuously accredited by a regional accrediting agency since at least October 1, 2007 and have provided the program continuously since January 1, 2009; (2) preparatory classwork necessary for enrollment in a Title IV eligible program; and (3) approved comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities. Additional requirements apply to foreign medical, veterinary, and nursing schools. Those additional requirements are beyond the scope of this report. For additional information, see 34 C.F.R. §600.54(e)(3)(i). |
18. |
Previously, ED had issued rules on gainful employment in late 2010 and early 2011. On June 30, 2012, the day before the final regulations related to gainful employment performance metrics were to go into effect, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia vacated most of the gainful employment regulations. Association of Private Colleges & Universities v. Duncan, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90434 (D.C. 2012). Rather than appealing the decision, ED promulgated new gainful employment rules. |
19. |
The Final Rules state that the disclosure requirements were effective January 1, 2017; however, the release of an ED-developed disclosure template that IHEs are required to use was delayed by ED. Due to this delay, ED extended the compliance deadline to July 1, 2017. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Federal Student Aid, Electronic Announcement No. 105, "Gainful Employment Electronic Announcement #105—Additional Time for Submission of an Alternate Earnings Appeal and to Comply with Gainful Employment (GE) Disclosure Requirements." |
20. |
Department of Education, "Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program," 82 Federal Register 27621, June 16, 2017. |
21. |
34 C.F.R. Part 668, Subpart Q. |
22. |
Annual loan payments are calculated by determining the median loan debt of a program's completers during the cohort period (two or four years, depending on the enrollment size of the program) and amortizing the median loan debt over a specified repayment period, depending on the credential offered by the program (e.g., over a 10-year repayment for a program that leads to an undergraduate certificate, a post-baccalaureate certificate, an associate degree, or a graduate certificate). 34 C.F.R. §668.404(b). |
23. |
Annual earnings are the greater of the mean or median annual earnings. ED obtains the earnings of gainful employment program completers during the cohort period from the Social Security Administration. |
24. |
Discretionary income is the difference between the greater of the mean or median annual earnings and 150% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. |
25. |
Additional information required in the warning includes describing the academic and financial options available to enrolled students to continue in another program at the IHE or to transfer credits to another IHE. An IHE must provide prospective students with similar information and may not enroll, register, or enter into a financial commitment with a prospective student earlier than (a) three business days after it provided the prospective student with the warning or (b) if 30 days have passed from the date the IHE first provided the warning to the prospective student, three business days after it provides the prospective student with a second warning. |
26. |
This calculation is completed using a two-year cohort period. |
27. |
The annual earnings rate is the percentage of a gainful employment program's annual loan payments (see footnote 20) divided by the higher of the mean or median annual earnings of the program's completers during the applicable cohort period. |
28. |
34 C.F.R. §600.2, Clock Hour. |
29. |
34 C.F.R. §600.2, Credit Hour. |
30. |
For both credit and clock hours, a week of instructional time is any seven-day period in which at least one day is devoted to regularly scheduled educational activity. 20 U.S.C. §1088(a)(2). |
31. |
34 C.F.R. §668.3(a)(2). For individual educational programs within an IHE, the Secretary may approve academic years of 26 to 29 weeks of instructional time if the IHE offers a two-year program leading to an associate's degree or a four-year bachelor's degree. The IHE must submit a written request to ED that identifies each program for which it is requesting a reduction in instructional time and the requested number of weeks of instructional time for the program. The IHE must also show good cause for the reduction in instructional time, and the licensing agency for the state in which the IHE is located must have approved the request. |
32. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-18 through 2-19. |
33. |
Short-term programs are only eligible to participate in the Direct Loan Program. 34 C.F.R. §668.8. |
34. |
Additionally, short-term programs must have verified student completion and job placement rates of at least 70%, not be more than 50% longer than the minimum training period required by a federal or state agency for the occupation for which an instructional program is intended, and have been in existence for at least one year. FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-18 through 2-19. |
