This page shows textual changes in the document between the two versions indicated in the dates above. Textual matter removed in the later version is indicated with red strikethrough and textual matter added in the later version is indicated with blue.
On February 9, 2016, the Obama Administration submitted to Congress its FY2017 budget request that includestotaling $52.78 billion in new budget authority for the State Department, Foreign Operations, and Related Appropriations (SFOPS) accounts. Of the total request, $17.05 billion1 is for programs funded through the State operationsState Operations and related agencies (a 3.6 % increase over FY2016 estimates), and $35.74 billion is for foreign operations (-1.8 Foreign Operations (-1.8% compared with FY2016 estimates that include emergency Ebola funds).
On June 29, 2016, the Senate Appropriations Committee introduced and reported the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2017 (S. 3117/S.Rept. 114-290). It would provide a total of $52.24 billion, after rescissions and including funds designated for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO). This level is $542.04 million (or 1%) below the President's request. For State Operations and related agencies, it would provide $16.88 billion and for Foreign Operations, $35.52 billion.
On July 15, 2016, the House Appropriations Committee introduced and reported its Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2017 (H.R. 5912/H.Rept. 114-693). The measure would provide $52.24 billion, including OCO. This level is $546 million (or 1%) below the President's request, and about $4 million less than the Senate bill. Funding for State Operations and related agencies would be $16.29 billion, nearly $600 million below the Senate funding level. Its Foreign Operations funding level of $35.95 billion is $432 million above the Senate-recommended level.
(funding in billions of current U.S. dollars)
302(b) AllocationsaCommittee Action
Floor Action
Conference/Agreement
Public Law
House
Senate
House
Senate
House
Senate
House
Senate
Agreement
7/14/16
4/14/2016
7/15/16
6/29/16
$52.24
$52.08
$52.24
$52.24
a. The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 established a congressional budget process. The act, as amended, includes a requirement that the House and Senate allocate funds to the Appropriations Committee, which are then divided among the 12 subcommittees, as required by Section 302(b).b. The Senate 302(b) allocation report total does not appear to include $159 million in mandatory spending for the Foreign Service Retirement account, which is included in the House allocation and the House and Senate committee totals.
The FY2017 appropriations process is shaped by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (BBA, H.R. 1314; P.L. 114-74) that Congress passed at the end of October 2015. The law raised the overall revised discretionary spending limits set by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA, P.L. 112-25) from $1.039 trillion to $1.069 trillion for FY2017. The law also increased non-security funding security funding levels from $536.1 billion to $551.1 billion and nonsecurity funding (that includes SFOPS funding) from $503.5 billion to $518.5 billion for FY2017. It also established for SFOPS a minimum of $14.895 billion in OCO funding and established a $14.895 billion minimum for SFOPs OCO funding for FY2017.2
In the FY2017 request, as every year since FY2012, the Administration distinguishes between enduring costs versusand those to support "overseas contingency operations" (OCO), described in earlier . OCO-designated funds, which do not count toward discretionary budget allocations established each year by appropriators, were initially described in budget documents as "extraordinary, but temporary, costs of the Department of State and USAID in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan."3 ,"3 but have been used for a broader range of countries and activities, including counterterrorism efforts. The OCO designation gained increased significance in August 2011 with enactment of the BCA thatBudget Control Act, which specified that emergency orand OCO funds do not count toward the budget caps established by the act. For FY2017, to meet the BBA minimum requirement, $14.895 billion, or about 28% of the SFOPS request, is designated as OCO. The FY2017 OCO request is the same as the FY2016 level, which was also set by the BBA, but represents an increase of 59% compared with the FY2015 estimate that included funds for the three frontline states, "other areas of unrest," anti-terrorism activities, and operations to counter the Islamic State (IS). (See Table 1.)
Table 1 for FY2011-FY2021 and enforced by across-the-board cuts called sequestration. Use of the OCO designation expanded further with enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) in 2015, which established a minimum annual OCO funding level for FY2016 and FY2017 SFOPs appropriations that was significantly higher ($14.89 billion) than SFOPs OCO spending in prior years. As a result of the BBA, the Administration request and House and Senate SFOPs bills all call for the same OCO funding level for FY2017, which is level with the FY2016 OCO funding but represents an increase of 59% from the FY2015 funding. (See Table 2.)
Table 2. State-Foreign Operations Appropriations, FY2008-FY2017
(in billions of current U.S. dollars)
FY08 |
FY09 |
FY10 |
FY11 |
FY12 |
FY13 |
FY14 |
FY15 |
FY16 est. |
FY17 req. |
|
Enduring $ |
34.52 |
50.30 |
49.44 |
48.80 |
41.80 |
39.75 |
42.91 |
41.01 |
37.97 |
37.89 |
OCO/Supp $ |
5.66 |
1.83 |
2.34 |
0.00 |
11.20 |
10.82 |
6.52 |
11.89 |
14.89 |
14.89 |
Total |
40.18 |
52.13 |
51.78 |
48.80 |
53.00 |
50.57 |
49.43 |
52.90 |
52.86 |
52.78 |
Sources: Congressional Budget Justification Department of State and Foreign Operations, Fiscal Year 2017; CRS appropriations reports; CRS calculations.
