< Back to Current Version

The Kingdom of Bhutan

Changes from May 25, 2017 to March 23, 2020

This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.


May 25, 2017Updated March 23, 2020 The Kingdom of Bhutan Background The Kingdom of Bhutan, also known as the Land of the Thunder Dragon, is a small, landlocked Himalayan country country situated between India and China. The mountainous kingdom is about half the size of Indiana, with an estimated population of 792782,000, approximately a quarter of which is in115,000 of them in and around the capital city, Thimphu. Bhutan’s economy has grown primarily as a result of hydropower, agriculture, and and forestry development. The United States has no significant significant trade relations with Bhutan, and its foreign aid mission and bilateral consular affairs are handled by the U.S. Embassy in New Delhi, India. Bhutan Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan visited Bhutan in August, 2019. Bhutan has participated in a U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) regional program for South Asia directed at developing power infrastructure, and it has implemented programs intended to help mitigate some of the effects of climate change. Bhutan in Brief Form of Government: Constitutional Monarchy Head of State: King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck Area: 18,146 square miles, or about half the size of Indiana Geography: Mountainous country with 2.6% arable land located between China and India Population: 792,000 with 1.05% annual growth Religion: 75.3% Buddhist, 22.1% Hindu, and 2.6% other Life Expectancy: 70.1 years (2016 est.) Literacy: 64.9% (2016 est.) Poverty: 13% live below the poverty line (2012 est.) Unemployment: 2.5% (est. December 2016) GDP Growth/Per Capita (PPP): 6.5% (2015)/$2,532 (2016) Origins of GDP: Agric. 16.4%, Industry 42.1%, Services 41.5% Principal Exports: Electricity, ferrosilicon, cement, calcium carbide, copper wire, manganese, and vegetable oil Sources: CIA World Handbook, World Bank 2016. The Constitution, Recent Elections, and the Wangchuck Dynasty the effects of climate change. With 70% forest cover and extensive hydropower, Bhutan is a carbon negative country. The Constitution, Elections, and the King The constitution of Bhutan establishes three branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. The bicameral legislature, or Chi Tshog, includes the National Assembly (Tshogdu), with 47 elected representatives, and the National Council (Gyelyong Tshongde), with 25 members, 5 of which are selected by the king. Legislators serve five-year terms. The executive branch includes the “Dragon King” (Druk Gyalpo), currently King Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, as Head of State, and the prime minister, presently Tshering TobgayLotay Tshering, as Head of Government. The king is hereditary and appoints the majority leader in the parliament as prime minister. There is also a Council of Ministers (Lhengye Zhungtshog), whose members are nominated by the king, in consultation with the prime minister, and approved by the National Assembly. Ministers serve five-year terms. The judiciary consists of the Supreme Court, the High Court, District Courts (Dzongkhag), and Sub-District Courts (Dungkhag). The Supreme Court has five members. The Chief Justice, appointed by the king, serves up to two five-year terms, and the four Associate Justices (Drangpons) serve up to two 10year terms. Bhutan’s path to democracy was not spurred by a popular movement but rather was initiated and encouraged by the fourth king fourth and fifth kingkings of the Wangchuck dynasty. According According to Bhutan’s first prime minister, Jigme Y. Thinley, who came to power in the country’s first election of 2008, the Bhutanese people were apprehensive about the new system because “in many of the countries, democracy had failed or was in the process of failing, and leading to tremendous tremendous upheavals, strife among the people.” The king, however, insisted that the long-term interests of the people were best served by elected leaders. The first election went smoothly smoothly in 2008, and the second election, in 2013, brought a , in 2013, brought a Figure 1.Bhutan in Brief Source: CIA World Factbook, Economist Intelligence Unit, Media peaceful transition of power in which the opposition People’s Democratic Party won 32 of the 42 elected National Assembly seats. Lotay Tshering’s Bhutan United Party won the 2018 National Assembly elections with 30 of 47 seats. The birth of the hereditary Wangchuck dynasty in 1907 has shaped Bhutan’s democracy. The first ruler, King Ugyen (1907-1926), introduced reforms and Western education. The second ruler, King Jigme (1926-1952), continued his father’s moderation and centralization efforts by building more schools and roads and bringing public institutions under government control. Two generations later, the third ruler, King Jigme Dorji (1952-1972), established a high court, introduced a bicameral legislative branch, set up a planning commission, and created the Council of Ministers. The sudden death of the third king brought his son, King Jigme Singye (1972-2006), to power, and, like his forefathers, King Jigme Singye continued his father’s legacy. In 2006, the fourth King abdicated in favor of his son, Jigme Khesar Namgyel, who started a top-down democratic process. In July 2008, Bhutan’s political system changed from an absolute monarchy to constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary form of government. Ethnic, Religious, and Refugee Issues Bhutan has four ethnic groups: the Ngalops (westerners), the Sharchop (easterners), aboriginal groupspeople, and the Lhotshampa (southerners). The Ngalops migrated from Tibet to Bhutan around the ninth century CE. They introduced . They introduced Tibetan culture and Mahayana Buddhism to Bhutan. The https://crsreports.congress.gov The Kingdom of Bhutan Ngalops are the majority in central, western, and northern Bhutan, and they dominate cultural, religious, and political elements in modern Bhutan. The Sharchops, an Indo-Mongoloid origin, are thought to have originated from Assam, in present-day India, or perhaps Burma, and they also practice Mahayana Buddhism. Several aboriginal groups (Drokpa, Lepcha, Doya) live and practice Hinduism throughout Bhutan. Hindu Nepali settlers, the fourth group, are the majority in the south. These southerners, or Lhotshampa, arrived in the late 19th and early 20th centuries https://crsreports.congress.gov The Kingdom of Bhutan in search of arable land Lhotshampa, arrived from Nepal. Many of the Lhotshampa settlers are not legal residents of Bhutan. InDuring the late 1980s and early 1990s, the government of BhutanThimphu government viewed the Lhotshampa, which made up about 28% of the population, as a threat to the country’s cultural identity. Many Lhotshampa were expelled or voluntarily emigrated to India and Nepal, escapingevading government attempts attempts to forcibly integrate them into mainstream Bhutanese culture. Such forceful assimilation attempts have been viewed as a threat to their Nepali Bhutanese culture. This tension led to unrest in the south of Bhutan in the early 1990s and resulted in an estimated 107,000 Hindu Nepali settlers returning to Nepal as refugees. Economic Development and “Gross National Happiness (GNH)” The World Bank projects the acceleration of Bhutan’s economic growth in 2018, citing hydropower projects, robust economic policy, and India’s positive economic outlook as drivers In recent years, Bhutan has experienced consistent economic growth. New hydropower plants are expected to come online in the next eight years;while past hydropower profits have been invested by the government in public health care, contributing to an increase in Bhutanese life expectancy. Bhutan’s financial policy has controlled exchange rates and inflation, as evidenced by “single-digit inflation, a relative stable exchange rate, and accumulating international reserves,” according to the World Bank. Because Bhutan’s economy is inextricably linked to India’s, a projected positive economic outlook in India would benefit Bhutan. With an average 8% GDP growth from 1996 until 2015, Bhutan fits the low middle-income group profile. In fits the low middle-income group profile. In contrast to Gross Domestic Product (GDP), Gross the concept of measuring Gross National Happiness (GNH) has a deep-rooteddeeprooted history in Bhutanese culture. In 1987, the fourth king stated, “We are convinced that we must aim for contentment and happiness.” The king’s vision of happiness has since been enshrined in Article 9 of the 2008 Constitution of Bhutan, which reads, “The State shall strive to promote those conditions that will enable the pursuit of Gross National Happiness.” Established by the Royal Government of Bhutan, the Centre for Bhutan Studies & Gross National Happiness Research (CBS & GNH), which describes itself as “an autonomous research institute” based in the capital Thimphu, is mandated by the government to study the GNH concept and develop indicators for the Royal Government of Bhutan’s Gross National Happiness Commission Commission (GNHC), which is responsible for integrating “GNH into national planning process.” The GNHC chair and vice chair are the prime minister and finance minister, respectively. GNHC ensures all government policies “are formulated and implemented in line with the principles of GNH including: (a) developing a dynamic economy as the foundation for a vibrant democracy, (b) living in harmony with tradition and nature, (c) effective and good governance, and (d) investing in our people, the nation’s greatest asset.” Foreign Relations Despite the focus on GNH, income inequality is a growing issue in Bhutan’s domestic politics. Foreign Relations Bhutan’s external relations have been influenced by the United Kingdom, and more recently India, for much of the past century. The 1910 Treaty of Punakha and 1949 Treaty of Friendship allowed the British and Indian governments, respectively, to direct Bhutan’s external affairs. Both treaties promised the policy of “no interference in the internal administration of Bhutan” and provided protection from external encroachment. India is Bhutan’s key strategic and economic partner. India and Bhutan