35. |
34 C.F.R. §600.9. |
36. |
There two requirements that do not apply to (1) institutions authorized by the federal government by name to operate postsecondary educational programs and (2) institutions authorized by name by an Indian tribe to operate postsecondary educational programs, provided they are located on tribal lands and the tribal government has a process to review and address complaints concerning the IHEs and enforces applicable tribal law. Additionally, religious institutions are considered to be legally authorized to operate postsecondary educational programs within a state if they are exempt under state law from state authorization as religious institutions. Federal Student Aid Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-7. |
37. |
States may exempt institutions established through a state charter, statute, or constitutional provision from state approval or licensure requirements based on the IHE's having been in operation for at least 20 years or based on its accreditation by one or more ED-recognized accrediting agencies. States may not exempt IHEs from state approval or licensure requirements based on years in operation, accreditation, or comparable exemptions if the IHE was authorized by the state to conduct business or operate as a nonprofit organization. Federal Student Aid Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-8. |
38. |
20 U.S.C. §1099a. |
39. |
For additional information on accreditation and the federal government's role, see CRS Report R43826, An Overview of Accreditation of Higher Education in the United States, by [author name scrubbed]. |
40. |
Judith S. Eaton, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation, Council for Higher Education Accreditation, Washington, DC, November 2015, p. 1, http://chea.org/pdf/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%202015.pdf (hereinafter CHEA, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation). |
41. |
For additional information on the history of accreditation and the federal role, see John R. Proffit, The Federal Connection for Accreditation, The Journal of Higher Education, 1979, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1980935?seq=1. |
42. |
20 U.S.C. §1001(a)(5). |
43. |
CHEA, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation, p. 2. |
44. |
Such an agency is known as the institution's primary accrediting agency. |
45. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-9. |
46. |
CHEA, An Overview of U.S. Accreditation, p. 4. |
47. |
Ibid., pp. 4-5. |
48. |
Generally, although institutions are not required to have their programs accredited by programmatic accrediting agencies, they may wish to have a program accredited for various reasons. For instance, many employers require prospective employees to be graduates of an accredited program, and licensure requirements for some occupations in certain states require programmatic accreditation. Under the new gainful employment regulations, however, an institution must certify to ED that each gainful employment program it operates is programmatically accredited, if such accreditation is required by a federal government entity or by the state in which the institution is located to participate in the Title IV student aid programs. This certification requirement effectively requires programmatic accreditation for Title IV eligibility in certain instances. 34 C.F.R. §668.414(d)(1). |
49. |
20 U.S.C. §1099b(h) & (i). |
50. |
20 U.S.C. §1099b(j). |
51. |
20 U.S.C. §1099b; 34 C.F.R. §602.1. |
52. |
Section 496 of the HEA sets forth four criteria for an accrediting agency to be considered "separate and independent." They are (1) members of the postsecondary education governing body of the agency cannot be elected or selected by the board or chief executive officer of any related or affiliated trade association or membership organization; (2) for every six members of the board of the agency, at least one must be a member of the public; (3) dues to the agency must be paid separately from dues to any related or associated trade association or membership organization; and (4) the agency's budget must be developed and determined by the agency, without review or consultation from another entity or organization. |
53. |
The requirement that accrediting agencies review an institution's policies and procedures for determining credit hours was added to regulations in October 2010 and became effective July 1, 2011. ED-recognized accrediting agencies are required to use the recently amended definition of credit hour (34 C.F.R. §600.2) for federal program purposes, including Title IV funding. 34 C.F.R. §602.24(f). |
54. |
20 U.S.C. §1099b. |
55. |
The HEA authorized NACIQI through September 30, 2014. Since then, its authorization has been extended numerous times. NACIQI's authorization was most recently extended through April 28, 2017 under P.L. 114-254. |
56. |
Section 114(b)(1)(B) of the HEA specifies that three of these appointments will be made at the recommendation of the majority leader of the House of Representatives and three will be made at the recommendation of the minority leader of the House of Representatives. |