Note: Supp includes funds for Iraq and Afghanistan prior to OCO first requested and appropriated=emergency supplemental funds, largely used for Iraq and Afghanistan before the OCO designation was first used in FY2012. FY2015 OCO/Supp includes $9.2637 billion for OCO and $2.53 billion for emergency Ebola funds.
Within the broad range of activities supported by the SFOPS budget are several programs and focus areas that may be of particular interest to Congress as a result of their size, recent funding or policy changes, or relation to current world events.
Operations in Frontline States. Operations in the challenging environments of the three countries termed "frontline states"—Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq—continue to be a focus of attention by the department. Together, these three countries alone make up roughly 22% of the department's overall request for operational funding. As the Department confronts a more challenging security environment in Afghanistan and transitions to a civilian lead as U.S. troops draw down, the FY2017 request for operations there seeks a 29% increase above FY2016 estimated levels to $1.24 billion to provide more secure housing for staff in Kabul, among other facilities upgrades. FY2017 funding requested for operations in Iraq—a total of $1.26 billion—represents growth of 49% over the FY2016 estimated levels, and would address previously deferred maintenance, and additional aviation and life support costs. Last year, the request for State operations in Pakistan sought a 21% increase over FY2015 levels, in order to continue "normalizing" operations in that country while taking into account the U.S. military drawdown in neighboring Afghanistan. This year, by contrast, the department seeks 7.7% less than FY2016 estimated levels, or a total of $117.6 million; diplomatic posts would rely more on the local economy and support than is possible in Iraq or AfghanistanAdministration of Foreign Affairs. The Administration of Foreign Affairs funds salaries and expenses, including security funding, for the Diplomatic and Consular Programs (D&CP) account, embassy security and construction, and educational and cultural exchanges, among other activities. The Administration is requesting a total of $12.06 billion, compared with $11.98 billion in the Senate bill (S. 3117) and $11.86 billion in the House bill (H.R. 5912), all including OCO funds of which both House and Senate include more than requested. The House bill would provide $167.29 million less for D&CP and nearly $37 million less for exchange programs, while the Senate bill would fund $11.08 million less for D&CP and $67.1 million less for exchanges.
Cuba. In order to support implementation of its new Cuba policy, $3.8 million is requested within the Diplomatic & Consular Programs account (D&CP)D&CP account for infrastructure improvements to the U.S. embassy in Havana (converted from an Interests Section last year). The departmentState Department's funding request would support up to 10 additional U.S. citizen positions (at least 8 foreign service officers and one civil servant), as well as refurbishing workspace, securing communications and updating vehicles for the motor pool.
Contribution for International Peacekeeping Activities. While the FY2016 request sought a jump of 29% in the International Organizations accounts, the FY2017 proposal contemplates a 0.1% increase from FY2016 estimated levels, to $3.93 billion. The House bill (H.R. 5912) includes language prohibiting funds from being used for the establishment of a United States diplomatic presence in Cuba or to facilitate the establishment or operation of a diplomatic mission of Cuba in the United States beyond that which was in existence prior to December 17, 2014, with certain exceptions and limitations.
The Senate bill (S. 3117) has no comparable provision.
Contribution for International Organizations and Peacekeeping Activities. The Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) account funds the U.S. share of the assessed budgets of 44 international organizations, including the U.N. regular budget and U.N. specialized agencies. The FY2017 CIO request is $1.39 billion, a 4% decrease from the FY2016 estimated level. The reduction is tied to a decrease in the U.N. regular budget projection, as well as the winding down of United Nations Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. H.R. 5912 would provide $41.14 million less than requested and S. 3117 would provide $11.81 million less.The Contributions for International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) request, which funds U.N. peacekeeping missions and the two international war crimes tribunals, is $2.39 billion, a decrease of 2.7% from the FY2016 level. The request is based on the U.N. peacekeeping assessment for the United States of 28.56% (rather than the amount recognized by U.S. law of 27.14%). It also reflects the possible closure of the U.N. Mission in Liberia. In addition, the Administration's FY2017 request includes $150 million for a Mechanism for Peace Operations Response (MPOR), a repeat proposal from the FY2015 and FY2016 requests intended to support urgent—but as yet undefined—peacekeeping needs. The proposal was not funded by Congress in prior years.
The House would provide $1.95 billion or $445.4 million less than requested for CIPA. The Senate measure would fund CIPA at $2.37 billion, nearly the level of the request.