signed another treaty of friendship in 2007 that grants Bhutan more Treaty of Friendship in 2007 granting Bhutan more independence in its foreign and defense relations. Bhutan has joined a number of international organizations and entered into several international agreements. It was a co-foundingcofounding member of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) in 1985 and joined the South Asian Free Trade Agreement in 2004, the same year it also joined the Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Singapore, and Thailand Agreement in 2004. Bhutan is also a member of the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) forum. Bhutan also has has representation at the United Nations, which it joined in 1971. Bhutan also joined 174 other countries to sign the Paris Agreement on Climate Change in 2016. Bilateral Bilateral relations with the United States are limited, with no formal diplomatic relations. According to the U.S. Department of State, however, “the two countries maintain warm informal relations.” The United States has helped resettle Lhotshampa refugees residing in Nepal, and since 2006, the United States has admitted 92,462 of these refugees, including 650 in 2017 to date. China also does not maintain formal diplomatic relations with Bhutan, but some progress in developing relations has been reported. In 2016, China and Bhutan held their 24th round of border talks in Beijing. China is currently building rail links across the Tibetan plateau and has plans to extend the railway toward the Bhutanese border. Security Concerns Bhutan had experienced external and internal security challenges in recent years. In the 1990s, Indian separatist militants (the United Liberation Front of Assam and others) left India to establish bases in southern Bhutan. The king, concerned about sovereignty, warned India not to cross into Bhutan. Meanwhile, the National Assembly discussed peaceful and military options to drive out the groups. After five rounds of talks with the militants failed, the National Assembly approved “Operation All Clear” in 2003 to remove the groups forcefully. The operation captured or killed 650 militants, including top ULFA leaders. New security threats emerged prior to the March 2008 election. Before the election, several bombs exploded in Thimphu and other districts. A new group, the United Revolutionary Front of Bhutan (URFB), claimed responsibility for the bombings to highlight the rights of Lhotshampa. There were no URFB-related bomb threats in the March 2013 elections. There was, however, a case of a URFB bombing claim in Phuentsholing, 100 miles south of Thimphu, in 2012. Bruce Vaughn, Specialist in Asian Affairs Bhutan’s external relations have been influenced by the United Kingdom and India for much of the past century. https://crsreports.congress.gov IF10660 The Kingdom of Bhutan resettle Lhotshampa refugees residing in Nepal. China and Bhutan do not have formal diplomatic relations. Doklam With a population of less than 1 million, Bhutan is dwarfed by India (1.3 billion) and China (1.4 billion), and since the 1962 border war between China and India periodic tensions between the two powers have complicated Bhutan’s external situation. Border tensions between China and India escalated in mid-June 2017, while Indian Prime Minister Modi was in Washington, DC, to meet with President Trump. Possibly intending to signal displeasure over developing ties between India and the United States, China extended an unpaved road near Doklam on the disputed border between China and Bhutan, high in the Himalayas. China’s road-building activity was first revealed by a Royal Bhutan Army Patrol that sought to dissuade the Chinese from continuing. Indian military personnel subsequently moved to the border area and a standoff ensued until a deescalation of tensions in August, 2017. Doklam is located in territory disputed by Bhutan and China to the north of the Siliguri Corridor. The corridor, also known as the “chicken’s neck” and 20 miles wide at its narrowest, links central India with its seven northeastern states. Chinese control of the corridor would isolate 45 million Indians in an area the size of the United Kingdom. Other Security Concerns Bhutan has also experienced other security challenges. In the 1990s, Indian separatist militants (the United Liberation Front of Assam and others) established bases in southern Bhutan. The National Assembly discussed peaceful and military options to drive out the groups. After five rounds of talks with the militants failed, the National Assembly approved “Operation All Clear” in 2003 to remove the groups forcefully. The operation captured or killed 650 militants, including top ULFA leaders. Other security threats emerged prior to the March 2008 election, as several bombs exploded in Thimphu and other districts. The United Revolutionary Front of Bhutan (URFB), claimed responsibility for the bombings to highlight the rights of Lhotshampa. https://crsreports.congress.gov The Kingdom of Bhutan IF10660 Bruce Vaughn, Specialist in Asian Affairs Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10660 · VERSION 3 · NEW4 · UPDATED