57. |
Section 114(b)(1)(C) of the HEA specifies that three of these appointments will be made at the recommendation of the majority leader of the Senate and three will be made at the recommendation of the minority leader of the Senate. |
58. |
For additional information on the NACIQI, see The Department of Education, "Boards & Commissions: National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity," http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/naciqi.html. |
59. |
An IHE is considered to have the full faith and credit backing if it notifies ED that it is designated as a public institution by the state, local, or municipal government entity; tribal authority; or other government entity that has the legal authority to make such a designation. The IHE must provide ED with a letter from an appropriate official confirming its status as a public institution. FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-70. |
60. |
In evaluating an IHE's financial responsibility, ED will calculate a composite scored based on its equity, primary, and net income ratios. 34 C.F.R. §668.172. |
61. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-70 through 2-78. Effective July 1, 2017, the occurrence of specified "trigger events" at nonprofit and proprietary IHEs may indicate that an IHE is not financially responsible, and as a result, it would be required to meet additional requirements to continue participating in the Title IV programs. Such trigger events include failing to meet the 90/10 rule or having cohort default rates that equal 30% or more in two consecutive years. U.S. Department of Education, "Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, Federal Family Education Loan Program, William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program, and Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education Grant Program, " 81 Federal Register 75934, November 1, 2016. |
62. |
See 34 C.F.R. §668.16. |
63. |
Some of the required electronic processes include establishment of a Student Aid Internet Gateway mailbox to transmit student data records to ED, use of the E-App to submit and update an institution's eligibility information, and use of the Default Management website to receive draft and official cohort default rate data. A list of required electronic processes can be found at FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-50. |
64. |
ED considers an individual capable for purposes of Title IV administration if the individual: (1) is certified as a financial aid administrator, if the institution's state requires such certification; (2) has successfully completed a Title IV training program; or (3) has previous experience and success in administering Title IV programs. This list is not definitive; ED may consider other relevant factors. 34 C.F.R. §668.12. |
65. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-37 through 2-45. |
66. |
For more information about SAP and student eligibility for FSA programs, see FSA Handbook, vol. 1. |
67. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-14. |
68. |
For institutions with fewer than 30 students entering repayment in a given cohort fiscal year, an "average rate" CDR is used, which is calculated by dividing the number of borrowers who entered repayment in the current cohort fiscal year and the two preceding cohort fiscal years, divided by the number who defaulted in the CDP for the cohort fiscal year in which they entered repayment. 20 U.S.C. §1085(m)(1)(A). |
69. |
For instance, the 2013 cohort fiscal year includes the number of borrowers who entered repayment in 2013 and who defaulted in 2013, 2014, or 2015. In 2016, the CDR for the 2013 cohort fiscal year was used to determine whether an institution is administratively incapable based on that information. Prior to 2014, ED used a two-year CDP in calculating an institution's CDR. |
70. |
These first two CDRs are calculated for Federal Family Education Loan program Subsidized and Unsubsidized Stafford Loans and Direct Loan program Subsidized and Unsubsidized Loans. An institution may be subject to provisional certification if two of the three of its most recent CDRs are 30% or greater. 34 C.F.R. §668.16(m). |
71. |
34 C.F.R. §668.13(c). |
72. |
HEA §498A(a)(2). |
73. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-163. |
74. |
Ibid. |
75. |
Ibid. |
76. |
34 C.F.R. §600.40. |
77. |
Of those domestic proprietary institutions that lost their Title IV participation in 2016, approximately 68% lost Title IV participation due to closure. |
78. |
34 C.F.R. §668.14. |
79. |
34 C.F.R. §668.14(22). |
80. |
For a detailed list of activities covered by the incentive compensation prohibition, see FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2- 47 through 2-49, Tables 1-3 and U.S. Department of Education, "Higher Education: Program Integrity Questions and Answers—Incentive Compensation," http://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2009/compensation.html. |
81. |
20 U.S.C. §1094(f). |
82. |
34 C.F.R. §602.25(c). |