Diplomatic Security. The FY2017 request for Worldwide Security Protection (WSP), which supports the Diplomatic Security Bureau's functions around the world, would grow by 9.4% over FY2016 estimated levels to $3.71 billion. Much of the increase in requested funding is for security measures in Afghanistan and Iraq. Physical security upgrades at diplomatic facilities, which are mostly funded through Worldwide Security Upgrades (WSU) under the Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance (ESCM) account, are managed by the Bureau of Overseas Building Operations. The WSU request for FY2017 is for $1.6 billion, an 11% increase from FY2016 estimated levels. Within the ESCM request is $1.0 billion to provide for the Department of State's share of the Capital Security Cost Sharing (CSCS) program, which is an interagencyThe House and Senate bills would provide the same total as requested. The Senate, however, would designate more of the total as OCO funds, while the House funding is the same as the Administration's request.
Cuts to NED, Asia Foundation, East-West Center. The FY2017 request repeats theBoth House and Senate bills would maintain the FY2016 funding levels for all three organizations for FY2017.
Passport Surge. The departmentThe House bill does not address this issue. The Senate provides the Secretary of State with the authority to collect a surcharge on passport fees to cover any costs of meeting increased demand for passports.
Foreign Operations accounts, which fund foreign assistance activities, would total about $35.74 billion under the FY2017 request, comprising about two-thirds of the international affairs budget. As in recent years, the FY2017 funding would be allocated largely to major Obama Administration foreign aid initiatives and support to strategic allies. In addition, notable focus areas within the FY2017 request include countering ISIS, humanitarian assistance, responding to Russian aggression, and Central American migration, and food aid reforms.
The House committee-passed bill, H.R. 5912, includes $35.95 billion for Foreign Operations accounts, and the Senate committee-passed bill, S. 3117, includes $35.52 billion for these accounts. In this section, references to H.R. 5912 and S. 3117 include both the bills and their accompanying reports (H.Rept. 114-693 and S.Rept. 114-290, respectively).
Administration Initiatives. The Obama Administration's four broad foreign assistance initiatives would continue to play a major role under the FY2017 foreign operations request and the House and Senate proposals, accounting for about 30% of the total foreign operations request.
Top Country Recipients. In the FY2017 request, top foreign assistance recipients would not differ much from FY2015 (FY2016 country allocations are not yet available). Israel would continue to be the top recipient, with a requested $3.1 billion (level with FY2015) in Foreign Military Financing (FMF) funds, followed by Egypt, for which $1.46 billion is requested (almost level with FY2015), primarily in FMF to support shared security interests. Afghanistan would receive $1.25 billion (+11% from FY2015), primarily to help build sustainable institutions and help the newly elected government protect development gains, and Jordan would receive $1.0 billion (1% below FY2015) to promote security and stability in the region as well as address economic and security strains related to the crisis in Syria. Pakistan would get $742 million (a 7.6% cut from FY2015), to continue ongoing efforts to increase stability, counter violent extremism, and support economic growth. Other top recipients would include Kenya ($626 million), Nigeria ($606 million), and Tanzania ($575 million), all of which are top recipients of global health funds. Ethiopia would receive $514 million, a mix of security, development, and governance assistance. Iraq would re-joinrejoin the top recipient list in FY2017, after a few years absence, with a requested $510 million (more than double FY2015 funding) for security and stabilization activities, as well as support for a $1 billion sovereign loan guarantee.
Neither the House nor Senate bill details comprehensive country allocation, but both bills and their accompanying reports specify aid funding levels for select countries. H.R. 5912 allocates $3.1 billion for Israel, $1.275 billion to Jordan, and explains that no funding levels are provided for Afghanistan and Pakistan because of the evolving situation in those countries. S. 3117 provides allocations for many countries, with top recipients including Israel ($3.4 billion), Egypt ($1.38 billion), Jordan ($1.0 billion), Afghanistan ($725 million), Pakistan ($642 million), and Iraq ($510 million).
Focus Areas. In addition to foreign assistance initiatives and support to strategic allies, there are a number of priority issues and objectives identified in the FY2017 Foreign Operations request.Appendix A. State-Foreign Operations Appropriations, by Account
Table A-1. State Department, Foreign Operations, and Related Agencies Appropriations, FY2015-FY2017 Request
(in millions of current U.S. dollars)
16,288.38
11,856.08
Payment American Institute Taiwan
|
2016 Estimate |
FY2017 | % change FY16 vs. FY17 Req. FY2017 House Bill (H.R. 5912) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Enduring |
OCO |
Total |
Enduring |
OCO |
Total |
Enduring |
OCO |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Title I. State, Broadcasting & Related Agencies, TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| +3.6% |
5,167.07 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Administration of Foreign Affairs, Subtotal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| +5.4% |
3,704.09 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diplomatic & Consular Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(of which Worldwide Security Protection) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital Investment Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embassy Security, Construction & Maintenance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(of which Worldwide Security Upgrades) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict Stabilization Operations |
|
|
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
— |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ed. & Cultural Exchanges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office of Inspector General |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Representation Expenses |
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
03
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protection of Foreign Missions & Officials |
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Emergency-Diplomatic & Consular Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repatriation Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payment American Institute Taiwan |
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+6.5% 30.00 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Service Retirement (mandatory)c |
|
|
|
|
158.9 |
158 | .90 |
158 | .90 |
158 | .90 |
0%
158.90
International Orgs, Subtotal
3, | .95 | .85 |
74 | .40 | .82 |
3,615 | .35 | .24 |
2,011 | .03 | .06 |
1,895 | .82 |
3,906 | .85 | .24 |
2,097 | .82 | .25 |
1,834 | .24 |
3,932 | .06 |
1,452.28
+0.1%
Contributions to Int'l Orgs
1, | .16 | .19 |
74 | .40 | .89 |
1,496 | .56 | .24 |
1, | .46 | .13 |
101 | .73 |
1,446 | .19 | .24 |
1, | .89 | .32 |
96 | .24 |
1,387 | .13 |
66.61
-4.1%
Contributions, International Peacekeeping
2, | .79 | .66 |
806 | .93 |
2,118 | .79 | .00 |
666 | .57 | .93 |
1,794 | .09 |
2,460 | .66 | .00 |
806 | 2,369.93 |
1,588 | .00 |
2,394 | .93 |
1,385.67
-2.7%
Peacekeeping Response Mechanism
— |
— |
— | .00 |
— | .00 |
—
— |
— |
—
150 | .00 |
150 | .00 |
International Commission subtotal (Function 300)
72
122 | . |
121 | .29 |
122 | .95 |
122 | .72 | .29 |
126.29
122 | .72 |
121 | 126.29 |
121 | .29 |
123.65
-1.2%
Int'l Boundary/U.S.-Mexico
77
73 | . |
76 | .53 |
73 | .71 |
73 | .77 | .53 |
76.53
73 | .77 | .53 |
76 | .53 |
74.71
74.71
American Sections
12 | .33 |
76 | .53 | .26 |
+3.8%
American Sections
26
12 | . |
12.26
26
12 | . |
12 | .33 |
12.26
International Fisheries
12 | .33 | .68 |
12 | .26 | .50 |
12 | .26 | .50 |
-0.6%
International Fisheries
36 | .68 | .50 |
36.68
36.68
International Broadcast, Subtotal
36 | .68 | .59 |
36 | .68 | .84 |
36 | .68 | .84 |
772.69
32 | .50 |
772 | .69 |
32 | .50 |
10.70
-11.4%
International Broadcast, Subtotal