83. |
20 U.S.C. §1091b. |
84. |
For examples on how to calculate the amount of Title IV funds to be returned to the federal government, see FSA Handbook, vol. 5, pp. 5-131 through 5-207. |
85. |
This determination includes the amount that could have been disbursed if the student was eligible for a later disbursement. For information on late disbursements, see FSA Handbook, vol. 5, pp. 5-7. |
86. |
A student is considered to have withdrawn if: (1) in a program measured in credit hours, the student does not complete all of the days in the payment or enrollment period; (2) in programs measured in clock hours, the student does not complete all the clock hours and weeks of instructional time in the payment or enrollment period; or (3) in a non-term or nonstandard-term program, the student is not scheduled to begin another course within a payment or enrollment period for more than 45 calendar days after the end of the module that the student stopped attending. FSA Handbook, vol. 5, p. 5-4. |
87. |
An IHE is required to take attendance if: (1) an outside entity (e.g., the IHE's accrediting agency or a state licensing agency) requires that it do so; (2) the IHE itself has a requirement that instructors take attendance; or (3) the IHE or an outside entity has a requirement that can only be met by taking attendance (e.g., requiring students in a program to demonstrate attendance in the classes of that program). 34 C.F.R. §668.22(b)(3). |
88. |
34 C.F.R. §668.22. |
89. |
In a credit hour program, the total number of calendar days in a period may depend on the pace at which a student progresses through the program. An institution must project a completion date based on a student's progress as of the date of withdrawal. |
90. |
34 C.F.R. §668.22. |
91. |
Post-withdrawal disbursements must be made within 180 days of the date the institution determined that a student withdrew. If a post-withdrawal disbursement is made, an institution must contact the student, explain the student's repayment obligations associated with accepting the funds, and confirm that the student still needs the loan funds. |
92. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 5, pp. 5-87. |
93. |
Generally, institutional charges are defined as charges for tuition and fees, room and board, and other educational expenses that are paid directly to the institution (e.g., charges for supplies, equipment, and materials). |
94. |
20 U.S.C. §1091b. |
95. |
34 C.F.R. §668.22(h). |
96. |
Students who must return Title IV loan funds must repay any outstanding loans according to the terms of the student's promissory note. Students who must return Title IV grant funds can do so through (1) full and immediate repayment of funds to the institution; (2) repayment arrangements that are satisfactory to the institution; or (3) overpayment collection procedures negotiated with ED's Debt Resolution Services. Students who owe grant overpayments as a result of withdrawal initially retain their Title IV eligibility for a maximum of 45 days from the earlier of when the institution sends the student notice of the overpayment or the date the institution was required to notify the student of the overpayment. Students can retain their Title IV eligibility after the initial 45 day period if they take one of the three actions for repayment listed above. FSA Handbook, vol. 5, pp. 5-102 through 5-103. |
97. |
20 U.S.C. §1003(7); 34 C.F.R. §600.2. |
98. |
Department of Education, "Federal Student Aid Programs," 71 Federal Register 45667, August 9, 2006. |
99. |
34 C.F.R. §600.2. In certain instances, elements of a correspondence course may be combined with non-correspondence course elements. These multi-component courses may or may not be considered correspondence courses for the purposes of Title IV eligibility. For specific examples of such courses, see FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-30 through 2-31. |
100. |
20 U.S.C. §1002(a)(3)(A) and (B). This rule does not apply to "a public nonprofit technical institution or career and technical education school used exclusively or principally for the provision of career and technical education to individuals who have completed or left secondary school and who are available for study in preparation for entering the labor market." 20 U.S.C. §2302(3)(C). |
101. |
34 C.F.R. 600.7(a)(1)(i) & (ii). This second limitation may be waived if an IHE offers a two-year associate's degree or four-year bachelor's degree program and it demonstrates to ED that in the award year, students who were enrolled in correspondence courses received 5% or less of the total FSA funds received by all of the IHE's students. ED, FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-81. |
102. |
34 C.F.R. §600.4(a)(3). |
103. |
34 C.F.R. §600.9(c). |
104. |
The court vacated this provision of the state authorization regulations on procedural grounds. Career Colleges Association d/b/a Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, 796 F. Supp. 2d (D.C. 2011). |
105. |