734 | .66 | .79 |
9 | .25 | .14 |
743 | .91 |
738 | .89 | .14 |
762.99
10 | .70 |
749 | .59 | .99 |
777 | .84 |
10.70
768.27
Capital Improvements
777 | .84 | .80 |
+3.8%
Broadcasting Operations
9 | .70 |
726 | .66 |
70
9 | . |
9.70
735 | .91 |
734 | .09 | .70 |
10 | .70 |
8.88
Related Approps, Subtotal
744 | .79 | .31 |
768 | .14 | .22 |
768 | .14 | .22 |
+3.1%
Capital Improvements
8 | .00 | .42 |
222.82
222.82
Asia Foundation
8 | 17.00 |
4 | .80 | .00 |
4 | .80 | .00 |
9 | .70 |
9 | .70 | .00 |
+102.1%
17.00
Related Approps, Subtotal
204 | .93 | .30 |
37 | .88 |
204 | .93 |
240 | .31 | .88 |
37.88
240 | .31 | .88 |
155 | .22 |
35.30
35.50
Center for Middle East-West Dialogue-Trust & Program
0 | .12 |
155 | .22 | .12 |
-35.4%
Asia Foundation
17 | .00 | .12 |
0.12
17 | .00 | .12 |
17 | .00 |
0.12
Eisenhower Exchange Programs
17 | .00 | .40 |
12 | .00 | .35 |
12 | .00 | .35 |
-29.4%
U.S. Institute of Peace
35 | .30 | .35 |
0.35
0.35
Israeli Arab Scholarship Program
35 | .30 | .05 |
35 | .30 | .05 |
35 | .30 | .05 |
37 | .88 |
37 | .88 | .05 |
+7.3%
Center for Middle East-West Dialogue-Trust & Program
0.05
East-West Center
0 | .11 | .70 |
— |
0 | .11 |
0 | .12 |
16.70
0 | .12 | .70 |
0 | .12 |
--
--
National Endowment for Democracy
170 | .00 |
0 | .12 | .50 |
0%
Eisenhower Exchange Programs
0 | .27 | .50 |
170.00
0 | .27 | .00 |
0 | .40 |
170.00
International Chancery Center
74
0 | . |
0 | .35 | .32 |
0 | .35 | .32 |
-12.5%
Israeli Arab Scholarship Program
0 | .02 | .32 |
[1.32]
[1.32]
Other Commissions, Subtotal
0 | .02 | .26 |
0 | .05 | .47 |
0 | .05 | .47 |
0 | .05 |
0 | .05 | .47 |
0%
East-West Center
12.47
Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad
16 | .70 | .68 |
0 | .89 |
16 | .70 |
16 | .70 | .89 |
0.89
16 | .70 | .89 |
— |
0.89
0.89
International Religious Freedom
3 | .50 |
3
.50 |
-100%
National Endowment for Democracy
135 | .00 | .50 |
3.50
135 | .00 | .50 |
170 | .00 |
3.50
Security & Cooperation in Europe
170 | .00 | .58 |
103 | .50 | .58 |
103 | .50 | .58 |
-39.1%
International Chancery Center
0 | .53 | .58 |
2.58
2.58
Congressional-Exec Commission on People's Republic of China
0 | .53 | .00 |
0 | .74 | .00 |
0 | .74 | .00 |
1 | .32 |
1 | .32 | .00 |
+77.7%
FOREIGN OPERATION, TOTAL
2.00
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review
26,859 | .82 | .50 |
7,598 | .08 | .50 |
2,489 | .96 EE |
36,947 | .86 | .50 |
26,793 | .03 |
9,612 | .23 | .50 |
3.50
3.50
FOREIGN OPERATION, TOTAL
36,405 | .25 |
26,101 | .85 |
9,634 | .80 |
35,736 | .65 |
-1.8%
Title II. Admin of Foreign Assistance
26,091 | .10 |
1,275 | .94 | .26 |
125 | .46 | .36 |
24 | .66 EE |
26,222.60
9,727.93
35,950.53
Title II. Admin of Foreign Assistance
1, | .06 | .18 |
1, | .91 | .09 |
139 | .26 | .30 |
1, | .18 | .39 |
1, | .09 | .67 |
232 | .30 | .72 |
1, | 642.39 |
+10.2%
98.46
1,550.47
USAID Operating Expenses
1, | .84 | .88 |
125 | .46 | .34 |
19 | .07 EE | .46 |
1, | .34 | .80 |
1, | .61 | .93 |
139 | .26 | .88 |
1, | .88 | .81 |
1,306 | .34 |
98 | .46 |
1,404 | .80 |
+9.5%
98.46
1,282.88
USAID Capital Investment Fund
130 | .82 | .30 |
66 | .15 |
130 | .82 | .84 |
168 | .30 |
.99 |
168 | .30 | .15 |
66 | .15 | .84 |
133 | .84 | .99 |
199 | .99 |
+18.8%
USAID Inspector General
54 | .29 | .00 |
5 | .63 EE | .60 |
59 | .91 |
66 | .00 | .60 |
67 | .60 |
66 | .00 |
67 | .60 |
67 | .60 |
67.60
+2.4%
Title III. Bilateral Economic Assistance
16,707 | .86 | .16 |
5,757 | .65 |
2,460 | .00 EE | .02 |
24,925 | .51 | .76 |
17,159 | .38 | .78 |
6,964 | .78 | .12 |
24,124 | .16 | .15 |
16,531 | .02 | .27 |
7,502 | .76 |
24,033 | .78 |
7,121.57
-0.4%
Global Health Programs (GHP), State + USAID
8, | .11 | .45 |
312 | .00 EE | .50 |
8,770 | .11 |
8, | .45 | .50 |
8,665 | .00 |
8,503 | .45 |
8, | .50 |
8,576 | .50 |
8,916.50
+0.9%
GHP (State Dept.)
[5,670 | .00] |
[ | .00] |
[5,670 |
[5,670 | .00] |
[5,670 | .00] |
[5,670 | .00] |
+0.0%
GHP (USAID)
[2,788 | .11] |
[312 | .00] EE |
[5,670.00]
GHP (USAID)
[ |
[ |
[ |
[2, |
[2, |
+2.6%
Development Assistance
2,507 | .00 |
[3,246.50]
Development Assistance
2, | .00 | .97 |
2, | .97 | .57 |
2, | .97 | .57 |
2,959 | .57 |
2,959 | .57 |
+6.4%
2,780.97
International Disaster Assistance (IDA)
560 | .00 | .18 |
1,335 | 125.00 |
1, | .27 EE | .00 |
3,331 | .27 | .00 |
874 | 474.76 |
1,919 | .42 |
2, | 394.18 |
125 | .00 |
1,832 | .00 |
1,957 | .00 |
-30.0%
1,885.13
2,794.19
Transition Initiatives
47 | 67.00 |
20 | 15.00 |
67 | .00 | .60 |
30 | .00 | .60 |
37 | 30.00 |
67 | 37.00 |
15 | 67.00 |
62 | .60 |
77 | .60 |
37.00
+15.8%
Complex Crises Fund
20 | 30.00 |
30 | 10.00 |
50 | 20.00 |
10 | 30.00 |
20 | 10.00 |
30 | 20.00 |
10 | 30.00 |
—
20 | .00 |
30 | .00 |
0.0%
Development Credit Authority –—Admin
8 | .12 |
8 | .12 |
8 | .12 | .00 |
8 | .12 | .00 |
10 | .00 |
10 | .00 |
+23.2%
Development Credit Authority Subsidy
[40 | .00] |
8.12
Development Credit Authority Subsidy
[40 | .00] |
[ | 60.00] |
[ | 60.00] |
)
.00 |
[60 | .00] |
+50.0%
[40.00]
Economic Support Fund
2,640 | .24 | .27 |
2, | .54 |
711 | .73 EE | .45 |
5,597 | .50 | .15 |
1,879 | .60 | .61 |
2,422 | .67 | .36 |
4,302 | .27 | .01 |
2,408 | .45 | .37 |
3,672 | .15 |
6,080 | .61 |
2,422.67
+41.3%
Democracy Fund
130 | 150 | .50 |
130 | .50 |
150 | .50 |
— |
150 | .50 |
— |
150 | .50 |
— |
-100%
Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia
— | .66 |
— |
— |
546 | .09 |
438 | .57 | .42 |
984 | .66 | .61 |
— | .03 |
— |
491.12
438.57
-100%
Migration & Refugee Assistance
931 | .89 | .00 |
2,127 | .11 | .60 |
3,059 | 1,876.00 |
938 | .89 | .60 |
2,127 | .11 | .89 |
3,066 | .00 | .11 |
922 | .60 | .00 |
1,876 | .00 |
2,798 | .60 |
2,287.90
-8.7%
Emergency Refugee and Migration
50 | .00 |
10 | .00 |
50 | 40.00 |
50 | .00 |
50 | 10.00 |
10 | 40.00 |
40 | 50.00 |
50 | .00 |
50.00
0.0%
Independent Agencies subtotal
1, | .50 |
1,331 | 363.50 |
1, | .50 | .40 |
1, | .50 | .40 |
1, | .40 | .50 |
1, | .40 | .50 |
+7.1%
Inter-American Foundation
22 | .50 |
1,363.50
Inter-American Foundation
22 | .50 |
20
22 | . |
20
22 | . |
50
22 | . |
50
22 | . |
-1.3%
African Development Foundation
30 | .00 |
22.50
African Development Foundation
30 | .00 |
30 | .00 | .20 |
30 | .00 | .20 |
28 | .20 | .00 |
28 | .20 | .00 |
-6.0%
Peace Corps
379 | .50 |
30.00
Peace Corps
379 | .50 | .00 |
410 | .00 |
410 | .00 |
410 | .00 |
410 | .00 |
0.0%
Millennium Challenge Corporation
899 | .50 |
410.00
Millennium Challenge Corporation
899 | .50 | .00 |
901 | 1,000.00 |
901 | 1,000.00 |
1,000 | 905.00 |
1,000 | 905.00 |
+11.0%
Department of Treasury, subtotal
23 | .50 |
901.00
Department of Treasury, subtotal
23 | .50 |
23 | 33.50 |
23 | 33.50 |
33 | .50 | .10 |
33 | .50 | .10 |
+42.6%
Treasury Department Technical Assistance
23 | .50 |
28.50
Treasury Department Technical Assistance
23 | .50 |
23 | 33.50 |
23 | 33.50 |
33 | .50 | .20 |
33 | .50 | .20 |
+42.6%
28.50
Title IV. Int'l Security Assistance
6,704 | .49 | .41 |
1,714 | .97 | .37 |
5 | .30 EE | .74 |
8, | .76 | .12 |
6, | .23 | .38 |
2,508 | .19 | .40 |
8, | .41 | .78 |
6,206 | .37 |
1,899 | .74 |
8,106 | .12 |
-8.2%
2,508.20
9,086.31
International Narcotics Control & Law Enforcement
853 | .06 | .50 |
439 | .20 | .77 |
1,292 | .25 | .24 |
839 | .85 | .01 |