ED recently completed a negotiated rulemaking to determine what regulations it might propose for state authorization of IHEs offering distance education. A consensus was not reached, thus, ED now has the authority to issue its own rule for comment but recently stated it would not do so in the near future. See Michael Stratford, "No Consensus on Debit Cards, State Authorization," Inside Higher Ed, May 21, 2014. |
106. |
U.S. Department of Education, "Program Integrity and Improvement," 81 Federal Register 92262, December 19, 2016. |
107. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, p. 2-30. |
108. |
34 C.F.R. §600.51(d). |
109. |
Prior to these amendments, 15% was the threshold. |
110. |
For information on changes made to each Title of the HEA under the HEOA, see CRS Report RL34654, The Higher Education Opportunity Act: Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act, by [author name scrubbed] et al.; archived. |
111. |
Authorization for the appropriations for many HEA programs expired at the end of FY2014 and was automatically extended through the end of FY2015 under Section 422 of the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA). Additionally, many of these programs were extended multiple times through various appropriations measures and continuing resolutions. Most recently, these HEA programs were extended through April 28, 2017, under the Further Continuing and Security Assistance Appropriations Act, 2017 (P.L. 114-254). |
112. |
Other bills introduced in the 114th Congress that would have amended the 90/10 Rule include H.R. 3988; H.R. 4054; H.R. 6062, §305; and S. 1664. |
113. |
For additional information on these and other issues for consideration related to accreditation, see CRS Report R43826, An Overview of Accreditation of Higher Education in the United States, by [author name scrubbed]. |
114. |
As discussed earlier in this report, effective July 1, 2015, institutions are required to certify that each gainful employment program it offers meets any relevant state and federal entity accreditation requirements for those gainful employment programs to be eligible to participate in Title IV FSA programs. |
115. |
U.S. Department of Education, FACT SHEET: Department of Education Launches the Educational Quality through Innovative Partnerships (EQUIP) Experiment to Provide Low-Income Students with Access to New Models of Education and Training, October 14, 2015, https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/fact-sheet-department-education-launches-educational-quality-through-innovative-partnerships-equip-experiment-provide-low-income-students-access-new-models-education-and-training. |
116. |
Ibid. The U.S. Department of Education, as part of its Experimental Sites Initiative, recently launched EQUIP, which "seeks to learn about these new [nontraditional providers] and their costs and educational and employment outcomes for students." Through the initiative, partnerships of nontraditional providers, IHEs, and third-party quality assurance entities will be provided waivers of specified Title IV eligibility requirements to test new ways of permitting students to access innovative learning and training opportunities. |
117. |
Paul Fain, "Taking the Direct Path," Inside Higher Ed, February 21, 2014. |
118. |
FSA Handbook, vol. 2, pp. 2-24 through 2-25. In 2013, ED released guidance outlining how institutions can have direct-assessment programs approved under current regulations for Title IV eligibility. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, General Announcement, Applying for Title IV Eligibility for Direct Assessment (Competency-Based) Programs, GEN-13-10, March 19, 2013, http://ifap.ed.gov/dpcletters/GEN1310.html. In December 2014, ED released additional guidance further discussing direct assessment program and Title IV eligibility. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Dear Colleague Letter, Competency-Based Education Programs—Questions and Answers, GEN-14-23, December 19, 2014. |
119. |
Moreover, there is concern that some institutions may encourage their students to enter into deferment or forbearance, which may help delay default but ultimately does not necessarily prevent it. See Libby A. Nelson, "Default Rates Continue Climb, Mostly," Inside Higher Ed, October 1, 2012, http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/10/01/two-year-default-rates-student-loans-increase-again. |
120. |
For information on reporting and disclosure requirements for participating Title IV institutions, see CRS Report R40789, Reporting and Disclosure Requirements for Institutions of Higher Education to Participate in Federal Student Aid Programs Under Title IV of the Higher Education Act, by [author name scrubbed]; archived. |
121. |
The authorization of the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance lapsed at the end of FY2015. Congress neither extended the committee's authorization nor provided additional appropriations for the committee; therefore, it disbanded and ceased operations at the end of FY2015. |
122. |
Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance, Higher Education Regulations Study, Final Report, Washington, DC, November 2011, p. 15, Table 5. |
123. |
Ibid., pp. 37-39. |