371 | .65 | .82 |
1,211 | .50 | .65 |
813 | .77 | .47 |
324 | .24 |
1,138 | .01 |
371.66
-6.1%
Nonproliferation, Anti-Terrorism, Demining
586 | .26 | .47 |
95 | .24 |
5 | .30 EE | .20 |
686 | .80 | .25 |
506 | .38 | .45 |
379 | .09 | .20 |
885 | .47 | .25 |
454 | .20 | .45 |
214 | .25 |
668 | .45 |
379.09
-24.5%
International Military Education & Training
106 | .07 | .12 |
110 | .30 |
106 | .07 |
108 | .12 |
.30 |
108 | .12 | .50 |
110 | .30 |
109 | .50 |
110 | .30 |
+2.0%
Foreign Military Financing
5,014 | .11 | .70 |
851 | .84 | .81 |
5,865 | .95 | .15 |
4,737 | .52 | .96 |
1,288 | .18 | .37 |
6,025 | .70 | .55 |
4,701 | .81 | .92 |
1,012 | .15 |
5,713 | .96 |
1,288.18
-5.2%
Peacekeeping Operations
144 | .99 | .63 |
328 | .70 | .29 |
473 | .69 | .10 |
131 | .36 | .39 |
469 | .27 | .50 |
600 | .63 | .94 |
126 | .29 | .44 |
349 | .10 |
475 | .39 |
469.27
-20.9%
Title V. Multilateral Assistance
2, | .81 |
2,770 | .81 | .97 |
2, | .97 | .92 |
2, | .97 | .92 |
2, | .92 | .53 |
2, | .92 | .53 |
-0.4%
1,741.91
World Bank: Global Environment Facility
136 | .56 | .26 |
146 | .56 |
136 | .56 |
168 | .26 | .56 |
146 | .56 |
168 | .26 |
146 | .56 |
146 | .56 |
146.56
-12.9%
International Clean Technology Fund
201 | .24 | .68 |
— |
201 | .24 |
170 | .68 |
— |
170 | .68 |
— |
— |
—
—
-100%
Strategic Climate Fund
63 | .20 | .62 |
— |
63 | .20 |
59 | .62 |
— |
59 | .62 |
— |
— |
—
—
-100%
Green Climate Fund
— |
— |
— | 250 | .00 |
— | .00 |
250 | 263.00 |
250 | 263.00 |
n.a.
North American Development Bank
— |
—
—
North American Development Bank
— | .00 |
10 | 45.00 |
10 | 45.00 |
45 | .00 |
45 | .00 |
+350.0%
10.00
World Bank: Int'l. Development Association
1, | .80 |
1,287 | .80 | .13 |
1, | .13 | .07 |
1, | .13 | .07 |
1, | .07 | .13 |
1, | .07 | .13 |
+15.6%
1,197.13
Int. Bank Recon & Dev
186 | .96 |
186 | .96 |
186 |
| 5 |
186 | 5.96 |
5 | .96 |
5 | .96 |
-96.8%
5.96
Inter-Amer. Dev. Bank - capital
102 | .02 |
21 | .94 |
102 | .02 |
102 | .02 | .94 |
21 | .94 |
102 | .02 |
21 | .94 |
21 | .94 |
21.94
-78.5%
IADB: Enterprise for Americas MIF
3 | .38 |
— |
3 | .38 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
n.a.
Asian Development Fund
104 | .98 |
99 | .23 |
104 | .98 |
104 | .98 | .23 |
99 | .23 |
104 | .98 |
99 | .23 |
99 | .23 |
99.23
-5.5%
Asian Development Bank – —capital
106 | .59 | .61 |
— |
106 | .59 |
5 | .61 |
5 | .61 |
— |
— |
-100%
African Development Fund
175 | .67 |
175 | .67 |
175 | .67 | 214 | .33 |
175 | .67 | .33 |
214 | .33 |
214 | .33 |
+22.0%
175.67
African Development Bank - capital
32 | .42 |
.12 |
32 | .42 |
34 | .12 |
34 | .12 | .42 |
32 | .42 |
32 | .42 |
-5.0%
32.42
International Fund for Agricultural Development
30 | .00 |
.93 |
30 | .00 |
31 | .93 |
31 | .93 | .00 |
30 | .00 |
30 | .00 |
-6.0%
30.00
Global Agriculture and Food Security Program
— |
— |
.00
43 | 43 | .00 | 23 |
43 | 23.00 |
23 | .00 |
23 | .00 |
-46.5%
23.00
International Organizations & Programs
340 | .01 | .00 |
332 | .90 |
340 | .01 |
339 | .00 | .90 |
347 | .95 |
339 | .00 |
332 | .90 | .95 |
332 | .90 |
—
—
-1.8%
Central American and Caribbean Catastrophic Risk Insurance Facility
— |
12 | .50 |
— |
—
— | .50 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
12 | .50 |
12 | .50 |
n.a.
Global Infrastructure Facility
— |
20 | .00 |
— |
—
— | .00 |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
— |
20 | .00 |
20 | .00 |
n.a.
Title VI. Export Assistance
( |
(599 | .29) |
(696 |
| (693 |
( |
( |
( |
-0.4%
Export-Import Bank (net)
(425 | .87) |
(610.96)
Export-Import Bank (net)
( |
( |
( |
( |
( |
-8.4%
(417.75)
Overseas Private Investment Corporation (net)
( | .21) |
( | .42) |
(283 |
( |
( |
( |
+20.4%
Trade & Development Agency
60 | .00 |
(258.21)
Trade & Development Agency
60 | .00 |
60 | .00 | .70 |
60 | .00 | .70 |
7
80 | . |
7
80 | . |
+34.5%
65.00
State, Foreign Ops & related Programs, TOTAL
41,066.43
9,365.24
2,526.38 EE
14,894.99
52,928.05
37,968.21
14,895.01
52,863.21
37,889.93
14,894.99
52,784.92
-0.1%
Add Ons/ Rescissionsb
(30 | .00) |
(30 | .00) |
6 | .00 |
(165 | .00) |
(159 | .00) |
State-Foreign Ops Total, Net of Rescissions
41,036.43
9,365.24
2,526.38 EE
14,894.99
52,928.05
37,968.21
14,895.01
52,863.21
37,889.93
14,894.99
52,784.94
-0.1%
Source: Congressional Budget Justification, Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, Fiscal Year 2017; CRS calculations.
Notes: EE = Ebola Emergency request. Shaded columns indicate fiscal year totals. Figures in brackets are subsumed in the larger account above and are not counted against the total. Figures in parentheses are negative numbers. "Enduring" funding is also sometimes referred to as "base" or "ongoing" funding in budget documents. Numbers may not add due to rounding.
a. The request includes $10.8 million for the East-West Center under the Educational and Cultural Exchanges account.
b.
FY2015 rescission is from the Export-Import Bank account; $6 million add-on in the FY2017 Senate bill was in title VII, for special immigrant visas; the $165 million rescission in the FY2017 Senate bill is from the ESF-OCO account..
c.
This account is mandatory spending, so State Operations and SFOPS totals in this table differ from budget totals in the International Affairs Congressional Budget Justification that include only discretionary spending.
Appendix B. International Affairs (150) Function Account, FY2015 Actual, FY2016 Estimate, and FY2017 Request
and Legislation The International Affairs budget, or Function 150, includes funding that is not in the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs appropriation: foreign food aid programs (P.L. 480 Food for Peace and McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Programs) are in the Agriculture Appropriations, and the Foreign Claim Settlement Commission and the International Trade Commission are in the Commerce, Justice, Science appropriations. In addition, the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs appropriation measure includes funding for certain international commissions that are not part of the International Affairs Function 150 account. Table B-1. International Affairs Budget, FY2015, FY2016, and FY2017 Request and House and Senate ProposalsTable B-1. International Affairs Budget, FY2015-FY2017 Request
(in millions of current U.S. dollars)
FY2015 Actual |
FY2016 Estimate |
FY2017 Request |
% change FY2017 vs. FY2016 FY2017 House Bills |
|
State-Foreign Operations, excluding commissionsa |
52,805.10 |
52,740.49 |
52,663.65 |
-0.1% 52,115.26 |
Commerce-Justice-Science |
||||
Foreign Claim Settlement Commission |
1.99 |
2.37 |
2.41 |
1.7% 2.37 |
Int'l Trade Commission |
85.38 |
88.84 |
92.87 |
4.5% 90.00 |
Agriculture |
||||
P.L. 480 |
1,466.00 |
1,716.00 |
1,350.00 |
-21.3% 1,466.00 |
McGovern-Dole |
191.63 |
201.63 |
182.05 |
-9.7% 201.63 |
Local/Regional Procurement |
— |
— |
15.00 |
n.a. |
Total International Affairs (150) |
54,550.10 |
54,749.33 |
54,305.98 |
-0.8% 53,875.26 |
Source: Congressional Budget Justification, Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, Fiscal Year 2015, amended requests of June 26, 2014, November 5, and 10, 2014, P.L. 113-235,2017; S. 3117; H.R. 5912; H.Rept. 114-531; S.Rept. 114-259; H.Rept. 114-605; S.Rept. 114-239; and CRS calculations.
a.
Includes mandatory spending from the Foreign Service retirement account, and does not align with budget justification figures that only count discretionary spending. Funding for certain international commissions appropriated in the State-Foreign Operations bill are excluded here because they fall underunder function 300 of the budget, not function 150 (International Affairs).
b. The FY2017 Senate Agriculture appropriations bill provides $10 million for a local and regional procurement program, but does so through the McGovern-Dole account rather than a separate account as requested.
Author Contact Information
1. |
This figure includes $158.9 million for the Foreign Service Retirement account, which is mandatory spending and therefore |
2. |
The BBA also impacted the FY2016 appropriations cycle, raising the discretionary spending cap that year from $1.016 trillion to $1.066 trillion, increasing security funding from $523.1 billion to $548.1 billion and nonsecurity funding from $493.5 billion to $518.5 billion, and setting an SFOPS OCO minimum of $14.895 billion. |
3. |
Executive Budget Summary, Function 150 & Other International Programs, Fiscal Year 2013, p. 137. |
4. |
This includes the International Disaster Assistance (IDA), Migration and Refugee Assistance (MRA) and Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance (ERMA) accounts and excludes the Food for Peace account, which is humanitarian in nature but funded through the Agriculture appropriation. |